Next Article in Journal
The Adaptation and Tolerance of Major Cereals and Legumes to Important Abiotic Stresses
Previous Article in Journal
A Review on the Role of Non-Coding RNAs in the Pathogenesis of Myasthenia Gravis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Resveratrol-Induced Signal Transduction in Wound Healing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fetal Immunomodulatory Environment Following Cartilage Injury—The Key to CARTILAGE Regeneration?

1
VETERM, Equine Surgery Unit, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria
2
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
3
Administrative Unit Veterinary Medicine, UMIT—Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology GmbH, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
4
Histology & Embryology, Department of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(23), 12969; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312969
Submission received: 5 November 2021 / Revised: 27 November 2021 / Accepted: 28 November 2021 / Published: 30 November 2021

Abstract

:
Fetal cartilage fully regenerates following injury, while in adult mammals cartilage injury leads to osteoarthritis (OA). Thus, in this study, we compared the in vivo injury response of fetal and adult ovine articular cartilage histologically and proteomically to identify key factors of fetal regeneration. In addition, we compared the secretome of fetal ovine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in vitro with injured fetal cartilage to identify potential MSC-derived therapeutic factors. Cartilage injury caused massive cellular changes in the synovial membrane, with macrophages dominating the fetal, and neutrophils the adult, synovial cellular infiltrate. Correspondingly, proteomics revealed differential regulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators and growth-factors between adult and fetal joints. Neutrophil-related proteins and acute phase proteins were the two major upregulated protein groups in adult compared to fetal cartilage following injury. In contrast, several immunomodulating proteins and growth factors were expressed significantly higher in the fetus than the adult. Comparison of the in vitro MSCs proteome with the in vivo fetal regenerative signature revealed shared upregulation of 17 proteins, suggesting their therapeutic potential. Biomimicry of the fetal paracrine signature to reprogram macrophages and modulate inflammation could be an important future research direction for developing novel therapeutics.

1. Introduction

Fetal cartilage fully regenerates following injury [1,2]. In contrast, adult cartilage has only negligible inherent reparative capacity but responds to injury by producing mechanically and functionally inferior fibrocartilage [3]. Cartilage injury in adult mammals, therefore, leads to chronic degenerative joint disease: osteoarthritis (OA) [3]. OA, the most common musculoskeletal disease affecting 240 million people globally, is associated with substantial morbidity, disability, reduced quality of life and commensurate socioeconomic costs [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Currently, no treatment is available to stop the progressive degeneration of articular cartilage in OA.
Although OA is characterized by a failure to repair damaged cartilage, it is a disease of the entire joint, affecting all articular tissues because of their physical and functional association [10]. The pathogenesis of OA is multifaceted, involving mechanical, cellular and molecular processes, inflammation, metabolic dysfunction and epigenetic modifications, and is orchestrated by intricate crosstalk including chondrocytes, synovial macrophages and fibroblasts, osteocytes and infiltrating leukocytes [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. OA may occur as a result of a variety of predisposing factors, such as age and mechanical injury, that incite a cascade of pathophysiological events within articular tissues [11,12,13,14,15]. Cartilage ECM debris and intracellular alarmins released into the synovial microenvironment activate synovial macrophages, synovial fibroblasts, and chondrocytes to produce inflammatory and catabolic mediators, which in turn disrupt cellular homeostasis and the balance between matrix synthesis and degradation and thus create a vicious cycle of inflammation and cartilage breakdown [11,12,13,14,15].
The inflammatory response is amplified by an influx of leukocytes, predominantly macrophages but also neutrophils, natural killer cells, and a smaller number of T- and B-cell lymphocytes and mast cells from the vascular compartment [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Neutrophils are the first immune cells that accumulate in the joint (six hours), followed by macrophages (one day) and natural killer cells (three days) [28]. Much of the innate immune activation and cytokine production in the OA joint is attributed to synovial pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, the key effectors of synovial inflammation that show significantly increasing numbers with increasing grade of inflammation [22,23,24,25,26,27]. In addition to their autocrine effects, paracrine interactions between macrophages and chondrocytes cause additional feedback loops and enhance synovitis and cartilage degradation [29]. The interplay between joint tissues and inflammatory mediators released by articular cells and infiltrating inflammatory cell populations contributes to the loss of articular homeostasis and disease progression [22,23,24,25,26,27]. Once inflammation is established, a dysregulated balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory polarized macrophages and the failure of synovial macrophages (Mɸ) to transition from M1 to M2 may contribute to the onset and progression of OA [30,31]. Interestingly, neutrophil depletion has been shown to ameliorate OA in a murine model [28], while macrophage depletion resulted in more equivocal results depending on the polarization of the macrophages and the selectivity of the depletion method; while CD14+ synovial macrophage depletion reduced cartilage degeneration, systemic and local depletion of colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor-expressing macrophages increased pro-inflammatory mediators and infiltration of monocytes and neutrophils into the joint synovium [30,32], indicating that macrophages are essential for immunomodulation.
Recently, we found differential regulation of inflammatory mediators in response to cartilage and tendon injury in fetal compared to adult sheep, suggesting a more robust immunomodulatory response in fetal animals [2]. Furthermore, in a comparison of fetal and adult tendon healing, we found a pronounced inflammatory response in adult injured tendons accompanied by activation of neutrophils and significant upregulation of pro-inflammatory factors and neutrophil-attracting chemokines. In contrast, in fetal regeneration, we observed prominent recruitment of macrophages with significant upregulation of anti-inflammatory proteins, several inflammation-resolving molecules and stem cell markers. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify key factors of fetal cartilage regeneration versus adult fibrocartilaginous repair and early OA development. To this end, shotgun proteomics and histologic analyses of tissue samples from fetal and adult injured compared to uninjured sheep were performed. The results were compared to the proteome profile of fetal MSCs to evaluate their therapeutic potential. We hypothesized that (a) the fetal response to cartilage injury is characterized by a rapid resolution of inflammation and the differential upregulation of immunomodulatory and growth factors, and (b) fetal MSCs in vitro respond to inflammatory stimuli by upregulating similar anti-inflammatory and pro-regenerative pathways as seen during the fetal injury response in vivo.

2. Results

2.1. Macroscopic and Histologic Evaluation of the In Vivo Injury Response

Upon harvest, 1- and 3-days (fetus) and 3-days (adult) post-injury (p.i.), the OARSI macroscopic score was 4/16 for cartilage because of the surgically-induced defect in the medial femoral condyle, and 0 for osteophytes and synovium. Fetal and adult control joints showed healthy articular cartilage with OARSI scores of 0 in all categories.
The cartilage defect was clearly visible in fetal as well as in adult samples (Figure 1) without any morphologically visible repair attempt. Fetal and adult control condyles showed regular cartilage with a smooth articular surface (Figure 1).
In fetal synovial samples 1-day p.i., affected samples could be identified by fibrin deposition on the synovial surface, extravascular erythrocytes, and synovial oedema. Nests of Mac 387-positive neutrophils, which were absent in control animals, were detected in the sub-synovial tissue 1-day p.i. (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Iba1-positive macrophages were prominent in the synovial lining of fetal control, but less obvious in the injured samples. In the sub-synovial tissue, irregularly shaped Iba1-positive cells were found both in control and injured samples. However, additional round Iba1-positive macrophages were seen in samples of injured animals (Figure 3). Extravascular erythrocytes and remnant fibrin deposition containing erythrocytes were still seen in fetal synovial samples three days p.i. (Figure 3). Only single Mac 387-positive neutrophils could be detected. In contrast to day 1 and control tissue, Iba1-positive macrophages in the synovial lining were almost absent in injured animals (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Irregularly shaped Iba1-positive cells were found in the control, and less prominent in injured sub-synovial tissue. Again, round Iba1 positive macrophages were most abundant in the sub-synovial tissue and in the fibrin deposited on the synovial surface.
In adult synovial samples 3-days p.i., fibrin deposition and extravascular erythrocytes were noticeable. The synovia appeared wider with a higher cell density when compared with the control samples (Figure 4). Invasion of neutrophils shown in H&E and Mac 387 staining into sub-synovial tissue was most prominent when compared with control samples (Figure 2 and Figure 4). The synovial lining of control adult animals contained more abundant Iba1-positive cells than in the fetus (Figure 2 and Figure 4). However, these cells were almost absent post-injury (Figure 2 and Figure 4). In the sub-synovial tissue, irregularly shaped Iba1-positive macrophages were accumulated directly below the synovial lining (Figure 4).
Both in fetal and adult injured synovial samples, the presence of high endothelial venules (HEV) was striking, indicating inflammatory cell recruitment (Figure 3 and Figure 4).

2.2. Mass Spectrometry of Adult and Fetal Cartilage Samples Following In Vivo Cartilage Injury

Out of a total of 2153 proteins identified in secretome fractions of cartilage samples (FDR < 0.01 for both protein and peptide levels, at least two peptides per protein), 57 proteins were found significantly upregulated upon injury in adults (more than two-fold change (FC), corrected for multiparameter analysis with an FDR < 0.05; individual p-values are indicated in Supplementary Table S1, whereas 67 proteins were found significantly down-regulated (FC < −2). As described previously, tissue-derived secretome samples contain not only genuinely secreted proteins but also proteins originating from cell debris, with some variance originating from the inherent complexity and heterogeneity of biological model systems and tissue samples [33,34]. Due to their functional implications, only genuinely secreted proteins significantly regulated between adult injured and adult control samples were included in the further analysis. Besides fifteen cell leakage proteins, the upregulated proteins comprised eighteen proteins related to neutrophil activation and neutrophil extracellular trap formation, ten acute phase proteins, four immunoglobulin-like proteins, two cytokines, five plasma proteins, one membrane protein and two ECM proteins. Among the downregulated proteins, 56 were found to be cell leakage proteins, in addition to three ECM proteins, three membrane proteins, one plasma protein, three platelet-derived proteins and one mucin.
Remarkably, neutrophil-related proteins and acute phase proteins were the two major upregulated protein groups. While most of these proteins were also positively identified in fetal samples, the abundance levels were much lower compared to the adult samples and the contrast between injured and uninjured samples was far less pronounced (Figure 5 and Figure 6). However, although the difference between fetal injured and fetal control samples was not significant, proteins shown to be significantly upregulated in adults showed a consistent upregulation also in the fetus, suggesting that neutrophils and acute phase proteins were also involved in fetal regeneration.

2.3. Neutrophil-Derived Proteins Identified in the Secretome of Adult versus Fetal Ovine Cartilage

Among the proteins significantly upregulated in adult sheep post-injury, lactotransferrin (LTF), cathelicidin 1-3 (CATL 1-3), S100 calcium binding protein A8 (S100A8) and myeloid antimicrobial peptide (Map-34) were particularly abundant (Figure 6A). Lactotransferrin is a marker for neutrophils and macrophages [35]. Cathelicidins are known as antimicrobial effector molecules characteristic for innate immune response and have been described in humans as biomarker for joint infection predominantly expressed by neutrophils [36]. Protein S100A8, contained in calprotectin, is reported to be a reliable blood marker for neutrophils [37]. Myeloid antimicrobial peptide (Map-34) is another effector molecule with anti-microbial properties, which was significantly upregulated in adult samples. Interestingly, this protein is described only for sheep and goats [38].
Other proteins which are characteristic for activated neutrophils and presently found to be significantly upregulated in adults but not in the fetus were high mobility group box 2 (HMGB2), histone cluster 1 H1 family member d (HIST1H1D), histones H2a, H3, H4 and H15 (LOC101106292, H2AFJ, H3F3A, LOC101109652), proteins S100 A9 and A12 (S100A9, S100A12), bactinecin (BAC11), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (LCN2), H1 histone family member X (H1FX), and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1).

2.4. Acute Phase Proteins Identified in the Secretome of Adult versus Fetal Ovine Cartilage

Acute phase proteins are systemic inflammation markers induced by the action of pro-inflammatory cytokines and typically synthesized in the liver [39]. All acute phase proteins identified in our experiments were found upregulated in adult animals upon injury but only slightly in fetal animals, demonstrating a pronounced systemic inflammation in adults. Haptoglobin (HP) was reported to be found in arthritic synovial fluid, potentially forming pro-inflammatory fragments [40] (Figure 6B). Mannose binding lectin 2 (MBL2) is a pathogen recognition molecule, facilitating the opsonisation of pathogens and cell debris and potentially initiating the complement cascade [41]. Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain family member 4 (ITIH4) is an anti-inflammatory type II acute phase protein, involved in inflammatory responses to trauma [42]. While RETN, which promotes chemotaxis of myeloid cells, is an adipokine mainly contributed by adipose tissue, its regulation resembles that of acute phase proteins [43].
Further potential acute phase proteins which were found significantly upregulated in adult sheep upon injury were serum amyloid A protein (SAA), serum amyloid A3.2 (SAA 3.2), mannan binding lectin serine peptidase 1 (MASP1), fibrinogen gamma chain (FGG), fibrinogen alpha chain (FGA) and a plasma proteinase inhibitor.

2.5. Macrophage Markers Identified in the Secretome of Adult versus Fetal Ovine Cartilage

As suggested by our histological assessment, macrophage activity was significantly higher in fetal than adult cartilage (corrected for multiparameter analysis, FDR < 0.05), but showed no regulation upon injury (Figure 6C). Remarkably, both M1 (pro-inflammatory) and M2 (pro-regenerative) markers were detected: activin beta A (INHBA), which is preferentially released by M1 macrophages, promotes the pro-inflammatory phenotype and inhibits the formation of polarized M2 macrophages [44]. Arginase ARG1 is predominantly expressed by macrophages and represents a typical marker for M2 polarized macrophages [45]. Antileukoproteinase SLPI is an antibacterial protein with immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory functions promoting M2 polarization, neutrophil apoptosis and clearance [46]. CHI3L1, a carbohydrate-binding lectin, is a marker for late stages of macrophage differentiation and takes part in macrophage bacterial killing but subsequently promotes M2 formation [47,48,49]. As expected, this protein was found induced also in adult animals upon injury, indicating that some immunomodulatory activity may also take place in the adults. The consistent expression of these marker molecules in fetal samples is a strong indicator for the presence of polarized macrophages in the fetal cartilage in contrast to adult tissue.

2.6. Anabolic Factors Identified in the Secretome of Adult versus Fetal Ovine Cartilage

In the fetus, several growth factors including Ras-related protein Rap1B, latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 4 (LTBP4) and Arf-GAP with SH3 domain ANK repeat and PH domain-containing protein 1 (Asap1), have a high baseline expression potentially promoting a rapid anabolic response to injury (Figure 6D). Rap1B regulates crosstalk of signaling pathways during skeletal development by balancing the signaling effects of bone morphogenetic proteins and fibroblast growth factor during skeletal development and disease, and promotes chondrogenic fate and chondrogenesis [50]. LTBP4 is a key molecule required for the stability of the TGFβ receptor complex [51]. Similarly, Asap1, a regulator of cytoskeletal dynamics and biosynthetic trafficking, is essential for the morphogenesis of tissues derived from mesenchymal progenitor cells [52]. In contrast, in adults, these anabolic factors have a low baseline expression but are upregulated following injury.

2.7. Proteins Secreted by Fetal MSCs In Vitro, Which Were Also Identified in the Secretome of Adult versus Fetal Ovine Cartilage

Mesenchymal stem cells were reported to contribute to the fetal healing processes potentially via the secretion of proteins, which might thus be of therapeutic interest. In order to identify potentially interesting therapeutic candidate proteins, we searched for proteins secreted by fMSCs in vitro which are described as healing-associated, and which were also detectable in the secretomes of the fetal in vivo samples (Figure 6D,E, Table 1). Out of a total of 902 proteins identified in secretome fractions of fetal MSCs in vitro (FDR < 0.01 for both protein and peptide levels, at least two peptides per protein, Supplementary Table S2), 94 were considered as biologically relevant (genuinely secreted and known to be associated with wound healing/osteoarthritis based on literature research); of these, 17 were also highly expressed in injured fetal cartilage in vivo (Table 1). Among these, several candidate effector molecules potentially contributing to the healing processes, such as connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), dickkopf-3 (DKK3), secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (sFRP2), elastin microfibril interface (Emilin1), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 (IGFBP5), could be discerned.

3. Discussion

The difference in regenerative capacity between fetal and adult tissues was accompanied by a significantly different histologic and proteomic response to injury. Fetal cartilage injury resulted in a rapid inflammatory response within one day, characterised by an infiltration of neutrophils into the sub-synovial tissue and upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines such as resistin (RETN) and cathelcidin-3 (CATHL3), demonstrating the fetal ability to mount an inflammatory response (Figure 6). By day 3 p.i., neutrophils had largely disappeared, and the fetal synovial immune cell population was dominated by Iba1-positive activated macrophages in the sub-synovial tissue (Figure 3).
The lack of differentially regulated proteins corroborated the histologically apparent rapid resolution of inflammation in fetal injured joints. In contrast, an equivalent injury to adult cartilage yielded a significantly stronger inflammatory response with 124 differentially regulated proteins at day 3 p.i., of which 18 were proteins characteristic for neutrophils, such as CATHL3, S100A8 and lactotransferrin. In addition, acute phase proteins including haptoglobin (HP), RETN, mannose-binding lectin 2 (MBL2) and inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H4 (ITIH4) were significantly higher regulated in adult injury. Indeed, cathelicidin and S100A 8 levels have been shown to correlate with cellular influx in collagen-induced arthritis, demonstrating their fundamental role in OA pathogenesis and the perpetuation of inflammation [53]. Additionally, synovial haptoglobin levels strongly correlate with the severity of OA [54]. Similarly, lactotransferrin, a known neutrophil activation marker protein, and resistin, which has been shown to enhance neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, indicate high neutrophil activation and are associated with synovitis and sustained inflammation [55]. Histology further confirmed neutrophils as the primary immune cell in the adult synovial tissue.
Innate immune cell activation, particularly neutrophil function, has a profound role in OA pathology and, while critical to the injury response, can also cause extensive collateral tissue damage [56]. Neutrophils induce rapid damage to articular cartilage and degrade cartilage proteoglycan up to 28 times more than either macrophages or synovial fibroblasts [57]. Correspondingly, neutrophil depletion has been shown to ameliorate OA in a murine model and preserve the joint architecture, reduce cell infiltration and synovitis, chondrocyte apoptosis and glycosaminoglycan loss [28]. Since the elimination of inflammatory neutrophils from the site of inflammation is a prerequisite for resolution of the acute inflammatory response [58], the rapid clearance of neutrophils from the synovial tissue in fetal joint injury as shown in the current study may contribute to the efficient fetal resolution response.
The role of Mɸ in the context of OA pathogenesis is more diverse and dependent on their polarization state that dynamically responds to microenvironmental cues [30,59,60]. On the one hand, dysregulation of Mɸ activation with non-resolving persistent macrophage-mediated synovial inflammation is considered as one of the main drivers of both the establishment and progression of OA [30,31,61]. Indeed, the accumulation of M1 polarized macrophages in the intimal lining is the principal morphological characteristic of synovitis and correlates with the progression of OA, stiffness, function and quality of life [22,29,62,63,64]. On the other hand, macrophages are critical immunomodulators in joint injury and have a pivotal role in reinstating articular homeostasis and functional healing [30,32,60,62,65,66,67]. Corresponding to their diverse functional spectrum, macrophage depletion studies yielded equivocal effects depending on the targeted subpopulations, exacerbating rather than diminishing disease [30,32,62,68,69]. These studies indicate that the failure to transform from the M1 to M2 subtype may play a larger role in the progression of OA than the quantity of activated macrophages [29]. This was confirmed in transgenic mouse models, which showed that synovial macrophage M1 polarization exacerbated experimental collagenase-induced OA, while M2 polarization attenuated OA development [70]. Interestingly, in the present study, Iba1+ (“pan-macrophage marker”, ref. [71]) synovial lining macrophages disappeared at day 3 p.i. in both adult and fetal joints while Iba1+ cells appeared in the sub-synovial tissue, indicating either migration into the sub-synovial tissue or loss into the synovial fluid or both. However, in the fetal samples, the presence of round Iba1+ macrophages in the sub-synovia was more prominent, potentially indicating recruitment of monocytes from the circulation.
While the crucial role of macrophages in morphogenesis is well-established [72,73,74,75], the upregulation of macrophage marker proteins such as scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain-containing protein (SSC5D) and secretory leucocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) in both control and injured fetal animals was unexpected but may contribute to the rapid switch from a neutrophil to a macrophage dominated injury response and the efficient resolution of inflammation. SLPI promotes neutrophil apoptosis and their subsequent clearance, and reprograms myeloid cells towards resolution responses [46]. Similar to the fetus, adult cartilage also upregulated macrophage markers, such as the M2 macrophage marker arginase1 (Arg1) and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1) [49,76], in response to injury. However, in contrast to the fetus, the adult attempt to modulate the inflammatory response toward resolution seems to fail.
Like all biological cascades, the inflammatory response is shaped by a delicate balance between positive and negative feedback loops; moreover, the resolution of inflammation is an active process rather than a passive return to homeostasis [77,78]. Events at the onset of acute inflammation already establish biosynthetic circuits for a series of chemical mediators that later not only antagonistically inhibit the inflammatory cascade but also agonistically actively promote resolution [77]. Anti-inflammation and pro-resolution are therefore not equivalent but fundamentally different at both the molecular and cellular levels [77]. As in joint injury, the innate immune response also encodes part of the stromal cell repertoire’s response towards cell stress and damage, implicating chondrocytes and synovial fibroblasts in addition to the classical immune effector cells; immunomodulatory strategies must address the articular homeostasis and not selectively the immune system to successfully resolve the inflammatory response [69,79]. Transition from the inflammatory to the proliferative phase is a crucial step of the healing process and accumulating evidence associates a compromised transition with fibrosis and scarring [80]. Thus, targeting factors that impact this phase transition may offer a novel therapeutic strategy [80].
Furthermore, several growth factors were shown to have a high baseline expression, potentially promoting a rapid anabolic response to injury in the fetus, while in the adult these anabolic factors are upregulated following injury after the catabolic processes induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines have already dysbalanced the articular homeostasis. Although adult injured cartilage upregulates many factors also seen in fetal animals, the timing and magnitude of the response seem insufficient to achieve regeneration. Interestingly, several factors associated with OA, such as SSC5D and periostin [81,82], are constitutively expressed in fetal animals, indicating that these factors are not associated with pathogenesis per se but rather with morphogenetic or reparative processes. Consequently, therapeutic strategies need to modulate the adult articular microenvironment to facilitate successful repair.
In addition to the immune system, chondrocytes and articular MSC populations are major contributors to the healing response. Joint resident MSCs and progenitor cells, contrary to longstanding historical beliefs, are actually relatively abundant in vivo even in adults and occupy several articular niches, including the superficial cartilage zone, synovium and synovial fluid [83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91]. Interestingly, several cell tracing studies showed that MSCs found in experimental cartilage defects in vivo predominantly originate in the synovial membrane rather than in the superficial zone [86,89,92]. MSC senescence and an associated loss of potency could be an important facet of OA pathophysiology [93,94,95]. Indeed, advanced OA is associated with a numerical increase, but functional decline, in MSCs; while on the other hand, osteoarthritic synovium impacts chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs via macrophage polarisation state, thus closing the vicious circle of OA cellular crosstalk [91,93,96,97]. In contrast, fetal stem cells such as umbilical cord-derived MSC have superior anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties compared to MSCs from adult tissues [98].
To assess the potential of fetal MSCs secretome as novel regenerative treatment, we also examined the secretory response of fetal MSCs in vitro to inflammatory stimuli and found several growth factors, such as CTGF, DKK3, Emilin1, periostin, sFRP2 and IGFBP5, highly expressed in the fetus, which were also expressed by fetal MSCs in vitro, suggesting a potential therapeutic role. Indeed, CTGF plays critical roles in cartilage development, maintenance, and regeneration [99,100]. Dkk3 has a well-established protective effect on cartilage integrity by preventing proteoglycan loss, modulating inflammatory cell activity and helping to restore OA-relevant signaling pathway activity [101,102]. In addition, DKK3 was described to regulate functional differentiation of various forms of stem cells including in smooth muscle or intestinal crypts [103,104]. Emilin1 was described as a marker molecule for regenerative multipotent mesenchymal stromal cell promoting the regeneration of damaged pancreatic islets [105]. In our samples, Emilin1 was found up-regulated in adults upon injury but was expressed at significantly higher levels in fetal tissue samples. Periostin, a regulator of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway, was recently described to promote functional regeneration and repair of tendons [106]. SFRP2 has recently been highlighted as a key molecule for the biogenesis of a regenerative phenotype in MSCs [107,108]. Similarly, insulin-like growth factor binding proteins such as IGFBP5 have been recently described to modulate matrix synthesis in degenerated areas of osteoarthritic cartilage in a healing-promoting fashion [109].
One inherent limitation of the in vivo comparison of fetal and adult cartilage healing lies in the difference in articular cellularity and vascularity. In this study, we tried to compensate for the latter by creating microfractures in adult cartilage defects to access the bone marrow. The difference in chondrocyte cellularity, which decreases at the articular surface between fetal and adult cartilage from 290 to 150 million cells per cm3 and the corresponding distance to the nearest neighbouring cell, which increases with maturity from 7.9 microns to 9.1 microns [110], remains a confounding factor, which must be taken into account in the development of biomimetic therapeutic strategies.
Furthermore, while no in vitro model can fully emulate the in vivo situation, we tried to address the inherent limitations of in vitro studies and to closely mimic the in vivo stimulation of these cells by using the secretome of inflamed chondrocytes to precondition the MSCs and IL1 and TNFa, key inflammatory stimuli in OA, to induce inflammation in chondrocytes.
As OA is one of the most common diseases among mammals and the world’s leading cause of chronic disability not only for the elderly but also for individuals of working age [111], novel disease-modifying treatments are urgently needed. Given the crucial role of inflammation in OA, inducers/agonists of the resolution phase of inflammation have enormous therapeutic potential [77]. Indeed, the rapid fetal resolution of inflammation appears to be key for a successful response to injury. Biomimicry of the fetal paracrine signature to reprogram macrophages and modulate inflammation could thus be an important future research direction for developing novel therapeutics for OA. In fact, paracrine factors secreted by fetal MSCs in vitro show substantial parallels to the in vivo regenerative signature, suggesting their therapeutic potential.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Design

To investigate the fetal immunomodulatory environment, the fetal and adult in vivo response to cartilage injury was assessed in an ovine medial femoral condylar defect model and compared using comprehensive histological and proteomic analyses, with the latter focusing on neutrophil, macrophage and stem cell markers, and acute phase proteins. In addition, proteins expressed in fetal inflamed MSCs in vitro were compared with the in vivo response to injury to identify potential MSC-derived therapeutic factors.

4.2. In Vivo Cartilage Injury Model

Standardized cartilage lesions were created (ethical approval numbers 68.205/0155-WF-/V/3b/2014 and 68.205/0028-II/3b/2014) in musculoskeletally mature (2–5 years, body weight 95 ± 12 kg), female Merino-cross ewes (Ovis aries) without orthopaedic disease, and fetal lambs (80 gd, term = ∼150 days) as previously described [2]. Day 80 of gestation was chosen to be able to study the regenerative response in the presence of a fully functioning immune system and established ability to mount an inflammatory response, which fetal sheep acquire by gestational day 65–75 [112,113,114,115,116]. For the fetal subjects, only twin pregnancies were included to provide a twin lamb as an uninjured control to allow differentiation between protein secretion of normal fetal development and fetal response to cartilage injury.
Following a minimally invasive medial parapatellar arthrotomy [117], bilateral full-thickness cartilage lesions with a diameter of 7 mm (adult sheep) or 1 mm (fetal lamb) and a depth of 1 mm were created in the medial femoral condyle. To ensure that differences in the healing response between fetal and adult articular cartilage are not caused by differences in blood supply due to fetal cartilage channels [1], we generated three microfractures of standardized size, number and distribution in adult cartilage defects to access the bone marrow vasculature, as evidenced by visible bleeding in all defects [118]. Adult animals were allowed full weight-bearing immediately after surgery. Pain management was provided with morphine.
Tissue samples were harvested immediately following euthanasia on day one and three (fetal twin sheep, injured and control), day 0 (uninjured control) and day three after injury (adult sheep), respectively, from three biological replicates per comparison group. After macroscopic evaluation using the OARSI scoring system [119], the medial femoral condyles and patellae with attached synovial membrane were surgically excised, and left and right knees were randomly assigned to mass spectrometry and histology. For mass spectrometry, the (cartilage) tissue remnants contained in the defect area and the cartilage rim surrounding the lesion (3 mm width in adults; 1 mm width in fetal sheep) were excised, cultivated in serum-free RPMI medium (Gibco, Life Technologies, Vienna, Austria) supplemented with 1% penicillin and 1% streptomycin (ATCC, LGC Standards GmbH, Wesel, Germany) for 6 h, sterile-filtered (0.2 µm filter), precipitated with ice-cold ethanol and stored at −20 °C until further processing. In addition, adult articular cartilage and umbilical cord blood was harvested for chondrocyte and MSC isolation.

4.3. Cell Isolation and Culture

To determine the proteomic fingerprint of fetal MSCs in vitro for comparison with the in vivo secretome, MSCs were isolated from umbilical cord blood of fetal sheep (n = 3) as previously described [120,121]. In brief, following standard density gradient centrifugation (400 g at 20 °C for 30 min) using a polysaccharide solution (Ficoll-Paque Premium, GE Healthcare, Vienna, Austria), mononuclear cells were resuspended in standard culture medium consisting of DMEM (low glucose, without L-Glutamine (Lonza, Visp, Valis, Switzerland), 10% FCS (low endotoxin (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1% L-Glutamine (L-Alanyl L-Glutamine 200 mM, Biochrom, M&B Stricker, Bernried, Bavaria, Germany), 1% Pen/Strep (100×, Sigma Aldrich) and 1% Amphotericin B (250 µg/mL, Biochrom, M&B Stricker, Bernried, Bavaria, Germany), seeded on a culture dish and cultured in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The following day, the cells were washed to remove non-adherent cells and tissue debris. MSCs were characterized using FACS and trilineage differentiation as previously described (details see Supplementary material S3 and Supplementary Figure S4) [120,122].
For biomimicry of the in vivo inflammatory stimulation of MSCs (preconditioning of MSCs), adult articular cartilage was harvested and chondrocytes isolated as previously described [121]. In brief, articular cartilage samples were minced into small pieces (1 mm3), digested in a 1 mg/mL collagenase (Type I, Sigma Aldrich) solution for 6–8 h under constant stirring at 37 °C, and filtered through a cell strainer (100 µm, Greiner Bio One, Kremsmünster, OÖ, Austria). The obtained chondrocytes were washed twice (DPBS + Ca/Mg (Lonza; centrifugation at 400× g for 5 min at room temperature). The resulting cell pellet was resuspended in standard culture medium (equivalent to the MSCs). Chondrocytes were seeded onto a culture dish and cultured in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The following day, the cells were washed to remove non-adherent cells and tissue debris.
Medium was changed twice weekly. Passaging was performed upon colony confluence for the first passage and later upon 80–90% confluence by trypsinisation (Trypsin 0.05%, EDTA 0.02%, Biochrom, M&B Stricker, Bernried, Bavaria, Germany). MSCs and chondrocytes were frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen until further use at the lowest possible passage (P1-2).

4.4. Histology and Immunohistochemistry

For histological analysis, the femoral condyles and synovial membranes (n = 3/group) were fixed in 4% buffered formalin and processed as previously described [2,123,124]. Condyles from adult sheep were decalcified in 8% neutral EDTA. After routine embedding in paraffin, 4-μm-thick sections were mounted on APES-glutaraldehyde-coated slides (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Consecutive sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Toluidine blue, and Safranin-O, and evaluated based on the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) criteria [125,126], including the cartilage surface and matrix, cell distribution, cell viability and subchondral bone, but without scores as no defect repair can occur in a 3-day time frame. Consecutive sections of synovial membranes were stained with H&E or immunohistochemically.
For immunohistochemical detection of neutrophils (via mouse monoclonal antibody Macrophage/Calprotectin Ab-1 [Mac 387], Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and macrophages (via rabbit polyclonal antibody Ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 [Iba1], Wako, Neuss, Germany), sections were deparaffinised, rehydrated, and endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 0.6% hydrogen peroxide in methanol (15 min at room temperature). Sections were pre-treated with 1 mg/mL protease (Sigma Aldrich, P5147; 20 min at room temperature) for Mac 387 staining, and 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0, 2 h in a water bath at 65 °C) for Iba1 staining. Nonspecific binding of antibodies was prevented by incubation with 1.5% normal goat serum (Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 30 min at room temperature). Primary antibodies were diluted in PBS (1:2000 for Mac 387, and 1:4000 for Iba1) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. An appropriate BrightVision Peroxidase system (Immunologic, Duiven, The Netherlands) was used and peroxidase activities were localized with diaminobenzidine (DAB Quanto Chromogen TA-125-QHDX, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cell nuclei were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin.
Tissue from sheep lymph node (Mac 387) and sheep liver (Iba1) served as positive controls. For negative control experiments, the primary antibody was omitted. For quantification, Mac 387 and Iba1 positive cells were counted and the synovial tissue area measured in five regions of interest (ROI), each at 20× magnification. Afterwards, the numbers of positive cells per mm2 of synovial tissue were calculated.

4.5. Fetal MSCs Secretome Production

Fetal ovine umbilical cord blood derived MSC and adult ovine articular chondrocytes (n = 3 biological and n = 2 technical replicates per cell type) were thawed and cultured (in T175 cell culture flasks, Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) in standard culture medium to passage 2 to 4, then cells were transferred to StemMACS™ MSC Expansion Media (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) plus corresponding medium supplements as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
For inflammatory preconditioning of the fetal MSCs, adult chondrocytes (100,000 cells/well in 12-well-plates, Sarstedt) were chemically inflamed by adding 10 ng/mL IL1β and TNFα (Immuno Tools, Friesoythe, Germany) to StemMACSTM medium for 24 h. Thereafter, the medium was changed to StemMACSTM without inflammatory stimuli and chondrocyte supernatants were harvested after 6 h incubation. Fetal MSCs (100000 cells/well in 12-well-plates) were cultured in the supernatant of the inflamed chondrocytes for 24 h to simulate naturally inflammatory stimuli occurring in the joint. Thereafter, the medium was changed to StemMACSTM medium with only 0.14% of the provided medium supplements (to minimize cell death; higher quantities were not possible as the proteins contained in the supplement would overshadow the mass spectrometry measurement results). Fetal MSC secretomes were harvested after 6 h incubation and centrifuged at 4° at 1400× g for 5 min. The obtained supernatant was precipitated in ice cold 99.6% ethanol and stored at −20 °C until further processing and downstream analysis.

4.6. Mass Spectrometry

After precipitation, proteins were dissolved in sample buffer (7.5 M urea, 1.5 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 0.05% SDS, 100 mM dithiothreitol (DDT)) and protein concentrations were determined using Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany).
A 20 μg sample of each protein was used for a filter-aided digestion, as described previously [127,128,129,130,131]. Briefly, 3 kDa molecular weight cut-off filters (Pall Austria Filter GmbH) were conditioned with MS-grade water (Millipore GmbH). Protein samples were concentrated on the pre-washed filter by centrifugation at 15,000× g for 15 min. After reduction with DTT [5 mg/mL dissolved in 8 M guanidinium hydrochloride in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ABC) buffer, pH 8] and alkylation with iodoacetamide (10 mg/mL in 8 M guanidinium hydrochloride in 50 mM ABC buffer), samples were washed and 1 µg trypsin was added before incubation at 37 °C for 18 h. After enzymatic digestion, peptide samples were cleaned with C18 spin columns (Pierce, Thermo Scientific, Germany), dried, and stored at −20 °C until analysis.
For mass spectrometric analyses, dried samples were reconstituted in 5 µL 30% formic acid (FA) containing 10 fmol of each of the four synthetic standard peptides and diluted with 40 µL mobile phase A (H2O:ACN:FA = 97.9:2:0.1). A 10 µL aliquot of the peptide solution was loaded onto a 2 cm × 75 µm C18 Pepmap100 precolumn (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a flow rate of 10 µL/min using mobile phase A. Afterwards, peptides were eluted from the precolumn to a 50 cm × 75 µm Pepmap100 analytical column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a flow rate of 300 nl/min, and separation was achieved using a gradient of 8% to 40% mobile phase B (ACN:H2O:FA = 79.9:20:0.1) over 95 min. For mass spectrometric analyses, MS scans were performed in the range of m/z 400–1400 at a resolution of 70,000 (at m/z = 200). MS/MS scans of the eight most abundant ions were achieved through high-energy collisional dissociation fragmentation at 30% normalized collision energy and analysed in the orbitrap at a resolution of 17,500 (at m/z = 200). All samples were analysed in duplicate. Untargeted proteome profiling of secreted protein fractions derived from healthy and injured sheep cartilage tissue as well as fetal MSCs was performed, extending our previously published dataset, which established the feasibility of our fetal cartilage injury model [2].

4.7. Data Analysis

Protein identification and label-free quantitative (LFQ) data analysis were performed using the open source software MaxQuant (version 1.3.0.5, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany) including the Andromeda search engine [132]. Protein identification was achieved searching against Ovis aries in the Uniprot Database (version 09/2014 with 26,864 entries), allowing a mass tolerance of 5 ppm for MS spectra and 20 ppm for MS/MS spectra, as well as a maximum of two missed cleavages. In addition, carbamidomethylation on cysteine residues was included as a fixed modification, whereas methionine oxidation and N-terminal protein acetylation were included as variable modifications. Furthermore, search criteria included a minimum of two peptide identifications per protein, at least one of them unique, and the false discovery rate (FDR) calculation based on q-values, performed for both peptide identification as well as protein identification, less than 0.01. Prior to statistical analyses, proteins were filtered for reversed sequences, contaminants, and a minimum of three independent identifications per protein. Proteins identified in the present work were assigned to human orthologues and subsequently classified according to cell leakage, or genuinely secreted based on the UniProt database (accessed February–May 2021). Statistical evaluation was performed with Perseus software (version 1.6.0.2) using LFQ intensities of the MaxQuant result file [133]. After filtering potential contaminants, the LFQ values were log(2)-transformed. Technical duplicates were averaged. Only proteins detected in three of three biological replicates in either control and/or treatment groups were considered for data evaluation. Permutation-based FDR was set to 0.05 for t-tests and provided significant protein expression changes corrected for multi-parameters (S0 = 0.1).

5. Conclusions

In summary, the innate immune system may cause substantial tissue damage in adults due to molecular dysregulation and persistent inflammation. Defence against potential pathogens orchestrated by neutrophils appears to be evolutionarily prioritized over regenerative processes in the adult. In the fetus in contrast, there seems to be a concerted effort to limit innate immune system-induced cell damage supported by higher macrophage activity, which accelerates clearance of debris and resolution of inflammation, considered to be a crucial prerequisite for successful regeneration.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms222312969/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.R., C.G. and F.J.; methodology, I.R., C.G. and F.J.; formal analysis, A.B., M.E., S.G., R.L.M., L.J.; investigation, I.R., A.B., M.E., S.G., R.L.M., L.J., C.G. and F.J.; resources, C.G. and F.J.; writing—original draft preparation, I.R. and F.J.; writing—review and editing, I.R., C.G. and F.J.; visualization, A.B., M.E. and S.G.; supervision, C.G. and F.J.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG grant number: 7269695); Open Access Funding by the University of Vienna.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Approval of the national (“Commission for Animal Research” of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy) and institutional (“Ethics and Animal Welfare Committee” of the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna”) animal welfare committees (Approval numbers 68.205/0155-WF-/V/3b/2014 and 68.205/0028-II/3b/2014) was obtained for all experiments. Experiments were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository [134] with the dataset identifier PXD027486.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support by the Joint Metabolome Facility of the University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, all members of the Vienna Life Science Instruments (VLSI).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Namba, R.S.; Meuli, M.; Sullivan, K.M.; Le, A.X.; Adzick, N.S. Spontaneous Repair of Superficial Defects in Articular Cartilage in a Fetal Lamb Model. J. Bone Jt. Surgery. Am. Vol. 1998, 80, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ribitsch, I.; Mayer, R.L.; Egerbacher, M.; Gabner, S.; Kańduła, M.M.; Rosser, J.; Haltmayer, E.; Auer, U.; Gültekin, S.; Huber, J.; et al. Fetal Articular Cartilage Regeneration versus Adult Fibrocartilaginous Repair: Secretome Proteomics Unravels Molecular Mechanisms in an Ovine Model. Dis. Models Mech. 2018, 11, dmm033092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Shapiro, F.; Koide, S.; Glimcher, M.J. Cell Origin and Differentiation in the Repair of Full-Thickness Defects of Articular Cartilage. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1993, 75, 532–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. March, L.; Cross, M.; Lo, C.; Arden, N.; Gates, L.; Leyland, K. Osteoarthritis: A Serious Disease; US Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2016; p. 103. Available online: https://oarsi.org/sites/default/files/docs/2016/oarsi_white_paper_oa_serious_disease_121416_1.pdf (accessed on 25 October 2021).
  5. Cucchiarini, M.; de Girolamo, L.; Filardo, G.; Oliveira, J.M.; Orth, P.; Pape, D.; Reboul, P. Basic Science of Osteoarthritis. J. Exp. Orthop. 2016, 3, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Hay, S.I.; Abajobir, A.A.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K.M.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdulkader, R.S.; Abdulle, A.M.; Abebo, T.A.; Abera, S.F.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) for 333 Diseases and Injuries and Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE) for 195 Countries and Territories, 1990–2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017, 390, 1260–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hunter, D.J.; Schofield, D.; Callander, E. The Individual and Socioeconomic Impact of Osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2014, 10, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Symmons, D.; Mathers, C.; Pfleger, B. Global Burden of Osteoarthritis in the Year 2000; WHO Global Burden of Disease; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; Available online: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/bod_osteoarthritis.pdf (accessed on 25 October 2021).
  9. Glyn-Jones, S.; Palmer, A.J.R.; Agricola, R.; Price, A.J.; Vincent, T.L.; Weinans, H.; Carr, A.J. Osteoarthritis. Lancet 2015, 386, 376–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Loeser, R.F.; Goldring, S.R.; Scanzello, C.R.; Goldring, M.B. Osteoarthritis: A Disease of the Joint as an Organ. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 1697–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Raman, S.; FitzGerald, U.; Murphy, J.M. Interplay of Inflammatory Mediators with Epigenetics and Cartilage Modifications in Osteoarthritis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Goldring, M.B.; Otero, M.; Plumb, D.A.; Dragomir, C.; Favero, M.; Hachem, K.E.; Hashimoto, K.; Roach, H.I.; Olivotto, E.; Borzí, R.M.; et al. Roles of Inflammatory and Anabolic Cytokines in Cartilage Metabolism: Signals and Multiple Effectors Converge upon MMP-13 Regulation in Osteoarthritis. Eur. Cells Mater. 2011, 21, 202–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sellam, J.; Berenbaum, F. The Role of Synovitis in Pathophysiology and Clinical Symptoms of Osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2010, 6, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Houard, X.; Goldring, M.B.; Berenbaum, F. Homeostatic Mechanisms in Articular Cartilage and Role of Inflammation in Osteoarthritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2013, 15, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Berenbaum, F. Osteoarthritis as an Inflammatory Disease (Osteoarthritis Is Not Osteoarthrosis!). Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2013, 21, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Holt, D.W.; Henderson, M.L.; Stockdale, C.E.; Farrell, J.T.; Kooyman, D.L.; Bridgewater, L.C.; Seegmiller, R.E. Osteoarthritis-like Changes in the Heterozygous Sedc Mouse Associated with the HtrA1–Ddr2–Mmp-13 Degradative Pathway: A New Model of Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2012, 20, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sandell, L.J.; Aigner, T. Articular Cartilage and Changes in Arthritis: Cell Biology of Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2001, 3, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mobasheri, A.; Rayman, M.P.; Gualillo, O.; Sellam, J.; van der Kraan, P.; Fearon, U. The Role of Metabolism in the Pathogenesis of Osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2017, 13, 302–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sokolove, C.M.L.J. Role of Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Osteoarthritis: Latest Findings and Interpretations. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2013, 5, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Robinson, W.H.; Lepus, C.M.; Wang, Q.; Raghu, H.; Mao, R.; Lindstrom, T.M.; Sokolove, J. Low-Grade Inflammation as a Key Mediator of the Pathogenesis of Osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2016, 12, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. De Lange-Brokaar, B.J.E.; Ioan-Facsinay, A.; van Osch, G.J.V.M.; Zuurmond, A.M.; Schoones, J.; Toes, R.E.M.; Huizinga, T.W.J.; Kloppenburg, M. Synovial Inflammation, Immune Cells and Their Cytokines in Osteoart. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2012, 20, 1484–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kraus, V.B.; McDaniel, G.; Huebner, J.L.; Stabler, T.V.; Pieper, C.F.; Shipes, S.W.; Petry, N.A.; Low, P.S.; Shen, J.; McNearney, T.A.; et al. Direct in Vivo Evidence of Activated Macrophages in Human Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016, 24, 1613–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Manferdini, C.; Paolella, F.; Gabusi, E.; Gambari, L.; Piacentini, A.; Filardo, G.; Fleury-Cappellesso, S.; Barbero, A.; Murphy, M.; Lisignoli, G. Adipose Stromal Cells Mediated Switching of the Pro-Inflammatory Profile of M1-like Macrophages Is Facilitated by PGE2: In Vitro Evaluation. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2017, 25, 1161–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Manferdini, C.; Paolella, F.; Gabusi, E.; Silvestri, Y.; Gambari, L.; Cattini, L.; Filardo, G.; Fleury-Cappellesso, S.; Lisignoli, G. From Osteoarthritic Synovium to Synovial-Derived Cells Characterization: Synovial Macrophages Are Key Effector Cells. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016, 18, 1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Utomo, L.; Bastiaansen-Jenniskens, Y.M.; Verhaar, J.A.N.; van Osch, G.J.V.M. Cartilage Inflammation and Degeneration Is Enhanced by Pro-Inflammatory (M1) Macrophages in Vitro, but Not Inhibited Directly by Anti-Inflammatory (M2) Macrophages. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016, 24, 2162–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Fahy, N.; Farrell, E.; Ritter, T.; Ryan, A.E.; Murphy, J.M. Immune Modulation to Improve Tissue Engineering Outcomes for Cartilage Repair in the Osteoarthritic Joint. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2015, 21, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mathiessen, P.G.C.A. Synovitis in Osteoarthritis: Current Understanding with Therapeutic Implications. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017, 19, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Benigni, G.; Dimitrova, P.; Antonangeli, F.; Sanseviero, E.; Milanova, V.; Blom, A.; van Lent, P.; Morrone, S.; Santoni, A.; Bernardini, G. CXCR3/CXCL10 Axis Regulates Neutrophil–NK Cell Cross-Talk Determining the Severity of Experimental Osteoarthritis. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 2115–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, H.; Cai, D.; Bai, X. Macrophages Regulate the Progression of Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2020, 28, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wu, C.-L.; Harasymowicz, N.S.; Klimak, M.A.; Collins, K.H.; Guilak, F. The Role of Macrophages in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Repair. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2020, 28, 544–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xie, J.; Huang, Z.; Yu, X.; Zhou, L.; Pei, F. Clinical Implications of Macrophage Dysfunction in the Development of Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2019, 46, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, C.; McNeill, J.; Goon, K.; Little, D.; Kimmerling, K.; Huebner, J.; Kraus, V.; Guilak, F. Conditional Macrophage Depletion Increases Inflammation and Does Not Inhibit the Development of Osteoarthritis in Obese Macrophage Fas-Induced Apoptosis–Transgenic Mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017, 69, 1772–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Poulos, R.C.; Hains, P.G.; Shah, R.; Lucas, N.; Xavier, D.; Manda, S.S.; Anees, A.; Koh, J.M.S.; Mahboob, S.; Wittman, M.; et al. Strategies to Enable Large-Scale Proteomics for Reproducible Research. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zwickl, H.; Traxler, E.; Staettner, S.; Parzefall, W.; Grasl-Kraupp, B.; Karner, J.; Schulte-Hermann, R.; Gerner, C. A Novel Technique to Specifically Analyze the Secretome of Cells and Tissues. Electrophoresis 2005, 26, 2779–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kovacic, B.; Hoelbl-Kovacic, A.; Fischhuber, K.M.; Leitner, N.R.; Gotthardt, D.; Casanova, E.; Sexl, V.; Müller, M. Lactotransferrin-Cre Reporter Mice Trace Neutrophils, Monocytes/Macrophages and Distinct Subtypes of Dendritic Cells. Haematologica 2014, 99, 1006–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Banke, I.J.; Stade, N.; Prodinger, P.M.; Tübel, J.; Hapfelmeier, A.; von Eisenhart-Rothe, R.; van Griensven, M.; Gollwitzer, H.; Burgkart, R. Antimicrobial Peptides in Human Synovial Membrane as (Low-Grade) Periprosthetic Joint Infection Biomarkers. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2020, 25, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Åsberg, A.; Løfblad, L.; Felic, A.; Aune, M.W.; Hov, G.G.; Fagerli, U.M. Using Blood Calprotectin as a Measure of Blood Neutrophils. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 2021, 81, 303–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kościuczuk, E.M.; Lisowski, P.; Jarczak, J.; Strzałkowska, N.; Jóźwik, A.; Horbańczuk, J.; Krzyżewski, J.; Zwierzchowski, L.; Bagnicka, E. Cathelicidins: Family of Antimicrobial Peptides. A Review. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 10957–10970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Jain, S.; Gautam, V.; Naseem, S. Acute-Phase Proteins: As Diagnostic Tool. J. Pharm. Bioallied. Sci. 2011, 3, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Park, H.J.; Oh, M.-K.; Kim, N.-H.; Cho, M.-L.; Kim, I.-S. Identification of a Specific Haptoglobin C-Terminal Fragment in Arthritic Synovial Fluid and Its Effect on Interleukin-6 Expression. Immunology 2013, 140, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dean, M.M.; Minchinton, R.M.; Heatley, S.; Eisen, D.P. Mannose Binding Lectin Acute Phase Activity in Patients with Severe Infection. J. Clin. Immunol. 2005, 25, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kashyap, R.S.; Nayak, A.R.; Deshpande, P.S.; Kabra, D.; Purohit, H.J.; Taori, G.M.; Daginawala, H.F. Inter-α-Trypsin Inhibitor Heavy Chain 4 Is a Novel Marker of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Clin. Chim. Acta 2009, 402, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chumakov, A.M.; Kubota, T.; Walter, S.; Koeffler, H.P. Identification of Murine and Human XCP1 Genes as C/EBP-ε-Dependent Members of FIZZ/Resistin Gene Family. Oncogene 2004, 23, 3414–3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Sierra-Filardi, E.; Puig-Kröger, A.; Blanco, F.J.; Nieto, C.; Bragado, R.; Palomero, M.I.; Bernabéu, C.; Vega, M.A.; Corbí, A.L. Activin A Skews Macrophage Polarization by Promoting a Proinflammatory Phenotype and Inhibiting the Acquisition of Anti-Inflammatory Macrophage Markers. Blood 2011, 117, 5092–5101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Xue, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Su, Q.; Hao, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, X. Long Non-coding RNA MEG3 Inhibits M2 Macrophage Polarization by Activating TRAF6 via MicroRNA-223 Down-regulation in Viral Myocarditis. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 12341–12354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Triantafyllou, E.; Pop, O.T.; Possamai, L.A.; Wilhelm, A.; Liaskou, E.; Singanayagam, A.; Bernsmeier, C.; Khamri, W.; Petts, G.; Dargue, R.; et al. MerTK Expressing Hepatic Macrophages Promote the Resolution of Inflammation in Acute Liver Failure. Gut 2018, 67, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Choi, J.-W.; Kwon, M.-J.; Kim, I.-H.; Kim, Y.-M.; Lee, M.-K.; Nam, T.-J. Pyropia Yezoensis Glycoprotein Promotes the M1 to M2 Macrophage Phenotypic Switch via the STAT3 and STAT6 Transcription Factors. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 38, 666–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Niller, H.-H.; Rehli, M.; Ammon, C.; Langmann, S.; Schwarzfischer, L.; Andreesen, R.; Krause, S.W. Transcriptional Regulation of CHI3L1, a Marker Gene for Late Stages of Macrophage Differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 44058–44067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Xu, N.; Bo, Q.; Shao, R.; Liang, J.; Zhai, Y.; Yang, S.; Wang, F.; Sun, X. Chitinase-3-Like-1 Promotes M2 Macrophage Differentiation and Induces Choroidal Neovascularization in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 4596–4605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Maruyama, T.; Jiang, M.; Abbott, A.; Yu, H.I.; Huang, Q.; Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M.; Chen, E.I.; Hsu, W. Rap1b Is an Effector of Axin2 Regulating Crosstalk of Signaling Pathways During Skeletal Development. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017, 32, 1816–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Su, C.-T.; Huang, J.-W.; Chiang, C.-K.; Lawrence, E.C.; Levine, K.L.; Dabovic, B.; Jung, C.; Davis, E.C.; Madan-Khetarpal, S.; Urban, Z. Latent Transforming Growth Factor Binding Protein 4 Regulates Transforming Growth Factor Beta Receptor Stability. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 4024–4036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Schreiber, C.; Saraswati, S.; Harkins, S.; Gruber, A.; Cremers, N.; Thiele, W.; Rothley, M.; Plaumann, D.; Korn, C.; Armant, O.; et al. Loss of ASAP1 in Mice Impairs Adipogenic and Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells through Dysregulation of FAK/Src and AKT Signaling. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1008216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hemshekhar, M.; Piyadasa, H.; Mostafa, D.; Chow, L.N.Y.; Halayko, A.J.; Mookherjee, N. Cathelicidin and Calprotectin Are Disparately Altered in Murine Models of Inflammatory Arthritis and Airway Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liao, W.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Wang, K.; Yang, Y. Proteomic Analysis of Synovial Fluid as an Analytical Tool to Detect Candidate Biomarkers for Knee Osteoarthritis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 9975–9989. [Google Scholar]
  55. Birkelund, S.; Bennike, T.B.; Kastaniegaard, K.; Lausen, M.; Poulsen, T.B.G.; Kragstrup, T.W.; Deleuran, B.W.; Christiansen, G.; Stensballe, A. Proteomic Analysis of Synovial Fluid from Rheumatic Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis Patients. Clin. Proteom. 2020, 17, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Uderhardt, S.; Martins, A.J.; Tsang, J.S.; Lämmermann, T.; Germain, R.N. Resident Macrophages Cloak Tissue Microlesions to Prevent Neutrophil-Driven Inflammatory Damage. Cell 2019, 177, 541–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Halliday, D.A.; Clemente, G.; Rathjen, D.A.; Ferrante, A. Rapid Degradation of Articular Cartilage Proteoglycan by Neutrophils: Comparison with Macrophages and Synovial Fibroblasts. Inflamm. Res. 2000, 49, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Boff, D.; Crijns, H.; Teixeira, M.M.; Amaral, F.A.; Proost, P. Neutrophils: Beneficial and Harmful Cells in Septic Arthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Stables, M.J.; Shah, S.; Camon, E.B.; Lovering, R.C.; Newson, J.; Bystrom, J.; Farrow, S.; Gilroy, D.W. Transcriptomic Analyses of Murine Resolution-Phase Macrophages. Blood 2011, 118, e192–e208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zhu, X.; Lee, C.-W.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.-F.; Yung, P.S.H.; Jiang, Y.; Lee, O.K. Phenotypic Alteration of Macrophages during Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2021, 23, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sun, A.R.; Wu, X.; Liu, B.; Chen, Y.; Armitage, C.W.; Kollipara, A.; Crawford, R.; Beagley, K.W.; Mao, X.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Pro-Resolving Lipid Mediator Ameliorates Obesity Induced Osteoarthritis by Regulating Synovial Macrophage Polarisation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bailey, K.N.; Furman, B.D.; Zeitlin, J.; Kimmerling, K.A.; Wu, C.-L.; Guilak, F.; Olson, S.A. Intra-Articular Depletion of Macrophages Increases Acute Synovitis and Alters Macrophage Polarity in the Injured Mouse Knee. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2020, 28, 626–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, B.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, J.; Zheng, M.; Yang, H. Imbalance of M1/M2 Macrophages Is Linked to Severity Level of Knee Osteoarthritis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 16, 5009–5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gómez-Aristizábal, A.; Gandhi, R.; Mahomed, N.N.; Marshall, K.W.; Viswanathan, S. Synovial Fluid Monocyte/Macrophage Subsets and Their Correlation to Patient-Reported Outcomes in Osteoarthritic Patients: A Cohort Study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2019, 21, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Armiento, A.R.; Alini, M.; Stoddart, M.J. Articular Fibrocartilage-Why Does Hyaline Cartilage Fail to Repair? Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 146, 289–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rosas, M.; Davies, L.C.; Giles, P.J.; Liao, C.-T.; Kharfan, B.; Stone, T.C.; O’Donnell, V.B.; Fraser, D.J.; Jones, S.A.; Taylor, P.R. The Transcription Factor Gata6 Links Tissue Macrophage Phenotype and Proliferative Renewal. Science 2014, 344, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Davies, L.C.; Rosas, M.; Jenkins, S.J.; Liao, C.-T.; Scurr, M.J.; Brombacher, F.; Fraser, D.J.; Allen, J.E.; Jones, S.A.; Taylor, P.R. Distinct Bone Marrow-Derived and Tissue-Resident Macrophage Lineages Proliferate at Key Stages during Inflammation. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. De Munter, W.; Geven, E.J.W.; Blom, A.B.; Walgreen, B.; Helsen, M.M.A.; Joosten, L.A.B.; Roth, J.; Vogl, T.; van de Loo, F.A.J.; Koenders, M.I.; et al. Synovial Macrophages Promote TGF-β Signaling and Protect against Influx of S100A8/S100A9-Producing Cells after Intra-Articular Injections of Oxidized Low-Density Lipoproteins. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2017, 25, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Griffin, T.M.; Lories, R.J. Cracking the Code on the Innate Immune Program in OA. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2020, 28, 529–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zhang, H.; Lin, C.; Zeng, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Lu, J.; Liu, X.; Shao, Y.; Zhao, C.; Pan, J.; et al. Synovial Macrophage M1 Polarisation Exacerbates Experimental Osteoarthritis Partially through R-Spondin-2. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Köhler, C. Allograft Inflammatory Factor-1/Ionized Calcium-Binding Adapter Molecule 1 Is Specifically Expressed by Most Subpopulations of Macrophages and Spermatids in Testis. Cell Tissue Res. 2007, 330, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lakhdari, O.; Yamamura, A.; Hernandez, G.E.; Anderson, K.K.; Lund, S.J.; Oppong-Nonterah, G.O.; Hoffman, H.M.; Prince, L.S. Differential Immune Activation in Fetal Macrophage Populations. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Smith, S.J.; Mohun, T.J. Early Cardiac Morphogenesis Defects Caused by Loss of Embryonic Macrophage Function in Xenopus. Mech. Dev. 2011, 128, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hopkinson-Woolley, J.; Hughes, D.; Gordon, S.; Martin, P. Macrophage Recruitment during Limb Development and Wound Healing in the Embryonic and Foetal Mouse. J. Cell Sci. 1994, 107, 1159–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wood, W.; Martin, P. Macrophage Functions in Tissue Patterning and Disease: New Insights from the Fly. Dev. Cell 2017, 40, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Yu, T.; Gan, S.; Zhu, Q.; Dai, D.; Li, N.; Wang, H.; Chen, X.; Hou, D.; Wang, Y.; Pan, Q.; et al. Modulation of M2 Macrophage Polarization by the Crosstalk between Stat6 and Trim24. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Buckley, C.D.; Gilroy, D.W.; Serhan, C.N. Proresolving Lipid Mediators and Mechanisms in the Resolution of Acute Inflammation. Immunity 2014, 40, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Kennedy, A.; Fearon, U.; Veale, D.J.; Godson, C. Macrophages in Synovial Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2011, 2, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Vincent, T.L. Mechanoflammation in Osteoarthritis Pathogenesis. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2019, 49, S36–S38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Landén, N.X.; Li, D.; Ståhle, M. Transition from Inflammation to Proliferation: A Critical Step during Wound Healing. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 3861–3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Balakrishnan, L.; Bhattacharjee, M.; Ahmad, S.; Nirujogi, R.S.; Renuse, S.; Subbannayya, Y.; Marimuthu, A.; Srikanth, S.M.; Raju, R.; Dhillon, M.; et al. Differential Proteomic Analysis of Synovial Fluid from Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis Patients. Clin. Proteom. 2014, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Attur, M.; Duan, X.; Cai, L.; Han, T.; Zhang, W.; Tycksen, E.D.; Samuels, J.; Brophy, R.H.; Abramson, S.B.; Rai, M.F. Periostin Loss-of-Function Protects Mice from Post-Traumatic and Age-Related Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2021, 23, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Dowthwaite, G.; Bishop, J. Characterisation of Articular Cartilage Progenitor Cells. Cells Mater. 2002, 4, 35–36. [Google Scholar]
  84. Dowthwaite, G.P.; Bishop, J.C.; Redman, S.N.; Khan, I.M.; Rooney, P.; Evans, D.J.R.; Haughton, L.; Bayram, Z.; Boyer, S.; Thomson, B.; et al. The Surface of Articular Cartilage Contains a Progenitor Cell Population. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Williams, R.; Khan, I.M.; Richardson, K.; Nelson, L.; McCarthy, H.E.; Analbelsi, T.; Singhrao, S.K.; Dowthwaite, G.P.; Jones, R.E.; Baird, D.M.; et al. Identification and Clonal Characterisation of a Progenitor Cell Sub-Population in Normal Human Articular Cartilage. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Decker, R.S.; Um, H.-B.; Dyment, N.A.; Cottingham, N.; Usami, Y.; Enomoto-Iwamoto, M.; Kronenberg, M.S.; Maye, P.; Rowe, D.W.; Koyama, E.; et al. Cell Origin, Volume and Arrangement Are Drivers of Articular Cartilage Formation, Morphogenesis and Response to Injury in Mouse Limbs. Dev. Biol. 2017, 426, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kozhemyakina, E.; Zhang, M.; Ionescu, A.; Ayturk, U.M.; Ono, N.; Kobayashi, A.; Kronenberg, H.; Warman, M.L.; Lassar, A.B. Identification of a Prg4-Expressing Articular Cartilage Progenitor Cell Population in Mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015, 67, 1261–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Li, L.; Newton, P.T.; Bouderlique, T.; Sejnohova, M.; Zikmund, T.; Kozhemyakina, E.; Xie, M.; Krivanek, J.; Kaiser, J.; Qian, H.; et al. Superficial Cells Are Self-Renewing Chondrocyte Progenitors, Which Form the Articular Cartilage in Juvenile Mice. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 1067–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Chagin, A.S.; Medvedeva, E.V. Cartilage Stem Cells Identified, but Can They Heal? Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2017, 13, 522–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jones, E.A.; English, A.; Henshaw, K.; Kinsey, S.E.; Markham, A.F.; Emery, P.; McGonagle, D. Enumeration and Phenotypic Characterization of Synovial Fluid Multipotential Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells in Inflammatory and Degenerative Arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50, 817–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Jones, E.A.; Crawford, A.; English, A.; Henshaw, K.; Mundy, J.; Corscadden, D.; Chapman, T.; Emery, P.; Hatton, P.; McGonagle, D. Synovial Fluid Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Health and Early Osteoarthritis: Detection and Functional Evaluation at the Single-cell Level. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58, 1731–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Roelofs, A.J.; Zupan, J.; Riemen, A.H.K.; Kania, K.; Ansboro, S.; White, N.; Clark, S.M.; Bari, C.D. Joint Morphogenetic Cells in the Adult Mammalian Synovium. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. McGonagle, D.; Baboolal, T.G.; Jones, E. Native Joint-Resident Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Cartilage Repair in Osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2017, 13, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fellows, C.R.; Williams, R.; Davies, I.R.; Gohil, K.; Baird, D.M.; Fairclough, J.; Rooney, P.; Archer, C.W.; Khan, I.M. Characterisation of a Divergent Progenitor Cell Sub-Populations in Human Osteoarthritic Cartilage: The Role of Telomere Erosion and Replicative Senescence. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Sethe, S.; Scutt, A.; Stolzing, A. Aging of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Ageing Res. Rev. 2006, 5, 91–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Campbell, T.M.; Churchman, S.M.; Gomez, A.; McGonagle, D.; Conaghan, P.G.; Ponchel, F.; Jones, E. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Alterations in Bone Marrow Lesions in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016, 68, 1648–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Fahy, N.; Melle ML de, V.; Lehmann, J.; Wei, W.; Grotenhuis, N.; Farrell, E.; Kraan PM van, d.e.r.; Murphy, J.M.; Bastiaansen-Jenniskens, Y.M.; van Osch, G.J.V.M. Human Osteoarthritic Synovium Impacts Chondrogenic Differentiation of MSCs via Macrophage Polarisation State. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2014, 22, 1167–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Islam, A.; Urbarova, I.; Bruun, J.A.; Martinez-Zubiaurre, I. Large-Scale Secretome Analyses Unveil the Superior Immunosuppressive Phenotype of Umbilical Cord Stromal Cells as Compared to Other Adult Mesenchym. Eur. Cells Mater. 2019, 37, 153–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Arnott, J.A.; Lambi, A.G.; Mundy, C.; Hendesi, H.; Pixley, R.A.; Owen, T.A.; Safadi, F.F.; Popoff, S.N. The Role of Connective Tissue Growth Factor (CTGF/CCN2) in Skeletogenesis. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene 2011, 21, 43–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Kubota, S.; Takigawa, M. The Role of CCN2 in Cartilage and Bone Development. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2011, 5, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Snelling, S.J.B.; Davidson, R.K.; Swingler, T.E.; Le, L.T.T.; Barter, M.J.; Culley, K.L.; Price, A.; Carr, A.J.; Clark, I.M. Dickkopf-3 Is Upregulated in Osteoarthritis and Has a Chondroprotective Role. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016, 24, 883–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Corr, M. Wnt–β-Catenin Signaling in the Pathogenesis of Osteoarthritis. Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol. 2008, 4, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Karamariti, E.; Zhai, C.; Yu, B.; Qiao, L.; Wang, Z.; Potter, C.M.F.; Wong, M.M.; Simpson, R.M.L.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; et al. DKK3 (Dickkopf 3) Alters Atherosclerotic Plaque Phenotype Involving Vascular Progenitor and Fibroblast Differentiation into Smooth Muscle Cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc Biol. 2018, 38, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Kataoka, K.; Rikitake, Y.; Ayabe, Y. Expression Pattern of Dkk-3, a Secreted Wnt Pathway Inhibitor, in Mouse Intestinal Tissue and Three-Dimensional Cultured Caco-2 Spheroids. J. Stem. Cells Regen. Med. 2015, 11, 48–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Lavoie, J.R.; Creskey, M.M.; Muradia, G.; Bell, G.I.; Sherman, S.E.; Gao, J.; Stewart, D.J.; Cyr, T.D.; Hess, D.A.; Rosu-Myles, M. Brief Report: Elastin Microfibril Interface 1 and Integrin-Linked Protein Kinase Are Novel Markers of Islet Regenerative Function in Human Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Stem. Cells 2016, 34, 2249–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Wang, Y.; Jin, S.; Luo, D.; He, D.; Shi, C.; Zhu, L.; Guan, B.; Li, Z.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Functional Regeneration and Repair of Tendons Using Biomimetic Scaffolds Loaded with Recombinant Periostin. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Alfaro, M.P.; Vincent, A.; Saraswati, S.; Thorne, C.A.; Hong, C.C.; Lee, E.; Young, P.P. SFRP2 Suppression of Bone Morphogenic Protein (BMP) and Wnt Signaling Mediates Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) Self-Renewal Promoting Engraftment and Myocardial Repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 35645–35653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Pazin, D.E.; Gamer, L.W.; Cox, K.A.; Rosen, V. Molecular Profiling of Synovial Joints: Use of Microarray Analysis to Identify Factors That Direct the Development of the Knee and Elbow. Dev. Dyn. 2012, 241, 1816–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Tanaka, N.; Tsuno, H.; Ohashi, S.; Iwasawa, M.; Furukawa, H.; Kato, T.; Fukui, N. The Attenuation of Insulin-like Growth Factor Signaling May Be Responsible for Relative Reduction in Matrix Synthesis in Degenerated Areas of Osteoarthritic Cartilage. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2021, 22, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jadin, K.D.; Wong, B.L.; Bae, W.C.; Li, K.W.; Williamson, A.K.; Schumacher, B.L.; Price, J.H.; Sah, R.L. Depth-Varying Density and Organization of Chondrocytes in Immature and Mature Bovine Articular Cartilage Assessed by 3d Imaging and Analysis. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2005, 53, 1109–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Bondeson, J.; Blom, A.B.; Wainwright, S.; Hughes, C.; Caterson, B.; van den Berg, W.B. The Role of Synovial Macrophages and Macrophage-produced Mediators in Driving Inflammatory and Destructive Responses in Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010, 62, 647–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Silverstein, A.M.; Lukes, R. Fetal Response to Antigenic Stimulus. I. Plasmacellular and Lymphoid Reactions in the Human Fetus to Intrauterine Infection. Lab. Investig. J. Tech. Methods Pathol. 1962, 11, 918–932. [Google Scholar]
  113. Silverstein, A.M.; Uhr, J.W.; Kraner, K.; Lukes, R. Fetal Response to Antigenic Stimulus. II. Antibody Production by the Fetal Lamb. J. Exp. Med. 1963, 117, 799–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Silverstein, A.M.; Prendergast, R.; Kraner, K. Fetal Response to Antigenic Stimulus. IV. Rejection of Skin Homografts by the Fetal Lamb. J. Exp. Med. 1964, 119, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Silverstein, A.M.; Thorbecke, G.J.; Kraner, K.; Lukes, R. Fetal Response to Antigenic Stimulus. III. Gamma-Globulin Production in Normal and Stimulated Fetal Lambs. J. Immunol. 1963, 91, 384–395. [Google Scholar]
  116. Silverstein, A.M. Ontogeny of the Immune Response. Science 1964, 144, 1423–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Orth, P.; Madry, H. A Low Morbidity Surgical Approach to the Sheep Femoral Trochlea. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2013, 14, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Dorotka, R.; Bindreiter, U.; Macfelda, K.; Windberger, U.; Nehrer, S. Marrow Stimulation and Chondrocyte Transplantation Using a Collagen Matrix for Cartilage Repair. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2005, 13, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Little, C.B.; Smith, M.M.; Cake, M.A.; Read, R.A.; Murphy, M.J.; Barry, F.P. The OARSI Histopathology Initiative-Recommendations for Histological Assessments of Osteoarthritis in Sheep and Goats. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010, 18 (Suppl. 3), S80–S92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Ribitsch, I.; Chang-Rodriguez, S.; Egerbacher, M.; Gabner, S.; Gueltekin, S.; Huber, J.; Schuster, T.; Jenner, F. Sheep Placenta Cotyledons: A Noninvasive Source of Ovine Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2017, 23, 298–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Rosser, J.; Bachmann, B.; Jordan, C.; Ribitsch, I.; Haltmayer, E.; Gueltekin, S.; Junttila, S.; Galik, B.; Gyenesei, A.; Haddadi, B.; et al. Microfluidic Nutrient Gradient-Based 3D Chondrocyte Culture-on-a-Chip as in Vitro Equine Arthritis Model. Mater. Today Bio 2019, 100023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Dominici, M.; Blanc, K.L.; Mueller, I.; Slaper-Cortenbach, I.; Marini, F.; Krause, D.; Deans, R.; Keating, A.; Prockop, D.; Horwitz, E. Minimal Criteria for Defining Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy Position Statement. Cytotherapy 2006, 8, 315–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Haltmayer, E.; Ribitsch, I.; Gabner, S.; Rosser, J.; Gueltekin, S.; Peham, J.; Giese, U.; Dolezal, M.; Egerbacher, M.; Jenner, F. Co-Culture of Osteochondral Explants and Synovial Membrane as in Vitro Model for Osteoarthritis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Mulisch, M.; Welsch, U. (Eds.) Romeis-Mikroskopische Technik, 19th ed.; Springer Spektrum; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; ISBN 978-3-642-55189-5. [Google Scholar]
  125. Mainil-Varlet, P.; Aigner, T.; Brittberg, M.; Bullough, P.; Hollander, A.; Hunziker, E.; Kandel, R.; Nehrer, S.; Pritzker, K.; Roberts, S.; et al. Histological Assessment of Cartilage Repair: A Report by the Histology Endpoint Committee of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS). JBJS 2003, 85 (Suppl.2), 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bergholt, N.L.; Lysdahl, H.; Lind, M.; Foldager, C.B. A Standardized Method of Applying Toluidine Blue Metachromatic Staining for Assessment of Chondrogenesis. Cartilage 2019, 10, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Aukland, K. Distribution Volumes and Macromolecular Mobility in Rat Tail Tendon Interstitium. Am. J. Physiol. 1991, 260, H409–H419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Aukland, K.; Wiig, H.; Tenstad, O.; Renkin, E.M. Interstitial Exclusion of Macromolecules Studied by Graded Centrifugation of Rat Tail Tendon. Am. J. Physiol. 1997, 273, H2794–H2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Aukland, K.; Reed, R.K.; Wiig, H. The Problem of Gaining Access to Interstitial Fluid. An Attempt to Rationalize a Wicked Discussion on Wicks. Lymphology 1997, 30, 111–115. [Google Scholar]
  130. Bileck, A.; Kreutz, D.; Muqaku, B.; Slany, A.; Gerner, C. Comprehensive Assessment of Proteins Regulated by Dexamethasone Reveals Novel Effects in Primary Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 5989–6000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wiśniewski, J.R.; Zougman, A.; Nagaraj, N.; Mann, M. Universal Sample Preparation Method for Proteome Analysis. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Cox, J.; Mann, M. MaxQuant Enables High Peptide Identification Rates, Individualized p.p.b.-Range Mass Accuracies and Proteome-Wide Protein Quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 1367–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Tyanova, S.; Temu, T.; Sinitcyn, P.; Carlson, A.; Hein, M.Y.; Geiger, T.; Mann, M.; Cox, J. The Perseus Computational Platform for Comprehensive Analysis of (Prote)Omics Data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Perez-Riverol, Y.; Csordas, A.; Bai, J.; Bernal-Llinares, M.; Hewapathirana, S.; Kundu, D.J.; Inuganti, A.; Griss, J.; Mayer, G.; Eisenacher, M.; et al. The PRIDE Database and Related Tools and Resources in 2019: Improving Support for Quantification Data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 47, D442–D450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Fetal and adult control femoral condyle and condyle with lesion (asterisk) three days post-injury (p.i.) depicting Toluidine blue metachromatic staining of proteoglycans in the epiphyseal (EC) and articular cartilage (AC); bone (B).
Figure 1. Fetal and adult control femoral condyle and condyle with lesion (asterisk) three days post-injury (p.i.) depicting Toluidine blue metachromatic staining of proteoglycans in the epiphyseal (EC) and articular cartilage (AC); bone (B).
Ijms 22 12969 g001
Figure 2. Mean numbers and standard deviation of Mac 387 (A) and Iba1 (B) positive cells per mm2 of synovial tissue.
Figure 2. Mean numbers and standard deviation of Mac 387 (A) and Iba1 (B) positive cells per mm2 of synovial tissue.
Ijms 22 12969 g002
Figure 3. Fetal synovia from healthy and injured animals 1-day post-injury (p.i.). Nests of neutrophils (black arrowheads and inserts), which were readily detectable in H&E-stained sections, showed strong Mac 387 immunostaining but were negative for Iba1 (insert). Iba1-positive macrophages were prominent in the synovial lining (sl) of fetal control, but less obvious in the injured animal samples (white arrows). In the sub-synovial tissue (sst), irregularly shaped Iba1-positive cells (arrowheads) were found both in control and injured samples. However, additional round Iba1-positive macrophages (black arrows) were seen in samples of injured animals. Fetal synovia from healthy and injured animals 3-days post-injury (p.i.). Fibrin deposition and erythrocytes were observed on the synovial surface (asterisks). Striking blood vessels with high endothelium resembling HEV were seen (). Mac 387 positive neutrophils were mostly absent (black arrowhead). Macrophages seen in the synovial lining of control animals (white arrows) were almost absent in injured samples. Irregularly shaped Iba1-positive cells (arrowheads) were found in the control, and less prominent in injured sub-synovial tissue. Round Iba1 positive macrophages (black arrows) were abundant in the sub-synovial tissue and in the fibrin deposited on the synovial surface.
Figure 3. Fetal synovia from healthy and injured animals 1-day post-injury (p.i.). Nests of neutrophils (black arrowheads and inserts), which were readily detectable in H&E-stained sections, showed strong Mac 387 immunostaining but were negative for Iba1 (insert). Iba1-positive macrophages were prominent in the synovial lining (sl) of fetal control, but less obvious in the injured animal samples (white arrows). In the sub-synovial tissue (sst), irregularly shaped Iba1-positive cells (arrowheads) were found both in control and injured samples. However, additional round Iba1-positive macrophages (black arrows) were seen in samples of injured animals. Fetal synovia from healthy and injured animals 3-days post-injury (p.i.). Fibrin deposition and erythrocytes were observed on the synovial surface (asterisks). Striking blood vessels with high endothelium resembling HEV were seen (). Mac 387 positive neutrophils were mostly absent (black arrowhead). Macrophages seen in the synovial lining of control animals (white arrows) were almost absent in injured samples. Irregularly shaped Iba1-positive cells (arrowheads) were found in the control, and less prominent in injured sub-synovial tissue. Round Iba1 positive macrophages (black arrows) were abundant in the sub-synovial tissue and in the fibrin deposited on the synovial surface.
Ijms 22 12969 g003
Figure 4. Adult synovia from healthy and injured animals 3-days post-injury (p.i.). Invasion of neutrophils detectable in H&E sections, showed strong Mac 387 immunostaining (black arrowheads and inserts), but were negative for Iba1 (insert). The synovial lining (sl) of control adult animals contained abundant Iba1-positive cells (white arrows); however, these cells were absent post-injury. In the sub-synovial tissue (sst), irregularly shaped Iba1-positive macrophages were accumulated directly below the synovial lining (arrowheads). Striking blood vessels with high endothelium resembling HEV were seen ().
Figure 4. Adult synovia from healthy and injured animals 3-days post-injury (p.i.). Invasion of neutrophils detectable in H&E sections, showed strong Mac 387 immunostaining (black arrowheads and inserts), but were negative for Iba1 (insert). The synovial lining (sl) of control adult animals contained abundant Iba1-positive cells (white arrows); however, these cells were absent post-injury. In the sub-synovial tissue (sst), irregularly shaped Iba1-positive macrophages were accumulated directly below the synovial lining (arrowheads). Striking blood vessels with high endothelium resembling HEV were seen ().
Ijms 22 12969 g004
Figure 5. The fetal and adult injury response in vivo. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of adult and fetal secretomes derived from injured versus uninjured (control) cartilage samples (three biological and two technical replicates/group). PCA comparison shows clustering of adult injured and adult controls indicating a strong and robust difference in protein expression between adult uninjured control animals and animals 3-days post-injury. The fetal samples, although showing a less pronounced response to injury, cluster far away from the adult samples indicating a significant difference between fetal and adult samples. Adult control = red diamonds outlined; adult injured (day 3 post-injury (D3pi)) = red diamonds filled; fetal controls (D1pi) = green squares outlined; fetal injured (D1pi) = green squares filled; fetal control (D3pi) = blue circles outlined; fetal injured (D3pi) = blue circles filled). (B) Volcano plot showing the adult injury response. Three days post-injury, 57 proteins were significantly up-regulated, whereas 67 proteins were significantly down-regulated. The volcano plots indicate neutrophil (asterisk) and acute phase proteins (circles) in adults post-injury compared to the control samples. (C,D) Fetal injured sheep show little differences post-injury compared to uninjured controls (C = 1-day post-injury, D = 3-days post-injury).
Figure 5. The fetal and adult injury response in vivo. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of adult and fetal secretomes derived from injured versus uninjured (control) cartilage samples (three biological and two technical replicates/group). PCA comparison shows clustering of adult injured and adult controls indicating a strong and robust difference in protein expression between adult uninjured control animals and animals 3-days post-injury. The fetal samples, although showing a less pronounced response to injury, cluster far away from the adult samples indicating a significant difference between fetal and adult samples. Adult control = red diamonds outlined; adult injured (day 3 post-injury (D3pi)) = red diamonds filled; fetal controls (D1pi) = green squares outlined; fetal injured (D1pi) = green squares filled; fetal control (D3pi) = blue circles outlined; fetal injured (D3pi) = blue circles filled). (B) Volcano plot showing the adult injury response. Three days post-injury, 57 proteins were significantly up-regulated, whereas 67 proteins were significantly down-regulated. The volcano plots indicate neutrophil (asterisk) and acute phase proteins (circles) in adults post-injury compared to the control samples. (C,D) Fetal injured sheep show little differences post-injury compared to uninjured controls (C = 1-day post-injury, D = 3-days post-injury).
Ijms 22 12969 g005
Figure 6. Differentially expressed proteins in adult and fetal sheep in response to injury. Comparison of adult and fetal secretomes from injured versus control cartilage (three biological and two technical replicates/group). (A) Neutrophil derived proteins—pointing to a higher neutrophil activity in adult than fetal samples. (B) Acute phase proteins showing a more pronounced upregulation in adult compared to fetal animals. (C) Macrophage marker proteins indicating a higher macrophage activity in fetal than adult samples. (D) Several growth factors with a high baseline expression in the fetus. (E) Proteins secreted by fetal MSCs which are described as healing-associated, and which were also detectable in the secretomes of the fetal in vivo samples and might thus be of therapeutic interest. AC: adult uninjured control samples; AId3: adult injured samples, 3-days post-injury; FCd1: fetal uninjured control samples, 1-day post-surgery of injured twins; FId1: fetal injured samples, 1-day post-injury; FCd3: fetal uninjured control samples, 3-days post-surgery of injured twins; FId3: fetal injured samples, 1-day post-injury; *: statistically significant difference, p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Differentially expressed proteins in adult and fetal sheep in response to injury. Comparison of adult and fetal secretomes from injured versus control cartilage (three biological and two technical replicates/group). (A) Neutrophil derived proteins—pointing to a higher neutrophil activity in adult than fetal samples. (B) Acute phase proteins showing a more pronounced upregulation in adult compared to fetal animals. (C) Macrophage marker proteins indicating a higher macrophage activity in fetal than adult samples. (D) Several growth factors with a high baseline expression in the fetus. (E) Proteins secreted by fetal MSCs which are described as healing-associated, and which were also detectable in the secretomes of the fetal in vivo samples and might thus be of therapeutic interest. AC: adult uninjured control samples; AId3: adult injured samples, 3-days post-injury; FCd1: fetal uninjured control samples, 1-day post-surgery of injured twins; FId1: fetal injured samples, 1-day post-injury; FCd3: fetal uninjured control samples, 3-days post-surgery of injured twins; FId3: fetal injured samples, 1-day post-injury; *: statistically significant difference, p < 0.05.
Ijms 22 12969 g006
Table 1. List of 17 proteins, which are highly expressed both in injured fetal cartilage in vivo and in fetal inflamed MSCs in vitro. Calculated q-value regarding protein identification confidence was 0 for all listed proteins.
Table 1. List of 17 proteins, which are highly expressed both in injured fetal cartilage in vivo and in fetal inflamed MSCs in vitro. Calculated q-value regarding protein identification confidence was 0 for all listed proteins.
Protein NameGene NameUniProt
Accession Number
Max. Quant. ScoreIntensityMS/MS Count
Connective tissue growth factorCTGFC7EDS580.1164,281,300,000241
Dickkopf-3DKK3W5PHV531.057224,210,00033
Elastin microfibril interfaceEMILIN1W5QCQ38.141539,950,00015
Fibrillin-2FBN2W5Q6X0184.29572,190,00091
Fibulin-5FBLN5W5PSC829.544867,790,00088
Inhibin beta a INHBAW5Q7R48.3799179,290,00017
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5IGFBP5B3GS77108.132,128,300,000190
Nidogen-1NID1W5P094101.44656,120,000102
Nidogen-2NID2W5QHQ8101.561,151,100,000163
Olfactomedin-like protein 2BOLFML2BW5PLG38.010859,673,00013
PeriostinPOSTNW5PK03323.311.3×1010870
PeroxidasinPXDNW5P5G36.92795,649,00012
Platelet-derived growth factor receptor-like proteinPDGFRLW5PHH536.858980,960,00081
Ras-related proteinRap1bW5NSD557.3323,110,100,000364
Secreted frizzled-related protein 2sFRP2C5IWT384.4271,302,800,000111
SERPIN domain-containing proteinSERPINF2W5PXU697.2031,648,900,000191
Transforming growth factor-beta-induced protein ig-h3TGFBIW5Q0F3323.312.0637×1010612
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ribitsch, I.; Bileck, A.; Egerbacher, M.; Gabner, S.; Mayer, R.L.; Janker, L.; Gerner, C.; Jenner, F. Fetal Immunomodulatory Environment Following Cartilage Injury—The Key to CARTILAGE Regeneration? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312969

AMA Style

Ribitsch I, Bileck A, Egerbacher M, Gabner S, Mayer RL, Janker L, Gerner C, Jenner F. Fetal Immunomodulatory Environment Following Cartilage Injury—The Key to CARTILAGE Regeneration? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(23):12969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312969

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ribitsch, Iris, Andrea Bileck, Monika Egerbacher, Simone Gabner, Rupert L. Mayer, Lukas Janker, Christopher Gerner, and Florien Jenner. 2021. "Fetal Immunomodulatory Environment Following Cartilage Injury—The Key to CARTILAGE Regeneration?" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 23: 12969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312969

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop