Next Article in Journal
Impact of the Family Environment on Juvenile Mental Health: eSports Online Game Addiction and Delinquency
Next Article in Special Issue
A Profile of Knee Injuries Suffered by Australian Army Reserve Soldiers
Previous Article in Journal
The More Educated, the Healthier: Evidence from Rural China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Executive Stress Management: Physiological Load of Stress and Recovery in Executives on Workdays
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Occupational Diseases among Workers in Lower and Higher Socioeconomic Positions

by
Henk F. Van der Molen
*,
Sanne De Vries
and
Judith K. Sluiter
Amsterdam UMC, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dr. Judith K. Sluiter passed away last year.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(12), 2849; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122849
Submission received: 13 November 2018 / Revised: 10 December 2018 / Accepted: 12 December 2018 / Published: 13 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Worker and Public Health and Safety: Current Views)

Abstract

:
Background: To determine differences between workers in lower and higher socioeconomic positions (SEP) in incidences of occupational disease (OD) and incapacity for work due to ODs. Methods: From a Dutch dynamic prospective cohort of occupational physicians (OPs), ODs assessed by OPs were retrieved for lower and higher SEP groups. Results: Among the lower SEP, musculoskeletal disorders, and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) comprised two-thirds of the OD diagnoses. Among the higher SEP, stress/burnout comprised 60% of the OD diagnoses. Temporary and permanent incapacity for work due to work-related lower back disorders and repetitive strain injuries differed significantly between workers in lower compared to higher SEP. Conclusions: Occupational diseases occur at a 2.7 higher incidence rate for workers in lower SEP compared with higher SEP. Incapacity for work varies between the type of OD and the level of SEP.

1. Introduction

Maintaining the health of workers in lower socioeconomic positions (SEP) is an increasing cause for concern [1,2]. In higher SEP jobs, however, task demands can also exceed individual capacities, as shown in a recent European overview regarding the effect of work on mental health [3]. Due to demographic changes, the age of workers is increasing, resulting in more frequent morbidity or, comorbidity, sickness absence [4], lower physical capacities, and higher cumulative work exposures. These changes increase the risk of work-related diseases [5,6].
Socioeconomic status as a determinant of health has been recognized widely and analysed as a composition of various underlying aspects such as education, income and social position [7]. Occupation is one dimension of socioeconomic status, and the weighing of occupations on education and income by job title [8] could reflect SEP. Job complexity could also be an indicator of SEP, with managerial and intellectually complex jobs at the higher end of SEP, and manual, less complex jobs at the lower end of SEP [9]. Ultimately, lower and higher SEP will reflect the distinction between blue and white-collar workers, with different task demands and working circumstances.
Registries of occupational diseases (ODs) can provide insight into job title, work-related diseases and incapacity for work. ODs are relevant outcomes, because they are clinically established diseases mainly caused by work [10,11]. In the Netherlands, OPs are obliged to report ODs to the Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases (NCOD). In contrast to most other countries, there is no financial compensation system for diagnosed ODs in the Netherlands [12]. An OD is defined as a disease for which the work-related fraction is >50%. Each worker diagnosed with an OD is anonymously reported to the NCOD, with the following information recorded in its database: disease or pathology with clinical diagnosis, demographic characteristics, exposure, job title, economic sector, and incapacity for work [12].
It is hypothesized that workers in lower and higher SEP still differ in health disparities from an occupational perspective, with a higher burden of work-related diseases for lower SEP. The objective of this study is to determine differences between workers in lower and higher SEP occupational groups in (i) incidence and type of occupational disease and (ii) incapacity for work as a consequence of an occupational disease.

2. Methods

From a dynamic prospective cohort of occupational physicians (OPs), all ODs diagnosed by the OPs and reported to the Netherlands Centre for Occupational Diseases (NCOD) over a seven-year period (2010–2016) were retrieved for workers with lower and higher SEP. Elementary occupations and machine operating and assembly jobs (ISCO-08 groups 81–83, 91–96) were defined as lower SEP. Managerial and professional intellectual jobs (ISCO-08 groups 11–14, 21–26) were defined as higher SEP. The population size for the higher and lower SEP was retrieved from the database of Eurostat [13], consisting of 1,090,700 workers for the lower SEP and 2,642,00 workers for the higher SEP in 2016. During the period of 2010–2016, the annual populations varied between 1,002,400 and 1,207,000 workers for the lower SEP and between 2,478,800 and 2,642,000 workers for the higher SEP group.
An OD was defined as a clinically diagnosed disease (ICD-10 classification) that was predominantly caused by work-related factors [12]. Incidences were determined for all ODs and seven frequently occurring groups of ICD diagnosis, which were the following: noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL): H833, H919; non-specific low back pain: M545; repetitive strain injuries of the upper extremity: G560, G589, I730, M189, M199 (partly), M531, M700, M709 (partly), M770, M771; arthrosis of the knee and hip: M169, and M179; burnout/stress: Z730, F432; contact dermatitis: L239, L249, and L259; asthma/COPD: J439, J449, J450, J451, J458, J459, and J689.
Incidence of OD with incapacity for work was determined for the seven frequently occurring ODs. Trends in incidence were estimated using a multilevel negative binomial regression model. Annual incidence was determined by dividing the number of reported ODs in 2016 by the total working population. Differences in incapacity for work between lower and higher SEP were determined through chi-squared tests (IBM SPSS 24, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Trends in incidence rates were analysed with multilevel binomial regression analysis [14]. Case counts were analysed using a negative binomial regression model with 2010 as the reference year. Population estimates, as natural logarithms of the annual number of workers, were included in the regression model as an “offset”. No report of a specific OD diagnosis was assumed to indicate a report of zero cases for that year. Trend analyses were performed with Stata 15.1 (StataCorp LLC, Texas, TX, USA).

3. Results

In total, 1233 OPs reported 13,917 ODs for workers in lower and higher SEP during the period of 2010–2016 (see Table 1). Lower SEP consisted of 8145 workers (82% male), of which 82% were aged over 40 years. Higher SEP consisted of 5772 workers (59% male), of which 71% were aged over 40 years.
Among the lower SEP, musculoskeletal disorders (37%) and NIHL (32%) comprised two-thirds of the OD diagnoses, with decreasing trends for non-specific low back pain (−12%; 95% CI: −18% to −6%) and NIHL (−7%; 95% CI: −11% to −3%). Among the higher SEP, stress/burnout comprised 60% of the OD diagnoses, with an increasing trend (6%; 95% CI: 3%−8%).
Incapacity for work varied between OD and SEP. It was rarely reported for NIHL (2%−3%), with no significant differences (p = 0.177) between SEP. Highest (temporary) incapacity for work was reported for stress/burnout (94%), with no significant differences (p = 0.382) between SEP. Occupational contact dermatitis, COPD and asthma, and knee and hip arthrosis showed the highest risks for permanent incapacity for work, varying from 13% to 32%, but no significant differences between SEP (p > 0.50). Incapacity for work due to work-related lower back disorders (69% vs. 9%) and repetitive strain injuries (89% vs. 47%) differed significantly (p = 0.000) between lower and higher SEP.
In 2016, 54 per 100,000 workers in Dutch elementary occupations, machine operating and assembly jobs, and managerial and professional jobs had an OD diagnosed, of which 98 per 100,000 workers were from lower SEP and 36 per 100,000 workers were from higher SEP.

4. Discussion

Occupational diseases occurred at a 2.7 higher incidence rate for workers in lower SEP compared with higher SEP in 2016. Among the workers in a lower SEP, musculoskeletal disorders and noise-induced hearing loss were the most frequently occurring ODs, with trends decreasing over a seven-year period. Among the workers in a higher SEP, stress/burnout was the most frequently occurring OD, with an increasing trend over a seven-year period. The highest temporary incapacity for work was reported for work-related stress/burnout, with no differences between SEP. Work-related knee and hip arthrosis, as well as dermal and lung diseases showed the highest risks for permanent incapacity for work, both in lower and higher SEP. Temporary and permanent incapacity for work due to work-related musculoskeletal disorders were higher in lower SEP workers compared with higher SEP workers.
Misclassification, selection bias, and uncertainty about missing values are methodological limitations in this study. Misclassification in SEP due to job title by ISCO-08 codes is possible, but considered to be non-differential. Selection bias may have been introduced due to differences in entrance to OPs; however, most employed workers visit their OPs when incapacity for work occurs or as a result of worker health monitoring, irrespective of SEP. Furthermore, the reporting of ODs may differ between SEP, e.g., OPs are more familiar with work-related musculoskeletal disorders, which may cause selection bias. Since many ODs emerge after cumulative exposures over time, the incidence of OD may depend on age; however, in our study no large differences in age between lower and higher SEP were found at the time of the assessed ODs. Uncertainty about missing values in regression analyses may have a large impact on the estimates of trends in OD incidence. To counteract this, we modified our methods to input zero reports only when an OP demonstrated being active in a specific year, thus assuming true zero reports [15]. The data in this paper were collected from the Dutch national registry. In future research, OD incidence and incapacity for work between lower and higher SEP could be enriched if SEP at an individual level also encompasses educational and income level.
Occupational diseases occur in both higher and lower SEP, although they differ in incidence, type of OD, and consequences for work capacity. Our results suggest that among lower SEP, hazardous workplaces and adverse work practices are still present, with known biomechanical, physical, and chemical risks factors still to be eliminated. In higher SEP requiring managerial and intellectual tasks, psychosocial demands seem to present the largest risk factors for mental disorders, accompanied by a temporary incapacity for work. Temporary and permanent incapacity for work due to work-related musculoskeletal disorders are higher for lower SEP compared with higher SEP, suggesting fewer opportunities to modify work tasks and working circumstances for lower SEP jobs. These findings are in line with evidence that work indeed explains socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health among workers besides lifestyle factors [16], while differences in incidences of the specific ODs reflect the prevalence of risk factors in the lower SEP (e.g., noise levels [17] and biomechanical risk factors [18] and higher SEP (psychosocial risk factors [19]).
The understanding of whether SEP influences the possibility to stay in work with an OD is of considerable interest. Although adverse health conditions due to work hamper sustainable work ability, especially in lower SEP [20], higher SEP is at risk for especially work-related stress disorders. The frequently reported ODs among the Dutch working population revealed population attributable fractions varying between 3% and 25%, leaving considerable potential for taking preventive actions on work-related exposure in terms of the occurrence of ODs and their medical and productivity cost [21].

5. Conclusions

Occupational diseases occur at a 2.7 higher incidence rate for workers in lower SEP compared with higher SEP. Occupational diseases differ in incidence, type, and resulting incapacity for work between workers in higher and lower SEP. Among the workers in a lower SEP, musculoskeletal disorders and noise-induced hearing loss were the most frequently occurring ODs, with trends decreasing over a seven-year period. Among the workers in a higher SEP, stress/burnout was the most frequently occurring OD, with an increasing trend over a seven-year period. This provides further insight into disparities between workers in different socioeconomic positions in terms of their capacity to counteract negative consequences due to work.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.F.v.d.M.; Data curation, S.d.V.; Formal analysis, H.F.v.d.M.; Writing—original draft, H.F.v.d.M.; Writing—review and editing, S.d.V. and J.K.S.

Patient Consent

Not applicable for this report/study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment (grant project number 21082).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Schuring, M.; Robroek, S.J.W.; Otten, F.W.J.; Arts, C.H.; Burdorf, A. The effect of ill health and socioeconomic status on labor force exit and re-employment: A prospective study with ten years follow-up in the Netherlands. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2013, 39, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schaap, R.; de Wind, A.; Coenen, P.; Proper, K.; Boot, C. The effects of exit from work on health across different socioeconomic groups: A systematic literature review. Soc. Sci. Med. 2017, 198, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lastovkova, A.; Cardner, M.; Rasmussen, H.M.; Sjoberg, L.; de Groene, G.J.; Sauni, R.; Vevoda, J.; Vevodova, S.; Lasfargues, G.; Svartengren, M.; et al. Industrial Health Burnout syndrome as an occupational disease in the European Union: An exploratory study. Ind. Health 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De Vroome, E.M.M.; Uegaki, K.; Ploeg, C.P.B. Burden of Sickness Absence Due to Chronic Disease in the Dutch Workforce from 2007 to 2011. J. Occup. Rehabil. 2015, 25, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Verbeek, J.; Mischke, C.; Robinson, R.; Ijaz, S.; Kuijer, P.; Kievit, A.; Ojajärvi, A.; Neuvonen, K. Occupational Exposure to Knee Loading and the Risk of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. Saf. Health Work 2017, 8, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Blanc, P.D.; Torén, K. COPD and occupation: Resetting the agenda. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016, 73, 357–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  8. Maden, M.; Cunliffe, A.; McMahon, N. Use of programme theory to understand the differential effects of interventions across socio-economic groups in systematic reviews-a systematic methodology review. Syst. Rev. 2017, 6, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fujishiro, K. Job Complexity, Race, and Socioeconomic Status: Examining Health Disparities from an Occupational Perspective. Available online: https://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2017/10/05/job-complexity/ (accessed on 29 January 2018).
  10. Bakusic, J.; Lenderink, A.; Lambreghts, C.; Vandenbroeck, S.; Verbeek, J.; Curti, S.; Mattioli, S.; Godderis, L. Methodologies to Identify Work-Related Diseases: Review of Sentinel and Alert Approaches. European Risk Observatory: Literature Review. Available online: https://limo.libis.be/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=LIRIAS1781378&context=L&vid=Lirias&search_scope=Lirias&tab=default_tab&lang=en_US&fromSitemap=1 (accessed on 29 January 2018).
  11. Carder, M.; Hussey, L.; Money, A. The Health and Occupation Research Network: An Evolving Surveillance System. Saf. Health Work 2017, 8, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Van der Molen, H.F.; Kuijer, P.P.F.M.; Smits, P.B.A.; Schop, A.; Moeijes, F.; Spreeuwers, D.; Frings-Dresen, M.H.W. Annual incidence of occupational diseases in economic sectors in the Netherlands. Occup. Environ. Med. 2012, 69, 519–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Eurostat. Available online: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do? (accessed on 29 January 2018).
  14. Stocks, S.J.; McNamee, R.; van der Molen, H.F.; Paris, C.; Urban, P.; Campo, G.; Sauni, R.; Jarreta, B.M.; Valenty, M.; Godderis, L.; et al. Trends in incidence of occupational asthma, contact dermatitis, noise-induced hearing loss, carpal tunnel syndrome and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders in European countries from 2000 to 2012. Occup. Environ. Med. 2015, 72, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Van der Molen, H.F.; de Vries, S.C.; Stocks, S.J.; Warning, J.; Frings-Dresen, M.H.W. Incidence rates of occupational diseases in the Dutch construction sector, 2010–2014. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016, 73, 350–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dieker, A.C.M.; IJzelenberg, W.; Proper, K.I.; Burdorf, A.; Ket, J.C.F.; van der Beek, A.J.; Hulsegge, G. The contribution of work and lifestyle factors to socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health—A systematic review. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sayler, S.K.; Roberts, B.J.; Manning, M.A.; Sun, K.; Neitzel, R.L. Patterns and trends in OSHA occupational noise exposure measurements from 1979 to 2013. Occup. Environ. Med. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Driscoll, T.; Jacklyn, G.; Orchard, J.; Passmore, E.; Vos, T.; Freedman, G.; Lim, S.; Punnett, L. The global burden of occupationally related low back pain: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014, 73, 975–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Müller, G.; Brendel, B.; Freude, G.; Potter, G.; Rose, U.; Burr, H.; Falkenstein, M.; Martus, P. Work-Related determinants of burnout in a nationally representative sample of German employees. Results from the study on mental health at work. JOEM 2018, 60, 584–588. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Knowledge Agenda Prevention. Dutch National Research Route Healthcare Research, Prevention and Treatment; Nederlandse Federatie van Universitair Medische Centra (NFU) en ZonMw: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Van der Molen, H.F.; Hulshof, C.T.J.; Kuijer, P.P.F.M. How to improve the assessment of the impact of occupational diseases at a national level? The Netherlands as an example. Occup. Environ. Med. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Occupational diseases and incapacity for work among workers in lower and higher socioeconomic positions (SEP).
Table 1. Occupational diseases and incapacity for work among workers in lower and higher socioeconomic positions (SEP).
International Classification of Diseases—10N
2010–2016
Incidence per 100,000
2016
2010–2016Incapacity for Work
2010–2016
Occupational Diseases IRR *95% CITemporary%Permanent %
Total
Lower SEP8145980.950.94–0.97
Higher SEP5772361.031.01–1.05
Noise Induced Hearing Loss
Lower SEP2599230.930.89–0.970.8%2%
Higher SEP83030.990.93–1.050.2%2%
Non-specific Low Back Pain
Lower SEP63560.880.82–0.9464%5%
Higher SEP1310.50.920.80–1.047%2%
Arthrosis Knee/Hip
Lower SEP15720.970.88–1.0740%27%
Higher SEP190.10.970.71–1.2232%21%
Repetitive Strain Injury
Lower SEP2192311.000.97–1.0383%6%
Higher SEP33920.950.89–1.0245%2%
Stress/Burnout
Lower SEP46381.000.95–1.0691%3%
Higher SEP3439251.061.03–1.0892%2%
Contact Dermatitis
Lower SEP19321.010.94–1.0946%13%
Higher SEP280.11.090.88–1.2936%18%
COPD/Asthma
Lower SEP540.50.930.79–1.0744%32%
Higher SEP20-0.840.60–1.0740%30%
* IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio (reference year 2010). Bold means p < 0.05.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Van der Molen, H.F.; De Vries, S.; Sluiter, J.K. Occupational Diseases among Workers in Lower and Higher Socioeconomic Positions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122849

AMA Style

Van der Molen HF, De Vries S, Sluiter JK. Occupational Diseases among Workers in Lower and Higher Socioeconomic Positions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15(12):2849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122849

Chicago/Turabian Style

Van der Molen, Henk F., Sanne De Vries, and Judith K. Sluiter. 2018. "Occupational Diseases among Workers in Lower and Higher Socioeconomic Positions" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, no. 12: 2849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122849

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop