Next Article in Journal
Silicone vs. Polyurethane Stent: The Final Countdown
Previous Article in Journal
Rural–Urban Differences in Common Mental Disorders, Functional Limitation and Social Support among Adults with Cancer: A Population-Based Study in Spain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/jcm11102745
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Electrochemotherapy of Primary Colon Rectum Cancer and Local Recurrence: Case Report and Prospective Analysis

by
Daniela Rega
1,
Vincenza Granata
2,3,*,
Antonella Petrillo
2,
Ugo Pace
1,
Massimiliano Di Marzo
1,
Roberta Fusco
4,
Valeria D’Alessio
4,
Guglielmo Nasti
5,
Carmela Romano
5,
Antonio Avallone
5,
Vincenzo Ravo
6,
Fabiana Tatangelo
7,
Piera Maiolino
8,
Raffaele Palaia
9,
Francesco Izzo
9 and
Paolo Delrio
1
1
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
2
Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
4
IGEA SpA Medical Division-Oncology, Via Casarea 65, Casalnuovo di Napoli, 80013 Napoli, Italy
5
Division of Abdominal Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
6
Division of Abdominal Radiotherapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
7
Division of Pathological Anatomy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
8
Division of Pharmacy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
9
Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(10), 2745; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102745
Submission received: 14 April 2022 / Revised: 5 May 2022 / Accepted: 9 May 2022 / Published: 12 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Purpose: Surgery, radiotherapy, and oncological treatment (chemotherapy and antineoplastic antibodies) are standard treatments of rectal cancer. ECT has shown its effectiveness and suitability in deep solid tumors conducted in both preclinical and clinical studies. We show here an update and preliminary results with locally advanced rectum cancer (LARC) treated with ECT. Methods: Two patients with major clinical response to restaging after neoadjuvant treatment for LARC were subjected to ECT 12 weeks after completing chemo-radiation therapy. One patient was subjected to ECT on a colorectal local recurrence formed after neoadjuvant treatment for LARC and surgery. Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging were used to assess ECT response. Results: The results showed stable disease in two of the three patients treated, while one patient achieved a complete response. The local control of disease is maintained in the patient follow-up. For each patient, a reduction in pain was observed and for the patient with local recurrence, a reduction in bleeding present before ECT was also achieved. Conclusion: Preliminary results showed that ECT is a safe and effective treatment in patients with a major clinical response or local recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy for LARC and allows a reduction in pain and bleeding with a consequent improvement to quality of life.

1. Introduction

Every year, about 1.4 million new cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) are registered worldwide [1], and most of these cases are in older patients (65 years and above) [2]. Standard treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is represented by surgery, radiotherapy, and oncological treatment (chemotherapy and antineoplastic antibodies). New compounds that could potentially be active against colorectal cancer have been synthesized [3].
Unfortunately, between 2.6% and 32% of cases relapse and without adequate surgical treatment, less than 5% of patients survive at 5 years. This percentage can rise to 60% (at 5 years) without radical treatment of the relapse [4]. Survival increases if surgery is associated with adjuvant integrated and intraoperative radiotherapy (+/− chemotherapy) [5,6,7,8].
A high percentage (up to 25%) of colorectal cancer patients have metastases at diagnosis [9]. Although surgery is the gold standard for CLM, only 20% of patients are eligible for surgery [9]. Patients with unresectable liver metastases at diagnosis are typically treated with a combination of surgical and non-surgical procedures such as radiothermal ablation, cryoablation, irreversible electroporation, and portal embolization unless patients had some bilobar involvement or previous liver surgery [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. The aim is to reduce the tumor mass and obtain radicality with subsequent surgery, or to limit the progression of the tumor [10].
Moreover, local treatment such as reversible electroporation could be used to reduce the lesion size before the surgery. Electroporation (EP) is a physical phenomenon whereby if adequate voltage is applied, the membrane becomes permeable, enabling entry into the cell of molecules that are not, or are poorly, permeable. The EP technique used alone as Irreversible Electroporation (IRE), or in combination with anticancer drugs (Electrochemotherapy, ECT), has proven to be effective in the treatment of primary and metastatic tumors. Compared to other techniques such as Radio Frequencies (RF) and Microwave (Microwave) Radiotherapy (RX), the treatment of EP is not associated with a variation in the temperature of the exposed tissue. Therefore, the treatment can also be completed in the vicinity of noble structures (vessels and nerves) without risk of complication. ECT is a locoregional anti-tumor therapy that combines a low dose of chemotherapy with high-intensity electric pulses to induce cell membrane electroporation and, consequently, to locally enhance drug delivery into tumor cells. Bleomycin and cisplatin are the two most used drugs; cisplatin is usually injected intratumorally and bleomycin is injected intratumorally or systemically depending on the dimension and number of lesions. Bleomycin intravenous infusion is the most common administration [18,19]. After the first electrochemotherapy clinical trials [18,19,20,21,22,23], the Standard Operating Procedures for ECT with the CLINIPORATOR™ Device (IGEA S.p.A., Carpi, Italy) were defined [23,24]. ECT clinical effectiveness and its safety profile have been confirmed in several studies [23,24,25,26,27,28], showing no serious adverse effects and limited side effects on normal tissues. Moreover, studies have shown that ECT with bleomycin is safe and improves outcomes for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck when compared to bleomycin therapy alone [29,30].
ECT has shown its effectiveness and suitability in deep solid tumors conducted in both preclinical and clinical studies [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. ECT was confirmed to be safe and free of intraoperative or postoperative serious adverse events [1,37].
Recently, a phase I clinical trial on endoscopic electrochemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer was conducted in six patients using intravenous bleomycin (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04649372, accessed on 10 April 2021). The treatment procedure is similar to standard endoscopic colorectal examination (therapeutic colonoscopy) with the added element of an intravenous injection of bleomycin followed by the delivery of electric pulses (each one less than 1 msec in duration). The pulses are endoscopically delivered directly to the tumor mass. The entire procedure is minimally invasive. A successful treatment will cause the tumor to shrink in size in the weeks following the procedure.
The objective of this study is to assess the preliminary finding of ECT used in downsizing locally advanced rectal tumors prior to the intended curative surgery. Multiple needles in a variable geometry and fixed geometry were used to perform the treatment and safety and feasibility for each procedure was considered.
In this study, we present a prospective analysis of two LARC patients with a major clinical response after neoadjuvant treatment at restaging. Patients were subjected to ECT 12 weeks after completing neoadjuvant treatment, and one patient was treated with ECT for local recurrence after surgery. Attention was given to the feasibility and safety of the treatment.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Patients with Primary Cancer

Three LARC patients were treated with long course radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant regimen before local excision (LE). Long course radiotherapy consists of 45–50 Gy (in fractions of 1.8–2 Gy), with simultaneous 5-fluorouracil administration. Standard fractions of 1.8 Gy/day to the reference point were given, 5 times a week up to a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions [42]. Each subject received the standard treatment with capecitabine at a dose of 825 mg/m2 twice daily, 5 days a week, for 5 weeks.
A 3-field technique (one posterior–anterior and two lateral fields) or IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy) were used for external radiation therapy.
Electrochemotherapy was performed according to ESOPE guidelines. Shortly after the induction of systemic anesthesia, bleomycin (15,000 IU BLM/m2) was injected intravenously. Eight minutes after, electric pulses were delivered to the lesion with the CLINIPORATOR™ (IGEA Ltd., Modena, Italy) with the insertion of appropriate CE certificate electrodes (STINGER or VGD applied part by IGEA Ltd., Modena, Italy). The procedure was completed within 40 min from the end of the bleomycin injection [23]. Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) were used to assess ECT response [6,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. In Table 1, case descriptions and results are summarized.

2.2. First Case of LARC Description

A 75-year-old male with a major clinical response to restaging was submitted to ECT treatment 12 weeks after chemo-radiation therapy. A trans-anal laparoscopic approach with a single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port was used to perform the ECT (Figure 1) on a lesion of the endorectal mucosa at 6 cm from the anal canal. An expandable divergent electrode with 10 degrees of divergence, a length of 20 cm, and a 5 mm shaft (STINGER IG0E821) was used.

2.3. Second Case LARC Description

A 66-year-old male with a major clinical response to restaging was submitted to ECT treatment 12 weeks after chemo-radiation therapy. ECT with a trans-anal laparoscopic approach and a SILS port (Figure 2) on the primary rectal tumor with semi-annular morphology and extension from hours 2 to 5 were performed. The distal margin of the tumor was 90 mm from the external anal orifice. The tumor extended into the caudal skull for 13 mm and had a maximum axial thickness of 5 mm. The ECT treatment was performed using an expandable divergent electrode with 10 degrees of divergence, a length of 20 cm, and a 5 mm shaft (STINGER IG0E821).

2.4. Third LARC Case Description

A 50-year-old male with recurrence after long course neoadjuvant therapy and total mesorectal excision (TME). The treatment was performed with four single needles in a variable geometry (Figure 3), defined using a preoperative planning tool (Pulsar, IGEA Ltd., Modena, Italy). A single needle has 30 mm of active part and 20 cm of length. Moreover, one fixed geometry electrode with hexagonal configuration (EPSA, IGEA Ltd., Modena, Italy) was used to treat the patient. Multiple insertions to the subcutaneous recurrence part of the perianal region were performed.

3. Results of Included Cases

3.1. First Case

The ECT treatment was determined accurately without current alarms during electric pulse delivery, and the procedure was considered safe and feasible by clinicians. MRI and CT before treatment showed thickening of the rectal walls (about 8 mm) with residual inhomogeneity of the wall (Figure 4A,B). The parietal thickening of the rectum was substantially stable, as shown in the CT scan performed 6 months after ECT treatment (Figure 4C). The lesion still appears in stable disease nine months after ECT (Figure 4D). The patient reported pain reduction according to the VAS scale from 2 to 0.

3.2. Second Case

The ECT treatment was determined accurately without current alarms during electric pulse delivery and the procedure was considered safe and feasible by clinicians. MRI and CT before treatment with ECT (Figure 5A,B) showed persistent rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy with semi-annular morphology and extension from 2 to 5 h. The neoplasm did not invade the mesorectal adipose tissue. MRI was performed 2 months after the ECT showed that the primary rectal tumor with semi-annular morphology and extension from 2 to 4 h had reduced in volume. The distal tumor margin was located 91 mm from the external anal verge, extending into the caudal skull for 24 mm, and appeared markedly hypointense on T2-weighted sequences due to extensive fibrosis. CT showed a slight residual thickening of the rectal walls on the side of apparent fibrotic content (Figure 5C,D). The patient reported pain reduction according to the VAS scale from 3 to 0.

3.3. Third Case

The ECT treatment was determined accurately without current alarms during electric pulse delivery and the procedure was considered safe and feasible by clinicians. MRI was performed at a baseline (Figure 6A,B) and showed a large recurrence of the disease from the perianal skin region (also with distinct nodules), which travelled up along the perineum, leading anteriorly near the pubis, infiltrated, with fistula towards the wall anterior abdominal. Subsequently, the recurrence approached the sacrum, from which it was indissociable. The commitment of the presacral fascia and the right muscular structures was also appreciated, up to the iliac bifurcation. MRI 6 months after ECT treatment showed no significant morphostructural changes in the lesion that was considered stable disease (Figure 6C,D). However, the patient reported a reduction in pain on the VAS 7 to 4 scale and a reduction in bleeding.

4. Literature Review

TME is the gold standard in rectal cancer surgery and involves resection of the rectum together with surrounding fatty tissue [55]. Currently, 45–55% of LARC patients receive a combination of preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy (pCRT) in a neoadjuvant regimen before TME [56].
Since TME involves significant morbidity and complications, the need for conservative treatment strategies is strongly felt for patients with LACR and with a major response after pCRT with the advantage of reducing morbidity and preserving organs [57]. An improvement of survival seems to be related to the prolongation of the treatment interval [58,59,60].
Many advances have been achieved with ECT technique and due to the endoluminal approach; the difficulty of reaching the entire target lesion has been overcome in endoluminal cavities. The phase I clinical trial on the endoscopic treatment of advanced esophageal cancer revealed that the treatment is well tolerated and capable of inducing a reduction in mass [61]. No adverse events or complications were recorded in a phase II clinical trial underway in patients with colorectal cancer not suitable for surgery (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03040180, accessed on 10 April 2021). Therefore, preliminary results of an endoscopic treatment for colorectal cancer highlight that the treatment is minimally invasive and ambulatory.
The advantage of this treatment is also evident for liver metastasis, whose indications of curative intent have increased in recent years. In fact, as demonstrated by population-based studies, 25–30% of patients diagnosed with CRC will develop liver metastases in the course of the disease, but despite oncological and surgical advances, only 25% of patients affected are candidates for resection [62,63]. Edhemovic et al. published the first experience of intraoperative colorectal liver metastases treatment [35]. 29 metastases in 16 patients were treated in 16 sessions of Variable Geometry Poration (VGP) and bleomycin. No serious adverse events were described and radiological evaluation showed 85% complete responses and 15% partial responses. Electrochemotherapy of colorectal liver metastases has proved a feasible, safe, and efficient treatment for metastases which are located near the main hepatic vessels and are not suitable for surgery or radiofrequency ablation [34,35,64,65].
A prospective, pilot study of feasibility, safety, and efficacy of intraoperative ECT for unresectable colorectal liver metastases was performed by Coletti et al. Linear or hexagonal needle electrodes according to an individualized pretreatment were used to perform ECT with an open liver resection approach [66].
A prospective study on 39 patients with metachronous colorectal liver metastases performed by Edhemovich et al. demonstrated the long-term effectiveness and safety of electrochemotherapy [67]. An objective response rate equal to 75% (63% CR, 12% PR) and median duration of the response equal to 20.8 months for metastases in CR and 9.8 months for metastases in PR was obtained. The best response was obtained for metastases smaller than 3 cm in diameter, while no difference was observed in metastatic location, i.e., metastases in central versus peripheral locations. Patients with a complete response after ECT showed a better progression-free survival compared to those metastases that had a partial response or progressive disease. However, there was no difference in overall survival for metastases smaller than 3 cm in diameter than for larger ones, and the median overall survival was 29.0 months [67].

5. Discussion

In this study, we present a prospective analysis of two patients with LARC subjected to neoadjuvant therapy and then to ECT, and of one patient subjected to ECT for colorectal local recurrence formed after neoadjuvant treatment and TME.
We reported that the ECT treatment is safe and feasible considering an endoscopic approach with a SILS port compared to a percutaneous approach using multiple needles in a variable geometry, planned with a preoperative planning tool before the treatment.
Preoperative planning was an important phase of ECT procedure when multiple needles in a variable geometry to ensure the complete coverage of the lesion were used. In these cases, the assistance of product specialists of the device was necessary (IGEA S.p.A., Carpi, Italy).
Furthermore, as preliminary results, we considered ECT in patients with LARC to be safe and feasible.
Moreover, the preliminary results showed stable disease in two of the three patients treated, while one patient achieved a complete response. The local control of disease was maintained in the patient follow-up. For each patient, a reduction in pain was observed and for the patient with local recurrence, a reduction in bleeding present before ECT was also achieved.
Therefore, our preliminary results showed that ECT could be used both in primary and secondary rectal cancer.
The treatment was safe and feasible both using an expandable electrode with fixed geometry, and multiple needles in a variable geometry adequately positioned considering a preoperative planning.
Moreover, in addition to the safety of procedures, the preliminary results could be considered promising in terms of the efficacy of ECT and in patients’ quality of life improvement (according to pain and bleeding reduction).
The limits of this study were related to sample size. These results should be validated on a large group of patients since the results reported in this manuscript are only preliminary to a first experience in a cancer center. However, 35 patients with LARC undergoing neoadjuvant therapy should be enrolled in a randomized multicenter study [43] 12 weeks after the end of pCRT if they have had an important clinical response to undergo ECT with the intent to preserve the organ and guide towards a conservative surgery approach.

6. Conclusions

Preliminary results showed that ECT could be considered a safe and effective treatment in patients with a major clinical response or local recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy for LARC and could allow a reduction in pain and bleeding with a consequent improvement in quality of life.

Author Contributions

P.D., D.R., M.D.M., R.P., F.I. and U.P. are the surgeons that designed the study and the protocol investigations. A.P. and V.G. performed the radiological investigations. C.R., G.N., A.A., V.R., P.M. and F.T. performed protocol investigations. V.D. and R.F. drafted the initial manuscript. P.D. and D.R. revised the manuscript for intellectual content and approved the final manuscript as submitted. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Institutional Review Board of the Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale and the AIFA. Trial registration EudraCT number: 2018-004166-33 Authorization: Determines of National Cancer Institute of Naples Pascale Foundation N. 47 of 18 January 2021.

Informed Consent Statement

All enrolled patients will sign the informed consent. Written informed consent for publication must be obtained from participating patients who can be identified (including by the patients themselves).

Data Availability Statement

Images are available at link https://zenodo.org/record/6538151#.YntzNOhBy3A (accessed on 12 April 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

Roberta Fusco and Valeria D’Alessio work for IGEA SpA.

References

  1. Torre, L.A.; Bray, F.; Siegel, R.L.; Ferlay, J.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015, 65, 87–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Siegel, R.; Desantis, C.; Jemal, A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2014, 64, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dimić, D.S.; Kaluđerović, G.N.; Avdović, E.H.; Milenković, D.A.; Živanović, M.N.; Potočňák, I.; Samoľová, E.; Dimitrijević, M.S.; Saso, L.; Marković, Z.S.; et al. Synthesis, Crystallographic, Quantum Chemical, Antitumor, and Molecular Docking/Dynamic Studies of 4-Hydroxycoumarin-Neurotransmitter Derivatives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Heriot, A.G.; Tekkis, P.P.; Darzi, A.; Mackay, J. Surgery for local recurrence of rectal cancer. Color. Dis. 2006, 8, 733–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Park, S.H.; Kim, Y.S.; Choi, J. Dosimetric analysis of the effects of a temporary tissue expander on the radiotherapy technique. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Crimì, F.; Capelli, G.; Spolverato, G.; Bao, Q.R.; Florio, A.; Rossi, S.M.; Cecchin, D.; Albertoni, L.; Campi, C.; Pucciarelli, S.; et al. MRI T2-weighted sequences-based texture analysis (TA) as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 1216–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bertocchi, E.; Barugola, G.; Nicosia, L.; Mazzola, R.; Ricchetti, F.; Dell’Abate, P.; Alongi, F.; Ruffo, G. A comparative analysis between radiation dose intensification and conventional fractionation in neoadjuvant locally advanced rectal cancer: A monocentric prospective observational study. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 990–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schicchi, N.; Fogante, M.; Palumbo, P.; Agliata, G.; Pirani, P.E.; Di Cesare, E.; Giovagnoni, A. The sub-millisievert era in CTCA: The technical basis of the new radiation dose approach. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 1024–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wieser, M.; Sauerland, S.; Arnold, D.; Schmiegel, W.; Reinacher-Schick, A. Peri-operative chemotherapy for the treatment of resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Akgül, Ö.; Çetinkaya, E.; Ersöz, Ş.; Tez, M. Role of surgery in colorectal cancer liver metastases. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 6113–6122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gurgitano, M.; Angileri, S.A.; Rodà, G.M.; Liguori, A.; Pandolfi, M.; Ierardi, A.M.; Wood, B.J.; Carrafiello, G. Interventional Radiology ex-machina: Impact of Artificial Intelligence on practice. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 998–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mathew, R.P.; Sam, M.; Raubenheimer, M.; Patel, V.; Low, G. Hepatic hemangiomas: The various imaging avatars and its mimickers. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 801–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Esposito, A.; Buscarino, V.; Raciti, D.; Casiraghi, E.; Manini, M.; Biondetti, P.; Forzenigo, L. Characterization of liver nodules in patients with chronic liver disease by MRI: Performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v.2018) scale and its comparison with the Likert scale. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bozkurt, M.; Eldem, G.; Bozbulut, U.B.; Bozkurt, M.F.; Kılıçkap, S.; Peynircioğlu, B.; Çil, B.; Ergün, E.L.; Volkan-Salanci, B. Factors affecting the response to Y-90 microsphere therapy in the cholangiocarcinoma patients. Radiol. Med. 2020, 126, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shin, N.; Choi, J.; Choi, J.M.; Cho, E.S.; Kim, J.H.; Chung, J.J.; Yu, J.S. Sclerotic changes of cavernous hemangioma in the cirrhotic liver: Long-term follow-up using dynamic contrast-enhanced com- puted tomography. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Filippo, M.; Ziglioli, F.; Russo, U.; Pagano, P.; Brunese, L.; Bertelli, E.; Pagnini, F.; Maestroni, U. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of T1a renal cancer with externally cooled multitined expandable electrodes. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fantoni, M.; Marcato, C.; Ciuni, A.; Pellegrino, C.; Russo, U.; Zannoni, R.; Paladini, I.; Andreone, A.; De Filippo, M. Renal artery embolization of non-functioning graft: An effective treatment for graft intolerance syndrome. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 494–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Orlowski, S.; Belehradek, J., Jr.; Paoletti, C.; Mir, L.M. Transient electropermeabilization of cells in culture: Increase of the cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1988, 37, 4727–4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sersa, G.; Cemazar, M.; Miklavcic, D. Antitumor effectiveness of electrochemotherapy with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) in mice. Cancer Res. 1995, 55, 3450–3455. [Google Scholar]
  20. Belehradek, M.; Domenge, C.; Luboinski, B.; Orlowski, S.; Belehradek, J., Jr.; Mir, L.M. Electrochemotherapy, a new antitumor treatment. First clinical phase I-II trial. Cancer 1993, 72, 3694–3700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mir, L. Bases and rationale of the electrochemotherapy. Eur. J. Cancer Suppl. 2006, 4, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mir, L.M.; Belehradek, M.; Domenge, C.; Orlowski, S.; Poddevin, B. L’électrochimiothérapie, un nouveau traitement antitumoral: Premier essai clinique. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. 1991, 313, 613–618. [Google Scholar]
  23. Marty, M.; Sersa, G.; Garbay, J.R.; Gehl, J.; Collins, C.G.; Snoj, M.; Billard, V.; Geertsen, P.F.; Larkin, J.O.; Miklavčič, D.; et al. Electrochemotherapy—An easy, highly effective and safe treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases: Results of ESOPE (European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy) study. Eur. J. Cancer Suppl. 2006, 4, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mir, L.M.; Gehl, J.; Sersa, G.; Collins, C.G.; Garbay, J.-R.; Billard, V.; Geertsen, P.F.; Rudolf, Z.; O’Sullivan, G.C.; Marty, M. Standard operating procedures of the electrochemotherapy: Instructions for the use of bleomycin or cisplatin administered either systemically or locally and electric pulses delivered by the CliniporatorTM by means of invasive or non-invasive electrodes. Eur. J. Cancer Suppl. 2006, 4, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gehl, J.; Sersa, G.; Matthiessen, L.W.; Muir, T.; Soden, D.; Occhini, A.; Quaglino, P.; Curatolo, P.; Campana, L.G.; Kunte, C.; et al. Updated standard operating procedures for electrochemotherapy of cutaneous tumours and skin metastases. Acta Oncol. 2018, 57, 874–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Campana, L.G.; Mocellin, S.; Basso, M.; Puccetti, O.; De Salvo, G.L.; Sileni, V.C.; Vecchiato, A.; Corti, L.; Rossi, C.R.; Nitti, D. Bleomycin-Based Electrochemotherapy: Clinical Outcome from a Single Institution’s Experience with 52 Patients. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2009, 16, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Campana, L.G.; Valpione, S.; Mocellin, S.; Sundararajan, R.; Granziera, E.; Sartore, L.; Sileni, V.C.; Rossi, C.R. Electrochemotherapy for disseminated superficial metastases from malignant melanoma. Br. J. Surg. 2012, 99, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mali, B.; Jarm, T.; Snoj, M.; Sersa, G.; Miklavcic, D. Antitumor effectiveness of electrochemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013, 39, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bertino, G.; Sersa, G.; De Terlizzi, F.; Occhini, A.; Plaschke, C.C.; Groselj, A.; Langdon, C.; Grau, J.J.; McCaul, J.A.; Heuveling, D.; et al. European Research on Electrochemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (EURECA) project: Results of the treatment of skin cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 2016, 63, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Plaschke, C.C.; Bertino, G.; McCaul, J.A.; Grau, J.J.; de Bree, R.; Sersa, G.; Occhini, A.; Groselj, A.; Langdon, C.; Heuveling, D.A.; et al. European Research on Electrochemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (EURECA) project: Results from the treatment of mucosal cancers. Eur. J. Cancer 2017, 87, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bimonte, S.; Leongito, M.; Granata, V.; Barbieri, A.; Del Vecchio, V.; Falco, M.; Nasto, A.; Albino, V.; Piccirillo, M.; Palaia, R.; et al. Electrochemotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma treatment: Pre-clinical and clinical studies. Radiol. Oncol. 2016, 50, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rega, D.; Scala, D.; Pace, U.; Sassaroli, C.; Ruffolo, F.; Grimaldi, A.; Caraco’, C.; Mozzillo, N.; DelRio, P. 246. Electrochemotherapy for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiotherapy: A case report. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014, 40, S100–S101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tarantino, L.; Busto, G.; Nasto, A.; Fristachi, R.; Cacace, L.; Talamo, M.; Accardo, C.; Bortone, S.; Gallo, P.; Tarantino, P.; et al. Percutaneous electrochemotherapy in the treatment of portal vein tumor thrombosis at hepatic hilum in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: A feasibility study. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 906–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mali, B.; Gorjup, V.; Edhemovic, I.; Brecelj, E.; Cemazar, M.; Sersa, G.; Strazisar, B.; Miklavcic, D.; Jarm, T. Electrochemotherapy of colorectal liver metastases—An observational study of its effects on the electrocardiogram. Biomed. Eng. Online 2015, 14, S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Edhemovic, I.; Brecelj, E.; Gasljevic, G.; Music, M.M.; Gorjup, V.; Mali, B.; Jarm, T.; Kos, B.; Pavliha, D.; Kuzmanov, B.G.; et al. Intraoperative electrochemotherapy of colorectal liver metastases. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014, 110, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Girelli, R.; Prejanò, S.; Cataldo, I.; Corbo, V.; Martini, L.; Scarpa, A.; Claudio, B. Feasibility and safety of electrochemotherapy (ECT) in the pancreas: A pre-clinical investigation. Radiol. Oncol. 2015, 49, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Granata, V.; Fusco, R.; Setola, S.V.; Piccirillo, M.; Leongito, M.; Palaia, R.; Granata, F.; Lastoria, S.; Izzo, F.; Petrillo, A. Early radiological assessment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with electrochemotherapy. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 4767–4778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Djokic, M.; Cemazar, M.; Popovic, P.; Kos, B.; Dezman, R.; Bosnjak, M.; Zakelj, M.N.; Miklavcic, D.; Potrc, S.; Stabuc, B.; et al. Electrochemotherapy as treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma, a prospective pilot study. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 44, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Cornelis, F.; Korenbaum, C.; Ben Ammar, M.; Tavolaro, S.; Nouri-Neuville, M.; Lotz, J. Multimodal image-guided electrochemotherapy of unresectable liver metastasis from renal cell cancer. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2019, 100, 309–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ritter, A.; Bruners, P.; Isfort, P.; Barabasch, A.; Pfeffer, J.; Schmitz, J.; Pedersoli, F.; Baumann, M. Electroporation of the Liver: More Than 2 Concurrently Active, Curved Electrodes Allow New Concepts for Irreversible Electroporation and Electrochemotherapy. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2018, 17, 1533033818809994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Tarantino, L.; Busto, G.; Nasto, A.; Nasto, R.A.; Tarantino, P.; Fristachi, R.; Cacace, L.; Bortone, S. Electrochemotherapy of cholangiocellular carcinoma at hepatic hilum: A feasibility study. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 44, 1603–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. ICRU. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements: Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). ICRU Report 83. J. ICRU 2010, 10, 41–53. [Google Scholar]
  43. Rega, D.; Granata, V.; Petrillo, A.; Pace, U.; Sassaroli, C.; Di Marzo, M.; Cervone, C.; Fusco, R.; D’Alessio, V.; Nasti, G.; et al. Organ Sparing for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Treatment Followed by Electrochemotherapy. Cancers 2021, 13, 3199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rega, D.; Granata, V.; Romano, C.; D’Angelo, V.; Pace, U.; Fusco, R.; Cervone, C.; Ravo, V.; Tatangelo, F.; Avallone, A.; et al. Watch and Wait Approach for Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Treatment: The Experience of a High Volume Cancer Center. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rega, D.; Pace, U.; Niglio, A.; Scala, D.; Sassaroli, C.; Delrio, P. TAMIS for rectal tumors: Advancements of a new approach. Updat. Surg. 2016, 68, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rega, D.; Pecori, B.; Scala, D.; Avallone, A.; Pace, U.; Petrillo, A.; Aloj, L.; Tatangelo, F.; Delrio, P. Evaluation of Tumor Response after Short-Course Radiotherapy and Delayed Surgery for Rectal Cancer. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fusco, R.; Granata, V.; Sansone, M.; Rega, D.; Delrio, P.; Tatangelo, F.; Romano, C.; Avallone, A.; Pupo, D.; Giordano, M.; et al. Validation of the standardized index of shape tool to analyze DCE-MRI data in the assessment of neo-adjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1044–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Scapicchio, C.; Gabelloni, M.; Barucci, A.; Cioni, D.; Saba, L.; Neri, E. A deep look into radiomics. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1296–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Benedetti, G.; Mori, M.; Panzeri, M.M.; Barbera, M.; Palumbo, D.; Sini, C.; Muffatti, F.; Andreasi, V.; Steidler, S.; Doglioni, C.; et al. CT-derived radiomic features to discriminate histologic characteristics of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 745–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. De Filippo, M.; Puglisi, S.; D’Amuri, F.; Gentili, F.; Paladini, I.; Carrafiello, G.; Maestroni, U.; Del Rio, P.; Ziglioli, F.; Pagnini, F. CT-guided percutaneous drainage of abdominopelvic collections: A pictorial essay. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1561–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cusumano, D.; Meijer, G.; Lenkowicz, J.; Chiloiro, G.; Boldrini, L.; Masciocchi, C.; Dinapoli, N.; Gatta, R.; Casà, C.; Damiani, A.; et al. A field strength independent MR radiomics model to predict pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer. Radiol. Med. 2020, 126, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fornell-Perez, R.; Vivas-Escalona, V.; Aranda-Sanchez, J.; Gonzalez-Dominguez, M.C.; Rubio-Garcia, J.; Aleman-Flores, P.; Lozano-Rodriguez, A.; Porcel-De-Peralta, G.; Loro-Ferrer, J.F. Primary and post-chemoradiotherapy MRI detection of extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer: The role of diffusion-weighted imaging. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Petralia, G.; Zugni, F.; Summers, P.E.; Colombo, A.; Pricolo, P.; Grazioli, L.; Colagrande, S.; Giovagnoni, A.; Padhani, A.R. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) for cancer screening: Recommendations for use. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1434–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Petralia, G.; Summers, P.E.; Agostini, A.; Ambrosini, R.; Cianci, R.; Cristel, G.; Calistri, L.; Colagrande, S. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in oncology: How we do it. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 1288–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Smith, J.J.; Garcia-Aguilar, J. Advances and Challenges in Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 1797–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Petrelli, F.; Sgroi, G.; Sarti, E.; Barni, S. Increasing the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of published studies. Ann. Surg. 2016, 263, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Avallone, A.; Delrio, P.; Guida, C.; Tatangelo, F.; Petrillo, A.; Marone, P.; Cascini, L.G.; Morrica, B.; Lastoria, S.; Parisi, V.; et al. Biweekly oxaliplatin, raltitrexed, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid combination chemotherapy during preoperative radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: A phase I-II study. Br. J. Cancer 2006, 94, 1809–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Avallone, A.; Pecori, B.; Bianco, F.; Aloj, L.; Tatangelo, F.; Romano, C.; Granata, V.; Marone, P.; Leone, A.; Botti, G.; et al. Critical role of bevacizumab scheduling in combination with pre-surgical chemo-radiotherapy in MRI-defined high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer: Results of the branch trial. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 30394–30407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Avallone, A.; Delrio, P.; Pecori, B.; Tatangelo, F.; Petrillo, A.; Scott, N.; Marone, P.; Aloi, L.; Sandomenico, C.; Lastoria, S.; et al. Oxaliplatin Plus Dual Inhibition of Thymidilate Synthase During Preoperative Pelvic Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma: Long-Term Outcome. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2011, 79, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Avallone, A.; Piccirillo, M.C.; Delrio, P.; Pecori, B.; Di Gennaro, E.; Aloj, L.; Tatangelo, F.; D’Angelo, V.; Granata, C.; Cavalcanti, E.; et al. Phase 1/2 study of valproic acid and short-course radiotherapy plus capecitabine as preoperative treatment in low-moderate risk rectal cancer-V-shoRT-R3 (Valproic acid–short Radiotherapy–rectum 3rd trial). BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Egeland, C.; Baeksgaard, L.; Johannesen, H.H.; Löfgren, J.; Plaschke, C.C.; Svendsen, L.B.; Gehl, J.; Achiam, M.P. Endoscopic electrochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: A phase I clinical study. Endosc. Int. Open 2018, 6, E727–E734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Engstrand, J.; Nilsson, H.; Strömberg, C.; Jonas, E.; Freedman, J. Colorectal cancer liver metastases—A population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hackl, C.; Neumann, P.; Gerken, M.; Loss, M.; Klinkhammer-Schalke, M.; Schlitt, H.J. Treatment of colorectal liver metastases in Germany: A ten-year population-based analysis of 5772 cases of primary colorectal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Edhemovic, I.; Gadzijev, E.M.; Brecelj, E.; Miklavčič, D.; Kos, B.; Zupanic, A.; Mali, B.; Jarm, T.; Pavliha, D.; Marcan, M.; et al. Electrochemotherapy: A New Technological Approach in Treatment of Metastases in the Liver. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 10, 475–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Tschon, M.; Salamanna, F.; Gasbarrini, A.; Boriani, S.; Fini, M. Feasibility of Electroporation in Bone and in the Surrounding Clinically Relevant Structures: A Preclinical Investigation. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2016, 15, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Coletti, L.; Battaglia, V.; De Simone, P.; Turturici, L.; Bartolozzi, C.; Filipponi, F. Safety and feasibility of electrochemotherapy in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A pilot study. Int. J. Surg. 2017, 44, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Edhemovic, I.; Brecelj, E.; Cemazar, M.; Boc, N.; Trotovsek, B.; Djokic, M.; Dezman, R.; Ivanecz, A.; Potrc, S.; Bosnjak, M.; et al. Intraoperative electrochemotherapy of colorectal liver metastases: A prospective phase II study. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 46, 1628–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 11 02745 g001 550
Figure 1. Trans-anal laparoscopic approach with a SILS port for ECT treatment on a lesion of the endorectal mucosa at 6 cm from the anal canal using an expandible divergent electrode with 10 degrees of divergence, a length of 20 cm, and a 5 mm shaft.
Figure 1. Trans-anal laparoscopic approach with a SILS port for ECT treatment on a lesion of the endorectal mucosa at 6 cm from the anal canal using an expandible divergent electrode with 10 degrees of divergence, a length of 20 cm, and a 5 mm shaft.
Jcm 11 02745 g001
Jcm 11 02745 g002 550
Figure 2. ECT with a trans-anal laparoscopic approach and a SILS port on the primary rectal tumor with semi-annular morphology and extension from hours to 2 to 5 using an expandable divergent electrode with 10 degrees of divergence, a length of 20 cm, and a 5 mm shaft.
Figure 2. ECT with a trans-anal laparoscopic approach and a SILS port on the primary rectal tumor with semi-annular morphology and extension from hours to 2 to 5 using an expandable divergent electrode with 10 degrees of divergence, a length of 20 cm, and a 5 mm shaft.
Jcm 11 02745 g002
Jcm 11 02745 g003 550
Figure 3. Preoperative planning of third LARC case effected using MR images.
Figure 3. Preoperative planning of third LARC case effected using MR images.
Jcm 11 02745 g003
Jcm 11 02745 g004 550
Figure 4. MR and CT images (A,B) before treatment of first case and CT images at 6 and 9 months after ECT treatment in (C,D), respectively.
Figure 4. MR and CT images (A,B) before treatment of first case and CT images at 6 and 9 months after ECT treatment in (C,D), respectively.
Jcm 11 02745 g004
Jcm 11 02745 g005 550
Figure 5. MR images (A,B) before treatment of second case and 2 months after ECT treatment (C,D).
Figure 5. MR images (A,B) before treatment of second case and 2 months after ECT treatment (C,D).
Jcm 11 02745 g005
Jcm 11 02745 g006 550
Figure 6. MR images (A,B) before treatment of third case and 6 months after ECT treatment (C,D).
Figure 6. MR images (A,B) before treatment of third case and 6 months after ECT treatment (C,D).
Jcm 11 02745 g006
Table
Table 1. Case descriptions and results.
Table 1. Case descriptions and results.
Case N°DescriptionElectrodesResults
1M 75 years old with major response was treated with ECT 12 weeks after chemo-radiation therapyExpandable STINGER electrodesThe parietal thickening of the rectum was substantially stable. The lesion still appears in stable disease nine months after ECT. Pain reduction was obtained according to the VAS scale from 2 to 0.
2M 66 years old with major response was treated with ECT 12 weeks after chemo-radiation therapyExpandable STINGER electrodesCT showed a slight residual thickening of the rectal walls on the side apparently of fibrotic content. The patient reported pain reduction according to the VAS scale from 3 to 0.
3Male 50 years old with recurrence after long course neoadjuvant therapy and total mesorectal excision (TME) treated with ECTVariable and fixed geometry electrodesMRI 6 months after ECT treatment showed no significant morphostructural changes in the lesion that was considered to be stable disease. Patient reported a reduction in pain on the VAS 7 to 4 scale and a reduction in bleeding.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rega, D.; Granata, V.; Petrillo, A.; Pace, U.; Di Marzo, M.; Fusco, R.; D’Alessio, V.; Nasti, G.; Romano, C.; Avallone, A.; et al. Electrochemotherapy of Primary Colon Rectum Cancer and Local Recurrence: Case Report and Prospective Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2745. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102745

AMA Style

Rega D, Granata V, Petrillo A, Pace U, Di Marzo M, Fusco R, D’Alessio V, Nasti G, Romano C, Avallone A, et al. Electrochemotherapy of Primary Colon Rectum Cancer and Local Recurrence: Case Report and Prospective Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(10):2745. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102745

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rega, Daniela, Vincenza Granata, Antonella Petrillo, Ugo Pace, Massimiliano Di Marzo, Roberta Fusco, Valeria D’Alessio, Guglielmo Nasti, Carmela Romano, Antonio Avallone, and et al. 2022. "Electrochemotherapy of Primary Colon Rectum Cancer and Local Recurrence: Case Report and Prospective Analysis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 10: 2745. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102745

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop