Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Walking Backward on a Treadmill on Balance, Speed of Walking and Cardiopulmonary Fitness for Patients with Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Association of White Blood Cells and Air Pollutants—A Population-Based Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 5
10.3390/ijerph18052375
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Association of Bisphenol A and Phthalates with Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

by
Ge Liu
1,2,
Wei Cai
1,2,
Huan Liu
1,2,
Haihong Jiang
1,2,
Yongyi Bi
1,2 and
Hong Wang
1,2,*
1
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
2
Hubei Biomass-Resource Chemistry and Environment Biotechnology Key Laboratory, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(5), 2375; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052375
Submission received: 3 February 2021 / Revised: 23 February 2021 / Accepted: 24 February 2021 / Published: 1 March 2021
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death amongst American women. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), especially bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates, have adverse effects on human health. However, the association of BPA and phthalates with breast cancer remains conflicting. This study aims to investigate the association of BPA and phthalates with breast cancer. Methods: Correlative studies were identified by systematically searching three electronic databases, namely, PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase, up to November 2020. All data were analyzed using Stata 15.0. Results: A total of nine studies, consisting of 7820 breast cancer cases and controls, were included. The urinary phthalate metabolite mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP) and mono-2-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP) were negatively associated with breast cancer (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60–0.90; OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.58–0.98, respectively). However, the overall ORs for BPA, mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP), mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP), mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP), mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP), mono-(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP), and mono-butyl phthalate (MBP) were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.69–1.05), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.62–1.48), 1.12 (95% CI: 0.88–1.42), 1.13 (95% CI: 0.74–1.73), 1.01 (95% CI: 0.74–1.40), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.48–1.14), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.55–1.15), respectively, suggesting no significant association. The sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were relatively stable. Conclusion: Phthalate metabolites MBzP and MiBP were passively associated with breast cancer, whereas no associations were found between BPA, MEP, MEHHP, MEHP, MEOHP, MCPP, and MBP and breast cancer. More high-quality case-control studies or persuasive cohort studies are urgently needed to draw the best conclusions.

1. Introduction

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are ubiquitous exogenous chemical substances that interfere with a series of functions of endocrine system either by enzyme and receptor-mediated mechanisms or epigenetic effects, thereby adversely inducing various aspects of reproductive, metabolic, neurological, and immune problems at any stage of human life [1,2]. Phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA) are two prevailing EDCs that have drawn increasingly remarkable public concern globally over the past few decades.
Phthalates are a group of aromatic chemicals consisting of dialkyl esters or alkyl and aryl esters of orthophthalic acid (1,2-dicarboxylic acid) [3], and can be commonly separated into two categories, i.e., high molecular weight (HMW) phthalates and low molecular weight (LMW) phthalates [4]. HMW phthalates, such as di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), di-n-octyl phthalate (DOP), di-isononyl phthalate (DiNP), and butyl benzyl phthalate (BBzP), mainly function as plasticizers in plastics products, food containers, children’s toys, building materials, and medical devices (e.g., medical tubing, blood and intravenous bags, dialysis machines, and disposable surgical gloves) [5,6,7]. LMW phthalates, such as di-butyl phthalate (DBP), di-isobutyl phthalates (DiBP), di-ethyl phthalate (DEP), and di-methyl phthalate (DMP), are widely used as additives in personal care products (e.g., cosmetics, lotions, and perfumes), medications and dietary supplements [8,9] and pesticide [10]. In this way, it is important to notice that due to the fact that phthalates are usually physically, rather than chemically, added to the above daily products. The ease release of phthalates into the environment results in pervasive human exposure to environmental phthalates through digestive tract ingestion (dietary intake or indoor dust ingestion) [11,12], inhalation [13,14], and percutaneous absorption (by personal care products) directly or indirectly. The phenomenon occurs because phthalates are usually physically, rather than chemically, added to the above daily products.
BPA is an alkylphenol organic compound whose structure consists of two phenol functional groups connected by two carbon-containing methyl groups [15]. BPA is extensively used in epoxy resins and polycarbonate plastics, and shares some common sources of exposure with phthalates. A range of consumer products that contain BPA can release hazardous pollutants under high temperature, strong acid, or other certain conditions. For example, a previous study has tested that the migration of BPA from polycarbonate plastics into the food occurred at 70 °C [16], and this occurrence is consequently considered as a potential chronic threat to human health [17,18].
In fact, a number of EDCs have been increasingly reported to be linked with human health problems especially female reproductive disorders in recent years [19]. Results from several literature indicated that BPA and phthalates played negative roles in thyroid function on the basis of different thyroid hormone levels [20,21]. In addition, two cross-sectional studies have found positive relationship between BPA and the phthalate metabolite mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP) and precocious puberty in Thai girls [22,23]. Some other epidemiologic studies have focused on the higher BPA level in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) [24,25] and the consistent conclusion can be also found in adolescents [26]. In addition, various cell cultures [27], animal models [28], and human epidemiologic data have supplied evidences that phthalates may change the endometrial environment or are possibly associated with endometriosis [29]. One recent study has described that BPA exposure may affect the expression of key severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection mediators such as angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), and furin in human tissues. Thus, the BPA exposure may have relevant effects on the risk of severe COVID-19 [30]. Furthermore, BPA and phthalates—as oestrogen-mimicking EDCs—are thought to be responsible for inducing the occurrence and progression of many oestrogen-dependent cancers by binding to oestrogenic receptors, which are important evolution-related transcription factors related to many critical biological processes. Such actions probably play a considerable role in human breast carcinogenesis [19,31]. Amongst the multitudinous hormone-dependent cancers related to BPA and phthalates exposure, breast cancer is the most important issue that should be placed more attention.
Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death amongst American women [32] and accounts for almost a quarter of all types of cancer in women worldwide. The incidence of breast cancer is on the rise in many countries over the last few decades [33]. Over time, emerging literature from laboratory works and human epidemiological studies have focused on the relationship of BPA and phthalates exposure with breast cancer [34,35,36]. However, the results still remain inconsistent although several recent laboratory findings have supplied valuable evidence that BPA or di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) exposure is responsible for the development and progression of breast cancer [17,37]. An Alaska case-control study has revealed that the phthalate metabolite MEHP was associated with breast cancer [38]. Similarly, another study has demonstrated the correlation between urinary MEP concentrations and increased breast cancer risk, whereas MBzP and mono(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP) were negatively linked with breast cancer [39]. However, in a recent study conducted in America, the researchers have not observed any relationship between phthalates or BPA and breast cancer [40].
Therefore, given the controversial conclusion of current epidemiological studies, we aim to perform a meta-analysis to assess systematically the association of BPA and eight phthalate metabolites, including mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP), mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP), mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP), mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP), mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP), mono (3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP), mono-butyl phthalate (MBP), and mono-2-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP) with the risk of breast cancer.

2. Methods

2.1. Literature Search Strategy

We performed a systematic literature search in three online databases, namely, PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase for eligible studies, with the following terms from January 1990 to November 2020: (1) “bisphenol A” OR “BPA” OR “phthalates” OR “phthalate” OR “phthalate esters” OR “phthalic acid ester” OR “endocrine-disruptors” OR “endocrine-disrupting chemicals”; (2) “breast cancer” OR “mammary cancer”; and (3) 2 and 3. First, we browsed the titles and abstracts to exclude irrelevant literature (such as cell experiments, animal experiments, the studies aimed on the association of other EDCs exposure and other health outcomes), and potential eligible articles were identified by reading the full text carefully. All retrieved results were exported into the NoteExpress to remove duplicates. The references cited in the included studies and the references of other relevant reviews and meta-analyses were also searched manually so that additional eligible sources would not be neglected.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria of our meta-analysis were as follows: cohort or case-control studies (1) that evaluated the relationship between BPA or phthalates exposure and breast cancer; (2) that odds ratio (OR) or relative risk (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were reported; and (3) published in English. Letters, reports, reviews and editorials, conference abstracts, and cross-sectional studies were excluded. We also excluded studies reporting only urinary concentrations of EDCs but without available OR or RR information. Overall, three investigators (Ge Liu, Huan Liu, and Haihong Jiang) screened and assessed the eligibility for all articles independently, and any disagreement was discussed and resolved by consensus.

2.3. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

The extraction and recording of data and quality assessment were carried out by three independent investigators (Ge Liu, Huan Liu, and Haihong Jiang), and any debate was settled by discussion. For each selected study, the following items were extracted: the first author and the year of publication, study area, study period, the type of study, number of cases and controls, age, and interested categories of EDCs. The quality appraisal of all the articles included was performed on the basis of Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) with three categories including selection, comparability, and exposure for case control studies, or outcome for cohort studies [41]. A high NOS score resulted in a high study quality. Studies with scores of no less than seven were considered to be of high quality.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All extracted ORs were calculations from the highest versus the lowest concentrations of interested EDCs. Statistical analysis was carried out using Stata version 15.0 software. (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) to coalesce the summary ORs and relevant 95% CIs of the relationship of BPA and phthalates exposure with breast cancer. The size of heterogeneity amongst the included studies was measured using Chi-square test and I2 statistic. If I2 < 50% and p > 0.05, no statistical heterogeneity was present, and the fixed-effects model was used. Otherwise, the random-effects model was selected for a merger. The subgroup analysis was conducted to assess the influence of study region and source of controls on the estimation of overall OR. We also conducted leave-one-out sensitivity analysis to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity and meanwhile to assess the robustness of the results. Considering that fewer than 10 eligible studies were included in our meta-analysis, no funnel plot test for publication bias was performed [42].

3. Results

3.1. Literature Search and Selection

Figure 1 shows the flow diagram of the literature screening process. A total of 2940 potentially relevant studies were presented in accordance with the key words preliminarily searched in three databases. Following the deletion of duplicate records, 2388 articles remained. Of these articles, 2077 unrelated studies were excluded by scanning all titles and abstracts. A total of 311 full-text articles were carefully read and assessed for data eligibility, and 302 studies were removed on account of conference abstract, review, and no available data. Eventually, the remaining nine articles were included in the final meta-analysis [38,39,40,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Amongst these articles, five focused on BPA, whereas six paid attention to phthalates, and two studies investigated both of the EDCs.

3.2. Characteristics of Included Studies

In total, nine retrospective case-control studies, involving 7820 participants, were included. The maximum sample size of participants was 2501, and the minimum was only 50. Overall, six studies were conducted on the basis of participants in America, and the remaining works were performed in Alaska Native, Poland, and Northern Mexico. Table 1 displayed the detailed characteristics of all enrolled studies. The results of quality assessment by NOS for the included studies were shown in Table S1. Of the 9 studies, 5 studies were deemed to have high quality (scored 7–9), whereas other studies had medium quality (scored 4–6).

3.3. BPA Levels and Risk of Breast Cancer

Overall, five studies including 5668 participants (1661 breast cancer cases and 4007 controls) were conducted to evaluate the association between BPA and the risk of breast cancer. We selected the fixed-effects model in pooled analysis because no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.705) was found amongst these studies. As shown in Figure 2, the overall OR for the highest versus lowest BPA levels and breast cancer risk was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.69–1.05), indicating no significant association.

3.4. Urinary Phthalate Metabolite Levels and Risk of Breast Cancer

We, respectively, analyzed the association between eight different phthalate metabolites and breast cancer risk. Figure 3a showed the lack of heterogeneity in six included studies regarding MBzP (I2 = 27.0%, p = 0.232). Thus, the fixed-effects model was used. Comparing the highest versus the lowest levels, the urinary MBzP was negatively associated with the risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60–0.90). In addition, the OR for urinary phthalate metabolite MiBP and risk of breast cancer was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.58–0.98, Figure 3h) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.937), which also showed a negative correlation. However, the overall ORs for MEP, MEHHP, MEHP, MEOHP, MCPP, and MBP, were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.62–1.48, Figure 3b), 1.12 (95% CI: 0.88–1.42, Figure 3c), 1.13 (95% CI: 0.74–1.73, Figure 3d), 1.01 (95% CI: 0.74–1.40, Figure 3e), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.48–1.14, Figure 3f), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.55–1.15, Figure 3g), respectively, showing the six aforementioned phthalate metabolites had no significant association with breast cancer. In addition, results revealed no heterogeneity between the articles assessing the relationship of MEHHP (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.497), MBP (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.843) and MEOHP (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.587) with breast cancer, but significant heterogeneity was found amongst articles on MEP (I2 = 73.2%, p = 0.005) MEHP (I2 = 59.7%, p = 0.059), and MCPP (I2 = 80.0%, p = 0.007).

3.5. Sensitivity Analyses

Regarding the sensitivity analysis, the removal of the study of L. López-Carrillo (2010) [39] study reduced I2 from 73.2 to 0.9% and increased p from 0.001 to 0.388 in the correlation analysis of urine phthalate metabolite MEP and breast cancer risk, whereas the removal of the study of A K. Holmes (2014) [38] study reduced I2 from 59.7% to 1.0% and increase p from 0.059 to 0.364 for the association of urine MEHP and breast cancer. These results indicated the potential sources of heterogeneity. The correspondingly total ORs value for MEP and MEHP did not change significantly, suggesting that the results of the meta-analysis were relatively stable. However, when we removed the study of K W. Reeves (2019) [47] study, reduced I2 from 83.8 to 43.9%, increased p from 0.002 to 0.182 for the association of urine MCPP and breast cancer, and decreased OR from 0.80 (95% CI: 0.41–1.56) to 0.60 (95% CI: 0.38–0.94). Detailed results of sensitivity analyses were displayed in Table S2.

3.6. Subgroup Analyses

We performed subgroup analyses according to study region and source of controls for BPA, MBzP, MEP, MEHHP, MEHP, MEOHP, MCPP, and MBP. Specially, we performed the subgroup analysis of the relationship between MiBP and breast cancer only according to the study region since the control sources were all from the general population. The results were displayed successively in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8, Table 9 and Table 10.
As shown in Table 2, BPA was significantly adversely associated with breast cancer risk for studies conducted in America (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61–0.99, I2 = 0.0%), but no specific association was observed in the subgroup of the source of controls.
As for phthalate metabolites, MBzP was significantly adverse associated with breast cancer in the subgroups of America (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.59–0.93, I2 = 0. 0%) and the general population controls (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51–0.85, I2 = 0.0%), but no association was observed in either non-America or clinical medical center subgroups (Table 3). Interestingly, as shown in Table 8, we also observed that MCPP was passively associated with breast cancer in Non-America (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24–0.80) and the general population control subgroups (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51–0.85, I2 = 43.9%). Moreover, MEP, MEHHP, MEHP, MEOHP, MBP, and MiBP were not significantly associated with breast cancer risk in the subgroups (Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7, Table 9, and Table 10).

4. Discussion

The widespread sources of exposure to BPA and phthalates are unavoidable and unintentional in daily life. Moreover, BPA and phthalates all exist as immanent EDCs that play a major role in adverse reproductive system damages [49,50,51], metabolic disorders [52], grip strength [53], and hormone-sensitive cancers [54,55] in males and females. Previous studies have shown that exposure during preconception and prenatal stages may cause adverse health consequences for pregnant women and their offspring [18,56,57,58]. An earlier review includes examples that showing how several EDCs are identified and affect the development of mammary glands in animal models [59]. Fabiana and Kalpana’s recent studies conducted in rat models report that exposure to low-dose diethyl phthalate (DEP) and phenol at critical windows lead to changes in histology and transcriptome in rat mammary glands [60,61]. However, very few epidemiological studies are conducted on the correlation between certain EDCs, especially BPA and phthalates and human breast cancer risk. Some studies have even yielded inconsistent results.
Therefore, we conducted an updated meta-analysis by extracting and summarizing the data from nine selected case-control studies, which involves 7820 participants across four different countries, to assess the relationship of BPA and eight phthalate metabolites with the risk of breast cancer accurately and comprehensively. We found that only phthalate metabolites MBzP and MiBP were passively associated with breast cancer risk. One of the possible mechanisms leading to the negative relationship is the ability of MBzP to activate human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α and γ [62], and the ligand activation of PPARγ is relative to adipocyte differentiation, lipid accumulation, and decreased growth of breast cancer cell [63,64]. Another potential speculation is that phthalates metabolites are related to increased intron 1 methylation level and upregulated disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 33 (ADAM33) expression, which play an important role in reducing breast cancer risk [35]. Besides, results did not provide sufficient evidence of the correlations of BPA and other phthalate metabolites MEP, MEHHP, MEHP, MEOHP, MCPP, and MBP with breast cancer. However, when we conducted subgroup analyses, a marginally negative association between BPA exposure and breast cancer risk was observed in America but not in Non-America; for MCPP, we found a negative association in Non-America and general population subgroups and for MBzP, the passive association between urinary MBzP and breast cancer remained in subgroups of America and general population controls. These results proved that the correlation was influenced by region and control selection, which might partly contribute to different sources or levels of BPA and phthalates exposure in different countries and control populations. The subgroup analyses for MEP, MEHHP, MEHP, MBP, and MEOHP did not reveal any significant result. Additionally, the results of sensitivity analysis suggested that the results of our meta-analysis were relatively stable, except that the conclusion was reversed after the removal of the study of K W. Reeves (2019) [47] study in the correlation analysis for MCPP and breast cancer. One possible explanation was that the subjects of the study were recruited from postmenopausal women, which was different from two other studies. Finally, regional diversity, age differences, different detection methods, the limit of detection (LOD) and concentration classification methods for EDCs, and adjusted models produced heterogeneity to some extent and affected the data merging.
Our study had some advantages. Firstly, this study was the first meta-analysis to evaluate systematically the relationship of exposure to BPA and eight specific phthalate metabolites with breast cancer risk across four different countries to date. Secondly, we also discovered the potential sources of heterogeneity according to leaving a study each time in the sensitivity analysis. Finally, we performed the subgroup analyses by region (i.e., America and Non-America) and sources of control (i.e., clinical medical center and general population), which further verified the relationship between selected EDCs and breast cancer risk.
Our research also had several limitations. Firstly, the meta-analysis was based on relatively insufficient number of studies so that only one study was included in a certain subgroup analysis. Secondly, the sensitivity analysis suggested the presence of heterogeneity, and some of the results were not stable. In this sense, well-conducted epidemiological studies on the relationship of BPA and various phthalate metabolites with breast cancer are needed to reinforce our research results. Thirdly, although urine concentrations of BPA and phthalate metabolites are the most common methods to assess human BPA and phthalates exposures, some potential factors such as the relatively short biological half-life of above EDCs, the changes of subjects’ lifestyle after breast cancer diagnosis, the nature of retrospective case-control study, breast cancer itself, and the treatments or surgery are all likely to affect the measurement of EDCs exposure. Therefore, the time of urine collection, the inconsistency of the assessment and classification of exposure levels of the same EDCs in different original articles and the evaluation of long-term exposure based on short-term biomarker levels measured in urine led to a degree of bias. More sensitive and accurate biomarkers and better designed studies are needed to explore this possible effect in the future.

5. Conclusions

The meta-analysis results demonstrated that phthalate metabolites MBzP and MiBP were passively associated with breast cancer risk. However, MEP, MEHHP, MEHP, MEOHP, MCPP, MBP, and BPA were not statistically associated with breast cancer. Given the limited epidemiological data on these EDCs and risk of breast cancer, high-quality case-control studies or persuasive cohort studies are urgently needed to draw the best conclusions.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2375/s1, Table S1: Quality assessment of the included studies by Newcastle-Ottawa standard, Table S2: Results of sensitivity analyses by removing each study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.L. and W.C.; methodology, G.L. and W.C.; software, G.L.; validation, G.L., W.C.; formal analysis, G.L.; investigation, G.L.; resources, G.L.; data curation, G.L., H.L., and H.J.; Writing—original draft preparation, G.L.; Writing—review and editing, G.L., H.W., and Y.B.; visualization, G.L., H.W., and Y.B.; supervision, G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statements

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Diamanti-Kandarakis, E.; Bourguignon, J.P.; Giudice, L.C.; Hauser, R.; Prins, G.S.; Soto, A.M.; Zoeller, R.T.; Gore, A.C. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: An Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr. Rev. 2009, 30, 293–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sifakis, S.; Androutsopoulos, V.P.; Tsatsakis, A.M.; Spandidos, D.A. Human exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals: Effects on the male and female reproductive systems. Environ. Toxicol. Phar. 2017, 51, 56–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Marie, C.; Vendittelli, F.; Sauvant-Rochat, M.P. Obstetrical outcomes and biomarkers to assess exposure to phthalates: A review. Environ. Int. 2015, 83, 116–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cheng, B.J.; Xu, P.R.; Wei, R.; Li, X.D.; Sheng, J.; Wang, S.F.; Liu, K.Y.; Chen, G.M.; Tao, F.B.; Wang, Q.N.; et al. Levels and determinants of urinary phthalate metabolites in Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 762, 144173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Talsness, C.E.; Andrade, A.J.; Kuriyama, S.N.; Taylor, J.A.; Vom, S.F. Components of plastic: Experimental studies in animals and relevance for human health. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 2079–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hannon, P.R.; Flaws, J.A. The effects of phthalates on the ovary. Front. Endocrinol. 2015, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rocha, B.A.; Asimakopoulos, A.G.; Barbosa, F.; Kannan, K. Urinary concentrations of 25 phthalate metabolites in Brazilian children and their association with oxidative DNA damage. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 586, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hernandez-Diaz, S.; Mitchell, A.A.; Kelley, K.E.; Calafat, A.M.; Hauser, R. Medications as a potential source of exposure to phthalates in the U.S. population. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kelley, K.E.; Hernandez-Diaz, S.; Chaplin, E.L.; Hauser, R.; Mitchell, A.A. Identification of phthalates in medications and dietary supplement formulations in the United States and Canada. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dodson, R.E.; Nishioka, M.; Standley, L.J.; Perovich, L.J.; Brody, J.G.; Rudel, R.A. Endocrine disruptors and asthma-associated chemicals in consumer products. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 935–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Schecter, A.; Lorber, M.; Guo, Y.; Wu, Q.; Yun, S.H.; Kannan, K.; Hommel, M.; Imran, N.; Hynan, L.S.; Cheng, D.; et al. Phthalate concentrations and dietary exposure from food purchased in New York State. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Guo, Y.; Kannan, K. Comparative Assessment of Human Exposure to Phthalate Esters from House Dust in China and the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 3788–3794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rudel, R.A.; Camann, D.E.; Spengler, J.D.; Korn, L.R.; Brody, J.G. Phthalates, alkylphenols, pesticides, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and other endocrine-disrupting compounds in indoor air and dust. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 4543–4553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tran, T.M.; Kannan, K. Occurrence of phthalate diesters in particulate and vapor phases in indoor air and implications for human exposure in Albany, New York, USA. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 68, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Martínez-Ibarra, A.; Martínez-Razo, L.D.; MacDonald-Ramos, K.; Morales-Pacheco, M.; Vázquez-Martínez, E.R.; López-López, M.; Rodríguez Dorantes, M.; Cerbón, M. Multisystemic alterations in humans induced by bisphenol A and phthalates: Experimental, epidemiological and clinical studies reveal the need to change health policies. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 271, 116380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Park, S.; Park, S.; Jeong, M.; Choi, J.C.; Kim, M. Fast and simple determination and exposure assessment of bisphenol A, phenol, p-tert-butylphenol, and diphenylcarbonate transferred from polycarbonate food-contact materials to food simulants. Chemosphere 2018, 203, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Segovia-Mendoza, M.; Gómez De León, C.T.; García-Becerra, R.; Ambrosio, J.; Nava-Castro, K.E.; Morales-Montor, J. The chemical environmental pollutants BPA and BPS induce alterations of the proteomic profile of different phenotypes of human breast cancer cells: A proposed interactome. Environ. Res. 2020, 191, 109960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Braun, J.M.; Yolton, K.; Dietrich, K.N.; Hornung, R.; Ye, X.; Calafat, A.M.; Lanphear, B.P. Prenatal bisphenol A exposure and early childhood behavior. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 1945–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kumar, M.; Sarma, D.K.; Shubham, S.; Kumawat, M.; Verma, V.; Prakash, A.; Tiwari, R. Environmental Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical Exposure: Role in Non-Communicable Diseases. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 553850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kwon, J.A.; Shin, B.; Kim, B. Urinary bisphenol A and thyroid function by BMI in the Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) 2012–2014. Chemosphere 2020, 240, 124918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Park, C.; Choi, W.; Hwang, M.; Lee, Y.; Kim, S.; Yu, S.; Lee, I.; Paek, D.; Choi, K. Associations between urinary phthalate metabolites and bisphenol A levels, and serum thyroid hormones among the Korean adult population—Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) 2012–2014. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 584–585, 950–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Srilanchakon, K.; Thadsri, T.; Jantarat, C.; Thengyai, S.; Nosoognoen, W.; Supornsilchai, V. Higher phthalate concentrations are associated with precocious puberty in normal weight Thai girls. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 30, 1293–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Supornsilchai, V.; Jantarat, C.; Nosoognoen, W.; Pornkunwilai, S.; Wacharasindhu, S.; Soder, O. Increased levels of bisphenol A (BPA) in Thai girls with precocious puberty. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 29, 1233–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kandaraki, E.; Chatzigeorgiou, A.; Livadas, S.; Palioura, E.; Economou, F.; Koutsilieris, M.; Palimeri, S.; Panidis, D.; Diamanti-Kandarakis, E. Endocrine disruptors and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): Elevated serum levels of bisphenol A in women with PCOS. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, E480–E484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Hossein, R.B.; Amanlou, M.; Behrouzi, L.T.; Ghazizadeh, M.; Haghollahi, F.; Bagheri, M.; Eslami, B. The Association Between Bisphenol A and Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Case-Control Study. Acta Med. Iran. 2017, 55, 759–764. [Google Scholar]
  26. Akgül, S.; Sur, Ü.; Düzçeker, Y.; Balcı, A.; Kızılkan, M.P.; Kanbur, N.; Bozdağ, G.; Erkekoğlu, P.; Gümüş, E.; Kocer-Gumusel, B.; et al. Bisphenol A and phthalate levels in adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2019, 35, 1084–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, M.; Chang, C.; Lai, G.; Tzeng, C. Exposure to Mono-n-Butyl Phthalate in Women with Endometriosis and Its Association with the Biological Effects on Human Granulosa Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Richardson, K.A.; Hannon, P.R.; Johnson-Walker, Y.J.; Myint, M.S.; Flaws, J.A.; Nowak, R.A. Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) alters proliferation and uterine gland numbers in the uteri of adult exposed mice. Reprod. Toxicol. 2018, 77, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kim, S.H.; Cho, S.; Ihm, H.J.; Oh, Y.S.; Heo, S.; Chun, S.; Im, H.; Chae, H.D.; Kim, C.; Kang, B.M. Possible Role of Phthalate in the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis: In Vitro, Animal, and Human Data. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, E1502–E1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zahra, A.; Sisu, C.; Silva, E.; Sophie-Christine, D.A.G.; Randeva, H.S.; Chatha, K.; Kyrou, I.; Karteris, E. Is There a Link between Bisphenol A (BPA), a Key Endocrine Disruptor, and the Risk for SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Severe COVID-19? J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Delfosse, V.; Maire, A.L.; Balaguer, P.; Bourguet, W. A structural perspective on nuclear receptors as targets of environmental compounds. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2015, 36, 88–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. DeSantis, C.E.; Ma, J.; Gaudet, M.M.; Newman, L.A.; Miller, K.D.; Goding Sauer, A.; Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.L. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 438–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ahern, T.P.; Broe, A.; Lash, T.L.; Cronin-Fenton, D.P.; Ulrichsen, S.P.; Christiansen, P.M.; Cole, B.F.; Tamimi, R.M.; Sorensen, H.T.; Damkier, P. Phthalate Exposure and Breast Cancer Incidence: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 1800–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yang, P.J.; Hou, M.F.; Tsai, E.M.; Liang, S.S.; Chiu, C.C.; Ou-Yang, F.; Kan, J.Y.; Peng, C.Y.; Wang, T.N. Breast cancer is associated with methylation and expression of the a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 33 (ADAM33) gene affected by endocrinedisrupting chemicals. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 40, 2766–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Binder, A.M.; Corvalan, C.; Pereira, A.; Calafat, A.M.; Ye, X.; Shepherd, J.; Michels, K.B. Prepubertal and Pubertal Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical Exposure and Breast Density among Chilean Adolescents. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2018, 27, 1491–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Crobeddu, B.; Ferraris, E.; Kolasa, E.; Plante, I. Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) increases proliferation of epithelial breast cancer cells through progesterone receptor dysregulation. Environ. Res. 2019, 173, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Holmes, A.K.; Koller, K.R.; Kieszak, S.M.; Sjodin, A.; Calafat, A.M.; Sacco, F.D.; Varner, D.W.; Lanier, A.P.; Rubin, C.H. Case-control study of breast cancer and exposure to synthetic environmental chemicals among Alaska Native women. Int. J. Circumpolar Health 2014, 73, 25760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Lopez-Carrillo, L.; Hernandez-Ramirez, R.U.; Calafat, A.M.; Torres-Sanchez, L.; Galvan-Portillo, M.; Needham, L.L.; Ruiz-Ramos, R.; Cebrian, M.E. Exposure to phthalates and breast cancer risk in northern Mexico. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Morgan, M.; Deoraj, A.; Felty, Q.; Roy, D. Environmental estrogen-like endocrine disrupting chemicals and breast cancer. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017, 457, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Stang, A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 25, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Furuya-Kanamori, L.; Barendregt, J.J.; Doi, S. A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2018, 16, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Reeves, K.W.; Schneider, S.; Xue, J.; Kannan, K.; Mason, H.; Johnson, M.; Makari-Judson, G.; Santana, M.D. Bisphenol-A in breast adipose tissue of breast cancer cases and controls. Environ. Res. 2018, 167, 735–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Aschengrau, A.; Coogan, P.F.; Quinn, M.; Cashins, L.J. Occupational exposure to estrogenic chemicals and the occurrence of breast cancer: An exploratory analysis. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1998, 34, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Trabert, B.; Falk, R.T.; Figueroa, J.D.; Graubard, B.I.; Garcia-Closas, M.; Lissowska, J.; Peplonska, B.; Fox, S.D.; Brinton, L.A. Urinary bisphenol A-glucuronide and postmenopausal breast cancer in Poland. Cancer Causes Control 2014, 25, 1587–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Parada, H.; Gammon, M.D.; Ettore, H.L.; Chen, J.; Calafat, A.M.; Neugut, A.I.; Santella, R.M.; Wolff, M.S.; Teitelbaum, S.L. Urinary concentrations of environmental phenols and their associations with breast cancer incidence and mortality following breast cancer. Environ. Int. 2019, 130, 104890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Reeves, K.W.; Díaz Santana, M.; Manson, J.E.; Hankinson, S.E.; Zoeller, R.T.; Bigelow, C.; Sturgeon, S.R.; Spiegelman, D.; Tinker, L.; Luo, J.; et al. Urinary Phthalate Biomarker Concentrations and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2019, 111, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Parada, H.; Gammon, M.D.; Chen, J.; Calafat, A.M.; Neugut, A.I.; Santella, R.M.; Wolff, M.S.; Teitelbaum, S.L. Urinary Phthalate Metabolite Concentrations and Breast Cancer Incidence and Survival following Breast Cancer: The Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project. Environ. Health Persp. 2018, 126, 47013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Skakkebaek, N.E.; Rajpert-De, M.E.; Main, K.M. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: An increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum. Reprod. 2001, 16, 972–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Piazza, M.J.; Urbanetz, A.A. Environmental toxins and the impact of other endocrine disrupting chemicals in women’s reproductive health. JBRA Assist. Reprod. 2019, 23, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rodprasert, W.; Main, K.M.; Toppari, J.; Virtanen, H.E. Associations between male reproductive health and exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Curr. Opin. Endocr. Metab. Res. 2019, 7, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Desai, M.; Jellyman, J.K.; Ross, M.G. Epigenomics, gestational programming and risk of metabolic syndrome. Int. J. Obes. 2015, 39, 633–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sun, L.; Fan, J.; Song, G.; Cai, S.; Fan, C.; Zhong, Y.; Li, Y. Exposure to phthalates is associated with grip strength in US adults. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 209, 111787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Takashima, K.; Ito, Y.; Gonzalez, F.J.; Nakajima, T. Different mechanisms of DEHP-induced hepatocellular adenoma tumorigenesis in wild-type and Ppar alpha-null mice. J. Occup. Health 2008, 50, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Shi, X.Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, L.; Feng, L.M.; Li, N.; Liu, S.; Gao, H. Low concentrations of bisphenol A promote human ovarian cancer cell proliferation and glycolysis-based metabolism through the estrogen receptor-alpha pathway. Chemosphere 2017, 185, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Braun, J.M.; Kalkbrenner, A.E.; Calafat, A.M.; Yolton, K.; Ye, X.; Dietrich, K.N.; Lanphear, B.P. Impact of early-life bisphenol A exposure on behavior and executive function in children. Pediatrics 2011, 128, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Latini, G.; De Felice, C.; Presta, G.; Del, V.A.; Paris, I.; Ruggieri, F.; Mazzeo, P. In utero exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and duration of human pregnancy. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 1783–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Watkins, D.J.; Sanchez, B.N.; Tellez-Rojo, M.M.; Lee, J.M.; Mercado-Garcia, A.; Blank-Goldenberg, C.; Peterson, K.E.; Meeker, J.D. Phthalate and bisphenol A exposure during in utero windows of susceptibility in relation to reproductive hormones and pubertal development in girls. Environ. Res. 2017, 159, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fenton, S.E. Endocrine-Disrupting Compounds and Mammary Gland Development: Early Exposure and Later Life Consequences. Endocrinology 2006, 147, s18–s24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Manservisi, F.; Gopalakrishnan, K.; Tibaldi, E.; Hysi, A.; Iezzi, M.; Lambertini, L.; Teitelbaum, S.; Chen, J.; Belpoggi, F. Effect of maternal exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals on reproduction and mammary gland development in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Reprod. Toxicol. 2015, 54, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Gopalakrishnan, K.; Teitelbaum, S.L.; Lambertini, L.; Wetmur, J.; Manservisi, F.; Falcioni, L.; Panzacchi, S.; Belpoggi, F.; Chen, J. Changes in mammary histology and transcriptome profiles by low-dose exposure to environmental phenols at critical windows of development. Environ. Res. 2017, 152, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Hurst, C.H.; Waxman, D.J. Activation of PPARalpha and PPARgamma by environmental phthalate monoesters. Toxicol. Sci. 2003, 74, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Mueller, E.; Sarraf, P.; Tontonoz, P.; Evans, R.M.; Martin, K.J.; Zhang, M.; Fletcher, C.; Singer, S.; Spiegelman, B.M. Terminal Differentiation of Human Breast Cancer through PPARγ. Mol. Cell 1998, 1, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Elstner, E.; Muller, C.; Koshizuka, K.; Williamson, E.A.; Park, D.; Asou, H.; Shintaku, P.; Said, J.W.; Heber, D.; Koeffler, H.P. Ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorgamma and retinoic acid receptor inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of human breast cancer cells in vitro and in BNX mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 8806–8811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijerph 18 02375 g001 550
Figure 1. The flow diagram of screening process of included studies.
Figure 1. The flow diagram of screening process of included studies.
Ijerph 18 02375 g001
Ijerph 18 02375 g002 550
Figure 2. Forest plot of pooled OR of BPA level and breast cancer risk. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; BPA, bisphenol A.
Figure 2. Forest plot of pooled OR of BPA level and breast cancer risk. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; BPA, bisphenol A.
Ijerph 18 02375 g002
Ijerph 18 02375 g003a 550Ijerph 18 02375 g003b 550
Figure 3. Forest plot of pooled OR of phthalate metabolites and breast cancer risk: (a) MBzP; (b) MEP; (c) MEHHP; (d) MEHP; (e) MEOHP; (f) MCPP; (g) MBP; (h) MiBP. Abbreviations: MBzP, mono-benzyl phthalate; MEP, mono-ethyl phthalate; MEHHP, mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate; MEHP, mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate; MEOHP, mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate; MCPP, mono (3-carboxypropyl) phthalate; MBP, mono-butyl phthalate; MiBP, mono-2-isobutyl phthalate.
Figure 3. Forest plot of pooled OR of phthalate metabolites and breast cancer risk: (a) MBzP; (b) MEP; (c) MEHHP; (d) MEHP; (e) MEOHP; (f) MCPP; (g) MBP; (h) MiBP. Abbreviations: MBzP, mono-benzyl phthalate; MEP, mono-ethyl phthalate; MEHHP, mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate; MEHP, mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate; MEOHP, mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate; MCPP, mono (3-carboxypropyl) phthalate; MBP, mono-butyl phthalate; MiBP, mono-2-isobutyl phthalate.
Ijerph 18 02375 g003aIjerph 18 02375 g003b
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.
Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.
Study
(Year)		RegionStudy DesignTime PeriodNo. of Case/ControlAgeCategories of EDCsSamples Determined
A K. Holmes (2014) [38]Alaska Nativecase-control1999–200275/9530–88MBzP, MEP, MBP, MEHHP, MEHP, MEOHP, MMPUrine
L. López-Carrillo (2010) [39]Northern Mexicocase-control2007–2008233/221Cases: 53.41 ± 12.78
Controls:53.83 ± 12.54 		MBzP, MEP, MCPP, MBP, MEHHP, MEHP, MEOHP, MiBP, MECPPUrine
M Morgan (2017) [40]Americacase-control2003–201091/2410≥20MBzP/MZP, MEP, MBP, MEHHP, MEHP, MEOHP, MiBP, MnBP, MCCP, MCPPUrine
M Morgan (2017) [40]Americacase-control2005–201078/2067≥20BPAUrine
K W. Reeves (2018) [43] Americacase-control2014–201536/14Case: 55.7 ± 10.5
Control: 42.1 ± 16.5 		BPABreast adipose tissue
A. Aschengrau (1998) [44]Americacase-control1983–1986261/753≥18BBzPUrine
A Aschengrau (1998) [44]Americacase-control1983–1986261/753≥18BPANIOSH/NOES
B Traber (2014) [45]Polandcase-control2000–2003575/57520–74BPA-glucuronide (BPA-G)Urine
H Parada (2019) [46]Americacase-control1996–1997711/59822–96BPAUrine
K W. Reeves (2019) [47]Americacase-controlNA404/768Case: 62.56;
Control: 62.46		BzP, MEP, MCPP, DBP, DiBP, MCNP, MCOP, DEHPUrine
H Parada (2018) [48]Americacase-control1996–1997710/59822–96MBzP, MEP, MCPP, MEHHP, MEHP, MEOHP, MiBP, MnBP, MECPP, MCOP, MCNPUrine
Abbrevations: NA, not available; NIOSH/NOES: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health National Occupational Exposure Survey.
Table
Table 2. Subgroup analysis of the association between BPA and breast cancer.
Table 2. Subgroup analysis of the association between BPA and breast cancer.
SchemeNo. of StudiesMeta-AnalysesModelHeterogeneity
ORs (95% CIs)p-ValueI2p-Value
Region
Non-America11.09 (0.73–1.63)0.674---
America40.78 (0.61–0.99)0.045Fixed0.00.980
Source of controls
Clinical medical centre10.90 (0.40–2.01)0.797---
General population40.85 (0.68–1.06)0.142Fixed0.00.542
Table
Table 3. Subgroup analysis of the association between MBzP and breast cancer.
Table 3. Subgroup analysis of the association between MBzP and breast cancer.
SubgroupsNo. of StudiesMeta-AnalysesModelHeterogeneity
ORs (95% CIs)p-ValueI2p-Value
Region
Non-America20.82 (0.25–2.64)0.734Random84.90.010
America40.74 (0.59–0.93)0.010Fixed0.00.983
Source of controls
Clinical medical center21.00 (0.51–1.95)0.996Random63.40.098
General population40.66 (0.51–0.85)0.001Fixed0.00.503
Table
Table 4. Subgroup analysis of the association between MEP and breast cancer.
Table 4. Subgroup analysis of the association between MEP and breast cancer.
SubgroupsNo. of StudiesMeta-AnalysesModelHeterogeneity
ORs (95% CIs)p-ValueI2p-Value
Region
Non-America21.13 (0.29–4.40)0.856Random88.80.003
America30.87 (0.68–1.11)0.259Fixed0.00.411
Source of controls
Clinical medical center20.87 (0.59–1.28)0.480Fixed47.10.169
General population31.07 (0.55–2.10)0.836Random83.90.002
Table
Table 5. Subgroup analysis of the association between MEHHP and breast cancer.
Table 5. Subgroup analysis of the association between MEHHP and breast cancer.
SubgroupsNo. of StudiesMeta-AnalysesModelHeterogeneity
ORs (95% CIs)p-ValueI2p-Value
Region
Non-America21.41(0.93–2.12)0.102Fixed0.00.843
America21.00 (0.75–1.33)0.985Fixed0.00.468
Source of controls
Clinical medical center11.50 (0.71–3.17)0.288---
General population31.08 (0.84–1.39)0.533Fixed0.00.423
Table
Table 6. Subgroup analysis of the association between MEHP and breast cancer.
Table 6. Subgroup analysis of the association between MEHP and breast cancer.
SubgroupsNo. of StudiesMeta-AnalysesModelHeterogeneity
ORs (95% CIs)p-ValueI2p-Value
Region
Non-America21.62 (0.84–3.11)0.150Random52.90.145
America20.82 (0.60–1.12)0.214Fixed0.00.686
Source of controls
Clinical medical center12.43 (1.12–5.26)0.024---
General population30.92 (0.71–1.20)0.551Fixed1.00.364
Table
Table 7. Subgroup analysis of the association between MEOHP and breast cancer risk.
Table 7. Subgroup analysis of the association between MEOHP and breast cancer risk.
SubgroupsNo. of StudiesMeta-AnalysesModelHeterogeneity
ORs (95% CIs)p-ValueI2p-Value
Region
Non-America20.92 (0.61–1.38)0.686Fixed0.00.491
America11.19 (0.71–1.99)0.508---
Source of controls
Clinical medical center11.15 (0.54–2.44)0.716---
General population20.99 (0.70–1.40)0.945Fixed0.00.333
All studies31.01 (0.74–1.40)0.927Fixed0.00.587
Table
Table 8. Subgroup analysis of the association between MCPP and breast cancer risk.
Table 8. Subgroup analysis of the association between MCPP and breast cancer risk.
SubgroupsNo. of StudiesMeta-AnalysesModelHeterogeneity
ORs (95% CIs)p-ValueI2p-Value
Region
Non-America10.44 (0.24–0.80)0.008---
America20.89 (0.63–1.25)0.496Random70.90. 064
Source of controls
Clinical medical center11.02 (0.90–1.16)0.760---
General population20.63 (0.46–0.85)0.025Fixed43.90.182
All studies30.74 (0.48–1.14)0.173Random83.80.002
Table
Table 9. Subgroup analysis of the association between MBP and breast cancer risk.
Table 9. Subgroup analysis of the association between MBP and breast cancer risk.
SubgroupsNo. of StudiesMeta-AnalysesModelHeterogeneity
ORs (95% CIs)p-ValueI2p-Value
Region
Non-America20.77 (0.48–1.22)0.266Fixed0.00.602
America10.85 (0.47–1.64)0.593---
Source of controls
Clinical medical center10.66 (0.32–1.38)0.267---
General population20.85 (0.56–1.30)0.453Fixed0.01.000
All studies30.80 (0.55–1.55)0.228Fixed0.00.843
Table
Table 10. Subgroup analysis of the association between MiBP and breast cancer risk.
Table 10. Subgroup analysis of the association between MiBP and breast cancer risk.
SubgroupsNo. of StudiesMeta-AnalysesModelHeterogeneity
ORs (95% CIs)p-ValueI2p-Value
Region
Non-America10.77 (0.48–1.22)0.244---
America20.76 (0.57–1.03)0.073Fixed0.00.740
All studies30.75 (0.58–0.98)0.033Fixed0.00.937
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, G.; Cai, W.; Liu, H.; Jiang, H.; Bi, Y.; Wang, H. The Association of Bisphenol A and Phthalates with Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052375

AMA Style

Liu G, Cai W, Liu H, Jiang H, Bi Y, Wang H. The Association of Bisphenol A and Phthalates with Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(5):2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052375

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Ge, Wei Cai, Huan Liu, Haihong Jiang, Yongyi Bi, and Hong Wang. 2021. "The Association of Bisphenol A and Phthalates with Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 5: 2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052375

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop