Next Article in Journal
Influence of NiO ALD Coatings on the Field Emission Characteristic of CNT Arrays
Next Article in Special Issue
N, S Co-Coordinated Zinc Single-Atom Catalysts for N-Alkylation of Aromatic Amines with Alcohols: The Role of S-Doping in the Reaction
Previous Article in Journal
Single-Step Fabrication of Au-Fe-BaTiO3 Nanocomposite Thin Films Embedded with Non-Equilibrium Au-Fe Alloyed Nanostructures
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 19
10.3390/nano12193462
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in Carbon-Based Iron Catalysts for Organic Synthesis

by
Fei Wang
1,†,
Fuying Zhu
1,†,
Enxiang Ren
1,
Guofu Zhu
1,
Guo-Ping Lu
2,* and
Yamei Lin
1,*
1
School of Food Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
2
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 200 Xiao Ling Wei Street, Nanjing 210094, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this paper.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(19), 3462; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193462
Submission received: 7 September 2022 / Revised: 29 September 2022 / Accepted: 30 September 2022 / Published: 3 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Porous Carbon Nanocomposites for Catalysis)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Carbon-based iron catalysts combining the advantages of iron and carbon material are efficient and sustainable catalysts for green organic synthesis. The present review summarizes the recent examples of carbon-based iron catalysts for organic reactions, including reduction, oxidation, tandem and other reactions. In addition, the introduction strategies of iron into carbon materials and the structure and activity relationship (SAR) between these catalysts and organic reactions are also highlighted. Moreover, the challenges and opportunities of organic synthesis over carbon-based iron catalysts have also been addressed. This review will stimulate more systematic and in-depth investigations on carbon-based iron catalysts for exploring sustainable organic chemistry.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Organic synthesis has made great contributions to the progress of human society, but has also caused serious environmental pollution [1,2], so there is an urgent demand to introduce green chemistry into this area. One practical tool is the exploration of efficient and selective catalysts for organic synthesis, which can improve synthetic efficiency and reduce production costs and wastes, thereby minimizing the impact on the environment [3,4].
Iron, as the most productive and cheapest metal [5,6,7], is widely available, biocompatible and non-contaminant. The valence state of iron ranges from −2 to +5, which equips it with flexible redox properties, Lewis acidity and coordination ability [8]. Furthermore, iron-based enzymes are involved in lots of vital and efficient transformations in vivo [9]. All the above mentioned features of iron render a wonderful candidate to replace noble metals, and stand out among other non-precious metals. Therefore, iron-based catalysts meet the requirement of “catalyst economy”, and the development of these catalysts for organic transformations is conductive to the sustainable development of this area [6]. Nevertheless, the high chemical activity of iron also leads to its poor stability, which limits its application possibilities in more catalytic processes [10,11]. Meanwhile, iron has lower electronegativity and proportion of d orbitals and electrons than noble metals (such as Pd, Ru and Au), so it has poor catalytic activity in hydrogenation and cross-coupling reactions [12,13].
To solve these issues, ligands or supports are required to stabilize or tune the performance of iron sites [14,15,16,17]. Considering that ligands are relatively expensive and non-recyclable, solid supports are undoubtedly more in line with the requirements of green chemistry. Among various supports, carbon materials, with advantages of good biocompatibility, unique microstructure, high specific surface area and excellent physical and chemical properties, are considered excellent supports for iron-based heterogeneous catalysts [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Therefore, carbon-supported iron materials combining the advantages of iron and carbon materials are an efficient and sustainable catalyst for organic synthesis. In addition, N-doped carbon anchored iron-single-atom catalysts have similar FeN4 active sites with natural iron-based enzymes in terms of electronic, geometric and chemical structures [26,27].
Although there are several excellent reviews concerning the organic reactions over heterogenous and homogeneous iron-based catalysts [4,5,6,7,8,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37], no attempt focuses on the carbon-based iron catalysts for organic synthesis. In recent years, there have been dozens of organic transformations catalyzed by carbon-based iron materials, including oxidation, reduction, tandem and other reactions. Taking into account the advantages and development trends of nanocarbon-based iron catalysts for organic synthesis, the review on this kind of heterogenous catalysts for organic reactions is of great importance and appeal.
In this review, we thus focus on the recent progress on nanocarbon-based iron catalyzed organic transformations, which is categorized by the reaction types. The introduction strategies of iron into carbon materials and the structure and activity relationship (SAR) are also highlighted in this review. In addition, the challenges and opportunities of organic synthesis over nanocarbon-based iron catalysts have also been addressed.

2. General Consideration

2.1. The Introduction Strategies of Iron into Carbon Materials

The catalytic activity of carbon-based iron materials is closely related to their structures, which are controlled by their synthetic strategies. Because numerous reviews on carbon-based metal materials have systematically summarized the controlled fabrication of these materials [38,39,40], this review mainly focuses on the introduction methods of iron into carbon materials. There are three main steps for the preparation of these catalysts: precursor synthesis, pyrolysis and post-modification (Figure 1). In the precursor synthesis step, iron can be introduced by mechanical mixing, self-assembly and impregnation methods [41,42,43]. Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) can be applied for iron doping during the pyrolysis process [44,45,46]. Impregnation is also an efficient approach for anchoring iron to carbon material in the post-modification step.

2.1.1. Mechanical Mixing Strategy

Mechanical mixing refers to the direct mixing of iron sources and precursor compounds, without special treatment and requirements on the structure of the precursors. Although this method is easy to be operated, it results in the non-uniformity of carbon particle size and iron distribution [47]. Ball milling has been applied for more even mixing. In 2015, Deng et al. prepared FeN4/GN with highly dispersed FeN4 center by ball milling the mixture of iron phthalocyanine and graphene nanosheets (GNs) [48].

2.1.2. Impregnation Strategy

The impregnation strategy is to impregnate the solution of iron source with carbon materials or carbon precursors, with the removal of residual solvent after impregnation equilibration then leading to the introduction of iron species into carbon materials or carbon precursors [49]. In general, the impregnation method has better mixing efficiency than mechanical mixing, resulting in a more uniform Fe doping. However, the impregnation method still cannot effectively solve the problem on the inhomogeneity of carbon particle size and iron distribution. For example, ethyl cellulose was dissolved in ethanol and mixed with the aqueous solution of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, and then melamine and zinc nitrate were added as nitrogen source and pore former, respectively (Figure 2a) [50]. However, the size and distribution of carbon and iron particles in Fe@CN-Zn are not uniform, which can be observed from the results of TEM (Figure 2b) and SEM (Figure 2c).

2.1.3. Self-Assembly Strategy

The introduction of iron can also be achieved through the self-assembly of iron salts with certain organic ligands to form ordered 3D porous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which can be divided into two types: Bimetallic MOFs and Fe-based MOFs. Compared to other methods, nanocarbon-based iron catalysts prepared from self-assembly precursors have advantages of ordered porous structure, more uniform carbon size and iron distribution [51,52,53]. However, this approach has special requirements for organic ligands, which should be able to coordinate with iron ions to form MOFs.
As a bimetallic MOF strategy example, Fe-ZIF (ZIF represents zeolitic imidazolate framework) was prepared via the self-assembly of iron salts and zinc nitrates with 2-methylimidazoles (Figure 3a) [43]. An N-doped carbon-based iron catalyst was synthesized by the pyrolysis of Fe-ZIF. As a representative example of Fe-based MOF strategy, MIL-101(Fe) was prepared by self-assembly of 1,4-terephthalic acid with iron nitrate hexahydrate, which was grinded with melamine and then calcinated to obtain Fe/Fe2O3@NnPC-T-x catalyst (n represents the ratio of MIL-101 (Fe) and melamine, T represents calcination temperature and x represents calcination pyrolysis time) (Figure 3b) [54].

2.1.4. Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD)

Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) refers to a vapor phase self-assembly carbonization process at high temperatures, which can effectively control the chemical composition, morphology, crystal structure and grain size of the membrane layer by adjusting the deposition parameters [55]. This method can make iron species in full contact with the carbon materials during the carbonization process, constructing a unique active iron center, and finally obtaining a catalyst for carbon-loaded iron with excellent catalytic activity. In 2021, Jia et al. prepared a Fe-N-C catalyst containing dense FeN4 sites by flowing iron vapor through the Zn-N-C substrate at 750 °C (Figure 4) [56].

2.2. The Structure and Activity Relationship (SAR)

2.2.1. Nature Properties of the Carbon Materials

In comparison of metal oxide supports, carbon materials have unique porous structure, and are easier to be doped with heteroatoms, which can adjust their Lewis acid-base sites and defect the degree and electronic state of Fe sites, facilitating the formation of stable and active iron catalytic sites. Therefore, iron-doped carbon materials exhibit superior performance than metal oxide-supported iron catalysts in various transformations. For example, Beller’s group have prepared two carbon-supported iron catalysts: Fe-phenanthroline/C-800 [57] and Fe-L1@EGO-900 [41], which exhibit good catalytic activity for the reduction of nitroarenes and acceptorless dehydrogenation reactions, respectively. The two catalysts were prepared by calcinating the mixture of iron precursor, 1,10-phenanthroline ligand and carbon support. The difference is that carbon powder was used as carbon support in Fe-phenanthroline/C-800, while exfoliated graphene oxide (EGO) was applied as carbon support in Fe-L1@EGO-900. However, the catalytic efficiency of other heterogeneous iron catalysts is much lower, or even with no catalytic effect when the carbon material is replaced with other carriers, such as Al2O3, SiO2, CeO2 and TiO2. Overall, the porous structure and defects of carbon supports are favorable for the interaction between substrates with active sites, as well as the exposure of active sites in the catalysts. The Lewis acid-base sites of carbon supports can improve the adsorption and activation of substrates.

2.2.2. Iron Sites in Carbon Materials

Generally, there are two types of iron sites in carbon materials: single atomic iron sites and iron nanoparticles (NPs) [58,59]. The identification of these two iron sites can be achieved by XRD, TEM, XAFS and HAADF-STEM [60,61,62]. Single atomic iron sites and iron nanoparticles (NPs) can usually play a synergistic catalytic role by exerting their respective catalytic advantages in different steps of one reaction [58,60,63]. Although some control experiments have been designed to verify the synergistic catalytic effect between these two sites, the research on this aspect is still in its infancy.
For example, Yang et al. designed a series of control experiment to confirm the synergistic catalysis on FeNx sites (single atomic Fe sites) and Fe NPs for the fabrication of quinolones and quinazolinones (Figure 5a) [58]. Because acid etching can remove Fe NPs selectively, while SCN− can specifically poison FeNx sites, the catalytic effects of FeNx and Fe NPs in the reaction can be clarified. In addition, the reaction principles of Fe(II)Pc and nano-Fe powder are similar to that of FeNx sites and Fe NPs, which are also applied to detect the role of FeNx and Fe NPs during the catalytic process. The coupling reaction of amine and aldehyde and the oxidative dehydrogenation of intermediate I are the two steps involved in the oxidative coupling reaction (Figure 5a). As shown in Figure 5a, FeNx sites are more favorable for the formation of intermediate I, while Fe NPs are more conducive to the further dehydrogenation of intermediates I to produce quinolones and quinazolinones. Thus, FeNx sites and Fe NPs play a synergistic catalytic role in this oxidative coupling reaction.
FeNx site has similar structure with active sites of natural iron-based enzymes, so it exhibits excellent redox performance under mild conditions. Meanwhile, the coordination environment of iron single-atom sites can also be regulated by manipulating the preparation parameters, such as heteroatom doping, which may further improve the catalytic performance of iron sites. For example, Li et al. prepared phosphorus-doped atomically dispersed catalyst Fe-P-C for the first time, and found that the resulting O2-Fe-P4 structure is reduced by hydrogen to generate a large number of Fe-P4 sites, which is attributed to the excellent catalytic performance of the catalyst in the hydrogenation reaction (Figure 5b) [64]. However, the FeN4 sites generated in Fe-N-C prepared by nitrogen atom doping are less active towards the same reaction.
In general, FeNx sites have higher atom utilization and catalytic efficiency than iron NPs, while Fe NPs in the catalysts do play a non-negligible catalytic role in many reactions. This is mainly because many organic reactions inherently involve multi-step steps that require the synergy of multiple active sites.

2.2.3. The Construction of SAR

The construction of SAR between carbon-based iron catalysts and organic reactions are mainly explored by control experiments, reaction kinetics studies and density functional theory (DFT). Control experiments are performed to determine possible reaction intermediates and reaction pathways by changing the reaction conditions or substrates appropriately, or by adding additives. As shown in Scheme 1, the role of Fe-Fe3C@NC-800 and H2O2 in the reaction is investigated by control experiments. Based on the results of Scheme 1, it can be concluded that Fe-Fe3C@NC-800 is necessary for both the coupling and dehydrogenation process, while H2O2 is favorable for the dehydrogenation process [58].
The main purpose of reaction kinetic studies is to determine the rate-determining step (RDS) of the reaction. RDS is the most critical step in the complex organic reactions, so determining RDS is beneficial to simplify the studies of the reaction mechanism. Kinetic isotope experiments (KIE) is a commonly used approach to determine RDS, in which the kH/kD value can be an indicator for RDS [65]. The RDS can also be determined by detecting reaction orders, which reflects the effect of reactant concentration on the reaction rate. For example, our group determines the borrowing hydrogen N-alkylation reaction order of benzyl alcohol and benzylamine, and performs KIE to confirm the RDS (Figure 6) [66]. The reaction order of aniline in this reaction is negative, while that of benzyl alcohol is positive (Figure 6b,c), confirming the activation of benzyl alcohol may be involved in the RDS [67]. The parallel experiments are performed by using PhCH2OH and isotope-labeled PhCD2OH to go through this reaction respectively, and the kH/kD of this reaction is calculated to be 2.75 (Figure 6a), further indicating that the C-H activation of benzyl alcohol may be related to RDS.
In addition, DFT calculations can further confirm the main catalytic active center in RDS by comparing the energy barriers, which can also provide useful information for the construction of SAR between carbon-based iron catalysts and organic reactions. For instance, to further identify the catalytically active center, the RDS energy barriers of different Fe sites can be calculated based on DFT [4,43,68,69,70]. The energy barriers of these four sites can be sorted as Fe1-N4S1 < Fe1-N5 < Fe1-N4O1 < Fe2O3, which are positively related to their positive charge density (Figure 6d,e). These results suggest that Fe1-N4S1 and Fe1-N5 are more likely to be the main catalytically active sites for the RDS process [66].
Based on these results, a possible strategy for construction the structure-activity relationship is listed: (1) confirming the rate-determining steps of reactions and the main active sites of carbon-based iron catalysts by catalyst characterization data, control and kinetic experiments; and (2) establishing the relationship between the two based on reaction yields and structural information of the active sites, and confirming it by DFT calculations.

3. Oxidation Reactions

Compared to metal oxides, O2 and metal-free peroxides are undoubtedly greener and safer oxidants, but their own oxidative capacity is relatively poor. Thus, further activation of these oxidants by certain catalysts is required. Iron features the ability to transfer electrons to O2 and peroxides, thereby displaying excellent performance on many oxidation reactions. Furthermore, the porous carbon materials are favorable for the adsorption of O2 and peroxides. Therefore, carbon-based iron catalysts show superior catalytic performance than noble metal-based catalysts in many oxidation reactions using O2 or metal-free peroxides as oxidizing agents.

3.1. Selective Oxidation of Nitrogenous Compounds

In 2015, FeOx NPs surrounded by nitrogen-doped-graphene shells that immobilized on carbon layers (FeOx@NGr-C) were successfully prepared by simple pyrolysis process (Scheme 2a). This catalyst was applied in the oxidative dehydrogenation of N-heterocycles, which overcomes the poor functional-group tolerance and harsh condition requirements involved in the reported catalytic system (Scheme 2b) [17]. The high thermal stability and coordination ability of 1,10-phenanthroline promotes the formation of graphene shells around FeOx NPs during the pyrolysis process, and the formed N-doped carbon layers with graphene-stacking defects lead to the exposure of active sites for O2 absorption. In the same year, this group developed a similar catalyst (Fe2O3/NGr@C) to achieve the selective dehydrogenation of primary amines for the production of various aliphatic, aromatic and heterocyclic nitriles (Scheme 2c) [71]. It is worth noting that the use of excess aqueous ammonia can inhibit the formation of secondary imine, thereby improving the reaction selectivity. In addition, the unique carbon layer encapsulation structure makes the activity of Fe2O3/NGr@C not significantly decrease after 5 runs, exhibiting industrial application potential.

3.2. Epoxidation of Olefines

The epoxidation of olefines provides a variety of important building blocks for the pharmaceutical and fine chemical industries [72]. In 2019, Kucernak et al. introduced a Fe-N/C catalyst by calcining the complex of polymerized 1,5-diaminonaphthalene and FeCl2 [73]. The FeNx active sites in Fe-N/C are similar to that in Fe porphyrins, and thereby display excellent performance in the epoxidation of olefines, with O2 as the oxidant under mild conditions (Figure 7a). This is also the first example that such kind of catalysts are used for the aerobic epoxidation of olefins under mild conditions, which with high turnover frequency (2700 h−1) and good recyclability can be reused 5 times.
An iron single-atom site catalyst (SAS-Fe) with 30 wt.% of Fe loading was fabricated by the reductive calcination of the complex formed by the coordination of dicyandiamide and Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (Figure 7b) [74], which overcomes the shortcomings of common SAS catalysts, such as low metal loading, and the aggregation and movement of single-atom-sites. Furthermore, DFT calculations were performed to study the catalytic mechanism of SAS-Fe (Figure 8). It was found that the difference in the energy barrier to generate epoxy styrene or benzaldehyde during the reaction can reach a maximum of ΔEa = 0.83 eV, revealing that SAS-Fe tends to promote the formation of epoxy styrene rather than phenylacetaldehyde. The selectivity of SAS-Fe to epoxy styrene can be as high as about 90%, and its activity remains unchanged after 5 cycles. Due to the high metal loading and scalable production, SAS-Fe does meet the requirement of industrial applications.

3.3. Selective Oxidation of Hydrocarbons

In 2015, Deng et al. fabricated highly dispersed single FeN4 centers by high-energy ball milling of the mixture of iron phthalocyanine (FePc) and graphene nanosheets (GNs) under controlled conditions. The obtained catalyst FeN4/GN exhibits excellent activity for oxidizing benzene to form phenol at room temperature using H2O2 as oxidant [48]. The catalytic mechanism of FeN4/GN is proposed based on the results of control experiments and DFT calculations, indicating that the formation of Fe=O moiety is a critical step to realize the transformation of benzene to phenol (Figure 9a).
Nanocarbon-supported iron catalysts were found to show “platinum-like” properties in catalytic reactions, while the specific active site on them still remains controversial. Along this line, Zhang et al. synthesized an atomically dispersed Fe-N-C catalyst for the selective oxidation of C-H bond in alkanes with high selectivity [60]. In order to investigate the main active site in Fe-N-C, a series of characterizations are performed, the results of which indicate that the atomic iron mainly exists in the form of FeNx (x = 4–6) (Figure 9b). Based on control experiments, FeN5 shows the highest TOF compared to FeN4 and FeN6, although the content of FeN5 is much lower. In addition, the content of FeN5 sites decreases as the temperature raises from 700 °C to 800 °C, which in turn results in a significant loss of catalytic activity. It can be concluded that the content of FeN5 depends on the calcination temperature, and can significantly affect the catalytic efficiency.

4. Reduction Reactions

In addition to oxidation reactions, nanocarbon-supported iron catalysts also show potential to catalyze reduction reactions [75,76]. Hydrodeoxygenation, hydrogenolysis and hydrogenation are three main kinds of catalytic reduction reaction over iron-doped carbon materials.

4.1. Hydrodeoxygenation

In 2017, Fu et al. described an effective iron catalyst (Fe-L1/C-800) by simultaneous calcination of 1,10-phenanthroline (L1) as the nitrogen precursor and activated carbon as the carrier at 800 °C, which could selectively realize the hydrodeoxygenation of HMF (5-hydroxymethylfurfural) to DMF (N, N-dimethylformamide), with a selectivity of 86.2% [77]. The hydrogenation of aldehyde group in HMF is found to be the rate-determining step, which can be accelerated by the use of alcohol as an additional hydrogen source. Moreover, this catalyst maintains excellent stability and high selectivity in both batch and continuous flow fixed-bed reactors.
The selective hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of carboxylic acids to alkanes is of great importance for the production of biofuel from biomass [78]. Therefore, a N-doped carbon-alumina hybrid supported iron (Fe-N-C@Al2O3) catalyst was prepared by calcining the mixture of Fe(acac)3, melamine and Al2O3 at 900 °C [79]. Surprisingly, the Fe-NC@Al2O3 catalyzed HDO of carboxylic acids displays excellent chemo-selectivity, even in the presence of an aromatic ring that is generally easier to be hydrogenated than carboxylic acid (Figure 10), which is ascribed to the formation of the FeC3 active phase and N-doped carbon-alumina hybrid. Moreover, the formation of both nitrogen-doped carbo-alumina hybrid and iron loading effect the Lewis basicity of Fe-N-C@Al2O3 to adsorb substrates.

4.2. Hydrogenation of Nitroarenes

Beller et al. developed a classic iron catalyst (Fe-phen/C) derived from pyrolyzing the mixture of Fe(OAc)2, 1,10-phenanthroline and carbon powder (Figure 11) [42]. The prepared catalyst exhibits high chemo-selectivity toward the reduction of various nitroarenes to corresponding aromatic amines with hydrazine hydrate as a hydrogen source. Subsequently, the catalytic activity toward the reduction of nitroarenes of Fe-phen/C was further investigated by the same group using H2 or HCOOH as a hydrogen source [57,80]. The FeN4 sites on the iron oxide surface are the source of the unique catalytic activity of this catalyst. Meanwhile, iron oxide can also play a minor role in the reduction reaction if it does not inhibit the FeN4 sites of the catalyst.
It is well known that nitrogen atoms act as basic sites in N-doped nanocarbon-supported iron catalysts, which can improve their hydrogenation performance [81]. Melamine was mixed with MIL-101(Fe) to improve the nitrogen content, and the resultant mixture was pyrolyzed at 700 °C to obtain Fe/Fe2O3@N5PC-700-1 [54]. This material exhibits excellent chemical selectivity towards the hydrogenation of nitro compounds, and the turnover frequency (TOF) reaches 8898 h−1, which is 100 times higher than that of reported similar catalysts [82]. Meanwhile, the nitrogen sites on the catalyst surface can effectively capture nitrobenzene and aniline to further improve the catalytic activity of this material.
In 2019, a novel iron single-atom catalyst Fe1/N-C was prepared by immersing the template SBA-15 into the mixture of ferric nitrate and glucosamine, which was then calcinated at inert atmosphere before acid etching [70]. The prepared Fe1/N-C exhibits excellent activity for the transfer hydrogenation of nitroarenes to amines with hydrazine as a hydrogen source. A series of characterization confirmed that the formation of FeN4 active sites in Fe1/N-C, and the pathway for hydrogenation of nitroarene in the presence of FeN4 sites was investigated [83].
In 2020, FeSAs/Fe2O3ACs/NPC that both contain FeN4 sites and Fe2O3 clusters was fabricated by the pyrolysis of Fe-ZIF at 900 °C, which was then annealed naturally [43]. Compared with FeSAs and Fe NPs, FeSAs/Fe2O3ACs/NPC shows the highest activity towards hydrogenation of nitroarenes (TOF up to 1923 h−1), owing to the synergistic effect between FeSAs and Fe2O3ACs. Based on the DFT results, FeSAs reduces the overall barrier for hydrazine to decompose into hydrogen, and then under the catalysis of Fe2O3ACs, the hydrogen further participates in the hydrogenation reaction of nitrobenzene.
In 2022, our group developed an aniline modified ZIF-derived N-doped carbon iron single-atom catalyst (FeSA@NC-20A) with 2.4 wt.% Fe loading (Figure 12) [84]. This catalyst displays excellent catalytic performance on the selective hydrogenation of nitroarenes, with N2H4·H2O as the reducing agent (TOF up to 1727 h−1, more than 10 runs). This strategy also exhibits great potential to be applied to the synthesis of complex amines and drugs. According to DFT calculations and control experiments, the N-H activation of N2H4·H2O is confirmed as the rate determine step, and FeN4 sites in FeSA@NC-20A are considered the active sites for this reaction.
Recently, a mesoporous carbon (MC) support was prepared by hydrothermal reaction of citric acid and magnesium citrate, which was then loaded by potassium ferrocyanide through calcination to form NMC-Fe [85]. The prepared NMC-Fe could selectively mediate the reduction of nitro aromatics into azo compounds using hydrazine hydrate as a hydrogen source (Scheme 3), which was due to the formation of Fe-N complex in the NMC-Fe catalyst.

4.3. Others

In 2016, the group of Fu applied an iron catalyst (Fe-L1/C-800, the same catalyst in ref. [77]) to achieve the transfer hydrogenation of furfural (FF) to furfuryl alcohol (FFA) with a selectivity of 83.0% and a conversion rate of 91.6% [86]. Moreover, the catalyst can be reused five times, and finally deactivates due to the destruction of the Fe-N bond, the formation of crystalline Fe2O3 phase and the change of pore structure. In 2018, they continued to study the same catalyst for the selective cracking of C-O bonds in lignin model compounds (Scheme 4). In the presence of Fe-L1/C-800, the α-O-4 linkage of lignin model compounds is directly hydrolyzed to phenol and toluene, with yields of 95% and 90%, respectively [68]. In the occasion of the β-O-4 compounds, the presence of vicinal -OH group is required. Although monomers are not detected during the Fe-L1/C-800-catalyzed lignin pyrolysis process, its selectivity to aromatic hydrocarbons is still much higher than that of noble metal catalysts.

5. Cascade Reactions

Cascade reaction is considered as a sustainable and environmentally friendly tool for the synthesis of new drugs and natural products, owing to its step and atom economy, simple operation process, lesser amount of solvent and reagents used and minimized waste emission. Therefore, the preparation of secondary amines, nitriles, unnatural amino acids and N-arylsulfonamides has been explored via a cascade reaction catalyzed by nanocarbon-supported iron catalysts.

5.1. Dehydration-Oxidation Reactions

Li et al. prepared 2,5-diformylfuran (DFF) from fructose via one-pot two-step process with 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as the intermediate (Figure 13a) [87]. This transformation could be achieved by an octahedral Fe/C-S catalyst, which was produced from the pyrolysis of sulfur powder-doped Fe-based MOF (Figure 13b). The doping of sulfur results in more acidic sites that promote the dispersion of iron species, which is beneficial for the dehydration of fructose and the oxidation of HMF to DFF. The high catalytic activity and selectivity for Fe/C-S were also attributed to the strong adsorption of HMF and weak interaction of DFF with catalyst, respectively. Furthermore, the strategy for catalyst preparation applied in this work provides new insights to synthesize uniform-shaped metal nanoparticle catalysts from MOFs.

5.2. N-Alkylation Reactions

Our group prepared a stable and recoverable N, S-codoped Fe20-SA@NSC catalyst with a high iron loading of 2.51 wt.% [66], which can catalyze the N-alkylation of amines and alcohols with high selectivity and efficiency under solvent free conditions (TOF up to 13.9 h−1) (Figure 14). According to the results of HAADF-STEM, XAFS and DFT calculations, the single atom site Fe1-N4S1 was formed in Fe20-SA@NSC with high electron density, which not only enhances the C-H bond activation of alcohols, but also improves the hydrogen borrowing ability.
In 2014, Beller et al. synthesized Fe2O3/NGr@C by their reported method for the N-alkylation of benzaldehyde with nitroarenes to prepare secondary amines [88]. In this work, anilines were formed in situ from the hydrogenation of nitroarenes, and underwent a condensation reaction with aldehydes to afford imines, which were then reduced to afford N-alkylation amines (Scheme 5a). This method shows atom economy and environmental friendliness, providing an important application prospect for the industrial production for secondary amines. In 2017, they continued to study the application of Fe2O3/NGr@C catalyst in the fabrication of N-methylated amines from nitroarene and paraformaldehyde without a hydrogen source [89]. The paraformaldehyde in this work acts as both a hydrogen source and a methylating agent. In addition to structurally different substrates, some drugs and fluorescent molecules containing nitro groups can also well undergo this strategy to afford corresponding N-methylated amines (Scheme 5b), including nimodipine, cilnidipine, nicardipine, nimesulide, rhodamine derivatives and fluorenone.

5.3. Oxidative Coupling Reactions

In 2018, the nitriles and amides were prepared via the tandem reaction of aldehydes and ammonia in the presence of Fe2O3-N/C [90]. The aldehydes and ammonia first undergo condensation reaction to generate imines, which are oxidized to desired nitriles (Scheme 6a). An additional hydrolysis process is required for the formation of amides (Scheme 6b). Both the nitrogen-doped graphene layer-supported Fe2O3 nanoparticles and Fe-N interactions are found to contribute to the activity of Fe2O3-N/C. Moreover, gram scale synthesis is realized in this green strategy, and the Fe2O3-N/C can be reused for several times, indicating the potential industrial application of this work.
In 2022, some of us synthesized a single-atom catalyst Fe1-N-C by calcinating ZIFs to achieve the conversion of a wide range of primary alcohols to nitriles under mild conditions for the first time (Figure 15) [91]. In the preparation process of the catalyst, benzyl amine is introduced to make the obtained catalysts with higher nitrogen contents, and modify the morphology, crystal structure and size of ZIFs, which is conducive to the formation of stable FeN4 active sites. The catalyst facilitates the absorption of oxygen and the transportation of reactants in the catalytic process, and maintains a high catalytic activity after being reused six times, which plays an important role in exploring the conversion of renewable biomass resources (bio-based primary alcohols) into fine chemicals (nitriles).
In 2019, Fe-Fe3C@NC, composed of a N-doped carbon layer surrounded Fe-Fe3C nanoparticles and FeNx sites, was prepared by Song et al., which was then applied in the oxidative cyclization reaction between amines and aldehydes to efficiently synthesize quinolines and quinazolinones [58]. A series of characterization and control experiments were performed to investigate the catalytic mechanism, the results of which indicate that the Fe-Fe3C nanoparticles and FeNx sites in Fe-Fe3C@NC have a synergistic catalytic effect in catalyzing this cyclization reaction. This strategy provides a convenient and sustainable method for obtaining a set of N-heterocycles with pharmaceutical action.
Natural woods are an abundant biomass with hierarchical structure and good mechanical properties, which have been applied as porous carbon supports to immobilize iron single atoms for the formation of iron-based single atom catalyst (SAC) (Figure 16) [92]. The obtained iron-based SAC shows excellent performance in three-component oxidative cyclization to afford various quinolines from anilines and ketones under mild conditions. In addition, this iron-based SAC exhibits better activity than traditional catalysts, such as Pd/C, Fe/C and FeCl3. The DFT calculations were performed to identify the active sites in iron-based SAC, and the FeN4 sites were found with lower reaction barriers than Fe-C1N3 and Fe-C2N2. Therefore, the excellent catalytic activity of iron-based SAC can be attributed to the weak desorption energy between FeN4 and products, and the increased exposure of active sites resulted from hierarchically porous carbon plates.

6. Others

Acceptorless dehydrogenation can produce valuable intermediates while generating molecular hydrogen, which is known as a green energy resource. Based on this, Balaraman et al. prepared a Fe-L1@EGO-900 catalyst with iron oxides as the outer shell and iron carbide as the inner core for acceptorless dehydrogenation of N-heterocycles, amines and alcohols (Scheme 7) [41]. However, other iron catalysts prepared from traditional supports, such as Al2O3, SiO2, CeO2 and TiO2, failed to undergo this reaction under similar experimental conditions. This is due to the fact that 1,10-phenanthroline (L1) with broad π area is applied to prepare Fe-L1@EGO-900, which enables the catalyst to better recognize and bind substrate. Furthermore, this catalyst can be reused four times without a significant decrease in activity, showing potential for practical application.
In 2022, Beller et al. prepared Fe-Cellulose-1000 with metallic iron as the active site by pyrolyzing the mixture of cellulose and Fe(NO3)3·9H2O at 1000 °C [93]. This material breaks through the limitations of the acid-required hydrogen-deuterium exchange reaction, and can selectively catalyze the deuteration of the locations that are not prone to electrophilic substitution reactions (Figure 17). In the reaction pathway of catalytic deuteration, the iron oxides in Fe-Cellulose-1000 can be reduced in situ to metallic iron under hydrogen pressure, which further promotes the homolytic splitting of the deuteration reagent (D2O). The generated •OD radicals are activated and adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst in the form of D* and *OD, and the former one can selectively substitute hydrogen atom on the benzene ring. Therefore, the Fe-Cellulose-1000 can promote highly selective deuteration reaction of aniline, indole, phenol and other heterocyclic compounds, and there is no obvious activity loss of Fe-Cellulose-1000 after five times of recycle. Furthermore, this catalyst can be applied to the preparation of kilogram-grade deuterated compounds, providing the possibility of industrial production.
Another efficient catalyst Fe@NC-800 for acylation reaction was reported by Jia et al., which was prepared by pyrolyzing the Fe-DABCO-MOF formed by self-assembly of FeCl2·4H2O, terephthalic acid and 1,4-diazabicyclo [2,2,2] octane (DABCO) at 800 °C (Figure 18) [94]. In addition to provide nitrogen source, the incorporation of DABCO can also facilitate the formation of highly graphitized materials and inhibit iron agglomeration. The excellent catalytic performance of this catalyst is mainly attributed to the electronic effect of the graphic layer and encapsulation of iron particles by the graphic layer, which will promote the stabilization of the iron species.
In 2021, our group constructed a nitrogen-doped carbon supported iron-based catalyst Fe@CN-Zn using iron nitrate as the iron source, zinc nitrate as the pore forming agent, and melamine and ethyl cellulose as the nitrogen source and carbon source, respectively [50]. In this work, carbene species were generated from diazoacetate in the presence of Fe@CN-Zn, and then further reacted with amines to afford corresponding amino acid derivatives (Figure 19). The N-doped carbon decreased the electron density of Fe/FeOx nanoparticles in Fe@CN-Zn [95], which is beneficial for the formation of intermediate A. Meanwhile, the dope of nitrogen afforded more Lewis base sites, improving the transfer of proton during the rection process. The active Fe@CN-Zn catalyst can be recycled four times without significant activity loss.

7. Summary and Outlook

This review focuses on organic reactions catalyzed by carbon-based iron materials, such as oxidation, reduction and tandem reactions, in which the introduction strategies of iron into carbon materials and the structure and activity relationship between carbon-based iron catalysts and organic reactions are summarized. Despite the great development in this field, challenges and opportunities for the widespread application of iron-doped carbon materials still exist.
The homogeneity and tunability of iron sites are the basis for the high catalytic performance of carbon-based iron catalysts. There is still a lack of effective means to regulate and determine the coordination environment of iron sites. A feasible solution is anchoring single iron atoms on nitrogen-doped carbon, forming FeNx sites with similar coordination environments, which can be detected by X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES). Nevertheless, limited approaches have been demonstrated for fine-tuning FeNx sites. At the same time, the current characterization of XANES is the weighted average of the coordination environment of all iron sites, so the homogeneity of iron sites is actually not high.
Compared with homogeneous iron catalysis, the application range of carbon-supported iron catalysts in organic synthesis is very limited. There are two main reasons for this:
(1) The poor homogeneity and tunability of iron sites in these catalysts limits its application in complex and delicate organic synthesis, such as asymmetric synthesis. The investigation of efficient strategies for improving the homogeneity or tuning the coordination environment of iron sites is desirable.
(2) Since most organic chemists are not proficient in designing and preparing such materials, more chemists that are specialized in organic synthesis, catalysis and materials ought to undertake related cooperation and innovation in this field, in order to expand its application range and depth.
Finally, carbon-based iron catalysts also offer more new possibilities for organic synthesis. For example, these catalysts exhibit excellent catalytic activity for the activation of O2, owing to porous structure and enzyme-like iron sites, so they can enable many efficient green oxidation processes.

Author Contributions

Supervision and project administration, G.-P.L. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, F.W. and F.Z.; writing—review and editing, E.R.; and editing images, G.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 32001266).

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rodionov, I.A.; Zvereva, I.A. Photocatalytic activity of layered perovskite-like oxides in practically valuable chemical reactions. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2016, 85, 248–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ju, S.; Shin, G.; Lee, M.; Koo, J.M.; Jeon, H.; Ok, Y.S.; Hwang, D.S.; Hwang, S.Y.; Oh, D.X.; Park, J. Biodegradable chito-beads replacing non-biodegradable microplastics for cosmetics. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 6953–6965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rydel-Ciszek, K.; Pacześniak, T.; Zaborniak, I.; Błoniarz, P.; Surmacz, K.; Sobkowiak, A.; Chmielarz, P. Iron-Based Catalytically Active Complexes in Preparation of Functional Materials. Processes 2020, 8, 1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shesterkina, A.A.; Kustov, L.M.; Strekalova, A.A.; Kazansky, V.B. Heterogeneous iron-containing nanocatalysts—Promising systems for selective hydrogenation and hydrogenolysis. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020, 10, 3160–3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shang, R.; Ilies, L.; Nakamura, E. Iron-Catalyzed C-H Bond Activation. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 9086–9139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Furstner, A. Iron Catalysis in Organic Synthesis: A Critical Assessment of What It Takes to Make This Base Metal a Multitasking Champion. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 778–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wei, D.; Darcel, C. Iron Catalysis in Reduction and Hydrometalation Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 2550–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bauer, I.; Knolker, H.J. Iron catalysis in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 3170–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bertini, I.; Gray, H.B.; Lippard, S.J.; Valentine, J.S. Bioinorganic Chemistry; University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, Q.; Tao, H.L.; Li, Z.Q.; Wang, G.X. Effect of iron precursor on the activity and stability of PtFe/C catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Alloy Compd. 2020, 814, 152212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, Q.S.; Yang, H.P.; Kang, L.; Gao, Z.; Ren, F.F. Fe-based metal-organic frameworks as Fenton-like catalysts for highly efficient degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride over a wide pH range: Acceleration of Fe (II)/Fe (III) cycle under visible light irradiation. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2020, 263, 118282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hedstrom, A.; Lindstedt, E.; Norrby, P.O. On the oxidation state of iron in iron-mediated C-C couplings. J. Organomet. Chem. 2013, 748, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sun, X.B.; Hansen, T.; Poater, J.; Hamlin, T.A.; Bickelhaupt, F.M. Rational design of iron catalysts for C-X bond activation. J. Comput. Chem. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zuo, W.W.; Lough, A.J.; Li, Y.F.; Morris, R.H. Amine(imine)diphosphine Iron Catalysts for Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Ketones and Imines. Science 2013, 342, 1080–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Morris, R.H. Exploiting Metal-Ligand Bifunctional Reactions in the Design of Iron Asymmetric Hydrogenation Catalysts. Accounts Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1494–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Raji, M.; Mirbagheri, S.A.; Ye, F.; Dutta, J. Nano zero-valent iron on activated carbon cloth support as Fenton-like catalyst for efficient color and COD removal from melanoidin wastewater. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 127945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cui, X.J.; Li, Y.H.; Bachmann, S.; Scalone, M.; Surkus, A.E.; Junge, K.; Topf, C.; Beller, M. Synthesis and Characterization of Iron-Nitrogen-Doped Graphene/Core-Shell Catalysts: Efficient Oxidative Dehydrogenation of N-Heterocycles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10652–10658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Varma, R.S. Biomass-Derived Renewable Carbonaceous Materials for Sustainable Chemical and Environmental Applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 6458–6470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kramer, S.; Hejjo, F.; Rasmussen, K.H.; Kegnæs, S. Silylative Pinacol Coupling Catalyzed by Nitrogen-Doped Carbon-Encapsulated Nickel/Cobalt Nanoparticles: Evidence for a Silyl Radical Pathway. ACS Catal. 2017, 8, 754–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lin, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, X.; Fang, J.; Lu, G.-P.; Huang, H. Carbohydrate-derived porous carbon materials: An ideal platform for green organic synthesis. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 186–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, K.; Shan, H.; Lu, G.P.; Cai, C.; Beller, M. Synthesis of N-Heterocycles via Oxidant-Free Dehydrocyclization of Alcohols Using Heterogeneous Catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60, 25188–25202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lam, E.; Luong, J.H.T. Carbon Materials as Catalyst Supports and Catalysts in the Transformation of Biomass to Fuels and Chemicals. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 3393–3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Borchardt, L.; Zhu, Q.-L.; Casco, M.E.; Berger, R.; Zhuang, X.; Kaskel, S.; Feng, X.; Xu, Q. Toward a molecular design of porous carbon materials. Mater. Today 2017, 20, 592–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, K.; Shan, H.; Ma, R.; Wang, P.; Neumann, H.; Lu, G.P.; Beller, M. Catalytic oxidative dehydrogenation of N-heterocycles with nitrogen/phosphorus co-doped porous carbon materials. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 6865–6872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Su, T.Y.; Lu, G.P.; Sun, K.K.; Zhang, M.; Cai, C. ZIF-derived metal/N-doped porous carbon nanocomposites: Efficient catalysts for organic transformations. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2022, 12, 2106–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiao, L.; Yan, H.; Wu, Y.; Gu, W.; Zhu, C.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. When Nanozymes Meet Single-Atom Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 2565–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, Y.; Wang, F.; Yu, J.; Zhang, X.; Lu, G.-P. Iron single-atom anchored N-doped carbon as a ‘laccase-like’ nanozyme for the degradation and detection of phenolic pollutants and adrenaline. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 425, 127763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rana, S.; Biswas, J.P.; Paul, S.; Paik, A.; Maiti, D. Organic synthesis with the most abundant transition metal-iron: From rust to multitasking catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 243–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, S.-P.; Wu, W.D.; Wu, Z. Nanostructured semiconductor supported iron catalysts for heterogeneous photo-Fenton oxidation: A review. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 15513–15546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Raya-Barón, Á.; Oña-Burgos, P.; Fernández, I. Iron-Catalyzed Homogeneous Hydrosilylation of Ketones and Aldehydes: Advances and Mechanistic Perspective. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 5400–5417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Balaraman, E.; Nandakumar, A.; Jaiswal, G.; Sahoo, M.K. Iron-catalyzed dehydrogenation reactions and their applications in sustainable energy and catalysis. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 3177–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Damiano, C.; Sonzini, P.; Gallo, E. Iron catalysts with N-ligands for carbene transfer of diazo reagents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 4867–4905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Batista, V.F.; Pinto, D.C.G.A.; Silva, A.M.S. Iron: A Worthy Contender in Metal Carbene Chemistry. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 10096–10116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sears, J.D.; Neate, P.G.N.; Neidig, M.L. Intermediates and Mechanism in Iron-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 11872–11883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bakas, N.J.; Neidig, M.L. Additive and Counterion Effects in Iron-Catalyzed Reactions Relevant to C-C Bond Formation. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 8493–8503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cassani, C.; Bergonzini, G.; Wallentin, C.-J. Active Species and Mechanistic Pathways in Iron-Catalyzed C-C Bond-Forming Cross-Coupling Reactions. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 1640–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bailly, B.; Thomas, S.P. Iron-catalysed reduction of carbonyls and olefins. RSC Adv. 2011, 1, 1435–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, P.; Gao, S.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; He, W.; Huang, W.; Luo, J. Carbon nanocages with N-doped carbon inner shell and Co/N-doped carbon outer shell as electromagnetic wave absorption materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, L.Y.; Feng, Y.; Yu, D.B.; Qiu, J.H.; Zhang, X.F.; Dong, D.H.; Yao, J.F. Design of ZIF-based CNTs wrapped porous carbon with hierarchical pores as electrode materials for supercapacitors. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2019, 125, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, X.; Fan, Q.Y.; Yang, H.; Xiao, H.Y.; Xiao, Y.H. Metal-organic framework assisted synthesis of nitrogen-doped hollow carbon materials for enhanced supercapacitor performance. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 17389–17395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jaiswal, G.; Landge, V.G.; Jagadeesan, D.; Balaraman, E. Iron-based nanocatalyst for the acceptorless dehydrogenation reactions. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 2147–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jagadeesh, R.V.; Stemmler, T.; Surkus, A.-E.; Junge, H.; Junge, K.; Beller, M. Hydrogenation using iron oxide-based nanocatalysts for the synthesis of amines. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yun, R.; Zhan, F.; Li, N.; Zhang, B.; Ma, W.; Hong, L.; Sheng, T.; Du, L.; Zheng, B.; Liu, S. Fe Single Atoms and Fe2O3 Clusters Liberated from N-Doped Polyhedral Carbon for Chemoselective Hydrogenation under Mild Conditions. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2020, 12, 34122–34129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, J.K.; Jiao, L.; Wegener, E.; Richard, L.L.; Liu, E.S.; Zitolo, A.; Sougrati, M.T.; Mukerjee, S.; Zhao, Z.P.; Huang, Y.; et al. Evolution Pathway from Iron Compounds to Fe-1(II)-N-4 Sites through Gas-Phase Iron during Pyrolysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1417–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Deng, B.; Liu, Z.; Peng, H. Toward Mass Production of CVD Graphene Films. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1800996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, J.B.; Ren, Z.; Hou, Y.; Yan, X.L.; Liu, P.Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.X.; Guo, J.J. A review of graphene synthesis at low temperatures by CVD methods. New Carbon Mater. 2020, 35, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Amadi, E.V.; Venkataraman, A.; Papadopoulos, C. Nanoscale self-assembly: Concepts, applications and challenges. Nanotechnology 2022, 33, 1361–6528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Deng, D.; Chen, X.; Yu, L.; Wu, X.; Liu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Yang, H.; Tian, H.; Hu, Y.; Du, P.; et al. A single iron site confined in a graphene matrix for the catalytic oxidation of benzene at room temperature. Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, e1500462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Guayaquil-Sosa, J.F.; Calzada, A.; Serrano, B.; Escobedo, S.; de Lasa, H. Hydrogen Production via Water Dissociation Using Pt-TiO2 Photocatalysts: An Oxidation-Reduction Network. Catalysts 2017, 7, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lin, Y.; Wang, F.; Lu, G.-P.; Zhang, X. Ethyl cellulose derived porous iron@N-doped carbon material for N-H carbene insertion reaction. Tetrahedron 2021, 98, 132432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Song, C.; Wang, Z.G.; Ding, B.Q. Smart Nanomachines Based on DNA Self-Assembly. Small 2013, 9, 2382–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Boal, A.K.; Ilhan, F.; DeRouchey, J.E.; Thurn-Albrecht, T.; Russell, T.P.; Rotello, V.M. Self-assembly of nanoparticles into structured spherical and network aggregates. Nature 2000, 404, 746–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Whitesides, G.M.; Grzybowski, B. Self-assembly at all scales. Science 2002, 295, 2418–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Yun, R.R.; Hong, L.R.; Ma, W.J.; Jia, W.G.; Liu, S.J.; Zheng, B.S. Fe/Fe2O3@N-dopped Porous Carbon: A High-Performance Catalyst for Selective Hydrogenation of Nitro Compounds. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 724–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tsen, A.W.; Brown, L.; Levendorf, M.P.; Ghahari, F.; Huang, P.Y.; Havener, R.W.; Ruiz-Vargas, C.S.; Muller, D.A.; Kim, P.; Park, J. Tailoring Electrical Transport Across Grain Boundaries in Polycrystalline Graphene. Science 2012, 336, 1143–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Jiao, L.; Li, J.K.; Richard, L.L.; Sun, Q.; Stracensky, T.; Liu, E.R.; Sougrati, M.T.; Zhao, Z.P.; Yang, F.; Zhong, S.C.; et al. Chemical vapour deposition of Fe-N-C oxygen reduction catalysts with full utilization of dense Fe-N4 sites. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 1385–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jagadeesh, R.V.; Surkus, A.E.; Junge, H.; Pohl, M.M.; Radnik, J.; Rabeah, J.; Huan, H.M.; Schunemann, V.; Bruckner, A.; Beller, M. Nanoscale Fe2O3-Based Catalysts for Selective Hydrogenation of Nitroarenes to Anilines. Science 2013, 342, 1073–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ma, Z.; Song, T.; Yuan, Y.; Yang, Y. Synergistic catalysis on Fe-Nx sites and Fe nanoparticles for efficient synthesis of quinolines and quinazolinones via oxidative coupling of amines and aldehydes. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 10283–10289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Rui, T.; Lu, G.-P.; Zhao, X.; Cao, X.; Chen, Z. The synergistic catalysis on Co nanoparticles and CoNx sites of aniline-modified ZIF derived Co@NCs for oxidative esterification of HMF. Chinese Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, W.; Zhang, L.; Liu, X.; Liu, X.; Yang, X.; Miao, S.; Wang, W.; Wang, A.; Zhang, T. Discriminating Catalytically Active FeNx Species of Atomically Dispersed Fe-N-C Catalyst for Selective Oxidation of the C-H Bond. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10790–10798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, J.; Zou, Y.; Cruz, D.; Savateev, A.; Vilé, G. Ligand-Metal Charge Transfer Induced via Adjustment of Textural Properties Controls the Performance of Single-Atom Catalysts during Photocatalytic Degradation. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2021, 13, 25858–25867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ding, S.; Lyu, Z.; Zhong, H.; Liu, D.; Sarnello, E.; Fang, L.; Xu, M.; Engelhard, M.H.; Tian, H.; Li, T.; et al. An Ion-Imprinting Derived Strategy to Synthesize Single-Atom Iron Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction. Small 2021, 17, e2004454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Jiang, W.J.; Gu, L.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.J.; Wang, J.Q.; Hu, J.S.; Wei, Z.; Wan, L.J. Understanding the High Activity of Fe-N-C Electrocatalysts in Oxygen Reduction: Fe/Fe3C Nanoparticles Boost the Activity of Fe-Nx. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3570–3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Long, X.; Li, Z.; Gao, G.; Sun, P.; Wang, J.; Zhang, B.; Zhong, J.; Jiang, Z.; Li, F. Graphitic phosphorus coordinated single Fe atoms for hydrogenative transformations. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, H.; Xu, D.; Guan, E.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, S.; Xu, H.; Meng, X.; Yang, B.; et al. Atomically Dispersed Ru on Manganese Oxide Catalyst Boosts Oxidative Cyanation. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 6299–6308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lu, G.P.; Shan, H.B.; Lin, Y.M.; Zhang, K.; Zhou, B.J.; Zhong, Q.; Wang, P.C. A Fe single atom on N, S-doped carbon catalyst for performing N-alkylation of aromatic amines under solvent-free conditions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 25128–25135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, Y.; Furukawa, S.; Yan, N. Identification of an Active NiCu Catalyst for Nitrile Synthesis from Alcohol. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 6681–6691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, J.; Sun, H.; Liu, J.-X.; Zhang, J.-J.; Li, Z.-X.; Fu, Y. Selective reductive cleavage of CO bond in lignin model compounds over nitrogen-doped carbon-supported iron catalysts. Mol. Catal. 2018, 452, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yun, R.; Zhang, S.; Ma, W.; Lv, X.; Liu, S.; Sheng, T.; Wang, S. Fe/Fe3C Encapsulated in N-Doped Carbon Tubes: A Recyclable Catalyst for Hydrogenation with High Selectivity. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 9469–9475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cheong, W.C.; Yang, W.J.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhao, D.; Liu, S.J.; Wu, K.L.; Liu, Q.G.; Zhang, C.; Wang, D.S.; et al. Isolated Iron Single-Atomic Site-Catalyzed Chemoselective Transfer Hydrogenation of Nitroarenes to Arylamines. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2019, 11, 33819–33824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jagadeesh, R.V.; Junge, H.; Beller, M. “Nanorust”-catalyzed benign oxidation of amines for selective synthesis of nitriles. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ho, K.P.; Wong, W.L.; Lam, K.M.; Lai, C.P.; Chan, T.H.; Wong, K.Y. A simple and effective catalytic system for epoxidation of aliphatic terminal alkenes with manganese(II) as the catalyst. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 7988–7996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Malko, D.; Guo, Y.; Jones, P.; Britovsek, G.; Kucernak, A. Heterogeneous iron containing carbon catalyst (Fe-N/C) for epoxidation with molecular oxygen. J. Catal. 2019, 370, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xiong, Y.; Sun, W.; Xin, P.; Chen, W.; Zheng, X.; Yan, W.; Zheng, L.; Dong, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, D.; et al. Gram-Scale Synthesis of High-Loading Single-Atomic-Site Fe Catalysts for Effective Epoxidation of Styrene. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e2000896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Cantillo, D.; Moghaddam, M.M.; Kappe, C.O. Hydrazine-mediated reduction of nitro and azide functionalities catalyzed by highly active and reusable magnetic iron oxide nanocrystals. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 4530–4542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wienhöfer, G.; Sorribes, I.; Boddien, A.; Westerhaus, F.; Junge, K.; Junge, H.; Llusar, R.; Beller, M. General and Selective Iron-Catalyzed Transfer Hydrogenation of Nitroarenes without Base. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12875–12879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, J.; Liu, J.L.; Liu, H.Y.; Xu, G.Y.; Zhang, J.J.; Liu, J.X.; Zhou, G.L.; Li, Q.; Xu, Z.H.; Fu, Y. Selective Hydrodeoxygenation of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-Dimethylfuran over Heterogeneous Iron Catalysts. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 1436–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jamil, F.; Al-Haj, L.; Al-Muhtaseb, A.H.; Al-Hinai, M.A.; Baawain, M.; Rashid, U.; Ahmad, M.N.M. Current Scenario of Catalysts for Biodiesel Production: A Critical Review. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2018, 34, 267–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; Xu, G.; Wang, H.; Vlachos, D.G. Chemoselective Hydrodeoxygenation of Carboxylic Acids to Hydrocarbons over Nitrogen-Doped Carbon-Alumina Hybrid Supported Iron Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 1564–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jagadeesh, R.V.; Natte, K.; Junge, H.; Beller, M. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene-Activated Iron-Oxide-Based Nanocatalysts for Selective Transfer Hydrogenation of Nitroarenes. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1526–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bai, Y.H.; Zheng, Y.J.; Wang, Z.; Hong, Q.; Liu, S.Q.; Shen, Y.F.; Zhang, Y.J. Metal-doped carbon nitrides: Synthesis, structure and applications. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 11876–11892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mukherjee, A.; Milstein, D. Homogeneous Catalysis by Cobalt and Manganese Pincer Complexes. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 11435–11469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, L.; Shao, Z.-J.; Cao, X.-M.; Hu, P. Insights into Different Products of Nitrosobenzene and Nitrobenzene Hydrogenation on Pd (111) under Realistic Reaction Conditions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 20337–20350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lu, G.; Sun, K.; Lin, Y.; Du, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wang, K.; Wang, P. Single-atomic-site iron on N-doped carbon for chemoselective reduction of nitroarenes. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wang, J.T.; Yu, X.C.; Shi, C.Y.; Lin, D.J.; Li, J.; Jin, H.L.; Chen, X.; Wang, S. Iron and Nitrogen Co-Doped Mesoporous Carbon-Based Heterogeneous Catalysts for Selective Reduction of Nitroarenes. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 3525–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, J.; Liu, J.L.; Zhou, H.J.; Fu, Y. Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenation of Furfural to Furfuryl Alcohol over Nitrogen-Doped Carbon-Supported Iron Catalysts. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 1339–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Fang, R.; Luque, R.; Li, Y. Efficient one-pot fructose to DFF conversion using sulfonated magnetically separable MOF-derived Fe3O4 (111) catalysts. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Stemmler, T.; Surkus, A.E.; Pohl, M.M.; Junge, K.; Beller, M. Iron-Catalyzed Synthesis of Secondary Amines: On the Way to Green Reductive Aminations. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 3012–3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Natte, K.; Neumann, H.; Jagadeesh, R.V.; Beller, M. Convenient iron-catalyzed reductive aminations without hydrogen for selective synthesis of N-methylamines. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Murugesan, K.; Senthamarai, T.; Sohail, M.; Sharif, M.; Kalevaru, N.V.; Jagadeesh, R.V. Stable and reusable nanoscale Fe2O3-catalyzed aerobic oxidation process for the selective synthesis of nitriles and primary amides. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sun, K.K.; Shan, H.B.; Neumann, H.; Lu, G.P.; Beller, M. Efficient iron single-atom catalysts for selective ammoxidation of alcohols to nitriles. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Chen, Z.; Song, J.; Peng, X.; Xi, S.; Liu, J.; Zhou, W.; Li, R.; Ge, R.; Liu, C.; Xu, H.; et al. Iron Single Atom Catalyzed Quinoline Synthesis. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2101382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Li, W.; Rabeah, J.; Bourriquen, F.; Yang, D.; Kreyenschulte, C.; Rockstroh, N.; Lund, H.; Bartling, S.; Surkus, A.-E.; Junge, K.; et al. Scalable and selective deuteration of (hetero)arenes. Nat. Chem. 2022, 14, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zhang, H.; Song, X.; Hu, D.; Zhang, W.; Jia, M. Iron-based nanoparticles embedded in a graphitic layer of carbon architectures as stable heterogeneous Friedel-Crafts acylation catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 3812–3819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sun, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wu, H.; Jin, Y.; Li, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhu, T.; Mao, H.; Liu, J.; et al. Simultaneously Realizing Rapid Electron Transfer and Mass Transport in Jellyfish-Like Mott-Schottky Nanoreactors for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1910482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustration for the introduction of iron species into carbon supports.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration for the introduction of iron species into carbon supports.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g001
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Fe@CN-Zn. (b) TEM and (c) SEM images of Fe@CN-Zn. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Fe@CN-Zn. (b) TEM and (c) SEM images of Fe@CN-Zn. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g002
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) The preparation of FeSAs/Fe2O3ACs/NPC from bimetallic MOF strategy. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (b) The preparation of Fe/Fe2O3@NnPC-700-x from Fe-based MOF strategy. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [54]. Copyright 2019, Wiley.
Figure 3. (a) The preparation of FeSAs/Fe2O3ACs/NPC from bimetallic MOF strategy. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (b) The preparation of Fe/Fe2O3@NnPC-700-x from Fe-based MOF strategy. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [54]. Copyright 2019, Wiley.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g003
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g004 550
Figure 4. Preparation of FeNC-CVD-750 via CVD strategy. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright 2021, Springer Nature.
Figure 4. Preparation of FeNC-CVD-750 via CVD strategy. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright 2021, Springer Nature.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g004
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) The control experiments on the synergistic catalysis between FeNx sites and Fe NPs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) The synthetic route of Fe-P-C. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [64]. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature.
Figure 5. (a) The control experiments on the synergistic catalysis between FeNx sites and Fe NPs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) The synthetic route of Fe-P-C. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [64]. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g005
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch001 550
Scheme 1. The role of Fe-Fe3C@NC-800 and H2O2 in mechanism exploration. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Scheme 1. The role of Fe-Fe3C@NC-800 and H2O2 in mechanism exploration. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch001
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) The H/D kinetic isotope effect (KIE) experiment results. Plots of reaction orders of (b) aniline and (c) benzyl alcohol. (d) The energy barriers for Fe2O3, Fe1-N4O1, Fe1-N5 and Fe1-N4S1 sites. (e) The relationship between positive charge density of Fe sites and energy barriers. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [66]. Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 6. (a) The H/D kinetic isotope effect (KIE) experiment results. Plots of reaction orders of (b) aniline and (c) benzyl alcohol. (d) The energy barriers for Fe2O3, Fe1-N4O1, Fe1-N5 and Fe1-N4S1 sites. (e) The relationship between positive charge density of Fe sites and energy barriers. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [66]. Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g006
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch002 550
Scheme 2. (a) Schematic diagram for the preparation of FeOx@NGr-C. (b) Oxidative dehydrogenation of tetrahydroquinolines catalyzed by FeOx@NGr-C. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [17]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society. (c) Fe2O3/NGr@C catalyzed synthesis of nitriles. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. Copyright 2015, Wiley.
Scheme 2. (a) Schematic diagram for the preparation of FeOx@NGr-C. (b) Oxidative dehydrogenation of tetrahydroquinolines catalyzed by FeOx@NGr-C. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [17]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society. (c) Fe2O3/NGr@C catalyzed synthesis of nitriles. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. Copyright 2015, Wiley.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch002
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Epoxidation of olefines with Fe-N/C catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [73]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. (b) Schematic diagram for the preparation of SAS-Fe.
Figure 7. (a) Epoxidation of olefines with Fe-N/C catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [73]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. (b) Schematic diagram for the preparation of SAS-Fe.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g007
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g008 550
Figure 8. DFT calculations of styrene epoxidation over SAS-Fe (* represents the active sites). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [74]. Copyright 2020, Wiley.
Figure 8. DFT calculations of styrene epoxidation over SAS-Fe (* represents the active sites). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [74]. Copyright 2020, Wiley.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g008
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) The proposed catalytic mechanism for FeN4/GN catalyzed transformation of benzene to phenol. (b) HAADF-STEM image of Fe-N-C and a turnover frequency (TOF) comparison of different iron sites on the Fe-N-C towards the oxidation of C-H bond. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [60]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Figure 9. (a) The proposed catalytic mechanism for FeN4/GN catalyzed transformation of benzene to phenol. (b) HAADF-STEM image of Fe-N-C and a turnover frequency (TOF) comparison of different iron sites on the Fe-N-C towards the oxidation of C-H bond. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [60]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g009
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g010 550
Figure 10. The preparation of Fe-N-C@Al2O3 and its application in the selective hydrodeoxygenation of carboxylic acids. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [79]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Figure 10. The preparation of Fe-N-C@Al2O3 and its application in the selective hydrodeoxygenation of carboxylic acids. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [79]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g010
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g011 550
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of Fe-phen/C preparation and its catalyzed reduction reaction of nitroaromatics. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [42]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of Fe-phen/C preparation and its catalyzed reduction reaction of nitroaromatics. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [42]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g011
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g012 550
Figure 12. The preparation process of FeSA@NC-20A. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [84]. Copyright 2022, Springer Nature.
Figure 12. The preparation process of FeSA@NC-20A. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [84]. Copyright 2022, Springer Nature.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g012
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch003 550
Scheme 3. NMC-Fe-catalyzed reduction coupling of nitroaromatics to form azo compounds.
Scheme 3. NMC-Fe-catalyzed reduction coupling of nitroaromatics to form azo compounds.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch003
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Selective hydrogenolysis of the C-O bonds in α-O-4 and β-O-4 lignin models over Fe-N/C catalyst.
Scheme 4. Selective hydrogenolysis of the C-O bonds in α-O-4 and β-O-4 lignin models over Fe-N/C catalyst.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch004
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g013 550
Figure 13. (a) One-pot synthesis of DFF from glucose. (b) Synthetic strategy for Fe/C-S catalysts (The illustration proposed the possible structure in the catalyst). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [87]. Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry.5.2. N-Alkylation Reactions.
Figure 13. (a) One-pot synthesis of DFF from glucose. (b) Synthetic strategy for Fe/C-S catalysts (The illustration proposed the possible structure in the catalyst). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [87]. Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry.5.2. N-Alkylation Reactions.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g013
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g014 550
Figure 14. Schematic diagram of the preparation of N, S-codoped Fe20-SA@NSC and its catalytic application for synthesizing N-alkylation of aromatic amines under solvent-free conditions. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [66]. Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 14. Schematic diagram of the preparation of N, S-codoped Fe20-SA@NSC and its catalytic application for synthesizing N-alkylation of aromatic amines under solvent-free conditions. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [66]. Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g014
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch005 550
Scheme 5. (a) The preparation of secondary amines catalyzed by Fe2O3/NGr@C. (b) The synthesis of N-methylated amines catalyzed by Fe2O3/NGr@C. The cascade reaction of nitroarenes and aldehydes for the synthesis of N-alkylation amines.
Scheme 5. (a) The preparation of secondary amines catalyzed by Fe2O3/NGr@C. (b) The synthesis of N-methylated amines catalyzed by Fe2O3/NGr@C. The cascade reaction of nitroarenes and aldehydes for the synthesis of N-alkylation amines.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch005
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch006 550
Scheme 6. (a) The tandem reaction of aldehydes and ammonia to prepare nitriles. (b) The synthesis of amides from the reaction of aldehydes and ammonia.
Scheme 6. (a) The tandem reaction of aldehydes and ammonia to prepare nitriles. (b) The synthesis of amides from the reaction of aldehydes and ammonia.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch006
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g015 550
Figure 15. (a) Synthesis of Fe1-N-C catalyst (The illustration presented the possible structure of the catalyst). (b) Fe1-N-C catalyzed ammoxidation of alcohols to form nitriles. #2 MPa air, 130 °C. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [91]. Copyright 2022, Springer Nature.
Figure 15. (a) Synthesis of Fe1-N-C catalyst (The illustration presented the possible structure of the catalyst). (b) Fe1-N-C catalyzed ammoxidation of alcohols to form nitriles. #2 MPa air, 130 °C. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [91]. Copyright 2022, Springer Nature.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g015
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g016 550
Figure 16. Schematic of the preparation of carbon-based single-atom catalyst from natural wood. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [92]. Copyright 2019, Wiley.
Figure 16. Schematic of the preparation of carbon-based single-atom catalyst from natural wood. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [92]. Copyright 2019, Wiley.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g016
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch007 550
Scheme 7. Fe-L1@EGO-900 catalyzed acceptorless dehydrogenation of (a) N-heterocycles, (b) amines and (c) alcohols.
Scheme 7. Fe-L1@EGO-900 catalyzed acceptorless dehydrogenation of (a) N-heterocycles, (b) amines and (c) alcohols.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 sch007
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g017 550
Figure 17. Selective deuteration of (hetero)arenes over Fe-Cellulose-1000. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [93]. Copyright 2022, Springer Nature.
Figure 17. Selective deuteration of (hetero)arenes over Fe-Cellulose-1000. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [93]. Copyright 2022, Springer Nature.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g017
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g018 550
Figure 18. Schematic diagram of the synthesis of Fe@CN-800 and its catalyzed acylation reaction. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [94]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 18. Schematic diagram of the synthesis of Fe@CN-800 and its catalyzed acylation reaction. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [94]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g018
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g019 550
Figure 19. Mechanism of N-H carbene insertion reaction catalyzed by Fe@CN-Zn. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Figure 19. Mechanism of N-H carbene insertion reaction catalyzed by Fe@CN-Zn. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Nanomaterials 12 03462 g019
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, F.; Zhu, F.; Ren, E.; Zhu, G.; Lu, G.-P.; Lin, Y. Recent Advances in Carbon-Based Iron Catalysts for Organic Synthesis. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193462

AMA Style

Wang F, Zhu F, Ren E, Zhu G, Lu G-P, Lin Y. Recent Advances in Carbon-Based Iron Catalysts for Organic Synthesis. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(19):3462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193462

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Fei, Fuying Zhu, Enxiang Ren, Guofu Zhu, Guo-Ping Lu, and Yamei Lin. 2022. "Recent Advances in Carbon-Based Iron Catalysts for Organic Synthesis" Nanomaterials 12, no. 19: 3462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193462

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop