Next Article in Journal
Neonatal Drug Formularies—A Global Scope
Previous Article in Journal
State of the Art Bowel Management for Pediatric Colorectal Problems: Anorectal Malformations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antiarrhythmic Drug Dosing in Children—Review of the Literature

1
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria
2
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2023, 10(5), 847; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10050847
Submission received: 17 April 2023 / Revised: 27 April 2023 / Accepted: 5 May 2023 / Published: 8 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Cardiology)

Abstract

:
Antiarrhythmic drugs represent a mainstay of pediatric arrhythmia treatment. However, official guidelines and consensus documents on this topic remain scarce. There are rather uniform recommendations for some medications (including adenosine, amiodarone, and esmolol), while there are only very broad dosage recommendations for others (such as sotalol or digoxin). To prevent potential uncertainties and even mistakes with regard to dosing, we summarized the published dosage recommendations for antiarrhythmic drugs in children. Because of the wide variations in availability, regulatory approval, and experience, we encourage centers to develop their own specific protocols for pediatric antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

1. Introduction

Supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) represent the majority of arrhythmias in pediatric patients, including the foremost atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT), atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrial tachycardia (AT). Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL), predominating in the adult population, are less frequently encountered in pediatric patients. AF and AFL occur mainly following heart surgery or, occasionally, may be caused by alcohol consumption [1,2]. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) are rare among pediatric patients [2,3].
Thus, target arrhythmias for antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy in pediatric patients differ from those in adults. Among the substances used, betablockers and class I antiarrhythmics dominate. Other substances, e.g., ivabradine, are reserved for exceptional cases only. Recommendations with regard to indications and dosage in pediatric patients are limited and based largely on expert consensus [2,3,4]. In clinical practice, however, dosage recommendations from medical books and online platforms or applications are broadly accessed and frequently employed. For some drugs, substantial gaps with regard to dosing recommendations exist, and comprehensive information on pediatric patients remains scarce. In this article, we aim to provide a review on dosage recommendations for AADs in the pediatric cohort.

2. Materials and Methods

We conducted a structured review with regard to dosage recommendations for commonly used antiarrhythmic agents in the pediatric cohort. A total of 18 antiarrhythmic substances commonly used in pediatric patients in central Europe were considered. Included among these is ajmaline, which is frequently used in Germany and Austria but is not ubiquitously available.
We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL using the following terms in different combinations: “pediatric”, “children”, “antiarrhythmic drugs”, “antiarrhythmic therapy”, “arrhythmia treatment”, and “antiarrhythmic substances”. Papers with regard to AAD dosing in out-of-hospital resuscitation, recommendations on AAD dosing in resuscitation scenarios only, or dosing recommendation for other causes than arrhythmia therapy were excluded. Every study was assessed independently by two reviewers.
Furthermore, we considered the following online resources:
Prescription drugs—information, interactions and side effects, Hazleton, PA, USA (drugs.com) accessed on 10 April 2023.
Antiarrhythmic drug guide, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA (pediatrics.wustl.edu/cardiology/antiarrhythmic-drug-guide) accessed on 10 April 2023.
We included guideline papers and expert consensus statements on antiarrhythmic therapy in children by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) [2,3].
Data on antiarrhythmic drug dosing in children were gathered, focusing on commonly used antiarrhythmic drugs. Dosage recommendations were outlined based on body weight and/or body surface area and given as the minimum to maximum dosage.

3. Review on Antiarrhythmic Drug Dosing in Children

Indications for the use of antiarrhythmic drugs are provided by guidelines and consensus statement and position papers [2,3,4]. Dosage varies by indication but also between different resources of information on specific drugs and indications. Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5 summarize the range of dosage recommendations for each antiarrhythmic substance. Table 6 provides data on antiarrhythmic drugs, including indications, preparations, and mechanism of action.
  • Class 0 antiarrhythmic drugs
Ivabradine, a class 0 AAD with hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channel blocking properties, is available for oral administration only. Dosage is reported as 0.05 mg/kg twice daily in children <40 kg body weight. It may then be uptitrated to 0.2 mg/kg per dose in infants 6 months to 1 year of age and to 0.3 mg/kg per dose (NOT per kg) in children >1 year of age. A maximum single dose is reported up to 7.5 mg (NOT per kg). In children >40 kg body weight, the initial dose is reported as 2.5 mg per dose twice daily, not to exceed 7.5 mg per dose (NOT per kg). Ivabradine is a relatively new drug, approved by the FDA in 2015 (for heart failure therapy) [100]. It has not yet been incorporated into pediatric arrhythmia guidelines, and data on its use in pediatric patients are mainly based on case reports. Ivabradine’s half-life is reported up to 6 h, with peak plasma levels within 1 h following intake when fasting and 2 h when taken with food. Ivabradine may cause negative inotropic and vasoconstrictive effects, arrhythmias, impaired intracardiac impulse propagation, or arterial hypotension. Rarely, dysphagia has been reported [5,6,7,8,9]. Case reports show beneficial effects in tachyarrhythmias, showing no increase in adverse events compared to use in adults. Future recommendations will most likely include ivabradine for tachyarrhythmia treatment in pediatric patients.
  • Class I antiarrhythmic drugs
Ajmaline, a class Ia AAD with sodium blocking properties, is an alkaloid from the roots of Rauvolfia serpentia (Indian snake root). The reported initial dosage ranges from 0.5 to 1 mg/kg iv. The maximum dosage is reported up to 50 mg per dose or 8 mg/kg per day or 1.200 mg per day (NOT per kg) for continuous infusion. If using continuous iv dosing, the initial dose is reported to range from 0.5 to 1 mg/kg per hour, not to exceed more than 10 mg/min (NOT per kg). However, ajmaline is not available in most countries, even though it is recommended for diagnostic testing in cases of suspicion for Brugada syndrome. In that case, the dosage is reported as 1 mg/kg, administered either over 10 min continuously iv or as bolus of 10 mg per dose iv every 2 min. Common indications for ajmaline include diagnostic testing for Brugada syndrome. Its use in supraventricular tachycardia is not an established practice in pediatric patients. Ajmaline’s half-life is reported to range from 6 to 96 min. Ajmaline may exhibit negative inotropic and vasoconstrictive effects, among others [2,10,11,12].
For flecainide, a class Ic AAD, the intravenous bolus dose is reported to range from 0.2 to 2.0 mg/kg per dose, administered every 12 h. Furthermore, a single bolus dose is reported to be followed by continuous infusion ranging from 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg/h. Flecainide continuous infusion is also reported without prior bolus administration. The maximum dosage is reported up to 200 mg/day (NOT per kg). For oral administration, the dosage is reported based on body weight (BW) and based on body surface area (BSA). The BW dosage is reported to range from 1 to 7 mg/kg per dose administered every 8 to 12 h. Based on BSA, the initial dosage is reported as 50 mg/m2/day in children below 6 months of age. For children older than 6 months, the dosage is reported as 100 mg/m2/day. The maximum dosage is reported up to 200 mg/day (NOT per kg) or 8 mg/kg/day. Common indications for flecainide include supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, including Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome. It may also be used to control hemodynamically stable wide complex tachycardias. It is also used to treat prenatal tachyarrhythmias. Flecainide’s half-life is reported to be up to 29 h in newborns, up to 6 h in infants below one year of age, and up to 8 h in children older than one year of age. Flecainide may cause dizziness, visual disturbance, dyspnea, chest pain, or proarrhythmia. The latter is reported especially for patients with Brugada syndrome and is reported as a potential fatality [2,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].
For lidocaine, a class Ib AAD, the dosage is reported as 1 mg/kg per intravenous dose, followed by continuous infusion ranging from 20 to 50 mcg/kg/min. The maximum loading dose is reported to be up to 1 mg/kg. The maximum dosage for continuous infusion is reported to be up to 50 mcg/kg/min. Common indications for lidocaine include life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation according to current ERC guidelines, hemodynamically stable wide complex tachycardia, or drug refractory supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Lidocaine’s half-life is reported to be up to 2 h, with the onset of action within 90 s following iv administration. There is no preparation of lidocaine available for oral administration. The effect duration is reported to be up to 20 min. Lidocaine may cause headache, shivering, bradycardia, arrhythmias, or circulatory shock, among others [2,37,38,39,40].
For mexiletine, a class Ib AAD, the dosage is reported to range from 1.4 to 5 mg/kg per dose, administered orally every 8 to 12 h. The maximum dosage is reported to be up to 8 mg/kg per dose (or 450 to 1.200 mg/day in adults). There is no preparation of mexiletine available for intravenous administration. Mexiletine is indicated in long QT syndrome type 3, where it has been shown to significantly reduce the risk for sudden cardiac death/ventricular arrhythmias. Mexiletine’s half-life is reported to be up to 12 h. The onset of action is reported as early as 30 min, ranging up to 120 min following administration. Mexiletine may cause headache, heartburn, chest pain, dizziness, visual disturbances, or nausea and vomiting, among others [13,14,15,16].
For propafenone, a class Ic AAD, the dosage is reported to range from 0.2 to 2.0 mg/kg intravenously over two hours, followed by continuous infusion ranging from 4 to 20 mcg/kg/min. The maximum dosage is reported to be up to 2.0 mg/kg iv over two hours (loading dose) and 20 mcg/kg/min for continuous infusion. For oral administration, the dosage is reported based on body weight (BW) and based on body surface area (BSA). The BW dosage is reported to range from 6 to 20 mg/kg/day, administered every 8 to 12 h. Based on BSA, the dosage is reported to range from 150 to 600 mg/m2/day. The maximum oral dosage is reported to be up to 20 mg/kg/day or 900 mg/day (NOT per kg, in adults). Common indications for propafenone include supraventricular tachyarrhythmias or idiopathic monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Propafenone’s half-life is reported to be up to 32 h in poor metabolizers and up to 10 h in rapid metabolizers. Propafenone may cause unusual taste, nausea, dizziness, or arrhythmias, among others [2,24,35,36].
Quinidine, a class Ia AAD, is available in some countries as quinidine sulfate or quinidine gluconate. For quinidine sulfate, the oral dosage is reported to range from 15 to 30 mg/kg/day, administered every 6 h. The maximum dose is reported to be 60 mg/kg/day. The dosage based on BSA is not well described. BSA-based dosing of 900 mg/m2 is reported. Quinidine sulfate is not available for iv administration. Quinidine gluconate dosing is reported as 20–60 mg/kg orally, administered every 8 h. For quinidine gluconate intravenous dosing is reported to be 30 mg/kg/day or 900 mg/m2/day, administered every 5 to 6 h. Indications for quinidine’s use in pediatric patients mainly focus on Brugada syndrome-associated electrical storm or Short QT syndrome. Quinidine’s half-life is reported to be up to 8 h. The onset of action is reported within 3 h following oral administration. Quinidine may cause lightheadedness, heartburn, diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. Torsade-de-pointes tachycardias have been reported when it is administered concomitantly with clarithromycin. When patients are on warfarin, closely monitor coagulation, as quinidine may potentiate warfarin effects. Grapefruit juice may delay gastrointestinal absorption [17,18,19,20,21].
  • Class II antiarrhythmic drugs
For adenosine, a revised Vaughan–Williams classification [101] class IIe AAD, the dosage is reported uniformly throughout literature resources as 0.1 mg/kg, with repetitive doses of 0.2 and 0.3 mg/kg. In children younger than one year, the initial dose is reported to be uptirated to 0.15 mg/kg. Given the nature of the drug, there is no preparation of adenosine available for continuous iv or oral administration. Common indications for adenosine include the acute treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. It may also be used for diagnostic purposes in hemodynamically stable wide complex tachycardias. Adenosine’s half-life is reported to be less than 10 s due to the rapid uptake by vascular endothelial cells and erythrocytes with rapid metabolization. Adenosine may cause chest discomfort, facial flushing, neck discomfort, gastrointestinal distress, or cardiac arrhythmia, among others [2,3,4,75].
For atenolol, a class IIa AAD, dosage is reported range from 0.05 to 0.2 mg/kg per dose. The maximum dose is reported as 2.5 mg per dose. If using continuous iv dosing, the initial dose is reported to range from 0.5 to 1 mg/kg per hour, not to exceed 10 mg/min. If used orally, the dosage range is reported from 0.3 to 1.0 mg/kg per day, with a maximum dose of 2 mg/kg per day or 100 mg per day. Common indications for atenolol include recurrent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias and long QT syndrome 1 & 2. Atenolol’s half-life is reported to be up to 35 h, with 16 h reported in newborns and up to 7 h reported in children aged 5 years or older. The onset of action is reported within 1 h following oral administration. Atenolol may cause arterial hypotension, fatigue, tachycardias, or bradycardia, among others [27,41].
For atropine, a class IIc AAD, the dosage is reported to ranging from 0.01 to 0.04 mg/kg per dose. For atropine, there is a recommended minimum dose of 0.05 to 0.1 mg per dose. The maximum dose is reported to be 0.5 to 1 mg per dose. There is no continuous iv dosing or oral dosage preparation available for atropine. Common indications for atropine include symptomatic bradyarrhythmias, especially associated with betablocker or calcium channel blocker toxicity. Atropine’s half-life is reported to be up to 10 h, with the longest half-life reported in children younger than two years of age. Atropine may cause asystole, chest pain, atrial arrhythmias, or transient atrioventricular dissociation, among others [37,76,77,78,79].
Bisoprolol, a class IIa AAD, is not available for intravenous administration. The oral dosage is reported to range from 0.1 to 0.4 mg/kg per day, with a maximum dose of 20 mg per day. Bisoprolol is mainly used in heart failure therapy. However, it may be indicated in paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in conjunction with heart failure. Bisoprolol’s half-life is reported to be up to 12 h when renal function is unimpaired. In patients with impaired renal or hepatic function, the half-life is reported to extend up to 36 h. The onset of action is reported within 2 h following oral administration, with peak action reported 2 to 4 h following administration. Bisoprolol may cause chest pain, fatigue, diarrhea, or an increase in hepatic transaminases (AST/ALT), among others [42,43,44,45].
Carvedilol, a class IIa AAD, is not available for intravenous administration. The oral dosage is reported to range from 0.075 to 0.8 mg/kg per dose, with a maximum reported dose of 50 mg per day (NOT per kg). Carvedilol is mainly used in heart failure therapy. However, it may be indicated in paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in conjunction with heart failure. Carvedilol’s half-life is reported to be up to 3.6 h. The onset of action is reported within 1 h following administration, with an earlier alpha blocking effect (within 30 min) and later onset beta blocking effect. Carvedilol may cause arterial hypotension, dizziness, fatigue, weight gain, or hyperglycemia, among others [46,47,48,49,50,51].
For digoxin, a class IId AAD, the intravenous dose is reported to range from 0.01 to 0.015 mg/kg per dose, administered every 8 h. The maximum dosage is reported to be up to 0.2 mg/dose. Intravenous administration aims for a blood target level of 1 to 2.5 nmol/L or 0.78 to 1.95 ng/mL. For oral administration, the dosage is reported based on body weight (BW), as well as based on body surface area (BSA). The BW dosage is reported to range from 0.01 to 0.017 mg/kg per dose, administered every 8 to 12 h. The maximum dosage based on BW is reported to be up to 0.017 mg/kg/dose. Based on BSA, the dosage is reported to be 0.2 mg/m2/dose, administered every 8 to 12 h. Common indications for digoxin include supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter for ventricular rate control. It is also used to treat prenatal tachyarrhythmias. Digoxin’s half-life is dependent on age and cardiac and renal function. The half-life is reported to be up to 170 h in preterm born infants. For the pediatric cohort, the average half-life is reported to be 18 to 36 h. The onset of action is reported within 2 h following oral administration and within 5 to 60 min following intravenous administration. Digoxin may cause arrhythmias, asystole, heart block, ST segment depression, facial edema, or premature ventricular contractions, among others [22,24,26,35,72,80,81,82,83].
For esmolol, a class II AAD, the intravenous dosage is reported to range from 0.01 to 0.5 mg/kg as an initial bolus over one minute, followed by continuous infusion of 10 to 500 mcg/kg/min. The maximum dose is reported to be 0.5 mg/kg over one minute for the initial bolus dose and up to 500 mcg/kg/min for continuous infusion. Esmolol is not available for oral administration. Furthermore, esmolol continuous infusion has been well documented up to 48 h. Data on longer continuous use currently remain scarce. Therefore, the duration of use should be limited to 48 h, transitioning the patient to an alternative betablocker. Common indications for esmolol include supraventricular tachyarrhythmias or postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia. Esmolol’s half-life is reported to be up to 5 min. The onset of action is reported to be within 2 to 10 min following intravenous administration. The duration of action is reported to be up to 30 min. Esmolol may cause arterial hypotension, confusion, nausea, vomiting, headache, agitation, or infusion site reactions including inflammation or induration, among others [24,31,36,52,53,54,55,56,57].
For isoprenaline, a class IIb AAD, the intravenous dosage is reported to range from 0.05 to 2.0 mcg/kg/min. The maximum dosage is reported to be up to 2.0 mcg/kg/min. Isoprenaline is not available for oral administration. Common indications for isoprenaline include long QT syndrome with torsades or atrioventricular block. Isoprenaline’s half-life is reported to be up to 5 min, with immediate onset following intravenous administration. The effect duration is reported to be up to 15 min. Isoprenaline may cause flushing, angina pectoris, arterial hyper- or hypotension, palpitations, restlessness, arrhythmias, or seizures, among others [84,85,86].
Landiolol, a novel substance with rapid onset beta blocking properties (class IIa), has not yet been approved for pediatric use. Therefore, dosage recommendations are still lacking. Currently available reports on landiolol use in pediatric patients demonstrate favorable results for tachyarrhythmia treatment in pediatric patients [58]. Further studies will be needed for landiolol to be included in pediatric arrhythmia guidelines. Current reports on safety and efficacy in pediatric patients are promising. Landiolol is available for intravenous administration only. The dosage is reported to range from 1 to 5 mcg/kg/min iv. It may then be uptitrated to 40 mcg/kg/min iv, based on efficacy. Landiolol’s half-life is reported to be up to 4 min, with an onset of action reported within 1 min following iv administration. Landiolol may cause arterial hypotension, bradycardia, dizziness, or headache, among others [58,59,60,61,62].
For metoprolol, a class II AAD, the dosage is reported to be 0.1 mg/kg per intravenous dose. Up to three doses are reported to be administered every 5 min based on efficacy. Bolus administration may be followed by continuous infusion ranging from 1 to 5 mcg/kg/min. The maximum dosage is reported to be up to three consecutive doses of 0.1 mg/kg or 5 mcg/kg/min for continuous infusion. For oral administration, the dosage is reported to range from 0.5 to 6 mg/kg/day, administered every 8 to 12 h. The maximum dosage is reported to be up to 2 mg/kg/dose. Common indications for metoprolol include paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias, especially in conjunction with heart failure. Metoprolol’s half-life is reported to be up to 10 h in neonates and up to 4 h in adults. The half-life is strongly influenced by CYP2D6 metabolism. The onset of action is reported within 20 min following iv administration or 1 h following immediate release oral administration. Metoprolol may cause arterial hypotension, bradycardia, fatigue, depression, or vertigo, among others [41,44,48,51,63,64,65].
For nadolol, a class IIa AAD, the oral dosage is reported to range from 0.5 to 5.0 mg/kg per dose, administered once daily. The maximum dosage is reported to be up to 5 mg/kg/day or 240 mg/day (NOT per kg). There is no preparation of nadolol available for intravenous administration. Common indications for nadolol include long QT syndrome or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias. Nadolol’s half-life is reported to be up to 5 h in infants, 16 h in children, and 7 h in adolescents. Peak serum levels are reported within 3–4 h following administration. The effect duration is reported to be up to 24 h. Nadolol may cause arterial hypotension, bradycardia, edema, palpitations, Raynaud’s phenomenon, depression, or sedation, among other things [20,22,41,44,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71].
For propranolol, a class IIa AAD, the dosage is reported to range from 0.01 to 0.3 mg/kg per intravenous dose, administered every 3 h. The maximum dosage is reported to be up to 1.0 mg/day (NOT per kg) in children below one year of age. For children above one year of age, the maximum dosage is reported to be up to 5 mg/day (NOT per kg). For oral administration, the dosage is reported to range from 0.5 to 16 mg/kg/day, administered every 6 to 8 h. The maximum oral dosage is reported to be 320 mg/day (NOT per kg). Common indications for propranolol include supraventricular tachyarrhythmias or long QT syndrome. Propranolol’s half-life is reported to be up to 6.5 h, with the onset of action reported within 2 h following oral administration and within 5 min following iv administration. Propranolol may cause sleep disorder (most prominently in infants), agitation, bronchitis, or cold extremities, among other things [2,20,24,27,31,41,43,44,54,64,69,70,72,73,74].
  • Class III antiarrhythmic drugs
For amiodarone, a class IIIa AAD, the dosage is reported as 5 mg/kg for the initial iv dosage. The maximum dosage is reported to be up to 15 mg per dose or up to 30 mg/kg per day. If using continuous iv dosing, the initial dosage is reported to range from 7 to 20 mg/kg per hour, not to exceed a maximum daily dose of 30 mg/kg, as aforementioned. If used orally, the dosage is reported to range from 3 to 15 mg/kg per day, with a reported maximum dose of 8 mg/kg per dose or 200 mg per day (NOT per kg). When administering amiodarone loading maximum is 400mg per day (NOT per kg). Common indications for amiodarone in pediatric patients include life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation according to current ERC guidelines, hemodynamically stable wide complex tachycardia, or drug refractory supraventricular tachyarrhythmias [40]. Its use is also recommended for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF) [102]. However, AF is uncommon in pediatric patients. When administered orally, amiodarone’s half-life is reported to be up to 40 days. Following iv administration, the reported half-life ranges from 9 to 36 days. The onset of action is reported to range from 2 days to 3 weeks when administered orally and is reported to occur within hours when administered iv. Amiodarone may lead to arterial hypotension, nausea, vomiting, or epithelial keratopathy in up to 99% of patients when administered over long periods of time. It also exhibits pulmonary toxicity, and routine follow-up with regard to side effects is recommended in patients on long-term amiodarone. Baseline parameters should be established when starting amiodarone therapy. These should include electrolytes, urea and creatinine, liver function tests (LFT´s), thyroid function tests (TFT´s), chest X-ray, eye examination, and 12-lead ECG. For long term follow-up, it is recommended to perform LFTs, TFTs, respiratory function assessment, and visual function assessment every six months [2,25,27,35,40,96,97,98,99].
Sotalol, a class III AAD, dosage is reported ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 mg/kg intravenously per dose, administered every 12 hours. A single bolus dose is reported to be followed by continuous infusion ranging from 1 to 6 mg/kg/h. Sotalol is also reported for use as continuous infusion only (no prior bolus). Maximum dosage is reported up to 120 mg/dose (NOT per kg) or 6 mg/kg/h. For oral administration dosage reports are more complex. Dosage may be based on body weight (BW) or body surface area (BSA). Based on BW dosage is reported ranging from 2 to 26 mg/kg/day, administered every 8 to 12 hours. However, there are different target doses reported depending on patient age. In children aged 1 month to 6 years, target dose is reported up to 6 mg/kg/day. For children older than 6 years, target dosage is reported up to 4 mg/kg/day. Maximum dosage based on BW is reported up to 26 mg/kg/day or 480 mg/day (NOT per kg). Based on BSA, dosage is reported up to 90 mg/m2/day. However, in children younger than 2 years, dosage is recommended to be corrected by an age factor, downgrading the absolute dose. In the first week the age factor is reported as 0.3, 1 week to 1 month of age the factor is reported as 0.6. For infants older than one month, the factor is reported to increase up to 0.97 at 20 months of age. Usually BSA based dose is corrected by the above mentioned factors (e.g. 30 mg/m2 × 0.3 in a 5 days old newborn). For the first week of life reported dosage ranges from 60 to 200 mg/m2/day. Maximum dosage is reported up to 60 mg/m2/day or 320 mg/day (NOT per kg). Common indications for sotalol include supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Sotalol half life is reported up to 9 hours, with prominent prolongation in patients with renal failure. Onset of action is reported within 2 hours following oral administration, and ranging from 5 to 10 minutes following iv administration. Sotalol may cause bradycardia, chest pain, dyspnea, fatigue, headaches, or weakness, among others [22,24,26,30,63,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113].
  • Class IV antiarrhythmic drugs
For diltiazem, a class IVa AAD, the dosage is uniformly reported to be 0.25 mg/kg per dose, with a maximum dose of 20 mg per dose. When administered intravenously, the initial dose is reported to range from 0.05 to 0.25 mg/kg per hour, not to exceed 15 mg per hour (NOT per kg). When administered orally, the initial dosage is reported to range from 1.0 to 3.0 mg/kg per dose, with a maximum dose of 3.5 mg/kg per day or 180 mg per day (NOT per kg). Common indications for diltiazem include supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Calcium channel blockers should not be used in children below one year of age due to possible hemodynamic impairment. Diltiazem’s half-life is reported to be up to 7 h following oral administration and up to 5 h following intravenous administration. Diltiazem may cause headache, gingival hyperplasia, constipation, peripheral edema, or arterial hypotension. The latter is reported as a potential fatality in infants younger than one year of age. Therefore, its use should be restricted to children one year of age or older [92,94,95].
For verapamil, a class IVa AAD, the dosage is reported to range from 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg intravenously (bolus dose) over ten minutes, followed by continuous infusion of 5 mcg/kg/min. The maximum dosage is reported to be up to 15 mg/dose (NOT per kg). However, there is no maximum daily dose reported. For oral administration, the dosage is reported to range from 2 to 9 mg/kg/day, administered every 8 h. The maximum oral dosage is reported to be up to 480 mg/day (NOT per kg). Verapamil should not be used in children below 1 year of age. Common indications for verapamil include supraventricular tachyarrhythmias or Belhassen VT. Verapamil’s half-life is reported up to 7 h following oral administration and up to 5 h following iv administration. Verapamil may cause headache, gingival hyperplasia, constipation, peripheral edema, or arterial hypotension. The latter is reported to be potentially fatal in infants younger than one year. Therefore, its use should be restricted to children >1 year of age [63,87,88,89,90,91,92,93].

4. Discussion

Indications for AAD therapy in children are very well outlined in official consensus documents endorsed by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) [2,3]. However, the dosage of AADs in children, though homogeneous for some drugs, is reported to be somewhat heterogeneous. For example, for adenosine, which is exclusively used in the acute treatment of arrhythmias and exists in iv dosage form only, the pediatric dosage is uniformly reported as 0.1 mg/kg per dose. For other substances, e.g., sotalol, the reported dosage ranges quite extensively. As for iv sotalol, the reported dosage ranges from 2 to 26 mg/kg/day. Such ranges lead to difficulties in clinical practice. This seems even more true for smaller centers where experience in pediatric arrhythmias and electrophysiology may be limited. Future guidelines on the treatment of arrhythmias in children may include dosage recommendations based on task force consensus agreement. A European multicenter study evaluating the dosage of antiarrhythmic drugs in the treatment of pediatric arrhythmias may aid such recommendations.
Most centers may have their “favorites” among AADs which are routinely used. As for our center, we routinely use metoprolol, propranolol, esmolol, flecainide, sotalol and amiodarone. Our dosing approach for the above-mentioned drugs is as follows:
Metoprolol: initial dosage of 0.1 mg/kg over 1 h iv; uptitrate to 0.3 mg/kg over one hour iv, if needed. The maximum iv dose is 5 mg/kg/day. For rate control in the acute treatment of SVT, we prefer esmolol over metoprolol or propranolol. When using betablockers for long-term treatment, however, we routinely use metoprolol at an initial dosage of 0.5 to 1 mg/kg per dose p.o., once daily (extended release preparation). Below one year of age, we prefer propranolol over metoprolol.
Propranolol: initial dosage of 0.05 mg/kg over 10 min iv, administered every 6 h, if needed. Maximum iv dose: 1 mg per dose in infants, 3 mg per dose in children up to 6 years of age, or 60 mg per day (NOT per kg!). When using propranolol for long-term treatment (e.g., long QT syndrome or SVT), we initiate therapy as 0.5 to 1 mg/kg per day p.o., administered every 6–8 h. We uptitrate to a maximum of 16 mg/kg per day.
Esmolol: initial dosage of 100 mcg/kg over 1 min iv bolus, followed by 50 mcg/kg/min continuous infusion. We uptitrate continuous infusion to the effect (max. 500 mcg/kg/min). For rate control in the acute treatment of SVT, esmolol is our first choice.
Flecainide: initial dosage of 50 mg/m2 per day p.o. in infants younger than one year, administered every 8–12 h. In children one year of age or older, we use 100 mg/m2 per day p.o. every 8–12 h. Flecainide is our first choice for the long-term treatment of SVT, with a special emphasis on Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome. When testing for Brugada syndrome, we use ajmaline.
Sotalol: initial dosage of 6 mg/kg per day p.o. in children younger than six years, administered every 8 h. We uptitrate to a maximum 15 mg/kg per day or 320 mg per day (NOT per kg!). In children six years of age and older, we initially administer 4 mg/kg per day p.o. every 8 h. We use sotalol in patients with congenital heart disease (e.g., Tetralogy of Fallot or complete AV canal) for the long-term treatment of SVT. We do not use sotalol iv preparations.
Amiodarone: initial dosage of 5 mg/kg over 5 to 30 min of iv bolus, followed by continuous infusion of 5–15 mg/kg per day. Maximum of 15 mg/kg per day or 1200 mg per day (NOT per kg!). Amiodarone iv is our first choice in treating wide complex tachycardias, especially in children with congenital heart defects (CHD). In patients with CHD, we use amiodarone for long-term treatment at an initial dose of 5 mg/kg per day p.o., administered every 8 h. Maximum oral dosage: 12 mg/kg per day or 1200 mg per day (NOT per kg!). However, long-term adverse effects of amiodarone should be considered. We prefer sotalol for long-term treatment in select patients.
We use other substances on a case-by-case basis. As for nadolol, this substance is not available in Austria. Experience with certain substances may vary among centers. However, experience is important, as it leads to confidence in the use of certain drugs. Substances that are barely ever in use are typically associated with insecurity regarding the correct initial dosing and uptitration throughout therapy. Dosage failure may result.
Furthermore, the availability of substances and their approval by authorities play a crucial role when it comes to AAD therapy in children. While some substances (e.g., propranolol) may be widely available, others such as nadolol or ajmaline are not. The availability of substances will vary between centers and countries. Most likely, the experience will be high with substances that have been available for a long time at a certain center.
Therefore, we would recommend that centers establish their own specific protocols with regard to AAD therapy in children suffering from arrhythmias. Whenever possible, substances that are recommended within official guideline documents (e.g., nadolol in long QT syndrome) should be used. In case these substances may not be available, which unfortunately still remains true, e.g., nadolol in some European countries, local consensus should be achieved as for which substance may serve as a replacement. Local center-specific protocols in this regard should prevent the arbitrary use of different substances and provide a uniform approach to AAD therapy.
When treating patients with antiarrhythmic drugs, physicians must be aware of overdosing or intoxications. In the current era of COVID, depression and hospitalizations of children, and even more so of adolescents, due to intoxications or suicidal attempts have increased [114,115]. AADs are highly effective but also potentially lethal drugs, and the recognition of either intentional or unintentional intoxication is of the utmost importance to establish sufficient therapy quickly. As with digoxin, overdose may be treated by administering digoxin-specific antibody fragments (FAB) [116]. Usually, the dosage of FAB is based on serum digoxin levels. An approximate dose can be calculated as “serum digoxin level (nmol/L) × body weight (kg) × 0.3″ [117,118]. In class I AAD overdoses (i.e., with propafenone or flecainide), sodium bicarbonate (e.g., start 1 mmol/kg iv; high doses needed!), isoproterenol (e.g., up to 2 mcg/kg/min iv), lipid emulsions (e.g., intravenous lipid emulsion 20% 1–1.5 mL/kg iv bolus over 1 min, followed by continuous infusion of 0.25–0.5 mL/kg/min), or calcium-gluconate (e.g., calcium gluconate 10% 0.5 mL/kg over 30 min iv) are recommended [119,120,121,122]. For betablocker intoxications, activated charcoal (1 g/kg, max. 50 g), calcium-gluconate (e.g., calcium gluconate 10% 0.25–0.5 mL/kg over 30 min iv), isoproterenol e.g., (up to 2 mcg/kg/min iv), atropine (e.g., 0.02–0.04 mg/kg iv), or glucagon (e.g., 0.1 mg/kg iv) are recommended, among other substances [123,124]. The consultation of poison control services is strongly recommended when treating patients for AAD overdose.
More recently developed substances such as landiolol or ivabradine may be introduced in future guidelines on pediatric arrhythmias. Currently, their use and dosing remain off-label and subject to future studies. Both landiolol and ivabradine, however, have been reported to show promising results with regard to tachyarrhythmia therapy in children.
Within this manuscript, we aimed to summarize the dosage for what we consider the most commonly used AADs. All provided dosages must be carefully checked before use in patients.

5. Conclusions

Within this review article, we focused on the most commonly used AADs in pediatric arrhythmias and aimed to provide an overview on the dosage, as reported in the literature. We encourage centers to establish their own protocols for AAD dosing in children to provide a center-specific uniform approach and prevent dosing failure whenever possible.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K.-K. and N.O.; methodology, S.K.-K. and H.S.; validation, D.S., M.K., and M.M.; formal analysis, S.S., P.F.; investigation, S.K.-K. and L.S.; resources, D.S.; data curation, L.S. and P.F.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.-K.; writing—review and editing, M.M. and M.K.; visualization, N.O.; supervision, D.S.; project administration, S.S., M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Noessler, N.; Schweintzger, S.; Kurath-Koller, S. Holiday heart syndrome: An upcoming tachyarrhythmia in today’s youth? Cardiol. Young 2021, 31, 1054–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Brugada, J.; Blom, N.; Sarquella-Brugada, G.; Blomstrom-Lundqvist, C.; Deanfield, J.; Janousek, J.; Abrams, D.; Bauersfeld, U.; Brugada, R.; Drago, F.; et al. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy for arrhythmias in the pediatric population: EHRA and AEPC-Arrhythmia Working Group joint consensus statement. Europace 2013, 15, 1337–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hernández-Madrid, A.; Paul, T.; Abrams, D.; Aziz, P.F.; Blom, N.A.; Chen, J.; Chessa, M.; Combes, N.; Dagres, N.; Diller, G.; et al. Arrhythmias in congenital heart disease: A position paper of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Grown-up Congenital heart disease, endorsed by HRS, PACES, APHRS, and SOLAECE. Europace 2018, 20, 1719–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hernández-Madrid, A.; Hocini, M.; Chen, J.; Potpara, T.; Pison, L.; Blomström-Lundqvist, C. How are arrhythmias managed in the paediatric population in Europe? Results of the European Heart Rhythm survey. Europace 2014, 16, 1852–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Balducci, V.; Credi, C.; Sacconi, L.; Romanelli, M.N.; Sartiani, L.; Cerbai, E. The HCN channel as a pharmacological target: Why, where, and how to block it. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2021, 166, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Di Marco, G.M.; De Nigris, A.; Pepe, A.; Pagano, A.; Di Nardo, G.; Tipo, V. Ivabradine-Flecainide as Breakthrough Drug Combination for Congenital Junctional Ectopic Tachycardia: A Case Report and Literature Review. Pediatr. Rep. 2021, 13, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hackett, G.; Lin, T.K.; Imundo, J.R. Use of ivabradine in a critically ill pediatric patient with recalcitrant ectopic atrial tachycardia and complex congenital heart disease. Heart Rhythm Case Rep. 2022, 8, 415–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Penslar, J.; Udupa, S. Ivabradine in the Management of Pediatric Arrhythmias. Can. J. Cardiol. 2023, 39, 11–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Younis, N.K.; Abi-Saleh, B.; Al Amin, F.; El Sedawi, O.; Tayeh, C.; Bitar, F.; Arabi, M. Ivabradine: A Potential Therapeutic for Children With Refractory SVT. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 660855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Conte, G.; Brugada, P. The challenges of performing ajmaline challenge in children with suspected Brugada syndrome. Open Heart 2014, 1, e000031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sorgente, A.; Sarkozy, A.; De Asmundis, C.; Chierchia, G.B.; Capulzini, L.; Paparella, G.; Henkens, S.; Brugada, P. Ajmaline challenge in young individuals with suspected Brugada syndrome. Pacing. Clin. Electrophysiol. 2011, 34, 736–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gonzalez Corcia, M.C.; de Asmundis, C.; Chierchia, G.B.; Brugada, P. Brugada syndrome in the paediatric population: A comprehensive approach to clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management. Cardiol. Young 2016, 26, 1044–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bagkaki, A.; Tsoutsinos, A.; Hatzidaki, E.; Tzatzarakis, M.; Parthenakis, F.; Germanakis, I. Mexiletine Treatment for Neonatal LQT3 Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 9, 674041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Funasako, M.; Aiba, T.; Ishibashi, K.; Nakajima, I.; Miyamoto, K.; Inoue, Y.; Okamura, H.; Noda, T.; Kamakura, S.; Anzai, T.; et al. Pronounced Shortening of QT Interval With Mexiletine Infusion Test in Patients With Type 3 Congenital Long QT Syndrome. Circ. J. 2016, 80, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Mazzanti, A.; Maragna, R.; Faragli, A.; Monteforte, N.; Bloise, R.; Memmi, M.; Novelli, V.; Baiardi, P.; Bagnardi, V.; Etheridge, S.P.; et al. Gene-Specific Therapy With Mexiletine Reduces Arrhythmic Events in Patients With Long QT Syndrome Type 3. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. van der Ree, M.H.; van Dussen, L.; Rosenberg, N.; Stolwijk, N.; van den Berg, S.; van der Wel, V.; Jacobs, B.A.W.; Wilde, A.A.M.; Hollak, C.E.M.; Postema, P.G. Effectiveness and safety of mexiletine in patients at risk for (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias: A systematic review. Europace 2022, 24, 1809–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Brugada, P. Short QT Syndrome and Hydroquinidine: Rare Diseases and Unavailable Drugs. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 70, 3016–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grace, A.A.; Matthews, G.D.K. Quinidine Rebooted: Contemporary Approaches to Multichannel Blockade. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2019, 5, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pieroni, M.; Notarstefano, P.; Bolognese, L. Brugada Syndrome in the Young and in the Adult: A Tale of 2 Diseases? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 1766–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schwartz, P.J.; Ackerman, M.J.; Antzelevitch, C.; Bezzina, C.R.; Borggrefe, M.; Cuneo, B.F.; Wilde, A.A.M. Inherited cardiac arrhythmias. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2020, 6, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vitali Serdoz, L.; Rittger, H.; Furlanello, F.; Bastian, D. Quinidine-A legacy within the modern era of antiarrhythmic therapy. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 144, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Capponi, G.; Belli, G.; Giovannini, M.; Remaschi, G.; Brambilla, A.; Vannuccini, F.; Favilli, S.; Porcedda, G.; De Simone, L. Supraventricular tachycardias in the first year of life: What is the best pharmacological treatment? 24 years of experience in a single centre. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2021, 21, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ergül, Y.; Özgür, S.; Onan, S.H.; Tuzcu, V. Can flecainide totally eliminate bidirectional ventricular tachycardia in pediatric patients with Andersen-Tawil syndrome? Turk. Kardiyol. Dern. Ars. 2018, 46, 718–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guerrier, K.; Shamszad, P.; Czosek, R.J.; Spar, D.S.; Knilans, T.K.; Anderson, J.B. Variation in Antiarrhythmic Management of Infants Hospitalized with Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Multi-Institutional Analysis. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2016, 37, 946–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hill, A.C.; Silka, M.J.; Bar-Cohen, Y. A comparison of oral flecainide and amiodarone for the treatment of recurrent supraventricular tachycardia in children. Pacing. Clin. Electrophysiol. 2019, 42, 670–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kahr, P.C.; Moffett, B.S.; Miyake, C.Y.; Kim, J.J.; Valdes, S.O. “Second line medications” for supraventricular arrhythmias in children: In-hospital efficacy and adverse events during treatment initiation of sotalol and flecainide. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2021, 32, 2207–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lim, Y.T.; Kim, Y.H.; Kwon, J.E. Effective Control of Supraventricular Tachycardia in Neonates May Requires Combination Pharmacologic Therapy. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Öztürk, E.; Kafalı, H.C.; Tanıdır, İ.; Tunca Şahin, G.; Onan, İ.; Haydin, S.; Güzeltaş, A.; Ergül, Y. Early postoperative arrhythmias in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery. Turk. Gogus Kalp. Damar. Cerrahisi. Derg. 2021, 29, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pflaumer, A.; Davis, A.M. An Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia. Heart Lung Circ. 2019, 28, 366–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sakurai, K.; Takahashi, K.; Nakayashiro, M. Combined flecainide and sotalol therapy for multifocal atrial tachycardia in cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome. Pediatr. Int. 2018, 60, 1036–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tella, J.B.; Dao, D.T.; Alexander, M.E.; Geva, A.; Vitali, S.H.; Zalieckas, J.M.; Mehta, N.M.; McManus, M.L.; Buchmiller, T.L.; Mullen, M.P. Supraventricular Tachycardia in Infants With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Prevalence, Associations, and Outcomes. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 23, e329–e337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Thomas, S.A.L.; Ferguson, R.; Wilson, D.G. Flecainide administration in children: Dosage, drug levels, and clinical effect. Cardiol. Young 2022, 22, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ünal Yüksekgönül, A.; Azak, E.; Akalın, A.; Ertuğrul, İ.; Kılıç, E.; Utine, G.E.; Karagöz, T. Efficacy of flecainide in bidirectional ventricular tachycardia and tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy with Andersen-Tawil syndrome. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2022, 65, 104499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vaquer, G.; Marfil, L.; Ortega, J.; Sabaté-Rotés, A.; Gran-Ipiña, F.; Roses-Noguer, F. Flecainide intoxication in pediatric patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Ann. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2020, 13, 264–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bruder, D.; Weber, R.; Gass, M.; Balmer, C.; Cavigelli-Brunner, A. Antiarrhythmic Medication in Neonates and Infants with Supraventricular Tachycardia. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2022, 43, 1311–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tunca Sahin, G.; Ozturk, E.; Kasar, T.; Guzeltas, A.; Ergul, Y. Sustained tachyarrhythmia in children younger than 1 year of age: Six year single-center experience. Pediatr. Int. 2018, 60, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Maconochie, I.K.; Aickin, R.; Hazinski, M.F.; Atkins, D.L.; Bingham, R.; Couto, T.B.; Guerguerian, A.M.; Nadkarni, V.M.; Ng, K.C.; Nuthall, G.A.; et al. Pediatric Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 2020, 142 (Suppl. S1), S140–S184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McBride, M.E.; Marino, B.S.; Webster, G.; Lopez-Herce, J.; Ziegler, C.P.; De Caen, A.R.; Atkins, D.L. Amiodarone Versus Lidocaine for Pediatric Cardiac Arrest Due to Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Systematic Review. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 18, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Valdes, S.O.; Donoghue, A.J.; Hoyme, D.B.; Hammond, R.; Berg, M.D.; Berg, R.A.; Samson, R.A. Outcomes associated with amiodarone and lidocaine in the treatment of in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest with pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation 2014, 85, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Van de Voorde, P.; Turner, N.M.; Djakow, J.; de Lucas, N.; Martinez-Mejias, A.; Biarent, D.; Bingham, R.; Brissaud, O.; Hoffmann, F.; Johannesdottir, G.B.; et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Paediatric Life Support. Resuscitation 2021, 161, 327–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abu-Zeitone, A.; Peterson, D.R.; Polonsky, B.; McNitt, S.; Moss, A.J. Efficacy of different beta-blockers in the treatment of long QT syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64, 1352–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Fazio, G.; Vernuccio, F.; Lo Re, G.; Grutta, G.; Mongiovì, M. Role of bisoprolol in patients with long QT syndrome. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2013, 18, 467–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ostman-Smith, I. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in childhood and adolescence-strategies to prevent sudden death. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2010, 24, 637–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Peltenburg, P.J.; Kallas, D.; Bos, J.M.; Lieve, K.V.V.; Franciosi, S.; Roston, T.M.; Denjoy, I.; Sorensen, K.B.; Ohno, S.; Roses-Noguer, F.; et al. An International Multicenter Cohort Study on β-Blockers for the Treatment of Symptomatic Children With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia. Circulation 2022, 145, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Suwa, M.; Ito, T.; Otake, Y.; Kobashi, A.; Hirota, Y.; Kawamura, K. Effect of beta-blocker treatment in dilated cardiomyopathy with bradyarrhythmias. Jpn Circ. J. 1998, 62, 765–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Adorisio, R.; Pontrelli, G.; Cantarutti, N.; Bellettini, E.; Caiazza, M.; Mencarelli, E.; Limongelli, G.; Poli, D.; Drago, F.; Kirk, R.; et al. Heart rate reduction as a marker to optimize carvedilol treatment and enhance myocardial recovery in pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 1001752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Adorisio, R.; Cantarutti, N.; Ciabattini, M.; Amodeo, A.; Drago, F. Real-World Use of Carvedilol in Children With Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Long-Term Effect on Survival and Ventricular Function. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 845406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Etheridge, S.P.; Shaddy, R.E. QT dispersion after beta-blocker therapy (carvedilol or metoprolol) in children with heart failure. Am. J. Cardiol. 2003, 91, 1497–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Matsumura, T.; Tamura, T.; Kuru, S.; Kikuchi, Y.; Kawai, M. Carvedilol can prevent cardiac events in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Intern. Med. 2010, 49, 1357–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Oflaz, M.B.; Balli, S.; Kibar, A.E.; Ece, I.; Akdeniz, C.; Tuzcu, V. Effects of carvedilol therapy on cardiac autonomic control, QT dispersion, and ventricular arrhythmias in children with dilated cardiomyopathy. Med. Sci. Monit. 2013, 19, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Taylor, B.; Moffett, B.S.; Krenek, M.; Valdes, S.O.; Kim, J. Race contributes to beta-blocker efficacy in pediatric patients with arrhythmias. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2014, 35, 641–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Adamson, P.C.; Rhodes, L.A.; Saul, J.P.; Dick, M.; Epstein, M.R.; Moate, P.; Boston, R.; Schreiner, M.S. The pharmacokinetics of esmolol in pediatric subjects with supraventricular arrhythmias. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2006, 27, 420–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Affolter, J.T.; Well, A.; Gottlieb, E.A.; Fraser, C.D. Routine Perioperative Esmolol After Infant Tetralogy of Fallot Repair: Single-Center Retrospective Study of Hemodynamics. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 23, e583–e589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cafferkey, A.; McMahon, C. Successful Treatment of Refractory Cardiac Arrest With β-Blockade and Extracorporeal Life Support in a Pediatric Patient With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia: A Case Report. A A Pract. 2018, 11, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, D.; Guo, J.; Li, X.H.; Liao, Y.; Zhang, M.M.; Shi, L.; Lin, Y.; Liu, Y. A case report of an infant after episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia with left ventricular thrombosis and cerebral infarction. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2021, 10, 8322–8327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wiest, D.B.; Haney, J.S. Clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of esmolol. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2012, 51, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Garnock-Jones, K.P. Esmolol: A review of its use in the short-term treatment of tachyarrhythmias and the short-term control of tachycardia and hypertension. Drugs 2012, 72, 109–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ashida, A.; Ozaki, N.; Kishi, K.; Odanaka, Y.; Nemoto, S.; Konishi, H. Safety and Efficacy of Landiolol Hydrochloride in Children with Tachyarrhythmia of Various Etiologies. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2021, 42, 1700–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sagawa, K.; Suzuki, T.; Takei, K.; Miura, M.; Ueda, H.; Horigome, H.; Ono, H.; Ohashi, N.; Sato, S.; Fukunaga, H.; et al. Control of Heart Rate in Infant and Child Tachyarrhythmia With Reduced Cardiac Function Using Landiolol (HEARTFUL)—Results of a Prospective, Multicenter, Uncontrolled Clinical Study. Circ. J. 2022, 87, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schroeder, L.; Monno, P.; Unger, M.; Ackerl, J.; Shatilova, O.; Schmitt, J.; Dresbach, T.; Mueller, A.; Kipfmueller, F. Heart rate control with landiolol hydrochloride in infants with ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. ESC Heart Fail. 2023, 10, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sumitomo, N.; Horigome, H.; Miura, M.; Ono, H.; Ueda, H.; Takigiku, K.; Yoshimoto, J.; Ohashi, N.; Suzuki, T.; Sagawa, K.; et al. Study design for control of HEART rate in inFant and child tachyarrhythmia with heart failure Using Landiolol (HEARTFUL): A prospective, multicenter, uncontrolled clinical trial. J. Cardiol. 2017, 70, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Yoneyama, F.; Tokunaga, C.; Kato, H.; Nakajima, T.; Mathis, B.J.; Sakamoto, H.; Hiramatsu, Y. Landiolol Hydrochloride Rapidly Controls Junctional Ectopic Tachycardia After Pediatric Heart Surgery. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 19, 713–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bertels, R.A.; Kammeraad, J.A.E.; Zeelenberg, A.M.; Filippini, L.H.; Knobbe, I.; Kuipers, I.M.; Blom, N.A. The Efficacy of Anti-Arrhythmic Drugs in Children With Idiopathic Frequent Symptomatic or Asymptomatic Premature Ventricular Complexes With or Without Asymptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia: A Retrospective Multi-Center Study. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2021, 42, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chockalingam, P.; Crotti, L.; Girardengo, G.; Johnson, J.N.; Harris, K.M.; van der Heijden, J.F.; Hauer, R.N.; Beckmann, B.M.; Spazzolini, C.; Rordorf, R.; et al. Not all beta-blockers are equal in the management of long QT syndrome types 1 and 2: Higher recurrence of events under metoprolol. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 60, 2092–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Waddell-Smith, K.E.; Skinner, J.R. Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Familial Long QT Syndrome. Heart Lung Circ. 2016, 25, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Abrams, D.J.; Macrae, C.A. Long QT syndrome. Circulation 2014, 129, 1524–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ackerman, M.J.; Priori, S.G.; Dubin, A.M.; Kowey, P.; Linker, N.J.; Slotwiner, D.; Triedman, J.; Van Hare, G.F.; Gold, M.R. Beta-blocker therapy for long QT syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: Are all beta-blockers equivalent? Heart Rhythm 2017, 14, e41–e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Anys, S.; Arnaud, M.; Minois, D.; Rajalu, A.; Guyomarch, B.; Thollet, A.; Gourraud, J.B.; Probst, V. Dose response to nadolol in congenital long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2021, 18, 1377–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Etheridge, S.P.; Asaki, S.Y.; Niu, M.C. A personalized approach to long QT syndrome. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2019, 34, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mazzanti, A.; Kukavica, D.; Trancuccio, A.; Memmi, M.; Bloise, R.; Gambelli, P.; Marino, M.; Ortíz-Genga, M.; Morini, M.; Monteforte, N.; et al. Outcomes of Patients With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Treated with β-Blockers. JAMA Cardiol. 2022, 7, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. von Alvensleben, J.C.; LaPage, M.J.; Caruthers, R.; Bradley, D.J. Nadolol for Treatment of Supraventricular Tachycardia in Infants and Young Children. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2017, 38, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Bolin, E.H.; Lang, S.M.; Tang, X.; Collins, R.T. Propranolol Versus Digoxin in the Neonate for Supraventricular Tachycardia (from the Pediatric Health Information System). Am. J. Cardiol. 2017, 119, 1605–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Stritzke, A.; Kabra, N.; Kaur, S.; Robertson, H.L.; Lodha, A. Oral propranolol in prevention of severe retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Perinatol. 2019, 39, 1584–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Uniat, J.; Hill, A.C.; Shwayder, M.; Silka, M.J.; Bar-Cohen, Y. Ectopic Atrial Tachycardia in Infants Following Congenital Heart Disease Surgery. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2022, 44, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Qureshi, A.U.; Hyder, S.N.; Sheikh, A.M.; Sadiq, M. Optimal dose of adenosine effective for supraventricular tachycardia in children. J. Coll. Physicians Surg Pak. 2012, 22, 648–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Eisa, L.; Passi, Y.; Lerman, J.; Raczka, M.; Heard, C. Do small doses of atropine (<0.1 mg) cause bradycardia in young children? Arch. Dis. Child. 2015, 100, 684–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hanna, A.; Crowe, R.P.; Fishe, J.N. Pediatric Bradycardia Is Undertreated in the Prehospital Setting: A Retrospective Multi-Agency Analysis. Prehosp. Emerg. Care 2023, 27, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jones, P.; Dauger, S.; Denjoy, I.; Pinto da Costa, N.; Alberti, C.; Boulkedid, R.; Peters, M.J. The effect of atropine on rhythm and conduction disturbances during 322 critical care intubations. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 14, e289–e297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kannankeril, P.J.; Shoemaker, M.B.; Gayle, K.A.; Fountain, D.; Roden, D.M.; Knollmann, B.C. Atropine-induced sinus tachycardia protects against exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Europace 2020, 22, 643–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Belli, G.; Giovannini, M.; Porcedda, G.; Moroni, M.; la Marca, G.; Capponi, G.; Favilli, S.; De Simone, L. Incessant Automatic Atrial Tachycardia in a Neonate Successfully Treated with Nadolol and Closely Spaced Doses of Flecainide: A Case Report. Pediatr. Rep. 2020, 12, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Charfi, R.; Ben Sassi, M.; Gaies, E.; Jebabli, N.; Daghfous, R.; Trabelsi, S. Digoxin therapeutic drug monitoring: Age influence and adverse events. Tunis. Med. 2020, 98, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Drago, F.; Tamborrino, P.P. Atrial Flutter in Pediatric Patients. Card Electrophysiol. Clin. 2022, 14, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Környei, L.; Szabó, A.; Róth, G.; Ferenci, T.; Kardos, A. Supraventricular tachycardias in neonates and infants: Factors associated with fatal or near-fatal outcome. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2021, 180, 2669–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bolourchi, M.; Silver, E.S.; Liberman, L. Advanced Heart Block in Children with Lyme Disease. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2019, 40, 513–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kubuš, P.; Vít, P.; Gebauer, R.A.; Materna, O.; Janoušek, J. Electrophysiologic profile and results of invasive risk stratification in asymptomatic children and adolescents with the Wolff-Parkinson-White electrocardiographic pattern. Circ. Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014, 7, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Sledz, J.; Labus, M.; Mazij, M.; Klank-Szafran, M.; Karbarz, D.; Ludwik, B.; Kusa, J.; Deutsch, K.; Szydlowski, L.; Mscisz, A.; et al. A simplified approach for evaluating sustained slow pathway conduction for diagnosis and treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in children and adults. Adv. Med. Sci. 2018, 63, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ataíde Silva, R.; Mingas, O.; Martins, D.; Morgado, F.B. Fascicular tachycardia in a child: Striking features that improve emergency management. BMJ. Case Rep. 2020, 13, e239657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Huang, J.H.; Saharan, S.; McCammond, A.; Balaji, S. Belhassen tachycardia in a 19-month-old child. J. Pediatr. 2015, 166, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Janson, C.M.; Poelzing, S.; Shah, M.J. Combined inhibition of Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ channels: A novel paradigm for the treatment of incessant ventricular arrhythmias in Andersen-Tawil syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2014, 11, 318–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kehr, J.; Binfield, A.; Maxwell, F.; Hornung, T.; Skinner, J.R. Fascicular tachycardia in infancy and the use of verapamil: A case series and literature review. Arch. Dis. Child. 2019, 104, 789–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Lapage, M.J.; Bradley, D.J.; Dick, M. Verapamil in infants: An exaggerated fear? Pediatr. Cardiol. 2013, 34, 1532–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Sharada, K.; Narasimhan, C.; Rao, K.N.; Soma Raju, B. Refractory adenosine-sensitive congenital His bundle tachycardia: Response to calcium-channel blockers. Indian Heart J. 2003, 55, 259–261. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Velázquez-Rodríguez, E.; García-Hernández, N.; Silva-Oropeza, E.; Jiménez-Arteaga, S.; Martínez-Sánchez, A.; Alva-Espinoza, C.; David-Gómez, F.; Yáñez-Gutiérrez, L. Idiopathic left fascicular ventricular tachycardia in children and adolescents. Bol. Med. Hosp. Infant Mex 2022, 79, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Fujino, H.; Fujiseki, Y.; Shimada, M. Electrophysiologic effects of calcium channel blockers on supraventricular tachycardia in children. J. Cardiol. 1989, 19, 307–315. [Google Scholar]
  95. Pass, R.H.; Liberman, L.; Al-Fayaddh, M.; Flynn, P.; Hordof, A.J. Continuous intravenous diltiazem infusion for short-term ventricular rate control in children. Am. J. Cardiol. 2000, 86, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ramusovic, S.; Läer, S.; Meibohm, B.; Lagler, F.B.; Paul, T. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous amiodarone in children. Arch. Dis. Child. 2013, 98, 989–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Saul, J.P.; Scott, W.A.; Brown, S.; Marantz, P.; Acevedo, V.; Etheridge, S.P.; Perry, J.C.; Triedman, J.K.; Burriss, S.W.; Cargo, P.; et al. Intravenous amiodarone for incessant tachyarrhythmias in children: A randomized, double-blind, antiarrhythmic drug trial. Circulation 2005, 112, 3470–3477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Guccione, P.; Paul, T.; Garson, A. Long-term follow-up of amiodarone therapy in the young: Continued efficacy, unimpaired growth, moderate side effects. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1990, 15, 1118–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Vrobel, T.R.; Miller, P.E.; Mostow, N.D.; Rakita, L. A general overview of amiodarone toxicity: Its prevention, detection, and management. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 1989, 31, 393–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Fala, L. Corlanor (Ivabradine), First HCN Channel Blocker, FDA Approved for the Treatment of Patients with Heart Failure. Am. Health Drug Benefits 2016, 9, 56–59. [Google Scholar]
  101. Lei, M.; Wu, L.; Terrar, D.A.; Huang, C.L. Modernized Classification of Cardiac Antiarrhythmic Drugs. Circulation 2018, 138, 1879–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hindricks, G.; Potpara, T.; Dagres, N.; Arbelo, E.; Bax, J.J.; Blomström-Lundqvist, C.; Boriani, G.; Castella, M.; Dan, G.A.; Dilaveris, P.E.; et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 373–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Borquez, A.A.; Aljohani, O.A.; Williams, M.R.; Perry, J.C. Intravenous Sotalol in the Young: Safe and Effective Treatment With Standardized Protocols. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2020, 6, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Chandler, S.F.; Chu, E.; Whitehill, R.D.; Bevilacqua, L.M.; Bezzerides, V.J.; DeWitt, E.S.; Alexander, M.E.; Abrams, D.J.; Triedman, J.K.; Walsh, E.P.; et al. Adverse event rate during inpatient sotalol initiation for the management of supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia in the pediatric and young adult population. Heart Rhythm 2020, 17, 984–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kikano, S.; Kannankeril, P.J. Sotalol vs amiodarone for postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia: Citius, Altius, Fortius? Heart Rhythm 2022, 19, 457–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Jiang, H.; Ge, H.; Zhang, Y. Pediatric Dosing of Intravenous Sotalol Based on Body Surface Area in Patients with Arrhythmia. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2017, 38, 1450–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Malloy-Walton, L.E.; Von Bergen, N.H.; Balaji, S.; Fischbach, P.S.; Garnreiter, J.M.; Asaki, S.Y.; Moak, J.P.; Ochoa, L.A.; Chang, P.M.; Nguyen, H.H.; et al. IV Sotalol Use in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Patients: A Multicenter Registry Study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e024375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Moak, J.P. Has Intravenous Sotalol Come of Age as an Alternative Treatment for Arrhythmias in the Young Heart? Heart Rhythm 2018, 15, 1870–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Qin, J.; Deng, Z.; Tang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, R.; Li, J.; Hua, Y.; Li, Y. Efficacy and Safety of Various First-Line Therapeutic Strategies for Fetal Tachycardias: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 935455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Rochelson, E.; Valdés, S.O.; Asadourian, V.; Patel, R.; Lemming, K.; Howard, T.S.; Pham, T.D.N.; Miyake, C.Y.; Kim, J.J. Sotalol versus amiodarone for postoperative junctional tachycardia after congenital heart surgery. Heart Rhythm 2022, 19, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Samanta, R.; Thiagalingam, A.; Turner, C.; Lakkireddy, D.J.; Kovoor, P. The Use of Intravenous Sotalol in Cardiac Arrhythmias. Heart Lung Circ. 2018, 27, 1318–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Valdés, S.O.; Miyake, C.Y.; Niu, M.C.; de la Uz, C.M.; Asaki, S.Y.; Landstrom, A.P.; Schneider, A.E.; Rusin, C.G.; Patel, R.; Lam, W.W.; et al. Early experience with intravenous sotalol in children with and without congenital heart disease. Heart Rhythm 2018, 15, 1862–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Valdés, S.O.; Landstrom, A.P.; Schneider, A.E.; Miyake, C.Y.; de la Uz, C.M.; Kim, J.J. Intravenous sotalol for the management of postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. Case Rep. 2018, 4, 375–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Kersten, J.M.; van Veen, M.; van Houten, M.A.; Wieringa, J.; Noordzij, J.G.; Bekhof, J.; Tramper-Stranders, G.A.; Visser-Trip, H.; Vet, N.J.; Kruizinga, M.D. Adverse effect of lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic: Increased incidence of pediatric crisis admissions due to eating disorders and adolescent intoxications. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2023, 182, 1137–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Thorisdottir, I.E.; Agustsson, G.; Oskarsdottir, S.Y.; Kristjansson, A.L.; Asgeirsdottir, B.B.; Sigfusdottir, I.D.; Valdimarsdottir, H.B.; Allegrante, J.P.; Halldorsdottir, T. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescent mental health and substance use up to March, 2022, in Iceland: A repeated, cross-sectional, population-based study. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Chan, B.S.; Isbister, G.K.; O’Leary, M.; Chiew, A.; Buckley, N.A. Efficacy and effectiveness of anti-digoxin antibodies in chronic digoxin poisonings from the DORA study (ATOM-1). Clin. Toxicol. 2016, 54, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Hansen, L.L.; Herskind, A.M. Digoxin intoxication in an infant because of confusion of bottles of magistral preparations of medicine. Ugeskr. Laeger. 2014, 176, V12130715. [Google Scholar]
  118. Pellegrino, M.; Garofalo, M. Digoxin-specific Fab and therapeutic plasma exchange for digitalis intoxication and renal failure. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2019, 37, e793–e798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chen, X.; Yang, Z. Successful treatment of propafenone-induced cardiac arrest by calcium gluconate. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2017, 35, e1201–e1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Keramari, S.; Poutoglidis, A.; Poutoglidou, F.; Kaiafa, G.; Keramaris, M. Propafenone Poisoning of a Female Adolescent After a Suicide Attempt. Cureus 2021, 13, e16576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Kim, H.K.; Kim, S.S.; Ki, Y.J.; Park, K.H.; Choi, D.H. Ventricular Tachycardia in Association with Propafenone Overdose. Acta Cardiol. Sin. 2021, 37, 100–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ling, B.; Geng, P.; Tan, D.; Walline, J. Full recovery after prolonged resuscitation from cardiac arrest due to propafenone intoxication: A case report. Medicine 2018, 97, e0285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. van den Berg, M.J.; Bosch, F.H. Case Report: Hemodynamic Instability Following Severe Metoprolol and Imipramine Intoxication Successfully Treated With Intravenous Fat Emulsion. Am. J. Ther. 2016, 23, e246–e248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Sebe, A.; Dişel, N.R.; Açıkalın Akpınar, A.; Karakoç, E. Role of intravenous lipid emulsions in the management of calcium channel blocker and β-blocker overdose: 3 years experience of a university hospital. Postgrad. Med. 2015, 127, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Dosage of Vaughn–Williams classification 0, Ia, and Ib drugs in children [2,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
Table 1. Dosage of Vaughn–Williams classification 0, Ia, and Ib drugs in children [2,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
Antiarrhythmic Agent & ClassIvMAXINTERVALpoMAXINTERVAL
Vaughn–Williams Class 0
Ivabradine
Weight-based 0.05 mg/kg/ED
<40 kg
Max. 0.2 mg/kg/ED *
Max. 0.3 mg/kg/ED **
Or max. 7.5 mg/ED (NOT per kg!)
12 h
* 6 months to 1 year of age; ** >1 year of age
Vaughn–Williams Class 1a
Ajmaline *
Weight-based0.5–1 mg/kg/ED
Cont.: 0.5–1 mg/kg/h
Max. 50 mg/ED or 8 mg/kg/d or 1.200 mg/dN.A.
Max. 10 mg/min!
* Continuous ECG monitoring during the application of Ajmaline is required! Stop application if: ≥25% prolongation of QRS or QT duration or ≥50% prolongation of PQ duration.
Quinidine Sulfate
Weight-based 15–30 mg/kg/dayMax. 60 mg/kg/d6 h
BSA-based 900 mg/m2/dN.A.6 h
Quinidine Gluconate
Weight-based30 mg/kg/dN.A.5–6 h20–60 mg/kg/dayMax. 60 mg/kg/d8 h
BSA-based900 mg/m2/dN.A.5–6 h
Vaughn–Williams Class 1b
Lidocaine
Weight-based1 mg/kg/ED
Cont.: 20–50 mcg/kg/min
1 mg/kg/ED
50 mcg/kg/min
Loading ED followed by cont. iv
Mexiletine
Weight-based 1.4–5.0 mg/kg/EDMax. 8 mg/kg/ED or 1200 mg/d8–12 h
Leg.: BSA = body surface area, ED = enddose, cont. = continuous, min = minute, h = hour, d = day, a = year, interval is given as number of hours between single applications.
Table 2. Dosage of Vaughn–Williams classification Ic drugs in children [2,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
Table 2. Dosage of Vaughn–Williams classification Ic drugs in children [2,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
Antiarrhythmic Agent & ClassivMAXINTERVALpoMAXINTERVAL
Vaughn–Williams Class Ic
Flecainid
Weight-based0.2–2.0 mg/kg/ED
Cont.: 0.2–0.5 mg/kg/h
max. 200 mg/d12 h1–7 mg/kg/EDmax. 200 mg/d or 8 mg/kg/d8 h/12 h
BSA-based <6 mo: 50 mg/m2/d
>6 mo: 100 mg/m2/d
12 h
12 h
Propafenone
Weight-based0.2–2.0 mg/kg/ED in 2 h
Cont.: 4–20 mcg/kg/min
2 mg/kg/ED in 2 h
20 mcg/kg/min
Loading ED followed by cont. iv6–20 mg/kg/d20 mg/kg/d8 h/12 h
BSA-based 150–600 mg/m2/dmax. 900 mg/d8 h/12 h
Leg.: BSA = body surface area, ED = enddose, cont. = continuous, min = minute, h = hour, d = day, a = year, interval is given as number of hours between single applications.
Table 3. Dosage of Vaughn–Williams classification IIa drugs in children [2,20,22,24,27,31,36,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74].
Table 3. Dosage of Vaughn–Williams classification IIa drugs in children [2,20,22,24,27,31,36,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74].
Antiarrhythmic Agent & ClassivMAXINTERVALpoMAXINTERVAL
Vaughn–Williams Class IIa
Atenolol
Weight-based0.05–0.2 mg/kg/EDmax. 2.5 mg/kg/ED12 h0.3–1.0 mg/kg/dmax. 2.0 mg/kg/d or 100 mg/d12 h/24 h
Bisoprolol
Weight-based 0.1–0.4 mg/kg/dmax. 10–20 mg/d24 h
Carvedilol
Weight-based 0.075–0.8 mg/kg/EDmax. 25–50 mg/d8–12 h
Esmolol
Weight-basedBolus: 0.01–0.5 mg/kg in 1 min
Cont.: 10–500 mcg/kg/min
0.5 mg/kg in 1 min
500 mcg/kg/min
Bolus followed by cont. infusion
Landiolol
Weight-basedCont.: 1–5 mcg/kg/minMax. 40 mcg/kg/mincont. iv
Metoprolol
Weight-based0.1 mg/kg/ED
Cont.: 1–5 mcg/kg/min
3 consecutive ED
5 mcg/kg/min
Repeat ED every 5 min, followed by cont. iv0.5–6 mg/kg/dmax. 1–2 mg/kg/ED8 h/12 h
Nadolol
Weight-based 0.5–5.0 mg/kg/EDmax. 2.5 mg/kg/d or 240 mg/d24 h
Propranolol
Weight-based0.01–0.3 mg/kg/ED<1a: max. 1 mg/d
>1a: max. 3–5 mg/d
3 h0.5–16 mg/kg/dmax. 240–320 mg/d6 h/8 h
Leg.: BSA = body surface area, ED = enddose, cont. = continuous, min = minute, h = hour, d = day, a = year, interval is given as number of hours between single applications.
Table 4. Dosage of Vaughn–Williams classification IIb, IIc, IId, and IIe drugs in children [2,3,4,22,24,26,35,37,72,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86].
Table 4. Dosage of Vaughn–Williams classification IIb, IIc, IId, and IIe drugs in children [2,3,4,22,24,26,35,37,72,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86].
Antiarrhythmic Agent & ClassivMAXINTERVALpoMAXINTERVAL
Vaughn–Williams Class IIb
Isoprenaline
Weight-based0.05–2.0 mcg/kg/min2 mcg/kg/minCont. iv
Vaughn–Williams Class IIc
Atropine
Weight-based0.01–0.04 mg/kg/ED
min. 0.05–0.1 mg/ED
max. 0.5–1.0 mg/kg/ED8 h/12 h
Vaughn–Williams Class IId
Digoxin *
Weight-based0.01–0.015 mg/kg/ED
Blood level target:
1–2.5 nmol/L
0.78–1.95 ng/mL
max. 0.2 mg/ED8 h0.01–0.017 mg/kg/ED0.017 mg/kg/ED8 h/12 h
BSA-based 0.2 mg/m2 8 h/12 h
* Changing Digoxin from oral to iv; dose must be reduced by 20–25%. Lower doses are needed in patients with renal failure. Total digitalizing dose is optional and is not presented within this table.
Vaughn–Williams Class IIe
Adenosine
Weight-based0.1 (0.2/0.3) mg/kg/ED
<1a: 0.15 mg/kg/ED
max. 12 mg/ED3 consecutive ED
Leg.: BSA = body surface area, ED = enddose, cont. = continuous, min = minute, h = hour, d = day, a = year, interval is given as number of hours between single applications.
Table 5. Dosage of Vaughn–Williams classification III and IV drugs in children [2,25,27,35,40,63,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99].
Table 5. Dosage of Vaughn–Williams classification III and IV drugs in children [2,25,27,35,40,63,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99].
Antiarrhythmic Agent & ClassivMAXINTERVALpoMAXINTERVAL
Vaughn–Williams Class III
Amiodarone
Weight-based5 mg/kg/ED
7–20 mcg/kg/min
max. 15 mg/kg/ED
max. 10–30 mg/kg/d
8 h/12 h/24 h3–15 mg/kg/dmax. 8 mg/kg/ED or 200 mg/d8 h/12 h/24 h
Sotalol
Weight-based0.5–2.0 mg/kg/ED
Cont.: 1–6 mg/kg/h
Max. 120 mg/ED
Cont. max. 6 mg/kg/h
12 h2–26 mg/kg/d
Target dose
1 mo–6 y: 6 mg/kg/d
>6 y: 4 mg/kg/d
max. 26 mg/kg/d
or 200–480 mg/d
8 h/12 h
BSA-based 90 mg/m2/d
1st WOL:
60–200 mg/m2/d
<2 years of age corrected for age **
60 mg/m2/d
or 320 mg/d
8 h
Vaughn–Williams Class IV
Diltiazem
Weight-based0.25 mg/kg/ED
0.05–0.25 mg/kg/h
max. 20 mg/ED
5–15 mg/h
1 ED followed by cont. infusion1.0–3.0 mg/kg/EDmax. 3.5 mg/kg/d or 180 mg/d8 h
Verapamil
Weight-based0.1–0.3 mg/kg/ED
Cont.: 5 mcg/kg/min
max. 5–15 mg/EDLoading ED over 10 min, followed by cont. iv2–9 mg/kg/dmax. 120–480 mg/d8 h
Leg.: BSA = body surface area, ED = enddose, cont. = continuous, min = minute, h = hour, d = day, a = year, interval is given as number of hours between single applications. ** <2 years of age; the manufacturer recommends dosage reduction based on an age factor determined. In infants with BSA <0.33 m2, a larger drug exposure (larger AUC) and greater pharmacologic effects for a given dose per m2 were observed compared to infants with BSA ≥0.33 m2. WOL = week of life.
Table 6. Common antiarrhythmic drugs in children and their indications, preparations, and mechanism of action.
Table 6. Common antiarrhythmic drugs in children and their indications, preparations, and mechanism of action.
DrugV-W ClassMain IndicationsPreparationsMechanism of ActionPharmacokinetics
Ivabradine0IST, AT, JETpoHCN channel blockingHL 6 h; peak level 1 h (2 h with food)
AjmalineIaBrS testingivNa+ channel blocking (imt)HL up to 96 min
QuinidineIaBrS, SQTSpo, ivNa+ channel blocking (imt)HL up to 8 h; onset of action within 3 h
LidocaineIbVTivNa+ channel blocking (fast)HL 2 h; onset of action 90 s
MexiletineIbLQTS-3poNa+ channel blocking (fast)HL 12 h; onset of action within 120 min
FlecainideIcSVT, WPWpo, ivNa+ channel blocking (slow)HL 8 h (up to 29 h in newborns)
PropafenoneIcSVT, VT, AT, MATpo, ivNa+ channel blocking (slow)HL up to 32 h
AtenololIIaLQTS, SVTpoBeta blocking (selective)HL up to 35 h; onset of action 1 h
BisoprololIIaSVTpoBeta blocking (selective)HL 12 h; onset of action 2 h; peak level 2–4 h
CarvedilolIIaSVTpoBeta blocking (non-selective)HL 3.6 h; onset of action 1 h
EsmololIIaSVTivBeta blocking (selective)HL 5 min; onset 2 min & duration of action 30 min
LandiololIIaSVTivBeta blocking (selective)HL 4 min; onset of action within 1 min
MetoprololIIaSVTpo, ivBeta blocking (selective)HL 10 h; onset of action 20 min (iv)/1 h (po)
NadololIIaLQTS, SVTpoBeta blocking (non-selective)HL up to 16 h; peak level 4 h; duration 24 h
PropranololIIaLQTS, SVTpo, ivBeta blocking (non-selective)HL 6.5 h; onset of action 5 min (iv)/2 h (po)
IsoprenalineIIbTdP in LQTS, BrSivBeta blocking (non-selective)HL 5 min; immediate onset; duration up to 15 min
AtropineIIcBrady, BB/CaB IntoxivM2 receptor inhibitorHL 10 h (longest in children <2 years)
DigoxinIIdSVT, AF/AFL, fetalpo, ivM2 receptor activatorHL 36 h; onset of action 5–60 min (iv)/2 h (po)
AdenosineIIeSVTivA1 receptor activatorHL <10 s; immediate onset of action
AmiodaroneIIIVT/VFpo, ivK+ channel blocking (non-selective)HL up to 36d; onset of action few h (iv)/2d (po)
SotalolIIISVT, VTpo, ivK+ channel blocking (IKr), Beta blockingHL 9 h; onset of action 10 min (iv)/2 h (po)
DiltiazemIVSVTpoL-type Ca++ channelHL 7 h (shorter when given iv)
VerapamilIVSVT/ILVTpoL-type Ca++ channelHL 7 h (shorter when given iv)
Leg.: AF/AFL = atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter; AT = atrial tachycardia; MAT = multifocal atrial tachycardia; Brady = Bradycardia; BB = betablockers; BrS = Brugada syndrome; CaB = calcium channel blockers; HL = half life; h = hours; iv = intravenous; ILVT = idiopathic fascicular left ventricular tachycardia; imt = intermediate; LQTS = Long QT syndrome; min = minutes; po = per os; SQTS = Short QT syndrome; SVT = supraventricular tachycardia; TdP = Torsade-de-pointes; V-W class = Vaughn–Williams classification; VF = ventricular fibrillation; VT = ventricular tachycardia.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oeffl, N.; Schober, L.; Faudon, P.; Schweintzger, S.; Manninger, M.; Köstenberger, M.; Sallmon, H.; Scherr, D.; Kurath-Koller, S. Antiarrhythmic Drug Dosing in Children—Review of the Literature. Children 2023, 10, 847. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10050847

AMA Style

Oeffl N, Schober L, Faudon P, Schweintzger S, Manninger M, Köstenberger M, Sallmon H, Scherr D, Kurath-Koller S. Antiarrhythmic Drug Dosing in Children—Review of the Literature. Children. 2023; 10(5):847. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10050847

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oeffl, Nathalie, Lukas Schober, Patrick Faudon, Sabrina Schweintzger, Martin Manninger, Martin Köstenberger, Hannes Sallmon, Daniel Scherr, and Stefan Kurath-Koller. 2023. "Antiarrhythmic Drug Dosing in Children—Review of the Literature" Children 10, no. 5: 847. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10050847

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop