Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Effects of Pre-Weaning Individual or Pair Housing of Dairy Heifer Calves on Subsequent Growth and Feed Efficiency
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Brosimum alicastrum Foliage on Intake, Kinetics of Fermentation and Passage and Microbial N Supply in Sheep Fed Megathyrsus maximus Hay
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Protein Quality Affects the Interplay between Gut Microbiota and Host Performance in Nile Tilapia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Fermented Concentrate on Ruminal Fermentation, Ruminal and Fecal Microbiome, and Growth Performance of Beef Cattle
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Isochlorogenic Acid on Ewes Rumen Fermentation, Microbial Diversity and Ewes Immunity of Different Physiological Stages

1
College of Pratacultural Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
Key Laboratory for Grassland Ecosystem of Ministry of Education, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
3
College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(5), 715; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14050715
Submission received: 11 December 2023 / Revised: 12 February 2024 / Accepted: 19 February 2024 / Published: 24 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Nutritional Manipulation of Rumen Fermentation)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In the context of large-scale production, it is necessary to improve ewes health status and reproductive performance to promote newborns survival rate and later fattening performance. Previous studies have indicated that phenolic acids could change the host rumen microflora and inhibit pathogenic bacteria to ensure rumen health and host body health. However, there are few studies on isochlorogenic acid (ICGA) in ruminants. Therefore, based on regulating the rumen environment of breeding ewes during the whole physiological period, the experiment was conducted to study the effects of ICGA on rumen fermentation, microbial diversity and immunity of ewes at estrus, pregnancy and lactation stages. The experimental data obtained showed that adding ICGA could regulate ewes rumen fermentation mode, optimize microbial flora of different physiological stages by increasing Bacteroidota relative abundance while reducing Firmicutes relative abundance, maintain rumen microbial homeostasis at the pregnancy stage, and increase ewes blood immuneglobulin content, thereby improving ewes health.

Abstract

The effects of isochlorogenic acid (ICGA) on ewes rumen environment, microbial diversity, and immunity at different physiological stages (estrus, pregnancy and lactation) were studied in this experiment. Twenty healthy female Hu lambs of 1.5 months with similar body weight (17.82 ± 0.98 kg) and body condition were selected and randomly divided into two groups: the control group (CON) and the ICGA group (ICGA). The lambs of CON were fed a basal diet, while the lambs of ICGA were supplemented with 0.1% ICGA based on the basal diet. Lambs rumen fermentation characteristics, microbial diversity and immunity at estrus, pregnancy, and lactation stages were determined and analyzed, respectively. The results showed that the rumen pH in CON increased first and then decreased as lambs grew (p < 0.05). However, it showed the opposite change in ICGA. The content of ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) showed the highest at estrus stage in both groups, but it was significantly higher in ICGA than that in CON (p < 0.05). The Acetic acid/propionic acid (A/P) ratio at estrus stage and the volatile fatty acids (VFAs) at pregnancy stage in ICGA were significantly higher than those of the CON (p < 0.05). The 16S rDNA sequencing analysis showed that the Shannon, Chao 1 and ACE indexes of the ICGA were significantly higher than those of the CON both at estrus and lactation stages (p < 0.05), while they showed higher at the pregnancy stage in CON (p > 0.05). Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that there were significant differences in rumen microorganism structure between CON and ICGA at all physiological stages (p < 0.01). At the phylum level, compared with the CON, Firmicutes relative abundance of three physiological stages decreased (p > 0.05) while Bacteroidota increased (p > 0.05). The relative abundance of Synergistota at estrus stage and Patescibacteria at the lactation stage increased significantly too (p < 0.05). At the genus level, compared with the CON, the relative abundance of Prevotella at three stages showed the highest (p > 0.05), while the relative abundance of Succiniclasticum, unclassified_Selenomonadaceae and Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group showed different abundances at different physiological stages in ICGA. Compared with the CON, the lambs of the ICGA showed higher blood IgG, IgM, and TNF- α contents at three physiological stages and higher IL-6 contents at pregnancy stage (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Adding ICGA could regulate ewes rumen fermentation mode at different physiological stages by increasing rumen NH3-N at estrus, VFAs at pregnancy, and the ratio of A/P at lactation. It optimizes rumen microbial flora of different physiological stages by increasing Bacteroidota relative abundance while reducing Firmicutes relative abundance, maintaining rumen microbial homeostasis at pregnant stage, increasing the number of beneficial bacteria in later lactating and ewes blood immunoglobulins content at three physiological stages.

1. Introduction

With the development of urbanization, animal product consumption has undergone a historic turning point in China [1]. People currently prefer mutton to meet their high-quality protein needs [2]. To meet mutton supply, sheep breeding and feeding are gradually transitioning from grazing to large-scale and standardized production [3]. In this context, sheep health status has become one of the focuses, especially ewes, which has directly impacted ewes reproductive performance, growth rate, and lambs’ production performance [4]. Meanwhile, the problems of ewes low immunity, low fecundity, and the survival rate of newborns faced by the animal industry has affected the development of sheep industry seriously [5]. Therefore, it is necessary to improve ewes’ health condition and reproductive performance to promote newborns survival rate and later fattening performance.
Stevia rebaudiana was native to the subtropical region of South America [6]. It has been planted widely in both southern and northern regions since it was introduced and cultivated successfully in China in 1977 [7]. In recent years, there have been reports that the stevia extract contained a variety of phenolic acids, such as chlorogenic acid (CGA) and isochlorogenic acid (ICGA), which have biological activities, such as scavenging free radicals, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory, inhibiting tumors, protecting liver and gallbladder, promoting blood circulation and reducing blood pressure, etc. [8,9]. Previous studies indicated that CGA had multiple benefits for animals gastrointestinal health [10]. It can optimize the gastrointestinal flora composition to improve animal intestinal health by increasing short-chain fatty acids (SFAs), promoting intestinal probiotics growth and inhibiting pathogenic bacteria [11,12,13]. ICGA has a similar structure as CGA [14], it has one more caffeoyl group than CGA in structure, and so, has stronger biological activity [15]. In our previous study, we found that adding ICGA to the sheep diet could increase rumen acetic acid (AA), butyric acid (BA), and total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) concentration, so as to regulate the rumen fermentation mode [16].
Rumen is a special digestive and absorptive organ of ruminants [17]. Microorganisms in the rumen not only play a key role in animal digestion and absorption but also play an important role in host immune response and body health [18,19,20]. A large number of studies on cows have shown that ruminal dysbiosis could lead to metabolic changes in rumen and other parts of the digestive tract, causing a large number of microorganisms to release toxins into gastrointestinal lumen, triggering various systemic inflammations and directly affecting the health of next generation [21]. Therefore, from the perspective of ruminant reproductive health, strengthening rumen health is particularly important [22].
Previous studies have shown that ICGA could regulate the rumen fermentation mode. So, we speculate that ICGA may change the host rumen microflora and inhibit pathogenic bacteria to ensure rumen health and host body health. Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to investigate the effects of isochlorogenic acid (ICGA) on rumen fermentation and microbial diversity in ewes across different physiological stages. Our hypothesis is that ICGA can regulate the mode of rumen fermentation and contribute to the optimization of microbial flora, thereby improving the health of Hu sheep.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Material

The ICGA derived from stevia is purchased from Chenguang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Handan, China), with a total acidity greater than 55%.
The 1.5-month-old weaned female lambs of Hu sheep came from Guanghe county, Gansu province, with similar body conditions selected as experimental animals. All of the lambs are in a state of health.

2.2. Experimental Design

Twenty 1.5-month-old healthy and homogeneous weaned female lambs with similar body weights (17.82 ± 0.98 kg) were randomly divided into two groups: the control group (CON) and ICGA group (ICGA), 10 lambs in each and housed in one pen (one pen per group) throughout the research. The lambs in CON were fed a basal diet, while the lambs in ICGA were supplemented with 0.1% ICGA based on the basal diet (air-dried basis). The amount of ICGA addition was referred to the results of our previous research of in vitro rumen fermentation [16]. It was weighed and mixed into their diet, stirred thoroughly and evenly before feeding. Lambs in each group were raised in one pen, free feeding and drinking water. After all lambs were fed to sexual maturity (7 months old), embolectomy and estrus synchronization operations were started. Pregnant mare’s serum hormones were injected 10 days later. The embolus was withdrawn after 11 days, then insemination was performed 2 days later, and again 24 h later. Artificial insemination status assessment was conducted 10 days later after the insemination. Ewe pregnancy was checked using B-ultrasound 45 days later, then the successfully pregnant ewe was fed until they gave birth (lactation). Every period the ewes were fed the according diets shown in Table 1. The basal diets of two groups at different physiological stages were formulated according to Agricultural Industry Standard Mutton Sheep Feeding Standard of People’s Republic of China. “Estrus ration” was used during estrus, “Pregnancy ration” during pregnancy, and “Lactation ration” during lactation. The composition and nutritional components of raw materials are shown in Table 1.

2.3. Sample Collection and Processing

The ewes rumen fluid and blood samples in each group were collected at estrus, pregnancy (120 days after pregnancy) and lactation (30 days after delivery) stages, respectively. Rumen fluid samples were collected through oral cavity using a rumen tube. Briefly, a flexible PVC tube (2 mm of wall thickness × 6 mm of internal diameter) with holes of 2.5 mm diameter in the 15 cm-probe head (Anscitech Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) was connected to an electric vacuum pump (7 mbar) and inserted into the ewes rumen via the esophagus to collect the rumen sample. About 75 mL of rumen fluid from each ewe was collected 3 h after morning feeding. The first 5 mL of rumen fluid in each sampling was discarded to remove the potential saliva contamination and the remaining contents were collected. One part was divided into a 50 mL centrifuge tube and stored at −20 °C for fermentation parameters determination; and one part was placed in 5 mL cryotube and stored at −80 °C for rumen microbiota determination. Approximately 10 mL of fasting jugular vein blood in every period were also collected and placed in a common blood collection vessel, centrifuged at 3500 r·min−1 for 10 min to obtain the separated serum, then stored at −20 °C for the determination of blood immune indexes.

2.4. Rumen Fermentation Index Determination

The pH value was measured by Sartorius acidometer (PB-10). Volatile fatty acids content was determined by the Agilent 7890B meteorological chromatograph. After the rumen fluid sample was pretreated, it was injected into a gas chromatograph to obtain the chromatogram of VFAs sample, then we calculated the content of VFAs using the peak area external standard method [23]. Ammonia nitrogen content was determined by the phenol-sodium hypochlorite colorimetric method. The rumen fluid was centrifuged at 4000 r/min for 10 min, and 2 mL of supernatant was taken into a 15 mL centrifuge tube, 8 mL of 0.2 mol/L hydrochloric acid was added, then shaken well. Then, 2 mL of solution A (0.08 g of sodium nitroso ferricyanide dissolved in 100 mL of 14% sodium salicylate solution) and 2 mL of solution B (2 mL of sodium hypochlorite solution mixed with 100 mL of 0.3 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution) were added in turn, respectively. After shaking and standing for 10 min, the absorbance value was recorded at 700 nm to calculate the ammonia nitrogen content [24].

2.5. Analysis of Rumen Microbial Diversity

From DNA extraction to sequencing steps: (1) Microbial total DNA extraction; (2) Target fragment PCR amplification; (3) Amplification products purification and recovery by magnetic beads; (4) Amplification products fluorescence quantification; (5) Sequencing library preparation; (6) High-throughput sequencing; (7) Results analysis, including preliminary screening of the original offline data of high-throughput sequencing according to the sequence quality, the problem samples retesting, then removing the primer fragments of the sequence, discarding the unmatched primers sequence, and performing quality control, denoising, splicing, chimera removal and other steps. Based on valid data, the sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with 97% homology, and species annotation analysis was performed using OTUs sequences and the RDP Classifier database. According to the results of species annotation, alpha diversity and beta diversity were calculated, and the differences between groups were compared to reveal the differences of the same flora under each treatment. The diversity index was calculated based on the OTU level. Beta diversity analysis (PCA) was used to analyze the differences in community structure among different populations.

2.6. Blood Immune Index Determination

Serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin M (IgM), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) were measured using commercial ELISA kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Biotech, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) [25].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Excel 2010 was used to sort out the experimental data and the independent sample t-test in SPSS 23.0 software was used to analyze the significance between different treatments at the same physiological stage. p < 0.05 indicated the difference was significant, while p < 0.01 showed extremely significant.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of ICGA on Ewes Rumen Fermentation at Different Physiological Stages

With the advancement of ewes physiological periods, the ewes rumen pH increased at pregnancy and then decreased at lactation in CON, while the content of NH3-N and VFAs decreased at pregnancy and then increased at lactation, while in ICGA, the ewes rumen NH3-N content decreased first and then increased, but the pH and VFAs content showed the opposite change (Table 2). Compared with the CON, the rumen propionic acid (PA), butyric acid (BA) and TVFA content decreased significantly, and the A/P ratio and NH3-N content increased significantly (p < 0.05) at estrus stage, while acetic acid (AA), PA, isobutyric acid (IBA), BA, isovaleric acid (IVA), valeric acid (VA) and TVFA increased (p < 0.05) at pregnancy stage in ICGA. There were no significant differences in rumen fermentation parameters between CON and ICGA at lactation stage (p > 0.05) (Table 2).

3.2. Effects of ICGA on Ewes Rumen Microbial Diversity at Different Physiological Stages

3.2.1. Effect on the Number of Operational Taxonomic Units (OUT)

A total of 18,302 OTUs were obtained in this sequencing. The number of OTUs were higher at estrus and lactation stage while they were lower at pregnancy stage in ICGA than those in CON (Figure 1). There were 2171 unique OTUs in CON and 2873 unique OTUs in ICGA, with a total of 785 OTUs at estrus stage (Figure 2A), 4371 unique OTUs in CON and 3303 unique OTUs in ICGA, with a total of 955 OTUs at pregnancy stage (Figure 2B) and 3206 unique OTUs in CON and 3884 unique OTUs in ICGA, with a total of 1077 OTUs at lactation stage (Figure 2C).

3.2.2. Effect on Dilution Curve

The sample dilution curves of ewes three physiological stages in both groups showed a trend of rising first and then leveling off (Figure 3), indicating that the sequencing depth was sufficient to cover all species in the sample, and the sequencing results were reliable.

3.2.3. Effect on Alpha Diversity

The Shannon, Chao 1, and ACE indexes of the ICGA at estrus stage were significantly higher and those at the pregnancy stage were significantly lower than those of the CON group (p < 0.05). The Shannon and Simpson indexes of the ICGA were significantly higher than those of the CON at lactation stage (p < 0.05) (Figure 4).

3.2.4. Effect on Beta Diversity

There were significant differences in rumen microflora between CON and ICGA at estrus (Figure 5A), pregnancy (Figure 5B) and lactation (Figure 5C) stage (p < 0.01).

3.2.5. Effect on Bacterial Composition and Structure at the Phylum Level

At the phylum classification level, the top 10 species in the relative abundance of rumen microbial communities at three physiological stages of two groups were counted (Figure 6A) (Table 3). With the advancement of the physiological periods, the relative abundance of Firmicutes in CON decreased first and then increased, while that in ICGA decreased. The relative abundance of Bacteroidota in both groups increased first and then decreased. The relative abundance of Firmicutes in both groups were highest at three physiological stages, followed by Bacteroidota. Compared with the CON, the relative abundance of Firmicutes in ICGA was lower (p > 0.05), and the relative abundance of Bacteroidota and Proteobacteria were higher than those in CON (p > 0.05). The relative abundance of Synergistota in ICGA was significantly higher than that in CON at the estrus stage (p < 0.05), but the relative abundance of Patescibacteria in ICGA was significantly higher than that in CON at lactation stage (p < 0.05).

3.2.6. Effect on Bacterial Composition and Structure at the Genus Level

At the genus classification level, the top 10 species in the relative abundance of rumen microbial communities in CON and ICGA at three physiological stages were counted (Figure 6B) (Table 4). With the advancement of the physiological periods, the relative abundance of Prevotella in CON increased gradually, while the relative abundance of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group and Succiniclasticum decreased. The relative abundance of Prevotella and Succiniclasticum in ICGA increased first and then decreased, and the relative abundance of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group decreased first and then increased. Compared with the CON, the relative abundance of Prevotella in ICGA was higher at three physiological stages (p > 0.05), the relative abundance of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group in ICGA at lactation stage was significantly higher (p < 0.05), and the relative abundance of NK4A214_group was significantly lower (p < 0.05). The relative abundance of unclassified_Selenomonadaceae was significantly higher at the pregnancy stage (p < 0.05) while the relative abundance of Succiniclasticum and unclassified_F082 was significantly lower at the estrus stage in ICGA than those in CON (p < 0.05).

3.2.7. Effect on LEfSe Difference

LEfSe difference analysis was performed on rumen microorganisms of two groups at three physiological stages at different classification levels (Figure 7). At the estrus stage (Figure 7A), the ewes in CON had eight species groups with significant differences. They were mainly Negativicutes, uncultured_rumen_bacterium, Acidaminococcales, Acidaminococcaeae, Succiniclasticum, and Christensenellaceae_R7_group. There were four significantly different microbial groups in ICGA, mainly Bacteroidales_BS11_gut_group, uncultured_rumen_bacterium and Quinella. At the pregnancy stage (Figure 7B), there were ten significantly different species groups in CON, mainly including Clostridia, Oscillospirales, Lachnospiraceae and unclassified_Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group. There were seven significantly different microbial groups in ICGA, mainly for Negativicutes, Veillonellales-selenomonadales, unclassified_Selenomonadaceae, and uncultured_rumen_bacterium. At the lactation stage (Figure 7C), there were two significantly different species groups in CON, which were unclassified_NK4A214-group and Prevotellaceae_UCG_001, respectively. There were twelve significantly different microbial groups in ICGA, mainly Rikenellaceae, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group and uncultured_rumen_bacterium.

3.3. Effects of ICGA on Ewes Blood Immune Index at Different Physiological Stages

Compared with the CON, the ewes of ICGA showed higher serum IgG, IgM, TNF- α contents at three physiological stages (p < 0.05), while lower serum IL-6 contents at the estrus and lactation stages, but higher IL-6 at the pregnancy stage (p < 0.05) (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

4.1. Effects of ICGA on Ewes Rumen Fermentation at Different Physiological Stages

Ruminant rumen is a relatively stable anaerobic fermentation tank. NH3-N, pH, and VFAs are the main internal environmental indicators for rumen fermentation [26]. In this experiment, the rumen pH is within the normal range of 6.3 and 7.0 at three physiological stages in both groups, meaning that there was no adverse effect on ewes rumen fermentation by ICGA. The rumen NH3-N content had a significant increase at estrus in ICGA, which was beneficial to synthesize more microbial protein (MCP) to provide large amounts of protein for body, so improve ovulation rate and conception rate of ewes at estrus stage [27]. Weston pointed out the TVFA content decreased with the prolongation of pregnancy time [28], which may be due to ewes absorbing VFAs rapidly by rumen wall to need higher energy demand because of the rapid development of pregnant embryos, thus reduce the rumen VFAs concentration of pregnant ewes. Adding ICGA may stimulate the rumen microorganisms (unclassified_Selenomonadaceae) of pregnant ewes to produce VFAs, providing sufficient energy for pregnant ewes, which is beneficial to the health of ewes and embryos [29]. Due to the heavy burden and nutrient consumption at the pregnancy stage, the feed intake of lactating ewes increased, and the rumen NH3-N and VFAs content also increased [30,31] However, the NH3-N and VFAs contents showed the opposite in ICGA. Adding ICGA may accelerate the absorption of NH3-N and VFAs in the rumen wall so that the ewes rumen NH3-N and VFAs contents decrease at the lactation stage in ICGA. Liu Yongjun pointed out the high-yield group of dairy cows had a stronger absorption capacity for VFAs produced by rumen fermentation [32]. In this experiment, the A/P of the ICGA was higher than that of the CON at the estrus and lactation stages and was significantly lower than that of the CON at the pregnancy stage. AA is an important precursor for synthesis of milk fat, PA is the precursor of body fat synthesis, and the A/P ratio is significantly positively correlated with milk fat rate [33,34]. Adding ICGA could promote the synthesis of body fat in estrus ewes and accumulate energy for pregnancy, promote synthesis of glucose from propionic acid to provide more energy for pregnant ewes and synthesis of milk fat in lactating ewes to increase the milk fat rate of milk.

4.2. Effects of ICGA on Ewes Rumen Microbial Diversity at Different Physiological Stages

Through sequencing data analysis, it was found that the diversity dilution curve of rumen flora increased first and then tended to be gentle, indicating that the depth of this sequencing was sufficient and the sequencing results were reliable. The rumen microbial community is dynamic and often changes with diet, host, physiological state and environment [35]. In ICGA, the rumen microorganisms richness and diversity at estrus and lactation stages were higher than those of the CON while lower than those of the CON at pregnancy stage. It may be due to the stress response during pregnancy that the rumen fluid flora in CON was disordered, resulting in an increase of rumen species richness in CON during pregnancy. Guo pointed out the rumen flora diversity of ewes increased at 120 days of pregnancy [36]. It is speculated that adding ICGA to the diet may maintain the rumen microbial homeostasis of pregnant ewes and alleviate pregnant ewes stress response. Through Beta diversity analysis of samples, we found that the sample composition of CON and ICGA at different physiological stages was significantly separated, and there were significant differences in rumen microflora. So, adding ICGA could change the ewes rumen microbial flora structure at estrus, pregnancy and lactation stages.
The analysis of rumen microflora composition and structure at the phylum level showed that the dominant phyla in CON and ICGA were Firmicutes and Bacteroidota at three physiological stages, and the dominant phyla distribution was similar to results of other studies [37]. In this experiment, the relative abundance of Firmicutes in ICGA was lower than that in CON, while the relative abundance of Bacteroidota was higher than that in CON. High abundance of Bacteroidota usually has anti-inflammatory effects [38], showing ICGA may exert anti-inflammatory effects by reducing Firmicutes abundance and increasing Bacteroidota abundance, so increase the ratio of Bacteroidota to Firmicutes, the same as other results [39], which can reduce fat ewes deposition, thereby accelerating material circulation and energy flow to be benefit to maintain ewes health [40]. It is also indicated that ICGA can promote the protein and non-structural carbohydrates degradation and feed absorption and transformation in rumen by reducing Firmicutes abundance and increasing Bacteroidota abundance [41]. The relative abundance of Synergistota at estrus stage and the relative abundance of Patescibacteria at lactation stage in ICGA both were significantly increased. Studies showed that Synergistota isolated from ruminant foods could use arginine and histidine as substrates to degrade toxins in diet, while Patescibacteria has a strong ability to adapt to adverse environments [42,43]. It can be suggested that ICGA may improve ewes stress resistance on adverse environments to help host animals survive well.
The composition and structure analysis of rumen microbial flora at the genus level showed that the relative abundance of Prevotella in ICGA was higher than that in CON at three physiological stages. Prevotella is the dominant genus in mature rumen and the most abundant and common group of rumen microorganisms [44]. ICGA may promote rumen microflora maturation [45]. In this experiment, the relative abundance of unclassified_Selenomonadaceae in ICGA at pregnancy stage was significantly higher than that in CON, which could promote VFAs production in pregnant ewes rumen [46]. It was consistent with the status of pregnant ewes rumen fermentation. Studies showed that the Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group could promote the digestion and absorption of carbohydrates in intestine and protect mucosal barrier function by increasing butyrate levels [47,48]. Just in time, the relative abundance of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group in ICGA was significantly higher than that in CON in the experiment. ICGA could improve lactating ewes rumen health by increasing rumen beneficial bacteria amounts and promoting rumen VFAs absorption and utilization of lactating ewes., The relative abundance of Succiniclasticum at the estrus stage in ICGA was significantly lower than that in CON in the experiment. Succiniclasticum played an important role in PA production, which may be the reason for the decrease of rumen PA concentration at estrus stage in ICGA [49].
LEfSe difference analysis showed that Negativicutes species were significantly enriched in CON at estrus, and Bacteroidales_BS11_gut_group and Quinella were significantly enriched in ICGA. The studies showed that the increase in Quinella abundance was related to a decrease in methane production [50]. It was speculated that ICGA not only promoted the ewes protein and soluble carbohydrates degradation at estrus but also inhibited methane production. At pregnancy, the species significantly enriched in CON were mostly Clostridia; Negativicutes species in ICGA were significantly enriched. Both Clostridia and Negativicutes belong to Firmicutes, which could promote fiber degradation to provide energy for pregnant ewes. At lactation, Prevotellaceae_UCG_001 was significantly enriched in CON, and Rikenellaceae and Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group were significantly enriched in ICGA. ICGA could increase rumen beneficial bacteria of postpartum lactating ewes, promote ewes carbohydrates digestion and absorption at lactating, so maintain lactating ewes rumen health.

4.3. Effects of ICGA on Ewes Blood Immune Index at Different Physiological Stages

Immunoglobulin is a type of large molecular protein that is rapidly produced after being stimulated by foreign pathogens and can combine with antigens to enhance the body’s resistance to stress, thereby promoting animal overall health [51]. In this experiment, the ewes serum IgG, IgM, and TNF-α contents increased significantly at three physiological stages in ICGA, showing that ICGA can increase ewes serum immunoglobulin contents. Once external pathogens invade the body, they quickly bind with complement, dissolve bacteria, and prevent or reduce the occurrence of stillbirth, miscarriage, and other phenomena [52]. It can also promote the proliferation of immune cells, improve immune ability, and ewes health status [53]. In this experiment, the blood IL-6 contents in ICGA ewes was significantly higher than that of the CON at pregnancy stage. IL-6 belongs to the inflammatory cytokine family and is one of the essential components in the complex cytokine network in animal. Low IL-6 value may lead to trophoblast invasion into the surface and hinder placental vascular formation, resulting in placental trophoblast ischemia [54]. Researchers found that IL-6 mRNA levels were significantly decreased in preeclamptic placentas before the development of gestational hypertension syndrome [55]. So, adding ICGA can prevent gestational hypertension syndrome in pregnant ewes and maintain maternal pregnancy health.

5. Conclusions

ICGA could regulate ewes rumen fermentation mode at different physiological stages by increasing rumen NH3-N content at the estrus stage, the VFAs content at the pregnancy stage, and the ratio of A/P at the lactation stage, optimizing rumen microbial flora of different physiological stages by increasing Bacteroidota relative abundance while reducing Firmicutes relative abundance. This maintains the rumen microbial homeostasis at the pregnancy stage, and increases the number of beneficial bacteria in later lactating and ewes blood immunoglobulins content at three physiological stages, therefore reducing the use of antibiotics and achieving healthy breeding purposes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Z. and T.J.; methodology, T.J.; software, X.L. and Z.W.; validation, X.L., Y.S. and S.Q.; formal analysis, X.Z. and H.W.; investigation, S.L.; resources, T.J.; data curation, T.J.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L.; writing—review and editing, T.J.; visualization, T.J.; supervision, T.J.; project administration, T.J.; funding acquisition, S.Z. and T.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project Technology Innovation Guidance Plan-Lugan Science and Technology Cooperation Special Topic (22CX2NA005); South Xinjiang Key Industry Innovation Development Support Program Project (2022DB017); Major Special Project of Gansu Provincial Department of Science and Technology (21ZD11NM001) and Guanghe County Cow and Sheep Industry Quality Improvement and Efficiency Enhancement Technology Demonstration Project (LXZC21520230202).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Animal Committee of Gansu Agricultural University (GSAU-Eth-AST-2023-035).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Chen Jiangang for guiding the use of experimental instruments and Jinheyuan Family Ecological Farm for providing breeding base.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, Y.C.; Zhao, Q.R.; Zhai, T.C.; Si, W. Structural transition of protein intake in urban China: Stage characteristics and driving forces. Agribusiness 2023, 39, 1559–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ma, Z.F. Research on the Construction and Application of Dairy Big Data Platform from the Perspective of Grassland Agriculture; Lanzhou University: Lanzhou, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, X.L.; Yuan, Q.H.; Wan, L.Q.; He, F. Perspectives on livestock production systems in China. Rangel. J. 2008, 30, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Khanal, P.; Nielsen, M.O. Impacts of prenatal nutrition on animal production and performance: A focus on growth and metabolic and endocrine function in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 8, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, S.Z.; Zhang, S.B.; Han, J.Y.; Liu, H.B.; Chen, Q.L.; Yang, J.F.; Shi, Z.H.; Wang, Y.Z.; Li, X.L.; Song, L.G. Effects of compound Chinese herbal medicine additive on reproductive performance, some blood biochemical indexes and reproductive hormones of Hu sheep ewes. Heilongjiang J. Anim. Sci. Vet. Med. Sci. 2020, 16, 118–120. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hossain, M.F.; Islam, M.T.; Islam, M.A.; Akhtar, S. Cultivation and uses of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni): A review. Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2017, 17, 12745–12757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Angelini, L.G.; Martini, A.; Passera, B.; Tavarini, S. Cultivation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni and associated challenges. In Sweeteners; Springer International Publishing AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 35–85. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, F.; Du, E.C.; Fan, Q.W.; Wei, J.T. The application and research progress of chlorogenic acids in livestock and poultry production. Hubei Agric. Sci. 2020, 59, 10–13+16. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xi, L.S.; Mu, T.H.; Sun, H.N. Research progress of chlorogenic acids at home and abroad. Acta Agric. Nucl. Sin. 2014, 28, 292–301. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, J.L.; Chen, D.W.; Yu, B.; Luo, Y.H.; Zheng, P.; Mao, X.B.; Yu, J.; Luo, J.Q.; Huang, Z.Q.; Yan, H.; et al. Chlorogenic acid attenuates oxidative stress-Induced intestinal mucosa disruption in weaned pigs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 806253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ye, X.L.; Liu, Y.; Hu, J.J.; Gao, Y.Y.; Ma, Y.N.; Wen, D.L. Chlorogenic acid-induced gut microbiota improves metabolic endotoxemia. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 762691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cao, Q. Effects of Chlorogenic Acid on Growth Performance, Gastrointestinal Tissue Morphology and Microflora of Hu Sheep. Master’s Thesis, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, D.; Li, Y.Q.; He, X.L.; Ito, K.; Liu, K.X.; Tan, H.Q.; Zhen, B.K.; Ma, Y.B. Dietary supplementation with chlorogenic acid enhances antioxidant capacity, which promotes growth, jejunum barrier function, and cecum microbiota in broilers under high stocking density stress. Animals 2023, 13, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, Z.Y.; Zhen, J.D.; Liu, W. Research progress on biological activity and extraction process of isochlorogenic acid. Feed Ind. 2021, 42, 54–59. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, Y.C.; Niu, Z.P.; Xu, M.L.; Tian, H.; Gao, W. Comparative analysis of chlorogenic acids in stevia and other plants. China Food Addit. 2021, 32, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, S.Y.; Jiao, T.; Qi, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H.N.; Zhao, S.G. In vitro study of the effects of isochlorogenic acid supplementation on nutrient digestion and rumen fermentation in sheep diets. J. Zhejiang Agric. 2024, accepted. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ren, Q.M. Study on the Structure and Function of Microbial Community in Different Niches of Yak Rumen. Ph.D. Thesis, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, J.; Zhang, L.Q.; Wang, W.L.; Zhao, Z.W.; Ma, Q.; Wen, X.F. Effects of caragana korshinskii fermented feed on growth performance and rumen microflora of Ningxia Tan sheep. J. Anim. Nutr. 2023, 35, 1035–1045. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guo, H.; Yang, H.C.; Gao, Q.X.; Xin, G.X. Rumen microbiota and its regulation. Pratacultural Sci. 2022, 39, 371–380. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shen, Y.Y.; Tong, J.J.; Xiong, B.H.; Jiang, L.S. Research progress of multi-omics technology in the interaction mechanism between rumen microorganisms and host in dairy cows. Chin. Milk Ind. 2021, 8, 68–75. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhao, C.X.; Liu, G.W.; Li, X.B.; Guan, Y.; Wang, Y.Z.; Yuan, X.; Sun, G.Q.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.W. Inflammatory mechanism of rumenitis in dairy cows with subacute ruminal acidosis. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hu, X.X.; Bian, Q.; Zhang, S.P.; Wang, F.; Liu, H.L.; Zhang, J.B. The relationship between rumen health, body health and reproductive performance in dairy cows. Hunan Feed 2021, 3, 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rey, J.; Otálora DD, X.; Atxaerandio, R.; Mandaluniz, N.; García-Rodríguez, A.; González-Recio, O.; Lopez-García, A.; Ruiz, R.; Goiri, A. Effect of chitosan on ruminal fermentation and microbial communities, methane emissions, and productive performance of dairy cattle. Animals 2023, 13, 2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Feng, Z.C.; Gao, M. Improvement of colorimetric method for determination of ammonia nitrogen in rumen fluid. Anim. Husb. Feed Sci. 2010, 31, 37. [Google Scholar]
  25. Luo, T.; Li, Y.T.; Zhang, W.Y.; Liu, J.X.; Shi, H.B. Rumen and fecal microbiota profiles associated with immunity of young and adult goats. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 978402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, H.T.; Yang, Z.B.; Yang, W.R.; Jiang, S.Z.; Zhang, G.G.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, C.Y. Effects of different dietary types on rumen pH, ammonia nitrogen and volatile fatty acid concentration in Dorper sheep. Chin. J. Anim. Husb. 2017, 53, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, H.T. Effects of Different Nutritional Levels on Reproductive Performance (Estrus Time) of Ultra-Early-Weaned Small-Tailed Han Ewes. Master’s Thesis, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  28. Weston, R.H. The effect of pregnancy and early lactation on the digestion of a medium-quality roughage. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1988, 39, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, F.; Diao, Q.Y. Effects of energy on the health of ewes and their lambs during late pregnancy. Chin. Anim. Vet. 2017, 44, 1369–1374. [Google Scholar]
  30. Du, H.D.; Na, R.H. Research progress on physiological metabolism and microbial changes of ruminants during gestation and lactation and their effects on offspring development. J. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2023, 54, 4458–4467. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaske, M.; Groth, A. Changes in factors affecting the rate of digesta passage during pregnancy and lactation in sheep fed on hay. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1997, 37, 573–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, Y.J. Study on the Differences in Physiological Metabolism and Rumen Internal Environment of Dairy Cows with Different Milk Yields. Master’s Thesis, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cui, C.Y.; Li, W.J.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.L.; Wu, Q.C.; Wang, W.K.; Jiang, Y.W.; Chen, H.W.; Yang, H.J. Effects of Bacillus subtilis on rumen microbial fermentation and degradation characteristics of peanut vine, oat and alfalfa hay. Chin. J. Anim. Husb. 2023, 59, 266–271. [Google Scholar]
  34. Luo, Z.J.; Ma, L.; Pu, D.P.; Qin, X. Meta-analysis of the effects of rumen fermentation product acetic acid and propionic acid ratio on production performance and milk composition of dairy cows. Chin. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2021, 48, 1613–1624. [Google Scholar]
  35. Xiang, K.H.; Hu, X.Y.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.X.; Zhang, N.S. Research progress on the changes and influencing factors of rumen flora in dairy cows during perinatal period. Vet. Med. Prog. 2022, 43, 93–97. [Google Scholar]
  36. Guo, Y.J. Comparison of Rumen Outflow Rate and Microflora of Ewes during Non-Pregnancy, Pregnancy and Lactation; Shanxi Agricultural University: Jinzhong, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yang, D.; Yin, F.Y.; He, R.H.; Tian, R.G.; Wu, J.H. Research progress on rumen and intestinal microorganisms in ruminants. Anim. Husb. Feed Sci. 2021, 42, 28–38. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chaput, N.; Lepage, P.; Coutzac, C.; Soularue, E.; Roux, K.L.; Monot, C.; Boselli, L.; Routier, E.; Cassard, L.; Collins, M.; et al. Baseline gut microbiota predicts clinical response and colitis in metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, 1368–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shi, A.M.; Li, T.; Zheng, Y.; Song, Y.H.; Wang, H.T.; Wang, N.; Dong, L.; Shi, H.T. Chlorogenic acid improves NAFLD by regulating gut microbiota and GLP-1. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 693048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jami, E.; Israel, A.; Kotser, A.; Mizrahi, I. Exploring the bovine rumen bacterial community from birth to adulthood. Isme J. 2013, 7, 1069–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dodd, D.; Moon, Y.H.; Swaminathan, K.; Mackie, R.; Cann, I. Transcriptomic analyses of xylan degradation by prevotella bryantii and insights into energy acquisition by xylanolytic Bacteroidetes. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 30261–30273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cao, Q.N.; Zhang, Y.M.; Ao, C.J.; Zhang, T.L.; Zhang, X.F.; Bai, C.; Zhao, Y.B.; Qi, J.W. Effects of γ-polyglutamic acid on rumen fermentation and microflora structure of Small Tail Han sheep. Chin. J. Anim. Husb. 2021, 57, 136–142. [Google Scholar]
  43. Long, T.H.; Ou Yang, K.H.; Fang, Y.T.; Chen, X.F.; Wang, C.B.; Li, Y.J.; Ou Yang, K.H.; Qiu, Q.H. Effects of dietary lysine supplementation on rumen fermentation characteristics and microbial community structure. Feed Ind. 2023, 44, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang, K. Study on the Vertical Effect of Maternal Microorganisms on Gastrointestinal Flora and Intestinal Function of Offspring during Pregnancy-Lactation Period; Northwest University of Agriculture and Forestry: Xianyang, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  45. Stevenson, D.M.; Weimer, P.J. Dominance of prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 75, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Scheifinger, C.C.; Linehan, B.; Wolin, M.J. H2 production by selenomonas ruminantium in the absence and presence of methanogenic bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. 1975, 29, 480–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wei, Z.W.; Chi, Z.; Deng, M.; Tian, H.C.; Zhong, C.M.; Sun, B.L.; Guo, Y.Q. Effects of dietary concentrate and chromium propionate levels on growth performance, fecal fermentation parameters and microflora of Leizhou goats. Ann. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 33, 5781–5793. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhao, G.L.; Niu, Y.; Zhang, R.Q.; Dai, B.; Yang, C.M. Effects of yeast culture on growth performance, immune function and caecal microflora of yellow-feathered broilers. Ann. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 34, 7701–7710. [Google Scholar]
  49. Van, G.N.O. Succiniclasticum ruminis gen. nov., sp. nov., a ruminal bacterium converting succinate to propionate as the sole energy-yielding mechanism. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1995, 45, 297–300. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wuriliga Aladar Cui, S.; Xiao, M.; Gong, J. Effects of selenium on rumen fermentation and rumen microflora of grazing sheep under heat stress. Chin. Feed 2022, 3, 8–16. [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang, L. Effects of Leonurine on Immune and Antioxidation in Broilers and the Related Mechanisms. Ph.D. Thesis, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  52. Gao, Y. Effects of Feeding Acidified Milk on Growth Performance, Blood Immunologic Indicator and Fecal Microorganism Diversity in Holstein Calves; Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University: Daqing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, Y.Q.; Liu, Y.Z.; Yang, Y.F.; Li, J.G. Effects of feeding ginseng powder to sows during the perinatal period on their reproductive performance and blood immunoglobulins. Pig Breed. 2019, 2, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang, L.; Bai, H.; Wang, Z.T. Changes of hCG and IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α serum level in different phase of pregnancy. J. Armed Police Med. Coll. 2008, 10, 864–868. [Google Scholar]
  55. Feng, D.L.; Yin, C.X.; You, H. A study on the correlation between placental IL-6 mRNA and amniotic fluid IL-6 level with preeclampsia. Chin. J. Matern. Child Health 2001, 16, 765–767. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Operational Taxonomic Unit number distribution map.
Figure 1. Operational Taxonomic Unit number distribution map.
Animals 14 00715 g001
Figure 2. Venn diagram for OTU distribution of rumen microorganisms. (A): Estrus; (B): Pregnancy; (C): Lactation.
Figure 2. Venn diagram for OTU distribution of rumen microorganisms. (A): Estrus; (B): Pregnancy; (C): Lactation.
Animals 14 00715 g002
Figure 3. Sample dilution curve. (A): OTU number dilution curve; (B): Shannon index dilution curve.
Figure 3. Sample dilution curve. (A): OTU number dilution curve; (B): Shannon index dilution curve.
Animals 14 00715 g003
Figure 4. Alpha diversity index of rumen microbes. (A): Chao 1 Index; (B): ACE Index; (C): Shannon Index; (D): Simpson Index. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4. Alpha diversity index of rumen microbes. (A): Chao 1 Index; (B): ACE Index; (C): Shannon Index; (D): Simpson Index. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Animals 14 00715 g004
Figure 5. PCA of rumen microflora. (A): Estrus; (B): Pregnancy; (C): Lactation.
Figure 5. PCA of rumen microflora. (A): Estrus; (B): Pregnancy; (C): Lactation.
Animals 14 00715 g005
Figure 6. The relative abundance of phylum (A) and genus (B) of rumen microbiota Top 10.
Figure 6. The relative abundance of phylum (A) and genus (B) of rumen microbiota Top 10.
Animals 14 00715 g006
Figure 7. LDA value distribution histogram. (A): Estrus; (B): Pregnancy; (C): Lactation.
Figure 7. LDA value distribution histogram. (A): Estrus; (B): Pregnancy; (C): Lactation.
Animals 14 00715 g007
Figure 8. Effects of ICGA on ewes blood immune index at different physiological stages. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 8. Effects of ICGA on ewes blood immune index at different physiological stages. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Animals 14 00715 g008
Table 1. Diet composition and nutritional levels of ewes at different physiological stages (air-dried basis).
Table 1. Diet composition and nutritional levels of ewes at different physiological stages (air-dried basis).
Physiological PeriodEstrus
(7.5 Months Old)
Pregnancy
(7.5–12.5 Months Old)
Lactation
(12.5–14.5 Months Old)
Formula composition/%Whole plant silage corn201022
Wheat straw252510
Alfalfa253033
Corn grain131515
Bran255
Sesame cake877
Cottonseed meal344
Baking soda0.50.50.5
Calcium hydrogen phosphate111
Salt0.50.50.5
Premix 1222
Total100100100
Nutritional levelDry matter, DM (%)80.1985.9182.85
Digestible energy, DE/(MJ kg −1)11.0111.5313.03
Metabolizable energy, ME/(MJ kg −1)9.078.859.12
Calcium, Ca (%)1.941.071.08
Phosphorus, P (%)0.710.540.58
Crude protein, CP (%)12.8913.7613.07
1 The premix provided the following per kg of the diet: Cu 5.40 mg, Fe 19.80 mg, Zn 9.00 mg, Mn 14.40 mg, Se 0.11 mg, I 0.18 mg, Co 0.07 mg, VA 7200 IU, VD 1440 IU, VE 500 IU; Metabolic energy and digestible energy were calculated, and other values are measured.
Table 2. Effects of ICGA on ewes rumen fermentation at different physiological stages.
Table 2. Effects of ICGA on ewes rumen fermentation at different physiological stages.
IndexEstrusPregnancyLactation
CONICGAp ValueCONICGAp ValueCONICGAp Value
pH6.55 ± 0.05 b6.91 ± 0.02 a0.0026.73 ± 0.13 a6.28 ± 0.02 b0.0256.52 ± 0.15 a6.93 ± 0.04 a0.053
Ammonia nitrogen
(mg dL−1)
8.62 ± 0.19 b10.50 ± 0.60 a0.0404.79 ± 0.78 a4.16 ± 0.20 a0.4818.10 ± 0.94 a4.73 ± 0.25 a0.061
Acetic acid
(mmol L−1)
49.39 ± 3.49 a44.18 ± 1.08 a0.22726.14 ± 0.46 b45.63 ± 2.14 a0.00945.30 ± 1.91 a38.33 ± 3.72 a0.172
Propionic acid
(mmol L−1)
12.91 ± 0.85 a9.36 ± 0.46 b0.0216.64 ± 0.67 b18.99 ± 1.37 a0.00115.00 ± 1.15 a10.84 ± 1.07 a0.057
Isobutyric acid
(mmol L−1)
0.59 ± 0.04 a0.66 ± 0.02 a0.2140.26 ± 0.02 b0.41 ± 0.03 a0.0110.55 ± 0.11 a0.43 ± 0.01 a0.405
Butyric acid
(mmol L−1)
7.99 ± 0.46 a4.58 ± 0.20 b0.0023.31 ± 0.11 b7.26 ± 0.39 a0.0016.58 ± 0.79 a5.49 ± 0.40 a0.284
Isovaleric acid
(mmol L−1)
0.93 ± 0.06 a0.95 ± 0.10 a0.8720.32 ± 0.00 b0.64 ± 0.02 a0.0030.88 ± 0.18 a0.78 ± 0.04 a0.638
Valeric acid
(mmol L−1)
0.52 ± 0.01 a0.48 ± 0.03 a0.3650.27 ± 0.02 b0.57 ± 0.05 a0.0060.64 ± 0.06 a0.61 ± 0.02 a0.715
Acetic acid/Propionic acid3.82 ± 0.02 b4.74 ± 0.16 a0.0294.00 ± 0.34 a2.42 ± 0.12 b0.0123.04 ± 0.11 a3.55 ± 0.21 a0.100
Total volatile fatty acids (mmol L−1))71.45 ± 3.69 a59.1 ± 2.21 b0.04536.88 ± 1.07 b78.31 ± 4.78 a0.00167.17 ± 3.69 a56.39 ± 5.21 a0.167
a,b Values with different treatments in the same physiological stage are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Rumen microbial relative abundance at phylum level Top 10 (%).
Table 3. Rumen microbial relative abundance at phylum level Top 10 (%).
PhylumEstrusPregnancyLactation
CONICGAp ValueCONICGAp ValueCONICGAp Value
Firmicutes56.05 ± 0.0448.86 ± 0.020.9946.42 ± 0.0445.78 ± 0.021.0051.80 ± 0.0342.78 ± 0.040.93
Bacteroidota37.79 ± 0.0440.78 ± 0.021.0042.13 ± 0.0242.86 ± 0.021.0036.92 ± 0.0241.78 ± 0.050.99
Proteobacteria1.26 ± 0.002.25 ± 0.011.004.78 ± 0.015.68 ± 0.021.002.60 ± 0.003.70 ± 0.001.00
Patescibacteria1.09 ± 0.001.22 ± 0.001.003.11 ± 0.000.92 ± 0.000.063.51 ± 0.006.92 ± 0.010.00
Verrucomicrobiota0.41 ± 0.000.28 ± 0.001.000.44 ± 0.000.27 ± 0.001.002.63 ± 0.011.26 ± 0.000.48
Desulfobacterota1.28 ± 0.001.13 ± 0.001.000.80 ± 0.000.48 ± 0.000.990.38 ± 0.000.33 ± 0.001.00
Actinobacteriota0.27 ± 0.001.13 ± 0.010.550.63 ± 0.000.66 ± 0.001.000.67 ± 0.000.87 ± 0.001.00
Fibrobacterota0.35 ± 0.000.72 ± 0.001.001.16 ± 0.011.64 ± 0.011.000.38 ± 0.000.11 ± 0.001.00
Synergistota0.06 ± 0.001.88 ± 0.010.000.04 ± 0.000.03 ± 0.001.000.03 ± 0.000.05 ± 0.001.00
Acidobacteriota0.01 ± 0.000.35 ± 0.000.410.34 ± 0.000.31 ± 0.001.000.26 ± 0.000.40 ± 0.001.00
Table 4. Rumen microbial relative abundance at genus levels Top10 (%).
Table 4. Rumen microbial relative abundance at genus levels Top10 (%).
GenusEstrusPregnancyLactation
CONICGAp ValueCONICGAp ValueCONICGAp Value
Prevotella9.67 ± 0.0111.49 ± 0.011.0014.97 ± 0.0116.78 ± 0.011.0016.09 ± 0.0116.44 ± 0.031.00
Rikenellaceae_RC9_gu-t_group11.16 ± 0.0110.44 ± 0.011.008.13 ± 0.016.89 ± 0.001.004.54 ± 0.0110.36 ± 0.010.00
Succiniclasticum14.80 ± 0.016.98 ± 0.010.009.45 ± 0.019.78 ± 0.021.000.88 ± 0.001.11 ± 0.001.00
uncultured_rumen_bac-terium4.00 ± 0.018.70 ± 0.020.237.90 ± 0.017.19 ± 0.021.007.53 ± 0.016.76 ± 0.011.00
NK4A214_group2.46 ± 0.001.89 ± 0.001.003.08 ± 0.002.05 ± 0.001.009.54 ± 0.024.32 ± 0.000.00
Veillonellaceae_UCG_0016.76 ± 0.014.45 ± 0.010.272.08 ± 0.002.95 ± 0.011.002.4 ± 0.011.81 ± 0.001.00
unclassified_Bacteroid-ales_RF16_group3.56 ± 0.011.81 ± 0.010.912.40 ± 0.015.59 ± 0.020.094.45 ± 0.012.79 ± 0.000.94
unclassified_Selenom-onadaceae4.11 ± 0.013.57 ± 0.011.000.72 ± 0.006.87 ± 0.040.020.52 ± 0.000.94 ± 0.001.00
unclassified_Lachnospi-raceae2.75 ± 0.002.77 ± 0.011.002.87 ± 0.002.00 ± 0.001.002.77 ± 0.013.2 ± 0.001.00
unclassified_F0825.09 ± 0.011.93 ± 0.010.023.05 ± 0.001.14 ± 0.000.561.15 ± 0.003.56 ± 0.000.19
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Li, X.; Sha, Y.; Qi, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, S.; Jiao, T. Effects of Isochlorogenic Acid on Ewes Rumen Fermentation, Microbial Diversity and Ewes Immunity of Different Physiological Stages. Animals 2024, 14, 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14050715

AMA Style

Li S, Li X, Sha Y, Qi S, Zhang X, Wang H, Wang Z, Zhao S, Jiao T. Effects of Isochlorogenic Acid on Ewes Rumen Fermentation, Microbial Diversity and Ewes Immunity of Different Physiological Stages. Animals. 2024; 14(5):715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14050715

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shuyan, Xiongxiong Li, Yuzhu Sha, Shuai Qi, Xia Zhang, Huning Wang, Zhengwen Wang, Shengguo Zhao, and Ting Jiao. 2024. "Effects of Isochlorogenic Acid on Ewes Rumen Fermentation, Microbial Diversity and Ewes Immunity of Different Physiological Stages" Animals 14, no. 5: 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14050715

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop