Next Article in Journal
Follow-Up of a Rare Case of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis Associated with Persistent Blood Eosinophilia and Multiple Food Allergies
Previous Article in Journal
Frequency and Consequences of Cervical Lymph Node Overstaging in Head and Neck Carcinoma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/diagnostics12061380
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Fluorescence-Based Competitive Antibody Binding Assay for Kynurenine, a Potential Biomarker of Kidney Transplant Failure

by
Max Borgolte
1,2,
Isabel Quint
1,3,
Lars Kaiser
1,4,
René Csuk
2 and
Hans-Peter Deigner
1,5,*
1
Institute of Precision Medicine, Furtwangen University, Jakob-Kienzle Str. 17, 78054 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
2
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Kurt-Mothes-Str. 2, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
3
Faculty of Science, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 8, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
4
Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Freiburg, Albertstraße 25, 79104 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
5
EXIM Department, Fraunhofer Institute IZI (Leipzig), Schillingallee 68, 18057 Rostock, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(6), 1380; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061380
Submission received: 22 March 2022 / Revised: 13 May 2022 / Accepted: 29 May 2022 / Published: 2 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Kynurenine is a tryptophan metabolite linked to several inflammatory processes including transplant failure, a significant challenge in transplant medicine. The detection of small molecules such as kynurenine, however, is often complex and time consuming. Herein, we report the successful synthesis of a fluorescently labelled kynurenine derivative, showing proper fluorescence and anti-kynurenine antibody binding behavior in a magnetic bead immunoassay (MIA). The fluorescent kynurenine–rhodamine B conjugate shows a KD-value of 5.9 µM as well as IC50 values of 4.0 µM in PBS and 10.2 µM in saliva. We thus introduce a rapid test for kynurenine as a potential biomarker for kidney transplant failure.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Kynurenine is a metabolite of the tryptophan degradation pathway linked to several inflammatory, metabolic, oncogenic [1] as well as psychiatric disorders [2,3]. While some tryptophan is metabolized to serotonin [4], 95% of the dietary tryptophan is metabolized to the kynurenine pathway (KP) via the enzyme class of indolamine-2,3-dioxygenases (IDOs) [5,6,7], followed by a cascade of degradation enzymes with quinolinic acid as the final product [8]. The activity of the IDO enzymes is regulated through immunological factors such as pathogenic microorganisms and LPS [9,10,11], inflammatory cytokines [12,13], or IL-1 and TNF-α [14]. Elevated kynurenine levels also downregulate immune activation and convey anti-inflammatory activity [15,16,17,18], demonstrating a feedback-loop-like behavior.
The link between inflammatory response and elevated kynurenine levels in serum via upregulation of IDO by pro-inflammatory factors renders kynurenine an interesting biomarker for clinically relevant inflammatory processes. Upregulated IDO and, therefore, elevated kynurenine levels of 3.9 ± 2.1 µM in serum have been found in the case of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients in the pre-dialysis stage. Values increase along with CKD severity up to 5.6 ± 2.3 µM because of chronic inflammation during CKD progression [19,20,21,22]. Elevated kynurenine levels are related not only to CKD but also to inflammatory processes after kidney transplantation; they are inversely correlated with kidney function [23,24]. In a study from 2007 by Buczko et al., plasma and saliva kynurenine levels from uremic patients were compared, showing reproducible results and correlations among saliva and serum kynurenine levels [25]. Due to this correlation in serum and saliva kynurenine found by Buczko et al. [25] and the association with inflammation and IDO expression both in kidney failure during chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant rejection [22,26,27], and due to the findings that kynurenine is discussed as a biomarker for renal allograft failure in the literature [28,29], here, we focus on kynurenine determined from saliva as a potential biomarker for kidney transplant rejection. In patients with transplant rejection, L-kynurenine levels of 17.4 ± 8.4 µM for serum and 4.6 ± 1.6 µM for saliva were measured, compared to control groups with serum levels of 2.7 ± 0.4 µM and 0.7 ± 0.4 µM in saliva [23,25,28,29,30].
Apart from transplant failure, elevated kynurenine levels have also been linked to titanium dental implants and to bone-osseointegration processes [31], as well as to the implantation of a left ventricular assist device, showing that kynurenine as a metabolite is linked to implant failure as well [32].
Most approaches in clinical trials to quantifying kynurenine from different tissues are focused on LC-MS [33,34,35] or GC-MS [36] methods, displaying clinical impracticability and delayed diagnosis. Apart from these, Ungor et al., 2019, presented fluorescent gold nanoclusters able to detect kynurenine in physiological concentrations in PBS with a quenching mechanism [37]. Another approach is the usage of fluorescently labelled kynurenine derivatives, as shown by Klockow et al., 2013, who labelled kynurenine with a coumarin aldehyde scaffold, showing fluorescence while undergoing a shift in pH [38]. Other approaches for potential rapid testing, using the kynurenine pathway for diagnosis, focus on quantifying the IDO activity instead of measuring kynurenine directly [39].
To date and due to the small size of the kynurenine molecule, no fluorescently labelled kynurenine derivatives bound to an anti-kynurenine antibody are described in the literature. Likewise, there is no functional bioassay based on antibody binding of kynurenine described in the literature. Herein, we report the synthesis of a fluorescent, rhodamine B-labelled kynurenine derivative and demonstrate its binding ability to an anti-kynurenine antibody. We demonstrate that this denotes a promising approach for the development of a competitive kynurenine antibody-binding assay and ultimately a kynurenine rapid test from saliva and possibly other body fluids.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Experimental

TLC was carried out on Silica Gel 60 F254 (Merck, layer thickness 0.2 mm) with detection by UV light (254 nm) or by charring with 1% KMnO4 in 1N NaOH. Flash column chromatography (FC) was performed on M&N Silica Gel 60 (0.063–0.200 mm). 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance I 200 (200 MHz), Bruker Avance II 400 (400 MHz, both Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), or Varian Unity 500 (500 MHz) spectrometer (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million relative to solvent signals (CDCl3: δH = 7.26 ppm, δC = 77.0 ppm; DMSO-d6: δH = 2.49 ppm, δC = 39.7 ppm). Signals were assigned by first-order analysis and assignments were supported where feasible by 2-dimensional 1H, 1H and 1H, 13C correlation spectroscopy. Coupling constants are reported in hertz. UV/vis spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer Lambda XLS+ UV/vis spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in a 10.00 mm QS quartz cuvette. Fluorescence was recorded on a Tecan Infinite M200 multiplate reader in commercially available 96-well multitier plates. Chemicals and reagents were purchased from Acros Organics, Alfa Aesar, Sigma-Aldrich, Carl Roth, Carbolution or ABCR and were used without further purification.

2.2. Synthesis of Kynurenine–Rhodamine B Conjugates

2.2.1. [6-Diethylamino-9-(2-prop-2-ynyloxycarbonyl-phenyl)-xanthen-3-ylidene]-diethyl-ammonium; Chloride 1

Rhodamine B (10 g, 20.9 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 (250 mL) under N2 atmosphere. EDC (4.4 g, 22.99 mmol, 1.1 eq) and DMAP (0.51 g, 4.18 mmol, 0.2 eq) were added, and the mixture obtained was stirred for 15 min at room temperature. After the addition of propargyl alcohol (1.33 mL, 22.99 mmol, 1.1 eq) and after stirring overnight at room temperature, the mixture was washed 2x with 1M HCl (250 mL) and 1x with brine (250 mL). Drying the organic layer over Na2SO4 and evaporating the solvent yielded the crude product. Purification via flash column chromatography (CH2Cl2: MeOH 9:1) gave the final product: violet powder (6.08 g, 56%).
1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 8.66 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H), 7.88 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H), 7.78 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H), 7.38 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H), 7.09 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, Ar-H, 1 H), 6.95 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, Ar-H, 1 H), 6.88 (s, Ar-H, 1 H), 4.65 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, CH2, 2 H), 3.68 (q, J = 7.1, CH2, 8 H), 2.46 (s, CH, 1 H), 1.36 (t, J = 7.1, CH3, 12 H).
13C-NMR (DMSO, 50 MHz): 164.4 (C(=O)O), 157.6 (Ar-C), 155.6 (Ar-C), 134.0 (Ar-C), 133.8 (Ar-C), 131.3 (Ar-C), 131.3 (Ar-C), 131.0 (Ar-C), 129.3 (Ar-C), 115.1 (Ar-C), 113.4 (Ar-C), 107.4 (Ar-C), 96.4 (Ar-C), 78.5 (C), 77.8 (CH), 53.3 (CH2), 45.8 (CH2), 12.9 (CH3).

2.2.2. 4-(2-Amino-phenyl)-2-tert-butoxycarbonylamino-4-oxo-butyric Acid 2

NH2 protection of kynurenine was carried out by Boc-chemistry following Schotten–Baumann conditions: kynurenine (500 mg, 2.4 mmol, 1 eq) was dissolved in a water/THF 1:1 mixture containing NaOH (288 mg, 7.2 mmol, 3 eq). After the solution turned clear, Boc2O (1.55 mL, 7.2 mmol, 3 eq) was added dropwise at 0 °C, and the reaction was monitored by TLC. Complete conversion was observed after 90 min. Acidification using 10% HCl, followed by 3 extractions with ethyl acetate, drying of the organic layer and evaporation of the solvent yielded the crude product: a yellowish oil. Column chromatography (ethyl acetate) yielded the pure product: a yellowish powder (327.7 mg, 44%).
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 7.73 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H- Ar-H), 7.34 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 6.83–6.72 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 5.64 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.67 (ddd, J = 12.8, 8.5, 4.3 Hz, 1H, CH), 3.80–3.69 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.53 (dd, J = 18.0, 3.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 1.45 (s, 9H, 3x CH3).
13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 199.54 (Ar-C(=O)), 172.43 (C(C=O)OH), 155.68 (Boc-C(=O)), 149.45 (Ar-C), 134.96 (Ar-C), 131.08 (Ar-C), 125.83 (Ar-C), 118.10 (Ar-C), 116.73 (Ar-C), 69.98 (Boc-tert-C), 52.60 (CH), 41.47 (CH2), 28.34 (CH3).

2.2.3. [3-(2-Amino-phenyl)-1-(2-{2-[2-(2-azido-ethoxy)-ethoxy]-ethoxy}-ethylcarbamo-yl)-3-oxo-propyl]-carbamic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester 3

Boc-protected kynurenine 1 (318.9 mg, 1.03 mmol, 1 eq) and the corresponding azido-linker (248.68 mg, 1.14 mmol, 1.1 eq) were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (50 mL). EDC (197.45 mg, 1.03 mmol, 1 eq) and DMAP (25.17 mg, 0.206 mmol, 0.2 eq) were added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h. Washing 3× with 2 M NaOH (80 mL) followed by washing with brine (80 mL), drying over Na2SO4 and evaporation yielded the crude product. Column chromatography (ethyl acetate) yielded the pure product: an orange solid, which was used directly in the next step without further analysis (175.11 mg, 33%).

2.2.4. (9-{2-[1-(2-{2-[4-(2-Amino-phenyl)-2-tert-butoxycarbonylamino-4-oxo-butyrylamino]-ethoxy}-ethyl)-1H-[1,2,3]triazol-4-ylmethoxycarbonyl]-phenyl}-6-diethylamino-xanthen-3-ylidene)-diethyl-ammonium Salt 4

Azido functionalized Boc-L-Kynurenine 3 (166 mg, 326.6 µmol, 1 eq) and propargyl rhodamine B 1 (169 mg, 326.6 µmol, 1 eq) were dissolved in 30 mL of a mixture of CH2Cl2/MeOH/H2O 10:10:3. After adding an aqueous CuSO4 solution (262 µL, 0.5 M, 130.64 µmol, 0.4 eq), TBTA (18 mg, 32.66 µmol, 0.1 eq) and Na ascorbate (142 mg, 718.52 µmol, 2.2 eq), the mixture was heated to 60 °C for 16 h. After cooling down, 20 mL of ddH2O was added and the mixture was extracted 3 times with 50 mL CH2Cl2, followed by drying over Na2SO4 and evaporation of the solvent. The pure product was obtained after column chromatography (CH2Cl2/MeOH 3:1) as a pink powder (302.5 mg, 90%).
1H-NMR (DMSO, 500 MHz): 8.20 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.0 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.91–7.85 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.83–7.79 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.47 (dd, J = 7.6, 0.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.08–7.00 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 6.97–6.90 (m, 5H, Ar-H), 5.04 (s, 2H, Ar-CH2), 4.65 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.44 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H, Triazol-CH2), 3.74 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H, O-CH2), 3.63 (dd, J = 13.9, 6.7 Hz, 8H, 4x RhB-CH2), 3.48–3.45 (m, 2H, O-CH2), 3.44–3.40 (m, 6H, 3× O-CH2), 3.30 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H, O-CH2), 3.00 (dd, J = 12.0, 6.0 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.33 (s, 9H, 3× Boc-CH3), 1.20 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 12H, 4x RhB-CH3).
13C-NMR (DMSO, 125 MHz): 198.9 (Ar-C(=O), 172.1 (C(=O)-NH), 164.9 (C(=O)-O), 157.8 (Ar-H), 157.5 (Boc-C(=O)), 156.0 (Ar-C), 155.6 (Ar-C), 155.5 (Ar-C), 141.04 (Triazol-Ar-C), 134.6 (Ar-C), 133.9 (Ar-C), 133.8 (Ar-C), 133.7 (Ar-C), 131.3 (Ar-C), 131.2 (Ar-C), 131.0 (Ar-C), 130.9 (Ar-C), 129.6 (Ar-C), 129.2 (Ar-C), 125.3 (Triazol-Ar-C), 115.0 (Ar-C), 114.9 (Ar-C), 114.8 (Ar-C), 113.3 (Ar-C), 96.3 (Ar-C), 78.4 (tert.-C), 78.0 (NH(Boc)-CH), 77.8 (O-CH2), 70.1 (O-CH2), 70.0 (O-CH2), 69.9 (O-CH2), 69.6 (O-CH2), 69.3 (O-CH2), 68.0 (O-CH2), 58.6 (Ar-CH2), 53.2 (RhB-CH2), 49.8 (Ar-CH2), 45.8 (N-CH2), 28.7 (Boc-CH3), 12.9 (RhB-CH3).

2.2.5. (9-{2-[1-(2-{2-[2-Amino-4-(2-amino-phenyl)-4-oxo-butyrylamino]-ethoxy}-ethyl)-1H-[1,2,3]triazol-4-ylmethoxycarbonyl]-phenyl}-6-diethylamino-xanthen-3-ylidene)-diethyl-ammonium Salt 5

Boc-deprotection of rhodamine B–kynurenin conjugate 4 was carried out by dissolving conjugate 4 in 6 mL of CH2Cl2 containing 25% trifluoroacetic acid. After stirring at room temperature for 1 h, the solution was precipitated in 50 mL ice cold Et2O and centrifuged for 5 min at 4 °C and max speed. The precipitate was dissolved in ddH2O and lyophilized. Purification by HPLC yielded the pure product: a pink solid (60.5 mg, 26%).
1H-NMR (DMSO, 500 MHz): 8.20 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.4, 1H, Ar-H), 8.11 (s, 1H, C(=O)NH), 7.93–7.84 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.85–7.78 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.47 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.4, 1H, Ar-H), 7.05–6.99 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 6.97–6.89 (m, 5H, Ar-H), 5.05 (d, J = 4.4, 3H, Ar-CH2 + CH), 4.47–4.41 (m, 2H, Ar-CH2), 3.75 (t, J = 5.2, 2H, O-CH2), 3.63 (q, J = 6.9, 8H, RhB-CH2), 3.54 (d, J = 5.6, 2H, O-CH2), 3.50–3.42 (m, 8H, O-CH2), 2.92 (q, J = 5.6, 2H, O-CH2), 1.20 (t, J = 7.0, 12H, RhB-CH3).
13C-NMR (DMSO, 125 MHz): 197.3 (Ar-C(=O)), 168.8 (C(=O)-NH), 164.9 (C(=O)-O), 158.2 (Ar-C), 157.9 (Ar-C), 157.5 (Ar-C), 155.5 (Ar-C), 141.1 (Triazol-Ar-C), 133.2 (Ar-C), 133.7 (Ar-C), 131.2 (Ar-C), 130.9 (Ar-C), 129.6 (Ar-C), 125.3 (Triazol-Ar-C), 117.5 (Ar-C), 114.9 (Ar-C), 113.3 (Ar-C), 96.3 (Ar-C), 70.1 (O-CH2), 70.0 (O-CH2), 69.9 (O-CH2), 69.0 (O-CH2), 67.1 (O-CH2), 58.6 (Ar-CH2), 49.8 (Ar-CH2), 45.7 N-CH2), 12.87 (CH3).

2.2.6. (6-Diethylamino-9-{2-[1-(2-{2-[2-(2-hydroxy-ethoxy)-ethoxy]-ethoxy}-ethyl)-1H-[1,2,3]tr-iazol-4-ylmethoxycarbonyl]-phenyl}-xanthen-3-ylidene)-diethyl-ammonium Salt 6

Propargyl rhodamine B 1 (100 mg, 193.4 µmol, 1 eq) and azidotetraethylene glycol (42.4 mg, 193.4 µmol, 1 eq, synthesized according to the literature [40]) were dissolved in 25 mL of a mixture of CH2Cl2/MeOH/H2O 10:10:3. A solution of CuSO4 in H2O (0.5 M, 15.5 µL, 7.74 µmol, 0.04 eq) was added, TBTA (1 mg, 1.93 µmol, 0.01 eq) and Na ascorbate (8.4 mg, 42.6 µmol, 0.22 eq) were added, and the mixture was heated to 60 °C. The reaction was monitored by TLC. After 16 h, the mixture was left to cool down, followed by the addition of 25 mL of ddH2O. Extraction with 50 mL of CH2Cl2 3 times, followed by drying over Na2SO4, gave the crude product. Column chromatography (CH2Cl2/MeOH 3:1) gave the pure product: a pink oil (135.8 mg, 95%).
1H-NMR (DMSO, 500 MHz): 8.22 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.89 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.82 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.48 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.04 (dd, J = 9.5, 2.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 6.96 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 6.95–6.92 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 5.06 (s, 2H, Ar-CH2), 4.56 (s, 1H, OH), 4.45 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H, O-CH2), 3.76 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H, O-CH2), 3.65 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 8H, CH2), 3.49 (dd, J = 5.6, 3.1 Hz, 2H, O-CH2), 3.46–3.41 (m, 6H, O-CH2), 3.37–3.34 (m, 2H, O-CH2), 1.22 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 12H, CH3).
13C-NMR (DMSO, 125 MHz): 164.88 (C(=O)), 157.88 (Ar-H), 157.53 (Ar-H), 155.53 (Ar-H), 141.05 (Ar-H), 133.71 (Ar-H), 131.24 (Ar-H), 130.93 (Ar-H), 129.67 (Ar-H), 125.36 (Ar-H), 114.94 (Ar-H), 113.32 (Ar-H), 96.29 (Ar-H), 72.75 (CH2), 70.21 (CH2), 70.17 (CH2), 70.05 (CH2), 69.97 (CH2), 69.01 (CH2), 66.81 (CH2), 60.63 (CH2), 58.63 (CH2), 49.77 (CH2), 45.76 (CH2), 12.89 (CH3).

2.3. Magnetic Bead Immunoassay (MIA)

2.3.1. Antibody Biotinylation

A total of 1 µL of a 6 mg/mL Biotin-NHS solution (NHS-dPEG®12-biotin, Sigma Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) was added to 100 µL of an anti-kynurenine antibody (monoclonal Mouse IgG1a k chain anti-kynurenine antibody, clone 3D4-F2, ImmuSmol SAS, 0.5 mg/mL). The mixture was incubated for 50 min at room temperature with gentle shaking. Excess Biotin-NHS was removed using a VivaSpin 500 centrifugal concentrator with 10 kDa MWCO (Sigma Aldrich).

2.3.2. Bead Preparation

For bead activation, 50 µL of magnetic beads (Dynabeads™ MyOne™ Streptavidin C1 magnetic beads 10 mg/mL, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany) was diluted to 1 mg/mL with 450 µL of PBS and pelleted on a magnetic rack for 2 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the beads were washed three times with 500 µL PBS. After the last washing step, 20 µL of the supernatant was replaced with 20 µL biotinylated antibody (0.5 mg/mL). The mixture was incubated for 30 min at RT under gentle shaking. The reaction was blocked by washing the beads three times with PBS containing 1.5% BSA and 0.5% Tween-20. The final concentration was 20 µg of antibody per 1 mg of beads.

2.3.3. Immunoassay Conjugate Binding

For 3 h at RT, 0–100 µM rhodamine B–kynurenine conjugate 5 or rhodamine B-PEG-Linker 6 was incubated with 50 µL of antibody-conjugated magnetic beads and 50 µL of PBS (1:3 dilution). The beads were pelleted on a magnetic rack, and the unbound rhodamine B in the supernatant was quantified in a 96-well-plate with a fluorescence measurement of 100 µL of supernatant at 561 nm excitation and 592 nm emission, using a Tecan Infinite M200 multiplate reader. A standard curve of rhodamine B fluorescence intensity between 0 and 100 µM diluted 1:3 in PBS was used for the calculation of bead-bound conjugate 5 or 6.

2.3.4. Competition between Rhodamine B–Kynurenine Conjugate and Native Kynurenine

Fifty microliters of antibody coupled beads was incubated with 50 µL of 12 µM rhodamine B-kynurenine conjugate 5 and 50 µL of spiked PBS or artificial saliva (Sigma Aldrich, SAE0149) containing 0–250 µM native L-kynurenine for 3 h at RT on a hula shaker (1:3 dilution). Beads were pelleted on a magnet and fluorescence intensity of unbound rhodamine B–kynurenine conjugate 5 in 100 µL supernatant was measured in a Tecan Infinite M200 multiplate reader at 561 nm excitation and 592 nm emission. Bead-bound L-kynurenine was indirectly calculated by calculating the amount of displaced rhodamine B–kynurenine conjugate 5. Therefore, the fluorescence intensity of bound rhodamine B–kynurenine conjugate 5 without L-kynurenine was subtracted from the fluorescence intensity of samples with different L-kynurenine concentrations.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of Fluorescent Kynurenine Conjugates

Chemical synthesis of the fluorescent L-kynurenine–rhodamine B conjugate was carried out as shown in Figure 1. First, commercial rhodamine B was reacted with propargyl alcohol to the corresponding rhodamine B propargyl ester 1 using Steglich esterification by EDC and DMAP, which was used as the fluorescent probe for click-conjugates 5 and 6.
For the azido tetraethylene glycol L-kynurenine derivative 3, Boc-protection of the primary amine of kynurenine was carried out to obtain product 2, followed by attaching an amino-azido-tetraethylene glycol linker, synthesized according to a published protocol [41] yielding the azido-4EG-L-kynurenine derivative 3. Click reaction of 3 with 1 gave product 4, followed by Boc-deprotection to the fluorescent kynurenine probe 5. To study the effect of the linker as well as the rhodamine B moiety on antibody binding, rhodamine B clickamer 6 containing only a tetraethylene glycol linker [40] was prepared, following the same reaction conditions as for product 4.

3.2. Spectral Properties

To determine emission and absorption maxima for the synthesized rhodamine B click-conjugates, UV/vis spectra of the compounds were recorded in ddH2O (cf. Figure 2). The absorption maximum of rhodamine B is at 554 nm [42] while the absorption maxima of the rhodamine B conjugates 5 and 6, containing a benzoic ester instead of a free benzoic acid at the rhodamine’s benzoic acid residue, is slightly shifted to 560 nm. Emission maxima were determined to be at 586 nm for the L-Kyn-4EG-RhB probe 5, while the 4EG-RhB clickamer 6 shows an emission maximum of 584 nm, indicating suitable absorption and emission properties for immunoassays.

3.3. Magnetic Bead Immunoassay (MIA)

To determine the antibody binding capabilities of the synthesized fluorescent L-kynurenine conjugate, we elucidated the antibody binding capability of fluorescent conjugates 5 and 6 as well as their competitive binding capability by using magnetic bead-bound anti-kynurenine antibodies, followed by incubation with the fluorescent conjugates and the subsequent fluorescence measurements of unbound conjugate in the supernatant. The tetraethylene glycol rhodamine B clickamer 6 was used as a negative control to exclude unspecific interactions between the rhodamine B or the tetraethylene glycol linker with the antibody. Antibody binding data are shown in Figure 3. As the magnetic beads are suspended in solution, the surface coated with antibodies is effectively increased, leading to increased assay sensitivity and favorable binding kinetics and, therefore, more accurate data on competition between fluorescent probe 5 and native L-kynurenine.
To this end, antibodies were bound to magnetic beads in 1 µm diameter, followed by incubation with the target compounds, pelleted via magnet and the fluorescence measured in the supernatant. In the competitive assay, 0–83 µM L-kynurenine was incubated together with either 4 µM RhB-4EG-L-Kyn conjugate 5, followed by a pelleting of the beads and the measurement of the fluorescence in the supernatant. The binding curves of 5 and 6 as well as the competitive binding curve are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
With increasing concentration of the fluorescent L-kynurenine conjugate 5, the measured fluorescence in the supernatant decreases since more fluorescent conjugates bind to the antibody. Figure 3A shows the difference in fluorescence intensity between L-kynurenine conjugate 5 and 4EG-RhB clickamer 6 with and without incubation with the bead-bound antibodies. In higher concentrations, the 4EG-RhB clickamer 6 binding affinity also increases, probably due to unspecific interactions between either the linker or the rhodamine B residue. Apart from this, the difference in measured fluorescence for the L-kynurenine conjugate 5 is significantly stronger, showing a KD-value of 5.9 µM, and therefore, unspecific interactions between the 4EG-RhB clickamer 6 and the magnetic bead-bound antibody can be neglected.
As shown in Figure 4, the competitive binding assay shows a proper increase in fluorescence along with increasing concentrations of native L-kynurenine in both PBS and artificial saliva. Increasing fluorescence levels are caused by the displacement of the fluorescent conjugate through native kynurenine. The IC50 values of this competition were calculated to be 4.0 µM in PBS and 10.2 µM in saliva. As expected, the IC50 value in saliva is higher than in PBS due to interfering components such as enzymes and proteins in saliva samples.

4. Conclusions

We successfully synthesized a fluorescent kynurenine conjugate based on rhodamine B with unique antibody binding properties, a promising component of a future rapid diagnostic test for kynurenine, a metabolite with a clinically relevant marker for the diagnosis of distinct diseases. Spectral properties of the products were elucidated, showing only a slight shift of 6 nm in the fluorescence emission maximum when compared to native rhodamine B. The antibody binding was investigated, and the magnetic bead assay showed a good sensitivity with a KD-value of 5.9 µM for the L-kynurenine conjugate 5 and IC50 values of 4.0 µM in PBS and 10.2 µM in saliva for the competitive assay. Since an increase in kynurenine levels in saliva to 4.6 ± 1.6 µM under pathological conditions, compared to 0.7 ± 0.4 µM in the healthy subject, are observed [30], it thus is possible to detect metabolite changes with statistical significance by using repeated measurements. This allows for the detection of transplant rejection in a clinical setting subject to validation in clinical trials. In addition, this approach offers the possibility of using other body fluids such as blood serum, where kynurenine levels are much higher with 17.4 ± 8.4 µM for serum compared to 4.6 ± 1.6 µM for saliva [30], even though the influence of matrix proteins and other metabolites from serum would have to be investigated in more detail for this to obtain reliable measurements. Since the current standard methods for kynurenine detection are based on liquid chromatography, they are not practical for routine diagnostics; likewise, no clinically applied functional bioassay based on antibody binding of kynurenine exists. Together, our investigations provide a promising approach towards future rapid tests for kynurenine. Here, we introduced a microbead competitive assay allowing for the determination of L-kynurenine metabolites directly from saliva, thus avoiding the use of invasive procedures and expensive equipment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-P.D.; methodology, M.B. and I.Q.; investigation, M.B. and I.Q.; resources, H.-P.D. and R.C.; data curation, M.B. and I.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B. and I.Q.; writing—review and editing, M.B., I.Q., L.K. and H.-P.D.; visualization, M.B., I.Q. and L.K.; supervision, H.-P.D.; project administration, H.-P.D.; funding acquisition, H.-P.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Economics, Labor and Housing Baden-Württemberg, Germany, TechPat nano, grant number 35-4223.10/10 and by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action, Germany, InfektResonator, IGF-grant number 20934 N. The article processing charge was funded by the Baden-Württemberg Ministry of Science, Research and Culture and the Furtwangen University in the funding program Open Access Publishing.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Doris Benz-Schreger for her tremendous and continuous support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Adams, S.; Teo, C.; McDonald, K.L.; Zinger, A.; Bustamante, S.; Lim, C.K.; Sundaram, G.; Braidy, N.; Brew, B.J.; Guillemin, G.J. Involvement of the Kynurenine Pathway in Human Glioma Pathophysiology. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Cervenka, I.; Agudelo, L.Z.; Ruas, J.L. Kynurenines: Tryptophan’s Metabolites in Exercise, Inflammation, and Mental Health. Science 2017, 357, eaaf9794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Dantzer, R. Role of the Kynurenine Metabolism Pathway in Inflammation-Induced Depression—Preclinical Approaches. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2017, 31, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Badawy, A.A.-B. Kynurenine Pathway of Tryptophan Metabolism: Regulatory and Functional Aspects. Int. J. Tryptophan Res. 2017, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Badawy, A.A.-B. Tryptophan Metabolism in Alcoholism. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2002, 15, 123–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bender, D.A. Biochemistry of Tryptophan in Health and Disease. Mol. Asp. Med. 1983, 6, 101–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ball, H.J.; Yuasa, H.J.; Austin, C.J.; Weiser, S.; Hunt, N.H. Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase-2; a New Enzyme in the Kynurenine Pathway. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 41, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stone, T.W.; Stoy, N.; Darlington, L.G. An Expanding Range of Targets for Kynurenine Metabolites of Tryptophan. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 34, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Fujigaki, S.; Saito, K.; Sekikawa, K.; Tone, S.; Takikawa, O.; Fujii, H.; Wada, H.; Noma, A.; Seishima, M. Lipopolysaccharide Induction of Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase Is Mediated Dominantly by an IFN-q-Independent Mechanism. Eur. J. Immunol. 2001, 31, 2313–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Divanovic, S.; Sawtell, N.M.; Trompette, A.; Warning, J.I.; Dias, A.; Cooper, A.M.; Yap, G.S.; Arditi, M.; Shimada, K.; DuHadaway, J.B.; et al. Opposing Biological Functions of Tryptophan Catabolizing Enzymes During Intracellular Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 205, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Suzuki, Y.; Suda, T.; Asada, K.; Miwa, S.; Suzuki, M.; Fujie, M.; Furuhashi, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Inui, N.; Shirai, T.; et al. Serum Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase Activity Predicts Prognosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2012, 19, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Taylor, M.W.; Feng, G. Relationship between Interferon-Gamma, Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase, and Tryptophan Catabolism. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1991, 5, 2516–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hassanain, H.H.; Chon, S.; Gupta, S.L. Differential Regulation of Human Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase Gene Expression by Interferons-Gamma and -Alpha. Analysis of the Regulatory Region of the Gene and Identification of an Interferon-Gamma-Inducible DNA-Binding Factor. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 5077–5084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Babcock, T.A.; Carlin, J.M. Transcriptional Activation of Indoleamine Dioxygenase by Interleukin 1 and Tumor Necrosis Factor α in Interferon-Treated Epithelial Cells. Cytokine 2000, 12, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fallarino, F.; Grohmann, U.; Vacca, C.; Bianchi, R.; Orabona, C.; Spreca, A.; Fioretti, M.C.; Puccetti, P. T Cell Apoptosis by Tryptophan Catabolism. Cell Death Differ. 2002, 9, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hill, M.; Tanguy-Royer, S.; Royer, P.; Chauveau, C.; Asghar, K.; Tesson, L.; Lavainne, F.; Rémy, S.; Brion, R.; Hubert, F.X.; et al. IDO Expands Human CD4+CD25high Regulatory T Cells by Promoting Maturation of LPS-Treated Dendritic Cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37, 3054–3062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mellor, A.L.; Munn, D.H. Ido Expression by Dendritic Cells: Tolerance and Tryptophan Catabolism. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 4, 762–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wood, K.J.; Sawitzki, B. Interferon γ: A Crucial Role in the Function of Induced Regulatory T Cells in Vivo. Trends Immunol. 2006, 27, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schefold, J.C.; Zeden, J.-P.; Fotopoulou, C.; von Haehling, S.; Pschowski, R.; Hasper, D.; Volk, H.-D.; Schuett, C.; Reinke, P. Increased Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase (IDO) Activity and Elevated Serum Levels of Tryptophan Catabolites in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Possible Link between Chronic Inflammation and Uraemic Symptoms. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2009, 24, 1901–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bao, Y.-S.; Ji, Y.; Zhao, S.-L.; Ma, L.-L.; Xie, R.-J.; Na, S.-P. Serum Levels and Activity of Indoleamine2,3-Dioxygenase and Tryptophanyl-TRNA Synthetase and Their Association with Disease Severity in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Biomarkers 2013, 18, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gagnebin, Y.; Jaques, D.A.; Rudaz, S.; de Seigneux, S.; Boccard, J.; Ponte, B. Exploring Blood Alterations in Chronic Kidney Disease and Haemodialysis Using Metabolomics. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Konje, V.C.; Rajendiran, T.M.; Bellovich, K.; Gadegbeku, C.A.; Gipson, D.S.; Afshinnia, F.; Mathew, A.V. Tryptophan Levels Associate with Incident Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease. Clin. Kidney J. 2021, 14, 1097–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Marzinzig, M. Dynamics and Diagnostic Relevance of Kynurenine Serum Level after Kidney Transplantation. Ann. Transplant. 2015, 20, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Lahdou, I.; Sadeghi, M.; Daniel, V.; Schenk, M.; Renner, F.; Weimer, R.; Löb, S.; Schmidt, J.; Mehrabi, A.; Schnitzler, P.; et al. Increased Pretransplantation Plasma Kynurenine Levels Do Not Protect from but Predict Acute Kidney Allograft Rejection. Hum. Immunol. 2010, 71, 1067–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Buczko, P.; Tankiewicz-Kwedlo, A.; Buraczewska, A.; Mysliwiec, M.; Pawlak, D. Accumulation of Kynurenine Pathway Metabolites in Salive and Plasma of Uremic Patients Accumulation of Kynurenine Pathway Metabolites in Saliva and Plasma of Uremic Patients. Pharmacol. Rep. 2007, 59, 199–204. [Google Scholar]
  26. Debnath, S.; Velagapudi, C.; Redus, L.; Thameem, F.; Kasinath, B.; Hura, C.E.; Lorenzo, C.; Abboud, H.E.; O’Connor, J.C. Tryptophan Metabolism in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Secondary to Type 2 Diabetes: Relationship to Inflammatory Markers. Int. J. Tryptophan Res. 2017, 10, 1178646917694600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, H.; Jang, H.B.; Yoo, M.G.; Park, S.I.; Lee, H.J. Amino Acid Metabolites Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease: An Eight-Year Follow-Up Korean Epidemiology Study. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brandacher, G.; Cakar, F.; Winkler, C.; Schneeberger, S.; Obrist, P.; Bösmüller, C.; Werner-Felmayer, G.; Werner, E.R.; Bonatti, H.; Margreiter, R.; et al. Non-Invasive Monitoring of Kidney Allograft Rejection through IDO Metabolism Evaluation. Kidney Int. 2007, 71, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Holmes, E.W.; Russell, P.M.; Kinzler, G.J.; Reckard, C.R.; Flanigan, R.C.; Thompson, K.D.; Bermes, E.W. Oxidative Tryptophan Metabolism in Renal Allograft Recipients: Increased Kynurenine Synthesis Is Associated with Inflammation and OKT3 Therapy. Cytokine 1992, 4, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kaden, J.; Abendroth, D.; Marzinzig, M.; May, G. Untersuchungen Zur Dynamik Der Indolamin 2,3-Dioxygenase Bei Patienten Mit Unterschiedlichen Verläufen Nach Nierentransplantation. Transplant. Organ Dtsch. Transplant. 2007, 19, 110–116. [Google Scholar]
  31. Merino, J.J.; Cabaña-Muñoz, M.E.; Gasca, A.T.; Garcimartín, A.; Benedí, J.; Camacho-Alonso, F.; Parmigiani-Izquierdo, J.M. Elevated Systemic L-Kynurenine/L-Tryptophan Ratio and Increased IL-1 Beta and Chemokine (CX3CL1, MCP-1) Proinflammatory Mediators in Patients with Long-Term Titanium Dental Implants. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Clendenen, N.; Cornwell, W.; Pal, J.; Weitzel, N. Acute Metabolomic Changes after Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2019, 38, S245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Linderholm, K.R.; Skogh, E.; Olsson, S.K.; Dahl, M.-L.; Holtze, M.; Engberg, G.; Samuelsson, M.; Erhardt, S. Increased Levels of Kynurenine and Kynurenic Acid in the CSF of Patients With Schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 2012, 38, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Flieger, J.; Święch-Zubilewicz, A.; Śniegocki, T.; Dolar-Szczasny, J.; Pizoń, M. Determination of Tryptophan and Its Major Metabolites in Fluid from the Anterior Chamber of the Eye in Diabetic Patients with Cataract by Liquid Chromotography Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Molecules 2018, 23, 3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sundaram, G.; Brew, B.J.; Jones, S.P.; Adams, S.; Lim, C.K.; Guillemin, G.J. Quinolinic Acid Toxicity on Oligodendroglial Cells: Relevance for Multiple Sclerosis and Therapeutic Strategies. J. Neuroinflamm. 2014, 11, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Notarangelo, F.M.; Wu, H.Q.; Macherone, A.; Graham, D.R.; Schwarcz, R. Gas Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry Detection of Extracellular Kynurenine and Related Metabolites in Normal and Lesioned Rat Brain. Anal. Biochem. 2012, 421, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ungor, D.; Horváth, K.; Dékány, I.; Csapó, E. Red-Emitting Gold Nanoclusters for Rapid Fluorescence Sensing of Tryptophan Metabolites. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 288, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Klockow, J.L.; Glass, T.E. Development of a Fluorescent Chemosensor for the Detection of Kynurenine. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 235–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Seegers, N.; van Doornmalen, A.M.; Uitdehaag, J.C.M.; de Man, J.; Buijsman, R.C.; Zaman, G.J.R. High-Throughput Fluorescence-Based Screening Assays for Tryptophan-Catabolizing Enzymes. SLAS Discov. Adv. Sci. Drug Discov. 2014, 19, 1266–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Mahou, R.; Wandrey, C. Versatile Route to Synthesize Heterobifunctional Poly(Ethylene Glycol) of Variable Functionality for Subsequent Pegylation. Polymers 2012, 4, 561–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Niskanen, J.; Karesoja, M.; Aseyev, V.; Qiu, X.-P.; Winnik, F.M.; Tenhu, H. Thermal Response of a PVCL-HA Conjugate. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2016, 54, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Helttunen, K.; Prus, P.; Luostarinen, M.; Nissinen, M. Interaction of Aminomethylated Resorcinarenes with Rhodamine B. New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diagnostics 12 01380 g001 550
Figure 1. Route of synthesis for the fluorescent labelled kynurenine probe. Rhodamine B was reacted with propargyl alcohol to rhodamine B propargyl ester 1, which was reacted with an azido tetraethylene glycol linker to afford 6 or with azido-kynurenine to yield product 5. Reaction conditions: (a) EDC, DMAP, CH2Cl2, RT, overnight; (b) NaOH, H2O/THF 1:1, RT, 90 min; (c) EDC, DMAP, CH2Cl2, RT, 48 h; (d) 1, CuSO4, TBTA, Na ascorbate, H2O/MeOH/CH2Cl2 10:10:3, 16 h; and (e) CH2Cl2/TFA 4:1, RT, 1 h.
Figure 1. Route of synthesis for the fluorescent labelled kynurenine probe. Rhodamine B was reacted with propargyl alcohol to rhodamine B propargyl ester 1, which was reacted with an azido tetraethylene glycol linker to afford 6 or with azido-kynurenine to yield product 5. Reaction conditions: (a) EDC, DMAP, CH2Cl2, RT, overnight; (b) NaOH, H2O/THF 1:1, RT, 90 min; (c) EDC, DMAP, CH2Cl2, RT, 48 h; (d) 1, CuSO4, TBTA, Na ascorbate, H2O/MeOH/CH2Cl2 10:10:3, 16 h; and (e) CH2Cl2/TFA 4:1, RT, 1 h.
Diagnostics 12 01380 g001
Diagnostics 12 01380 g002 550
Figure 2. Absorption (A,C) and fluorescence (B,D) spectra of compounds 5 and 6, measured in ddH2O. Absorption maxima of compounds 5 and 6 are shifted slightly to 560 nm in the comparison at 554 nm for native rhodamine B [42]. Fluorescence maxima are 586 nm.
Figure 2. Absorption (A,C) and fluorescence (B,D) spectra of compounds 5 and 6, measured in ddH2O. Absorption maxima of compounds 5 and 6 are shifted slightly to 560 nm in the comparison at 554 nm for native rhodamine B [42]. Fluorescence maxima are 586 nm.
Diagnostics 12 01380 g002
Diagnostics 12 01380 g003 550
Figure 3. Binding assay of L-Kyn-4EG-RhB conjugate 5 and 4EG-RhB control 6 with antibody-coated magnetic beads (A) Concentration in micromole per liter and (B) logarithmic analyte concentration. Binding of the conjugate 5 to the antibody is significantly stronger than binding of the 4EG-RhB control 6. A specific binding of the conjugate to the antibody is concluded.
Figure 3. Binding assay of L-Kyn-4EG-RhB conjugate 5 and 4EG-RhB control 6 with antibody-coated magnetic beads (A) Concentration in micromole per liter and (B) logarithmic analyte concentration. Binding of the conjugate 5 to the antibody is significantly stronger than binding of the 4EG-RhB control 6. A specific binding of the conjugate to the antibody is concluded.
Diagnostics 12 01380 g003
Diagnostics 12 01380 g004 550
Figure 4. Competitive antibody binding assay in magnetic bead assay of the L-kynurenine–rhodamine B conjugate 5 against native L-kynurenine in (A) PBS and (B) artificial saliva. Fluorescence of the solution increases with increasing L-kynurenine concentration, meaning native kynurenine competes in antibody binding against the kynurenine conjugate.
Figure 4. Competitive antibody binding assay in magnetic bead assay of the L-kynurenine–rhodamine B conjugate 5 against native L-kynurenine in (A) PBS and (B) artificial saliva. Fluorescence of the solution increases with increasing L-kynurenine concentration, meaning native kynurenine competes in antibody binding against the kynurenine conjugate.
Diagnostics 12 01380 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borgolte, M.; Quint, I.; Kaiser, L.; Csuk, R.; Deigner, H.-P. A Fluorescence-Based Competitive Antibody Binding Assay for Kynurenine, a Potential Biomarker of Kidney Transplant Failure. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061380

AMA Style

Borgolte M, Quint I, Kaiser L, Csuk R, Deigner H-P. A Fluorescence-Based Competitive Antibody Binding Assay for Kynurenine, a Potential Biomarker of Kidney Transplant Failure. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(6):1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061380

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borgolte, Max, Isabel Quint, Lars Kaiser, René Csuk, and Hans-Peter Deigner. 2022. "A Fluorescence-Based Competitive Antibody Binding Assay for Kynurenine, a Potential Biomarker of Kidney Transplant Failure" Diagnostics 12, no. 6: 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061380

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop