Next Article in Journal
Plant Growth Promotion Using Bacillus cereus
Next Article in Special Issue
Transgenic East African Highland Banana Plants Are Protected against Radopholus similis through Host-Delivered RNAi
Previous Article in Journal
Potentiating the Cross-Reactive IFN-γ T Cell and Polyfunctional T Cell Responses by Heterologous GX-19N DNA Booster in Mice Primed with Either a COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine or Inactivated Vaccine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exogenously Induced Silencing of Four MYB Transcription Repressor Genes and Activation of Anthocyanin Accumulation in Solanum lycopersicum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

RNA Interference Past and Future Applications in Plants

1
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
2
Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403 1 Ave S., Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(11), 9755; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119755
Submission received: 1 May 2023 / Revised: 29 May 2023 / Accepted: 2 June 2023 / Published: 5 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue RNA Interference-Based Tools for Plant Improvement and Protection 2.0)

Abstract

:
Antisense RNA was observed to elicit plant disease resistance and post-translational gene silencing (PTGS). The universal mechanism of RNA interference (RNAi) was shown to be induced by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), an intermediate produced during virus replication. Plant viruses with a single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome have been instrumental in the discovery and characterization of systemic RNA silencing and suppression. An increasing number of applications for RNA silencing have emerged involving the exogenous application of dsRNA through spray-induced gene silencing (SIGS) that provides specificity and environmentally friendly options for crop protection and improvement.
Keywords:
RNAi; immunity; HIGS; VIGS; SIGS

1. Introduction

RNA silencing is a revolutionary innate immunity mechanism in eukaryotes that has greatly expanded our knowledge of gene expression and regulation in plants. RNA interference (RNAi) is an important regulatory mechanism that has become an invaluable tool for plant research, especially in terms of understanding the effects of gene regulation in response to abiotic and biotic stress. RNAi has enabled researchers to gain insight into gene function, pest resistance, and physiological processes in plants. Although RNA is known to play critical roles in biology, the extensive capabilities and complexity of this nucleic acid remained elusive and not fully understood. The intrinsic nature of the relatively labile, often single-stranded RNA molecule, and limited availability of RNA-dependent enzymes had slowed characterization and progress. Traditional research focused on messenger transcript (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA), but the universality of the molecule to life remained underestimated [1]. The occurrence of viruses with RNA genomes (gRNA), the dominant genome type of viruses in plants, provided an extraordinary platform for the study of RNA function and gene expression. In a relatively brief period of time, knowledge of the dynamic RNA molecule has dramatically increased, and our understanding of RNA capabilities and applications rapidly expanded. This review summarizes key developments in the discovery and characterization of RNAi and examines applications in plants to advance agricultural biotechnology, crop engineering, pest control, and virus resistance.
Plant viruses can cause major diseases in crops worldwide. Management has relied on a combination of strategies involving virus eradication and transmission prevention. Early studies reported the occurrence of cross-protection in plants where infection with a mild strain of a virus protected against infection by more pathogenic strains [2]. A major advance based on this phenomenon, and the suggestion that introduction of the viral coat protein may provide protection, was the resistance observed with the introduction of the Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) coat protein mRNA into transgenic tobacco [3]. Several subsequent studies reported a similar resistance for other groups of plant single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) viruses including the family Solemoviridae, one of the most devastating group of viruses worldwide for many important crops [4,5]. Molecular characterization and control of Solemoviridae has been especially challenging as they are phloem-limited and transmitted in a persistent circulative manner by specific aphids.

2. RNA Interference

Remarkably, transformation of plants with the genus Polerovirus coat protein antisense RNA of the Potato leafroll virus produced similarly high levels of reduced virus titre and disease resistance as the corresponding sense mRNA [4,6]. The response was rapid and all transformed plants exhibited sequence-specific sustained high levels of immunity regardless of the virus inoculum concentration (Figure 1). Vector transmission of the virus by the green peach aphid Myzus persicae was reduced and disease symptoms in foliage and tubers were eliminated. This showed that RNA was capable of conferring resistance as a trigger molecule and was subsequently observed in other plant virus groups [7]. Replicative intermediates of RNA viruses include double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and dsRNA secondary structures that are produced to regulate gene expression and are relatively stable compared to ssRNA due to the widespread occurrence of resilient ssRNA ribonucleases [8]. The disease resistance achieved with antisense RNA demonstrated an inherent ability of RNA to protect against pathogens.
Experiments to transiently or stably increase endogenous gene expression often unexpectedly produced a decrease in mRNA. For example, attempts to overexpress chalcone synthase (CHS) in pigmented petunia petals blocked anthocyanin biosynthesis [9]. Developmental timing and expression of the CHS mRNA by the endogenous gene was not altered but the level of transcript was reduced by 50 fold. This posttranslational gene silencing (PTGS) highlighted a regulatory mechanism of gene expression involving RNA interference. Polygalacturonase involved in plant cell wall degradation and ripening was inhibited in transgenic tomato expressing antisense RNA [10]. Similarities between viral defense and gene silencing mechanisms suggested a common innate immunity in plants, including the systemic signalling in gene silencing contributing to the sequence-specific RNA interference [11,12].

3. Characterization of RNA Interference

RNA interference (RNAi) involves a sequence-specific suppression of gene expression by transcriptional or translational repression. The results of the RNAi characterization demonstrated that feeding or injecting gene-specific dsRNA into Caenorhabditis elegans resulted in the disappearance of the targeted message [13]. Silencing effects were observed with only a few molecules of unc-22 dsRNA per cell supporting a role as a trigger molecule. The RNAi mechanism is a naturally occurring process in most eukaryotes, conferring an ability of dsRNA to induce a sequence-specific systemic silencing process [6,9,10,13].
Exogenous dsRNA initiates RNAi by activating the ribonuclease Dicer enzymes that bind and cleave dsRNA into 21–24-base-pair small interfering RNA (siRNA) fragments with 3′ overhangs of 2–3 nucleotides (Figure 2). Dicer proteins have an RNA helicase domain, RNase III motifs, and nucleic-acid-binding PAZ domain [7]. The siRNA is converted to ssRNA when the sense complimentary RNA strand is degraded by Argonaute (AGO) enzymes and the antisense guide strand is incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Members of AGO possess a PAZ domain and a PIWI domain, resembling RNaseH, that are required for cleavage activity [7]. The RISC complex further uses this strand to bind and degrade additional copies of sense complimentary RNA. Systemic silencing occurs and the inherit specificity suggests that nucleic acid is the signal molecule in plants [7,12]. Amplification of even weak silencing signals indicates that RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RDRP) recognition and replication elicits effective silencing.
The occurrence of double-stranded RNA during viral RNA replication and hairpin RNA secondary structures regulating gene expression, indicated that ssRNA viruses have an inherent protective mechanism from RNAi [14,15]. Silencing suppressors were subsequently identified within RNA virus genomes that targeted different components of RISC, such as the DICER-LIKE (DCL) proteins, and inhibit innate RNA silencing [16]. Similar to the systemic nature of RNAi, silencing suppressors were also capable of systemic silencing suppression [17]. The application of RNA silencing suppressors, such as the Tomato bushy stunt tombusvirus p19 protein, are often required in preventing PTGS in plant studies expressing homologous or heterologous genes [14].

4. Applications of RNA Interference

Stably or transiently expressed genes and nucleic acids in genetically engineered plants is often utilized in the study of gene function or the heterologous production of commercially valuable products. The use of full-length infectious clones (FLICs) of RNA viruses has facilitated the amplification of targeted genes, providing a convenient vector platform that can circumvent RNAi for site-directed mutations and increase or reduce gene expression to characterize PTGS and produce valuable heterologous commercial products. Application of virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) has successfully utilized several RNA virus vectors including Tobacco rattle virus (TRV), Potato virus Y (PVY), TMV, and PLRV [18,19,20,21]. Different virus vectors confer specific advantages such as titre and tissue specificity. For example, field-grown plants are subjected to strict containment by regulatory agencies to limit unexpected transmission in the environment by vectors. Phloem-specific expression by the PLRV FLIC is not transmitted mechanically or by vector when the capsid readthrough protein is replaced by the heterologous nucleic acid, eliminating accidental movement of genetic materials (Figure 3).
Innate immunity is more complex than originally envisioned and the RNAi regulatory mechanism is independent of other recognition and signalling pathways. Identification of genes for gene receptors and avirulence proteins has advanced our understanding of cellular resistance to a wide range of pathogens, including Pseudomonas syringae, Cladosporium fulvum, and Verticillium species [22,23,24,25]. Mechanisms for signal amplification and recognition by receptors of sessile plants has improved our understanding of an important component of innate immunity [26,27]. Cross-protection and intracellular communication has expanded with the discovery of RNAi and its role in innate immunity and gene regulation through extracellular plant and fungal RNA [28,29]. Together the different sources of innate immunity provide complementary strategies in controlling historically devastating crop losses and emerging new threats to food production.
Exogenously introduced dsRNA to target plant pests began with the introduction of dsRNAs through microinjections [30,31]. Microinjections are a favoured laboratory technique because incredibly precise amounts of dsRNA can be introduced into the target organism, allowing for precise delivery [32]. Although an adequate delivery method for lab- and smaller-scale applications, microinjection unfortunately is not suitable for field-level control of plant pests and pathogens [30,31]. Another delivery method involves the soaking of an organism in a suspension that contains the target dsRNA or directly spraying it with a solution containing the dsRNA [32]. This method may not be as exact as microinjection; however, it is often used because of its ease of use and overall convenience. Many other methods of RNA delivery have been examined and application choice is often influenced by several factors including efficacy and economics (Table 1).
Investigators have created transgenic plants that express desired dsRNAs to cause RNAi-induced gene silencing in the target organism when it ingests plant material, referred to as Host-Induced Gene Silencing (HIGS) [31,33]. One example of HIGS was transgenic Zea mays (corn) called SmartStax Pro that was created to target corn rootworm (Diabrotica vwirgifera virgifera) that was approved for commercial use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture [31,33,34]. Commercial acceptancet of transgenic plants has been challenging due to general public concerns related to genetic engineering, especially the stable insertion of nucleic acid from other organisms [33,35]. A similar pest control efficacy was achieved with exogenously applied dsRNA in plants, representing a friendlier environmental and regulatory strategy for protection and production improvements [30].
Microorganisms transformed to contain target dsRNA have also been evaluated as a method for exogenous application. One notable example showed that bacteria transformed to contain the target dsRNA could be fed to insects to induce RNAi [36]. These genetically modified bacteria in some cases were even able to colonize the gut of the host and continue to deliver dsRNA directly to it through the gut. Another example of the ingestion of a transformed microorganism is the study of transformed Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) containing dsRNA targeting spotted wing fruit fly Drosophila suzukii [37]. This type of yeast naturally occurs on the surface of rotting fruit that D. suzukii consumes, and therefore was seen as a viable vector to induce oral ingestion of the dsRNA. They had success and found that locomotor activity, survivorship, and reproductive fitness were all negatively impacted by the complimentary dsRNA [37]. Acceptance of products derived from transgenic platforms are subjected to elevated regulatory and consumer acceptance concerns.
Table 1. Examples of spray-induced gene silencing of different targets and organisms.
Table 1. Examples of spray-induced gene silencing of different targets and organisms.
Viral/Viroid TargetHostdsRNA TargetApplication MethodReference
Sugarcane Mosaic Virus (SCMV)CornCoat proteinEscherichia coli HT115 co-inoculation spray with dsRNA-producing bacteria[38]
Pea Seed-borne Mosaic Virus (PSbMV)PeaCoat proteindsRNA spray[39]
Pepper Mild Mottle Virus (PMMoV)TobaccoPMMoV replicaseSpray containing dsRNA coated in Layered Double Hydroxide (LDH) bioclay[40]
Tobacco, pepperRP gene (multiple lengths)Tobacco leaves treated with carborundum, dsRNA mixed with inoculum rubbed on leaves[41]
TobaccoRP geneMechanical inoculation of dsRNA with co-inoculation using an atomizer[42]
Cucumber Mosaic Virus (CMV)CowpeaCMV 2bSpray containing dsRNA coated in Layered Double Hydroxide (LDH) clay nanosheets[40]
Bean Common Mosaic Virus (BCMV)TobaccoNuclear inclusion b protein (Nib) and coat proteindsRNA mechanical inoculation with carborundum sprayed with an atomizer[43]
Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus (TYLCV)Tobacco, tomatoCoat proteinLDH clay nanosheets sprayed using an atomizer[44]
Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV)TobaccoCoat protein and TMV p126dsRNA (virus co-inoculated rubbed on carborundum-dusted tobacco leaves[45]
TobaccoTMV replicase, movement proteinTobacco leaves were dusted with celite, and dsRNA solution was rubbed on[46]
TobaccoCoat proteindsRNA and purified TMV solution inoculation[47]
Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV)TobaccoRP gene (multiple lengths)Tobacco leaves treated with carborundum, dsRNA mixed with inoculum rubbed on leaves[41]
Alfalfa Mosaic Virus (AMV)TobaccoRP gene (multiple lengths)Tobacco leaves treated with carborundum, dsRNA mixed with inoculum rubbed on leaves[41]
Papaya Ringspot Virus (PRSV)PapayaCoat proteindsRNA in PRSV-infected papaya sap that was mechanically inoculated[48]
Isolates Tirupati and DelhiPapayaCoat protein and HC-ProdsRNA in PSRV-infected papaya sap rubbed on to leaves dusted with carborundum[49]
Cymbidium Mosaic Virus (CymMV)Brassolaeliocattleya hybridaCoat proteinCelite-treated orchid leaves were inoculated with dsRNA in the form of crude bacterial lysate, and gently rubbed onto said leaves[50]
Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus (ZYMV)Watermelon, cucumber, squashHelper component proteinase (Hc-Pro) and coat proteindsRNA in ZYMV-infected summer squash sap gently rubbed on to carborundum-dusted leaves[51]
Potato Spindle Tuber Viroid (PSTVd)TomatoViroid-specific genedsRNA rubbed on to leaves that were dusted with carborundum[52]
Chrysanthemum Chlorotic Mottle Viroid (CChMVd)Tomato and chrysanthemumViroid-specific genedsRNA rubbed on to leaves that were dusted with carborundum[52]
Citrus Exocortis Viroid (CEVd)Tomato and GynuraViroid-specific genedsRNA rubbed on to leaves that were dusted with carborundum[52]
Fungal TargetHostdsRNA TargetApplication MethodReference
Fusarium graminearumBarleyCytochrome P450 lanosterol, C-14α-demethylases CYP51A, CYP51B, CYP51CdsRNA sprayed on detached barley leaves[53]
Arabidopsis and BarleyFgCYP51A, FgCYP51B, and FgCYP51C in various combinationsDetached leaves sprayed with naked dsRNA[54]
BarleyDCL1 and DCL2, AGO1 and AGO2, AGO-interacting protein, FgQIP, RecQ helicase, several Fg RNA-dependent RNA polymerasesdsRNA sprayed on detached leaves[55]
BarleyAGO1 and AGO2, DCL1 and DCL2 in combinationsdsRNA sprayed on detached leaves[56]
BarleyCYP51A, CYP51B, CYP51CDetached barley leaves drop-inoculated with dsRNA[57]
Fusarium asiaticumWheatMyosin5dsRNA sprayed on plant surface[58]
WheatFaβ2Tub-3Naked, sprayed dsRNA[59]
Fusarium oxysporumTomatoCYP51, chitin synthase 1,
elongation factor 2
LDH nanosheet-coated dsRNA spray on leaf[60]
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubenseBananaNuclear condensin, coatomers alpha and zeta, DNA-directed RNA polymerase, ARP 2/3, cap methyltransferase, proteasome Pre4, ribosomal RNA, DNA polymerase alpha and delta subunits, adenyl cyclase, protein kinase C, FRQ RNA helicasedsRNA aliquoted into spore suspension[61]
Magnaporthe oryzaeBarleyFaβ2Tub-3Naked, sprayed dsRNA[59]
Colletotrichum truncatumSoybeanFaβ2Tub-3Naked, sprayed dsRNA[59]
Botrytis cinereaArabidopsis, tomato, grape, rose, lettuce, onion, strawberryDicer-like DCL1 and DCL2dsRNA co-inoculated on fruits, vegetables, and rose petals[62]
CucumberFaβ2Tub-3dsRNA sprayed on plant surface[59]
GrapevineBcCYP51, BcCHS1, BcEF2dsRNA sprayed on plant surface[63]
Tomato, lettuce, rose, and grapeDCTN1, SAC1, DCL1, and DCL2Drop inoculation of dsRNA for lettuce, rose, tomato fruit, and grape, dsRNA spray for tomato leaves[64]
RapeseedPeroxidase activity, TIM44, thioredoxin reductase, pre-40s ribosomal particle, necrosis-inducing peptide 1Detached leaves sprayed with dsRNA[65]
Tomato and chickpeaDCL1 and DCL2, VPS51, bik1, and SAC1dsRNA spray[66]
Hyaloperonospora arabidopsisArabidopsisHpa-CesAdsRNA and sRNA added to spore inoculation[67]
Phakopsora pachyrhiziSoybeanAcetyl-CoA acyltransferase
40S ribosomal protein S16, glycine cleavage system H protein
Diethyl-pyrocarbonate detached leaves sprayed with dsRNA[68]
Plasmopara viticolaGrapevinePvDCL1 and pvDCL2dsRNA sprayed post-inoculation[69]
Phytophthora infestansPotatoSorbitol dehydrogenase,
translation elongation factor 1-a, phospholipase-D like 3,
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored acidic
serine-threonine rich
HAM34-like protein, and heat shock protein-90
E. coli HT115 sprayed dsRNA coated with nanoclay formation[70]
PotatoGuanine-nucleotide-binding protein B subunit, haustorial
membrane protein, cutinase, endo-1,3(4)-B-glucanase
dsRNA sprayed on detached leaves[71]
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumBarleySsThioR, SsTlm44, SsCHC, SsAp2, SsArf72A, SsFCHO1, SsAmph, SsVATPase, and SseGFPdsRNA clathrin-mediated endocytosis spray[72]
Lettuce and collard greensDCTN1, SAC1, DCL1, and DCL2Drop inoculation of dsRNA[64]
Rapeseed and ArabidopsisVarious genes involved in reactive oxygen species responses, transcription, host colonization, ribosomal biogenesis, mitochondrial protein import, and cell regulationdsRNA sprayed on detached leaves[65]
Botryotinia fuckelianaStrawberryChitin synthase class Ill, DCL1, and DCL2E. coli-derived minicell topical spray[73]
Rhizoctonia solaniRiceDCTN1, SAC1, and PGDrop inoculation of dsRNA[64]
Aspergillus nigerTomato, apple, and grapepgxB, VPS51, DCTN1, SAC1Drop inoculation of dsRNA[64]
Verticillium dahliaeArabidopsisDCL1, DCL2, SAC1, and DCTN1Root dip co-inoculation of V. dalhiae spores and dsRNA[64]
Verticillium spp.ArabidopsisDicer-like DCL1 and DCL2dsRNA co-inoculated[62]
Mycosphaerella fijiensisBananaNuclear condensin, coatomers alpha and zeta, DNA-directed RNA polymerase, ARP 2/3, cap methyltransferase, proteasome Pre4, ribosomal RNA, DNA polymerase alpha and delta subunits, adenylase cyclase, protein kinase C, FRQ-interacting helicasedsRNA spore suspension[61]
Insect TargetHostdsRNA TargetApplication MethodReference
Diabrotica virgifera virgiferaCornV-ATPase A, α-tubulin, COPI coatomerPlant dsRNA artificial diet[74]
CornSmooth septate junction (SSJ)Artificial diet containing dsRNA[75]
Sitobeon avenaeBarleySalivary sheath proteinNaked dsRNA foliar spray of leaves[76]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataPotatoInhibitor of apoptosis, actin, HSP70, dynaminEscherichia coli HT115 dsRNA[77]
PotatoActinNaked dsRNA sprayed leaves[78]
PotatoMesh geneNaked dsRNA sprayed plants[79]
Phaedon cochleariaeCabbageCactus, srp54k, rop, α-SNAP shibire, PP-α, hsc70-3, rpt3Naked dsRNA sprayed leaves[78]
Helicoverpa armigeraCottonCYP6AE14, GST1Plant dsRNA in artificial diet[80]
ChickpeaJuvenile hormone
methyltransferase,
acetylcholine esterase
Chitosan nanoparticles
sprayed onto plants
[81]
CottonCYP enzyme systemInjection of dsRNA into abdomen of fourth-instar larvae[82]
CottonHMG-CoA reductaseInjection of dsRNA into abdomen of 2-day-old female pupa[83]
Henosepilachna
vigintioctopunctata
PotatoEcdysone receptorEscherichia coli HT115 immersed in dsRNA and sprayed on foliage[84]
Ostrinia furnaclisCornCYP18A1, carboxylesterasePlant dsRNA in artificial diet (dsRNA in leaves)[85]
Plutella xylostellaCabbageAcetylcholine esterase genes AChE1 and AChE2Plants sprayed with siRNA, taken in through insect diet[86]
Diaphorina citriCitrusCYP4C67, CYP4DA1, CYPC68, CYPG70, CYPDB1Insects anaesthetized and a drop of dsRNA was topically applied to the ventral side of the thorax[87]
CitrusAbnormal wing disc-like proteinOn 5th-instar nymphs, a drop of dsRNA was topically applied to the ventral side of the thorax[88]
CitrusArginine kinaseFoliar spray, soil/root drench, tree trunk injection, and clay soaked in dsRNA added as a soil amendment to potted citrus trees, dsRNA was ingested by insects through plant material[89]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataPotatoActin genedsRNA-coated leaf surface, larvae fed for 7 days[90]
Halyomorpha halysCommon beanJuvenile hormone acid O-methyltransferase, vitellogeninGreen beans soaked in dsRNA[89]
Acyrthosiphon pisumFava beanCoo2siRNA injected into insects[91]
BroadbeanCalreticulinInjection[92]
BroadbeanCathespin-L, vATPaseInjection and ingestion (respectively)[93]
BroadbeanAquaporinIngestion[94]
Drosophila melanogasterBroad rangevATPaseArtificial diet containing dsRNA[91]
Manduca sexaTobaccovATPaseArtificial diet containing dsRNA[93]
Brassicogethes aeneusOilseed rapeAlpha COPDietary exposure to buds treated with dsRNA[95]
Lygus lineolarisCottonInhibitor of apoptosis gene, polygalacturonaseInjection[96]
AlfalfaPolygalacturonaseInjection[97]
Nilaparvata lugensRiceCalreticulin, cathepsin-B, NIβ2Injection[98]
RiceTrehalose phosphate synthaseIngestion[99]
RicevATPase subunit EIngestion[100]
RiceAGO1 and DicerPlant dsRNA in artificial diet (leaves soaked in dsRNA)[85]
RiceNADPH–cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR)dsRNA injection into 3rd-instar nymphs[101]
RiceCalmodulins NlCaM1 andNlCaM2dsRNA injected into nymphs[102]
Choristoneura fumiferanaSpruceChitin deacetylaseInjection of dsRNA into larvae and pre-pupae[103]
Spodoptera exiguaBeetChitinase7, PGCP, chitinase1, ATPase, tubulin1, arf2, tubulin2, arf1, and helicaseInjection of dsRNA into 4th-instar larvae in the abdomen[104]
BeetSeCHSAFed dsRNA through artificial diet[105]
Chinese cabbageChitin synthaseChinese cabbage leaf discs were soaked in guanidine coated polymer that coated dsRNA and were fed to larvae[106]
Spodoptera lituraCastorBt toxin receptordsRNA injected into early 5th-instar larvae[107]
Spodoptera frugiperdaCornsfVATPase, sfKIF, sfCDC27Larvae fed dsRNA suspension[108]
Sesamia nonagrioidesCornJuvenile hormone esterase-related geneInject dsRNA into 5th-instar larvae[109]
Laodelphax striatellusRiceCytochrome P450 monooxygenase Shadow (Sad)dsRNA fed to 4th-instar larvae through artificial diet[110]
Aphis gossypiiCottonJuvenile hormone-binding protein (JHBP) and vacuolar ATPase subunit H (V-ATPase-H)dsRNA fed through artificial diet to first instar larvae[111]
Aphis glycinesSoybeanTREH, ATPD, ATPE, and CHS1Insect orally fed on dsRNA with a nanocarrier that was sprayed on soybean plants[112]
Sitobion avenaeWinter wheatLaccase 1Insects fed dsRNA through artificial diet[113]
Tetranychus urticaeRed kidney beanJuvenile hormone (JH), methoprene-tolerant (Met), retinoid X receptor β, farnesoic acid O-methyltransferase, CREB-binding proteinBean leaf discs soaked in dsRNA and fed to insects[114]
Plant TargetHostdsRNA TargetApplication MethodReference
Nicotiana benthamianaTobaccoCaMV 35S promotorNaked dsRNA sprayed with carborundum[115]
Mikana micranthaWeedsChlorophyll a/b proteinsdsRNA, RNAi nanomicrosphere shRNA[116]
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsisSTM and WERRoot soaking in naked dsRNA and a fluorescent nanocarrier[117]
ArabidopsisEGFP and NPTIINaked dsRNA, suspension brushed onto leaves[118]
ArabidopsisMob1A, WRKY23, actinRoot soaking in dsRNA suspension[85]
ArabidopsisCHSLeaf infiltration of dsRNA with a carrier peptide using a syringe with no needle onto plant leaf[119]
Dendrobium hybridaDendrobium orchidDhMYB1Rubbing plant with bacterial extract containing the dsRNA[120]

5. Spray-Induced Gene Silencing

Application of RNAi as a foliar spray has become of particular interest, specifically because it has promise in being turned into a viable and specific biopesticide that would be available for commercial use. This technology is referred to as Spray-Induced Gene Silencing (SIGS), and it is a method that allows non-transformative control of plant pests and pathogens [31,35]. This mechanism involves the application of long siRNAs and dsRNAs through a foliar spray to the affected host, which will induce RNAi when consumed by the target pest or pathogen. This mechanism can allow for specific control of harmful pathogens, without some of the downstream effects that a chemical-based pesticide may have on the surrounding ecosystem [35]. To date, SIGS has been successful in treating a wide range of pathogens and pests (Table 1). One major drawback of this technique is that ssRNAs and even dsRNAs are relatively unstable, especially when exposed to the elements [31,35]. Considerable effort surrounding the SIGS strategy is going into testing various coatings and methods to stabilize the RNAs to allow for higher efficiency [35].
Published exogenously applied RNA studies report efficacies of up to 100% with over 30 days of activity and were influenced by many parameters including the genetic target, RNA size, and environment (Table 1). With all of these successes, however, there are always places for improvement and many roadblocks that continue to pose challenges with SIGS. To begin with, dsRNA has relatively short environmental survival, as mentioned previously, but may be an advantage from a regulatory perspective as the molecule does not persist and contaminate the environment. Some ways of increasing this efficiency include the use of liposomes or nanoparticles as transfection agents, or even the chemical modification of one or both strands of the dsRNA [30]. Polymeric nanoparticles have been synthesized and used because of their overall stability, ease of surface modification, their biodegradability, and environmental safety. A popular polymer to use is one called chitosan, which is often used because of its relatively cheap cost, non-toxicity, and general biodegradability [30]. Taning et al. [121] reported that the use of a cationic liposome branded Lipofectamine to coat the dsRNA resulted in a 40–50% efficiency of gene-silencing. Without the use of the transfection agent, they were unsuccessful in their goal to induce gene silencing through RNAi. Chemical modifications are not often used due to their high cost and general safety concerns, but they can be used to improve molecule stability, increase double-stranded siRNA half-life in vivo, target siRNA to specific cells, and many other functions [30].

6. Conclusions

RNA silencing is an essential component of innate immunity and gene regulation in plants and a rapidly growing number of tools are available for applications. Efficacy and survivability of the dsRNA is being actively explored to meet specific environmental and industry requirements. Exogenous RNA survivability and uptake may be improved using polymeric, lipid-based, and inorganic nanoparticles (Table 1). Advances made in synthetic biology have opened new possibilities for optimizing traits by modulating metabolic and immunity pathways via siRNA delivery. Systemic cellular and plant movement of triggers and signals observed with the RISC response in a plant facilitates protection in tissues not exposed to the dsRNA [12,17]. As research continues on this fascinating technology, new possibilities for applications in agricultural improvements continue to emerge, such as creating improved crops that have higher yields and greater nutritional value, resistant to pests and disease, resilient to environment and climate changes, and higher yields and quality. Future developments are expected in the application of RNAi technology in plants and subsequently other biological organisms. For instance, research into controlling epigenetic elements in gene silencing will have important implications for both agricultural biotechnology and fundamental evolutionary studies [122]. There are still many exciting possibilities for future development and applications of RNA interference in the areas of crop improvement, pest management, and human health care therapies.

Author Contributions

Writing and original draft preparation, S.K., L.K. and M.K.; writing-review and editing, L.K. and M.K.; proofreading, L.K. and M.K.; conceptualization, L.K. and M.K.; supervision, M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by Ontario Ministry of Food and Agricultural Affairs (OMAFRA) Alliance Project Number 030712 (M.K.) and a University of Guelph Raymond Chyc Scholarship (S.K.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gheysen, G.; Vanholme, B. RNAi from plants to nematodes. Trends Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wingard, S.A. Hosts and symptoms of ring spot, a virus disease of plants. J. Agric. Res. 1928, 37, 127–153. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abel, P.P.; Nelson, R.S.; De, B.; Hoffmann, N.; Rogers, S.G.; Fraley, R.T.; Beachy, R.N. Delay of disease development in transgenic plants that express the tobacco mosaic virus coat protein gene. Science 1986, 232, 738–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kawchuk, L.M.; Martin, R.R.; McPherson, J. Resistance in transgenic potato expressing the potato leafroll virus coat protein gene. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1990, 3, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wilson, T.M. Strategies to protect crop plants against viruses: Pathogen-derived resistance blossoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 3134–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Kawchuk, L.M.; Martin, R.R.; McPherson, J. Sense and antisense RNA-mediated resistance to potato leafroll virus in Russet Burbank potato plants. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1991, 4, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Waterhouse, P.M.; Wang, M.B.; Lough, T. Gene silencing as an adaptive defence against viruses. Nature 2001, 411, 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jaag, H.M.; Kawchuk, L.; Rohde, W.; Fischer, R.; Emans, N.; Prüfer, D. An unusual internal ribosomal entry site of inverted symmetry directs expression of a potato leafroll polerovirus replication-associated protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 8939–8944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Van der Krol, A.R.; Lenting, P.E.; Veenstra, J.; van der Meer, I.M.; Koes, R.E.; Gerats, A.G.M.; Mol, J.N.M.; Stuitje, A.R. An anti-sense chalcone synthase gene in transgenic plants inhibits flower pigmentation. Nature 1988, 333, 866–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Smith, C.J.S.; Watson, C.F.; Ray, J.; Bird, C.R.; Morris, P.C.; Schuch, W.; Grierson, D. Antisense RNA inhibition of polygalacturonase gene expression in transgenic tomatoes. Nature 1988, 334, 724–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ratcliff, F.; Harrison, B.D.; Baulcombe, D.C. A similarity between viral defense and gene silencing in plants. Science 1997, 276, 1558–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Voinnet, O.; Baulcombe, D.C. Systemic signalling in gene silencing. Nature 1997, 389, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fire, A.; Xu, S.; Montgomery, M.K.; Kostas, S.A.; Driver, S.E.; Mello, C.C. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 1998, 391, 806–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Voinnet, O.; Pinto, Y.M.; Baulcombe, D.C. Suppression of gene silencing: A general strategy used by diverse DNA and RNA viruses of plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 14147–14152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Anandalakshmi, R.; Pruss, G.J.; Ge, X.; Marathe, R.; Mallory, A.C.; Smith, T.H.; Vance, V.B. A viral suppressor of gene silencing in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 13079–13084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Fusaro, A.F.; Correa, R.I.; Nakasugi, K.; Jackson, C.; Kawchuk, L.; Vaslin, M.F.S.; Waterhouse, P.M. The Enamovirus P0 protein is a silencing suppressor which inhibits local and systemic RNA silencing through AGO1 degradation. Virology 2012, 426, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fusaro, A.F.; Barton, D.A.; Nakasugi, K.; Jackson, C.; Kalischuk, M.L.; Kawchuk, L.M.; Vaslin, M.F.S.; Correa, R.L.; Waterhouse, P.M. The luteovirus P4 movement protein is a suppressor of systemic RNA silencing. Viruses 2017, 9, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ratcliff, F.; Martin-Hernandez, A.M.; Baulcombe, D.C. Technical Advance. Tobacco rattle virus as a vector for analysis of gene function by silencing. Plant J. 2001, 25, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumagai, M.H.; Donson, J.; Della-Cioppa, G.; Harvey, D.; Grill, L.K. Cytoplasmic inhibition of carotenoid biosynthesis with Virus-derived RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 1679–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ruiz, M.T.; Voinnet, O.; Baulcombe, D.C. Initiation and maintenance of virus-induced gene silencing. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 937–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kawchuk, L.; Jaag, H.M.; Toohey, K.; Martin, R.; Rohde, W.; Prüfer, D. In planta agroinfection by Canadian and German Potato leafroll virus full-length cDNAs. Can. J. Plant. Path. 2002, 24, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Martin, G.B. Map-based cloning of a protein-kinase gene conferring disease resistance in tomato. Science 1993, 262, 1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jones, D.A.; Thomas, C.M.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E.; Balint-Kurti, P.J.; Jones, J.D.G. Isolation of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum by transposon tagging. Science 1994, 266, 789–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kawchuk, L.M.; Hachey, J.; Lynch, D.R.; Kulcsar, F.; Van Rooijen, G.; Waterer, D.R.; Robertson, A.; Kokko, E.; Byers, R.; Howard, R.J.; et al. Tomato Ve disease resistance genes encode cell surface-like receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 6511–6515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Förderer, A.; Li, E.; Lawson, A.W.; Deng, Y.; Sun, Y.; Logemann, E.; Zhang, X.; Wen, J.; Han, Z.; Chang, J.; et al. Wheat resistosome defines common principles of immune receptor channels. Nature 2022, 610, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kalischuk, M.; Müller, B.; Fusaro, A.F.; Wijekoon, C.P.; Waterhouse, P.M.; Prüfer, D.; Kawchuk, L. Amplification of cell signaling and disease resistance by an immunity receptor Ve1Ve2 heterocomplex in plants. Comm. Biol. 2022, 5, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kourelis, J.; Marchal, C.; Posbeyikian, A.; Harant, A.; Kamoun, S. NLR immune receptor–nanobody fusions confer plant disease resistance. Science 2023, 379, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Weiberg, A.; Wang, M.; Lin, F.M.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, Z.; Kaloshian, I.; Huang, H.D.; Jin, H. Fungal small RNAs suppress plant immunity by hijacking host RNA interference pathways. Science 2013, 342, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Cai, Q.; Qiao, L.; Wang, M.; He, B.; Lin, F.M.; Palmquist, J.; Huang, S.D.; Jin1, H. Plants send small RNAs in extracellular vesicles to fungal pathogen to silence virulence genes. Science 2018, 360, 1126–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Joga, M.R.; Zotti, M.J.; Smagghe, G.; Christiaens, O. RNAi efficiency, systemic properties, and novel delivery methods for pest insect control: What we know so far. Front. Physiol. 2016, 7, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sang, H.; Kim, J.I. Advanced strategies to control plant pathogenic fungi by host-induced gene silencing (HIGS) and spray-induced gene silencing (SIGS). Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 14, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, N.; Christiaens, O.; Liu, J.; Niu, J.; Cappelle, K.; Caccia, S.; Huvenne, H.; Smagghe, G. Delivery of dsRNA for RNAi in insects: An overview and future directions. Insect Sci. 2013, 1, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Dalakouras, A.; Wassenegger, M.; Dadami, E.; Ganopoulos, I.; Pappas, M.L.; Papadopoulou, K. Genetically modified organism-free RNA interference: Exogenous application of RNA molecules in plants. Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gordon, K.H.J.; Waterhouse, P.M. RNAi for insect-proof plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 1231–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Puyam, A.; Kaur, K. Exploiting RNA interference mechanism in plants for disease resistance. In Plant Disease Management Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture through Traditional and Modern Approaches. Sustainability in Plant and Crop Protection; Ul Haq, I., Ijaz, S., Eds.; Springe: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 13, pp. 217–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Murphy, K.A.; West, J.D.; Kwok, R.S.; Chiu, J.C. Accelerating research on Spotted Wing Drosophila management using genomic technologies. J. Pest Sci. 2016, 89, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Murphy, K.A.; Tabuloc, C.A.; Cervantes, K.R.; Chiu, J.C. Ingestion of genetically modified yeast symbiont reduces fitness of an insect pest via RNA interference. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gan, D.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, H.; Jiang, T.; Zhu, S.; Cheng, B. Bacterially expressed dsRNA protects maize against SCMV infection. Plant Cell Rep. 2010, 29, 1261–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Safarova, D.; Brazda, P.; Navratil, M. Incidence, distribution and molecular characterization of Pea seed-borne mosaic virus (PSbMV) in Egypt. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2014, 50, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Mitter, N.; Worrall, E.A.; Robinson, K.E.; Li, P.; Jain, R.G.; Taochy, C.; Fletcher, S.J.; Caroll, B.J.; Lu, G.Q.; Zu, Z.P. Clay nanosheets for topical delivery of RNAi for sustained protection against plant viruses. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tenllado, F.; Díaz-Ruíz, J.R. Double-stranded RNA-mediated interference with plant virus infection. J. Virol. 2001, 76, 12288–12297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Tenllado, F.; Martínez-García, B.; Vargas, M.; Díaz-Ruíz, J.R.; Ramón, J. Crude extracts of bacterially expressed dsRNA can be used to protect plants against virus infections. BMC Biotechnol. 2003, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Worrall, E.A.; Bravo-Cazar, A.; Nilon, A.T.; Fletcher, S.J.; Robinson, K.E.; Carr, J.P.; Mitter, N. Exogenous application of RNAi-inducing double-stranded RNA inhibits aphid-mediated transmission of a plant virus. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Liu, Q.; Li, Y.; Xu, K.; Li, D.; Hu, H.; Zhou, F.; Song, P.; Yu, Y.; Wei, Q.; Liu, Q.; et al. Clay nanosheet-mediated delivery of recombinant plasmids expressing artificial miRNAs via leaf spray to prevent infection by plant DNA viruses. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Konakalla, N.C.; Kaldis, A.; Berbate, M.; Masarapu, H.; Voloudakies, A.E. Exogenous application of double-stranded RNA molecules from TMV p126 and CP genes confers resistance against TMV in tobacco. Planta 2016, 244, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Niehl, A.; Soinen, M.; Poranen, M.M.; Heinlein, M. Synthetic biology approach for plant protection using dsRNA. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1679–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Yin, G.; Sun, Z.; Liu, N.; Song, Y.; Zhu, C.; Wen, F. Production of double-stranded RNA for interference with TMV infection utilizing a bacterial prokaryotic expression system. App. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shen, W.; Yang, G.; Chen, Y.; Yan, P.; Tue, D.; Li, X.; Zhou, P. Resistance of non-transgenic papaya plants to papaya ringspot virus (PRSV) mediated by intron-containing hairpin dsRNAs expressed in bacteria. Acta Virol. 2014, 58, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Valdamundi, T.; Patil, B.L.; Kaldis, A.; Sai Gopal, D.V.R.; Mishra, R.; Berbati, M.; Voloudakis, A. DsRNA-mediated protection against two isolates of Papaya ringspot virus through topical application of dsRNA in papaya. J. Virol. Methods 2020, 275, 113750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lau, S.E.; Mazumdar, P.; Hee, T.W.; Song, A.L.A.; Harikrishna, J.A. Crude extracts of bacterially-expressed dsRNA protect orchid plants against Cymbidium mosaic virus during transplantation from in vitro culture. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 89, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kaldis, A.; Berbati, M.; Melita, O.; Reppa, C.; Holeva, M.; Otten, P.; Voloudakis, A. Exogenously applied dsRNA molecules deriving from the Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) genome move systemically and protect cucurbits against ZYMV. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 883–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Carbonell, A.; Martínez de Alba, Á.E.; Flores, R.; Gago, S. Double-stranded RNA interferes in a sequence-specific manner with the infection of representative members of the two viroid families. Virology 2008, 371, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Koch, A.; Biedenkopf, D.; Furch, A.; Weber, L.; Rossbach, O.; Abdellatef, E.; Linicus, L.; Johannsmeier, J.; Jelonke, L.; Goesmann, A.; et al. An RNAi-based control of Fusarium graminearum infections through spraying of long dsRNAs involves a plant passage and is controlled by the fungal silencing machinery. PLoS Pathalog. 2016, 12, e1005901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Koch, A.; Hofle, L.; Werner, B.T.; Imani, J.; Schmidt, A.; Jelonek, L.; Kogel, K.H. SIGS vs. HIGS: A study on the efficacy of two dsRNA delivery strategies to silence Fusarium FgCYP51 genes in infected host and non-host plants. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 1636–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Gaffar, F.Y.; Koch, A. Catch me if you can! RNA silencing-based improvement of antiviral plant immunity. Viruses 2019, 11, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Werner, B.T.; Gaffar, F.Y.; Schuemann, J.; Biedenkopf, D.; Koch, A.M. RNA-Spray-Mediated Silencing of Fusarium graminearum AGO and DCL Genes Improve Barley Disease Resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hofle, L.; Biedenkopf, D.; Werner, B.T.; Shrestha, A.; Jelonek, L.; Koch, A. Study on the efficiency of dsRNAs with increasing length in RNA-based silencing of the Fusarium CYP51 genes. RNA Biol. 2020, 17, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Song, X.S.; Gu, K.X.; Duan, X.X.; Xiao, X.M.; Hou, Y.P.; Duan, Y.B.; Wang, J.X.; Yu, N.; Zhou, M.G. Secondary amplification of siRNA machinery limits the application of spray-induced gene silencing. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 2543–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Gu, K.X.; Song, X.; Xiao, X.M.; Duan, X.X. A β-tubulin dsRNA derived from Fusarium asiaticum confers plant resistance to multiple phytopathogens and reduces fungicide resistance. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 2019, 153, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mohamed, M.A.; Youssef, K. Topical delivery of host induced RNAi silencing by layered double hydroxide nanosheets: An efficient tool to decipher pathogenicity gene function of Fusarium crown and root rot in tomato. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021, 115, 101684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mumbanza, F.M.; Kiggundu, A.; Tusiime, G.; Tushemereirwe, W.K.; Niblett, C.; Bailey, A. In Vitro antifungal activity of synthetic dsRNA molecules against two pathogens of banana, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense and Mycosphaerella fijiensis. Pest Manag. Sci. 2013, 69, 1155–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, M.; Weiberg, A.; Lin, F.M.; Thomma, B.P.H.J.; Huang, H.D.; Jin, H. Bidirectional cross-kingdom RNAi and fungal uptake of external RNAs confer plant protection. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Nerva, L.; Sandrini, M.; Gambino, G.; Chitarra, W. Double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) as a sustainable tool against gray mold (Botrytis cinerea) in grapevine: Effectiveness of different application methods in an open-air environment. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Qiao, L.; Lan, C.; Capriotti, L.; Ah-Fong, A.; Nino Sanchez, J.; Hamby, R.; Heller, J.; Zhao, H.; Glass, N.L.; Judelson, H.S.; et al. Spray-induced gene silencing for disease control is dependent on the efficiency of pathogen RNA uptake. Plant Biotech. J. 2021, 19, 1756–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. McLoughlin, A.G.; Wytinck, N.; Talker, P.L.; Girard, I.J.; Rashid, K.Y.; de Kievit, T.; Fernando, W.G.D.; Whyard, S.; Belmonte, M.F. Identification and application of exogenous dsRNA confers plant protection against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Niño-Sánchez, J.; Sambasivam, P.T.; Sawyer, A.; Hamby, R.; Chen, A.; Czislowski, E.; Li, P.; Manzie, N.; Gardiner, D.M.; Ford, R.; et al. BioCLay prolongs RNA interference-mediate crop protection against Botrytis cinerea. J. Int. Plant. Biol. 2022, 64, 2187–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bilir, O.; Telli, O.; Norman, C.; Budak, H.; Hong, Y.; Tor, M. Small RNA inhibits infection by downy mildew pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 1523–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Hu, D.; Chen, Z.Y.; Zhang, C.; Ganiger, M. Reduction of Phakopsora pachyrhizi infection on soybean through host- and spray-induced gene silencing. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2020, 21, 794–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Haile, Z.M.; Gebremichael, D.E.; Capriotti, L.; Molesini, B.; Negrini, F.; Collina, M.; Sabbadini, S.; Mezzetti, B.; Baraldi, E. Double-stranded RNA targeting dicer-Like genes compromises the pathogenicity of Plasmopara viticola on grapevine. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 667539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sundaresha, S.; Sharma, S.; Bairwa, A.; Tomar, M.; Kumar, R.; Bhardwaj, V.; Jeevalatha, A.; Bakade, R.; Salaria, N.; Thakur, K.; et al. Spraying of dsRNA molecules derived from Phytophthora infestans, as an effective plant protection strategies for the management of potato late blight. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 3183–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kalyandurg, P.B.; Sundararajan, P.; Dubey, M.; Ghadamgahi, F.; Zahid, M.A.; Whisson, S.C.; Vetukuri, R.R. Spray-induced gene silencing as a potential tool to control potato late blight disease. Phytopathology 2021, 111, 2168–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wytinck, N.; Sullivan, D.S.; Biggar, K.T.; Crisostomo, L.; Pelka, P.; Belmonte, M.F.; Whyard, S. Clathrin mediated endocytosis is involved in the uptake of exogenous double-stranded RNA in the white mold phytopathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Islam, M.T.; Davis, Z.; Chen, L.; Englaender, J.; Zomorodi, S.; Frank, J.; Bartlett, K.; Somers, E.; Carballo, S.M.; Kester, M.; et al. Minicell-based fungal RNAi delivery for sustainable crop protection. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 14, 1847–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Baum, J.A.; Bogaert, T.; Clinton, W.; Heck, G.R.; Feldmann, P.; Ilagan, O.; Johnson, S.; Plaetinch, G.; Munyikwa, T.; Pleau, M. Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 1322–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hu, X.; Steimel, J.P.; Kapka-Kitzman, D.M.; Davis-Vogel, C.; Richtman, N.M.; Mathis, J.P.; Nelson, M.E.; Lu, A.L.; Wu, G.; Gao, Y. Molecular characterization of the insecticidal activity of double-stranded RNA targeting the smooth septate junction of western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera). PLoS ONE 2018, 14, e0210481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Biedenkopf, D.; Will, T.; Knauer, T.; Jelonek, L.; Furch, A.C.U.; Busche, T.; Koch, A. Systemic spreading of exogenous applied RNA biopesticides in the crop plant Hordeum vulgare. ExRNA 2020, 2, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Maximo, W.P.F.; Howell, J.L.; Mogilicherla, K.; Basij, M.; Chereddy, S.C.R.R.; Palli, S.R. Inhibitor of apoptosis is an effective target gene for RNAi-mediated control of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 104, e21685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mehlhorn, S.; Ulrich, J.; Baden, C.U.; Buer, B.; Maiwald, F.; Lueke, B.; Geibel, S.; Bucher, G.; Nauen, R. The mustard leaf beetle, Phaedon coclileariae, as a screening model for exogenous RNAi-based control of coleopteran pests. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 176, 104870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Petek, M.; Coll, A.; Ferenc, R.; Razinger, J.; Gruden, K. Validating the potential of double-stranded RNA targeting Colorado potato beetle mesh gene in laboratory and field trials. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mao, J.; Zhang, P.; Liu, C.; Seng, F. Co-silence of the coatomer β and v-ATPase A genes by siRNA feeding reduces larval survival rate and weight gain of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2015, 118, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kolge, H.; Kadam, K.; Galande, S.; Lanjekar, V.; Ghormade, V. New frontiers in pest control: Chitosan nanoparticles-shielded dsRNA as an effective topical RNAi spray for gram podborer biocontrol. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4, 5145–5157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tang, T.; Zhao, C.; Feng, X.; Liu, X.; Qiu, L. Knockdown of several components of cytochrome P450 enzyme systems by RNA interference enhances the susceptibility of Helicoverpa armigera to fenvalerate. Pest Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 1501–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wang, Z.; Dong, Y.; Desnaux, N.; Niu, C.; Sambhara, S. RNAi silencing of the HaHMG-CoA reductase gene inhibits oviposition in the Helicoverpa armigera cotton bollworm. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wu, J.J.; Mu, L.L.; Kang, W.N.; Ze, L.J.; Shen, C.H.; Jin, L.; Anjum, A.A.; Li, G.Q. RNA interference targeting ecdysone receptor blocks the larval-pupal transition in Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata. Insect Sci. 2021, 28, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, H.; Guan, R.; Guo, H.; Miao, X. New insights into an RNAi approach for plant defence against piercing-sucking and stem-borer insect pests. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 2277–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Gong, L.; Chen, Y.; Hu, Z.; Hu, M.; Unver, T. Testing insecticidal activity of novel chemically synthesized siRNA against Plutella xylostella under laboratory and field conditions. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Killiny, N.; Hajeri, S.; Tiwari, S.; Gowda, S.; Stelinski, L.L.; Hansen, I.A. Double-stranded RNA uptake through topical application mediates silencing of five CYP4 genes and suppresses insecticide resistance in Diaphorina citri. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. El-Shesheny, I.; Hajeri, S.; El-Hawary, I.; Gowda, S.; Killiny, N.; Niedz, R.P. Silencing abnormal wing disc gene of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, disrupts adult wing development and increases nymph mortality. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Ghosh, S.K.B.; Hunter, W.B.; Park, A.L.; Gundersen-Rindal, D.E. Double-stranded RNA oral delivery methods to induce RNA interference in phloem and plant-sap-feeding hemipteran insects. J. Vis. Exp. 2018, 135, e57390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. San Miguel, K.; Scott, J.G. The next generation of insecticides: dsRNA is stable as a foliar-applied insecticide. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 72, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mutti, N.S.; Parl, Y.; Reese, J.C.; Reeck, G.R. RNAi knockdown of a salivary transcript leading to lethality in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. J. Insect Sci. 2006, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Jaubert-Possami, S.; Le Trionnaire, G.; Bonhomme, J.; Chistophides, G.K.; Rispe, C.; Tagu, D. Gene knockdown by RNAi in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. BMC Biotechnol. 2007, 7, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Whyard, S.; Singh, A.D.; Wong, S. Ingested double-stranded RNAs can act as species-specific insecticides. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2009, 39, 824–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Shakesby, A.J.; Wallace, I.S.; Isaacs, H.V.; Pritchar, J.; Roberts, D.M.; Douglas, A.E. A water-specific aquaporin involved in aphid osmoregulation. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2009, 39, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Willow, J.; Soonvald, L.; Sulg, S.; Kaasik, R.; Silva, A.I.; Taning, C.N.T.; Christiaens, O.; Smagghe, G.; Veromann, E. First evidence of bud feeding-induced RNAi in a crop pest via exogenous application of dsRNA. Insects 2020, 11, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Walker, W.B.; Allen, M.L. Expression and RNA interference of salivary polygalacturonase genes in the tarnished plant bug Lygus lineolaris. J. Insect Sci. 2010, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Walker, W.B.; Allen, M.L. RNA interference-mediated knockdown of IAP in Lygus lineolaris induced mortality in adult and pre-adult life stages. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2011, 138, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Liu, S.; Ding, Z.; Zhang, C.; Yang, B.; Liu, Z. Gene knockdown by into-thoracic injection of double-stranded RNA in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40, 666–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chen, J.; Zhang, D.; Yao, Q.; Zhang, J.; Dong, X.; Tian, H.; Zhang, W. Feeding-based RNA interference of a trehalose phosphate synthase gen in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens. Insect Mol. Biol. 2010, 19, 777–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, J.; Chen, Q.; Lin, Y.; Jiang, T.; Wu, G.; Hua, H. RNA interference in Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae) based on dsRNA ingestion. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 852–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, S.; Liang, Q.M.; Zhou, W.W.; Jiang, Y.D.; Zhu, Q.Z.; Yu, H.; Zhang, C.X.; Gurr, G.M.; Zhu, Z.R. RNA interference of NADPH–cytochrome P450 reductase of the rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens, increases susceptibility to insecticides. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, W.; Wan, P.; Lai, F.; Zhu, T.; Fu, Q. Double-stranded RNA targeting calmodulin reveals a potential target for pest management of Nilaparvata lugens. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 1711–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Quan, G.; Ladd, T.; Duan, J.; Wen, F.; Doucet, D.; Cusson, M.; Krell, P.J. Characterization of a spruce budworm chitin deacetylase gene: Stage- and tissue-specific expression, and inhibition using RNA interference. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 43, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, H.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Xing, Y.; Li, F.; Ternius, O. Transcriptome analysis and screening for potential target genes for RNAi-mediated pest control of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Tian, H.; Peng, H.; Ya, Q.; Chen, H.; Xie, Q.; Tang, B.; Zhang, W.; Hansen, I.A. Developmental control of a Lepidopteran pest Spodoptera exigua by ingestion of bacteria expressing dsRNA of a non-midgut gene. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Christiaens, O.; Tardajos, M.G.; Martinez Reyna, Z.L.; Dash, M.; Dobruel, P.; Smagghe, G. Increased RNAi efficacy in Spodoptera exigua via the formulation of dsRNA with guanylated polymers. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Rajagopal, R.; Sivakumar, S.; Agrawal, N.; Malhotra, P.; Bhatnagar, R.K. Silencing of midgut aminopeptidase N of Spodoptera litura by double-stranded RNA establishes its role as Bacillus thuringiensis toxin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 46849–46851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Parsons, K.H.; Mondal, M.H.; McCormick, C.L.; Flynt, A.S. Guanidinium-functionalized interpolyelectrolyte complexes enabling RNAi in resistant insect pests. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 1111–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Kontogiannatos, D.; Swevers, L.; Maenaka, K.; Park, E.Y.; Iatrou, K.; Kourti, A.; Wicker-Thomas, C. Functional characterization of a juvenile hormone esterase related gene in the moth Sesamia nonagrioides through RNA interference. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Wan, P.J.; Jia, S.; Li, N.; Fan, J.M.; Li, G.G. A Halloween gene shadow is a potential target for RNA-interference-based pest management in the small brown planthopper Laodelphax striatellus. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Rebijith, K.B.; Asokan, R.; Ranjitha, H.H.; Prasad, B.S.R.; Krishna, V.; Kumar, N.K.K. Diet-delivered dsRNAs for juvenile hormone-binding protein and vacuolar ATPase-H implied their potential in the management of the melon aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entymol. 2016, 45, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yan, S.; Qian, J.; Cai, C.; Ma, Z.; Li, J.; Yin, M.; Ren, B.; Shen, J. Spray method application of transdermal dsRNA delivery system for efficient gene silencing and pest control on soybean aphid Aphis glycines. J. Pest Sci. 2020, 93, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhang, Y.; Fan, J.; Francis, F.; Chen, J. Molecular characterization and gene silencing of Laccase 1 in the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2018, 97, e21446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Yoon, J.S.; Sahoo, D.K.; Maiti, I.B.; Palli, S.R. Identification of target genes for RNAi-mediated control of the Two spotted Spider Mite. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Dalakouras, A.; Ganopoulos, I. Induction of promoter DNA methylation upon high-pressure spraying of double-stranded RNA in plants. Agronomy 2021, 11, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mai, J.; Liao, L.; Ling, R.; Guo, X.; Lin, J.; Mo, B.; Chen, W.; Yu, Y. Study on RNAi-based herbicide for Mikania micrantha. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2021, 6, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Jiang, L.; Ding, L.; He, B.; Shen, J.; Xu, Z.; Yin, M.; Zhang, X. Systemic gene silencing in plants triggered by fluorescent nanoparticle-delivered double stranded RNA. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 9965–9969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dubrovina, A.S.; Aleynova, O.A.; Kalachev, A.V.; Suprun, A.R.; Ogneva, Z.V.; Kiselev, K.V. Induction of transgene suppression in plants via external application of synthetic dsRNA. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Numata, K.; Ohtani, M.; Yoshizumi, T.; Demura, T.; Kodama, Y. Local gene silencing in plant via synthetic dsRNA and carrier peptide. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12, 1027–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Lau, S.E.; Schwarzacher, T.; Othman, R.Y.; Harikrishna, J.N. dsRNA silencing of an R2R3-MYB transcription factor affects flower cell shape in a Dendrobium hybrid. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Taning, C.N.T.; Christiaens, O.; Berkvens, N.; Casteels, H.; Maes, M.; Smagghe, G. Oral RNAi to control Drosophila suzukii: Laboratory testing against larval and adult stages. J. Pest Sci. 2016, 89, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kalischuk, M.L.; Johnson, D.; Kawchuk, L.M. Priming with a double-stranded DNA virus alters Brassicae rapa seed architecture and facilitates a defense response. Gene 2015, 557, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. RNA interference (RNAi) against virus infection. Sense and antisense RNA protection against the single-stranded positive-sense RNA Potato leafroll virus (PLRV). Although phloem limited, members of the genus Polerovirus are transmitted in a persistent, non-propagative manner and cause considerable disease-related losses worldwide. The icosahedral virus is approximately 25 nm in size (top left transmission electron photomicrograph) is transmitted in an aphid-specific manner by the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, approximately 2.5 mm in length (top middle scanning electron photomicrograph). Disease symptoms include stunting and chlorosis of infected plants (top right) that reduce yield and quality. Virus titres in plants expressing coat protein messenger RNA (mRNA, red line) or antisense RNA (aRNA, blue line) reduced virus levels significantly as compared to untransformed controls (green line), determined by double antibody sandwich (DAS) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Figure 1. RNA interference (RNAi) against virus infection. Sense and antisense RNA protection against the single-stranded positive-sense RNA Potato leafroll virus (PLRV). Although phloem limited, members of the genus Polerovirus are transmitted in a persistent, non-propagative manner and cause considerable disease-related losses worldwide. The icosahedral virus is approximately 25 nm in size (top left transmission electron photomicrograph) is transmitted in an aphid-specific manner by the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, approximately 2.5 mm in length (top middle scanning electron photomicrograph). Disease symptoms include stunting and chlorosis of infected plants (top right) that reduce yield and quality. Virus titres in plants expressing coat protein messenger RNA (mRNA, red line) or antisense RNA (aRNA, blue line) reduced virus levels significantly as compared to untransformed controls (green line), determined by double antibody sandwich (DAS) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Ijms 24 09755 g001
Figure 2. Mechanism of RNA interference (RNAi). RNAi is initiated by the enzyme Dicer that cleaves double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) into short fragments of approximately 21- to 24-nucleotide short interfering RNA (siRNA). The siRNA is unwound into single-stranded RNA and the sense RNA (green) is further cleaved and degraded by the enzyme Argonaute (AGO). The antisense RNA (red) is recruited into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) that binds to the target sense RNA through the specificity of the complementary antisense RNA.
Figure 2. Mechanism of RNA interference (RNAi). RNAi is initiated by the enzyme Dicer that cleaves double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) into short fragments of approximately 21- to 24-nucleotide short interfering RNA (siRNA). The siRNA is unwound into single-stranded RNA and the sense RNA (green) is further cleaved and degraded by the enzyme Argonaute (AGO). The antisense RNA (red) is recruited into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) that binds to the target sense RNA through the specificity of the complementary antisense RNA.
Ijms 24 09755 g002
Figure 3. RNA virus replication and applications. (a) Genomic and subgenomic RNA for the replication and translational strategies of the Potato leafroll virus, including a silencing suppressor produced immediately following virus disassembly. Replication involves the production of antisense RNA and subsequent sense subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs) and expression of proteins involves several translational strategies including leaky start and stop codons, proteolytic site-specific cleavage of genomic RNA (gRNA), and an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) sequence. (b) A full-length infectious clone (FLIC) of the Potato leafroll virus RNA amplifies expression of heterologous sequences for virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) or production of commercially valuable proteins as shown (magnification 0.25×) with green fluorescent protein (GFP).
Figure 3. RNA virus replication and applications. (a) Genomic and subgenomic RNA for the replication and translational strategies of the Potato leafroll virus, including a silencing suppressor produced immediately following virus disassembly. Replication involves the production of antisense RNA and subsequent sense subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs) and expression of proteins involves several translational strategies including leaky start and stop codons, proteolytic site-specific cleavage of genomic RNA (gRNA), and an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) sequence. (b) A full-length infectious clone (FLIC) of the Potato leafroll virus RNA amplifies expression of heterologous sequences for virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) or production of commercially valuable proteins as shown (magnification 0.25×) with green fluorescent protein (GFP).
Ijms 24 09755 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koeppe, S.; Kawchuk, L.; Kalischuk, M. RNA Interference Past and Future Applications in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9755. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119755

AMA Style

Koeppe S, Kawchuk L, Kalischuk M. RNA Interference Past and Future Applications in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(11):9755. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119755

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koeppe, Sarah, Lawrence Kawchuk, and Melanie Kalischuk. 2023. "RNA Interference Past and Future Applications in Plants" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 11: 9755. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119755

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop