Next Article in Journal
Insights into the Metabolic Response of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum CCFM1287 upon Patulin Exposure
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study of the Solid-Liquid Interfacial Adsorption of Proteins in Their Native and Amyloid Forms
Previous Article in Journal
Homozygous CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Generated a Novel Functionally Active Exon 1 Skipping XPA Variant in Melanoma Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mixture Effects of Tryptophan Intestinal Microbial Metabolites on Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 19
10.3390/ijms231911648
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of Biological Activities and ADMET-Related Properties of Salicylanilide-Based Peptidomimetics

by
Dominika Pindjakova
1,
Eliska Pilarova
2,
Karel Pauk
2,
Hana Michnova
3,
Jan Hosek
4,
Pratibha Magar
2,
Alois Cizek
3,
Ales Imramovsky
2,* and
Josef Jampilek
1,5
1
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Ilkovicova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia
2
Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentska 95, 530 09 Pardubice, Czech Republic
3
Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Palackeho tr. 1946/1, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic
4
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 296/70, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic
5
Department of Chemical Biology, Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Slechtitelu 27, 783 71 Olomouc, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11648; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911648
Submission received: 13 September 2022 / Revised: 22 September 2022 / Accepted: 28 September 2022 / Published: 1 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemistry towards Biology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of eleven benzylated intermediates and eleven target compounds derived from salicylanilide were tested against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 as reference strains and against three clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and three isolates of vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis. In addition, the compounds were evaluated against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra and M. smegmatis ATCC 700084. The in vitro cytotoxicity of the compounds was assessed using the human monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1. The lipophilicity of the prepared compounds was experimentally determined and correlated with biological activity. The benzylated intermediates were found to be completely biologically inactive. Of the final eleven compounds, according to the number of amide groups in the molecule, eight are diamides, and three are triamides that were inactive. 5-Chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[(2S)- 4-(methylsulfanyl)-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}butan-2-yl]benzamide (3e) and 5-chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[(2S)-(4-methyl-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino)pentan-2-yl)benzamide (3f) showed the broadest spectrum of activity against all tested species/isolates comparable to the used standards (ampicillin and isoniazid). Six diamides showed high antistaphylococcal activity with MICs ranging from 0.070 to 8.95 μM. Three diamides showed anti-enterococcal activity with MICs ranging from 4.66 to 35.8 μM, and the activities of 3f and 3e against M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis were MICs of 18.7 and 35.8 μM, respectively. All the active compounds were microbicidal. It was observed that the connecting linker between the chlorsalicylic and 4-CF3-anilide cores must be substituted with a bulky and/or lipophilic chain such as isopropyl, isobutyl, or thiabutyl chain. Anticancer activity on THP-1 cells IC50 ranged from 1.4 to >10 µM and increased with increasing lipophilicity.

1. Introduction

Natural molecules are an inexhaustible source of inspiration for designing new bioactive entities [1,2]. Salicylic acid is one of the molecules that has made its mark among medicines [3,4]. The most famous is its acetylated derivative, Aspirin®, used as a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic drug that helps prevent heart attacks, ischemic strokes, and blood clots [5]. It has made it onto the World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines [6]. In addition to inhibiting cyclooxygenases, acetylsalicylic acid uncouples oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria [7,8]; inhibits the transport of protons through membranes; induces the formation of NO radicals, which has a positive effect on the stimulation of immunity [9,10]; modulates signaling via NF-κB [11,12]; activates AMP-activated protein kinase [13,14]; and acetylates cellular proteins and thus regulates their functions at the post-translational level [15,16]. The functional modification of the carboxylic acid to a carboxamide or the incorporation of a phenolic group into the carbamate resulted in a great extension of the bioeffects [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The CONH and/or OCONH moieties are peptide-bond-simulating groups and can interact with many biological targets, bringing these small molecules to the attention of medicinal chemists [27,28,29].
Thus, salicylanilides/salicylcarbamates represent a group of agents that have a wide range of activities [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] due to their ability to influence a wide range of targets (multitargeting [30,31]) in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Derivatives in which we have specialized for a long time mainly show good antimicrobial properties [22,23,32,33,34], but they can also be used in the treatment of cancer [35,36,37,38]. This dual (anticancer and at the same time antibacterial) effect [39,40,41,42,43] is especially advantageous in the treatment of oncology patients when treatment results in overall immunosuppression, when, in addition to nosocomial pathogens, banal infections and opportunistic pathogens also become a threat to these patients. The effects of various derivatives, especially against Gram-positive bacteria and mycobacteria, have been described earlier [22,23,32,33,34]. On the other hand, for example, the effects on the parasites Onchocerca or Toxoplasma have been described recently [44,45]. Important derivatives include, for example, niclosamide, which, in addition to its anthelmintic activity, has proven to be an important aid in the fight against cancer growth [46] as well as an antimicrobial agent [47]. The activity of all these compounds is closely related to the presence of halogen in the molecule. According to the literature, derivatives containing fluorine showed the highest biological activities, and it is likely that electronegativity is directly related to antibacterial activity (F > Cl > Br > I). In most cases, these agents are more effective against Gram-positive bacteria than against Gram-negative bacteria [32,33,48,49,50].
In one of our previous works, compounds of the “diamide” type, not only simple salicylanilides, were prepared and tested against a battery of Gram-positive bacteria and mycobacteria [33,34]. One of these agents, containing 4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline and an isopropyl chain as substituents, showed the highest activity against Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MICs ranged 4.82–9.64 µM), Bacillus cereus (MIC 2.41 µM), Clostridium perfringens (MIC 4.82 µM), Mycobacterium kansasii (MIC 38.6 µM), and M. smegmatis (MIC 77.1 µM) [33]; therefore, we decided to prepare a series of derivatives from this lead compound (compound 3c here) and subject them to deeper investigation. The investigated agents were substituted on the C(5) salicyl part of the molecule with chlorine and on the anilide C(4)’ part with a CF3 moiety. The middle part was modified by various inserted amino acids, i.e., by aliphatic and aromatic substitution, and a series of new derivatives were prepared and tested for their antibacterial properties. Moreover, other extended derivatives, in which the middle fragment between the salicylic and anilide parts was prolonged by two amino acid fragments (“diamides” were changed/prolonged to “triamides”)—see Figure 1—were also tested for anti-infective activity. Thus, this contribution captures new knowledge about the anti-invasive activity of diamides and selected triamides.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Physicochemical Properties

The procedure for the preparation of acid 1 was described in a previous paper [36]. This monopeptide acid 1 was used as a starting material, which was coupled with 4-trifluoromethyl aniline to yield benzylated intermediates 2a–h, whose debenzylation by hydrogen gave targeted diamides 3a–h (see Scheme 1). The preparation of triamides was described by Jorda et al. [38] and is briefly shown in Scheme 2. The synthesis again starts from monopeptide acids 1f, 1h, which reacted with the ester of the second amino acid to give dipeptide acids 4a–c, which coupled with 4-trifluoromethyl aniline gave benzylated triamides 5a–c, which after hydrogenation debenzylation afforded the target triamides 6a–c. Detailed syntheses of diamides 3f, 3h and triamides 7a–c was published by Jorda et al. [38].
Target compounds 3a–h and 6a–c, including their benzyl-protected precursors 2a–h and 5a–c, were studied for their lipophilicity; one of the most important physicochemical parameters had a fundamental influence on the effect of bioactive molecules [51,52,53]. Experimental lipophilicity values of benzylated precursors 2 and 5 are shown in Table S1 in Supplementary Materials, and values of final compounds 3 and 6 are shown in Table 1. In addition to the standard logarithm of the capacity factor (log k), lipophilicity was also expressed as the logarithm of the distribution coefficient (log D) at physiological pH of 6.5 and 7.4. Logically benzylated derivatives are more lipophilic than debenzylated ones (see Table S1 and Table 1); the range of averaged values of all three experimentally determined lipophilicity descriptors (log k/log D6.5/log D7.4) of benzylated diamides 2a–h and 5a–c is from 1.47 ± 0.02 (2a) to 2.12 ± 0.03 (5c). Based on the deviations, the values of log k, log D6.5, and log D7.4 are very close to each other, similarly to final compounds 3a–h and 6a–c, where the range of averaged lipophilicity values of log k/log D6.5/log D7.4 parameters is from 0.81 ± 0.05 (3a) to 1.62 ± 0.05 (3g). Thus, the least lipophilic compound within the discussed series is the methyl (3a) derivative, while cyclohexylmethyl-substituted compound 3g is the most lipophilic derivative within a series of the final compounds, in contrast to the benzylated series, where “tribenzylated” triamide 5c was the most lipophilic. Triamides 6a–c have lipophilicity values ranging from 1.51 ± 0.05 to 1.54 ± 0.05; insignificantly increasing in the order of 6b (R1 = Bn, R2 = iBu) < 6a (R1 = iBu, R2 = Bn) < 6c (R1 = Bn, R2 = Bn). It is evident from the results (Table 1) that the lipophilicity values of derivatives 3d (R1 = butyl) and 3b (R1 = propyl) are higher than their branched isomers 3f (R1 = isobutyl) and 3c (R1 = isopropyl). The lipophilicity of thiabutyl-substituted compound 3e is approx. the same as that of the isopropyl (3c) derivative. The lipophilicity of the benzyl-substituted compound (3h) is between thiabutyl 3e and isobutyl 3f derivatives.
In addition to experimental values, lipophilicity values predicted by commercially available programs, such as ACD/Percepta ver. 12 (log P) and ChemBioDraw Ultra 13.0 (log P, Clog P), are listed in Table 1. While the mutual agreement of the experimental data has an average correlation coefficient of r = 0.996 ± 0.001 (n = 3 × 11), see Figure S1, the mutual correlations of the experimental and predicted values are lower (see Figures S2–S4), indicating intermolecular and intramolecular interactions that are not captured by computational programs.
Table 1 also shows the predicted (ACD/Percepta) parameters of Lipinski’s Rule of Five (Ro5) [54], which is one of the generally accepted recommendations regarding the physicochemical parameters of biologically active agents. Ro5 contains specific molecular descriptor limits (Table 1) determined based on experimentally and statistically obtained results such that a compound meeting this recommendation is drug-like. However, it must be noted that a good drug-like score does not make a molecule a drug and vice versa [55]. Based on the data from Table 1, it can be stated that triamides significantly exceed the recommended molecular weight and lipophilicity (log P) values, while only some diamides do not meet the recommended log P values (depending on the type of software/algorithm with which log P is calculated). In addition, Table 1 also shows the calculated (ACD/Percepta) steric parameters (bulkiness of R1 and R2 substituents expressed as molar volumes (MV [cm3])) describing the length/branching of the substituents.

2.2. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity

All the investigated compounds were tested for in vitro antibacterial activity against the susceptible reference strains Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 and representatives of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), SA 3202, SA 630, and 63718 carriers of the mecA gene [22,34], and three isolates of vanA gene-carrying vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis (VRE), 342B, 368, and 725B [56]. In addition, all the compounds were evaluated in vitro against slow-growing Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra/ATCC 25177 and fast-growing M. smegmatis ATCC 700084. Activities are expressed as the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and the minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs); see Table 2. To establish that a compound demonstrates a bactericidal effect against a particular tested strain, it must meet the condition MIC/MBC ≤ 4 [22,34,57]. MBC values that meet this requirement, i.e., the compound is bactericidal, are indicated in bold in Table 2.
As mentioned previously, lead compound 3c was previously evaluated for its antistaphylococcal activity [33,34], other antibacterial effects listed in Table 2 are still unpublished, and it was the inspiration for the whole series of compounds investigated here. Both benzylated precursors 2a–h, 5a–c and final diamides 3a–h and triamides 6a–c were tested in vitro for their biological activities. The blockade (benzylation) of the phenolic moiety was found to completely eliminate any effects; MICs of all the benzylated precursors were >256 µg/mL; therefore, derivatives 2 and 5 are listed in Table S2.
Table 2 shows the antimicrobial activities of derivatives 3 and 6. Compounds 3a, 3b, and 6a–c were inactive compared to 3c–3h. Derivatives 3e (R1 = 3-thiabutyl) and 3f (R1 = isobutyl) demonstrated complex antibacterial activity not only against S. aureus/MRSA but also against E. faecalis/VRE and both mycobacteria much more pronounced than the used standards. Compounds 3g (R1 = cyclohexylmethyl) and 3h (R1 = benzyl) showed high selective antistaphylococcal activity. It should be noted that compounds 3c–3h showed comparable antistaphylococcal activities both against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and MRSA isolates; therefore, it can be assumed that the presence of the mecA gene (which encodes an alternative transpeptidase and causes methicillin resistance [56,58]) [22,34] in MRSA does not affect the activity of these compounds. It is important to mention that all effective compounds demonstrated bactericidal activity as described for lead structure 3c by Zadrazilova [34]. Thus, it can be speculated concerning the specific activity against Staphylococcus sp. Similarly, the close activity of the compounds against both E. faecalis and VRE indicates a mechanism of action unrelated to vancomycin resistance [56].
In an effort to clarify the mechanism of antibacterial activity, an MTT test of the most active diamides was performed. The MTT assay can be used to assess cell growth by measuring respiration. The MTT measured the viability of bacterial cells less than 70% after exposure to the MIC values for each tested compound considered a positive result of this assay. This low level of cell viability indicates the inhibition of cell growth by the inhibition of respiration [59,60]. It can be noted that compounds 3g and 3f showed a decrease in viability of <70% at their MIC value or below, suggesting that these agents may act through the inhibition of the respiratory chain. Compounds 3e and 3h inhibited the respiratory chain by 94% at a value of 2× MIC, so they are able to significantly affect it, compared to, e.g., ciprofloxacin or ampicillin. The lowest multiples of MIC values that achieved more than 70% inhibition of S. aureus viability (%) are shown in Table 3.
It was hypothesized that these diamides (and triamides) could behave as unnatural peptidomimetics mimicking the overall amphipathic structures and hence could have a mechanism of action similar to antimicrobial peptides [61,62]. Therefore, triamides based on the structure of active diamides were tested for their antimicrobial activity, and their zero antibacterial effect was a complete disappointment. At least the bactericidal effect of diamides was tested as their ability to disrupt bacterial membranes. Thus, an alteration in the membrane permeability of S. aureus ATCC 29123 was detected by a hydrophobic crystal violet dye assay [63,64]. The bacterial suspensions were treated with compounds 3e, 3f, 3g, and 3h (4× MIC) for 1 h. The uptake of crystal violet was expressed as a percentage compared to the original crystal violet solution. The results are shown in Figure 2. The test compounds did not affect plasma membrane permeability of S. aureus because the percentage absorption of crystal violet was comparable to the growth control and disproportionately lower than the 1% Tween 20 solution used as the positive control. Based on these results, it can be claimed that the investigated compounds do not increase membrane permeability.

2.3. In Vitro Cell Viability

Preliminary in vitro cytotoxicity screening of all the investigated compounds, 2, 3, 5, and 6, was performed using human monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 in the culture medium containing 10% FBS, and it was expressed as IC50 values (see Table 2). Similar to the case of antimicrobial activity, no activity was observed for any of the benzylated derivatives (IC50 > 10 µM, see Table S2). These findings are consistent with previously published results for benzylated precursors [38]. It should be mentioned that compounds 3a, 3f, and 3h and all triamides 6a–c were investigated for their anticancer potential [35,38], where, for example, their IC50 on the chronic myeloid leukemia cell line K562 or the human breast carcinoma cell MCF-7 ranged from approx. 3 to 6 μM (see [35,38] for detailed results).
Antimicrobially active diamides 3d, 3f–h showed IC50 values from 1.4 to 4.5 µM on THP-1 cells. Any cytotoxic effect (IC50 > 10 µM) was found for 3e (R1 = thiabutyl) active in the entire spectrum of evaluated bacteria and for previously studied 3c (R1 = isopropyl). However, based on all these observations, it can be concluded that high antibacterial activity is associated with a significant antiproliferative effect against cancer cell lines, whereas, according to previous studies, diamides are able to inhibit DNA replication without any effect on protein expression; activate apoptosis as well as autophagy; and can modulate the attachment of cancer cells and FAK signaling, which is important for cell survival, proliferation, and migration [35,38]. These facts make the discussed diamides interesting anti-invasive agents with dual antiproliferative and antibacterial activity.

2.4. Structure–Activity Relationships

As mentioned previously, biologically active diamides show rather higher log P (depending on the type of software) compared to what is recommended in Ro5, which, however, seems to be important for their antibacterial activity and also affects the antiproliferative effect. In previous studies of diamides and their antibacterial activity, it was clearly demonstrated that for significant efficacy, the middle part of the molecule must be substituted by a branched chain, i.e., isopropyl or benzyl. Compounds with no substitution (R1 = H) or substituted with methyl, propyl, or nitrogen heterocycle resulted in a significant reduction in antimicrobial activity [32,33]. Based on the results listed in Table 2, the isopropyl chain (compound 3c, log k = 1.081, MV = 64.18 cm3) also proved to be effective against E. feacalis/VRE and mycobacteria, although better results were obtained with the slightly less lipophilic but bulkier thiabutyl (compound 3e, log k = 1.076, MV = 77.77 cm3), and especially the bulkier and more lipophilic isobutyl chain (compound 3f, log k = 1.266, MV = 80.68 cm3). Compounds 3g and 3h substituted with a cyclohexylmethyl (log k = 1.679, MV = 113.26 cm3) or benzyl (log k = 1.192, MV = 91.49 cm3) ring exceeded the optimal lipo-hydrophilic properties; on the other hand, the butyl chain (compound 3d, log k = 1.322, MV = 80.31 cm3) did not reach the optimum and were only effective against Staphylococcus sp. The optimal lipophilicity and bulkiness parameters of the substituents for antibacterial activity appear to be approx. MV ~80 cm3 and log k ~1.1. Finally, it is important to note that the antiproliferative effect against cancer cells increases with increasing lipophilicity, where derivatives 3c and 3e with log k 1.081 and 1.076, respectively, have IC50 >10 µM, while compound 3h with log k 1.192 has IC50 3.3 µM.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Methods

All reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial sources: Sigma-Aldrich/Merck (Prague, Czech Republic), Lach-Ner (Neratovice, Czech Republic), Fluorochem (Hadfield, UK), TCI Europe (Zwijndrecht, Belgium), Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). Commercial-grade reagents were used without further purification. Reactions were monitored by using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates coated with 0.2 mm silica gel (60 F254, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). TLC plates were visualized using UV irradiation (254 nm). All melting points were determined by using a Melting Point B-540 apparatus (Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland) and are given in their uncorrected form. The IR spectra were recorded with a Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) over the range 4000–400 cm1 by using the ATR technique. The NMR spectra were measured in DMSO-d5 or CDCl3-d3 solutions at ambient temperature with a Bruker Avance™ III 400 spectrometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) at frequencies 400 MHz (1H) and 100.26 MHz (13C), or with a Bruker Ascend™ 500 spectrometer at frequencies 500.13 MHz (1H) and 125.76 MHz (13C{1H}). The chemical shifts are given in ppm and are related to the following residual solvent peaks: ~2.49 (DMSO-d5), ~7.27 (CDCl3). The coupling constants (J) are reported in Hz. Elemental (CHN) analyses were performed with an automatic microanalyzer Flash 2000 (Thermo Scientific, West Palm Beach, FL, USA). Mass spectrometry with high resolution was determined by the “dried droplet” method using a MALDI mass spectrometer LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a nitrogen UV laser (337 nm, 60 Hz). Spectra were measured in positive ion mode and in regular mass extent with a resolution of 100,000 at a mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 400, with 2,5-dihydrobenzoic acid (DBH) used as the matrix.

3.2. Synthesis

3.2.1. General Procedure for Synthesis of (benzyloxy) Trifluoromethylbenzamides 2

Carboxylic acid 1 (1 mM) was dissolved in dichloromethane (DCM, 30 mL) and hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt, 1.1 mM), and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC∙HCl) (0.95 mM) was added in one portion. Reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h, and then 4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline (1 mM) in DCM (10 mL) was added. Reaction mixture was stirred for 18 h at RT. DCM was removed by rotary evaporation, and residue was dissolved in ethylacetate (EtOAc, 30 mL). Solution was extracted by saturated solution of NaHCO3 (3 × 20 mL), 5% citric acid (3 × 20 mL), and saturated NaCl (20 mL). (Benzyloxy)trifluoromethylbenzamide (2) was purified via crystallization and/or column chromatography.
2-(Benzyloxy)-5-chloro-N-[(2S)-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}propan-2-yl]benzamide (2a). Reaction was completed on a 3.6 mM scale. White crystals; yield 75%; mp = 140.9–143.2 °C; Rf = 0.633 (EtOAc/n-hexane 1:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 10.48 (s, 1H, NH), 8.58 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.82 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.76 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 7.69 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.56 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 3H, 3×CH(Ar)), 7.37 (dt, J = 24.6, 8.1 Hz, 4H, 4×CH(Ar)), 5.33–5.26 (m, 2H, O-CH2-Ph), 4.62 (p, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H, NH-CH-C=O), 1.28 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 172.15, 163.91, 155.69, 143.09, 136.54, 132.63, 130.48, 129.15, 128.90, 128.68, 126.73, 126.70, 125.45, 124.90, 124.09 (q, 1J (19F,13C) = 32 Hz), 119.80, 116.39, 71.47, 50.38, 18.65. 19F NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ -60.34 (s). CHN analysis: Calc. For C24H20ClF3N2O3 (476.88): C, 60.45; H, 4.23; N, 5.87. Found: C, 60.08 ± 0.22; H, 4.15 ± 0.12; N, 5.48 ± 0.02. HRMS: m/z calc. for C24H20ClF3N2O3: 477.11928 [M+H]+, 499.10122 [M+Na]+, 515.07516 [M+K]+; found: 477.11873 [M+H]+, 499.10068 [M+Na]+, 515.07461 [M+K]+.
2-(Benzyloxy)-5-chloro-N-[(2S)-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}pentan-2-yl]benzamide (2b). Reaction was completed on a 4.5 mM scale. White crystals; yield 59%; mp = 160.3–161.6 °C; Rf = 0.636 (EtOAc/n-hexane 1:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 10.50 (s, 1H, NH), 8.44 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.81 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.75 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 7.67 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.59–7.51 (m, 3H, 3×CH(Ar)), 7.43–7.32 (m, 4H, 4×CH(Ar)), 5.31–5.23 (m, 2H, O-CH2-Ph), 4.59 (dd, J = 13.1, 7.6 Hz, 1H, NH-CH-C=O), 1.63 (dt, J = 14.7, 5.9 Hz, 1H,CHH), 1.53–1.42 (m, 1H, CHH), 1.24–1.08 (m, 2H, CH2), 0.76 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, CH3).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.67, 164.08, 155.77, 143.04, 136.37, 132.65, 130.53, 129.17, 129.00, 128.96, 126.70, 126.67, 125.47, 124.78, 124.10 (q, 1J (19F,13C) = 31 Hz), 119.85, 116.30, 71.63, 54.51, 34.67, 19.07, 14.22. 19F NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ -60.36 (s). CHN analysis: Calc. For C26H24ClF3N2O3 (504.93): C, 61.85; H, 4.79; N, 5.55. Found: C, 61.51 ± 0.29; H, 4.81 ± 0.02; N, 5.54 ± 0.02. HRMS: m/z calc. for C26H24ClF3N2O3: 505.15003 [M+H]+, 527.13198 [M+Na]+; found: 505.15155 [M+H]+, 527.13354 [M+Na]+.
2-(Benzyloxy)-5-chloro-N-[(2S)-3-methyl-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}butan-2-yl]benzamide (2c). Reaction was completed on a 4.8 mM scale. White crystals; yield 67%; mp = 195.2–196.5 °C; Rf = 0.536 (EtOAc/n-hexane 1:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.51 (s, 1H, NH), 8.54 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.15 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 7.57 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.50 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.46–7.39 (m, 6H, 6×CH(Ar)), 7.07 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 5.21 (dd, J = 28.5, 10.5 Hz, 2H, O-CH2-Ph), 4.63 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, NH-CH-C=O), 2.05–1.96 (m, 1H, CH-(CH3)2), 0.90 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H, CH3), 0.66 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.03, 164.80, 155.71, 141.13, 134.49, 133.13, 131.94, 129.25, 129.13, 128.73, 126.93, 125.97, 125.54 (q, 1J (19F,13C) = 24 Hz),125.4, 122.05, 119.26, 114.13, 72.05, 60.46, 30.34, 19.35, 18.01. 19F NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ -62.15 (s). CHN analysis: Calc. For C26H24ClF3N2O3 (504.93): C, 61.85; H, 4.79; N, 5.55. Found: C, 62.23 ± 0.05; H, 4.75 ± 0.03; N, 5.42 ± 0.04. HRMS: m/z calc. for C26H24ClF3N2O3: 505.15058 [M+H]+, 527.13252 [M+Na]+, 543.10646 [M+K]+; found: 505.15036 [M+H]+, 527.13226 [M+Na]+, 543.10602 [M+K]+.
2-(Benzyloxy)-5-chloro-N-[(2S)-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}hexan-2-yl]benzamide (2d). Reaction was completed on a 17.1 mM scale. White crystals; yield 4%; mp = 141.4–142.4 °C; Rf = 0.622 (EtOAc/n-hexane 1:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 10.53 (s, 1H, NH), 8.49 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.82 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.76 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 7.68 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.57 (dd, J = 11.4, 5.0 Hz, 3H, 3×CH(Ar)), 7.42 – 7.32 (m, 4H, 4×CH(Ar)), 5.32–5.24 (m, 2H, O-CH2-Ph), 4.58 (dd, J = 13.2, 7.6 Hz, 1H, NH-CH-C=O), 1.71–1.62 (m, 1H, CHH), 1.54–1.43 (m, 1H, CHH), 1.24–1.06 (m, 4H, CH2-CH2), 0.75 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 171.49, 163.87, 155.55, 142.84, 136.21, 132.51, 130.34, 128.98, 128.82, 128.71, 126.57, 125.26, 124.80 (q, 1J (19F,13C) = 74 Hz), 124.01, 123.75, 119.62, 116.08, 71.34, 54.52, 32.14, 27.76, 22.26, 14.21. 19F NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ -60.37 (s). CHN analysis: Calc. For C27H26ClF3N2O3 (518.96): C, 62.49; H, 5.05; N, 5.40. Found: C, 62.38 ± 0.06; H, 4.92 ± 0.05; N, 5.03 ± 0.03. HRMS: m/z calc. for C27H26ClF3N2O3: 541.14763 [M+Na]+; found: 541.14899 [M+Na]+.
2-(Benzyloxy)-5-chloro-N-[(2S)-4-(methylsulfanyl)-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}butan-2-yl]benzamide (2e). Reaction was completed on a 7.3 mM scale. White crystals; yield 23%; mp = 171.6–173.2 °C; Rf = 0.688 (EtOAc/n-hexane 1:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 10.56 (s, 1H, NH), 8.58 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.82 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.73–7.66 (m, 3H, 3×CH(Ar)), 7.59–7.51 (m, 3H, 3×CH(Ar)), 7.36 (dt, J = 16.7, 8.0 Hz, 4H, 4×CH(Ar)), 5.31–5.23 (m, 2H, O-CH2-Ph), 4.74–4.66 (m, 1H, NH-CH-C=O), 2.42–2.27 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.03–1.93 (m, 4H, CH3, CHH), 1.87–1.77 (m, 1H, CHH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 170.93, 164.32, 155.42, 142.79, 136.35, 132.34, 130.17, 129.00, 128.77, 128.53, 126.56, 125.15, 125.03, 123.96 (q, 1J (19F,13C) = 25 Hz), 123.84, 119.78, 116.05, 71.18, 53.81, 31.99, 29.84, 15.06. 19F NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ -60.35 (s). CHN analysis: Calc. For C26H24ClF3N2O3S (536.99): C, 58.15; H, 4.50; N, 5.22. Found: C, 58.62 ± 0.15; H, 4.40 ± 0.02; N, 5.20 ± 0.06. HRMS: m/z calc. for C26H24ClF3N2O3S: 559.10405 [M+Na]+; found: 559.10553 [M+Na]+.
2-(Benzyloxy)-5-chloro-N-[(2S)-3-cyclohexyl-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}propan-2-yl]benzamide (2g). Reaction was completed on a 12.3 mM scale. White crystals; yield 56%; mp = 166.4–167.4 °C; Rf = 0.663 (EtOAc/n-hexane 1:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 10.53 (s, 1H, NH), 8.44 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.82 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.75 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 7.68 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.59–7.53 (m, 3H, 3×CH(Ar)), 7.42–7.32 (m, 4H, 4×CH(Ar)), 5.32–5.25 (m, 2H, O-CH2-Ph), 4.65 (ddd, J = 9.8, 7.6, 5.2 Hz, 1H, NH-CH-C=O), 1.68 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H, CH-CH2), 1.63–1.45 (m, 5H (cyclohexylalanine)), 1.41–1.33 (m, 1H (cyclohexylalanine)), 1.23–1.12 (m, 1H (cyclohexylalanine)), 1.09–0.97 (m, 3H (cycylohexylalanine)), 0.88–0.73 (m, 2H, CH2-CH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 172.02, 163.89, 155.55, 142.90, 136.27, 132.52, 130.32, 129.03, 128.84, 128.61, 126.55, 125.26, 124.81 (q, 1J (19F,13C) = 67 Hz), 123.74, 119.67, 116.09, 71.30, 52.40, 34.10, 33.40, 32.17, 26.36, 26.10, 25.95. 19F NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ -60.36 (s). CHN analysis: Calc. For C30H30ClF3N2O3 (559.02): C, 64.46; H, 5.41; N, 5.01. Found: C, 64.53 ± 0.06; H, 5.36 ± 0.03; N, 5.24 ± 0.02. HRMS: m/z calc. for C30H30ClF3N2O3: 581.17893 [M+Na]+; found: 581.18066 [M+Na]+.

3.2.2. General Procedure for Synthesis of (hydroxy) Trifluoromethylbenzamides 3

Benzyl-protected trifluoromethylbenzamide 2 (1 mM) was dissolved in EtOAc (50 mL), and palladium with 10% on carbon was added (catalytic amount). The reaction mixture was stirred overnight in a hydrogen atmosphere to complete conversion of starting materials (TLC control). Catalyst was removed, and ethyl acetate was evaporated under reduced pressure. Obtained residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane/EtOAc 5:1) to give compound 3.
5-Chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[(2S)-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}propan-2-yl]benzamide (3a). Reaction was completed on a 1.8 mM scale. White crystals; yield 29%; mp = 240.3–241.2 °C; Rf = 0.505 (EtOAc/n-hexane 1:3, evaluated 3×). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 12.20 (s, 1H, OH), 10.52 (s, 1H, NH), 9.12 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.07 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 7.84 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.69 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.45 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.3 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 6.98 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 4.68 (p, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H, NH-CH-C=O), 1.48 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 172.09, 167.09, 158.43, 143.09, 133.95, 128.93, 126.74, 124.32, 124.13 (q, 1J (19F,13C) = 32 Hz), 123.25, 119.90, 119.83, 117.94, 50.50, 18.57. 19F NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ -60.38 (s). CHN analysis: Calc. For C17H14ClF3N2O3 (386.75): C, 52.79; H, 3.65; N, 7.24. Found: C, 52.92 ± 0.06; H, 3.67 ± 0.03; N, 7.10 ± 0.03. HRMS: m/z calc. for C17H14ClF3N2O3: 387.07178 [M+H]+, 409.05373 [M+Na]+; found: 387.07315 [M+H]+, 409.05508 [M+Na]+.
5-Chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[(2S)-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}pentan-2-yl]benzamide (3b). Reaction was completed on a 0.7 mM scale. White crystals; yield 28%; mp = 216.5–218.3 °C; Rf = 0.533 (EtOAc/n-hexane 1:3, evaluated 3×). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 12.18 (s, 1H, OH), 10.56 (s, 1H, NH), 9.03 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.06 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 7.83 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.67 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.44 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.6 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 7.05–6.82 (m, 1H, CH(Ar)), 4.79–4.47 (m, 1H, NH-CH-C=O), 2.00–1.71 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.58–1.28 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.00–0.85 (m, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 171.66, 167.19, 158.26, 142.99, 133.90, 128.99, 126.73, 126.70, 124.16 (q, 1J (19F,13C) = 32 Hz), 123.28, 119.89, 119.80, 118.08, 54.59, 34.42, 19.43, 14.23. 19F NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ -60.40 (s). CHN analysis: Calc. For C19H18ClF3N2O3 (414.81): C, 55.01; H, 4.37; N, 6.75. Found: C, 55.20 ± 0.02; H, 4.49 ± 0.02; N, 6.68 ± 0.02. HRMS: m/z calc. for C19H18ClF3N2O3: 415.10308 [M+H]+, 437.08503 [M+Na]+; found: 415.10428 [M+H]+, 437.08624 [M+Na]+.
5-Chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[(2S)-3-methyl-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}butan-2-yl]benzamide (3c). Reaction was completed on a 1.5 mM scale. White crystals; yield 61%; mp = 192.6–194.6 °C; Rf = 0.716 (EtOAc/n-hexane 1:3, evaluated 3×). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 12.02 (s, 1H, OH), 10.61 (s, 1H, NH), 8.97 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.02 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 7.84 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.69 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.44 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.7 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 6.99 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 4.59 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, NH-CH-C=O), 2.21 (dd, J = 13.6, 6.8 Hz, 1H, (CH3)2-CH), 0.98 (dd, J = 6.7, 3.1 Hz, 6H, (CH3)2-CH) (Figure S5). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.86, 165.99, 157.15, 142.61, 133.49, 129.40, 126.60, 126.57, 124.00 (q, 1J (19F,13C) = 26 Hz), 123.29, 119.68, 119.49, 118.84, 59.60, 31.14, 19.64, 18.82 (Figure S6). 19F NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ -60.36 (s) (Figure S7). CHN analysis: Calc. For C19H18ClF3N2O3 (414.81): C, 55.01; H, 4.37; N, 6.75. Found: C, 55.81 ± 0.06; H, 4.86 ± 0.06; N, 6.32 ± 0.02. HRMS: m/z calc. for C19H18ClF3N2O3: 437.08503 [M+Na]+; found: 437.08582 [M+Na]+.
5-Chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[(2S)-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}hexan-2-yl]benzamide (3d). Reaction was completed on a 1.2 mM scale. White crystals; yield 40%; mp = 201.9–203.8 °C; Rf = 0.496 (EtOAc/n-hexane 1:5, evaluated 2×). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 12.20 (s, 1H, OH), 10.59 (s, 1H, NH), 9.05 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.06 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 7.83 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.68 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.44 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.5 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 6.97 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 4.65 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, NH-CH-C=O), 1.88–1.79 (m, 2H, CH2-CH), 1.43-1.30 (m, 4H, CH2-CH2), 0.86 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, CH3) (Figure S8). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 171.48, 166.92, 158.02, 142.80, 133.74, 128.83, 126.57, 126.55, 123.96 (q, 1J (19F,13C) = 25 Hz), 123.11, 119.67, 119.62, 117.89, 54.60, 31.93, 28.11, 22.35, 14.30 (Figure S9). 19F NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ -60.40 (s) (Figure S10). CHN analysis: Calc. For C20H20ClF3N2O3 (428.83): C, 56.02; H, 4.70; N, 6.53. Found: C, 56.29 ± 0.01; H, 4.76 ± 0.01; N, 6.28 ± 0.03. HRMS: m/z calc. for C20H20ClF3N2O3: 451.10068 [M+Na]+; found: 451.10102 [M+Na]+.
5-Chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[(2S)-4-(methylsulfanyl)-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}butan-2-yl]benzamide (3e). Reaction was completed on a 1.4 mM scale. White crystals; yield 51%; mp = 153.9–155.2 °C; Rf = 0.588 (EtOAc/n-hexane 1:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 12.21 (s, 1H, OH), 10.61 (s, 1H, NH), 9.11 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.06 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 7.84 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.69 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.46 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.6 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 6.97 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 4.79–4.70 (m, 1H, NH-CH-C=O), 2.66–2.51 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.18–2.03 (m, 5H, CH3-S, CH2-S) (Figure S11). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3):170.88, 167.47, 158.29, 142.74, 133.86, 128.66, 126.56, 126.53, 124.02 (q, 1J (19F,13C) = 26 Hz), 123.02, 119.82, 119.66, 117.67, 53.96, 31.70, 30.19, 15.12 (Figure S12). 19F NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ -60.38 (s) (Figure S13). CHN analysis: Calc. For C19H18ClF3N2O3S (446.87): C, 51.07; H, 4.06; N, 6.27. Found: C, 50.93 ± 0.34; H, 4.48 ± 0.01; N, 5.64 ± 0.18. HRMS: m/z calc. for C19H18ClF3N2O3S: 469.05710 [M+Na]+; found: 469.05844 [M+Na]+.
5-Chloro-N-[(2S)-3-cyclohexyl-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}propan-2-yl]-2-hydroxybenzamide (3g). Reaction was completed on a 1.8 mM scale. White crystals; yield 39%; mp = 217.3–218.1 °C; Rf = 0.474 (EtOAc/n-hexane 1:5, evaluated 2×). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO): δ 12.25 (s, 1H, OH), 10.58 (s, 1H, NH), 9.02 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.07 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 7.83 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.60 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 2H, 2×CH(Ar)), 7.45 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.6 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 6.97 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, CH(Ar)), 4.75–4.71 (m, 1H, NH-CH-C=O), 1.79-1.71 (m, 3H, 3×H-cyclohexylalanine), 1.68–1.62 (3H, m, 3×H-cyclohexylalanine), 1.59 (s, 1H, H-cyclohexylalanine), 1.40–1.39 (m, 1H, CH-cyclohexylalanine), 1.24–1.11 (m, 3H, 3×H-cyclohexylalanine), 0.99-0.92 (m, 2H, CH2-CH-cyclohexylalanine) (Figure S14). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 171.96, 167.20, 158.23, 142.86, 133.84, 128.69, 126.58, 126.55, 123.93 (q, 1J (19F,13C) = 25 Hz), 123.08, 119.73, 119.68, 117.68, 52.44, 34.25, 32.22, 26.45, 26.21, 26.01 (Figure S15). 19F NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ -60.38 (s) (Figure S16). CHN analysis: Calc. For C23H24ClF3N2O3 (468.90): C, 58.91; H, 5.16; N, 5.97. Found: C, 59.46 ± 0.18; H, 5.09 ± 0.04; N, 5.72 ± 0.02. HRMS: m/z calc. for C23H24ClF3N2O3: 491.13198 [M+Na]+; found: 491.13200 [M+Na]+.
The synthesis and detailed characterization of compounds 2f/3f, 2h/3h were reported by Jorda et al. [38]. The synthesis and characterization of benzylated triamide precursors 5 and final triamides 6 were reported by Jorda et al. [38].

3.3. Lipophilicity Determination by HPLC

An HPLC separation module Agilent 1200 Series (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a Dual Absorbance Detector (DAD SL G1315C, Agilent Technologies) was used. A chromatographic column Symmetry® C18 5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm, Part No. W21751W016 (Waters Corp, Milford, MA, USA) was used. The HPLC separation process was monitored by ChemStation for LC 3D systems (Agilent Technologies). Isocratic elution by a mixture of MeOH (HPLC grade, 72%) and H2O-HPLC Mili-Q grade (28%) as a mobile phase was used for the determination of capacity factor k. Isocratic elution by a mixture of MeOH (HPLC grade, 72%) and acetate-buffered saline (pH 7.4 and pH 6.5) (28%) as a mobile phase was used for the determination of distribution coefficient expressed as D7.4 and D6.5. The total flow of the column was 1.0 mL/min, injection was 20 μL, column temperature was 40 °C, and sample temperature was 10 °C. The detection wavelength of 210 nm was chosen. A KI methanolic solution was used for the determination of the dead times (td). Retention times (tr) were measured in minutes. The capacity factors k were calculated according to the formula k = (tr − td)/td, where tR is the retention time of the solute, and td is the dead time obtained using an unretained analyte. The distribution coefficients DpH were calculated according to the formula DpH = (tr − td)/td. Each experiment was repeated three times. The log k values of individual compounds are shown in Table 1.

3.4. In Vitro Antibacterial Evaluation

In vitro antibacterial activity of the synthesized compounds was evaluated against representatives of multidrug-resistant bacteria, three clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus: clinical isolate of animal origin, MRSA 63718 (Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Czech Republic), carrying the mecA gene [58]; and MRSA SA 630 and MRSA SA 3202 [22] (National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic), both of human origin. These three clinical isolates were classified as vancomycin-susceptible (but with higher MIC of vancomycin equal to 2 μg/mL (VA2-MRSA) within the susceptible range for MRSA 63718) methicillin-resistant S. aureus (VS-MRSA) [22]. Vancomycin- and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus ATCC 29213 and vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, were used as the reference and quality control strains. Three vanA gene-carrying vancomycin-resistant isolates of E. faecalis (VRE 342B, VRE 368, VRE 725B) were provided by Oravcova et al. [56].
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were evaluated by the microtitration broth method according to the CLSI [65,66] with some modifications. The compounds were dissolved in DMSO (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) to obtain a concentration of 10 µg/mL and diluted in a microtitration plate in an appropriate medium, i.e., Cation Adjusted Mueller–Hinton Broth (CaMH, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) for staphylococci and Brain Heart Infusion Broth (BHI, Oxoid) for enterococci to reach the final concentration of 256–0.125 µg/mL. Microtitre plates were inoculated with test microorganisms so that the final concentration of bacterial cells was 105. Ampicillin (Sigma) was used as reference drug. A drug-free control and a sterility control were included. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C for staphylococci and enterococci. After static incubation in the darkness in an aerobic atmosphere, the MIC was visually evaluated as the lowest concentration of the tested compound, which completely inhibited the growth of the microorganism. The experiments were repeated three times. The results are summarized in Table 2.

3.5. Determination of Minimum Bactericidal Concentrations

For the above-mentioned strains/isolates, the agar aliquot subculture method [67,68] was used as a test for bactericidal agents. After the MIC value determination, the inoculum was transferred to CaMH (Oxoid) for staphylococci and BHI (Oxoid) for enterococci medium using a multipoint inoculator. The plates were incubated in a thermostat at 37 °C for 24 h. The lowest concentration of test compound at which ≤5 colonies were obtained was then evaluated as MBC, corresponding to a 99.9% decrease in CFU relative to the original inoculum.

3.6. MTT Assay

Compounds were prepared as previously stated and diluted in CaMH broth for S. aureus to achieve the desired final concentrations. S. aureus bacterial suspension in sterile distilled water at 0.5 McFarland was diluted 1:3. Inocula were added to each well by multi-inoculator. Diluted mycobacteria in broth free from inhibiting compounds were used as the growth control. All compounds were prepared in duplicate. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h for S. aureus. After the incubation period, 10% well volume of MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) reagent (Sigma) was mixed into each well and incubated at 37 °C 1 h for S. aureus. Then, 100 µL of 17% sodium dodecyl sulfate in 40% dimethylformamide was added to each well. The plates were read at 570 nm. The absorbance readings from the cells grown in the presence of the tested compounds were compared with uninhibited cell growth to determine the relative percent inhibition. The percent inhibition was determined through the MTT assay. The percent viability is calculated through the comparison of a measured value and that of the uninhibited control: % viability = OD570E/OD570P × 100, where OD570E is the reading from the compound-exposed cells, while OD570P is the reading from the uninhibited cells (positive control). Cytotoxic potential is determined by the percent viability of <70% [59,60]. The results are summarized in Table 3.

3.7. Crystal Violet Uptake

The method of crystal violet uptake [63,64] was used to study membrane alteration. A bacterial suspension was cultivated to logarithmic phase in CaMH and harvested at 4500 rpm for 5 min. The cells were washed twice and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 4× MIC of the tested compounds. Tween 20 (1% solution) was used as the positive control. A growth control without antibiotics was included. The tubes were cultivated at 37 °C for 1 h. After that, the tubes were centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 15 min and washed twice in PBS. The cells were resuspended in PBS containing crystal violet (10 µg/mL). After 15 min, the tubes were incubated at 37 °C and centrifuged (15 min, 4500 rpm), and the absorbance of the supernatant at 595 nm was measured. The experiment was repeated five times, and the results were averaged. The percentage of crystal violet uptake was evaluated according to the following equation:
%   o f   u p t a k e = O D 595   o f   s a m p l e O D 595   o f   c r y s t a l   v i o l e t   s o l u t i o n   × 100

3.8. In Vitro Antimycobacterial Evaluation

The evaluation of in vitro antimycobacterial activity of the compounds was performed against Mycobacterium tuberculosis ATCC 25177/H37Ra and M. smegmatis ATCC 700084. M. tuberculosis was grown in Middlebrook Broth (MB), supplemented with Oleic Acid–Albumin–Dextrose–Catalase (OADC) supplement (Difco, Lawrence, KS, USA). At log phase growth, a culture sample (10 mL) was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm/20 min using a benchtop centrifuge (MPW-65R, MPW Med Instruments, Warszawa, Poland). Following the removal of the supernatant, the pellet was washed in fresh MB and resuspended in fresh, ODAC-supplemented MB (10 mL). The turbidity was adjusted to match McFarland standard No. 1 (3 × 108 CFU) with MB. A further 1:10 dilution of the culture was then performed in MB broth. The antimicrobial susceptibility of M. tuberculosis was investigated in a 96-well plate format. In these experiments, sterile deionized water (300 µL) was added to all outer-perimeter wells of the plates to minimize evaporation of the medium in the test wells during incubation. Each evaluated compound (100 µL) was incubated with M. tuberculosis (100 µL). Dilutions of each compound were prepared in duplicate. For all synthesized compounds, final concentrations ranged from 256 to 0.125 μg/mL. All compounds were dissolved in DMSO, and subsequent dilutions were made in supplemented MB. The plates were sealed with Parafilm and incubated at 37 °C for 14 days. Following incubation, a 10% addition of alamarBlue (Difco) was mixed into each well, and readings at 570 nm and 600 nm were taken, initially for background subtraction and subsequently after 24 h reincubation. The background subtraction is necessary for strongly colored compounds, where the color may interfere with the interpretation of any color change. For noninterfering compounds, blue color in the well was interpreted as the absence of growth, and a pink color was scored as growth.
For M. smegmatis, the broth dilution micro-method in Middlebrook 7H9 medium (Difco) supplemented with ADC Enrichment (Difco) was used. The compounds were dissolved in DMSO (Sigma), and the final concentration of DMSO did not exceed 2.5% of the total solution composition. The final concentrations of the evaluated compounds ranging from 256 to 0.125 μg/mL were obtained by twofold serial dilution of the stock solution in a microtiter plate with sterile medium. Bacterial inocula were prepared by transferring colonies from culture to sterile water. The cell density was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland units using a densitometer (Densi-La-Meter, LIAP, Riga, Latvia). The final inoculum was made by 1:1000 dilution of the suspension with sterile water. Drug-free controls, sterility controls, and controls consisting of medium and DMSO alone were included. The determination of results was performed visually after three days of static incubation in the darkness at 37 °C in an aerobic atmosphere.
Isoniazid (Sigma) was used as the positive control, as it is a clinically used antitubercular drug. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were defined as the lowest concentration of the compound at which no visible bacterial growth was observed. The MIC value is routinely and widely used in bacterial assays and is a standard detection limit according to the CLSI [65,66]. The results are summarized in Table 2.

3.9. In Vitro Cell Viability Analysis

Human monocytic leukemia THP-1 cells obtained from the European Collection of Cell Cultures (ECACC, Salisbury, UK) were used for in vitro antiproliferative assays. They were routinely cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2% l-glutamine, 1% penicillin, and streptomycin (all from Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The cells were incubated in a complete medium (i.e., containing FBS) with test compounds at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24 h, similarly as we described previously [69]. The effect of the test compounds dissolved in DMSO on cell viability was determined using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The results are shown in Table 2.

4. Conclusions

Based on the excellent antibacterial activities of 5-chloro-2-hydroxy- N-[(2S)-3-methyl-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}butan-2-yl]benzamide (3c), 10 new compounds were designed, and together with 11 previously prepared, all 22 agents were tested for antibacterial activity against staphylococcal, enterococcal, and mycobacterial strains. All compounds were also evaluated for their anticancer activity on the human cancer cell line THP-1, with IC50 ranging widely from 1.4 to >10 µM. Intermediates 2a–h and 5a–c with a benzyl-protected salicylic hydroxyl were found to be biologically inactive. The final 11 compounds could be divided into eight diamides and three triamides according to the number of amide groups. All the triamides were antibacterially completely inactive, i.e., the prolongation of the diamides by inserting the second amino acid into the linker did not increase the antibacterial activity. The crystal violet uptake assay showed no damage to the bacterial wall/membrane by the active diamides, indicating that the compounds do not affect membranes. On the other hand, interactions of the compounds with the bacterial enzyme equipment can be predicted, as demonstrated for 5-chloro-N-[(2S)-3-cyclohexyl-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]- amino}propan-2-yl]-2-hydroxybenzamide (3g), 5-chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[(2S)-(4-methyl- 1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino)pentan-2-yl)benzamide (3f), 5-chloro- 2-hydroxy-N-[(2S)-4-(methylsulfanyl)-1-oxo-1-{[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}butan-2-yl]benzamide (3e), and 5-chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[(2S)-(1-oxo-3-phenyl- 1-{[4-(trifluoro- methyl)phenyl]amino}propan-2-yl)benzamide (3h) by the MTT assay. It was confirmed that for the compounds to have antibacterial activity, the connecting fragment between the chlorsalicylic and 4-CF3-anilide cores must be substituted with a bulky and/or lipophilic chain such as isopropyl, isobutyl, or a thiabutyl chain (compounds 3c, 3e, 3f). Diamides 3e and 3f demonstrated activity against all tested strains/isolates comparable to or better than that of the used standards (ampicillin and isoniazid). Antistaphylococcal activities were in the MIC range of 0.070–8.95 μM, anti-enterococcal activities were in the MIC range of 4.66–35.8 μM, and activities of compounds 3f and 3e against M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis showed MICs of 18.7 and 35.8 μM, respectively. All the effective compounds demonstrated bactericidal activities. Compounds 3g and 3h, i.e., diamides substituted with bulkier and lipophilic fragments (cyclohexylmethyl or benzyl), showed only an antistaphylococcal effect. Cytotoxic activity increases with lipophilicity. It can be stated that the high antibacterial activity is associated with a significant cytotoxic effect against cancer cell lines, which makes the investigated diamides interesting anti-invasive agents with dual (cytotoxic and antibacterial) activity. However, this action should be targeted due to the supposed negative effect on healthy tissue and cells.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms231911648/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.I. and J.J.; methodology, A.I., J.H., A.C. and J.J.; investigation, D.P., E.P., K.P., P.M., H.M. and J.H.; resources, J.H., A.I. and J.J.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I., K.P., J.H. and J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Operation Program of Integrated Infrastructure for the project, UpScale of Comenius University Capacities and Competence in Research, Development and Innovation, ITMS2014+: 313021BUZ3, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Atanasov, A.G.; Zotchev, S.B.; Dirsch, V.M.; The International Natural Product Sciences Taskforce; Supuran, C.T. Natural products in drug discovery: Advances and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 200–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Dewick, P.M. Medicinal Natural Products: A Biosynthetic Approach, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Salicylic Acid, DrugBank. Available online: https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00936 (accessed on 2 September 2022).
  5. Aspirin, DrugBank. Available online: https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00945 (accessed on 2 September 2022).
  6. WHO Model List of Essential Medicines-22nd List. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-MHP-HPS-EML-2021.02 (accessed on 2 September 2022).
  7. Somasundaram, S.; Sigthorsson, G.; Simpson, R.J.; Watts, J.; Jacob, M.; Tavares, I.A.; Rafi, S.; Roseth, A.; Foster, R.; Price, A.B.; et al. Uncoupling of intestinal mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and inhibition of cyclooxygenase are required for the development of NSAID-enteropathy in the rat. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2000, 14, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bekebrede, A.F.; Keijer, J.; Gerrits, W.J.J.; de Boer, V.C.J. Mitochondrial and glycolytic extracellular flux analysis optimization for isolated pig intestinal epithelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Paul-Clark, M.J.; van Cao, T.; Moradi-Bidhendi, N.; Cooper, D.; Gilroy, D.W. 15-epi-lipoxin A4-mediated induction of nitric oxide explains how aspirin inhibits acute inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 200, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Ausina, P.; Branco, J.R.; Demaria, T.M.; Esteves, A.M.; Leandro, J.G.B.; Ochioni, A.C.; Mendonca, A.P.M.; Palhano, F.L.; Oliveira, M.F.; Abou-Kheir, W.; et al. Acetylsalicylic acid and salicylic acid present anticancer properties against melanoma by promoting nitric oxide-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mussbacher, M.; Salzmann, M.; Brostjan, C.; Hoesel, B.; Schoergenhofer, C.; Datler, H.; Hohensinner, P.; Basilio, J.; Petzelbauer, P.; Assinger, A.; et al. Cell type-specific roles of NF-κB linking inflammation and thrombosis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Nath, N.; Chattopadhyay, M.; Rodes, D.B.; Nazarenko, A.; Kodela, R.; Kashfi, K. Nitric oxide-releasing aspirin suppresses NF-κB signaling in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Molecules 2015, 20, 12481–12499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Hawley, S.A.; Fullerton, M.D.; Ross, F.A.; Schertzer, J.D.; Chevtzoff, C.; Walker, K.J.; Peggie, M.W.; Zibrova, D.; Green, K.A.; Mustard, K.J.; et al. The ancient drug salicylate directly activates AMP-activated protein kinase. Science 2012, 336, 918–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Park, H.; Kim, W.; Kim, D.; Jeong, S.; Jung, Y. Mesalazine activates adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase: Implication in the anti-inflammatory activity of this anti-colitic drug. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2019, 12, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alfonso, L.F.; Srivenugopal, K.S.; Bhat, G.J. Does aspirin acetylate multiple cellular proteins? Mol. Med. Rep. 2009, 2, 533–537. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Christensen, D.G.; Xie, X.; Basisty, N.; Byrnes, J.; McSweeney, S.; Schilling, B.; Wolfe, A.J. Post-translational protein acetylation: An elegant mechanism for bacteria to dynamically regulate metabolic functions. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Angom, R.S.; Zhu, J.; Wu, A.T.H.; Sumitra, M.R.; Pham, V.; Dutta, S.; Wang, E.; Madamsetty, V.S.; Perez-Cordero, G.D.; Huang, H.S.; et al. LCC-09, a novel salicylanilide derivative, exerts anti-inflammatory effect in vascular endothelial cells. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021, 14, 4551–4565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kratky, M.; Vinsova, J. Salicylanilide ester prodrugs as potential antimicrobial agents—A review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2011, 17, 3494–3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Marrugal-Lorenzo, J.A.; Serna-Gallego, A.; Berastegui-Cabrera, J.; Pachon, J.; Sanchez-Cespedes, J. Repositioning salicylanilide anthelmintic drugs to treat adenovirus infections. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Otevrel, J.; Mandelova, Z.; Pesko, M.; Guo, J.; Kralova, K.; Sersen, F.; Vejsova, M.; Kalinowski, D.; Kovacevic, Z.; Coffey, A.; et al. Investigating the spectrum of biological activity of ring-substituted salicylanilides and carbamoylphenylcarbamates. Molecules 2010, 15, 8122–8142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Imramovsky, A.; Pesko, M.; Monreal-Ferriz, J.; Kralova, K.; Vinsova, J.; Jampilek, J. Photosynthesis-inhibiting efficiency of 4-chloro-2-(chlorophenylcarbamoyl)phenyl alkylcarbamates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 4564–4567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zadrazilova, I.; Pospisilova, S.; Masarikova, M.; Imramovsky, A.; Monreal-Ferriz, J.; Vinsova, J.; Cizek, A.; Jampilek, J. Salicylanilide carbamates: Promising antibacterial agents with high in vitro activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 77, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kushkevych, I.; Kollar, P.; Ferreira, A.L.; Palma, D.; Duarte, A.; Lopes, M.M.; Bartos, M.; Pauk, K.; Imramovsky, A.; Jampilek, J. Antimicrobial effect of salicylamide derivatives against intestinal sulfate-reducing bacteria. J. Appl. Biomed. 2016, 14, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Copp, J.N.; Pletzer, D.; Brown, A.S.; van der Heijden, J.; Miton, C.M.; Edgar, R.J.; Rich, M.H.; Little, R.F.; Williams, E.M.; Hancock, R.E.W.; et al. Mechanistic understandingenables the rational design of salicylanilide combination therapies for Gram-negative infections. mBio 2020, 11, e02068-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Imramovsky, A.; Stepankova, S.; Vanco, J.; Pauk, K.; Monreal-Ferriz, J.; Vinsova, J.; Jampilek, J. Acetylcholinesterase-inhibiting activity of salicylanilide N-alkylcarbamates and their molecular docking. Molecules 2012, 17, 10142–10158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kratky, M.; Stepankova, S.; Houngbedji, N.H.; Vosatka, R.; Vorcakova, K.; Vinsova, J. 2-Hydroxy-N-phenylbenzamides and their esters inhibit acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Trabocchi, A. Principles and applications of small molecule peptidomimetics. In Small Molecule Drug Discovery; Trabocchi, A., Lenci, E., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 163–195. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ghosh, A.K.; Brindisi, M. Organic carbamates in drug design and medicinal chemistry. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 2895–2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Matosevic, A.; Bosak, A. Carbamate group as structural motif in drugs: A review of carbamate derivatives used as therapeutic agents. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 2020, 71, 285–299. [Google Scholar]
  30. Makhoba, X.H.; Viegas, C.; Mosa, R.A.; Viegas, F.P.D.; Pooe, O.J. Potential impact of the multi-target drug approach in the treatment of some complex diseases. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2020, 14, 3235–3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gray, D.A.; Wenzel, M. Multitarget approaches against multiresistant superbugs. ACS Infect. Dis. 2020, 6, 1346–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Imramovsky, A.; Pesko, M.; Kralova, K.; Vejsova, M.; Stolarikova, J.; Vinsova, J.; Jampilek, J. Investigating spectrum of biological activity of 4- and 5-chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[2-(arylamino)-1-alkyl-2-oxoethyl]benzamides. Molecules 2011, 16, 2414–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Pauk, K.; Zadrazilova, I.; Imramovsky, A.; Vinsova, J.; Pokorna, M.; Masarikova, M.; Cizek, A.; Jampilek, J. New derivatives of salicylamides: Preparation and antimicrobial activity against various bacterial species. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 6574–6581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zadrazilova, I.; Pospisilova, S.; Pauk, K.; Imramovsky, A.; Vinsova, J.; Cizek, A.; Jampilek, J. In vitro bactericidal activity of 4- and 5-chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[1-oxo-1-(phenylamino)alkan-2-yl]benzamides against MRSA. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 349534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Imramovsky, A.; Jorda, R.; Pauk, K.; Reznickova, E.; Dusek, J.; Hanusek, J.; Krystof, V. Substituted 2-hydroxy-N-(arylalkyl)benzamides induce apoptosis in cancer cell lines. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 68, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dusek, J.; Imramovsky, A.; Pauk, K.; Jorda, R.; Reznickova, E.; Krystof, V. Synthesis and antiproliferative activities of novel O-benzyl salicylamide derivatives. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2017, 14, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jorda, R.; Dusek, J.; Reznickova, E.; Pauk, K.; Magar, P.; Imramovsky, A.; Krystof, V. Synthesis and antiproteasomal activity of novel O-benzyl salicylamide-based inhibitors built from leucine and phenylalanine. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 135, 142–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jorda, R.; Magar, P.; Hendrychova, D.; Pauk, K.; Dibus, M.; Pilarova, E.; Imramovsky, A.; Krystof, V. Novel modified leucine and phenylalanine dipeptides modulate viability and attachment of cancer cells. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 188, 112036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Felicio, M.R.; Silva, O.N.; Goncalves, S.; Santos, N.C.; Franco, O.L. Peptides with dual antimicrobial and anticancer activities. Front. Chem. 2017, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Thankappan, B.; Sivakumar, J.; Asokan, S.; Ramasamy, M.; Pillai, M.M.; Selvakumar, R.; Angayarkanni, J. Dual antimicrobial and anticancer activity of a novel synthetic α-helical antimicrobial peptide. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 161, 105784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Hicks, R.P. Antibacterial and anticancer activity of a series of novel peptides incorporating cyclic tetra-substituted Cα amino acids. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 4056–4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sharma, P.; Kaur, S.; Chadha, B.S.; Kaur, R.; Kaur, M.; Kaur, S. Anticancer and antimicrobial potential of enterocin 12a from Enterococcus faecium. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Parchebafi, A.; Tamanaee, F.; Ehteram, H.; Ahmad, E.; Nikzad, H.; Kashani, H.H. The dual interaction of antimicrobial peptides on bacteria and cancer cells; mechanism of action and therapeutic strategies of nanostructures. Microb. Cell Fact. 2022, 21, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Garner, A.L.; Gloeckner, C.; Tricoche, N.; Zakhari, J.S.; Samje, M.; Cho-Ngwa, F.; Lustigman, S.; Janda, K.D. Design, synthesis, and biological activities of closantel analogues: Structural promiscuity and its impact on Onchocerca volvulus. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 3963–3972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fomovska, A.; Wood, R.D.; Mui, E.; Dubey, J.P.; Ferreira, L.R.; Hickman, M.R.; Lee, P.J.; Leed, S.E.; Auschwitz, J.M.; Welsh, W.J.; et al. Salicylanilide inhibitors of toxoplasma gondii. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 8375–8391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Laudisi, F.; Maronek, M.; Di Grazia, A.; Monteleone, G.; Stolfi, C. Repositioning of anthelmintic drugs for the treatment of cancers of the digestive system. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Jampilek, J. Drug repurposing to overcome microbial resistance. Drug Discov. Today 2022, 27, 2028–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kratky, M.; Vinsova, J.; Novotna, E.; Mandikova, J.; Trejtnar, F.; Stolarikova, J. Antibacterial activity of salicylanilide 4-(trifluoromethyl)-benzoates. Molecules 2013, 18, 3674–3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Kratky, M.; Volkova, M.; Novotna, E.; Trejtnar, F.; Stolarikova, J.; Vinsova, J. Synthesis and biological activity of new salicylanilide N,N-disubstituted carbamates and thiocarbamates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 4073–4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Molchanova, N.; Nielsen, J.E.; Sorensen, K.B.; Prabhala, B.K.; Hansen, P.R.; Lund, R.; Barron, A.E.; Jenssen, H. Halogenation as a tool to tune antimicrobial activity of peptoids. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Arnot, J.A.; Planey, S.L. The influence of lipophilicity in drug discovery and design. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2012, 7, 863–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kerns, E.H.; Di, L. Drug-like Properties: Concepts. Structure Design and Methods: From ADME to Toxicity Optimization; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wermuth, C.; Aldous, D.; Raboisson, P.; Rognan, D. The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry, 4th ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997, 23, 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ertl, P.; Schuffenhauer, A. Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molecular complexity and fragment contributions. J. Cheminform. 2009, 1, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Oravcova, V.; Zurek, L.; Townsend, A.; Clark, A.B.; Ellis, J.C.; Cizek, A. American crows as carriers of vancomycin-resistant enterococci with vanA gene. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 939–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pankey, G.A.; Sabath, L.D. Clinical relevance of bacteriostatic versus bactericidal mechanisms of action in the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 38, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Nubel, U.; Dordel, J.; Kurt, K.; Strommenger, B.; Westh, H.; Shukla, S.K.; Zemlickova, H.; Leblois, R.; Wirth, T.; Jombart, T.; et al. A timescale for evolution, population expansion, and spatial spread of an emerging clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Measuring Cell Viability/Cytotoxicity. Dojindo EU GmbH, Munich, Germany. Available online: https://www.dojindo.eu.com/Protocol/Dojindo-Cell-Proliferation-Protocol.pdf (accessed on 2 September 2022).
  60. Grela, E.; Kozlowska, J.; Grabowiecka, A. Current methodology of MTT assay in bacteria—A review. Acta Histochem. 2018, 120, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Nainu, F.; Permana, A.D.; Djide, N.J.N.; Anjani, Q.K.; Utami, R.N.; Rumata, N.R.; Zhang, J.; Emran, T.B.; Simal-Gandara, J. Pharmaceutical approaches on antimicrobial resistance: Prospects and challenges. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lachowicz, J.I.; Szczepski, K.; Scano, A.; Casu, C.; Fais, S.; Orru, G.; Pisano, B.; Piras, M.; Jaremko, M. The best peptidomimetic strategies to undercover antibacterial peptides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Devi, K.P.; Nisha, S.A.; Sakthivel, R.; Pandian, S.K. Eugenol (an essential oil of clove) acts as an antibacterial agent against Salmonella typhi by disrupting the cellular membrane. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 130, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vaara, M.; Vaara, T. Outer membrane permeability barrier disruption by polymyxinin polymyxin-susceptible and-resistant Salmonella typhimurium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1981, 19, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, 11th ed.; M07; NCCLS: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  66. Schwalbe, R.; Steele-Moore, L.; Goodwin, A.C. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocols; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  67. Scandorieiro, S.; de Camargo, L.C.; Lancheros, C.A.; Yamada-Ogatta, S.F.; Nakamura, C.V.; de Oliveira, A.G.; Andrade, C.G.; Duran, N.; Nakazato, G.; Kobayashi, R.K. Synergistic and additive effect of oregano essential oil and biological silver nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant bacterial strains. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Guimaraes, A.C.; Meireles, L.M.; Lemos, M.F.; Guimaraes, M.C.C.; Endringer, D.C.; Fronza, M.; Scherer, R. Antibacterial activity of terpenes and terpenoids present in essential oils. Molecules 2019, 24, 2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Kos, J.; Kozik, V.; Pindjakova, D.; Jankech, T.; Smolinski, A.; Stepankova, S.; Hosek, J.; Oravec, M.; Jampilek, J.; Bak, A. Synthesis and hybrid SAR property modeling of novel cholinesterase inhibitors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 11648 g001 550
Figure 1. Design of diamides and triamides (peptidomimetics) derived from salicylanilide.
Figure 1. Design of diamides and triamides (peptidomimetics) derived from salicylanilide.
Ijms 23 11648 g001
Ijms 23 11648 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of benzylated (2a–h) and debenzylated (3a–h) diamides. Reagents and conditions: (a) HOBt, EDC·HCl, DCM; (b) H2/Pd-C, EtOAc [36].
Scheme 1. Synthesis of benzylated (2a–h) and debenzylated (3a–h) diamides. Reagents and conditions: (a) HOBt, EDC·HCl, DCM; (b) H2/Pd-C, EtOAc [36].
Ijms 23 11648 sch001
Ijms 23 11648 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of benzylated (5a–c) and debenzylated (6a–c) triamides. Reagents and conditions: (a) HOBt, EDC·HCl, DCM; LiOH, dioxan/H2O; (b) HOBt, EDC·HCl, DCM; (c) H2/Pd-C, EtOAc [38].
Scheme 2. Synthesis of benzylated (5a–c) and debenzylated (6a–c) triamides. Reagents and conditions: (a) HOBt, EDC·HCl, DCM; LiOH, dioxan/H2O; (b) HOBt, EDC·HCl, DCM; (c) H2/Pd-C, EtOAc [38].
Ijms 23 11648 sch002
Ijms 23 11648 g002 550
Figure 2. Uptake of crystal violet by S. aureus (GC = growth control).
Figure 2. Uptake of crystal violet by S. aureus (GC = growth control).
Ijms 23 11648 g002
Table
Table 1. Structures of diamides 3a–h and triamides 6a–c, experimentally determined (log k, log D6.5, log D7.4) and calculated (log P/Clog P) lipophilicity values of the final compounds, as well as their molecular weight (MW), number of H-bond donors (HBD), number of H-bond acceptors (HBA), number of rotatable bonds (RB), and molar volume (MV) of the R substituents.
Table 1. Structures of diamides 3a–h and triamides 6a–c, experimentally determined (log k, log D6.5, log D7.4) and calculated (log P/Clog P) lipophilicity values of the final compounds, as well as their molecular weight (MW), number of H-bond donors (HBD), number of H-bond acceptors (HBA), number of rotatable bonds (RB), and molar volume (MV) of the R substituents.
No.R1R2log klog D6.5log D7.4log P alog P bClog P bMW aHBD aHBA aRB aMV a [cm3]
Ijms 23 11648 i001
3aMe–0.8660.8040.7594.513.275.004386.7535530.79
3bPr–1.1411.0601.0165.144.186.062414.8135763.80
3ciPr–1.0810.9730.9344.984.165.932414.8135664.18
3dBu–1.3221.2471.2135.304.596.591428.8335880.31
3eS-Bu–1.0761.0210.9635.203.615.152446.8735877.77
3fiBu–1.2661.2561.1615.324.516.461428.8335780.68
3gMe-cHex–1.6791.6151.5766.375.267.654468.89357113.26
3hBn–1.1921.1481.0435.804.956.422462.8435791.49
Ijms 23 11648 i002
6aiBuBn1.5601.5101.4936.385.527.621576.014711172.17
6bBniBu1.5471.5281.4536.295.527.621576.014711172.17
6cBnBn1.5871.5481.4957.565.977.582610.024711182.98
Ro5–––<5<5–<500<5<10––
a ACD/Percepta ver. 2012 (Advanced Chemistry Development. Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada, 2012); b ChemBioDrawUltra 13.0 (CambridgeSoft, PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA); Ro5 = Lipinski’s Rule of Five.
Table
Table 2. In vitro antistaphylococcal, anti-enterococcal, and antimycobacterial activities (MIC/MBC (μM)) compared to ampicillin (APC), isoniazid (INH), and in vitro cell viability (IC50 (µM) ± SD, n = 6) on human monocytic leukemia cell line (THP-1).
Table 2. In vitro antistaphylococcal, anti-enterococcal, and antimycobacterial activities (MIC/MBC (μM)) compared to ampicillin (APC), isoniazid (INH), and in vitro cell viability (IC50 (µM) ± SD, n = 6) on human monocytic leukemia cell line (THP-1).
No.R1
R2		MIC (µM)
MBC (µM)		IC50 (µM) THP-1@10% FBS 24 h
SAMRSA1MRSA2MRSA3EFVRE1VRE2VRE3MTMS
3aMe
–		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		>10
3bPr
–		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		7.3 ± 1.2
3ciPr
–		2.41
4.82		4.82
4.82		4.82
4.82		4.82
9.64		38.6
38.6		38.6
38.6		38.6
38.6		38.6
38.6		77.1
n.d.		77.1
n.d.		>10
3dBu
–		0.583
1.17		2.33
2.33		2.33
4.66		4.66
4.66		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		4.5 ± 1.2
3eS-Bu
–		2.24
2.24		8.95
8.95		4.48
8.95		8.95
8.95		17.9
35.8		35.8
35.8		17.9
35.8		35.8
35.8		35.8
n.d.		35.8
n.d.		>10
3fiBu
–		1.17
1.17		1.17
1.17		1.17
1.17		0.070
0.070		4.66
9.33		4.66
18.7		9.33
18.7		4.66
37.3		18.7
n.d.		18.7
n.d.		1.9 ± 1.1
3gMe-cHex
–		1.07
1.07		1.07
1.07		1.07
2.13		2.13
2.13		546
n.d.		546
n.d.		546
n.d.		546
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		1.4 ± 1.1
3hBn
–		1.08
2.16		2.16
2.16		1.08
2.16		0.270
0.270		277
n.d.		277
n.d.		277
n.d.		277
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		3.3 ± 1.0
6aiBu
Bn		222
n.d.		444
n.d.		444
n.d.		444
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		2.2 ± 1.1
6bBn
iBu		55.6
112		55.6
n.d.		55.6
444		444
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		1.6 ± 1.0
6cBn
Bn		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		n.a.
n.d.		1.3 ± 1.1
APC–5.72
>5.72		45.8
>45.8		45.8
>45.8		45.8
>45.8		2.81
2.81		11.5
11.5		11.5
11.5		11.5
11.5		–––
INH–––––––––36.6
–		117
–		–
SA = Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213; MRSA1–3 = clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus SA 3202, SA 630 (National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic), and 63718 (Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Czech Republic); EF = Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci VRE1–3 = VRE 342B, VRE 368, VRE 725B; MT = Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra/ATCC 25177; MS = M. smegmatis ATCC 700084; FSB = fetal bovine serum; n.a. = no activity (MIC > 256 µg/mL); n.d. = not determined. The real bactericidal values required by the MBC/MIC ≤ 4 rule are in bold.
Table
Table 3. Lowest MIC values with at least 70% inhibition of S. aureus ATCC 29213 viability.
Table 3. Lowest MIC values with at least 70% inhibition of S. aureus ATCC 29213 viability.
No.Conc.S. aureus Viability Inhibition (%)
3e2× MIC (2× MBC)94.6
3f1× MIC (1× MBC)95.3
3g0.5× MIC (0.5× MBC)95.2
3h2× MIC (2× MBC)94.0
APC8× MIC (>8× MBC)90.0
CPX32× MIC (32× MBC)92.8
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pindjakova, D.; Pilarova, E.; Pauk, K.; Michnova, H.; Hosek, J.; Magar, P.; Cizek, A.; Imramovsky, A.; Jampilek, J. Study of Biological Activities and ADMET-Related Properties of Salicylanilide-Based Peptidomimetics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11648. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911648

AMA Style

Pindjakova D, Pilarova E, Pauk K, Michnova H, Hosek J, Magar P, Cizek A, Imramovsky A, Jampilek J. Study of Biological Activities and ADMET-Related Properties of Salicylanilide-Based Peptidomimetics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(19):11648. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911648

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pindjakova, Dominika, Eliska Pilarova, Karel Pauk, Hana Michnova, Jan Hosek, Pratibha Magar, Alois Cizek, Ales Imramovsky, and Josef Jampilek. 2022. "Study of Biological Activities and ADMET-Related Properties of Salicylanilide-Based Peptidomimetics" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 19: 11648. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911648

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop