Protein Supplementation and Grazing Behavior for Cows on Differing Late-Season Rangeland Grazing Systems
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Treatment Allocation
2.2. Range Sites
2.3. Forage Production and Quality
2.4. Grazing Behavior Observations and Data Processing
2.5. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Climatic Data
3.2. Forage Production and Quality
3.3. Grazing Behavior
4. Discussion
4.1. Climatic Effects
4.2. Nutritional Quality and Supplementation Strategies
4.3. Grazing Behavior
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ganskopp, D.; Bohnert, D. Nutritional Dynamics of 7 Northern Great Basin Grasses. J. Range Manag. 2001, 54, 640–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leng, R.A. Factors Affecting the Utilization of ‘Poor-Quality’ Forages by Ruminants Particularly Under Tropical Conditions. Nutr. Res. Rev. 1990, 3, 277–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cochran, R.C. Developing optimal supplementation programs for range livestock. In Fifty Years of Range Research Revisited; KSU Range Field Day: Manhattan, KS, USA, 1995; pp. 58–71. [Google Scholar]
- Schauer, C.S.; Bohnert, D.W.; Ganskopp, D.C.; Richards, C.J.; Falck, S.J. Influence of protein supplementation frequency on cows consuming low-quality forage: Performance, grazing behavior, and variation in supplement intake1. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 83, 1715–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holechek, J.L.; Berry, T.J.; Vavra, M. Grazing System Influences on Cattle Performance on Mountain Range. J. Range Manag. 1987, 40, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walker, J.W.; Heitschmidt, R.K.; De Moraes, E.A.; Kothmann, M.M.; Dowhower, S.L. Quality and Botanical Composition of Cattle Diets under Rotational and Continuous Grazing Treatments. J. Range Manag. 1989, 42, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bailey, D.W.; Brown, J.R. Rotational Grazing Systems and Livestock Grazing Behavior in Shrub-Dominated Semi-Arid and Arid Rangelands. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 64, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herd, R.M.; Archer, J.A.; Arthur, P.F. Reducing the cost of beef production through genetic improvement in residual feed intake: Opportunity and challenges to application. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81 (Suppl. S1), E9–E17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richardson, E.C.; Herd, R.M. Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. 2. Synthesis of results following divergent selection. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2004, 44, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arthur, J.P.; Herd, R. Residual feed intake in beef cattle. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2008, 37, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koch, R.M.; Swiger, L.A.; Chambers, D.; Gregory, K.E. Efficiency of Feed Use in Beef Cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1963, 22, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herd, R.M.; Richardson, E.C.; Hegarty, R.S.; Woodgate, R.T.; Archer, J.A.; Arthur, P.F. Pasture intake by high versus low net feed efficient Angus cow. Anim. Prod. Aust. 1998, 22, 137–140. [Google Scholar]
- Herd, R.M.; Hegarty, R.S.; Dicker, R.W.; Archer, J.A.; Arthur, P.F. Selection for residual feed intake improves feed efficiency in steers on pasture. Anim. Prod. Aust. 2002, 24, 85–88. [Google Scholar]
- Herd, R.M.; Dicker, R.W.; Lee, G.J.; Johnston, D.J.; Hammond, A.J.; Oddy, V.H. Steer growth and feed efficiency on pasture are favourably associated with genetic variation in sire net feed intake. Anim. Prod. Aust. 2004, 25, 93–96. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, A.M.; Kerley, M.S.; Kallenbach, R.L. The effect of residual feed intake classification on forage intake by grazing beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 2670–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lawrence, P.; Kenny, D.; Earley, B.; McGee, M. Grazed grass herbage intake and performance of beef heifers with predetermined phenotypic residual feed intake classification. Animals 2012, 6, 1648–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lawrence, P.; Kenny, D.; Earley, B.; McGee, M. Intake of conserved and grazed grass and performance traits in beef suckler cows differing in phenotypic residual feed intake. Livest. Sci. 2013, 152, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manafiazar, G.; Basarab, J.A.; Baron, V.S.; McKeown, L.; Doce, R.R.; Swift, M.; Undi, M.; Wittenberg, K.; Ominski, K. Effect of post-weaning residual feed intake classification on grazed grass intake and performance in pregnant beef heifers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 95, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Knight, C.W.; Bailey, D.W.; Faulkner, D.; Schafer, D.W. Intake and grazing activity of mature range cows on Arizona rangelands. Proc. West. Sec. Amer. Soc. Anim. Sci. 2015, 66, 222–224. [Google Scholar]
- Sprinkle, J.E.; Taylor, J.B.; Clark, P.E.; Hall, J.B.; Strong, N.K.; Roberts-Lew, M.C. Grazing behavior and production characteristics among cows differing in residual feed intake while grazing late season Idaho rangeland. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 98, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parsons, C.; Dafoe, J.; Wyffels, S.; DelCurto, T.; Boss, D. The Influence of Residual Feed Intake and Cow Age on Beef Cattle Performance, Supplement Intake, Resource Use, and Grazing Behavior on Winter Mixed-Grass Rangelands. Animals 2021, 11, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sprinkle, J.E.; Ellison, M.J.; Hall, J.B.; Yelich, J.V.; Willmore, C.M.; Brennan, J.R. Grazing behavior and production for lactating cows differing in residual feed intake while grazing spring and summer rangeland. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2021, 5, txab063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sprinkle, J.E.; Sagers, J.K.; Hall, J.B.; Ellison, M.J.; Yelich, J.V.; Brennan, J.R.; Taylor, J.B.; Lamb, J.B. Grazing behavior and production for cattle on differing late-season rangeland grazing systems with or without protein supplementation. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2019, 3, 1792–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sprinkle, J.E.; Sagers, J.K.; Hall, J.B.; Ellison, M.J.; Yelich, J.V.; Brennan, J.R.; Taylor, J.B.; Lamb, J.B. Predicting Cattle Grazing Behavior on Rangeland using Accelerometers. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 76, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, J.B.; Glaze, J.B., Jr.; Smith, W.K.; Roberts, M.C. Relationship among feed efficiency traits and reproduction in heifers. Proc. West. Sec. Amer. Soc. Anim. Sci. 2015, 66, 272–276. [Google Scholar]
- Padmore, J.M. Protein (crude) in animal feed–combustion method, Method No. 990.03. In Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th ed.; Helrich, K., Ed.; AOAC, Inc.: Arlington, VA, USA, 1990; pp. 3–4. [Google Scholar]
- Padmore, J.M. Protein (crude) in animal feed–Dumas method, Method No. 968.06. In Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th ed.; Helrich, K., Ed.; AOAC, Inc.: Arlington, VA, USA, 1990; pp. 71–72. [Google Scholar]
- Gavlak, R.G.; Horneck, D.A.; Miller, R.O. Total nitrogen in botanical materials–automated combustion method. In Western States Laboratory Proficiency Testing Program. Soil and Plant Analytical Methods; Version 3.00; Western Regional Extension Publication, Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1996; pp. 71–72. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, R.O.; Kotuby-Amacher, J.; Rodriguez, J.B. Total nitrogen in botanical materials–automated combustion method. In Western States Laboratory Proficiency Testing Program. Soil and Plant Analytical Methods; Version 4.00; Western Regional Extension Publication, Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1997; pp. 106–107. [Google Scholar]
- Mertens, D.R. Critical conditions in determining detergent fiber. In Proceedings of the NFTA Forage Analysis Workshop, Denver, CO, USA, 16–17 September 1992; pp. C1–C8. [Google Scholar]
- Sprinkle, J.E.; Holloway, J.W.; Warrington, B.G.; Ellist, W.C.; Stuth, J.W.; Forbes, T.D.A.; Greene, L.W. Digesta kinetics, energy intake, grazing behavior, and body temperature of grazing beef cattle differing in adaptation to heat. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78, 1608–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Saxton, A.M. A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. In Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group International Conference, Nashville, TN, USA, 22–25 March 1998; pp. 1243–1246. Available online: http://statweb.lsu.edu/faculty/geaghan/pdmix800.sas.txt (accessed on 2 September 2021).
- Brownson, R.; Ames, D. Winter stress in beef cattle. In Cattle Producer’s Handbook, 3rd ed.; Western Beef Resource Committee: Twin Falls, ID, USA, 2000; p. 4. [Google Scholar]
- Sprinkle, J. Managing Nutritional Challenges to Reproduction. 2015. Available online: https://extension.arizona.edu/pubs/managing-nutritional-challenges-reproduction (accessed on 2 September 2021).
- Caton, J.S.; Olson, B.E. Energetics of grazing cattle: Impacts of activity and climate1. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, B.A. Ruminant Cold Stress: Effect on Production. J. Anim. Sci. 1983, 57, 1601–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dunn, R.; Havstad, K.; Ayers, E. Grazing behavior responses of rangeland beef cows to winter ambient temperatures and age. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1988, 21, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adams, D.C.; Nelsen, T.C.; Reynolds, W.L.; Knapp, B.W. Winter Grazing Activity and Forage Intake of Range Cows in the Northern Great Plains. J. Anim. Sci. 1986, 62, 1240–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huston, J.E.; Lippke, H.; Forbes, T.; Holloway, J.W.; Machen, R.V. Effects of supplemental feeding interval on adult cows in western Texas. J. Anim. Sci. 1999, 77, 3057–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wyffels, S.A.; Petersen, M.K.; Boss, D.L.; Sowell, B.F.; Bowman, J.G.; McNew, L.B. Dormant Season Grazing: Effect of Supplementation Strategies on Heifer Resource Utilization and Vegetation Use. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 72, 878–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagnon, K.A. Behavior of Beef Cows on a California Range; College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California: Davis, CA, USA, 1963; Available online: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwis8OXvr-HyAhWC6Z4KHZWSAQwQFnoE-CAMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fucanr.edu%2Frepository%2Ffileaccess.cfm%3Farticle%3D157195%26p%3DTVRFFY&usg=AOvVaw0OWYeOwBy64AQv2sS8lUSh (accessed on 2 September 2021).
- Lahart, B.; Prendiville, R.; Buckley, F.; Kennedy, E.; Conroy, S.B.; Boland, T.M.; McGee, M. The repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high-concentrate, grass silage and pasture-based diets. Animals 2020, 14, 2288–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barton, R.K.; Krysl, L.J.; Judkins, M.B.; Holcombe, D.W.; Broesder, J.T.; Gunter, S.A.; Beam, S.W. Time of daily supplementation for steers grazing dormant intermediate wheatgrass pasture. J. Anim. Sci. 1992, 70, 547–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Krysl, L.J.; Hess, B.W. Influence of supplementation on behavior of grazing cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1993, 71, 2546–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ag Guide. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching, 4th ed.; American Dairy Science Association, American Society of Animal Science and Poultry Science Association: Champaign, IL, USA, 2020; 227p, Available online: https://www.asas.org/services/ag-guide (accessed on 2 September 2021).
Item | Guaranteed Analysis, (As is) | Typical Analysis, (As is) | Typical Analysis, (Dry Matter) |
---|---|---|---|
Dry matter, % | - | 90.0 | 90.0 |
Crude protein, % | 28.0 | 28.0 | 31.0 |
Crude fat, % | 8.0 | 9.0 | 10.0 |
Crude fiber, % | 10.0 | 6.2 | 6.9 |
Phosphorus, % | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.85 |
Pasture Treatment 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grazing Period, h | Daily Activity, min | CCON | CTRT | RCON | RTRT |
0000 to 0159 | Grazing | 57 ± 3.2 a | 52 ± 3.4 a | 46 ± 3.5 a | 47 ± 4.1 a |
0000 to 0159 | Resting | 49 ± 3.4 b | 60 ± 3.6 ab | 62 ± 3.7 a | 63 ± 4.3 ab |
0200 to 0359 | Grazing | 46 ± 3.3 a | 39 ± 3.5 a | 41 ± 3.4 a | 40 ± 3.6 a |
0200 to 0359 | Resting | 59 ± 4.3 b | 74 ± 4.6 a | 67 ± 4.5 ab | 73 ± 4.7 a |
0400 to 0559 | Grazing | 29 ± 4.7 a | 24 ± 5.0 a | 17 ± 5.0 a | 17 ± 5.0 a |
0400 to 0559 | Resting | 77 ± 5.8a | 90 ± 6.1a | 93 ± 6.1a | 94 ± 6.2a |
0600 to 0759 | Grazing | 32 ± 3.5 a | 28 ± 3.7 ab | 22 ± 3.7 b | 23 ± 3.7 ab |
0600 to 0759 | Resting | 73 ± 4.1 b | 85 ± 4.3 ab | 88 ± 4.3 a | 87 ± 4.3 a |
0800 to 0959 | Grazing | 87 ± 5.6 a | 72 ± 5.1 a | 84 ± 5.0 a | 76 ± 5.3 a |
0800 to 0959 | Resting | 29 ± 5.5 a | 21 ± 5.7 a | 16 ± 5.7 a | 14 ± 5.8 a |
1000 to 1159 | Grazing | 71 ± 2.6 b | 68 ± 2.8 b | 82 ± 2.7 a | 72 ± 2.8 b |
1000 to 1159 | Resting | 32 ± 2.5 a | 35 ± 2.6 a | 24 ± 2.6 b | 27 ± 2.7 ab |
1200 to 1359 | Grazing | 59 ± 2.6 b | 60 ± 2.7 b | 66 ± 2.7 ab | 68 ± 2.8 a |
1200 to 1359 | Resting | 45 ± 2.7 a | 45 ± 2.8 a | 42 ± 2.7 ab | 34 ± 2.9 b |
1400 to 1559 | Grazing | 61 ± 3.1 b | 65 ± 3.2 ab | 73 ± 3.2 a | 72 ± 3.3 a |
1400 to 1559 | Resting | 42 ± 3.5 a | 37 ± 3.6 ab | 33 ± 3.6 ab | 31 ± 3.7 b |
1600 to 1759 | Grazing | 77 ± 4.9 c | 81 ± 5.2 bc | 97 ± 5.1 a | 93 ± 5.2 ab |
1600 to 1759 | Resting | 25 ± 5.4 a | 17 ± 5.7 ab | 7 ± 5.7 b | 9 ± 5.7 ab |
1800 to 1959 | Grazing | 60 ± 3.6 a | 64 ± 3.8 a | 68 ± 3.8 a | 66 ± 3.9 a |
1800 to 1959 | Resting | 44 ± 4.0 a | 42 ± 4.2 a | 39 ± 4.2 a | 40 ± 4.3 a |
2000 to 2159 | Grazing | 30 ± 3.6 a | 30 ± 3.8 a | 18 ± 3.8 b | 19 ± 3.9 ab |
2000 to 2159 | Resting | 76 ± 4.8 b | 84 ± 5.0 ab | 93 ± 5.0 a | 93 ± 5.1 a |
2200 to 2359 | Grazing | 36 ± 2.7 b | 45 ± 2.8 a | 31 ± 2.8 b | 33 ± 3.2 b |
2200 to 2359 | Resting | 69 ± 3.0 ab | 66 ± 3.1 b | 78 ± 3.1 a | 78 ± 3.4 ab |
Year 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Grazing Period, h | Daily Activity, min | 2016 | 2017 | p-Value |
0000 to 0159 | Grazing | 51 ± 2.6 | 50 ± 2.6 | 0.8752 |
0000 to 0159 | Resting | 60 ± 2.7 | 58 ± 2.8 | 0.7288 |
0000 to 0159 | Walking | 10 ± 1.5 | 12 ± 1.5 | 0.3807 |
0200 to 0359 | Grazing | 45 ± 2.5 | 24 ± 2.6 | <0.0001 |
0200 to 0359 | Resting | 66 ± 3.2 | 83 ± 3.3 | 0.0007 |
0200 to 0359 | Walking | 10 ± 2.1 | 13 ± 2.1 | 0.2715 |
0400 to 0559 | Grazing | 27 ± 3.9 | 15 ± 4.0 | 0.0269 |
0400 to 0559 | Resting | 84 ± 4.7 | 94 ± 4.8 | 0.1660 |
0400 to 0559 | Walking | 8 ± 2.3 | 11 ± 2.4 | 0.3229 |
0600 to 0759 | Grazing | 37 ± 2.5 | 27 ± 2.6 | 0.0119 |
0600 to 0759 | Resting | 72 ± 3.3 | 79 ± 3.4 | 0.1243 |
0600 to 0759 | Walking | 11 ± 1.9 | 13 ± 1.9 | 0.4406 |
0800 to 0959 | Grazing | 72 ± 3.9 | 94 ± 3.9 | 0.0002 |
0800 to 0959 | Resting | 25 ± 3.9 | 6 ± 4.0 | 0.0014 |
0800 to 0959 | Walking | 23 ± 2.2 | 20 ± 2.3 | 0.2976 |
1000 to 1159 | Grazing | 70 ± 2.8 | 87 ± 2.8 | 0.0001 |
1000 to 1159 | Resting | 31 ± 3.0 | 18 ± 3.1 | 0.0065 |
1000 to 1159 | Walking | 20 ± 1.6 | 15 ± 1.9 | 0.0618 |
1200 to 1359 | Grazing | 58 ± 2.0 | 69 ± 2.3 | 0.0016 |
1200 to 1359 | Resting | 44 ± 2.1 | 39 ± 2.4 | 0.0917 |
1200 to 1359 | Walking | 18 ± 1.1 | 13 ± 1.1 | 0.0018 |
1400 to 1559 | Grazing | 70 ± 3.2 | 68 ± 3.3 | 0.6569 |
1400 to 1559 | Resting | 32 ± 3.8 | 38 ± 3.9 | 0.2357 |
1400 to 1559 | Walking | 18 ± 1.2 | 14 ± 1.2 | 0.0103 |
1600 to 1759 | Grazing | 77 ± 3.9 | 97 ± 4.0 | 0.0010 |
1600 to 1759 | Resting | 20 ± 4.2 | 7 ± 4.3 | 0.0374 |
1600 to 1759 | Walking | 16 ± 2.4 | 21 ± 2.3 | 0.0394 |
1800 to 1959 | Grazing | 70 ± 2.6 | 63 ± 2.6 | 0.0610 |
1800 to 1959 | Resting | 35 ± 2.8 | 42 ± 2.9 | 0.0626 |
1800 to 1959 | Walking | 15 ± 1.2 | 15 ± 1.3 | 0.8032 |
2000 to 2159 | Grazing | 32 ± 3.4 | 14 ± 3.4 | 0.0006 |
2000 to 2159 | Resting | 78 ± 4.3 | 94 ± 4.4 | 0.0102 |
2000 to 2159 | Walking | 10 ± 2.6 | 11 ± 2.7 | 0.6684 |
2200 to 2359 | Grazing | 38 ± 2.4 | 38 ± 2.5 | 0.9271 |
2200 to 2359 | Resting | 71 ± 3.0 | 71 ± 3.0 | 0.9033 |
2200 to 2359 | Walking | 11 ± 1.9 | 11 ± 1.9 | 0.8612 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sprinkle, J.E.; Sagers, J.K.; Hall, J.B.; Ellison, M.J.; Yelich, J.V.; Brennan, J.R.; Taylor, J.B.; Lamb, J.B. Protein Supplementation and Grazing Behavior for Cows on Differing Late-Season Rangeland Grazing Systems. Animals 2021, 11, 3219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113219
Sprinkle JE, Sagers JK, Hall JB, Ellison MJ, Yelich JV, Brennan JR, Taylor JB, Lamb JB. Protein Supplementation and Grazing Behavior for Cows on Differing Late-Season Rangeland Grazing Systems. Animals. 2021; 11(11):3219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113219
Chicago/Turabian StyleSprinkle, James E., Joseph K. Sagers, John B. Hall, Melinda J. Ellison, Joel V. Yelich, Jameson R. Brennan, Joshua B. Taylor, and James B. Lamb. 2021. "Protein Supplementation and Grazing Behavior for Cows on Differing Late-Season Rangeland Grazing Systems" Animals 11, no. 11: 3219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113219