Next Article in Journal
Placental Growth Factor and Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A as Potential Early Predictors of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Previous Article in Journal
Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers: Where Are We Now in 2023?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 59
Issue 2
10.3390/medicina59020397
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Protective Effect of Neutral Electrolyzed Saline on Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity: Evaluation of Histopathologic Parameters in a Murine Model

by
Nomely S. Aurelien-Cabezas
1,
Brenda A. Paz-Michel
1,2,
Ivan Jacinto-Cortes
3,
Osiris G. Delgado-Enciso
1,3,
Daniel A. Montes-Galindo
4,
Ariana Cabrera-Licona
2,
Sergio A. Zaizar-Fregoso
1,2,
Juan Paz-Garcia
5,
Gabriel Ceja-Espiritu
1,
Valery Melnikov
1,
Jose Guzman-Esquivel
6,
Iram P. Rodriguez-Sanchez
7,
Margarita L. Martinez-Fierro
8 and
Ivan Delgado-Enciso
1,2,*
1
School of Medicine, University of Colima, Colima 28040, Mexico
2
Department of Research, Esteripharma SA de CV, Atlacomulco 50450, Mexico
3
Cancerology State Institute, Colima State Health Services, Colima 28085, Mexico
4
School of Chemical Sciences, University of Colima, Coquimatlan 28400, Mexico
5
Union Hospital Center, Villa de Álvarez, Colima 28970, Mexico
6
Clinical Epidemiology Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security Institute, Villa de Álvarez 28984, Mexico
7
Molecular and Structural Physiology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, San Nicolás de los Garza 66455, Mexico
8
Molecular Medicine Laboratory, Unidad de Medicina Humana y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas 98160, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2023, 59(2), 397; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020397
Submission received: 11 January 2023 / Revised: 15 February 2023 / Accepted: 15 February 2023 / Published: 17 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Gentamicin (GM) is a nephrotoxic aminoglycoside. Neutral electrolyzed saline (SES) is a compound with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory properties. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether kidney damage by GM can be prevented and/or reversed through the administration of SES. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out as a prospective, single-blind, five-arm, parallel-group, randomized, preclinical trial. The nephrotoxicity model was established in male BALB/c mice by administering GM at a dose of 100 mg/kg/day intraperitoneally for 30 days, concomitantly administering (+) SES or placebo (physiologic saline solution), and then administering SES for another 30 days after the initial 30 days of GM plus SES or placebo. At the end of the test, the mice were euthanized, and renal tissues were evaluated histopathologically. Results: The GM + placebo group showed significant tubular injury, interstitial fibrosis, and increased interstitial infiltrate of inflammatory cells compared with the group without GM. Tubular injury and interstitial fibrosis were lower in the groups that received concomitant GM + SES compared with the GM + placebo group. SES administration for 30 days after the GM administration periods (GM + placebo and GM + SES for 30 days) did not reduce nephrotoxicity. Conclusions: Intraperitoneal administration of SES prevents gentamicin-induced histologic nephrotoxicity when administered concomitantly, but it cannot reverse the damage when administered later.

1. Introduction

Drug-related nephrotoxicity is a cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) [1]. Six months after presenting AKI induced by nephrotoxic drugs, 70% of patients present evidence of residual kidney damage: reduced glomerular filtration rate, hyperfiltration, proteinuria, or hypertension [2]. Aminoglycosides are a group of antibiotics still widely used at the hospital level, due to their low cost and broad bactericidal effects [3]. Cumulative aminoglycoside use is associated with long-term renal impairment [4]. Gentamicin (GM), a drug belonging to the aminoglycoside family, is known to be nephrotoxic [5,6]. Most studies have reported rates of nephrotoxicity between 8 and 26%, and it is estimated that 21.4% of pediatric patients admitted to ICUs receive GM [7].
In preclinical studies, gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity is characterized by histologic changes, including tubular injury, tubular atrophy, and interstitial fibrosis [8,9,10,11,12]. Such effects are known to be triggered by the nitrosative and oxidative stress induced by the aminoglycoside [13,14].The administration of compounds with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity to reduce GM-induced nephrotoxicity has been effective [15,16], albeit their clinical efficacy is inconclusive [17].
Neutral electrolyzed saline (SES) is a neutral-pH solution that has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties [18], as well as antiseptic activity [19,20]. SES is produced from a saline solution of sodium chloride and is activated by a controlled electrolysis process, which produces reactive species of chlorine and oxygen (ROS). The ROS that are generated are oxidizing chlorine species, such as hypochlorous acid (HOCl), and oxidizing oxygen species, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). In addition, molecular hydrogen (H2) is generated during the process (pat. no. MX330845B).
In vitro, activated saline solution participates in an anti-inflammatory mechanism at the cellular level, inhibiting the secretion of TNF-α, IL-6, and MIP-1 [18]. Furthermore, SES has been reported to have an immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effect capable of increasing the number of total platelets and leukocytes in patients with COVID-19 [21]. Molecular hydrogen, an SES compound, has also been reported to have a pulmonary antifibrotic effect [22]. On the other hand, electrolyte-reduced water, with an alkaline pH and a significantly higher concentration of H2 than SES, has been used in hemodialysis as a dialysis solution, reducing oxidative stress and the proinflammatory cytokine profile [23]. However, the latter study did not analyze whether molecular hydrogen prevented histopathologic alterations [23]. It is also well-established in the literature that SES can improve wound healing, not only because of its benefits as an antiseptic, but also due to its effects as an anti-inflammatory and cell-proliferation substance, through the mediation of oxidative and inflammatory responses [24,25,26]. This suggests that, to some extent and according to its components, SES or any of its components can protect against nephrotoxic agents. However, whether its potential beneficial effect is only preventive or whether it is also therapeutic (capable of reversing damage) has not been proven histologically, nor has it been evaluated.
Based on these premises, the present study aims to analyze the prophylactic and/or therapeutic effect of neutral electrolyzed saline in a murine model of gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

The study was carried out as a prospective, single-blind, 5-arm, parallel-group, randomized, preclinical trial (see Figure 1), according to the “ARRIVE Essential 10” guidelines for Animal Research [27].

2.2. Sample Size

The sample size was calculated using the formula based on incidence assessment [28], as previously reported [29]. The minimum number required to establish comparisons was nine animals per group. In this study, 53 mice were randomly divided into five groups.

2.3. Animals, Inclusion Criteria, and Randomization

Inclusion criteria were male BALB/c mice (Envigo, Coyoacan, Mexico City, Mexico) aged 12–14 weeks and weighing 20–30 g. Elimination criteria were any experimental subject that died during the study period or that developed any other type of illness. The animals were kept under suitable conditions at 21 ± 2 °C in a 12 h light/dark cycle, with food and water provided ad libitum. As previously reported, the mice were fed a high-fat diet to promote a renal and systemic inflammatory environment [30,31,32]. The mice were kept in cages, with a maximum of 5 mice per group. Fifty-three mice were divided into five parallel groups using a randomized block design [33] (see Figure 1).

2.4. Ethics

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Colima State Institute of Cancerology (Colima, Colima, Mexico) (protocol no. CIIECAN/06/19). The animals were handled following institutional guidelines and the official Mexican norm that regulates the use of laboratory animals (NOM-062-ZOO-1999) [34], in addition to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the National Academy of Sciences of the USA (2011) [35]. Furthermore, all the animals were euthanized by decapitation according to the American Veterinary Medical Association Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, 2020 Edition [36].

2.5. Reagents, Animal Model, and Intervention

The gentamicin used was Genkova® (SON’S, SA de CV, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico). Esteripharma provided a neutral electrolyzed saline solution (Atlacomulco, State of Mexico, Mexico) of parenteral-application quality (Homestec) [37], which was SES neutral pH, 0.0020% active chlorine® [37]. Physiologic saline solution for intravenous application was used as the placebo.
The nephrotoxicity model was established in male BALB/c mice by administering GM at a dose of 100 mg/kg/day for 30 days intraperitoneally (IP), administering SES or placebo (150 µL/mice/day, IP) concomitantly, and later administering SES or placebo for another 30 days. Five groups were formed: (1) GM + SES-after placebo (to assess the protective effect of SES); (2) GM + placebo-after SES (to assess whether SES reversed the damage through its application after the GM-application period); (3) GM + SES-after SES; (4) GM + placebo-after placebo (to assess the maximum kidney damage caused by GM); and (5) Placebo-after placebo (reference of the absence of damage caused by GM). After the completion of the experiment, the mice were euthanized by decapitation (day 61). The dose of SES administered per day in the mouse model was equivalent to that given to human patients intravenously in a previous clinical trial, in which an 80 mL dose of SES per day was shown to have an anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effect on patients [21]. Using a calculator that estimates the dose scale between species of different body weights via exponential allometry (http://clymer.altervista.org/minor/allometry.html; accessed 2 February 2023) [38], a dose of 150 µL/day for the mice was found to be a dose equivalent to 80 mL/day in humans. This calculation considered an exponent of 0.80, as well as an average weight of mice and humans of 25 g and 70 Kg, respectively. The concomitant GM + SES-application period was 30 days. Blood samples were obtained afterward, and the serum was separated for IL-6, creatinine, and urea quantification. A Mouse IL-6 ELISA Kit RAB0308 (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the analyses were performed in triplicate. Serum creatinine and urea were determined using an automatic biochemical analyzer (Cobas c111, Roche®, Miguel Hidalgo, Mexico City, Mexico). The kidneys were simultaneously dissected for histologic processing. The researcher who performed the histopathologic assessment was blinded.
In the present study, GM was administered for 30 days because that application period is capable of causing permanent destruction of some of the tubules that reflect fibrosis [39,40]. The recovery period after the final GM application was 30 days, after which the mice were euthanized for histologic analysis. That time period was chosen because acute histologic changes have been reported to be fully reversed between 3 and 30 days after the cessation of GM administration, and so changes that remain after 30 days can be considered chronic and permanent [39,41]. It is important to point out that nephrotoxicity from administering GM for up to 30 days, despite being able to cause histologic lesions, does not alter blood urea nitrogen or creatinine because of glomerular-filtration-rate preservation due to a process of necrosis and cell regeneration [40]. Therefore, the mouse model analyzed in the present study represents early (preclinical) chronic kidney disease [42], considering that the common histopathologic features can predict renal failure [43].

2.6. Histopathologic Processing and Assessment

The tissues were fixed in a solution of 10% formaldehyde for at least 24 h. Renal tissue was embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (5 µm) were prepared using a microtome and mounted on slides. Masson’s trichrome stain (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany) was used to detect interstitial fibrosis. In addition, hematoxylin–eosin staining (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany) was also carried out to detect tubular injury (blebbing of the apical membrane into the tubular lumen, cell fragments within the tubular lumen, flattening of the tubular epithelium, or loss of nuclei), tubular atrophy, and interstitial infiltrate of inflammatory cells [44]. Hematoxylin–eosin and Masson’s trichrome staining were performed according to standard procedures. Slices were evaluated via images captured with a Moticam 1080 digital camera (Motic China Group Co Ltd, Xiamen, Fujian, China) attached to a Moticam BA310E optical microscope (Motic China Group Co Ltd, Xiamen, Fujian, China) with 10× and 40× objectives. All images were captured under the same conditions of light and exposure.
Renal histopathologic lesions were calculated as the percentage of the total area observed under the microscope [45]. The total area of the renal tissue cut was considered 100%, and the percentage of the cortical area affected by tubular injury, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and interstitial infiltration of inflammatory cells was quantified. Additionally, the total percentage of the renal cortex tissue altered histopathologically was calculated and was the result of the sum of the percentages of tubular injury, tubular atrophy, fibrosis, and inflammatory infiltrate in the renal cortex. Tubular injury was defined as the flattening of the tubular epithelium with calcified or noncalcified cellular fragments within their lumens, blebbing of the apical membrane into the tubular lumen, or loss of nuclei [44]. Interstitial fibrosis was defined as increased extracellular matrix separating tubules in the cortical area [46], demonstrated as the blue-stained areas on Masson’s trichrome stains [47]. Tubular atrophy was defined by thick, irregular tubular basement membranes, with decreased diameters of tubules [46]. Interstitial infiltrate of inflammatory cells was defined as an excess of inflammatory cells within the cortical interstitium [46]. The evaluations were carried out blindly by two anatomopathologic experts.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The data distributions were not normal (except for serum creatinine and urea values), according to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, making the statistical analyses non-parametric. Therefore, the interquartile mean (IQM) was used as a measure of central tendency [48], and the 25th and 75th ranks and percentiles (Q1 and Q3, respectively) were used as measures of dispersion. The descriptive statistics were performed using Excel version 2101 (Microsoft 365, Redmond, WA, USA). For the inferential statistics, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyze the histopathologic differences between groups, with a post hoc analysis using the Mann–Whitney U test. The comparison of serum creatinine and urea levels was analyzed using ANOVA, with a Bonferroni post hoc test. The statistical tests were performed using IBM SPSS version 20 software (IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

Significant differences were found in tubular injury (p < 0.001), interstitial infiltrate of inflammatory cells (p < 0.001), and interstitial fibrosis (p < 0.001), when the intergroup analysis (Kruskal–Wallis tests) was carried out. However, no difference was observed in tubular atrophy (p = 0.400).
The post hoc analysis was made with the Mann–Whitney U test to explore each pair (Table 1). The control group showed normal kidney tissue with no tubular injury or interstitial fibrosis. Gentamicin produced significant tubular injury and interstitial fibrosis (GM + placebo-after placebo) compared with the group without gentamicin (p < 0.001, for both analyses), confirming the validity of the animal model (Table 1 and Figure 2).
The group in which neutral electrolyzed saline was administered concomitantly with gentamicin had significantly less tubular injury and interstitial fibrosis than the gentamicin plus placebo group (GM + placebo-after placebo) (p < 0.001, for all groups). The comparison of the GM + placebo-after SES vs. GM + placebo-after placebo groups showed that there was no beneficial effect of neutral electrolyzed saline when administered after the end of the gentamicin administration period (p = 0.104 for tubular injury, and p= 0.872 for interstitial fibrosis) (Figure 2).
There was an increase in the interstitial infiltrate of inflammatory cells in all groups that received gentamicin, regardless of whether SES was administered, compared with the group without gentamicin (Table 1 and Figure 2). It is striking that there were more inflammatory cells in the groups with concomitant administration of neutral electrolyzed saline and gentamicin (GM + SES-after placebo p = 0.017, and GM + SES-after SES p = 0.036) compared with the group that received gentamicin and placebo (GM + placebo-after placebo) (Table 1 and Figure 2). The total percentage of histopathologically altered renal cortex tissue showed that the concomitant administration of SES and GM was capable of significantly preventing kidney damage (Table 1).
Serum IL-6 values were determined at the end of the study in the groups: (1) Placebo-after placebo (IQM = 14.9 pg/mL, Q1–Q3 = 7.6–23.0); (2) GM + placebo-after placebo (IQM = 5.6 pg/mL, Q1–Q3 = 4.9–7.3); and (3) GM + SES-after placebo (IQM = 28.6 pg/mL, Q1–Q3 = 9.9–41.2). Using the Mann–Whitney U test, differences in the groups were determined, and it was found that IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the group that only received GM compared with the group that received GM + SES concomitantly (p = 0.028) and compared with the placebo-only group (p = 0.046). Meanwhile, the group that received GM + SES showed no significant differences from the group that received only placebo (p = 0.173). Table 2 shows a comparison of the serum values for creatinine and urea. In an intergroup analysis via ANOVA, only creatinine levels were different between groups. In the post hoc analysis, creatinine was significantly elevated in the GM + placebo-after placebo group compared with the GM + SES-after placebo (p = 0.004), GM + SES-after SES (p = 0.006), and GM + placebo-after SES groups (p = 0.025), with no differences between the rest of the groups (p > 0.05 for the rest of the comparisons). The placebo-after placebo group showed no statistically significant differences with respect to any of the groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).

4. Discussion

Gentamicin administration in an animal model generated tubular injury, interstitial infiltration of inflammatory cells, and renal interstitial fibrosis. The tubular injury and interstitial fibrosis were significantly reduced by the concomitant administration of neutral electrolyzed saline (SES), but there was no beneficial effect when SES was administered after gentamicin application. With the concomitant administration of SES and GM, low serum creatinine levels were also maintained compared with the group that received GM alone. In conclusion, neutral electrolyzed saline mainly had a prophylactic (nephroprotective) effect rather than a therapeutic (reversible) effect on gentamicin nephrotoxicity. The only beneficial effect of administering SES in a period after GM administration was the maintenance of serum creatinine levels that were significantly lower than those of the group that received GM alone.
The gentamicin nephrotoxicity model of the present study generated renal histologic alterations as previously reported [8,9,45,49,50]; however, unlike other investigations, no tubular atrophy was found [45,51]. In addition, doses of gentamicin similar to those in other investigations were administered in our model, but they were applied for 30 days—a period longer than that used in most previous studies [52,53]. Gentamicin nephrotoxicity models differ among studies in terms of dose (80–150 mg/k/day), administration route (subcutaneous or intraperitoneal), and administration time (ranging from 4 to 21 days) [54,55,56,57,58,59]. In the present study, gentamicin doses of 100 mg/k/day were used intraperitoneally for 30 days plus the administration of a high-fat diet to increase the renal and systemic inflammatory environment [30,31,32]. Tubular injury, tubular atrophy, interstitial inflammatory cell infiltrate, and interstitial fibrosis were reported quantitatively as the percentage of the total area of the renal cortex occupied by each lesion. Other studies have used semiquantitative scales that consist of the previous percentage evaluation of histologic lesions and subsequent reports in stages [60,61]. Therefore, the use of a model with a more favorable environment for kidney damage and more precise histologic measurements of kidney damage than those that have featured in previous studies [62,63] can be considered a strength of our investigation. However, the damage we observed was not very extensive, which is an aspect to be considered in future research.
Alternative nephrotoxicity animal models, such as those related to chemotherapeutic drugs like cisplatin, allow clear histopathological damages and have also been studied to evaluate the nephroprotective effect of electrolyzed saline. Oral administration of this substance to cisplatin-induced-renal-injury mice showed a significant nephroprotective effect due to the inhibition of lipidic peroxidation and an increment in antioxidant defense activity. The histopathological analysis of intoxicated mice without electrolyzed saline treatment showed moderate hydropic changes and extensive injury to tubular cells, while histopathological changes in the mice treated with electrolyzed saline revealed lower levels of edema and trace levels of tubular injury [64].
In all cases, the results on nephroprotection due to neutral electrolyzed saline are consistent with previous findings which showed that antioxidant and anti-inflammatory substances can generate a similar effect [65,66]. Inflammation and the exacerbated production of free radicals are known processes involved in the pathogenesis of gentamicin nephrotoxicity [14,67]. The production of proinflammatory cytokines leads to renal structural deterioration, including deterioration due to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), which is involved in the induction of loss of tubular cells secondary to tubular necrosis [54], and IL-6, levels of which increase after induction by GM [68]. The above takes place within the acute period of kidney damage. In addition, gentamicin increases transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) levels in the renal cortex [36] and serum malondialdehyde levels [69].
Crocin has previously been shown to have protective effects against gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats; it has been postulated that this is due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [45]. Similarly, molecular hydrogen is a potent anti-inflammatory [70] and antioxidant [71] which prevents the low intrarenal oxygenation induced by gentamicin [23]. Additionally, the administration of hydrogen-rich saline has an antifibrotic effect on the skin (on sclerodermatous skin lesions) [72], lungs [17], and liver and decreases circulating TNF-α [70]. All these findings are consistent with the results of the present investigation.
A possible explanation of the nephroprotective effects of neutral electrolyzed saline could be its ability to reduce inflammation [18]. Recently, a preclinical study showed that administering neutral electrolyzed saline in a rheumatoid arthritis model reduced IL-6 levels in a dose-dependent manner [73]. Additionally, molecular hydrogen, which is a component of neutral electrolyzed saline, has previously been reported to reduce levels of malondialdehyde (a marker of lipid peroxidation) and TGF- β1 (a profibrotic cytokine) [22], which would generate a nephroprotective and antifibrotic effect [61,74,75].
Nevertheless, the role of IL-6 in the evolution of kidney damage, determined through its serum levels, seems to be different in the acute and recovery phases. Elevated IL-6 serum levels during an acute process of renal damage are associated with worse renal function and/or pathohistologic changes in animal and human models [68,76], but the role of IL-6 in renal function recovery appears to be very different. Several animal studies suggest that IL-6 regulates antioxidant factors and modifies oxidative stress to protect the kidneys. Even in humans, a higher IL-6 level has been associated with a higher rate of complete renal recovery in survivors with acute kidney injuries admitted to intensive care units [76]. The present study found that IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the animals that received GM alone than in the placebo-only (p = 0.046) or gentamicin + SES (p = 0.028) groups. Low levels of IL-6 in the group with the greatest kidney damage is consistent with the idea that IL-6 is essential to the recovery process of that organ [76]. The group with concomitant administration of GM + SES did not show this decrease in serum IL-6, and although its values were higher than those in the group that received only placebo (healthy animals), the differences were not significant.
It is important to note that the tested dose of neutral electrolyzed saline could not reverse kidney damage when a subsequent toxic agent was administered. The reversal of already established interstitial fibrosis is documented in reports using other therapies; however, in those studies, gentamicin was administered at a dose of 80 mg/kg/day for 8–10 days [12,77], whereas in our study it was administered for 30 days.
Also noteworthy is the high number of inflammatory cells in the kidney tissues of the mice with fewer histologic lesions due to the nephroprotective effect of neutral electrolyzed saline—a result consistent with the findings of previous studies. The simultaneous administration of L-arginine with gentamicin was reported to contribute to the absence of tubular necrosis and mononuclear cell infiltration associated with tubular regeneration [78]. Carvacrol demonstrated a nephroprotective effect by reducing tubular necrosis without reducing interstitial leukocyte infiltration [79]. Cucumis melo seed extract prevented tubular necrosis, and, depending on the dose, the degree of interstitial infiltration of inflammatory cells was maintained or decreased [16]. These results suggest that the role of the interstitial infiltrate of inflammatory cells in the groups with neutral electrolyzed saline may have been due to renal repair mechanisms rather than deleterious effects, but such a hypothesis needs to be tested in future research. Studies have also shown a reduction in the renal inflammatory infiltrate related to [45,54,80] a decrease in tubular necrosis, interstitial fibrosis, and other histologic lesions of interest. There is a fine line between the component of the interstitial infiltrate induced by nephrotoxicity and inflammation, the fibrotic response, and its possible reparative effect [81,82]. Therefore, studies on this topic and the influence of neutral electrolyzed saline are necessary.
In our research, the mice were fed a high-fat diet (HFD) that contributed to inflammation and renal interstitial fibrosis coupled with gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity. HFD increases renal cortical mRNA levels of proinflammatory markers (MIP-1α (macrophage inflammatory protein-1α), TNFα, and IL-6) and profibrotic markers (TGF-β1) and increases renal macrophage infiltration [30]. These data could explain the presence of the interstitial infiltrate of inflammatory cells in all the groups, including the control. Therefore, when interpreting the results of the present study or comparing them with future research, the type of diet given to the animals should be taken into account.
Our study has several limitations. First, varied doses of neutral electrolyzed saline, enabling the evaluation of the minimum effective dose to obtain the nephroprotective effect, were not tested. Second, the cellular phenotype of the interstitial component was not characterized. Therefore, the exact role of the interstitial inflammatory cell infiltrates in the murine model of gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity was not demonstrated. Third, the mouse model utilized represented early (preclinical) chronic kidney disease, with maximum percentages of interstitial fibrosis or tubular injury of 25%, without elevated serum creatinine or urea levels. Future investigations with models that represent more advanced renal disease are necessary. Other studies should demonstrate how neutral electrolyzed saline protects against toxic agents, such as gentamicin, as well as analyze oxidative stress parameters and molecular/biochemical data.

5. Conclusions

Our results show that the concomitant administration of neutral electrolyzed saline significantly reduces the nephrotoxic histologic changes caused by gentamicin. However, its administration after toxic damage does not reverse said renal histopathologic lesions. Future research is necessary to analyze the potential clinical use of neutral electrolyzed saline to prevent kidney damage due to toxic agents.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.S.A.-C., B.A.P.-M., J.P.-G. and I.D.-E.; Formal analysis, O.G.D.-E., I.P.R.-S., M.L.M.-F. and I.D.-E.; Investigation, I.J.-C., S.A.Z.-F., V.M. and J.G.-E.; Methodology, D.A.M.-G., A.C.-L., S.A.Z.-F. and G.C.-E.; Resources, N.S.A.-C.; Writing—original draft, G.C.-E. and J.G.-E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Foundation for Cancer Ethics, Education and Research of the Cancerology State Institute, Colima, México (grant no. 2020-2).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Board Statement: Cancerology State Institute ethics committee (Colima State Health Services, Mexico) approved the present study (protocol no. CIIECAN/06/19). The experimental subjects were handled according to institutional procedures, satisfying the Mexican legislation related to laboratory animal practice (NOM-062-ZOO-1999). Additionally, all animals were euthanized in accordance with the American Veterinary Medical Association’s 2013 guidelines.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The current study contains all necessary data. The corresponding author will provide the datasets used and analyzed during the current work upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

BPM and ACL declare that they have a commercial affiliation with Esteripharma; however, the company had no role in the study design, data collection, or analysis, or in the decision to publish the manuscript. These authors did not participate in the study design, data collection, or analyses. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Uchino, S. Acute Renal Failure in Critically Ill Patients: A Multinational, Multicenter Study. JAMA 2005, 294, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Menon, S.; Kirkendall, E.S.; Nguyen, H.; Goldstein, S.L. Acute Kidney Injury Associated with High Nephrotoxic Medication Exposure Leads to Chronic Kidney Disease after 6 Months. J. Pediatr. 2014, 165, 522–527.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Benavides-Plascencia, L.; Leonardo Aldama-Ojeda, A.; Javier Vázquez, H. Vigilancia de Los Niveles de Uso de Antibióticos y Perfiles de Resistencia Bacteriana En Hospitales de Tercer Nivel de La Ciudad de México. Salud Publica Mex. 2005, 47, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Al-Aloul, M.; Miller, H.; Alapati, S.; Stockton, P.A.; Ledson, M.J.; Walshaw, M.J. Renal Impairment in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Due to Repeated Intravenous Aminoglycoside Use. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2005, 39, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Brunton, L.L. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 11th ed.; Gilman, G., Ed.; McGrawHill: New York, NY, USA, 2006; ISBN 0-07-142280-3. [Google Scholar]
  6. Martínez-Salgado, C.; López-Hernández, F.J.; López-Novoa, J.M. Glomerular Nephrotoxicity of Aminoglycosides. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2007, 223, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Slater, M.B.; Gruneir, A.; Rochon, P.A.; Howard, A.W.; Koren, G.; Parshuram, C.S. Identifying High-Risk Medications Associated with Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Pharmacoepidemiologic Evaluation. Pediatr. Drugs 2017, 19, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kart, A.; Yapar, K.; Karapehlivan, M.; Tunca, R.; Ogun, M.; Citil, M. Effects of L-Carnitine on Kidney Histopathology, Plasma and Tissue Total Sialic Acid, Malondialdehyde and Glutathione Concentrations in Response to Gentamicin Administration in Balb/C Mice. Rev. Med. Vet. 2006, 157, 179–184. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bae, E.H.; Kim, I.J.; Joo, S.Y.; Kim, E.Y.; Choi, J.S.; Kim, C.S.; Ma, S.K.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.W. Renoprotective Effects of the Direct Renin Inhibitor Aliskiren on Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. JRAAS J. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Syst. 2014, 15, 348–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Otunctemur, A.; Ozbek, E.; Dursun, M.; Sahin, S.; Besiroglu, H.; Ozsoy, O.D.; Cekmen, M.; Somay, A.; Ozbay, N. Protective Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide on Gentamicin-Induced Renal Injury. Ren. Fail. 2014, 36, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Otunctemur, A.; Ozbek, E.; Cekmen, M.; Cakir, S.S.; Dursun, M.; Polat, E.C.; Somay, A.; Ozbay, N. Protective Effect of Montelukast Which Is Cysteinyl-Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist on Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity and Oxidative Damage in Rat Kidney. Ren. Fail. 2013, 35, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moghadam, A.; Tahereh Talaei, K.; Afsaneh, M.; Mohammad Reza, N.; Farzaneh, D. Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Kidney Regeneration in Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2017, 32, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Selby, N.M.; Shaw, S.; Woodier, N.; Fluck, R.J.; Kolhe, N. V Gentamicin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury. QJM Int. J. Med. 2009, 102, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Balakumar, P.; Rohilla, A.; Thangathirupathi, A. Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity: Do We Have a Promising Therapeutic Approach to Blunt It? Pharmacol. Res. 2010, 62, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Boroushaki, M.T.; Fanoudi, S.; Mollazadeh, H.; Boroumand-Noughabi, S.; Hosseini, A. Reno-Protective Effect of Rheum Turkestanicum against Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2019, 22, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Saleem, M.; Javed, F.; Asif, M.; Kashif Baig, M.; Arif, M. HPLC Analysis and In Vivo Renoprotective Evaluation of Hydroalcoholic Extract of Cucumis Melo Seeds in Gentamicin-Induced Renal Damage. Medicina 2019, 55, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Vicente-Vicente, L.; Casanova, A.G.; Hernández-Sánchez, M.T.; Pescador, M.; López-Hernández, F.J.; Morales, A.I. A Systematic Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Pre-Clinically Tested Nephroprotectants at Preventing Aminoglycoside Nephrotoxicity. Toxicology 2017, 377, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Medina-Tamayo, J.; Sánchez-Miranda, E.; Balleza-Tapia, H.; Ambriz, X.; Cid, M.E.; González-Espinosa, D.; Gutiérrez, A.A.; González-Espinosa, C. Super-Oxidized Solution Inhibits IgE-Antigen-Induced Degranulation and Cytokine Release in Mast Cells. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2007, 7, 1013–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. González-Cantú, C.C.; Torres-Muñoz, Á.; Urrutia-Baca, V.H.; Sánchez-García, G.A.; De La Garza-Ramos, M.A. Antibacterial Efficacy of a PH-Neutral Electrolyzed Super-Oxidized Solution for Nonsurgical Periodontal Treatment. Heliyon 2022, 8, e12291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Montesinos-Peña, N.E.; Hernández-Valencia, M.; Delgado-Enciso, I.; Herrera-Leal, A.; Paz-Michel, B.A. Evaluation of an Antiseptic Gel of Intravaginal Application for Multitreated Patients for Infectious Cervicovaginitis. Ginecol. Obs. Mex. 2019, 87, 454–466. [Google Scholar]
  21. Delgado-Enciso, I.; Delgado-Enciso, I.; Paz-Garcia, J.; Barajas-Sauced, C.E.; Mokay-Ramirez, K.A.; Meza-Robles, C.; Lopez-Flores, R.; Dllgado-Machuca, N.; Murillo-Zamora, E.; Toscano-Velazquez, J.A.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of a COVID-19 Treatment with Nebulized and/or Intravenous Neutral Electrolyzed Saline Combined with Usual Medical Care vs. Usual Medical Care Alone: A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Trial. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Terasaki, Y.; Ohsawa, I.; Terasaki, M.; Takahashi, M.; Kunugi, S.; Dedong, K.; Urushiyama, H.; Amenomori, S.; Kaneko-Togashi, M.; Kuwahara, N.; et al. Hydrogen Therapy Attenuates Irradiation-Induced Lung Damage by Reducing Oxidative Stress. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2011, 301, L415–L426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Matsushita, T.; Kusakabe, Y.; Kitamura, A.; Okada, S.; Murase, K. Protective Effect of Hydrogen-Rich Water against Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats Using Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent MR Imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 2011, 10, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Fadriquela, A.; Sajo, M.E.J.; Bajgai, J.; Kim, D.-H.; Kim, C.-S.; Kim, S.-K.; Lee, K.-J. Effects of Strong Acidic Electrolyzed Water in Wound Healing via Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Response. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 2459826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Huang, K.C.; Yang, C.C.; Hsu, S.P.; Lee, K.T.; Liu, H.W.; Morisawa, S.; Otsubo, K.; Chien, C.T. Electrolyzed-Reduced Water Reduced Hemodialysis-Induced Erythrocyte Impairment in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients. Kidney Int. 2006, 70, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Huang, K.-C.; Yang, C.-C.; Lee, K.-T.; Chien, C.-T. Reduced Hemodialysis-Induced Oxidative Stress in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients by Electrolyzed Reduced Water. Kidney Int. 2003, 64, 704–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Percie du Sert, N.; Hurst, V.; Ahluwalia, A.; Alam, S.; Avey, M.T.; Baker, M.; Browne, W.J.; Clark, A.; Cuthill, I.C.; Dirnagl, U.; et al. The ARRIVE Guidelines 2.0: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18, e3000410. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rojo-Amigo, A. Cálculo Del Tamaño Muestral En Procedimientos de Experimentación Con Animales. Valoración de Las Incidencias. Anim. Lab. 2014, 62, 31–33. [Google Scholar]
  29. Randjelovic, P.; Veljkovic, S.; Stojiljkovic, N.; Jankovic-Velickovic, L.; Sokolovic, D.; Stoiljkovic, M.; Ilic, I. Salicylic Acid Attenuates Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 390613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Declèves, A.-E.; Mathew, A.V.; Cunard, R.; Sharma, K. AMPK Mediates the Initiation of Kidney Disease Induced by a High-Fat Diet. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011, 22, 1846–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Garcia-Rivera, A.; Madrigal-Perez, V.; Rodriguez-Hernandez, A.; Martinez-Martinez, R.; Martinez-Fierro, M.; Soriano-Hernandez, A.; Galvan-Salazar, H.; Gonzalez-Alvarez, R.; Valdez-Velazquez, L.; Espinoza-Gomez, F.; et al. A Simple and Low-Cost Experimental Mouse Model for the Simultaneous Study of Steatohepatitis and Preclinical Atherosclerosis. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2014, 9, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Madrigal-Perez, V.M.; García-Rivera, A.; Rodriguez-Hernandez, A.; Ceja-Espiritu, G.; Briseño-Gomez, X.G.; Galvan-Salazar, H.R.; Soriano-Hernandez, A.D.; Guzman-Esquivel, J.; Martinez-Fierro, M.L.; Newton-Sanchez, O.A.; et al. Preclinical Analysis of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Usefulness for the Simultaneous Prevention of Steatohepatitis, Atherosclerosis and Hyperlipidemia. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 22477–22483. [Google Scholar]
  33. Festing, M.F.W. The “Completely Randomised” and the “Randomised Block” Are the Only Experimental Designs Suitable for Widespread Use in Pre-Clinical Research. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-062-ZOO-1999. Especificaciones Técnicas Para La Producción, Cuidado y Uso de Los Animales de Laboratorio; Diario Oficial de la Nación, 75, 113-160, Mexico City, Mexico, 2001. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/203498/NOM-062-ZOO-1999_220801.pdf (accessed on 6 May 2020).
  35. National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th ed.; National Academies Press (US): Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
  36. American Veterinary Medical Association. AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition. Available online: https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/2020-01/2020-euthanasia-final-1-17-20.pdf (accessed on 6 May 2020).
  37. Delgado-Enciso, I.; Paz-Garcia, J.; Barajas-Saucedo, C.E.; Mokay-Ramírez, K.A.; Meza-Robles, C.; Lopez-Flores, R.; Delgado-Machuca, M.; Murillo-Zamora, E.; Toscano-Velazquez, J.A.; Delgado-Enciso, J.; et al. Patient-Reported Health Outcomes After Treatment of COVID-19 with Nebulized and/or Intravenous Neutral Electrolyzed Saline Combined with Usual Medical Care Versus Usual Medical Care Alone: A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Trial. Res. Sq. 2020, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. West, G.B.; Brown, J.H. The Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology from Genomes to Ecosystems: Towards a Quantitative Unifying Theory of Biological Structure and Organization. J. Exp. Biol. 2005, 208, 1575–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Houghton, D.C.; Hartnett, M.; Campbell-Boswell, M.; Porter, G.; Bennett, W. A Light and Electron Microscopic Analysis of Gentamicin Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Am. J. Pathol. 1976, 82, 589–612. [Google Scholar]
  40. Houghton, D.C.; Lee, D.; Gilbert, D.N.; Bennett, W.M. Chronic Gentamicin Nephrotoxicity. Continued Tubular Injury with Preserved Glomerular Filtration Function. Am. J. Pathol. 1986, 123, 183–194. [Google Scholar]
  41. Morin, J.P.; Viotte, G.; Vandewalle, A.; Van Hoof, F.; Tulkens, P.; Fillastre, J.P. Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity: A Cell Biology Approach. Kidney Int. 1980, 18, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Quinn, G.Z.; Abedini, A.; Liu, H.; Ma, Z.; Cucchiara, A.; Havasi, A.; Hill, J.; Palmer, M.B.; Susztak, K. Renal Histologic Analysis Provides Complementary Information to Kidney Function Measurement for Patients with Early Diabetic or Hypertensive Disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2021, 32, 2863–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Eadon, M.T.; Schwantes-An, T.-H.; Phillips, C.L.; Roberts, A.R.; Greene, C.V.; Hallab, A.; Hart, K.J.; Lipp, S.N.; Perez-Ledezma, C.; Omar, K.O.; et al. Kidney Histopathology and Prediction of Kidney Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2020, 76, 350–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fogo, A.; Kashgarian, M. Atlas Diagnostico de Patología Renal, 1st ed.; Elsevier España S.A: Madrid, Spain, 2006; ISBN 84-8174-959-1. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yarijani, Z.M.; Najafi, H.; Hamid Madani, S. Protective Effect of Crocin on Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2016, 19, 337–343. [Google Scholar]
  46. Roberts, I.S.D.; Cook, H.T.; Troyanov, S.; Alpers, C.E.; Amore, A.; Barratt, J.; Berthoux, F.; Bonsib, S.; Bruijn, J.A.; Cattran, D.C.; et al. The Oxford Classification of IgA Nephropathy: Pathology Definitions, Correlations, and Reproducibility. Kidney Int. 2009, 76, 546–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Yamashita, N.; Kusaba, T.; Nakata, T.; Tomita, A.; Ida, T.; Watanabe-Uehara, N.; Ikeda, K.; Kitani, T.; Uehara, M.; Kirita, Y.; et al. Intratubular Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Tubular Atrophy after Kidney Injury in Mice. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2020, 319, F579–F591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mangat, C.S.; Bharat, A.; Gehrke, S.S.; Brown, E.D. Rank Ordering Plate Data Facilitates Data Visualization and Normalization in High-Throughput Screening. J. Biomol. Screen. 2014, 19, 1314–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Geleilete, T.J.; Melo, G.C.; Costa, R.S.; Volpini, R.A.; Soares, T.J.; Coimbra, T.M. Role of Myofibroblasts, Macrophages, Transforming Growth Factor-Beta Endothelin, Angiotensin-II, and Fibronectin in the Progression of Tubulointerstitial Nephritis Induced by Gentamicin. J. Nephrol. 2002, 15, 633–642. [Google Scholar]
  50. Vijay, K.K.; Naidu, M.; Anwar, A.; Ratnakar, K. Probucol Protects against Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2000, 32, 108–113. [Google Scholar]
  51. El-Kashef, D.H.; El-Kenawi, A.E.; Suddek, G.M.; Salem, H.A. Protective Effect of Allicin against Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015, 29, 679–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chiu, P.Y.; Leung, H.Y.; Ko, K.M. Schisandrin B Enhances Renal Mitochondrial Antioxidant Status, Functional and Structural Integrity, and Protects against Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 31, 602–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Lee, M.-C.; Cheng, K.-J.; Chen, S.-M.; Li, Y.-C.; Imai, K.; Lee, C.-M.; Lee, J.-A. A Novel Preventive Mechanism of Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity by Atorvastatin. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2019, 33, e4639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shahani, S.; Behzadfar, F.; Jahani, D.; Ghasemi, M.; Shaki, F. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Nasturtium Officinale Involved in Attenuation of Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 2017, 27, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dhanarajan, R.; Abraham, P.; Isaac, B. Protective Effect of Ebselen, a Selenoorganic Drug, against Gentamicin-Induced Renal Damage in Rats. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2006, 99, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gomaa, A.M.S.; Abdelhafez, A.T.; Aamer, H.A. Garlic (Allium sativum) Exhibits a Cardioprotective Effect in Experimental Chronic Renal Failure Rat Model by Reducing Oxidative Stress and Controlling Cardiac Na+/K+-ATPase Activity and Ca2+ Levels. Cell Stress Chaperones 2018, 23, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pedraza-Chaverrí, J.; Maldonado, P.D.; Medina-Campos, O.N.; Olivares-Corichi, I.M.; de los Ángeles Granados-Silvestre, M.a.; Hernández-Pando, R.; Ibarra-Rubio, M.a.E. Garlic Ameliorates Gentamicin Nephrotoxicity: Relation to Antioxidant Enzymes. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2000, 29, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Boroushaki, M.T.; Asadpour, E.; Sadeghnia, H.R.; Dolati, K. Effect of Pomegranate Seed Oil against Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rat. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 3510–3514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sawardekar, S.; Patel, T. Evaluation of the Effect of Boerhavia Diffusa on Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2015, 6, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Dursun, M.; Sahin, S.; Besiroglu, H.; Otunctemur, A.; Ozbek, E.; Cakir, S.S.; Cekmen, M.; Somay, A. Protective Effect of Nebivolol on Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Bratislava Med. J. 2018, 119, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Karadeniz, A.; Yildirim, A.; Simsek, N.; Kalkan, Y.; Celebi, F. Spirulina Platensis Protects against Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Phyther. Res. 2008, 22, 1506–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ajami, M.; Eghtesadi, S.; Pazoki-Toroudi, H.; Habibey, R.; Ebrahimi, S.A. Effect of Crocus Sativus on Gentamicin Induced Nephrotoxicity. Biol. Res. 2010, 43, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Abdel-Raheem, I.T.; Abdel-Ghany, A.A.; Mohamed, G.A. Protective Effect of Quercetin against Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 32, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Cheng, T.-C.; Hsu, Y.-W.; Lu, F.-J.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Tsai, N.-M.; Chen, W.-K.; Tsai, C.-F. Nephroprotective Effect of Electrolyzed Reduced Water against Cisplatin-Induced Kidney Toxicity and Oxidative Damage in Mice. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2018, 81, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ince, S.; Kucukkurt, I.; Demirel, H.H.; Arslan-Acaroz, D.; Varol, N. Boron, a Trace Mineral, Alleviates Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 195, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Erseçkin, V.; Mert, H.; İrak, K.; Yildirim, S.; Mert, N. Nephroprotective Effect of Ferulic Acid on Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Female Rats. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 45, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Morales, A.I.; Arévalo, M.; Pérez-Barriocanal, F. Mecanismos Implicados En La Nefrotoxicidad Producida Por Aminoglucósidos. Nefrologia 2000, 20, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Sun, H.; Yang, H.; Ruan, H.; Li, W.; He, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, F.; Zhang, J. The Protective Effect of Sika Deer Antler Protein on Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity In Vitro and In Vivo. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 50, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Tavafi, M.; Ahmadvand, H.; Toolabi, P. Inhibitory Effect of Olive Leaf Extract on Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Iran. J. Kidney Dis. 2012, 6, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Gharib, B.; Hanna, S.; Abdallahi, O.M.; Lepidi, H.; Gardette, B.; De Reggi, M. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Molecular Hydrogen: Investigation on Parasite-Induced Liver Inflammation. Comptes Rendus L’académie Sci.-Ser. III-Sci. Vie 2001, 324, 719–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ishibashi, T. Molecular Hydrogen: New Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis and Related Diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013, 19, 6375–6381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Qian, L.; Liu, X.; Shen, J.; Zhao, D.; Yin, W. Therapeutic Effects of Hydrogen on Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2017, 21, 2627–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zaizar-Fregoso, S.A.; Paz-Michel, B.A.; Rodriguez-Hernandez, A.; Paz-Garcia, J.; Aurelien-Cabezas, N.S.; Tiburcio-Jimenez, D.; Melnikov, V.; Murillo-Zamora, E.; Delgado-Enciso, O.G.; Cabrera-Licona, A.; et al. Systemic Administration of Neutral Electrolyzed Saline as a Novel Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis Reduces Mechanical and Inflammatory Damage to the Joints: Preclinical Evaluation in Mice. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 1717614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Beshay, O.N.; Ewees, M.G.; Abdel-Bakky, M.S.; Hafez, S.M.N.A.; Abdelrehim, A.B.; Bayoumi, A.M.A. Resveratrol Reduces Gentamicin-Induced EMT in the Kidney via Inhibition of Reactive Oxygen Species and Involving TGF-β/Smad Pathway. Life Sci. 2020, 258, 118178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Polat, A.; Parlakpinar, H.; Tasdemir, S.; Colak, C.; Vardi, N.; Ucar, M.; Emre, M.H.; Acet, A. Protective Role of Aminoguanidine on Gentamicin-Induced Acute Renal Failure in Rats. Acta Histochem. 2006, 108, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shimazui, T.; Nakada, T.-A.; Tateishi, Y.; Oshima, T.; Aizimu, T.; Oda, S. Association between Serum Levels of Interleukin-6 on ICU Admission and Subsequent Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury. BMC Nephrol. 2019, 20, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Bledsoe, G.; Shen, B.; Yao, Y.Y.; Hagiwara, M.; Mizell, B.; Teuton, M.; Grass, D.; Chao, L.; Chao, J. Role of Tissue Kallikrein in Prevention and Recovery of Gentamicin-Induced Renal Injury. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 102, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Can, C.; Şen, S.; Boztok, N.; Tuǧlular, I. Protective Effect of Oral L-Arginine Administration on Gentamicin-Induced Renal Failure in Rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 390, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ahmadvand, H.; Tavafi, M.; Asadollahi, V.; Jafaripour, L.; Hadipour-Moradi, F.; Mohammadrezaei-Khoramabadi, R.; Khosravi, P.; Salehi, H.; Cheraghi, A. Protective Effect of Carvacrol on Renal Functional and Histopathological Changes in Gentamicin-Induced-Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Zahedan J. Res. Med. Sci. 2016, 18, e6446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ehsani, V.; Amirteimoury, M.; Taghipour, Z.; Shamsizadeh, A.; Bazmandegan, G.; Rahnama, A.; Khajehasani, F.; Fatemi, I. Protective Effect of Hydroalcoholic Extract of Pistacia Vera against Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Ren. Fail. 2017, 39, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Moeckel, G.; Palmer, M.; Cantley, L.; Vichot, A. Quantification and Localization of M2 Macrophages in Human Kidneys with Acute Tubular Injury. Int. J. Nephrol. Renovasc. Dis. 2014, 7, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Kim, M.-G.; Kim, S.C.; Ko, Y.S.; Lee, H.Y.; Jo, S.-K.; Cho, W. The Role of M2 Macrophages in the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease Following Acute Kidney Injury. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Medicina 59 00397 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the study. GM: gentamicin, SES: neutral electrolyzed saline, IL-6: interleukin 6.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the study. GM: gentamicin, SES: neutral electrolyzed saline, IL-6: interleukin 6.
Medicina 59 00397 g001
Medicina 59 00397 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of neutral electrolyzed saline (SES) on histopathologic changes in gentamicin (GM)-induced nephrotoxicity in the Balb/c mouse model. Placebo-after placebo group; GM + placebo-after placebo group; GM + placebo-after SES group; GM + SES-after SES group; and GM + SES-after placebo group. Yellow arrows show areas of tubular injury (flattening of the tubular epithelium, cellular fragments within their lumens, blebbing of the apical membrane into the tubular lumen, and loss of some nuclei), interstitial fibrosis, and interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration in the appropriate section. The GM + SES-after SES and GM + SES-after placebo groups showed less tubular injury and interstitial fibrosis compared with the GM + placebo-after placebo group. In addition, the GM + SES-after placebo and GM + SES-after SES groups had more interstitial inflammatory cell infiltrate than the GM + placebo-after placebo group. Tubular injury and interstitial inflammatory cell infiltrate: hematoxylin–eosin, x400; interstitial fibrosis: Masson’s trichrome, ×100; n = 53.
Figure 2. Effect of neutral electrolyzed saline (SES) on histopathologic changes in gentamicin (GM)-induced nephrotoxicity in the Balb/c mouse model. Placebo-after placebo group; GM + placebo-after placebo group; GM + placebo-after SES group; GM + SES-after SES group; and GM + SES-after placebo group. Yellow arrows show areas of tubular injury (flattening of the tubular epithelium, cellular fragments within their lumens, blebbing of the apical membrane into the tubular lumen, and loss of some nuclei), interstitial fibrosis, and interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration in the appropriate section. The GM + SES-after SES and GM + SES-after placebo groups showed less tubular injury and interstitial fibrosis compared with the GM + placebo-after placebo group. In addition, the GM + SES-after placebo and GM + SES-after SES groups had more interstitial inflammatory cell infiltrate than the GM + placebo-after placebo group. Tubular injury and interstitial inflammatory cell infiltrate: hematoxylin–eosin, x400; interstitial fibrosis: Masson’s trichrome, ×100; n = 53.
Medicina 59 00397 g002
Table
Table 1. Paired comparison of kidney histopathologic lesions.
Table 1. Paired comparison of kidney histopathologic lesions.
GroupPlacebo-after
Placebo
(n = 10)		GM + Placebo-after Placebo
(n = 10)		GM + Placebo-after SES
(n = 10)		GM + SES-after SES
(n = 11)		GM + SES-after Placebo
(n = 12)
Tubular injury (%)
IQM0.002.50.000.000.00
Q1–Q30–00–250–00–00–0
Min–max value
p-value, comparison		0–00–250–100–00–0
    vs. placebo aloneNA0.000 *0.003 *1.001.00
    vs. GM alone0.000 *NA0.1040.000 *0.000 *
Interstitial fibrosis (%)
IQM0.004.006.500.000.00
Q1–Q30–00–100–150–00–0
Min–max value
p-value, comparison		0–00–250–200–50–0
    vs. placebo aloneNA0.000 *0.000 *0.0631.00
    vs. GM alone0.000 *NA0.8720.000 *0.000 *
Interstitial infiltrate of inflammatory cells (%)
IQM5.501013.5013.3310.23
Q1–Q35–105–1510–158.75–1510–15
Min–max value
p-value, comparison		0–105–255–205–200–30
   vs. placebo aloneNA0.000 *0.000 *0–000 *0.000 *
    vs. GM alone0.000 *NA0.017 *0.036 *0.601
Total percentage of renal cortex tissue altered histopathologically
IQM5.523.021.513.310.2
Q1–Q35–105–4015–306.3–18.810–15
Min–max value
p-value, comparison		0–105–405–405–255–30
    vs. placebo aloneNA0.000 *0.000 *0.000 *0.000 *
    vs. GM alone0.000 *NA0.9450.009 *0.005 *
NA: Does not apply, GM: gentamicin, SES: neutral electrolyzed saline, IQM: interquartile mean, Q1: 25th percentile, Q3: 75th percentile, Min–max: smallest and largest values in the data set. (%): Renal histopathologic lesions were calculated as the percentage of the total area observed under the microscope. Total percentage of renal cortex tissue altered histopathologically: result of the sum of percentages of tubular injury, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and inflammatory infiltrate in the renal cortex. Comparisons were made with the Mann–Whitney U test. * Value of statistical significance: p < 0.05.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of serum creatinine and urea levels.
Table 2. Comparison of serum creatinine and urea levels.
GroupPlacebo-after Placebo
(n = 10)		GM + Placebo-after Placebo
(n = 10)		GM + Placebo-after SES
(n = 10)		GM + SES-
after SES
(n = 11)		GM + SES-
after Placebo
(n = 12)		p
ANOVA
Creatinine * 1.17 ± 0.101.53 ± 0.561.05 ± 0.360.98 ± 0.200.96 ± 0.230.002 *
Urea * 28.34 ± 5.732.26 ± 3.6139.06 ± 17.9437.0 ± 10.0331.61 ± 5.510.132
* mg/dL. GM: gentamicin, SES: neutral electrolyzed saline. The means + standard deviations are shown. Comparisons were made with ANOVA tests. * Value of statistical significance: p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aurelien-Cabezas, N.S.; Paz-Michel, B.A.; Jacinto-Cortes, I.; Delgado-Enciso, O.G.; Montes-Galindo, D.A.; Cabrera-Licona, A.; Zaizar-Fregoso, S.A.; Paz-Garcia, J.; Ceja-Espiritu, G.; Melnikov, V.; et al. Protective Effect of Neutral Electrolyzed Saline on Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity: Evaluation of Histopathologic Parameters in a Murine Model. Medicina 2023, 59, 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020397

AMA Style

Aurelien-Cabezas NS, Paz-Michel BA, Jacinto-Cortes I, Delgado-Enciso OG, Montes-Galindo DA, Cabrera-Licona A, Zaizar-Fregoso SA, Paz-Garcia J, Ceja-Espiritu G, Melnikov V, et al. Protective Effect of Neutral Electrolyzed Saline on Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity: Evaluation of Histopathologic Parameters in a Murine Model. Medicina. 2023; 59(2):397. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020397

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aurelien-Cabezas, Nomely S., Brenda A. Paz-Michel, Ivan Jacinto-Cortes, Osiris G. Delgado-Enciso, Daniel A. Montes-Galindo, Ariana Cabrera-Licona, Sergio A. Zaizar-Fregoso, Juan Paz-Garcia, Gabriel Ceja-Espiritu, Valery Melnikov, and et al. 2023. "Protective Effect of Neutral Electrolyzed Saline on Gentamicin-Induced Nephrotoxicity: Evaluation of Histopathologic Parameters in a Murine Model" Medicina 59, no. 2: 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020397

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop