Next Article in Journal
Biomarkers of Pediatric Cataracts: A Proteomics Analysis of Aqueous Fluid
Next Article in Special Issue
Structure and Dynamics of Compact Dinucleosomes: Analysis by Electron Microscopy and spFRET
Previous Article in Journal
Metformin and Canagliflozin Are Equally Renoprotective in Diabetic Kidney Disease but Have No Synergistic Effect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

PARP3 Affects Nucleosome Compaction Regulation

Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(10), 9042; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24109042
Submission received: 10 March 2023 / Revised: 12 May 2023 / Accepted: 18 May 2023 / Published: 20 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Chromatin Structure and Function)

Abstract

:
Genome compaction is one of the important subject areas for understanding the mechanisms regulating genes’ expression and DNA replication and repair. The basic unit of DNA compaction in the eukaryotic cell is the nucleosome. The main chromatin proteins responsible for DNA compaction have already been identified, but the regulation of chromatin architecture is still extensively studied. Several authors have shown an interaction of ARTD proteins with nucleosomes and proposed that there are changes in the nucleosomes’ structure as a result. In the ARTD family, only PARP1, PARP2, and PARP3 participate in the DNA damage response. Damaged DNA stimulates activation of these PARPs, which use NAD+ as a substrate. DNA repair and chromatin compaction need precise regulation with close coordination between them. In this work, we studied the interactions of these three PARPs with nucleosomes by atomic force microscopy, which is a powerful method allowing for direct measurements of geometric characteristics of single molecules. Using this method, we evaluated perturbations in the structure of single nucleosomes after the binding of a PARP. We demonstrated here that PARP3 significantly alters the geometry of nucleosomes, possibly indicating a new function of PARP3 in chromatin compaction regulation.

1. Introduction

DNA in eukaryotes is mostly packed into chromatin [1]. The compaction is implemented by chromatin proteins and is presumably regulated by modifications of nitrogenous bases in DNA or chromatin proteins. The compaction level can influence the expression of the affected genes via transcription regulation [2]. The basic unit of DNA compaction is the nucleosome. The main functions of nucleosomes are compaction and the protection of DNA and regulation of gene expression [3]. A nucleosome consists of 147 nt of DNA wrapped around a histone octamer consisting of two molecules of each of the following histones: H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. This nucleoprotein complex is also termed the nucleosome core particle (NCP). The structural and functional details are reviewed in Reference [3].
The higher compaction level is usually mediated by linker histone H1. This histone binds to an NCP in the entry–exit region, thus forming a chromatosome, and chromatosomes can then condense into fibers. This compaction of NCPs requires a certain density of DNA wrapping [4]. Parameters of the fiber may depend on the NCP compaction degree. For example, the replacement of the H3 histone with CenpA leads to less compacted NCPs [5,6]. This alteration probably results in an alternative type of NCP compaction in fibers [5]. Functions of different types of DNA compaction in chromatin are being debated. One of the known chromatin changes occurs in response to the binding of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase 1 (PARP1) [7].
The diphtheria toxin-like ADP-ribosyltransferase (ARTD) family of proteins consists of 17 members. These proteins share the active site of the catalytic domain [8]. Three proteins from this family—PARP1, PARP2, and PARP3—are known to be DNA-damage-dependent. These PARPs activate in response to DNA damage. They catalyze the transfer of ADP-ribose from NAD+ to an acceptor molecule. Various proteins and DNAs can act as an acceptor for these PARPs [9,10,11]. PARP1 and PARP2 can synthesize long branched polymers of ADP-ribose (PAR), whereas PARP3 performs only mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation [12]. PARP1 and PARP2 are regulator proteins in base excision repair and double-strand break repair [13,14,15,16,17]. ADP-ribosylation can perform the function of an intracellular signal for the recruitment of DNA repair proteins. On the other hand, as a type of post-translational modification, ADP-ribosylation influences the properties of a target protein [18].
Several authors have revealed an interaction of the PARP1 protein with NCPs and have proposed that there is a change in the NCP structure as a result [19]. PARP1 can affect the chromatin structure via poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) [20]. Under PARylation conditions, PARP1 modifies histone H1, thus causing its dissociation. Recently, a protein involved in histone PARylation (HPF1) was discovered [21,22]. In the presence of this protein, PARP1 and PARP2 can modify (ADP-ribosyl)ate core histones in an NCP. These modifications lead to chromatin relaxation [23].
PARP1 can also directly affect NCPs. It has been shown that in the absence of linker regions, PARP1′s binding to an end of nucleosomal double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) causes a significant increase in the distance between adjacent gyres of the duplex, and this process is not accompanied by a loss of histones; moreover, it is reversible after PARylation [24]. Such major distortions of the NCP structure may be a consequence of the ability of PARP1 to strongly interact with DNA through the DNA-binding domain (DBD), which includes three Zn-finger domains, a WGR domain, and even a BRCT domain.
Although PARP2 is the closest homolog of PARP1, its DBD is considerably different. PARP2 does not contain any known DNA-binding motifs but comprises a structure similar to the SAP motif. It also has different DNA-binding properties: a lower affinity for free DNA and compacted DNA as compared to PARP1. It has been demonstrated that during the interaction with compacted DNA, PARP2 forms a bridge between two NCPs in double-strand breaks [25]. In contrast to PARP1, the interplay between PARP2 and an NCP has not been described in much detail.
In this regard, PARP3 is less characterized compared to PARP1 and PARP2, and the processes involving PARP3 are being researched at present. PARP3 interacts with PARP1 and several DNA damage repair proteins [26,27,28]. In the cell, PARP3 is reported to be associated with several polycomb group proteins [27]. The latter finding suggests that PARP3 participates in epigenetic regulation of transcription. Notably, this enzyme does not have a structurally separate DBD. The unstructured N-terminus is responsible for this function in PARP3. Nevertheless, PARP3 is strongly activated by DNA strand breaks in vitro and can facilitate non-homologous end joining [27,28,29].
More detailed information about aspects of structural reorganization during direct binding of a PARP protein to an NCP may be obtained by single-molecule methods such as atomic force microscopy (AFM). AFM is an approach used to directly measure the geometric characteristics of individual molecules placed on mica plaque surfaces. It is one of the most widely used nano-tools for studying protein DNA complexes including NCPs [30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. This method can be employed for estimating the NCP compaction degree by measurement of the angle between DNA arms near the entry–exit site of an NCP [31,37]. Using this approach, a stabilizing effect of histone H1 on an NCP has been demonstrated [32].
In our work, we studied the interactions of PARP1, PARP2, and PARP3 with an NCP reconstituted from native core histones and Widom’s clone 603 DNA extended by 79 and 120 bp DNA arms. In particular, we determined changes in the geometric parameters of NCPs during their binding to PARP1, PARP2, or PARP3.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. The Localization of PARP Proteins in NCP–PARP Complexes

First, we determined the site of binding of each PARP protein to our model NCP. For this purpose, reconstituted NCPs were incubated with a PARP followed by immobilization on a mica surface and visualization by AFM scanning in air. Only images of complexes containing both PARP and NCP molecules were chosen for the analysis. According to the positioning of a PARP molecule, the captured images were sorted into two categories: (i) a PARP is located close to the NCP core; (ii) the PARP is located on the linker DNA region. Figure 1 shows typical images of NCPs in their complex with PARPs. While accumulating the data, we found that each of the three PARPs presumably binds near the NCP core: in 153 out of 200 complexes for PARP1, in 148 out of 200 complexes for PARP2, and 158 out of 200 complexes for PARP3.
Strong affinity (in the sub-nanomolar range) of PARP1 and PARP2 for DNA containing various structural elements has been demonstrated earlier [36,38]. In those experiments, naked DNA was used. Additionally, our previous data revealed that Kd values are almost identical when complexes of PARP1 with naked DNA and of PARP1 with an NCP are compared [39].
An earlier study uncovered a specific nature of PARP1′s binding to NCP and the ability of this protein to modulate chromatin structure through NAD+-dependent automodification without disassembly of the NCP core [40]. These authors also showed that PARP1 is associated with chromatin regions depleted of histone H1. PARP1 saturates chromatin in a molar ratio of 1:1 toward the NCP and competes with H1 for the binding to NCPs. A recent study shows the ability of PARP1 to bind DNA near the entry–exit site of an NCP through the BRCT domain of PARP1 in addition to Zn-finger domains [41]. Furthermore, a condensing effect of PARP1 binding on chromatin has been demonstrated [7]. These data are in agreement with our findings about PARP1 localization during its binding to the model NCP. Taken together, all these data may indicate a potential structural role of PARP1. The binding of PARP1 to an NCP instead of H1 in the absence of DNA damage may lead to a certain temporal pattern of chromatin alterations and to an alternative compaction degree.
Preferential binding of PARP2 to the NCP core was expected here because PARP2 possesses a significantly stronger affinity for NCP compared to naked DNA [39]. The mechanism underlying the interaction of PARP2 or PARP3 with the NCP is not clear, first of all, owing to dramatic differences in the structure of their DBDs from those of PARP1 and differences in subsequent various types of interaction with DNA [42,43]. Moreover, the interaction of PARP2 or PARP3 with the NCP in the absence of DNA damage may be mediated by core histones. In any case, the binding of PARP2 or PARP3 to an NCP may affect its geometry.

2.2. The Impact of PARP Binding on the NCP Compaction Degree

Here, we analyzed only the complexes where a PARP molecule is located close to the NCP core. We measured the angle between the linker DNAs of the NCP, i.e., the opening angle (as described in Materials and Methods), to evaluate the changes in the geometric parameters of the NCP. A similar approach was used previously [32,44].
We analyzed 200 complexes of the NCP under all conditions under study. As a reference sample in the experiment, we utilized an NCP without supplementation with any PARP. Graphical representation of the results is given in Figure 2b. The raw data are presented in Table A1, Table A2, Table A3 and Table A4. The average angle between DNA arms near the entry–exit region for NCPs in native states was estimated as 120° ± 5°. This result is consistent with the data obtained by Jan Lipfert’s group [31]. Those authors showed a dual-mode distribution in 2D density plots, which depicted a correlation between the length of unwrapped DNA and an opening-angle distribution. In contrast to their data, we did not observe such a clear-cut dual-mode distribution in our experiments (Figure A2). This discrepancy may be explained by a difference in the nucleotide sequences of the DNA used. In our work, we employed Widom’s clone 603 DNA (which is characterized by weaker affinity of binding to core histones) instead of clone 601 DNA as used in Reference [31]. The main difference between these two DNA sequences is the toughness of the NCP core: the NCP based on clone 601 DNA is tougher and therefore has less flexible DNA ends. It is probable that our model NCPs based on clone 603 DNA have insufficient differences in their opening-angle values to discriminate clearly between these two modes.
The binding of PARP1 to an NCP caused slight narrowing of the distribution of the opening arms’ angle without a significant effect on the compaction of the NCP (115° ± 4°). The difference in the measured values of the angle in the nucleosome in the presence and in the absence of PARP1 was not significant (even for a p-value of 0.9). As mentioned above, PARP1 can bind an NCP near the entry–exit site and interact with both DNA linkers. This interaction can influence the structural functioning of chromatin similarly to linker histone H1. It has been reported that the presence of H1 narrows the opening-angle distribution (meaning NCP stabilization) and does not change the compaction degree [32]. Furthermore, similarly to histone H1, PARP1 compacts chromatin, which is relaxed under PARylation conditions [7]. The authors of Reference [45] propose that the compaction is accomplished via the bringing of neighboring NCPs together by PARP1 molecules, analogously to the process observed in the polycomb group protein complex. This effect is probably due to loop formation caused by PARP1–PARP1 contacts [46]. It should be noted that the binding of PARP1 to DNA near the entry–exit site leads to the distancing of the two DNA gyres, thereby destabilizing the NCP core [24]. Thus, PARP1 loosens the NCP structure. Nonetheless, in that report, the authors demonstrated separation of fluorescent labels located on the DNA helices wrapping the histone core when PARP1 was bound. These data were obtained by the Forster resonance energy transfer technique, which does not discriminate between directions of the NCP deformation; the changes in NCP structure can occur in one of two directions: radial or axial. Because we did not detect significant changes in the compaction degree of the NCP in the presence of PARP1, the changes probably proceed in the axial direction. In this case, the influence cannot be determined by the method under study. We also cannot rule out that the previously described NCP structure distortions caused by PARP1 may affect only the DNA region that is in direct contact with the histone core. In this context, the geometry of the entry–exit site of DNA may be unaltered.
Even though PARP2 manifests significantly stronger affinity for NCPs than for naked DNA, PARP2 (just as PARP1) does not significantly affect the NCP compaction [39]. In the present work, neither the distribution of opening-angle values nor the compaction degree of the NCP was changed by the presence of PARP2 (121° ± 4°). Taking into account the standard deviation, the difference in the measured values of the angle in the nucleosome in the presence and in the absence of PARP2 was not significant (even for a p-value of 0.8). In the absence of blunt DNA ends, PARP2 probably binds to NCPs through histones. In this case, it is highly likely that PARP2 mostly binds outside the entry–exit site. Therefore, the impact on the compaction degree may be small.
Meanwhile, PARP3 exerted a distinctive effect on the compaction of the NCP core. We observed an increased compaction degree of the NCPs in the presence of PARP3 (104° ± 4°). Taking into account the standard deviation, the difference in the measured values of the angle in the nucleosome in the presence and in the absence of PARP3 was significant (a p-value of 0.001). Moreover, the presence of PARP3 induced the narrowing of the opening-angle distribution. It is worth mentioning that PARP3 is widespread in the nucleus as a part of polycomb group protein complexes. The molecular function of the polycomb group is important for homeotic gene regulation and is consequently suppressed during cell differentiation with the transition of genes into the heterochromatic state. Thus, the effect of PARP3 on NCP compaction may be required for the regulation of the access of other proteins to undamaged DNA via DNA compaction regulation.
In our work, we investigated changes in the NCP architecture during interactions with PARP1, PARP2, or PARP3 in the absence of (ADP-ribosyl)ation. The observed effects can be dramatically altered by the presence of lesions in DNA and NAD+. These alterations could also be important, especially because of the different abilities of PARP proteins to synthesize various PAR chains on an acceptor molecule, starting from the transfer of one ADP-ribose (as PARP3 does). What is more, the contribution of accompanying factors such as HPF1 could be substantial during the (ADP-ribosyl)ation and consequent NCP compaction reorganization.
Nevertheless, our study simulates the scenario where DNA is undamaged and the basic ADP-ribose transfer activity of PARPs is weak. To summarize, PARP3 is a new probable player in chromatin compaction regulation.
In conclusion, the clear difference between PARP1, PARP2, and PARP3 in their actions during this process may open up a new research field: the elucidation of PARP3′s function in chromatin compaction in the absence of DNA damage. The question is how to find the conditions (the biological process) where the observed effect is indispensable. The effect may be clarified when higher-order DNA compaction is studied in this context.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Reagents and Equipment

The following reagents and materials were used: 3.5 kDa cutoff dialysis membranes (Spectrum Laboratories Inc., Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA); bromophenol blue and xylene cyanol (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland). Most of the reagents used in the study were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Recombinant Taq DNA polymerase was kindly provided by Prof. Svetlana Khodyreva (Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (ICBFM SB RAS)). Recombinant proteins—human PARP1, murine PARP2, human PARP3, and histone octamers H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 from G. gallus—were prepared and isolated as described in References [11,47,48]. AFM imaging was performed on Multimode 8 (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with the help of NSG30_SS probes (TipsNano, Tallinn, Estonia). The synthesis of 1-(3-aminopropyl)-silatrane (APS) was performed as described elsewhere [49]. NCP assembly products were visualized after separation in a polyacrylamide gel by means of a Typhoon FLA 9500 system (GE Healthcare Life Science, Barrington, IL, USA) and Amersham Imager 680 (GE Healthcare Life Science, Barrington, IL, USA).

3.2. Preparation of DNA Substrates

The DNA-603-containing substrate used in the experiments was generated by PCR from a pGEM-3z/603 plasmid vector (AddGene, Watertown, MA, USA) with unique primers. The DNA construct contains 147 bp of strong positioning of Widom’s clone 603 DNA sequence surrounded by plasmid DNA sequences of 120 and 79 bp:
5′-GGGCGAATTCGAGCTCGGTACCCGGGGATCCTCTAGAGTCGGGAGCTCGGAACACTATCCGACTGGCACCGAAACGGGTACCCCAGGGACTTGAAGTAATAAGGACGGAGGGCCTCTTTCAACATCGATGCACGGTGGTTAGCCTTGGATTGCGCTCTACCGTGCGCTAAGCGTACTTAGAAGCCCGAGTGACGACTTCACACGGTAGGTGGGCGCGCGAACTGGGCACCCGAGAGTGTCGATTATTTTACGGCTCACGCTGGGGTGATTTGTACTAGGAAAACGCCTATTCGTGTATTCCGCCTTGGTCATTAGGATCCCGGACCTGCAGGCATGCAAGCTTGAG-3′.
Primer oligonucleotides 5′-GGGCGAATTCNAGCTCGGTAC-3′ and 5′-CTCAAGCTTGCATGCCTGCAG-3′ were synthesized in the Laboratory of Biomedical Chemistry at the ICBFM SB RAS (Russia). The following program in PCR was used: 3 min at 94 °C; 30 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 20 s at 65 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C; with final extension for 3 min at 72 °C.
After the PCR-based synthesis, the DNA substrate was purified by gel electrophoresis and isolated from the gel by the protocol from reference [50].

3.3. NCP Assembly

The NCP assembly was carried out in accordance with our previously described protocol [51]. Briefly, by quick reconstitution of NCPs in analytical amounts, the correct ratio of DNA–histones’ species was determined. Then, preparative reconstitution was performed by gradient dialysis according to the determined ratio.

3.4. Preparation of NCP Samples Containing a PARP

Sample preparation for AFM imaging was performed as described before [52]. Freshly cleaved mica was functionalized with a solution of APS for sample deposition.
The reaction mixture was composed of 10 nM NCP, NCP buffer (20 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 1.6 mM CHAPS, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, and 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and one of PARPs at a concentration of 10 nM (PARP1), 35 nM (PARP2), or 66 nM (PARP3). The reaction mixture was incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. Then, samples were diluted tenfold with Milli-Q water and immediately deposited on the mica surface. After 120 s of deposition, the mica surface was rinsed three times with 1 mL of Milli-Q water and dried in a gentle stream of argon. The samples were stored in a desiccator before the imaging.

3.5. AFM Imaging

The visualization was performed in tapping mode in air at a tip resonance frequency of 240–440 kHz. A typical resulting image had a size of 2 µm × 2 µm at 1024 pixels/row or 4 µm × 4 µm at 2048 pixels/row. The scanning rate was either 1.0 or 0.5 Hz, respectively.

3.6. Data Analysis

All images were first processed in the Gwyddion software (http://gwyddion.net/, accessed on 1 March 2023). The ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, accessed on 1 March 2023) was employed to measure parameters of the NCP core disk and of the NCP core in complex with PARPs, the length of the NCP DNA arm, and the angle between DNA arms. The arm length was estimated by measuring the DNA from the end point to the point of “entry” into the NCP disk. Diameters of the core and core PARP were estimated as the maximal distance between two parallel tangents to the disk. The angle between NCP DNA arms was defined as an angle formed by two beams from the center of the core disc to the “entry” points of DNA arms. On the basis of the obtained data, histograms and graphs were constructed using the SigmaPlot software v.11.0 (Systat Software Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Variances in measured values were calculated by means of Student’s t distribution with 95% confidence intervals. Measured values are shown diagrammatically in Figure 2a. When sorting PARP–NCP complexes, we chose a distance of 3 nm between the NCP core and a PARP as the border point. The resolution of the cantilever used in this work allowed us to uniquely identify a PARP separated from the NCP core when the distance was more than 3 nm. Therefore, when the proteins were located closer to the NCP core, we assumed that they were directly interacting. The workflow is illustrated in Figure A1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K. and E.B.; methodology and formal analysis, A.U. and M.J.; validation, V.G. and A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K.; writing—review and editing, O.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 22-74-10059). The purification of PARP3 was supported by the Russian state-funded project for ICBFM SB RAS (grant number 121031300041-4).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data needed to reproduce our results are contained within the article. Raw data are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the entire Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry of Enzymes (ICBFM SB RAS) for feedback on the manuscript. We acknowledge Svetlana Khodyreva for preparation of the recombinant Taq DNA polymerase.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. The workflow.
Figure A1. The workflow.
Ijms 24 09042 g0a1
Figure A2. The 2D density plot of wrapped length versus the opening-angle distribution of NCPs.
Figure A2. The 2D density plot of wrapped length versus the opening-angle distribution of NCPs.
Ijms 24 09042 g0a2
Table A1. NCP parameters.
Table A1. NCP parameters.
NCP #α, °D, µml1, µm,l2, µm
12300.0110.0250.03
2590.0150.0310.015
31030.0110.0320.017
41210.0160.040.026
51280.0180.0350.024
61720.0130.0290.015
72670.0110.0420.021
81060.0190.0410.028
9660.0250.0570.026
101480.0210.0450.019
111240.0210.050.03
12830.0210.0450.023
131800.0160.0450.046
141360.0210.0420.017
15940.0190.0390.025
16940.0180.0450.028
17680.0110.0570.036
18460.0180.0370.038
19960.0230.040.022
201690.0240.0470.021
211090.0260.0290.028
22880.0170.0390.034
231110.0210.0370.03
241480.0220.0330.025
25710.0210.0320.026
262800.0160.0560.026
271910.0240.0410.024
281240.0210.0370.018
291020.0180.0470.038
30680.020.0350.021
311150.0220.0250.023
32900.020.0380.027
33770.0240.0330.019
341430.020.0340.028
351620.0170.0450.027
361120.0180.040.02
371250.0160.0440.018
381240.0180.0420.025
391090.020.0280.016
401260.0230.040.028
41740.0170.0450.034
421130.0220.0240.027
431040.020.0460.023
441210.020.0610.027
451730.020.0430.022
461040.0170.0290.03
471330.0190.0410.014
481740.0190.0430.032
491090.0150.0420.022
50830.0150.0380.024
511420.0150.0520.02
521240.0180.0370.038
531790.0230.0320.018
541110.0160.0450.02
55850.020.0250.024
561150.0170.0410.032
571960.0220.0430.024
581150.0180.0590.036
59970.0160.0410.025
601010.0230.0480.032
61730.0160.0580.031
62670.0230.0240.018
63910.0220.0550.035
64910.0270.0320.018
651260.0150.0370.031
661510.0180.0460.033
671040.0150.040.039
68780.0180.0530.031
691920.0160.0450.022
701060.0170.0320.021
711190.0190.0270.015
72790.0220.0390.012
73970.0180.0280.016
741200.020.0280.022
751280.0170.0360.024
761210.0190.0370.023
771310.020.0240.015
781310.0190.0360.014
79910.0140.0250.017
801460.0170.0370.021
811360.0170.0310.023
821490.0190.0220.019
831410.0150.0340.018
84940.0230.0270.018
85930.0160.0310.024
861100.0190.0330.016
871420.0150.0290.012
881570.0140.0350.015
891170.0180.0420.047
901780.0140.0320.023
912000.0140.0430.018
921060.020.060.019
93880.020.0350.024
941030.020.0260.015
951090.0130.0310.026
961030.0120.0350.016
971010.0120.0460.025
981180.0090.0660.026
991060.0110.0330.019
1001160.0130.0260.015
1011580.0140.0380.035
1021460.0160.0460.022
103910.0150.0350.036
104970.0190.0440.021
1051640.0140.0290.024
1061390.0170.0380.021
1071970.0150.040.024
1081170.0130.0370.024
1091200.0180.0330.021
110750.0150.0320.02
1111050.0160.040.014
1121010.0150.0390.027
1131780.0180.0310.019
114610.0180.0340.025
1151380.0130.0360.025
116910.0150.0320.022
1171570.0130.0270.022
118630.0150.0320.021
1191440.0130.0320.012
1201650.0150.0510.019
1211510.0180.0510.021
122860.0160.0420.014
1231220.0160.0390.018
1241850.0160.0330.024
1251100.0130.040.012
1261560.0130.0380.019
1271760.0170.030.019
1281030.0160.020.019
129740.0150.0240.019
1302190.0190.0470.013
131970.0170.0370.015
1321540.0160.0420.024
133480.0150.0370.02
1341140.0180.0470.024
135830.0130.0410.029
1361110.0180.0360.024
137860.0180.0320.027
1381150.0160.0520.02
1391130.0170.0380.015
140940.0160.0330.019
141610.0170.040.034
1421560.0160.0510.032
143710.0190.0480.03
144900.0210.040.018
145470.0180.0250.022
146840.0230.0320.017
1471140.0140.0320.028
1481460.0160.0330.027
149780.020.030.021
150860.0120.0430.029
151880.0160.0420.026
152990.0230.0370.02
1531060.020.0310.022
1541490.020.0410.013
1551100.0130.0390.027
1561580.0140.0380.028
157940.0160.0350.02
158800.0180.0330.022
159810.0170.0420.027
160850.0110.0380.017
161580.020.0260.018
162820.020.0340.022
163840.0170.0330.022
1641580.0190.0350.023
1651170.0170.0280.027
166570.0150.0330.02
1671110.020.040.025
1681220.020.0390.016
1691790.0190.0340.023
1702210.0210.0230.02
171810.0180.0310.018
172530.0170.0390.021
173940.0150.040.025
1742150.0170.0380.017
1751180.0180.0370.022
1761760.0170.0610.017
1771220.0170.0280.019
178840.020.0330.022
1791550.0180.0340.026
1801760.0220.0530.026
1811260.020.0250.02
182890.0170.0280.021
1831330.020.0410.02
1841520.0160.0330.022
1851220.0160.0320.023
1861480.0170.0390.025
1871190.0140.0290.014
188820.0170.0310.014
1891420.0180.0320.022
1901140.0170.0310.011
1911700.020.0270.026
1921370.0130.040.02
193710.0180.0360.02
1941030.0120.0370.023
1951210.0170.0240.018
1961370.0150.0260.026
1971250.0150.0330.019
1981620.0150.0280.025
1991680.0160.0420.021
2001200.0120.0390.019
Table A2. NCP parameters in the presence of PARP1.
Table A2. NCP parameters in the presence of PARP1.
NCP #α, °D, µml1, µm,l2, µm
1700.0190.0530.032
2610.02900.027
31280.02600.02
41000.01900.014
5610.0230.0310.03
6960.0240.0350.019
71170.03200.022
8970.02200.016
91090.02300.019
101120.02700.026
111200.0270.0160.033
121070.0330.0230.035
131790.02300.032
14890.02600.018
15580.0260.030.021
161760.0240.0190.017
171120.0240.0080.019
181120.01900.019
191520.0180.0370.011
20990.0210.0390
21980.02200.02
22850.0310.0120.019
231070.0200.024
241070.0220.0330
25680.0240.0210.018
26560.0230.0230.018
271290.02300.02
28970.0260.0080.032
291310.0230.040.02
30850.0200.023
311350.0240.0520.005
321180.01900.028
331620.0240.0030.023
341070.02700.021
351730.03100.022
361220.0240.040
371030.0240.0360.025
381180.0300.024
39980.02500.024
401050.02600.024
411610.0230.0440
421210.02300.02
431140.02300.024
441090.02200.025
45850.03200.023
461050.0350.0060.023
47930.02700.021
48960.02300.023
491520.0280.0150.023
501210.02100.015
511160.0320.0310.004
521530.0240.0150.02
53870.0230.0310.008
54740.0300.018
55670.0370.0110.019
56770.02200.02
57760.02100.02
58760.02600.02
5900.02500.025
601160.0300.019
611010.0330.0350
62960.02900.019
631450.02800.018
641380.02700.027
651010.0240.0220.019
661080.0230.0160.015
672200.020.0440
681030.02600.02
691020.02400.018
701290.02300.021
71840.01800.021
72920.01800.016
73980.0220.0160.023
741470.01700
75820.02800.017
761300.0200.016
771790.0290.0430
781100.0270.0430
791300.0260.0420
80960.0190.0080.01
81830.0270.0130.024
82550.0260.0380
831440.0210.0410
841730.02600.018
851490.0200.023
861640.02400.028
87690.02600.022
881040.0270.0130.024
891740.0200.023
901710.02400.026
911060.02500.011
92830.02100.018
931030.02500.016
941200.0240.0220.021
952000.0230.0330.024
961400.02300.022
971120.02400.019
981680.0210.0160.02
991320.01900.02
1001120.02800.016
1011280.0240.0370
102810.02200.018
103630.02500.02
1041020.02600
1051080.0210.0380
106910.0210.0390
107840.02300
108930.01800.014
1091410.02100.013
1101120.01800.025
111750.020.0190.019
112910.01800.018
113660.02100.022
114930.02600.018
1151200.01700
1161190.01700.029
1171420.02200.018
118640.02100.026
119780.01800.027
120820.0170.0110.028
1211190.01700.033
122850.01800.026
1231130.0200.025
1241380.02200.033
1251400.0220.0190
1261170.0170.0120.02
127970.020.0170.025
128870.01600.03
1291570.0290.0250.025
1301040.01800.023
131630.02500.027
1321150.0230.0380.027
1331330.02400.026
134980.02900.023
1351540.020.0090.021
1361260.0220.0430
137590.0180.0370.008
1381330.01800.019
1391100.0200.02
1401320.01600.02
1411160.020.0370.015
1421240.0250.0340
143980.0140.0430
1441240.02100.023
1451110.02200.023
146820.0220.0230.014
1471730.02400
1481410.0230.0120.026
1491020.01900.026
1501150.0210.0440.009
1511220.0210.0070
152850.01900.025
153970.02100.027
1541100.02400.022
1551370.02200.028
1561510.0210.040
157920.0260.040
1581120.02200.023
159540.0140.0350
1601800.0210.0140.028
1611170.02100.018
162770.02200.023
1631160.0120.0350.007
1641420.0110.030.019
1651280.0150.040
166750.01200.021
1671780.0130.0090.005
1681440.0140.0350
1691550.01500.026
1701300.0140.0180.023
1711200.0150.0080.024
1721160.0150.0140.022
173960.0140.0050.03
1741510.0140.0080.033
1751470.0130.0430
176690.01900.028
1771220.0210.0410
1781220.0190.0360
1791510.0160.0120.019
1801360.01400.023
1811480.0160.0370
182890.0140.0350
1831730.0140.0090
1841620.01900.025
1851200.02100.019
1861190.0190.0390
187850.02400.025
1881240.0170.0410
1891180.01700.026
1901500.0180.0130.024
1911150.0170.0370
192900.0170.0330
1931660.01700.028
1941080.020.0350
1951610.01900.028
1961710.01600.025
1971140.0200.017
198870.0190.0370
1991450.01600.027
2001250.020.0110.028
2011100.02100.028
2021080.02200.018
203740.01400.024
204660.0180.0140.01
205920.0240.0270.025
Table A3. NCP parameters in the presence of PARP2.
Table A3. NCP parameters in the presence of PARP2.
NCP #α, °D, µml1, µm,l2, µm
1610.03300.018
21440.0290.0290
31590.0280.0320.03
4600.0230.0240.016
5990.0200.022
61050.0200.018
71400.02400.02
8780.0190.0420.009
91090.02100
101130.01800.023
11880.0260.0230.019
12820.01900.022
13970.0200.022
141850.0200.014
151670.01900.021
161040.02100.019
17770.01900.024
18630.02200.022
191470.0200.021
201080.020.0150
212810.01800.029
22600.03200
231180.0200.023
241400.0220.0340
25860.01900.024
261390.01600.02
27880.01700.02
28720.0190.0420
291720.01700.025
301600.02300.001
311300.0240.0470.019
32940.02700.023
331470.0270.0150.022
341740.0210.0410
351480.02500
36920.020.0380.01
371460.0180.010.029
38850.01800.024
39980.02200.019
40810.0170.0360
411600.020.040.021
421420.02100.024
431290.0250.0070.022
441050.0220.0160.019
451340.0200.023
461210.0230.0370
471130.01500.025
481700.020.0320
491590.0250.0470
50740.02200.026
511320.02800.019
521120.01500.023
53870.01900.023
541240.02200.018
55990.02200.021
56920.0200.028
57930.01900.023
58830.01600
59990.02200.023
601250.01900.017
611140.0160.0110.018
621370.01500.02
631260.0160.0090.023
641140.0160.0370
651040.01900.017
661120.02200.025
671680.01800.022
681020.01800.025
691770.0270.0350.022
701050.02100.024
711090.02300.023
72950.0210.0340.023
731350.0180.040
74860.01800.025
75950.01600.022
761920.01600.023
771590.0200.024
781160.01800.024
791130.0190.0370
801490.0220.0230.025
811590.02100.022
82670.02200.014
831300.01900.024
841450.020.0180.03
85950.02100.021
861420.0180.0430
871290.01900.023
882160.02200.019
891350.0200.033
901120.0280.040.017
911280.0190.0390.017
921170.0210.0120.024
931140.0180.0440
941150.01800.027
951090.0220.020.022
961120.01700.023
97880.020.0390
981170.020.0150.024
991390.01800.024
1001250.02800.019
101950.0230.0360
1021660.0310.0330.031
103940.0250.0350.004
104960.0170.0140.025
1051070.02300.021
1061380.020.0150.021
107880.01600.008
1081240.020.0350
109900.01600.027
110550.0140.0390.008
1111340.0180.0040.019
112880.01900.027
113770.01400.021
1141040.0190.0380
1151000.020.0330.024
1161710.01700.024
1171110.0140.0240.018
1181740.0190.0320.031
1191360.01700.028
120950.0170.0080.011
1211740.0180.0360
122830.0190.0290.021
1231270.0190.0120.022
1241340.0200.028
1251460.0200.028
126730.0180.0390
1271130.01600.015
1281110.0220.0420.016
1291350.01400.026
1301280.0160.0420
131960.0170.0090.012
1321560.01800.03
1331570.01900.029
1342140.0210.0090.027
1351680.0190.040
136990.01700.029
137830.0200.024
1381230.0150.0360
1391140.01700.032
1401210.02100.028
1411440.01800.025
142970.0180.040
1431430.0180.0360
1441040.020.0380.019
145990.01800.027
146850.01900.02
1471030.01700.027
1481430.0170.0450
1491330.01600.032
1501110.0160.0060.029
1511530.0190.0130.03
1521090.0190.0080.028
1531280.01400.032
154930.0210.0070.029
155990.020.040.01
1561200.0170.0350.007
157960.0170.0380.002
1581110.0140.0380
1591220.0170.0110.028
1601330.0140.0080.028
1611130.02100.028
162730.0150.0040.03
1631130.0180.010.032
164970.0190.040
165860.0170.0380
1661420.0170.0070.029
167770.0190.0070.028
168780.0180.0070.019
1691540.01500.027
1701280.0200.031
1711250.020.0420
1721010.0180.010.023
1731090.0170.0370
174860.01700.026
1751030.01500.031
1761420.020.010
1771020.0200.029
1781520.01800.027
1791720.01600.025
1801180.01900.028
1811480.01900.03
1821020.01600.026
183840.0210.0370.013
1841450.01500.031
185950.01400.024
1861440.0150.0330
1871020.020.0070.018
1882170.0160.0480
1891720.01500
1901450.0180.040
1911620.0180.0060
1921070.0220.0050.025
1931230.0140.0410
194840.0180.0370
1952670.0190.0490.029
1961140.0170.0390
197960.01600.024
198910.01900.023
1991480.01700.008
2001360.0190.0330.005
201850.0190.0390
Table A4. NCP parameters in the presence of PARP3.
Table A4. NCP parameters in the presence of PARP3.
NCP #α, °D, µml1, µm,l2, µm
11060.0250.0050.025
21560.02400.024
3870.0200.02
4770.02400.025
5980.02500.022
6770.01500.027
7810.01700.024
81380.020.0410.01
9830.01800.016
101020.0210.0350.009
11930.01600.027
12950.0130.0350
131190.01900.021
141740.02100.021
151220.01700.023
16970.0130.040
17840.0180.0370
18750.020.0430
19840.02400.024
20960.01800.028
211450.01500.023
22690.0200.024
23810.01800.028
241030.01800.021
25790.0180.0410
261540.01900.032
27990.01800.023
281060.01500.024
291160.01800.023
30870.02100
31980.0180.0410
321340.01900.021
331110.020.0380
341040.01800.026
351610.01600.023
361090.01700.027
371140.01500.028
381100.01800.027
391160.01900.021
401010.0140.0390
41750.01200.023
421350.0180.0340
43830.01700.023
44940.01400.02
45870.01900.023
461570.0160.0420.015
47810.01900.03
48620.0200.032
49950.0200.022
501320.0180.0380
511080.0170.0380
52710.01500.024
531400.01700.021
54990.01900.014
55450.01700.024
56940.01900.024
571190.01400.023
581160.01800.021
59380.01900.018
60740.01600.023
61530.0150.0370
62950.01800.02
631660.0140.0150.021
64610.01500.019
651220.01800.024
662090.01600.023
671190.01500.023
68780.01400.023
691210.0120.0370
701180.01700
711010.0170.040.01
721050.0180.0270.022
73870.0160.0090.024
74660.01600.018
751780.0170.0380.014
761610.0260.0160.023
77970.0160.0180.024
78820.01800.024
791420.0160.0350
801230.01600.026
81820.01500.023
821330.01300.022
83710.01700.024
84930.0190.0080.022
851050.02100.024
86980.01600.028
871440.01400.028
881130.020.0070.021
891240.01500.027
901070.01600.022
91850.01600.026
921540.0180.0110.028
931190.01500.019
94900.01900.021
951060.01800.024
96870.0170.040
97600.0170.0380.011
98830.0140.0380
991190.01700.022
1001180.01400.023
101890.01400.025
102990.0160.0040.025
1031310.01700.02
1041180.01500.021
1051020.01500
106680.0150.0090.025
107860.01300.026
108820.0160.0170.022
1091040.01600.022
1101190.0150.0390.004
111740.0130.010.026
1121000.0170.0080.003
113960.01700.02
114890.0120.0380
1151170.0150.0380
1161050.01400.024
117590.01600.028
1181510.01300.03
1191150.0130.0050.028
120830.01700.006
1211690.0140.0190.031
1221300.020.0430.004
1231350.0150.0340
1241100.0120.0080.017
1251220.01600.026
1261050.0190.0130
127960.0140.0120.02
128930.01800.026
1291320.01800.027
130850.01800.024
131850.01500.03
132930.0160.0080.026
133990.0200.028
134970.0150.0390
1351230.0200.021
136950.01300.029
137970.0180.040.006
1381190.0140.0380
139930.01600.024
140930.0170.0130.017
141970.0170.0330.006
1421090.01700.023
143980.01600.021
1441130.0220.0260.027
145790.01800.026
1461340.02300
1471170.02100.026
148600.0160.0350
149860.020.0090.024
1501110.0190.0340
1511480.01800.024
152450.01700.031
153920.0170.0380
154930.01700.024
155990.0210.0420.015
156930.02200.031
1571140.0180.0150.028
158990.0230.0190.027
159890.0180.0080.022
1601400.02100.034
161870.0170.0160.025
162940.0190.0370
1631080.0200.025
164890.020.0320
165860.0220.0060.028
1661000.0210.0090.029
167750.0190.0380
168520.020.0370
1691140.01800.027
170970.0180.040
171910.0170.0130.024
172810.0210.0450
1731520.0270.0310
174910.01800.028
1751700.0190.0170.033
176550.020.0060.024
177880.01700.026
178810.02300.029
179590.01800
1801380.0170.0370
181740.01700.023
182750.0190.0360
183820.0200.024
1841020.0230.0160.004
1851700.020.0440
1861130.01700.023
187710.0210.0390
1881570.01900.027
1891560.0180.0380
1901700.01800.006
191850.0220.0420.006
1921040.01500.021
1931750.0210.040.009
1941170.0190.0380.014
195560.0180.0420
1961260.01500.027
197990.01900.032
198960.01500.022
199980.0180.0090.023
200650.0210.0420
201700.02600.029

References

  1. Rao, S.S.; Huntley, M.H.; Durand, N.C.; Stamenova, E.K.; Bochkov, I.D.; Robinson, J.T.; Sanborn, A.L.; Machol, I.; Omer, A.D.; Lander, E.S.; et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 2014, 159, 1665–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007, 128, 693–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McGinty, R.K.; Tan, S. Nucleosome structure and function. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 2255–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Öztürk, M.A.; De, M.; Cojocaru, V.; Wade, R.C. Chromatosome Structure and Dynamics from Molecular Simulations. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2020, 71, 101–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lyubchenko, Y.L. Centromere chromatin: A loose grip on the nucleosome? Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014, 21, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Stormberg, T.; Lyubchenko, Y.L. The Sequence Dependent Nanoscale Structure of CENP-A Nucleosomes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wacker, D.A.; Ruhl, D.D.; Balagamwala, E.H.; Hope, K.M.; Zhang, T.; Kraus, W.L. The DNA binding and catalytic domains of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 cooperate in the regulation of chromatin structure and transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 7475–7485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lüscher, B.; Ahel, I.; Altmeyer, M.; Ashworth, A.; Bai, P.; Chang, P.; Cohen, M.; Corda, D.; Dantzer, F.; Daugherty, M.D.; et al. ADP-ribosyltransferases, an update on function and nomenclature. FEBS J. 2022, 289, 7399–7410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Talhaoui, I.; Lebedeva, N.A.; Zarkovic, G.; Saint-Pierre, C.; Kutuzov, M.M.; Sukhanova, M.V.; Matkarimov, B.T.; Gasparutto, D.; Saparbaev, M.K.; Lavrik, O.I.; et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases covalently modify strand break termini in DNA fragments in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 9279–9295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zarkovic, G.; Belousova, E.A.; Talhaoui, I.; Saint-Pierre, C.; Kutuzov, M.M.; Matkarimov, B.T.; Biard, D.; Gasparutto, D.; Lavrik, O.I.; Ishchenko, A.A. Characterization of DNA ADP-ribosyltransferase activities of PARP2 and PARP3: New insights into DNA ADP-ribosylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 2417–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Belousova, E.A.; Ishchenko, A.A.; Lavrik, O.I. Dna is a New Target of Parp3. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vyas, S.; Matic, I.; Uchima, L.; Rood, J.; Zaja, R.; Hay, R.T.; Ahel, I.; Chang, P. Family-wide analysis of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kutuzov, M.M.; Belousova, E.A.; Ilina, E.S.; Lavrik, O.I. Impact of PARP1, PARP2 & PARP3 on the Base Excision Repair of Nucleosomal DNA. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1241, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ray Chaudhuri, A.; Nussenzweig, A. The multifaceted roles of PARP1 in DNA repair and chromatin remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2017, 18, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alemasova, E.E.; Lavrik, O.I. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by PARP1: Reaction mechanism and regulatory proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 3811–3827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Van Beek, L.; McClay, É.; Patel, S.; Schimpl, M.; Spagnolo, L.; Maia de Oliveira, T. PARP Power: A Structural Perspective on PARP1, PARP2, and PARP3 in DNA Damage Repair and Nucleosome Remodelling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Beck, C.; Robert, I.; Reina-San-Martin, B.; Schreiber, V.; Dantzer, F. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases in double-strand break repair: Focus on PARP1, PARP2 and PARP3. Exp. Cell. Res. 2014, 329, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Virág, L.; Robaszkiewicz, A.; Rodriguez-Vargas, J.M.; Oliver, F.J. Poly(ADP-ribose) signaling in cell death. Mol. Aspects Med. 2013, 34, 1153–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Belousova, E.A.; Lavrik, O.I. The Role of PARP1 and PAR in ATP-Independent Nucleosome Reorganisation during the DNA Damage Response. Genes 2022, 14, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Poirier, G.G.; de Murcia, G.; Jongstra-Bilen, J.; Niedergang, C.; Mandel, P. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of polynucleosomes causes relaxation of chromatin structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1982, 79, 3423–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gibbs-Seymour, I.; Fontana, P.; Rack, J.G.M.; Ahel, I. HPF1/C4orf27 Is a PARP-1-Interacting Protein that Regulates PARP-1 ADP-Ribosylation Activity. Mol. Cell. 2016, 62, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Suskiewicz, M.J.; Zobel, F.; Ogden, T.E.H.; Fontana, P.; Ariza, A.; Yang, J.C.; Zhu, K.; Bracken, L.; Hawthorne, W.J.; Ahel, D.; et al. HPF1 completes the PARP active site for DNA damage-induced ADP-ribosylation. Nature 2020, 579, 598–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Longarini, E.J.; Matic, I. The fast-growing business of Serine ADP-ribosylation. DNA Repair 2022, 118, 103382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sultanov, D.C.; Gerasimova, N.S.; Kudryashova, K.S.; Maluchenko, N.V.; Kotova, E.Y.; Langelier, M.F.; Pascal, J.M.; Kirpichnikov, M.P.; Feofanov, A.V.; Studitsky, V.M. Unfolding of core nucleosomes by PARP-1 revealed by spFRET microscopy. AIMS Genet. 2017, 4, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gaullier, G.; Roberts, G.; Muthurajan, U.M.; Bowerman, S.; Rudolph, J.; Mahadevan, J.; Jha, A.; Rae, P.S.; Luger, K. Bridging of nucleosome-proximal DNA double-strand breaks by PARP2 enhances its interaction with HPF1. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Loseva, O.; Jemth, A.S.; Bryant, H.E.; Schüler, H.; Lehtiö, L.; Karlberg, T.; Helleday, T. PARP-3 is a mono-ADP-ribosylase that activates PARP-1 in the absence of DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 8054–8060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rouleau, M.; McDonald, D.; Gagné, P.; Ouellet, M.E.; Droit, A.; Hunter, J.M.; Dutertre, S.; Prigent, C.; Hendzel, M.J.; Poirier, G.G. PARP-3 associates with polycomb group bodies and with components of the DNA damage repair machinery. J. Cell Biochem. 2007, 100, 385–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rulten, S.L.; Fisher, A.E.; Robert, I.; Zuma, M.C.; Rouleau, M.; Ju, L.; Poirier, G.; Reina-San-Martin, B.; Caldecott, K.W. PARP-3 and APLF function together to accelerate nonhomologous end-joining. Mol. Cell. 2011, 41, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Augustin, A.; Spenlehauer, C.; Dumond, H.; Ménissier-De Murcia, J.; Piel, M.; Schmit, A.C.; Apiou, F.; Vonesch, J.L.; Kock, M.; Bornens, M.; et al. PARP-3 localizes preferentially to the daughter centriole and interferes with the G1/S cell cycle progression. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 1551–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, Z.; Stormberg, T.; Filliaux, S.; Lyubchenko, Y.L. Three-Way DNA Junction as an End Label for DNA in Atomic Force Microscopy Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Konrad, S.F.; Vanderlinden, W.; Lipfert, J. Quantifying epigenetic modulation of nucleosome breathing by high-throughput AFM imaging. Biophys. J. 2022, 121, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Würtz, M.; Aumiller, D.; Gundelwein, L.; Jung, P.; Schütz, C.; Lehmann, K.; Tóth, K.; Rohr, K. DNA accessibility of chromatosomes quantified by automated image analysis of AFM data. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lyubchenko, Y.L.; Shlyakhtenko, L.S. AFM for analysis of structure and dynamics of DNA and protein-DNA complexes. Methods 2009, 47, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shlyakhtenko, L.S.; Lushnikov, A.Y.; Lyubchenko, Y.L. Dynamics of nucleosomes revealed by time-lapse atomic force microscopy. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 7842–7848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sukhanova, M.V.; Abrakhi, S.; Joshi, V.; Pastre, D.; Kutuzov, M.M.; Anarbaev, R.O.; Curmi, P.A.; Hamon, L.; Lavrik, O.I. Single molecule detection of PARP1 and PARP2 interaction with DNA strand breaks and their poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation using high-resolution AFM imaging. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, e60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sukhanova, M.V.; Hamon, L.; Kutuzov, M.M.; Joshi, V.; Abrakhi, S.; Dobra, I.; Curmi, P.A.; Pastre, D.; Lavrik, O.I. A Single-Molecule Atomic Force Microscopy Study of PARP1 and PARP2 Recognition of Base Excision Repair DNA Intermediates. J. Mol. Biol. 2019, 431, 2655–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Filenko, N.A.; Kolar, C.; West, J.T.; Smith, S.A.; Hassan, Y.I.; Borgstahl, G.E.; Zempleni, J.; Lyubchenko, Y.L. The role of histone H4 biotinylation in the structure of nucleosomes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kutuzov, M.M.; Khodyreva, S.N.; Amé, J.C.; Ilina, E.S.; Sukhanova, M.V.; Schreiber, V.; Lavrik, O.I. Interaction of PARP-2 with DNA structures mimicking DNA repair intermediates and consequences on activity of base excision repair proteins. Biochimie 2013, 95, 1208–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kutuzov, M.M.; Belousova, E.A.; Kurgina, T.A.; Ukraintsev, A.A.; Vasil’eva, I.A.; Khodyreva, S.N.; Lavrik, O.I. The contribution of PARP1, PARP2 and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation to base excision repair in the nucleosomal context. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, M.Y.; Mauro, S.; Gévry, N.; Lis, J.T.; Kraus, W.L. NAD+-dependent modulation of chromatin structure and transcription by nucleosome binding properties of PARP-1. Cell 2004, 119, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rudolph, J.; Muthurajan, U.M.; Palacio, M.; Mahadevan, J.; Roberts, G.; Erbse, A.H.; Dyer, P.N.; Luger, K. The BRCT domain of PARP1 binds intact DNA and mediates intrastrand transfer. Mol. Cell. 2021, 81, 4994–5006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Grundy, G.J.; Polo, L.M.; Zeng, Z.; Rulten, S.L.; Hoch, N.C.; Paomephan, P.; Xu, Y.; Sweet, S.M.; Thorne, A.W.; Oliver, A.W.; et al. PARP3 is a sensor of nicked nucleosomes and monoribosylates histone H2B(Glu2). Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Obaji, E.; Maksimainen, M.M.; Galera-Prat, A.; Lehtiö, L. Activation of PARP2/ARTD2 by DNA damage induces conformational changes relieving enzyme autoinhibition. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Stumme-Diers, M.P.; Banerjee, S.; Hashemi, M.; Sun, Z.; Lyubchenko, Y.L. Nanoscale dynamics of centromere nucleosomes and the critical roles of CENP-A. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Francis, N.J.; Kingston, R.E.; Woodcock, C.L. Chromatin compaction by a polycomb group protein complex. Science 2004, 306, 1574–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bell, N.A.W.; Haynes, P.J.; Brunner, K.; de Oliveira, T.M.; Flocco, M.M.; Hoogenboom, B.W.; Molloy, J.E. Single-molecule measurements reveal that PARP1 condenses DNA by loop stabilization. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabf3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Amé, J.C.; Kalisch, T.; Dantzer, F.; Schreiber, V. Purification of recombinant poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 780, 135–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Peterson, C.L.; Hansen, J.C. Chicken erythrocyte histone octamer preparation. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2008, 2008, prot5112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shlyakhtenko, L.S.; Gall, A.A.; Lyubchenko, Y.L. Mica functionalization for imaging of DNA and protein-DNA complexes with atomic force microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 931, 295–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Green, M.R.; Sambrook, J. Isolation of DNA Fragments from Polyacrylamide Gels by the Crush and Soak Method. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2019, 2019, prot100479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kutuzov, M.M.; Kurgina, T.A.; Belousova, E.A.; Khodyreva, S.N.; Lavrik, O.I. Optimization of nucleosome assembling from histones and model DNAs and estimation of the reconstitution efficiency. Biopolym. Cells 2019, 35, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Stormberg, T.; Stumme-Diers, M.; Lyubchenko, Y.L. Sequence-dependent nucleosome nanoscale structure characterized by atomic force microscopy. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 10916–10923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Representative AFM scans of an NCP. Cores of the NCP are indicated by white arrows. PARP1, PARP2, and PARP3 molecules are pointed out by blue, green, and red arrows, respectively. (A) A PARP located close to the NCP core. (B) A PARP located on the linker DNA region.
Figure 1. Representative AFM scans of an NCP. Cores of the NCP are indicated by white arrows. PARP1, PARP2, and PARP3 molecules are pointed out by blue, green, and red arrows, respectively. (A) A PARP located close to the NCP core. (B) A PARP located on the linker DNA region.
Ijms 24 09042 g001
Figure 2. The compaction of NCPs depending on the presence of a PARP protein. (a) Schematic representation of determined parameters of an NCP. In the image, “l1” and “l2” are DNA arm lengths, “α” is the angle between DNA arms, and “D” is the diameter of the NCP core. (b) The Gauss interpolation of the distribution of “α” angle values. The black curve: NCP samples, the blue curve: samples of NCPs supplemented with PARP1, the green curve: samples of NCPs supplemented with PARP2, and the red curve: samples of NCPs supplemented with PARP3. (c) Representation of the distribution of “α” angle values. Black bars: NCP, blue bars: NCP supplemented with PARP1, green bars: NCP supplemented with PARP2, and red bars: NCP supplemented with PARP3.
Figure 2. The compaction of NCPs depending on the presence of a PARP protein. (a) Schematic representation of determined parameters of an NCP. In the image, “l1” and “l2” are DNA arm lengths, “α” is the angle between DNA arms, and “D” is the diameter of the NCP core. (b) The Gauss interpolation of the distribution of “α” angle values. The black curve: NCP samples, the blue curve: samples of NCPs supplemented with PARP1, the green curve: samples of NCPs supplemented with PARP2, and the red curve: samples of NCPs supplemented with PARP3. (c) Representation of the distribution of “α” angle values. Black bars: NCP, blue bars: NCP supplemented with PARP1, green bars: NCP supplemented with PARP2, and red bars: NCP supplemented with PARP3.
Ijms 24 09042 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ukraintsev, A.; Kutuzov, M.; Belousova, E.; Joyeau, M.; Golyshev, V.; Lomzov, A.; Lavrik, O. PARP3 Affects Nucleosome Compaction Regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24109042

AMA Style

Ukraintsev A, Kutuzov M, Belousova E, Joyeau M, Golyshev V, Lomzov A, Lavrik O. PARP3 Affects Nucleosome Compaction Regulation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(10):9042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24109042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ukraintsev, Alexander, Mikhail Kutuzov, Ekaterina Belousova, Marie Joyeau, Victor Golyshev, Alexander Lomzov, and Olga Lavrik. 2023. "PARP3 Affects Nucleosome Compaction Regulation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 10: 9042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24109042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop