Next Article in Journal
Extrusion 3D (Bio)Printing of Alginate-Gelatin-Based Composite Scaffolds for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Journal
Systematic Evaluation of Permeability of Concrete Incorporating Coconut Shell as Replacement of Fine Aggregate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microstructure, Interface and Strengthening Mechanism of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 Magnesium Matrix Composites

1
School of Material Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China
2
Faculty of Printing, Packaging Engineering and Digital Media Technology, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(22), 7946; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15227946
Submission received: 3 October 2022 / Revised: 6 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 November 2022 / Published: 10 November 2022

Abstract

:
Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites were fabricated by ultrasound treatment combined with a semi-solid stirred method for the first time. The agglomerated spherical Ni-CNTs transferred from spherical shape to clear tubular shape after pre-dispersion treatment. For the Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite prepared by semi-solid stirring followed by ultrasonic treatment, Ni-CNTs were evenly distributed in the magnesium matrix or wrapped on the β (Mg17Al12) phase. Mg2Ni were formed at the interface of the magnesium matrix and CNTs by in-situ reaction, which significantly improved the interface bonding strength of CNTs and the Mg matrix. The tensile strength and elongation of 1.0wt.% Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites were improved by 36% and 86%, respectively, compared with those of AZ91 matrix alloy. After Ni-CNTs were added to AZ91 matrix alloy, more dimples were observed at the fracture surface. The fracture behavior of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 composite was transformed from a cleavage fracture of AZ91 matrix alloy to a quasi-cleavage fracture. Meanwhile, the CNTs dispersed near the fracture showed a “pull-out” state, which would effectively bear and transfer loads. The strengthening mechanism of CNTs was also discussed.

1. Introduction

Magnesium alloy possesses various advantages, such as good machinability, high specific strength, and high specific stiffness [1,2,3,4,5,6], leading to a promising application in the fields of medical devices, new energy vehicles, aerospace, and electronic devices [7,8,9,10,11,12]. However, the poor mechanical properties of magnesium alloy, low strength, low elastic modulus, and poor plasticity, highly limit its practical application. It is an effective approach to improving the mechanical properties of magnesium alloy, which have attracted much attention in recent years. Adding SiC [13], TiC [14], Al2O3 [15], CNT [16] to magnesium alloy effectively enhanced its mechanical properties. CNT was first discovered by Iijima in 1991 [17,18]. It has excellent mechanical properties with a tensile strength of 50–200 GPa and elastic modulus of 1 TPa, and is widely considered a promising reinforcement [19,20,21,22]. Hayder et al. [23] prepared multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)/Mg matrix composite material by powder metallurgy. The research showed that the addition of CNTs in the magnesium matrix had a certain improvement in the compressive strength of the composite. With the increase of the volume fraction of the carbon nanotube reinforcement, the wear resistance was gradually improved. However, CNTs’ advantages could not be fully exploited since the ball milling process destroyed their structure. Uozumi et al. [24] prepared MWCNTs/Mg matrix composite material by the squeeze casting method. The integrity of the CNTs was good, but the wettability between matrix and reinforcement was poor, resulting in adverse interface bonding. In order to solve the wettability of CNTs and Mg, Han et al. [25] prepared Ni-CNTs/Mg matrix composite material by hot extrusion. Mg2Ni was generated by in situ reaction at the interface between the CNTs and the Mg matrix. There is an effective interfacial binding between the CNTs and the Mg matrix, but the dispersion of CNTs in the Mg matrix is poor. Without the advantage of a high length-diameter ratio, CNTs cannot effectively improve the strength and toughness of the magnesium matrix. AZ91 magnesium alloy has good castability, but poor strength and toughness. The strength and toughness of the composites were significantly improved by adding Ni-CNTs to the AZ91 magnesium matrix. There are no relevant studies on the interface, microstructure and mechanical properties of Ni-CNTs to strengthen AZ91 magnesium matrix composites at present.
In this paper, ultrasound treatment combined with a semi-solid stirred method was used to prepare the Ni-CNTs-reinforced AZ91 magnesium matrix composites for the first time. The agglomeration of Ni-CNTs was dispersed by ultrasonic crushing in the pre-dispersion process. Ni-CNTs, which aggregated in the AZ91 magnesium matrix were dispersed by melt ultrasound in the smelting process. The dispersion of Ni-CNTs, the dispersion of Ni-CNTs in the matrix material, the interface between Ni-CNTs and the matrix material and the mechanism of enhancing mechanical properties were systematically studied.

2. Experimental Materials and Methods

The primary experimental materials were presented in Table 1. Ni-CNTs and TNADIS dispersant were obtained from Chengdu times nano. The preparation process of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite is shown in Figure 1. Chemical dispersants were added into anhydrous ethanol. Then, Ni-CNTs were fed into the solution to obtain suspension of the Ni-CNTs, which were ultrasonically dispersed for 2 h with an ultrasonic power of 550 W. After that, magnesium powder was added to the suspension of CNTs, and magnetic stirring was carried out for 3 h. After drying at 50 °C, Ni-CNTs-Mg powder mixed powder was obtained. Finally, the mixed powder was placed in a mold and pressed into blocks by a press at a pressure of 780 MPa to obtain Ni-CNTs/Mg pre-dispersed blocks (diameter: 2.5 mm, height: 1.8 mm), which retained the dispersed state of Ni-CNTs on the surface of the magnesium powder particles to prevent their re-agglomeration. After the powder mixture is directly added to the alloy liquid in the smelting process, the powder will be suspended on the surface of the alloy liquid because of its light weight, which is not conducive to the dispersion of carbon nanotubes in the matrix, and the dispersed blocks will avoid this situation to a large extent. Then, the dispersed block was added to the magnesium alloy liquid and subjected to ultrasound-assisted semi-solid agitation, and the Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite was cast. In this paper, the AZ91 alloy is melted by well resistance furnace (model: SG2-7.5-12A), and the melting process is shown in Figure 2. The AZ91 alloy ingot was completely melted at 720 °C. Then, the melting furnace temperature was lowered to a semi-solid temperature of 630 °C, compacted Ni-CNTs/Mg blocks were added, and semi-solid stirring was performed at 630 °C and 500 r/min for 5 min. After that, the mixed melt was heated to 700 °C, the ultrasonic vibrator was inserted into the melting furnace, preheated for 30 min, and ultrasonic treatment was carried out with a power of 1 KW for 10 min. Subsequently, the resistance furnace was heated to 720 °C and held for 5 min. Eventually, the composite melt was poured into the mold and solidified to obtain Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites. To prevent the oxidation combustion of the alloy during the melting process, a little RJ-2 covering agent was sprinkled on the magnesium alloy metal block and the whole smelting process was carried out under an argon atmosphere. The AZ91 alloy ingots were prepared by the same preparation process for comparison.
Phase analysis of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 composites was carried out by X-ray diffractometer (model: XRD-7000), the wavelength was 0.154 nm, the anode material was Cu, the 2θ range of measurement was 20–90°, the step size was 0.02°, and the scanning speed was 4°/min. Metallographic samples were prepared by a standard sample preparation process, then the samples were etched with a 5% nitric acid ethanol solution. The microstructure of the samples was characterized by a Zeiss scanning electron microscope (model: Merlin Compact) and transmission electron microscope (model: Tecnai G2 F30 S-Twin). The acceleration voltage of SEM was 10 KV, and all SEM images were secondary electron images. The acceleration voltage of TEM was 300 KV. The composite tensile specimens with different content of CNTs were machined by electrical discharge machining and polished with sandpaper, and the dimension of the specimen was as shown in Figure 3. The HT-2040 universal tensile testing machine was used to carry out the tensile test at room temperature, and the tensile speed was set at 0.5 mm/min. At least three tests were repeated for each type of material.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructural Analysis

Figure 4 shows the morphology of Ni-CNTs before and after pre-dispersion. It can be seen that Ni-CNTs are agglomerated with large particle sizes due to the strong van der Waals force between Ni-CNTs before pre-dispersion [26], hence it is difficult to take full advantage of the high aspect ratio as super reinforcement. The morphology of Ni-CNTs obtained after pre-dispersion treatment is shown in Figure 4b. The agglomerated spherical Ni-CNTs transferred from spherical shape to clear tubular shape after pre-dispersion treatment. There are two reasons for this: first, with the addition of TNADIS dispersant to Ni-CNTs, the lyophilic and lipophilic groups of the dispersant are attached to the nanotubes to weaken the van der Waals forces between the nanotubes; second, the cavitation effect was generated in the suspension of Ni-CNTs by ultrasonic treatment, the shock waves formed by microbubble breakage destroy the agglomeration of Ni-CNTs.
The phase composition of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite was characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis, as shown in Figure 5. It can be seen from the X-ray diffraction pattern that α-Mg and β-Mg17Al12 phases are the main phases in the composite material, the diffraction peak of C (CNTs) is found at 26° and 42°, the diffraction peaks of Mg2Ni are found at 40°, 44° and 52°. After adding a small amount of Ni-CNTs to the AZ91 magnesium matrix, the interface reactant Mg2Ni was generated by in-situ reaction at the interface between matrix and CNTs, which improved the interface binding ability between the matrix and CNTs, gave full play to the advantage of the ratio of height to aspect of CNTs, and achieved the purpose of improving the strength and toughness of the magnesium alloy. Ni is pre-plated on the surface of CNTs, so no Mg2Ni dispersed separately in the magnesium matrix or around the CNTs.
To explore the distribution of CNTs and Mg2Ni in the composite, the microstructure of the composite was observed by SEM and EDS analysis, as shown in Figure 6. After energy spectrum analysis, some regions (labeled as ABCD) in Figure 6a,b are respectively displayed in Figure 6c–f. It can be known that region A in Figure 6a is CNTs, region B is the Magnesium matrix, region C in Figure 6b is the CNTs, region D is β-Mg17Al12. It can be found that the morphology of the CNTs is a clear tubular structure, there are two main distribution modes in the composite material: one contains a large number of CNTs, evenly distributed in the Mg alloy matrix; the other contains a small number of winding distributions of CNTs on the β-Mg17Al12 phase. This phenomenon can be explained as follows. During semi-solid stirring, a small amount of solid phase α-Mg exists, and strong collisions occurred between the solid particles and CNTs, which contributes to the dispersion of CNTs in the matrix alloy. During the ultrasonic treatment, the supersonic cavitation effect was generated in the melt. The breakup of tiny bubbles produces shock waves that break up CNTs gathered in the alloy solution to achieve the secondary dispersion of CNTs in the matrix alloy. This indicates that ultrasound treatment combined with a semi-solid stirred method can effectively prevent Ni-CNTs from agglomeration in the fabrication of the Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites.

3.2. Interface Analysis

To analyze the interface bonding mode between CNTs and the Mg matrix, TEM analysis was carried out on the composites, and the distribution maps of CNTs, Mg, and Mg2Ni in Ni-CNTs/AZ91 composites were obtained. Figure 7 presents CNTs in Ni-AZ91/CNTs composite materials, Mg and Mg2Ni distribution. By scanning the A region at the interface in Figure 7a with TEM energy spectrum, it can be found that Mg, C, and Ni are distributed at the interface between the CNTs and the Mg matrix. As shown in Figure 7b–d, the results of the surface scan area are consistent with the X-ray diffraction pattern, which can better explain the existence of the interface reactant Mg2Ni.
Figure 8 shows the electron diffraction pattern and the composite interface structure. To explore the interface bonding relationship among CNTs, Mg, and Mg2Ni, selected electron diffraction was carried out in area B at the interface of Figure 8a, and the selected diffraction pattern was calibrated. It was found that Mg2Ni has three different crystal plane spacings at the interface, which correspond to (200)Mg2Ni, 0.224 nm, and (107)Mg2Ni, 0.147 nm, (215)Mg2Ni, 0.141 nm, respectively. In addition, two kinds of C phases with different crystal plane spacing can be found, which are 0.357 nm, 0.206 nm respectively, corresponding to (004)C, and (114)C crystal planes. This is consistent with the results obtained by X-ray diffraction analysis.
To deeply understand the interface information of CNTs, Mg, and Mg2Ni, area A of the interface in Figure 7a was further enlarged, as shown in Figure 8b. The crystal morphologies are (004)C, (200)Mg2Ni, and (101)Mg, and the corresponding crystal plane spacing is 0.357 nm, 0.225 nm, and 0.250 nm, respectively. The existence of the interface layer Mg2Ni between the CNTs and the magnesium matrix can be exhibited. Meanwhile, there is a coherent interface relationship between Mg2Ni and the magnesium matrix by further analysis of the crystal structure, and the coherent angle between the two planes is 139.6°. Figure 8c is a schematic diagram of the coherent interface. The existence of the interface coherent relationship between Mg2Ni and the magnesium matrix will enhance the connection between the magnesium matrix and the CNTs, and improve the interface bonding strength between the CNTs and the matrix materials. Under the connection of interface reactant Mg2Ni, the magnesium matrix can form a strong interface bonding with CNTs, which can effectively enhance the strength and toughness of composite materials [26].

3.3. Mechanical Properties

Figure 9 shows the tensile test results of AZ91 alloy and 1.0 wt.% Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites at room temperature. Figure 10 shows the tensile stress-strain curves of the two materials. The tensile strength of the AZ91 alloy and the Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite was 140 MPa and 190 MPa, the elongation was 4.2% and 7.8%, respectively. It can be observed that the tensile strength and elongation of the composite materials after adding Ni-CNTs to the AZ91 alloy were superior to the AZ91 alloy. Compared with the AZ91 matrix alloy, the tensile strength and elongation of the 1.0 wt.% Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite were enhanced by 36% and 86%, respectively. The change in the mechanical properties can be explained as follows: firstly, during the tensile process of the composites, the tensile load is transferred from the matrix to the CNTs. With the gradual increase of the tensile load, the CNTs change from the bending state to the straightening state, until the final fracture, and the CNTs bear the main load. Secondly, the interface reactants formed between the CNTs and the Mg matrix play a role in connecting the CNTs and the Mg matrix, which improves the interface bonding strength.
To analyze the strengthening mechanism of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite, the fracture morphology of two materials (AZ91 matrix material and 1.0 wt.% Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite) was observed by SEM, as shown in Figure 11. The Mg alloy has a dense hexagonal crystal structure, which can only be plastically deformed by basal plane slip and twin, generally. Under the action of external forces, magnesium alloy grain deformation coordination is insufficient, and it is difficult to deform at room temperature. Figure 11b shows the fracture morphology of 1.0 wt.% Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites. Tearing edges and many dimples can be found in the fracture surface, the fracture surface is rough with large surface undulation, and the section is a quasi-cleavage fracture mixed with cleavage plane and dimple. The “pull-out” state of a small number of CNTs can be seen from the fracture morphology of the high magnification region in Figure 11c. The drawing process of the composite material is shown in Figure 12. It can be seen from Figure 4b that the pre-dispersed Ni-CNTs are in a state of bending, while the Ni-CNTs found at the tensile fracture are in a straight state, which indicates that Ni-CNTs go through four stages of bending, stretching, bridging, and fracture in the process of stretching [27]. This process can be visually demonstrated more in Figure 12. This indicates that the interface reactant Mg2Ni generated by the in-situ reaction of Ni-CNTs added to the AZ91 matrix alloy can effectively improve the binding strength of the matrix materials and CNTs. The CNTs dispersed near the fracture can effectively carry and transfer the load, inhibit the fracture of the matrix, and help to enhance the strength and plasticity of the composite.

4. Conclusions

  • Ni-CNTs were tubular with obvious slenderness ratio advantage after the pre-dispersed treatment of Ni-CNTs. Meanwhile, CNTs in Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites prepared by ultrasonic-assisted treatment combined with semi-solid stirring casting exist in two states. Ni-CNTs were evenly distributed in the magnesium matrix, or wrapped on the β phase. Mg2Ni was generated by in-situ reaction at the interface of magnesium matrix and CNTs, which effectively enhanced the interfacial bond between the CNTs and the AZ91 alloy.
  • After Ni-CNTs were added to the AZ91 magnesium alloy, the interface reactant Mg2Ni was generated by in-situ reaction between the matrix and the surface of the CNTs. Mg2Ni plays a bridging role in the composite material, and the mechanical properties of the composite material are improved to some extent. The tensile strength and elongation of the 1.0 wt.% Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites were increased by 36% and 86% compared with the AZ91 matrix alloy, respectively.
  • After Ni-CNTs were added to the AZ91 matrix alloy, more dimples were found at the fracture. The fracture behavior of the Ni-CNTs/AZ91 composite was transformed from cleavage fracture of the AZ91 matrix alloy to quasi-cleavage fracture. Meanwhile, CNTs dispersed near the fracture showed a “pull-out” state, which could effectively bear and transfer loads.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.L.; Data curation, Z.L., X.C. and W.L.; Formal analysis, D.L. and X.C.; Funding acquisition, S.Q. and J.L.; Project administration, W.W.; Resources, Z.L. and W.L.; Software, S.Q., J.L. and B.M.; Validation, B.M.; Visualization, W.W.; Writing—original draft, Z.L.; Writing—review & editing, Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Program No. 2022JM-236); The Scientific research program funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (grant number 21JK0804).

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the publication of this paper has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sun, X.; Guo, R.F.; Shaga, A.; Hu, Z.J.; Shen, P.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Jiang, Q.C. Preparation and characterization of high damage-tolerance nacre-inspired magnesium alloy matrix composites with high carbon nanotube contents. Carbon 2020, 162, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, X.Y.; Li, W.G.; Ma, J.Z.; Li, Y.; Deng, Y.; Yang, M.Q.; Zhou, Y.B.; Zhang, X.; Dong, P. Temperature dependent strengthening mechanisms and yield strength for CNT/metal composites. Compos. Struct. 2020, 244, 112246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Askarnia, R.; Fardi, S.R.; Sobhani, M.; Staji, H.; Aghamohammadi, H. Effect of graphene oxide on properties of AZ91 magnesium alloys coating developed by micro-arc oxidation process. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 892, 162106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xiao, P.; Gao, Y.M.; Yang, C.C.; Dong, Y.X.; Huang, X.Y.; Wang, Y.R.; Yang, S.S. Effect of Sb doping on microstructure, mechanical and electronic properties of Mg2Si in Mg2Si/AZ91 composites by experimental investigation and first-principles calculation. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 902, 163859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, Z.Y.; Zhao, R.X.; Bai, P.K.; Du, W.B.; Guan, R.G.; Tie, D.; Naik, N.H.; Huang, M.N.; Guo, Z.H. AZ91 alloy nanocomposites reinforced with Mg-coated graphene: Phases distribution, interfacial microstructure, and property analysis. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 902, 163484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, A.; Kumar, S.; Mukhopadhyay, N.K.; Yadav, A.; Kumar, V.; Winczek, V.J. Effect of Variation of SiC Reinforcement on Wear Behaviour of AZ91 Alloy Composites. Materials 2021, 14, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Iulian, A.; Răzvan, A.; Ana, B.; Marian, M.; Octavian, T.; Mircea, P.I.; Mark, P. Comparative Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo Biodegradation of Mg-1Ca Magnesium Alloys for Orthopedic Applications. Materials 2020, 14, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tan, J.K.E.; Balan, P.; Birbilis, N. Advances in LDH coatings on Mg alloys for biomedical applications: A corrosion perspective. Appl. Clay Sci. 2020, 202, 105948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Luo, Q.; Guo, Y.; Liu, B.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Q.; Chou, K. Thermodynamics and kinetics of phase transformation in rare earth–magnesium alloys: A critical review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 44, 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Petra, M.; Norbert, H. Magnesium Alloys for Biomedical Applications. Metals 2020, 10, 1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Anna, D.; Piotr, S.; Krzysztof, M. The Analysis of Deformability, Structure and Properties of AZ61 Cast Magnesium Alloy in a New Hammer Forging Process for Aircraft Mounts. Materials 2021, 14, 2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kwon, D.J.; Choi, J.Y.; Shin, P.S.; DeVries, K.L.; Park, J.M. Improvement in mechanical properties of recycled GF prepreg with CNT reinforced composites using a spray coating method. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2016, 25, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Poddar, P.; Srivastava, V.C.; De, P.K.; Sahoo, K.L. Processing and mechanical properties of SiC reinforced cast magnesium matrix composites by stir casting process. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 460–461, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, A.; Kumar, S.; Mukhopadhyay, N.K.; Yadav, A.; Sinha, D.K. Effect of TiC Reinforcement on Mechanical and Wear Properties of AZ91 Matrix Composites. Int. J. Met. 2022, 16, 2128–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chandrashekar, A.; Chaluvaraju, B.V.; Afzal, A.; Vinnik, D.A.; Kaladgi, A.R.; Alamri, S.; Saleel, C.A.; Tirth, V. Mechanical and Corrosion Studies of Friction Stir Welded Nano Al2O3 Reinforced Al-Mg Matrix Composites: RSM-ANN Modelling Approach. Symmetry 2021, 13, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, W.S.; Zhao, H.Y.; Hu, X.D.; Ju, D.Y. A Novel Processing for CNT-Reinforced Mg-Matrix Laminated Composites to Enhance the Electromagnetic Shielding Property. Coatings 2021, 11, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sumio, I. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, S.P.; Selvamani, S.T.; Vigneshwar, M.; Hariharan, S.J. Tensile, Microhardness, and Microstructural Analysis on Mg-CNT Nano Composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 7882–7888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jeng, H.S.; Aqeel, A.; Beáta, B. Effect of CNT on microstructure, dry sliding wear and compressive mechanical properties of AZ61 magnesium alloy. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 4273–4286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Singh, A.; Prabhu, T.R.; Sanjay, A.R.; Koti, V. An Overview of Processing and Properties of CU/CNT Nano Composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2017, 4, 3872–3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, B.W.; Cho, D.H.; Nam, J.H.; Park, I.M. Effect of CNT volume fraction on wear properties of hybrid CNT+SiCsf/AS52 Mg matrix composites. Met. Mater. Int. 2016, 22, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nia, A.A.; Nourbakhsh, S.H. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of AZ31/SiC and AZ31/CNT Composites Produced by Friction Stir Processing. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2016, 69, 1435–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hayder, M.A.Z.; Abdul, R.N.A.; Hala, S.H. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Magnesium (Mg) Matrix Composites Reinforced with Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Fabricated by Powder Metallurgy Technique. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2019, 14, 10087–10091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Uozumi, H.; Kobayashi, K.; Nakanishi, K.; Matsunaga, T.; Shinozaki, K.; Sakamoto, H.; Tsukada, T.; Masuda, C.; Yoshida, M. Fabrication process of carbon nanotube/light metal matrix composites by squeeze casting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 495, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Han, G.Q.; Du, W.B.; Ye, X.X.; Liu, K.; Du, X.; Wang, Z.H.; Li, S.B. Compelling mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes reinforced pure magnesium composite by effective interface bonding of Mg2Ni. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 727, 963–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liang, J.H.; Li, H.J.; Qi, L.H.; Tian, W.L.; Li, X.F.; Chao, X.J.; Wei, J.F. Fabrication and mechanical properties of CNTs/Mg composites prepared by combining friction stir processing and ultrasonic assisted extrusion. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 728, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, H.P.; Fan, J.W.; Kang, J.L.; Zhao, N.Q.; Wang, X.X.; Li, B.E. In-situ homogeneous synthesis of carbon nanotubes on aluminum matrix and properties of their composites. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2014, 24, 2331–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the preparation of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the preparation of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites.
Materials 15 07946 g001
Figure 2. Flow chart of smelting process.
Figure 2. Flow chart of smelting process.
Materials 15 07946 g002
Figure 3. Tensile specimen size of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites (unit: mm).
Figure 3. Tensile specimen size of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites (unit: mm).
Materials 15 07946 g003
Figure 4. SEM image of surface morphology of Ni-CNTs (a) before and (b) after pre-dispersion.
Figure 4. SEM image of surface morphology of Ni-CNTs (a) before and (b) after pre-dispersion.
Materials 15 07946 g004
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction pattern of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites.
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction pattern of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites.
Materials 15 07946 g005
Figure 6. SEM images and EDS analysis of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites: (a) uniformly distributed Ni-CNTs in the Mg alloy matrix (b) wound on the β-Mg17Al12 phase (cf) EDS analysis: CNTs, Magnesium matrix, CNTs, β-Mg17Al12.
Figure 6. SEM images and EDS analysis of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites: (a) uniformly distributed Ni-CNTs in the Mg alloy matrix (b) wound on the β-Mg17Al12 phase (cf) EDS analysis: CNTs, Magnesium matrix, CNTs, β-Mg17Al12.
Materials 15 07946 g006
Figure 7. CNTs in Ni-CNTs/AZ91 composite materials, Mg and Mg2Ni distribution. (a): TEM micrographs; (bd): EDS mapping of Mg, C, and Ni, respectively (region A).
Figure 7. CNTs in Ni-CNTs/AZ91 composite materials, Mg and Mg2Ni distribution. (a): TEM micrographs; (bd): EDS mapping of Mg, C, and Ni, respectively (region A).
Materials 15 07946 g007
Figure 8. Electron diffraction pattern and interface structure of composite materials (a) electron diffraction pattern of region B; (b) Interface structure diagram of CNTs, Mg, and Mg2Ni (region A); (c) Schematic diagram of common lattice interface.
Figure 8. Electron diffraction pattern and interface structure of composite materials (a) electron diffraction pattern of region B; (b) Interface structure diagram of CNTs, Mg, and Mg2Ni (region A); (c) Schematic diagram of common lattice interface.
Materials 15 07946 g008
Figure 9. Tensile mechanical properties of the two materials (AZ91 matrix material, 1.0 wt.% Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite) at room temperature.
Figure 9. Tensile mechanical properties of the two materials (AZ91 matrix material, 1.0 wt.% Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite) at room temperature.
Materials 15 07946 g009
Figure 10. Tensile stress-strain curve of the two materials (AZ91 matrix material, 1.0 wt.% Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite) at room temperature.
Figure 10. Tensile stress-strain curve of the two materials (AZ91 matrix material, 1.0 wt.% Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite) at room temperature.
Materials 15 07946 g010
Figure 11. Fracture morphology of the two materials: (a) AZ91 matrix alloy; (b) and (c) 1.0 wt.% Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites.
Figure 11. Fracture morphology of the two materials: (a) AZ91 matrix alloy; (b) and (c) 1.0 wt.% Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites.
Materials 15 07946 g011
Figure 12. Schematic diagram of the tensile process of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites.
Figure 12. Schematic diagram of the tensile process of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 magnesium matrix composites.
Materials 15 07946 g012
Table 1. Primary experimental materials.
Table 1. Primary experimental materials.
MaterialsOuter Diameter/nmParticle Size/μmCNTs ContentManufacturer
AZ91 magnesium alloy////
Ni-CNTs (nickel-plated carbon nanotubes)20–3010–30>38%Chengdu times nano
TNADIS dispersant///Chengdu times nano
Mg/100/Comio Chemical Reagent Factory
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Z.; Qin, S.; Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Liu, D.; Chen, X.; Li, W.; Mei, B. Microstructure, Interface and Strengthening Mechanism of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 Magnesium Matrix Composites. Materials 2022, 15, 7946. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15227946

AMA Style

Liu Z, Qin S, Wang W, Liu J, Liu D, Chen X, Li W, Mei B. Microstructure, Interface and Strengthening Mechanism of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 Magnesium Matrix Composites. Materials. 2022; 15(22):7946. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15227946

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Zhengzheng, Shaoyong Qin, Wuxiao Wang, Jian Liu, Dongchao Liu, Xiaogang Chen, Wuzhao Li, and Bingchu Mei. 2022. "Microstructure, Interface and Strengthening Mechanism of Ni-CNTs/AZ91 Magnesium Matrix Composites" Materials 15, no. 22: 7946. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15227946

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop