Next Article in Journal
An Ultrasensitive Lateral Flow Immunoassay Based on Metal-Organic Framework-Decorated Polydopamine for Multiple Sulfonylureas Adulteration in Functional Foods
Previous Article in Journal
Impacts of Climate Change on Rice Grain: A Literature Review on What Is Happening, and How Should We Proceed?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gender-Disaggregated Consumer Testing and Descriptive Sensory Analysis of Local and New Yam Varieties

by
Liticia Effah-Manu
1,
Faustina D. Wireko-Manu
2,
Jacob K. Agbenorhevi
2,
Busie Maziya-Dixon
3,* and
Ibok N. Oduro
2
1
Department of Food Science and Technology, Ho Technical University, Ho P.O. Box HP 217, Ghana
2
Department of Food Science and Technology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, PMB KNUST, Kumasi AK-039-5028, Ghana
3
Postharvest and Nutrition Laboratory, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), PMB 5320, Ibadan 200001, Nigeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(3), 537; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030537
Submission received: 6 December 2022 / Revised: 11 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 25 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Sensory and Consumer Sciences)

Abstract

:
Gender-disaggregated sensory evaluation has become an essential element that could enhance breeding activities by increasing the adoption of new varieties. The effect of age, sex and geographical location on descriptor preferences for boiled and pounded yam were studied using descriptive and consumer testing. Attributes with definitions and measurement scales were used to generate lexicons for boiled and pounded yam. Analytical tools employed for the inferential statistics were the independent t-test, analysis of variance, Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann–Whitney test and relative importance index (RII). Descriptive testing showed that all the D. rotundata varieties were good for boiling and pounding. The D. alata varieties afase soanyinto and afase biri were most liked, while afase pa and ahodenfo were disliked. Age had no significant effect on descriptor preferences. Being a female or male, however, influenced preferences for pounded yam descriptors such as mouldability, lumpiness and colour. The RII for the D. rotundata varieties (0.22–0.28) showed that they are all good varieties for boiling and pounding. The local D. alata varieties were still highly acceptable compared the new CRI varieties due to the aroma. Rural consumers preferred all the descriptors of boiled D. rotundata than urban consumers, whereas urban consumers liked the pounded yam varieties better than the rural consumers. Availability of the new yam varieties on local markets could therefore increase consumption and improve adoption.

1. Introduction

Yam is an important staple in the humid and semihumid tropical Asia and Americas. According to Maroya et al. [1], yam is the second most important root/tuber crop after cassava in terms of providing food security in Africa. In yam-consuming countries, it serves as a good source of carbohydrates, and adds more than 200 dietary calories per capita daily, according to Thompson and Onyenweaku [2].
Environmental changes that bring about stressful conditions in yam production make it more important to breed new varieties that could withstand them. When new varieties are released, sensory evaluation is the main assessment that needs to be carried out on them. Sensory evaluation is defined by Stone et al. [3] as a scientific method that evokes, measures, analyses and interprets responses to products, as perceived through the senses of sight, aroma, touch, taste and sound. Stone and Sidel [4] grouped sensory evaluation into affective and analytical tests. In affective testing, a large number of untrained panellists are required to represent the target population. Analytical tests, on the other hand, are used for the laboratory evaluation of products and for the identification and quantification of sensory characteristics. The major examples of this test are discrimination and descriptive.
According to Stone and Sidel [4], descriptive tests require a trained panel, but the participants in a discrimination test need to be partly trained or sometimes untrained. Work conducted by Hampson et al. [5] shows that descriptive sensory evaluation is the most informative and comprehensive as it gives detailed information, and is the standard for sensory characterization. According to the authors, more reliable data could be generated by breeders when formal sensory evaluation is applied. In acceptance testing, the degree of liking is rated, while the preference identifies the product that is liked more usually using a category scale (e.g., hedonic scale). Consumer acceptability tests, however, use a scaling method to measure the degree of liking or disliking of a product. This test is the most important, and must be conducted when new varieties are released. Hampson et al. [5] further reiterates that food preference is influenced by sensory perception, which affects acceptance of food commodities.
Accepting a particular food product or new food crop may be affected by a number of factors, including culture, attitudes and beliefs, as indicated by Köster [6]. Rappoport et al. [7] also found that age and gender influence food preferences. However, it has been indicated by Kittler et al. [8] that food selection is primarily stimulated by personal taste (colour, aroma and texture). Studies related to sensory descriptive analysis and consumer tests have been extensively carried out by Lestringant et al. [9]. Nonetheless, there is limited literature concerning gender-disaggregated data of preferences for quality descriptors of yam. According to Mudege et al. [10], this will enhance gender-responsive breeding, which means “providing farmers with a basket of choices so that traits that men and women value are included during product profile development”.
Therefore, the objective of the present study was to use descriptive testing to ascertain the descriptors of quality of boiled and pounded yam from both new and local varieties and to determine the consumer preferences for the descriptors of quality as influenced by sex, age and community.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Population Characteristics and Sample for Consumer Testing

The Brong Ahafo and the Northern Regions of Ghana are noted for high yam production. For the purposes of this work, the Brong Ahafo Region (Now Bono East) was selected for the study based on the high production of (39%) compared to 25% for the Northern Region, as stated by SRID [11]. The region lies between longitude 00° 15” E-1° 30” W 00 15′ E-30 W and latitude 8° 45” N-7 30” N 80 45′ N-70 30′ with an estimated population of 2,282,128. Data from the Ghana Statistical Service [12] give the population of Sene West District, Kintampo Mmunicipality and Techiman East District to be 57,734, 95,480 and 59,068, respectively.
The same communities used for the survey aspect of the work by Effah-Manu et al. [13] were used for the consumer testing. A total of twelve (12) communities made up of three district capitals from each selected district and nine other communities (three from each district) were used. Sixty (60) respondents in each of the district capitals and twenty (20) from each of the other communities were used. In total, 360 respondents (120 from each of the district) participated in the consumer testing. The ratio of female to male was 1:1 for all the communities.

2.2. Acquisition of Yam

New yam varieties were obtained from the Crops Research Institute (CRI) in Fumesua, Kumasi-Ghana. Local varieties were obtained from a known farmer at Mampong in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. All yam samples used in the study were stored for 3 months after harvest, but COVID-19 restrictions lengthened the storage of D. rotundata varieties. The yams were stored in yam barns at the CRI-Fumesua until they were ready for use.

2.3. Preparation of Boiled and Pounded Yam

Yams were peeled and cut manually into 2 × 2 cm cubes and cooked in boiling water in a saucepan with 180 mL of water under high-heat intensity gas oven (T/SZCX 002-2018, China) for approximately 15 min and 20 min, respectively, for D. alata and D. rotundatata varieties based on preliminary work. Boiled yam was kept in plastic bowls with cover and placed in a food warmer at approximately 70 °C for sensory evaluation. Pounded yam was prepared from the boiled yam using a commercial fufu pounding machine (GH X21, Enebel Fabricators, Ghana 2015). For all the varieties, samples were extruded three times to obtain a consistent product for analysis without adding water.

2.4. Panel Training and Descriptive Testing

An initial panel of 20 was recruited from the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi and trained for three weeks. Panel training was conducted by the researcher, who had received sensory panel training by RTB Foods and CIRAD at the Nairobi Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kawanda in 2018. Training included basic acuity tests, i.e., identification of sweet, sour and bitter using sugar, lime and quinine. Threshold studies and identification of aromas were also conducted. Panellists were further trained on triangle and difference tests. During this period, panel members whose scores were extremely below or above the panel average were eliminated. Eventually, a 12-member panel was constituted and trained in identification of descriptors of quality of boiled and pounded yam. After ensuring that panellists’ scores for the various attributes were good using XLSTAT 2019.4, they were oriented on how to generate attributes for the samples. The panel generated attributes with definitions and how to measure and scale for measurement, and later used the lexicon generated as a guide to analyse boiled and pounded yam samples. Eleven yam varieties of D. alata and D. rotundata made up of four local and seven unspecified CRI (new) varieties with varying sensory characteristics were prepared and served to the panel.
The descriptive testing was conducted in the Sensory Laboratory of the Department of Food Science and Technology, KNUST-Kumasi. The panel was made up of five males and seven females. Prepared samples were served in transparent plastic containers with cover lids. Pounded yam was served at room temperature while boiled yam was served hot. Samples were blind-labelled with random three-digit codes in a randomized order using XLSTAT 2019.4 for each serving. The room was well-lit and each panellist was provided with a booth, the sample and water for palate cleansing. To avoid the effect of sample size and tuber part variations on textural attributes, panellists were served with approximately the same sample size and shape as well as the tail, middle and head part of yam.

2.5. Consumer Testing

People who are regular consumers of boiled and pounded yam from the different yam species (D. alata and D. rotundata) were used for the consumer testing. Areas for consumer testing were carefully selected to ensure that physical and chemical factors did not interfere with the procedure. Hence, community centres, areas around market centres and church auditoriums were used for the test. The holding time, defined as the minimum and maximum time after preparation that a product can be used for sensory test, was considered. Therefore, testing was conducted within at most 1 h for each set of respondents. Samples were kept in a food warmer during the holding time to ensure consistency in test results. Samples were blind-labelled with random three-digit codes in a randomized order using (XLSTATS 2019.4) for each serving. Transparent containers with lids were used for the presentation. Water was used as palate cleanser to aid in the removal of residues from previous samples.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical package for social science (IBM SPSS Statistics for windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY:IBM Corp.) (SPSS, Version 23) was used for the analysis of both the descriptive and consumer testing. Average scores, as well as overall liking of test varieties in descriptive and consumer testing, were calculated using ANOVA. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to relate/link the various descriptors to the varieties that best possessed them. Independent t-test was used to test the significance between two sample means. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to test and compare the effect of age group of participants on descriptor preferences. In ranking the varieties based on the preferences of the descriptors, the relative importance index (RII) was used, and Mann–Whitney U test was employed to establish the variations in descriptor preferences among males and females. Significance was determined at p < 0.5.

2.7. Ethical Considerations

Participation in this research was fully voluntary. The study ensured that key principles such as informed consent and anonymity outlined in the Humanities and Social Sciences Research (HuSSR) Policy of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology [14] were followed.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Descriptors of Quality of Boiled and Pounded Yam as Identified by Descriptive Sensory Panel

The quality descriptors from the panel (Table 1a,b) are similar to those reported by Otegbayo et al. [15] and Akissoe et al. [16]. For pounded yam, Otegbayo et al. [15] reported fibrousness (i.e., presence of fibrous strands) as a quality descriptor. However, during the deliberations of the panel, it was noted that most commonly consumed yams in Ghana do not have this quality descriptor, so they agreed to exclude it. Similarly in the survey work by Effah-Manu et al. [13], heaviness for boiled yam and shelf life for pounded yam, which are not directly/physically seen on the food product, were included as descriptors. Further, during the preliminary test of the consumer testing questionnaire, respondents suggested the removal of the descriptors of fracturability and stickiness. They argued that it was difficult to understand fracturability as it is closely related to mouldability. For stickiness, they noted that it is not an important descriptor as at the point of eating, the presence of soup (usually liquid in Ghana) makes it difficult to consider this descriptor. These suggest that the descriptors of quality of boiled and pounded yam are country-specific. Although considered difficult to score, these two attributes were still kept within the lexicon.
The means of descriptors from the scoring are found in Table 2. For boiled D. alata varieties, local variety, matches had highest value for whiteness while akaba reported the highest aroma value. In terms of taste, only ahodenfo came close to the local varieties. However, mealiness values were high and compared well with local varieties. For D. rotundata boiled yam varieties, values for many descriptors are quite related, indicating that descriptors of quality are liked almost in the same manner as local varieties.
On the other hand, average values for colour, aroma, stretchability and lumpiness for all the CRI D. alata varieties were lower than the local varieties for pounded yam samples. Average scores for aroma and colour of the CRI D. rotundata yam varieties were approximately equal to the local varieties, indicating high preference for these descriptors. Generally, the CRI D. rotundata compared favourably with counterpart local varieties.

3.2. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of Descriptors of Quality of Boiled and Pounded Yam Samples

The PCA was applied to data from descriptive analysis of boiled and pounded yam to find out how the different varieties associate with the various descriptors of quality. F1 and F2 together explain 82% of variance observed in the data for boiled yam (Figure 1a). In terms of mealiness, local pona was most mealy, while CRI pona had a good aroma and was chewy. Mankrong pona and serwaa were found in-between sweet taste and hardness. For pounded yam (Figure 1b), kukrupa was found to be most fracturable. Aroma, mouldability and preferred hardness were characteristics of CRI pona, whilst the local pona was most stretchable. F1 and F2 explain the 75.54% of variability in data.
For the boiled samples, afase soanyinto was hardest. In terms of the descriptors of sweet taste and aroma, all the varieties were found farther, except afase biri and akaba, which were close to having sweet taste. These same varieties were also seen as highly chewy. However, afase soanyinto, akaba and afase biri were slightly close to the descriptor of mealiness. Afase ahodenfo and afase pa were seen farther from all the descriptors of quality of boiled yam. This clearly indicates that these varieties are not suitable for boiled yam.
Figure 2b indicates that afase pa and afase ahodenfo do not qualify as poundable varieties. This is because they are found opposite to the descriptors of quality for pounded yam. Afase biri had a high pounded yam aroma than the rest of the varieties. Afase soanyinto (CRI) and matches (local) were found to be stretchable and lumpy, respectively. Akaba was the variety that was very white compared to the others.
The results from texture studies by Effah-manu et al. [17] indicated that the new D. alata varieties afase soanyinto and afase biri are good varieties for boiled and pounded yam as seen in the PCA for descriptive testing. According to Otegbayo et al. [18], dry matter content, starch and amylose rations may be responsible for good cooking quality of boiled yam. For Afase soanyinto, the starch content (17.0%), which is similar to that of the D. rotundata varieties (17–20.5%) as determined by Effah-Manu et al. [19], may have accounted for its superior characteristics.

3.3. Effect of Sex of Respondents on Descriptor Preferences for Boiled D. alata and D. rotundata Yam Varieties

The effect of sex of respondents on the preference of descriptors of quality of boiled and pounded yam were determined. As shown in Figure 3a,b and Figure 4a,b, no significant differences were obtained (p > 0.05), and in terms of overall liking, no significance was observed (p > 0.05). The results point to the fact that males and females like descriptors of quality of boiled and pounded D. alata and D. rotundata in the same way. Findings from gender-disaggregated interviews conducted in the same communities by Effah-Manu et al. [13] contrast this observation, as preferences showed an association of descriptor preferences with sex when Cramer’s V (Phi) was used. Lombardo et al. [20] observed that sex-specific taste preferences could account for differences in eating behaviour. The difference observed between the consumer test and interview results may be attributed to the number of respondents used (i.e., 120 and 684), respectively, for consumer test and interviews.

3.4. Kruskal–Wallis Test Statistic of the Effects of Age on the Liking of Descriptors of Boiled and Pounded D. alata and D. rotundata Yam Varieties

The Kruskal–Wallis test is a nonparametric test that is useful for more than two independent samples. This test assumes that the observations in each group come from populations with distribution and that the samples are random and independent. A Kruskal–Wallis rank test for differences was employed to determine preferences based on age categories (i.e., <30, 30–65 and >65). The results indicate that sensory perception of boiled and pounded yam varieties do not vary (p > 0.05) across the various age groupings (Supplementary Materials Tables S1–S4 V). Similar observations were made in the interviews conducted in the same communities by Effah-Manu et al. [13]. Work performed by Koehler and Leonhaeuser [21] show that age affects consumer preferences.

3.5. Multiple Comparison for D. alata Yam Varieties and Descriptors of Boiled and Pounded Yam

Multiple comparison of boiled yam shows that akaba (local D. alata) was the variety that significantly differed from the other varieties for most of the descriptors (Figure 5a). CRI Afase pa generally varied from the other varieties in colour but had same mealiness with the other varieties. CRI ahodenfo varied from the others in mealiness and was different from chewiness, aroma, taste and overall acceptability. CRI afase biri varied from akaba in all the descriptors and overall acceptability, except hardness and mealiness. The mean taste of akaba differed significantly from the varieties. In terms of overall acceptability, matches was only significantly different from ahodenfo. CRI afase soanyinto was different from akaba in colour, aroma and taste. Matches significantly differed from afase pa and soanyinto in terms of aroma and colour. The matches variety had higher scores for mouldability, aroma and hardness (Figure 5b). Afase biri and soanyinto are equally good varieties for pounding, as they came second in terms of overall acceptability. The colour and the aroma of these varieties may have accounted for their low ratings. For example, afase biri, which has a cocoyam colour, resulted in low preference compared to the other varieties. The consumers commented that “these varieties do not have the usual yam aroma”.

3.6. Multiple Comparison for D. rotundata Yam Varieties and Descriptors of Boiled and Pounded Yam

Multiple comparison for boiled yam from D. rotundata varieties varied significantly (p < 0.05), as shown in Figure 6a. The most preferred variety was pona (local), which varied significantly from all the varieties in all descriptors except the taste of CRI pona. CRI mankrong pona differed from CRI pona in mealiness, hardness, mealiness, chewiness and aroma. Pona (local) differed significantly from mankrong pona in colour, hardness, mealiness and chewiness and from CRI pona in colour, hardness, mealiness, aroma and overall acceptability. CRI pona was significantly different in overall acceptability and varied from mankrong pona in colour, pona (local) in hardness and taste. The aroma and taste of boiled CRI pona were liked similarly to the local pona. This implies that this variety can compete well on the Ghanaian market.
Generally, some differences existed among the descriptors for the five pounded yam samples (Figure 6b). Mankrong pona and kukrupa significantly differed in overall acceptability. While pona local differed in colour mouldability and lumpiness, kukrupa was different from serwaa in terms of mouldability and hardness, while mankrong pona only varied in springiness from pona (local). Mankrong pona was similar to CRI pona and pona (local) in all descriptors and overall acceptability, but varied from serwaa and kukrupa in acceptability. CRI kukrupa was not significantly different from CRI pona and pona (local) but differed from serwaa and mankrong pona. CRI pona varied from serwaa in aroma, colour and lumpiness and from pona (local) in all descriptors except aroma. In overall acceptability, pona (local) was different from only CRI pona but differed from serwaa in aroma, colour and lumpiness. Colour and stretchability of CRI pona were preferred more than local pona.

3.7. Descriptive Statistics of Variations in Quality Descriptors of Pounded D. rotundata Varieties

The local pona was highly preferred because of its high mealiness compared to the new varieties. Cassava mealiness is associated with high starch content, as determined by Uchendu et al. [22]. Since the CRI pona had starch content of 17%, which is close to the local pona with starch content of 20%, it could be the reason why the CRI pona came second to the local pona in terms of mealiness. The low liking of kukrupa was due to its hardness. This result correlates with the result of the texture analysis determined by Effah-manu et al. [17], where CRI kukrupa variety was the hardest variety, with a value of 4.47 N.
Moreover, the high stretchability of local pona made it a preferred variety after CRI pona. From the previous work conducted, that these two varieties have approximately the same amylose contents of these varieties could be the reason (CRI pona, 16.9%; local pona, 17.9%). The amylose content of rice is reported to affect its springiness (stretchability). According to Xu et al. [23], springiness of rice was directly related to amylose content. Heo et al. [24] also worked on noodles and found a significant correlation of springiness to amylose content.

3.8. Relative Importance Index (RII) of D. alata and D. rotundata Yam Varieties

To determine the ranking of the different varieties in terms of overall liking, the relative importance index (RII) was used. Johnson and LeBreton [25] define the RII as the proportionate contribution each predictor makes to R2, considering both the unique contribution of each predictor by itself and its incremental contribution when combined with the other predictors. The rankings (Table 3 and Table 4) are therefore directly related to the descriptive statistics.

3.9. Sex and Descriptor Preferences for Boiled and Pounded Yam

To assess for significance in a scale- or ordinal-dependent variable by a single dichotomous independent variable, the Mann–Whitney U test, a nonparametric test, is used, as described by McKnight and Najab [26]. Thus, the effect of sex on descriptor preferences was determined. The results (Supplementary Materials Tables S5 and S6) indicate that no significance exists (p < 0.05) between females and males for preferences of all the descriptors. Results from the survey also showed that for boiled yam, there is no significant difference in preference by males and females, but rather, significance was observed for pounded yam descriptors in the work conducted by Effah-Manu et al. [13]. These findings may result from the diversity of respondents involved in both studies.

3.10. Preferences by Urban and Rural Consumers for Quality Descriptors of ampesi and fufu

Variations in preferences for the various descriptors by urban and rural consumers was analysed (Supplementary Materials Tables S7 and S8). For boiled yam, mean rank for hardness (760.58) differed significantly (p < 0.05), with a p-value of 0.00 from respondents from the district capitals (680.42). Preference for hardness is lower in the cities than the villages. A p-value of 0.004 was also obtained for aroma. The mean rank for aroma is higher in the villages (750.54) than the cities (690.46). This observation could be due to the fact that an accompanying good/tasty sauce for eating ampesi is sometimes hard to come by in some rural communities, hence the preference of yams with high aromatic compounds. According to Qin et al. [27] volatile constituents of foods have been used in breeding programs and can be improved to ensure the production of high-aroma yams.
Preference for descriptors of pounded yam (SD8) aroma, colour and lumpiness differed significantly (p < 0.05) between the other communities and the cities. Pounded yam aroma had least mean score of 664.54 compared to 776.46 in the rural communities. A similar observation was made for the descriptor colour, with mean rank values of 757.11 for other communities vs. 683.89 for the district capitals. Both descriptors had a p-value of 0.000. Lumpiness was more highly detected by urban consumers than respondents from the rural communities, and was significant, with a p-value of 0.001.
Mean values for boiled D. rotundata varieties (Supplementary Marials Table S10) showed significance (p < 0.05) for the descriptors of colour and aroma, with mean rank values for the district capitals being higher than the other communities. Differences occurred between the district capitals and the other communities in preferences for colour, mouldability and lumpiness (Supplementary Materials Table S9). The rank values were higher for these descriptors in the rural communities. Thus, these descriptors of the varieties presented were liked/appreciated more in urban communities than rural communities. Generally, rural consumers who mainly grow and consume a lot of ampesi and fufu may have varying preferences for descriptors as a result of access to different varieties that provide them with a great idea of variations in various descriptors for yam. Conversely, Arsil et al. [28] found that factors that influence consumers’ preferences seemed remarkably homogeneous in terms of food quality, although consumer demographics differed. Generally, the descriptor preferences that varied include aroma, colour, mouldability and lumpiness. These descriptors can, however, be improved in breeding programs for increased acceptability of released varieties.
Overall, rural consumers preferred all the descriptors of boiled D. rotundata than urban consumers, whereas urban consumers liked the pounded yam varieties better than the rural consumers.

3.11. Limitations of Work

The time frame for consumer tests for the two varieties (D. alata and D. rotundata) differed due to availability of samples. Because of this limitation, not all the respondents who were involved in the testing of D. alata varieties were available for testing D. rotundata varieties. Moreover, since the entire testing period lasted for three weeks, the length of storage may have affected some descriptors of quality for communities such as Gulumpe and Kawampe that were last to conduct the testing.

4. Conclusions

The findings show that preferences for descriptors of boiled and pounded yam did not vary across different age segmentation. Females and males perceive boiled yam quality descriptors in the same way but varied for pounded yam. The descriptors that influenced the variations in preferences include colour, lumpiness and mouldability. The relative importance index (RII) for the D. rotundata varieties showed that they are all good varieties for boiling and pounding. Generally, in terms of urban and rural consumers, new D. rotundata yam varieties were highly liked by rural compared to urban consumers. The preference ranks for descriptors of quality of pounded yam from the new varieties by urban consumers show that their availability on the markets will be a good competition for the locally known varieties, which are used for pounding. D. alata varieties (local) were still more acceptable than the new CRI varieties due to the aroma.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12030537/s1, Table S1. Kruskal Wallis test statistics of the effect of age group liking of D. rotundata boiled yam. Table S2. Kruskal Wallis test statistics of the effect of age group and liking of D. rotundata pound-ed yam. Table S3. Kruskal Wallis test statistics of the effects of age group and liking of D. alata boiled yam. Table S4. Kruskal Wallis test statistics of the effect of age group and liking of D. alata pounded yam. Table S5. Descriptive statistics of sex differences in attribute preference for boiled yam. Table S6. Descriptive statistics of sex differences in attribute preference for boiled yam. Table S7. Mann-Whitney U & Wilcoxon test of communities and their descriptors of boiled D. alata yam varieties. Table S8. Mann-Whitney U & wilcoxon test of communities and their descriptors of pounded D. alata varieties. TableS9. Mann-Whitney test of the effects of district capitals and other communities on the level of liking for pounded D. rotundata varieties. Table S10. Mann-Whitney test of the effects of district capitals and other communities on the level of liking for boiled D. rotundata varieties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.E.-M., F.D.W.-M., J.K.A., B.M.-D. and I.N.O.; funding acquisition, B.M.-D.; methodology, L.E.-M., F.D.W.-M. and B.M.-D.; supervision, F.D.W.-M., J.K.A., B.M.-D. and I.N.O.; writing—original draft, L.E.-M.; writing—review and editing, F.D.W.-M., J.K.A. and I.N.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by Africa Yam through IITA, Nigeria.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the results of this study are all included in the present article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Africa Yam for financial support and Ralph Feneku for his support in conducting the consumer testing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maroya, N.; Balogun, M.; Asiedu, R. Seed Yam Production in an Aeroponics System: A Novel Technology; YIIFSWA Working Paper Series No 2 (Revised); International Institute of Tropical Agriculture: Ibadan, Nigeria, 2014; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
  2. Etim, N.A.A.; Thompson, D.; Onyenweaku, C.E. Measuring efficiency of yam (Dioscorea spp) production among resource poor farmers in rural Nigeria. J. Agric. Food Sci. 2013, 1, 42–47. [Google Scholar]
  3. Stone, H.; Herbert, S.; Sidel, J.L. Introduction to Sensory Evaluation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780126724820/sensory-evaluation-practices (accessed on 16 December 2020).
  4. Stone, H.; Sidel, J.L. Sensory Evaluation by Quantitative Descriptive Analysis. In Descriptive Sensory Analysis in Practice; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hampson, C.R.; Quamme, H.A.; Hall, J.W.; MacDonald, R.A.; King, M.C.; Cliff, M.A. Sensory evaluation as a selection tool in apple breeding. Euphytica 2020, 111, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Köster, E.P. Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. J. Food Qual. Prefer. 2009, 20, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rappoport, L.; Peters, G.R.; Downey, R.; McCann, T.; Huff-Corzine, L. Gender and age differences in food cognition. Appetite 1993, 20, 33–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kittler, P.G.; Sucher, K.P.; Nelms, M. Food and Culture; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lestringant, P.; Delarue, J.; Heymann, H. 2010–2015: How have conventional descriptive analysis methods really been used? A systematic review of publications. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 71, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mudege, N.N.; Mayanja, S.; Nyaga, J.; Nakitto, M.; Tinyiro, S.E.; Magala, D.B.; Achora, J.C.; Kisakye, S.; Bamwirire, D.; Mendes, T.; et al. Prioritising quality traits for gender-responsive breeding for boiled potato in Uganda. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 1362–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. SRID. 2011. Available online: http://www.e-agriculture.gov.gh/index.php/about-mofa/extensions/srid (accessed on 20 September 2021).
  12. Ghana Statistical Service. 2010 Population and Housing Census Final Results Ghana Statistical Service. 2012; pp. 1–11. Available online: http://www.statsghana.gov.gh/docfiles/2010pc/2010_Population_And_Housing_Census_Final_Results.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2021).
  13. Effah-Manu, L.; Wireko-Manu, F.D.; Agbenorhevi, J.K.; Maziya-Dixon, B.; Oduro, I.N.; Baah-Ennum, T.Y. The effect of gender on end-user preferences for yam quality Descriptors. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 4, 364–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (HuSSREC) Standard Operating Procedures. In Research Policy; QAPU, KNUST: Kumasi, Ghana, 2018; ISBN 978-9988-2-8487-9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Otegbayo, B.; Aina, J.; Asiedu, R.; Bokanga, M. Sensory profile of pounded yam. J. Texture Stud. 2005, 36, 478–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Akissoe, N.; Mestres, C.; Hounhouigan, J.; Nago, M. Sensory and physicochemical quality of pounded yam: Varietal and storage effects. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2009, 33, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Effah-Manu, L.; Maziya-Dixon, B.; Wireko-Manu, F.D.; Agbenorhevi, J.K.; Oduro, I. Yam pectin and textural characteristics: A preliminary study. Int. J. Food Prop. 2022, 25, 1591–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Otegbayo, B.; Oguniyan, D.; Akinwumi, O. Physicochemical and functional characterization of yam starch for potential industrial applications. Starch-Stärke 2014, 66, 235–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Effah-Manu, L.; Wireko-Manu, F.D.; Agbenorhevi, J.K.; Maziya-Dixon, B.; Oduro, I. Chemical, functional and pasting properties of starches and flours from new yam compared to local varieties. CyTA J. Food 2022, 20, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lombardo, M.; Aulisa, G.; Padua, E.; Annino, G.; Iellamo, F.; Pratesi, A.; Caprio, M.; Bellia, A. Gender differences in taste and foods habits. Nutr. Food Sci. 2020, 50, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koehler, J.; Leonhaeuser, I. Changes in food preferences during aging. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2008, 52 (Suppl. 1), 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Uchendu, K.; Njoku, D.N.; Rabbi, I.Y.; Dzidzienyo, D.; Tongoona, P.; Offei, S.; Egesi, C. Genome-Wide Association Study of Root Mealiness and Other Texture-Associated Traits in Cassava. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 770434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xu, X.; Xu, Z.; Matsue, Y.; Xu, Q. Effects of Genetic Background and Environmental Conditions on Texture Properties in a Recombinant Inbred Population of an Inter-Subspecies Cross. Rice 2019, 12, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Heo, H.; Kang, C.; Woo, S.; Park, C. Characteristics of Yellow Alkaline Noodles Prepared from Korean Wheat Cultivar. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2012, 21, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Johnson, J.; LeBreton, J.M. History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational Research. Organ. Res. Methods 2004, 7, 238–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. McKnight, P.E.; Najab, J. Mann-Whitney U Test. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qin, G.; Tao, S.; Cao, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhang, H.; Huang, W.; Zhang, S. Evaluation of the volatile profile of 33 Pyrus ussuriensis cultivars by HS–SPME with GC–MS. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 2367–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Arsil, P.; Brindal, M.; Sularso, K.E.; Mulyani, A. Determinants of consumers’ preferences for local food: A comparison study from urban and rural areas in Indonesia. J. Bus. Retail. Manag. Res. 2018, 13, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Principal component of descriptors of quality for (a) boiled and (b) pounded D. rotundata varieties. Yam varieties: CRI pona, CRI kukrupa, CRI Mankrong pona, serwaa, local pona; L = local variety.
Figure 1. Principal component of descriptors of quality for (a) boiled and (b) pounded D. rotundata varieties. Yam varieties: CRI pona, CRI kukrupa, CRI Mankrong pona, serwaa, local pona; L = local variety.
Foods 12 00537 g001
Figure 2. Principal component of descriptors of quality for (a) boiled and (b) pounded D. alata varieties. Yam varieties—CRI afase pa, CRI afase biri, CRI afase pa, CRI ahodenfo, CRI soanyinto, akaba matches. L = local variety.
Figure 2. Principal component of descriptors of quality for (a) boiled and (b) pounded D. alata varieties. Yam varieties—CRI afase pa, CRI afase biri, CRI afase pa, CRI ahodenfo, CRI soanyinto, akaba matches. L = local variety.
Foods 12 00537 g002
Figure 3. Sex-disaggregated preferences for (a) boiled and (b) pounded Dioscorea alata.
Figure 3. Sex-disaggregated preferences for (a) boiled and (b) pounded Dioscorea alata.
Foods 12 00537 g003
Figure 4. Sex-disaggregated preferences for (a) boiled and (b) pounded Dioscorea rotundata.
Figure 4. Sex-disaggregated preferences for (a) boiled and (b) pounded Dioscorea rotundata.
Foods 12 00537 g004
Figure 5. Preference level of quality descriptors of (a) boiled and (b) pounded Discorea alata varieties.
Figure 5. Preference level of quality descriptors of (a) boiled and (b) pounded Discorea alata varieties.
Foods 12 00537 g005
Figure 6. Preference level of quality descriptors of (a) boiled and (b) pounded Discorea retundata varieties.
Figure 6. Preference level of quality descriptors of (a) boiled and (b) pounded Discorea retundata varieties.
Foods 12 00537 g006
Table 1. (a) Attributes generated by trained sensory panellists for boiled yam; (b) attributes generated by trained panellists for pounded yam.
Table 1. (a) Attributes generated by trained sensory panellists for boiled yam; (b) attributes generated by trained panellists for pounded yam.
AttributePanel DefinitionHow to MeasureScale
(a)
Sweet tasteThe taste perceived when eating food rich in sugarsChew and/or swallow to determine the intensity of sweetness0—bitter
5—bland
10—high sugar intensity like local pona
Smell/aromaWhat is perceived in the nose when sample brought close to the nose/after chewingBring sample close to the nose/chew and swallow sample for aroma0—cocoyam/cassava aroma
10—yam aroma
ColourDegree of whitenessVisual inspection0—grey
5—cream
10—white
HardnessMechanical textural attribute relating to the force required to achieve a given deformationHand: pressing with fingers/taking a morsel
Mouth: amount of time used in masticating to softness before swallowing
0—soft like ripe pawpaw
5—slightly ripened avocado pear
10—apple
Mealiness/waxinessSmoothness or roughness of sample
Mealy: ease of disintegration of boiled yam
Waxy: extent to which yam remains intact and does not disintegrate easily
Hand feel
Mouth feel when masticating
0—not mealy/waxy
10—mealy
ChewinessA measure of energy required to masticate the food (gumminess × springiness)Chew sample in the mouth0—highly chewy
10—less chewy
(b)
SmellWhat is perceived in the nose when sample is served/openedBring sample close to the nose0—cocoyam
5—cassava
10—yam aroma
ColourDegree of whitenessVisual inspection0—light pink/grey
5—cream
10—white
FracturabilityMechanical textural attribute associated with cohesiveness and hardness and with the force necessary to break a product into crumbs or piecesFeel between the fingers/breaking off/tearing a portion of the sample0—like cake
10—banku with about 20% cassava dough
MouldabilityAbility to be made into a shape without separating.By hand: mould sample in the palm and observe if there is disintegration0—like banku made from only corn dough (etew)
10—cassava fufu
HardnessMechanical textural attribute relating to the force required to achieve a given deformationHand: pressing with fingers/taking a morsel
Throat: swallowing with water
0—very soft TZ
10—cold koose
Lumpiness/consistencyPresence of lumpsHand feel0—corn porridge with lumps
10—no lumps
Springiness/
Stretchability
The tendency of sample to return to its original state after it has been stretched/pressedStretch/press sample with fingers to determine how fast it will return to original position0—not springy/stretchy
10—springy/stretchy
StickinessTendency of sample to bind to other surfacesBy mouth: initiate swallowing; sample dipped in water
Bowl: visual inspection of sample in bowl/turn slightly to detect stickiness
0—like Ga kenkey
10—cassava fufu
Table 2. Average scores for boiled yam from D. alata and D. rotundata yam varieties.
Table 2. Average scores for boiled yam from D. alata and D. rotundata yam varieties.
Yam VarietySpeciesWhitenessAromaSweet TasteHardnessMealinessChewiness
CRI afase ahodenfoD. alata3.006.086.084.916.927.41
CRI afas biriD. alata2.504.54.3756.426.005.25
CRI afase paD. alata3.53.164.754.56.755.83
CRI afase soanyintoD. alata2.912.913.55.756.56.5
akaba (local)D. alata4.416.55.875.087.456.83
matches (local)D. alata8.005.55.673.086.416.33
CRI kukrupaD. rotundata5.676.425.916.585.675.58
CRI ponaD. rotundata5.257.085.256.255.757.33
CRI mankrong ponaD. rotundata4.917.55.55.915.585.33
serwaa (local)D. rotundata5.666.415.916.585.675.58
pona (local)D. rotundata6.087.006.084.255.916.16
Yam VarietySpeciesAromaColourStretchabilityLumpinessHardnessFracturability
CRI afase ahodenfoD. alata4.252.081.413.923.753.25
CRI afase soanyintoD. alata5.007.001.584.583.414.08
CRI afase biriD. alata5.174.163.634.915.664.83
CRI afase paD. alata6.123.161.173.913.253.83
akaba (local)D. alata6.582.413.254.835.56.83
matches (local)D. alata7.098.093.815.636.363.36
CRI kukrupaD. rotundata8.427.336.004.417.004.42
CRI ponaD. rotundata8.916.54.928.58.256.92
CRI Mankrong ponaD. rotundata8.335.925.417.667.424.75
serwaa (local)D. rotundata8.427.336.004.417.004.42
pona localD. rotundata8.086.257.008.667.666.41
Scale 0–10; where 0 is least liked and 10 is highly liked.
Table 3. Relative index for choice of yam variety for overall acceptability of boiled and pounded yam (D. alata).
Table 3. Relative index for choice of yam variety for overall acceptability of boiled and pounded yam (D. alata).
VarietiesRIIRankingVarietiesRIIRanking
Boiled Pounded
Akaba0.221Matches0.221
Afase biri0.252Soanyinto0.242
Matches0.283Akaba0.242
Afase pa0.284Afase pa0.263
Afase soanyinto0.305Afase Biri0.284
Afase ahodenfo0.326Ahodenfo0.365
Table 4. Relative index for choice of yam variety for overall acceptability of boiled and pounded yam (D. rotundata).
Table 4. Relative index for choice of yam variety for overall acceptability of boiled and pounded yam (D. rotundata).
VarietiesRIIRankingVarietiesRIIRanking
Boiled Pounded
Local pona0.221CRI pona0.221
CRI pona0.252Local pona0.242
Mankrong pona0.283Mankrong pona0.243
serwaa0.284kukrupa0.264
kukrupa0.305serwaa0.285
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Effah-Manu, L.; Wireko-Manu, F.D.; Agbenorhevi, J.K.; Maziya-Dixon, B.; Oduro, I.N. Gender-Disaggregated Consumer Testing and Descriptive Sensory Analysis of Local and New Yam Varieties. Foods 2023, 12, 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030537

AMA Style

Effah-Manu L, Wireko-Manu FD, Agbenorhevi JK, Maziya-Dixon B, Oduro IN. Gender-Disaggregated Consumer Testing and Descriptive Sensory Analysis of Local and New Yam Varieties. Foods. 2023; 12(3):537. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030537

Chicago/Turabian Style

Effah-Manu, Liticia, Faustina D. Wireko-Manu, Jacob K. Agbenorhevi, Busie Maziya-Dixon, and Ibok N. Oduro. 2023. "Gender-Disaggregated Consumer Testing and Descriptive Sensory Analysis of Local and New Yam Varieties" Foods 12, no. 3: 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030537

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop