Next Article in Journal
The Rapid Phenotypic Susceptibility Testing in Real-Life Experience: How the MIC Values Impact on Sepsis Fast Diagnostic Workflow
Previous Article in Journal
Inter-System Variability of Eight Different Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) Devices—A Prospective Comparison of B-Scan Quality and Clinical Significance in Intensive Care
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer: From Diagnosis to Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Increased Risk of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) in Patients with Gout: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study Using a National Health Screening Cohort

1
Department of Urology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea
2
Suseoseoulent Clinic, Seoul 06349, Republic of Korea
3
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Pathology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea
5
Department of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea
6
Department of Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea
7
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13488, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(1), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010055
Submission received: 18 October 2023 / Revised: 21 December 2023 / Accepted: 22 December 2023 / Published: 26 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Prostate Cancer)

Abstract

:
A previous study reported a high risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in patients with gout. This study intended to evaluate the risk of BPH in gout patients. A total of 514,866 Korean National Health Insurance Service—Health Screening Cohorts were retrieved from 2002 to 2019. Among these individuals, 14,961 gout patients and 58,764 control participants were matched based on demographic factors. The incidence of BPH during the follow-up periods was collected for both the gout and control groups. The risk of BPH was analyzed using stratified Cox proportional hazard models, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Secondary analyses were conducted based on demographic factors and comorbidities. The incidence of BPH was 23.40% in gout patients and 20.70% in control participants. In the adjusted model, the HR of BPH was 1.13-fold higher in gout patients than in the control group (95% CI = 1.09–1.18). Compared with the ≥60-year-old group, the <60-year-old group demonstrated a higher HR for BPH in gout patients (1.19 [1.13–1.24] vs. 1.07 [1.01–1.13]). The risk of BPH in gout patients was consistent according to various comorbidities. Patients with gout demonstrated a greater risk of BPH than participants without gout. The young adult population had a higher risk of BPH related to gout.

1. Introduction

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is histologically defined as the abnormal proliferation of epithelial and stromal cells in the prostate gland, which encompasses the proximal urethra [1]. Approximately 26.2% of the population is estimated to suffer from BPH [2]. The prevalence of BPH increases with age, as more than 50% of the population older than 60 years has BPH [3]. In Korea, approximately 20.0% of males are diagnosed with BPH, and the prevalence of BPH is as high as 26.6% in populations older than 70 years [4]. To relieve the difficulties in emptying and retaining patients, several types of medical and surgical approaches are employed [5,6,7]. Because many of these treatments cannot reverse the changes in prostate hyperplasia, preventive management and the delineation of the risk factors of BPH are important. A number of lifestyle factors, such as obesity; high intake of carbohydrates, fat, protein, and sugar; smoking; alcohol consumption; and sedentary behavior, have been suggested to increase the risk of BPH [8]. In addition, comorbidities, including metabolic disorders such as diabetes and related medications, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, are purportedly associated with increased susceptibility to BPH [9].
Gout is one of the most common inflammatory arthritis types. Uric acid deposits mainly originate from chronic hyperuricemia, which causes inflammatory arthritis [10]. In the U.S., the prevalence of gout is approximately 5.9% in men and 2.0% in women [3]. In Korea, the incidence of gout was estimated to be approximately 1.94 (95% confidence intervals (CI) = 1.93–1.95) per 1000 persons, and the incidence of gout was calculated to be approximately 7.58 (7.55–7.60) [11]. Because gout also involves the perturbation of metabolism, which results in the deposition of urate crystals and inflammation, patients with gout may be more vulnerable to the development of BPH. Indeed, a previous cohort study reported a 1.3 times greater risk of BPH in patients with gout [12]. In particular, a young male population aged >60 years demonstrated a high risk of BPH among gout patients but not in a population older than 60 years. Moreover, an association between uric acid levels and the risk of BPH has been suggested. A population cohort study reported a lower risk of BPH related to urate-lowering medication, such as allopurinol [13]. Allopurinol use lowers the risk of BPH in terms of medication, diagnosis, and surgery (HR = 0.81 [0.75–0.88], 0.78 [0.71–0.86], and 0.67 [0.58–0.76]) [13].
The present study hypothesized that patients with gout, including those in the older age group, have a greater risk of BPH in the adult population. Moreover, we investigated the risk of BPH in gout patients according to comorbid conditions and lifestyle factors. This study used large, nationwide population data in Korea, which reduced selection bias due to the limited number of study populations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Exposure (Gout)

Gout was defined as occurring in participants who visited the clinic or hospital with a diagnosis of gout (International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10): M10) ≥ 2 times. These methods were modified from the previous study.

2.2. Outcome (Definition of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) was defined using International Classification of Diseases 10 code (ICD-10 code) N40 from 2002 through 2019. Among them, we selected the participants who were treated ≥2 times and participants who were diagnosed with BPH with an exam (claim codes: C4280, E7050, EY521, EY522, EB451) following our previous studies.

2.3. Participant Selection

A detailed description of the Korean National Health Insurance Service—Health Screening Cohort data was provided recently in [14].
Gout participants were selected from 514,866 participants with 895,300,177 medical claim codes from 2002 to 2019 (n = 27,313). The control group included participants who were not diagnosed with gout between 2002 and 2019 (n = 487,553). To select gout participants who were diagnosed for the first time, gout participants diagnosed in 2002 were excluded (washout periods, n = 2470). To select only men, females were excluded (n = 5281). Control participants were also excluded if they were diagnosed with M10 per the International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) code once or if they were females (n = 212,229). In both the gout and control groups, participants who had a history of BPH before the index date were excluded. In the gout group, 4870 participants were excluded. Participants who did not have a blood pressure record were excluded (n = 1). Gout participants were 1:4 matched with control participants for age, sex, income, and region of residence. To prevent selection bias when selecting the matched participants, the control participants were sorted using a random number order and were subsequently selected from top to bottom. It was assumed that the matched control participants were evaluated at the same time as each matched gout participant (index date). Therefore, participants in the control group who died before the index date were excluded. During the matching procedure, 216,560 control participants were excluded. Finally, 14,691 gout participants were 1:4 matched with 58,764 control participants (Figure 1).

2.4. Covariates

Age was divided into 5-year intervals: 40–44… and 85+ years. A total of 10 age groups were specified. Income groups were classified into 5 classes (class 1 (lowest income) to class 5 (highest income)). The regions of residence were grouped into urban (Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Incheon, Gwangju, Daejeon, and Ulsan) and rural (Gyeonggi, Gangwon, Chungcheongbuk, Chungcheongnam, Jeollabuk, Jeollanam, Gyeongsangbuk, Gyeongsangnam, and Jeju) areas.
Tobacco smoking was categorized based on the participant’s current smoking status (nonsmoker, past smoker, and current smoker). Alcohol consumption was categorized on the basis of the frequency of alcohol consumption (<1 time a week and ≥1 time a week). Obesity was measured using BMI (body mass index, kg/m2000). BMI was categorized as <18.5 (underweight), ≥18.5 to <23 (normal), ≥23 to <25 (overweight), ≥25 to <30 (obese I), and ≥30 (obese II) based on the Asia–Pacific criteria following the Western Pacific Regional Office (WPRO) [15]. Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), fasting blood glucose (mg/dL), and total cholesterol (mg/dL) were measured.
The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to measure disease burden using 17 comorbidities. A score was given to each participant depending on the severity and number of diseases. The CCI was measured as a continuous variable (0 (no comorbidities) to 29 (multiple comorbidities)) [16].

2.5. Statistical Analyses

The standardized difference was used to compare the percentages of patients with different general characteristics between the gout and control groups.
Stratified Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of gout for BPH. Crude (simple) and adjusted (obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, and CCI scores) models were used in these analyses, and the 95% CI was calculated. In these analyses, age, sex, income, and region of residence were stratified. K—M curves and logrank tests were used.
For the subgroup analyses using the stratified Cox-proportional hazards model, we divided participants by age, sex, obesity, and fasting blood glucose.
We performed additional subgroup analyses using the unstratified Cox-proportional hazards model. We divided participants by income, region of residence, smoking status, alcohol consumption, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and CCI scores.
Two-tailed analyses were performed, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for the statistical analyses.

3. Results

A total of 23.40% (3438/14,691) of the gout patients and 20.70% (12,163/58,764) of the control participants were diagnosed with BPH (sd = 0.07; Table 1). The distributions of obesity groups, smoking status, alcohol consumption, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, and CCI score were different between the BPH and control groups.
The gout patients demonstrated a 1.15 times greater risk of BPH than did the control individuals in the crude analysis (95% CI = 1.11–1.20, p < 0.001; Table 2). After adjusting for covariables, the risk of BPH was 1.13 times greater in the gout patients than in the control individuals (95% CI = 1.09–1.18, p < 0.001; Figure 2).
According to age, the younger age group (<60 years old) showed a higher risk of BPH than the older age group (≥60 years old) for gout patients (HR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.13–1.25 for <60-year-old group and HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01–1.13 for ≥60-year-old group). The male, low or high income, urban or rural residence, normal weight, overweight, obese, nonsmoker, past and current smoker, and alcohol consumption <1 times a week or ≥1 times a week subgroups and CCI scores of zero or one indicated a higher risk of BPH in gout patients.

4. Discussion

The risk of BPH was greater in patients with gout in the present study. Although the risk of BPH was greater in the young adult population, the old population also demonstrated an elevated risk for BPH in gout patients in the present study.
Chronic hyperuricemia in gout patients can increase the subsequent risk of BPH. It has been suggested that oxidative stress can induce BPH by activating the inflammasome in response to uric acid [17]. The impact of high levels of uric acid in serum on the proliferation of prostate cancer cells was suggested to be mediated by urate transporters in [18]. In addition, there is supporting evidence that reducing serum urate levels decreases the risk of BPH [13]. A cohort study revealed that high serum uric acid levels are associated with a low risk of lower urinary tract symptoms [19]. Thus, it can be presumed that there is a close relationship between uric acid levels and BPH. Most patients with gout are exposed to chronic hyperuricemia, which induces the accumulation of urate crystals in articular and nonarticular areas [20]. In addition to the deposition of urate in articular areas, high levels of serum urate can result in the modulation of prostate cells and may increase the risk of BPH.
In addition to hyperuricemia, systemic inflammatory conditions and abnormalities in testosterone levels can mediate the elevated risk of BPH in gout patients. Both gout and BPH are accompanied by systemic inflammation. The activation of the NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, which initiates inflammatory cascades involving interleukin-1β and other inflammatory cytokines, is known for acute gout attacks [21]. In addition to the NLRP3-related pathway, more than 200 genes have been suggested to be dysregulated in gout patients; these genes are mainly associated with inflammation, cytokines, and chemokine activation [22]. The pathophysiology of BPH also includes inflammation and metabolic derangements [23,24]. Thus, metabolic and inflammatory dysfunctions in gout patients can increase vulnerability to BPH. Moreover, testosterone may mediate the link between gout and BPH. A low level of testosterone was suggested to be related to BPH [10]. Low testosterone levels have also been reported to be associated with hyperuricemia in males [25]. Thus, abnormal testosterone levels may link hyperuricemia in gout patients with the risk of BPH.
Decreased physical activity due to arthritis and acute symptoms in gout patients could increase the risk of BPH. A follow-up study demonstrated an increased risk of BPH in participants with low physical activity [26]. Physical activity was negatively associated with BPH incidence (OR = 0.75, 95% CO = 0.67 = 0.85) [26]. Thus, a sedentary lifestyle due to arthritic symptoms in gout patients can impose an increased risk of BPH in these populations.
The old population demonstrated a lower risk of BPH related to gout than the younger population in the present study. This may be explained by the multiple contributing factors to the development of BPH in the older population. For instance, a certain pathology in the aging process, mitochondrial dysfunction, may contribute to fibrosis and dysfunction in the prostate, which results in BPH [27]. According to our subgroup analyses, the presence or absence of comorbidities and lifestyle factors did not modify the association between gout and BPH. Therefore, we can assume that the risk of BPH associated with gout may be solid and multifactorial and cannot be ruled out given these comorbidities and lifestyle factors.
This study analyzed a large, nationwide cohort population. A sufficient number of control participants can be fooled without potential selection bias. Because all Koreans are legally registered with the national health insurance system and their medical records must be recorded and monitored by the government, the reliability of this study can be guaranteed.
However, there are several limitations concerning potential bias and uncertainty in the present study. Because the data were collected from clinics, hidden patients who did not visit clinics were missed in the present study. In addition, the types and severity of gout were heterogeneous in the present study. A previous study reported that gouty nephropathy patients, other than those with other types of gout, including gouty arthropathy and gouty tophi, demonstrated a high risk of BPH [12]. Thus, the differentiation of gout types can specify the relationship between gout and BPH in future studies. The severity and treatment history of BPH also varied among the study populations. Several surgical modalities and other modalities, including uroflowmetry, are used to treat BPH according to the established guidelines [6,7,28]. In Korea, medication has been reported to be the most prevalent therapy for BPH patients (98.77%) [29]. A previous study reported that medication for BPH was associated with the incidence of gout [30,31]. Therefore, medication history can influence the relationship between gout and BPH in this study. Although this study analyzed numerous variables and secondary analyses were conducted, confounders may remain in the current study. Because this study was based on a Korean population, ethnic or regional differences may be possible regarding the association between the two diseases. Further studies are warranted to explore the different types of gout and their associations with BPH considering the effects of medication on this relationship and investigating ethnic or regional variations in this association.

5. Conclusions

Patients with gout had a higher risk of BPH in the adult population. The elevated risk of BPH in gout patients was independent of lifestyle factors and comorbid conditions. Clinicians may need to consider the potentially increased risk of BPH when managing patients with gout and the need for early monitoring or intervention.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.G.C., S.Y.K. and W.J.B.; methodology, H.G.C.; software, H.G.C.; validation, J.H.K. and J.-H.K.; formal analysis, H.G.C. and H.S.K.; investigation, H.G.C. and S.Y.K.; resources, S.Y.K. and W.J.B.; data curation, H.G.C. and H.S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.G.C., S.Y.K., M.J.K. and W.J.B.; writing—review and editing, H.G.C. and W.J.B.; visualization, H.G.C.; supervision, W.J.B.; project administration, H.G.C. and H.S.K.; funding acquisition, S.Y.K. and W.J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a research grant (NRF-2022R1C1C100307) from the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT). The funding organization did not contribute to the design or conduct of this study; preparation, review, or approval; or the decision to submit this manuscript for publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The ethics committee of Hallym University (2019-10-023, 23 October 2019) approved this study. Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. All the analyses adhered to the guidelines and regulations of the ethics committee of Hallym University.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Restrictions apply to the availability of these data. Data was obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort and are available from https://nhiss.nhis.or.kr/bd/ab/bdaba021eng.do, accessed on 22 December 2023, with the permission of Korean National Health Insurance Service.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Priest, R.; Garzotto, M.; Kaufman, J. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Brief Overview of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Tech. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2012, 15, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Thorpe, A.; Neal, D. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Lancet 2003, 361, 1359–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhu, Y.; Pandya, B.J.; Choi, H.K. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2008. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63, 3136–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Goh, H.J.; Kim, S.A.; Nam, J.W.; Choi, B.Y.; Moon, H.S. Community-based research on the benign prostatic hyperplasia prevalence rate in Korean rural area. Korean J. Urol. 2015, 56, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Miernik, A.; Gratzke, C. Current Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Dtsch. Aerzteblatt Online 2020, 117, 843–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fusco, F.; Creta, M.; Trama, F.; Esposito, F.; Crocetto, F.; Aveta, A.; Mangiapia, F.; Imbimbo, C.; Capece, M.; La Rocca, R.; et al. Tamsulosin plus a new complementary and alternative medicine in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results from a retrospective comparative study. Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 2020, 92, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pandolfo, S.D.; Del Giudice, F.; Chung, B.I.; Manfredi, C.; De Sio, M.; Damiano, R.; Cherullo, E.E.; De Nunzio, C.; Cacciamani, G.E.; Cindolo, L.; et al. Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy versus other treatment modalities for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6500 cases. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023, 26, 495–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Plochocki, A.; King, B. Medical Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2022, 49, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.-B.; Yang, L.; Deng, Y.-Q.; Yan, S.-Y.; Luo, L.-S.; Chen, P.; Zeng, X.-T. Causal relationship between obesity, lifestyle factors and risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization study. J. Transl. Med. 2022, 20, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hammarsten, J.; Högstedt, B.; Holthuis, N.; Mellström, D. Components of the metabolic syndrome—Risk factors for the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 1998, 1, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dalbeth, N.; Merriman, T.R.; Stamp, L.K. Gout. Lancet 2016, 388, 2039–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kim, J.-W.; Kwak, S.G.; Lee, H.; Kim, S.-K.; Choe, J.-Y.; Park, S.-H. Prevalence and incidence of gout in Korea: Data from the national health claims database 2007–2015. Rheumatol. Int. 2017, 37, 1499–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, W.-M.; Pasaribu, N.; Lee, S.-S.; Tsai, W.-C.; Li, C.-Y.; Lin, G.-T.; Chuang, H.-Y.; Tung, Y.-C.; Tu, H.-P. Risk of incident benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with gout: A retrospective cohort study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018, 21, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kukko, V.; Kaipia, A.; Talala, K.; Taari, K.; Tammela, T.L.J.; Auvinen, A.; Murtola, T.J. Allopurinol and risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia in a Finnish population-based cohort. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018, 21, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, S.Y.; Min, C.; Yoo, D.M.; Chang, J.; Lee, H.-J.; Park, B.; Choi, H.G. Hearing Impairment Increases Economic Inequality. Clin. Exp. Otorhinolaryngol. 2021, 14, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. World Health Organization. The Asia-Pacific Perespective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  17. Quan, H.; Li, B.; Couris, C.M.; Fushimi, K.; Graham, P.; Hider, P.; Januel, J.-M.; Sundararajan, V. Updating and Validating the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Score for Risk Adjustment in Hospital Discharge Abstracts Using Data From 6 Countries. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 173, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. De Nunzio, C.; Presicce, F.; Tubaro, A. Inflammatory mediators in the development and progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2016, 13, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sangkop, F.; Singh, G.; Rodrigues, E.; Gold, E.; Bahn, A. Uric acid: A modulator of prostate cells and activin sensitivity. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2016, 414, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hwang, J.; Ryu, S.; Ahn, J.K. Higher Levels of Serum Uric Acid Have a Significant Association with Lower Incidence of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Healthy Korean Men. Metabolites 2022, 12, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dalbeth, N.; Gosling, A.L.; Gaffo, A.; Abhishek, A. Gout. Lancet 2021, 397, 1843–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. So, A.K.; Martinon, F. Inflammation in gout: Mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2017, 13, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Qiu, K.; Zeng, T.; Liao, Y.; Min, J.; Zhang, N.; Peng, M.; Kong, W.; Chen, L.-L. Identification of Inflammation-Related Biomarker Pro-ADM for Male Patients with Gout by Comprehensive Analysis. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 798719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Madersbacher, S.; Sampson, N.; Culig, Z. Pathophysiology of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Benign Prostatic Enlargement: A Mini-Review. Gerontology 2019, 65, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lloyd, G.L.; Marks, J.M.; Ricke, W.A. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: What Is the Role and Significance of Inflammation? Curr. Urol. Rep. 2019, 20, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tsai, M.-K.; Hung, K.-C.; Liao, C.-C.; Pan, L.-F.; Hung, C.-L.; Yang, D.-H. The Association between Serum Testosterone and Hyperuricemia in Males. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Platz, E.A.; Kawachi, I.; Rimm, E.B.; Colditz, G.A.; Stampfer, M.J.; Willett, W.C.; Giovannucci, E. Physical activity and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Arch. Intern. Med. 1998, 158, 2349–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Adrian, A.E.; Liu, T.T.; Pascal, L.E.; Bauer, S.R.; DeFranco, D.B.; Ricke, W.A. Aging-Related Mitochondrial Dysfunction is Associated with Fibrosis in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 2023, glad222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pandolfo, S.D.; Crauso, F.; Aveta, A.; Cilio, S.; Barone, B.; Napolitano, L.; Scarpato, A.; Mirto, B.F.; Serino, F.; Del Giudice, F.; et al. A Novel Low-Cost Uroflowmetry for Patient Telemonitoring. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jo, J.K.; Shinn, S.H.; Kim, K.S.; Moon, H.S. Changes in Prevalence and Treatment Pattern of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Korea. Int. Neurourol. J. 2021, 25, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hsu, W.-H.; Lai, J.-N.; Lin, C.-L.; Loh, C.-H.; Huang, H.-K.; Huang, L.-K. Association of alpha-1-adrenergic antagonist use with the risk of gout development in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients: A population-based cohort study. Fam. Pr. 2022, 39, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A schematic illustration of the participant selection process used in the present study. Among a total of 514,866 participants, 14,691 gout participants were matched with 58,764 control participants for age, sex, income, and region of residence.
Figure 1. A schematic illustration of the participant selection process used in the present study. Among a total of 514,866 participants, 14,691 gout participants were matched with 58,764 control participants for age, sex, income, and region of residence.
Diagnostics 14 00055 g001
Figure 2. The risk of benign prostate hyperplasia in patients with gout compared with the control group.
Figure 2. The risk of benign prostate hyperplasia in patients with gout compared with the control group.
Diagnostics 14 00055 g002
Table 1. Patient general characteristics.
Table 1. Patient general characteristics.
CharacteristicsTotal Participants
GoutControlStandardized Difference
Age (years old) (n, %) 0.00
40–44497 (3.38)1988 (3.38)
45–491660 (11.30)6640 (11.30)
50–542654 (18.07)10,616 (18.07)
55–593136 (21.35)12,544 (21.35)
60–642440 (16.61)9760 (16.61)
65–691910 (13.00)7640 (13.00)
70–741288 (8.77)5152 (8.77)
75–79752 (5.12)3008 (5.12)
80–84280 (1.91)1120 (1.91)
85+74 (0.50)296 (0.50)
Sex (n, %) 0.00
Male14,691 (100.0)58,764 (100.0)
Income (n, %) 0.00
1 (lowest)1901 (12.94)7604 (12.94)
21807 (12.30)7228 (12.30)
32245 (15.28)8980 (15.28)
43127 (21.29)12,508 (21.29)
5 (highest)5611 (38.19)22,444 (38.19)
Region of residence (n, %) 0.00
Urban6268 (42.67)25,072 (42.67)
Rural8423 (57.33)33,692 (57.33)
Obesity † (n, %) 0.33
Underweight173 (1.18)1508 (2.57)
Normal3395 (23.11)20,146 (34.28)
Overweight4067 (27.68)16,689 (28.40)
Obese I6442 (43.85)19,123 (32.54)
Obese II614 (4.18)1298 (2.21)
Smoking status (n, %) 0.03
Nonsmoker6226 (42.38)24,436 (41.58)
Past smoker2460 (16.74)9126 (15.53)
Current smoker6005 (40.88)25,202 (42.89)
Alcohol consumption (n, %) 0.14
<1 time a week6931 (47.18)31,880 (54.25)
≥1 time a week7760 (52.82)26,884 (45.75)
Systolic blood pressure (n, %) 0.20
<120 mmHg3779 (24.22)14,711 (25.43)
120–139 mmHg7850 (50.32)29,617 (51.19)
≥140 mmHg3972 (25.46)13,526 (23.38)
Diastolic blood pressure (n, %) 0.19
<80 mmHg5905 (37.85)23,356 (40.37)
80–89 mmHg5985 (38.36)22,464 (38.83)
≥90 mmHg3711 (23.79)12,034 (20.80)
Fasting blood glucose (n, %) 0.03
<100 mg/dL9336 (59.84)31,992 (55.30)
100–125 mg/dL4680 (30.00)18,955 (32.76)
≥126 mg/dL1585 (10.16)6907 (11.94)
Total cholesterol (n, %) 0.11
<200 mg/dL8654 (55.47)32,689 (56.50)
200–239 mg/dL5070 (32.50)18,369 (31.75)
≥240 mg/dL1877 (12.03)6796 (11.75)
CCI score (n, %) 0.09
08533 (54.70)36,099 (62.40)
12649 (16.98)8539 (14.76)
≥24419 (28.33)13,216 (22.84)
Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (n, %)3438 (23.40)12,163 (20.70)0.07
Abbreviations: CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; † obesity (BMI, body mass index, kg/m2) was categorized as <18.5 (underweight), ≥18.5 to <23 (normal), ≥23 to <25 (overweight), ≥25 to <30 (obese I), or ≥30 (obese II).
Table 2. Analyses of crude and overlap propensity score-weighted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of gout for benign prostate hyperplasia.
Table 2. Analyses of crude and overlap propensity score-weighted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of gout for benign prostate hyperplasia.
N of Event/
N of Total (%)
Follow-Up
Duration (PY)
IR per
1000
(PY)
IRD
(95% CI)
Hazard Ratios for Migraine
Crude †p ValueAdjusted †,‡p-Value
Total Participants
Gout3438/14,691 (23.40)98,58234.905.00 (3.72–6.16)1.15 (1.11–1.20)<0.001 *1.13 (1.09–1.18)<0.001 *
Control12,163/58,764 (20.70)406,32829.90 1 1
Age < 60 years old
Gout1862/7947 (23.43)64,77328.705.00 (3.68–6.37)1.21 (1.15–1.27)<0.001 *1.19 (1.13–1.25)<0.001 *
Control6378/31,788 (20.06)268,87723.70 1 1
Age ≥ 60 years old
Gout1575/6744 (23.35)33,80946.704.60 (2.03–6.96)1.10 (1.04–1.16)0.001 *1.07 (1.01–1.13)0.016 *
Control5785/26,976 (21.44)137,45142.10 1 1
Male
Gout3438/14,691 (23.40)98,58234.905.00 (3.72–6.16)1.15 (1.11–1.20)<0.001 *1.13 (1.09–1.18)<0.001 *
Control12,163/58,764 (20.70)406,32829.90 1 1
Low-income group
Gout1336/5953 (22.44)38,03635.106.40 (4.50–8.37)1.22 (1.14–1.29)<0.001 *1.19 (1.12–1.27)<0.001 *
Control4538/23,812 (19.06)158,15928.70 1 1
High-income group
Gout2102/8738 (24.06)60,54634.704.00 (2.42–5.57)1.12 (1.07–1.12)<0.001 *1.10 (1.04–1.15)<0.001 *
Control7625/34,952 (21.82)248,16930.70 1 1
Urban resident
Gout1546/6268 (24.66)42,53636.304.60 (2.73–6.56)1.14 (1.07–1.20)<0.001 *1.12 (1.06–1.18)<0.001 *
Control5532/25,072 (22.06)174,49131.70 1 1
Rural resident
Gout1892/8423 (22.46)56,04633.805.20 (3.57–6.74)1.17 (1.11–1.23)<0.001 *1.15 (1.09–1.21)<0.001 *
Control6631/33,692 (19.68)231,83728.60 1 1
Underweight
Gout33/173 (19.08)91336.107.00 (−4.72–18.78)1.20 (0.83–1.72)0.3331.16 (0.81–1.68)0.420
Control259/1508 (17.18)889629.10 1 1
Normal weight
Gout746/3395 (21.97)21,93634.005.10 (2.71–7.60)1.16 (1.07–1.25)<0.001 *1.13 (1.05–1.23)0.002 *
Control4014/20,146 (19.92)139,11628.90 1 1
Overweight
Gout942/4067 (23.16)27,39834.403.70 (1.33–5.99)1.11 (1.03–1.19)0.005 *1.08 (1.01–1.16)0.035 *
Control3584/16,689 (21.48)116,65730.70 1 1
Obese
Gout1717/7056 (24.33)48,33535.505.10 (3.29–6.96)1.16 (1.10–1.23)<0.001 *1.15 (1.09–1.22)<0.001 *
Control4306/20,421 (21.09)141,65930.40 1 1
Nonsmoker
Gout1640/6226 (26.34)41,74139.305.80 (3.81–7.80)1.29 (1.18 to 1.41)<0.001 *1.29 (1.20 to 1.38)<0.001 *
Control5592/24,436 (22.88)167,01133.50 1 1
Past and current smoker
Gout1798/8465 (21.24)56,84131.604.10 (2.64–5.71)1.17 (1.04 to 1.32)0.011 *1.19 (1.08 to 1.32)<0.001 *
Control6571/34,328 (19.14)239,31727.50 1 1
Alcohol consumption < 1 time a week
Gout1642/6931 (23.69)46,05335.703.80 (1.93–5.56)1.31 (1.20 to 1.43)<0.001 *1.26 (1.18 to 1.35)<0.001 *
Control6970/31,880 (21.86)218,42031.90 1 1
Alcohol consumption ≥ 1 time a week
Gout1796/7760 (23.14)52,52934.206.60 (4.91–8.20)1.22 (1.07 to 1.38)0.002 *1.23 (1.11 to 1.38)<0.001 *
Control5193/26,884 (19.32)187,90827.60 1 1
SBP < 120 mmHg and DBP < 80 mmHg
Gout2102/9496 (22.14)60,25834.905.00 (3.40–6.48)1.15 (1.10–1.21)<0.001 *1.05 (1.00–1.10)0.050
Control8497/42,344 (20.07)283,77829.90 1 1
SBP ≥ 120 mmHg or DBP ≥ 80 mmHg
Gout1336/5195 (25.72)38,32434.905.00 (2.92–6.97)1.16 (1.09–1.24)<0.001 *1.01 (0.94–1.07)0.876
Control3666/16,420 (22.33)122,55029.90 1 1
Fasting blood glucose < 100 mg/dL
Gout1988/8084 (24.59)57,41434.604.40 (2.81–6.02)1.14 (1.08–1.20)<0.001 *1.04 (0.99–1.09)0.166
Control7348/33,244 (22.10)243,22930.20 1 1
Fasting blood glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL
Gout1450/6607 (21.95)41,16835.205.70 (3.81–7.59)1.18 (1.12–1.25)<0.001 *1.02 (0.96–1.08)0.567
Control4815/25,520 (18.87)163,09929.50 1 1
Total cholesterol < 200 mg/dL
Gout1779/7761 (22.92)49,68035.805.20 (3.51–6.96)1.16 (1.10–1.22)<0.001 *1.01 (0.96–1.07)0.663
Control6875/33,582 (20.47)224,89830.60 1 1
Total cholesterol ≥ 200 mg/dL
Gout1659/6930 (23.94)48,90233.904.80 (3.04–6.51)1.16 (1.09–1.22)<0.001 *1.05 (0.99–1.11)0.114
Control5288/25,182 (21.00)181,43029.10 1 1
CCI scores = 0
Gout1682/8225 (20.45)56,65129.703.50 (2.04–5.01)1.14 (1.07–1.20)<0.001 *1.12 (1.06–1.18)<0.001 *
Control6851/36,407 (18.82)261,85726.20 1 1
CCI scores = 1
Gout620/2410 (25.73)16,24138.204.50 (1.24–7.70)1.17 (1.11–1.23)<0.001 *1.15 (1.09–1.21)<0.001 *
Control2029/8778 (23.11)60,20033.70 1 1
CCI scores ≥ 2
Gout1136/4056 (28.01)25,69044.205.20 (2.46–8.06)1.13 (1.06–1.21)<0.001 *0.98 (0.91–1.05)0.485
Control3283/13,579 (24.18)84,27139.00 1 1
Abbreviations: IR, incidence rate; IRD, incidence rate difference; PY, person-year; * stratified Cox proportional hazard regression model, significance at p < 0.05. † Models were stratified by age, sex, income, and region of residence. ‡ The model was adjusted for age, sex, income, region, obesity status, smoking status, alcohol consumption, SBP, DBP, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, and CCI score.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bang, W.J.; Choi, H.G.; Kang, H.S.; Kwon, M.J.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, S.Y. Increased Risk of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) in Patients with Gout: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study Using a National Health Screening Cohort. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010055

AMA Style

Bang WJ, Choi HG, Kang HS, Kwon MJ, Kim JH, Kim J-H, Kim SY. Increased Risk of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) in Patients with Gout: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study Using a National Health Screening Cohort. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(1):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bang, Woo Jin, Hyo Geun Choi, Ho Suk Kang, Mi Jung Kwon, Ji Hee Kim, Joo-Hee Kim, and So Young Kim. 2024. "Increased Risk of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) in Patients with Gout: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study Using a National Health Screening Cohort" Diagnostics 14, no. 1: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010055

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop