Next Article in Journal
Production of Marine Probiotic Bacteria in a Cost-Effective Marine Media Based on Peptones Obtained from Discarded Fish By-Products
Previous Article in Journal
The Infant Gut Microbiota and Risk of Asthma: The Effect of Maternal Nutrition during Pregnancy and Lactation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 8
10.3390/microorganisms8081120
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mycorrhizal Fungi Isolated from Native Terrestrial Orchids from Region of La Araucanía, Southern Chile

by
Hector Herrera
1,
Tedy Sanhueza
1,
Rodolfo Martiarena
2,
Rafael Valadares
3,
Alejandra Fuentes
1 and
Cesar Arriagada
1,*
1
Laboratorio de Biorremediación, Departamento de Ciencias Forestales, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad de La Frontera, 4811230 Temuco, Chile
2
Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Montecarlo, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Av. el Libertador 2472, Montecarlo N3384, Misiones, Argentina
3
Instituto Tecnologico Vale, Rua Boaventura da Silva 955, Cep, 66050-090 Belém, PA, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(8), 1120; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081120
Submission received: 15 June 2020 / Revised: 6 July 2020 / Accepted: 7 July 2020 / Published: 25 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Microbe Interactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mycorrhizal interactions of orchids are influenced by several environmental conditions. Hence, knowledge of mycorrhizal fungi associated with orchids inhabiting different ecosystems is essential to designing recovery strategies for threatened species. This study analyzes the mycorrhizal associations of terrestrial orchids colonizing grassland and understory in native ecosystems of the region of La Araucanía in southern Chile. Mycorrhizal fungi were isolated from peloton-containing roots and identified based on the sequence of the ITS region. Their capacities for seed germination were also investigated. We detected Tulasnella spp. and Ceratobasidium spp. in the pelotons of the analyzed orchids. Additionally, we showed that some Ceratobasidium isolates effectively induce seed germination to differing degrees, unlike Tulasnella spp., which, in most cases, fail to achieve protocorm growth. This process may underline a critical step in the life cycle of Tulasnella-associated orchids, whereas the Ceratobasidium-associated orchids were less specific for fungi and were effectively germinated with mycorrhizal fungi isolated from adult roots.

1. Introduction

The symbiotic relationship established between orchids and their compatible mycorrhizal fungi is characterized by the dependence of the plant on fungal carbon (C) and other mineral nutrients essential to start the initial developmental stages [1,2,3]. These mechanisms are called mycoheterotrophy and describe the ability of the plant to obtain C from intracellular fungal hyphae [4]. Mycoheterotrophic processes are conserved in most orchids (accounting for roughly 30,000 species) with differing degrees of fungal exploitation, but are usually present at the seed germination stage, where an embryo without sufficient mineral nutrients to support morphogenesis needs the external supply of C from soil-borne fungi [5,6]. After the plantlet stage, orchids can retain mycoheterotrophy throughout their lives (fully mycoheterotrophic species), can change to autotrophy or can maintain both lifestyles (autotrophic and heterotrophic) in a process known as partial mycoheterotrophy or mixotrophy [4,7].
Mycorrhizal fungi associated with orchids are mainly included in the polyphyletic Rhizoctonia-like fungi complex, but recently the diversity of fungi establishing symbiotic interactions with orchids has grown considerably [8,9,10]. Additionally, differences in the fungi isolated from mycorrhizal roots can differ according to the root sections, sampling site, or plant stage (protocorm, plantlet or adult plant) [11,12,13]. A conserved characteristic is the formation of a symbiotic structure named peloton, which corresponds to hyphal coils where the metabolic interchange between symbionts occurs in both protocorm and mycorrhizal roots [1,14].
Chilean Orchidaceae are strictly terrestrial and require the nutrients obtained from the mycorrhizal fungi to germinate. After that, plants retain mycorrhizal structures in pelotons but photosynthetic tissues are also present. In the region of La Araucanía, almost 40% of the Chilean orchids are distributed in native and exotic forests, where it is expected that seeds have almost all of the symbiotic and nutritional requirements to germinate [15]. The soils in which these orchids grow are mainly of volcanic origin, with high organic matter content and high rates of nitrate and phosphate retention [16,17]. These conditions turn to orchid mycorrhizal fungi (OMF), as well as other microorganisms—essential symbionts—to achieve plant establishment and sustain growth when orchids defoliate or in winter where orchids live only by the reserves stored in their underground organs [8]. Culture-based methodologies have identified different Ceratobasidium spp. and Tulasnella spp. strains, as common OMF are associated with native terrestrial orchids [18,19,20]. These results showed that different OMF can be isolated from orchids from diverse geographic zones, as well as showing differences in their capabilities to induce seed germination under in vitro conditions [19,21,22].
Considering the dynamisms of the mycorrhizal associations of terrestrial orchids and the influence of the ecosystem conditions, we hypothesize that a narrow fungal diversity can be isolated from mycorrhizal tissues of native species from high-diversity microhabitats in the region of La Araucanía. Therefore, the aim of this work was to isolate and identify mycorrhizal fungi, able to promote the seed germination of terrestrial orchids, colonizing different microhabitats in the region of La Araucanía for their use in the germination of native threatened species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites and Sampling

Terrestrial orchids colonizing several sampling sites, as shown in Table 1, were found on different field trips between November 2018 and February 2019 at various locations in the region of La Araucanía. We focused the sampling at sites with high orchid populations. These orchids were found growing in the first 15 cm of the soil in native grasslands and in the understory of native or exotic forests. Only colonized roots segment (brownish root) from random plants were extracted and transported to the laboratory for further processing.
During sampling, we identified 13 terrestrial orchid species with flowers, which was key to perform identification according to the flower characteristics detailed in Novoa et al. [15].

2.2. Isolation and Characterization of Fungi

Compatible mycorrhizal fungi were isolated from peloton-containing roots following the methodology proposed by Valadares et al. [23] with modifications. The sampled roots were washed under running tap water and inspected for the presence of mycorrhizal segments. The root segments containing pelotons were cut transversely in minor fragments (1 cm) and superficially disinfected by immersion in a solution containing 95% ethanol, sodium hypochlorite (2.5% active chlorine) and sterile deionized water (1:1:8), and were rinsed five times in sterile deionized water under a laminar flow cabinet. The disinfected root segments were sliced transversely and the pelotons were separated with a sterile scalpel, discarding the velamen and non-peloton-containing root segments. The fragments containing mycorrhizal fungi were placed in Petri dishes with modified potato dextrose agar (PDA, plus streptomycin at 100 mM) and cultured for 14 days in darkness at 25 ± 1 °C or until fungal growth started. The purified strains were cultured in PDA and grouped according to the isolation source, phenotypic characteristic of the strains and the growth rate. Isolates that did not match the standard phenotypical characteristics of OMF were discarded.

2.3. Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analyses

The fungal strains were identified according to Valadares et al. [23] with minor modifications. Fungal isolates (ø 5 mm mycelia plugs) were incubated in 50 mL falcon tubes containing 1/7 potato dextrose broth under continuous agitation in an orbital shaker at 150 rpm for 21 days. The fungal mycelia were washed with sterile deionized water and centrifuged at 5000 rpm. The pellet underwent DNA extraction to perform molecular identification based on the nucleotide sequence of the internal transcriber spacers (ITS). Total DNA was extracted with the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The ITS region was amplified by using the ITS1 and ITS4 primers, according to White et al. [24]. The PCR cycle consists of initial denaturing at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturing at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 1 min each and final extension for 5 min at 72 °C. PCR products were checked in 2% agarose gel stained with GelRed® (Biotium Inc, Fremont, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed by Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea) and the sequences were submitted to the GenBank database.
The phylogenetic analyses of the sequences were performed according to Herrera et al. [19] with modifications. BLAST searches were performed to find the closest match in the database, accepting the species when the similarity between query and match was >99%, and the genus was accepted when similarity >95%. Multiple sequence alignments were performed using ClustalX with default conditions for gap opening and gap extension penalty [25]. Non-conserved regions were eliminated using the BioEdit software. Operative taxonomic units (OTUs) were assigned at 97% sequence similarity. Phylogenetic trees were constructed in the MEGA 6 software with the neighbor-joining method [26] and considering the sequences of mycorrhizal fungi isolated from native Chilean orchids, downloaded from the GenBank database [8]. Isolates that matched with OMF strains were stored at −80 °C in cryotubes with 10% Glycerol solution for further analyses.

2.4. Symbiotic Seed Germination

Symbiotic seed germination trials were performed to evaluate the effect of the fungal isolates in embryo growth and differentiation. The seeds from one mature capsule were superficially disinfected by immersion in ethanol 90% for one min, sodium hypochlorite 10% for two min and tree washes in sterile deionized water. The disinfected seeds were suspended in 30 mL sterile deionized water, and 300 µL of the suspension were dispersed in Petri dishes containing 25 mL of oatmeal agar (OMA plus streptomycin 100 mM). A fungal plug (ø 5 mm) was placed in the center of the plate containing OMA and incubated for a maximum of six months in darkness at 25 ± 1 °C. The effect of fungi on seed germination after 60 days was estimated, as reported in Vasudevan et al. [27] with modifications: stage 0, presence of embryo, without testa modification; stage 1, imbibed embryo, swollen, partially covered by testa; stage 2, enlarged seed without testa; stage 3, protocorms with rhizoids; stage 4, protocorms with pointed shoot apex and rhizoids; stage 5, emergence of first leaf. A germination index was calculated according to the formula proposed by Valadares et al. [23]:
GI = N 1 + N 2 × 2 + N 3 × 3 + N 4 × 4 + N 5 × 5 N 0 +   N 1 + N 2 + N 3 + N 4 + N 5
where GI = germination index of 100 evaluated seeds and N0, N1, N2, N3, N4 and N5 are the numbers of seeds at stages 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. The most effective strain for seed germination was deposited to the Chilean Collection of Microbial Genetic Resources at Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA), under the code 1030.
Quantitative data were analyzed by ANOVA. If the p value indicated significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05), post-hoc pair-wise comparisons were performed using the SD of means and Tukey’s multiple range test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All statistical tests were conducted using the R software (R Core Team 2018; https://www.R-project.org).

3. Results

During sampling, 13 terrestrial orchids belonging to the genera Chloraea, Gavilea and Codonorchis were found at the 11 different sampling sites considered for our analyses.
Mycorrhizal fungi were isolated from all orchid species at different frequencies, as shown in Table 2 and Table 3, and belonged to the order Cantharellales. The isolates FO1, FO2, FO3, FO4, FO5 and FO6 showed high similarity with different Ceratobasidium strains, as shown in Table 3, whereas the isolates FO7, FO8 and FO9 showed high similarity with diverse Tulasnella strains, as shown in Table 3. Regardless of the sampling site, Ceratobasidium spp. were the most frequent strains, accounting for approximately 90% of the isolates, especially in the orchids sampled near the coastal mountains. By contrast, orchids from the sites near the Andes mountains (i.e., Chloraea alpina, Chloraea magellanica and Gavilea lutea) showed less success in the isolation of mycorrhizal fungi, and the obtained isolates belonged mainly to Tulasnella spp.
At the sites with orchid species living sympatrically, we found sites with different mycorrhizal fungi colonizing the roots (i.e., orchids from Malalche), as shown in Figure 1 and Table 3, and sites with conserved mycorrhizal fungus (i.e., orchids from Las Raices), as shown in Figure 1 and Table 3.
For the phylogenetic analyses, we considered 178 sequences of mycorrhizal fungi isolated from native Chilean orchids available in the GenBank database (retrieved in October 2019). Such sequences were reduced to 27, based on the sequence similarity, and included in the phylogenetic analyses. The phylogenetic analyses showed that mycorrhizal fungi isolated from the orchid analyzed in this study belonged to four OTUs, three from Ceratobasidiaceae and one from Tulasnellaceae, as shown in Figure 2. In the Ceratobasidiaceae, the isolates FO2, FO3, FO4 and FO5 were assigned to OTU1, whereas the isolates FO6 and FO1 were assigned to OTU2 and OTU3, respectively. In the Tulasnellaceae, the isolates FO7, FO8 and FO9 were assigned to the OTU4.
To evaluate the effect of mycorrhizal fungi on seed germination, only a representative strain from each OTU was selected, as shown in Table 4. Almost 9 out of 12 orchids tested (except Chloraea gavilu which have no viable seeds) were germinated at different rates with almost one of the tested isolates, excluding the orchids Codonorchis lessonii, Gavilea araucana and Chloraea incisa, which had no effect on embryo growth, as shown in Table 4. The results showed that strain FO5 from OTU3 was the most effective isolate able to promote germination and differentiation, leading to the massive germination of Chloraea crispa seeds with protocorms up to stage 4 in some cases, as shown in Table 4. However, such germination seems to be species-specific, because some OTUs promote the germination of some species but fail in others, as shown in Table 4. The highest germination indexes were obtained in Chloraea crispa (GI = 3.26) and Chloraea collicensis (GI = 3.08). The symbiotic germination was significantly low in the Tulasnella-associated orchids, whereas the plants associated with Ceratobasidium strains had a higher germination index, as shown in Table 4. We also detected that, when protocorm development was complete, most of them failed to advance to the plantlet stage without changes in protocorm growth after three months of co-culture.

4. Discussion

Our study analyzes the presence of orchid mycorrhizal fungi in the roots of native terrestrial orchids growing in sites with a high density of orchid plants and tested their roles in seed germination. Despite mycorrhizal fungi associated with terrestrial orchids having been previously identified, such studies have reported a high diversity of OMF associated with the target plants, including mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal fungal endophytes, which agrees with the results obtained in our study [19,22,32]. Such diversity is influenced by the high diversity of forests present in the sampling sites, which certainly influences the symbiosis between orchids and fungi. Additionally, several exogenous mechanisms related to the ecosystem can influence the composition of endophytes, including the mycoheterotrophic strategy of the plant (autotrophic, fully or partially mycoheterotrophic), nutrient availability and surrounding plant species [33,34]. Similar to our study, Fracchia et al. [35] analyzed the potential of mycorrhizal fungi isolated from the terrestrial Andean orchids, Chloraea riojana and Aa achalensis, for promoting seed germination in threatened species. Our results showed that some of the Ceratobasidium isolates (especially from orchids sampled in coastal area grassland) can positively induce seed germination to different degrees despite the fact that the transition from protocorm to plantlet was difficult. Such mechanisms may reflect the need for associations with other microorganisms, which can influence the transition from protocorm to plantlet under field conditions, similar to what is reported for the terrestrial orchids Goodyera pubescens and Paphiopedilum appletonianum [11,36]. A previous study analyzing root fungal endophytes on native terrestrial orchids from south–central Chile have isolated and identified several fungal endophytes from Chilean orchids, including non-mycorrhizal fungi with roles in plant growth promotion, such as Chaetomium spp., Phialocephala spp. and Leptodontidium spp. [37,38]. Additionally, bacterial endophytes may positively interact to improve the nutrition and growth of mycoheterotrophic species, such as in the case of Arachnitis uniflora and Dendrobium catenatum [39,40]. Associations with such microorganisms are necessary for orchids, especially after the initial mycoheterotrophic stage, for them to become established in the ecosystem [39,41]. Our results showed that, after two months of symbiotic germination, the growing protocorms slow their growth, probably by the lack of appropriated soil-borne fungi able to contribute synergistically to plant growth. This diverse class of fungi can also be isolated from mycorrhizal tissues and can have positive roles in the orchid life cycle [9,42,43].
Despite the fact that asymbiotic seed germination has been tested in Andean terrestrial orchids with positive results, such processes are far from what occurs under natural conditions and the plants lack mycorrhizal benefits, such as nutrition, stress tolerance and defense against plant pathogens [44,45,46,47]. Our results agree with resent studies into mycorrhizal fungi associated with native orchids from Chile, which have shown contrasting abilities to induce seed germination under laboratory conditions, which denotes the crucial role of the OMF in providing the initial C to start germination and promote embryo growth and differentiation [19,22]. Hence, the use of mycorrhizal fungi in seed germination strategies is a crucial step to improve plant performance under field conditions. It would be very interesting to characterize other mycorrhizal fungi able to associate with germinated protocorms in the field, in order to better understand a crucial symbiotic step that will help improve the survival rates of plantlets derived from in vitro symbiotic germination assays.
Tulasnellaceae have been described as common mycorrhizal fungi associated with photosynthetic terrestrial orchids [33,48]. Such associations are conserved in terrestrial orchids from the southern Andes, where several Rhizoctonia-like strains can be isolated from native orchids [20,22,49]. Additionally, the phylogenetic analyses showed that some of the isolates have high similarity with other mycorrhizal fungi isolated from the orchids C. lessonii and Chloraea chrysantha, among others, as shown in Figure 2. Unlike our previous study, conducted in south–central Chile, where we identified Tulasnella spp. as the main mycorrhizal fungi associated with terrestrial orchids from the Maule region [19], in this study we identified Ceratobasidium spp. as the most frequent isolates and some strains were effective at inducing the seed germination of the related orchids species. Similar results were reported in the orchids Bipinnula volckmannii and Bipinnula apinnula, despite the fact that mycorrhizal fungi isolated from adult roots (Ceratobasidium spp.) mostly fail to induce embryo growth and differentiation, suggesting that mycorrhizal fungi isolated from adult plants may not be as effective at inducing the germination and development of the protocorms as mycorrhizal fungi isolated from protocorms, such as was the case in the results of our study in orchids from the sampling sites near the Andean mountains [21,50]. Furthermore, temporal variations in mycorrhizal fungi must to be considered by the effect of the habitat conditions as well as neighboring plant species during the vegetative or reproductive growth of some terrestrial orchids [51,52], a process that has certainly influenced the presence of fungi in the orchid roots analyzed in our study.
Symbiotic seed germination in orchids is a complex process, particularly in terrestrial orchids, where different factors affect germination success. Our results did not show a conserved mycorrhizal fungus capable of promoting embryo growth and differentiation, suggesting specific fungal partners for each orchid species, which is consistent with Meng et al. [50], who showed that mycorrhizal fungi isolated from advanced seedlings are more efficient at inducing seed germination than fungi isolated from adult mycorrhizal roots of the terrestrial orchid Arundina graminifolia, a process that may explain the low germination rates obtained in our studies, especially in the plants from the Andean sites.
Mycorrhizal fungi associated with terrestrial orchids have demonstrated a direct influence on the distribution of orchid populations. McCormick et al. [53] reported that the dependence of orchids on mycorrhizal fungi can affect the distribution range of orchid species and it is necessary to know which orchids need particular mycorrhizal fungi for germination and plantlet development and whether there is an influence from other fungal endophytes in plantlet development. Such variable dependence on fungi may reflect a dynamism in the association of orchids with fungi at different plant stages (i.e., protocorm plantlet and adulthood) and certainly influences the presence of orchid plants at sites with abundant populations. Hence, it is crucial to know the mycorrhizal fungi associated with native orchids in specific microhabitats to develop safeguarding strategies for endemic orchids under imminent threat [8].

5. Conclusions

In this study we isolated and characterized mycorrhizal fungi associated with thirteen terrestrial orchids from native ecosystems in the region of La Araucanía, southern Chile, which has expanded the knowledge of mycorrhizal associations with native orchids in Chile. We detected that mycorrhizal fungi belonging to Ceratobasidiaceae were the most frequently isolated and effective at promoting seed germination to differing degrees. Such isolated microorganisms can be stored and implemented in germination programs of threatened species involving compatible mycorrhizal fungi.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.H. and C.A.; methodology, H.H. and T.S.; validation, H.H. and C.A.; formal analysis, H.H. and R.M.; investigation, H.H.; data curation, H.H. and C.A.; writing—original draft preparation, H.H. and R.V.; writing—review and editing, A.F. and C.A.; funding acquisition, H.H. and C.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FONDO NACIONAL DE DESARROLLO CIENTÍFICO Y TECNOLÓGICO, grant number 1170931 to C.A. and 3200134 to H.H.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Valadares, R.; Perotto, S.; Santos, E.; Lambais, M. Proteome changes in Oncidium sphacelatum (Orchidaceae) at different trophic stages of symbiotic germination. Mycorrhiza 2014, 24, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dearnaley, J.D.; Cameron, D.D. Nitrogen transport in the orchid mycorrhizal symbiosis-further evidence for a mutualistic association. New Phytol. 2016, 213, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fochi, V.; Chitarra, W.; Kohler, A.; Voyron, S.; Singan, V.; Lindquist, E.; Barry, K.; Girlanda, M.; Grigoriev, I.; Martin, F. Fungal and plant gene expression in the Tulasnella calospora–Serapias vomeracea symbiosis provides clues about nitrogen pathways in orchid mycorrhizas. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Merckx, V.S. Mycoheterotrophy: An introduction. In Mycoheterotrophy: The Biology of Plants Living on Fungi; Merckx, V., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  5. Roberts, D.L.; Dixon, K.W. Orchids. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18, R325–R329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Dearnaley, J.; Perotto, S.; Selosse, M.A. Structure and development of orchid mycorrhizas. Mol. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis 2016, 63–86. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lallemand, F.; Figura, T.; Damesin, C.; Fresneau, C.; Griveau, C.; Fontaine, N.; Zeller, B.; Selosse, M.-A. Mixotrophic orchids do not use photosynthates for perennial underground organs. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Herrera, H.; García-Romera, I.; Meneses, C.; Pereira, G.; Arriagada, C. Orchid Mycorrhizal Interactions on the Pacific Side of the Andes from Chile. A Review. J. Soil Sci. Plant. Nutr. 2019, 19, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jiang, J.; Zhang, K.; Cheng, S.; Nie, Q.; Zhou, S.-x.; Chen, Q.; Zhou, J.; Zhen, X.; ting Li, X.; wen Zhen, T. Fusarium oxysporum KB-3 from Bletilla striata: An orchid mycorrhizal fungus. Mycorrhiza 2019, 29, 531–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ogura-Tsujita, Y.; Gebauer, G.; Hashimoto, T.; Umata, H.; Yukawa, T. Evidence for novel and specialized mycorrhizal parasitism: The orchid Gastrodia confusa gains carbon from saprotrophic Mycena. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 276, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. McCormick, M.K.; Whigham, D.F.; Sloan, D.; O’Malley, K.; Hodkinson, B. Orchid–fungus fidelity: A marriage meant to last? Ecology 2006, 87, 903–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cowden, C.C.; Shefferson, R.P. Diversity of root-associated fungi of mature Habenaria radiata and Epipactis thunbergii colonizing manmade wetlands in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. Mycoscience 2013, 54, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bidartondo, M.I.; Burghardt, B.; Gebauer, G.; Bruns, T.D.; Read, D.J. Changing partners in the dark: Isotopic and molecular evidence of ectomycorrhizal liaisons between forest orchids and trees. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 271, 1799–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kuga, Y.; Sakamoto, N.; Yurimoto, H. Stable isotope cellular imaging reveals that both live and degenerating fungal pelotons transfer carbon and nitrogen to orchid protocorms. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Novoa, P.; Espejo, J.; Cisternas, M.; Rubio, M.; Dominguez, E. Guía de Campo de las Orquídeas Chilenas, 2nd ed.; Corporación Chilena de la Madera (CORMA): Santiago, Chile, 2015; Available online: https://www.corma.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/guia-de-campo-orquideas-2015-web.pdf (accessed on 19 December 2019).
  16. Matus, F.; Rumpel, C.; Neculman, R.; Panichini, M.; Mora, M. Soil carbon storage and stabilisation in andic soils: A review. Catena 2014, 120, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Matus, F.; Stock, S.; Eschenbach, W.; Dyckmans, J.; Merino, C.; Nájera, F.; Köster, M.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Dippold, M.A. Ferrous Wheel Hypothesis: Abiotic nitrate incorporation into dissolved organic matter. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 2019, 245, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Atala, C.; Pereira, G.; Romero, C.; Muñoz-Tapia, L.; Vargas, R.; Suz, L.M. Orchidiod fungi of the form-genus Rhizoctonia associated with the roots of Chloraea cuneata Lindl. From Araucanía, Chile. Gayana Bot. 2015, 72, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Herrera, H.; Valadares, R.; Contreras, D.; Bashan, Y.; Arriagada, C. Mycorrhizal compatibility and symbiotic seed germination of orchids from the Coastal Range and Andes in south central Chile. Mycorrhiza 2017, 27, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mujica, M.I.; Saez, N.; Cisternas, M.; Manzano, M.; Armesto, J.J.; Pérez, F. Relationship between soil nutrients and mycorrhizal associations of two Bipinnula species (Orchidaceae) from central Chile. Ann. Bot. 2016, 118, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Claro, A.; Mujica, M.I.; Cisternas, M.; Armesto, J.J.; Perez, F. Low mycorrhizal diversity in the endangered and rare orchids Bipinnula volckmannii and B. apinnula of Central Chile. Symbiosis 2019, 80, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Steinfort, U.; Verdugo, G.; Besoain, X.; Cisternas, M.A. Mycorrhizal association and symbiotic germination of the terrestrial orchid Bipinnula fimbriata (Poepp.) Johnst (Orchidaceae). Flora 2010, 205, 811–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Valadares, R.B.; Pereira, M.C.; Otero, J.T.; Cardoso, E.J. Narrow fungal mycorrhizal diversity in a population of the orchid Coppensia doniana. Biotropica 2012, 44, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc. Guide Methods Appl. 1990, 18, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  25. Larkin, M.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.; McWilliam, H. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Vasudevan, R.; van Staden, J. Fruit harvesting time and corresponding morphological changes of seed integuments influence in vitro seed germination of Dendrobium nobile Lindl. Plant. Growth Regul. 2010, 60, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jurado, V.; Porca, E.; Cuezva, S.; Fernandez-Cortes, A.; Sanchez-Moral, S.; Sáiz-Jiménez, C. Fungal outbreak in a show cave. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 3632–3638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pandey, M.; Sharma, J.; Taylor, D.L.; Yadon, V.L. A narrowly endemic photosynthetic orchid is non-specific in its mycorrhizal associations. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22, 2341–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Waterman, R.J.; Bidartondo, M.; Stofberg, J.; Combs, J.K.; Gebauer, G.; Savolainen, V.; Barraclough, T.G.; Pauw, A. The effects of above-and belowground mutualisms on orchid speciation and coexistence. Am. Nat. 2011, 177, E54–E68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Martos, F.; Munoz, F.; Pailler, T.; Kottke, I.; Gonneau, C.; Selosse, M.A. The role of epiphytism in architecture and evolutionary constraint within mycorrhizal networks of tropical orchids. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21, 5098–5109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fracchia, S.; Aranda-Rickert, A.; Flachsland, E.; Terada, G.; Sede, S. Mycorrhizal compatibility and symbiotic reproduction of Gavilea australis, an endangered terrestrial orchid from south Patagonia. Mycorrhiza 2014, 24, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ogura-Tsujita, Y.; Yokoyama, J.; Miyoshi, K.; Yukawa, T. Shifts in mycorrhizal fungi during the evolution of autotrophy to mycoheterotrophy in Cymbidium (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, 1158–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Griffin, E.A.; Harrison, J.G.; McCormick, M.K.; Burghardt, K.T.; Parker, J.D. Tree Diversity Reduces Fungal Endophyte Richness and Diversity in a Large-Scale Temperate Forest Experiment. Diversity 2019, 11, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Fracchia, S.; Aranda-Rickert, A.; Rothen, C.; Sede, S. Associated fungi, symbiotic germination and in vitro seedling development of the rare Andean terrestrial orchid Chloraea Rioja. Flora 2016, 224, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tsavkelova, E.A.; Cherdyntseva, T.A.; Botina, S.G.; Netrusov, A.I. Bacteria associated with orchid roots and microbial production of auxin. Microbiol. Res. 2007, 162, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khan, A.L.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Kim, Y.-H.; Waqas, M.; Hamayun, M.; Kamran, M.; Lee, I.-J. Role of endophyte Chaetomium globosum LK4 in growth of Capsicum annuum by producion of gibberellins and indole acetic acid. Pak. J. Bot. 2012, 44, 1601–1607. [Google Scholar]
  38. Fernando, A.A.; Currah, R.S. A comparative study of the effects of the root endophytes Leptodontidium orchidicola and Phialocephala fortinii (Fungi Imperfecti) on the growth of some subalpine plants in culture. Can. J. Bot. 1996, 74, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, X.; Yam, T.W.; Meng, Q.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, P.; Wu, H.; Wang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Song, X. The dual inoculation of endophytic fungi and bacteria promotes seedlings growth in Dendrobium catenatum (Orchidaceae) under in vitro culture conditions. Plant. Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2016, 126, 523–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Herrera, H.; Novotná, A.; Ortiz, J.; Soto, J.; Arriagada, C. Isolation and identification of plant growth-promoting bacteria from rhizomes of Arachnitis uniflora, a fully mycoheterotrophic plant in southern Chile. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 2020, 149, 103512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Herrera, H.; Sanhueza, T.; Novotná, A.; Charles, T.C.; Arriagada, C. Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria from mycorrhizal tissues of terrestrial orchids from southern Chile. Diversity 2020, 12, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Fracchia, F.; Vanesa, S.; Eduardo, F.; Graciela, T. Symbiotic seed germination and protocorm development of Aa achalensis Schltr., a terrestrial orchid endemic from Argentina. Mycorrhiza 2014, 24, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zimmerman, E.; Peterson, L. Effect of a dark septate fungal endophyte on seed germination and protocorm development in a terrestrial orchid. Symbiosis 2007, 43, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pereira, G.; Albornoz, V.; Romero, C.; Lara, S.; Sánchez-Olate, M.; Ríos, D.; Atala, C. Asymbiotic germination in three Chloraea species (Orchidaceae) from Chile. Gayana Bot. 2017, 74, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Romero, C.; Cuba-Díaz, M.; Silva, R. In vitro culture of Chloraea gavilu Lindl., an endemic terrestrial orchid from Chile. Plant Biosyst. 2018, 152, 612–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Herrera, H.; Valadares, R.; Oliveira, G.; Fuentes, A.; Almonacid, L.; do Nascimento, S.V.; Bashan, Y.; Arriagada, C. Adaptation and tolerance mechanisms developed by mycorrhizal Bipinnula fimbriata plantlets (Orchidaceae) in a heavy metal-polluted ecosystem. Mycorrhiza 2018, 28, 651–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  48. Jacquemyn, H.; Duffy, K.J.; Selosse, M.-A. Biogeography of orchid mycorrhizas. In Biogeography of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis; Tedersoo, L., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 159–177. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pereira, G.; Suz, L.M.; Albornoz, V.; Romero, C.; García, L.; Leiva, V.; Atala, C. Hongos micorrícicos asociados a Codonorchis lessonii (Brongn.) Lindl., una orquídea terrestre de Chile. Gayana Bot. 2018, 75, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Meng, Y.-Y.; Zhang, W.-L.; Selosse, M.-A.; Gao, J.-Y. Are fungi from adult orchid roots the best symbionts at germination? A case study. Mycorrhiza 2019, 29, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Oja, J.; Kohout, P.; Tedersoo, L.; Kull, T.; Kõljalg, U. Temporal patterns of orchid mycorrhizal fungi in meadows and forests as revealed by 454 pyrosequencing. New Phytol. 2015, 2015. 205, 1608–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ercole, E.; Adamo, M.; Rodda, M.; Gebauer, G.; Girlanda, M.; Perotto, S. Temporal variation in mycorrhizal diversity and carbon and nitrogen stable isotope abundance in the wintergreen meadow orchid Anacamptis Morio. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1308–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. McCormick, M.K.; Whigham, D.F.; Canchani-Viruet, A. Mycorrhizal fungi affect orchid distribution and population dynamics. New Phytol. 2018, 219, 1207–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 08 01120 g001 550
Figure 1. Sampling sites and presence of the analyzed orchid plants in Araucanía Region in southern Chile.
Figure 1. Sampling sites and presence of the analyzed orchid plants in Araucanía Region in southern Chile.
Microorganisms 08 01120 g001
Microorganisms 08 01120 g002 550
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood tree of ITS sequences of orchid mycorrhizal fungi isolated from orchid from Araucanía Region, Southern Chile (in bold). The tree also includes mycorrhizal fungi isolated from other Chilean native orchids.
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood tree of ITS sequences of orchid mycorrhizal fungi isolated from orchid from Araucanía Region, Southern Chile (in bold). The tree also includes mycorrhizal fungi isolated from other Chilean native orchids.
Microorganisms 08 01120 g002
Table
Table 1. List of plant and locations of orchids sampled in the experiments.
Table 1. List of plant and locations of orchids sampled in the experiments.
SpeciesLocationSample SiteNumber of Root Samples
Chloraea alpinaIcalma (38°46′36.4″ S 71°09′44.5″ W)Grassland4
Chloraea barbataImperial (38°43′31.5″ S 72°59′45.0″ W)
Cholchol (38°36′40.9″ S 72°49′16.0″ W)
Malalche (38°34′53.0″ S 72°56′01.8″ W)		Grassland
Grassland
Grassland		4
4
4
Chloraea collicensisImperial (38°43′31.5″ S 72°59′45.0″ W)
Cholchol (38°36′40.9″ S 72°49′16.0″ W)
Malalche (38°34′53.0″ S 72°56′01.8″ W)		Grassland
Grassland
Grassland		4
4
4
Chloraea crispaMelipeuco (38°50′12.2″ S 71°39′36.8″ W)
Lautaro (38°35′15.1″ S 72°26′52.1″ W)		Wayside
Rock		4
4
Chloraea gaviluMalalche (38°34′01.7″ S 72°56′57.3″ W)Understory4
Chloraea grandifloraLas raices (38°27′34.7″ S 71°30′09.1″ W)Understory2
Chloraea incisaMalalche (38°34′01.1″ S 72°57′21.7″ W)Understory1
Chloraea longipetalaBlanco sur (38°30′40.5″ S 71°51′01.5″ W)
Lumaco (38°10′06.2″ S 72°51′42.2″ W)		Wayside
Wayside		2
1
Chloraea magellanicaLas raices (38°27′34.7″ S 71°30′09.1″ W)
Galletue (38°37′05.8″ S 71°26′02.4″ W)		Grassland
Understory		3
3
Chloraea philippiMalalche (38°34′05.5″ S 72°57′17.2″ W)Understory2
Codonorchis lessoniiMelipeuco (38°45′02.8″ S 71°36′09.8″ W)
Las Raíces (38°27′33.5″ S 71°30′35.4″ W)		Understory
Understory		2
2
Gavilea araucanaMalalche (38°33′38.5″ S 72°56′19.5″ W)
Carahue (38°41′32.2″ S 73°10′23.8″ W)
Lumaco (38°10′06.2″ S 72°51′42.2″ W)		Understory
Wayside
Wayside		2
1
4
Gavilea luteaLas Raíces (38°27′32.6″ S 71°30′26.3″ W)
Melipeuco (38°45′02.8″ S 71°36′09.8″ W)		Understory
Understory		3
2
Table
Table 2. Occurrence and morphological characteristics of the root fungal isolates associated to terrestrial orchids from the region of La Araucanía, Southern Chile.
Table 2. Occurrence and morphological characteristics of the root fungal isolates associated to terrestrial orchids from the region of La Araucanía, Southern Chile.
IsolateNumber of StrainsIsolation FrequencyGrowth Rate
(m day−1)		Color
FO160.087.5 ± 2.2White/cream
FO2170.246.2 ± 1.5White
FO3110.156.8 ± 3.0White
FO460.085.3 ± 0.4White
FO580.116.0 ± 1.4White
FO6130.185.7 ± 0.6White
FO740.063.5 ± 0.2Light brown
FO850.072.8 ± 0.1Light brown
FO920.034.1 ± 0.4Light brown
Table
Table 3. Molecular identification of culturable mycorrhizal fungi isolated from peloton-containing roots, based on the closest match in the GenBank database.
Table 3. Molecular identification of culturable mycorrhizal fungi isolated from peloton-containing roots, based on the closest match in the GenBank database.
Fungal IsolateGenBank Accession NumberIsolation SourceClose Relatives
(Accession Number)		Identity
(%)		SourceReference
FO1MK792996Gavilea araucana, Chloraea gaviluCeratobasidium sp.
FN812725		99AirJurado et al. [28]
FO2MK792998G. araucana, Chloraea longipetala, Chloraea barbata, Chloraea collicensisUncultured Ceratobasidiaceae
JQ972130		100Orchid rootPandey et al. [29]
FO3MK792999Chloraea philippi, Chloraea crispa, C. barbataUncultured Ceratobasidiaceae
JQ972130		100Orchid rootPandey et al. [29]
FO4MK793000Chloraea collicensisUncultured Ceratobasidiaceae
JQ972129		100Orchid rootPandey et al. [29]
FO5MK793001C. crispa, C. longipetalaUncultured Ceratobasidiaceae
JQ972130		100Orchid rootPandey et al. [29]
FO6MK793002C. philippi, G. araucana, Chloraea incisaUncultured Ceratobasidiaceae
FJ788720		97Orchid mycorrhizal root sectionWaterman et al. [30]
FO7MK793003C. collicensisUncultured Tulasnellaceae
JF691471		99Orchid rootMartos et al. [31]
FO8MK793004Gavilea lutea, Chloraea alpina, Codonorchis lessoniiTulasnella sp.
KP278150		98Chloraea gaviluHerrera et al. [19]
FO9MK793005Chloraea grandiflora, Chloraea magellanicaTulasnella sp.
KJ713701		100Gavilea australisFracchia et al. [32]
Table
Table 4. Symbiotic germination index (GI) for the four tested isolated fungal strains on twelve orchid seeds over 60 days of in vitro culture. Results are means ± standard deviation for n = 5. Differrent letters in the GI of each OTU are significantly different according to Tukey’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Symbiotic germination index (GI) for the four tested isolated fungal strains on twelve orchid seeds over 60 days of in vitro culture. Results are means ± standard deviation for n = 5. Differrent letters in the GI of each OTU are significantly different according to Tukey’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Orchid SpeciesControlOTU1
Ceratobasidium sp.		OTU2
Ceratobasidium sp.		OTU3
Ceratobasidium sp.		OTU4
Tulasnella sp.
Chloraea alpine00.02 ± 0.0 c0.07 ± 0.0 d01.76 ± 0.2 a
Chloraea magellanica000.05 ± 0.0 d00.07 ± 0.0 cd
Chloraea grandiflora00.03 ± 0.0 c0.05 ± 0.0 d0.02 ± 0.0 d0
Gavilea lutea00001.27 ± 0.3 b
Codonorchis lessonii00000
Gavilea araucana00000
Chloraea longipetala00.05 ± 0.0 c0.12 ± 0.0 c1.83 ± 0.3 c0
Chloraea barbata01.67 ± 0.3 a1.96 ± 0.0 b2.71 ± 0.2 b0.26 ± 0.1 c
Chloraea collicensis01.72 ± 0.2 a1.84 ± 0.2 b3.08 ± 0.2 a0.07 ± 0.0 cd
Chloraea crispa0.04 ± 0.0 ns1.97 ± 0.4 a2.39 ± 0.2 a3.26 ± 0.1 a1.17 ± 0.2 b
Chloraea incisa0.00000
Chloraea philippi0.05 ± 0.0 ns0.54 ± 0.0 b0.28 ± 0.1 c0.04 ± 0.0 d0.03 ± 0.0 d
ns Non-significant.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Herrera, H.; Sanhueza, T.; Martiarena, R.; Valadares, R.; Fuentes, A.; Arriagada, C. Mycorrhizal Fungi Isolated from Native Terrestrial Orchids from Region of La Araucanía, Southern Chile. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081120

AMA Style

Herrera H, Sanhueza T, Martiarena R, Valadares R, Fuentes A, Arriagada C. Mycorrhizal Fungi Isolated from Native Terrestrial Orchids from Region of La Araucanía, Southern Chile. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(8):1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081120

Chicago/Turabian Style

Herrera, Hector, Tedy Sanhueza, Rodolfo Martiarena, Rafael Valadares, Alejandra Fuentes, and Cesar Arriagada. 2020. "Mycorrhizal Fungi Isolated from Native Terrestrial Orchids from Region of La Araucanía, Southern Chile" Microorganisms 8, no. 8: 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081120

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop