Next Article in Journal
Corrosion Behavior in 3.5% NaCl Solutions of γ-TiAl Processed by Electron Beam Melting Process
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of 4-Benzyloxybenzaldehyde-4-methyl-3-thiosemicarbazone (Containing Sulphur and Nitrogen Donor Atoms) and Its Cd(II) Complex
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Additions of Ceramic Nanoparticles and Gas-Dynamic Treatment on Al Casting Alloys

1
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel
2
Electrometallurgical Faculty, the National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine, 4 Gagarina Ave., Dnepropetrovsk 49600, Ukraine
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2015, 5(4), 2277-2288; https://doi.org/10.3390/met5042277
Submission received: 18 October 2015 / Revised: 24 November 2015 / Accepted: 27 November 2015 / Published: 3 December 2015

Abstract

:
In recent years, improving the mechanical properties of metals has become the main challenge in the modern materials and metallurgical industry. An alloying process is usually used to achieve advanced performance of metals. This paper, however, describes an alternative approach. Modification with ceramic nanoparticles, gas-dynamic treatment (GDT) and a combined treatment were investigated on a hypoeutectic Al-Si A356 alloy. Microstructural studies revealed the refinement of coarse α-Al grains and the formation of distributed eutectic Si particles. Subsequent testing of the mechanical properties revealed improvement after applying each of the treatments. The best results were obtained after modification with TiCN nanoparticles followed by GDT; the tensile strength and elongation of the A356 alloys increased by 18% and 19%, respectively.

1. Introduction

In the last two decades, the materials industry has become more interested in the production of Al alloys due to their advanced properties, such as high thermal and electrical conductivity and relatively low density, 1/3 of steel [1]. Unfortunately, Al alloys show relatively low mechanical properties compared to those of steel. Traditionally, strengthening of Al is achieved by well-known alloying processes, involving the addition of certain elements to affect the final properties of the metals. This technology has become increasingly less efficient due to the large amount of expensive materials used to obtain the desirable technological characteristics.
Aluminum casting alloy A356 is widely used in the automotive and aerospace industries, as it preserves relatively high strength at elevated temperatures. Therefore, improvement of this alloys’ mechanical properties has been extensively investigated. A356 alloys’ strength is conventionally improved by the alloying technique [2,3,4,5,6,7] using master alloys, by heat treatment or by applying ultrasound, which affects the crystallization process of the solidifying alloy [8,9,10]. Some studies have shown that the addition of TiB2 particles causes grain refinement of the alloy [11,12]. Other studies have demonstrated A356 modification though rear-earth metals, such as Er, La and Ce [13,14].
Modification processes can be performed with different modifiers. According to Rebinder, two types of modification processes can be distinguished [15]:
  • Inoculation: modification by refractory particles, which must have a higher melting point than the molten metal. The modification of Al alloy can be achieved using the following metals and compounds: Ti, Zr, V, TiC, TiB2, etc.
  • Limitation: modification by surface-active elements, which must have a relatively high solubility limit in the modified phase. The modification of Al alloy can be achieved using the following elements: B, Sr, Sb, Ba, etc.
An effective method for improving the mechanical properties of Al alloys employs solidification under severely non-equilibrium conditions, as was illustrated in [16]. Here, pressure was applied during the solidification process, and it was found that the higher the applied pressure, the more elevated the crystallization rate. Guan et al. showed improvement of Al-Si A356 alloy by applying squeeze casting, which is a type of molten metal solidification under pressure [17]. Selivorstov et al. noted the same behavior applying to Al-Si hypereutectic alloy [18].
Similarly, improvement of the mechanical properties of metals can be achieved using a method involving nano-sized particles into the melt. It is expected that nano-sized particles formed in the metal would cause some change in mechanical properties, but that its influence would be “milder” and more balanced. Several published studies indicate that the mechanical properties of Al alloy A356 can be improved by additions of Al2O3, TiB2 or TiC nanoparticles during the casting process [19,20,21].
The aim of the present work is to develop a combined technology using modification with nano-sized particles and gas-dynamic treatment (GDT) during the solidification of an Al-Si A356 alloy in a casting mold and to analyze its effectiveness.

2. Experimental Section

Al-Si alloy A356 (Rheinfelden Alloys GmbH, Rheinfelden, Germany) was used as the bulk material. The composition of the alloy is given in Table 1.
First, to examine the effect of GDT, a 1.2 kg portion of ingots of alloy A356 was melted in a Carbolyte ELF 11/14B (Hope, UK) laboratory furnace and superheated to 720 °C. This was followed by the addition of NaCl, KCl and a NITRAL C 19 (Foseco)-containing powder to prevent the alloy from oxidizing. The melt was poured into a special GDT system (Figure 1); during its solidification, inert gas argon was fed from the initial pressure of 0.1–0.2 MPa up to 1.3–1.4 MPa, until the alloy was solidified completely. Finally, the obtained casts were aged according to the T6 heat treatment procedure; first, the solid solution was heat-treated at 538ºC for 8h, then it was water-quenched followed by an artificially aging at 160ºC for 4h
Table 1. Chemical composition of Al-Si A356.
Table 1. Chemical composition of Al-Si A356.
ComponentSiMgFeTiOthersAl
wt. %7.0200.3540.1210.1250.1Balance
Figure 1. Gas-dynamic treatment (GDT) system used in the research. 1, inert gas (Ar) cylinder; 2, valve; 3, 4, non-return valve; 5, gas pipe; 6, solidifying container cover; 7, solidifying container.
Figure 1. Gas-dynamic treatment (GDT) system used in the research. 1, inert gas (Ar) cylinder; 2, valve; 3, 4, non-return valve; 5, gas pipe; 6, solidifying container cover; 7, solidifying container.
Metals 05 02277 g001
Next, industrial experiments were performed. A 200 kg portion of Al-Si alloy A356 ingots was melted in an industrial electric resistance furnace, superheated to 680 °C and subjected to the addition of DEGASAL T200 (Schaefer Chemiche Fabrik, Hennef (Sieg), Germany). Then, a modifier containing 0.01 wt. % titanium carbonitride (TiCN) nanoparticles (Neomat Co., Riga, Latvia; N, 9.7 wt. %; C, 9.5 wt. %; crystallite size, ~50 nm) was added to the molten metal, and the mixture was kept at 680 °C for 40–60 s. The melt was poured and aged for a given period of time, after which inert Ar gas was fed until the metal fully solidified.
To examine the shrinkage, one treated (after the addition of nanoparticles and the GDT process) specimen and one untreated specimen were poured into preheated cylindrical cast iron molds.

Characterization Techniques

Microstructure studies were carried out using a Zeiss Axiolab optical microscope by Zeiss GmbH, Jena, Germany. Specimens of the A356 casting alloy were analyzed using Keller-Wilcox’s reagent (3 mL HCl, 5 mL HNO3, 1 mL HF and 190 mL H2O) to investigate their microstructures.
The mechanical properties were measured by a P100 testing machine (Ukon Tans Ltd., Lubny, Ukraine) according to ASTM B 108-01. The modified alloys produced were compared to unmodified alloys cast under the same conditions. Hardness tests were conducted on Al alloys by a TS-B-C2 static hardness tester (NOVOTEST Ltd., Novomoskovs’k, Ukraine) before and after treatment.
The phases were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis using a PANalytical X’Pert Pro X-ray powder diffractometer (Almelo, The Netherlands) at 40 kV and 40 mA. The XRD patterns were recorded in the 2Θ range from 20°–100° (the step size was 0.03°, and the time per step was 3 s).
The aluminum strengthening mechanism was determined from measurements taken on a JEOL JEM 2010 high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM, Tokyo, Japan). Specially-prepared disks with a diameter of 3 mm were punched out of thinned Al and were subsequently jet-polished using a solution of 30% nitric acid and 70% methanol at −20 °C and 10 V.

3. Results and Discussion

The effect of GDT on the crystallization of A356 alloys is not limited only to refinement of the structural components. It also promotes an increase in the mutual solubility of the alloy components and, as a result, alters the eutectic concentration of the alloys.
Figure 2 shows the Al-Si phase diagram, which was obtained after GDT was applied (dashed lines). Mutual solubility of the alloys increases as the result of the diffusion rate decrease during the liquid-solid phase transformation. The diagram was constructed using the Schröder equation [22]:
ln   X = Q A 2 ( 1 T A 1 T )
ln ( 1 X ) = Q B 2 ( 1 T B 1 T )
where X is the molar concentration of component A, (1 − X) is the molar concentration of component B, QA is the latent heat of fusion of component A, QB is the latent heat of fusion of component B, TA is the melting point of component A, TB is the melting point of component B and T is the current melting point.
In the calculations, it was assumed that the melting point of Al increases by 6.3 × 10−3 °C per pressure of 1 atm and that the melting point of Si decreases by 5.8 × 10−3 °C per pressure of 1 atm [23]. The resultant Al-Si phase diagram is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Al-Si phase diagram. The solid lines comprise the equilibrium phase diagram [24]. The dashed lines were added to the diagram after GDT application. This is a new image obtained by authors; new dashed lines build on a known phase diagram.
Figure 2. Al-Si phase diagram. The solid lines comprise the equilibrium phase diagram [24]. The dashed lines were added to the diagram after GDT application. This is a new image obtained by authors; new dashed lines build on a known phase diagram.
Metals 05 02277 g002
The calculations performed showed that the displacement of the eutectic point toward pure Si on the Al-Si diagram amounts to 0.003% per atmosphere.
Figure 3 shows the microstructure of А356 alloy before and after GDT. It is clearly shown that the GDT process refines the disoriented, elongated α-Al grains into fine equiaxed grains with homogeneously-distributed eutectic Si particles. The breaking of the silicon network allows a decrease in the stress-concentration factor. Moreover, formed new Si particles prevent dislocation movement; therefore, the material shows greater strength properties.
It is also seen that A356 alloy treatment significantly refined the coarse, large, elongated α-Al grains into fine equiaxed grains with homogeneously-distributed eutectic Si particles. Additionally, a lamellar Si structure formed in the modified alloy, similar to the modification of Al alloys by Sr [25].
Figure 3. Optical micrographs of А356 alloy before (а) and after GDT (b). Large α-Al grains are refined into fine equiaxed grains surrounded by homogeneously-distributed eutectic Si particles.
Figure 3. Optical micrographs of А356 alloy before (а) and after GDT (b). Large α-Al grains are refined into fine equiaxed grains surrounded by homogeneously-distributed eutectic Si particles.
Metals 05 02277 g003
The average grain size changes were calculated according to ASTM E112-96 from the microstructures shown in Figure 3a,b using ImageJ 1.49v software by National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. It was found that the average grain size reduced by 33%, from 95 μm down to 63.5 μm.
This grain refinement induces changes in the mechanical properties of the metals, which will be discussed in greater detail below. The strengthening mechanism for an A356 alloy modified by ceramic nanoparticles was described in [21]. It was found that the nanoparticles act as nucleation accelerators in the crystallization process and that a grain boundary mechanism is responsible for the strengthening process. TiCN nanoparticles were used in the current research, as they have the same cubic crystal structure and Fm-3m space group as aluminum; therefore, they act as a nucleation accelerator belonging to the second type of modifiers mentioned above.
A combined technology with GDT and modification by TiCN nanoparticles was implemented in aluminum A356 casting alloy. Figure 4 shows cylindrical casts obtained after pouring into pre-heated cast iron molds. It is clearly seen that the shrinkage defect is reduced significantly after the combined treatment with GDT and additions of ceramic nanoparticles.
An XRD study was conducted to determine whether any phase changes occurred in the alloy after the modification process using additions of TiCN nanoparticles. XRD patterns of the modified and unmodified A356 casting alloy are shown in Figure 5.
Figure 4. Cylindrical casts produced using the conventional technology (a) and the combined effect by GDT and modification by TiCN (b). The shrinkage defect in the untreated alloy is much greater than in the treated alloy.
Figure 4. Cylindrical casts produced using the conventional technology (a) and the combined effect by GDT and modification by TiCN (b). The shrinkage defect in the untreated alloy is much greater than in the treated alloy.
Metals 05 02277 g004aMetals 05 02277 g004b
Figure 5. XRD patterns of A356 alloy before and after modification process by TiCN nanoparticles.
Figure 5. XRD patterns of A356 alloy before and after modification process by TiCN nanoparticles.
Metals 05 02277 g005
The XRD results indicate the presence of only aluminum (JCPDS 01-071-4624) and silicon (JCPDS 01-070-5680) phases. No difference caused by the modification was observed; therefore, no new phase formed in a detectable amount.
The evidence of the TiCN nanoparticles’ presence was found in TEM images (Figure 6) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDS) analysis results (Table 2). Different points were analyzed, as shown in Figure 6. As seen in the image, TiCN nanoparticles (Points a and c) were distributed into Al grains (Point b) of the alloy.
Figure 6. TEM image of A356 alloy after the modification process by TiCN nanoparticles.
Figure 6. TEM image of A356 alloy after the modification process by TiCN nanoparticles.
Metals 05 02277 g006
Table 2. EDS analysis results of the treated A356 alloy.
Table 2. EDS analysis results of the treated A356 alloy.
ElementWeight %
Point aPoint bPoint c
Al91.69 ± 0.5098.16 ± 0.6092.81 ± 0.52
Si3.96 ± 0.171.84 ± 0.233.65 ± 0.22
Ti4.35 ± 0.10-3.54 ± 0.09
Measurements of the mechanical properties were carried out on the untreated (as-cast) alloy and on samples subjected to gas dynamic treatment (GDT), modification by TiCN nanoparticles (M) and a combined treatment using GDT and modification (GDT + M). The results obtained are presented in Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9.
Figure 7. Results of ultimate tensile strength (UTS) measurements performed on A356 alloy.
Figure 7. Results of ultimate tensile strength (UTS) measurements performed on A356 alloy.
Metals 05 02277 g007
Figure 8. Results of elongation measurements performed on A356 alloy.
Figure 8. Results of elongation measurements performed on A356 alloy.
Metals 05 02277 g008
Figure 9. Results of hardness measurements performed on A356 alloy.
Figure 9. Results of hardness measurements performed on A356 alloy.
Metals 05 02277 g009
As is shown by the results of the mechanical properties measurements, the tensile strength of the GDT alloy improved by 12%, that of the modified alloy by 15% and that of the alloy subjected to the combined treatment by 18%. The elongation results showed the same behavior, with an improvement of 17%–19% of the treated alloys. The hardness results were slightly improved, as well; modification and treatment processes increased their value by 4.3%–7.3%.
The strengthening of aluminum can usually be increased by several mechanisms:
(1) Solid-solution strengthening when the dislocation motion in the lattice is prevented by the formed solid solution.
(2) Grain-size strengthening expressed by the Hall-Petch equation relation [26]:
σ y = σ 0 + K d 1 2
where σy is the yield stress of the alloy, σ0 is a material’s constant for the starting stress for dislocation movement, d is the average grain diameter and K is the strengthening coefficient (which is specific to each material).
(3) Aging, which is the process of the fixation of the high-temperature structure of alloys at lower temperatures.
Electron microscopy observation was performed to determine the mechanism of the strengthening that occurs in the alloy. Figure 10 shows an electron microscopy image of a grain boundary of the modified alloy. A high dislocation concentration was observed near the grain boundaries.
Figure 10. TEM image of A356 alloy after the modification process by TiCN nanoparticles with a high concentration of dislocations near a grain boundary of the alloy.
Figure 10. TEM image of A356 alloy after the modification process by TiCN nanoparticles with a high concentration of dislocations near a grain boundary of the alloy.
Metals 05 02277 g010
Based on the results obtained in the present study, together with our previous experimental results [21], it is suggested that a grain-size strengthening mechanism is at work in the process.

4. Conclusions

The effect of modification with TiCN nanoparticles, GDT and a combined treatment on aluminum casting alloy A356 has been investigated. Improvement of the mechanical properties was demonstrated after all three different treatments. GDT alone showed the smallest improvement, while the combined treatment showed the greatest. The tensile strength and elongation increased after the combined treatment by 18% and 19%, respectively, and the hardness of the materials improved by 7.3%.
The results of the experimental work demonstrate microstructural refinement of the A356 alloy. Phase analysis showed that no new phase was formed after the addition of ceramic nanoparticles, while TEM images showed that Ti-based nanoparticles were found in Al grains. Based on these results together with the mechanical properties’ results, it can be safely assumed that a grain-size strengthening mechanism operates in the combined process.

Author Contributions

Konstantin Borodianskiy, Michael Zinigrad, Yuri Dotsenko and Vadim Selivorstov designed the experiments. Shrinkage defects and mechanical properties tests were performed by Yuri Dotsenko and Vadim Selivorstov. XRD results and electron microscopy were performed by Konstantin Borodianskiy. The manuscript was written and revised by Konstantin Borodianskiy with the help of Michael Zinigrad, Yuri Dotsenko and Vadim Selivorstov.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Callister, W.D. Materials Science and Engineering, 7th ed.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Birol, Y. AlB3 master alloy to grain refine AlSi10Mg and AlSi12Cu aluminum foundry alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 513, 150–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schaffer, P.L.; Dahle, A.K. Settling behavior of different grain refiners in aluminum. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 413–414, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mohanty, P.S.; Gruzleski, J.E. Mechanism of grain refinement in aluminum. Acta Metall. Mater. 1995, 43, 2001–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, C.; Wang, M.; Yu, B.; Chen, D.; Qin, P.; Feng, M.; Dai, Q. The grain refinement behavior of TiB2 particles prepared with in situ technology. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 459, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Daoud, A.; Abo-Elkhar, M. Influence of Al2O3 or ZrO2 particulate addition on the microstructure aspects of AlNi and AlSi alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2002, 120, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chou, N.-S.; Huang, J.-L.; Lii, D.-F.; Lu, H.-H. The mechanical properties of Al2O3/aluminum alloy A356 composite manufactured by squeeze casting. J. Alloys Compd. 2006, 419, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Han, Y.; Le, K.; Wang, J.; Shu, D.; Sun, B. Influence of high-intensity ultrasound on grain refining performance of Al-5Ti-1B master alloy on aluminum. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 405, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Das, A.; Kotadia, H.R. Effect of high-intensity ultrasonic irradiation on the modification of solidification microstructure in a Si-rich hypoeutectic Al-Si alloy. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011, 125, 853–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Cheng, X.; Chen, G.; Dai, Q. High-energy ultrasonic field effects on the microstructure and mechanical behaviors of A356 alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 470, 168–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lu, H.T.; Wang, L.C.; Kung, S.K. Grain Refining in A356 Alloys. J. Chin. Foundrym. Assoc. 1981, 29, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sigworth, G.K.; Guzowski, M.M. Grain refining of Hypo-eutectic Al-Si alloys. ASF Trans. 1985, 93, 907–912. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shi, Z.M.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, R.Y. Effects of erbium modification on the microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 aluminum alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 626, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Torre, A.D.L.; Pérez-Bustamante, R.; Camarillo-Cisneros, J.; Gómez-Esparza, C.D.; Medrano-Prieto, H.M.; Martínez-Sánchez, R. Mechanical properties of the A356 aluminum alloy modified with La/Ce. J. Rare Earths 2013, 31, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rebinder, P.A.; Lipman, M.S. Research in the Field of Applied Physico-Chemical Surface Behavior; USSR Academy of Sciences Publishers: Moscow, Russian, 1936. [Google Scholar]
  16. Khodaverdizadeh, H.; Niroumand, B. Effects of applied pressure on microstructure and mechanical properties of squeeze cast ductile iron. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 4747–4755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guan, R.G. Microstructure and properties of squeeze cast A356 alloy processed with a vibrating slope. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2016, 229, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Selivorstov, V.; Dotsenko, Y.; Selivorstova, T.; Dotsenko, N. The use of gas-dynamic pressure to improve the mechanical properties of aluminum casting alloys with high iron content. Syst. Technol. 2015, 2, 68–74. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sajjadi, S.A.; Parizi, M.T.; Ezatpour, H.R.; Sedghic, A. Fabrication of A356 composite reinforced with micro and nano Al2O3 particles by a developed compocasting method and study of its properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 511, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Akbari, M.K.; Baharvandi, H.R.; Shirvanimoghaddam, K. Tensile and fracture behavior of nano/micro TiB2 particle reinforced casting A356 aluminum alloy composites. Mater. Des. 2015, 66, 150–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Borodianskiy, K.; Kossenko, A.; Zinigrad, M. Improvement of the Mechanical Properties of Al-Si Alloys by TiC Nanoparticles. Metall. Mater. Trans. 2013, 44a, 4948–4953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schröder, E. About a solid body solubility dependence on its melting temperature. Z. Phyzik. Chem. 1893, 11, 449–465. [Google Scholar]
  23. Markov, V.V.; Rizhikov, A.A. Heat Transfer between Cast and Mold; High School Publ.: Minsk, Russian, 1967; pp. 71–74. [Google Scholar]
  24. Massalski, T.B. Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 1990; Volume 1, pp. 211–213. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shin, S.S.; Kim, E.S.; Yeom, G.Y.; Lee, J.C. Modification effect of Sr on the microstructures and mechanical properties of Al-10.5Si-2.0Cu recycled alloy for die casting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 532, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hall, E.O. The deformation and aging of mild steel: III discussion and results. Proc. Phys. Soc. 1951, 643, 747–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borodianskiy, K.; Selivorstov, V.; Dotsenko, Y.; Zinigrad, M. Effect of Additions of Ceramic Nanoparticles and Gas-Dynamic Treatment on Al Casting Alloys. Metals 2015, 5, 2277-2288. https://doi.org/10.3390/met5042277

AMA Style

Borodianskiy K, Selivorstov V, Dotsenko Y, Zinigrad M. Effect of Additions of Ceramic Nanoparticles and Gas-Dynamic Treatment on Al Casting Alloys. Metals. 2015; 5(4):2277-2288. https://doi.org/10.3390/met5042277

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borodianskiy, Konstantin, Vadim Selivorstov, Yuri Dotsenko, and Michael Zinigrad. 2015. "Effect of Additions of Ceramic Nanoparticles and Gas-Dynamic Treatment on Al Casting Alloys" Metals 5, no. 4: 2277-2288. https://doi.org/10.3390/met5042277

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop