Next Article in Journal
Gene Set−Based Integrative Analysis Revealing Two Distinct Functional Regulation Patterns in Four Common Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
New Treatment Strategies for Alcohol-Induced Heart Damage
Previous Article in Journal
Droplet Digital PCR Based Androgen Receptor Variant 7 (AR-V7) Detection from Prostate Cancer Patient Blood Biopsies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Distinct Effects of Nalmefene on Dopamine Uptake Rates and Kappa Opioid Receptor Activity in the Nucleus Accumbens Following Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Exposure
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 17
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms17081271
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The FKBP5 Gene Affects Alcohol Drinking in Knockout Mice and Is Implicated in Alcohol Drinking in Humans

by
Bin Qiu
1,
Susan E. Luczak
2,
Tamara L. Wall
3,4,5,
Aaron M. Kirchhoff
6,
Yuxue Xu
1,
Mimy Y. Eng
5,
Robert B. Stewart
7,
Weinian Shou
8,
Stephen L. Boehm
7,
Julia A. Chester
9,
Weidong Yong
1,8,* and
Tiebing Liang
10,*
1
Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS), Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing 100021, China
2
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
3
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA 92037, USA
4
Psychology Service, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USA
5
Veterans Medical Research Foundation, San Diego, CA 92161, USA
6
Immunology and Microbial Science Department, Research Technician, The Scripps Research Institute, Scripps Clinic South Driveway, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
7
Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
8
Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
9
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
10
Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine Gatch Hall, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(8), 1271; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17081271
Submission received: 15 June 2016 / Revised: 21 July 2016 / Accepted: 25 July 2016 / Published: 5 August 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alcoholism: Molecular Mechanisms and Treatment Strategies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
FKBP5 encodes FK506-binding protein 5, a glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-binding protein implicated in various psychiatric disorders and alcohol withdrawal severity. The purpose of this study is to characterize alcohol preference and related phenotypes in Fkbp5 knockout (KO) mice and to examine the role of FKBP5 in human alcohol consumption. The following experiments were performed to characterize Fkpb5 KO mice. (1) Fkbp5 KO and wild-type (WT) EtOH consumption was tested using a two-bottle choice paradigm; (2) The EtOH elimination rate was measured after intraperitoneal (IP) injection of 2.0 g/kg EtOH; (3) Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was measured after 3 h limited access of alcohol; (4) Brain region expression of Fkbp5 was identified using LacZ staining; (5) Baseline corticosterone (CORT) was assessed. Additionally, two SNPs, rs1360780 (C/T) and rs3800373 (T/G), were selected to study the association of FKBP5 with alcohol consumption in humans. Participants were college students (n = 1162) from 21–26 years of age with Chinese, Korean or Caucasian ethnicity. The results, compared to WT mice, for KO mice exhibited an increase in alcohol consumption that was not due to differences in taste sensitivity or alcohol metabolism. Higher BAC was found in KO mice after 3 h of EtOH access. Fkbp5 was highly expressed in brain regions involved in the regulation of the stress response, such as the hippocampus, amygdala, dorsal raphe and locus coeruleus. Both genotypes exhibited similar basal levels of plasma corticosterone (CORT). Finally, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FKBP5 were found to be associated with alcohol drinking in humans. These results suggest that the association between FKBP5 and alcohol consumption is conserved in both mice and humans.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Alcohol use disorder displays a high level of comorbidity with several psychiatric disorders [1,2]. Dysregulation of a primary component of the stress response, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, has been implicated in the pathophysiology of these psychiatric disorders [3,4,5,6] and mediates the transition from episodic drug and alcohol use to dependence [7,8,9,10]. Glucocorticoids, glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and its binding proteins (e.g., Fkbp5, FK506 binding protein 5, also known as FKBP51) are critical HPA axis regulatory elements.
Diverse lines of research suggest a correlation between glucocorticoid levels and alcohol consumption. For instance, increases in HPA axis responsivity in young primates predicted higher levels of future alcohol consumption [11]. Alcohol consumption and withdrawal have both been shown to increase circulating glucocorticoids and to decrease GR availability [12], and the release of high levels of glucocorticoid peptides has been shown to sensitize the reward pathways in the brain [13,14,15]. Other research indicates that the GR plays an important role in the determination of alcohol abuse. Polymorphisms in the GR are associated with the onset of alcohol abuse in adolescents [6]; GR-mediated plasticity increased voluntary alcohol consumption in rats [16]; and a GR antagonist reduced alcohol intake in rats [17]. Thus, the GR is a worthy target of research aimed at identifying novel treatment strategies for alcohol use disorder.
GR binding proteins are critical for GR function and GR-regulated behavior. However, limited research has been done to investigate the role of GR binding proteins in behaviors related to alcohol use disorder. FKBP5 is a GR binding protein that acts as a co-chaperone of heat shock protein 90 and is involved in regulating GR activity, nuclear translocation and transcriptional regulation of GR-targeted genes [18,19,20]. Functionally, FKBP5 is a potent inhibitor of GR activation and a determinant of HPA axis regulation [21]. As replicated in other studies, both Fkbp5 knockout (KO) mice and FKBP5 knockdown neuronal cell cultures exhibit elevated GR nuclear translocation [22,23].
High expression of Fkbp5 has been observed in the brain, especially, hippocampus [24], which is consistent with its function in the stress response. Increased hippocampal expression of Fkbp5 mRNA, as well as increased plasma corticosterone (CORT) levels and adrenal gland weight were observed after chronic social defeat in mice [25]. When compared to WT mice prior to chronic social defeat, Fkbp5-deficient mice exhibited lower basal CORT and lower adrenal weights [26].
Fkbp5 gene expression is not only induced by stress [27], but also by alcohol [28,29] and drug administration [30]. In addition, glucocorticoid treatment increased Fkbp5 expression in peripheral tissue [31] and the brain [32]. Consistent with the effects of alcohol on Fkbp5 gene expression in the CNS following acute alcohol injection, these findings suggest that increases in Fkbp5 expression following steroid receptor activation reduce GR sensitivity and, in turn, modulate GR-related behavior [28,33].
FKBP5 SNPs and gene expression levels are associated with the onset of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anxiety disorder in humans [20,34]. Particularly, two SNPs, rs1360780 (C/T) and rs3800373 (T/G) are often used for association studies. In humans, alcohol use disorder is often comorbid with anxiety and other psychiatric disorders [2,35]. In rodents, anxiety is correlated with alcohol preference in various models of alcohol use disorder [36,37]. Genetic variations of FKBP5 are associated with an increased risk for depression [38,39], PTSD [40] and bipolar disorder [41] and are also associated with a greater risk for comorbid alcohol dependence and PTSD onset [42]. Moreover, FKBP5 SNPs are associated with the degree of cortisol response [20,21], response to antidepressants [38,39,40], heroin addiction [43] and alcohol withdrawal severity [5]. For example, heterozygous and homozygous carriers of the rs3800373 (T/G and G/G) or rs1360780 (C/T and T/T) variants are more likely to respond to antidepressant drugs [44]. Some findings suggest that the G allele of rs3800373 and the T allele of rs1360780 (minor alleles) may represent protective alleles for PTSD with a history of childhood abuse, while the major alleles, T allele of rs3800373 and C allele of rs1360780, represent risk alleles for comorbid alcohol dependence and PTSD onset [42]. However, correlations between the risk allele of FKBP5 and onset of PTSD have been inconsistent, and no direct research has investigated FKBP5 and its role in alcohol consumption.
In the current study, we utilize the Fkbp5 KO mouse model to address the functional relevance of Fkbp5 in alcohol consumption and to map Fkbp5 gene expression in brain. Furthermore, we extend the mouse findings by determining associations between FKBP5 SNPs and alcohol drinking behaviors in humans, an effort critical for future translational research. Taken together, our findings are the first to demonstrate a role for Fkbp5 in the regulation of alcohol drinking in both mice and humans.

2. Results

2.1. Alcohol Consumption Is Increased in Fkbp5−/− Mice

Studies suggest that alcohol consumption is directly affected by circulating corticoid and GR availability [12] and that FKBP5 plays a role in GR activation and HPA axis regulation [21]. In order to ascertain whether alcohol consumption was affected by Fkbp5 gene knockout, a series of drinking tests were performed in both male and female adult mice. In the established alcohol drinking test protocol, two indices were calculated including alcohol consumption (g EtOH/kg body weight/day) and alcohol preference (percentage of EtOH/total fluid, v/v). A significant genotypic effect was observed on male alcohol consumption using repeated measures two-way ANOVA with F (1,47) = 9.27, p = 0.0038. Sidak’s multiple comparisons post hoc test revealed significant differences at 9% (p = 0.0226), 12% (p = 0.0081) and 15% (p = 0.0002) (Figure 1A). However, while repeated measures two-way ANOVA revealed significant differences due to ethanol concentration (p < 0.0001), no genotypic effects were observed in female alcohol consumption or in ethanol preference of either sex (Figure 1B–D). During the drinking tests, the body weight was measured twice per week. No significant changes in body weight were detected within genotype, regardless of sex. When different concentrations of alcohol were presented with water, the total fluid intake (volume of alcohol plus water) of KO mice was lower than WT in general, but only in males, this difference found to be significant via repeated measures two-way ANOVA with F (1,47) = 11.07, p = 0.0017. Sidak’s multiple comparisons post hoc test revealed significant differences at 6% (p = 0.0043), 9% (p = 0.0495) and 15% (p = 0.0032) (Figure 1E,F). Taken together, the current results suggest that deficiency of Fkbp5 can enhance EtOH intake, at least in males.
To exclude the possibility that taste sensitivity may have been influenced by Fkbp5 KO, animals were tested for quinine consumption (Figure 1G), but no significant difference was observed between KO and WT mice of either sex. Finally, we determined whether the observed differences in alcohol consumption might be due to differences in the rate of alcohol metabolism between genotypes. An ethanol dose of 2.0 g/kg body weight was injected intraperitoneally (IP), and the EtOH elimination rate was assessed. Regardless of sex, no significant difference in alcohol elimination rate was observed between Fkbp5 KO (1.2 ± 0.13 mg% EtOH per min) and WT mice (0.9 ± 0.23 mg% EtOH per min) (Figure 1H).

2.2. Blood Alcohol Concentration Is Higher in KO than WT Mice

Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was measured after 3 h of limited access to 15% EtOH. Fkbp5 KO mice consumed more alcohol than WT mice (mean = 2.24 g EtOH/kg body weight for KO vs. 0. 94 g/kg for WT), resulting in higher BACs for KO mice compared to WT mice (mean = 53 ± 1.3 mg% EtOH in KO vs. 25.9 ± 1.92 mg% EtOH in WT).

2.3. The Fkbp5 Gene Is Highly Expressed in Brain Regions Important for the Stress Response

FKBP5 has been found to have reduced expression in individuals with PTSD [45]. Fkbp5-deficient mice were generated using a gene-trapping approach [46] in which the LacZ reporter gene was inserted. Previous studies have also shown that the murine Fkbp5 gene is expressed in various tissues, including brain and peripheral tissue. We therefore charted the Fkbp5 gene expression pattern in KO mice by staining for the LacZ gene product. In the brains of one-month-old Fkbp5 KO mice, LacZ staining revealed Fkbp5 expression in the hippocampus, striatum, dorsal raphe (DR) and locus coeruleus (LC) (Figure 2B). In four-month-old Fkbp5 KO mice, LacZ staining was observed in the hippocampus and additional brain regions, such as amygdala (Figure 2D). Whole brain LacZ staining followed by sectioning and eosin red staining in four-month-old KO mice revealed that Fkpb5 was highly expressed in the lateral septum, which includes lateral septal nuclei dorsal (LSD), ventral (LSV) and intermediate (LSI) (Figure 2F); bed nucleus of the striatum terminalis (BST) (Figure 2F); and hippocampus (Figure 2H,J). In the four-month-old hippocampus, LacZ staining suggested that Fkbp5 is highly expressed in CA1, CA2, CA3 and the dentate gyrus (DG) (Figure 2D,H,J). Consistent with the absence of the LacZ reporter gene, WT control mice did not exhibit any LacZ staining (Figure 2A,C,E,G,I).

2.4. Basal Corticosterone Is Not Different Between Fkbp5−/− and WT Mice

Multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that Fkbp5 expression responds to CORT treatment [32,47]. Basal CORT was measured in blood samples of KO and WT mice to determine if there was a genotype and sex difference. No significant differences between KO and WT were detected by ANOVA (genotype × sex) (interaction term: F (1,21) = 3.4, p = 0.08) (Figure 3). However, there is trend of lower baseline CORT in female KO compared to WT.

2.5. SNPs in FKBP5 Are Associated with Alcohol Drinking Behavior in Humans

Genotype frequency and allele frequency are shown in Table 1 split by ethnic group (including all 1162 participants regardless of drinking status). Genotype distributions were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (a principle that the genetic variation in a population will remain constant from one generation to the next without disturbing factors) for all three ethnic groups (p > 0.40). Our results were consistent with previous findings that have found the two SNPs in the FKBP5 gene (rs3800373 in the 3’UTR and rs1360780 in intron 2) to be highly linked [38]. The two SNPs were linked among 92%–97% of all subjects studied (Table 1).
Significant associations of both SNPs with alcohol measures were found in Chinese and Koreans, but not in Caucasians (Table 2) for raw means and standard deviations and regression statistics using transformed variables. For the rs1360780 SNP, Chinese with the CC genotype had significantly higher scores than those with CT/TT genotypes on average quantity, binge drinking episodes, lifetime maximum drinks and lifetime alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms, although lifetime maximum drinks was only significant in Chinese men (12.0 vs. 7.2, F = 9.32, p = 0.003, R2 change = 0.049). Koreans with the CC genotype also had significantly higher scores on AUD symptoms than Koreans with CT/TT genotypes. For the FKBP5 3’-UTR rs3800373 SNP, Chinese with the TT genotype had higher scores on lifetime maximum drinks and AUD symptoms than the TG/GG genotypes; again, lifetime maximum drinks was only significant in Chinese men (11.8 vs. 7.4, F = 13.37, p < 0.001, R2 change = 0.069). Koreans with the TT genotype also had a greater number of lifetime AUD symptoms than Koreans with TG/GG genotypes. No gene-binge drinking interaction terms were significant.

3. Discussion

The current studies investigated the role that Fkbp5 plays in alcohol drinking in both mice and humans. Compared to WT mice, Fkbp5 KO mice exhibited increases in alcohol. These increases were not attributed to sensitivity to a bitter-tasting solution or to differences in the rate of alcohol metabolism. Relevant to its function in the stress response, Fkbp5 was found to be expressed in brain regions that are important in the stress response. Consistent with a previous study [26], basal differences in CORT levels were not observed between genotypes in male mice; although a trend toward lower basal CORT in female Fkbp5-deficient mice can be seen in Figure 3, consistent with those findings [26]. Finally, FKBP5 SNPs were associated with alcohol consumption in Asians, but not Caucasians. This is the first study to demonstrate a role for the Fkbp5 gene in regulating alcohol consumption in both mouse and human samples.

3.1. FKBP5 Is Associated with Psychiatric Disease Including Alcohol Use Disorder

Previous research has focused on FKBP5 and its association with various psychiatric disorders [21,41,48,49]. This study demonstrated that the gene expression of Fkbp5 in the mouse plays at least a partial role in the regulation of alcohol drinking; KO mice with no expression of Fkbp5 consumed more alcohol. Even though we do not have RNA available for FKBP5 gene expression measurement in humans, the results from previous research also support the hypothesis that low FKBP5 expression is associated with greater alcohol consumption. Previous research has shown that rs1360780 (CC) homozygous subjects exhibit decreased FKBP5 mRNA expression compared to (TT) homozygous subjects [38]. Consistent with the assumption that subjects with CC genotypes also display lower FKBP5 mRNA expression than subjects with CT or TT genotypes, we found that Chinese and Koreans with CC had higher scores on alcohol-related variables than CT/TT carriers.
FKBP5 SNPs and gene expression levels are associated with the onset of PTSD and anxiety disorder in humans [20,34]. These SNPs are also associated with altered response to antidepressants [39,40,41]. Particularly, heterozygous and homozygous carriers of the rs3800373 (TG and GG) or rs1360780 (CT and TT) variants are more likely to respond to antidepressant drugs [44]. A recent study also indicated that aged (>50 years) T allele carriers of rs1360780 showed significantly higher induction of FKBP5 mRNA expression by glucocorticoids in peripheral blood mononuclear cells [50]. Additionally, the effect of increasing severity of childhood abuse on the resultant level of adult PTSD appears to be carried by a subset of subjects with more common alleles of FKBP5 [34]. These findings suggest that the G allele of rs3800373 and the T allele of rs1360780 (minor alleles) may represent protective alleles for PTSD with a history of childhood abuse, while the major alleles, the T allele of rs3800373 and the C allele of rs1360780, represent risk alleles. In agreement with previous studies, these major alleles are associated with a higher risk for comorbid alcohol dependence and PTSD onset [42].
In our prior study, alcohol-dependent inpatients with the T allele of rs3800373 had more severe withdrawal symptoms [5]. In this study, this major allele is associated with higher scores on alcohol-related variables. Interestingly, the rs1360780 SNP is within an intronic region; a homologous region in rodent Fkbp5 is highly conserved and has a functional hormone response element [51]. We speculate that rs1360780 may be a functional SNP that regulates gene expression, which in turn alters alcohol drinking. In summary, the major alleles of FKBP5 SNPs are associated with higher levels of alcohol consumption, more frequent consumption and a greater likelihood for alcohol-related problems in this study, as well as with withdrawal symptoms in prior studies [5]. In the future, genotyping FKBP5 SNPs in heavy drinkers and the general population may explain the previous finding, which demonstrated that alcohol-dependent subjects had more withdrawal symptoms, higher alcohol intake and a higher maximum number of drinks compared to the general population [52]. FKBP5 can be used as a biomarker for the diagnosis of alcohol use disorder.
This study demonstrates ethnic differences in the association of FKBP5 SNPs with alcohol-related phenotypes. In Korean and Chinese individuals, significant associations were found between FKBP5 SNPs and alcohol drinking-related variables, but no FKBP5 gene effects were detected in Caucasian participants. Previous research has found a combinatorial effect of the FKBP5 gene and childhood abuse on the risk for developing PTSD in African Americans, but not in European Americans [42]. Results of this study also indicated consistent findings across gender within each ethnicity with the exception of the association of FKBP5 SNPs with lifetime maximum number of drinks in Chinese, which only reached significance in the men. This lack of significance in the Chinese female sample may be due to statistical power given the lower levels of maximum drinks in the women overall, with the trends being similar in both genders. In addition, our analyses did not indicate that recent heavier drinking was associated with a differential effect of the genes on lifetime heavy drinking or problems, further indicating the consistency of the findings within each ethnic group despite differences between the ethnic groups. Future research should continue to investigate gender and ethnic group differences in the associations of these SNPs with alcohol-related behaviors to better understand their relationships in those with different allele prevalence and consumption patterns, including those with more severe alcohol-related problems.

3.2. No Basal Difference in CORT Level, but Fkbp5 Expressed in the Brain Regions Involving Stress Response

Previous studies have indicated a correlation between alcohol consumption, glucocorticoid levels and GR activity [4,14,53]. Animal studies show that circulating levels of CORT rise after stress in Fkbp5 KO mice [54] and prenatally stressed rats [27]. Consistent with a previous study [26], we did not find basal differences in CORT levels between genotypes in male mice; although, a trend toward lower basal CORT in female Fkbp5-deficient mice can be seen in Figure 3. Based on our research and that of others, it is clear that eliminating Fkbp5 does not affect basal CORT. Given the tantalizing result that Fkbp5 is expressed in the brain regions that are relevant to stress response, it will be very interesting to study how stress affects CORT levels in Fkbp5 KO mice.
In the periphery, as well as the CNS, Fkbp5 plays an important role in the stress response. Research has shown Fkbp5 gene expression in the adult brain [24,55] and in mice as young as three months [56]. The current study revealed Fkbp5 expression in the brain of one-month-old mice. Brain regions with high expression of Fkbp5 have been implicated in both the stress response and the development of alcohol dependence [57,58]. Fkbp5 expression is induced in the brain by stress [24,27], alcohol [28,29] and other drugs [30]. Our ongoing studies aim to understand how stress and alcohol affect Fkbp5 expression in the brain and circulating CORT levels.
The limitation of this research is that because Fkbp5 is a stress response gene, other stressors could be confounders; for example, we did not include smoking as a covariate in our analyses and only assessed current consumption patterns and lifetime alcohol problems in these analyses.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animal and Human Subjects

All experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committees at the Indiana University School of Medicine (protocol #DS0000871R, date of approval 4/24/2013), Purdue University (#1112000327, 10/11/2013), and the Institute of Laboratory Animal Science of Peking Union Medical College (#ILAS-PG-2014-013). These protocols were carried out in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. As described in a previous paper, Fkbp5 knockout (Fkbp5−/−) mice were generated using the gene trapping method [46]. Fkbp5−/− and WT littermates were bred through heterozygous mating and were backcrossed with C57BL/6J inbred mice for at least 5 generations.
The human study (#041122, 9/2/2004; #080978, 5/22/2008; #100399, 2/25/2010) was approved by the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Human Research Protections Program and had a Certificate of Confidentiality from the USA Department of Health and Human Services. UCSD college students of legal drinking age were recruited to participate through advertisements on campus. All participants provided written informed consent.

4.2. Alcohol Drinking Tests

Drinking experiments were repeated three times using different cohorts of animals, in all a total of 82 Fkbp5−/− (male, n = 46; female, n = 36) and 92 WT (male, n = 52; female, n = 40) mice. Fluid intake and body weight were measured every other day throughout each experiment. The average body weights of the mice were WT = 30 g and KO = 27 g for males and WT = 24 g and KO = 22 g for females. At 13 weeks of age, mice were habituated to drinking in their home cages for 6 days with two 25-mL graduated cylinders containing water. Following the habituation phase, mice were given 24-h access to water and alcohol (EtOH). The concentration of EtOH (v/v) was increased every four days as follows: 3%, 6%, 9%, 12% and 15%. Average alcohol consumption per day was calculated and corrected for individual differences in body weight (BW) (g EtOH/kg BW/day). Alcohol preference ratios were then calculated (EtOH/total fluid). To exclude the possibility that KO and WT mice differed in taste reactivity, animals were tested for quinine (0.5 µM) intake as published [59].

4.3. Alcohol Elimination Rate

At 12 weeks of age, the EtOH elimination rate was determined using a separate cohort of Fkbp5−/− and WT mice (4 male and 4 female mice of each genotype). An EtOH dose of 2.0 g/kg was injected intraperitoneally (IP). Tail blood was collected at 30, 75 and 120 min after IP injection, and plasma samples were spun down and stored at −80 °C until further analysis [60]. Plasma alcohol concentrations were measured using gas chromatography according to the instructions of the manufacturer (HP Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

4.4. Blood Alcohol Concentration after 3-h Limited Access

Mice (10 Fkbp5−/− and 10 WT mice of both sexes at 6 months of age) were maintained at reverse light cycle for 3 weeks before the experiment. The subjective dark period is the active time for rodents. In order to assess the blood EtOH levels achieved during the active period, intake volume of a 15% EtOH solution and subsequent blood EtOH concentrations were determined after a 3-h access period, occurring 3 h into the dark cycle. On the test day, a stacking design was used with 10-min intervals separating the presentation of EtOH to each mouse. Beginning at 7:00 a.m., the first animal received 15% EtOH, and tail blood was taken at 10:00 a.m., with the rest of the mice following in sequence at 10-min intervals. Blood was collected in an EDTA-coated tube and stored on ice until all samples were collected. After collection, blood samples were centrifuged at 1500× g for 10 min, and plasma was isolated for blood alcohol concentration measurement. The same GC platform was used as described above.

4.5. LacZ Staining

Age-matched Fkbp5−/− (n = 6) and littermate control (n = 6) mice of both sexes were used for morphological and histological studies. Fkbp5 gene expression in the whole brain was determined at 1 and 4 months of age. Whole brains were collected, and the LacZ gene product, β-galactosidase activity, was detected using X-gal [48,61]. After images were collected, the whole brain or brain slices were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. Brains were paraffin embedded, sectioned (5 µm) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin following standard protocols [62,63].

4.6. CORT Measurement

Basal corticosterone (CORT) levels were measured in mice. Blood samples were collected from the submandibular vein (male: KO = 8, WT = 5; female: KO = 7, WT = 5) between 1200 and 1300 (light cycle on at 700–1900). The concentration of CORT in the blood was determined using a competitive enzyme immunoassay kit from Assay Designs (Ann Arbor, MI, USA), as previously published [64]. Optical densities were read on a MultiskanTM FC microplate reader (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Standards and plasma samples were analyzed in duplicate. CORT concentrations were interpolated from standard curves generated using a four-parameter logistic curve fitting program (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

4.7. Human Sample Phenotypes

Participants were students at UCSD (n = 1162) 21–26 years of age (M = 22.0, SD = 1.34), with an average of 15.1 years of education (SD = 0.89), who reported that all 4 of their grandparents were entirely of Chinese (n = 360, 48% female), Korean (n = 343, 50% female) or Caucasian (n = 449, 48% female) ethnicity. Participants completed the time-line follow-back measure to evaluate alcohol consumption for the preceding 90 days [65,66]. A standard drink was defined as 12 oz (355 mL) of beer, 5 oz (150 mL) of wine or 1.5 oz (45 mL) of hard liquor. These amounts are the equivalent of approximately 14 g of pure ethanol. Participants also completed the Semi-Structured Assessment for the Genetics of Alcohol use disorder [67,68] with a trained research interviewer. During a portion of this interview, participants recounted the maximum number of drinks ever consumed in a 24-h period and were assessed for the 11 DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence symptoms (range 0–11; American Psychological Association, 1994) [69]. Five alcohol-related variables were calculated from these assessments: (1) average quantity of drinking during the previous three months (standard drinks/occasion); (2) average frequency of drinking during the previous three months (days/month); (3) number of binge drinking episodes (four or more drinks on an occasion for women and five or more on an occasion for men) during the previous three months; (4) lifetime maximum number of alcohol drinks ever consumed in a 24-h period; and (5) number of lifetime alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms (alcohol abuse and dependence). Lifetime non-drinkers (defined as never having had a standard drink of alcohol) were excluded (n = 30).

4.8. Human Sample Genotyping

Blood samples were collected by fingertip puncture and delivered to the Genomics and Bioinformatics Core of Indiana Alcohol Research Center for genotyping. Genomic DNA was isolated by the “HotSHOT” method [70], and TaqMan probes were used for allelic discrimination (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA). Genotyping procedures were reported previously [71]. Two SNPs, rs1360780 (major/minor allele, C/T) within intron 2 and rs3800373 (T/G) in the 3’UTR, were selected for genotyping. The two SNPs selected comprise one single large linkage disequilibrium (LD) block based on previous LD structure analysis [38].

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Total fluid intake and alcohol consumption and preference differences at tested EtOH concentrations between genotypes were assessed via 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Sidak’s test for multiple comparisons. Differences in quinine intake and CORT data were analyzed using Student’s t-test.
In humans, data were analyzed using linear regressions. All alcohol variables were log transformed to account for the non-normality of the distribution of raw scores. Based on the genotypic distributions (Table 1) and consistent with prior studies [44], we dichotomized the genotype groups, such that CT and TT were combined for the FKBP5 intron SNP (rs1360780) and TG and GG were combined for the FKBP5 3’-UTR SNP (rs3800373). Because of the strong association of alcohol metabolizing genes (e.g., ALDH2, ADH1B) with alcohol-related behaviors [72], we co-varied for these two genotypes (dichotomized variables for those with and without the variant ALDH2*2 and ADH1B*2 alleles) by entering them in linear regressions as the first step prior to entering the FKBP5 gene in the second step. Note that the ALDH2*2 allele was present only in the Chinese and Korean groups, whereas the ADH1B*2 was present in all three ethnic groups.
We tested for gender differences in the relationship of the FKBP5 SNPs with alcohol-related behaviors by including gene-gender interaction terms in the regression models. For any interaction term with a p < 0.10, we then examined the relationship of the gene with the alcohol-related variable in each gender separately. We used a similar approach to examine the possibility that current heavy alcohol consumption might differentially affect the association of the genes with lifetime heavy drinking and AUD symptoms; in these analyses, we included interaction terms of the genes with having binged in the past 3 months.

5. Conclusions

Despite these limitations, our study demonstrates that FKBP5 is associated with alcohol consumption phenotypes in mice and in humans of Asian, but not Caucasian, descent. The current study has established the foundation for future studies investigating the potential role of FKBP5 in responses to acute and chronic drinking, alcohol withdrawal symptoms and the interplay of stress and Fkbp5 expression on the development of alcohol dependence. FKBP5 may well be an interesting therapeutic target for the prevention and treatment of stress-related alcohol drinking behavior.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the state high-tech program (863-2012AA022403), National Key Basic Research Program of China (2013CB945000), the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcohol use disorder (NIAAA) Grants R01AA10707, P60AA007611, R01AA11257, R01AA18179, and internal funding from the Indiana University, School of Medicine. We also would like to express our appreciation to Judy E. Powers, Hanying Chen and Tamara J. Graves for their technical support.

Author Contributions

Bin Qiu, Weidong Yong, and Tiebing Liang contributed to the experimental design, alcohol-related data collection and data analysis, and manuscript submission. Susan E. Luczak, Tamara L. Wall, and Mimy Y. Eng carried out human subject recruitment, data collection and data analysis, and manuscript preparation. Aaron M. Kirchhoff, Stephen L. Boehm II, and Julia A. Chester performed CORT measurement, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. Robert B. Stewart performed animal behavioral testing. Weinian Shou, Yuxue Xu, Weidong Yong, and Tiebing Liang carried out the creation and maintenance of KO animals and performed gene expression.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kessler, R.C.; Nelson, C.B.; McGonagle, K.A.; Edlund, M.J.; Frank, R.G.; Leaf, P.J. The epidemiology of co-occurring addictive and mental disorders: Implications for prevention and service utilization. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 1996, 66, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hasin, D.S.; Grant, B.F. The national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions (NESARC) Waves 1 and 2: Review and summary of findings. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2015, 50, 1609–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kellendonk, C.; Gass, P.; Kretz, O.; Schutz, G.; Tronche, F. Corticosteroid receptors in the brain: Gene targeting studies. Brain Res. Bull. 2002, 57, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Roy, A.; Mittal, N.; Zhang, H.; Pandey, S.C. Modulation of cellular expression of glucocorticoid receptor and glucocorticoid response element-DNA binding in rat brain during alcohol drinking and withdrawal. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 301, 774–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Huang, M.C.; Schwandt, M.L.; Chester, J.A.; Kirchhoff, A.M.; Kao, C.F.; Liang, T.; Tapocik, J.D.; Ramchandani, V.A.; George, D.T.; Hodgkinson, C.A.; et al. FKBP5 moderates alcohol withdrawal severity: Human genetic association and functional validation in knockout mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014, 39, 2029–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Desrivieres, S.; Lourdusamy, A.; Muller, C.; Ducci, F.; Wong, C.P.; Kaakinen, M.; Pouta, A.; Hartikainen, A.L.; Isohanni, M.; Charoen, P.; et al. Glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) gene polymorphisms and onset of alcohol abuse in adolescents. Addict. Biol. 2011, 16, 510–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Robinson, T.E.; Berridge, K.C. The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res. Rev. 1993, 18, 247–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jose, B.S.; van Oers, H.A.; van de Mheen, H.D.; Garretsen, H.F.; Mackenbach, J.P. Stressors and alcohol consumption. Alcohol 2000, 35, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Koob, G.F.; Ahmed, S.H.; Boutrel, B.; Chen, S.A.; Kenny, P.J.; Markou, A.; O’Dell, L.E.; Parsons, L.H.; Sanna, P.P. Neurobiological mechanisms in the transition from drug use to drug dependence. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2004, 27, 739–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Koob, G.F.; Le Moal, M. Drug abuse: Hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science 1997, 278, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Fahlke, C.; Lorenz, J.G.; Long, J.; Champoux, M.; Suomi, S.J.; Higley, J.D. Rearing experiences and stress-induced plasma cortisol as early risk factors for excessive alcohol consumption in nonhuman primates. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2000, 24, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Errico, A.L.; King, A.C.; Lovallo, W.R.; Parsons, O.A. Cortisol dysregulation and cognitive impairment in abstinent male alcoholics. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2002, 26, 1198–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rouge-Pont, F.; Deroche, V.; Le Moal, M.; Piazza, P.V. Individual differences in stress-induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens are influenced by corticosterone. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1998, 10, 3903–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Adinoff, B.; Iranmanesh, A.; Veldhuis, J.; Fisher, L. Disturbances of the stress response: The role of the HPA axis during alcohol withdrawal and abstinence. Alcohol. Health Res. World 1998, 22, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Nader, K.; Schafe, G.E.; Le Doux, J.E. Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature 2000, 406, 722–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vendruscolo, L.F.; Barbier, E.; Schlosburg, J.E.; Misra, K.K.; Whitfield, T.W.; Logrip, M.L.; Rivier, C.; Repunte-Canonigo, V.; Zorrilla, E.P.; Sanna, P.P.; et al. Corticosteroid-dependent plasticity mediates compulsive alcohol drinking in rats. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 7563–7571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Koenig, H.N.; Olive, M.F. The glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone reduces ethanol intake in rats under limited access conditions. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2004, 29, 999–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wochnik, G.M.; Ruegg, J.; Abel, G.A.; Schmidt, U.; Holsboer, F.; Rein, T. Fk506-binding proteins 51 and 52 differentially regulate dynein interaction and nuclear translocation of the glucocorticoid receptor in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 4609–4616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Schiene, C.; Fischer, G. Enzymes that catalyse the restructuring of proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000, 10, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Binder, E.B. The role of FKBP5, a co-chaperone of the glucocorticoid receptor in the pathogenesis and therapy of affective and anxiety disorders. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2009, 34 (Suppl. 1), S186–S195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ising, M.; Depping, A.M.; Siebertz, A.; Lucae, S.; Unschuld, P.G.; Kloiber, S.; Horstmann, S.; Uhr, M.; Muller-Myhsok, B.; Holsboer, F. Polymorphisms in the fkbp5 gene region modulate recovery from psychosocial stress in healthy controls. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tatro, E.T.; Everall, I.P.; Kaul, M.; Achim, C.L. Modulation of glucocorticoid receptor nuclear translocation in neurons by immunophilins Fkbp51 and Fkbp52: Implications for major depressive disorder. Brain Res. 2009, 1286, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Banerjee, A.; Periyasamy, S.; Wolf, I.M.; Hinds, T.D.; Yong, W.; Shou, W.; Sanchez, E.R. Control of glucocorticoid and progesterone receptor subcellular localization by the ligand-binding domain is mediated by distinct interactions with tetratricopeptide repeat proteins. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 10471–10480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Scharf, S.H.; Liebl, C.; Binder, E.B.; Schmidt, M.V.; Muller, M.B. Expression and regulation of the fkbp5 gene in the adult mouse brain. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wagner, K.V.; Marinescu, D.; Hartmann, J.; Wang, X.D.; Labermaier, C.; Scharf, S.H.; Liebl, C.; Uhr, M.; Holsboer, F.; Muller, M.B.; et al. Differences in Fkbp51 regulation following chronic social defeat stress correlate with individual stress sensitivity: Influence of paroxetine treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012, 37, 2797–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hartmann, J.; Wagner, K.V.; Liebl, C.; Scharf, S.H.; Wang, X.D.; Wolf, M.; Hausch, F.; Rein, T.; Schmidt, U.; Touma, C.; et al. The involvement of FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP5) in the behavioral and neuroendocrine effects of chronic social defeat stress. Neuropharmacology 2012, 62, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Szymanska, M.; Budziszewska, B.; Jaworska-Feil, L.; Basta-Kaim, A.; Kubera, M.; Leskiewicz, M.; Regulska, M.; Lason, W. The effect of antidepressant drugs on the HPA axis activity, glucocorticoid receptor level and Fkbp51 concentration in prenatally stressed rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2009, 34, 822–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kerns, R.T.; Ravindranathan, A.; Hassan, S.; Cage, M.P.; York, T.; Sikela, J.M.; Williams, R.W.; Miles, M.F. Ethanol-responsive brain region expression networks: Implications for behavioral responses to acute ethanol in DBA/2J versus C57B1/6J mice. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 2255–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Treadwell, J.A.; Singh, S.M. Microarray analysis of mouse brain gene expression following acute ethanol treatment. Neurochem. Res. 2004, 29, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. McClung, C.A.; Nestler, E.J.; Zachariou, V. Regulation of gene expression by chronic morphine and morphine withdrawal in the locus ceruleus and ventral tegmental area. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 6005–6015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Vermeer, H.; Hendriks-Stegeman, B.I.; van der Burg, B.; van Buul-Offers, S.C.; Jansen, M. Glucocorticoid-induced increase in lymphocytic Fkbp51 messenger ribonucleic acid expression: A potential marker for glucocorticoid sensitivity, potency, and bioavailability. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 88, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lee, R.S.; Tamashiro, K.L.; Yang, X.; Purcell, R.H.; Harvey, A.; Willour, V.L.; Huo, Y.; Rongione, M.; Wand, G.S.; Potash, J.B. Chronic corticosterone exposure increases expression and decreases deoxyribonucleic acid methylation of fkbp5 in mice. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 4332–4343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. McQuillin, A.; Rizig, M.; Gurling, H.M. A microarray gene expression study of the molecular pharmacology of lithium carbonate on mouse brain mrna to understand the neurobiology of mood stabilization and treatment of bipolar affective disorder. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2007, 17, 605–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Binder, E.B.; Bradley, R.G.; Liu, W.; Epstein, M.P.; Deveau, T.C.; Mercer, K.B.; Tang, Y.; Gillespie, C.F.; Heim, C.M.; Nemeroff, C.B.; et al. Association of fkbp5 polymorphisms and childhood abuse with risk of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in adults. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2008, 299, 1291–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pacek, L.R.; Storr, C.L.; Mojtabai, R.; Green, K.M.; La Flair, L.N.; Alvanzo, A.A.; Cullen, B.A.; Crum, R.M. Comorbid alcohol dependence and anxiety disorders: A national survey. J. Dual. Diagn. 2013, 9, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Izidio, G.S.; Ramos, A. Positive association between ethanol consumption and anxiety-related behaviors in two selected rat lines. Alcohol 2007, 41, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Barrenha, G.D.; Chester, J.A. Genetic correlation between innate alcohol preference and fear-potentiated startle in selected mouse lines. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2007, 31, 1081–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Binder, E.B.; Salyakina, D.; Lichtner, P.; Wochnik, G.M.; Ising, M.; Putz, B.; Papiol, S.; Seaman, S.; Lucae, S.; Kohli, M.A.; et al. Polymorphisms in fkbp5 are associated with increased recurrence of depressive episodes and rapid response to antidepressant treatment. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36, 1319–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lekman, M.; Laje, G.; Charney, D.; Rush, A.J.; Wilson, A.F.; Sorant, A.J.; Lipsky, R.; Wisniewski, S.R.; Manji, H.; McMahon, F.J.; et al. The FKBP5-gene in depression and treatment response—An association study in the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) cohort. Biol. Psychiatry 2008, 63, 1103–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Koenen, K.C.; Saxe, G.; Purcell, S.; Smoller, J.W.; Bartholomew, D.; Miller, A.; Hall, E.; Kaplow, J.; Bosquet, M.; Moulton, S.; et al. Polymorphisms in fkbp5 are associated with peritraumatic dissociation in medically injured children. Mol. Psychiatry 2005, 10, 1058–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Willour, V.L.; Chen, H.; Toolan, J.; Belmonte, P.; Cutler, D.J.; Goes, F.S.; Zandi, P.P.; Lee, R.S.; MacKinnon, D.F.; Mondimore, F.M.; et al. Family-based association of fkbp5 in bipolar disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 2009, 14, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xie, P.; Kranzler, H.R.; Poling, J.; Stein, M.B.; Anton, R.F.; Farrer, L.A.; Gelernter, J. Interaction of fkbp5 with childhood adversity on risk for post-traumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010, 35, 1684–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Levran, O.; Peles, E.; Randesi, M.; Li, Y.; Rotrosen, J.; Ott, J.; Adelson, M.; Kreek, M.J. Stress-related genes and heroin addiction: A role for a functional fkbp5 haplotype. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014, 45, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kirchheiner, J.; Lorch, R.; Lebedeva, E.; Seeringer, A.; Roots, I.; Sasse, J.; Brockmoller, J. Genetic variants in fkbp5 affecting response to antidepressant drug treatment. Pharmacogenomics 2008, 9, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yehuda, R.; Cai, G.; Golier, J.A.; Sarapas, C.; Galea, S.; Ising, M.; Rein, T.; Schmeidler, J.; Muller-Myhsok, B.; Holsboer, F.; et al. Gene expression patterns associated with posttraumatic stress disorder following exposure to the world trade center attacks. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 66, 708–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yong, W.; Yang, Z.; Periyasamy, S.; Chen, H.; Yucel, S.; Li, W.; Lin, L.Y.; Wolf, I.M.; Cohn, M.J.; Baskin, L.S.; et al. Essential role for co-chaperone Fkbp52 but not Fkbp51 in androgen receptor-mediated signaling and physiology. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 5026–5036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Malviya, S.A.; Kelly, S.D.; Greenlee, M.M.; Eaton, D.C.; Duke, B.J.; Bourke, C.H.; Neigh, G.N. Estradiol stimulates an anti-translocation expression pattern of glucocorticoid co-regulators in a hippocampal cell model. Physiol. Behav. 2013, 122, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tatro, E.T.; Everall, I.P.; Masliah, E.; Hult, B.J.; Lucero, G.; Chana, G.; Soontornniyomkij, V.; Achim, C.L. Differential expression of immunophilins fkbp51 and fkbp52 in the frontal cortex of hiv-infected patients with major depressive disorder. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2009, 4, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ellsworth, K.A.; Moon, I.; Eckloff, B.W.; Fridley, B.L.; Jenkins, G.D.; Batzler, A.; Biernacka, J.M.; Abo, R.; Brisbin, A.; Ji, Y.; et al. Fkbp5 genetic variation: Association with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2013, 23, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Fujii, T.; Hori, H.; Ota, M.; Hattori, K.; Teraishi, T.; Sasayama, D.; Yamamoto, N.; Higuchi, T.; Kunugi, H. Effect of the common functional fkbp5 variant (rs1360780) on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and peripheral blood gene expression. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014, 42, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Hubler, T.R.; Scammell, J.G. Intronic hormone response elements mediate regulation of fkbp5 by progestins and glucocorticoids. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2004, 9, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Schumann, G.; Rujescu, D.; Kissling, C.; Soyka, M.; Dahmen, N.; Preuss, U.W.; Wieman, S.; Depner, M.; Wellek, S.; Lascorz, J.; et al. Analysis of genetic variations of protein tyrosine kinase fyn and their association with alcohol dependence in two independent cohorts. Biol. Psychiatry 2003, 54, 1422–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Prasad, C.; Prasad, A. A relationship between increased voluntary alcohol preference and basal hypercorticosteronemia associated with an attenuated rise in corticosterone output during stress. Alcohol 1995, 12, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. O’Leary, J.C., 3rd; Dharia, S.; Blair, L.J.; Brady, S.; Johnson, A.G.; Peters, M.; Cheung-Flynn, J.; Cox, M.B.; de Erausquin, G.; Weeber, E.J.; et al. A new anti-depressive strategy for the elderly: Ablation of fkbp5/fkbp51. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24840. [Google Scholar]
  55. Soontornniyomkij, V.; Risbrough, V.B.; Young, J.W.; Wallace, C.K.; Soontornniyomkij, B.; Jeste, D.V.; Achim, C.L. Short-term recognition memory impairment is associated with decreased expression of fk506 binding protein 51 in the aged mouse brain. Age (Dordr.) 2010, 32, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jinwal, U.K.; Koren, J., 3rd; Borysov, S.I.; Schmid, A.B.; Abisambra, J.F.; Blair, L.J.; Johnson, A.G.; Jones, J.R.; Shults, C.L.; O’Leary, J.C., 3rd; et al. The hsp90 cochaperone, fkbp51, increases tau stability and polymerizes microtubules. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bonkale, W.L.; Turecki, G.; Austin, M.C. Increased tryptophan hydroxylase immunoreactivity in the dorsal raphe nucleus of alcohol-dependent, depressed suicide subjects is restricted to the dorsal subnucleus. Synapse 2006, 60, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bardo, M.T.; Bhatnagar, R.K.; Gebhart, G.F. Chronic naltrexone increases opiate binding in brain and produces supersensitivity to morphine in the locus coeruleus of the rat. Brain Res. 1983, 289, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Grahame, N.J.; Li, T.K.; Lumeng, L. Selective breeding for high and low alcohol preference in mice. Behav. Genet. 1999, 29, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Donovan, J.; Brown, P. Blood collection. In Current Protocols in Immunology; Coligan, J., Bierer, B., Margulies, D., Shevach, E., Strober, W., Coico, R., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  61. Tojo, H.; Takami, K.; Kaisho, Y.; Nakata, M.; Abe, T.; Shiho, O.; Igarashi, K. Analysis of neurotrophin-3 expression using the lacz reporter gene suggests its local mode of neurotrophic activity. Neuroscience 1996, 71, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, H.; Yong, W.; Hinds, T.D.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Sanchez, E.R.; Shou, W. Fkbp52 regulates androgen receptor transactivation activity and male urethra morphogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 27776–27784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. McArthur, T.; Ohtoshi, A. A brain-specific homeobox gene, Bsx, is essential for proper postnatal growth and nursing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 5120–5127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chester, J.A.; Kirchhoff, A.M.; Barrenha, G.D. Relation between corticosterone and fear-related behavior in mice selectively bred for high or low alcohol preference. Addict. Biol. 2014, 19, 663–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Maisto, S.A.; Sobell, M.B.; Cooper, A.M.; Sobell, L.C. Test-retest reliability of retrospective self-reports in three populations of alcohol abusers. J. Behav. Assess. 1979, 1, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sobell, L.C.; Sobell, M.B. Time-Line Follow-Back: A Technique for Assessing Self-Reported Alcohol Consumption, in Measuring Alcohol Consumption; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 1992; pp. 73–98. [Google Scholar]
  67. Bucholz, K.K.; Cadoret, R.; Cloninger, C.R.; Dinwiddie, S.H.; Hesselbrock, V.M.; Nurnberger, J.I.; Reich, T.; Schmidt, I.; Schuckit, M.A. A new, semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies: A report on the reliability of the SSAGA. J. Stud. Alcohol 1994, 55, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Hesselbrock, M.; Easton, C.; Bucholz, K.K.; Schuckit, M.; Hesselbrock, V. A validity study of the SSAGA—A comparison with the scan. Addiction 1999, 94, 1361–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. APA. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV); APA: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  70. Truett, G.E.; Heeger, P.; Mynatt, R.L.; Truett, A.A.; Walker, J.A.; Warman, M.L. Preparation of PCR-quality mouse genomic DNA with hot sodium hydroxide and tris (HotSHOT). Biotechniques 2000, 29, 52–54. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  71. Hendershot, C.S.; Neighbors, C.; George, W.H.; McCarthy, D.M.; Wall, T.L.; Liang, T.; Larimer, M.E. ALDH2, ADH1B and alcohol expectancies: Integrating genetic and learning perspectives. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2009, 23, 452–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Luczak, S.E.; Glatt, S.J.; Wall, T.L. Meta-analyses of ALDH2 and ADH1B with alcohol dependence in Asians. Psychol. Bull. 2006, 132, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 17 01271 g001 1024
Figure 1. EtOH consumption and preference, quinine consumption and EtOH metabolism in Fkbp5 KO and WT mice. A significant increase in alcohol consumption (A) in male mice was observed in the KO mice at 9%, 12% and 15% EtOH concentrations when compared to WT mice. No significant increases in alcohol consumption (C) in female mice or preference (B,D) in either sex were observed. Lower total fluid consumption was observed (E) in male mice, but not (F) in female mice during the EtOH consumption test. KO and WT mice did not differ in quinine consumption (G). No differences in alcohol metabolism were found between KO and WT mice (H). *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 1. EtOH consumption and preference, quinine consumption and EtOH metabolism in Fkbp5 KO and WT mice. A significant increase in alcohol consumption (A) in male mice was observed in the KO mice at 9%, 12% and 15% EtOH concentrations when compared to WT mice. No significant increases in alcohol consumption (C) in female mice or preference (B,D) in either sex were observed. Lower total fluid consumption was observed (E) in male mice, but not (F) in female mice during the EtOH consumption test. KO and WT mice did not differ in quinine consumption (G). No differences in alcohol metabolism were found between KO and WT mice (H). *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001.
Ijms 17 01271 g001
Ijms 17 01271 g002a 1024Ijms 17 01271 g002b 1024
Figure 2. FKBP5 expression in the brain of WT and KO mice. Whole brain staining using the LacZ reporter gene. For each pairing of photomicrographs, the left panel is the WT control sample and the right panel is the KO sample. Fkbp5 gene expression was observed in the brain regions of mice at one month (A,B) and four months (C–J) of age. Whole brain staining for LacZ in fresh tissue was performed (A–D) followed by hematoxylin and eosin staining in the four-month-old sample (E–J). Hippo (hippocampus), DR (dorsal raphe nucleus), LC (locus coeruleus), DLG (dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (nu)), Rt (reticular thalamic (nu)), PH (posterior hypothalamic area), Amg (amygdala), Pir (piriform cortex), LSD (lateral septal nucleus, dorsal part), LSI (intermediate part), LSV (ventral part), BST (bed nucleus of the stria terminalis), CA (field CA of Ammon’s horn) and DG (dentate gyrus). Scale bars (A,B) = 2 mm, scale bars (C,D) = 1.5 mm, scale bars (E–J) = 1 mm.
Figure 2. FKBP5 expression in the brain of WT and KO mice. Whole brain staining using the LacZ reporter gene. For each pairing of photomicrographs, the left panel is the WT control sample and the right panel is the KO sample. Fkbp5 gene expression was observed in the brain regions of mice at one month (A,B) and four months (C–J) of age. Whole brain staining for LacZ in fresh tissue was performed (A–D) followed by hematoxylin and eosin staining in the four-month-old sample (E–J). Hippo (hippocampus), DR (dorsal raphe nucleus), LC (locus coeruleus), DLG (dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (nu)), Rt (reticular thalamic (nu)), PH (posterior hypothalamic area), Amg (amygdala), Pir (piriform cortex), LSD (lateral septal nucleus, dorsal part), LSI (intermediate part), LSV (ventral part), BST (bed nucleus of the stria terminalis), CA (field CA of Ammon’s horn) and DG (dentate gyrus). Scale bars (A,B) = 2 mm, scale bars (C,D) = 1.5 mm, scale bars (E–J) = 1 mm.
Ijms 17 01271 g002aIjms 17 01271 g002b
Ijms 17 01271 g003 1024
Figure 3. Basal serum corticosterone (CORT) levels in male (A) and female (B) WT and KO mice. No significant difference was found between genotypes.
Figure 3. Basal serum corticosterone (CORT) levels in male (A) and female (B) WT and KO mice. No significant difference was found between genotypes.
Ijms 17 01271 g003
Table
Table 1. FKBP5 genotype distributions and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) values for each ethnic group. The chi-square statistic (X2) is used to test if the allele frequencies are in HWE for each ethnic group, that is they are consistent with the expected distribution for the general population. The significance tests (p-values), all being >0.05, show that the alleles are in HWE, indicating no deviation from the expected distribution of alleles in the population and no bias in our samples.
Table 1. FKBP5 genotype distributions and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) values for each ethnic group. The chi-square statistic (X2) is used to test if the allele frequencies are in HWE for each ethnic group, that is they are consistent with the expected distribution for the general population. The significance tests (p-values), all being >0.05, show that the alleles are in HWE, indicating no deviation from the expected distribution of alleles in the population and no bias in our samples.
SNPFKBP5 Intron (rs1360780)FKBP5 3’-UTR (rs3800373)
Genotype DistributionHWEGenotype DistributionHWE
EthnicityCCCTTTX2pTTTGGGX2p
Chinese190 (53%)141 (39%)29 (8%)0.20.69192 (53%)138 (38%)29 (8%)0.40.55
Korean195 (57%)131 (38%)17 (5%)0.70.40205 (60%)123 (36%)15 (4%)0.40.52
Caucasian226 (50%)189 (42%)34 (8%)0.40.52240 (46%)175 (33%)33 (6%)0.00.89
Table
Table 2. Alcohol-related variables in Chinese, Korean and Caucasian college students for two FKBP5 genotypes after co-varying for ALDH2*2 and ADH1B*2.
Table 2. Alcohol-related variables in Chinese, Korean and Caucasian college students for two FKBP5 genotypes after co-varying for ALDH2*2 and ADH1B*2.
SNPFKBP5 Intron (rs1360780)FKBP51 UTR (rs3800373)
GenotypeCCCT/TT–––TTTG/GG–––
StatisticM (SD)M (SD)FpChange in R2M (SD)M (SD)FpChange in R2
Chinesen = 180n = 160–––n = 183n = 157–––
Quantity3.8 (6.02)2.9 (1.52)2.130.0340.0133.3 (2.11)2.9 (1.53)1.390.1640.005
Frequency10.9 (11.31)9.7 (9.61)0.690.4910.00110.7 (11.30)9.8 (9.64)0.340.7310.001
Binges3.3 (5.20)2.8 (4.70)1.960.0510.0103.2 (5.17)2.8 (4.74)1.600.1100.007
Max drinks9.1 (8.54)6.3 (5.21)3.69<0.0010.0378.7 (8.46)6.4 (5.21)2.840.0050.022
AUD symptoms1.4 (1.00)1.2 (0.65)2.330.0210.0151.4 (0.97)1.2 (0.65)1.990.0480.012
Koreann = 188n = 146–––n = 198n = 136–––
Quantity4.2 (2.48)3.8 (2.21)1.180.2380.0044.1 (2.44)3.9 (2.20)0.330.7410.001
Frequency15.1 (14.89)12.2 (11.99)1.630.1050.00814.8 (15.01)12.5 (11.97)0.890.3740.002
Binges6.1 (8.17)5.2 (7.88)1.370.1720.0065.8 (7.99)5.4 (8.03)0.580.5600.001
Max drinks12.1 (9.89)10.4 (7.32)1.570.1180.00711.7 (9.73)10.7 (7.20)0.520.6030.000
AUD symptoms2.1 (1.77)1.7 (1.29)2.400.0170.0172.0 (1.72)1.7 (1.31)1.950.0520.011
Caucasiann = 217n = 220–––n = 203n = 235–––
Quantity3.1 (1.86)3.3 (2.24)0.210.650.0003.2 (1.98)3.2 (2.20)0.000.980.000
Frequency24.5 (18.80)24.2 (17.19)0.040.840.00024.2 (18.40)24.1 (17.42)0.080.770.000
Binges8.2 (12.16)8.0 (10.51)0.200.650.0008.2 (12.28)8.0 (10.63)0.050.820.000
Max drinks13.9 (10.13)14.2 (11.83)0.230.630.00114.0 (10.35)13.9 (11.42)0.060.810.000
AUD symptoms1.0 (1.71)1.0 (1.61)0.100.760.0001.0 (1.75)1.0 (1.58)0.630.430.001
Raw scores reported for means and standard deviations. In the analyses, alcohol variables were log transformed to adjust for right-tailed distributions. ALDH2*2 and ADH1B*2 were covaried in all analyses, but no Caucasian possessed an ALDH2*2 allele. AUD, alcohol use disorder. Bolded p-value indicated statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, B.; Luczak, S.E.; Wall, T.L.; Kirchhoff, A.M.; Xu, Y.; Eng, M.Y.; Stewart, R.B.; Shou, W.; Boehm, S.L.; Chester, J.A.; et al. The FKBP5 Gene Affects Alcohol Drinking in Knockout Mice and Is Implicated in Alcohol Drinking in Humans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17081271

AMA Style

Qiu B, Luczak SE, Wall TL, Kirchhoff AM, Xu Y, Eng MY, Stewart RB, Shou W, Boehm SL, Chester JA, et al. The FKBP5 Gene Affects Alcohol Drinking in Knockout Mice and Is Implicated in Alcohol Drinking in Humans. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(8):1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17081271

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Bin, Susan E. Luczak, Tamara L. Wall, Aaron M. Kirchhoff, Yuxue Xu, Mimy Y. Eng, Robert B. Stewart, Weinian Shou, Stephen L. Boehm, Julia A. Chester, and et al. 2016. "The FKBP5 Gene Affects Alcohol Drinking in Knockout Mice and Is Implicated in Alcohol Drinking in Humans" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 8: 1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17081271

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop