Next Article in Journal
The Interactional Characterization of Lentil Protein Isolate (LPI) with Cyanidin-3-O-Glucoside (C3G) and Their Effect on the Stability and Antioxidant Activity of C3G
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Whey Protein-Based Emulsion Coating Treatment in Fresh-Cut Apple Preservation
Previous Article in Journal
Phenolic Acid Content and Antioxidant Properties of Edible Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) with Various Tuber Flesh Colours
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in Postharvest Irradiation Preservation Technology of Edible Fungi: A Review

College of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(1), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12010103
Submission received: 22 November 2022 / Revised: 13 December 2022 / Accepted: 22 December 2022 / Published: 25 December 2022

Abstract

:
Edible fungi have high edible, medicinal and economic value. Rapid development of the edible fungi industry can meet people’s consumption demands. However, due to lack of suitable preservation technology after harvest, edible fungi are susceptible to mechanical damage, microbial infection, and discoloration, which could affect the quality and shelf life of fresh edible fungi. Many techniques have been developed to extend the postharvest storage time of fresh edible fungi and irradiation technology has been proven to be one of the potential technologies. This review summarizes the internal and external factors affecting the postharvest quality deterioration of edible fungi, introduces the types of irradiation preservation technology and describes comprehensive advances in the effects of irradiation on shelf life, microbiology, organoleptic qualities, nutritional qualities (proteins, fats, sugars and vitamins) and enzymatic activities of edible fungi from different regions and of different species worldwide. This review uncovers that the postharvest quality decay of edible fungi is a complex process. The irradiation preservation of edible fungi is affected not only by the edible fungus itself and the storage environment but also by the radiation type, radiation dose and radiation source conditions. Future studies need to consider the combined application of irradiation and other novel technologies to further improve the preservation effect of edible fungi, in particular in the area of irradiation’s influence on the flavor of edible fungus.

1. Introduction

Edible fungi are large fungi that can form large fleshy (or colloidal) fruiting bodies or sclerotia-like tissues and can be used for food or medicine. More than 6000 species of edible fungi exist in nature, of which more than 2000 species can be used for consumption [1]. Nowadays, China is the world’s most important producer of edible fungi and 30 species of edible fungi have been industrialized, such as Lentinus edodes, Auricularia auricula, Pleurotus ostreatus, Flammulina velutipes, Pleurotus eryngii, Agaricus bisporus and Agrocybe aegerita [2,3]. The production of edible fungi in China reached 40.61 million tons in 2020 according to data from the China Edible Fungi Association, with the total production exceeding 80% of the world total and a value of more than USD 51.4 billion [4]. The reason for the increasing consumption of edible fungi is that they combine high medicinal value and nutritional characteristics as food. Relevant studies confirmed that edible fungi are not only rich in protein, essential amino acids, dietary fiber, vitamins and other nutrients [5], but also contain a variety of bioactive substances with certain efficacy, such as high molecular polysaccharides, polyphenols, triterpenes, etc. [6,7]. However, the commercial circulation of fresh edible fungi after harvest will face a major challenge: they are one of the most perishable products and often lose quality quickly after being harvested. Therefore, appropriate and efficient postharvest preservation methods are of great significance for improving the economic value of edible fungi.
The quality attributes of edible fungi after harvest are affected by variable factors, including internal factors related to edible fungi themselves (i.e., microbial activity, respiration rate and water activity) and external factors related to storage conditions (relative humidity, storage temperature and mechanical damage) (Figure 1). The tissue of edible fungi has a high moisture content (85–95%) [8], and the outer epidermis lacks protective tissue and loses a large amount of moisture under transpiration after picking [9]. Secondly, temperature fluctuation can enable edible fungi to activate a variety of oxidases, enhance physiological activity and increase postripening during storage [10,11]. In addition, edible fungi are vulnerable to damage, especially the invasion of pathogenic microorganisms during picking, transportation and storage [12]. In this regard, postharvest changes in edible fungi, such as cap opening, stipe elongation, cap diameter increase, etc. [13], further lead to discoloration [14], texture changes [15] and moisture loss [16] (pp. 203–211), thus reducing the edible and economic value of edible fungi and affecting consumers’ purchasing behavior.
There are extensive studies on developing and implementing preservation technology for edible fungi. Refrigeration [17], modified atmosphere packaging [18], coating [9], washing [19] and ozone treatment [20] are frequently applied technologies. However, they also produce adverse effects including contamination with pathogenic microorganisms, off-flavors, discoloration and safety considerations, and are unsuitable for application on an industrial scale [21]. In contrast, heating and ionizing radiation treatment can completely inhibit or inactivate microbial growth, resulting in producing shelf-stable food [22]. Although Fernandes, Antonio, Oliveira, Martins and Ferreira [21] reviewed the effects of gamma and electron beam irradiation on the physicochemical and nutritional properties of mushrooms before 2012, there has not been a recent detailed review on research advances in the area. Therefore, this review focuses on the recent developments of irradiation technology in edible fungus postharvest quality preservation, compares the preservation effects of different irradiation technologies and discusses the impact of irradiation treatment on edible fungi. This review aims to provide a theoretical reference for the study of the storage methods for prolonging the postharvest shelf life of edible fungi. Finally, some future research trends are proposed.

2. Irradiation Techniques and Species

Food irradiation is a recognized and established food processing technology worldwide, and another breakthrough after pasteurization technology. Irradiation sterilization processes food at or near ambient temperature, and is known as cold pasteurization and belongs to the non-thermal treatment processes [23]. Irradiation treatment is particularly important for producing shelf-stable agricultural products at ambient temperatures, such as meat, fruits and vegetables, fish and spices [22]. Furthermore, according to statistics in 2011, 70 countries and regions worldwide have approved 548 kinds of food and condiments for irradiation treatment [24].
Irradiation preservation mainly uses high-energy radiation to produce active free radicals such as -H and -OH in food (Figure 2). These free radicals interact with nuclear substances to kill pathogenic microorganisms, parasites, etc., inhibit certain metabolic reactions and biological activities in food, delay the deterioration of tissue structure and maintain the sensory and nutritional characteristics, thereby extending the shelf life of foods [25,26]. In particular, common pathogenic bacteria in food such as Salmonella, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria were inhibited under radiation treatment [27]. In addition, irradiation technology is suitable for the preservation of a variety of edible fungi. This radiation preservation method mainly uses elements with a radioactive effect to process the mushroom body under a certain intensity of rays, and separates the water and other substances in the mushroom body through ionization, which can effectively prevent or reduce the rate of solid own metabolism [28]. Notably, the preservation effect of irradiation on edible fungi depends on the irradiation dose, storage environment, variety and maturity of edible fungi.

Irradiated Species

Radiation sources, such as gamma irradiation, ultraviolet irradiation and electron beam, are mostly used to cause the effects of ionizing radiation to preserve the quality of edible fungi. At present, irradiation preservation of Agaricus bisporus [29], Volvariella volvacea [30], Lentinus edodes [31], Pleurotu nebrodensis [17], Pleurotus ostreatus [32], Laclarius deliciosus [33], Flammulina velutipes [34] and Pleurotus eryngii [35] has been studied internationally. Moreover, the recommended dose for extending the shelf life of fresh edible fungi in different countries is 1–3 kGy, while the recommended dose regarding the decontamination of dried edible fungi (included in food additives with spices), used as seasonings, is 10–50 kGy [36]. Table 1 summarizes the parameters of radiation absorbed doses to edible fungi published in the past decade.
Gamma irradiation is electromagnetic waves induced by the release of α or β rays from atomic nuclei. They have strong penetrating and dissociating abilities, do not deflect in the magnetic field, do not generate induced radiation, can cause irradiated molecules to generate paired ions or free radicals and then induce other chemical reactions, especially for products with high moisture content [35]. Currently, there are two internationally approved irradiation sources: 137Cs and 60Co. Postharvest edible fungi are irradiated by gamma irradiation with strong penetrating power to inhibit the growth of microorganisms, reduce the activity of enzymes and the opening rate and delay the metabolic process of bacteria to achieve the purpose of preservation and storage [21].
Electron beam (e-beam) irradiation involves the use of accelerators that accelerate electrons close to the velocity of light to produce high-energy e-beams. Compared with gamma irradiation, e-beam irradiation has a short processing time, and the irradiation dose (high dose rate) can be controlled by adjusting the transmission speed. In addition, the irradiation process can be initiated and stopped more easily under the control of electric energy. However, unlike gamma rays, the penetration distance of e-beam irradiation is related to the density of the irradiated product. In general, high-energy electrons penetrate over short distances and are more suitable for thin products with regular shapes. It was claimed that an appropriate dose of e-beam irradiation can inhibit the microbial reproduction of edible fungi, delay physiological metabolism and not change their nutritional composition [25,66].
Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation technology is divided into UV-A (400–315 nm), UV-B (315–280 nm) and UV-C (280–100 nm) according to different wavelengths. In recent years, UV-C has been widely used as a substitute for chemical sterilization and microbial reduction in food, and has been approved as a disinfectant for food surface treatment [67]. Pulsed ultraviolet (PUV) light is rich in UV-C light, and could quickly inactivate microbes on surfaces of food with a wavelength range of 180–1100 nm [68]. On the other hand, as a postharvest treatment of fresh produce, a certain dose of UV-C radiation has been shown to reduce fruit and vegetable rot, and delay the senescence and ripening of different fruits and vegetables as well as edible fungi [69].
Overall, the application of gamma, e-beam and UV radiation technology mainly focuses on fresh samples of edible fungi (Table 1 and cited references), but also includes freeze-dried [37] and air-dried samples [64], and is even applied to the aqueous extract of dried edible fungi [38]. The applied doses of gamma and e-beams are around 1 kGy and 2 kGy in most cases. Nevertheless, the dose of UV application varies widely.

3. Effects of Irradiation on Edible Fungi

3.1. Shelf Life of Edible Fungi

Prolonging shelf life is a key factor for the postharvest commercialization of edible fungi, so as to promote the circulation of edible fungi among regions. Many efforts have been devoted to investigating the shelf life of edible fungi, which is only 1–3 days after harvest at normal temperatures [13]. However, the storage of edible fungi after being irradiated with a dose of a few kGy or less has an obvious effect on extending the shelf life of edible fungi and even various vegetables [36]. In this process, using a radiation dose of 1 kGy at ambient temperature effectively inhibited stalk growth and cap opening of fresh edible fungi, and extended the shelf life [54].
Regarding the effect of irradiation treatment on the shelf life of edible fungi, Wani, Hussain, Meena, Dar and Mir [70] found that a 2.0 kGy dose of gamma radiation can significantly reduce the weight loss of Agaricus bisporus and prevent browning and mold growth. Meanwhile, the cap and veil opening of edible fungi was delayed by 9 days, and the shelf life was extended by 12 days. Mami et al. [25] reported that under specified temperature (4 °C) and humidity (80%) storage conditions, the shelf life of Agaricus bisporus could be extended to 16 days after irradiation with 2 and 4 kGy e-beam irradiation. Supporting this view, Shi et al. [43] also found that an enhancement in the shelf life of fresh Lentinula edodes up to a period of 20 days could be achieved by the application of a gamma ray dose of 1 kGy and storage at 4 °C, and it retained the quality attributes required for its acceptability. Lu et al. [60] studied the shelf life of Agaricus bisporus irradiated with short-wavelength ultraviolet rays and it remained relatively stable for 18 days at 4 °C. UV-C irradiation can restrain the ripening of Agaricus bisporus and inhibit the activity of polyphenol oxidase during storage, accordingly reducing its respiration rate, diminishing plasmic permeability and delaying browning reaction, thus extending the preservation time. Other studies also revealed that gamma irradiation (1 and 1.5 kGy) in combination with modified atmosphere packaging can extend the storage life of shiitake mushrooms up to 20 days [31]. Similarly, Shi et al. [44] demonstrated that ultrasound combined with gamma ray (1 kGy) treatment could maintain the quality of fresh Lentinus edodes during 20 days of storage. These results confirmed that food irradiation may be quite effective, in conjunction with other food preservation techniques such as low temperature or packaging materials, to acquire maximum synergetic effect with minimum process losses. Furthermore, low-dose rate irradiation is beneficial to prolong the shelf life of edible fungi. For instance, under a cumulative irradiation dose (2 kGy), the shelf life of Agaricus bisporus could be increased by 2 days when the irradiation dose rate of 4.5 kGy/h was compared with 32 kGy/h [71]. The higher the irradiation dose rate, the less obvious the effect of irradiation on prolonging the shelf life of edible fungi. This may be due to the integrity of the edible fungal cell membrane being seriously damaged by the high dose rate, which changes the permeability of the cell membrane, resulting in the attenuation of the edible fungal cell defense function and the invasion of external harmful substances [27,72].

3.2. Pathogenic Microorganisms of Edible Fungi

Microbial infection is the main reason for the spoilage of edible fungi. Combined with their rich nutrients and moisture content, edible fungi provide favorable conditions for the growth and reproduction of microorganisms. Different studies have indicated that some pathogenic bacteria are particularly sensitive to irradiation treatment [27]. In general, the principle of inactivation of microorganisms by irradiation has two parts: on one hand, ionizing radiation (UV) inhibits the replication and transcription of genetic material [73]. On the other hand, ionizing radiation (such as gamma ray or e-beam) directly acts on biological molecules, breaking hydrogen bonds, oxidizing double bonds, destroying ring structures or polymerizing some molecules, changing the structure of biological macromolecules [70,74]. In addition, microorganisms irradiated by high-energy electron rays will ionize, hindering all activities in the microbial cells and leading to microbial cell death. Meanwhile, different radiation doses and electron energies are needed to control different microorganisms. The main studies regarding the impact of irradiation on edible fungal microorganisms published in the past decade are summarized in Table 2.
In terms of irradiation sterilization, recent studies have found that irradiation treatment can cause qualitative and quantitative changes in the microbial flora of edible fungi. It can reduce the total plate count, coliform group count, psychrophilic bacterial count and yeast and mold count to a certain extent, and obtain valuable results to ensure the quality of fresh edible fungi. Dong et al. [29] found that an e-beam irradiation dose of 1 kGy and above effectively inhibits the growth and reproduction of Pseudomonas during storage of Agaricus bisporus. These results were in agreement with Yurttas et al. [54] who showed that e-beam irradiation treatment (1 kGy) had a significant impact on reducing aerobic and psychrotrophic populations, whereas higher doses were required for inhibition of yeasts and molds.
Generally, the combination of different preservation technologies can maintain the product quality required during processing and storage as much as possible. Guan, Fan and Yan [55] treated Agaricus bisporus with hydrogen peroxide and found that UV-C could reduce the value of E. coli O157:H7 and the total number of colonies, compared with the control group. A recent study by Jiang, Luo, Chen, Shen and Ying [31] indicated that 2 kGy gamma irradiation combined with modified atmosphere packaging can effectively reduce the microbial content (Pseudomonas, psychrophilic, mesophilic, yeasts and molds) in Lentinus edodes. Additionally, the combination of ultrasound and gamma irradiation treatment had the best synergistic effects on the inhibition of microbial growth during storage [44]. Ramos Villarroel [75] found that the initial counts of Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes inoculated on fresh-cut mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) were reduced by 3 and 2 logarithms, respectively, after UV pulse treatment of a full wavelength spectrum (180–1100 nm), indicating that there was antibacterial effect in this spectral range. These results demonstrated that the conversion of radiation technology has the ability to inactivate microorganisms without compromising food quality, as well as being a greener and safer technology. Therefore, in order to avoid the deterioration of edible fungi during storage and to ensure safety regarding their consumption, irradiation of edible fungi may be the best possible option.

3.3. Sensory Quality of Edible Fungi

Regarding the effects of irradiation technology on the sensory quality of edible fungi, changes in flavor, texture and color have been reported by some researchers. It was previously reported by Mau and Hwang [76] that the volatile flavor components of fresh edible fungi were mainly composed of eight-carbon compounds, including 1-octanol, 3-octanol, 3-octanone, 1-octen-3-ol, 2-octen-1-ol and 1-octen-3-one. Among them, 1-octene-3-ol was the most important compound related to the flavor of fresh edible fungi, and the content would decrease with the extension of the postharvest storage period. In addition, Akram et al. [77] found that irradiation with 1 kGy increased the eight-carbon volatile components of fresh shiitake, while 2 and 3 kGy irradiation treatment of fresh shiitake produced some new volatile compounds, such as methylethyl disulfide and sulfinylbis methane. However, the eight-carbon compounds mostly disappeared after drying. It is notable that gamma ray irradiation (5 kGy) of dried Agaricus bisporus reduced the total volatile compounds by more than 50%, and there was no flavor difference between the irradiated and non-irradiated samples in sensory evaluation [12].
Texture is the main quality measure for consumers when evaluating the freshness of edible fungi [45]. Overall, the firmness of fruits and vegetables mainly depends on the mechanical strength of the cell wall and the expansion pressure of the cell [10]. Table 3 summarizes the changes in texture and color of edible fungi by irradiation technology in recent years. Notably, the effect of irradiation treatment on the sensory quality of edible fungi was closely related to the irradiation dose. Several researchers have found better retention of texture/higher firmness or delay in postharvest edible fungi softening with low-dose e-beam or gamma irradiation. For instance, Dong et al. [29] found that the firmness of mushrooms in the treated group dramatically exceeded other groups under low-dose (1 kGy) e-beam irradiation. Duan, Xing, Shao and Zhao [66] showed that softening was delayed by irradiating freshly harvested mushrooms with different doses of e-beams. Among them, the dose of 2 kGy could inhibit the respiration of mushrooms, reduce the weight loss rate and maintain the turgor pressure of cells and a better firmness. Furthermore, Jiang, Luo, Chen, Shen and Ying [31] indicated that a 1 kGy gamma irradiation dose effectively maintained the firmness of edible fungi, while there was a negative impact on texture, chemical properties and functional components at a higher dose (2 kGy). Hou et al. [46] also reported that 0.8 kGy gamma irradiation slowed down the weight loss and softening of Volvariella volvacea. The softening of edible fungi during storage may be related to the degradation of the cell wall and microbial infection. Moreover, Pseudomonas can destroy the intracellular matrix and make the central vacuole smaller or even disappear, reducing the mechanical strength of the cell wall and the turgor pressure of the cell, resulting in partial collapse of the cell and loss of turgor pressure [78]. This softening phenomenon of edible fungi caused by microbial infection has been observed in untreated groups, but irradiation treatment can effectively delay the softening process and still maintain good firmness in the later storage period. In addition, Xiong, Xing, Feng, Tan and Bian [17] combined refrigeration with low-dose (1.2 kGy) gamma radiation and applied it to edible fungi. The treatment group had significantly delayed occurrence of softening, splitting and browning of fruiting bodies (6–9 days), while the loss of texture was minimized compared with refrigeration treatment alone.
The color of edible fungi is an intuitive impression for consumers to judge the quality attribute. Browning is the main reason for the quality loss of edible fungi [14]. This is mainly caused by two reasons: for one thing, it is an extremely complex chemical reaction between various oxygenated compounds such as organic acids, carbohydrates and amino acids, also known as non-enzymatic browning. The toxic substances and odor are produced slowly from the browning of edible fungi [18]. Secondly, enzymatic browning can occur. The browning substrate in plant cells is an acid substance that can react in the presence of oxygen and phenolic oxidase to oxidize brown or red quinones. This is also the main reaction causing browning of edible fungi [71,79]. Regarding the effect of irradiation technology on the color of edible fungi, all the authors reported the conclusion that browning was delayed. For example, longer retention of whiteness and/or color improvement was also confirmed in irradiated Agaricus bisporus [25,45], Lactarius deliciosus [33], Lentinula edodes [44,64] and Volvariella volvacea [46] samples. Shiitake mushrooms pretreated with pulses of UV light reduced the initial browning index and browning degree values by 43.02% and 47.54%, respectively, improving the surface color of dried shiitake mushrooms [80]. This was probably due to irradiation diminishing enzymatic browning by inhibiting polyphenol oxidase activity in edible fungi [81]. Other previous studies also showed that Agaricus bisporus exposed to UV-C irradiation had more severe browning with the increase in dose (0.45 kJ/m2) [55].

3.4. Nutritional Composition of Edible Fungi

Edible fungi are nutritionally rich and a good source of carbon and nitrogen. Changes in composition have a great impact on product quality and nutritional health value. The effects of irradiation on nutrients of edible fungi, including proteins, fat, sugars and vitamins, were described by different authors in several edible fungi species in the past decade and are summarized in Table 3.
Concerning the effect of irradiation technology on the soluble protein of edible fungi, some studies have confirmed that Agaricus bisporus (4 kGy) [25], Amanita (10 kGy) [50] and Boletus pinophilus (2 kGy) [41] treated with irradiation exhibited smaller initial declines in soluble protein content than non-irradiated controls, while higher doses showed negative effects [40]. Possibly, the higher sensitivity of proteins was related to the scission of the C\N bonds in the backbone of the polypeptide chain or splitting of the disulfide bonds, or physical changes such as unfolding or aggregation. Dawoud and Abu-Taleb [82] found that protein and free amino acid contents did not drop after using 0.5 kGy gamma irradiation to irradiate Pleurotus ostreatus. As reported by Jiang, Luo, Chen, Shen and Ying [31], the soluble protein content of shiitake mushroom samples treated with gamma rays during storage (the initial level was 54.1%) decreased slightly, while the decrease rate during this period increased at higher doses (2 kGy). Nevertheless, Wang, Chu and Kou [57] showed that the soluble protein content of Pleurotus ostreatus remained basically unchanged after 4.0 kJ/m2 UV-C irradiation.
For fatty acids, some researchers investigated the effect of irradiation technology on the nutrients of edible fungi. Cardoso et al. [49] confirmed that irradiation maintained the content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in dried edible fungi between 81% and 82%, saturated fatty acids (SFAs) only accounted for 12% to 34% and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) were less than 2%. Remarkably, the high incidence of PUFA indicates that edible fungus powder contains healthy unsaturated fats, which also helps edible fungus powder to be regarded as a healthy food. Palmitic acid, oleic acid and linoleic acid are the main fatty acid composition of edible fungi, which is related to the acceptable organoleptic properties of edible fungi. Among them, linoleic acid is the precursor of the aroma component of edible fungi [11]. Some researchers have reported that both gamma and e-beam irradiation can change the fatty acid profiles of edible fungi [39,48,50,51,53]. In this way, saturated fatty acids seem to be more resistant to radiation, while PUFA is more sensitive to radiolysis than MUFA, thereby the percentage tends to decrease [40]. The changes in lipid profiles may be divided into two situations, one is the auto-oxidation of fatty acids and molecular oxygen by radiation as catalysis, and the other is the self-effect of high-energy radiation [83]. Obviously, the unsaturated molecules of fatty acids were changed after irradiation. The general mechanism of lipid radiolysis is mainly primary ionization, followed by the migration of a positive charge to the carboxyl carbonyl group or double bond, leading to the degradation of unsaturated fatty acids [73]. However, this phenomenon mostly occurs in fresh edible fungi. In addition, Fernandes et al. [39] observed that the change in fat content of Boletus edulis during storage was affected in non-irradiated and high-dose irradiated samples (10 kGy), while relatively lower doses (2 or 6 kGy) kept fat levels more stable during storage.
Free sugars are one of the most important parameters in quality assessment and are considered a good indicator of suitable conservation techniques due to their sensitivity to technical practices [84]. Concomitantly, radiation causes changes such as melting point decreases, reduction in optical rotation and browning of sugars. The free sugars that can be detected in edible fungi are mainly trehalose, mannitol and fructose. Cardoso et al. [49] found that the total sugar content of the irradiated Agaricus bisporus decreased gradually within 12 months, while the trehalose content increased, but there was no significant correlation with the storage period. This is consistent with that reported by Fernandes et al. [51] and Fernandes et al. [40] who observed that the sugar content of irradiated edible fungi changed significantly. In this process, the sugar may be degraded, producing a particular atmosphere mainly composed of H2 and CO2, as well as traces of CH4, CO and H2O [73]. Likewise, Fernandes et al. [50] reported that the sugar content of edible fungi had a significant change after e-beam irradiation, but the effects of the two edible fungus species were not consistent, namely, the sugar content increased with irradiation in A. caesarea, but not in A. curtipes. However, the sugar content of irradiated Macrolepiota procera did not change significantly during storage [53].
Edible fungi are also a good resource of vitamins, being rich in vitamins B, C, D and E. Regarding the effects of irradiation on the vitamins of edible fungi, some researchers have confirmed that the total tocopherol content of edible fungi irradiated by gamma rays [40,41] or e-beam [50,51,53] tended to be higher than that of the non-irradiated controls, while showing the opposite result at high doses. Furthermore, unlike gamma and e-beam irradiation, the main role of UV irradiation in the edible fungus industry is to increase their vitamin D content. For example, irradiating fresh Agaricus bisporus and freeze-dried Hygrophorus marzuolus with UV-C increased their vitamin D up to 14-fold and 9-fold, respectively [85]. Similar results were found in the study of Guan et al. [56]. In addition, Huang et al. [65] observed that the content of vitamin D2 in the fruiting bodies of 11 fresh edible fungi significantly increased from 0–3.93 to 15.06–208.65 mg/g when irradiated with UV-B. Meanwhile, Simon, Phillips, Horst and Munro [86] showed that UV-B irradiated Agaricus bisporus showed no significant effect regarding the change in water-soluble vitamin content. At present, the European Commission has formulated regulations on the exposure of Agaricus bisporus to ultraviolet light (UV) irradiation to induce the conversion of provitamin D-2 (ergosterol) into vitamin D-2 (ergocaciferol) content, ensuring the safety of mushroom powder as a novel food [87].

3.5. Enzymatic Activity of Edible Fungi

Irradiation has a great impact on the activities of various enzymes in edible fungi, such as polyphenol oxidase (PPO), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), which is summarized in Table 3. Dong et al. [29] applied e-beam irradiation to decelerate the increase in PPO content of Agaricus bosporus during storage, as compared to the non-irradiation group. In fact, the mechanism of enzymatic browning of edible fungi is that PPO catalyzes the oxidation of monophenols (epicatechin and chlorogenic acid) to o-quinones (epicatechin quinone and chlorogenic quinone), which leads to the formation of brown spots (melanin) (Figure 3A). In this process, e-beam irradiation treatment inactivated the PPO activity of Agaricus bisporus during postharvest storage and inhibited the browning phenomenon. Likewise, the activities of SOD and CAT of Agaricus bisporus treated with e-beams were always higher than those of the control group throughout the storage period, with the most pronounced effect after treatment with 1.0 kGy. SOD and CAT are the key components of the cellular antioxidant defense system, which can protect cells from the attack of reactive oxygen species and maintain the freshness of food by protecting the integrity of the cell membrane (Figure 3B) [17]. Nie et al. [61] showed that the combined treatment of UV-C irradiation and biocontrol yeast (Pichia kluyveri) induced the activity levels of SOD and CAT in mushrooms to be higher than in untreated (control) mushrooms. A similar result was also found in studying the effect of gamma irradiation on the enzyme activity of Volvariella volvacea by Hou et al. [46]. In addition, Shi et al. [44] showed that the PAL activity level of Lentinula edodes combined with gamma and ultrasound was higher than the control group throughout refrigeration storage, except on days 4 and 20. In general, PAL is directly related to the synthesis of phenolic compounds in cells, and is also one of the antioxidant enzymes involved in the synthesis of secondary metabolites [88]. On the other hand, the increase in PAL activity contributes to the accumulation of phenols, forming phenolic compounds such as flavonoids and enhancing phenolic retention during late storage. Meanwhile, Wang et al. [59] also reported that the PAL content of oyster mushrooms treated by UV-C irradiation was relatively high during the storage period, except on day 0. These results demonstrate that an appropriate radiation dose reduces the activity of related enzymes and promotes the accumulation of phenolic compounds.

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

In the current review, the research progress of postharvest radiation preservation technology for edible fungi focuses on the types of radiation preservation technology and radiation effects, including the effects of radiation on the shelf life, microorganisms, sensory quality, nutritional components and enzyme activities of edible fungi. In general, with the development of the edible fungus industry and the increase in the output of edible fungi, the radiation preservation technology of edible fungi belongs includes physical sterilization technology and is a promising method for the preservation of edible fungi, having a good sterilization effect, no pollution, no residue, low energy consumption and maintaining the sense and quality of edible fungi to the greatest extent. Indicatively, from a global point of view, 1–3 kGy irradiation doses are recommended for fresh edible fungi, and doses below 10 kGy are recommended for dried edible fungi. It is noteworthy that the irradiation technology may affect the nutritional composition of edible fungi to varying degrees, according to the species of edible fungus, the irradiation dose and the types of irradiation source. Furthermore, postharvest internal quality degradation of edible fungi is inevitable, and the current research on the effect of radiation-induced flavor differences is still in its infancy, therefore further in-depth research is needed. On the other hand, some novel technologies should be encouraged, such as the combined use of irradiation technology and other preservation treatment technologies, and combining different technologies with lower capital cost or shorter processing time to further improve the postharvest preservation effect of edible fungi.

Author Contributions

Y.Z.: Writing—original draft, Visualization, Investigation. S.D.: Investigation, Visualization. Y.C.: Investigation. X.D.: Validation. H.X.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation. M.L.: Writing—review and editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31901788); Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi (2021NY-152); and Doctoral Fund of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. F2020221004).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Perez-Montes, A.; Rangel-Vargas, E.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Romero, L.; Santos, E.M. Edible mushrooms as a novel trend in the development of healthier meat products. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 40, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Y.R.; Wang, D.W.; Chen, Y.T.; Liu, T.T.; Zhang, S.S.; Fan, H.X.; Liu, H.; Li, Y. Healthy function and high valued utilization of edible fungi. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2021, 10, 408–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sun, Y.N.; Zhang, M.; Fang, Z.X. Efficient physical extraction of active constituents from edible fungi and their potential bioactivities: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 105, 468–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, X.Y.; Hasan, K.M.F.; Wei, S.F. Immunological regulation, effects, extraction mechanisms, healthy utilization, and bioactivity of edible fungi: A comprehensive review. J. Food Process. Eng. 2022, 45, e13970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cardwell, G.; Bornman, J.F.; James, A.P.; Black, L.J. A review of mushrooms as a potential source of dietary vitamin D. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gu, K.; Zhou, C.Y.; Shao, Y. Advances research and utilization on active constituents of edible fungus. Edible Fungus China 2016, 35, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, Y.; Venkitasamy, C.; Pan, Z.L. Recent developments on umami ingredients of edible mushroom-A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 33, 78–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ding, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhao, J.; Nie, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Sheng, J.; Meng, D.; Mao, H.; Tang, X. Effects of postharvest brassinolide treatment on the metabolism of white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) in relation to development of browning during storage. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2016, 9, 1327–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nasiri, M.; Barzegar, M.; Sahari, M.A.; Niakousari, M. Application of Tragacanth gum impregnated with Satureja khuzistanica essential oil as a natural coating for enhancement of postharvest quality and shelf life of button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Singh, P.; Langowski, H.C.; Wanib, A.A.; Saengerlaub, S. Recent advances in extending the shelf life of fresh Agaricus mushrooms: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 1393–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pei, F.; Shi, Y.; Gao, X.; Wu, F.; Mariga, A.M.; Yang, W.; Zhao, L.; An, X.; Xin, Z.; Yang, F.; et al. Changes in non-volatile taste components of button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) during different stages of freeze drying and freeze drying combined with microwave vacuum drying. Food Chem. 2014, 165, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sommer, I.; Schwartz, H.; Solar, S.; Sontag, G. Effect of gamma-irradiation on flavour 50-nucleotides, tyrosine, and phenylalanine in mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus). Food Chem. 2010, 123, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lin, X.; Sun, D.W. Research advances in browning of button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus): Affecting factors and controlling methods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 90, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, X.; Guan, W.; Yan, R.; Lei, J.; Xu, L.; Wang, Z. Effects of UV-C on antioxidant activity, total phenolics and main phenolic compounds of the melanin biosynthesis pathway in different tissues of button mushroom. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 118, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aday, M.S. Application of electrolyzed water for improving postharvest quality of mushroom. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 68, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Weijn, A.; Tomassen, M.; Bastiaan-Net, S.; Hendrix, E.; Baars, J.; Sonnenberg, A.; Wichers, H.; Mes, J.J. Browning sensitivity of button mushrooms. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products (ICMBMP7), Arcachon, France, 4–7 October 2011; pp. 203–211. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xiong, Q.L.; Xing, Z.T.; Feng, Z.Y.; Tan, Q.; Bian, Y.B. Effect of Co-60 gamma-irradiation on postharvest quality and selected enzyme activities of Pleurotus nebrodensis. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gantner, M.; Guzek, D.; Pogorzelska, E.; Brodowska, M.; Wojtasik-Kalinowska, I.; Godziszewska, J. The effect of film type and modified atmosphere packaging with different initial gas composition on the shelf life of white mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus L.). J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 41, e13083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, K.; Pu, Y.Y.; Sun, D.W. Recent advances in quality preservation of postharvest mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus): A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Akata, I.; Torlak, E.; Erci, F. Efficacy of gaseous ozone for reducing microflora and foodborne pathogens on button mushroom. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 109, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fernandes, A.; Antonio, A.L.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Effect of gamma and electron beam irradiation on the physico-chemical and nutritional properties of mushrooms: A review. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kume, T.; Furuta, M.; Todoriki, S.; Uenoyama, N.; Kobayashi, Y. Status of food irradiation in the world. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2009, 78, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ehlermann, D.A.E. The early history of food irradiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2016, 129, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Feliciano, C.P. High-Dose Irradiated Food: Current progress, applications, and prospects. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 144, 34–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mami, Y.; Peyvast, G.; Ziaie, F.; Ghasemnezhad, M.; Salmanpour, V. Improvement of shelf life and postharvest quality of white button mushroom by electron beam irradiation. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2014, 38, 1673–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Roberts, P.B. Food irradiation is safe: Half a century of studies. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2014, 105, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, X.N.; Jin, W.B.; Dong, Y.R.; Meng, L.C.; Wei, Q. Research progress in preservation of postharvest edible fungi. New Mater. New Process. 2012, 476, 614–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Inamura, P.Y.; Uehara, V.B.; Teixeira, C.A.H.M.; Mastro, N.L. Mediate gamma radiation effects on some packaged food items. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 1144–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dong, S.T.; Guo, J.T.; Yu, J.T.; Bai, J.Q.; Xu, H.D.; Li, M. Effects of electron-beam generated X-ray irradiation on the postharvest storage quality of Agaricus bisporus. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 80, 103079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sakinah, M.J.N.; Misran, A.; Mahmud, T.M.M.; Abdullah, S. A review: Production and postharvest management of Volvariella volvacea. Int. Food Res. J. 2019, 26, 367–376. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jiang, T.J.; Luo, S.S.; Chen, Q.P.; Shen, L.R.; Ying, T.J. Effect of integrated application of gamma irradiation and modified atmosphere packaging on physicochemical and microbiological properties of shiitake mushroom (Lentinus edodes). Food Chem. 2010, 122, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kortei, N.K.; Odamtten, G.T.; Ayim-Akonor, M.; Akonor, P.T. Modeling the solar drying kinetics of gamma irradiation-pretreated oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus). Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23, 34–39. [Google Scholar]
  33. Fernandes, A.; Antonio, A.L.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Effects of gamma irradiation on physical parameters of Lactarius deliciosus wild edible mushrooms. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 74, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Castellanos-Reyes, K.; Villalobos-Carvajal, R.; Beldarrain-Iznaga, T. Fresh Mushroom Preservation Techniques. Foods. 2021, 10, 2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Akram, K.; Ahn, J.J.; Yoon, S.R.; Kim, G.R.; Kwon, J.H. Quality attributes of Pleurotus eryngii following gamma irradiation. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 66, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jeong, S.G.; Yang, J.E.; Park, J.H.; Ko, S.H.; Choi, I.S.; Kim, H.M.; Chun, H.H.; Kwon, M.J.; Park, H.W. Gamma irradiation improves the microbiological safety and shelf-life of kimchi seasoning mixture. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 134, 110144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fernandes, A.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Antonio, A.L.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Effects of gamma irradiation on chemical composition and antioxidant potential of processed samples of the wild mushroom Macrolepiota procera. Food Chem. 2014, 149, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Khan, A.A.; Gani, A.; Shah, A.; Masoodi, F.A.; Hussain, P.R.; Wani, I.A.; Khanday, F.A. Effect of γ-irradiation on structural, functional and antioxidant properties of β-glucan extracted from button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus). Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2015, 31, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fernandes, A.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Günaydi, T.; Alkan, H.; Antonio, A.L.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C. Effect of gamma irradiation and extended storage on selected chemical constituents and antioxidant activities of sliced mushroom. Food Control. 2016, 72, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Fernandes, A.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Antonio, A.L.; Santos, P.M.P.; Martins, A.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Study of chemical changes and antioxidant activity variation induced by gamma-irradiation on wild mushrooms: Comparative study through principal component analysis. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fernandes, A.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Antonio, A.L.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Extended use of gamma irradiation in wild mushrooms conservation: Validation of 2 kGy dose to preserve their chemical characteristics. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 67, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Akram, K.; Ahn, J.J.; Shahbaz, H.M.; Jo, D.; Kwon, J.H. Effectiveness of thermoluminescence analysis to detect low quantity of gamma-irradiated component in non-irradiated mushroom powders. J. Lumin. 2013, 136, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shi, D.F.; Zhou, R.R.; Feng, X.; Dong, X.B.; Gao, H.; Fan, X.Z. Effects of low-dose γ-irradiation on the water state of fresh Lentinula edodes. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 118, 108764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shi, D.F.; Yin, C.M.; Fan, X.Z.; Yao, F.; Qiao, Y.; Xue, S.J.; Lu, Q.; Feng, C.; Meng, J.; Gao, H. Effects of ultrasound and gamma irradiation on quality maintenance of fresh Lentinula edodes during cold storage. Food Chem. 2022, 37, 131478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, M.; Mohammad-Razdari, A.; Yoosefian, S.H.; Izadi, Z. Effects of the combination of gamma irradiation and Ag nanoparticles polyethylene films on the quality of fresh bottom mushroom (Agaricus bisporus L.). J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42, e13652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hou, L.J.; Lin, J.S.; Ma, L.; Qu, S.X.; Li, H.P.; Jiang, N. Effect of Co-60 gamma irradiation on postharvest quality and selected enzyme activities of Volvariella volvacea. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 235, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fernandes, A.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Antonio, A.L.; Rafalski, A.; Morales, P.; Fernandez-Ruiz, V. Gamma and electron-beam irradiation as viable technologies for wild mushrooms conservation: Effects on macro- and micro-elements. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016, 242, 1169–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cardoso, R.V.C.; Fernandes, A.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Verde, S.C.; Antonio, A.L.; Gonzalez-Paramas, A.M.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Effectiveness of gamma and electron beam irradiation as preserving technologies of fresh Agaricus bisporus portobello: A comparative study. Food Chem. 2019, 278, 760–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Cardoso, R.V.C.; Carocho, M.; Fernandes, A.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Verde, S.C.; Santos, P.M.P. Combined effects of irradiation and storage time on the nutritional and chemical parameters of dried Agaricus bisporus Portobello mushroom flour. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 2276–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Fernandes, A.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Antonio, A.L.; Rafalski, A.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. How does electron beam irradiation dose affect the chemical and antioxidant profiles of wild dried Amanita mushrooms? Food Chem. 2015, 182, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Fernandes, A.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Antonio, A.L.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Feasibility of electron-beam irradiation to preserve wild dried mushrooms: Effects on chemical composition and antioxidant activity. Innovative Food Sci. Emerging Technol. 2014, 22, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fernandes, A.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Antonio, A.L.; Morales, P.; F’ernandez-Ruiz, V.; Martins, A.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Exquisite wild mushrooms as a source of dietary fiber: Analysis in electron-beam irradiated samples. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 855–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Fernandes, A.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Antonio, A.L.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Combined effects of electron-beam irradiation and storage time on the chemical and antioxidant parameters of wild macrolepiota procera dried samples. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014, 7, 1606–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Yurttas, Z.S.; Moreira, R.G.; Castell-Perez, E. Combined Vacuum Impregnation and Electron-Beam Irradiation Treatment to Extend the Storage Life of Sliced White Button Mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus). J. Food Sci. 2014, 79, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Guan, W.; Fan, X.; Yan, R. Effect of combination of ultraviolet light and hydrogen peroxide on inactivation of Escherichia coli O157: H7, native microbial loads, and quality of button mushrooms. Food Control. 2013, 34, 554–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Guan, W.; Zhang, J.; Yan, R.; Shao, S.; Zhou, T.; Lei, J.; Wang, Z. Effects of UV-C treatment and cold storage on ergosterol and Vitamin D2 contents in different parts of white and brown mushroom (Agaricus bisporus). Food Chem. 2016, 210, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, Q.; Chu, L.J.; Kou, L.P. UV-C Treatment maintains quality and delays senescence of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). Sci. Hortic. 2017, 225, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Murray, K.; Wu, F.; Aktar, R.; Namvar, A.; Warriner, K. Comparative study on the efficacy of bacteriophages, sanitizers, and UV light treatments to control listeria monocytogenes on sliced mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus). J. Food Prot. 2015, 78, 1147–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, X.Q.; He, X.X.; Wu, X.L.; Fan, X.T.; Wang, F.L.; Lin, Q.; Guan, W.; Zhang, N. UV-C treatment inhibits browning, inactivates Pseudomonas tolaasii and reduces associated chemical and enzymatic changes of button mushrooms. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 3259–3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lu, Y.Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.T.; Lin, Q.; Liu, W.; Xie, X.F.; Wang, Z.; Guan, W. Effects of UV-C irradiation on the physiological and antioxidant responses of button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) during storage. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 1502–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nie, X.B.; Zhang, R.C.; Cheng, L.L.; Li, S.L.; Zhao, X.R.; Chen, X.M. Combining the biocontrol yeast Pichia kluyveri with UV-C treatment to control postharvest decay of king oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus eryngii) caused by Lactococcus lactis subsp. Lactis. Biol. Control. 2020, 149, 104327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Edward, T.L.; Kirui, M.S.K.; Omolo, J.O.; Ngumbu, R.G.; Odhiambo, P.M. Effect of Ultraviolet-A (UV-A) and Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) Light on Mechanical Properties of Oyster Mushrooms during Growth. J. Biophys. 2014, 2014, 687028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Won, D.J.; Kim, S.Y.; Jang, C.H.; Lee, J.S.; Ko, J.A.; Park, H.J. Optimization of UV irradiation conditions for the vitamin D2-fortified shiitake mushroom (Lentinula edodes) using response surface methodology. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tiwari, A.; Singh, G.; Sharma, V.; Srivastava, R.K.; Sharma, S. Harnessing the potential of UVB irradiation for improving the nutraceutical properties of edible xylotrophic mushroom dried powder. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 150, 111913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Huang, S.J.; Lin, C.P.; Tsai, S.Y. Vitamin D-2 content and antioxidant properties of fruit body and mycelia of edible mushrooms by UV-B irradiation. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2015, 42, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Duan, Z.; Xing, Z.; Shao, Y.; Zhao, X. Effect of electron-beam irradiation on postharvest quality and selected enzyme activities of the white button mushroom, Agaricus bisporus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 9617–9621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. US-FDA United States Food and Drug Administration. Ultraviolet Radiation for the Processing and Treatment of Food; Code of Federal Regulations, 2002, Part 179.39; US-FDA United States Food and Drug Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
  68. Chen, D.; Cheng, Y.; Peng, P.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Anderson, E.; Chen, C.; Chen, P.; Ruan, R. Effects of intense pulsed light on Cronobacter sakazakii and Salmonella surrogate Enterococcus faecium inoculated in different powdered foods. Food Chem. 2019, 296, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sriponga, K.; Jitareerat, P.; Uthairatanakij, A. UV irradiation induces resistance against fruit rot disease and improves the quality of harvested mangosteen. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2019, 149, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wani, A.M.; Hussain, P.R.; Meena, R.S.; Dar, M.A.; Mir, M.A. Effect of gamma irradiation and sulphitation treatments on keeping quality of white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus (J-Lge). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 967–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Beaulieu, M.; D’Aprano, G.; Lacroix, M. Effect of dose rate of gamma irradiation on biochemical quality and browning of mushrooms Agaricus bisporus. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2002, 63, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Reis, F.S.; Barros, L.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I. Chemical composition and nutritional value of the most widely appreciated cultivated mushrooms: An interspecies comparative study. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Bisht, B.; Bhatnagar, P.; Gururani, P.; Kumar, V.; Tomar, M.S.; Sinhmar, R.; Rathi, N.; Kumar, S. Food irradiation: Effect of ionizing and non-ionizing radiations on preservation of fruits and vegetables- a review. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2021, 114, 372–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Akram, K.; Kwon, J.H. Food Irradiation for Mushrooms: A Review. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2010, 53, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ramos-Villarroel, A.Y.; Aron-Maftei, N.; Martin-Belloso, O.; Soliva-Fortuny, R. The role of pulsed light spectral distribution in the inactivation of Escherichia coli and Listeria innocua on fresh-cut mushrooms. Food Control. 2012, 24, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jung, M.Y.; Lee, D.E.; Cheng, H.Y.; Chung, I.M.; Kim, S.H.; Han, J.G.; Kong, W.S. Characterization of Volatile Profiles of Six Popular Edible Mushrooms Using Headspace-Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled with Gas Chromatography Combined with Chemometric Analysis. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Akram, K.; Ahn, J.J.; Yoon, S.R.; Kwon, J.H. Absorbed-dose estimation and quality attributes of gamma-irradiated fresh shiitake mushrooms. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2013, 93, 634–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Li, Y.J.; Ding, S.D.; Xiang, T.Y.; Kitazawa, H.; Sun, H.T.; Guo, Y.X. Effects of light irradiation on the textural properties and energy metabolism of postharvest shiitake mushrooms (Lentinula edodes). J. Food Process. Pres. 2021, 45, e16066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dhalsamant, K.; Dash, S.K.; Bal, L.M.; Panda, M.K. Effect of perforation mediated MAP on shelf life of mushroom (Volvariella volvacea). Sci. Hortic. 2015, 189, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, J.; Yagoub, A.A.; Sun, Y.H.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Ma, H.L.; Wahia, H.; Zhou, C.S. Intensive pulsed light pretreatment combined with controlled temperature and humidity for convection drying to reduce browning and improve quality of dried shiitake mushrooms. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2021, 101, 5608–5617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Donnadieu, F.; Freville, P.; Hervier, C.; Coltelli, M.; Scollo, S.; Prestifilippo, M.; Valade, S.; Rivet, S.; Cacault, P. Near-source Doppler radar monitoring of tephra plumes at Etna. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2016, 312, 26–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dawoud, M.E.A.; Abu-Taleb, A. Evaluation of the roles of physical (osmotic, gamma irradiation and/or heat shock) stress factors on enzyme activities and protein accumulation in Pleurotus ostreatus mushroom and its descendent progenies. J. Food Agr. Envir. 2012, 10, 22–32. [Google Scholar]
  83. Kido, S.; Chosa, E.; Tanaka, R. The effect of six dried and UV-C-irradiated mushrooms powder on lipid oxidation and vitamin D contents of fish meat. Food Chem. 2022, 398, 133917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Barreira, J.C.M.; Pereira, J.A.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Sugars profiles of different chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) and almond (Prunus dulcis) cultivars by HPLC-RI. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2010, 65, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Villares, A.; Mateo-Vivaracho, L.; Garcia-Lafuente, A.; Guillamon, E. Storage temperature and UV-irradiation influence on the ergosterol content in edible mushrooms. Food Chem. 2014, 147, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Simon, R.R.; Phillips, K.M.; Horst, R.L.; Munro, I.C. Vitamin D mushrooms: Comparison of the composition of button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) treated postharvest with UVB light or sunlight. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 8724–8732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Turck, D.; Bohn, T.; Castenmiller, J.; De Henauw, S.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.I.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.J.; Naska, A.; Pelaez, C.; et al. Safety of vitamin D-2 mushroom powder as a Novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 (NF 2019/1471). Efsa J. 2022, 20, e07326. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Yu, J.; Engeseth, N.J.; Feng, H. High intensity ultrasound as an abiotic elicitor effect on antioxidant capacity and overall quality of romaine lettuce. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2016, 9, 262–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The relationship between postharvest quality degradation and influential factors.
Figure 1. The relationship between postharvest quality degradation and influential factors.
Foods 12 00103 g001
Figure 2. The food system under irradiation technology (γ, gamma radiation; e-beam, electron beam; UV, ultraviolet).
Figure 2. The food system under irradiation technology (γ, gamma radiation; e-beam, electron beam; UV, ultraviolet).
Foods 12 00103 g002
Figure 3. The mechanism of polyphenol oxidase (A) and antioxidant enzyme (B) in edible fungi. (PPO, polyphenol oxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase).
Figure 3. The mechanism of polyphenol oxidase (A) and antioxidant enzyme (B) in edible fungi. (PPO, polyphenol oxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase).
Foods 12 00103 g003
Table 1. Irradiated edible fungal species and irradiation conditions.
Table 1. Irradiated edible fungal species and irradiation conditions.
Radiation SourceSpeciesOriginSampleDosesReference
γ radiationMacrolepiota proceraPortugalFreeze-dried/Fresh0.5 and 1 kGy[37]
Agaricus bisporus (extract β-glucan)IndiaDried (oven)5, 10, 20, 30 and 50 kGy[38]
Boletus edulisPortugalDried and sliced2, 6 and 10 kGy[39]
Lactarius deliciosusPortugalFresh0.5 and 1 kGy[33]
Boletus edulis, Hydnum repandumPortugalFresh1 and 2 kGy[40]
Boletus pinophilus, Clitocybe subconnexaPortugalFresh2 kGy[41]
Lentinus edodesKoreaDried2, 5 and 10 kGy[42]
Lentinula edodesChinaFresh1 and 2 kGy[43]
Lentinula edodesChinaFresh1 kGy[44]
Agaricus bisporusIranFresh1 and 2 kGy[45]
Volvariella volvaceaChinaFresh0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 kGy[46]
γ and e-beam radiationMacrolepiota proceraPortugalDried (oven)0.5, 1 and 6 kGy[47]
Agaricus bisporusPortugalFresh1, 2 and 5 kGy [48]
Agaricus bisporusPortugalDried (oven)1, 2, 5 and 10 kGy[49]
E-beamAgaricus bisporusChinaFresh0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 kGy[29]
Agaricus bisporusIranDried 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kGy[25]
Amanita (A. caesarea and A. curtipes)PortugalDried (oven)2, 6 and 10 kGy[50]
Boletus edulis, Russula delicaPortugalDried (oven)2, 6 and 10 kGy[51]
Boletus edulis, Macrolepiota proceraPortugalDried (oven)2, 6 and 10 kGy; 0.5, 1 and 6 kGy[52]
Macrolepiota proceraPortugalDried (oven)0.5, 1 and 6 kGy[53]
Agaricus bisporusUSADried and sliced1 kGy[54]
UV-CAgaricus bisporusChinaFresh0.45 kJ/m2[55]
Agaricus bisporusChinaFreeze-dried1 kJ/m2[14]
Agaricus bisporusChinaFreeze-dried0.5, 1 and 2 kJ/m2[56]
Pleurotus ostreatusChinaFresh4 kJ/m2[57]
Agaricus bisporusCanadaDried37.8, 56.7 mJ/cm2[58]
Agaricus bisporusChinaFresh0.5 to 9 kJ/m2[59]
Agaricus bisporusChinaFresh0.5, 1 and 2 kJ/m2[60]
Pleurotus eryngiiChinaFresh2, 4 and 6 kJ/m2[61]
UV-C and UV-APleurotus ostreatusKenyaFresh1.96 and 0.21 kJ/m2[62]
UV-BLentinula edodesKoreaFresh30 kJ/m2[63]
Lentinula edodesIndiaAir-dried0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5 h[64]
Agaricus blazei, Agrocybe cylindracea, Auricularia polytricha, Hypsizigus marmoreus, Lentinula edodes, Pholiota nameko, Pleurotus eryngii, Pleurotus citrinopileatus, Pleurotus ferulae, Pleurotus ostreatus, Pleurotus salmoneostramineusChinaFresh2 h, 25.9 kJ/m2[65]
E-beam: Electron beam; UV: Ultraviolet.
Table 2. Effects of radiation on the inhibition of pathogenic microorganisms of edible fungi.
Table 2. Effects of radiation on the inhibition of pathogenic microorganisms of edible fungi.
SpeciesRadiation SourceTime for AnalysisParameterResultsReference
Agaricus bisporusE-beamEvery 3 days until 21 daysPseudomonas contentIrradiation levels above 1 kGy inhibited the growth and reproduction of Pseudomonas.[29]
Agaricus bisporusγ radiationEvery 7 days until 21 daysEscherichia coli (E. coli), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus)Dose of 2 kGy and Ag nanoparticle polyethylene films could prevent the accumulation of microbial load.[45]
Lentinula edodesγ radiationEvery 4 days until 20 dayscolonies, Pseudomonas, molds and yeasts, EnterobacteriaceaeUltrasound and gamma irradiation (1 kGy) reduced natural microflora present, such as the total number of colonies, molds, yeasts, Pseudomonas and Enterobacteriaceae.[44]
Agaricus bisporusE-beam0, 4, 9, 12, 15 daysTotal aerobic plates, psychrotrophic, and yeast and mold countsE-beam irradiation had an impact on reducing aerobic and psychrotrophic populations, whereas higher doses were required for inhibition of yeasts and molds.[54]
Pleurotus ostreatusUV radiationEvery 3 days until 15 daysTotal viable count, lactobacillus, yeasts and moldUV-C radiation (4 kJ/m2) delayed the growth of microbiological population of oyster mushrooms during the storage period.[57]
Pleurotus eryngiiUV radiationEvery day until 4 daysLactococcus lactis subsp.The combination of UV-C and yeast (Pichia kluyveri) significantly increased the level of decay control on mushrooms than either treatment alone.[61]
Agaricus bisporusUV radiation15 daysListeria bacteriophagesThe growth of L. monocytogenes was inhibited on mushrooms treated with chitosan, electrolyzed water, peroxyacetic acid or UV.[58]
Agaricus bisporusUV radiationEvery 7 days until 14 daysEscherichia coli O157:H7, microbial loadsThe inactivation effect of H2O2+UV on E. coli O157:H7 inoculated on mushrooms was not obvious, but reduced the microbial loads and extended the shelf life.[55]
Volvariella volvaceaγ radiationEvery day until 7 daysbacteria count, yeasts and moldThe results showed that V. volvacea exposed to 60Co gamma irradiation resulted in decreased total bacterial, mold and yeast counts throughout storage compared with that of the non-irradiated control.[46]
E-beam, Electron beam; UV radiation, Ultraviolet radiation.
Table 3. Effects of irradiation on physico-chemical, biochemical parameters and nutritional properties of edible fungi.
Table 3. Effects of irradiation on physico-chemical, biochemical parameters and nutritional properties of edible fungi.
SpeciesRadiation SourceTime for AnalysisTextureColorNutrientsEnzymatic ActivityReference
Agaricus bisporusE-beamEvery 3 days until 21 daysThe firmness of irradiated group dramatically exceeded non-irradiated samples, and the texture was improved.The increase inbrowning index was inhibited./Irradiation group decreased PPO activity, while increased SOD and CAT activity.[29]
γ radiationEvery 7 days until 21 daysThe firmness and elasticity of the combined treatment (2 kGy) were higher than non-irradiated samples.Combined treatment (2 kGy) kept the color stable.//[45]
E-beamEvery 4 days until 16 days/Irradiation with 1 and 2 kGy appeared to produce higher L* value than non-irradiated samples.The protein content of irradiated group was the highest and increased with the increase in dose (4 kGy). However, this treatment reduced the content of vitamin C. /[25]
γ radiation, e-beam0, 6, 12 months//E-beam or gamma rays (up to a dose of 10 kGy) all benefited the preservation of specific nutrients such as sugars, fat, tocopherols and organic acids./[49]
E-beam, UV radiationEvery 4 days until 8 days//In general, irradiation did not cause marked changes in protein and tocopherol contents, except for a small number of organic acids and saturated fatty acids./[48]
UV radiationEvery 6 days until 18 days/UV-C irradiation suppressed browning during cold storage.//[60]
Lentinula edodesγ radiation, e-beamEvery 4 days until 20 days/Ultrasound and gamma irradiation (1 kGy) maintained a better appearance./Treatment group increased PAL activity.[44]
UV radiation0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 h/With the increase in the irradiation duration, the L* value of the samples decreased, the b* value had no significant difference, while the a* values depicted a slight increase.The content of vitamin D2 was increased in irradiated samples (2 h), while the amino acid content did not change significantly./[64]
UV radiation/The hardness of UV-reated was slightly increased compared to that of untreated samples. However, there were no significant differences in all textural indices.There were no statistically significant changes in L*, a* or b* value between UV-treated and untreated groups.-/[63]
Macrolepiota proceraγ radiation///Irradiation treatment did not cause marked changes in mushrooms’ nutritional composition, but combining freezing treatment with 0.5 kGy doses preserved total tocopherols./[37]
E-beam0, 6 and 12 months//In general, irradiation treatment did not cause significant changes in nutrients (carbohydrate, total sugar and protein), while this treatment changed the distribution of the fatty acids and reduced the tocopherol content./[53]
Volvariella volvaceaγ radiationEvery day until 7 daysAll samples softened as the storage time increases. The firmness of the samples irradiated with 0.8 kGy of gamma radiation changed the least over the storage period.The degree of browning increased initially, then decreased and finally increased again during the storage period, while the percentage of browning in the control group was significantly higher than those of the gamma-irradiated samples./Irradiation group (0.8 kGy) increased the CAT activity and SOD activity compared with the control group.[46]
Lactarius deliciosusγ radiationEvery day until 8 days/Compared with the non-irradiated group, there was a slight decrease in a* value with irradiation dose.//[33]
Boletus edulisγ radiation0, 6 and 12 months//The obtained profiles presented lower amounts of fat and proteins, and higher amounts of carbohydrates. However, the nutrition content of the irradiated group was stable for long periods./[39]
Boletus edulis, Hydnum repandumγ radiation///Irradiation treatment decreased the protein, total sugar content and unsaturated fatty acids. Meanwhile, it increased the total tocopherol content./[40]
Boletus edulis, Russula delicaE-beam///The contents of protein and total sugar were decreased in the irradiation group. However, irradiation changed fatty acid distribution and increased tocopherol content./[51]
Amanita (A. caesarea and A. curtipes)E-beam///Overall, irradiation treatment increased the contents of protein and tocopherol, but changed the distribution of fatty acids. In addition, the total sugar content increased in irradiated A. caesarea and decreased in irradiated A. curtipes./[50]
Pleurotus ostreatusUV radiationEvery 3 days until 15 days/Irradiation prevented the browning of mushroom surface, and the L* value of untreated samples was significantly lower compared with UV-C treatment.The change in soluble protein content was similar between untreated and irradiated samples, but the content of irradiated samples was significantly higher than that of untreated samples during entire storage period.UV-C irradiation increased the PAL activity.[57]
Boletus pinophilus, Clitocybe subconnexaγ radiation///The radiation treatment group increased the protein content and decreased the total sugar and tocopherol content./[41]
Pleurotus eryngiiUV radiationEvery day until 4 days///UV-C irradiation increased the CAT and SOD activity.[61]
E-beam, electron beam; UV radiation, ultraviolet radiation.; L*: lightness; a*: redness; b*: yellowness; PPO: polyphenol oxidase; PAL: phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; CAT: catalase; SOD: superoxide dismutase./: Not reported.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhong, Y.; Dong, S.; Cui, Y.; Dong, X.; Xu, H.; Li, M. Recent Advances in Postharvest Irradiation Preservation Technology of Edible Fungi: A Review. Foods 2023, 12, 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12010103

AMA Style

Zhong Y, Dong S, Cui Y, Dong X, Xu H, Li M. Recent Advances in Postharvest Irradiation Preservation Technology of Edible Fungi: A Review. Foods. 2023; 12(1):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12010103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhong, Yuanyuan, Shuting Dong, Yuan Cui, Xiaobo Dong, Huaide Xu, and Mei Li. 2023. "Recent Advances in Postharvest Irradiation Preservation Technology of Edible Fungi: A Review" Foods 12, no. 1: 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12010103

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop