Next Article in Journal
Whole Slide Imaging for High-Throughput Sensing Antibiotic Resistance at Single-Bacterium Level and Its Application to Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
Previous Article in Journal
Solubility and Antioxidant Potential of a Pyrogallol Derivative for Biodiesel Additive
Previous Article in Special Issue
Zero-Bias Visible to Near-Infrared Horizontal p-n-p TiO2 Nanotubes Doped Monolayer Graphene Photodetector
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Graphene Nanocomposites

Department of Biomedical Engineering, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(13), 2440; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132440
Submission received: 28 June 2019 / Accepted: 1 July 2019 / Published: 3 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Graphene Nanocomposites)
Integrating graphene with other nanomaterials has created a variety of graphene nanocomposites with extraordinary chemical, optical, mechanical, and electrical properties. These composites could combine the characteristics of their components to achieve structural stability and multifunctionality with proper design of the interfacial interactions. The field of graphene nanocomposites has developed rapidly over the past decade, with many applications in various fields, such as chemical/biomedical sensing, tissue engineering, and bioimaging.
This Special Issue contains six research articles and two reviews in total, covering structure-proprieties of graphene and its applications in sensing organic solvents, light and DNA, as well as in tissue engineering. Among these, four articles reported graphene nanocomposites for chemical/biomedical sensing applications. One article reported fabrication of graphene-like ZnO/graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets for acetone vapor sensing [1]. The sensing performances of such nanocomposites are superior: the response value could be up to 94 to 100 ppm and the recovery time could be as short as 4 s. Another paper developed a highly-sensitive-plasmonic-resonating sensor consisting of two graphene-modified straight waveguides, two metallic layers, and a racetrack nanodisk resonator [2]. The authors found that their product had the impressive Q value and refractive sensitivity of 21.5 and 1666.67 nm RIU−1, respectively. Moreover, this sensor achieved a temperature sensitivity of 2.33 nm/5 °C. These findings can expand the range of use for a nanoscale real-time temperature sensor with resistance to electromagnetic interference. Another project fabricated a temperature sensor consisting of two metal layers and two ethanol-sealed elliptical resonators, connected to a straight waveguide using two rectangular tubes [3]. This sensor can detect temperatures as low as −3.64 nm/°C, far more sensitive than traditional temperature sensors. The fourth paper presented a p-n-p monolayer graphene photodetector doped with TiO2 for light detection (405 to 1310 nm) [4].
In one of the remaining two research articles, the authors fabricated chitosan/graphene oxide (CS/GO) composite scaffolds for bone regeneration [5]. The other article describes the structure-properties of GO [6]. In this study, the authors investigated the wettability of a defective GO film using molecular dynamics simulations. They found that the contact angle of GO increased from 70° to 82°, with the increasing defective concentration from 0% to 10%. This finding could give insight on how to control the wetting properties of GO and design new devices.
One of the two review articles investigates the application of graphene nanocomposites for DNA detection. This review comprehensively summarizes recent trends in DNA detection using graphene and graphene-related nanomaterials including graphene nanopore (GNP), graphene nanoribbon (GNR), GO, reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and graphene-nanoparticle (G-NP) hybrid materials [7]. It also identifies the current challenges and future research directions. For example, the authors mention that although the G-NP hybrids are promising DNA biosensors, improvements are required for the technology to synthesize low-toxicity graphene nanocomposites with controllable size, shape, crystallinity, and defects at a low cost with a high yield. In addition, they suggest synthesizing graphene nanogaps and GNRs to realize the DNA base discrimination. The other review discusses the effect of graphene nanocomposites on neural stem cell differentiation and their applications in neural tissue engineering [8]. The authors conclude with the potential problems to be considered when using graphene nanocomposites including nanoparticle toxicity, aggregation, and intracellular/extracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during the accumulation of graphene-based materials. This special issue is accessible through the following link:

Acknowledgments

The guest editors thank all the authors for their contributions to this special issue, all the reviewers for their work in evaluating the manuscripts, and Derek J. McPhee, the editor-in-chief of Molecules, as well as the editorial staff of this journal, especially Genie Lu, Section Managing Editor, for their kind help in making this special issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, H.; Wang, D.; Tian, L.; Li, H.; Wang, P.; Ou, N.; Wang, X.; Yang, J. Graphene-Like Porous ZnO/Graphene Oxide Nanosheets for High-Performance Acetone Vapor Detection. Molecules 2019, 24, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhu, J.; Xu, Z.; Huang, Y. Novel High-Sensitivity Racetrack Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor Modified by Graphene. Molecules 2018, 23, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhu, J.; Lou, J. Ultrasensitive and Multifunction Plasmonic Temperature Sensor with Ethanol-Sealed Asymmetric Ellipse Resonators. Molecules 2018, 23, 2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, Z.; Ji, C.; Cheng, L.; Han, J.; Yang, M.; Wei, X.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, J. Zero-Bias Visible to Near-Infrared Horizontal pnp TiO2 Nanotubes Doped Monolayer Graphene Photodetector. Molecules 2019, 24, 1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Valencia, C.; Valencia, C.; Zuluaga, F.; Valencia, M.; Mina, J.; Grande-Tovar, C. Synthesis and application of scaffolds of chitosan-graphene oxide by the freeze-drying method for tissue regeneration. Molecules 2018, 23, 2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Xu, K.; Zhang, J.; Hao, X.; Zhang, C.; Wei, N.; Zhang, C. Wetting properties of defective graphene oxide: A molecular simulation study. Molecules 2018, 23, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wu, X.; Mu, F.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, H. Graphene and Graphene-Based Nanomaterials for DNA Detection: A Review. Molecules 2018, 23, 2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bei, H.P.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Tian, Y.; Luo, X.; Yang, M.; Zhao, X. Graphene-Based Nanocomposites for Neural Tissue Engineering. Molecules 2019, 24, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, X.; Yang, M. Graphene Nanocomposites. Molecules 2019, 24, 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132440

AMA Style

Zhao X, Yang M. Graphene Nanocomposites. Molecules. 2019; 24(13):2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132440

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Xin, and Mo Yang. 2019. "Graphene Nanocomposites" Molecules 24, no. 13: 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132440

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop