Next Article in Journal
Simvastatin Reduces Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity: Effects beyond Its Antioxidant Activity
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Sclerostin and Monoclonal Sclerostin Antibody Romosozumab on Osteogenesis and Osteoclastogenesis Mediated by Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Copper Accumulation Efficiency in Different Recombinant Microorganism Strains Available for Bioremediation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Waters

by
Constantina Bianca Vulpe
1,
Mariana Adina Matica
1,2,
Renata Kovačević
3,
Daniela Dascalu
1,
Zoran Stevanovic
3,
Adriana Isvoran
1,
Vasile Ostafe
1 and
Gheorghița Menghiu
1,*
1
Advanced Environmental Research Laboratories, Department of Biology–Chemistry, West University of Timisoara, Oituz 4A, 300086 Timisoara, Romania
2
Institute for Advanced Environmental Research, Department of Biology–Chemistry, West University of Timisoara, Oituz 4C, 300086 Timisoara, Romania
3
Mining and Metallurgy Institute, Zeleni Bulevar 35, 19210 Bor, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 7575; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087575
Submission received: 27 March 2023 / Revised: 8 April 2023 / Accepted: 18 April 2023 / Published: 20 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)

Abstract

:
The aim of this research was to investigate the bioremediation conditions of copper in synthetic water. In the present study, copper ions accumulation efficiency was determined using various genetically modified strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (EBY100, INVSc1, BJ5465, and GRF18), Pichia pastoris (X-33, KM71H), Escherichia coli (XL10 Gold, DH5α, and six types of BL21 (DE3)), and Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) OverExpress expressing two different peroxidases. Viability tests of yeast and bacterial strains showed that bacteria are viable at copper concentrations up to 2.5 mM and yeasts up to 10 mM. Optical emission spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma analysis showed that the tolerance of bacterial strains on media containing 1 mM copper was lower than the tolerance of yeast strains at the same copper concentration. The E. coli BL21 RIL strain had the best copper accumulation efficiency (4.79 mg/L of culture normalized at an optical density of 1.00), which was 1250 times more efficient than the control strain. The yeast strain S. cerevisiae BJ5465 was the most efficient in copper accumulation out of a total of six yeast strains used, accumulating over 400 times more than the negative control strain. In addition, E. coli cells that internally expressed recombinant peroxidase from Thermobifida fusca were able to accumulate 400-fold more copper than cells that produced periplasmic recombinant peroxidases.

1. Introduction

The availability of drinkable water is an essential feature for the prevention of diseases and the improvement of the quality of human and animal life. The metabolism of the body and enzymatic regulation in the cells depend on water. Natural waters contain various types of impurities and pollutants (dyes, metals, pharmaceuticals, fluoride, pesticides, and pathogens) derived from agricultural activities, mining activities, soil leaching, rock degradation, rainwater, dissolved aerosol particles from the air, and other human activities, including the processing and use of metal-based materials [1]. The mining industry is one of the main processes leading to the economic development of a country. However, mining generates water and soil pollution in the areas around the mines. Monitoring water and soil and providing remediation methods followed by metal recovery, without disturbing mining activities, are some of the ideal solutions to support a balance between economic, environmental, and human health requirements. Copper is a common element present in natural waters, resulting from mining activities as well as from corrosion of copper pipes or fittings [2]. In copper-rich waters, there is often a high concentration of iron and other metals. For instance, Romania and Serbia are countries with a copper mining industry, where mining areas and waters are under the control of researchers. Copper levels in river waters in mining areas range from 0.0136–0.1158 mg/L in Moldova Noua, Romania, to <0.005–318.7 mg/L in Bor, Serbia [3,4].
Copper is an important and essential mineral for human health as well as for animal and plant growth. It is necessary for normal metabolic processes and when bound to certain enzymes, such as ceruloplasmin, superoxide dismutase, cytochrome c-oxidase, lysyl oxidase, and monoamine oxidase, to act as a catalyst to support many body functions [4,5]. Although it is an essential micronutrient and is needed in the body in very small amounts, excess copper in the body can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach cramps, cirrhosis of the liver with periods of hemolysis, and damage to the renal tubules, brain, and other organs. Chronic copper intoxication leading to liver failure has been reported at 30–60 mg/day for three years, with the lethal dose of copper being about 10–20 g. Persons with Wilson’s disease, a rare genetic condition, are more sensitive to the effects of copper [6].
Remediation of heavy metals in water using various adsorbents is one of the main methods investigated in research laboratories. The most explored adsorbent materials are vegetable wastes (wood, wheat bran, wheat straw, seed husks, fruit and vegetable peels, sugar beet pectin gels, and carrot residues) [7,8,9], animal wastes (fish bones, crab shells, cow, donkey, chicken, horse skeletons, and human hair) [10,11], activated carbon (lignite, coal, biochar, peat, and activated carbon residue from biomass gasification) [11,12], nanomaterials (carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide, nanometer-sized TiO2, and nanocomposites) [13,14], natural materials (fly ash, zeolites, clay minerals, and diatomite) [15,16], biopolymers (cellulose, starch, alginate, and chitosan) [17,18], coordination compounds (halometalates and 3D metal-organic frameworks) [19,20,21], fungal and bacterial nonviable biomass [22,23]. The adsorption capacity of heavy metals depends on several factors, such as pH, adsorbent dosage, initial metal concentration, contact time, stirring speed, competing ions, and temperature [24]. Metal accumulation by microbial strains, or bioremediation, has received significant attention in recent years due to the potential use of microorganisms to clean metal-polluted water. Bioremediation is similar to the remediation of heavy metals in water using adsorbents but uses various viable organisms, such as bacteria, fungi, algae, and plants as key tools in treating heavy metals in the environment. It is a non-toxic, cost effective, low technology, and environmentally friendly technique for cleaning up areas contaminated with a wide range of pollutants. The purpose of bioremediation is to stimulate microorganisms with nutrients and other chemicals that allow them to remove pollution. Microorganisms enzymatically attack pollutants and convert them into non-toxic products. They may be autochthonous to the affected area or they may be isolated from other areas and introduced to the contaminated sites [25]. Moldova Noua mining area is under our research, where in river waters were found mainly nonspecific coliforms, diatoms, algae, and protozoa species. Bacteria, yeast, and algae can remove heavy metals from aqueous solutions in substantial quantities. To survive under metal-stressed conditions, microorganisms have evolved mechanisms for the removal of heavy metals that include the efflux of metal ions outside the cell, the accumulation, and formation of a complex with metal ions inside the cell and later reducing the toxic metal ions to a non-toxic state. The microorganisms involved in this process belong to the genera Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Streptomyces, Rhizopus, Aspergillus, and Saccharomyces. Yeast strains and genetically modified bacterial strains that are designed to produce recombinant metalloproteins are generally recognized as safe for humans (GRAS) and are, therefore, even more recommended for the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated water [26,27].
In order to develop an operational, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly technique for cleaning copper-polluted water that could be applied in polluted mining areas in Serbia and Romania (but not only), bioaccumulation experiments were carried out using different recombinant yeast strains (Saccharomyces cerevisiae EBY100, INVSc1, BJ5465, GRF18, and Pichia pastoris X-33, KM71H) and bacteria (Escherichia coli strains XL10 Gold, DH5α, and BL21 (DE3), BL21 (DE3) OverExpress, BL21 (DE3) RP, BL21 (DE3) RIL, BL21 (DE3) Star, and BL21 (DE3) Rosseta Gami, BL21 (DE3) Shuffle) on copper synthetic solutions. The copper accumulation efficiency of an Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) OverExpress expressing two different recombinant peroxidases was also determined. The novelty of this study is based on the development of an effective method of bioremediation of copper-polluted water using genetically modified strains of bacteria and yeast, tested for the first time for their bioaccumulation characteristics. Furthermore, the study showed the potential of using strains that produce two recombinant peroxidases, metal-dependent enzymes, for bioremediation.

2. Results and Discussions

2.1. Tolerance of Yeast and Bacterial Strains on Copper-Containing Media

The copper tolerance of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, two Pichia pastoris strains, and nine Escherichia coli strains was first assessed by a drop test on Yeast-Peptone-Dextrose (YPD) and Luria-Bertani (LB) solid media supplemented with increasing concentrations of CuSO4. As seen in Figure 1, P. pastoris yeast strains are viable up to a 10 mM copper concentration. However, S. cerevisiae EBY100, BJ5465, and GRF18 were viable up to 10 mM copper, while S. cerevisiae INVSc1 was viable only up to a 5 mM copper concentration. Plates containing only specific solid media without copper were used as the negative control for the viability of strains. E. coli strains are more sensitive to high concentrations of copper than yeast. All bacteria strains used are viable up to a 2.5 mM concentration of copper with higher concentrations being lethal for them (Figure 1).
Copper tolerance testing of three S. cerevisiae strains (BL7, EL1, and GL7) showed that they can tolerate YPD medium containing copper sulfate only up to a concentration of 6.2 mM [28], compared to the S. cerevisiae strains tested in this study (BJ5465, EBY100, and GRF18), which tolerate up to 10 mM copper. The growth rate of bacteria and yeasts was determined by growing strains in specific liquid media containing copper. The copper concentration chosen was 1 mM, at which concentration all strains were viable on plates. The results obtained for the growth rate of bacteria and yeasts by comparing the optical density after 48 h of incubation at 30 °C and 35 °C in copper and copper-free media are shown in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4.
The growth rate values show that the bacterial strains are around 40% inhibited on media containing 1 mM copper sulfate after 48 h of incubation at 35 °C. These results were obtained against reference cultures grown on media without copper that were considered 100%. Growth inhibition of the E. coli OverExpress strain expressing two types of recombinant peroxidase was between 40 and 60 percent.
Interestingly, there is almost no difference between the growth rates of yeast cultures grown on copper and cooper free media (Figure 4). This result indicates that the yeast strains used are more resistant to copper-containing media than the bacterial strains. In the previous experiment, it was also confirmed that yeast cells are viable up to a concentration of 10 mM copper, while bacterial cells are viable only up to a concentration of 2.5 mM. Therefore, the growth rate in liquid media containing copper is in agreement with the results obtained for the copper tolerance test. The mechanisms of copper resistance in bacteria and yeasts involve the biological activity of various copper proteins that are encoded by different genes in their genomes (cytochrome c oxidase, Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase, azurin, laccase, tyrosinase, copper-binding proteins in the inner membrane, and copper chaperones). Therefore, in order to prevent toxicity, copper ions are bound to proteins or stored for subsequent cellular metabolism [29,30]. In bacterial cells, most copper-dependent enzymes are located in the periplasmic space, in membranes, or in the outer space, compared to yeast systems, where copper-dependent enzymes are located intracellularly [30,31]. This characteristic makes the bacteria less resistant to copper-containing media than yeast. E. coli uses copper enzymes to maintain its own homeostasis in media containing copper up to 10 µM [32]. E. coli strains that tolerate concentrations higher than 10 µM are resistant strains that can be used in the bioremediation of polluted water with copper.
According to scientific literature, yeast strains possess surface adsorption and Cu2+ ion biosorption characteristics that are very important in biotechnological processes [28]. However, the bioaccumulation process depends on the yeast strains used. For instance, a high level of 0.1 mM Cu2+ inhibited S. cerevisiae X2180-1A yeast growth and activity in must [33]. Results of another study showed that S. cerevisiae strain BH8 has good tolerance and adsorption of copper ions, and reduces Cu2+ concentrations during fermentation in a simple model system mainly through surface adsorption [34].

2.2. Copper Accumulation Efficiency

Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) analysis provides more information about the ability of cells to accumulate copper in each strain, including the E. coli strains that produced peroxidase enzymes. Cells from 3 mL of cultures, harvested by centrifugation, and washed twice with distilled water were subjected to cell disaggregation in 500 µL 2% HNO3 and homogenized. A 300 µL volume of supernatant was subjected to ICP-OES analysis. Nine E. coli strains were tested for copper bioaccumulation characteristics.
E. coli RIL strain has the best copper accumulation efficiency (1250 times more efficient than the control strain), while the DHα and STAR strains are over 450 times more efficient in retaining copper ions (Figure 5). According to the scientific literature and Stratagene Company, E. coli BL21 (DE3) RIL cells contain additional copies of the argU, ileY, and leuW tRNA genes, which recognize the AGA/AGG, AUA, and CUA codons, respectively. This strain possesses protease deficiency and resistance to toxic protein production [35]. There seems to be a relationship between the characteristics of cells that can produce toxic proteins and the efficiency of copper ion accumulation.
Cultures of E. coli BL21 (DE3) OverExpress containing different recombinant plasmids carrying peroxidase genes were expressed for 7 h under isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) inducer. Plasmids containing the pelB signal sequence are designed for periplasmic expression, while vectors without this sequence are designed for the internal production of an enzyme [36]. Enzymes were periplasmic and internally expressed, and cultures were further exposed by dilution in copper-containing LB-IPTG medium for another 48 h. Only E. coli BL21 (DE3) OverExpress cells containing recombinant plasmids for internal peroxidase expression (Tfu_pET22b no pelB and Tfu_pET21d no pelB) were efficient in copper accumulation (Figure 6). These results suggest that when peroxidase is expressed internally, adaptation, and tolerance mechanisms are activated in the presence of copper and there is an efficient accumulation of the metal [37]. The bacterial strain is used for the production of toxic membrane proteins under the control of the T7 promoter and is also deficient in protease [35].
S. cerevisiae strain BJ5465 shows the highest copper accumulation efficiency, followed by S. cerevisiae strain INVSc1 (Figure 7). The S. cerevisiae yeast appears to have a higher copper accumulation capacity than P. pastoris. S. cerevisiae BJ5465 is a proteinase-deficient strain used for the production of recombinant proteins [38]. Being a common characteristic of all strains that efficiently accumulate copper, protease deficiency suggests a correlation with copper resistance.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Reagents

All reagents used, such as copper sulfate, yeast extract, tryptone, peptone, sodium chloride, glucose, agar, isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), and ampicillin, were purchased from Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany, or Merck, Darmstadt, Germany.

3.2. Recombinant Plasmids

Five recombinant plasmids containing genes for the expression of peroxidase from Thermobifida fusca, Tfu_pET22b(+) with and without pelB leader sequence, Tfu_pET21d(+), and a dye decolorizing peroxidase from Rhodococcus jostii, DypB_pET22b(+) with and without pelB leader sequence have been kindly received from Dr. Raluca Ostafe from the Purdue Institute of Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Disease, Molecular Evolution, Protein Engineering, and Production, Purdue University, USA. The blank control plasmid, pET22b(+), was purchased from GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA.

3.3. Organisms Strains

Escherichia coli strains XL10 Gold, DH5α, BL21 (DE3), BL21 (DE3) OverExpress, BL21 (DE3) RP, BL21 (DE3) RIL, BL21 (DE3) Star, BL21 (DE3) Rosseta Gami, and BL21 (DE3) Shuffle were bought from ATCC, USA. Saccharomyces cerevisiae EBY100, INVSc1, BJ5465, GRF18, and Pichia pastoris X-33, KM71H strains were purchased from Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA, or Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA.

3.4. Culture Media

Luria–Bertani (LB) medium containing 0.5% (w/v) yeast extract, 0.5% (w/v) NaCl, and 1% (w/v) tryptone at pH 7.40 was used to grow the bacterial strains. Yeast-Peptone-Dextrose (YPD) medium containing 1% (w/v) yeast extract, 2% (w/v) peptone, and 2% (v/v) glucose was used for yeast cell culture. Both media were prepared with or without 2% (w/v) agar and autoclaved at 121 °C for 30 min. Stock solutions of 2 mM copper sulfate were prepared in LB or YPD media. In addition, LB medium containing ampicillin (0.2 mg/mL) and 2 mM IPTG was prepared. The solutions were then sterilized by filtration through hydrophilic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes with 0.22 µm pores.

3.5. Copper Tolerance Assay of Yeast and Bacterial Strains

Different strains of E. coli, S. cerevisiae, and P. pastoris (see Section 3.3) were grown on LB or YPD solid media containing different concentrations of copper sulfate: 0 (negative control), 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 25.0, and 50.0 mM. Each plate was inoculated with 5 µL of each preculture. Plates were incubated for two days at 35 °C or 30 °C. Copper tolerance was given by experiments related to the viability of bacteria and yeasts on plates.

3.6. Transformation of E. coli with Recombinant Peroxidase Plasmids

Recombinant plasmids containing peroxidase genes were transformed into the E. coli BL21 (DE3) OverExpress strain according to the protocol described by Miller et al. [39].

3.7. Growth Conditions of Microorganisms

Two simultaneous experiments were conducted on the growth rate of microorganisms. First, E. coli, S. cerevisiae, and P. pastoris strains were cultured in liquid media. The growth of microorganisms was started at an optical density of 600 nm (OD 600 nm) of around 0.1, then the cultures were incubated for 24 h at 35 °C or 30 °C. Second, 200 µL of five recombinant E. coli strains precultures containing plasmids with peroxidase genes (see Section 3.2) were first inoculated in 10 mL LB containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin and then incubated for 2 h at 35 °C at 300 rpm. In the exponential phase (OD 600 nm around 1.0), the expression of recombinant peroxidases was induced by adding to the cultures IPTG 1 mM. These were further incubated at 35 °C, 300 rpm for 7 h.
To each 3 mL from each culture, 3 mL of specific medium, LB, YPD, and LB-ampicillin-IPTG containing 2 mM copper sulfate were added. All cultures were incubated for 48 h, 300 rpm, 35 °C (bacteria), and 30 °C (yeast). The OD 600 was measured after 48 h of incubation, as well. The series of cultures that have not contained copper were used as negative control samples.

3.8. Cell Sample Preparation

After 48 h of growth, 3 mL of each culture was centrifuged for 2 min at 11,000× g. The collected cells were resuspended twice in 1.5 mL of distilled water and centrifuged under the same conditions. After removal of the supernatant, cells were resuspended in 500 µL of 2% HNO3 solution and left at room temperature for 72 h. The cell debris was additionally subjected to homogenization for 30 s at 20,000 rpm using a Miccra D-1 homogenizer from Germany. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 11,000× g. The supernatant from each cell sample was subjected to analysis by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES).

3.9. ICP-OES Analysis

A volume of 300 µL of each cell sample was analyzed using an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES), model Spectro Arcos, Germany. The plasma was stabilized and optically profiled according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (ISO 11885:2007—Water Quality). The accumulated copper in the cells was determined at a wavelength of 324.754 nm. Operating conditions were as follows: forward power of 1450 W, coolant flow of 13.0 L/min, nebulization flow of 0.75 L/min, an auxiliary flow of 1.0 L/min, and a sample aspiration rate of 2 mL/min. All chemicals used were of high purity. Certified reference materials (VHG Labs, QWPTM-15) were used for quality control of chemical analyses.

4. Conclusions

The growth of the bacterial strains used in these experiments was inhibited upon exposure to 1 mM copper, while yeast cultures were unaffected at this concentration. These results were consistent with the YPD and LB solid medium rapid assays in terms of copper tolerance. ICP-OES analysis showed that the E. coli RIL strain had the best copper accumulation efficiency (1250 times more efficient than the control strain), while the DHα and STAR strains were about 450 times more efficient. E. coli BL21 (DE3) OverExpress cells that internally expressed peroxidase had the best copper accumulation efficiency. The S. cerevisiae BJ5465 yeast strain is the most efficient in copper accumulation of the six yeast strains used, accumulating over 400 times more copper than the negative control strain. Common genetic characteristics of the strains that showed efficiency in copper accumulation involve protease deficiency and resistance to toxic protein production, which is a possible key to successful heavy metal accumulation. Through acidic exposure and homogenization, all components of the cells were disintegrated. As a result, the method presented in this study effectively demonstrates both the efficiency of copper ion accumulation and the capacity of the strains’ cell walls to bind copper. The bioengineered yeasts and bacteria, as well as various strains expressing metal-dependent enzymes used for the first time, are successful candidates for copper accumulation to remove above-limit copper concentrations from water. A promising objective for the management of heavy metal-contaminated water remediation is developing genetically engineered strains that not only accumulate metals but also express proteins capable of binding multiple metal ions.

Author Contributions

G.M. and V.O. conceived, lead the study, analyzed data, and revised the manuscript, C.B.V., G.M. and M.A.M. performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript, R.K. performed ICP-OES analysis, V.O., D.D., A.I. and Z.S. have analyzed data, supervised, and performed critically revising of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Project RoRS 337- ROmania Serbia NETwork for assessing and disseminating the impact of copper mining activities on water quality in the cross-border area (RoS-NET2), implemented under the Interreg-IPA Cross-border Cooperation Romania-Serbia Programme that is financed by the European Union under the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II) and co-financed by the partner states in the program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Raluca Ostafe from the Purdue Institute of Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Disease, Molecular Evolution, Protein Engineering, and Production, Purdue University, USA, for providing recombinant peroxidase plasmids.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Sharma, S.; Bhattacharya, A. Drinking water contamination and treatment techniques. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 1043–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Butt, T.R.; Sternberg, E.J.; Gorman, J.A.; Clark, P.; Hamer, D.; Rosenberg, M.; Crooke, S.T. Copper metallothionein of yeast, structure of the gene, and regulation of expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1984, 81, 3332–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stevanović, Z.; Kovačević, R.; Marković, R.; Gardić, V.; Vulpe, B.C.; Boros, B.; Menghiu, G. State of the surface waters in cross border region of Eastern Serbia and Caras Severin county—Moldova Noua in Romania. Studia UBB Chem. 2021, 66, 309–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Isvoran, A.; Roman, D.L.; Dascalu, D.; Vlad-Oros, B.; Ciorsac, A.; Pitulice, L.; Jonovic, R.; Stevanovic, Z.; Ostafe, V. Human health effects of heavy metal pollution in the cross-border area of Romania and Serbia: A review. Ecol. Chem. Eng. S 2021, 28, 365–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Finney, J.; Moon, H.J.; Ronnebaum, T.; Lantz, M.; Mure, M. Human copper-dependent amine oxidases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2014, 546, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Uauy, R.; Maass, A.; Araya, M. Estimating risk from copper excess in human populations. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 867S–871S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nasernejad, B.; Zadeh, T.E.; Pour, B.B.; Bygi, M.E.; Zamani, A. Camparison for biosorption modeling of heavy metals (Cr (III), Cu (II), Zn (II)) adsorption from wastewater by carrot residues. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 1319–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Argun, M.E.; Dursun, S.; Ozdemir, C.; Karatas, M. Heavy metal adsorption by modified oak sawdust: Thermodynamics and kinetics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 141, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dang, V.B.H.; Doan, H.D.; Dang-Vu, T.; Lohi, A. Equilibrium and kinetics of biosorption of cadmium(II) and copper(II) ions by wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Carolin, C.F.; Kumar, P.S.; Saravanan, A.; Joshiba, G.J.; Naushad, M. Efficient techniques for the removal of toxic heavy metals from aquatic environment: A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 2782–2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Al-Saydeh, S.A.; El-Naas, M.H.; Zaidi, S.J. Copper removal from industrial wastewater: A comprehensive review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2017, 56, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Runtti, H.; Tuomikoski, S.; Kangas, T.; Lassi, U.; Kuokkanen, T.; Rämö, J. Chemically activated carbon residue from biomass gasification as a sorbent for iron(II), copper(II) and nickel(II) ions. J. Water Process Eng. 2014, 4, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Younas, F.; Mustafa, A.; Farooqi, Z.U.R.; Wang, X.; Younas, S.; Mohy-Ud-Din, W.; Ashir Hameed, M.; Mohsin Abrar, M.; Maitlo, A.A.; Noreen, S. Current and emerging adsorbent technologies for wastewater treatment: Trends, limitations, and environmental implications. Water 2021, 13, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liang, P.; Qin, Y.; Hu, B.; Peng, T.; Jiang, Z. Nanometer-size titanium dioxide microcolumn on-line preconcentration of trace metals and their determination by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry in water. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 440, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khraisheh, M.A.M.; Al-degs, Y.S.; McMinn, W.A.M. Remediation of wastewater containing heavy metals using raw and modified diatomite. Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 99, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Motsi, T.; Rowson, N.A.; Simmons, M.J.H. Adsorption of heavy metals from acid mine drainage by natural zeolite. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2009, 92, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schmuhl, R.; Krieg, H.M.; Keizer, K. Adsorption of Cu (II) and Cr (VI) ions by chitosan: Kinetics and equilibrium studies. Water Sa 2001, 27, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Crini, G. Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2005, 30, 38–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Usoltsev, A.N.; Korobeynikov, N.A.; Novikov, A.S.; Plyusnin, P.E.; Kolesov, B.A.; Fedin, V.P.; Sokolov, M.N.; Adonin, S.A. One-dimensional diiodine–iodobismuthate(III) hybrids Cat3{[Bi2I9](I2)3}: Syntheses, stability, and optical properties. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 17320–17325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Paul, A.; Martins, L.M.D.R.S.; Karmakar, A.; Kuznetsov, M.L.; Novikov, A.S.; Guedes da Silva, M.F.C.; Pombeiro, A.J.L. Environmentally benign benzyl alcohol oxidation and C-C coupling catalysed by amide functionalized 3D Co(II) and Zn(II) metal organic frameworks. J. Catal. 2020, 385, 324–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Adonin, S.A.; Gorokh, I.D.; Novikov, A.S.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Korolkov, I.V.; Sokolov, M.N.; Fedin, V.P. Bromobismuthates: Cation-induced structural diversity and Hirshfeld surface analysis of cation–anion contacts. Polyhedron 2018, 139, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brady, D.; Stoll, A.; Duncan, J.R. Biosorption of heavy metal cations by non-viable yeast biomass. Environ. Technol. 1994, 15, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hawari, A.H.; Mulligan, C.N. Biosorption of lead(II), cadmium(II), copper(II) and nickel(II) by anaerobic granular biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 692–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bilal, M.; Ihsanullah, I.; Younas, M.; Ul Hassan Shah, M. Recent advances in applications of low-cost adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals from water: A critical review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 278, 119510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vidali, M. Bioremediation. An overview. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73, 1163–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sewalt, V.; Shanahan, D.; Gregg, L.; La Marta, J.; Carrillo, R. The Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) process for industrial microbial enzymes. Ind. Biotechnol. 2016, 12, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bourdichon, F.; Casaregola, S.; Farrokh, C.; Frisvad, J.C.; Gerds, M.L.; Hammes, W.P.; Harnett, J.; Huys, G.; Laulund, S.; Ouwehand, A.; et al. Food fermentations: Microorganisms with technological beneficial use. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 154, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Adamo, G.M.; Brocca, S.; Passolunghi, S.; Salvato, B.; Lotti, M. Laboratory evolution of copper tolerant yeast strains. Microb. Cell. Fact. 2012, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Freitas, J.; Wintz, H.; Hyoun Kim, J.; Poynton, H.; Fox, T.; Vulpe, C. Yeast, a model organism for iron and copper metabolism studies. Biometals 2003, 16, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Andrei, A.; Öztürk, Y.; Khalfaoui-Hassani, B.; Rauch, J.; Marckmann, D.; Trasnea, P.I.; Daldal, F. Cu homeostasis in bacteria: The ins and outs. Membranes 2020, 10, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, C.; Li, Y.; Ding, C. The role of copper homeostasis at the host-pathogen axis: From bacteria to fungi. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Laskin, A.I.; Gadd, G.M.; Sariaslani, S. Advances in Applied Microbiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ohsumi, Y.; Kitamoto, K.; Anraku, Y. Changes induced in the permeability barrier of the yeast plasma membrane by cupric ion. J. Bacteriol. 1988, 170, 2676–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, X.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, L.L.; Jia, B.; Zhao, F.; Huang, W.D.; Zhan, J.C. Copper tolerance and biosorption of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during alcoholic fermentation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0128611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rosano, G.L.; Morales, E.S.; Ceccarelli, E.A. New tools for recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli: A 5-year update. Protein Sci. 2019, 28, 1412–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, W.; Lu, J.; Zhang, S.; Liu, L.; Pang, X.; Lv, J. Development an effective system to expression recombinant protein in E. coli via comparison and optimization of signal peptides: Expression of Pseudomonas fluorescens BJ-10 thermostable lipase as case study. Microb. Cell. Fact. 2018, 17, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cavalcanti Luna, M.A.; Vieira, E.R.; Okada, K.; Campos-Takaki, G.M.; Nascimento, A.E. Copper-induced adaptation, oxidative stress and its tolerance in Aspergillus niger UCP1261. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 18, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lin, H.; Choi, J.H.; Hasek, J.; DeLillo, N.; Lou, W.; Vancura, A. Phospholipase C is involved in kinetochore function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Miller, H.; Witherow, D.S.; Carson, S. Molecular Biology Techniques: A Classroom Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; p. 232. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Viability testing of various strains of bacteria and yeast on media with different concentrations of copper sulfate (0 mM—negative control, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 25.0, and 50.0 mM).
Figure 1. Viability testing of various strains of bacteria and yeast on media with different concentrations of copper sulfate (0 mM—negative control, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 25.0, and 50.0 mM).
Ijms 24 07575 g001
Figure 2. Growth rate (%) for different Escherichia coli strains, after 48 h of incubation, at 35 °C, in Luria–Bertani medium without and with copper 1 mM.
Figure 2. Growth rate (%) for different Escherichia coli strains, after 48 h of incubation, at 35 °C, in Luria–Bertani medium without and with copper 1 mM.
Ijms 24 07575 g002
Figure 3. Growth rate (%) for Escherichia coli OverExpress containing different recombinant plasmids, after 48 h of expression in Luria-Bertani-isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside-ampicillin medium without and with copper (1 mM).
Figure 3. Growth rate (%) for Escherichia coli OverExpress containing different recombinant plasmids, after 48 h of expression in Luria-Bertani-isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside-ampicillin medium without and with copper (1 mM).
Ijms 24 07575 g003
Figure 4. Growth rate (%) for different yeast strains, after 48 h of incubation, at 30 °C, in Yeast-Peptone-Dextrose medium without or with copper (1 mM).
Figure 4. Growth rate (%) for different yeast strains, after 48 h of incubation, at 30 °C, in Yeast-Peptone-Dextrose medium without or with copper (1 mM).
Ijms 24 07575 g004
Figure 5. Copper accumulation efficiency (x) in different strains of Escherichia coli after 48 h growth in copper, containing Luria–Bertani medium at 35 °C. Control strains were grown on copper-free medium.
Figure 5. Copper accumulation efficiency (x) in different strains of Escherichia coli after 48 h growth in copper, containing Luria–Bertani medium at 35 °C. Control strains were grown on copper-free medium.
Ijms 24 07575 g005
Figure 6. Copper accumulation efficiency (x) in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) OverExpress containing different recombinant plasmids expressing peroxidase after 48 h of expression in copper-containing Luria-Bertani-isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside -ampicillin medium at 35 °C. Control strains were grown in copper-free medium.
Figure 6. Copper accumulation efficiency (x) in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) OverExpress containing different recombinant plasmids expressing peroxidase after 48 h of expression in copper-containing Luria-Bertani-isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside -ampicillin medium at 35 °C. Control strains were grown in copper-free medium.
Ijms 24 07575 g006
Figure 7. Copper accumulation efficiency (x) of different yeast strains after 48 h of incubation at 30 °C, in copper-containing Yeast-Peptone-Dextrose medium. Control strains were grown in a copper-free medium.
Figure 7. Copper accumulation efficiency (x) of different yeast strains after 48 h of incubation at 30 °C, in copper-containing Yeast-Peptone-Dextrose medium. Control strains were grown in a copper-free medium.
Ijms 24 07575 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vulpe, C.B.; Matica, M.A.; Kovačević, R.; Dascalu, D.; Stevanovic, Z.; Isvoran, A.; Ostafe, V.; Menghiu, G. Copper Accumulation Efficiency in Different Recombinant Microorganism Strains Available for Bioremediation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Waters. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087575

AMA Style

Vulpe CB, Matica MA, Kovačević R, Dascalu D, Stevanovic Z, Isvoran A, Ostafe V, Menghiu G. Copper Accumulation Efficiency in Different Recombinant Microorganism Strains Available for Bioremediation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Waters. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(8):7575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087575

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vulpe, Constantina Bianca, Mariana Adina Matica, Renata Kovačević, Daniela Dascalu, Zoran Stevanovic, Adriana Isvoran, Vasile Ostafe, and Gheorghița Menghiu. 2023. "Copper Accumulation Efficiency in Different Recombinant Microorganism Strains Available for Bioremediation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Waters" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 8: 7575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087575

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop