Next Article in Journal
Work-Related Eye Injuries: A Relevant Health Problem. Main Epidemiological Data from a Highly-Industrialized Area of Northern Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Activity and Participation Norms among General Adult Populations in Taiwan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seroprevalence of Measles Antibodies and Predictors for Seropositivity among Chinese Children

1
Department of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an 710061, China
2
Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN 37920, USA
3
Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Qian County, Xianyang 713300, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(6), 605; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060605
Submission received: 13 March 2017 / Revised: 22 May 2017 / Accepted: 2 June 2017 / Published: 6 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Global Health)

Abstract

:
Background: Supplementary measles immunization has been implemented since 2010 throughout China, yet few studies have reported its effect in the northwest regions. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among children aged 2 to 4 years old (n = 755) from February to September 2014 in 25 towns of Qian County, Shaanxi Province. Blood samples were analyzed for measles antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent immunoglobulin G (IgG) assays. Socio-demographic factors were assessed by questionnaire. Data on vaccine dose were collected from town medical records. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with measles antibody seropositivity. Results: Measles antibody seroprevalence was 91.13% (95% CI: 89.52–92.83) in our sample. Compared with children whose mother’s highest education was primary school, seroprevalence was higher in children whose maternal education was middle school (adjusted OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.7–2.8), high school (adjusted OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.3–7.7), and college/university (adjusted OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2–9.3). Vaccine dose was positively associated with seropositivity. Conclusions: Measles seroprevalence is high in China and is associated with the mother’s education and vaccine dose.

1. Introduction

Measles is a highly contagious infectious airborne disease caused by morbillivirus [1] that usually occurs in children and non-immune people of any age. It affects about 20 million people per year [2], leading to 134,200 deaths globally in 2015, primarily in the developing areas of Africa and Asia [1]. As of 20 January 2017, China ranked fifth in the World Health Organization’s (WHO) western pacific region with an annualized measles incidence rate of 17.4 per million people [3].
From 1986 to 2005, Chinese health authorities mandated that children should be vaccinated with two doses of measles vaccine, given at 8 months and 7 years of age [4]. A WHO position paper suggests that the people are protected after 2 vaccine doses even when antibodies are below the protective level due to immune memory [5]. Even though the Chinese government has made great efforts to reduce morbidity and mortality from the disease, measles remains a leading vaccine-preventable cause of child mortality in China [6]. This vaccine schedule was replaced by a routine measles-rubella vaccine at 8 months of age, followed by a measles-mumps-rubella vaccine at 18–24 months of age according to the recommendation from China’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Programs in 2005 [7]. In 2010, China adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) Supplementary Immunization Activity (SIA) [8], which recommends a measles-mumps vaccine for children aged from 8 months to 4 years old regardless of their prior vaccination status.
Several studies [9,10] have examined the effect of two doses of measles vaccine in southern areas of China, leading to increased public health activity and reduced measles morbidity. In contrast, the northwestern regions of China have comparatively greater inequities in medical service [11]. In some areas, only 53.6% were found to have a first measles vaccine during the recommended time period [12]. Consequently, this area ranked second in China for measles morbidity with an infection reported in 3.47 per 10,000 people in 2014 [13]. Hence, a greater understanding of the factors associated with measles immunity in northwest China is needed.
Several studies in different countries have indicated that age [14], geographic region [15], history of measles vaccination [16], migration history [17], and history of measles infection [18] are associated with seropositivity of the measles antibody. However, few studies have examined the effectiveness of the measles vaccination and predictors for the measles antibody among children in northwest China. This study aimed to identify the social determinants of measles seropositivity and the effectiveness of SIA among children aged 2 to 4 years old in a large county of northwest China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 755 healthy children aged 2 to 4 years in all 25 administrative townships in Qian County from February to September in 2014. Participants with acute febrile illness and infections, and individuals who were on immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. There were 247 children from rural areas, 384 from urban areas, and 124 from suburban areas. We planned to recruit ten children in every age group (2 years, 3 years, and 4 years) from each town. The starting point for participant contact was a randomly selected household in each town based on the house’s county register number. Selection then continued with next nearest household until ten eligible children were obtained. Using this process, we enrolled 755 children, slightly higher than our target of 750.
In each town, face-to-face interviews were conducted with parents or guardians who had children aged 2–4 years old. A questionnaire was administered by the staff to collect socio-demographic information, including the children’s gender, age, district type (rural, suburban, or urban), the mother’s educational level, and history of measles infection. Data on vaccination was taken directly from the town’s medical records.
Informed written consent was obtained from a parent or guardian of the participating children. Confidentiality was ensured by assigning anonymous study numbers to the questionnaires and samples before data entry and analysis. The study protocol was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center (Code: 2013-279).

2.2. Laboratory Testing

Samples of 20 uL peripheral blood were collected via the ring finger from all subjects, centrifuged to isolate the sera, and frozen at −20 °C. Qualitative determination of immunoglobulin G (IgG) to measles in serum specimens was detected by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent IgG assays (ELISA) at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Qian County (kits were provided by the National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention of Chinese CDC, Beijing, China). A determination of seropositivity was based on an IgG antibody titer of ≥1:200; a titer of <1:200 was considered seronegative according to the Standard GB15983-1995 guidelines of China [19].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data management and statistical analysis were performed using SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions) for Windows (version 22.0) (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The Pearson’s Chi-square test was used for univariate analysis including gender, age, district type, maternal education level, maternal history of measles infection, and vaccine dose. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) were obtained from logistic regression models adjusting for measles vaccine dose, district type, mother’s education, and maternal history of measles infection. In the logistic regression, the collinerarity between factors was solved by deleting the subordinate variables [20]. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05; all tests were two-sided.

3. Results

3.1. Seroprevalence of Measles Antibody in Qian County

Overall, the measles antibody seroprevalence was 91.13% (95% CI: 89.52–92.83). The highest seroprevalence was observed in the towns of Guantou and Chengguan; Dayang had the lowest (Table 1).

3.2. Demographic Characteristics of the Children

The highest seroprevalence was observed in the 4 years age group (Table 2). Age (χ2 = 48.245, p < 0.001), maternal education level (χ2 = 8.738, p = 0.033), and vaccine dose (χ2 = 251.756, p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with seroprevalence (Table 2). The seroprevalence of children 2 and 3 years of age was significantly lower than that observed in the 4 years age group. No significant differences were found in seroprevalence with respect to gender, district type, or maternal history of measles infection.

3.3. Predictors for Seroprevalence among Children

We detected collinearity between age and measles vaccine dose (the condition index value was 11.37 and 16.12), so we removed the subordinate factor of age while analyzing by logistic regression to solve for it. Children vaccinated with two doses and three doses had 11.3 (95% CI: 4.0–32.2) and 685.5 (95% CI: 152.1–3089.1) times the odds of seropositivity of the measles antibody, respectively, compared with those receiving only one dose. Compared with children whose mother’s highest education was primary school, seroprevalence was higher in children whose maternal education was high school (adjusted OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4–6.9) or college/university (adjusted OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1–8.6). Neither district type nor maternal history of measles were significantly associated with seropositivity of the measles IgG antibody (Table 3).

4. Discussion

The results of our study showed 91.13% measles seropositivity among healthy children, which is below the 95% level recommended by the WHO [21]. Measles seropositive prevalence varies by country, with observed IgG levels of 89.5%, 98.2%, and 87.7% in Germany [22], United Arab Emirates [23], and Italy [24], respectively. In addition, the seroprevalence of the measles antibody in northwest China was lower than in other Chinese regions, such as Jiangsu (97.6%) [9], Tianjin (97.5%) [25], and Zhejiang (96.5%) [10] in southern China. The regional variation in measles seropositivity, both within China and across nations, might be due to differences in the design of early childhood immunization programs in each region [26] and inherited differences among various populations [27].
The higher seroprevalence of the measles antibody in children who received multiple doses of measles vaccine in our study is consistent with the results of previous studies [8]. As expected, multiple vaccine doses counter the natural decrease in immunity over time [21,28]. The seroprevalence in children that were administered one dose was far lower than in those receiving two doses. In some cases this may reflect a failure of the single dose because of vaccine degradation during storage or transport, rendering it less effective [29]. The primary vaccine failure rate was estimated to be 2–10% [30,31,32], but the secondary vaccination failure in those who developed seroconversion was shown to be considerably lower (0.2%) [33]. Furthermore, the first dose of the measles vaccine was administered at 8 months in China; vaccines given at that age may be nullified by maternal antibodies [34]. The seronegative rate was 24.5% in children administered two doses, which may be due to the delayed vaccine. Lower socioeconomic status, challenges in providing medical care, and poor dissemination of medical information may contribute to lower vaccine coverage in China [15].
In our study, the prevalence of antibodies increased with age, which is consistent with previous findings [16,35,36]. This might be due to the vaccination schedule or changes in maturing immune systems [26]. A study in Pakistan found that the levels of the measles-specific IgG antibody increased from 60.0% to 84.62% in children aged 9 months to 5 years [36]. Those IgG levels are lower than those in the present study, which may be related to the poor living conditions or nutritional status in the Pakistani sample. A study in Korea found that among children aged 1–3, 4–6, 7–9, and 10–12 years, the seropositive prevalence increased with age: 78.6%, 87.4%, 87.6%, and 92.7%, respectively, which was more in line with our results. The greater similarity of those results to ours may be related to the similar vaccination schedule or similar degrees of national development [37]. Nonetheless, children aged 4 years old was the only group that met the WHO target of >95% seropositivity in our study. This might be attributable to the implementation of SIA from 2010, which led to many children having three doses. Overall, routine vaccination was not satisfactory. Therefore, SIA appears to be an important way to eliminate measles.
The seroprevalence of measles antibodies was higher in children with highly educated mothers in the present study, which is consistent with previous studies [16,38,39]. A study in Pakistan showed an increasing trend of seropositivity with the mother’s education levels among children aged 12–59 months [16]. Another study in Bolivia found that seroprevalence of the measles antibody was higher in children with highly educated parents [38]. Consistent with those studies, a study in Istanbul showed that the vaccination rate was lower in children whose mother’s education level was primary school (89.8%) compared with those completing secondary school or higher (93.3%) [39]. Thus, efforts to decrease measles morbidity may need to be targeted to areas known to have lower levels of adult education.
There was no significant association between the district type and seropositivity of the measles antibody in our study. In China, the vaccination rate was lower in rural areas than urban areas according to the national Expanded Program on Immunization data [40]. A previous study conducted in 2008 in southern China found lower measles seropositivity in rural areas [15]. In our study, the seroprevalence was lower in rural areas than that in urban areas, but differences were not statistically significant. A weak association based on rural vs. urban areas in China may be related to the improvement of the rural primary health care service system and the implementation of SIAs from 2010. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the seropositivity of the measles antibody according to gender or maternal measles history, results that are consistent with those of previous studies [18,28,41].
Our study has some limitations. First, we relied on the mothers’ recall of measles history rather than medical records, which may have introduced differential or non-differential misclassification of exposure. Second, this study was conducted in a sample representing a northwestern district in China, so we cannot necessarily generalized our findings to the whole country. Moreover, our data are also 3 years old, and some changes in seroprevalence may have occurred since our data were collected.

5. Conclusions

The average seroprevalence of IgG to measles was 91.13% in the present study, which suggests an insufficient immunity among children aged 2–4 years old in northwest China. Our finding that seroprevalence was influenced by vaccine dose and the mothers’ education level suggests possible means to reduce measles morbidity.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the study participants, the staff members of the Qian County Health Services, and the support of Xi’an Jiaotong University.

Author Contributions

Xiaoqin Wang and Paul D. Terry designed the experiment; Mingxu Wang, Ling Li, Wei Gu, and Rui Su performed the experiment; Yue Zhang and Zhaozhao Hui analyzed the data; Mei Ma wrote the paper. Xiaoqin Wang and Paul D. Terry had primary responsibility for the final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interests.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
IgGImmunoglobulin G
WHOWorld Health Organization
MMRMeasles, Mumps, and Rubella
SIASupplementary Immunization Activity
OROdds Ratio
CIConfidence Interval

References

  1. World Health Organization. Measles Fact Sheets, 2016. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs286/en/ (accessed on 20 March 2017).
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Measles-United States, 2011. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2012, 61, 253–257. [Google Scholar]
  3. Western Pacific Regional, World Health Organization. Measles-Rubella Bulletin. Available online: http://iris.wpro.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665.1/13539/Measles-Rubella-Bulletin-2017-Vol-11-No-01.pdf?ua=1 (accessed on 20 January 2017).
  4. Zheng, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, H.; Liang, X. The role of the China Experts Advisory Committee on Immunization Program. Vaccine 2015, 28 (Suppl. 1), A84–A87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. English, A.I. Measles vaccines: WHO position paper. Relev. Epidemiol. Hebd. 2009, 84, 349. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, R.Q.; Li, H.B.; Li, F.Y.; Han, L.X.; Xiong, Y.M. Epidemiological characteristics of measles from 2000 to 2014: Results of a measles catch-up vaccination campaign in Xianyang, China. J. Infect. Public Health 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, L.; Yu, W.Z.; Shui, T.J.; Ma, C.; Wen, N.; Liang, X.F. Analysis on epidemiological characteristics of age distribution of measles in China during 2003–2006. Chin. J. Vaccines Immun. 2007, 13, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Z.; Yan, R.; He, H.; Li, Q.; Chen, G.; Yang, S.; Chen, E. Difficulties in Eliminating Measles and Controlling Rubella and Mumps: A Cross-Sectional Study of a First Measles and Rubella Vaccination and a Second Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccination. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Liu, Y.; Lu, P.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Deng, X.; Ma, F.; Tao, H.; Jia, C.; Ding, X.; Yang, H.; et al. Cross-Sectional surveys of measles antibodies in the Jiangsu Province of China from 2008 to 2010: The effect of high coverage with two doses of measles vaccine among children. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. He, H.; Chen, E.F.; Li, Q.; Wang, Z.; Yan, R.; Fu, J.; Pan, J. Waning immunity to measles in young adults and booster effects of revaccination in secondary school students. Vaccine 2013, 31, 533–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wu, C.; Fang, P. Analysis of inequity of health service for rural residents in west China and potential accessibility and countermeasure. Chin. Health Serv. Manag. 2007, 23, 560–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yue, C.Y.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, X.; Dz, D.J.; Du, W.; Zhang, X.S.; Guan, B.J.; Wu, S.E.; Cui, F.Q. Survey on the children guardians vaccination knowledge status and analysis on influencing factors of timely first dose of measles attenuated live vaccine vaccination in Western Poverty area of China. Chin. J. Vaccines Immun. 2014, 20, 109–154. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ma, C.; Hao, L.X.; Su, Q.R.; Wen, N.; Fan, C.X.; Yang, H.; Li, L.; Wang, H.Q. Measles epidemiology in China, 2014. Dis. Surveill. 2015, 30, 818–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Techasena, W.; Wongwacharapiboon, P.; Terawanich, S.; Pattamadilok, S. A comparison study of measles antibody between two doses vaccination at 9, 18 months and single dose at 9 months in children 4–6 years old. J. Med. Assoc. Thail. 2011, 94, 309–315. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fu, C.; Xu, J.; Liu, W.; Zhang, W.; Wang, M.; Nie, J.; Rüdiger, V.K. Low measles seropositivity rate among children and young adults: A sero-epidemiological study in southern China in 2008. Vaccine 2010, 28, 8219–8223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sheikh, S.; Ali, A.; Zaidi, A.K.; Agha, A.; Khowaja, A.; Allana, S.; Qureshi, S.; Azam, I. Measles susceptibility in children in Karachi, Pakistan. Vaccine 2011, 29, 3419–3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Paxton, G.A.; Rice, J.; Davie, G.; Carapetis, J.R.; Skull, S.A. East African immigrant children in Australia have poor immunisation coverage. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2011, 47, 888–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Poethko-Müller, C.; Mankertz, A. Sero-epidemiology of measles-specific IgG antibodies and predictive factors for low or missing titres in a German population-based cross-sectional study in children and adolescents (KiGGS). Vaccine 2011, 29, 7949–7959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ministry of Health of China. The Diagnostic Criteria and Principles of Management of Measles, 1995. Available online: http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/zwgkzt/s9491/201212/34116.shtml (accessed on 15 December 1995).
  20. Alin, A. Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2010, 2, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Progress toward the 2012 measles elimination goal—Western Pacific region, 1990–2008. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2009, 58, 669–673. [Google Scholar]
  22. Poethko-Mueller, C.; Mankertz, A. Seroprevalence of measles-, mumps- and rubella-specific IgG antibodies in German children and adolescents and predictors for seronegativity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Al-Mekaini, L.A.; Kamal, S.M.; Al-Jabri, O.; Soliman, M.; Alshamsi, H.; Narchi, H.; Souid, A.K.; Alsuwaidi, A.R. Seroprevalence of vaccine-preventable diseases among young children in the United Arab Emirates. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 50, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Del Fava, E.; Shkedy, Z.; Bechini, A.; Bonanni, P.; Manfredi, P. Towards measles elimination in Italy: monitoring herd immunity by Bayesian mixture modelling of serological data. Epidemics 2012, 4, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Boulton, M.L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Montgomery, J.P.; Wagner, A.L.; Carlson, B.F.; Ding, Y.; Li, X.; Gillespie, B.; Su, X. A population profile of measles susceptibility in Tianjin, China. Vaccine 2016, 34, 3037–3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Arafa, R.S.; Abdelmotaleb, G.S.; Shaker, R.H.M.; Elsayed, I.A.; Baioumy, R.F.S.; Dean, N.M.Z.E.; Seliem, L.H.A. Seroprevalence of measles, rubella, mumps and varicella specific antibodies in primary school children. Middle East J. Fam. Med. 2016, 14, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kimman, T.G.; Vandebriel, R.J.; Hoebee, B. Genetic variation in the response to vaccination. Community Genet. 2007, 10, 201–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kim, E.S.; Choe, Y.J.; Cho, H.; Kim, Y.J.; Yoon, H.S.; Yang, J.S.; Kim, K.; Bae, G.R.; Lee, D.H. Seroprevalence of measles among children affected by national measles elimination program in Korea, 2010. Vaccine 2012, 30, 3355–3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Strebel, P.M.; Papania, M.J.; Halsey, N.A. Measles vaccine. In Vaccines, 4th ed.; Plotkin, S.A., Orenstein, W.A., Eds.; WB Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  30. Haralambieva, I.H.; Ovsyannikova, I.G.; O’Byrne, M.; Pankratz, V.S.; Jacobson, R.M.; Poland, G.A. A large observational study to concurrently assess persistence of measles specific B-cell and T-cell immunity in individuals following two doses of MMR vaccine. Vaccine 2011, 29, 4485–4491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Defay, F.; De Serres, G.; Skowronski, D.M.; Boulianne, N.; Ouakki, M.; Landry, M.; Brousseau, N.; Ward, B.J. Measles in children vaccinated with 2 doses of MMR. Pediatrics 2013, 132, e1126–e1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Uzicanin, A.; Zimmerman, L. Field effectiveness of live attenuated measlescontaining vaccines: A review of published literature. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 204 (Suppl. 1), S133–S148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Anders, J.F.; Jacobson, R.M.; Poland, G.A.; Jacobsen, S.J.; Wollan, P.C. Secondary failure rates of measles vaccines: A meta-analysis of published studies. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 1996, 15, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kim, D.; Niewiesk, S. Sidestepping maternal antibody: A lesson from measles virus vaccination. Expert Rev. Clin. Immun. 2011, 7, 557–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Manirakiza, A.; Kipela, J.M.; Sosler, S.; Daba, R.M.; Gouandjika-Vasilache, I. Seroprevalence of measles and natural rubella antibodies among children in Bangui, Central African Republic. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Channa, R.A.; Hussain, S.; Kanher, N.A.; Malik, F.; Memon, M.; Mahmood, S.; Yasin, F.; Wajid, A.; Shafaat, S.; Mahmood, R. Sero-surveillance of measles amongst vaccinated and non-vaccinated children: An age stratified population based survey in Pakistan. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2012, 6, 1713–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, S.S.; Han, H.W.; Go, U.; Chung, H.W. Sero-epidemiology of measles and mumps in Korea: Impact of the catch-up campaign on measles immunity. Vaccine 2005, 23, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Masuet-Aumatell, C.; Ramon-Torrell, J.M.; Casanova-Rituerto, A.; Banqué Navarro, M.; Dávalos Gamboa Mdel, R.; Montaño Rodríguez, S.L. Measles in Bolivia: A “honeymoon period”. Vaccine 2012, 31, 2097–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Torun, S.D.; Bakirci, N. Vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination in a district of Istanbul. BMC Public Health 2006, 6, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liang, X.; Bi, S.; Yang, W.; Wang, L.; Cui, G.; Cui, F.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Gong, X.; Chen, Y. Evaluation of the impact of hepatitis B vaccination among children born during 1992–2005 in China. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 200, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bechini, A.; Boccalini, S.; Tiscione, E.; Pesavento, G.; Mannelli, F.; Peruzzi, M.; Rapi, S.; Mercurio, S.; Bonanni, P. Progress towards measles and rubella elimination in Tuscany, Italy: The role of population seroepidemiological profile. Eur. J. Public Health 2012, 22, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Seroprevalence of the measles antibody in Qian County, China.
Table 1. Seroprevalence of the measles antibody in Qian County, China.
RegionSample SizeSeroprevalence of Measles Antibody n (%)
Dayang3225 (78.13)
Tiefo3026 (86.67)
Xuelu3026 (86.67)
Jiangcun3127 (87.10)
Xinyang3127 (87.10)
Linping3127 (87.10)
Wudian3027 (90.00)
Daqiang3027 (90.00)
Zhugan3027 (90.00)
Lingyuan3128 (90.32)
Malian2927 (93.10)
Fengyang3028 (93.33)
Changliu3028 (93.33)
Liangcun3028 (93.33)
Moxi3028 (93.33)
Yanghan3028 (93.33)
Zhoucheng3028 (93.33)
Wangcun3028 (93.33)
Shiniu3028 (93.33)
Yangyu3028 (93.33)
Qianling3028 (93.33)
Liangshan3028 (93.33)
Yanghong3028 (93.33)
Guantou3029 (96.67)
Chengguan3029 (96.67)
Total755688 (91.13)
Table 2. Seroprevalence of the antibody to measles in association with demographic variables among 755 healthy children in Qian County, China.
Table 2. Seroprevalence of the antibody to measles in association with demographic variables among 755 healthy children in Qian County, China.
Demographic VariablesSample SizeMeasles Antibody Seroprevalence n (%)χ2p
Gender
 Boy425384 (90.4)0.7180.397
 Girl330304 (92.1)
Age
 4 years247242 (98.0)48.245<0.001
 3 years251237 (94.4)
 2 years257209 (81.3)
District type
 Rural247223 (90.3)1.9420.379
 Suburban124110 (88.7)
 Urban384355 (92.4)
Mother’s education
 Primary school190165 (86.8)8.7380.033
 Middle school221199 (90.0)
 High school208195 (93.8)
 Vocational College/University or higher136129 (94.9)
Measles vaccine dose
 1245 (20.8)251.756<0.001
 2188142 (75.5)
 3543541 (99.6)
Maternal history of measles infection
 Yes3431 (91.2)0.6480.723
 No683621 (90.9)
 Unknown3836 (94.7)
Table 3. Demographic and other predictors of measles antibody seropositivity among healthy children: a multivariable logistic regression model.
Table 3. Demographic and other predictors of measles antibody seropositivity among healthy children: a multivariable logistic regression model.
VariablesCrude OR95% CIpAdjusted OR95% CIp
Measles vaccine dose1 (reference)-
211.74.1–33.2<0.00111.34.0–32.2<0.001
31027.9187.3–5640.4<0.001685.5152.1–3089.1<0.001
District typeRural (ref)-
Suburban0.80.4–1.70.6370.90.7–1.30.713
Urban1.30.7–2.30.3391.10.8–1.30.341
Mother’s educationPrimary school (ref)-
Middle school1.40.7–2.50.3091.10.8–1.40.802
High school2.31.1–4.60.0192.21.4–6.90.006
Vocational College/University or higher2.81.2–6.70.0172.61.1–8.60.037
Maternal history of measles diseaseYes (reference)-
No1.00.3–3.30.9600.80.3–2.70.923
Unknown1.70.3–11.10.5532.40.8–16.20.477

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Ma, M.; Hui, Z.; Terry, P.D.; Zhang, Y.; Su, R.; Wang, M.; Gu, W.; Li, L. Seroprevalence of Measles Antibodies and Predictors for Seropositivity among Chinese Children. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060605

AMA Style

Wang X, Ma M, Hui Z, Terry PD, Zhang Y, Su R, Wang M, Gu W, Li L. Seroprevalence of Measles Antibodies and Predictors for Seropositivity among Chinese Children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(6):605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060605

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xiaoqin, Mei Ma, Zhaozhao Hui, Paul D. Terry, Yue Zhang, Rui Su, Mingxu Wang, Wei Gu, and Ling Li. 2017. "Seroprevalence of Measles Antibodies and Predictors for Seropositivity among Chinese Children" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, no. 6: 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060605

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop