Next Article in Journal
Novel Gemini Surfactant for Binding Eu(III)-Polyoxometalate into Hydrogels and Polymer Latexes
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Film-Forming Gel Formulations Containing Royal Jelly and Honey Aromatic Water for Cosmetic Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Insights into the Fundamental Steps Underlying Gelation of Plant and Algal Ionic Polysaccharides: Pectate and Alginate
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Gels
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/gels8120785
gels-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Fabrication of High-Resolution Fine Microneedles Derived from Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid Gels in Vacuum Environment Imprinting Using Water Permeable Mold

by
Sayaka Miura
1,
Rio Yamagishi
1,
Riku Miyazaki
1,
Kaori Yasuda
1,
Yuki Kawano
2,
Yoshiyuki Yokoyama
2,
Naoto Sugino
3,
Takao Kameda
3 and
Satoshi Takei
1,*
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Toyama Prefectural University, Imizu, Toyama 939-0398, Japan
2
Toyama Industrial Technology Research and Development Center, Takaoka, Toyama 933-0981, Japan
3
Futuristic Technology Department, Sanko Gosei, Nanto, Toyama 939-1852, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2022, 8(12), 785; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8120785
Submission received: 29 October 2022 / Revised: 23 November 2022 / Accepted: 24 November 2022 / Published: 29 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Beauty Gels: From Bench to Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid high-resolution fine microneedles of 13 µm in diameter and 24 µm in height were fabricated from hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid gels made in mixtures of water using vacuum environment imprint lithography processes with a water permeable mold. The gas traps of water and volatile solvents in the imprint materials cause transfer failure in the conventional water impermeable molds of quartz and metal. However, the water permeable mold allows the use of 67 wt% dilution water with high solubility to increase the fluidity of the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid during the patterning of high-resolution fine microneedles for cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. This demonstration sets a new paradigm of functional pure gels for high-resolution nano-patterning applications with various cosmetic and pharmaceutical materials containing dilution water using a water permeable mold.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Many beauty ingredients, such as hyaluronic acid and collagen gels, are expected to bring significant demand to the global market for cosmetology products [1]. Hyaluronic acid made in mixtures of solvents has excellent water retention properties and can contain approximately 1000 times its weight in water [2,3]. However, the concentration of hyaluronic acid, which occurs naturally in the skin, declines with age, affecting wrinkle formation, skin elasticity, and dryness [4,5]. Therefore, hyaluronic acid can be used in cosmetic products to provide anti-ageing and anti-wrinkle benefits [6,7].
The skin is composed of an epidermal layer, a dermal layer, and subcutaneous tissue, with a stratum corneum on the surface of the epidermal layer. Since the stratum corneum has a barrier function to prevent foreign substances from entering the body and moisture evaporation from the body [8,9], high-molecular-weight cosmetic ingredients such as hyaluronic acid cannot be delivered into the skin via transdermal administration [10,11]. Various methods have been used to determine how to penetrate the stratum corneum to the epidermis, i.e., the deep layer within the skin [12]. For example, hypodermic needles have been used, but they are painful and many patients have needle phobias; moreover, these needles require knowledgeable medical personnel to administer them [13,14].
Currently, technologies such as nano-emulsions, liposomes, nanoparticles, and other nanotechnologies have been developed to penetrate the stratum corneum with active ingredients in cosmetics [15,16]. These methods have shown significant improvement in the skin retention of active ingredients and are expected to enhance skin health. Microneedles are one of these technologies that are expected to be able to deliver water-absorbing ingredients safely and efficiently [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Microneedles shaped by microfabrication come in a variety of types, but soluble microneedles including hyaluronic acid and collagen gels have been used in a wide range of cosmetic and transdermal drug delivery system applications. The microneedles have the benefit of enhancing penetration, eliminating the risk of needles remaining in the body or leaving sharp waste that could be a biohazard after use [23,24].
Conventional microneedles for cosmetic applications are 100–800 µm in diameter and 200–800 µm in height. Conversely, the epidermal layer is approximately 200 µm thick. Consequently, the microneedles reach the dermis layer, which exists below the epidermis layer, leading to a painful injection because the dermal layer contains sensory receptors [25].
However, the microfabrication process involves problems such as gas generation from water and solvents during heating, molding defects, and mold breakage [26,27,28]. Furthermore, the microfabrication of a hyaluronic acid gel solution containing high concentrations of water and volatile solvents was difficult because of its high viscosity in solution even at low concentrations [29,30,31,32]. To improve the resolution of microneedles and achieve miniaturization, we developed gas and water permeable molds that can vent the gas generated during heat molding [33,34,35]. The high-resolution fine microneedle pattern failure of hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid gels containing 67 wt% water as a dilution solvent was demonstrated using the water permeable mold and the vacuum environment imprint lithography processes for skin care cosmetic patches.

2. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles fabricated at (a) the 1st imprint by using a conventional non-water permeable quartz mold with inverted microneedle patterns and (b) the 1st, 3rd, 10th, 13th, and 14th imprints by using the water permeable mold in the vacuum environment imprint lithography processes. There is no significant difference in patterning defects between the 1st and 14th imprints using the same water permeable mold. The hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid solutions were filled into the tip of the needles in the water permeable mold, and patterning defects were improved by using (b) the water permeable mold compared with (a) the conventional non-water permeable quartz mold. This is because the water vapor from the water evaporation generated during the processes permeated through the water permeable mold, improving the filling rate of the highly viscous hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid into the water permeable mold.
The high-resolution fine microneedles of approximately 13 µm in diameter and 24 µm in height, with hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid and water as their two components, were fabricated using the newly vacuum environment imprint lithography processes using a water permeable mold for cosmetic and pharmaceutical applications. The prepared water permeable surface material in the water permeable mold with titanium dioxide and silicon dioxide were cross-linked by the conditions to generate the cross-link density needed to obtain water permeability. The possibility of shortening the molding time by further improving the filling speed is expected to be realized in the next study.
In addition, Figure 2 shows the measurement results of (a) the bottom diameter, (b) the height and (c) the angle of the microneedle patterns by calculating the sharpness of the SEM images on the fabricated hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles at the 1st, 3rd, 10th, 13th, and 14th imprints. Although the measured result of the bottom diameter (Standard deviation; 0.11 µm), height (Standard deviation; 0.48 µm) and angle (Standard deviation; 0.37°) of microneedle patterns was considered to be a data variability by calculating the sharpness of the SEM images in five different areas, the size biases of the microneedles do not affect the above application of cosmetic and pharmaceutical microneedles. These results indicated that the water permeable mold improved the patterning defects of the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid gel solutions containing high concentrations of 67 wt% water and can be expected to be useful for the mass production of high-resolution fine microneedles using production-level automatic imprint lithography equipment.
Figure 3 is a comparison of the microneedle sizes and the dissolution behavior of (a,b) commercial microneedles (TAPPULEENA, JINBEEKOA, Japan) of 364 µm in the length on one side of the bottom of the rhombus and 346 µm in height and (d) the imprinted hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles of approximately 13 µm in diameter and 24 µm in height. The tip of the above commercial microneedle was not pointed and appeared to be flat compared with the tip of the newly developed hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles. Both (e) the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles without additives and (c) the commercial microneedles with sodium hyaluronate, as well as various additives such as glycerine and butylene glycol, which have the hygroscopic properties to dissolve easily under high humidity conditions, had more than 60% of their volume dissolve after 35 min. The hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles were advantageous in that they acted in the skin within a shorter time, broadening the application areas of the high-resolution microneedles to cosmetics and pharmaceuticals.
Figure 4 shows the Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) spectra of the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid before and after thermal deposition for evaluating the thermal decomposition in fine microneedle fabrication. The 3400 cm−1 (OH bond), 2880 cm−1 (CH bond), 1740 cm−1 (ester), 1649 cm−1 (amide type I), 1554 cm−1 (amide type II), and 1045 cm−1 (CO bond) peaks were observed before thermal deposition, and 3375 cm−1 (OH bond), 2885 cm−1 (CH bond), 1735 cm−1 (ester), 1640 cm−1 (amide type I), 1551 cm−1 (amide type II), and 1033 cm−1 (CO bond) peaks after thermal deposition also indicated the absorption of hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid and water, and these peaks were somewhat coincident before and after thermal deposition at 80 °C for 90 min.
Figure 5 shows the thermos-gravimetric differential thermal analysis instrument (Tg-DTA) curve of the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid. During heating up to approximately 100 °C, a continuous weight loss occurs nearly imperceptibly owing to the removal of the water in the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid. No shoulder and no sharp signal can be observed up to approximately 170 °C in the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid. The hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid in the microneedles was suggested to be stable up to 170 °C. Therefore, the above adjusted conditions at 40 °C for 15 min in the vacuum environment imprint lithography processes were also acceptable for the fabrication of hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles with high-resolution.
A more accurate evaluation of the biocompatibility such as vivo penetration experiments on mice and skin penetration is the subject of a future study. The result that one can nanoimprint functional gel solutions containing high volatile dilution solvents of over 60% is expected to be a breakthrough for various biomedical applications.

3. Conclusions

The high-resolution fine microneedle pattern failure of hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid gels containing 67 wt% water as a dilution solvent was solved using the water permeable mold in the vacuum environment imprint lithography processes. This demonstration of the high-resolution fine microneedles of 13 µm in diameter and 24 µm in height sets a new paradigm of functional pure gels for high-resolution fine patterning applications with various cosmetic and pharmaceutical materials containing dilution water using a water permeable mold for a skin care cosmetic patch and transdermal drug delivery system.

4. Materials and Methods

Figure 6 shows (a) the chemical structures of the water permeable surface material and (b) hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid as a raw material of fine microneedles. The water permeable surface materials with four components, 40 wt% 3-(acryloyloxy)propyltrimethoxysilane, 35 wt% methyltrimethoxysilane, 15 wt% tetraethyl titanate, and 10 wt% tetraethoxysilane, were prepared using the sol–gel polymerization [36,37,38]. The polymerized water permeable surface materials with an average molecular weight of 5500 relative to a polystyrene standard were measured using gel permeation chromatography (GPC, EcoSEC Elite HLC-8420GPC, Tosoh, Japan). GPC was performed using connected separation columns: SuperAW-H columns (TSK-GEL, Tosoh, Japan); N, N-dimethylformamide was used as the mobile phase. The solvent flow rate was fixed to 0.6 mL/min and the column temperature was maintained at a constant 40 °C. The 90 wt% water permeable surface material and 10 wt% cross-linkers were blended and stirred for 3 min. Then, the water permeable surface material was fabricated, after defoaming for 2 h in a vacuum dryer (AVO-250SB, AS ONE, Japan).
The water permeable porous substrates under the water permeable surface material were fabricated by using a hybrid metal 3D printer (LUMEX Avance-25, Matsuura, Japan) and the standard maraging steel powders with an average particle size of 20–30 μm. The powders were baked and hardened by irradiating them with a 400 W Yb fiber laser using the 3D printer [39,40]. This series of operations was repeated 10 times, and the shape was cut using a cutting process. The above water permeable surface material was dispensed on the surface of the water permeable porous substrates and polymerized at 180 °C for 20 min.
The hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid (Hyalo-Oligo, Kewpie, Japan) shown in Figure 6b was used as the only solid content of the fine microneedles with hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid and water as their two components. The concentration of the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid gel solutions had a trade-off relationship between the fluidity of the high-resolution nanoimprint transfer material and the process time of the vacuum environment imprinting using a water permeable mold. The 33 wt% hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid as the adjusted hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid gel solutions was mixed with 67 wt% pure water at 35 °C for 4 min using an ultrasonic cavitation machine (MH-010S, Mxmoonant), and then the gel solutions stood at 35 °C for 1 min.
Figure 7a shows the first step of the imprint lithography processes from a quartz master mold (10 mm × 10 mm) with high-resolution microneedle pattern structures of 12 µm in diameter and 25 µm in height at a 78° angle to the water permeable mold. The process conditions were as follows. The quartz master mold used as the template was treated with a mold release agent (DURASURF DS-831TH, Harves, Japan) to release the quartz master mold from the water permeable surface material. (1) The water permeable surface material was placed on the water permeable porous substrates, which were ultrasonically cleaned with acetone for 10 min and then dried in the above vacuum dryer for 20 min. (2) The quartz master mold was placed in contact with the water permeable surface material, and imprinting was performed using a hand hot press digital (HHP-2D, AS ONE, Japan) under pressure at 180 °C for 20 min. (3) Once the heat was removed, the quartz master mold was released, and a water permeable mold with inverted needle patterns was obtained.
Figure 7b shows the second step of the vacuum environment imprint lithography processes, from the water permeable mold with inverted microneedle patterns to the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid gel solutions. The process conditions were as follows. The glass substrates (S3233, MATSUNAMI, Japan) were hydrophilically treated for 5 min using UV ozone treatment equipment (LT0Z-180, Litho Tech Japan, Japan), to improve the adhesion between the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid and the glass substrates. (1) Hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid gel solutions were placed on the hydrophilically treated glass substrate. (2) The water permeable mold was placed over the solutions, and pressure was applied with a metal weight (1.116 kg). Thereafter, it was dried in the vacuum dryer at 40 °C for 15 min to remove the water in the solutions through the water permeable mold. (3) The water permeable mold was then released to obtain the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles. The hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid gel solutions were applied to 14 glass substrates under the condition of using one developed water permeable hybrid mold with inverted needle patterns. The pattern structures of the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles and the referenced commercial microneedles were observed using a cold field emission SEM (Regulus8100, Hitachi High-Tech, Japan).
In addition, to confirm the dissolution behavior and basic properties of the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid before and after the vacuum environment imprint lithography processes, three types of analysis of the hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles were carried out as follows.
1.
Measurement of the dissolution behavior using environmental test equipment
 
The evaluation of the dissolution behavior was performed for 35 min at 31 °C and 90–95% humidity using an incubator (PIC-101, AZ-ONE, Japan).
2.
Measurement using a FT-IR
 
The measurements were performed using an FT-IR (Spectrum Two; P erkin Elmer, USA). The measurement range was 450–4000 cm−1, the number of integrations was 4, and the resolution was 4 cm−1. The measurement was performed on films prepared by dropping hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid onto a glass slide and placing the slide at room temperature for 24 h. FT-IR measurements were carried out for component comparison before and after baking the films of hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid using a hot plate at 80 °C for 90 min.
3.
Measurement using a Tg-DTA
 
The measurement in nitrogen was performed using a Tg-DTA (EXSTAR TG/DTA7300, SII NanoTechnology, Japan) in the temperature range of 30 to 250 °C (temperature gradient: 10 °C /min). The weight of the analyzed sample was 5 mg.

Author Contributions

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, S.M. and S.T.; data curation, S.M. and S.T.; formal analysis, Y.K., Y.Y., R.M. and K.Y.; funding acquisition, S.T.; investigation, S.M. R.Y., R.M., K.Y., Y.K., Y.Y., N.S., T.K. and S.T.; methodology, S.M., R.Y. and S.T.; project administration, S.T.; resources, S.T.; supervision, S.T.; validation, S.M., R.Y. and Y.Y.; visualization, S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M. and S.T.; writing—review and editing, S.M. and S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This industry-academia-government collaboration was financially supported by the Japan Science and Technology Agency Adaptable and Seamless Technology Transfer Program No. JPMJTR192C, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Bilateral Joint Research Projects No.120229937 with Belgium and No. 120199971 with the U.S.A., a Toyama Prefecture Grant 2021–2022, Iketani Science and Technology Foundation, the Takeuchi Foundation, Hayashi Rheology Memorial Foundation, the Amada Foundation, the Ame Hisaharu Foundation, the Die and Mould Technology Promotion Foundation, Ogasawara Foundation, Lotte Foundation, KOSE Cosmetology Research Foundation and TOBE MAKI Scholarship Foundation (22-A-204).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because they belong to on-going research but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Kewpie Corporation assisted in the supply of raw materials of hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ganesan, P.; Choi, D.-K. Current application of phytocompound-based nanocosmeceuticals for beauty and skin therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Guillaumie, F.; Furrer, P.; Felt-Baeyens, O.; Fuhlendorff, B.L.; Nymand, S.; Westh, P.; Gurny, R.; Schwach-Abdellaoui, K. Comparative studies of various hyaluronic acids produced by microbial fermentation for potential topical ophthalmic applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A: Off. J. Soc. Biomater. Jpn. Soc. Biomater. Aust. Soc. Biomater. Korean Soc. Biomater. 2010, 92, 1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Suhail, M.; Khan, A.; Rosenholm, J.M.; Minhas, M.U.; Wu, P.C. Fabrication and Characterization of Diclofenac Sodium Loaded Hydrogels of Sodium Alginate as Sustained Release Carrier. Gels 2021, 7, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Allemann, I.B.; Baumann, L. Hyaluronic acid gel (Juvéderm™) preparations in the treatment of facial wrinkles and folds. Clin. Interv. Aging 2008, 3, 629. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sparavigna, A.; Tenconi, B.; Giori, A.M.; Bellia, G.; la Penna, L. Evaluation of the efficacy of a new hyaluronic acid gel on dynamic and static wrinkles in volunteers with moderate aging/photoaging. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 12, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Farwick, M.; Lersch, P.; Strutz, G. Low molecular weight hyaluronic acid: Its effects on epidermal gene expression & skin ageing. SÖFW J. 2008, 134, 17. [Google Scholar]
  7. Al-Halaseh, L.K.; Al-Jawabri, N.A.; Tarawneh, S.K.; Al-Qdah, W.K.; Abu-Hajleh, M.N.; Al-Samydai, A.M.; Ahmed, M.A. A review of the cosmetic use and potentially therapeutic importance of hyaluronic acid. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 12, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marks, R. The stratum corneum barrier: The final frontier. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 2017S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hashimoto, N.; Tatsuta, S.; Kitamura, H.; Katsuyama, M.; Uchida, K.; Sugibayashi, K. The Effect of Iontophoresis with and without Electroporation on the Penetration of High Molecular Compounds into the Stratum Corneum. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2022, 70, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kaushik, S.; Hord, A.H.; Denson, D.D.; McAllister, D.V.; Smitra, S.; Allen, M.G.; Prausnitz, M.R. Lack of pain associated with microfabricated microneedles. Anesth. Analg. 2001, 92, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Juncan, A.M.; Moisă, D.G.; Santini, A.; Morgovan, C.; Rus, L.L.; Vonica-Țincu, A.L.; Loghin, F. Advantages of hyaluronic acid and its combination with other bioactive ingredients in cosmeceuticals. Molecules 2021, 26, 4429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Paliwal, S.; Menon, G.K.; Mitragotri, S. Low-frequency sonophoresis: Ultrastructural basis for stratum corneum permeability assessed using quantum dots. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2006, 126, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sivamani, R.K.; Stoeber, B.; Wu, G.C.; Zhai, H.; Liepmann, D.; Maibach, H. Clinical microneedle injection of methyl nicotinate: Stratum corneum penetration. Ski. Res. Technol. 2005, 11, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bhatnagar, S.; Gadeela, P.R.; Thathireddy, P.; Venuganti, V.V.K. Microneedle-based drug delivery: Materials of construction. J. Chem. Sci. 2019, 131, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hameed, A.; Fatima, G.R.; Malik, K.; Muqadas, A.; Fazal-ur-Rehman, M. Scope of nanotechnology in cosmetics: Dermatology and skin care products. J. Med. Chem. Sci. 2019, 2, 9. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhou, H.; Luo, D.; Chen, D.; Tan, X.; Bai, X.; Liu, Z.; Yang, X.; Liu, W. Current Advances of Nanocarrier Technology-Based Active Cosmetic Ingredients for Beauty Applications. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2021, 14, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Donnelly, R.F.; McCrudden, M.T.; Alkilani, A.Z.; Larrañeta, E.; McAlister, E.; Courtenay, A.J.; Kearney, M.-C.; Singh, T.R.R.; McCarthy, H.O.; Kett, V.L. Hydrogel-forming microneedles prepared from “super swelling” polymers combined with lyophilised wafers for transdermal drug delivery. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Berkó, S.; Maroda, M.; Bodnár, M.; Erős, G.; Hartmann, P.; Szentner, K.; Szabó-Révész, P.; Kemény, L.; Borbély, J.; Csányi, E. Advantages of cross-linked versus linear hyaluronic acid for semisolid skin delivery systems. Eur. Polym. J. 2013, 49, 2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Choi, S.Y.; Kwon, H.J.; Ahn, G.R.; Ko, E.J.; Yoo, K.H.; Kim, B.J.; Lee, C.; Kim, D. Anti-wrinkle efficacy of cross-linked hyaluronic acid-based microneedle patch with acetyl hexapeptide-8 and epidermal growth factor on Korean skin. Dermatol. Ther. 2017, 30, e12546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tokudome, Y.; Komi, T.; Omata, A.; Sekita, M. A new strategy for the passive skin delivery of nanoparticulate, high molecular weight hyaluronic acid prepared by a polyion complex method. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Puri, A.; Nguyen, H.; Banga, A. Microneedle-mediated intradermal delivery of epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2016, 38, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Duarah, S.; Sharma, M.; Wen, J. Recent advances in microneedle-based drug delivery: Special emphasis on its use in paediatric population. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2019, 136, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Park, Y.; Park, J.; Chu, G.S.; Kim, K.S.; Sung, J.H.; Kim, B. Transdermal delivery of cosmetic ingredients using dissolving polymer microneedle arrays. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2015, 20, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, J.W.; Choi, S.O.; Felner, E.I.; Prausnitz, M.R. Dissolving microneedle patch for transdermal delivery of human growth hormone. Small 2011, 7, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Haque, T.; Talukder, M.M.U. Chemical enhancer: A simplistic way to modulate barrier function of the stratum corneum. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2018, 8, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Takei, S.; Hanabata, M. Ultraviolet nanoimprint lithography using cyclodextrin-based porous template for pattern failure reduction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 141904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Z.; Chu, J.; Zhang, R.; Guan, C.; Fan, Y. Preparation of an Integrated Polarization Navigation Sensor via a Nanoimprint Photolithography Process. Photonics 2022, 9, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kurematsu, K.; Takei, S.; Nakajima, S.; Mizui, K.; Takamatsu, S.; Hirata, D.; Hanabata, M. Comparison of gas permeable mold with acryl substituents for silver nano-paste imprint patterning. Microelectron. Eng. 2019, 216, 111085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nakajima, S.; Takei, S.; Takamatsu, S.; Mizui, K.; Oka, T.; Matsumoto, Y.; Sekiguchi, A.; Hanabata, M. Gas-permeable templates using cellulose derivatives with acrylate and methacrylate groups for reducing in void defect density in ultraviolet nanoimprint lithography. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 57, 086503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Papakonstantinou, E.; Roth, M.; Karakiulakis, G. Hyaluronic acid: A key molecule in skin aging. Dermato-Endocrinology 2012, 4, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Takei, S. Fabrication of moth-eye gold nanostructures by nanoimprint lithography using solvent-permeable porous cross-link molds derived from hydroxypropyl-cyclodextrin. Appl. Phys. Express 2019, 12, 046501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jang, M.; Baek, S.; Kang, G.; Yang, H.; Kim, S.; Jung, H. Dissolving microneedle with high molecular weight hyaluronic acid to improve skin wrinkles, dermal density and elasticity. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2020, 42, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Takei, S.; Nakajima, S.; Sugahara, K.; Hanabata, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Sekiguchi, A. Gas-Permeable Cellulose Template for Reduction of Template Damage and Gas Trapping in Microimprint Lithography of High Volume Manufacturing. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2016, 301, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Takei, S.; Ogawa, T.; Deschner, R.; Willson, C.G. Reduction of pattern peeling in step-and-flash imprint lithography. Microelectron. Eng. 2014, 116, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yamagishi, R.; Miura, S.; Yasuda, K.; Sugino, N.; Kameda, T.; Kawano, Y.; Yokoyama, Y.; Takei, S. Thermal nanoimprint lithography of sodium hyaluronate solutions with gas permeable inorganic hybrid mold for cosmetic and pharmaceutical applications. Appl. Phys. Express 2022, 15, 046502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shi, B.; Xie, L.; Ma, B.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, B.; Qu, L. Preparation and Properties of Highly Transparent SiO2 Aerogels for Thermal Insulation. Gels 2022, 8, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Takei, S.; Ogawa, T.; Deschner, R.; Jen, K.; Nihira, T.; Hanabata, M.; Willson, C.G. Silicon-containing spin-on underlayer material for step and flash nanoimprint lithography. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 49, 075201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mocioiu, O.C.; Vlăduț, C.M.; Atkinson, I.; Brătan, V.; Mocioiu, A.M. The Influence of Gel Preparation and Thermal Treatment on the Optical Properties of SiO2-ZnO Powders Obtained by Sol–Gel Method. Gels 2022, 8, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sugino, N.; Kurematsu, K.; Mizui, K.; Hanabata, M.; Takei, S. Improvement of Gas Permeability of Gas Permeable Mold with Lattice Structure for Reduction of Transfer Failure in Photoimprint Lithography. J. Photopolym. Sci. Technol. 2019, 32, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Nocheseda, C.J.C.; Liza, F.P.; Collera, A.K.M.; Caldona, E.B.; Advincula, R.C. 3D printing of metals using biodegradable cellulose hydrogel inks. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 48, 102380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gels 08 00785 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM images of hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles fabricated at (a) 1st imprint by using conventional non-water permeable quartz mold with inverted microneedle patterns and (b) 1st, 3rd, 10th, 13th, and 14th imprints by using water permeable mold in vacuum environment imprint lithography processes.
Figure 1. SEM images of hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles fabricated at (a) 1st imprint by using conventional non-water permeable quartz mold with inverted microneedle patterns and (b) 1st, 3rd, 10th, 13th, and 14th imprints by using water permeable mold in vacuum environment imprint lithography processes.
Gels 08 00785 g001
Gels 08 00785 g002 550
Figure 2. Measurement results of (a) bottom diameter, (b) height, and (c) angle of microneedle patterns obtained by calculating sharpness of SEM images on fabricated hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles at 1st, 3rd, 10th, 13th, and 14th imprints.
Figure 2. Measurement results of (a) bottom diameter, (b) height, and (c) angle of microneedle patterns obtained by calculating sharpness of SEM images on fabricated hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles at 1st, 3rd, 10th, 13th, and 14th imprints.
Gels 08 00785 g002
Gels 08 00785 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of microneedles size and dissolution behavior of commercial microneedles and imprinted hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles.
Figure 3. Comparison of microneedles size and dissolution behavior of commercial microneedles and imprinted hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid fine microneedles.
Gels 08 00785 g003
Gels 08 00785 g004 550
Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid before and after thermal deposition for evaluating thermal decomposition in fine microneedle fabrication.
Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid before and after thermal deposition for evaluating thermal decomposition in fine microneedle fabrication.
Gels 08 00785 g004
Gels 08 00785 g005 550
Figure 5. Tg-DTA curve of hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid in nitrogen.
Figure 5. Tg-DTA curve of hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid in nitrogen.
Gels 08 00785 g005
Gels 08 00785 g006 550
Figure 6. Chemical structures of (a) water permeable surface material and (b) hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid as a raw material of fine microneedles.
Figure 6. Chemical structures of (a) water permeable surface material and (b) hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid as a raw material of fine microneedles.
Gels 08 00785 g006
Gels 08 00785 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) First step of imprint lithography processes from quartz master mold with high-resolution microneedle pattern structures to the water permeable mold and (b) second step of vacuum environment imprint lithography processes from water permeable mold with inverted needle patterns to hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid gel solutions.
Figure 7. (a) First step of imprint lithography processes from quartz master mold with high-resolution microneedle pattern structures to the water permeable mold and (b) second step of vacuum environment imprint lithography processes from water permeable mold with inverted needle patterns to hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid gel solutions.
Gels 08 00785 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miura, S.; Yamagishi, R.; Miyazaki, R.; Yasuda, K.; Kawano, Y.; Yokoyama, Y.; Sugino, N.; Kameda, T.; Takei, S. Fabrication of High-Resolution Fine Microneedles Derived from Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid Gels in Vacuum Environment Imprinting Using Water Permeable Mold. Gels 2022, 8, 785. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8120785

AMA Style

Miura S, Yamagishi R, Miyazaki R, Yasuda K, Kawano Y, Yokoyama Y, Sugino N, Kameda T, Takei S. Fabrication of High-Resolution Fine Microneedles Derived from Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid Gels in Vacuum Environment Imprinting Using Water Permeable Mold. Gels. 2022; 8(12):785. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8120785

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miura, Sayaka, Rio Yamagishi, Riku Miyazaki, Kaori Yasuda, Yuki Kawano, Yoshiyuki Yokoyama, Naoto Sugino, Takao Kameda, and Satoshi Takei. 2022. "Fabrication of High-Resolution Fine Microneedles Derived from Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid Gels in Vacuum Environment Imprinting Using Water Permeable Mold" Gels 8, no. 12: 785. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8120785

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop