Next Article in Journal
Importance of Adequate qPCR Controls in Infection Control
Previous Article in Journal
Expression of Immune Checkpoints in Malignant Tumors: Therapy Targets and Biomarkers for the Gastric Cancer Prognosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/diagnostics11122371
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Increased SERPINA3 Level Is Associated with Ulcerative Colitis

by
Jingwei Zhang
1,2,
Wei Wang
1,
Shenglong Zhu
1,3,* and
Yongquan Chen
1,2,3
1
Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
2
School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
3
Wuxi Translational Medicine Research Center and Institute of Translational Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2021, 11(12), 2371; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122371
Submission received: 5 November 2021 / Revised: 6 December 2021 / Accepted: 13 December 2021 / Published: 16 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a recurrent, chronic intestinal disease that is currently incurable. Its pathogenesis remains to be further understood. Therefore, seeking new biomarkers and potential drug targets is urgent for the effective treatment of UC. In this study, the gene expression profile GSE38713 was obtained from the GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) database. Data normalisation and screening of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were conducted using R software, and gene ontology (GO) enrichment was performed using Metascape online tools. The PubMed database was used to screen new genes that have not been reported, and SERPINA3 was selected. The correlation between SERPINA3 and other inflammatory factors was analysed by Spearman correlation analysis. Finally, colitis model mice and an in-vitro model were established to validate the function of the SERPINA3 gene. SERPINA3 gene expression was markedly increased in UC patient samples, colitis models and in-vitro models and showed an association with other inflammatory factors. ROC analysis indicated that SERPINA3 could represent a potential biomarker of active UC. Additionally, silencing SERPINA3 in an in-vitro intestinal epithelial inflammatory model significantly decreased the mRNA level of inflammatory factors. This study provides supportive evidence that SERPINA3 may act as a key biomarker and potential drug target in UC treatment.

1. Introduction

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory gastrointestinal disorder [1] characterised by manifestations such as rectal bleeding, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, anaemia, and loss of body weight, which seriously attenuates the quality of life of patients [2,3]. In addition, long-term or even indefinite drug maintenance therapy imposes a substantial economic burden on patients [4].
Currently, the treatment of UC remains a challenge to clinicians [5]. The major pharmacological therapies for UC include corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory agents, and biologics [6]. Anti-inflammatory agents, such as 5-aminosalycerates (5-ASAs), have been the mainstay for the treatment of mild-to-moderate UC [7]. Although 5-ASAs are safe, their prolonged administration causes many side effects, such as headache, diarrhoea, nausea, interstitial nephritis, and hepatitis [8,9]. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for moderate to severe forms of UC [10]. However, corticosteroid use also creates side effects, including osteopenia, avascular necrosis, and mood changes [11,12]. Biologics alleviate UC by suppressing the inflammatory response [13]. However, a proportion of patients do not respond to biologics therapy or become intolerant or lose benefits [14,15,16]. Additionally, biologics are expensive, causing a tremendous economic burden for patients and medical care systems [17]. Therefore, identification of the key upstream regulatory gene is warranted for UC treatment.
Gene microarray technology has been used to analyse the molecular basis of many diseases [18]. Comprehensive and systemic analysis through gene microarray provides significant support to develop effective diagnosis and treatment strategies [19]. Currently, microarray technology has been widely used to elucidate disease progression and determine disease prognosis [20]. Presently, there exist studies mining UC-associated genes by public gene set databases. Previous studies have focused mainly on genes that have a close association with UC. In addition, the lack of experimental validation is another deficiency in these studies [21,22,23,24].
In this study, we performed multiple bioinformatics approaches to analyse UC gene microarray chip data and further analysed the clustered differentially expressed genes based on the Metascape online database. Next, we used the PubMed online database and selected SERPINA3, which has never been reported in UC. SERPINA3, also known as alpha-1 antichymotrypsin, acts as an inhibitor of several serine proteases. Insufficient serpin regulation causes excessive or prolonged cathepsin G activity, ultimately leading to tissue damage [25]. Previous studies have shown that SERPINA3 may act as a potential biomarker in several inflammatory-related diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and renal inflammatory diseases [26,27,28]. Accordingly, we further investigated the potential prognostic value of SERPINA3 and report on its association with UC, and ROC (receiver operator characteristic curve) analysis showed that SERPINA3 is a potential biomarker of active UC. The SERPINA3 mRNA level was markedly increased in the mouse colitis model and human intestinal epithelial cell inflammatory model. Silencing SERPINA3 in intestinal epithelial cells significantly attenuated the mRNA level of inflammatory factors. This study indicates that SERPINA3 is a new potential biomarker and therapeutic target of UC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microarray Data

The microarray data were obtained from the GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) (accessed on 1 October 2021). The gene expression profile of GSE38713 was performed to select new potential genes, and the dataset from GSE36807 was selected for validation of gene expression of new potential genes. The microarray data of GSE38713 were obtained from GPL570 platforms, which contain a total of 43 intestinal mucosa samples: 13 healthy controls, 8 inactive UC, and 22 active UC samples. The microarray data of GSE36807 were from GPL570 platforms, which contain a total of 35 intestinal mucosa samples: 7 healthy controls, 15 UC, and 13 CD samples.

2.2. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) in UC

The raw data of GSE38713 were downloaded from GEO as MINiML files. The extracted data were normalised and processed by log2 transformation. Probes were converted to gene symbols according to the GLP570 platform annotation information of the normalised data. An empirical Bayes method was used to select significant DEGs between UC samples and normal samples based on the “limma” package of Bioconductor (R software, version: 3.4). The Benjamin and Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) method was used to correct the adjusted p value and correct the occurrence of false-positive results. FDR <0.05 and log (fold change) >1 or <−1 were defined as the thresholds of DEGs. The box plot and PCA graphs were drawn by the R software package “ggplot2”. The heatmap is displayed by the R software package “pheatmap”.

2.3. Gene Enrichment Analysis

Metascape online databases (https://metascape.org/) (accessed on 1 October 2021) support statistical analysis and visualisation of functional profiles for genes and gene clusters and were used to conduct DEG gene ontology analyses. DEGs were divided into two groups: the up DEGs and the down DEGs, and then they were analysed throughout Metascape.

2.4. Candidate Gene Validation

The candidate gene expression was validated by GSE36807. Gene correlation analysis was performed between candidate genes and inflammatory genes. ROC analysis was applied to evaluate the predictive power of the candidate gene. Both gene correlation analysis and ROC analysis curves were drawn by GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

2.5. Establishment of the Mouse Model of Colitis

Thirteen 8-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and were housed in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) environment. Mice were subjected to light for a 12 h/darkness cycle, a normal diet, and water with an ambient temperature of 24–26 °C and humidity of 50% to 60%. After one week of adaptive feeding, the mice were modelled from the second week. The colitis model was induced by using dextran sodium sulfate (DSS, colitis grade, 0216011080, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA). Mice were divided into a control group (n = 5) and a DSS group (n = 8). Colitis was induced by adding 2.5% DSS to the drinking water of the animals for 8 days. During the experiment, body weight was recorded every day.

2.6. Colitis Assessment

Eight days after modelling, the colon was removed from sacrificed mice. A 1-cm portion of the distal colon was harvested, and one 0.5-cm colon was used for paraffin sections. In brief, colon tissues were fixed with 4% neutral formaldehyde solution for 48 h, and then paraffin sections (5 μm) were prepared by dehydration, transparency, wax dipping, and embedding. Finally, the sections were stained with haematoxylin-eosin (HE) reagents. The histopathological alterations were scored according to the method of Dieleman et al. [29]: 0, no inflammation and mucosal damage; 1, inflammatory cell infiltration into the mucosal layer and loss of basal 1/3 of crypts; 2, inflammatory cell infiltration into the submucosa and loss of basal 2/3 of crypts; 3, inflammatory cell infiltration into the muscularis mucosae and entire crypt loss; and 4, entire epithelial and crypt damage. Another 0.5-cm colon was used for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to test the transcript levels of SERPINA3 and other inflammatory factors.

2.7. Cell Culture

HT29 human intestinal epithelial cells were purchased from the Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco) with 10% foetal bovine serum (04-001-1ACS, Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit-Haemek, Israel) at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2. TNFα (10 ng/mL, Z01001, GenScript Biotech, Nanjing, China) was used in cell culture with HT29 cells for 12 h to mimic an inflammatory background [30].

2.8. SERPINA3 Gene Silencing

Before small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection, the cells were plated to obtain a next-day confluency of 50%. On the day of transfection, cells were transfected with 50 nM siRNA using JetPrime (101000046, Polyplus, Shanghai, China) transfection reagent. Sequences of SERPINA3 siRNA are: UGGAAUGCAAGCUGGAUGCCUTT. Universal negative control siRNA (A06001, GenePharma, Shanghai, China) was used as a control.

2.9. RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR

Colon or cell total RNA was isolated with the MolPure® TRIeasy™ Plus Total RNA Kit (19211ES60, Yeasen Biotech, Shanghai, China) according to the manual instructions. cDNA was synthesised with a HiScript III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (R312, Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) according to kit instructions. The human primer sequences used for qPCR were as follows: SERPINA3: CCTGAAGGCCCCTGATAAGAA (forward, 5′–3′), GCTGGACTGATTGAGGGTGC (reverse, 5′–3′); CXCL8: ACTGAGAGTGATTGAGAGTGGAC (forward, 5′–3′), AACCCTCTGCACCCAGTTTTC (reverse, 5′–3′); CCL2: CAGCCAGATGCAATCAATGCC (forward, 5′–3′), TGGAATCCTGAACCCACTTCT (reverse, 5′–3′); β-ACTIN: CATGTACGTTGCTATCCAGGC (forward, 5′–3′), CTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGAT (reverse, 5′–3′). The mouse primer sequences used for qPCR were as follows: Serpina3: ATTTGTCCCAATGTCTGCGAA (forward, 5′–3′), TGGCTATCTTGGCTATAAAGGGG (reverse, 5′–3′); IL1b: CTGAACTCAACTGTGAAATGC (forward, 5′–3′), TGATGTGCTGCTGCGAGA (reverse, 5′–3′); IL6: CTCTGCAAGAGACTTCCATCCAGT (forward, 5′–3′), GAAGTAGGGAAGGCCGTGG (reverse, 5′–3′); Tnf: AGGGTCTGGGCCATAGAACT (forward, 5′–3′), CCACCACGCTCTTCTGTCTAC (reverse, 5′–3′); β-actin: TGTTACCAACTGGGACGACA (forward, 5′–3′), CTGGGTCATCTTTTCACGGT (reverse, 5′–3′). A total volume of 20 µL was used for the qRT-PCR containing 50 ng template cDNA, 8 pmol forward primer and reverse primer, and 10 µL Hieff® qRT-PCR SYBR Green Master Mix (11201ES03, Yeasen Biotech, Shanghai, China). The amplification program was as follows: (1) 95 °C for 5 min, (2) 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 30 s followed by 40 cycles.

2.10. Western Blotting

Western blotting was performed as previously reported [31]. Briefly, tissues or cells were collected and lysed using RIPA buffer (P0013B, Beyotime, Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) with protease inhibitor cocktail (HY-K0010, MCE, Shanghai, China). Afterwards, samples were exposed to 5 cycles of 5 s ultrasound treatments and centrifuged at 12,000× g in a refrigerated centrifuge for 10 min. Samples were equalised according to the protein concentration and separated with SDS-PAGE. The proteins were electrically transferred to PVDF membranes (ISEQ00010, Millipore, Shanghai, China) followed by blocking the PVDF membranes for 1 h at room temperature with 5% skim (232100, BD, Sparks, MD, USA) in TBST. The membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies (A1021, anti-SERPINA3, ABclonal, Wuhan China; AC026, anti-β-ACTIN, ABclonal, Wuhan, China). The following day, membranes were washed 3 times in TBST, and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary IgG antibody (AS014, ABclonal, Wuhan, China) for 1 h at room temperature. Before imaging, the membranes were washed with TBST 3 times and ECL reagent kit (WBKLS0500, Millipore, Shanghai, China) was used for detection of expressed proteins.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student’s t-test was used to analyse the significant differences among different groups. Statistical significance was considered when the p-value <0.05.

3. Results

3.1. DEGs between UC and Health Control

The gene expression dataset GSE38713 includes 13 healthy control samples and 30 UC samples (8 inactive UC and 22 active UC). As shown in Figure 1A, the data distributions were neat after background adjustment and normalisation. Next, all data were analysed using principal component analysis (PCA). PCA revealed that the three groups were relatively well separated (Figure 1B). We used the “limma” package to identify the DEGs in GSE38713 with FDR <0.05 and log (fold change) >1 or <−1. There were 560 DEGs in the GSE38713 dataset, including 309 upregulated genes and 251 downregulated genes. DEGs were visualised using a volcano plot (Figure 1C), and the DEGs with significant fold changes were labelled in the plot.

3.2. SERPINA3 Is Significantly Increased in UC Patients

To analyse the biological classification of DEGs, the Metascape online database was used for gene enrichment analysis. The upregulated and downregulated DEGs were uploaded to Metascape. The upregulated DEGs were enriched mainly in inflammation and extracellular matrix-related terms (Figure 2A). The downregulated DEGs were enriched mainly in the transportation and metabolism of organic and inorganic small molecules (Figure 2B). The top three enriched GO terms, depending on the −log10 p value, are presented in Table 1 (p < 0.01). To screen the candidate genes that may be key biomarkers and potential drug targets in UC treatment, we focused on the GO term “extracellular matrix”, which has the largest −log10 p-value in the enrichment of up DEGs. There were 47 genes significantly enriched in this GO term, which contained some family genes, such as matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family genes (MMP1, MMP3, MMP7, MMP9, MMP10, MMP12), collagen (COL) family genes (COL1A1, COL1A2, COL3A1, COL4A1, COL5A2, COL6A3, COL15A1), serine proteinase inhibitor (SERPIN) family genes (SERPINA3, SERPING1, SERPINB5), and claudin (CLDN) family genes (CLND1, CLDN2). Next, PubMed (up to October 2021) was used to screen new candidate genes, and the following terms were used to screen: ** AND (colitis OR UC OR IBD OR ulcerative colitis OR inflammatory bowel disease), and ** indicates one gene that is included in the GO term “extracellular matrix”. After a literature search and gene screening, a total of 18 genes were selected. The associations of the selected genes with UC that were not previously reported were ranked according their log2FC (Table 2). As the fold change of SERPINA3 was the largest, SERPINA3 was selected for further study. Next, we validated the expression of SERPINA3 in GSE38713 and GSE36807. The difference in SERPINA3 expression between UC samples and healthy control samples was determined by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. As shown in Figure 2C, SERPINA3 gene expression was significantly upregulated in the intestinal mucosa of UC patients in both GSE38713 and GSE36807.

3.3. SERPINA3 Is a Potential Biomarker for the Active UC

To further examine whether SERPINA3 gene expression was associated with biomarkers of inflammation, we performed correlation analyses. In the UC samples of GSE38713, SERPINA3 expression was positively correlated with IL1B (p < 0.0001, r = 0.8554), IL6 (p < 0.0001, r = 0.6819), CXCL8 (p < 0.0001, r = 0.7669), and TNF (p < 0.0001, r = 0.6894) (Figure 3A). In the UC samples of GSE36807, SERPINA3 expression showed a positive correlation with IL1B (p = 0.0335, r = 0.5571) and CXCL8 (p = 0.0141, r = 0.6286) and was not correlated with IL6 (p = 0.0759, r = 0.475) or TNF (p = 0.9, r = −0.02857) (Figure 3B). These findings suggested that SERPINA3 was correlated with inflammation in UC. Next, ROC curves were used to determine whether SERPINA3 exhibited diagnostic significance for UC, and the area under the curve (AUC) value of the ROC curve reflects the quality of the ROC curve. In the GSE38713 dataset, the AUC for SERPINA3 was 0.7669. Considering that the GSE38713 dataset contains active UC samples and inactive UC samples, these two types of samples were separated for further analysis. For the active UC samples, the AUC for SERPINA3 was 0.8601, and for the inactive UC samples, the AUC for SERPINA3 was 0.5481 (p = 0.7173) (Figure 3C). Additionally, the GSE36807 dataset was used for further validation, and the AUC for SERPINA3 was 0.913 (Figure 3D). These findings suggest that SERPINA3 is a potential biomarker for active UC but not inactive UC.

3.4. Verification of SERPINA3 Function in Mice Model

To verify the analysis results described above, we used a mouse colitis model to evaluate the expression of SERPINA3 in colitis mice. Before verification, DSS was employed to establish the colitis model in mice. Mice were monitored for weight during the DSS treatment. On Day 7 of modelling, the DSS model group exhibited significant body weight loss, with the trend continuing through Day 8. In the control group, a slowly increasing trend for body weight emerged from Day 1 to Day 8 (Figure 4A). Next, intestinal sections of the control and DSS treatment groups were observed under microscopy. In the control group, HE staining results showed that the colonic mucosa was intact, and the intestinal epithelial cells and glands were arranged neatly, without significant pathological changes.
Compared with the control group, the intestinal mucosa in the DSS treatment group showed severe morphological damage, including marked crypt destruction, heavy inflammatory cellular infiltrate, and extensive destruction of the mucosal layer (Figure 4B). Therefore, the histological score in the DSS treatment group was significantly higher than the histological score in the control group (Figure 4C). The results of the above experiments showed the successful establishment of the colitis model. Next, the levels of inflammatory factors (IL1b, IL6, Tnf) and Serpina3 were analysed by qRT-PCR. The transcription levels of three inflammatory factors and Serpina3 in the model group were significantly increased. In addition, the protein level of SERPINA3 was also markedly increased (Figure 4D,E). This result was consistent with the bioinformatics analysis above.

3.5. Silencing SERPINA3 Attenuated Inflammation Status in an In-Vitro Model

To further study the potential role of SERPINA3 in UC, HT29 intestinal epithelial cells were incubated with TNFα to mimic inflammatory conditions in vitro. As shown in Figure 5A, TNFα stimulated noticeable transcription levels of IL1B, CXCL8, and CCL2, and the mRNA levels of SERPINA3 were also dramatically increased. Subsequently, SERPINA3 was silenced for 48 h, and the cells were incubated with TNFα for 12 h. As shown in Figure 5B, silencing SERPINA3 resulted in a marked decrease in the levels of IL1B, CXCL8, and CCL2. SERPINA3 knock down efficiency was validated by Western blot (Figure 5C). These results showed that SERPINA3 plays a proinflammatory role in intestinal epithelial inflammation.

4. Discussion

The incidence of UC has been rising in recent years [32]. Currently, due to its complex aetiology, the major barriers to medicine in UC are the lack of biomarkers and therapeutic targets [33], and the molecular mechanisms driving the disease course and response to therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC) are not well understood. To improve our understanding of UC pathogenesis and provide new directions for clinical diagnosis, we applied multiple large bioinformatics approaches to analyse UC gene microarray chip data.
In this study, we analysed the DSE38713 dataset through bioinformatics analysis, and GO analysis showed that the extracellular matrix and the inflammatory process were significantly enriched. The top 1 GO term was “extracellular matrix”. Previous studies have shown that the degradation and formation of extracellular matrix are associated with intestinal damage during inflammation, indicating that extracellular matrix may play a critical role in the pathology of UC, which arouses our interest in exploring whether we will be able to find a new gene related to UC in this GO term.
To identify UC-associated genes that have never been reported before, the PubMed database was used to search and screen. A total of 18 genes were selected, and SERPINA3 ranked first in terms of log2FC. SERPINA3 is a member of the serine protease inhibitor (SERPIN) superfamily. SERPINA3 has been reported to be upregulated in some inflammatory responses, such as cardiovascular inflammation and renal inflammation [34,35], but the role of SERPINA3 in UC has not been investigated. Several studies have shown that SERPINA3 can be found in plasma and urine, suggesting that SERPINA3 may be a useful non-invasive biomarker [36,37,38]. In this study, the correlation analysis showed that the expression of SERPINA3 was associated with inflammatory factors, and ROC analysis suggested that SERPINA3 was a potential biomarker of active UC. Additionally, the mRNA and protein levels of SERPINA3 were markedly increased in the inflamed colon. Previous in vivo studies found that SERPINA3 was markedly upregulated in the mice model of experimental autoimmune myocarditis and chronic pulmonary injuries [39,40]. These studies indicated that SERPINA3 could be a widely inflammatory biomarker. Given that SERPINA3 is a secretory protein, therefore, investigations on the correlation between UC and SERPINA3 protein levels in plasma or urine would be meaningful in the future.
The application of biologics has brought significant improvement in the management of UC [41,42]. Biologics, such as infliximab or adalimumab, have been used for the treatment of UC patents to alleviate symptoms [43]. Although biologic therapy exerts good therapeutic effects in a proportion of patients, approximately one-third of patients do not respond to them [42]. Additionally, patients who lose response to therapy may increase with longer periods of use [44]. A simple inflammatory target could be one reason for this phenomenon. The upstream targets of inflammatory signalling and multi-pathway inhibition are plausible solutions. Thus, uncovering the key upstream modulatory genes of inflammatory signals is warranted. In this study, we found that silencing SERPINA3 in an in vitro model markedly decreased the mRNA level of inflammatory factors, indicating that SERPINA3 may act as an upstream regulatory gene. With the development of monoclonal antibody therapy and gene therapy technology, targeting SERPINA3 may offer an innovative direction for UC therapeutic strategies.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we have uncovered a new function of SERPINA3 and demonstrated the inhibitory effect of SERPINA3 on the inflammation process in UC. Our study broadens the understanding of the pathogenesis of UC and provides potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of UC.

Author Contributions

Experimental design, J.Z. and S.Z.; experiment implementation, J.Z. and W.W.; data analysis, J.Z.; writing paper, J.Z., S.Z. and Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31771539 [Y.C.], 82000808 [S.Z.]), the Innovation and Application Project of Medical and Public Health Technology of Wuxi Science and Technology (N20202005), the Major Special Fund for Translational Medicine (2020ZHZD03, 2021ZHZD03), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JUSRP12048), the Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BE2018624) and the Fund of Wuxi Healthcare Commission (M202004).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the animal ethical committees of Jiangnan University (JN.No20210530c0641230[156]).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The part of results in this manuscript are generated by the GEO online database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) (accessed on 1 October 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xavier, R.J.; Podolsky, D.K. Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2007, 448, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dubinsky, M.C.; DiBonaventura, M.; Fan, H.; Bushmakin, A.G.; Cappelleri, J.C.; Maller, E.; Thorpe, A.J.; Salese, L.; Panés, J. Tofacitinib in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire Items in Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Induction Studies. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2021, 27, 983–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Danese, S.; Fiocchi, C. Ulcerative colitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 1713–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ng, S.C.; Shi, H.Y.; Hamidi, N.; Underwood, F.E.; Tang, W.; Benchimol, E.I.; Panaccione, R.; Ghosh, S.; Wu, J.C.Y.; Chan, F.K.L.; et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: A systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet 2017, 390, 2769–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Haritunians, T.; Taylor, K.D.; Targan, S.R.; Dubinsky, M.; Ippoliti, A.; Kwon, S.; Guo, X.; Melmed, G.Y.; Berel, D.; Mengesha, E.; et al. Genetic predictors of medically refractory ulcerative colitis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2010, 16, 1830–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Van Assche, G.; Vermeire, S.; Rutgeerts, P. Treatment of severe steroid refractory ulcerative colitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 5508–5511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ben-Horin, S.; Andrews, J.M.; Katsanos, K.H.; Rieder, F.; Steinwurz, F.; Karmiris, K.; Cheon, J.H.; Moran, G.W.; Cesarini, M.; Stone, C.D.; et al. Combination of corticosteroids and 5-aminosalicylates or corticosteroids alone for patients with moderate-severe active ulcerative colitis: A global survey of physicians’ practice. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 2995–3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Parker, C.E.; Bhanji, T.; Feagan, B.G.; MacDonald, J.K. Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 4, Cd000543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pithadia, A.B.; Jain, S. Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Pharmacol. Rep. 2011, 63, 629–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Magro, F.; Cordeiro, G.; Dias, A.M.; Estevinho, M.M. Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Non-biological treatment. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 160, 105075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Salice, M.; Rizzello, F.; Calabrese, C.; Calandrini, L.; Gionchetti, P. A current overview of corticosteroid use in active ulcerative colitis. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 13, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Barreiro-Alonso, E.; Saro-Gismera, C.; Sánchez, M. Outcomes and prediction of corticosteroid therapy after successive courses of ulcerative colitis treatments. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 12, 733–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bhattacharya, A.; Osterman, M.T. Biologic Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 49, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Colombel, J.F.; Sandborn, W.J.; Rutgeerts, P.; Enns, R.; Hanauer, S.B.; Panaccione, R.; Schreiber, S.; Byczkowski, D.; Li, J.; Kent, J.D.; et al. Adalimumab for maintenance of clinical response and remission in patients with Crohn’s disease: The CHARM trial. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 52–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Deltenre, P.; de Suray, N.; Branche, J.; Sandborn, W.J.; Colombel, J.F. Efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor antagonists in Crohn’s disease: Meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008, 6, 644–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schreiber, S.; Rutgeerts, P.; Fedorak, R.N.; Khaliq-Kareemi, M.; Kamm, M.A.; Boivin, M.; Bernstein, C.N.; Staun, M.; Thomsen, O.; Innes, A. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of certolizumab pegol (CDP870) for treatment of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2005, 129, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jean, L.; Audrey, M.; Beauchemin, C.; Consortium, O. Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Literature Review. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 2018, 7439730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Sobek, J.; Bartscherer, K.; Jacob, A.; Hoheisel, J.D.; Angenendt, P. Microarray technology as a universal tool for high-throughput analysis of biological systems. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2006, 9, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Ye, S.H.; Siddle, K.J.; Park, D.J.; Sabeti, P.C. Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification. Cell 2019, 178, 779–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Petryszak, R.; Burdett, T.; Fiorelli, B.; Fonseca, N.A.; Gonzalez-Porta, M.; Hastings, E.; Huber, W.; Jupp, S.; Keays, M.; Kryvych, N.; et al. Expression Atlas update-a database of gene and transcript expression from microarray- and sequencing-based functional genomics experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D926–D932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, J.; Shi, G. Lymphocyte infiltration and key differentially expressed genes in the ulcerative colitis. Medicine 2020, 99, e21997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, F.; Tang, X. Investigation of Potential Genetic Biomarkers and Molecular Mechanism of Ulcerative Colitis Utilizing Bioinformatics Analysis. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 4921387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Chen, Y.; Li, H.; Lai, L.; Feng, Q.; Shen, J. Identification of Common Differentially Expressed Genes and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Ulcerative Colitis and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 572194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, G.; Yan, X.; Chen, J.; Guo, X.; Guo, X.; Tang, Y.; Shi, Z. Bioinformatics Analysis of Key Candidate Genes and Pathways in Ulcerative Colitis. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2020, 43, 1760–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Baker, C.; Belbin, O.; Kalsheker, N.; Morgan, K. SERPINA3 (aka alpha-1-antichymotrypsin). Front. Biosci. 2007, 12, 2821–2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vanni, S.; Colini Baldeschi, A.; Zattoni, M.; Legname, G. Brain aging: A Ianus-faced player between health and neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. Res. 2020, 98, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Delrue, L.; Vanderheyden, M.; Beles, M.; Paolisso, P.; Di Gioia, G.; Dierckx, R.; Verstreken, S.; Goethals, M.; Heggermont, W.; Bartunek, J. Circulating SERPINA3 improves prognostic stratification in patients with a de novo or worsened heart failure. ESC Hear. Fail. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sánchez-Navarro, A.; González-Soria, I.; Caldiño-Bohn, R.; Bobadilla, N.A. An integrative view of serpins in health and disease: The contribution of SerpinA3. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2021, 320, C106–C118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dieleman, L.A.; Palmen, M.J.H.J.; Akol, H.; Bloemena, E.; Pena, A.S.; Meuwissen, S.G.M.; van Rees, E.P. Chronic experimental colitis induced by dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) is characterized by Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1998, 114, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Østvik, A.E.; Svendsen, T.D.; Granlund, A.V.B.; Doseth, B.; Skovdahl, H.K.; Bakke, I.; Thorsvik, S.; Afroz, W.; Walaas, G.A.; Mollnes, T.E.; et al. Intestinal Epithelial Cells Express Immunomodulatory ISG15 During Active Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease. J. Crohns Colitis 2020, 14, 920–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Feng, N.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, S.; Chen, Y.Q. Ndufa6 regulates adipogenic differentiation via Scd1. Adipocyte 2021, 10, 646–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Molodecky, N.A.; Soon, I.S.; Rabi, D.M.; Ghali, W.A.; Ferris, M.; Chernoff, G.; Benchimol, E.I.; Panaccione, R.; Ghosh, S.; Barkema, H.W.; et al. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology 2012, 142, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Walsh, A.J.; Bryant, R.V.; Travis, S.P. Current best practice for disease activity assessment in IBD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 13, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sánchez-Navarro, A.; Mejía-Vilet, J.M.; Pérez-Villalva, R.; Carrillo-Pérez, D.L.; Marquina-Castillo, B.; Gamba, G.; Bobadilla, N.A. SerpinA3 in the Early Recognition of Acute Kidney Injury to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) transition in the rat and its Potentiality in the Recognition of Patients with CKD. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, L.; Zheng, M.; Guo, Z.; Li, K.; Liu, Y.; Chen, M.; Yang, X. Circulating Serpina3 levels predict the major adverse cardiac events in patients with myocardial infarction. Int. J. Cardiol. 2020, 300, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Uysal, P.; Uzun, H. Relationship Between Circulating Serpina3g, Matrix Metalloproteinase-9, and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1 and -2 with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Severity. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Kim, S.H.; Ahn, H.S.; Park, J.S.; Yeom, J.; Yu, J.; Kim, K.; Oh, Y.M. A Proteomics-Based Analysis of Blood Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of COPD Acute Exacerbation. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2021, 16, 1497–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Turnier, J.L.; Brunner, H.I.; Bennett, M.; Aleed, A.; Gulati, G.; Haffey, W.D.; Thornton, S.; Wagner, M.; Devarajan, P.; Witte, D.; et al. Discovery of SERPINA3 as a candidate urinary biomarker of lupus nephritis activity. Rheumatology 2019, 58, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Gong, G.C.; Song, S.R.; Xu, X.; Luo, Q.; Han, Q.; He, J.X.; Su, J. Serpina3n is closely associated with fibrotic procession and knockdown ameliorates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 532, 598–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Shiheido-Watanabe, Y.; Maejima, Y.; Kasama, T.; Tamura, N.; Nakagama, S.; Ito, Y.; Hirao, K.; Isobe, M.; Sasano, T. Linagliptin, A Xanthine-Based Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, Ameliorates Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2021, 6, 527–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dignass, A.; Lindsay, J.O.; Sturm, A.; Windsor, A.; Colombel, J.F.; Allez, M.; D’Haens, G.; D’Hoore, A.; Mantzaris, G.; Novacek, G.; et al. Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis part 2: Current management. J. Crohns Colitis 2012, 6, 991–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Yanai, H.; Hanauer, S.B. Assessing response and loss of response to biological therapies in IBD. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 106, 685–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pugliese, D.; Felice, C.; Papa, A.; Gasbarrini, A.; Rapaccini, G.L.; Guidi, L.; Armuzzi, A. Anti TNF-α therapy for ulcerative colitis: Current status and prospects for the future. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2017, 13, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yoon, S.M.; Haritunians, T.; Chhina, S.; Liu, Z.; Yang, S.; Landers, C.; Li, D.; Ye, B.D.; Shih, D.; Vasiliauskas, E.A.; et al. Colonic Phenotypes Are Associated with Poorer Response to Anti-TNF Therapies in Patients with IBD. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2017, 23, 1382–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Diagnostics 11 02371 g001 550
Figure 1. Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the dataset GSE38713. (A) The extracted data in GSE38713 were normalised and processed by log2 transformation. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) of dataset GSE38713. Three groups of samples (healthy control, green; UC, red; inactive UC, blue) are shown in the PCA plot. (C) The volcano plot of the GSE38713. The red data points represent the upregulated genes (log2FC >1, FDR <0.05) and the blue data points represent the downregulated genes (log2FC <−1, FDR <0.05).
Figure 1. Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the dataset GSE38713. (A) The extracted data in GSE38713 were normalised and processed by log2 transformation. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) of dataset GSE38713. Three groups of samples (healthy control, green; UC, red; inactive UC, blue) are shown in the PCA plot. (C) The volcano plot of the GSE38713. The red data points represent the upregulated genes (log2FC >1, FDR <0.05) and the blue data points represent the downregulated genes (log2FC <−1, FDR <0.05).
Diagnostics 11 02371 g001
Diagnostics 11 02371 g002 550
Figure 2. GO enrichment analysis and candidate gene validation. Gene ontology analysis of the up- (A) and downregulated (B) DEGs was conducted using Metasacape online tools (p < 0.01). (C) Validation of the candidate gene SERPINA3 in GSE38713 and GSE36807. ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2. GO enrichment analysis and candidate gene validation. Gene ontology analysis of the up- (A) and downregulated (B) DEGs was conducted using Metasacape online tools (p < 0.01). (C) Validation of the candidate gene SERPINA3 in GSE38713 and GSE36807. ** p < 0.01.
Diagnostics 11 02371 g002
Diagnostics 11 02371 g003 550
Figure 3. Correlation analysis. Correlation analysis of SERPINA3 and other inflammatory factors (IL1B, IL6, CXCL8, and TNF) in the datasets (A) GSE38713 and (B) GSE36807. Spearman’s correlation coefficient r and the p value for each gene pair are indicated in each figure. ROC curve of SERPINA3 gene expression for UC diagnosis. The ROC curve data are derived from the datasets (C) GSE38713 and (D) GSE36807. In GSE38713, the UC samples were subdivided into two groups: inactive UC and active UC. The area under the curve (AUC), p value, and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) are shown in each figure.
Figure 3. Correlation analysis. Correlation analysis of SERPINA3 and other inflammatory factors (IL1B, IL6, CXCL8, and TNF) in the datasets (A) GSE38713 and (B) GSE36807. Spearman’s correlation coefficient r and the p value for each gene pair are indicated in each figure. ROC curve of SERPINA3 gene expression for UC diagnosis. The ROC curve data are derived from the datasets (C) GSE38713 and (D) GSE36807. In GSE38713, the UC samples were subdivided into two groups: inactive UC and active UC. The area under the curve (AUC), p value, and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) are shown in each figure.
Diagnostics 11 02371 g003
Diagnostics 11 02371 g004 550
Figure 4. SERPINA3 was upregulated in the mouse colon after DSS treatment. Mice were divided into two groups: the control group (n = 5, NC) and the DSS treatment group (n = 8, mouse model). Mice received 2.5% DSS for 7 days. Throughout the DSS treatment period, daily body weight was recorded. At the end of the modelling day, the mice were sacrificed, and distal colon samples were used for paraffin sectioning and qRT-PCR detection. (A) Body weight change in mice during the experimental period. (B) HE staining of colon tissues from the control and DSS-induced colitis model mice. (C) Histological scores of colon tissues. (D) The mRNA levels of IL1b, IL6, Tnf, and SERPINA3. (E) SERPINA3 protein expression was detected by Western blot. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. SERPINA3 was upregulated in the mouse colon after DSS treatment. Mice were divided into two groups: the control group (n = 5, NC) and the DSS treatment group (n = 8, mouse model). Mice received 2.5% DSS for 7 days. Throughout the DSS treatment period, daily body weight was recorded. At the end of the modelling day, the mice were sacrificed, and distal colon samples were used for paraffin sectioning and qRT-PCR detection. (A) Body weight change in mice during the experimental period. (B) HE staining of colon tissues from the control and DSS-induced colitis model mice. (C) Histological scores of colon tissues. (D) The mRNA levels of IL1b, IL6, Tnf, and SERPINA3. (E) SERPINA3 protein expression was detected by Western blot. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Diagnostics 11 02371 g004
Diagnostics 11 02371 g005 550
Figure 5. The potential role of SERPINA3 in an in-vitro UC model. HT29 intestinal epithelial cells were incubated with (cell model) or without (NC) TNFα (10 ng/mL) for 12 h to mimic inflammatory conditions in vitro. (A) After TNFα stimulation, cell RNA was isolated, and the transcription levels of IL1B, CXCL8, CCL2, and SERPINA3 were detected by qRT-PCR. HT29 intestinal epithelial cells were transfected with control siRNA (siControl) or SERPINA3 siRNA (siSERPINA3). Forty-eight hours post-transfection, all the groups were incubated with TNFα (10 ng/mL) for 12 h. After transfection and TNFα stimulation, cell RNA was isolated. (B) The transcription levels of IL1B, CXCL8, CCL2 and SERPINA3 were detected by RT-qPCR. (C) SERPINA3 protein expression was detected by Western blot. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. The potential role of SERPINA3 in an in-vitro UC model. HT29 intestinal epithelial cells were incubated with (cell model) or without (NC) TNFα (10 ng/mL) for 12 h to mimic inflammatory conditions in vitro. (A) After TNFα stimulation, cell RNA was isolated, and the transcription levels of IL1B, CXCL8, CCL2, and SERPINA3 were detected by qRT-PCR. HT29 intestinal epithelial cells were transfected with control siRNA (siControl) or SERPINA3 siRNA (siSERPINA3). Forty-eight hours post-transfection, all the groups were incubated with TNFα (10 ng/mL) for 12 h. After transfection and TNFα stimulation, cell RNA was isolated. (B) The transcription levels of IL1B, CXCL8, CCL2 and SERPINA3 were detected by RT-qPCR. (C) SERPINA3 protein expression was detected by Western blot. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Diagnostics 11 02371 g005
Table
Table 1. Top 3 GO terms and relative up and down genes.
Table 1. Top 3 GO terms and relative up and down genes.
Up
Go TermDescription−Log10PCountGenes
GO:0031012extracellular matrix26.5224547SERPINA3, AEBP1, AGT, ANXA5, AZGP1, SERPING1, CHI3L1, COL1A1, COL1A2, COL3A1, COL4A1, COL5A2, COL6A3, COL15A1, CPA3, CTSH, DMBT1, ECM1, F3, LAMC1, LGALS1, MMP1, MMP3, MMP7, MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, PCOLCE, PF4, PI3, HTRA1, S100A8, S100A9, SLPI, SPARC, TGFBI, TIMP1, WNT5A, PXDN, TFPI2, SPARCL1, SPON2, SULF1, ANGPTL2, MXRA5, GREM1, CTHRC1, CAV1, CTSK, SERPINB5, PRDX4, SPINK5, CSRP2, SPAG4, CLDN2, CLDN1, OLFM4
GO:0002237response to molecule of bacterial origin25.1826638ASS1, C5AR1, CASP1, CSF2RB, CD55, DEFA5, DEFA6, DMBT1, FCGR2B, GJA1, CXCL1, CXCL3, HCK, IL1B, IL10RA, CXCL10, LCN2, LYN, CXCL9, NOS2, PF4, S100A8, S100A9, CXCL6, CXCL11, CXCL5, SELP, SLPI, SPARC, TLR2, WNT5A, CLDN1, LILRB2, SPON2, CXCL13, LY96, CD274, TNIP3, C3, C4BPA, C4BPB, CAV1, DEFB4A, IL7R, PI3, PLA2G2A, S100A12, SPINK5, REG4, IGLL5, COL1A1, SPP1, LRP8, RAMP3, AGT, CHI3L1, F3, MMP12, MNDA, POU2AF1, SLC7A5, SERPINB7, AIM2, SULF1, HEG1, IL33, BST2, CDH3, TRIB2
GO:0019221cytokine-mediated signalling pathway24.9711342TNFRSF17, CASP1, CAV1, CSF2RB, ECM1, F3, CXCL1, CXCL3, HCK, IL1B, IL1RN, IL7R, CXCR2, IL10RA, IL13RA2, CXCL10, CXCL9, MMP12, PF4, ROBO1, CCL11, CCL18, CCL24, CXCL6, CXCL11, CXCL5, WNT5A, LRP8, PXDN, IFITM1, OSMR, AIM2, LILRB2, IFITM3, CXCL13, IFITM2, TNFSF13B, DUOX2, ACKR4, PLVAP, CCDC3, IL33, SERPING1, C1R, C3, C4BPA, C4BPB, CD55, DEFA5, DEFA6, DEFB4A, DMBT1, FCGR2B, CFI, REG3A, PI3, POU2AF1, REG1A, REG1B, S100A9, S100A12, SLPI, SPON2, SPINK5, SPNS2, IGLL5, C5AR1, LYN, MMP9, PECAM1, S100A8, SELL, SELP, THY1, PLA2G7, MADCAM1, OLFM4, GREM1, AGT, FPR1, GNA15, PNOC, ADA2, PROK2, MRAP2, CTHRC1, CDH5, ITGA5, SPP1, TFF1, TIMP1, MANF, GMFG, CHN1, PLAU
Down
Go TermDescription−Log10PCountGenes
GO:0016324apical plasma membrane14.320125CA4, CEACAM7, SLC26A2, P2RY1, ABCB1, PRKG2, SCNN1B, SLC1A1, SLC16A1, SLC22A4, SLC22A5, STX3, PLPP1, ABCB11, ABCG2, SLC23A1, NAALADL1, SLC17A4, CLCA4, CDHR5, RAB17, CYP4F12, PDZD3, TRPM6, SLC6A19, AQP8, LIMA1, CNGA1, GABRA2, PDE6A, PHLPP2, PSD3, CDHR1
GO:1901615organic hydroxy compound metabolic process13.21728ABAT, ADH1C, ADH6, CYP27A1, DDC, EPHX2, FMO5, HMGCS2, ITPKA, MAOA, P2RY1, PCK1, PRKG2, SCNN1B, SLC1A1, SULT1A2, VLDLR, PLPP1, ABCB11, OPN3, AMACR, NAAA, SULT1B1, LIMA1, RETSAT, CYP4F12, OSBPL1A, LDHD, CYP2B6, HSD17B2, DHRS11
GO:0032787monocarboxylic acid metabolic process11.272427ABAT, ACADM, ACADS, ADH1C, ADH6, ENTPD5, CPT1A, CYP2B6, CYP27A1, EDN1, ETFDH, HPGD, PCK1, PDK2, PPARG, ABCB11, SLC4A4, LIAS, AMACR, NAAA, CYP2S1, UGT1A10, CYP4F12, UGT2A3, ACSF2, OSBPL1A, LDHD, SULT1A2, APOBEC3B, DDAH2, SULT1B1, APOBEC3A, PLCD1, PRDX6, PLA2G12B, FMO4, FMO5, AIFM3, EPHX2, PLPP1, B4GALNT2, RETSAT
Table
Table 2. Selected genes after literature search. Genes were ranked by log2FC.
Table 2. Selected genes after literature search. Genes were ranked by log2FC.
Genelog2FCAveExprp-Valueadj. P Val.
SERPINA32.7814645.3394460.0023870.014217
CTHRC12.7523195.9631120.0001750.002244
COL4A12.0623378.2554270.000290.003163
SPINK51.8075689.7757120.0020940.012913
TGFBI1.75126910.091771.87 × 10−50.000504
SPAG41.6193585.3983440.0012350.008798
SPON21.5861216.6481040.0016810.011077
COL5A21.5788617.3399770.0015680.010548
PXDN1.4637796.6363860.0003620.003714
AZGP11.2931195.8534930.0037160.019688
PCOLCE1.2840436.8237380.0060830.028299
CTSH1.2309969.6964320.0007070.005954
LAMC11.1717727.5562160.0001590.002112
ANGPTL21.1637045.2296390.0012090.008677
MXRA51.0865068.4603760.0244820.080414
AEBP11.0763017.037460.0167540.0603
CSRP21.0753977.0347640.0083920.036062
CPA31.0630698.6034320.0311160.096113
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Zhu, S.; Chen, Y. Increased SERPINA3 Level Is Associated with Ulcerative Colitis. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122371

AMA Style

Zhang J, Wang W, Zhu S, Chen Y. Increased SERPINA3 Level Is Associated with Ulcerative Colitis. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(12):2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122371

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jingwei, Wei Wang, Shenglong Zhu, and Yongquan Chen. 2021. "Increased SERPINA3 Level Is Associated with Ulcerative Colitis" Diagnostics 11, no. 12: 2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122371

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop