Next Article in Journal
Emerging Evidence for Pleiotropism of Eosinophils
Next Article in Special Issue
STAT5 as a Key Protein of Erythropoietin Signalization
Previous Article in Journal
Procoagulant and Antimicrobial Effects of Chitosan in Wound Healing
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Interplay between Drivers of Erythropoiesis and Iron Homeostasis in Rare Hereditary Anemias: Tipping the Balance
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 13
10.3390/ijms22137074
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecular Insights into the Oxygen-Sensing Pathway and Erythropoietin Expression Regulation in Erythropoiesis

by
Jana Tomc
1,2 and
Nataša Debeljak
1,*
1
Medical Centre for Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Centre for Functional Genomics and Bio-Chips, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(13), 7074; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22137074
Submission received: 31 May 2021 / Revised: 25 June 2021 / Accepted: 26 June 2021 / Published: 30 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regulation of Erythropoiesis 2.0)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Erythropoiesis is regulated by several factors, including the oxygen-sensing pathway as the main regulator of erythropoietin (EPO) synthesis in the kidney. The release of EPO from the kidney and its binding to the EPO receptor (EPOR) on erythrocyte progenitor cells in the bone marrow results in increased erythropoiesis. Any imbalance in these homeostatic mechanisms can lead to dysregulated erythropoiesis and hematological disorders. For example, mutations in genes encoding key players of oxygen-sensing pathway and regulation of EPO production (HIF-EPO pathway), namely VHL, EGLN, EPAS1 and EPO, are well known causative factors that contribute to the development of erythrocytosis. We aimed to investigate additional molecular mechanisms involved in the HIF-EPO pathway that correlate with erythropoiesis. To this end, we conducted an extensive literature search and used several in silico tools. We identified genes encoding transcription factors and proteins that control transcriptional activation or repression; genes encoding kinases, deacetylases, methyltransferases, conjugating enzymes, protein ligases, and proteases involved in post-translational modifications; and genes encoding nuclear transport receptors that regulate nuclear transport. All these genes may modulate the stability or activity of HIF2α and its partners in the HIF-EPO pathway, thus affecting EPO synthesis. The theoretical information we provide in this work can be a valuable tool for a better understanding of one of the most important regulatory pathways in the process of erythropoiesis. This knowledge is necessary to discover the causative factors that may contribute to the development of hematological diseases and improve current diagnostic and treatment solutions in this regard.

1. Introduction

Erythropoiesis is a process of red blood cell (RBC) production which is regulated by a negative feedback loop of tissue oxygenation and hormone erythropoietin (EPO) synthesis. Expression of EPO in the kidney in low tissue oxygenation is induced by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor (HIF) via the oxygen-sensing pathway. EPO is thereafter released to the bloodstream and binds to the EPO receptor (EPOR) on red cell progenitors in the bone marrow, triggering erythropoiesis and resulting in compensation of tissue hypoxia [1]. Based upon the key molecular players involved in this process the pathway is named also the HIF-EPO pathway. The production of RBC involves a commitment of pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells to the erythroid lineage and their progression to terminally differentiated erythrocytes. The earliest progenitors committed to the erythroid lineage are burst-forming unit-erythroid cells and their proliferation is promoted by several factors, including stem cell factor (SCF) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF1). Colony-forming unit-erythroid cells (CFU-E) are the next stage of erythroid progenitors. CFU-E divide rapidly and are highly responsive to EPO. These cells give rise to proerythroblasts which become basophilic, polychromatophilic, and orthochromatophilic erythroblasts. CFU-E, proerythroblasts, and early basophilic erythroblasts express EPOR on their surface, and binding of EPO to EPOR activates the downstream signals, preventing the cells from apoptosis and stimulating their proliferation, differentiation, and maturation. Orthochromatophilic erythroblasts undergo enucleation and form reticulocytes which are released into the bloodstream, and there they develop into mature erythrocytes [2]. The oxygen capacity of the blood is thus enhanced and delivery of oxygen to tissues increased, thereby completing the negative feedback loop.
Any imbalance in these homeostatic mechanisms can result in hematological disorders, such as erythrocytosis. Therefore, the understanding of the main regulatory pathways in the process of erythropoiesis is necessary to discover the causative factors, which can contribute to the development of hematological disorders, and improve the current diagnostic solutions in this regard.
The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular mechanisms involved in the oxygen-sensing pathway and regulation of erythropoietin production that correlate with erythropoiesis. We reviewed factors acting on the level of (i) transcriptional regulation and (ii) protein interactions, including post-translational modifications and nuclear transport. All these factors alone or cumulatively modulate the stability or activity of the main players in the HIF-EPO pathway, and thus influence the EPO synthesis and final RBC production. In this respect, we conducted an extensive literature search and used several in silico tools, such as Reactome [3], String [4], UniProt [5], GeneCards [6], Human Protein Atlas [7], NCBI [8], and HGNC [9] databases. The literature research was performed using keywords such as oxygen-sensing pathway, hypoxia inducible factor, HIF, HIF1A, HIF2A, EPAS1, PHD2, EGLN1, VHL, erythropoietin, EPO, EPO synthesis, hypoxia, erythropoiesis, red blood cell production, and erythrocytosis. Gene names were unified according to the NCBI Gene database.

2. Main Players in the Oxygen-Sensing Pathway and EPO Expression Regulation

EPO is a key regulator of erythropoiesis and its constant production is necessary to maintain the daily renewal of RBC [10]. The major site of EPO production is specialized interstitial fibroblasts in the kidney, while a small amount can also be produced in hepatocytes [11]. During stress erythropoiesis, EPO expression can also be induced by bone marrow osteoblasts [12]. EPO expression is regulated by hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIFs) which consist of O2-dependent α subunit (HIFα) and constitutively expressed β subunit (HIF1β or ARNT) [1]. In normal oxygen conditions, the HIFα subunit is continuously transcribed, translated, and readily degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. O2-dependent degradation occurs after hydroxylation of HIFα by HIF-prolyl hydroxylase proteins PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3, and ubiquitination of hydroxylated HIFα by the von Hippel–Lindau disease tumor suppressor protein (VHL)-E3 ubiquitin ligase complex [13]. Reduced oxygen levels in the blood result in tissue hypoxia, which is the main stimulus for increased expression of EPO [14]. In hypoxia, the availability of oxygen for hydroxylation of HIFα by PHDs is limited. Consequently, HIFα protein is stabilized and translocated to the nucleus, where it forms a heterodimer with ARNT. The HIFα-ARNT complex binds to hypoxia-responsive elements (HREs) in the promoter/enhancer region of the EPO gene and recruits central transcriptional co-activators, histone acetyltransferase p300 (p300) and CREB-binding protein (CBP), through HIFα transactivation domain (TAD). This process is necessary for full transcriptional activation of the HIF complex [15].
Three independent HIFα subunits have been identified, namely HIF1α, HIF2α, and HIF3α. HIF1α and HIF2α, which are closely related and extensively studied, are both transcriptional activators with distinct as well as common gene targets, while the role of HIF3α in the regulation of gene transcription is less clear. It has been assumed that HIF3α plays an antagonistic role in the regulation of HIF1α and HIF2α isoforms [16]. Among the PHD and HIFα isoforms related to renal EPO production, PHD2 and HIF2α play the predominant role [17,18]. Among the ARNT isoforms, Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like protein 1 (ARNTL) has been identified as HIF2α partner, although it seems to be the most potent partner of HIF2α in chondrocytes. ARNT2 isoform, on the other hand, is more brain-specific and a dimerization partner for HIF1α in neural cells [19,20]. However, gene targeting studies have shown that neither ARNT2 nor ARNTL contribute to hypoxia-inducible transcriptional regulation [21].
The transcriptional activity of HIFα subunits can be negatively regulated also through another O2-dependent post-translational modification by asparaginyl hydroxylase Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha inhibitor (FIH-1). FIH-1 mediates hydroxylation of HIFα TAD and thus prevents the binding of co-activators CBP/p300. However, FIH-1 more efficiently hydroxylates HIF1α than HIF2α [22]; therefore, PHD2 remains the primary oxygen sensor in controlling the EPO production [23].
The key players of well-established mechanisms in the oxygen-sensing pathway are presented in Table 1. Additional molecular mechanisms in the HIF-EPO pathway, which can modulate the stability or activity of HIF2α and its partners correlated with erythropoiesis, are presented in Figure 1 and included genes described further in details in this chapter. All described genes are reviewed at the end of the chapter in Table 2, including abbreviation list of genes and proteins.

2.1. Regulation of HIF2α Transcription

Very little information exists on how the expression of the HIF2α gene (EPAS1) in the kidney and liver is controlled. Moniz et al. (2015) [24] showed that the E2F1 transcription factor is required for expression of the HIF2α mRNA by directly binding to the HIF2α promoter in a diverse range of cell lines, including human kidney 786-O cells. They also demonstrated that the mRNA expression of HIF2α is regulated indirectly by the deubiquitylase Cezanne, which modulates the stability of E2F1. On the other hand, MCP-induced protein 1 has been reported to negatively regulate EPAS1 transcription by acting as a regulator of stability and half-life of transcript encoding HIF2α in human renal cell carcinoma cell line [25]. However, several studies have investigated EPAS1 transcriptional regulation in other types of cells. For example, in mouse adipocyte cells the involvement of transcription factors SP1 and SP3 in EPAS1 expression has been suggested [26], while in neuroblastoma cells, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and serine/threonine-protein kinase mTORC2 have been demonstrated to regulate its transcription [27]. However, Hamidian et al. (2018) [28] identified a set of proteins specifically bound to the EPAS1 promoter region at normoxia in neuroblastoma cells. The majority of these proteins showed decreased binding to the EPAS1 promoter at hypoxia, indicating increased EPAS1 transcription as the result of dissociated promoter-associated factors. A mechanism of negative feedback regulation for the EPAS1 gene was also suggested in non-small cell lung cancer cells, where HIF2α mRNA was regulated by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). DNMT1 was verified as a HIF2α target gene which further promotes the hyper-methylation of EPAS1 promoter and thus decreases mRNA expression levels [29].

2.2. Protein Interactions and Modifications of the Main Players in the Oxygen-Sensing Pathway

Apart from O2-dependent hydroxylation, HIFα proteins can be regulated through other post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, ubiquitination, and sumoylation, and many do not require O2 as a co-factor. These modifications can regulate HIFα proteins directly or can occur on their binding partner, affecting HIFα activity or stability indirectly. Due to its important role in cancer development and progression, several studies in this regard have been directed to HIF1α (for review see [13]). However, we managed to identify quite a few HIF2α associated post-translational modifications as well as other proteins, interacting directly with HIF2α or its partners.

2.2.1. Post-Translational Modifications

Phosphorylation of HIF2α has been shown to affect HIF2α transcriptional activity as well as its nuclear localization. Several kinases were found in this respect, such as casein kinases (CK) and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK). For example, HIF2α transactivation capacity has been shown to depend on phosphorylation of HIF2α C-TAD at conserved threonine residues by CKIIα. This modification increased the affinity of HIF2α for CBP [15,30]. On the other hand, phosphorylation of HIF2α by MAPK1/3 enhanced HIF2α transcriptional activation by facilitating its nuclear accumulation via inhibition of its association with exportin-1 (CRM1) transporter [31]. Also, HIF2α modification by CKIδ led to its nuclear accumulation and full HIF2 transcriptional activity while silencing or inhibition of CKIδ reduced the expression of HIF2 target genes and the secretion of EPO in Huh7 and HepG2 hepatic cancer cell lines [32].
Acetylation of HIFα is a much less studied post-translational modification but can affect the transcriptional activity of modified proteins. Direct interaction and deacetylation of HIF2α with NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-1 (hSIRT1) has been found to increase HIF2α transcriptional activity, affecting EPO gene expression. However, hSIRT1 has been demonstrated as a redox-sensing deacetylase [33]. Besides, hSIRT1 has been reported to mediate deacetylation of p300 that results in repression of p300 transcriptional activity in human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293T). It has been suggested that this process requires SUMO modification of the p300 transcriptional repression domain (CRD1) [34].
Methylation has been mainly shown to affect DNA itself, regulating the transcription of genes. DNA methyltransferases that regulate HIF2α mRNA expression (described above) have been found also to affect the VHL gene expression. Even more, Yang et al. (2021) [35] proposed that VHL methylation contributes toward excessive erythropoiesis in chronic mountain sickness due to induced DNMT3a and DNMT3b expression triggered by hypoxia. Methylation at the CpG site in the VHL promoter resulted in decreased VHL expression and increased HIF2α and EPO expression in the bone marrow of rats.
Sumoylation is a highly dynamic post-translational modification that can be reversed by the action of SUMO-specific proteases. This process has been found to modify many proteins that participate in the oxygen-sensing pathway and EPO expression, including VHL, ARNT, p300, and CBP, resulting in repression of their transcriptional activity or inactivation, wherein SUMO conjugating enzyme UBC9 and E3 SUMO-protein ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 apparently play major roles [36,37,38,39]. Van Hagen et al. (2009) [40] identified the SUMO acceptor site also in HIF2α and demonstrated that sumoylation enabled proteasomal degradation of the protein in human adenocarcinoma HeLa cells. On the other hand, Sentrin-specific proteases 1 and 3 modulate desumoylation of HIF2α and p300, respectively, resulting in protein stabilization or induction of its transcriptional activity [40,41].
Ubiquitination is another highly dynamic process, in the oxygen-sensing pathway best known for its role in VHL-HIFα proteasomal degradation. Apart from that, ubiquitin modification is more complex with diverse functions and can affect other proteins than HIFα [42]. VHL itself can be subjected to proteasomal degradation which consequently results in HIFα stability. Several factors that regulate VHL abundance and function have been identified, such as ubiquitin ligases Cadherin 1, WD repeat and SOCS box-containing protein 1 (WSB1), hSMURF1, and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-EPF [42,43,44,45]. Although WSB1 and E2-EPF expression is associated with cancer progression, they were both identified to interact with VHL and promote its ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation also in normoxic conditions in the human embryonic kidney or renal carcinoma cells [44,45]. In another cancer-directed study, Cadherin 1 has been shown to regulate VHL in a cell cycle-dependent manner in renal cell carcinoma cells [43]. SIAH1 has been reported as another ubiquitin ligase that can regulate the oxygen-sensing pathway by interacting with FIH-1 and facilitating its proteasomal degradation, which results in HIFα stability, although FIH-1 has a more prominent role in the hydroxylation of HIF1α than HIF2α [22]. Besides, ring finger protein 4 (RNF4) has been reported to act as a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase for proteasomal degradation of sumo-modified HIF2α [40]. On the other hand, deubiquitinating enzymes (USPs) have been found to reverse the process of ubiquitination. For example, USP8 and USP29 can prevent VHL-mediated degradation of ubiquitinated HIF2α and thus increase its stability [46,47]. Probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X (USP9X) deubiquitylates hSMURF1, which targets VHL for proteasomal degradation, resulting in reduced VHL protein levels and stable HIFα protein [42].

2.2.2. Other Protein Interactions

Besides post-translational modifications, the activity of HIFs can be modulated also by other protein interactions. We found protein interactions that can affect HIF2α directly or affect its partners in the well-established oxygen-sensing pathway. Many proteins were found to interact with PHD2 and VHL, and positively or negatively regulate HIF2α hydroxylation or ubiquitination and thus HIF2α stability.
HIF2α modulators. NF-kappa-B essential modulator (NEMO) is a HIF2α interacting protein that seems to assist in recruiting CBP/p300 and enhance HIF2α transcriptional activity in human embryonic kidney cell line at normoxia [22]. Kelch-like protein 20 (KLHL20), as a part of an E3 ligase complex, interacts with HIF2α and increases its stability and activity. However, the molecular mechanism of the KLHL20-dependent regulation of HIF2α is not clear [48]. Another E3 ligase that binds to and increases HIF2α transcriptional activity instead of causing its degradation, as in the case of HIF1α, is a hypoxia-associated factor (HAF). HAF is overexpressed in a variety of tumors and has been associated with tumor development and poor prognosis [49]. On the other hand, Class E basic helix-loop-helix protein 41 (bHLHe41) has been shown to act as a tumor suppressor by binding to HIFα subunits and facilitating HIFα interaction with the proteasome and its degradation in an oxygen-, VHL-, and ubiquitination-independent manner [50]. bHLHe41 has also been found to be associated with erythrocytosis [51]. Chen et al. (2007) [52] reported the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit E (eIF3e) to be a negative regulator of HIF2α stability. Specific direct interaction of HIF2α (but not HIF1α or HIF3α) with eIF3e led to HIF2α degradation via the proteasome pathway in a hypoxia- and VHL-independent manner in renal cell carcinoma 786-O cells.
PHD2 modulators. PHD2 is regulated by interactions with Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP8 (PPIase FKBP8), Protein OS-9 (OS-9), Protein CBFA2T3 (CBFA2T3), and Prostaglandin E synthase 3 (PTGES3). While PPIase FKBP8 has been shown to decrease PHD2 protein stability and half-life [53], OS-9 promotion of PHD2 hydroxylase activity and consequent ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of HIF(1)α has been reported in human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells. Also, CBFA2T3 interaction with PHD2 has been demonstrated to promote ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of HIF(1)α in normoxia and hypoxia in human lymphoma cells. On the contrary to OS-9 which is overexpressed in osteosarcomas, CBFA2T3 is highly expressed in hematopoietic progenitor and erythroid cells [54,55]. The direct interaction between PHD2 and PTGES3 and its functional importance in promoting efficient HIFα degradation has been evidenced in the study of Song et al. (2013) [56], where PTGES3 knockdown augmented hypoxia-induced HIFα levels and HIF target genes. Since PTGES3 is known to bind to the N-terminus of HSP90, they proposed a model where PTGES3 recruits PHD2 to the HSP90 pathway, and the association between these three proteins facilitates hydroxylation of HIFα proteins. A protein which seems to be quite important to mention is LIM domain-containing protein 1 (LIMD1). PHD2 binding interface responsible for interaction with LIMD1 has been suggested in bioinformatics investigation of erythrocytosis causative mutations in PHD2 [57]. Actually, LIMD1 was shown to form a complex with PHD2 and VHL in several cell types, including human embryonic kidney cells, probably enhancing the activity of both proteins and yielding efficient HIF(1)α proteasomal degradation [58].
VHL modulators. VHL is the substrate recognition component of Cullin Ring Ubiquitin ligase complex (CRL), composed of Elongins B and C (ELOB and ELOC), scaffold protein Cullin-2, and ubiquitin-protein ligase RBX1. These components all play an important role in VHL-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of HIF2α [59]. ELOB and ELOC are complex adaptor subunits and important for the stabilization of VHL itself, while the interaction between VHL and ELOC can be stabilized by Thialysine N-epsilon-acetyltransferase (SSAT-2). T-complex protein 1 subunit alpha (TRiC), on the other hand, facilitates VHL folding, which enables its interaction with ELOB and ELOC to form the CRL complex. SSAT-2 and TRiC both seem important in the regulation of HIFα proteasomal degradation since failure to generate a correctly folded VHL or a mature CRL complex results in degradation of VHL and increased stability of HIFα subunits [60,61]. Contrary to above mentioned VHL interaction proteins, DNA-binding protein inhibitor ID-2 has been reported to be responsible for disrupting the interaction of VHL and HIF2α and increasing the stability of HIF2α in an O2-dependent manner, although ID2 is an oncoprotein and the study was performed in glioblastoma cells [62].
FIH-1 modulators. Several proteins have been reported also to interact with FIH-1, such as NF-kappa-B inhibitor alpha, Nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunit, Neurogenic locus notch homolog proteins 1, 2, and 3, and Ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 4. It has been suggested that these proteins are substrates for hydroxylation mediated by FIH-1 which can take place in competition with HIFα hydroxylation, which could potentially regulate HIF transcriptional activity [22]. Besides, Homeobox protein cut-like 1 has been found to be an important repressor of FIH-1 transcription that can contribute to increased HIFα stability and transcriptional activity. However, its binding to the FIH-1 promoter is supposed to be regulated by Protein kinase C zeta type [63].
ARNT modulators. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), which plays a prominent role in xenobiotic metabolism, has attracted our attention since ARNT can be its dimerization partner. Crosstalk between the AHR and hypoxia pathways was evident in a study, where endogenous AHR ligand suppressed nuclear accumulation of HIF2α and subsequent EPO production in human hepatoma HepG2 cells [64]. A noteworthy ARNT interacting protein, which was identified in human embryonic kidney 293T cells, is EPO-inducible transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 3 (TACC3). This protein can act as a co-activator of the HIF2 complex, and it has been demonstrated that the modular ARNT PAS-B domain simultaneously engages its heterodimeric HIFα partner and TACC3 [65].

2.2.3. Nuclear Transport of the Main Players in the Oxygen-Sensing Pathway

Proteins that are larger than ∼40 kDa move between the nucleus and cytoplasm through the nuclear pore complex (NPC). This process is regulated by nuclear transport receptors importins and exportins that recognize specific transport signals, the nuclear localization signal (NLS) and the nuclear export signal (NES), respectively. Importinα serves as an adapter protein that recognizes and binds directly to proteins containing either a simple or bipartite NLS and forms a trimeric import cargo complex with importinβ, which mediates the interaction with the NPC. Six human importinα isoforms, which differ in affinities to their targets, have been characterized. However, most proteins can directly bind the importinβ and do not utilize importinα as an adaptor protein. NES are recognized by nuclear export receptors, with CRM1 being the most abundant among seven exportins described so far [66,67].
The importance of intracellular transport of the oxygen-sensing machinery has been relatively ignored. However, the regulation of translocation between cytoplasm and nucleus represents another level of activity control of HIF subunits and molecular basis for cellular oxygen homeostasis. A classical importin α/β-dependent NLS has been found in HIF2α as well as in ARNT, and both have been shown to bind to importins α1, α3, α5 and α7 isoforms in HeLa and U2OS cells. HIF2α can be targeted also solely by importinβ, even with higher efficiency than by importinα [68]. While HIFα subunits shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm, ARNT is permanently inside the nucleus [66]. The nuclear export of HIFα is mediated through NES that are recognized by CRM1. However, HIF2α has been shown to associate with CRM1 in a phosphorylation-sensitive manner that is controlled by MAPK1/3 [31].
Transport between nucleus and cytoplasm has been reported also for PHD2 and VHL. Although the nuclear import of PHD2 does not occur via classical importin α/β interaction, its nuclear export depends on CRM1 binding [66]. Nuclear export of VHL, on the other hand, is regulated through the transcription-dependent nuclear export motif (TD-NEM), and Elongation factor 1-alpha 1 is involved in TD-NEM-mediated nuclear export of this protein [69]. Most of the VHL protein is found in the cytosol under steady-state conditions.

2.3. Regulation of EPO Transcription

As already mentioned, the major site of EPO expression is the kidney, while the liver is the main source of EPO during fetal development. The adult liver maintains the potential for high expression of EPO mRNA but production at this site is physiologically repressed. Transgenic animal studies revealed that HRE in renal cells is located between 9.5 and 14 kb 5′ of EPO, while HRE in the liver lies within 0.7 kb 3′ of the gene. A specific negative regulatory liver element is located between 2.2 and 7 kb 3′ to the gene, and generally active repressive elements exist between 0.4 and 6 kb 5′. Due to the lack of an appropriate renal cell culture system, the mechanisms of hypoxia-induced EPO expression were analyzed with the help of human hepatoma cells. Hypoxia-inducible enhancer has been identified at 120 bp 3′ to the EPO polyadenylation site, containing three important hypoxia-responsive sites: a CACGTGCT sequence at the 5′-end, defined as a HIF binding site (HBS); a CACA repeat, located 7 bp further 3′ of the HBS of the EPO gene; and a direct repeat of two steroid receptor half-sites separated by two base pairs (DR-2 site) at 3′ EPO enhancer [14,70]. EPO promoter, located at the 5′ flanking region of the gene, has been reported as a weak promoter that still contributes to the hypoxic inducibility of the EPO gene and synergistically cooperates with an enhancer [71]. The minimal EPO promoter capable of induction by hypoxia encompasses 117 bp 5′ to the transcription initiation site but lacks the consensus HBS and is negatively regulated by GATA sequence [14,70].
Besides HIF2 complex and transcriptional co-activators p300 and CBP, EPO expression depends on the cooperation with other transcription factors that associate with the EPO gene, such as Hepatocyte nuclear factor-4α (HNF4α). HNF4α binds to the DR-2 site in the EPO enhancer and probably plays a critical role in activating hepatic and renal hypoxia-inducible EPO transcription [72]. However, Makita et al. (2001) [73] demonstrated that Retinoid X receptor alpha (RXRα) is involved in transcriptional regulation of the EPO gene in the fetal liver during mouse development and also binds to the DR-2 site of EPO enhancer. Furthermore, nuclear receptor coactivator 3 (NCoA-3), a histone acetyltransferase coactivator, is recruited to the 3′ enhancer of the EPO gene upon hypoxic stimulation in a p300-dependent manner and NCoA-3 knockdown reduced EPO transcriptional activity in hepatoma Hep3B cells [71]. EPO gene contains also NFKB3 sequences, and NFKB3 has been reported to play a key role in hypoxia-regulated EPO gene expression [74,75].
On the other hand, transcription factors GATA-2 and GATA-3 have been shown to negatively regulate the EPO transcription through GATA sites in EPO promoter in hepatic and distal tubular cells [76,77]. Another mechanism repressing EPO expression has been shown in the study of Yin and Blachard (2000) [78], where CpG islands in the promoter and 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR) of the EPO gene have been identified. The authors proposed that methylation of CpGs in the promoter represses EPO transcription by blocking the binding of sequence-specific DNA binding proteins, while methylation in the 5′-UTR recruits Methyl-CpG binding protein 2, and directly represses transcription or recruits co-repressors, histone deacetylases, or both.
Table
Table 2. Genes and molecular mechanisms correlated with erythropoiesis in the HIF-EPO pathway.
Table 2. Genes and molecular mechanisms correlated with erythropoiesis in the HIF-EPO pathway.
Gene SymbolGene IDProtein NameCategoryMechanismRef.
Regulation of HIF2α transcription
E2F1#1869Transcription factor E2F11Transcriptional activation of EPAS1[24]
OTUD7B#56957OTU domain-containing protein 7B (Cezanne)2Transcriptional activation of EPAS1[24]
ZC3H12A#80149MCP-induced protein 1 (MCPIP1)1Negative transcriptional regulation of EPAS1[25]
SP1#6667Transcription factor Sp11Transcriptional activation of EPAS1[26]
SP3#6670Transcription factor Sp31Transcriptional activation of EPAS1[26]
PI3K# Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase2Transcriptional activation of EPAS1[27]
MTOR#2475Serine/threonine-protein kinase mTOR2Transcriptional activation of EPAS1[27]
DNMT1#1786DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1)1Negative transcriptional regulation of EPAS1[29]
HIF2α protein modifications and protein interactions
HIF1AN55662Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha inhibitor (FIH-1)1Hydroxylation[22]
CSNK2A11457Casein kinase II subunit alpha (CKIIα)1Phosphorylation[30]
CSNK1D#1453Casein kinase I isoform delta (CKIδ)1Phosphorylation and nuclear transport[32]
MAPK 1/3#5594/5595Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1/3 (MAPK 1/3)1Phosphorylation and nuclear transport[31]
SIRT1#23411NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-1 (hSIRT1)1Deacetylation[33]
SENP1#29843Sentrin-specific protease 11Desumoylation[40]
RNF4#6047E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RNF41Ubiquitination[40]
USP8#9101Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 8 (USP8)1Deubiquitination[46]
USP2957663Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 29 (USP29)1Deubiquitination[47]
IKBKG8517NF-kappa-B essential modulator (NEMO)1Other interaction proteins[22]
KLHL20#27252Kelch-like protein 20 (KLHL20)1Other interaction proteins[48]
SART1 (HAF)9092Hypoxia-associated factor (HAF)1Other interaction proteins[49]
BHLHE41 (SHARP1)79365Class E basic helix-loop-helix protein 41 (bHLHe41)4Other interaction proteins[50]
EIF3E (INT6)3646Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit E (eIF3e)1Other interaction proteins[52]
PHD2 protein modifications and protein interactions
FKBP823770Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP8 (PPIase FKBP8)1Other interaction proteins[53]
OS-910956Protein OS-9 (OS-9) Other interaction proteins[54]
CBFA2T3 (MTG16)#863Protein CBFA2T3 (CBFA2T3)1Other interaction proteins[55]
PTGES3 (P23)10728Prostaglandin E synthase 3 (PTGES3)1Other interaction proteins[55]
LIMD18994LIM domain-containing protein 11, 4Other interaction proteins[57,58]
VHL protein modifications and protein interactions
LIMD18994LIM domain-containing protein 11, 4Other interaction proteins[58]
DNMT3A1788DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3a)1MethylationNegative transcriptional regulation of VHL[35]
DNMT3B1789DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3B (DNMT3b)1MethylationNegative transcriptional regulation of VHL[35]
UBE2S27338Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 S (E2-EPF)1, 4UbiquitinationDegradation of VHL[45]
PIAS451588E3 SUMO-protein ligase PIAS4 (PIASY)1, 4Sumoylation[39]
CDH1999Cadherin 11UbiquitylationDegradation of VHL[43]
WSB126118WD repeat and SOCS box-containing protein 1 (WSB1)1UbiquitinationDegradation of VHL[44]
SMURF157154E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase SMURF1 (hSMURF1)1UbiquitinationDegradation of VHL[42]
USP9X8239Probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase FAF-X2, 4DeubiquitylationDegradation of VHL[42]
ELOB6923Elongin-B (ELOB)2Other interaction proteinsUbiquitination of HIFα[59]
ELOC6921Elongin-C (ELOC)1Other interaction proteinsUbiquitination of HIFα[59]
CUL28453Cullin-2 (CUL-2)2Other interaction proteinsUbiquitination of HIFα[59]
RBX19978E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RBX12Other interaction proteinsUbiquitination of HIFα[59]
SAT2112483Thialysine N-epsilon-acetyltransferase (SSAT-2)1, 4Other interaction proteins[60]
TCP16950T-complex protein 1 subunit alpha (TRiC)1Other interaction proteins[61]
ID2#3398DNA-binding protein inhibitor ID-2 (ID2)1Other interaction proteins[62]
FIH protein modifications and protein interactions
SIAH16477E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase SIAH12Ubiquitination[22]
NFKBIA4792NF-kappa-B inhibitor alpha2Other interaction proteins[22]
NFKB14790Nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunit2Other interaction proteins[22]
NOTCH1/2/34851/4853/4854Neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1/2/3 (Notch 1/2/3)2Other interaction proteins[22]
ASB451666Ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 4 (ASB-4)2Other interaction proteins[22]
CUX11523Homeobox protein cut-like 12DNA protein partner[63]
PRKCZ5590Protein kinase C zeta type3Other interaction proteins[63]
ARNT protein modifications and protein interactions
UBE2I#7329SUMO-conjugating enzyme UBC92Sumoylation[36]
PIAS1#8554E3 SUMO-protein ligase PIAS12Sumoylation[36]
AHR#196Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)2DNA protein partner[64]
TACC310460Transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 32DNA protein partnerCo-activator of HIF2 complex[65]
Nuclear transport of key players of oxygen-sensing pathway
KPNA2#3838Importin subunit alpha-1 (Importinα)1Nuclear import of HIF2α, ARNT[68]
KPNB1#3837Importin subunit beta-1 (Importinβ)1Nuclear transport of HIF2α, ARNT[68]
XPO17514Exportin-1 (CRM1)1Nuclear export of HIF2α, PHD2[31,66]
EEF1A11915Elongation factor 1-alpha 1 (eEF1A)1Nuclear export of VHL[69]
Regulation of EPO transcription
EP3002033Histone acetyltransferase p300 (p300)1Transcriptional activation of EPO (co-activator)[15,71]
CREBBP1387CREB-binding protein (CBP)1Transcriptional activation of EPO (co-activator)[15]
HNF4A3172Hepatocyte nuclear factor-4α (HNF4α)1Transcriptional activation of EPO[72]
RXRA6256Retinoid X receptor alpha (RXRα)1Transcriptional activation of EPO[73]
NCOA3 (SRC3)#8202Nuclear receptor coactivator 3 (NCoA-3)1, 4DNA protein partner[71]
RELA5970Transcription factor p65 (NFKB3)1, 4Transcriptional activation of EPO[74,75]
GATA22624Endothelial transcription factor GATA-2 (GATA-2)1Negative transcriptional regulation of EPO[77]
GATA32625Trans-acting T-cell-specific transcription factor GATA-3 (GATA-3)1Negative transcriptional regulation of EPO[77]
MECP24204Methyl- CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2)1Negative transcriptional regulation of EPO[78]
p300 protein modifications and protein interactions
SIRT123411NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-1 (hSIRT1)2Deaceltylation[34]
UBE2I7329SUMO-conjugating enzyme UBC92Sumoylation[37]
SENP326168Sentrin-specific protease 32Desumoylation[41]
CBP protein modifications and protein interactions
UBE2I7329SUMO-conjugating enzyme UBC92Sumoylation[38]
# Experiments were performed in cancer cell lines, or cells other than renal cells, or it was a cancer-directed study. Category: 0—genes involved in erythropoiesis; 1—protein partners of 0; 2—protein partners of 1; 3—protein partners of 2; 4—protein partners of 0 or 1, but only proven with HIF1α or cancer study. Abbreviation list: CBFA2T3—core-binding factor, runt domain, alpha subunit 2; translocated to, 3; CREB—cAMP-responsive element-binding protein; CRM1—chromosomal region maintenance 1; E2F—E2 factor; EP300—E1A binding protein p300; FAF-X—Fat facets protein-related, X-linked; FIH—Factor Inhibiting HIF; FKBP8—FK506 binding protein 8; ID—inhibitor of DNA binding; IKBKG—inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase regulatory subunit gamma; KPNA—karyopherin subunit alpha; KPNB—karyopherin subunit beta; MCP- monocyte chemotactic protein; MTG—myeloid translocation gene; mTOR—mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase; OS-9—Osteosarcoma Amplified 9; PIAS—protein inhibitor of activated STAT; RBX1—ring box 1; RNF—RING finger; SART1—spliceosome associated factor 1, recruiter of U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP; SAT2/SSAT-2—spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase family member 2; SHARP1—Enhancer-of-split and hairy-related protein 1; SIAH—Seven In Absentia Homolog; SMURF1—Smad ubiquitination regulatory factor 1; SOCS—suppressor of cytokine signalling; Sp—specificity protein; SRC3—Steroid receptor coactivator protein 3; SUMO—small ubiquitin-like modifier; TRiC—TCP1 ring complex; UBC9—ubiquitin carrier protein 9; UBE2I—ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 I; USP—ubiquitin specific peptidase; ZC3H12A—zinc finger CCCH-type containing 12A.

3. Diseases and Putative Treatments

Described factors may be involved in deregulation of erythropoiesis, including anemia, erythrocytosis and cancer [8]. Anemia is a deficiency of mature RBCs, which leads to a decreased oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood, tissue hypoxia, and a variety of clinical consequences, and is a very common disorder [79]. A severe anemia resulting from a mutation in EPO has been described in a study by Kim et al. (2017) [80]. Erythrocytosis, on the other hand, is a rare hematological disorder with increased RBC count, Hb concentration, and hematocrit (Hct) above the reference range. Four types of erythrocytosis are known to be caused by mutations in genes encoding key players of oxygen-sensing signalling and EPO production, namely VHL (ECYT2), EGLN1 (ECYT3), EPAS1 (ECYT4) and EPO (ECYT5) [81,82]. Importantly, HIF1α, HIF2α, VHL and EPO also play a well-known role in development and progression of a variety of human cancers [8,83,84,85,86]. Therefore, the HIF-EPO pathway is a potential target for treatment of cancer.
Also disorders affecting high-altitude accommodation can be mediated by HIF-EPO pathway deregulation. Tight regulation of EPO production is responsible for removal of erythrocytes and normalization of increased hemoglobin (Hb) upon descent, which are typical observations of acclimatization in long-term sojourners at high altitude and in high-altitude residents [87]. Although it has been assumed that this decrease occurs through neocytolysis, the selective destruction of newly formed erythrocytes during stress-erythropoiesis in hypoxia [88], Klein et al. (2021) [87] confirmed that the decrease actually occurs by a reduced rate of erythropoiesis along with normal clearance of senescent erythrocytes.
Several HIF inhibitors have been developed and investigated up to now, comprising direct inhibitors which affect the expression or function of HIF proteins through inhibition of mRNA expression, protein synthesis, dimerization of α and β subunits, DNA binding, and transcriptional activities of HIF, and indirect inhibitors which regulate proteins of upstream or downstream pathways and thus affect the HIF signaling, such as mTOR inhibitors [86,89,90]. Histone deacetylase inhibitors are also explored as anti-cancer agents, since they repress HIF1α and HIF2α transactivation potential [91]. Additionally, a promising potential of HIF inhibitors has been reported for treatment of erythrocytosis [92] and anemia [93]. Besides, recombinant human EPO and other erythropoiesis stimulating agents are already widely used to treat anemias associated with low EPO levels [79] as well as in cancer therapy [94], and GATA inhibitors have been shown to restore erythropoiesis in a mouse model of anemia of chronic disease [95].

4. Conclusions

Mechanisms controlling the HIF-EPO pathway have a prominent role in regulation of EPO synthesis, that are all together affecting the RBC production. Overall, any imbalance in HIF-EPO pathway mechanisms can result in deregulation of erythropoiesis that can lead to several diseases, including anemia, erythrocytosis and cancer. Understanding the main regulatory pathways in the process of erythropoiesis is necessary to identify the causative factors which can contribute to the development of such pathological conditions, and help to improve the diagnostic approach and therapeutic implications. Apart from the well-known O2-dependent hydroxylation mechanism that coordinates HIF2α stability and transcriptional activity and EPO synthesis, many other proteins are contributing to post-translational modifications, nuclear transport, and transcriptional regulation of complete oxygen-sensing machinery but have been relatively ignored in this context. It should be noted that besides HIF1α, HIF2α and VHL also play a role in cancer development and progression. As the majority of available information and literature data are directed in cancer studies, their enrolment in the regulatory mechanisms in healthy tissue must be considered with caution. However, further analysis of mechanisms in EPO receptor signaling, Hb oxygen affinity pathway, and iron metabolism should also be investigated in this regard.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.D.; formal analysis, J.T.; data curation, J.T. and N.D.; writing—original draft preparation, J.T.; writing—review and editing, N.D.; supervision, N.D.; funding acquisition, N.D. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Slovenian Research Agency, Grant Number: L3-9279 and P1-0390.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Haase, V.H. Regulation of Erythropoiesis by Hypoxia-Inducible Factors. Blood Rev. 2013, 27, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Shih, H.M.; Wu, C.J.; Lin, S.L. Physiology and Pathophysiology of Renal Erythropoietin-Producing Cells. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2018, 117, 955–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jassal, B.; Matthews, L.; Viteri, G.; Gong, C.; Lorente, P.; Fabregat, A.; Sidiropoulos, K.; Cook, J.; Gillespie, M.; Haw, R.; et al. The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D498–D503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Szklarczyk, D.; Franceschini, A.; Wyder, S.; Forslund, K.; Heller, D.; Huerta-Cepas, J.; Simonovic, M.; Roth, A.; Santos, A.; Tsafou, K.P.; et al. STRING V10: Protein-Protein Interaction Networks, Integrated over the Tree of Life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D447–D452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Consortium, T.U. UniProt: The Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D480–D489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stelzer, G.; Rosen, N.; Plaschkes, I.; Zimmerman, S.; Twik, M.; Fishilevich, S.; Iny Stein, T.; Nudel, R.; Lieder, I.; Mazor, Y.; et al. The GeneCards Suite: From Gene Data Mining to Disease Genome Sequence Analyses. Curr. Protoc. Bioinf. 2016, 54, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Uhlen, M.; Oksvold, P.; Fagerberg, L.; Lundberg, E.; Jonasson, K.; Forsberg, M.; Zwahlen, M.; Kampf, C.; Wester, K.; Hober, S.; et al. Towards a Knowledge-Based Human Protein Atlas. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 1248–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. NCBI Resource Coordinators. Database Resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D7–D19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tweedie, S.; Braschi, B.; Gray, K.; Jones, T.E.M.; Seal, R.L.; Yates, B.; Bruford, E.A. Genenames.Org: The HGNC and VGNC Resources in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D939–D946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jelkmann, W. Erythropoietin: Structure, Control of Production, and Function. Physiol. Rev. 1992, 72, 449–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Suzuki, N.; Yamamoto, M. Roles of Renal Erythropoietin-Producing (REP) Cells in the Maintenance of Systemic Oxygen Homeostasis. Pflugers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2016, 468, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kuhrt, D.; Wojchowski, D.M. Emerging EPO and EPO Receptor Regulators and Signal Transducers. Blood 2015, 125, 3536–3541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Semenza, G.L. The Genomics and Genetics of Oxygen Homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2020, 21, 183–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Fandrey, J. Oxygen-Dependent and Tissue-Specific Regulation of Erythropoietin Gene Expression. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2004, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dengler, V.L.; Galbraith, M.; Espinosa, J.M. Transcriptional Regulation by Hypoxia Inducible Factors. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 49, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Haase, V. The VHL Tumor Suppressor: Master Regulator of HIF. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009, 15, 3895–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bunn, H.F. Erythropoietin. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2013, 3, a011619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Souma, T.; Nezu, M.; Nakano, D.; Yamazaki, S.; Hirano, I.; Sekine, H.; Dan, T.; Takeda, K.; Fong, G.H.; Nishiyama, A.; et al. Erythropoietin Synthesis in Renal Myofibroblasts Is Restored by Activation of Hypoxia Signaling. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 27, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saito, T.; Kawaguchi, H. HIF-2α as a Possible Therapeutic Target of Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010, 18, 1552–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Stolze, I.; Berchner-Pfannschmidt, U.; Freitag, P.; Wotzlaw, C.; Rössler, J.; Frede, S.; Acker, H.; Fandrey, J. Hypoxia-Inducible Erythropoietin Gene Expression in Human Neuroblastoma Cells. Blood 2002, 100, 2623–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Suzuki, N.; Gradin, K.; Poellinger, L.; Yamamoto, M. Regulation of Hypoxia-Inducible Gene Expression after HIF Activation. Exp. Cell Res. 2017, 356, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lisy, K.; Peet, D.J. Turn Me on: Regulating HIF Transcriptional Activity. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15, 642–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Jelkmann, W. Regulation of Erythropoietin Production. J. Physiol. 2011, 589, 1251–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moniz, S.; Bandarra, D.; Biddlestone, J.; Campbell, K.J.; Komander, D.; Bremm, A.; Rocha, S. Cezanne Regulates E2F1-Dependent HIF2α Expression. J. Cell Sci. 2015, 128, 3082–3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ligęza, J.; Marona, P.; Gach, N.; Lipert, B.; Miekus, K.; Wilk, W.; Jaszczyński, J.; Stelmach, A.; Loboda, A.; Dulak, J.; et al. MCPIP1 Contributes to Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas Development. Angiogenesis 2017, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wada, T.; Shimba, S.; Tezuka, M. Transcriptional Regulation of the Hypoxia Inducible Factor-2α (HIF-2α) Gene during Adipose Differentiation in 3T3-L1 Cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 29, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Mohlin, S.; Hamidian, A.; Von Stedingk, K.; Bridges, E.; Wigerup, C.; Bexell, D.; Påhlman, S. PI3K-MTORC2 but Not PI3K-MTORC1 Regulates Transcription of HIF2A/EPAS1and Vascularization in Neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 4617–4628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Hamidian, A.; Vaapil, M.; von Stedingk, K.; Fujita, T.; Persson, C.U.; Eriksson, P.; Veerla, S.; De Preter, K.; Speleman, F.; Fujii, H.; et al. Promoter-Associated Proteins of EPAS1 Identified by EnChIP-MS—A Putative Role of HDX as a Negative Regulator. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 499, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, X.H.; Bao, Y.; Wang, X.; Yan, F.; Guo, S.; Ma, Y.; Xu, D.; Jin, L.; Xu, J.; Wang, J. Hypoxic-Stabilized EPAS1 Proteins Transactivate DNMT1 and Cause Promoter Hypermethylation and Transcription Inhibition of EPAS1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 6694–6705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gradin, K.; Takasaki, C.; Fujii-kuriyama, Y.; Sogawa, K. The Transcriptional Activation Function of the HIF-like Factor Requires Phosphorylation at a Conserved Threonine. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 23508–23514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gkotinakou, I.M.; Befani, C.; Simos, G.; Liakos, P. ERK1/2 Phosphorylates HIF-2α and Regulates Its Activity by Controlling Its CRM1-Dependent Nuclear Shuttling. J. Cell Sci. 2019, 132, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Pangou, E.; Befani, C.; Mylonis, I.; Samiotaki, M.; Panayotou, G.; Simos, G.; Liakos, P. HIF-2α Phosphorylation by CK1δ Promotes Erythropoietin Secretion in Liver Cancer Cells under Hypoxia. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 4213–4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Dioum, E.M.; Chen, R.; Alexander, M.S.; Zhang, Q.; Hogg, R.T.; Gerard, R.D.; Garcia, J.A. Regulation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 2α Signaling by the Stress-Responsive Deacetylase Sirtuin 1. Science 2009, 324, 1289–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bouras, T.; Fu, M.; Sauve, A.A.; Wang, F.; Quong, A.A.; Perkins, N.D.; Hay, R.T.; Gu, W.; Pestell, R.G. SIRT1 Deacetylation and Repression of P300 Involves Lysine Residues 1020/1024 within the Cell Cycle Regulatory Domain 1. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 10264–10276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yang, M.; Zhu, M.; Song, K.; Wuren, T.; Yan, J.; Ge, R.-L.; Ji, L.; Cui, S. VHL Gene Methylation Contributes to Excessive Erythrocytosis in Chronic Mountain Sickness Rat Model by Upregulating the HIF-2α/EPO Pathway. Life Sci. 2021, 266, 118873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tojo, M.; Matsuzaki, K.; Minami, T.; Honda, Y.; Yasuda, H.; Chiba, T.; Saya, H.; Fujii-Kuriyama, Y.; Nakao, M. The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Nuclear Transporter Is Modulated by the SUMO-1 Conjugation System. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 46576–46585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Girdwood, D.; Bumpass, D.; Vaughan, O.A.; Thain, A.; Anderson, L.A.; Snowden, A.W.; Garcia-Wilson, E.; Perkins, N.D.; Hay, R.T. P300 Transcriptional Repression Is Mediated by SUMO Modification. Mol. Cell 2003, 11, 1043–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Park, S.; Stanfield, R.L.; Martinez-Yamout, M.A.; Dyson, H.J.; Wilson, I.A.; Wright, P.E. Role of the CBP Catalytic Core in Intramolecular SUMOylation and Control of Histone H3 Acetylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E5335–E5342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Cai, Q.; Verma, S.C.; Kumar, P.; Ma, M.; Robertson, E.S. Hypoxia Inactivates the VHL Tumor Suppressor through PIASy-Mediated SUMO Modification. PLoS ONE 2010, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Van Hagen, M.; Overmeer, R.M.; Abolvardi, S.S.; Vertegaal, A.C.O. RNF4 and VHL Regulate the Proteasomal Degradation of SUMO-Conjugated Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-2α. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 38, 1922–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Huang, C.; Han, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, X.; Yan, S.; Yeh, E.T.H.; Chen, Y.; Cang, H.; Li, H.; Shi, G.; et al. SENP3 Is Responsible for HIF-1 Transactivation under Mild Oxidative Stress via P300 de-SUMOylation. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 2748–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kubaichuk, K.; Kietzmann, T. Involvement of E3 Ligases and Deubiquitinases in the Control of HIF-α Subunit Abundance. Cells 2019, 8, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Liu, W.; Xin, H.; Eckert, D.T.; Brown, J.A.; Gnarra, J.R. Hypoxia and Cell Cycle Regulation of the von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor. Oncogene 2011, 30, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kim, J.J.; Lee, S.B.; Jang, J.; Yi, S.Y.; Kim, S.H.; Han, S.A.; Lee, J.M.; Tong, S.Y.; Vincelette, N.D.; Gao, B.; et al. WSB1 Promotes Tumor Metastasis by Inducing PVHL Degradation. Genes Dev. 2015, 29, 2244–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lim, J.H.; Kim, D.G.; Yu, D.Y.; Kang, H.M.; Noh, K.H.; Kim, D.S.; Park, D.; Chang, T.K.; Im, D.S.; Jung, C.R. Stabilization of E2-EPF UCP Protein Is Implicated in Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 2647–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Troilo, A.; Alexander, I.; Muehl, S.; Jaramillo, D.; Knobeloch, K.; Krek, W. HIF1α Deubiquitination by USP8 Is Essential for Ciliogenesis in Normoxia. EMBO Rep. 2014, 15, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Schober, A.; Martin-Barros, I.; Martin-Mateos, T.; Perez-Andres, E.; Carlevaris, O.; Pozo, S.; Cortazar, A.; Aransay, A.; Carracedo, A.; Mayor, U.; et al. USP29 Is a Novel Non-Canonical Hypoxia Inducible Factor-α Activator. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Higashimura, Y.; Terai, T.; Yamaji, R.; Mitani, T.; Ogawa, M.; Harada, N.; Inui, H.; Nakano, Y. Kelch-like 20 up-Regulates the Expression of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-2α through Hypoxia- and von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein-Independent Regulatory Mechanisms. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 413, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hashimoto, T.; Shibasaki, F. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor as an Angiogenic Master Switch. Front. Pediatr. 2015, 3, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Montagner, M.; Enzo, E.; Forcato, M.; Zanconato, F.; Parenti, A.; Rampazzo, E.; Basso, G.; Leo, G.; Rosato, A.; Bicciato, S.; et al. SHARP1 Suppresses Breast Cancer Metastasis by Promoting Degradation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors. Nature 2012, 487, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Camps, C.; Petousi, N.; Bento, C.; Cario, H.; Copley, R.R.; McMullin, M.F.; Van Wijk, R.; Ratcliffe, P.J.; Robbins, P.A.; Taylor, J.C. Gene Panel Sequencing Improves the Diagnostic Work-up of Patients with Idiopathic Erythrocytosis and Identifies New Mutations. Haematologica 2016, 101, 1306–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chen, L.; Uchida, K.; Endler, A.; Shibasak, F. Mammalian Tumor Suppressor Int6 Specifically Targets Hypoxia Inducible Factor 2 Alpha for Degrada- Tion by Hypoxia- and PVHL-Independent Regulation. Chem. J. Biol. 2007, 282, 12707–12716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Barth, S.; Nesper, J.; Hasgall, P.A.; Wirthner, R.; Nytko, K.J.; Edlich, F.; Katschinski, D.M.; Stiehl, D.P.; Wenger, R.H.; Camenisch, G. The Peptidyl Prolyl Cis/Trans Isomerase FKBP38 Determines Hypoxia-Inducible Transcription Factor Prolyl-4-Hydroxylase PHD2 Protein Stability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 3758–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Baek, J.H.; Mahon, P.C.; Oh, J.; Kelly, B.; Krishnamachary, B.; Pearson, M.; Chan, D.A.; Giaccia, A.J.; Semenza, G.L. OS-9 Interacts with Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α and Prolyl Hydroxylases to Promote Oxygen-Dependent Degradation of HIF-1α. Mol. Cell 2005, 17, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kumar, P.; Gullberg, U.; Olsson, I.; Ajore, R. Myeloid Translocation Gene-16 Co-Repressor Promotes Degradation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Song, D.; Li, L.S.; Heaton-Johnson, K.J.; Arsenault, P.R.; Master, S.R.; Lee, F.S. Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain Protein 2 (PHD2) Binds a Pro-Xaa-Leu-Glu Motif, Linking It to the Heat Shock Protein 90 Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 9662–9674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Minervini, G.; Quaglia, F.; Tosatto, S.C.E. Computational Analysis of Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain-Containing Protein 2 (PHD2) Mutations Promoting Polycythemia Insurgence in Humans. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Foxler, D.E.; Bridge, K.S.; James, V.; Webb, T.M.; Mee, M.; Wong, S.C.K.; Feng, Y.; Constantin-Teodosiu, D.; Petursdottir, T.E.; Bjornsson, J.; et al. The LIMD1 Protein Bridges an Association between the Prolyl Hydroxylases and VHL to Repress HIF-1 Activity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Cardote, T.A.F.; Gadd, M.S.; Ciulli, A. Crystal Structure of the Cul2-Rbx1-EloBC-VHL Ubiquitin Ligase Complex. Structure 2017, 25, 901–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Baek, J.H.; Liu, Y.V.; McDonald, K.R.; Wesley, J.B.; Hubbi, M.E.; Byun, H.; Semenza, G.L. Spermidine/Spermine-N1-Acetyltransferase 2 Is an Essential Component of the Ubiquitin Ligase Complex That Regulates Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 23572–23580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Gossage, L.; Eisen, T.; Maher, E.R. VHL, the Story of a Tumour Suppressor Gene. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lee, S.; Frattini, V.; Bansal, M.; Castano, A.; Sherman, D.; Hutchinson, K.; Bruce, J.; Califano, A.; Liu, G.; Cardozo, T.; et al. An ID2-Dependent Mechanism for VHL Inactivation in Cancer. Nature 2016, 529, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Li, J.; Wang, E.; Dutta, S.; Lau, J.S.; Jiang, S.; Datta, K.; Mukhopadhyay, D. Protein Kinase C-Mediated Modulation of FIH-1 Expression by the Homeodomain Protein CDP/Cut/Cux. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 7345–7353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Asai, H.; Hirata, J.; Hirano, A.; Hirai, K.; Seki, S.; Watanabe-Akanuma, M. Activation of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Mediates Suppression of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Dependent Erythropoietin Expression by Indoxyl Sulfate. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2016, 310, C142–C150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Partch, C.L.; Gardner, K.H. Coactivators Necessary for Transcriptional Output of the Hypoxia Inducible Factor, HIF, Are Directly Recruited by ARNT PAS-B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7739–7744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Depping, R.; Jelkmann, W.; Kosyna, F.K. Nuclear-Cytoplasmatic Shuttling of Proteins in Control of Cellular Oxygen Sensing. J. Mol. Med. 2015, 93, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tran, E.J.; King, M.C.; Corbett, A.H. Macromolecular Transport between the Nucleus and the Cytoplasm: Advances in Mechanism and Emerging Links to Disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 2784–2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Depping, R.; Steinhoff, A.; Schindler, S.G.; Friedrich, B.; Fagerlund, R.; Metzen, E.; Hartmann, E.; Köhler, M. Nuclear Translocation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs): Involvement of the Classical Importin α/β Pathway. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2008, 1783, 394–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Khacho, M.; Mekhail, K.; Pilon-Larose, K.; Pause, A.; Cote, J.; Lee, S. EEF1A Is a Novel Component of the Mammalian Nuclear Protein Export Machinery. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19, 5296–5308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Ebert, B.L.; Bunn, H.F. Regulation of the Erythropoietin Gene. Blood 1999, 94, 1864–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, F.; Zhang, R.; Wu, X.; Hankinson, O. Roles of Coactivators in Hypoxic Induction of the Erythropoietin Gene. PLoS ONE 2010, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Galson, D.L.; Tsuchiya, T.; Tendler, D.S.; Huang, L.E.; Ren, Y.; Ogura, T.; Bunn, H.F. The Orphan Receptor Hepatic Nuclear Factor 4 Functions as a Transcriptional Activator for Tissue-Specific and Hypoxia-Specific Erythropoietin Gene Expression and Is Antagonized by EAR3/COUP-TF1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15, 2135–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Makita, T.; Hernandez-Hoyos, G.; Chen, T.H.P.; Wu, H.; Rothenberg, E.V.; Sucov, H.M. A Developmental Transition in Definitive Erythropoiesis: Erythropoietin Expression Is Sequentially Regulated by Retinoic Acid Receptors and HNF4. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 889–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Figueroa, Y.G.; Chan, A.K.; Ibrahim, R.; Tang, Y.; Burow, M.E.; Alam, J.; Scandurro, A.B.; Beckman, B.S. NF-ΚB Plays a Key Role in Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1-Regulated Erythropoietin Gene Expression. Exp. Hematol. 2002, 30, 1419–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Vočanec, D.; Prijatelj, T.; Debeljak, N.; Kunej, T. Genetic Variants of Erythropoietin (EPO) and EPO Receptor Genes in Familial Erythrocytosis. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2019, 41, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Imagawa, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Miura, Y. Negative Regulation of the Erythropoietin Gene Expression by the GATA Transcription Factors. Blood 1997, 89, 1430–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Obara, N.; Suzuki, N.; Kim, K.; Nagasawa, T.; Imagawa, S.; Yamamoto, M. Repression via the GATA Box Is Essential for Tissue-Specific Erythropoietin Gene Expression. Blood 2008, 111, 5223–5232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Yin, H.; Blachard, K.L. Erratum: DNA Methylation Represses the Expression of the Human Erythropoietin Gene by Two Different Mechanisms. Blood 2000, 95, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hodges, V.M.; Rainey, S.; Lappin, T.R.; Maxwell, A.P. Pathophysiology of Anemia and Erythrocytosis. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2007, 64, 139–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kim, A.R.; Ulirsch, J.C.; Wilmes, S.; Unal, E.; Moraga, I.; Karakukcu, M.; Yuan, D.; Kazerounian, S.; Abdulhay, N.J.; King, D.S.; et al. Functional Selectivity in Cytokine Signaling Revealed Through a Pathogenic EPO Mutation. Cell 2017, 168, 1053–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Bento, C.; Cario, H.; Gardie, B.; Sylvie, H.; McMullin, M.F. Congenital Erythrocytosis and Hereditary Thrombocytosis. In Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up: A Practical Guide with Clinical Cases; European Cooperation in Science & Technology: Brussels, Belgium, 2015; pp. 41–61. [Google Scholar]
  82. Lappin, T.R.; Lee, F.S. Update on Mutations in the HIF: EPO Pathway and Their Role in Erythrocytosis. Blood Rev. 2019, 37, 100590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zatyka, M.; Morrissey, C.; Kuzmin, I.; Lerman, M.I.; Latif, F.; Richards, F.M.; Maher, E.R. Genetic and Functional Analysis of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) Tumour Suppressor Gene Promoter. J. Med. Genet. 2002, 39, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Zhang, Q.; Yang, H. The Roles of VHL-Dependent Ubiquitination in Signaling and Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2012, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Semenza, G.L. Signal Transduction to Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2002, 64, 993–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Fallah, J.; Rini, B.I. HIF Inhibitors: Status of Current Clinical Development. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Klein, M.; Kaestner, L.; Bogdanova, A.Y.; Minetti, G.; Rudloff, S.; Lundby, C.; Makhro, A.; Seiler, E.; van Cromvoirt, A.; Fenk, S.; et al. Absence of Neocytolysis in Humans Returning from a 3-Week High-Altitude Sojourn. Acta Physiol. 2021, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mairbäurl, H. Neocytolysis: How to Get Rid of the Extra Erythrocytes Formed by Stress Erythropoiesis upon Descent from High Altitude. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chen, W.; Hill, H.; Christie, A.; Kim, M.S.; Holloman, E.; Pavia-Jimenez, A.; Homayoun, F.; Ma, Y.; Patel, N.; Yell, P.; et al. Targeting Renal Cell Carcinoma with a HIF-2 Antagonist. Nature 2016, 539, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Bei, Y. On-Target Efficacy of a HIF2α Antagonist in Preclinical Kidney Cancer Models. Physiol. Behav. 2017, 176, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fath, D.M.; Kong, X.; Liang, D.; Lin, Z.; Chou, A.; Jiang, Y.; Fang, J.; Caro, J.; Sang, N. Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Repress the Transactivation Potential of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors Independently of Direct Acetylation of HIF-α. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 13612–13619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Ghosh, M.C.; Zhang, D.L.; Ollivierre, W.H.; Noguchi, A.; Springer, D.A.; Linehan, W.M.; Rouault, T.A. Therapeutic Inhibition of HIF-2α Reverses Polycythemia and Pulmonary Hypertension in Murine Models of Human Diseases. Blood 2021, 137, 2509–2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kaelin, W.G.; Ratcliffe, P.J.; Semenza, G.L. Pathways for Oxygen Regulation and Homeostasis: The 2016 Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2016, 316, 1252–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Rainville, N.; Jachimowicz, E.; Wojchowski, D.M. Targeting EPO and EPO RECEPTOR PATHWAYS in Anemia and Dysregulated Erythropoiesis. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2016, 20, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Weidemann, A.; Johnson, R.S. Nonrenal Regulation of EPO Synthesis. Kidney Int. 2009, 75, 682–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 22 07074 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecular mechanisms in the HIF-EPO pathway, which can modulate the stability or activity of HIF2α and its partners correlated with erythropoiesis.
Figure 1. Molecular mechanisms in the HIF-EPO pathway, which can modulate the stability or activity of HIF2α and its partners correlated with erythropoiesis.
Ijms 22 07074 g001
Table
Table 1. Key players of oxygen-sensing pathway and EPO expression.
Table 1. Key players of oxygen-sensing pathway and EPO expression.
Gene SymbolGene IDProtein NameMechanism
EPAS12034Hypoxia-inducible factor 2-alpha (HIF2α)Transcriptional activation of EPO [17]
HIF1A3091Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF1α)Transcriptional activation [16]
HIF3A64344Hypoxia-inducible factor 3-alpha (HIF3α)Transcriptional repression [16]
EGLN154583HIF-prolyl hydroxylase 2 (PHD2)HIF2α hydroxylation [18]
VHL7428von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor protein (VHL)HIF2α ubiquitination [16]
ARNT405Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT)HIF2α DNA protein partner Transcriptional activation of EPO [15]
ARNTL#406Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like protein 1 (ARNTL)HIFα DNA protein partner [19]
ARNT2#9915Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator 2 (ARNT2)HIFα DNA protein partner [20]
EPO2056Erythropoietin
# Experiments were performed in cancer cell lines, or cells other than renal cells, or it was a cancer-directed study.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tomc, J.; Debeljak, N. Molecular Insights into the Oxygen-Sensing Pathway and Erythropoietin Expression Regulation in Erythropoiesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22137074

AMA Style

Tomc J, Debeljak N. Molecular Insights into the Oxygen-Sensing Pathway and Erythropoietin Expression Regulation in Erythropoiesis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(13):7074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22137074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tomc, Jana, and Nataša Debeljak. 2021. "Molecular Insights into the Oxygen-Sensing Pathway and Erythropoietin Expression Regulation in Erythropoiesis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 13: 7074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22137074

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop