Next Article in Journal
Quantitative Acetylome Analysis of Differentially Modified Proteins in Virulence-Differentiated Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum Isolates during Cucumber Colonization
Next Article in Special Issue
Osteoarticular Sporotrichosis of the Knee Caused by Sporothrix brasiliensis: Two Similar Cases with Different Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
Materials Engineering to Help Pest Control: A Narrative Overview of Biopolymer-Based Entomopathogenic Fungi Formulations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Relationship of Sporotrichosis and Infected Patients with HIV-AIDS: An Actual Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fungal Glycosidases in Sporothrix Species and Candida albicans

by
Jorge A. Ortiz-Ramírez
,
Mayra Cuéllar-Cruz
,
Julio C. Villagómez-Castro
and
Everardo López-Romero
*
Departamento de Biología, División de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad de Guanajuato, Guanajuato 36050, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(9), 919; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9090919
Submission received: 27 July 2023 / Revised: 30 August 2023 / Accepted: 6 September 2023 / Published: 12 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sporothrix and Sporotrichosis 3.0)

Abstract

:
Glycoside hydrolases (GHs) are enzymes that participate in many biological processes of fungi and other organisms by hydrolyzing glycosidic linkages in glycosides. They play fundamental roles in the degradation of carbohydrates and the assembly of glycoproteins and are important subjects of studies in molecular biology and biochemistry. Based on amino acid sequence similarities and 3-dimensional structures in the carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZy), they have been classified in 171 families. Members of some of these families also exhibit the activity of trans-glycosydase or glycosyl transferase (GT), i.e., they create a new glycosidic bond in a substrate instead of breaking it. Fungal glycosidases are important for virulence by aiding tissue adhesion and colonization, nutrition, immune evasion, biofilm formation, toxin release, and antibiotic resistance. Here, we review fungal glycosidases with a particular emphasis on Sporothrix species and C. albicans, two well-recognized human pathogens. Covered issues include a brief account of Sporothrix, sporotrichosis, the different types of glycosidases, their substrates, and mechanism of action, recent advances in their identification and characterization, their potential biotechnological applications, and the limitations and challenges of their study given the rather poor available information.

1. Introduction

Glycosidases catalyze the hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds present in a variety of molecules such as carbohydrates, glycolipids, and glycoproteins [1]. By virtue of this property, most of these enzymes play a crucial role in numerous biological processes including the digestion of carbohydrates, the degradation of complex macromolecules, the regulation of cell signaling, and the modification of glycans during glycoprotein and glycoconjugate synthesis. There are different types of glycosidases that are named according to the glycosidic bond they break and the specific substrate they interact with. Some common glycosidases are α- and β-glycosidases, α- and β-mannosidases, β-galactosidase, β-xylosidase, β-fucosidase, and β-glucuronidase, among others, each exhibiting a characteristic mechanism of action [2]. Glycosidases have been classified in 171 families based on the similarities of amino acid sequence and 3D structures in the carbohydrate-active enzyme (http://www.cazy.org, accessed on 30 June 2023) database [2,3].
Knowledge of the mechanism of glycosidase action not only helps us grasp the biochemical intricacies at play but it also has practical implications in various fields, including biotechnology and drug development. At the core of substrate binding, active site residues orchestrate a complex interplay of non-covalent interactions—hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, and electrostatic attractions—establishing a substrate-specific environment akin to a lock-and-key mechanism. Substrate specificity is further refined by the positioning of active site residues to interact specifically with surrounding chemical groups, ensuring exclusive binding to the correct substrate and preventing nonspecific interactions. A deep, detailed insight into this process reveals that it involves several steps: (a) the enzyme–substrate complex is formed in an enzyme-specific site, (b) a water molecule approaches the glycosidic bond forming a glycosyl–enzyme–water ternary intermediate, and (c) an internal reorganization in the complex allows the nucleophile (water) access to the anomeric carbon of the substrate. This results in the break of the glycosidic bond and the release of an outgoing group while the remaining sugar bound to the nucleophile gives rise to a new molecule. The reaction may retain the sugar anomeric configuration as α → α or β → β or α → β or β → α, depending on the orientation of the nucleophilic attack and the relative position of the outgoing group in the substrate. It is worth noting that glycosidase itself plays a relevant role in providing a favorable environment and facilitating the correct orientation of the substrate for the hydrolytic reaction to occur in an efficient manner [1,4,5]. In fungi and most organisms, secreted or membrane-associated glycosidases play a fundamental role in the decomposition of organic matter and the use of products as sources of carbon and energy [4]. In pathogenic fungi, glycosidases are important for the invasion and colonization of animals and plant tissues, thus contributing to fungal virulence and evasion of the immunological defenses by altering the glycosidic moieties of immune system molecules [5,6].

2. Sporothrix and Sporotrichosis

2.1. General Aspects

Sporothrix belongs to the fungal class Ascomycota and the order Ophiostomatales. It is a genus formed by filamentous fungi found in soil, plants, and decaying organic matter and includes pathogenic species for both humans and animals as well as environmental members. In general, members of the environmental clade do not infect mammals, except for some members of the S. pallida and S. stenoceras complexes [7,8,9]. Species of the pathogenic clinical clade of the genus include S. schenckii sensu stricto, S. brasiliensis, S. globosa, and S. luriei, which are responsible for the mycosis known as sporotrichosis of humans and animals, such as cats and dogs [10,11,12,13]. These species exhibit variations in virulence, transmission, and geographical distribution. Sporothrix is a true dimorphic fungus whose morphology depends on temperature, pH, and other factors, such as cyclic nucleotides [13,14]. At 25–28 °C and an acidic pH, it develops as mycelium, which is considered as the saprophytic phase whereas at higher temperatures (32–37 °C) and a pH of 7.0–7.5, it grows as yeast-like cells, which is the morphotype frequently isolated from infected tissues [13,14,15]. Hyphae form either primary or sympodial and secondary or sessile conidia [16,17,18,19,20]. Figure 1 shows the morphological stages of S. globosa, which are similar to other members of the genus.
Sporotrichosis is a cosmopolitan mycosis of humans and animals caused by members of the pathogenic clade of Sporothrix and is common mainly in intertropical areas. The pathogen is transmitted mainly in two ways: (a) the classical route, where soil- or decaying organic matter-borne fungal propagules (sapronosis) are inoculated through trauma and lacerations, and (b) an alternative route, in which the pathogen is inoculated via scratches or bites by infected animals. This route explains the horizontal transmission and zoonosis produced mainly by domestic cats [11,12,16]. On the other hand, infection by S. brasiliensis, an emerging fungal pathogen, can occur exclusively via bite, scratch, spore inhalation, direct contact with secretion, etc. [21].

2.2. Clinical Manifestations of Sporotrichosis

Sporotrichosis is a benign mycosis of humans. In general, it is limited to the epidermis where it forms lesions, the subcutaneous tissue, and the adjacent lymphatic vessels with occasional dissemination to bone tissue and internal organs. The severity and characteristics of the injuries depend on factors such as the depth of the lesion, the inoculum size, the inoculated morphology, virulence, comorbidities, and the immunological state of the host [22,23,24,25,26,27]. Sporotrichosis has been classified into four clinical categories: (a) fixed cutaneous, (b) lymphocutaneous, (c) multifocal, and (d) extracutaneous (systemic or visceral). It has a bad prognosis as it is associated with immunosuppression [24,25,26,28,29,30,31]. Figure 2 illustrates two of the most common clinical lesions of sporotrichosis.

2.3. The Cell Wall

In most fungi, the cell wall (CW) plays a fundamental role in the pathogenicity and virulence of Sporothrix and other fungi, as it establishes the first contact with the host. It is formed by two layers: a relatively conserved internal layer containing β1,3- and β1,6-glucan, which is alkali-insoluble and linked to chitin by β1,4-linkages, forming a very dynamic exoskeleton that protects the cell from internal (cell membrane and cytoplasmic turgor) and external factors. The external layer is more heterogeneous and adaptable to physiological conditions. Apart from these components, the CW also contains galactomannans, glycoproteins, glycolipids, and melanin [32]. The fungal CW plays a vital role in host–pathogen interaction at most stages of infection, aiding in keeping cell integrity [33]. Various pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) are present on the cell surface, which could be recognized by the host immune system’s pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), or they can function as virulence factors, contributing to the infection process and influencing the organism’s pathogenicity [34,35,36]. The proteins deriving from the Sporothrix CW remain insufficiently defined; however, multiple accounts exist regarding specific adhesins that attach to host extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, including fibronectin, laminin, and type II collagen [37,38,39,40]. Pathogen adhesion to host cells plays a pivotal role in proper colonization and subsequent spread [40].
The β-glucan layer is joined to two classes of proteins: those containing internal repetitions (PIR) and those dependent on glycosil-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) that couple covalently to polysaccharides. Functions such as cell adhesion, masking, and immune blocking have been attributed to these extensions [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. In S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis, the CW structure includes β-glucan microfibrils with β1,3, β1,4, and β1,6 linkages, as well as chitin and a peptidorhamnomannan (PRM), in addition to other homogeneous and heterogeneous polymers and manoproteins. Polysaccharides constitute approximately 80% of the dry weight of the CW, while glycoproteins constitute 20%. In some Sporothrix species, there may be variations, as some lack α-glucan. The absence of α-glucans in the CW of Sporothrix could have diverse consequences on the pathogen physiology, affecting its structural integrity, ability to withstand stress, interaction with the host immune system, colonization efficiency, and other aspects such as energy storage, virulence, and cell signaling [32,41,44,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. Recently, the CW composition was analyzed in conidia, germlings, and yeast-like cells of S. globosa and compared with S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis. It was found that both conidia and yeast-like cells of S. globosa had a higher amount of chitin in their CWs, and all morphologies had more exposed β1,3-glucan on their surface compared to S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis [57]. The composition and structure of the fungal cell wall are influenced not only by environmental conditions but also by the cell cycle, changes in growth form, and other processes [58,59,60,61].

2.4. Pathogenicity and Virulence

Virulence factors have been recently reviewed in the hyphae, conidia, and yeast-like cells of S. schenckii [62]. Accordingly, while chitin and β1,3-glucans are associated with the virulence of conidia and hyphae, other components are responsible for the virulence of yeast-like cells. These include the antigenic PRM, CW proteins, melanin, secreted and intracellular proteases, extracellular vesicles, and some lipids. Many of the cell surface components are glycoproteins that allow Sporothrix to interact with the host and evade the immune response, thus allowing the pathogen to survive. Some of these virulence factors are discussed below.
Adhesion of the pathogen to target cells is a required condition for fungal infection to occur. Thus, blocking this primary step represents a potential target to prevent it. Some of the CW proteins, generically known as adhesins, bind to host extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins such as laminin, elastin, fibrinogen, fibrinonectin, and others. One of the best-known adhesins is Gp70, which is one of the major antigenic components of the CW and an important immunogenic factor against Sporothrix. Gp70 adhesin was purified, shown to contain 5.7% N-linked oligosaccharides, and shown to be involved in the adhesion of yeast cells to mouse tail dermis [63]. Its presence was further demonstrated in S. schenckii, S. brasiliensis, and S. globosa [64,65]. Later, recombinant Gp70 was expressed in E. coli, and its gene was predicted to encode for a 43 kDa protein. It was immunogenic and contrary to previous findings and contained a much higher amount of oligosaccharide [66]. Thus, Gp70 seems to play the dual role of an adhesin and antigen.
A major antigenic component of S. schenckii CW is PRM, a complex glycoconjugate that was purified from the yeast morphotype and shown to contain 57% mannose, 33.5% rhamnose, 14.2% proteins, and 1% galactose [53,67]. Whereas the sugar composition of RPM has been fully characterized, only a few of the constituent 325 proteins have been identified. Of these, recombinant GroEL/Hsp 60 and the uncharacterized protein Pap1 showed adhesion to ECM proteins and were more abundant in the yeast morphotype during interaction with HeLa cells [28].
A very important virulence factor is dimorphism, which is defined as the ability of certain fungi to switch between unicellular yeast and multicellular filamentous growth, depending on some environmental conditions. Seemingly, the change in the saprophyte to the parasitic form in pathogenic fungi obeys the need of the organism to adapt, grow, and disseminate in internal organs. The fungus enters the host in the form of conidia or short hyphae which, after some time, transforms into yeast-like cells. It is not clear whether this shift occurs extracellularly and then yeast cells are phagocyted or if conidia and hyphae are first internalized and the dimorphic transition occurs inside the cell. Some results suggest that the conversion of conidia to yeast and/or mycelium can occur inside macrophages [68].
In studies to investigate the compensatory cell responses to damage of the CW by perturbing agents, it was observed that 15 μM Congo red inhibits conidia germination of S. schenckii under conditions set for yeast development but not for mycelial growth, even at a 10-fold higher concentration. When the dye was added to yeast cells pre-grown in its absence, cells rapidly differentiated into mycelial cells, suggesting that this shift may be a strategy to evade the noxious effect of the dye [69]. Further studies confirmed the same behavior in S. globosa and showed that hypha returned to yeast-like cells as soon as the dye disappeared. Cell compensatory responses also included significant variations in the activity of glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase, a critical regulatory enzyme of UDP-GlcNAc levels [70,71].
Melanin is a factor of virulence present in the CW of Sporothrix and many other pathogenic fungi. For its importance in pathogenesis, this pigment has been studied from different aspects including its role in cutaneous sporotrichosis [72], synthesis and assembly in fungi [73], structure [74], biosynthesis in pathogenic species of Sporothrix [75], its relationship with the mammalian immune system [76], its synthesis pathway in fungi as a source for fungal toxins [77], and its role as a factor of virulence in S. schenckii [62]. Melanins are structurally complex dark pigment polymers present in all biological systems [78,79] and in fungi, they are synthesized by two pathways, either from 1,8-dihydronaphthalene (DHN) or L-3,4-dihydrophenylalanine (L-DOPA) [76]. The synthesis of pyomelanin in fungi involves oxidizing and polymerizing aromatic amino acids, like tyrosine, forming a three-dimensional melanin network. Pyomelanin provides protective and adaptive properties, helping the fungus resist environmental factors and antifungal agents. Precise synthesis details can vary by fungal species and environmental conditions [80]. In one study, nonpigmented S. schenckii was phagocyted more readily by human monocytes and murine macrophages than its melanized counterpart. It was also observed that the pigment protects the fungus against radiation [81]. In the same line, several characteristics of sporotrichosis induced in rats with wild type (MEL+) and mutant (MEL-) strains of S. schenckii were compared. Among other observed differences, the pigmented strain showed greater tissue invasion giving rise to multifocal granulomas, while the mutant cells restricted the fungus to the core of the granulomas [72]. Melanin also protects fungal cells from reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide released during phagocytosis [62]. Moreover, it has been observed in some fungi that melanin interferes with the immune system as it reduces the effectiveness of phagocytes, binds effector molecules and antifungals, and alters complement and antibody responses [76].
The most important factor of the virulence of Sporothix and many other organisms is the formation of biofilms. These are highly organized structures formed by sessile cells and a variable amount of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), which function as an impermeable protecting coat that limits the diffusion of chemical substances, leading to recurring infections and resistance to antifungals [82,83,84]. Since the discovery of biofilms, it has been learned that about 90% of microorganisms possess this ability. The formation of biofilms is a complex process that occurs in four phases, namely adhesion, aggregation, maturation, and disaggregation. These colonies of sessile cells can form either on biotic or abiotic surfaces [85,86,87,88], such as medical devices, including catheters, prothesis, pacemakers, and others. A number of properties of biofilms have been studied in several pathogens, particularly Candida albicans and other pathogenic species of the genus [87,88,89,90,91] A biofilm formed by C. albicans is shown in Figure 3A. Recently, a review of materials used to prevent adhesion, growth, and biofilm formation of Candida species [92] was published. Information on biofilm formation by Sporothrix is rather limited. An image of a Sporothrix schenckii biofilm is depicted in Figure 3B. In one study, the ability of Sporothrix spp. to form biofilms in vitro was investigated, as well as the growth, morphology, and sensitivity of sessile cells to antifungals. Results corroborated previous findings observed in other organisms, i.e., that S. schenckii formed well-structured biofilms and the growth of sessile cells was less sensitive to antifungals than planktonic cells [93,94]. Later, it was demonstrated that biofilms formed in vitro by both mycelia and the yeast-like cells of the S. schenckii complex are inhibited by potassium iodide and miltefosine, an antiparasitary drug effective against helminthiasis [95]. Chitosan exhibits antimicrobial activity against many organisms, a function that largely depends on its molecular weight (MW) and deacetylation degree (DD) [96]. In one experiment, low, medium, and high MW chitosans with DD of 75–85% were tested in ten isolates of S. brasiliensis in the filamentous phase. Their effect was measured on planktonic cells, initial adhesion for biofilm formation, and mature biofilms. Low MW chitosan was more inhibitory of both planktonic cells and biofilm formation than the other chitosans, suggesting that low MW chitosan can penetrate and interact with the biofilm more easily than the high MW form, leading to the destruction of the biofilm structure more efficiently [97].

3. Glycosidases

3.1. General Mechanism of Action

A brief account of the general mechanism of reaction of glycosidases is given at the beginning of this review. Here, we go deeper into the fine-tuning of this catalytic process. As mentioned earlier, the hydrolysis of the glycosidic bond can lead to two stereochemical results: retention or inversion of the anomeric configuration, which implies the operation of at least two distinct mechanisms, as illustrated in Figure 4. However, it has been observed that all glycosidases belonging to the same sequence-related family give rise to the same result. In those enzymes that invert configuration, the two carboxyl groups act as general acids and base catalysts suitably positioned at an average distance of 10.5 Å to allow the substrate and a water molecule to bind between them. A reaction occurs by a mechanism involving an oxocarbenio ion-like transition state. In glycosidases that retain configuration, the two carboxyl groups are separated by 5.5 Å, which is consistent with a double displacement mechanism involving a covalent glycosyl enzyme intermediate. In the first step, one of the carboxyl groups acts as a general acid catalyst, protonating the glycosidic oxygen simultaneously with bond cleavage. The other acts as a nucleophile, forming a covalent glycosyl–enzyme intermediate. In the second step, the side-chain carboxylate deprotonates the incoming water molecule, which attacks at the anomeric center and displaces the sugar [4].

3.2. Glycosidases and Glycoprotein Synthesis

Protein glycosylation stands as a remarkably preserved post-translational alteration observed in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. This process entails the attachment of oligosaccharides and glycolipids to the peptide backbone. The impact of glycans extends to a range of biological phenomena, including protein folding, precise transport, cellular positioning, and the facilitation of host–pathogen interactions, among other vital functions [35]. There are two types of glycosylation: N-linked and O-linked. The attachment of N-glycans starts in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where the core glycan is joined by means of two moieties of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) to a specific asparagine residue of the nascent protein bearing the NXS/T sequence, or sequon, where X can be any amino acid except proline. N-glycans are trimmed by specific glycosidases and further modified as they transit through the ER and the Golgi complex. O-glycosylation occurs in the Golgi apparatus where the core O-glycans are attached through N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) to the side chain of serine or threonine residues of the protein [98].
Early studies on the role of glycosidases in glycoprotein synthesis in mammalian cells [99] and on the structure and function of mannosidases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammalian cells in glycoprotein synthesis and quality control [100] paved the way for further studies of these enzymes in various organisms. Many of these have considered S. cerevisiae as a reference for these studies. The generation of mutants, the analysis of phenotypes, and the effect on the physiology of mutant cells have been common approaches to investigating the role of glycosidases in glycoprotein synthesis.
The most common enzyme to remove N-glycans from a glycoprotein is peptide-N-glycosidase F (PNGase F). This amidase breaks the link between the innermost GlcNAc residue and the asparagine of the peptide, releasing the N-glycan and converting asparagine into aspartic acid. Released N-glycan can then be analyzed by LC-FLD and/or LC-MS, CE-LIF, and other techniques. Another enzyme, known as endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase (ENGase), breaks between the two GlcNAc residues, leaving one GlcNAc residue attached to the protein. The specificity of these enzymes is limited to the type of N-glycans they recognize. No endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase can break O-glycans, making the study of these glycoconjugates more difficult. On the other hand, there are two O-glycosidases: one from Streptococcus pneumoniae and the other from Enterococcus faecalis. The first releases galactose β1,3-linked to GalNAc, while E. faecalis, with a broader specificity, releases a GlcNAc-β1,3-GalNAc disaccharide [101,102].

3.3. Glycosidases in Sporothrix Species

Information on glycosidases involved in protein glycosylation in the pathogens referred to in this review has been generated in our laboratory and those of others. Regarding α-mannosidases, two types of these glycosidases belonging to family GH47 are involved in the trimming of N-glycans: those that trim only one mannose from Man9GlcNAc2 (M9), forming Man8GlcNAc2 isomer B (M8B) [103,104] in the ER, and those that operate in the Golgi complex in mammalian and fungal cells that remove three α1,2-linked mannoses from Man8GlcNAc2, forming Man5GlcNAc2, a primer required for the synthesis of complex and hybrid N-glycans [103,105]. In S. schenckii, a membrane-bound α-mannosidase of 75 kDa was solubilized from the ER, purified to homogeneity, and biochemically characterized. The enzyme was shown to convert M9 into M8 isomer B and was preferentially inhibited by deoxymannojirimycin. To our knowledge, this was the first report on the isolation and biochemical analysis of an enzyme involved in the N-linked protein glycosylation in S. schenckii [106].
In contrast to other filamentous fungi, S. schenckii lacks a Golgi α-mannosidase, suggesting that the processing of N-glycans by these enzymes is similar to lower eukaryotes, such as C. albicans and S. cerevisiae, which also lack these glycosidases in the Golgi and form only high-mannose N-glycans [106,107].
Early steps of N-linked glycoprotein synthesis involve the transfer of the dolichol-PP-anchored Man9GlcNAc2Glc3 (Glc3Man9) oligosaccharide to specific asparagine residues of nascent proteins in the ER. Shortly after the transfer, the terminal α1,2-linked and the two more internal α1,3-linked glucose residues are specifically removed by the sequential action of ER-resident α-glucosidases I and II, respectively [99,107]. These steps are similar in yeast, plant, and mammalian cells [108]. Further, α1,2-mannosidase selectively eliminates a specific mannose residue, generating the Man8GlcNAc2 isomer B (M8B) oligosaccharide [99], which either exits the ER for further modification in the Golgi complex or is targeted for degradation if is not properly folded in a process known as ERAD (ER-associated degradation) that involves α-glucosidases I and II [109].
Genetic and molecular biology approaches to the study of glycosidases involved in protein glycosylation were not possible until the genomes S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis were sequenced and a database was available. This achievement allowed us to use S. schenckii sensu stricto to track members of families GH 47 and 63 that gather glycosidases that are potentially involved in glycoprotein processing [110]. These authors detected eight homolog genes, seven belonging to family 47 and one to family 63. To determine the functional characterization of the genes, they used null mutants of C. albicans and investigated the ability of genes to restore the wild type phenotype. To that purpose, members of family 47 and one of family 63 were individually expressed in mutants lacking MNS1 and CWH41, respectively. They found that genes SsMNS1 and SsCWH41 were the orthologs of CaMNS1 and CaCWH41, respectively. They also observed that other members of family 47 encode Golgi mannosidases and RE degradation-enhancing a-mannosidase-like proteins (EDEMs) [109]. A benefit derived from the identification of the genes hosted by these families is their potential role as targets for antifungals against infectious diseases.
As mentioned above, α-glucosidases I and II play a fundamental role in N-glycoprotein biosynthesis, in particular α-glucosidase II, which acts after α-glucosidase I by trimming the two α1,3-linked glucose residues. This generates a deglycosylated intermediate, which is further processed by ER α1-2-mannosidase and fully elongated by Golgi mannosyltransferases [33,111]. α-Glucosidase II is also involved in the ER quality control system for misfolded proteins, which are further degraded in the proteasome [109,112]. In most eukaryotes, α-glucosidase II is a heterodimer consisting of α and β subunits, which correspond to the catalytic site and the ER retention signal, respectively [113].
A distribution analysis of α-glucosidase activity in the yeast morphotype of S. schenckii was carried out by a fluorometric method using 4-methylumbelliferyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (MUαGlc) as a substrate [114]. The results revealed that 38% and 50% of total enzyme activity were present in a soluble and a mixed membrane fraction (MMF), respectively. The MMF-bound enzyme was solubilized with the nonionic detergent Lubrol WX and purified to homogeneity to a dimeric protein consisting of 75.4 and 152.7 kDa subunits. Analysis of hydrolysis of α-linked glucose disaccharides such as nigerose (1,3), kojibiose (1,2), trehalose (1,1), and isomaltose (1,6) revealed the highest preference for nigerose over the other substrates, suggesting that it was an α-glucosidase II. Further evidence was obtained after using selective inhibitors of processing α-glucosidases, namely 1-deoxynojirimycin, castanospermine, and australine. Accordingly, 1-deoxynojirimycin, a more specific inhibitor of α-glucosidase II than I, was a stronger inhibitor of the hydrolysis of both MUαGlc and nigerose than the other inhibitors. Taken together, these properties are consistent with a type II-like α-glucosidase that was probably involved in N-glycan processing. To our knowledge, this was the first report of this activity in a truly dimorphic fungus [114].
In a further study, degenerate primers and inverse PCR approaches were used to isolate the open reading frame of ROT2, the encoding gene for the α subunit of ER α-glucosidase II in S. schenckii [114]. This approach revealed that ROT2 complemented a S. cerevisiae rot2∆ mutant and when expressed in C. albicans rot2∆ mutant, it partially increased α-glucosidase activity but failed to restore the N-glycosylation defect. This was the first report on the isolation of a gene involved in glycoprotein assembly in S. schenckii [115]. Recently, López-Ramírez et al. [116] were able to silence ROT2 and investigate how the lack of the catalytic subunit of RE α-glucosidase II affects the CW, host interaction, and virulence of S. schenckii as tested in Galleria mellonella larvae. They obtained three strains with intermediate (47.9 to 59.3%) and three with high (98.9 to 99.6%) ROT silencing. Gene silencing resulted in the accumulation of the Glc2Man9GlcNAc2 glycan core and a decrease in N-linked glycans in the CW; yet high-silenced strains showed a compensatory increase in CW O-linked glycans. ROT silencing also reduced cytokine production, macrophage phagocytosis, and virulence. The silencing of ROT, however, did not affect S. schenckii growth and morphology [116].

3.4. α-Glycosidases in C. albicans

Back in 1988, the soluble form of a specific α-mannosidase (Fraction II), a glycosidase that removes mannose from Man9GlcNAc to form a single isomer of Man8GlcNAc, was purified and characterized from S. cerevisiae [117]. Using this report as a starting point, Vázquez-Reyna et al. [118] later described that about 80% of α-mannosidase activity in the yeast cells of C. albicans was in a soluble form and demonstrated that no part of this enzyme resulted from the proteolytic release of a particulate cell component. These authors used 4-methylumbelliferyl-α-D-mannopyranoside and p-nitrophenyl-α-D-mannopyranoside as substrates and observed that the hydrolysis of the fluorogenic substrate was strongly inhibited by 1-deoxymannojirimycin (67%) and swainsonine (83%), whereas the hydrolysis of the colorimetric substrate was reduced to a much lower extent (10–15%) by both inhibitors. A molecular weight of 417 kDa was estimated for the enzyme present in a high-speed supernatant and was compared to 560 kDa calculated for the vacuolar α-mannosidase purified from S. cerevisiae [119]. The role of the soluble α-mannosidase of C. albicans in glycoprotein processing remained undetermined.
Further studies of α-mannosidases in C. albicans yeast cells resulted in the purification of two soluble forms of the enzyme, E-I and E-II, which were monomeric polypeptides of 54.3 and 93.3 kDa, respectively [119]. The enzymes were biochemically characterized using the fluorometric and colorimetric substrates described in [118]. Swainsonine and 1-deoxymannojirimycin strongly inhibited the hydrolysis of the fluorogenic substrate by both E-I and E-II, whereas the colorimetric substrate was slightly stimulated by E-I and not affected by E-II [119]. Linkage specificity of E-I and E-II was investigated with various substrates: CW mannans obtained from the wild type strain and the mnn1 and mnn2 mutants of S. cerevisiae, the AsnGlcNAc2Man6 (M6) oligosaccharide obtained from ovoalbumin, and the disaccharide 3-O-α-D-mannopyranosyl-D-mannopyranosyl (Man-α-1,3-Man). Released mannose from these substrates was analyzed by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography (HPAE) in Dionex equipment, Mod. LC20 Chromatography Enclosure. The results revealed that E-I and E-II from C. albicans preferentially cleaved α1,6 and α1,3 linkages, respectively [120].
A clue on the role of these enzymes in glycoprotein processing in C. albicans was obtained when E-I and E-II converted the yeast Man10GlcNAc (M10) oligosaccharide into an acceptor substrate of further mannose residues. Radiolabeled GDP-Man was used as a mannose donor, and the yeast MMF was used as the source of mannosyltransferases [121]. Accordingly, the M10 oligosaccharide was isolated from a triple mutant (mnn1 mnn9 ldb2) of S. cerevisiae. M10 lacks the characteristic signal phosphorylated molecule and contains a terminal α1,6-mannose substituted by an α1,2-mannose, making this product inert for further processing. In the first experiment, M10 was incubated at 37 °C with a buffer, E-I, or E-II. After 18 h, the released mannose was quantified by high-performance anion exchange chromatography. The results indicated that E-I and E-II released 1.2 and 2.0 mol of mannose per mol of M10, respectively. To obtain further insight into this activity, the radiolabeled sugar donor GDP-Man and other ingredients of the reaction mixture were incubated with either a buffer alone (A), MMF (B), MMF and M10 pre-incubated with a buffer (C), MMF and fresh M10 (D), MMF with M10 pre-incubated for 18 h at 37 °C with E-I (E), or E-II (F). Products formed after 18 h of incubation at 28 °C were separated in a column of Bio-Gel P-6, and the radioactivity of fractions was counted by liquid scintillation. Four mannose-labeled peaks of different sizes and amounts of radioactivity were obtained. Accordingly, a small peak, peak I, appeared in the void volume in eluates of incubation mixtures B–F. The nature of this peak was not investigated. Peak IV, with the minimum size, was recovered in all eluates and corresponded to the labeled sugar donor. Peak III appeared in an intermediate position between peaks I and IV in eluates of mixtures C–F and was not evident in the incubation mixture lacking M10 (B). Peak II, with a larger size than peak III, was detected in eluates of mixture F only. The label associated with peak III with respect to the total recovered radioactivity (sum of four peaks) varied from 10.3 (C, 2159 cpm) and 7.8% (D) to 18.1% (E) and 29.4% (F). In other words, the radioactivity and size of M10 significantly increased when it was pre-digested with E-I and, to a greater extent, with E-II. This indicates that these enzymes correspond to N-glycan processing glycosidases with E-I being more specific than E-II, as it removes a single mannose residue. In fact, the pre-digestion of M10 with E-II gave rise to a product (peak II) larger than peak III [121].
A soluble α1,2-mannosidase with the ability to hydrolyze Man9GlcNAc2 (M9) and Man8GlcNAc2 (M8) oligosaccharides was purified from C. albicans and was proposed as a new member of GH family 47. The enzyme was purified to a single polypeptide of 43 kDa by a conventional method of protein isolation [104]. The enzyme converted M9 into M8 isomer B and mannose after 12 h of incubation at 37 °C. The extension of time of incubation to 24 h resulted in the formation of Man7GlcNAc2 (M7) and another product, possibly Man6GlcNAc2 (M6). M7 and M6 oligosaccharides were also detected when M8 was used as a substrate. The enzyme failed to demannosylate Man6GlcNAc2-Asn, Man5GlcNAc2-Asn, and α1,6-mannobiosides, thus confirming enzyme specificity. The catalytic properties of the enzyme purified in this study strongly resemble the ER-resident α1,2-mannosidase. Yet, its molecular weight and linkage specificity disagree with those previously reported in [120]. This discrepancy may be explained by the difference in the isolation method used in these studies. Some of these reports are compiled in a short review [122].
Regarding α-glucosidases, a soluble α-glucosidase II was partially purified from yeast cells of C. albicans, and some of its properties were investigated [123]. Electrophoretic analysis of the purified preparation revealed two major polypeptides of 36 and 47 kDa. The latter was responsible for catalytic activity as visualized in zymograms with MUαGlc. Linkage specificity was investigated using nigerose, maltose, isomaltose, kojibiose, and trehalose as substrates. The enzyme showed a clear preference for nigerose, an a1,3-linked glucose disaccharide, over the other substrates, whose hydrolyses were barely significant. Moreover, the enzyme also converted GlcMan9GlcNAc2 into Man9GlcNAc2 oligosaccharide in a time-dependent manner. These properties are consistent with an α-glucosidase II involved in N-glycan processing. Later, by using protease inhibitors during cell processing, it was demonstrated that α-glucosidase II of C. albicans is a dimer of 83 kDa consisting of 36 and 47 kDa polypeptides [124]. The biochemical properties of the 47 kDa were essentially similar to those previously reported [123], suggesting that this protein is an α-glucosidase II released by the proteolysis of an 83 kDa precursor.
It is well-documented that protein glycosylation plays a critical role in the pathogenesis and immune recognition of C. albicans. To obtain further evidence of the relevance of this process, homolog genes to CWH41, ROT2, and MNS1, which encode ER α-glucosidase I, α-glucosidase II catalytic subunit, and α1,2-mannosidase in S. cerevisiae, respectively, were disrupted in C. albicans, and the corresponding null mutant phenotypes were analyzed in terms of N-glycosylation, CW integrity, and host–fungus interaction [111]. The cells of Cacwh41, Carot2, and Camns1∆ mutants showed several CW defects, exhibited attenuated virulence in a murine model of systemic infection, and stimulated the cytokine profile by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), confirming that the processing of oligosaccharides by these ER glycosidases is crucial for the formation of high-mannose N-glycans, host–fungus interaction, and virulence.
Despite the advance in the study of α-glucosidases I and II in C. albicans and other organisms, almost nothing is known about their 3D structure, catalytic amino acids, and specific residues that participate in substrate interaction. A study carried out with a recombinant α-glucosidase obtained from the expression of the C. albicans CWH41 gene in Escherichia coli demonstrated that the recombinant peptide was catalytically active despite lacking 419 amino acids from the N-terminal end. The biochemical analysis of the enzyme revealed that the presence of hydroxyl groups at carbons 3 and 6 and the orientation of a hydroxyl moiety at C-2 are important for glucose recognition. Moreover, cysteine rather than histidine residues is in the catalytic pocket of the recombinant polypeptide [125].

4. Future Directions

While much progress has been made in the knowledge of Candida and candidiasis, research on Sporothrix species has mainly focused on the pathogenicity and virulence, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of sporotrichosis, a neglected mycosis of humans and animals acquired by the routes discussed in this review. Only three members (S. brasiliensis, S. schenckii, and S. globosa) out of the fifty-three species in the genus impact human and animal health. Most of the other species belong to the environmental core and are not pathogenic for humans. Sporotrichosis is an expanding disease that can eventually reach a zoonotic epidemic driven by S. brasiliensis in cats and humans and become a serious threat to public health. Molecular studies on the physiology of these thermodimorphic fungi were seriously limited until the middle of the last decade, when the genome sequencing of S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis was announced in 2014. Hopefully, the identification and isolation of genes and the generation and phenotypic analysis of specific mutants in terms of altered cell functions will lead to a better knowledge of potential targets of antifungal drugs and a consequent improvement of the prevention and/or control not only of sporotrichosis but also other mycoses. Moreover, these approaches will strengthen genetic glycoengineering, as glycosylation/deglycosylation can be used to modulate the efficiency of protein pharmaceuticals, the modification of glycoprotein antibodies by adding or changing the position of some sugars, changing the properties of recombinant proteins, etc. These achievements will impact the areas of biotechnology, biomedicine, and consequently, human health.

Author Contributions

M.C.-C. and E.L.-R. conceived the structure of the review and J.A.O.-R. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. J.C.V.-C. revised the final version and contributed some suggestions. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Part of this work was performed with the financial support of projects 002/2023 and 019/2023 granted to M.C.C. and E.L.R., respectively, by Dirección de Apoyo a la Investigación y al Posgrado (DAIP), Universidad de Guanajuato, México.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report that there are no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Divakar, S. Glycosidases. In Enzymatic Transformation; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2013; pp. 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cha, J.H.; Hong, M.; Cha, C.J. Fungal β-Glycosidase belonging to subfamily 4 of glycoside hydrolase Family 30 with transglycosylation activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 15261–15267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Henrissat, B.; Davies, G. Structural and sequence-based classification of glycoside gydrolases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1997, 7, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zechel, D.L.; Withers, S.G. Glycosidase mechanisms: Anatomy of a finely tuned catalyst. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cerqueira, N.; Brás, N.; Ramos, M.J.; Fernandes, P.A. Glycosidases—A Mechanistic Overview. In Carbohydrates—Comprehensive Studies on Glycobiology and Glycotechnology; Chang, C.-F., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cairns, J.R.K.; Esen, A. β-Glucosidases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 3389–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nesseler, A.; Schauerte, N.; Geiger, C.; Kaerger, K.; Walther, G.; Kurzai, O.; Eisenberg, T. Sporothrix humicola (Ascomycota: Ophiostomatales)—A soil-borne fungus with pathogenic potential in the eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus). Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2019, 25, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rodrigues, A.M.; Della Terra, P.P.; Gremião, I.D.; Pereira, S.A.; Orofino-Costa, R.; de Camargo, Z.P. The threat of emerging and re-emerging pathogenic Sporothrix species. Mycopathologia 2020, 185, 813–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. de Carvalho, J.A.; Beale, M.A.; Hagen, F.; Fisher, M.C.; Kano, R.; Bonifaz, A.; Toriello, C.; Negroni, R.; Rego, R.S.d.M.; Gremião, I.D.F.; et al. Trends in the molecular epidemiology and population genetics of emerging Sporothrix species. Stud. Mycol. 2021, 100, 100129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Romeo, O.; Criseo, G. What lies beyond genetic diversity in Sporothrix schenckii species complex? Virulence 2013, 4, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Hagen, F.; Stielow, B.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Samerpitak, K.; Zhou, X.; Feng, P.; Yang, L.; Chen, M.; Deng, S.; et al. Phylogeography and evolutionary patterns in Sporothrix spanning more than 14,000 human and animal case reports. Persoonia 2015, 35, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, L.; Gao, W.; Giosa, D.; Criseo, G.; Zhang, J.; He, T.; Huang, X.; Sun, J.; Sun, Y.; Huang, J.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing and in silico analysis of two strains of Sporothrix globosa. Genome Biol. Evol. 2016, 8, 3292–3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Del Valle, N.R.; Rosario, M.; Torres-Blasini, G. Effects of pH, temperature, aeration and carbon source on the development of the mycelial or yeast forms of Sporothrix schenckii from conidia. Mycopathologia 1983, 82, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Del Valle, N.R.; Debs-Elias, N.; Alsina, A. Effects of caffeine, cyclic 3’,5’ adenosine monophosphate and cyclic 3’,5’ guanosine monophosphate in the development of the mycelial form of Sporothrix schenckii. Mycopathologia 1984, 86, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. López-Romero, E.; Reyes-Montes, M.D.R.; Pérez-Torres, A.; Ruiz-Baca, E.; Villagómez-Castro, J.C.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Flores-Carreón, A.; Toriello, C. Sporothrix schenckii complex and sporotrichosis, an emerging health problem. Future Microbiol. 2011, 6, 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rodrigues, A.M.; De Hoog, G.S.; De Camargo, Z.P. Feline sporotrichosis. In Emerging and Epizootic Fungal Infections in Animals; Seyedmousavi, S., Sybren de Hoog, G., Guillot, J., Verweij, P.E., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 199–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marimon, R.; Cano, J.; Gené, J.; Sutton, D.A.; Kawasaki, M.; Guarro, J. Sporothrix brasiliensis, S. globosa, and S. mexicana, three new Sporothrix species of clinical interest. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 3198–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Moussa, T.A.A.; Kadasa, N.M.S.; Al Zahrani, H.S.; Ahmed, S.A.; Feng, P.; van den Ende, A.H.G.G.; Zhang, Y.; Kano, R.; Li, F.; Li, S.; et al. Origin and distribution of Sporothrix globosa causing sapronoses in Asia. J. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 66, 560–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, X.; Wan, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Li, F.; Li, R.; Liu, X. Phenotypic and molecular identification of Sporothrix isolates of clinical origin in northeast China. Mycopathologia 2013, 176, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghosh, A.; Maity, P.K.; Hemashettar, B.M.; Sharma, V.K.; Chakrabarti, A. Physiological characters of Sporothrix schenckii isolates. Mycoses 2002, 45, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rossow, J.A.; Queiroz-Telles, F.; Caceres, D.H.; Beer, K.D.; Jackson, B.R.; Pereira, J.G.; Gremião, I.D.F.; Pereira, S.A. A One Health Approach to Combatting Sporothrix Brasiliensis: Narrative Review of an Emerging Zoonotic Fungal Pathogen in South America. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rodrigues, A.M.; Fernandes, G.F.; De Camargo, Z.P. Sporotrichosis. In Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases of Livestock; Bayry, J., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 391–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Almeida-Paes, R.; De Oliveira, L.C.; Oliveira, M.M.E.; Gutierrez-Galhardo, M.C.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M. Phenotypic characteristics associated with virulence of clinical isolates from the Sporothrix complex. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 212308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.Q.; Xu, X.G.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, P.; Zhou, X.Y.; Li, Z.Z.; Zhang, M.F. Sporotrichosis: Clinical and Histopathological Manifestations. Am. J. Dermatopathol. 2011, 33, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. de Lima Barros, M.B.; de Almeida Paes, R.; Schubach, A.O. Sporothrix schenckii and sporotrichosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 354–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ramírez Soto, M.C. Differences in clinical ocular outcomes between exogenous and endogenous endophthalmitis caused by Sporothrix: A systematic review of published literature. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 102, 977–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Orofino-Costa, R.; Rodrigues, A.M.; de Macedo, P.M.; Bernardes-Engemann, A.R. Sporotrichosis: An update on epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, laboratory and clinical therapeutics. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2017, 92, 606–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. García-Carnero, L.C.; Salinas-Marín, R.; Lozoya-Pérez, N.E.; Wrobel, K.; Wrobel, K.; Martínez-Duncker, I.; Niño-Vega, G.A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. The heat shock protein 60 and Pap1 participate in the Sporothrix schenckii-host interaction. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Orellana, Á.; Moreno-Coutiño, G.; Poletti, E.; Vega, M.E.; Arenas, R. A fixed sporotrichosis with an asteroid body next to a vegetal fragment. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2009, 26, 250–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bravo, T.C. Esporotricosis: Avances recientes en el diagnóstico de laboratorio, histopatología y la epidemiología en México. Rev. Mex. Patol. Clin. Med. Lab. 2012, 59, 147–171. [Google Scholar]
  31. Vásquez-del-Mercado, E.; Arenas, R.; Padilla-Desgarenes, C. Sporotrichosis. Clin. Dermatol. 2012, 30, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Travassos, L.R.; Lloyd, K.O. Sporothrix schenckii and related species of Ceratocystis. Microbiol. Rev. 1980, 44, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mora-Montes, H.M.; Ponce-Noyola, P.; Villagómez-Castro, J.C.; Gow, N.A.R.; Flores-Carreón, A.; López-Romero, E. Protein glycosylation in Candida. Future Microbiol. 2009, 4, 1167–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. García-Carnero, L.C.; Pérez-García, L.A.; Martínez-Álvarez, J.A.; Reyes-Martínez, J.E.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Current Trends to Control Fungal Pathogens: Exploiting Our Knowledge in the Host–Pathogen Interaction. Infect. Drug. Resist. 2018, 11, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lin, B.; Qing, X.; Liao, J.; Zhuo, K. Role of Protein Glycosylation in Host-Pathogen Interaction. Cells 2020, 9, 1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Retanal, C.; Ball, B.; Geddes-Mcalister, J. Post-Translational Modifications Drive Success and Failure of Fungal–Host Interactions. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lima, O.C.; Figueiredo, C.C.; Pereira, B.A.S.; Coelho, M.C.P.; Morandi, V.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M. Adhesion of the Human Pathogen Sporothrix schenckii to Several Extracellular Matrix Proteins. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 1999, 32, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lima, O.C.; Figueiredo, C.C.; Previato, J.O.; Mendonça-Previato, L.; Morandi, V.; Lopes Bezerra, L.M. Involvement of Fungal Cell Wall Components in Adhesion of Sporothrix schenckii to Human Fibronectin. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 6874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lima, O.C.; Bouchara, J.P.; Renier, G.; Marot-Leblond, A.; Chabasse, D.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M. Immunofluorescence and Flow Cytometry Analysis of Fibronectin and Laminin Binding to Sporothrix schenckii Yeast Cells and Conidia. Microb. Pathog. 2004, 37, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Teixeira, P.A.C.; de Castro, R.A.; Nascimento, R.C.; Tronchin, G.; Torres, A.P.; Lazéra, M.; de Almeida, S.R.; Bouchara, J.P.; Loureiro y Penha, C.V.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M. Cell Surface Expression of Adhesins for Fibronectin Correlates with Virulence in Sporothrix schenckii. Microbiology 2009, 155, 3730–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kollár, R.; Reinhold, B.B.; Petráková, E.; Yeh, H.J.C.; Ashwell, G.; Drgonová, J.; Kapteyn, J.C.; Klis, F.M.; Cabib, E. Architecture of the yeast cell wall. Beta(1-->6)-glucan interconnects mannoprotein, Beta(1-->)3-glucan, and chitin. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 17762–17775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Klis, F.M.; Mol, P.; Hellingwerf, K.; Brul, S. Dynamics of cell wall structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 26, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Beauvais, A.; Latgé, J.P. Special Issue: Fungal Cell Wall. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gow, N.A.R.; Latge, J.-P.; Munro, C.A. The fungal cell wall: Structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Latgé, J.P. The cell wall: A carbohydrate armour for the fungal cell. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 66, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wheeler, R.T.; Kombe, D.; Agarwala, S.D.; Fink, G.R. Dynamic, morphotype-specific Candida albicans β-glucan exposure during infection and drug treatment. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yadav, U.; Khan, M.A. Targeting the GPI biosynthetic pathway. Pathog. Glob. Health 2018, 112, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Garcia-Rubio, R.; de Oliveira, H.C.; Rivera, J.; Trevijano-Contador, N. The fungal cell wall: Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus species. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 492056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Previato, J.O.; Gorin, P.A.J.; Travassos, L.R. Cell wall composition in different cell types of the dimorphic species Sporothrix schenckii. Exp. Mycol. 1979, 3, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ruiz-Baca, E.; Alba-Fierro, C.A.; Pérez-Torres, A. Components and virulence factors of the Sporothrix schenckii species complex. In Sporotrichosis: New Developments and Future Prospects; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 37–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fernandes, G.F.; dos Santos, P.O.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Sasaki, A.A.; Burger, E.; de Camargo, Z.P. Characterization of virulence profile, protein secretion and immunogenicity of different Sporothrix schenckii sensu stricto isolates compared with S. globosa and S. brasiliensis species. Virulence 2013, 4, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ruiz-Baca, E.; Hernández-Mendoza, G.; Cuéllar-Cruz, M.; Toriello, C.; López-Romero, E.; Gutiérrez-Sánchez, G. Detection of 2 immunoreactive antigens in the cell wall of Sporothrix brasiliensis and Sporothrix globosa. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 79, 328–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lopes-Bezerra, L.M. Sporothrix schenckii cell wall peptidorhamnomannans. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 16636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alba-Fierro, C.A.; Pérez-Torres, A.; López-Romero, E.; Cuéllar-Cruz, M.; Ruiz-Baca, E. Cell call proteins of Sporothrix schenckii as immunoprotective agents. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2014, 31, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; Walker, L.A.; Niño-Vega, G.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Neves, G.W.P.; Villalobos-Duno, H.; Barreto, L.; Garcia, K.; Franco, B.; Martínez-Álvarez, J.A.; et al. Cell Walls of the Dimorphic Fungal Pathogens Sporothrix schenckii and Sporothrix brasiliensis Exhibit Bilaminate Structures and Sloughing of Extensive and Intact Layers. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Arroyo, J.; Farkaš, V.; Sanz, A.B.; Cabib, E. Strengthening the fungal cell wall through chitin–glucan cross-links: Effects on morphogenesis and cell integrity. Cell Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1239–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. García-Carnero, L.C.; Martínez-Duncker, I.; Gómez-Gaviria, M.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Differential recognition of clinically relevant Sporothrix species by human mononuclear cells. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Latgé, J.P. Tasting the fungal cell wall. Cell Microbiol. 2010, 12, 863–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Klis, F.M.; Boorsma, A.; De Groot, P.W.J. Cell wall construction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2006, 23, 185–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ruiz-Herrera, J.; Victoria Elorza, M.; Valentín, E.; Sentandreu, R. Molecular organization of the cell wall of Candida albicans and its relation to pathogenicity. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006, 6, 14–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sorais, F.; Barreto, L.; Leal, J.A.; Bernabé, M.; San-Blas, G.; Niño-Vega, G.A. Cell wall glucan synthases and GTPases in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Med. Mycol. 2010, 48, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. García-Carnero, L.C.; Martínez-Álvarez, J.A. Virulence factors of Sporothrix schenckii. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ruiz-Baca, E.; Toriello, C.; Pérez-Torres, A.; Sabanero-Lopez, M.; Villagómez-Castro, J.C.; López-Romero, E. Isolation and some properties of a glycoprotein of 70 kDa (Gp70) from the cell wall of Sporothrix schenckii involved in fungal adherence to dermal extracellular matrix. Med. Mycol. 2009, 47, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rodrigues, A.M.; Fernandes, G.F.; Araujo, L.M.; Della Terra, P.P.; dos Santos, P.O.; Pereira, S.A.; Schubach, T.M.P.; Burger, E.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; de Camargo, Z.P. Proteomics-based characterization of the humoral immune response in sporotrichosis: Toward discovery of potential diagnostic and vaccine antigens. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0004016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rodrigues, A.M.; Kubitschek-Barreira, P.H.; Fernandes, G.F.; de Almeida, S.R.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; de Camargo, Z.P. Immunoproteomic analysis reveals a convergent humoral response signature in the Sporothrix schenckii complex. J. Proteomics 2015, 115, 8–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Martínez-Álvarez, J.A.; García-Carnero, L.C.; Kubitschek-Barreira, P.H.; Lozoya-Pérez, N.E.; Belmonte-Vázquez, J.L.; De Almeida, J.R.F.; De Gómez-Infante, A.J.; Curty, N.; Villagómez-Castro, J.C.; Peña-Cabrera, E.; et al. Analysis of some immunogenic properties of the recombinant Sporothrix schenckii Gp70 expressed in Escherichia coli. Future Med. 2019, 14, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lloyd, K.O.; Bitoon, M.A. Isolation and purification of a peptido-rhamnomannan from the yeast form of Sporothrix schenckii. structural and immunochemical Studies. J. Immunol. 1971, 107, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Guzman-Beltran, S.; Perez-Torres, A.; Coronel-Cruz, C.; Torres-Guerrero, H. Phagocytic receptors on macrophages distinguish between different Sporothrix schenckii morphotypes. Microbes Infect. 2012, 14, 1093–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sánchez-López, J.F.; González-Ibarra, J.; Macías-Segoviano, J.I.; Cuéllar-Cruz, M.; Álvarez-Vargas, A.; Cano-Canchola, C.; López-Romero, E. Congo Red affects the growth, morphology and activity of glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase in the human pathogenic fungus Sporothrix schenckii. Arch. Microbiol. 2019, 201, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ortiz-Ramírez, J.A.; Cuéllar-Cruz, M.; López-Romero, E. Responses of Sporothrix globosa to the cell wall perturbing agents Congo Red and Calcofluor White. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2021, 114, 609–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ortiz-Ramírez, J.A.; Cuéllar-Cruz, M.; López-Romero, E. Cell Compensatory responses of fungi to damage of the cell wall induced by Calcofluor White and Congo Red with emphasis on Sporothrix schenckii and sporothrix globosa. A review. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 976924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Madrid, I.M.; Xavier, M.O.; Mattei, A.S.; Fernandes, C.G.; Guim, T.N.; Santin, R.; Schuch, L.F.D.; Nobre, M.d.O.; Araújo Meireles, M.C. Role of melanin in the pathogenesis of cutaneous sporotrichosis. Microbes Infect. 2010, 12, 162–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Eisenman, H.C.; Casadevall, A. Synthesis and assembly of fungal melanin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nosanchuk, J.D.; Stark, R.E.; Casadevall, A. Fungal melanin: What do we know about structure? Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 173098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Almeida-Paes, R.; Borba-Santos, L.P.; Rozental, S.; Marco, S.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M.; da Cunha, M.M.L. Melanin biosynthesis in pathogenic species of Sporothrix. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017, 31, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, S.; Youngchim, S.; Zamith-Miranda, D.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Fungal melanin and the mammalian immune system. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gao, J.; Wenderoth, M.; Doppler, M.; Schuhmacher, R.; Marko, D.; Fischer, R. Fungal melanin biosynthesis pathway as source for fungal toxins. mBio 2022, 13, e00219-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Riley, P.A. Melanin. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1997, 29, 1235–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Suwannarach, N.; Kumla, J.; Watanabe, B.; Matsui, K.; Lumyong, S. Characterization of melanin and optimal conditions for pigment production by an endophytic fungus, Spissiomyces endophytica SDBR-CMU319. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Almeida-Paes, R.; Figueiredo-Carvalho, M.H.G.; Brito-Santos, F.; Almeida-Silva, F.; Oliveira, M.M.E.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M. Melanins Protect Sporothrix brasiliensis and Sporothrix schenckii from the Antifungal Effects of Terbinafine. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Romero-Martinez, R.; Wheeler, M.; Guerrero-Plata, A.; Rico, G.; Torres-Guerrero, H. Biosynthesis and functions of melanin in Sporothrix schenckii. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 3696–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Allewell, N.M. Introduction to Biofilms Thematic Minireview Series. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 12527–12528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Nogueira Brilhante, R.S.; Correia, E.E.M.; De Melo Guedes, G.M.; Pereira, V.S.; De Oliveira, J.S.; Bandeira, S.P.; De Alencar, L.P.; De Andrade, A.R.C.; Collares Maia Castelo-Branco, D.d.S.; De Aguiar Cordeiro, R.; et al. Quantitative and structural analyses of the in vitro and ex vivo biofilm-forming ability of dermatophytes. J. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 66, 1045–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ortega-Peña, S.; Hernández-Zamora, E. Microbial biofilms and their impact on medical areas: Physiopathology, diagnosis and treatment. Bol. Med. Hosp. Infant. Mex. 2018, 75, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fanning, S.; Mitchell, A.P. Fungal biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Finkel, J.S.; Mitchell, A.P. Genetic control of Candida albicans biofilm development. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Al-Fattani, M.A.; Douglas, L.J. Biofilm matrix of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis: Chemical composition and role in drug resistance. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 55, 999–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kernien, J.F.; Snarr, B.D.; Sheppard, D.C.; Nett, J.E. The Interface between fungal biofilms and innate immunity. Front. Immunol. 2018, 8, 328714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Serrano-Fujarte, I.; López-Romero, E.; Reyna-López, G.E.; Martínez-Gámez, M.A.; Vega-González, A.; Cuéllar-Cruz, M. Influence of culture media on biofilm formation by Candida species and response of sessile cells to antifungals and oxidative stress. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 783639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nobile, C.J.; Johnson, A.D. Candida albicans biofilms and human Disease. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 69, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Pemmaraju, S.C.; Padmapriya, K.; Pruthi, P.A.; Prasad, R.; Pruthi, V. Impact of oxidative and osmotic stresses on Candida albicans biofilm formation. Biofouling 2016, 32, 897–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Tornero-Gutiérrez, F.; Ortiz-Ramírez, J.A.; López-Romero, E.; Cuéllar-Cruz, M. Materials used to prevent adhesion, growth and biofilm formation of Candida species. Med. Mycol. 2023, 61, myad065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Brilhante, R.S.N.; De Aguiar, F.R.M.; Da Silva, M.L.Q.; De Oliveira, J.S.; De Camargo, Z.P.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Pereira, V.S.; Serpa, R.; De Souza Collares Maia Castelo-Branco, D.; Correia, E.E.M.; et al. Antifungal susceptibility of Sporothrix schenckii complex biofilms. Med. Mycol. 2018, 56, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Brilhante, R.S.N.; Fernandes, M.R.; Pereira, V.S.; Costa, A.d.C.; de Oliveira, J.S.; de Aguiar, L.; Rodrigues, A.M.; de Camargo, Z.P.; Pereira-Neto, W.A.; Sidrim, J.J.C.; et al. Biofilm formation on cat claws by Sporothrix species: An ex vivo model. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 150, 104670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Brilhante, R.S.N.; Da Silva, M.L.Q.; Pereira, V.S.; De Oliveira, J.S.; Maciel, J.M.; Da Silva, I.N.G.; Garcia, L.G.S.; Guedes, G.M.D.M.; Cordeiro, R.D.A.; Pereira-Neto, W.D.A.; et al. Potassium iodide and miltefosine inhibit biofilms of Sporothrix schenckii species complex in yeast and filamentous forms. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 764–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Goy, R.C.; De Britto, D.; Assis, O.B.G. A Review of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan. Polímeros 2009, 19, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Garcia, L.G.S.; de Melo Guedes, G.M.; Fonseca, X.M.Q.C.; Pereira-Neto, W.A.; Castelo-Branco, D.S.C.M.; Sidrim, J.J.C.; de Aguiar Cordeiro, R.; Rocha, M.F.G.; Vieira, R.S.; Brilhante, R.S.N. Antifungal activity of different molecular weight chitosans against planktonic cells and biofilm of Sporothrix brasiliensis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 143, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Herscovics, A.; Orlean, P. Glycoprotein biosynthesis in yeast. FASEB J. 1993, 7, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Herscovics, A. Importance of glycosidases in mammalian glycoprotein biosynthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1473, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Herscovics, A. Structure and function of class I alpha 1,2-mannosidases involved in glycoprotein synthesis and endoplasmic reticulum quality control. Biochimie 2001, 83, 757–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Guthrie, E.P.; Magnelli, P.E. Using glycosidases to remove, trim, or modify glycans on therapeutic proteins. Bioprocess Int. 2016, 14, 2. [Google Scholar]
  102. Tzelepis, G.; Karlsson, M.; Suzuki, T. Deglycosylating enzymes acting on N-Glycans in fungi: Insights from a genome survey. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2017, 1861, 2551–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tremblay, L.O.; Herscovics, A. Cloning and expression of a specific human alpha 1,2-mannosidase that trims Man9GlcNAc2 to Man8GlcNAc2 isomer B during N-glycan biosynthesis. Glycobiology 1999, 9, 1073–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mora-Montes, H.M.; López-Romero, E.; Zinker, S.; Ponce-Noyola, P.; Flores-Carreón, A. Hydrolysis of Man9GlcNAc2 and Man8GlcNAc2 oligosaccharides by a purified α-mannosidase from Candida albicans. Glycobiology 2004, 14, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Akao, T.; Yamaguchi, M.; Yahara, A.; Yoshiuchi, K.; Fujita, H.; Yamada, O.; Akita, O.; Ohmachi, T.; Asada, Y.; Yoshida, T. Cloning and expression of 1,2-α-mannosidase gene (FmanIB) from filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae: In Vivo visualization of the FmanIBp-GFP fusion protein. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2006, 70, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Mora-Montes, H.M.; Robledo-Ortiz, C.I.; González-Sánchez, L.C.; López-Esparza, A.; López-Romero, E.; Flores-Carreón, A. Purification and biochemical characterisation of endoplasmic reticulum alpha1,2-mannosidase from Sporothrix schenckiil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2010, 105, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Herscovics, A. Processing glycosidases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1426, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Yet, M.-G.; Shao, M.-C.; Wold, F. Effects of the protein matrix on glycan processing in glycoproteins. FASEB J. 1988, 2, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Helenius, A.; Aebi, M. Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004, 73, 1019–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; Lozoya-Pérez, N.E.; López-Ramírez, L.A.; Martínez-Álvarez, J.A.; Teixeira, M.M.; Felipe, M.S.S.; Flores-Carreón, A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Functional characterization of Sporothrix schenckii glycosidases involved in the N-linked glycosylation pathway. Med. Mycol. 2015, 53, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mora-Montes, H.M.; Bates, S.; Netea, M.G.; Díaz-Jiménez, D.F.; López-Romero, E.; Zinker, S.; Ponce-Noyola, P.; Kullberg, B.J.; Brown, A.J.P.; Odds, F.C.; et al. Endoplasmic reticulum α-glycosidases of Candida albicans are required for N glycosylation, cell wall integrity, and normal host-fungus interaction. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 2184–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Vembar, S.S.; Brodsky, J.L. One step at a time: Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 9, 944–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Trombetta, E.S.; Simons, J.F.; Helenius, A. Endoplasmic reticulum glucosidase II is composed of a catalytic subunit, conserved from yeast to mammals, and a tightly bound noncatalytic HDEL- containing subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 27509–27516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Torres-Rodríguez, B.I.; Flores-Berrout, K.; Villagómez-Castro, J.C.; López-Romero, E. Purification and partial biochemical characterization of a membrane-bound type II-like α-glucosidase from the yeast morphotype of Sporothrix schenckii. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2012, 101, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Robledo-Ortiz, C.I.; Flores-Carreón, A.; Hernández-Cervantes, A.; Álvarez-Vargas, A.; Lee, K.K.; Díaz-Jiménez, D.F.; Munro, C.A.; Cano-Canchola, C.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Isolation and functional characterization of Sporothrix schenckii ROT2, the encoding gene for the endoplasmic reticulum glucosidase II. Fungal Biol. 2012, 116, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. López-Ramírez, L.A.; Martínez-Duncker, I.; Márquez-Márquez, A.; Vargas-Macías, A.P.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Silencing of ROT2, the encoding gene of the endoplasmic reticulum glucosidase II, affects the cell wall and the Sporothrix schenckii–host interaction. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Jelinek-Kelly, S.; Herscovics, A. Glycoprotein biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Purification of the α-mannosidase which removes one specific mannose residue from Man9GlcNAc. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 14757–14763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Vázquez-Reyna, A.B.; Balcázar-Orozco, R.; Flores-Carreón, A. Biosynthesis of glycoproteins in Candida albicans: Biochemical characterization of a soluble α-mannosidase. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1993, 106, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yoshihisa, T.; Ohsumi, Y.; Anraku, Y. Solubilization and purification of α-mannosidase, a marker enzyme of vacuolar membranes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 5158–5163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Vázquez-Reyna, A.B.; Ponce-Noyola, P.; Calvo-Méndez, C.; López-Romero, E.; Flores-Carreón, A. Purification and biochemical characterization of two soluble α-mannosidases from Candida albicans. Glycobiology 1999, 9, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Vázquez-Reyna, A.B.; Balcázar-Orozco, R.; Calvo-Méndez, C.; López-Romero, E.; Flores-Carreón, A. Processing of the Man10GlcNAc (M10) Oligosaccharide by α-mannosidases from Candida albicans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000, 185, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. López-Romero, E.; Flores-Carreón, A.; Arroyo-Flores, B.L.; Torre-Bouscoulet, M.E.; Bravo-Torres, J.C.; Viltlagómez-Castro, J.C.; Balcázar-Orozco, R. Glycosyl Transferases and glycosidases of glycoprotein biosynthesis with emphasis on Candida albicans and Entamoeba histolytica. Recent Res. Dev. Microbiol. 2000, 4, 667–681. [Google Scholar]
  123. Torre-Bouscoulet, M.E.; López-Romero, E.; Balcázar-Orozco, R.; Calvo-Méndez, C.; Flores-Carreón, A. Partial purification and biochemical characterization of a soluble α-glucosidase II-like activity from Candida albicans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 236, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Alberto, C.; Alfaro, R.; Mora-Montes, M.; Flores-Martínez, A.; Flores Carreón, A. Aislamiento y caracterización bioquímica de la α-glucosidasa II del hongo patógeno Candida albicans. Acta Univ. 2011, 21, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Frade-Pérez, M.D.; Hernández-Cervantes, A.; Flores-Carreón, A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Biochemical characterization of Candida albicans α-glucosidase I heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2010, 98, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphological phases of S. globosa. Images show mycelia or filamentous cells (A), conidia (B), and yeast-like cells (C). Images produced in ELR laboratory.
Figure 1. Morphological phases of S. globosa. Images show mycelia or filamentous cells (A), conidia (B), and yeast-like cells (C). Images produced in ELR laboratory.
Jof 09 00919 g001
Figure 2. Clinical lesions of sporotrichosis. Fixed cutaneous (A) and classical lymphangitic or subcutaneous (B). Images were kindly provided by Dr. Alexandro Bonifaz, Mexico.
Figure 2. Clinical lesions of sporotrichosis. Fixed cutaneous (A) and classical lymphangitic or subcutaneous (B). Images were kindly provided by Dr. Alexandro Bonifaz, Mexico.
Jof 09 00919 g002
Figure 3. Biofilm formed by C. albicans (A). Adapted with permission from [89], under an open access Creative Common License Deed (CC BY 3.0). Copyright 2015 Hindawi. S. schenckii (B) was produced in the JCVC laboratory.
Figure 3. Biofilm formed by C. albicans (A). Adapted with permission from [89], under an open access Creative Common License Deed (CC BY 3.0). Copyright 2015 Hindawi. S. schenckii (B) was produced in the JCVC laboratory.
Jof 09 00919 g003
Figure 4. Catalytic mechanism of retaining and inverting glycosidases. Reprinted with permissionfrom [5], under an open access Creative Commons Attibution 3.0. Copyright 2012 IntechOpen.
Figure 4. Catalytic mechanism of retaining and inverting glycosidases. Reprinted with permissionfrom [5], under an open access Creative Commons Attibution 3.0. Copyright 2012 IntechOpen.
Jof 09 00919 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ortiz-Ramírez, J.A.; Cuéllar-Cruz, M.; Villagómez-Castro, J.C.; López-Romero, E. Fungal Glycosidases in Sporothrix Species and Candida albicans. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 919. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9090919

AMA Style

Ortiz-Ramírez JA, Cuéllar-Cruz M, Villagómez-Castro JC, López-Romero E. Fungal Glycosidases in Sporothrix Species and Candida albicans. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(9):919. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9090919

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ortiz-Ramírez, Jorge A., Mayra Cuéllar-Cruz, Julio C. Villagómez-Castro, and Everardo López-Romero. 2023. "Fungal Glycosidases in Sporothrix Species and Candida albicans" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 9: 919. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9090919

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop