Next Article in Journal
Correction: Davies et al. Impact of Refinements to Handling and Restraint Methods in Mice. Animals 2022, 12, 2173
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Lyophilized Açaí (Euterpe oleracea) Supplementation on Oxidative Damage and Intestinal Histology in Juvenile Shrimp Penaeus vannamei Reared in Biofloc Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Seroepidemiology of Maedi-Visna in Intensively Reared Dairy Sheep: A Two-Year Prospective Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dietary Fishmeal Can Be Partially Replaced with Non-Grain Compound Proteins through Evaluating the Growth, Biochemical Indexes, and Muscle Quality in Marine Teleost Trachinotus ovatus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Replacing Soybean Meal Protein with Chlorella vulgaris Powder on the Growth and Intestinal Health of Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
2
College of Fisheries, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(14), 2274; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142274
Submission received: 26 June 2023 / Revised: 29 June 2023 / Accepted: 10 July 2023 / Published: 12 July 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The development of novel protein sources plays an important role in improving the economic benefit of aquatic products. The Chlorella vulgaris (C. vulgaris) powder is a novel non-grain single-cell protein with a high reproductive rate, short growth cycle, strong environmental tolerance and easy artificial cultivation. In this experiment, grass carps (initial weight: 20.13 ± 0.09 g) were fed diets by replacing 0% (SM), 25% (X25), 50% (X50), 75% (X75) and 100% (X100) of SM with C. vulgaris for 8 weeks. In conclusion, the C. vulgaris powder replacement of 50% soybean meal was recommended as feed for grass carp. However, the positive effects were apparently weakened when the soybean meal was replaced with high levels of C. vulgaris powder.

Abstract

Chlorella vulgaris (C. vulgaris) powder is a novel non-grain single-cell protein with enormous potential to be a protein source. However, it is poorly studied in aquatic animals. The purpose of the present study was to explore the optimum replacement ratio of C. vulgaris powder and the influence of the substitution of soybean meal with C. vulgaris on grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) in terms of growth performance, intestinal integrity and the microbial community. Five isonitrogenous and isolipidic diets were formulated by replacing 0% (SM, containing 30% soybean meal), 25% (X25), 50% (X50), 75% (X75) and 100% (X100) soybean meal with C. vulgaris. The feeding trial period lasted 8 weeks. At the end of the experimental trial, the X50 group showed higher FW, WGR and PER than the SM group (p < 0.05). The feed conversion ratio (FCR) of the X50 group was significantly lower than that of the SM group (p < 0.05). The X50 group showed the highest value of the goblet cell number, intestinal amylase and trypsin activities when compared with the SM group (p < 0.05). Replacing 50% soybean meal with C. vulgaris improved the intestinal barrier integrity, as evidenced by upregulating zo-1, zo-2 and occluding transcript (p < 0.05), and alleviated oxidative stress by an increased SOD enzymatic activity and transcript level, probably mediated through the Nrf2-keap1 signaling pathway (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the X50 group enhanced intestinal immunity, as manifested by increased ACP and LZM activities (p < 0.05), and downregulated the tlr-4, tlr-7, tlr-8 and il-6 through the tlr pathway (p < 0.05). The functionally predicting pathways related to the nitrate respiration and nitrogen respiration were observably activated in the X50 group (p < 0.05). The X50 group improved the biological barrier, as manifested by increased Firmicutes and Rhodobacter (p < 0.05). In conclusion, dietary C. vulgaris powder could promote the growth performance of grass carp by restoring intestinal morphology, increasing digestive enzyme activities, improving antioxidant properties and immunity and optimizing the microflora structure. A C. vulgaris powder replacement of 50% soybean meal was recommended as feed for grass carp.

1. Introduction

Soybean meal is one of the major protein sources for herbivorous fishes [1] due to its high crude protein content and comparatively balanced amino acid composition [2]. However, some limitations to its utilization have been encountered, drawing attention to antinutritional factors, such as the urease, soybean lectin, trypsin inhibitor and so on, which negatively affect the intestinal health and reduce the utilization nutrients [3]. The huge gap between domestic soybean production and consumption had been filled by soybean import trade, which accounted for about 60% of the world’s annual imports [4]. Therefore, it is of great significance to develop an alternative protein source to reduce soybean meal use.
Single-cell microalgae are an emerging non-grain protein source with great development prospects. Some studies showed that microalgae promoted growth [5], improved immunity and antioxidant activity [6], restrained the growth of the pathogenic bacterium and ameliorated intestine health [7]. Among unicellular microalgae, Chlorella vulgaris (C. vulgaris) is well known for its high reproductive rate, short growth cycle, strong environmental tolerance, easy artificial cultivation and independence from geographical and climatic restrictions [8]. Additionally, C. vulgaris powder’s protein content reaches up to 50~60% and is rich in 18 kinds of amino acids. Especially, the threonine, glycine and proline contents of C. vulgaris are higher than those of soybean meal. Moreover, C. vulgaris powder contains a variety of beneficial substances, involving polysaccharides, pigments, vitamins, minerals and antioxidants [9]. Some related studies have verified that C. vulgaris promoted growth and relieved intestinal inflammation in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) [10,11]. It is worth mentioning that the polysaccharide, ferrum and aluminum accumulation in C. vulgaris powder inhibited the growth of fish [12] when they were fed diets with high levels of C. vulgaris powder inclusion. However, research about C. vulgaris powder inclusion in aquatic animals is still limited.
Grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) is widely bred for its rapid growth, tender meat, rich nutrition and moderate price [13]. In practical production, the content of soybean meal as feed material in grass carp is 20~50%, accounting for about 21~53% of the cost. Therefore, this research aimed to explore the optimal proportion of C. vulgaris powder inclusion and its effect on the growth performance, intestinal structure, intestinal microbiota and immunity in grass carp. The results of this research will provide a theoretical foundation for the development and utilization of C. vulgaris powder as a novel non-grain protein source in aquatic animals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Feed

Peruvian steamed fish meal, soybean meal and rapeseed meal were used as the main protein sources, and soybean oil was the lipid source. Based on isonitrogenous and isolipidic principles, the control group (SM) was set to contain 30.0% soybean meal, and then graded levels (25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) of soybean meal were replaced by C. vulgaris powder (designed as X25, X50, X75 and X100, respectively) (Table 1). The amino acids contents of C. vulgaris powder and soybean meal was in the Table 2. The ingredients were crushed, sieved (0.25 mm) and mixed with soybean oil. Water was added into the mixture. After being blended uniformly, the extruded feed (3.0 mm in particle size) was formed by a single-screw feed extruder system (DGP-100, TROT Co., Ltd., Hebei, China), and the feed was put in a shady place to dry naturally. The feed was stored at −20 °C.

2.2. Fish Experimental Design

Healthy grass carp (20.13 ± 0.09 g) were obtained and reared at Zhan Mao Lake, in Xidongting, Changde, Hunan province, China. The fish were allocated in two pond cages (3.0 m × 3.0 m × 3.0 m) for one week to adapt to laboratory conditions. A total of 750 grass carp were randomly assigned into five groups in triplicate. The SM, X25, X50, X75 or X100 diet was fed to different groups of fish for 8 weeks in the separate pond cages (2.0 m × 2.0 m × 2.0 m). The fish were artificially fed three times daily (8 a.m., 12 noon and 5 p.m.) at a 3~5% body weight. According to the feeding situation and the estimated weight of the grass carp, the feeding amount was adjusted once a week. The physicochemical index of pond water, such as the water temperature (28.4 ± 3.5 °C) (measured using a thermometer), pH value (7.6 ± 0.6), dissolved oxygen (7.2 ± 0.3 mg·L−1) and ammonia (≤0.2 mg·L−1) (using the LH-M900 portable colorimeter), were monitored. The water quality remained stable during the study period.

2.3. Sample Collection and Preservation

After the feeding trial, the fish were fasted for 24 h prior to collecting samples and then weighed to record the growth data. Three fish per net cage were chosen at random and then used to calculate the condition factors (CF), hepatosomatic index (HSI) and viscerosomatic index (VSI). The midgut samples were put in 10% neutral buffered formalin to make slices. The remaining midgut samples were used for the analysis of the mRNA expression levels and intestinal relate indices. The midgut contents from each fish were used for gut microflora analysis.

2.4. Sample Analyses

2.4.1. Growth Index

The weight gain rate (WGR, %), feed conversion ratio (FCR), survival rate (SR, %), protein efficiency ratio (PER, %), condition factor (CF, g/cm3), hepatosomatic index (HSI, %) and viscerosomatic index (VSI, %) were calculated according to the following formulas:
WGR = (WF − W0)/W0 × 100
FCR = WI/(WM − WC + WD)
SR = NM/NC × 100
PER = (WM − WC)/(WI × Pc) × 100
CF = WF/(LB)3 × 100
HSI = WG/WF × 100
VSI = WN/WF × 100
where WF, WO, WM, WC, WD, WI, WG and WN were the last and original fish average weight, the last and original fish total weight, the weight of dead fish, the intake feed weight, the liver weight and the visceral weight; LB was the fish body length; NM and NC were the last and original numbers of fish; TA was the total feed consumed; Pc was the crude protein content of the feed.

2.4.2. Intestinal Histopathological Examination

Intestinal samples were obtained from five groups of fish. First, the samples were fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin. Second, the samples were dehydrated by a gradient with ethanol and xylene. Finally, the specimens were embedded in paraffin and stained with HE (hematoxylin-eosin staining) to make slides. The finished sections used the Case Viewer 2.0 analysis to measure the heights of villi, the muscle layer thickness and the number of goblet cells [14].

2.4.3. Intestinal Immunity, Antioxidant Indices and mRNA Level Genes

The homogenizer (XHF-D, Xinzhi, China) was used to homogenize the intestine samples of fish with matching buffer. The intestine homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000× g rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant of the samples was stored at −80 °C.
The kits of Nanjing Jiancheng Biological Engineering Research Institute (Nanjing, China) were used for determining the intestine superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, catalase (CAT) activity, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, alkaline phosphatase (AKP) activity, acid phosphatase (ACP) activity, lysozyme (LZM) activity, amylase activity, lipases activity and trypsin activity.
According to the present growth and intestinal morphology results, the SM, X50 and X100 groups were selected to measure the intestinal related gene expression. Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the specification requirements. The RNA specimens of the intestine were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and put into the NanoDrop ND-2000 UV–Visible Spectrophotometer at 260 nm. The SMART cDNA Synthesis kit (Monad Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used to synthesize the cDNA with the total RNA. The cDNA was saved at −80 °C. Biosune Biotechnology, Inc. (Shanghai, China) provided the primers (Table 3). The reference gene was β-actin. Each assay had three replications. The E = 2−ΔΔCT was the calculating formula.

2.4.4. 16S rRNA Sequencing and Intestinal Microbiota Analysis

According to the present growth and intestinal morphology results, the SM, X50 and X100 groups were selected for 16S rRNA sequencing. The intestinal contents of three groups were extracted. The CTAB/SDS was used to extract the DNA of the specimens. The Illumina MiSeq platform used highthroughput sequencing and amplified the 16S rRNA V3-V4 region. The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) classified all the sequences. The 97% similarity level was selected by QIIME (version 2.0) after the FASTX-Toolkit (Hannon Lab, New York, NY, USA) removed low-quality scores (Q score, 20). UCLUST was used to classify each OTU. The above indices were calculated by QIIME and uploaded to NovoMagic (Beijing Novogene Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) [15].

2.4.5. Prediction of Intestinal Microbial Function

The PICRUSt method (Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States) was used to predict the microbial function. The OTU abundance was the automatic normalization of the 16S rRNA gene copy number, which was from the Integrated Microbial Genomes. The predicted genes and related functions were matched to the KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) database.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The experimental data were analyzed using SPSS version 27.0 (SPSS Inc., Munich, Germany), and the results were represented by the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze significant differences among mean values. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to determine the significant differences between experimental groups when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Feed Utilization, Indices, Growth and Biometric Parameters

At the end of the experimental trial, the X50 group showed higher FW, WGR and PER values than the SM group (p < 0.05). Compared to the control group, the PER was markedly reduced in the X100 group (p < 0.05). The fish from the experimental X50 group exhibited a lower FCR value when compared to that observed for the control group (p < 0.05). The CF decreased remarkably (p < 0.05) when soybean meal was replaced by C. vulgaris powder completely. There was no statistical difference in the SR, HSI and VSI among the five experimental groups (p > 0.05) (Table 4).
Compared to the control group, the crude protein content was considerably increased when soybean meal was replaced by C. vulgaris powder (p < 0.05). The moisture content increased substantially in the X50 and X100 groups (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the crude lipid and ash contents among the five experimental groups (p > 0.05) (Table 5).

3.2. Intestinal Morphology and Digestive Enzyme Activities

The villus height of grass carp increased as the C. vulgaris powder substitution levels increased, and more than 25% of the soybean meal replaced by C. vulgaris powder was higher than that of the SM group (p < 0.05). The number of goblet cells revealed a significant increase in the X50 group in comparison with the SM group (p < 0.05). The muscle thickness was independent of the dietary C. vulgaris powder (p > 0.05). The middle intestinal villi in the SM and X25 groups were slightly damaged. In contrast, a markedly reduced injury of the middle intestinal villi was observed in the X50 group. However, the intestinal villi in the X75 and X100 groups were structurally disordered and showed intestinal villus adhesion, goblet cells hyperplasia and capillary congestion (Table 6, Figure 1).
The amylase and trypsin activities of grass carp in the X50 group were substantially (p < 0.05) increased compared with those of the SM group. Compared to that of the control group, the trypsin activity in the X100 was notably reduced. There was no statistical difference in the lipases of grass carp among the five experimental groups (p > 0.05) (Table 7).
It was observed that the zo-1, zo-2 and occludin of the mRNA expression levels were significantly upregulated in the X50 group compared with those in the SM group (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the mRNA expression level of the claudin12 showed no significant differences in the X50 group compared with that of the SM group (p > 0.05). The claudin12 was markedly downregulated, and there was no significant differences in the other mRNA expression levels in the X100 group compared with those in the SM group (p > 0.05) (Figure 2).

3.3. Intestine Antioxidant Indices

The highest SOD value was observed in the X50 group when compared with the control group (p < 0.05). The CAT activity decreased in the group of fish fed diets with more than 50% soybean replacement by C. vulgaris powder when compared with the SM group (p < 0.05). The MDA content was observably (p < 0.05) decreased in X25, X50 and X75 groups (p < 0.05) compared with that of the SM group (Table 8).
It was observed that the mnsod and nrf2 of the mRNA expression levels were markedly upregulated, while the keap1 was remarkably downregulated in the X50 group compared with the SM group (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the mRNA expression levels of the cat and cuznsod showed no significant differences in the X50 group compared with those of the control group (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in SOD and CAT between the SM group and X100 group (Figure 3).

3.4. Intestine Immune Responses and Inflammation

The AKP, ACP and LZM activities were higher in the X50 group compared to those in the SM group (p < 0.05). The AKP activity was considerably (p < 0.05) decreased in the X50, X75 and X100 groups (p < 0.05) compared with that of the SM group (Table 9).
It was observed that the tlr-4, tlr-8 and il-6 were substantially downregulated in the X50 group compared with those in the SM group (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the mRNA expression levels of the tlr-7 and il-1β showed no significant differences in the X50 group compared with the SM group (p > 0.05). The tlr-7 was appreciably upregulated, and there were no significant differences in other mRNA expression levels in the X100 group compared with those of the SM group (p > 0.05) (Figure 4).

3.5. Intestinal Microbiota

3.5.1. Comparison of Abundance and Diversity

The predominant intestinal microbiota were identified, including Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria. Bacteroidetes showed the highest relative abundance at 40.45% in the X100 group, while Firmicutes showed the highest relative abundance at 57.26% in the X50 group (p < 0.05) (Figure 5).
There was no statistical difference in the intestinal microbial population in the Chao1, Shannon and Simpson of grass carp among the groups (p > 0.05) (Figure 6).

3.5.2. Comparison of the Microbial Community Structure

Unweighted beta-diversity analysis showed a clear shift in the cluster of microbiota among the three experimental groups through the principal coordinates analysis (PCoA). In terms of cluster analysis, the C. vulgaris powder replacement of 50% soybean meal showed the largest distance from the control group (p < 0.05) (Figure 7).
For LEfSe, a differential abundance of bacterial taxa among different C. vulgaris powder treatments was spotted. As seen in Figure 8A, the phylogenetic composition of OTUs was noticeably different among C. vulgaris powder treatment samples. As shown in Figure 8B, a total of 25 bacterial biomarkers were differentially abundant among the three experimental groups. In comparison, Desulfobacterota (including the Desulfobaccaceae, Desulfobaccales and Desulfobaccia) were the abundant taxa in the SM group, while that of the X100 group was Fusobacteriota (including the Fusobacteriales and Fusobacteriales) (p < 0.05) (Figure 8A). The SM group had three greater differentially abundant genera, including Alsobacter, Desulfobacca and UTCFX1(p < 0.05). In addition, only Rhodobacter in the X50 group and Akkermansia in the X100 group were the most differentially abundant genera (p < 0.05) (Figure 8B).

3.5.3. Functional Predictions of Intestinal Microbiota

A deeper analysis of the KEGG among the three experimental groups revealed that the nitrate respiration and nitrogen respiration were appreciably enhanced in the X50 group (p < 0.05) (Figure 9A). The fermentation and chemoheterotrophy were observably enriched in the X100 group compared with those of the SM and X50 groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 9B,C).

4. Discussion

In the present study, the growth performance was observably improved in the X50 group of grass carp, which was similar to the results conducted on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) [16]. This was likely because the higher content of threonine, glycine and proline in C. vulgaris powder relative to soybean meal promoted grass carp growth, which was consistent with the results in shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) and large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) [17,18]. Moreover, C. vulgaris was rich in unsaturated fatty acids and the Chlorella growth factor (CGF), which was beneficial to fish growth and protein efficiency [19]. Furthermore, the antinutritional factors decreased with the decrease in the soybean meal content, which may be one of the reasons for the best growth of grass carp in the X50 group [20]. However, the total substitution of C. vulgaris powder with soybean meal reduced the growth performance of grass carp. This was in agreement with the result of juvenile yellow perch (Perca flavescens) [21] and blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) [22]. This might be caused by a negative feedback system for a high concentration of active polysaccharides from high levels of C. vulgaris powder in the body, which made the growth of fish back to a normal level or even below a normal level [23]. In addition, ferrum and aluminum accumulation with high levels C. vulgaris powder affected the feed utilization in the intestine by preventing the absorption of potassium, calcium, magnesium and other elements of grass carp, which was unfavorable for growing [24]. An increased proportion of C. vulgaris led to an amino acid imbalance, which was also one of the reasons [25].
Additionally, the intestine plays a crucial role in the digestion and absorption of nutrients directly defining the growth of grass carp [26]. The intestinal villi are formed by the surface epithelium and the lamina propria below it, protruding into the lumen. Higher villi indicated faster tissue turnover for permitting the renewal of the intestinal epithelium, which increased the contact area to improve nutrient absorption [27]. In this experiment, the villus height increased when the 50% soybean meal was replaced by C. vulgaris powder. It was the same with the study of Spirulina and Chlorella by-products in broiler chickens [28,29]. However, high levels of C. vulgaris powder replacement of soybean meal showed intestinal villus adhesion, goblet cells hyperplasia and capillary congestion. It may be related to the content of metal elements in C. vulgaris [30]. Digestive enzymes facilitate the absorption of nutrients by fish [31]. In this study, digestive enzyme activities increased when C. vulgaris powder replaced the 50% soybean meal. This was consistent with the results of giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) and grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) [32,33]. Supposedly, the improved growth by the C. vulgaris powder replacement of soybean meal might be related to the increase in intestinal villi and digestive enzyme activities.
The tight junction is a complex structure formed by the interaction of multiple proteins for closing the spaces between intestinal epithelial cells [34]. Among tight junctions between cells, zo-1, zo-2 and occludin were important for restoring the intestinal mechanical barrier [35]. In this study, the mRNA expression levels of the zo-1, zo-2 and occludin genes were upregulated when the 50% soybean meal was replaced by a C. vulgaris powder diet, demonstrating the improved integrity of the mucosal barrier structure. This result was similar to the study in mice in which that microalgae improved the intestinal structure through improving the tight junction proteins expression [36]. Goblet cells secrete mucin and trefoil peptides to protect the mucosal structure, which covers on the surface of the intestinal epithelium to strengthen intestinal mechanical barrier function [37]. In the study, the variation in the number of goblet cells was consistent with the expression of the tight junction protein. It was speculated that the increase in goblet cells may be related to the improvement of the mucosal structural integrity induced by C. vulgaris.
The antioxidative defense system can scavenge oxygen free radicals constantly produced by the body in the process of metabolism in order to keep the homeostatic regulation [38]. The X50 group’s antioxidant capacity was improved. Likewise, C. vulgaris and Chlorella pyrenoidosa polysaccharides contributed to the antioxidative capacity [39,40]. The polyphenols [41], flavonoids [42] and phytopigments [43] in C. vulgaris were able to chelate redox-active metals and accept electrons from reactive oxygen species. This may be a reason for the enhanced antioxidant activity in the C. vulgaris, whereas the C. vulgaris powder completely replacing the soybean meal showed an opposite trend. Similar to this experiment, antioxidant enzyme activities reduced with higher dietary levels of Nannochloropsis [44,45]. The Nrf2-keap1 signaling pathway maintains the oxidation-reduction reaction balance and metabolism of cells [46]. In the present study, keap1 was downregulated and nrf2 was upregulated in the X50 group, which was in line with the changes in studies in rats [47]. The results revealed that the C. vulgaris powder of proper substitution levels could promote the intestinal antioxidant capacity through the activation of the nrf2-keap1 signaling pathway.
AKP and ACP are two important hydrolytic enzymes which are involved in the metastasis and metabolism of the phosphate group. LZM dissolves cell walls to engulf bacteria and mediates protection against microbial invasion. The three enzyme activities are common indexes for assessing the nonspecific immune function of the body [48]. A variety of evidence has demonstrated dietary C. vulgaris to be a potent immunostimulant on juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [49], Nile tilapia [50] and gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) [51]. In this experiment, the ACP and LZM activities in the X50 group increased. This may be ascribed to the involvement of polysaccharides and the Chlorella growth factor (CGF) in regulating the non-specific immune response of grass carp [52].
The inflammatory response regulates the immune system by enhancing or inhibiting the expression levels of cytokines [53]. The regulation of microalgae regarding the inflammatory response has been reported. Chlorella pyrenoidosa decreased the levels of the inflammatory factor il-6 in the serum of rats with a high-fat diet [54]. The microalgae aqueous extracts inhibited inflammatory effects in il-1β, stimulating Caco-2 cells [55]. In this study, the mRNA expression levels of il-6 and il-1β were downregulated after the 50% soybean meal was replaced by a C. vulgaris powder diet. This was similar to the results in the glycolytic enzyme extract of microalgae residues [56]. The findings showed that moderate C. vulgaris powder replacing soybean meal could relieve the intestinal inflammation of grass carp. Toll-like receptors (tlrs) played a pivotal role in regulating the secretion of inflammatory cytokines and the activation of the inflammatory response [57]. In the present study, the mRNA expression levels of tlr-4, tlr-7 and tlr-8 were downregulated after the 50% soybean meal was replaced by a C. vulgaris powder diet. This was consistent with the gibel carp fed with dietary Scenedesmus ovalternus [58]. The proinflammatory cytokines expression was closely correlated with the tlrs, revealing that the anti-inflammation of C. vulgaris may be partially via tlrs signaling.
Intestinal microbial populations colonize the intestinal tract, forming a biological barrier which influences various physiological processes [59]. The Firmicutes are mostly beneficial bacteria, and the Bacteroidetes can produce enterotoxins. Compared with the group X50, the abundance of the Firmicutes decreased and the Bacteroidetes increased in group X100. This was a reason why the growth performance of the X50 group was better than that of the X100 group [60]. It was shown that the intestinal microbial intricacy and abundance were affected by the C. vulgaris powder replacement of the 50% soybean meal. The same observation could be seen in the study of Chlorella pyrenoidosa regarding the human colon [61]. LEfse showed that the Desulfobaccerota was remarkedly reduced in the X100 group. The Desulfobacterium played an essential role in the butyrate metabolism [62]. The butyrate is a key compound for both microbial and body epithelial cell growth, which improves the growth performance of Chinese striped-neck turtles (Mauremys sinensis) with dietary supplementation [63]. Therefore, it was inferred that the Desulfobacterium producing butyrate metabolites may affect the growth performance of grass carp with an excessive C. vulgaris powder replacement of soybean meal. Moreover, the Fusobacteriota was enriched in the X100 group of intestinal microbials. Fusobacteriota was connected with diarrhea and enteritis in newborn piglets [64,65]. These results indicate that the C. vulgaris complete replacement of soybean meal could also influence the intestinal homeostasis caused by enriching conditioned pathogens. Meanwhile, at the genus level, the results displayed that Rhodobacter increased remarkably in the X50 group of intestinal microbials. Rhodobacter is a kind of probiotic bacteria which contributes to promoting the growth of seawater red tilapia [66]. The Rhodobacter sphaeroides protein maintained the intestinal health [67]. Therefore, it was inferred that appropriate C. vulgaris powder strengthened the intestinal biologic barrier to limit the access of pathogenic bacteria and maintain intestinal health, contributing to the growth performance of grass carp.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the optimum C. vulgaris powder replacement of soybean meal improved the growth performance of grass carp by restoring the intestinal morphology, increasing digestive enzyme activities, improving antioxidant properties and immunity and optimizing the microflora structure. However, the positive effects were apparently weakened when the soybean meal was replaced with high levels of C. vulgaris powder. Therefore, C. vulgaris powder replacement of 50% soybean meal was recommended as feed for grass carp. This study provided a reference for C. vulgaris as a novel non-grain single-cell protein source for replacing soybean meal in aquatic animals.

Author Contributions

L.Y. was in charge of the methodology, data curation and writing—original draft. M.C. was in charge of the data curation and software. J.Z. was in charge of the formal analysis, software and writing—review and editing. L.Z. was in charge of the formal analysis and writing—review and editing. S.X. was in charge of the analysis, software, and writing—review and editing. Y.S. was in charge of the formal analysis and software. Y.H. was in charge of the funding acquisition, writing—review and editing and validation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the “development of new protein sources and high-efficiency feed for aquaculture animals” (Grant No. 2019YFD0900200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32172985) and the postgraduate scientific research innovation project of Hunan province (QL20210161). The authors thank the personnel of these teams for their kind assistance.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Basel Declaration and the recommendations of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, the ethics committee of Hunan Agricultural University. The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Hunan Agricultural University under permit No. 430517 (date of approval: 26 April 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all researchers involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, C.; Zhu, X.; Han, D.; Jin, J.; Yang, Y.; Xie, S. Responses to fishmeal and soybean meal-based diets by three kinds of larval carps of different food habits. Aquac. Nutr. 2015, 21, 552–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Koprucu, K.; Sertel, E. The effects of less-expensive plant protein sources replaced with soybean meal in the juvenile diet of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella): Growth, nutrient utilization and body composition. Aquac. Int. 2012, 20, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gatlin, D.M., III; Barrows, F.T.; Brown, P.; Dabrowski, K.; Gaylord, T.G.; Hardy, R.W.; Herman, E.; Hu, G.; Krogdahl, A.; Nelson, R.; et al. Expanding the utilization of sustainable plant products in aquafeeds: A review. Aquac. Res. 2007, 38, 551–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, X.T. The influence of the trade war between China and the United States on China’s soybean industry and countermeasures. Foreign Econ. Relat. Trade 2019, 11, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cai, M.; Hui, W.; Deng, X.; Wang, A.; Hu, Y.; Liu, B.; Chen, K.; Liu, F.; Tian, H.; Gu, X.; et al. Dietary Haematococcus pluvialis promotes growth of red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) via positive regulation of the gut microbial co-occurrence network. Aquaculture 2022, 551, 737900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, Z.; Li, X.Q.; Yang, H.; Poolsawat, L.; Wang, P.; Leng, X.J. Dietary rutin promoted the growth, serum antioxidant response and flesh collagen, free amino acids contents of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Aquac. Nutr. 2020, 27, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Phong, W.N.; Show, P.L.; Ling, T.C.; Juan, J.C.; Ng, E.P.; Chang, J.S. Mild cell disruption methods for bio-functional proteins recovery from microalgae—Recent developments and future perspectives. Algal Res. 2017, 31, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Safi, C.; Zebib, B.; Merah, O.; Pontalier, P.Y.; Vaca-Garcia, C. Morphology, composition, production, processing and applications of Chlorella vulgaris: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 35, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kholif, A.E.; Olafadehan, O.A. Chlorella vulgaris microalgae in ruminant nutrition: A review of the chemical composition and nutritive value. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2021, 21, 789–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raji, A.A.; Junaid, O.Q.; Milow, P.; Taufek, N.M.; Fada, A.M.; Kolawole, A.A.; Alias, Z.; Razak, S.A. Partial replacement of fishmeal with Spirulina platensis and Chlorella vulgaris and its effect on growth and body composition of African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822). Indian J. Fish. 2019, 66, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grammes, F.; Reveco, F.E.; Romarheim, O.H.; Landsverk, T.; Mydland, L.T.; Overland, M. Candida utilis and Chlorella vulgaris Counteract Intestinal Inflammation in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hussein, E.E.S.; Dabrowski, K.; El-Saidy, D.M.; Lee, B.J. Enhancing the growth of Nile tilapia larvae/juveniles by replacing plant (gluten) protein with algae protein. Aquac. Res. 2013, 44, 937–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, C.; Xie, C. Biology and ecology of grass carp in China: A review and synthesis. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 2020, 40, 1379–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shen, Y.; Li, X.; Bao, Y.; Zhu, T.; Wu, Z.; Yang, B.; Jiao, L.; Zhou, Q.; Jin, M. Differential regulatory effects of optimal or excessive dietary lipid levels on growth, lipid metabolism and physiological response in black seabream (Acanthopagrus schlegelii). Aquaculture 2022, 560, 738532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, Y.; Huang, H.; Fan, J.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, W.; Deng, J.; Tan, B. Effects of dietary non-starch polysaccharides level on the growth, intestinal flora and intestinal health of juvenile largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. Aquaculture 2022, 557, 738343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Badwy, T.M.; Ibrahim, E.M.; Zeinhom, M.M. Partial replacement of fishmeal with dried microalga (Chlorella spp. and Scenedesmus spp.) in nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) diets. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture 2008, Cairo, Egypt, 12–14 October 2008; pp. 801–811. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tang, Y.; Cheng, Z.Y.; Qiao, X.T.; Fu, Z.R.; Bai, M. Effect of glycine on the growth, digestive enzymes and antioxidant capacity of Penaeus vannamei. Feed Res. 2021, 44, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wei, Z.; Deng, K.; Zhang, W.; Mai, K. Interactions of dietary vitamin C and proline on growth performance, anti-oxidative capacity and muscle quality of large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea. Aquaculture 2020, 528, 735558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ru, I.T.K.; Sung, Y.Y.; Jusoh, M.; Wahid, M.E.A.; Nagappan, T. Chlorella vulgaris: A perspective on its potential for combining high biomass with high value bioproducts. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 1, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Shi, X.; Luo, Z.; Huang, C.; Zhu, X.M.; Liu, X. Effect of substituting Chlorella sp. for regular fishmeal on growth, body composition, hepatic lipid metabolism and histology in crucian carp (Carassius auratus). Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 2015, 39, 498–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, M.; Zhao, H.H.; Zai, S.W.; Shepherd, B.; Wen, H.; Deng, D.F. A defatted microalgae meal (Haematococcus pluvialis) as a partial protein source to replace fishmeal for feeding juvenile yellow perch Perca flavescens. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 1197–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ci, L.N. Effect of the Diets Replacing Different Proportions of Fishmeal with Aglgae Powder on the Growth Performance, Nutrients Digestbility and Immunity of Bluntnose Black Bream (Megalobrama Amblycephala). Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2011; pp. 60–63. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201401&filename=1013285901.nh (accessed on 5 June 2022).
  23. Liu, S.; Yu, H.; Li, P.; Wang, C.; Liu, G.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, C.; Qi, M.; Ji, H. Dietary nano-selenium alleviated intestinal damage of juvenile grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) induced by high-fat diet: Insight from intestinal morphology, tight junction, inflammation, anti-oxidization and intestinal microbiota. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 8, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hussein, E.E.S.; Dabrowski, K.; El-Saidy, D.M.S.D.; Lee, B.J. Effect of dietary phosphorus supplementation on utilization of algae in the grow-out diet of Nile tilapia O reochromis niloticus. Aquac. Res. 2014, 45, 1533–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ogello, E.O.; Kembenya, E.M.; Githukia, C.M.; Aera, C.N.; Munguti, J.M.; Nyamweya, C.S. Substitution of fishmeal with sunflower seed meal in diets for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) reared in earthen ponds. J. Appl. Aquac. 2017, 29, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pirarat, N.; Pinpimai, K.; Endo, M.; Katagiri, T.; Ponpornpisit, A.; Chansue, N.; Maita, M. Modulation of intestinal morphology and immunity in nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Res. Vet. Sci. 2011, 91, e92–e97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. He, Y.; Liang, J.; Dong, X.; Liu, H.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, S.; Chi, S.; Tan, B. Soybean β-conglycinin and glycinin reduced growth performance and the intestinal immune defense and altered microbiome in juvenile pearl gentian groupers Epinephelus fuscoguttatus♀× Epinephelus lanceolatus♂. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 9, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Joya, M.; Ashayerizadeh, O.; Dastar, B. Effects of Spirulina (Arthrospira) platensis and Bacillus subtilis PB6 on growth performance, intestinal microbiota and morphology, and serum parameters in broiler chickens. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2021, 61, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kang, H.K.; Park, S.B.; Kim, C.H. Effects of dietary supplementation with a Chlorella by-product on the growth performance, immune response, intestinal microflora and intestinal mucosal morphology in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 101, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gillingham, M.A.; Borghesi, F.; Montero, B.K.; Migani, F.; Béchet, A.; Rendón-Martos, M.; Amat, J.A.; Dinelli, E.; Sommer, S. Bioaccumulation of trace elements affects chick body condition and gut microbiome in greater flamingos. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 761, 143250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Assan, D.; Kuebutornye, F.K.A.; Hlordzi, V.; Chen, H.; Mraz, J.; Mustapha, U.F.; Abarike, E.D. Effects of probiotics on digestive enzymes of fish (finfish and shellfish); status and prospects: A mini review. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2022, 257, 110653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Radhakrishnan, S.; Bhavan, P.S.; Seenivasan, C.; Shanthim, R.; Poongodi, R. Influence of medicinal herbs (Alteranthera sessilis, Eclipta alba and Cissus qudrangularis) on growth and biochemical parameters of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquac. Int. 2015, 22, 551–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Akbary, P.; Raeisi, M.E. Effect of dietary supplementation of Chlorella vulgaris on several physiological parameters of grey mullet, Mugil cephalus. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2020, 19, 1130–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xv, Z.; Zhong, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, W.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lin, S. Yeast culture supplementation alters the performance and health status of juvenile largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) fed a high-plant protein diet. Aquac. Nutr. 2021, 27, 2637–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gonzalez-Mariscal, L.; Miranda, J.; Raya-Sandino, A.; Dominguez-Calderon, A.; Cuellar-Perez, F. ZO-2, a tight junction protein involved in gene expression, proliferation, apoptosis, and cell size regulation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2017, 1397, 35–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guo, W.; Zeng, M.; Zhu, S.; Li, S.; Qian, Y.; Wu, H. Phycocyanin ameliorates mouse colitis via phycocyanobilin-dependent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory protection of the intestinal epithelial barrier. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 3294–3307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, P.; Jiang, W.-D.; Liu, X.-A.; Feng, L.; Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, J.; Tan, B.-P.; Yang, Q.-H.; Kuang, S.-Y.; et al. Dietary biotin deficiency decreased growth performance and impaired the immune function of the head kidney, spleen and skin in on-growing grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 97, 216–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zheng, L.; Xie, S.; Zhuang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Tian, L.; Niu, J. Effects of yeast and yeast extract on growth performance, antioxidant ability and intestinal microbiota of juvenile pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Aquaculture 2021, 530, 735941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Son, Y.A.; Shim, J.A.; Hong, S.; Kim, M.K. Intake of Chlorella vulgaris improves antioxidative capacity in rats oxidatively stressed with dietary cadmium. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2009, 54, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Wu, L.; Tong, A.; Zhao, L.; Liu, B.; Zhao, C. Physicochemical characterization of polysaccharides from Chlorella pyrenoidosa and its anti-ageing effects in Drosophila melanogaster. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 185, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Balasundram, N.; Sundram, K.; Samman, S. Phenolic compounds in plants and agri-industrial by-products: Antioxidant activity, occurrence, and potential uses. Food Chem. 2006, 99, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shibata, S.; Natori, Y.; Nishihara, T.; Tomisaka, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Sansawa, H.; Nguyen, V.C. Antioxidant and anti-cataract effects of Chlorella on rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2003, 49, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yaakob, Z.; Ali, E.; Zainal, A.; Mohamad, M.; Takriff, M.S. An overview: Biomolecules from microalgae for animal feed and aquaculture. J. Biol. Res. -Thessalon. 2014, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Sørensen, M.; Gong, Y.; Bjarnason, F.; Vasanth, G.K.; Dahle, D.; Huntley, M.; Kiron, V. Nannochloropsis oceania-derived defatted meal as an alternative to fishmeal in atlantic salmon feeds. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Qiao, H.; Hu, D.; Ma, J.; Wang, X.; Wu, H.; Wang, J. Feeding effects of the microalga Nannochloropsis sp. on juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Algal Res. 2019, 41, 101540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tkachev, V.O.; Menshchikova, E.B.; Zenkov, N.K. Mechanism of the Nrf2/Keap1/ARE signaling system. Biochem. -Mosc. 2011, 76, 407–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Choi, J.W.; Lee, M.K.; Choi, Y.H.; Nam, T.J. Protective effects of Hizikia fusiforme and Chlorella sp. extracts against lead acetate-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2019, 22, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Lee, S.; Nambi, R.W.; Won, S.; Katya, K.; Bai, S.C. Dietary selenium requirement and toxicity levels in juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture 2016, 464, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Peng, K.; Chen, X.; Wei, D.; Zhao, L.; Chen, B.; Mo, W.; Zheng, C.; Sun, Y. Inclusion of Chlorella water extract in Oreochromis niloticus fingerling diets: Effects on growth performance, body composition, digestive enzyme activity, antioxidant and immune capacity, intestine and hepatic histomorphology and sodium nitrite stress resistance. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 18, 100547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, W.; Luo, L.; Han, D.; Long, F.; Chi, Q.; Hu, Q. Effect of dietary supplementation with Chlorella sorokiniana meal on the growth performance, antioxidant status, and immune response of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J. Appl. Phycol. 2021, 33, 3113–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, W.; Gao, Z.; Qi, Z.; Qiu, Z.; Peng, J.Q.; Shao, R. Effect of dietary chlorella on the growth performance and physiological parameters of gibel carp, Carassius auratus gibelio. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2014, 14, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kotrbacek, V.; Doubek, J.; Doucha, J. The chlorococcalean alga Chlorella in animal nutrition: A review. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 2173–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, X.-Z.; Jiang, W.-D.; Feng, L.; Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, Y.-Y.; Jiang, J.; Kuang, S.-Y.; Tang, L.; Tang, W.-N.; et al. Low or excess levels of dietary cholesterol impaired immunity and aggravated inflammation response in young grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 78, 202–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhang, J.; Miao, G.; Cao, J.M.; Zhou, H.T.; Niu, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, Y.; Bao, X.Y.; Xing, Y.W. Effects of aerobic exercise combined with chlorella pyrenoidos of disintegrated cell wall on some indicators of lipid metabolism in rats with high-fat diet. Chin. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018, 34, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guo, W.; Zhu, S.; Feng, G.; Wu, L.; Feng, Y.; Guo, T.; Yang, Y.; Wu, H.; Zeng, M. Microalgae aqueous extracts exert intestinal protective effects in Caco-2 cells and dextran sodium sulphate-induced mouse colitis. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 1098–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Eom, S.H.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.H.; Choe, I.H.; Kwon, H.J. Anti-neuroinflammatory Effects of Glycolytic Enzyme Extract of Microalgae Residues in LPS-stimulated BV-2 Microglia. J. Chitin Chitosan 2015, 20, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lim, K.H.; Staudt, L.M. Toll-like receptor signaling. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5, a011247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Xu, W.; Li, H.; Wu, L.; Jin, J.; Zhu, X.; Han, D.; Liu, H.; Yang, Y.; Xu, X.; Xie, S. Dietary Scenedesmus ovalternus improves disease resistance of overwintering gibel carp (Carassius gibelio) by alleviating toll-like receptor signaling activation. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 97, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sagaram, U.S.; Gaikwad, M.S.; Nandru, R.; Dasgupta, S. Microalgae as feed ingredients: Recent developments on their role in immunomodulation and gut microbiota of aquaculture species. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2021, 368, fnab071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fan, L.; Li, Q.X. Characteristics of intestinal microbiota in the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei differing growth performances in the marine cultured environment. Aquaculture 2019, 505, 450–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Van der Linde, C.; Barone, M.; Turroni, S.; Brigidi, P.; Keleszade, E.; Swann, J.R.; Costabile, A. An in vitro pilot fermentation study on the impact of Chlorella pyrenoidosa on gut microbiome composition and metabolites in healthy and ccoeliac subjects. Molecules 2021, 26, 2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Looft, T.; Levine, U.; Stanton, T. Cloacibacillus porcorum sp. nov.; a mucindegrading bacterium from the swine intestinal tract and emended description of the genus Cloacibacillus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 1960–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Khan, I.; Huang, Z.; Liang, L.; Li, N.; Ali, Z.; Ding, L.; Hong, M.; Shi, H. Ammonia stress influences intestinal histomorphology, immune status and microbiota of Chinese striped-neck turtle (Mauremys sinensis). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 222, 112471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Brennan, C.A.; Garrett, W.S. Fusobacterium nucleatum-symbiont, opportunist and oncobacterium. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Qi, M.; Cao, Z.; Shang, P.; Zhang, H.; Hussain, R.; Mehmood, K.; Chang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Dong, H. Comparative analysis of fecal microbiota composition diversity in Tibetan piglets suffering from diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC). Microb. Pathog. 2021, 158, 105106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chiu, K.H.; Liu, W.S. Dietary administration of the extract of Rhodobacter sphaeroides WL-APD911 enhances the growth performance and innate immune responses of seawater red tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus × Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2014, 418, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liao, Z.; Gong, Y.; Zhao, W.; He, X.; Wei, D.; Niu, J. Comparison effect of Rhodobacter sphaeroides protein replace fishmeal on growth performance, intestinal morphology, hepatic antioxidant capacity and immune gene expression of Litopenaeus vannamei under low salt stress. Aquaculture 2022, 547, 737488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mucosa morphology of middle intestinal (A,C,E,G,I) SM, X25, X50, X75 and X100 groups (Magnification ×100), respectively. (B,D,F,H,J) show the partial enlargement (Magnification ×200). VH: villus height, MT: muscle thickness, GC: goblet cell.
Figure 1. Mucosa morphology of middle intestinal (A,C,E,G,I) SM, X25, X50, X75 and X100 groups (Magnification ×100), respectively. (B,D,F,H,J) show the partial enlargement (Magnification ×200). VH: villus height, MT: muscle thickness, GC: goblet cell.
Animals 13 02274 g001
Figure 2. Effects of the C. vulgaris powder replacement of soybean meal on the intestinal relative mRNA expression in grass carp after 8 weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3). The statistical differences were represented by different superscripts (p < 0.05) (p = 0.082, 0.044, 0.001 and 0.014, respectively).
Figure 2. Effects of the C. vulgaris powder replacement of soybean meal on the intestinal relative mRNA expression in grass carp after 8 weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3). The statistical differences were represented by different superscripts (p < 0.05) (p = 0.082, 0.044, 0.001 and 0.014, respectively).
Animals 13 02274 g002
Figure 3. Effects of C. vulgaris powder replacement of soybean meal on the intestinal relative mRNA expression in grass carp after 8 weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3). The statistical differences are represented by different superscripts (p < 0.05) (p = 0.619, 0.236, 0.02, 0.064 and 0.01, respectively).
Figure 3. Effects of C. vulgaris powder replacement of soybean meal on the intestinal relative mRNA expression in grass carp after 8 weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3). The statistical differences are represented by different superscripts (p < 0.05) (p = 0.619, 0.236, 0.02, 0.064 and 0.01, respectively).
Animals 13 02274 g003
Figure 4. Effects of C. vulgaris powder replacement of soybean meal on intestinal relative mRNA expression in grass carp after 8 weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3). The statistical differences are represented by different superscripts (p < 0.05) (p = 0.023, 0.001, 0.027, 0.039 and 0.007, respectively).
Figure 4. Effects of C. vulgaris powder replacement of soybean meal on intestinal relative mRNA expression in grass carp after 8 weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3). The statistical differences are represented by different superscripts (p < 0.05) (p = 0.023, 0.001, 0.027, 0.039 and 0.007, respectively).
Animals 13 02274 g004
Figure 5. Community taxonomy composition and abundance map of grass carp with different levels of C. vulgaris powder replacing soybean meal at the phylum level (n = 3).
Figure 5. Community taxonomy composition and abundance map of grass carp with different levels of C. vulgaris powder replacing soybean meal at the phylum level (n = 3).
Animals 13 02274 g005
Figure 6. The α-diversity indices of the bacterial community of grass carp with different levels of C. vulgaris powder replacing soybean meal (n = 3), and box plots showing the Chao1, Shannon and Simpson indices in the intestine microbiota.
Figure 6. The α-diversity indices of the bacterial community of grass carp with different levels of C. vulgaris powder replacing soybean meal (n = 3), and box plots showing the Chao1, Shannon and Simpson indices in the intestine microbiota.
Animals 13 02274 g006
Figure 7. The principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of bacterial OTUs showed an intestinal microbial cluster in the SM, X50 and X100 groups.
Figure 7. The principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of bacterial OTUs showed an intestinal microbial cluster in the SM, X50 and X100 groups.
Animals 13 02274 g007
Figure 8. LEfSe manifested as a feature characterized by the intestinal microbial population, it was performed to identify differential taxa among gut microflora in grass carp with different levels of C. vulgaris powder replacement of soybean meal (n = 3). The dots in the center present OTUs at phylum levels, whereas the outer circle of dots present the OTUs at genus levels. Different colors of the dots and sectors indicate the compartment in which the respective OTUs are most abundant. The upper left corner of the legend is the color explanation. The yellow color indicates that the OTUs revealed a similar abundance in all compartments (A). The most differentially abundant intestinal microbial was characterized in the SM, X50 and X100 groups of grass carp (B).
Figure 8. LEfSe manifested as a feature characterized by the intestinal microbial population, it was performed to identify differential taxa among gut microflora in grass carp with different levels of C. vulgaris powder replacement of soybean meal (n = 3). The dots in the center present OTUs at phylum levels, whereas the outer circle of dots present the OTUs at genus levels. Different colors of the dots and sectors indicate the compartment in which the respective OTUs are most abundant. The upper left corner of the legend is the color explanation. The yellow color indicates that the OTUs revealed a similar abundance in all compartments (A). The most differentially abundant intestinal microbial was characterized in the SM, X50 and X100 groups of grass carp (B).
Animals 13 02274 g008
Figure 9. Extended error bar plot revealing the significantly different KEGG metabolic pathways among the SM, X50 and X100 groups. (A) SM vs. X50, (B) SM vs. X100 and (C) X50 vs. X100 intestine of grass carp. ((A): Red was the SM group, blue was the X50 group; (B): Red was the SM group, blue was the X100 group; (C): Red was the X50 group, blue was the X100 group. They were the error bars in the circle). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 9. Extended error bar plot revealing the significantly different KEGG metabolic pathways among the SM, X50 and X100 groups. (A) SM vs. X50, (B) SM vs. X100 and (C) X50 vs. X100 intestine of grass carp. ((A): Red was the SM group, blue was the X50 group; (B): Red was the SM group, blue was the X100 group; (C): Red was the X50 group, blue was the X100 group. They were the error bars in the circle). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Animals 13 02274 g009aAnimals 13 02274 g009b
Table 1. Formulation and proximate composition of nutrition (g/kg).
Table 1. Formulation and proximate composition of nutrition (g/kg).
IngredientsSMX25X50X75X100
Fish meal40.040.040.040.040.0
Distiller dried grains with solubles90.090.090.090.090.0
Soybean meal 1300.0225.0150.075.00.0
C. vulgaris powder 20.060.1120.1180.2240.3
Rapeseed meal200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0
Rice bran100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
Wheat flour220.0220.0220.0220.0220.0
Soybean oil21.416.010.75.30.0
Bentonite1.221.541.862.182.3
Choline chloride2.02.02.02.02.0
Ca(H2PO4)215.015.015.015.015.0
Premix 310.010.010.010.010.0
Antioxidant0.10.10.10.10.1
Anti-mildew agent0.30.30.30.30.3
Total1000.01000.01000.01000.01000.0
Proximate analysis
Crude protein304.6306.9305.9306.7307.8
Crude fat55.456.656.857.257.8
Crude ash102.999.4101.3100.5102.8
1 Soybean meal was USA soybean meal, which was provided by Tongwei Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China) (Crude protein 46.05%, Crude fat 1.03%). 2 C. vulgaris powder was provided by Wuhan Demeter Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China) (Crude protein 57.50%, Crude fat 10.02%). 3 Premix was provided by MGOTer Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China). Premix composition (mg/kg diet): vitamin A, 120,000 IU; vitamin D3, 40,000 IU; VC phosphatase, 6850 mg; iron, 4800 mg; magnesium, 4000 mg; acid, 3200 mg; zinc, 2000 mg; nicotinic acid, 1000 mg; manganese, 800 mg; calcium pantothenate, 720 mg; vitamin E, 480 mg; vitamin B2, 280 mg; 240 mg; vitamin B1, 200 mg; vitamin K3, 200 mg; copper, 160 mg; folic acid, 60 mg; iodine, 40 mg; cobalt, 12 mg; selenium, 4 mg; biotin, 1.2 mg; vitamin B12, 0.6 mg.
Table 2. The amino acids contents of C. vulgaris powder and soybean meal (g/kg).
Table 2. The amino acids contents of C. vulgaris powder and soybean meal (g/kg).
Amino AcidsC. vulgarisSoybean Meal
Ala38.020.4
Arg Δ27.134.6
Asp42.254.0
Cys2.46.8
Glu69.683.0
Gly24.219.7
His Δ10.412.5
Ile Δ15.020.4
Leu Δ36.634.7
Lys Δ27.624.7
Met Δ6.16.1
Phe Δ22.123.4
Pro33.123.5
Ser20.624.2
Thr Δ23.318.3
Trp/6.5
Tyr14.6/
Val Δ26.022.8
Δ For essential amino acids. The amino acids were detected by the automatic amino acid analyzer (Agilent-1100, Wuhan Demot Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Santa Clara, CA, USA).
Table 3. Primer sequences of qRT-PCR.
Table 3. Primer sequences of qRT-PCR.
GeneForward (5′-3′)Reverse (5′-3′)Accession No.
β-actinGATGATGAAATTGCCGCACTGACCGACCATGACGCCCTGATGTM25013
catGAAGTTCTACACCGATGAGGCCAGAAATCCCAAACCATFJ560431
cuznsodCGCACTTCAACCCTTACAACTTTCCTCATTGCCTCCGU901214
mnsodACGACCCAAGTCTCCCTAACCCTGTGGTTCTCCTCCGU218534
nrf2CTGGACGAGGAGACTGGAATCTGTGGTAGGTGGAACKF733814
keap1TTCCACGCCCTCCTCAATGTACCCTCCCGCTATGKF811013
il-1βAGAGTTTGGTGAAGAAGAGGTTATTGTGGTTACGCTGGAJQ692172
il-6CAGCAGAATGGGGGAGTTATCCTCGCAGAGTCTTGACATCCTTKC535507.1
tlr-4TTCCACCTATTCATCTTTGCACTTTACGGCTGCCCATTEU699768.1
tlr-7GAGCATACAGTTGAGTAAACGCACTCTCCAAGAATATCAGGACGATAAJN867639.1
tlr-8TCACATCGCTTCCAGGTCTCACGGTGAAATAATGGGGGTTHQ638214.1
occludinTATCTGTATCACTACTGCGTCGCATTCACCCAATCCTCCAKF193855.1
claudin12CCCTGAAGTGCCCACAAGCGTATGTCACGGGAGAAKF998571
zo-1CGGTGTCTTCGTAGTCGGCAGTTGGTTTGGGTTTCAGKF193852.1
zo-2TACAGCGGGACTCTAAAATGGTCACACGGTCGTTCTCAAAGKM112095
Table 4. Effects of soybean meal replacement by C. vulgaris powder on the growth indices of grass carp after eight weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3).
Table 4. Effects of soybean meal replacement by C. vulgaris powder on the growth indices of grass carp after eight weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3).
ItemsSMX25X50X75X100
IW 120.28 ± 0.1820.04 ± 0.1320.11 ± 0.1320.16 ± 0.1020.08 ± 0.18
FW 260.11 ± 1.13 a57.87 ± 3.96 a67.25 ± 0.49 b61.57 ± 0.48 ab59.43 ± 1.10 a
WGR 3200.56 ± 1.15 a189.34 ± 19.78 a232.92 ± 2.67 b207.83 ± 2.38 ab197.16 ± 5.49 a
FCR 41.71 ± 0.04 bc1.64 ± 0.05 b1.45 ± 0.03 a1.58 ± 0.03 b1.79 ± 0.04 c
SR 587.33 ± 0.6787.33 ± 1.7687.33 ± 2.9186.00 ± 2.0089.33 ± 2.40
PER 6168.89 ± 4.11 b159.56 ± 7.03 b208.58 ± 1.98 c174.27 ± 3.41 b142.23 ± 5.09 a
CF 72.18 ± 0.05 b1.99 ± 0.04 ab2.06 ± 0.05 ab2.06 ± 0.04 ab1.92 ± 0.12 a
HIS 83.45 ± 0.123.69 ± 0.233.59 ± 0.343.45 ± 0.263.84 ± 0.48
VSI 920.63 ± 0.6219.17 ± 0.4121.68 ± 0.6818.32 ± 3.7119.27 ± 1.74
The statistical differences are represented by different superscripts at p < 0.05 (Duncan test). 1 IW: Initial body weight (g); 2 FW: Final body weight (g); 3 WGR: Weight gain rate (%); 4 FCR: Feed conversion rate; 5 SR: Survival rate (%); 6 PER: Protein efficiency ratio (%); 7 CF: Condition factor (%); 8 HSI: Hepatopancreas index (%); 9 VSI: Viscerosomatic index (%).
Table 5. Effects of soybean meal replacement by C. vulgaris powder on the body composition of grass carp after eight weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3) (%).
Table 5. Effects of soybean meal replacement by C. vulgaris powder on the body composition of grass carp after eight weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3) (%).
ItemsSMX25X50X75X100
Crude protein17.63 ± 0.41 a19.34 ± 0.30 b20.62 ± 0.31 c19.61 ± 0.54 bc20.76 ± 0.31 c
Crude lipid8.27 ± 0.507.38 ± 0.517.23 ± 0.157.13 ± 0.557.33 ± 0.60
Moisture68.61 ± 0.16 a68.96 ± 0.58 a70.56 ± 0.30 b69.75 ± 0.66 ab70.48 ± 0.28 b
Ash3.95 ± 0.263.09 ± 0.801.65 ± 0.583.49 ± 1.111.64 ± 0.46
The statistical differences are represented by different superscripts at p < 0.05 (Duncan test).
Table 6. Effects of soybean meal replacement by C. vulgaris powder on the intestinal morphology of grass carp after eight weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3).
Table 6. Effects of soybean meal replacement by C. vulgaris powder on the intestinal morphology of grass carp after eight weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3).
ItemsSMX25X50X75X100
Villus height (μm)510.03 ± 24.41 a586.43 ± 28.20 ab601.27 ± 23.30 b605.60 ± 30.50 b604.90 ± 18.36 b
Muscle thickness (μm)206.60 ± 13.61207.81 ± 12.11199.87 ± 5.34198.34 ± 13.08195.06 ± 7.72
Goblet cell (A/root)43.00 ± 3.21 b51.00 ± 3.21 bc53.33 ± 4.81 c31.67 ± 0.88 a31.67 ± 1.45 a
The statistical differences are represented by different superscripts at p < 0.05 (Duncan test).
Table 7. Effects of soybean meal replacement by C. vulgaris powder on the digestive enzyme activities of grass carp in the intestine after eight weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3).
Table 7. Effects of soybean meal replacement by C. vulgaris powder on the digestive enzyme activities of grass carp in the intestine after eight weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3).
ItemsSMX25X50X75X100
Amylase (U/mg prot)8.50 ± 0.30 a8.16 ± 0.67 a12.00 ± 0.79 b9.31 ± 0.42 a8.75 ± 1.42 a
Lipases (U/g prot)6.96 ± 0.405.89 ± 0.606.03 ± 0.855.10 ± 0.635.25 ± 0.60
Trypsin (U/mg prot)573.80 ± 20.07 b543.33 ± 17.92 ab656.80 ± 13.66 c522.86 ± 15.79 ab490.80 ± 14.17 a
The statistical differences are represented by different superscripts at p < 0.05 (Duncan test).
Table 8. Effects of soybean meal replacement by C. vulgaris powder on the antioxidant index of grass carp in the intestine after eight weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3).
Table 8. Effects of soybean meal replacement by C. vulgaris powder on the antioxidant index of grass carp in the intestine after eight weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3).
ItemsSMX25X50X75X100
SOD 187.56 ± 4.52 a104.61 ± 5.22 ab112.79 ± 4.31 b96.05 ± 6.79 ab93.64 ± 6.56 a
CAT 221.46 ± 14.32 b22.80 ± 20.62 b24.80 ± 21.86 b15.87 ± 13.60 a16.83 ± 11.50 a
MDA 35.32 ± 0.08 c3.21 ± 0.48 b2.36 ± 0.05 a3.79 ± 0.09 b5.00 ± 0.08 c
The statistical differences are represented by different superscripts at p < 0.05 (Duncan test). 1 SOD: Superoxide dismutase (U/mg); 2 CAT: Catalase (U/mg); 3 MDA: Malondialdehyde (nmol/mg).
Table 9. Effects of soybean meal replacement by C. vulgaris powder on the immune enzyme activities of grass carp in the intestine after eight weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3).
Table 9. Effects of soybean meal replacement by C. vulgaris powder on the immune enzyme activities of grass carp in the intestine after eight weeks (Mean ± SEM, n = 3).
ItemsSMX25X50X75X100
AKP 1259.10 ± 13.57 c230.77 ± 2.85 bc206.83 ± 17.91 b112.45 ± 2.74 a112.67 ± 4.91 a
ACP 2224.92 ± 6.10 ab253.60 ± 19.89 b302.61 ± 4.57 c193.77 ± 12.77 a195.80 ± 14.52 a
LZM 331.82 ± 2.62 ab43.94 ± 4.01 c53.41 ± 0.66 d34.09 ± 0.58 b26.14 ± 0.66 a
The statistical differences are represented by different superscripts at p < 0.05 (Duncan test). 1 AKP: Alkaline phosphatase (King’s unit/g); 2 ACP: Acid phosphatase (King’s unit/g; 3 LZM: Lysozyme (U/mg).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, L.; Cai, M.; Zhong, L.; Shi, Y.; Xie, S.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, J. Effects of Replacing Soybean Meal Protein with Chlorella vulgaris Powder on the Growth and Intestinal Health of Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Animals 2023, 13, 2274. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142274

AMA Style

Yang L, Cai M, Zhong L, Shi Y, Xie S, Hu Y, Zhang J. Effects of Replacing Soybean Meal Protein with Chlorella vulgaris Powder on the Growth and Intestinal Health of Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Animals. 2023; 13(14):2274. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142274

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Linlin, Minglang Cai, Lei Zhong, Yong Shi, Shouqi Xie, Yi Hu, and Junzhi Zhang. 2023. "Effects of Replacing Soybean Meal Protein with Chlorella vulgaris Powder on the Growth and Intestinal Health of Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)" Animals 13, no. 14: 2274. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142274

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop