Next Article in Journal
Aspartyl Protease Inhibitors as Anti-Filarial Drugs
Next Article in Special Issue
Metagenomic Insights into Pathogenic Characterization of ST410 Acinetobacter nosocomialis Prevalent in China
Previous Article in Journal
Chicken Skin Decontamination of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. and Hygiene Indicator Escherichia coli Assessed by Viability Real-Time PCR
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/pathogens11060705
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence, Serotypes, and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Non-Typhoid Salmonella in Food in Northern Taiwan

by
Yi-Jung Chang
1,2,†,
Chyi-Liang Chen
2,3,†,
Hsin-Ping Yang
2 and
Cheng-Hsun Chiu
1,2,4,*
1
Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
2
Molecular Infectious Disease Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
3
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
4
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2022, 11(6), 705; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11060705
Submission received: 15 April 2022 / Revised: 10 June 2022 / Accepted: 14 June 2022 / Published: 18 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomics and Systems Biology Perspectives in Bacterial Pathogenesis and Antimicrobial Resistance)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Salmonella is one of the most common bacteria causing food poisoning worldwide. We evaluated the prevalence, the serotypes, and the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of Salmonella isolates from many kinds of food, particularly pork and chicken in retail, in Taiwan between January 2017 and December 2019. The E-test was used to assess antimicrobial susceptibility and a polymerase chain reaction was performed for serotyping. A total of 459 different foods were investigated, and 117 Salmonella strains were isolated. Retail pork and chicken were the most common Salmonella-contaminated foods (64.1% and 29.1%, respectively). Of the 117 isolates, 23 serotypes were identified. The serotypes Derby (16.2%), Anatum (13.7%), and Agona (8.5%) were the most prevalent. The resistance rates to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and carbapenem were 41.9%, 11.1%, and 1.7%, respectively. The Derby and Anatum serotypes were prevalent in chicken and pork; the Anatum serotype had significantly higher ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone resistance rates and was highly prevalent in 2017 and 2018. Multi-locus sequence typing analysis revealed that the 58 randomly chosen Salmonella isolates belonged to 18 sequence types (STs). ST64 (Anatum, 16 out of 58, 27.6%) was the most common, followed by ST321 (Muenster, 6/58, 10.3%), ST831 (Give, 5/58, 8.6%), ST155 (London, 4/58, 6.9%) and ST314 (Kentucky, 4/58, 6.9%). Multidrug-resistant Salmonella strains were remarkably observed in the serotypes Anatum (ST64) and Goldcoast (ST358). This study revealed that retail pork was commonly contaminated with antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella. Thus, periodic investigations of Salmonella serotypes and AMR are needed.

1. Introduction

Salmonella is one of the most common pathogens causing foodborne illnesses in humans, such as acute gastroenteritis, bacteremia, meningitis, arthritis and mycotic aneurysm, and the World Health Organization classifies it as a significant cause of illness and death [1]; however, many animals, such as pigs, chickens, rodents, and cattle, can carry Salmonella in their digestive tract and even invade and multiply in enterocytes and tonsillar lymphoid tissues without significant signs of illness [2]. Non-typhoidal salmonellosis (NTS) causes 78 million foodborne infections and 59,000 deaths each year, and NTS infection has become an emerging issue in public health worldwide [1]. Eating Salmonella-contaminated foods, such as poultry, pork, beef, and eggs, causes most Salmonella illnesses in humans [3]. The burden imposed by NTS is complicated in some infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria [4]. Salmonella has increasingly emerged, and there is growing concern about its resistance to last-line therapies [5].
A variety of foods linked to Salmonella outbreaks have been extensively studied [6,7]. Various resistance genes have been identified in Salmonella from different sources, with NTS infections posing a significant threat to global human health and being a cause of foodborne illnesses [8]. NTS infection is also the leading cause of foodborne illness in Taiwan [9]. According to Taiwanese research, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious problem in clinical Salmonella isolates [10]. The antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella spreads through the food chain, especially the MDR serotypes Anatum and Goldcoast in Taiwan [11,12], and it has been making the treatment of Salmonella infections in clinical practice more difficult [13].
However, there is little information on the epidemiology and AMR of Salmonella isolated from food in Taiwan, making it difficult to assess the impact of food-related AMR on public health [14]. Understanding the status of Salmonella contamination in food, as well as AMR, is critical for effectively controlling the spread of Salmonella. To better understand antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella isolated from food, we evaluated Salmonella contamination and AMR in food from Taiwanese markets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Identification of Salmonella

We collected Salmonella isolates from food samples. All the samples were collected from New Taipei City and Taoyuan City in Northern Taiwan. These two densely populated districts are the main sources of patients treated at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH). We randomly gathered food samples from 16 traditional markets and supermarkets from 2017 to 2019. The samples were processed using the methods suggested by the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists International and specified in the Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook of the United States Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service [15]. Each sample weighed 200–250 g and was collected at the point of sale in vendor-supplied containers, much like a consumer would purchase food. The packed pieces were immediately placed in a cooler and transferred to the laboratory, where they were stored at 4 °C until evaluation; the holding time did not exceed 16 h.

2.2. Microbiological Analysis

The 25 g samples (e.g., giant vegetables, fruits, or meat) were broken up in a homogenizer and incubated in 225 mL of BBL™ Gram-Negative Broth (Becton Dickinson Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for 24 h at 37 °C, followed by sub-incubation of a 0.1 mL aliquot of primary cultured bacterial solution in 10 mL fresh Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium (Becton, Dickinson and Co.) for 24 h at 42 °C. The Salmonella strains were obtained from the bright-black single colonies using Salmonella-selective HardyCHROM™ SS NoPro Agar plates (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA, USA). Salmonella serotyping was conducted using the multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) method, as described previously [16]. Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and an mPCR test was applied using the primer set design based on the chromosomal sequences of S. enterica serovars Typhimurium LT2 (STM), Typhi CT18 (STY) and Enteritidis (PT4) [16]. The serotype of each Salmonella isolate was determined based on its PCR amplicon pattern analyzed using electrophoresis in 2.5% agarose gel and compared to the patterns of the 30 most prevalent S. enterica serotypes.

2.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

We tested the Salmonella isolates purified from the food samples for resistance to antimicrobials. The antimicrobial sensitivity of the isolates to ciprofloxacin (susceptible: ≤0.5 μg/mL; resistant: ≥1 μg/mL), ceftriaxone (susceptible: ≤8 μg/mL; resistant: ≥64 μg/mL) and ertapenem (susceptible: ≤1 μg/mL; resistant: ≥4 μg/mL) was determined using E-test strips according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute’s (https://www.nih.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CLSI-2020.pdf; accessed on 14 April 2022) instructions [17].

2.4. Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) and Sequence Data Analyses

MLST was performed using PCR amplification and using 7 specific primer sets designed according to 7 housekeeping genes (aroC, dnaN, hemD, hisD, purE, sucA, and thrA), following the methods reported by Jolley et al. and referred to on the website of the Salmonella enterica MLST Database (https://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?db=pubmlst_mlst_seqdef&page=schemeInfo&scheme_id=2; accessed on 14 April 2022) [18]. The sequence type of each Salmonella isolate was determined according to the identity of 7 allelic profiles through sequencing PCR amplicons of 7 loci and screening with known sequences registered in the MLST Database.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The prevalence of AMR and replicon types were expressed as percentages of the total number of Salmonella isolates and calculated using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA). A chi-square test of independence was used to examine the correlations between different years of Salmonella collection for resistance phenotypes using SPSS version 22.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

Of the 459 food samples analyzed, 117 (25.4%) were positive for Salmonella. The foods investigated included pork (31.8%), vegetables (20.9%), chicken (20.3%), eggs (10 %), seafood (3.2%), fruit (5.0%), beef (5.8%), delicatessen (2.1%), sauces (0.4%), pig intestines (0.4%), and duck (0.2%). Salmonella was significantly more prevalent (p < 0.001) in pork (51.3% of the samples were positive) and chicken (35.2%) than in seafood (6.6%), vegetables (5.2%), beef (3.7%), eggs (0%), or other foods (2.7%). Twenty-three serotypes were identified from the 117 Salmonella-positive samples (Table 1). The Derby serotype was predominant (16.2%), followed by the Anatum (13.7%), Agona (8.5%), Albany (7.7%), Kentucky (7.7%), and London (6.8%) serotypes; these serotypes accounted for 60.6% of the isolates (Table 1 and Table 2). The prevalence of other serotypes ranged from 0.9% to 5.1%. Pork purchased from the supermarket had less Salmonella contamination than that purchased from a traditional market. The five serotypes most often identified among the pork isolates were Derby, Anatum, Agona, London, and Give. The Albany, Kentucky (12.8%), Anatum, and Brancaster (5.1%) serotypes were the most commonly isolated serotypes from chicken. In addition, the Salmonella serotypes Agona, Corvallis, Give Goldcoast, Livingstone, London, Mbandaka, Newport, Potsdam, Rissen, and Weltevreden were found in pork only, and other serotypes, including Brancaster, Enteritidis, Schwarzengrund, and Thompson, were isolated from chicken only. Salmonella Kaitaan and Salmonella Zigong were only detected in vegetable samples. The Derby serotype was the most common among the pork isolates (n = 16), while the Kentucky (n = 6) and Albany (n = 6) serotypes were isolated from chicken. The Anatum serotype was most prevalent in pork, followed by chicken and beef.
The AMR rate from 2017 to 2019 is shown in Figure 1. The resistance rates of ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone were higher in 2017 (60.7% and 17.9%, respectively), particularly the ciprofloxacin-resistant rate between 2017 and 2018, with a significant difference (p = 0.027). Table 1 and Table 2 list the resistance rates of the 117 Salmonella isolates. The resistance rates to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and carbapenem were 41.9%, 11.1%, and 1.7% in total, respectively (Table 2). Of all the Salmonella isolates tested, 50 (42.7%) were resistant to at least one highly antimicrobial-resistant agent and 13 (11.1%) were resistant to both (Table 1). Resistance to carbapenem was observed in two isolates. The carbapenem-resistant isolates included the Anatum serotype from pork and the Derby serotype from chicken. The resistance rate differed depending on the serotype. The Goldcoast and Anatum serotypes had the highest resistance to ceftriaxone (100% and 68.7%, respectively). The resistance rates to ciprofloxacin were higher among the Brancaster (100%), Give (100%), Goldcoast (100%), Albany (77.8%), Anatum (75.0%), London (50%), Kentucky (44.4%), Derby (42.1%), Enteritidis (25.0%), and Livingstone (20.0%) serotypes, while the Agona, Muenster, Newport, Typhimurium, and Weltevreden serotypes had lower resistance rates to ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone. Of the 117 Salmonella isolates, 58 were randomly chosen for MLST analysis (Table 1). Eighteen STs were identified. The most common ST was ST64 (serotype Anatum, 16/58, 27.6%; represented by 16 Salmonella isolates among 58 MLST-confirmed isolates), followed by ST321 (Muenster, 6/58, 10.3%), ST831 (Give, 5/58, 8.6%), ST155 (London, 4/58, 6.9%), ST314 (Kentucky, 4/58, 6.9%), ST358 (Goldcoast, 2/58, 3.4%), ST31 (Newport, 2/58, 3.4%), and ST96 (Schwarzengrund, 2/58, 3.4%). Most of the STs obtained in this study were correlated with particular serotypes, such as ST64 with Anatum, ST831 with Give, and ST358 with Goldcoast; moreover, Kentucky was correlated to at least two sequence types, ST198 and ST314 (Table 1).

4. Discussion

Our study provides the status of Salmonella contamination in food and the AMR properties in Taiwan. We found a high prevalence of Salmonella in retail pork. High AMR was found in at least one-third of the Salmonella isolates from chicken and pork, and was related to specific serotypes. Furthermore, we noted the diversity in the serotypes and genotypes of the Salmonella isolates during the 3 years.
In the current investigation, the prevalence rates of Salmonella in pork and chicken samples were 51.3% and 35.2%, respectively, which were consistent with previous studies conducted in Taiwan [9,19,20]. The Salmonella strains obtained from pork carcasses in Taiwan were previously relatively resistant to the antimicrobial treatments tested [21,22,23]. This study found Salmonella in 51.3% of retail pork. This figure is higher than the 2.1–31% reported in Ireland, Denmark, China, and the United States [24,25,26,27,28]. The relatively high contamination rate of Salmonella may be occurring because retail pork is generally obtained from traditional markets without consistent refrigerated storage. Additionally, Taiwan is in a subtropical zone, and Salmonella thrives in hot weather. In the current study, Derby was the most prevalent S. enterica serotype (abbreviated as S. Derby), matching previous results from other regions and nations [29,30]. S. Derby is one of the top ten serotypes isolated from human salmonellosis infections in many countries, including Taiwan [14,30,31,32]. In addition, a large S. Derby clone spread from pigs to humans in Europe [33,34]. According to these investigations, S. Derby has the potential to infect people through pork products, indicating that Salmonella may be transmitted from pigs to humans via the food chain.
The Salmonella strains isolated from pork in this study were relatively resistant to the antimicrobial agents tested, compared to the results from pork carcasses studied in Taiwan between 2000 and 2003, all of which were susceptible to ceftriaxone. Ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella isolates from humans have emerged in Taiwan. In this study, high AMR was common in some Salmonella serotypes detected in pork samples, particularly the Anatum and Goldcoast serotypes. A human outbreak of MDR S. Anatum emerged in Taiwan in 2015 [11]. This serotype is virulent in humans, and children became ill more frequently due to contamination from meat. Pork and poultry have been identified as potential carriers. This serotype is responsible for foodborne diseases, and it has caused outbreaks in many countries. S. Goldcoast infection was first reported in Taiwan in 2014, and all but one isolate were pan-susceptible from 2014 to 2016. S. Goldcoast infections spiked in 2018, and all isolates were MDR. According to whole-genome sequencing, the clone responsible for the clinical outbreak shared its genealogy with an S. Goldcoast strain detected in a retail meat isolate [12]. The antimicrobial-resistant isolates of serotypes Anatum and Goldcoast from Taiwan, which harbor conjugatable plasmids (such as pSal-3973_DHA_CMY and pSal-5364) with qnrB4 (or qnrS1) and blaDHA-1 (or blaCMY-2) genes conferring resistance to ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone, respectively, show high genetic similarity to Anatum isolates from the UK and Goldcoast isolates from the UK (strain 296839) and Germany (strain SAL_IB6386AA) [11,12]. Notably, very few MDR isolates were verified before 2015 [11,12,35,36]. Such global-wide dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella strains via bacterial conjugation to transmit the MDR gene-carrying plasmids could be the reason why certain areas have isolates that are resistant to certain antimicrobial agents.
Overall, Salmonella was detected in 35.2% of chicken samples. The prevalence was higher than in a previous report (25.1%; 95% confidence interval: 21.7–28.7). Similar to previous studies [37], Albany and Kentucky are the most common serotypes in chicken. S. Albany dominates chicken abattoirs in Taiwan. The Kentucky serotype is the most common in poultry products from North America [38]. The Agona serotype is susceptible to all antimicrobial agents. The Kentucky serotype is also sensitive to ceftriaxone. The link between serotypes and human epidemics in the United States is very weak, with rates < 1% [39].
Our results revealed that ST64 among the 18 identified STs was the most frequent Salmonella genotype in the current study. ST64 was commonly detected in Asian and European patients, and occurs widely in pork from Europe and the USA [40]. ST34 and ST19 were the second and third most common serotypes, respectively, widely found in humans and pigs in Japan, China, the USA, and Europe, indicating that Salmonella may be transmitted from pigs to humans via the food chain [24,41]. Additionally, ciprofloxacin-resistant ST314 strains have been increasing since 2014 (from 5.6% in 2014 to 53.2% in 2016). The emergence of ST314 strains increasingly becoming ciprofloxacin-resistant, similar to ST198, is a warning in global health. The recent emergence of concurrent resistance to ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone among Salmonella isolates is posing a serious threat that requires further monitoring. Another emerging issue related to colistin resistance that was first reported in patients with infection of the Salmonella ST155 strain harboring a colistin-resistant mcr-1 gene in China highlights the importance of cautious use and continuous monitoring of colistin resistance in both clinical and veterinary medicines [41,42].
Our findings reveal a high prevalence of Salmonella in retail meat in Northern Taiwan. Strong AMR was found in half of the Salmonella isolates from chicken and one-third of the Salmonella isolates from pork. High AMR correlates to specific serotypes, particularly MDR Anatum and Goldcoast, posing a danger to the control of Salmonella infections in humans and animals. More epidemiological surveillance is needed in Taiwan to determine the prevalence, AMR, and subtyping characteristics of foodborne pathogens, which will help to develop scientifically sound public health policies and put into place practical actions to ensure the safety of our food supply.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-J.C., C.-L.C. and C.-H.C.; methodology, Y.-J.C., C.-L.C. and H.-P.Y.; software, Y.-J.C., C.-L.C. and H.-P.Y.; validation, Y.-J.C., C.-L.C., H.-P.Y. and C.-H.C.; formal analysis, Y.-J.C., C.-L.C. and H.-P.Y.; investigation, Y.-J.C., C.-L.C. and H.-P.Y.; resources, C.-L.C. and C.-H.C.; data curation, Y.-J.C., C.-L.C. and H.-P.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-J.C. and C.-L.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.-J.C., C.-L.C. and C.-H.C.; visualization, Y.-J.C., C.-L.C., H.-P.Y. and C.-H.C.; supervision, C.-H.C.; project administration, C.-L.C., H.-P.Y. and C.-H.C.; funding acquisition, C.-L.C., H.-P.Y. and C.-H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan, Taiwan (grant number MOST 110-2314-B-182A-130) and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan (grant numbers CMRPG3L0541-3 and CMRPG3J1851-2). The APC was funded by Chang Gung Medical Foundation (Uniform number: 04122949).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Havelaar, A.H.; Kirk, M.D.; Torgerson, P.R.; Gibb, H.J.; Hald, T.; Lake, R.J.; Praet, N.; Bellinger, D.C.; de Silva, N.R.; Gargouri, N.; et al. World Health Organization global estimates and regional comparisons of the burden of foodborne disease in 2010. PLoS Med. 2015, 12, e1001923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Gruenberg, W. Overview of Salmonellosis. Merck Veterinary Manual. Available online: https://www.merckvetmanual.com/digestive-system/salmonellosis/overview-of-salmonellosis (accessed on 3 June 2019).
  3. Sun, T.; Liu, Y.; Qin, X.; Aspridou, Z.; Zheng, J.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Dong, Q. The prevalence and epidemiology of Salmonella in retail raw poultry meat in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Foods 2021, 10, 2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Prestinaci, F.; Pezzotti, P.; Pantosti, A. Antimicrobial resistance: A global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog Glob. Health 2015, 109, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Borowiak, M.; Baumann, B.; Fischer, J.; Thomas, K.; Deneke, C.; Hammerl, J.A.; Szabo, I.; Malorny, B. Development of a novel mcr-6 to mcr-9 multiplex PCR and assessment of mcr-1 to mcr-9 occurrence in colistin-resistant Salmonella enterica isolates from environment, feed, animals and food (2011–2018) in Germany. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bonardi, S. Salmonella in the pork production chain and its impact on human health in the European Union. Epidemiol. Infect. 2017, 145, 1513–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Butaye, P.; Halliday-Simmonds, I.; Van Sauers, A. Salmonella in pig farms and on pig meat in Suriname. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuus, K.; Kramarenko, T.; Sõgel, J.; Mäesaar, M.; Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.; Roasto, M. Prevalence and serotype diversity of Salmonella enterica in the Estonian meat production chain in 2016–2020. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lai, Y.H.; Chung, Y.A.; Wu, Y.C.; Fang, C.T.; Chen, P.J. Disease burden from foodborne illnesses in Taiwan, 2012–2015. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2020, 119, 1372–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, Y.L.; Lu, M.C.; Shao, P.L.; Lu, P.L.; Chen, Y.H.; Cheng, S.H.; Ko, W.C.; Lin, C.Y.; Wu, T.S.; Yen, M.Y.; et al. Nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among clinically important Gram-negative bacteria, with an emphasis on carbapenems and colistin: Results from the Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) in 2018. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2019, 54, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Feng, Y.; Chang, Y.J.; Pan, S.C.; Su, L.H.; Li, H.C.; Yang, H.P.; Yu, M.J.; Chiu, C.H. Characterization and source investigation of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Anatum from a sustained outbreak, Taiwan. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 2951–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Feng, Y.; Chang, Y.J.; Fang, S.H.; Su, L.H.; Li, H.C.; Yang, H.P.; Yu, M.J.; Chiu, C.H. Emergence and evolution of high-level cephalosporin-resistant Salmonella Goldcoast in northern Taiwan. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019, 6, ofz447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, L.; Fu, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Ma, Y.; Wei, Y.; Qu, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Liao, M. Highly prevalent multidrug-resistant Salmonella from chicken and pork meat at retail markets in Guangdong, China. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chang, Y.J.; Chen, M.C.; Feng, Y.; Su, L.H.; Li, H.C.; Yang, H.P.; Yu, M.J.; Chen, C.L.; Chiu, C.H. Highly antimicrobial-resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella from retail meats and clinical impact in children, Taiwan. Pediatr. Neonatol. 2020, 61, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg, and Siluriformes (Fish) Products and Carcass and Environmental Sponges. In The Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook; Food Safety and Inspection Service/United States Department of Agriculture. Available online: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/news-events/publications/microbiology-laboratory-guidebook (accessed on 2 January 2019).
  16. Kim, S.; Frye, J.G.; Hu, J.; Fedorka-Cray, P.J.; Gautom, R.; Boyle, D.S. Multiplex PCR-based method for identification of common clinical serotypes of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 3608–3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. M100, 30th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jolley, K.A.; Bray, J.E.; Maiden, M.C.J. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018, 3, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lin, C.H.; Adams, P.J.; Huang, J.F.; Sun, Y.F.; Lin, J.H.; Robertson, I.D. Prevalence and risk factors for Salmonella spp. contamination of slaughtered chickens in Taiwan. Prev. Vet. Med. 2021, 196, 105476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Manguiat, L.S.; Fang, T.J. Microbiological quality of chicken- and pork-based street-vended foods from Taichung, Taiwan, and Laguna, Philippines. Food Microbiol. 2013, 36, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, J.P.; Yeh, K.S.; Hsieh, M.W.; Fang, C.Y.; Chen, Z.W.; Lin, J.H. Pathogenic microbiological baseline survey of pork carcasses in Taiwan. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 1046–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, T.H.; Wang, Y.C.; Chen, Y.T.; Yang, C.H.; Yeh, K.S. Serotype occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella isolates recovered from pork carcasses in Taiwan (2000 through 2003). J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kuo, H.C.; Lauderdale, T.L.; Lo, D.Y.; Chen, C.L.; Chen, P.C.; Liang, S.Y.; Kuo, J.C.; Liao, Y.S.; Liao, C.H.; Tsao, C.S.; et al. An association of genotypes and antimicrobial resistance patterns among Salmonella isolates from pigs and humans in Taiwan. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Li, Y.C.; Pan, Z.M.; Kang, X.L.; Geng, S.Z.; Liu, Z.Y.; Cai, Y.Q.; Jiao, X.A. Prevalence, characteristics, and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Salmonella in retail pork in Jiangsu province, eastern China. J. Food Prot. 2014, 77, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Miao, Z.; Li, S.; Qin, K.; Zhou, Y. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from retail pork in major village markets in Tai’an region, China. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 1635–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Antunes, P.; Mourão, J.; Pestana, N.; Peixe, L. Leakage of emerging clinically relevant multidrug-resistant Salmonella clones from pig farms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 2028–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hansen, T.B.; Christensen, B.B.; Aabo, S. Salmonella in pork cuttings in supermarkets and butchers’ shops in Denmark in 2002 and 2006. Zoonoses Public Health 2010, 57 (Suppl. 1), 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jordan, E.; Egan, J.; Dullea, C.; Ward, J.; McGillicuddy, K.; Murray, G.; Murphy, A.; Bradshaw, B.; Leonard, N.; Rafter, P.; et al. Salmonella surveillance in raw and cooked meat and meat products in the Republic of Ireland from 2002 to 2004. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 112, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Thai, T.H.; Hirai, T.; Lan, N.T.; Yamaguchi, R. Antibiotic resistance profiles of Salmonella serovars isolated from retail pork and chicken meat in North Vietnam. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 156, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Cai, Y.; Tao, J.; Jiao, Y.; Fei, X.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, H.; Pan, Z.; Jiao, X. Phenotypic characteristics and genotypic correlation between Salmonella isolates from a slaughterhouse and retail markets in Yangzhou, China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 222, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Boyen, F.; Haesebrouck, F.; Maes, D.; Van Immerseel, F.; Ducatelle, R.; Pasmans, F. Non-typhoidal Salmonella infections in pigs: A closer look at epidemiology, pathogenesis and control. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 130, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Karabasanavar, N.; Sivaraman, G.K.; Satheesha, S.P.; Nair, A.S.; Vijayan, A.; Rajan, V.; Girish, P.S. Non-diarrhoeic pigs as source of highly virulent and multidrug-resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2022, 53, 1039–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kerouanton, A.; Rose, V.; Weill, F.X.; Granier, S.A.; Denis, M. Genetic diversity and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica serotype derby isolated from pigs, pork, and humans in France. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2013, 10, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Hauser, E.; Hebner, F.; Tietze, E.; Helmuth, R.; Junker, E.; Prager, R.; Schroeter, A.; Rabsch, W.; Fruth, A.; Malorny, B. Diversity of Salmonella enterica serovar Derby isolated from pig, pork and humans in Germany. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 151, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bremer, V.; Leitmeyer, K.; Jensen, E.; Metzel, U.; Meczulat, H.; Weise, E.; Werber, D.; Tschaepe, H.; Kreienbrock, L.; Glaser, S.; et al. Outbreak of Salmonella Goldcoast infections linked to consumption of fermented sausage, Germany 2001. Epidemiol. Infect. 2004, 132, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Inns, T.; Beasley, G.; Lane, C.; Hopps, V.; Peters, T.; Pathak, K.; Perez-Moreno, R.; Adak, G.; Shankar, A.; Outbreak Control Team. Outbreak of Salmonella enterica Goldcoast infection associated with whelk consumption, England, June to October 2013. Eurosurveillance 2013, 18, 20654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Niyomdecha, N.; Mungkornkaew, N.; Samosornsuk, W. Serotypes and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolated from pork, chicken meat and lettuce, Bangkok and central Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2016, 47, 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hendriksen, R.S.; Vieira, A.R.; Karlsmose, S.; Fo, L.; Wong, D.M.; Jensen, A.B.; Wegener, H.C.; Aarestrup, F.M. Global monitoring of Salmonella serovar distribution from the World Health Organization Global Foodborne Infections Network Country Data Bank: Results of quality assured laboratories from 2001 to 2007. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2011, 8, 887–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ferrari, R.G.; Rosario, D.; Cunha-Neto, A.; Mano, S.B.; Figueiredo, E.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Worldwide epidemiology of Salmonella serovars in animal-based foods: A meta-analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e00591-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bhatta, D.R.; Bangtrakulnonth, A.; Tishyadhigama, P.; Saroj, S.D.; Bandekar, J.R.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Kapadnis, B.P. Serotyping, PCR, phage-typing and antibiotic sensitivity testing of Salmonella serovars isolated from urban drinking water supply systems of Nepal. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 44, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, S.; Liao, X.; Xiong, Z.; Lin, Q.; Wen, J.; Xu, C.; Qu, X.; Chen, K.; Zhang, J. Characterization of the emerging multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky ST314 in China. Zoonoses Public Health 2021, 68, 622–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, G.; Qian, H.; Lv, J.; Tian, B.; Bao, C.; Yan, H.; Gu, B. Emergence of mcr-1-harboring Salmonella enterica serovar Sinstorf Type ST155 isolated from patients with diarrhea in Jiangsu, China. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 723697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 11 00705 g001 550
Figure 1. Change in the antimicrobial resistance rates among Salmonella isolates from 2017 to 2019. CIP, ciprofloxacin; CRO, ceftriaxone. *: significant difference with p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Change in the antimicrobial resistance rates among Salmonella isolates from 2017 to 2019. CIP, ciprofloxacin; CRO, ceftriaxone. *: significant difference with p < 0.05.
Pathogens 11 00705 g001
Table
Table 1. Diversity profiles of the Salmonella isolates based on MLST, serotyping, and antimicrobial resistance.
Table 1. Diversity profiles of the Salmonella isolates based on MLST, serotyping, and antimicrobial resistance.
SerotypesSequence Type *No.Antimicrobial ResistanceNo.Resistance Rate (%)Source (No.)
AgonaND10S100Pork (10)
AlbanyST2921S177.8Chicken (1)
ND8S1Chicken (1)
CIP7Chicken (4); Vegetables (1); Giblets (1); Clams (1)
AnatumST6416S475.0Pork (4)
CIP, CRO11Pork (4); Chicken (4); Haslets (2); Beef (1)
CIP, CRO, ETP1Haslets (1)
BrancasterST21331CIP1100Chicken (1)
ND2CIP2Chicken (2)
CorvallisST15411S1 Pork (1)
DerbyND19S1047.4Pork (8); Vegetables (2)
CIP8Pork (6); Haslets (2)
ETP1Chicken (1)
EnteritidisND4S325.0Chicken (3)
CIP1Chicken (1)
GiveST8315CIP5100Pork (4); Haslets (1)
GoldcoastST3582CIP, CRO2100Pork (1); Chicken (1)
Kaitaan*1S10Vegetables (1)
KentuckyST1981S144.4Chicken (1)
ST3144S1Pork (1)
CIP3Chicken (3)
ND4S3Chicken (2); Pork (1)
CIP1Pork (1)
LivingstoneND5S420.0Chicken (2); Pork (2)
CIP1Pork (1)
LondonST1554CIP450.0Pork (4)
ND4S4Pork (4)
MbandakaND2S20Pork (2)
MuensterST3216S60Pork (3); Chicken (2); Haslets (1)
NewportST312S20Pork (2)
PotsdamST24621S10Pork (1)
RissenST4691S10Pork (1)
SchwarzengrundST962CIP2100Chicken (2)
ThompsonST261S10Chicken (1)
TyphimuriumST361S10Chicken (1)
ND4S4Pork (3); Chicken (1)
WeltevredenST651S10Pork (1)
ND3S3Pork (3)
ZigongST34671S10Vegetables (1)
Total 117 11742.7%117
No., number; ND, not detected; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CRO, ceftriaxone; ERT = ertapenem; * no MLST analysis but PFGE typing to confirm that it was S. Kaitaan.
Table
Table 2. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of the Salmonella serotypes.
Table 2. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of the Salmonella serotypes.
Serotypes *No. of Isolates
(%)		Ciprofloxacin
Resistance Rate
%		Ceftriaxone
Resistance Rate
%		Carbapenem
Resistance Rate
%
Derby19 (16.2%)42.1% (8/19)0% (0/19)5.3% (1/19)
Anatum16 (13.7%)75% (12/16)68.8% (11/16)6.3% (1/16)
Agona10 (8.5%)0% (0/10)0% (0/10)0% (0/10)
Kentucky9 (7.7%)44.4% (4/9)0% (0/9)0% (0/9)
Albany9 (7.7%)77.8% (7/9)0% (0/9)0% (0/9)
London8 (6.8%)50% (4/8)0% (0/8)0% (0/8)
Muenster6 (5.1%)0% (0/6)0% (0/6)0% (0/6)
Give5 (4.3%)100% (5/5)0% (0/5)0% (0/5)
Livingstone5 (4.3%)20% (1/5)0% (0/5)0% (0/5)
Typhimurium5 (4.3%)0% (0/5)0% (0/5)0% (0/5)
Enteritidis4 (3.4%)25% (1/4)0% (0/4)0% (0/4)
Weltevreden4 (3.4%)0% (0/4)0% (0/4)0% (0/4)
Brancaster3 (2.6%)100% (3/3)0% (0/3)0% (0/3)
Goldcoast2 (1.7%)100% (2/2)100% (2/2)0% (0/2)
Mbandaka2 (1.7%)0% (0/2)0% (0/2)0% (0/2)
Newport2 (1.7%)0% (0/2)0% (0/2)0% (0/2)
Schwarzengrund2 (1.7%)100% (2/2)0% (0/2)0% (0/2)
Corvallis1 (0.9%)0% (0/1)0% (0/1)0% (0/1)
Kaitaan1 (0.9%)0% (0/1)0% (0/1)0% (0/1)
Potsdam1 (0.9%)0% (0/1)0% (0/1)0% (0/1)
Rissen1 (0.9%)0% (0/1)0% (0/1)0% (0/1)
Thompson1 (0.9%)0% (0/1)0% (0/1)0% (0/1)
Zigong1 (0.9%)0% (0/1)0% (0/1)0% (0/1)
Total11741.9% (49/117)11.1% (13/117)1.7% (2/117)
* The order of serotype is exhibited based on its number of isolates.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, Y.-J.; Chen, C.-L.; Yang, H.-P.; Chiu, C.-H. Prevalence, Serotypes, and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Non-Typhoid Salmonella in Food in Northern Taiwan. Pathogens 2022, 11, 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11060705

AMA Style

Chang Y-J, Chen C-L, Yang H-P, Chiu C-H. Prevalence, Serotypes, and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Non-Typhoid Salmonella in Food in Northern Taiwan. Pathogens. 2022; 11(6):705. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11060705

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Yi-Jung, Chyi-Liang Chen, Hsin-Ping Yang, and Cheng-Hsun Chiu. 2022. "Prevalence, Serotypes, and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Non-Typhoid Salmonella in Food in Northern Taiwan" Pathogens 11, no. 6: 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11060705

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop