Next Article in Journal
BSA-Seq and Transcriptomic Analysis Provide Candidate Genes Associated with Inflorescence Architecture and Kernel Orientation by Phytohormone Homeostasis in Maize
Previous Article in Journal
Succinyl-CoA Synthetase Dysfunction as a Mechanism of Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy: More than Just an Oxidative Energy Deficit
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Potato Salt Tolerance

College of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 10726; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310726
Submission received: 14 May 2023 / Revised: 16 June 2023 / Accepted: 24 June 2023 / Published: 27 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
Potato is the world’s fourth largest food crop. Due to limited arable land and an ever-increasing demand for food from a growing population, it is critical to increase crop yields on existing acreage. Soil salinization is an increasing problem that dramatically impacts crop yields and restricts the growing area of potato. One possible solution to this problem is the development of salt-tolerant transgenic potato cultivars. In this work, we review the current potato planting distribution and the ways in which it overlaps with salinized land, in addition to covering the development and utilization of potato salt-tolerant cultivars. We also provide an overview of the current progress toward identifying potato salt tolerance genes and how they may be deployed to overcome the current challenges facing potato growers.

1. Introduction

Potato is the fourth most important food crop in the world [1]. The ploidy of potatoes varies significantly in nature, ranging from diploid to hexaploid, but only diploid and tetraploid potatoes are used in modern cultivation [2,3]. Potato tubers contain proteins, starch, fats, reducing sugars, dietary fiber and other major nutrients, and they are rich in mineral elements such as potassium, iron, zinc, calcium, magnesium and vitamins. The content of vitamin C in potato is higher than that of wheat and other staple crops, and the content of protein and reducing sugar is higher than that of many common vegetables [4,5]. In addition to the direct consumption of fresh potatoes, potatoes are also widely used in the animal feed and food processing industries, and fresh potatoes and their processed products contribute to agricultural product trade and the global economy [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Compared with other food crops, potato has high adaptability, cold tolerance and drought resistance, resulting in stable yields [13]. These features make potato the only staple crop that can be planted in many areas of the world. Potato also plays a major role in food security for much of the developing world [14]. European and American countries have long consumed potato as a staple food, and Asian countries have increased their consumption more recently. Increased planting of potato in African countries has resulted in improved food security, leading to the United Nations naming 2008 as the ‘International Year of Potato’ [15].
During growth, potato utilizes nutrients stored in its tuber for vegetative propagation, including the bud growth stage, seedling stage, tuber formation stage, tuber growth stage, starch accumulation stage and maturity stage. Potatoes require very specific soil characteristics for ideal growth and yield, including soil with loose structure, good ventilation and high organic matter content [16]. In addition, potatoes are moderately sensitive to salt and grow best when the soil pH ranges from 5.0 to 5.5 [17]. Therefore, in salinized soil, the above-ground parts of salt-sensitive potato cultivars will have delayed seedling emergence and leaf wilting [18], and the underground parts will not take root and produce potatoes [19], resulting in dramatic yield reductions. The exploration of saline tolerance genes may therefore result in large productivity gains for regions with salinized soil.

2. Global Potato Planting Area and Consumption

Potatoes were first discovered in the Andes Mountains of South America, but their cultivation rapidly spread across the world due to their strong environmental adaptability and high nutritional value [20]. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), potatoes were grown in more than 150 countries and territories around the world in 2014. From 2013 to 2020, the global potato planting area declined slightly, reaching approximately 16,887.04 thousand hectares in 2020. The total potato output fluctuated widely over this time frame, with the lowest output in 2016 (Figure 1A). Asia and Europe represent the two largest potato planting areas in the world. In 2002, Asia surpassed Europe and became the largest potato producer in the world. Within Europe, the majority of potato production occurs in Russia and Ukraine. In 2020, Ukraine’s potato planting area accounted for 7.85% of the world’s total, with a fresh potato output of 20,837,990 tons, ranking third. Russia’s potato growing area accounts for 6.98% of the world’s total, with a total output of 19.6074 million tons, ranking fourth (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Potato-growing countries in Asia include China, India and several others [21]. In 2020, China’s potato growing area accounted for 27.69% of the world’s total, and its fresh food output was 92,800,000 tons, ranking first. India’s potato growing area accounted for 12.15% of the world’s total, with a fresh food output of 48,562,000 tons, ranking second (Figure 2 and Figure 3). As the backbone of potato cultivation in Asia, China has a long history of more than 400 years of potato cultivation. Over time, this cultivation area has gradually expanded. There are now four major potato producing areas in China, including the single-season cropping area of the north, the two-season cropping area in the central plains, the two-season mixed cropping area in the southwest and the winter cropping area in the south. From 2013 to 2020, the growing area of potato in China decreased slightly, and the yield increased moderately (Figure 1B). In 2020, the potato planting area in China reached 4656 thousand hectares, an increase of 3355.2 thousand hectares from 1961 [22]. In the past two years, frequent harsh weather conditions in the northern cropping area combined with lower profits and policy changes have caused a shift in the potato planting area towards the southwest. Despite these changes, the overall potato planting area in China is expected to remain stable, and yield is expected to continue to increase.

3. Current Challenges with Salinized Land

According to the FAO, the world had 1.56 billion hectares of farmland in 2020. According to the global saline soil map released by the FAO in October 2021, more than 833 million hectares of this area were affected by salinization, representing more than half of the total farmland area. This worldwide environmental problem has become an important factor hindering the development of agriculture [23,24,25]. Salt stress not only threatens crop productivity but also causes global economic losses of approximately USD 27.3 billion per year [26,27]. Salinized land is widely distributed across the world, with large areas affected in Australia, Canada, the United States, India and other countries [28,29]. China ranks third for global salinized soil [30]. Salinized soils mainly contain a large amount of Cl, SO42−, Mg2+, Na+, K+ and Ca2+. [31,32,33]. The causes of soil salinization are complex and include a combination of natural factors and human impacts [34,35,36,37]. The Northeast China Plain represents a good example of the salinization process. During spring, this area has high winds and low rainfall, and during winter, it is subject to frequent freeze–thaw weather patterns. These factors result in a steady accumulation of salt in the surface soil, which is exacerbated by human activities, including irrigation with river water and over-grazing [38,39,40,41]. The gradual salinization of cultivated land inevitably decreases cultivation area, leading to economic and food security problems. It is therefore important to create and utilize crop cultivars that are tolerant to salt stress [42,43,44,45].

4. Effects of Salt on Growth, Physiology and Biochemistry of Potato

In agricultural production, salt stress is one of the main abiotic stresses affecting potato. Under stress, potato plants experience significant changes in internal physiology and external morphology, leading to reduced tuber quality and yield.

4.1. Effect of Salt on Potato Growth and Development

Potato is a vegetative crop whose main economic value is dependent on the quality and yield of potato tubers. Although potato is a somewhat salt-tolerant plant, salt stress directly affects the quality and yield of potato tubers, with salt stress having a more direct impact on potato compared to other plants [46]. Salt stress can cause significant damage during all growth stages of potato. However, potato has the highest demand for nutrients during the tuber expansion stage, and salt stress during this developmental window is particularly damaging. In high-salt soil, salt-sensitive cultivars of potato have reduced seedling emergence, growth and development, and salt stress can aggravate scab disease, which directly affects the commercial value of potato. Studies have shown that there is a significant positive correlation between soil conductivity and salt content, and the higher the salinity, the higher the soil conductivity [47]. When the soil conductivity exceeds 1.95 dSm−1, seed potatoes will rot [48]. Salt can also delay the germination of potato seeds [48]. Additionally, salt severely affects root development, and a strong root system is a prerequisite for the robust growth of all plants. Salt can lead to a decreased rooting rate, shorter root length and lower root vitality [49,50]. The poor development of roots and the weakening of water absorption ability hinder the growth of plants at the seedling stage. Furthermore, salt can reduce the number of leaves and cause existing leaves to turn yellow and curled, eventually leading to the wilting and dropping of leaves [51]. The tuber formation stage determines the number of tubers per plant, and salt has been shown to inhibit tuber formation. At high salt levels, the growth of microtubers has been shown to be inhibited, and the number of microtubers decreases with increasing salinity [52]. Reduced photosynthesis of above-ground leaves and nutrient uptake of underground roots caused by salt limit tuber expansion and can reduce dry matter accumulation in potatoes. The presence of salt can eventually lead to a decrease in the number of tubers per plant, average tuber weight and total yield of potato.

4.2. Effects of Salt on Potato Physiology and Biochemistry

Salt stress has been shown to not only affect the morphology of potato, but also to interfere with many internal physiological and biochemical processes, causing damage to organs and tissues and greatly reducing the quality of tubers. Due to the competitive absorption of ions, high concentrations of sodium and chloride ions can have antagonistic effects on other ions and perturb the ion balance of plants [53,54]. At the same time, salt increases the permeability of cell membranes and damages the cell membrane structure [55,56].
Excessive accumulation of sodium ions also reduces potassium absorption, which inhibits the function of many enzymes that depend on potassium ions [57]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are by-products of aerobic metabolism in plants, including peroxides, superoxides, hydroxyl radicals and singlet oxygen [58]. Normally, the production and removal of reactive oxygen species are balanced, resulting in a relatively low level of ROS. When the salt concentration is too high, the synthesis of antioxidant enzymes increases, which can remove harmful substances, such as reactive oxygen species and free radicals. Antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT) and others, are often used as indicators to measure whether potatoes are salt-tolerant. Under high salt, potassium ions are reduced, and the activity of antioxidant enzymes is inhibited. Additionally, CO2 fixation during photosynthesis is impaired, which leads to the activation of O2 molecules and the production of a large number of reactive oxygen species [23,57,59]. Excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species can cause oxidative damage to proteins, lipids and DNA, and excessive accumulation of chloride ions in plants leads to reduced chlorophyll content [60,61,62,63]. Additionally, salt reduces soil water potential, reducing water absorption, resulting in osmotic stress, decreased leaf turgor pressure and the closure of stomatal cells [23]. These changes reduce photosynthesis, further impairing normal growth.
Chloride ions also lead to impaired carbohydrate distribution, reduced starch content and reduced quality of tubers [64]. In addition, salt has a significant effect on protein metabolism, inhibiting protein synthesis and promoting its hydrolysis. For example, free proline has been shown to accumulate under salt stress [65,66]. This reduction in protein also affects starch content, causing dramatic reductions in total potato yield.

5. Progress toward the Identification of Salt Tolerance Genes in Potato

5.1. Advances in Potato Genome Research

Cultivated potato is an autotetraploid, with high genomic heterozygosity, 10 gametes and 35 zygotes. The inheritance pattern of potato is very complex, and the phenotypes of offspring generated by sexual reproduction are unpredictable, severely limiting the rate of genetic improvement [67,68,69]. In agricultural production, potato blocks are used for vegetative propagation to obtain stable genetic characteristics. However, the use of tubers for propagation results in a low reproduction coefficient, large storage and transportation costs and high susceptibility to viral infection and insect infestation [70,71]. Potato breeding using traditional methods is a slow process, and a better understanding of the potato genome could greatly accelerate molecular breeding efforts [72]. In order to overcome the obstacles posed by tetraploid inheritance, potato was domesticated from a tetraploid crop that is propagated by tubers into a diploid crop propagated by seed, making it amenable to genome sequencing and molecular characterization [73].
In 2006, 29 scientific research institutions from 14 countries jointly formed the International Potato Genome Sequencing Collaborative Group (PGSC) to carry out potato genome sequencing and functional annotation [74]. PGSC initially investigated the genome of RH89-039-16 (RH), a diploid material that is closely related to commercial tetraploid potato cultivars. However, due to the limitations of high heterozygosity, low quality of physical maps and high sequencing costs of the diploid potato genome, progress eventually stalled. Dr. Huang Sanwen, a member of the PGSC group, proposed the use of the haploid potato DM1-3 516 R44 (DM), as well as the whole-genome shotgun method and the application of next-generation sequencing technology with low costs to overcome these issues. This new strategy solved the problems of the high complexity and high cost of genome analysis and greatly accelerated progress towards a complete potato haploid genome containing 12 chromosomes and 840 million base pairs. In 2009, the potato genome sequence framework, covering more than 95% of all genes, was completed [75]. In 2011, the functionally annotated potato doubled haploid reference genome was released, providing a reference genome for researchers studying potato at the genomic level. In this study, haploid potato was obtained in vitro by another culture of the diploid material Solanum tuberosum group Phureja clone (PI 225669). The homozygous doubled haploid DM was then obtained by chromosome doubling, followed by DNA extraction and genome sequencing. The PGSC also analyzed the genome sequence of the diploid material RH, which had a genome assembly that was only 10% complete [76]. The DM reference genome represents a wealth of data that is critical for the future genetic improvement of potato. However, due to the high heterozygosity of the potato genome and the difference between haplotypes, the information provided by the DM reference genome of dihaploid potato has some important limitations, and additional genomes are needed. The successful construction of high-quality pangenomes of several species, such as soybeans and rice, shows that many different lines are needed to capture the diversity of crop species [77,78].
Wild diploid potato has high levels of genetic diversity and polymorphism, especially in resistance genes. These genes confer resistance to a variety of diseases, including potato late blight. Potato late blight, caused by the Phytophthora infestans, causes significant damage to world potato production. Researchers have found dominant resistance genes against late blight (Rpi genes) in wild potato species, which have greatly reduced its damage to potato production [79]. The wild diploid potato Solanum commersonii, for example, contains genes related to pathogen defense as well as low-temperature tolerance that are missing in cultivated potato. Due to reproductive isolation between the wild diploid potato and cultivated potato, it is difficult to make hybrid crosses that would enable the integration of desirable wild traits, such as stress tolerance and disease resistance [80,81]. In 2015, an Italian research team assembled and published the Solanum commersonii genome using second-generation sequencing data, enabling more easy utilization of wild potato resources [82].
Diploid potato has self-incompatibility [83] and male sterility [84]. Previous studies have shown that potato self-incompatibility is controlled by the “S-locus”. Hosaka and Hanneman [85] (1998) found that an S-locus suppressor gene (Sli) exists on chromosome 12 of diploid potato Solanum chacoense, which can overcome potato self-incompatibility. The seventh-generation diploid inbred line M6 was derived from Solanum chacoense and has high tuber dry matter content and strong disease resistance. In 2018, Leisner et al. [86] (2018) released the genome sequence of M6 and found that even though it was derived from a seventh-generation self-crossing population that was mostly homozygous, some regions still had high heterozygosity. The release of the M6 genome represented a significant step towards identifying genes related to important agronomic traits in inbred diploid potato.
In September 2020, Huang Sanwen’s team published the most complete potato heterozygous diploid genome to date. In this study, RH was used to complete the haploid assembly of heterozygous diploid potato for the first time, and the genome sequences of two sets of chromosomes were obtained. Analysis of this genome revealed rich sequence variation, allelic expression differences, methylation modification differences and the presence of harmful heterozygous mutations, providing critical information for breeding potato inbred lines [87].
In a recent genome study, the highly heterozygous tetraploid potato genome was decoded for the first time. In this study, Korbinian Schneeberger’s team sequenced the genome of a large number of single pollen cells and reconstructed a complete map of the haplotype genome of tetraploid potato, which represented a significant step forward in the breeding of tetraploid potato [88].

5.2. Potato Salt Tolerance Genes and Pathways

5.2.1. Hormone Signals Involved in Response to Salt Stress in Potato

Plant hormones play important roles in growth, development and differentiation [89,90]. During abiotic stress, plant hormones mediate numerous signaling pathways to adapt to adverse conditions [91]. Thus far, nine plant hormones, including abscisic acid (ABA), auxin (IAA), gibberellin (GA), cytokinin (CK), ethylene (ET), brassinolactone (BRs), salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA) and hornolactone (SLs), have been found to regulate plant growth in response to salt stress [92]. ABA is one of the most important stress hormones in plants. ABA has been found to increase rapidly under salt stress, and its response element (ABRE) binding protein and ABRE binding factor (AREB/ABF) transcription factors are phosphorylated by SnRK2.2/2.3/2.6 [93]. In addition, ABA induces a decrease in stomatal area, the main site of plant transpiration, in response to salt stress. Salicylic acid levels also change in response to salt stress, leading to increased antioxidant synthesis, accumulation of osmotic compounds, and higher rates of photosynthesis [94]. BR induces the accumulation of NO, which can reduce the oxidative damage caused by salt stress through the clearance of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [95]. SL and ET mediate plant salt tolerance through their interaction with ABA signal transduction [92]. In general, plants reduce their growth rate in response to salt stress. Gibberellin, auxin and cytokinin inhibit growth and increase salt stress tolerance through signal transduction pathways [96,97,98]. The model plant Arabidopsis thaliana has been shown to activate the jasmonic acid signaling pathway during salt stress, thus inhibiting growth and increasing stress tolerance [99]. Additionally, the salicylic acid receptor NPR1 and its homologues NPR3 and NPR4 have been found to interact with salicylic acid to transmit signals during salt stress in potato. Li et al. [100] (2022) studied a member of the NPR family of proteins called NPR4 and found that the rooting rate of transgenic potato overexpressing the StNPR4 gene increased significantly under high salt stress compared to the wild type, further confirming the role that StNPR4 plays in salt stress adaptation. At present, no other hormone signaling pathways have been studied in potato salt stress (Figure 4).

5.2.2. The Ca2+ Signaling Pathway Is Involved in Response to Salt Stress in Potato

Ca2+ is an important second messenger in plant cells, which has been shown to play key roles in plant environmental stress tolerance [101,102,103,104]. The majority of Ca2+ in plant cells is located around the cell wall and outer surface of the plasma membrane, where its concentration can reach more than 10,000 times that of the intracellular space [105]. Under salt stress, Na+ interacts with the receptor GIPCs outside the cell membrane, resulting in a change in the potential difference outside the cell membrane. This potential difference results in the opening of Ca2+ internal flow channels, causing a massive influx of extracellular Ca2+ and Ca2+ from the intracellular calcium bank into the cytoplasmic matrix, causing the intracellular Ca2+ concentration to increase rapidly and leading to the transmission of calcium signals [106,107,108,109]. Calcium receptors then decode calcium signals, including Ca2+ signal perception and Ca2+ signal transmission. Ca2+ receptor elements bind to Ca2+ produced by cells, transmit Ca2+ signals downstream through protein interactions or conformational changes, activate downstream elements and regulate downstream response genes to cope with salt stress. These genes are primarily divided into two main categories: Ca2+ response elements and Ca2+ sensing elements [110,111]. There are three main kinds of calcium ion receptors in plants: calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK), calmodulin protein (CaM) and calmodulin-like protein (CML), calcineurin B protein (CBL) and CBL-bound protein kinases (CIPK) [112]. The first two classes act within the CDPK signaling pathway and the CAM/CML signaling pathway. CDPK is a large Ca2+-sensitive family, which contains an N-terminal calmodulin-like regulatory domain that binds Ca2+ and causes conformational changes, releasing the self-inhibitory domain [113,114]. Hong et al. [115] (2020) identified 27 StCDPK genes. Among them, StCDPK8/10/11/18/22 are related to salt stress response, and their expression levels are induced upon the perception of high salinity in order to improve tolerance to long-term stress. Zhu et al. [116] (2021) studied the mechanism by which StCDPK32 participates in salt stress tolerance and found that StCDPK32 protein is localized to the cell membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus. Salt treatment promotes the transcription of the StCDPK32 gene, and overexpression of StCDPK32 enhances the expression of salt-stress-related genes, increases the activity of stress-related enzymes and promotes plant photosynthesis in response to salt stress. Grossi et al. [117] (2022) found that plants overexpressing StCDPK2 under high salt stress showed reduced peroxide accumulation and increased catalase activity, resulting in higher stress tolerance. CaM is a Ca2+-signal-sensing element, which binds to Ca2+ and undergoes a conformational change, and then transmits this signal to interacting proteins to drive signal transduction pathways under stress [118,119]. Raina et al. [120] (2021) found that StCAM2 overexpression in tobacco significantly reduced reactive oxygen species accumulation and resulted in better photosystem II performance than wild plants under salt stress, leading to improved salt stress tolerance. The CBL/CIPK signaling pathway has been studied extensively in the model plant Arabidopsis Thaliana. Under salt stress, SOS3 (CBL4) first binds to Ca2+ and then forms a complex with SOS2 (CIPK24), thereby regulating SOS1’s interaction with intracellular Na+ and leading to reduced cell damage [121,122,123]. Thus far, no studies have been conducted to evaluate the CBL/CIPK signaling pathway during potato salt stress (Figure 4).

5.2.3. Enzymes Involved in Response to Salt Stress in Potato

Many different genes encoding enzymes are involved in plant responses to salt stress. Sucrose non-fermentation-associated protein kinase (SnPK), for example, regulates plant growth and development and responds to abiotic stress through reversible protein phosphorylation [124,125]. Wang et al. [126] (2020) found that StSnPK1 overexpression significantly increased SOD and POD activities as well as proline content under salt stress. Furthermore, the expression of genes related to proline biosynthesis, stress response and the active oxygen scavenging system were significantly upregulated, thus improving the salt tolerance of transgenic tobacco. Gao [127] (2015) examined the expression pattern of the StSnPK2 gene under salt stress and found that the relative expression level of StSnPK2.6 was significantly positively correlated with CAT and SOD activities. The DWF4 gene encodes a C-22 hydroxylase, which is a rate-limiting enzyme for brassinosteroid (BR) synthesis [128]. Zhou et al. [129] (2018) cloned the StDWF4 gene from potato and analyzed the phenotype of plants overexpressing this gene. Under salt stress, the MDA content of StDWF4 overexpression mutant potato plants was lower than that of non-transgenic (NT) potato plants. Additionally, the contents of proline, soluble sugar and soluble protein, as well as the activities of antioxidant enzymes SOD, POD and APX, were higher than that of NT potato plants. Zhou [130] (2016) found that under salt stress, the relative gene expression of StDWF4-transformed potatoes increased significantly compared with NT potatoes, and the growth rate of potatoes was significantly higher than that of NT potato. Both with and without salt stress, the MDA content of transgenic potatoes was significantly lower than NT potato, and the contents of proline, soluble sugar and soluble protein were significantly higher than NT potato. Furthermore, the enzyme activities of SOD, POD, GR, CAT and APX were all much higher than those of NT potato. The ubiquitin-binding enzyme E2 is a key enzyme catalyzing the ubiquitin proteasome pathway that plays an important role in substrate ubiquitination [131]. Liu et al. [132] (2019) found that eight StUBC genes were responsive to salt stress based on qRT-PCR analysis, with StUBC2/12/30/13 being the most highly expressed. Fu et al. [133] (2020) cloned the ubiquitin-binding enzyme E2 gene StUBC12 from potato ‘Atlantic Ocean’ and found that overexpression of this gene enhanced potato salt stress tolerance (Figure 4).

5.2.4. Transcription Factors Involved in Response to Salt Stress in Potato

Transcription factors are proteins that regulate gene transcription by binding to cis-acting elements of gene promoter regions to enhance or inhibit the transcription of target genes [134]. During abiotic stress, plants regulate the temporal and spatial expression of transcription factor genes at the transcriptional level in order to adapt to the stress [135,136]. To date, many transcription factors have been found to be involved in potato response to salt stress, including ERFs, NAC, DREB/CBF, TCP, WRKY, MYB and zinc finger proteins (Figure 4).
Studies have shown that ethylene response factor ERFs are involved in various biological processes associated with plant growth and development, biological stress and abiotic stress [137,138,139]. Wang et al. [140] (2021) conducted tissue-specific expression analysis of StERF109 using qPCR. This analysis showed that StERF109 was up-regulated under salt stress, with high expression seen in potato roots and variable expression changes in leaves and stems, implicating StERF109 as a key gene in salt stress response. Charfeddine et al. [141] (2019) identified the StERF94 gene and found that under salt treatment, the overexpression of StERF94 improved the salt tolerance of potato by inducing osmoprotector synthesis. The NAC transcription factor family is involved in various stress responses, including salt stress in the model plants Arabidopsis [142], rice [143,144], soybean [145], wheat [146,147,148] and maize [149,150]. A total of 110 NAC transcription factor genes with different functions have been identified in potato [151]. Yue [152] (2021) found that under salt stress, overexpression of StNAC1 increased the content of proline in tobacco, reduced the accumulation ROS and significantly enhanced the salt tolerance of plants. Yue et al. [153] (2021) showed that under salt stress, transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing StNAC1 had higher seed germination rates, more green leaves, more proline accumulation and less ROS accumulation. Wang et al. [154] (2021) found that overexpression of the stress-induced StNAC053 gene enhanced the tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana to salt stress. Xu et al. [155] (2014) found that overexpression of StNAC2 significantly enhanced the in vitro salt tolerance of potato (Figure 4).
The CBF/DREB protein is an important transcription factor in plants, which can specifically recognize CRT/DRE cis-acting elements in the downstream COR gene promoter, thus activating COR expression under abiotic stress to improve tolerance [156,157,158,159]. Song et al. [160] (2020) analyzed physiological and biochemical indexes of Arabidopsis plants overexpressing StCBF1 and StCBF4 under salt stress. The activities of antioxidant enzymes SOD, CAT, POD and APX were all increased, and fluorescence quantitative PCR analysis showed that StCBF1 and StCBF4 overexpression mutants had higher COR gene expression and Na+/H+ antiporter-related gene expression than the control wild-type Arabidopsis Thaliana. Bouaziz et al. [161] (2012) found that StDREB2 overexpression in potato caused enhanced tolerance to salt stress. Bouaziz et al. [162] (2013) also isolated the StDREB1 gene from potato and found that overexpression of StDREB1 enhanced tolerance to salt stress. Additionally, StDREB1 overexpression was found to activate a calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) stress response gene. An in-depth study on the involvement of StDREB1 in stress response found that the expression of a Cu/Zn SOD gene was enhanced in StDREB1 transgenic plants under salt treatment [163]. TCP transcription factors are widely found in plants and regulate plant growth, development and environmental signals [164]. Li et al. [165] (2021) used Escherichia coli BL21 to express an sttcp13-Gst tag fusion protein and verified that the expression of the potato transcription factor StTCP13 gene is induced by high salt stress and can improve the tolerance of Escherichia coli to high salt stress, indicating that StTCP13 plays an important role in response to salt stress (Figure 4).
WRKY transcription factors regulate the expression of several gene families during stress response to attenuate cellular damage [166,167,168,169,170,171]. Yang et al. [172] (2020) used ‘Qingshu9’ potato as a test material, obtained the StWRKY40 gene sequence by RT-PCR and analyzed the expression pattern of this gene under salt stress by qRT-PCR. StWRKY40 was found to be responsive to salt stress in numerous tissues, peaking after four days of stress at nearly 20 times the level seen in unstressed plants. After eight days of salt stress, StWRKY40 gene expression was still elevated in leaves. The involvement of MYB transcription factors in stress response has also been verified in rice [173,174], wheat [175,176], soybean [177,178,179] and other crops. Zhao [180] (2020) cloned the StMYB2R-86 gene and showed no significant phenotypic differences between control wild-type potato and StMYB2R-86-overexpressing potato under normal growth conditions. Under salt stress, the height of potato plants overexpressing StMYB2R-86 was significantly higher than that of the control, and the root system was more developed. Furthermore, physiological indexes indicated that StMYB2R-86 expression in potatoes under salt stress resulted in more proline accumulation, lower malondialdehyde content, lower cell ion leakage rates and lower levels of superoxide O2 in leaves (Figure 4).
Zinc finger proteins are transcription factors that play important roles in plant growth and stress responses [181]. Zhu et al. [182] (2021) cloned the StZFP593 gene from ‘Qingshu 9’ and showed that it was induced in numerous tissues during salt stress. After five days of 100 mmol sodium salt treatment, StZFP593 expression in roots and leaves was significantly up-regulated. After being treated with 150 mmol sodium for ten days, the expression level in roots and leaves peaked. Tian et al. [183] (2010) also found that ectopic expression of StZFP1 enhanced the tolerance of transgenic tobacco to salt stress (Figure 4).

5.2.5. Other Regulatory Factors That Participate in Response to Salt Stress in Potato

Protease suppressors (PIs) can inhibit the activity of proteases through steric hindrance. CYS is an inhibitor of cysteine proteases, which is involved in plant growth, development and stress responses [184]. Liu et al. [185] (2020) cloned and overexpressed the StCYS1 gene in ‘Holland 15’ and found that, compared with wild potatoes, the transgenic potatoes accumulated more proline and chlorophyll content and had stronger H2O2 scavenging ability and cell membrane integrity during salt stress. CPI is a cysteine protease inhibitor that improves the resistance of many crops to abiotic stress [184,186]. Li [187] (2018) cloned the StCPI gene from tetraploid potato ‘Holland 15’ and found that Escherichia-coli-overexpressing StCPI could grow normally under high salt stress, and StCPI diploid potato had higher survival rates under high salt stress compared with wild-type.
The CCR4-NOT protein complex is a messenger between the nucleus and cytoplasm that is involved in mRNA synthesis and degradation, DNA damage repair and other processes. Rcd1 is the main subunit of the CCR4-NOT protein complex, and Chen et al. [188] (2019) cloned the StRcd1 gene from potato ‘Qingshu 9’. Under salt stress, StRcd1 gene expression changed in roots, stems and leaves and reaches its highest expression level at 12 h. Proline (Pro) is a major osmoregulatory substance, and proline transporters (ProT) belong to the Na+ -dependent amino acid transporter family [189]. Wang et al. [190] (2019) cloned and studied StuProT1 and StuProT2 proline transporter genes. After sodium salt stress, StuProT1 and StuProT2 were strongly induced at 2 h, with relative expression levels more than 19 times that of the control. In plants, sucrose is transported from source to reservoir through both symplast and extracellular pathways [191]. The apoplast pathway is mainly dependent on sucrose transporters [192,193]. Xie et al. [194] (2020) cloned the StSUT2 sucrose transporter gene, which can be induced by salt stress in potato. The expression of this gene reached its maximum after eight hours of salt stress in roots and stems and after four hours of salt stress in leaves. The contents of proline, soluble sugar and soluble protein of tobacco-overexpressing StSUT2 were also found to be higher than those of wild-type under salt stress, indicating enhanced salt stress tolerance (Figure 4).
Unlike most other crops, a major goal of potato salt tolerance research is to identify salt tolerance genes that also have a positive effect on the quality and yield of underground organs. The transformation from stolon to tuber is a dynamic process regulated by hormones, proteins and other factors [195]. Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in various metabolic reactions, and overexpression of PDX-II, a key vitamin B6 pathway gene in potato, has been shown to significantly increase vitamin B6 content in tubers [196]. In addition, these transgenic strains also showed better salt tolerance [197]. Sucrose plays a role in regulating the source–sink relationship and is a critical metabolic signal during tuber development. In plants, sucrose transporters transport sucrose from the ’source’ to the ’sink’ [198]. Reduction in sucrose transporter expression in potato has been shown to decrease fresh weight during early tuber development [199]. Additionally, the average fructose content in potato tubers overexpressing the OsSUT5Z gene was shown to be significantly increased, resulting in higher tuber yield and more tubers per plant [198]. ABF (ABRE binding factor) protein is a bZIP transcription factor that regulates abscisic acid signaling in response to abiotic stresses [200]. ABF proteins also play important roles in tuber formation [201]. Research has shown that the salt tolerance of Arabidopsis 35S: ABF4 transgenic potato was enhanced, and the tuber yield, storage capacity and processing quality of tubers were improved under both normal and stress conditions [202]. Potato StPPI1 is a homologue of Arabidopsis proton-pump interaction factor 1, and its expression level increases during tuber development. Salt stress was also shown to increase the mRNA level of StPPI1 [203]. Taken together, these results indicate that manipulating salt tolerance genes in potato also results in increased tuber quality and yield.

5.3. Application of Multiomics Approaches to Potato Salt Tolerance

With the continued development of high-throughput sequencing technology, multiomics has become a common technique to study abiotic stress in plants [204,205,206]. Multiomics provides a comprehensive view of molecular changes that take place during potato salt tolerance responses, including changes in gene expression, protein levels and metabolites. The application of these technologies has accelerated the identification of potato salt tolerance genes as well as the study of their biological functions. This approach not only helps to elucidate the molecular mechanism of potato response to salt stress, but also provides a theoretical basis and candidate genes for the genetic improvement of potato stress tolerance.
Earlier transcriptomic analyses of the response of potato to salt stress have involved the use of Illumina Hi Seq to conduct transcriptomic sequencing (NA-SeQ) on the tissue culture seedlings of salt-tolerant and sensitive cultivars after salt stress. After sequencing and gene expression analysis, differentially expressed genes of two potato cultivars under different salt stress conditions are then compared and assessed for gene ontology (GO) and KEGG enrichment. Key differentially expressed genes associated with salt tolerance can then be verified by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR. Li [207] (2019) conducted transcriptome sequencing on the tissue culture seedlings of the salt-tolerant potato cultivar ‘Longshu 5’ and identified 20 key salt-tolerance-associated genes, which provided critical information for the cultivation of salt-tolerant potatoes. Proteomics is the large-scale study of the complete set of proteins expressed under a given set of conditions [208]. Metabolomics is one of the key omics techniques to study changes in plant metabolites during abiotic stress time courses [209]. This technique has been widely applied to salt stress in wheat [210], tomato [211] and maize [212]. Hamooh et al. [213] (2021) simulated a salt stress environment with LiCl, measured metabolite accumulation by GC-MS and spectrophotometry and compared the tolerance of red potato BARI-401 and yellow potato Spunta. Spunta accumulated more metabolites associated with stress tolerance during this time course, which may be correlated with its higher stress adaptability. Some research approaches aimed at understanding potato salt stress responses have combined transcriptomics with other high-throughput omics techniques. Evers et al. [214] (2012), for example, used transcriptomics and proteomics to comprehensively analyze the response of potato to cold stress and salt stress. At the transcriptomic level, the number of differentially expressed genes in potato under salt stress was less than that under cold stress, and genes related to primary metabolism, detoxification and signal transduction were strongly down-regulated. At the proteomic level, the number of differentially regulated proteins in potatoes increased by about three-fold under salt stress, and the level of most highly abundant proteins increased, except for genes associated with photosynthesis. Jing et al. [215] (2022) conducted transcriptome sequencing on potato DM plants and found 13 differentially expressed genes in the proline metabolism pathway that were correlated with increased proline content of DM plants.

6. Development and Utilization of Saline-Tolerant Potato Cultivars

It is important to develop salt-tolerant germplasm for tetraploid potato in order to increase potato yield. Khrais et al. [216] (1998) subjected the seedlings of 130 European and North American potato cultivars to NaCl stress, analyzed six growth parameters and conducted a cluster analysis. After this analysis, ‘BelRus’, ‘Bintje’, ‘Onaway’, ‘Sierra’ and ‘Tobique’ were identified as cultivars with strong salt tolerance. Since then, ‘Binjte’ has been widely used as a control cultivar for potato salt tolerance screening. Zhang et al. [217,218,219] (2010; 2013; 2014) used ‘Bintje’ as the control cultivar for salt tolerance screening of potato diploid clones in several analyses. Additionally, Liu et al. [220] (2010) conducted salt stress assays on 107 potato cultivars and determined that ‘Ningshu 5’ was a salt-tolerant cultivar. ‘Ningshu 5’, a late-maturing cultivar, is suitable for planting in the semi-arid mountainous area of south Ningxia in China. Zhang et al. [221] (2018) assessed morphological and physiological indexes during NaCl stress on potato cultivars from six different regions and found ‘Dongnong 09-33069’ to be a salt-tolerant cultivar. Zhou [222] (2018) studied the agronomic and quality traits of 18 potato cultivars grown on saline-alkali land and found that ‘M08’ had the smallest yield reduction and the highest overall yield. Based on these field experiments and assessment of seedlings treated with NaCl, ‘M08’ was determined to be a salt-tolerant cultivar. Additionally, Li et al. [223] (2018) determined ‘Longshu 5’, ‘LZ111’ and ‘391691.96’ to be salt-tolerant through salt stress treatment of 52 potato materials, measurement of physiological indexes and cluster analysis. ‘Longshu 5’ is a high-quality vegetable used for starch processing that is late-maturing. It is suitable for planting in the alpine region, the second Yin region and the semi-arid region of Gansu Province. ‘LZ111’ is a new potato strain suitable for flour processing with good yield, which is now a major processing potato in the Anding District, Gansu Province, China. Ahmed et al. [224] (2020) studied the morphological characteristics of tubercle and stolon growth of potato single-node stem slices under different concentrations of NaCl stress and determined that ‘Kennebec’ had strong salt tolerance by combining the results of a principal component analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. Hu et al. [225] (2020) determined that the ‘Youjin885’ cultivar has strong salt tolerance by measuring the physiological characteristics of six potato cultivars under different NaCl concentrations. ‘Youjin 885’ is suitable for fresh food processing. It is suitable for planting in the northern one-season cropping area, the Central Plains two-season cropping area and high-altitude areas. Jiang et al. [226] (2021) determined that ‘Jinshu16’ and ‘Kexin19’ were moderately salt-tolerant cultivars based on the growth indicators of 11 potato cultivars under salt stress. ‘Jinshu 16’ is a medium- and late-maturing cultivar that is suitable for fresh potato export and starch processing, with high, stable yield and good adaptability. Yu et al. [227] (2022) comprehensively evaluated ‘Kexin23’, ‘Jizhangshu 3’ and ‘Jizhangshu 5’ cultivars and found that they have strong salt tolerance by measuring the changes of physiological indexes of ten potato cultivars subjected to salt stress and applying membership function analysis, cluster analysis and Grey correlation degree analysis. Among them, ‘Kexin23’ is an early-maturing fresh food cultivar. ‘Jizhangshu 3’ is a medium ripe cultivar bred in the Hebei Province of China, which is highly adaptable to the four main potato producing areas of China. It is suitable for sale in southern China, Hong Kong and Macao. ‘Jizhangshu 5’ is a medium cooked fresh potato cultivar suitable for growing in northern Hebei Province (Table S1).
Diploid potatoes account for 73% of the potato germplasm resources, with significant room for improvement in salt stress tolerance [228]. Hawkes [229] (1990) divided cultivated potato into eight species, among which four species were diploid, including Solanum stenotomum, Solanum phureja, Solanum goniocalyx and Solanum ajanhuiri. Solanum stenotomum is one of the original species that is derived from other cultivated species, and Solanum phureja is used in breeding due to its high combining ability and ease of forming 2n gametes. In salt tolerance studies, hybrid asexual lines of Solanum stenotomum and Solanum phureja were screened for salt tolerance, and the screened salt-tolerant asexual lines were often used as parents along with salt-sensitive asexual material to construct salt-tolerant isolated populations for further screening and identification of new salt-tolerant cultivars. Zhang et al. [230] (2010) conducted salt tolerance screening on 45 in vitro seedlings of hybrid PHU-STN of diploid potato and found that the clone BD54-8 had high salt tolerance. After salt stress, the cell membrane, chloroplast and mitochondria of BD54-8 were still visible, and the ultrastructure of BD54-8 did not change significantly. Zhang et al. [231] (2013) conducted salt tolerance screening of 45 hybrid (PHU-STN) clones of diploid potato Solanum phureja and Solanum stenotomum and measured bud length, root length, bud fresh weight, root fresh weight, bud dry weight and root dry weight. Six clonal salt-tolerant materials (89-2-1, 188-1, 267-1, 566-1, 472-1 and 463-1) were identified from this work. Two salt-tolerant clones (A108 and A152) were selected by Ma [232] (2014) from the offspring of 472-1 (salt-tolerant) and 270-2 (salt-sensitive) parents, based on performance under salt stress. Zhao et al. [233,234] (2020; 2014) used 166 hybrid asexual lines of Solanum phureja and Solanum stenotomum (PHU-STN) as materials and obtained comprehensive evaluation D values by compounding the membership function and weight coefficients of six indicators: bud length, fresh weight of bud, dry weight of bud, root length, fresh weight of root and dry weight. They found that A108, A038, A024, A002, A152, A096, A003, A013 A200, A053, A066, A231, A139, A016, A120, A233, A254, A100, A255, A072, A050, A117, A238, A107, A069, A167 and A014 had better composite evaluation scores and were determined to have salt tolerance phenotypes. Wang [235] (2021) used the diploid salt-sensitive material HS66 and salt-tolerant material CE125 to construct salt-tolerant isolates and identified six highly salt-tolerant strains, including P3-403, P3-361, P3-563, P3-441, P3-482 and P3-394. Zaki and Radwan [236] (2022) examined the salt tolerance of diploid clones and found that PI 275136-6, PI 537025-8 and PI 566738-2 had the highest salt tolerance index in sodium salt screening. For agricultural production, the clones with high salt tolerance can be transplanted to the field and tested for 2n pollen production after flowering. After the identification of clones with 2n pollen, salt tolerance genes can be introduced into tetraploid cultivars by 4x-2x hybridization [237]. This scheme of using diploid potato salt-tolerant clones to breed tetraploid cultivars with high salt tolerance by decomposition breeding represents a novel way to develop salt-tolerant germplasm (Table S1).

7. Future Perspectives

7.1. Improved Identification of Potato That Is Tolerant to Salt and Alkali Stress

Part of China’s saline-alkali land has the potential to be used for potato growing but requires the development of more tolerant cultivars. Previous studies have identified some cultivars that are tolerant to neutral salt, but there is still little information about basic salt tolerance. In recent years, researchers have focused more on the salt-alkali tolerance of diploid clones, and some studies suggest that the salt tolerance of diploid potato is related to alkali tolerance. However, more work is needed to determine whether a simi2016lar pattern of tolerance is present in tetraploid potato. The combined effects of alkali and salt conditions typically result in more dramatic yield reductions than stress alone [238,239]. Therefore, it is critical to conduct simultaneous saline-alkali screening of tetraploid potato populations in future research, in order to select and breed tetraploid potato cultivars that can be grown under these conditions.

7.2. Additional Exploration of Genes Associated with Salt Tolerance in Potato

In previous studies, the investigations of salt genes have mainly focused on identifying gene expression changes and physiological index changes, with little work performed on understanding the underlying mechanisms governing these changes. Future studies should therefore explore the mechanisms by which differentially expressed genes result in different levels of salt tolerance across potato germplasm, with the ultimate goal of creating more salt-tolerant potato cultivars.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241310726/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.H. and Y.S.; methodology, X.H. and R.Y.; validation, L.Z., Y.S. and Q.W.; investigation, Y.W.; resources, X.H.; data curation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.H. and R.Y.; writing—review and editing, X.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang (LH2023C005), the Key R &D project (2018YFD0200807) and the National Potato Industry Technology System (CARS-09-P13).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Gebrechristos, H.Y.; Chen, W. Utilization of potato peel as eco-friendly products: A review. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 1352–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Watanabe, K. Potato genetics, genomics, and applications. Breed. Sci. 2015, 65, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Machida-Hirano, R. Diversity of potato genetic resources. Breed. Sci. 2015, 65, 26–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. McGill, C.R.; Kurilich, A.C.; Davignon, J. The role of potatoes and potato components in cardiometabolic health: A review. Ann. Med. 2013, 45, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhu, F.; He, J. Physicochemical and functional properties of Maori potato flour. Food Biosci. 2020, 33, 100488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dolničar, P. Importance of potato as a crop and practical approaches to potato breeding. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2354, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Salah, M.H.G.; Al-Zahrani, H.S.M.; Metwali, E.M.R. Improving the salinity tolerance in potato (Solanum tuberosum) by exogenous application of silicon dioxide nanoparticles. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2017, 19, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kikuchi, A.; Huynh, H.D.; Endo, T.; Watanabe, K. Review of recent transgenic studies on abiotic stress tolerance and future molecular breeding in potato. Breed. Sci. 2015, 65, 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pandey, J.; Scheuring, D.C.; Koym, J.W.; Vales, M.L. Genomic regions associated with tuber traits in tetraploid potatoes and identification of superior clones for breeding purposes. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 952263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, Y.; Han, F.; Huang, Y.; Xiao, L.; Cao, S.; Liu, Z.; Thakur, K.; Han, L. Physicochemical Properties and Molecular Structure of Starches from Potato Cultivars of Different Tuber Colors. Starch—Stärke 2022, 74, 2200096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cui, L.; Tian, Y.; Tian, S.; Wang, Y.; Gao, F. Preparation of potato whole flour and its effects on quality of flour products: A review. Grain Oil Sci. Technol. 2018, 1, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wang, Q.; Zhang, W. China’s potato industry and potential impacts on the global market. Am. J. Potato Res. 2004, 81, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Du, Y.; Hu, Y.; San, L.; Tian, J. Research on Potato Appearance Quality Detection Based on Computer Vision. In Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), Beijing, China, 19–22 April 2019; pp. 286–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meinzen-Dick, R.S.; Devaux, A.; Antezana, I. Underground assets: Potato biodiversity to improve the livelihoods of the poor. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2009, 7, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lutaladio, N. International year of the potato 2008. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2009, 22, 491–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, Y.B.; Noh, J.S. Effect of Soil Organic Matter Content and Nutrition Elements on Yield of Potato. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fertil. 2011, 44, 303–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Katerji, N.; Hoorn, J.W.V.; Hamdy, A.; Mastrorilli, M. Salt tolerance classification of crops according to soil salinity and to water stress day index. Agric. Water Manag. 2000, 43, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bilski, J.J.; Nelson, D.C.; Conlon, R.L. The response of four potato cultivars to chloride salinity, sulfate salinity and calcium in pot experiments. Am. J. Potato Res. 1988, 65, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Altaf, M.A.; Behera, B.; Mangal, V.; Singhal, R.K.; Kumar, R.; More, S.; Naz, S.; Mandal, S.; Dey, A.; Saqib, M.; et al. Tolerance and adaptation mechanism of Solanaceous crops under salinity stress. Funct. Plant Biol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Camire, M.E.; Kubow, S.; Donnelly, D.J. Potatoes and human health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 49, 823–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. De Jong, H. Impact of the potato on society. Am. J. Potato Res. 2016, 93, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cai, X.; Xie, C. Development history, current breeding situation and development suggestions of Chinese potato. J. Chang. Veg. 2016, 12, 30–33. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhao, C.; Zhang, H.; Song, C.; Zhu, J.; Shabala, S. Mechanisms of plant responses and adaptation to soil salinity. Innovation 2020, 1, 100017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rozema, J.; Flowers, T. Crops for a salinized world. Science 2008, 322, 1478–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ren, C.; Kong, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhong, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, X.; Qin, S. A perspective on developing a plant ‘holobiont’ for future saline agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 763014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barkla, B.J.; Castellanos-Cervantes, T.; de León, J.L.D.; Matros, A.; Mock, H.P.; Perez-Alfocea, F.; Salekdeh, G.H.; Witzel, K.; Zörb, C. Elucidation of salt stress defense and tolerance mechanisms of crop plants using proteomics--current achievements and perspectives. Proteomics 2013, 13, 1885–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qadir, M.; Quillérou, E.; Nangia, V.; Murtaza, G.; Singh, M.; Thomas, R.J.; Drechsel, P.; Noble, A.D. Economics of salt—Induced land degradation and restoration. Nat. Resour. Forum 2014, 38, 282–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, L.; Wang, B. Protection of halophytes and their uses for cultivation of saline-alkali soil in China. Biology 2021, 10, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shrivastava, P.; Kumar, R. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yang, W.; Yang, M.; Wen, H.; Jiao, Y. Global Warming Potential of CH4 uptake and N2O emissions in saline–alkaline soils. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 191, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Punia, H.; Tokas, J.; Mor, V.S.; Bhuker, A.; Malik, A.; Singh, N. Deciphering reserve mobilization, antioxidant potential, and expression analysis of starch synthesis in sorghum seedlings under salt stress. Plants 2021, 10, 2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, H.; Yang, H.; Lu, X.; Pan, Y.; Wu, H.; Liang, Z.; Ooi, M.K.J. Does high pH give a reliable assessment of the effect of alkaline soil on seed germination? A case study with Leymus chinensis (Poaceae). Plant Soil 2015, 394, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kang, Y.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y.; Shi, M.; Zhang, W.; Fan, Y.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Qin, S. Integration of mRNA and miRNA analysis reveals the molecular mechanism of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) response to alkali stress. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 182, 938–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, H.; Xu, J.; Wu, X. Present situation and tendency of saline-alkali soil in west Jilin Province. J. Geogr. Sci. 2001, 11, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bian, J.; Tang, J.; Lin, N. Relationship between saline–alkali soil formation and neotectonic movement in Songnen Plain, China. Environ. Geol. 2008, 55, 1421–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Banin, A.; Fish, A. Secondary desertification due to salinization of intensively irrigated lands: The Israeli experience. Environ. Monit. Assess. 1995, 37, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mohanavelu, A.; Naganna, S.R.; Al-Ansari, N. Irrigation induced salinity and sodicity hazards on soil and groundwater: An overview of its causes, impacts and mitigation strategies. Agriculture 2021, 11, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, L.; Seki, K.; Miyazaki, T.; Ishihama, Y. The causes of soil alkalinization in the Songnen Plain of Northeast China. Paddy Water Environ. 2009, 7, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Z.; Zhuang, J.; Zhao, A.; Li, X. Types, harms and improvement of saline soil in Songnen Plain. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 322, 052059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dong, G.; Zhao, F.; Chen, J.; Qu, L.; Jiang, S.; Chen, J.; Xin, X.; Shao, C. Land uses changed the dynamics and controls of carbon-water exchanges in alkali-saline Songnen Plain of Northeast China. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 133, 108353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chang, C.; Tian, L.; Tian, Z.; Mclaughlin, N.; Tian, C. Change of soil microorganism communities under saline—Sodic land degradation on the Songnen Plain in northeast China. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2022, 185, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shabala, S.; Wu, H.; Bose, J. Salt stress sensing and early signalling events in plant roots: Current knowledge and hypothesis. Plant Sci. 2015, 241, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Maurya, P.K.; Bahadur, V.; Thakur, G. Effect of Salinity and Sodicity on Vegetable Production and Remedial Measures: A Review. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2022, 34, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ruganzu, V.; Shirimpumu, A.; Mutegi, J.K. Salinity reducing food security and financial returns from rice production in Rwanda. J. Agric. Sustain. 2015, 7. [Google Scholar]
  45. Fita, A.; Rodríguez-Burruezo, A.; Boscaiu, M.; Prohens, J.; Vicente, O. Breeding and domesticating crops adapted to drought and salinity: A new paradigm for increasing food production. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Sanwal, S.K.; Kumar, P.; Kesh, H.; Gupta, V.K.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, A.; Meena, B.L.; Colla, G.; Cardarelli, M.; Kumar, P. Salinity Stress Tolerance in Potato Cultivars: Evidence from Physiological and Biochemical Traits. Plants 2022, 11, 1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hardie, M.; Doyle, R. Measuring soil salinity. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 913, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ghosh, S.C.; Asanuma, K.; Kusutani, A.; Toyota, M. Effect of salt stress on some chemical components and yield of potato. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2001, 47, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Naik, P.S.; Widholm, J.M. Comparison of tissue culture and whole plant responses to salinity in potato. Plant Cell 1993, 33, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jbir-Koubaa, R.; Charfeddine, S.; Ellouz, W.; Saidi, M.N.; Drira, N.; Gargouri-Bouzid, R.; Nouri-Ellouz, O. Investigation of the response to salinity and to oxidative stress of interspecific potato somatic hybrids grown in a greenhouse. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2015, 120, 933–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chourasia, K.N.; Lal, M.K.; Tiwari, R.K.; Dev, D.; Kardile, H.B.; Patil, V.U.; Kumar, A.; Vanishree, G.; Kumar, D.; Bhardwaj, V. Salinity Stress in Potato: Understanding Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Responses. Life 2021, 11, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, Z.; Mao, B.; Li, H.; Zhou, W.; Takeuchi, Y.; Yoneyama, K. Effect of salinity on physiological characteristics, yield and quality of microtubers in vitro in potato. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2005, 27, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Garthwaite, A.J.; von Bothmer, R.; Colmer, T.D. Salt tolerance in wild Hordeum species is associated with restricted entry of Na+ and Cl- into the shoots. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2365–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Maathuis, F.J.M. Sodium in plants: Perception, signalling, and regulation of sodium fluxes. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 849–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, D.; Zhang, M.; Huang, J.; Zhou, R.; Jin, Y.; Wu, C. Zygosaccharomyces rouxii Combats Salt Stress by Maintaining Cell Membrane Structure and Functionality. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. He, Z.; He, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zou, Z.; Wang, H. Changes of antioxidative enzymes and cell membrane osmosis in tomato colonized by arbuscular Mycorrhizae under NaCl stress. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2007, 59, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, M.; Zheng, Q.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 7370–7390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Møller, I.M.; Sweetlove, L.J. ROS signalling--specificity is required. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mirza, H.; Masayuki, F.; Hirosuke, O.; Kamrun, N.; Barbara, H.N. Plant Nutrients and Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Springer: Singapore, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Miller, G.; Suzuki, N.; Ciftci-Yilmaz, S.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pecherina, A.; Grinberg, M.; Ageyeva, M.; Zanegina, D.; Akinchits, E.; Brilkina, A.; Vodeneev, V. Salt-Induced Changes in Cytosolic pH and Photosynthesis in Tobacco and Potato Leaves. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tavakkoli, E.; Rengasamy, P.; McDonald, G.K. High concentrations of Na+ and Cl- ions in soil solution have simultaneous detrimental effects on growth of faba bean under salinity stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 4449–4459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Slabu, C.; Zörb, C.; Steffens, D.; Schubert, S. Is salt stress of faba bean (Vicia faba) caused by Na+ or Cl–toxicity? J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2009, 172, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Geilfus, C.M. Review on the significance of chlorine for crop yield and quality. Plant Sci. 2018, 270, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Aghaei, K.; Ehsanpour, A.A.; Komatsu, S. Proteome analysis of potato under salt stress. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 4858–4868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sobhanian, H.; Aghaei, K.; Komatsu, S. Changes in the plant proteome resulting from salt stress: Toward the creation of salt-tolerant crops? J. Proteom. 2011, 74, 1323–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Billah, S.A.; Khan, N.Z.; Ali, W.; Aasim, M.; Usman, M.; Alezzawi, M.A.; Ullah, H. Genome-wide in silico identification and characterization of the stress associated protein (SAP) gene family encoding A20/AN1 zinc-finger proteins in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0273416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gálvez, J.H.; Tai, H.H.; Barkley, N.A.; Gardner, K.; Ellis, D.; Strömvik, M.V. Understanding potato with the help of genomics. AIMS Agric. Food 2017, 2, 16–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Huang, X.; Han, B. The magic of genomics in creating hybrid potato. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 1237–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Prinzenberg, A.E.; Víquez—Zamora, M.; Harbinson, J.; Lindhout, P.; Van Heusden, S. Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging reveals genetic variation and loci for a photosynthetic trait in diploid potato. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 164, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Barrell, P.J.; Meiyalaghan, S.; Jacobs, J.M.E.; Conner, A.J. Applications of biotechnology and genomics in potato improvement. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2013, 11, 907–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Slater, A.T.; Cogan, N.O.I.; Forster, J.W.; Hayes, B.J.; Daetwyler, H.D. Improving genetic gain with genomic selection in autotetraploid potato. Plant Genome 2016, 9, plantgenome2016.02.0021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Markel, K.; Shih, P.M. From breeding to genome design: A genomic makeover for potatoes. Cell 2021, 184, 3843–3845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Visser, R.G.F.; Bachem, C.W.B.; de Boer, J.M.; Bryan, G.J.; Chakrabati, S.K.; Feingold, S.; Gromadka, R.; van Ham, R.C.H.J.; Huang, S.; Jacobs, J.M.E.; et al. Sequencing the potato genome: Outline and first results to come from the elucidation of the sequence of the world’s third most important food crop. Am. J. Potato Res. 2009, 86, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Visser, R.G.F.; Bachem, C.W.B.; Borm, T.; de Boer, J.; van Eck, H.J.; Finkers, R.; van der Linden, G.; Maliepaard, C.A.; Uitdewilligen, J.G.A.M.L.; Voorrips, R.; et al. Possibilities and challenges of the potato genome sequence. Potato Res. 2014, 57, 327–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Xu, X.; Pan, S.; Cheng, S.; Zhang, B.; Mu, D.; Ni, P.; Zhang, G.; Yang, S.; Li, R.; Wang, J.; et al. Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature 2011, 475, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Liu, Y.; Du, H.; Li, P.; Shen, Y.; Peng, H.; Liu, S.; Zhou, G.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.; Shi, M.; et al. Pan-genome of wild and cultivated soybeans. Cell 2020, 182, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, F.; Xue, H.; Dong, X.; Li, M.; Zheng, X.; Li, Z.; Xu, J.; Wang, W.; Wei, C. Long-read sequencing of 111 rice genomes reveals significantly larger pan-genomes. Genome Res. 2022, 32, 853–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Paluchowska, P.; Śliwka, J.; Yin, Z. Late blight resistance genes in potato breeding. Planta 2022, 255, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Micheletto, S.; Boland, R.; Huarte, M. Argentinian wild diploid Solanum species as sources of quantitative late blight resistance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 101, 902–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cardi, T.; D’Ambrosio, E.; Consoli, D.; Puite, K.J.; Ramulu, K.S. Production of somatic hybrids between frost-tolerant Solanum commersonii and S. tuberosum: Characterization of hybrid plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1993, 87, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Aversano, R.; Contaldi, F.; Ercolano, M.R.; Grosso, V.; Iorizzo, M.; Tatino, F.; Xumerle, L.; Dal Molin, A.; Avanzato, C.; Ferrarini, A.; et al. The Solanum commersonii genome sequence provides insights into adaptation to stress conditions and genome evolution of wild potato relatives. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 954–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Pal, B.P.; Nath, P. Genetic nature of self-and cross-incompatibility in potatoes. Nature 1942, 149, 246–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Salaman, R.N. Male sterility in potatoes, a dominant Mendelian character; with remarks on the shape of the pollen in wild and domestic varieties. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1910, 39, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hosaka, K.; Hanneman, R.E. Genetics of self-compatibility in a self-incompatible wild diploid potato species Solanum chacoense. 1. Detection of an S locus inhibitor (Sli) gene. Euphytica 1998, 99, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Leisner, C.P.; Hamilton, J.P.; Crisovan, E.; Manrique-Carpintero, N.C.; Marand, A.P.; Newton, L.; Pham, G.M.; Jiang, J.; Douches, D.S.; Jansky, S.H.; et al. Genome sequence of M6, a diploid inbred clone of the high—Glycoalkaloid—Producing tuber—Bearing potato species Solanum chacoense, reveals residual heterozygosity. Plant J. 2018, 94, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Zhou, Q.; Tang, D.; Huang, W.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Hamilton, J.P.; Visser, R.G.F.; Bachem, C.W.B.; Buell, C.R.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Haplotype-resolved genome analyses of a heterozygous diploid potato. Nat. Genet. 2020, 52, 1018–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sun, H.; Jiao, W.; Campoy, J.A.; Krause, K.; Goel, M.; Folz-Donahue, K.; Kukat, C.; Huettel, B.; Schneeberger, K. Chromosome-scale and haplotype-resolved genome assembly of a tetraploid potato cultivar. Nat. Genet. 2022, 54, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ahmad, I.; Zhu, G.; Zhou, G.; Song, X.; Ibrahim, M.E.H.; Salih, E.G.I.; Hussain, S.; Younas, M.U. Pivotal role of phytohormones and their responsive genes in plant growth and their signaling and transduction pathway under salt stress in cotton. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zluhan-Martínez, E.; López-Ruíz, B.A.; García-Gómez, M.L.; Garcia-Ponce, B.; Sanchez, M.D.; Alvarez-Buylla, E.R.; Garay-Arroyo, A. Integrative roles of phytohormones on cell proliferation, elongation and differentiation in the Arabidopsis thaliana primary root. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 659155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Waadt, R.; Seller, C.A.; Hsu, P.K.; Takahashi, Y.; Munemasa, S.; Schroeder, J.I. Plant hormone regulation of abiotic stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Bio. 2022, 23, 680–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yu, Z.; Duan, X.; Luo, L.; Dai, S.; Ding, Z.; Xia, G. How plant hormones mediate salt stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 1117–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Fujita, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Pivotal role of the AREB/ABF—SnRK2 pathway in ABRE—Mediated transcription in response to osmotic stress in plants. Physiol. Plant. 2013, 147, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Faried, H.N.; Ayyub, C.M.; Amjad, M.; Ahmed, R.; Wattoo, F.M.; Butt, M.; Bashir, M.; Shaheen, M.R.; Waqas, M.A. Salicylic acid confers salt tolerance in potato plants by improving water relations, gaseous exchange, antioxidant activities and osmoregulation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 1868–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Efimova, M.V.; Khripach, V.A.; Boyko, E.V.; Malofii, M.K.; Kolomeichuk, L.V.; Murgan, O.K.; Vidershpun, A.N.; Mukhamatdinova, E.A.; Kuznetsov, V.V. The priming of potato plants induced by brassinosteroids reduces oxidative stress and increases salt tolerance. Dokl. Biol. Sci. 2018, 478, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Colebrook, E.H.; Thomas, S.G.; Phillips, A.L.; Hedden, P. The role of gibberellin signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress. J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Jung, J.H.; Park, C.M. Auxin modulation of salt stress signaling in Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1198–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Papon, N.; Courdavault, V. ARResting cytokinin signaling for salt-stress tolerance. Plant Sci. 2022, 314, 111116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Valenzuela, C.E.; Acevedo-Acevedo, O.; Miranda, G.S.; Vergara-Barros, P.; Holuigue, L.; Figueroa, C.R.; Figueroa, P.M. Salt stress response triggers activation of the jasmonate signaling pathway leading to inhibition of cell elongation in Arabidopsis primary root. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 4209–4220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Li, D.; Lin, R.; Mu, Q.; Zhou, N.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, W. Cloning and functional analysis of potato StNPR4 gene. Plant Res. 2022, 42, 821–829. [Google Scholar]
  101. Thurley, K.; Skupin, A.; Thul, R.; Falcke, M. Fundamental properties of Ca2+ signals. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1820, 1185–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Dong, Q.; Wallrad, L.; Almutairi, B.O.; Kudla, J. Ca2+ signaling in plant responses to abiotic stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Seifikalhor, M.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Shomali, A.; Azad, N.; Hassani, B.; Lastochkina, O.; Li, T. Calcium signaling and salt tolerance are diversely entwined in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2019, 14, 1665455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Bachani, J.; Mahanty, A.; Aftab, T.; Kumar, K. Insight into calcium signalling in salt stress response. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 151, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Stael, S.; Wurzinger, B.; Mair, A.; Mehlmer, N.; Vothknecht, U.C.; Teige, M. Plant organellar calcium signalling: An emerging field. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1525–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Knight, H.; Trewavas, A.J.; Knight, M.R. Calcium signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana responding to drought and salinity. Plant J. 1997, 12, 1067–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jiang, Z.; Zhou, X.; Tao, M.; Yuan, F.; Liu, L.; Wu, F.; Wu, X.; Xiang, Y.; Niu, Y.; Liu, F.; et al. Plant cell-surface GIPC sphingolipids sense salt to trigger Ca2+ influx. Nature 2019, 572, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Knight, H. Calcium signaling during abiotic stress in plants. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1999, 195, 269–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Manishankar, P.; Wang, N.; Köster, P.; Alatar, A.A.; Kudla, J. Calcium signaling during salt stress and in the regulation of ion homeostasis. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 4215–4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. McAinsh, M.R.; Hetherington, A.M. Encoding specificity in Ca2+ signalling systems. Trends Plant Sci. 1998, 3, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gao, X.; Cox, K.L.; He, P. Functions of calcium-dependent protein kinases in plant innate immunity. Plants 2014, 3, 160–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. DeFalco, T.A.; Bender, K.W.; Snedden, W.A. Breaking the code: Ca2+ sensors in plant signalling. Biochem. J. 2010, 425, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Sanders, D.; Pelloux, J.; Brownlee, C.; Harper, J.F. Calcium at the crossroads of signaling. Plant Cell 2002, 14 (Suppl. 1), S401–S417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Mori, I.C.; Murata, Y.; Yang, Y.; Munemasa, S.; Wang, Y.; Andreoli, S.; Tiriac, H.; Alonso, J.M.; Harper, J.F.; Ecker, J.R.; et al. CDPKs CPK6 and CPK3 function in ABA regulation of guard cell S-type anion-and Ca2+-permeable channels and stomatal closure. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4, 1749–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Hong, X.; Li, S.; Yang, J.; Luo, H.; Zhang, N.; Si, H. Identification and expressional analysis of members of the potato StCDPKs gene family. J. Gansu Agric. Univ. 2020, 55, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhu, X.; Hong, X.; Liu, X.; Li, S.; Yang, J.; Wang, F.; Yue, Y.; Zhang, N.; Si, H. Calcium-dependent protein kinase 32 gene maintains photosynthesis and tolerance of potato in response to salt stress. Sci. Hortic-Amst. 2021, 285, 110179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Grossi, C.E.M.; Santin, F.; Quintana, S.A.; Fantino, E.; Ulloa, R.M. Calcium-dependent protein kinase 2 plays a positive role in the salt stress response in potato. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 535–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bouché, N.; Yellin, A.; Snedden, W.A.; Fromm, H. Plant-specific calmodulin-binding proteins. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56, 435–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. McCormack, E.; Tsai, Y.C.; Braam, J. Handling calcium signaling: Arabidopsis CaMs and CMLs. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Raina, M.; Kumar, A.; Yadav, N.; Kumari, S.; Yusuf, M.A.; Mustafiz, A.; Kumar, D. StCaM2, a calcium binding protein, alleviates negative effects of salinity and drought stress in tobacco. Plant Mol. Biol. 2021, 106, 85–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Strzyz, P. Decoding the Ca2+ signal for salt tolerance. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 642–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Qiu, Q.; Guo, Y.; Dietrich, M.A.; Schumaker, K.S.; Zhu, J. Regulation of SOS1, a plasma membrane Na+/H+ exchanger in Arabidopsis thaliana, by SOS2 and SOS3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 8436–8441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Manik, S.M.N.; Shi, S.; Mao, J.; Dong, L.; Su, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, H. The calcium sensor CBL-CIPK is involved in plant’s response to abiotic stresses. Int. J. Genom. 2015, 2015, 493191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Halford, N.G.; Hey, S.J. Snf1-related protein kinases (SnRKs) act within an intricate network that links metabolic and stress signalling in plants. Biochem. J. 2009, 419, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Coello, P.; Hirano, E.; Hey, S.J.; Muttucumaru, N.; Martinez-Barajas, E.; Parry, M.A.J.; Halford, N.G. Evidence that abscisic acid promotes degradation of SNF1-related protein kinase (SnRK) 1 in wheat and activation of a putative calcium-dependent SnRK2. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 913–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Wang, F.; Li, W.; Zhang, Y.; Dang, C.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, F.; Chen, X.; Zhou, Q. Study of Overexpression of StSnRK1 Gene increasess Salt Tolerance in Tobacco. J. Nucl. Agric. 2020, 34, 1674–1680. [Google Scholar]
  127. Gao, H. Study on the Structure and Physiological Response of Potato Test-tube Plantlets and StSnRK2 Gene Expression under Osmotic Stress. Master’s Thesis, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  128. Sahni, S.; Prasad, B.D.; Liu, Q.; Grbic, V.; Sharpe, A.; Singh, S.P.; Krishna, P. Overexpression of the brassinosteroid biosynthetic gene DWF4 in Brassica napus simultaneously increases seed yield and stress tolerance. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Zhou, X.; Zhang, N.; Yang, J.; Tang, X.; Wen, Y.; Si, H. Functional analysis of StDWF4 gene in response to salt stress in potato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 125, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhou, X. Response of Potato Brassinosteroid Synthesis Rate-Limiting Enzyme Genes StCPD and StDWF4 to Drought and Salt Stress. Ph.D. Thesis, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  131. Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xin, H.; Li, S.; Liang, Z. Involvement of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2 gene family) in ripening process and response to cold and heat stress of Vitis vinifera. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Liu, W.; Tang, X.; Zhu, X.; Qi, X.; Zhang, N.; Si, H. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the E2 gene family in potato. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 777–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Fu, X.; Tang, X.; Liu, W.; Li, S.; Qi, X.; Zhang, N.; Si, H. Bioinformatics and Expression Analysis of StUBC12 Gene in Potato. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 28, 784–793. [Google Scholar]
  134. Tolosa, L.N.; Zhang, Z. The role of major transcription factors in Solanaceous food crops under different stress conditions: Current and future perspectives. Plants 2020, 9, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Chinnusamy, V.; Schumaker, K.; Zhu, J. Molecular genetic perspectives on cross—Talk and specificity in abiotic stress signalling in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Hoang, X.L.T.; Nhi, D.N.H.; Thu, N.B.A.; Thao, N.P.; Tran, L.S.P. Transcription factors and their roles in signal transduction in plants under abiotic stresses. Curr. Genom. 2017, 18, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wang, Z.; Zhang, N.; Zhou, X.; Fan, Q.; Si, H.; Wang, D. Isolation and characterization of StERF transcription factor genes from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). C. R. Biol. 2015, 338, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Schmidt, R.; Mieulet, D.; Hubberten, H.M.; Obata, T.; Hoefgen, R.; Fernie, A.R.; Fisahn, J.; Segundo, B.S.; Guiderdoni, E.; Schippers, J.H.M.; et al. SALT-RESPONSIVE ERF1 regulates reactive oxygen species–dependent signaling during the initial response to salt stress in rice. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 2115–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Zhang, G.; Chen, M.; Li, L.; Xu, Z.; Chen, X.; Guo, J.; Ma, Y. Overexpression of the soybean GmERF3 gene, an AP2/ERF type transcription factor for increased tolerances to salt, drought, and diseases in transgenic tobacco. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3781–3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Wang, F.; Yang, J.; Zhu, X.; Li, S.; Liu, W.; Zhang, N.; Si, H. Bioinformatics and expression analysis of potato StERF109 gene. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 29, 2087–2098. [Google Scholar]
  141. Charfeddine, M.; Charfeddine, S.; Ghazala, I.; Bouaziz, D.; Bouzid, R.G. Investigation of the response to salinity of transgenic potato plants overexpressing the transcription factor StERF94. J. Biosci. 2019, 44, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. He, L.; Shi, X.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Yang, K.; Wang, Y.C. Arabidopsis ANAC069 binds to C [A/G] CG [T/G] sequences to negatively regulate salt and osmotic stress tolerance. Plant Mol Biol. 2017, 93, 369–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Jeong, J.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Baek, K.H.; Jung, H.; Ha, S.H.; Do Choi, Y.; Kim, M.; Reuzeau, C.; Kim, J.K. Root-specific expression of OsNAC10 improves drought tolerance and grain yield in rice under field drought conditions. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Hong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Huang, L.; Li, D.; Song, F. Overexpression of a stress-responsive NAC transcription factor gene ONAC022 improves drought and salt tolerance in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Hao, Y.; Wei, W.; Song, Q.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F. Soybean NAC transcription factors promote abiotic stress tolerance and lateral root formation in transgenic plants. Plant J. 2011, 68, 302–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Xia, N.; Zhang, G.; Liu, X.; Deng, L.; Cai, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, J.; Huang, L.; Kang, Z. Characterization of a novel wheat NAC transcription factor gene involved in defense response against stripe rust pathogen infection and abiotic stresses. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37, 3703–3712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Xia, N.; Zhang, G.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, L.; Xu, L.; Chen, X.; Liu, B.; Yu, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, L.; et al. TaNAC8, a novel NAC transcription factor gene in wheat, responds to stripe rust pathogen infection and abiotic stresses. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 74, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Mao, X.; Zhang, H.; Qian, X.; Li, A.; Zhao, G.; Jing, R. TaNAC2, a NAC-type wheat transcription factor conferring enhanced multiple abiotic stress tolerances in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 2933–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Lu, M.; Ying, S.; Zhang, D.; Shi, Y.; Song, Y.; Wang, T.; Li, Y. A maize stress-responsive NAC transcription factor, ZmSNAC1, confers enhanced tolerance to dehydration in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 1701–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Mao, H.; Yu, L.; Han, R.; Li, Z.; Liu, H. ZmNAC55, a maize stress-responsive NAC transcription factor, confers drought resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 105, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Singh, A.K.; Sharma, V.; Pal, A.K.; Acharya, V.; Ahuja, P.S. Genome-wide organization and expression profiling of the NAC transcription factor family in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). DNA Res. 2013, 20, 403–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Yue, L. Functional Study on Salt Tolerance of Potato Transcription Factor StNAC1. Master’s Thesis, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Yue, L.; Zhuang, Y.; Gu, Y.; Li, H.; Tu, S.; Yang, X.; Huang, W. Heterologous expression of Solanum tuberosum NAC1 gene confers enhanced tolerance to salt stress in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. J. Plant Biol. 2021, 64, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wang, Q.; Guo, C.; Li, Z.; Sun, J.; Deng, Z.; Wen, L.; Li, X.; Guo, Y. Potato NAC transcription factor StNAC053 enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Xu, Q.; He, Q.; Li, S.; Tian, Z. Molecular characterization of StNAC2 in potato and its overexpression confers drought and salt tolerance. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014, 36, 1841–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Yu, B.; Song, Q.; Liu, Y.; Chen, T.H.H.; Li, G.; Yang, X. Ectopic expression of StCBF1 and ScCBF1 have different functions in response to freezing and drought stresses in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2018, 270, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zandkarimi, H.; Ebadi, A.; Salami, S.A.; Alizade, H.; Baisakh, N. Analyzing the expression profile of AREB/ABF and DREB/CBF genes under drought and salinity stresses in grape (Vitis vinifera L.). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Li, W.; Chen, Y.; Ye, M.; Lu, H.; Wang, D.; Chen, Q. Evolutionary history of the C-repeat binding factor/dehydration-responsive element-binding 1 (CBF/DREB1) protein family in 43 plant species and characterization of CBF/DREB1 proteins in Solanum tuberosum. BMC Evol. Biol. 2020, 20, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Liu, Q.; Kasuga, M.; Sakuma, Y.; Abe, H.; Miura, S.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought-and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 1391–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Song, Q.; Liu, Y.; Chen, T.H.H.; Yang, X. Heterologous Expression of Potato StCBF1 and StCBF4 Genes Improves Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Chin. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 56, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Bouaziz, D.; Pirrello, J.; Ben Amor, H.; Hammami, A.; Charfeddine, M.; Dhieb, A.; Bouzayen, M.; Gargouri-Bouzid, R. Ectopic expression of dehydration responsive element binding proteins (StDREB2) confers higher tolerance to salt stress in potato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 60, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Bouaziz, D.; Pirrello, J.; Charfeddine, M.; Hammami, A.; Jbir, R.; Dhieb, A.; Bouzayen, M.; Gargouri-Bouzid, R. Overexpression of StDREB1 transcription factor increases tolerance to salt in transgenic potato plants. Mol. Biotechnol. 2013, 54, 803–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Bouaziz, D.; Jbir, R.; Charfeddine, S.; Saidi, M.N.; Gargouri-Bouzid, R. The StDREB1 transcription factor is involved in oxidative stress response and enhances tolerance to salt stress. Plant Cell 2015, 121, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Li, W.; Li, D.; Han, L.; Tao, M.; Hu, Q.; Wu, W.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Huang, G. Genome-wide identification and characterization of TCP transcription factor genes in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Li, J.; Xie, M.; Wan, C.; Zuo, R.; Lu, L.; Li, L. Prokaryotic Expression and Salt Stress Function of Potato Transcription Factor StTCP13 Gene. J. North China Agric. Sci. 2021, 36, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  166. Rajappa, S.; Krishnamurthy, P.; Kumar, P.P. Regulation of AtKUP2 expression by bHLH and WRKY transcription factors helps to confer increased salt tolerance to Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Huang, J.; Liu, F.; Chao, D.; Xin, B.; Liu, K.; Cao, S.; Chen, X.; Peng, L.; Zhang, B.; Fu, S.; et al. The WRKY Transcription Factor OsWRKY54 Is Involved in Salt Tolerance in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Shi, W.; Du, Y.; Ma, J.; Min, D.; Jin, L.; Chen, J.; Chen, M.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, Y.; Xu, Z.; et al. The WRKY transcription factor GmWRKY12 confers drought and salt tolerance in soybean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. Yousfi, F.E.; Makhloufi, E.; Marande, W.; Ghorbel, A.W.; Bouzayen, M.; Berges, H. Comparative analysis of WRKY genes potentially involved in salt stress responses in Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Ye, H.; Qiao, L.; Guo, H.; Guo, L.; Ren, F.; Bai, J.; Wang, Y. Genome-wide identification of wheat WRKY gene family reveals that TaWRKY75-A is referred to drought and salt resistances. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 663118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Bo, C.; Cai, R.; Fang, X.; Wu, H.; Ma, Z.; Yuan, H.; Cheng, B.; Fan, J.; Ma, Q. Transcription factor ZmWRKY20 interacts with ZmWRKY115 to repress expression of ZmbZIP111 for salt tolerance in maize. Plant J. 2022, 111, 1660–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Yang, Z.; Wang, F.; Wang, J. Sequence and Expression Pattern Analysis of Potato StWRKY40 Gene. Mol. Plant Breed. 2020, 18, 7283–7292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Tang, Y.; Bao, X.; Zhi, Y.; Wu, Q.; Guo, Y.; Yin, X.; Zheng, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; He, W. Overexpression of a MYB family gene, OsMYB6, increases drought and salinity stress tolerance in transgenic rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Zhu, N.; Cheng, S.; Liu, X.; Du, H.; Dai, M.; Zhou, D.; Zhou, D.; Yang, W.; Zhao, Y. The R2R3-type MYB gene OsMYB91 has a function in coordinating plant growth and salt stress tolerance in rice. Plant Sci. 2015, 236, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Song, Y.; Yang, W.; Fan, H.; Zhang, X.; Sui, N. TaMYB86B encodes a R2R3-type MYB transcription factor and enhances salt tolerance in wheat. Plant Sci. 2020, 300, 110624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Rahaie, M.; Xue, G.; Naghavi, M.R.; Alizadeh, H.; Schenk, P.M. A MYB gene from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is up-regulated during salt and drought stresses and differentially regulated between salt-tolerant and sensitive genotypes. Plant Cell Rep. 2010, 29, 835–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Shen, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, W.; Jiao, Y.; Zhou, X. Overexpression of the wild soybean R2R3-MYB transcription factor GsMYB15 enhances resistance to salt stress and Helicoverpa armigera in transgenic Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Yan, F.; Li, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhai, Y.; Wang, Q. Overexpression of soybean R2R3-MYB transcription factor, GmMYB12B2, and tolerance to UV radiation and salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Bian, S.; Jin, D.; Sun, G.; Shan, B.; Zhou, H.; Wang, J.; Zhai, L.; Li, X. Characterization of the soybean R2R3-MYB transcription factor GmMYB81 and its functional roles under abiotic stresses. Gene 2020, 753, 144803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Zhao, P. Functional Analysis of Potato StMYB2R-86 Gene against Salt Stress and Identification of StHsp20 Gene Family. Ph.D. Thesis, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, China, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Shi, X.; Wu, Y.; Dai, T.; Gu, Y.; Wang, L.; Qin, X.; Xu, Y.; Chen, F. JcZFP8, a C2H2 zinc finger protein gene from Jatropha curcas, influences plant development in transgenic tobacco. Electron. J. Biotechn. 2018, 34, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Zhu, W.; He, M.; Shen, S.; Wang, J. Cloning and expression analysis of potato StZFP593. Mol. Plant Breed. 2021, 19, 7657–7665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Tian, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Xie, C. Novel potato C2H2—Type zinc finger protein gene, StZFP1, which responds to biotic and abiotic stress, plays a role in salt tolerance. Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Zhang, X.; Liu, S.K.; Takano, T. Two cysteine proteinase inhibitors from Arabidopsis thaliana, AtCYSa and AtCYSb, increasing the salt, drought, oxidation and cold tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 68, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Liu, M.; Li, Y.; Li, G.; Dong, T.; Liu, S.; Liu, P.; Wang, Q. Overexpression of StCYS1 gene enhances tolerance to salt stress in the transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plant. J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 2239–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Wang, Y.; Zhan, Y.; Wu, C.; Gong, S.; Zhu, N.; Chen, S.; Li, H. Cloning of a cystatin gene from sugar beet M14 that can enhance plant salt tolerance. Plant Sci. 2012, 191, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Li, Y. Molecular Cloning, Expression Purification and Stress Resistance Function Characterization of Potato StCPI Gene. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  188. Chen, Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, J.; Sun, H.; He, M. Cloning of potato StRcd1 and its expression analysis under abiotic stress. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2019, 46, 1163–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Aycan, M.; Baslam, M.; Mitsui, T.; Yildiz, M. The TaGSK1, TaSRG, TaPTF1, and TaP5CS Gene Transcripts Confirm Salinity Tolerance by Increasing Proline Production in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plants 2022, 11, 3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Wang, M.; Xie, J.; Ding, H.; Xiong, X.; Wang, W.; Qin, Y. Cloning of potato stuProT1. 2 gene and expression analysis of abiotic stress. Mol. Plant Breed. 2019, 17, 6243–6255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Chen, W.; Diao, W.; Liu, H.; Guo, Q.; Song, Q.; Guo, G.; Wan, H.; Chen, Y. Molecular characterization of SUT Gene Family in Solanaceae with emphasis on expression analysis of pepper genes during development and stresses. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 14780–14798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Kühn, C.; Grof, C.P.L. Sucrose transporters of higher plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Aoki, N.; Hirose, T.; Scofield, G.N.; Whitfeld, P.R.; Furbank, R.T. The sucrose transporter gene family in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  194. Xie, H.; Ye, G.; Wang, J.; Yang, Y. Overexpression of potato sucrose transporter2 (StSUT2) gene enhances tolerrance of tobacco to salinity. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 33, 696–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Kondhare, K.R.; Natarajan, B.; Banerjee, A.K. Molecular signals that govern tuber development in potato. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2020, 64, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Vanderschuren, H.; Boycheva, S.; Li, K.T.; Szydlowski, N.; Gruissem, W.; Fitzpatrick, T.B. Strategies for vitamin B6 biofortification of plants: A dual role as a micronutrient and a stress protectant. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Bagri, D.S.; Upadhyaya, D.C.; Kumar, A.; Upadhyaya, C.P. Overexpression of PDX-II gene in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) leads to the enhanced accumulation of vitamin B6 in tuber tissues and tolerance to abiotic stresses. Plant Sci. 2018, 272, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Sun, A.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Meng, K.; Xu, H.; Wei, X.; Xiao, G.; Ouwerkerk, P.B.F.; Wang, M.; et al. A transgenic study on affecting potato tuber yield by expressing the rice sucrose transporter genes OsSUT5Z and OsSUT2M. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2011, 53, 586–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Kühn, C.; Hajirezaei, M.R.; Fernie, A.R.; Roessner-Tunali, U.; Czechowski, T.; Hirner, B.; Frommer, W.B. The sucrose transporter StSUT1 localizes to sieve elements in potato tuber phloem and influences tuber physiology and development. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Kim, S.; Kang, J.Y.; Cho, D.I.; Park, J.H.; Kim, S.Y. ABF2, an ABRE-binding bZIP factor, is an essential component of glucose signaling and its overexpression affects multiple stress tolerance. Plant J. 2004, 40, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. García, M.N.M.; Stritzler, M.; Capiati, D.A. Heterologous expression of Arabidopsis ABF4 gene in potato enhances tuberization through ABA-GA crosstalk regulation. Planta 2014, 239, 615–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. García, M.N.M.; Cortelezzi, J.I.; Fumagalli, M.; Capiati, D.A. Expression of the Arabidopsis ABF4 gene in potato increases tuber yield, improves tuber quality and enhances salt and drought tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 98, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. García, M.N.M.; País, S.M.; Téllez-Iñón, M.T.; Capiati, D.A. Characterization of StPPI1, a proton pump interactor from Solanum tuberosum L. that is up-regulated during tuber development and by abiotic stress. Planta 2011, 233, 661–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Farooqi, M.Q.U.; Nawaz, G.; Wani, S.H.; Choudhary, J.R.; Rana, M.; Sah, R.P.; Afzal, M.; Zahra, Z.; Ganie, S.A.; Razzaq, A. Recent developments in multi-omics and breeding strategies for abiotic stress tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 965878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Derbyshire, M.C.; Batley, J.; Edwards, D. Use of multiple ‘omics techniques to accelerate the breeding of abiotic stress tolerant crops. Curr. Plant Biol. 2022, 32, 100262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Gutschker, S.; Corral, J.M.; Schmiedl, A.; Ludewig, F.; Koch, W.; Fiedler-Wiechers, K.; Czarnecki, O.; Harms, K.; Keller, I.; Rodrigues, C.M.; et al. Multi-omics data integration reveals link between epigenetic modifications and gene expression in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris) in response to cold. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Li, Q. Screening and Analysis of Potato Salt Tolerance Physiology and Related Genes. Master’s Thesis, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Pandey, A.; Mann, M. Proteomics to study genes and genomes. Nature 2000, 405, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Shulaev, V.; Cortes, D.; Miller, G.; Mittler, R. Metabolomics for plant stress response. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Borrelli, G.M.; Fragasso, M.; Nigro, F.; Platani, C.; Papa, R.; Beleggia, R.; Trono, D. Analysis of metabolic and mineral changes in response to salt stress in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) genotypes, which differ in salinity tolerance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 133, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Rouphael, Y.; Raimondi, G.; Lucini, L.; Carillo, P.; Kyriacou, M.C.; Colla, G.; Cirillo, V.; Pannico, A.; El-Nakhel, C.; De Pascale, S. Physiological and metabolic responses triggered by omeprazole improve tomato plant tolerance to NaCl stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  212. Zörb, C.; Geilfus, C.M.; Mühling, K.H.; Ludwig-Muller, J. The influence of salt stress on ABA and auxin concentrations in two maize cultivars differing in salt resistance. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Hamooh, B.T.; Sattar, F.A.; Wellman, G.; Mousa, M.A.A. Metabolomic and biochemical analysis of two potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars exposed to in vitro osmotic and salt stresses. Plants 2021, 10, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Evers, D.; Legay, S.; Lamoureux, D.; Hausman, J.F.; Hoffmann, L.; Renaut, J. Towards a synthetic view of potato cold and salt stress response by transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 78, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Jing, Q.; Hou, H.; Meng, X.; Chen, A.; Wang, L.; Zhu, H.; Zheng, S.; Lv, Z.; Zhu, X. Transcriptome analysis reveals the proline metabolic pathway and its potential regulation TF-hub genes in salt-stressed potato. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Khrais, T.; Leclerc, Y.; Donnelly, D.J. Relative salinity tolerance of potato cultivars assessed by in vitro screening. Am. J. Potato Res. 1998, 75, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Zhang, J. Screening of Diploid Potato Salt-Tolerant Materials and Their Physiological Characteristics. Ph.D. Thesis, Northeast Agricultural University, Haerbin, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  218. Zhang, J.; Miao, N.; Bai, Y.; Wan, X.; Lv, W. Changes of chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activity in diploid potato under salt stress. Crop Mag. 2014, 30, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Zhang, J.; Bai, Y.; Miao, N.; Zhu, S.; Li, W.; Lv, W. Effects of Salt Stress on Leaf Plasma Membrane Permeability, MDA and Proline Contents of Diploid Potatoes with Different Salt Tolerance. Crop Mag. 2013, 29, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Liu, F.; Wang, P.; Yang, Y.; Ma, W.; Dong, D.; Chen, G. Differential research on the response of different potato varieties to salt stress. J. Southwest Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2010, 32, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Zhang, Z.; Zhou, J.; Lin, Y.; Guo, Y.; Shen, W.; Luo, W. Preliminary identification and screening of potato varieties (lines) tolerant to salt stress. China Agric. Sci. Bull. 2018, 34, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  222. Zhou, J. Screening of Salt-Tolerant Potato Germplasm and Its Physiological Characteristics. Master’s Thesis, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Li, Q.; Qin, Y.; Hu, X.; Ding, Y.; Xiong, X.; Wang, W. Establishment of in vitro identification method for salt tolerance of potato and evaluation of salt tolerance of 52 germplasm resources. J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2018, 19, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Ahmed, H.A.A.; Şahin, N.K.; Akdoğan, G.; Yaman, C.; Kom, D.; Uranbey, S. Variability in salinity stress tolerance of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties using in vitro screening. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 2020, 44, 7054202044004220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Hu, D.; Xu, Y.; Xu, J.; Wang, S.; Shi, X. Identification of potato salt-tolerant varieties and bioinformatics analysis of StDWF4 gene. Mol. Plant Breed. 2020, 18, 7654–7661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Jiang, Y.; Xing, B.; Feng, H.; Sun, H.; Chen, M.; Lang, C.; Xu, L. Identification and evaluation of salt tolerance of different potato varieties under in vitro conditions. Rural Sci. Technol. 2021, 2021, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Yu, G.; Liu, P.; Li, M.; Hao, H.; Cui, H.; Guo, A. Identification and comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance of different potato varieties (lines). Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2022, 50, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Tiwari, J.K.; Buckseth, T.; Zinta, R.; Bhatia, N.; Dakamu, D.; Naik, S.; Poonia, A.K.; Kardile, H.B.; Challam, C.; Singh, R.K.; et al. Germplasm, breeding, and genomics in potato improvement of biotic and abiotic stresses tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 805671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Hawkes, J.G. The Potato: Evolution, Biodiversity and Genetic Resources; Belhaven Press: London, UK, 1990; Volume 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Zhang, J.; Bai, Y.; Yu, M.; Li, W.; Lv, W. Effects of Salt Stress on Leaf Ultrastructure of Diploid Potato. J. Northeast Agric. Univ. 2010, 41, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Zhang, J.; Miao, N.; Bai, Y.; Zhu, S.; Lv, W. In Vitro Screening of Diploid Potato Salt-tolerant Materials. China Agric. Sci. Bull. 2013, 29, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Ma, Z. Effects of Salt Stress on Diploid Potato Physiology and Mitigation Effects of Exogenous Substances. Master’s Thesis, Northeast Agricultural University, Haerbin, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  233. Zhao, M.; Bai, Y.; Lv, W. Evaluation of salt tolerance of diploid potato (Solanum phureja × S. stenotomum) in vitro. J. Nucl. Agric. 2020, 34, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  234. Zhao, M. QTL Mapping of Salt-Alkaline Tolerance and Salt-Tolerance Morphological Traits in Diploid Potato. Ph.D. Thesis, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  235. Wang, H. Mapping and Analysis of Salt Tolerance Related Genes in Diploid Potatoes. Master’s Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Zaki, H.E.M.; Radwan, K.S.A. The use of osmoregulators and antioxidants to mitigate the adverse impacts of salinity stress in diploid and tetraploid potato genotypes (Solanum spp.). Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2022, 9, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Peloquin, S.J.; Yerk, G.L.; Werner, J.E.; Darmo, E. Potato breeding with haploids and 2 n gametes. Genome 1989, 31, 1000–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Yang, C.; Shi, D.; Wang, D. Comparative effects of salt and alkali stresses on growth, osmotic adjustment and ionic balance of an alkali-resistant halophyte Suaeda glauca (Bge.). Plant Growth Regul. 2008, 56, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Wang, H.; Wu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Yang, C.; Shi, D. Effects of salt and alkali stresses on growth and ion balance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil Environ. 2011, 57, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Potato planting area and fresh food production from 2013 to 2020. (A) Global potato planting area and fresh food production from 2013 to 2020. (B) Potato growing area and production in China from 2013 to 2020 (global potato planting area and fresh food production data source: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ (accessed on 15 April 2023); Chinese potato planting area and production data source: https://data.stats.gov.cn/ (accessed on 15 April 2023)).
Figure 1. Potato planting area and fresh food production from 2013 to 2020. (A) Global potato planting area and fresh food production from 2013 to 2020. (B) Potato growing area and production in China from 2013 to 2020 (global potato planting area and fresh food production data source: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ (accessed on 15 April 2023); Chinese potato planting area and production data source: https://data.stats.gov.cn/ (accessed on 15 April 2023)).
Ijms 24 10726 g001aIjms 24 10726 g001b
Figure 2. Proportion of potato growing area in the top ten countries in 2020 (data source: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ (accessed on 15 April 2023)).
Figure 2. Proportion of potato growing area in the top ten countries in 2020 (data source: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ (accessed on 15 April 2023)).
Ijms 24 10726 g002
Figure 3. Fresh potato production in the top ten countries in 2020 (data source: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ (accessed on 15 April 2023)).
Figure 3. Fresh potato production in the top ten countries in 2020 (data source: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ (accessed on 15 April 2023)).
Ijms 24 10726 g003
Figure 4. Proposed working model of salt tolerance genes and pathways in potato.
Figure 4. Proposed working model of salt tolerance genes and pathways in potato.
Ijms 24 10726 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, X.; Yang, R.; Zhang, L.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y. A Review of Potato Salt Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10726. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310726

AMA Style

Han X, Yang R, Zhang L, Wei Q, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Shi Y. A Review of Potato Salt Tolerance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(13):10726. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310726

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Xue, Ruijie Yang, Lili Zhang, Qiaorong Wei, Yu Zhang, Yazhi Wang, and Ying Shi. 2023. "A Review of Potato Salt Tolerance" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 13: 10726. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310726

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop