Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 19 June 2023
Sec. Functional and Applied Plant Genomics
This article is part of the Research Topic Growth Regulation in Horticultural Plants: New Insights in the Omics Era View all 14 articles

Transcriptome-wide m6A methylation in natural yellow leaf of Catalpa fargesii

Yu ZhangYu Zhang1Junhui WangJunhui Wang1Wenjun MaWenjun Ma1Nan LuNan Lu1Pengyue FuPengyue Fu1Yingying YangYingying Yang1Linjiao ZhaoLinjiao Zhao2Jiwen HuJiwen Hu1Guanzheng QuGuanzheng Qu1Nan Wang*Nan Wang1*
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry and Northeast Forestry University, Beijing, China
  • 2Hekou Yao Autonomous County Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Hekou, China

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant internal modification in eukaryotic messenger RNA, and involved in various biological processes in plants. However, the distribution features and functions of mRNA m6A methylation have been poorly explored in woody perennial plants. In this study, a new natural variety with yellow-green leaves, named Maiyuanjinqiu, was screened from the seedlings of Catalpa fargesii. Based on the preliminary experiment, the m6A methylation levels in the leaves of Maiyuanjinqiu were significantly higher than those in C. fargesii. Furthermore, a parallel analysis of m6A-seq and RNA-seq was carried out in different leaf color sectors. The result showed that m6A modification were mostly identified around the 3’-untranslated regions (3’-UTR), which was slightly negatively correlated with the mRNA abundance. KEGG and GO analyses showed that m6A methylation genes were associated with photosynthesis, pigments biosynthesis and metabolism, oxidation-reduction and response to stress, etc. The overall increase of m6A methylation levels in yellow-green leaves might be associated with the decreased the expression of RNA demethylase gene CfALKBH5. The silencing of CfALKBH5 caused a chlorotic phenotype and increased m6A methylation level, which further confirmed our hypothesis. Our results suggested that mRNA m6A methylation could be considered as a vital epigenomic mark and contribute to the natural variations in plants.

Introduction

Leaf color variation is a widespread phenomenon in nature, and has been widely used as an ornamental trait in plant kingdoms. In recent years, researchers have drawn attention to the study of leaf color mechanism, because they are excellent materials for investigating pigment metabolism, chloroplast development, photosynthetic efficiency, etc (Wu et al., 2007). Yellow-green leaves generally have the same genetic background but show two different leaf colors. Epigenetic modification might play an important role in the formation of leaf color (Li et al., 2015).

Approximately one hundred types of chemical modifications have been reported in eukaryotic RNAs, including N6-methyladenosine (m6A), N1-methyladenosine (m1A), 5-methylcytosine (m5C), 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (hm5C) and inosine (Frye et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2020). It is worth noting that m6A modification accounts for 80% of all RNA methylation modifications in eukaryotic cells, and more than 50% of methylated nucleotides in polyA mRNA (Kierzek and Kierzek, 2003; Boccaletto and Bagiński, 2021). In recent years, m6A modification of mRNA in plants has been reported in virous species. m6A methylation could affect many biological processes by interfering with mRNA metabolism, including messenger RNA stability, pre-mRNA splicing, nuclear-to-cytoplasmic export and RNA translation efficiency (Wang X et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Xiao et al., 2016; Roundtree et al., 2017; Liang et al., 2020; Luo et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2023). Recent studies suggested that m6A RNA methylation probably participate in the regulation of the plastid and thylakoid in the leaves (Li et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2021). However, little is known about the pattern and functions of m6A methylation in regulating leaf color. In order to better understand our biological event, m6A modification will pave the way for further in-depth molecular mechanism analysis.

The m6A modification is regulated by three components: writers (written by methyltransferase), erasers (erased by demethylase), and readers (read by m6A-binding proteins) in plants (Yang et al., 2018; Liang et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2020; Arribas-Hernandez and Brodersen, 2020; Arribas-Hernandez, 2023). In strawberry, m6A RNA methylation MTA and MTB were highly functionally conserved with dynamic modification of mRNA, and indispensable for fruit ripening (Zhou et al., 2021). In Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa, m6A methyltransferase AtFIP37 and OsFIP could influence the fate of shoot stem cells and early degeneration of microspores, respectively (Shen et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2019). Other m6A demethylases, such as ALKBH2, ALKBH4B, ALKBH8B, ALKBH9B and ALKBH10B, have been discovered that mediate mRNA demethylation to influence the stability of target transcripts, consequently regulating flowering time, trichome and root development, fruit ripening and biotic and abiotic stress responses (Duan et al., 2017; Martínez-Pérez et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2019; He et al., 2021; Amara et al., 2022; Huong et al., 2022; Han et al., 2023). In addition to methylases and demethylases, a class of m6A readers could fine-regulate biological function. For example, the YTH- domain proteins named EVOLUTIONARILIY CONSERVED C-TERMINAL REGION (ECT). Among which, ECT2, ECT3, ECT4, and ECT13 have been proven to function as m6A readers, playing critical roles in leaf and trichome formation, organogenesis, and nitrate signaling in Arabidopsis (Wei et al., 2018; Arribas-Hernandez and Brodersen, 2020; Scutenaire et al., 2018; Hou et al., 2021; Shao et al., 2021; Song et al., 2021). However, it is not clear whether there were other members of these three components involved in m6A modification, and whether these reported components are functionally conserved in different species also needed to be further explored. Catalpa fargesii Bur is widely distributed in the middle and western regions, and it is a famous timber and ornamental tree species in China (Wang et al., 2018). Maiyuanjinqiu with yellow-green leaf is a new variety (Identification code: 20150150) that was cultivated from the seedings of C. fargesii. The total chlorophyll and photosynthesis were significantly lower in Maiyuanjinqiu than those in C. fargesi (Wang et al., 2019). Based on the preliminary experiment, the m6A methylation level of total RNA in yellow leaves was higher than in green leaves. However, the key regulatory mechanism of m6A modifications and transcriptional regulation the leaf color formation was still poorly understood. In our study, transcriptome-wide m6A sequencing was performed in different leaf sectors of Maiyuanjinqiu and C. fargesii. Interestingly, the silencing of methyltransferase CfALKBH5 caused a chlorotic phenotype and increased m6A methylation level, which further confirmed our hypothesis. Our results together indicate that m6A modification is an important epigenetic mark related to leaf color in C. fargesii and provide new insights into natural leaf color variation via epitranscriptome manipulation in forest breeding.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Maiyuanjinqiu is a variety derived from C. fargesii seedlings. The plants samples used in this study were grown in the experimental field of Luoyang, Henan Province in China. All samples were collected, instantly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C refrigerator. The different leaf color sectors of Maiyuanjinqiu and the responding sectors of C. fargesii were divided and collected according to the method of Wang et al. (2019), respectively. For each experiment, at least three biological repeats and technical repetitions were performed.

RNA extraction

Fresh leaf samples were grinded in mortars with liquid nitrogen, and extracted using RNAprep Pure Plant Plus Kit (TIANGEN, DP441, China), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Then, the total RNA of the samples was purified with the PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix Kit (TaKaRa, RR036A, China). The concentration and quality of total RNA were tested on a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo, USA) and gel electrophoresis.

The quantitative detection of m6A modification

Total RNA isolation and two rounds of PolyA+ mRNA selection were performed to measure the global change of the m6A modification level. The change of global m6A levels in mRNA was measured by EpiQuik m6A RNA Methylation Quantification Kit (EpiGentek, P-9005, NY, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Library construction, m6A-seq and RNA-seq

The poly(A) mRNAs were fragmented into 100-nucleotide (nt)-long oligonucleotides by using divalent cations. The cleaved RNA fragments were immunoprecipitated by incubating in IP buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5% Igepal CA-630, 750 mM NaCl, and 0.5 g/L BSA) at 4 °C for 24 hours with an m6A-specific antibody (Synaptic Systems, Goettingen, Germany). According to the library preparation protocol, immunoprecipitated fragments (IP fractions) and input RNA (input control) libraries were constructed. The Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform was used for RNA sequencing at LC-BIO Biotech (Hangzhou, China). For each experiment, three biological repeats and technical repeats were performed.

m6A-seq data analyses

m6A-seq and RNA-seq were analyzed following the described previous method (Meyer and Jaffrey, 2014). Firstly, the FastQC tool was used to remove adaptor contamination, low-quality bases, and undetermined bases of raw data (Martin, 2011). Secondly, the clean data were mapped to the reference genome via HISAT2 (http://daehwankimlab.github.io/hisat2) (Kim et al., 2015). The mapping reads of input were then used to identify m6A peaks calling via the R package (Meng et al., 2014). HOMER and MEME online tools were used to identify conserved sequence motifs using Perl scripts. FPKM (fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads) was analyzed for the mRNA expression level of genes (Trapnell et al., 2012). The differentially expressed genes were selected with the standard of absolute |Log2FC| ≥ 1 and P < 0.05 via R package edgeR (Robinson et al., 2010). KEGG enrichment and GO analysis were performed using the LC-BIO online tools (https://www.omicstudio.cn/index).

qRT-PCR analysis

As described above, total RNAs were extracted from C. fargesii leaves. Extracted RNAs were synthesized first-strand cDNA using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, RR037A, China). qRT-PCR assays were analyzed on the Roche LightCycler® 480 Real-Time PCR system following the protocol described methods (Wang L et al., 2014). CfActin gene was used as internal reference genes (Supplementary Table S1) (Wang et al., 2018). The 2−ΔΔCT method was used to analyze the relative mRNA expression levels of genes (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). For each experiment, three biological repeats and technical repetitions were performed.

Subcellular localization of CfALKBH5 protein

For the generation of the CfALKBH5 and GFP fusion gene, the coding region of CfALKBH5 lacking the stop codon was ligated into the linearized pBI121 vector with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) (Supplementary Table S2). The construct CfALKBH5-GFP and 35S::GFP (control) were introduced into Nicotiana benthamiana lower leaf epidermal cells according to the method of Zheng et al. (2005). After being transformed for 48 h in the dark, the tobacco cells were pelleted, resuspended in infiltrations solution, including 100 μM acetosyringone and 10 mM MgCl2, and visualized using a confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM 700, Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

VIGS vectors construction and transformation

The full-length coding sequence (CDS) of CfALKBH5 was cloned using specific primers (Supplementary Table S2). The target gene fragment and pTRV2 were digested by XbaI and SacI and then ligated by T4 ligase (Promega, M1801, China). The specific vector primers were used to detect the recombinant plasmid pTRV2-CfALKBH5 by PCR (Supplementary Table S2). The constructed vectors were transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 by freeze-thaw method (Fire et al., 1998). The A. tumefaciens strain was grown at 0.6 OD600 with shaking at 120 rpm at 28°C in ILuria-Bertani (LB) medium contained kanamycin (50 mg/L) and rifampicin (50 mg/L). The A. tumefaciens strain cells were harvested and re-suspended in an inoculation solution with acetosyringone (200 mM), including 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES, and 200 mM acetosyringone. Incubate for 3 hours at room temperature, a mixture (1:1 v/v) of induced EHA105 cultures containing pTRV1 plus pTRV2 vector (control), or pTRV1 plus pTRV2-CfALKBH5, was applied using approximately 450 µL of the mixture into the leaves surface of one-month seedlings. At least 3 biological replicates were performed with 15 transgenic plants per replicate. The number of plants for empty vector and untreated control were both same to that of infected plants. Only the most representative individuals were used to photograph. The infected leaves were collected for subsequent experiment analyses.

Pigment profiling

Fresh leaves were harvested and used to determine total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents following the protocol (Lichtenthaler and Wellburn, 1983). Total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were extracted with 80% acetone at 4°C overnight in the dark, and then the solution was calculated at 645 nm, 663 nm, and 470 nm against the solvent (acetone) blank with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (TU-1901, PERSEE, China). For each experiment, three biological repeats and technical repeats were performed.

Statistical analyses

SPSS19 software was used for statistical analyses, and the statistically significant (*, **, or ***; P < 0.05, P < 0.01, or P < 0.001) were considered as significant differences. For each experiment, three biological repeats and technical repetitions were performed.

Results

m6A methylation level is increased in the yellow leaf

Maiyuanjinqiu is a natural variation cultivar derived from Catalpa fargesii, whose leaves exhibit yellow-green character (Figure 1A). The yellow leaves of Maiyuanjinqiu are named Y1, while the light green leaves in the middle sectores of Maiyuanjinqiu are named Y2. The corresponding sectors of normal green leaves of the C. fargesii are named G1 and G2, respectively. To clarify whether m6A methylation is related to leaf color, we examined the overall total RNA m6A methylation levels in different leaf color sectors of Maiyuanjinqiu and the corresponding leaves of C. fargesii. As shown in Figure 1B, the yellow leaves of Maiyuanjinqiu exhibit hypermethylation compared with the green leaves of C. fargesii. The m6A methylation level of yellow leaves reached 1.59 times higher than that in green leaves in Maiyuanjinqiu, while the light green leaves in Maiyuanjinqiu were 1.47 times higher than that in the corresponding green leaves of C. fargesii, respectively. Based on the above results, we speculated that a correlation might exist between m6A modifications and leaf color.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 The m6A methylation levels in Maiyuanjinqiu and C. fargesii. (A) The leaf color character of Maiyuanjinqiu. (B) The levels of m6A methylation in the leaves of G1, G2, Y1 and Y2 sectors. The asterisks (**, ***) indicate significant differences (P < 0.01, P<0.001) between the two samples. Bar=2 cm.

The landscape of m6A methylation in the leaves of Maiyuanjinqiu and C. fargesii

To verify our hypothesis, the transcriptome-wide sequencing of m6A methylation was performed with three biological replicates for Maiyuanjinqiu and C. fargesii leaves. After eliminating adapter reads, unidentified bases, and low-quality bases, around 67.34%-89.04% of clean reads were uniquely mapped into the Catalpa bungei genome (unpublished) (Supplementary Table  S3). The identified confident m6A peaks in three replicates with a high Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used for further subsequent analyses (Supplementary Figure S1). On average, approximately 30,236 m6A sites of 21,343 genes from G1, around 31,375 m6A sites of 21,429 genes from G2, approximately 32,258 sites of 21,543 genes from Y1, and 32,198 m6A sites of 21,684 genes from Y2 were successfully identified, respectively (Supplementary Table S4). The whole-genome density of the m6A peaks and transcripts have different distribution modes mapped on the reference genome (Figure 2A). In addition, compared with the leaves of C. fargesii, the global hypermethylation of m6A was exhibited in Maiyuanjinqiu leaves (Figure 2B).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Overview of m6A methylome and transcriptome in leaves between Maiyuanjinqiu and C.fargesii. (A) Circos plot of the distance and density of m6A peak and expression abundance on Catalpa bungei chromosomes. (B) Violin plot showed the enrichment of m6A peaks in Maiyuanjinqiu and Catalpa fargesii. (C) Distribution of m6A peaks in transcript segments divided into 5’-UTR (untranslated region), CDS (coding sequence), and 3’-UTR. (D) Violin plot representing a comparison of the fold enrichment of m6A peaks in the different gene segments. (E) RRACH and URUAY motifs conserved sequence motifs for m6A-containing peak regions. (F) Venn diagram showing the overlap of m6A peaks in the yellow leaves and the corresponding sectors of C. fargesii.

Furthermore, we discovered that the distribution of m6A peaks in protein-coding mRNA was mostly enriched around the 3’-UTR region in all groups and relatively less in the 5’-UTR (Figures 2C, D). In C. fargesii leaves, peak callings were almost equally distributed in transcription start (TSS) and end (TES) sites, whereas much more m6A peak callings were discovered in the TES regions than the TSS regions in Maiyuanjinqiu leaves (Supplementary Figure S2). Additionally, global m6A peaks were identified two conserved sequences: RRACY (R = G or A; Y = C or U) and UGUAH motifs (H = A, C, or U) using the MEME and HOMER suite (Figure 2E), which were very similar to the results identified in rice, tomato, and barley seedlings (Li et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2019; Miao et al., 2020; Su et al., 2022).

To further understand the relationship between m6A methylation and leaf color, the yellow edge leaves of Maiyuanjinqiu (Y1) and the corresponding green leaves of C. fargesii (G1), which have the more representative color difference, were selected for subsequent analysis. We identified 1,533 green-leaf specific m6A peaks and 1,113 yellow-leaf specific peaks, as well as 15,911 common peaks (Figure 2F). KEGG enrichment analysis showed that m6A-modified genes unique to green leaves are mainly involved in flavone and flavonoid biosynthesis, anthocyanin biosynthesis, and starch and sucrose metabolism (Supplementary Figure S3A). However, m6A-harboring genes specific to yellow leaves are principally involved in photosynthesis-antenna proteins and phenylalanine metabolism (Supplementary Figure S3B).

The m6A levels are slightly negatively correlated with global gene expression

m6A deposition has been reported to influence mRNA abundance (Shen et al., 2016; Wang X et al., 2014; Duan et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2017). To estimate the potential correlation between m6A mRNA methylation and gene expression during leaf yellowing, m6A-seq and RNA-seq were analyzed for the enhancement in the levels of m6A-containing transcripts and the global gene expression changes between two samples (Figure 3). A total of 9,586 transcripts with differential m6A levels (log2(FC) ≥1, P value < 0.05) between Y1 versus G1 were identified. Compared with Y1, 7,326 transcripts had higher m6A methylation levels than G1, while 2,260 transcripts had lower m6A methylation levels than G1 (Figure 3A). Among the 7,326 transcripts, only 669 showed higher expression levels, whereas 905 exhibited lower expression levels in Y1 versus G1 groups (Figure 3B). Accordingly, 719 and 372 displayed higher and lower expression levels among the 4,464 transcripts with lower m6A levels in Y2 compared to that in G2, respectively (Figure 3F, Supplementary Table S5). These data suggested that m6A methylation was slightly negatively correlated with the expression of the global transcripts.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 m6A RNA methylation is negatively associated with gene abundance. (A) Scatter plots exhibited transcripts abundance with differential m6A enrichment between the yellow leaves (Y1) and the corresponding green leaves (G1). The m6A-modified transcripts with substantially higher and lower peak enrichment in Y1 compared to G1 are highlighted in red and blue, respectively (|Log2FC| ≥ 1; P value < 0.05). (B) Expression of m6A-modified transcripts with markedly higher peak enrichment in Y1 than in G1. (C) Expression of m6A-modified transcripts with markedly lower peak enrichment in Y1 than in G1. (D) Scatter plots exhibited transcripts abundance with differential m6A enrichment between light green leaves (Y2) and the corresponding green leaves (G2). The m6A modified transcripts with substantially higher and lower peak enrichment in Y2 compared to G2 are highlighted in red and blue, respectively (|Log2FC| ≥ 1 and P < 0.05). (E) Expression of m6A-modified transcripts with markedly higher peak enrichment in Y2 than in G2. (F) Expression of m6A-modified transcripts with markedly lower peak enrichment in Y2 than in G2. RNA-seq was used for gene expression analysis. FPKM, fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped fragments.

Transcriptional differences in different leaf color sectors

To further explore the relationship between gene expression and leaf color, the yellow leaves (significant phenotypic characteristics) and the corresponding green leaves were selected for transcriptome differential analysis. A total of 3,308 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed by the comparison in Y1 versus G1 group, with 772 up-regulated genes and 882 down-regulated genes, respectively (Figure 4A, Supplementary Table S6). Heatmap plot of the differentially expressed genes showed the consistency of three biological replicates and the significant difference between yellow and green leaves, respectively (Figure 4B). KEGG analysis showed that all significant DEGs were enriched in 129 metabolic or biological pathways. Remarkably, DEGs were highly enriched in the pathways of flavonoid biosynthesis, photosynthesis-antenna proteins, carotenoid biosynthesis, photosynthesis, anthocyanin biosynthesis, and RNA transport (Figure 4C). GO analysis revealed these DEGs are highly enriched in response to photosynthesis, light reaction, response to stress, heme binding, chlorophyll metabolism, and metal ion binding (Figure 4D). These results showed that the mRNA expression levels of photosynthesis, pigment, ion-binding and stress-related genes contributed to the formation of leaf color in Maiyuanjinqiu.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the leaves of Y1 and G1. (A) Volcano plot and Venn graph of regulated genes. (B) Heatmap showed the correlation of transcript expression between three biological replicates between Y1 and G1. (C) KEGG enrichment pathways of the DEGs between Y1 and G1. (D) GO enrichment of DEGs. BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; MF, molecular function.

Correlation analysis of m6A-modified genes and DEGs expression on in yellow and green leaves

According to the crosstalk analysis of the m6A-seq and RNA-seq, we found 546 DEGs had differentially expressed peaks (DPs) in the comparison between yellow leaf and leaves. Among them, 140 transcripts showed m6A hypermethylation and up-regulated expression (Hyper-up), 143 transcripts displayed m6A hypermethylation and down-regulated expression (Hyper-down), 143 transcripts exhibited m6A hypomethylation and up-regulated expression (Hypo-up), and 120 transcripts had m6A hypomethylation and down-regulated expression (Hypo-down) (Figure 5A, Supplementary Table S7). Furthermore, KEGG analysis of those yellow leaf yellow genes in the four-quadrant plot revealed that they were abundant in 69 pathways, including plant hormone signal transduction, peroxisome, porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, carotenoid biosynthesis, flavonoid biosynthesis and carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms (Figure 5B). Meanwhile, GO analysis revealed that those genes were highly enriched in the oxidation-reduction process, response to stress, heme binding and metal ion binding (Figure 5C).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Integrating analysis of differentially m6A-modified and expressed transcripts between the yellow leaves (Y1) and the corresponding green leaves (G1). (A) Four-quadrant diagram exhibiting a relationship between m6A methylation and transcripts expression. Hyper-up, hypermethylation and up-regulated genes. Hyper-down, hypermethylation and down-regulated genes. Hypo-up, hypomethylation and upregulated genes. Hypo-down, hypomethylation and down-regulated genes. (B) KEGG pathways of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with m6A peaks. (C) GO enrichment of DEGs with m6A peaks. MF, Molecular Function; CC, Cellular Component; BP, Biological Process.

CfALKBH5 is a putative demethylase for m6A RNA that contributes to the yellow leaves

A large number of differential sites of m6A methylation modification were identified (Figure 5A), and the methylation level in yellow leaves was higher than that of green leaves. The differences in m6A levels might result from the regulation of m6A methyltransferases and demethylases. According to the existing literature report, the m6A writers mainly perform biological functions through a complex composed of methyltransferase METTL3 and METTL14 (Shi et al., 2019).The m6A writers mainly perform biological functions through a complex composed of methyltransferase METTL3 and METTL14 (Shi et al., 2019). The homologous genes of METTL3 and METTL14 were identified in the genome of C. fargesii, named CfMTA1 and CfMTA2, respectively. And both of which contained a conserved MT-A70 domain (Supplementary Figure S4A). Based on the RNA-seq, the mRNA expression levels of CfMTA1 and CfMTA2 did not change significantly in the yellow leaves (Supplementary Figure S4B). It is speculated that m6A methyltransferase might not be an important reason for the overall change of m6A methylation modification level in yellow leaves. However, five demethylase ALKBHs, from CfALKBH1 to CfALKBH5, were markedly down-regulated in the yellow leaves. The phylogenetic tree showed that CfALKBH3 and CfALKBH5 shared high similarity with AtALKBH10A and AtALKBH10B of Arabidopsis (Figure 6A). However, only the expression level of CfALKBH5 was remarkably decreased in the yellow-green leaves compared with that of C. fargesii among the five CfALKBH genes based on RNA-seq analysis results (Figure 6B, Supplementary Table S8). This result was further confirmed by qRT-PCR assay (Figure 6C). Therefore, CfALKBH5 gene might regulate gene expression by regulating m6A methylation, and thus affect leaf color.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6 Phylogenetic tree construction, gene expression analyses and subcellular localization of m6A RNA demethylases ALKBHs. (A) The phylogenetic tree of ALKBHs in C. fargesii and other ALKBH proteins by the neighbor-joining method using MEGA 6. The sequences of the ALKBH proteins were achieved from the NCBI website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/), and species names are shown below. Species names are abbreviated as follows: Cf, C. fargesii; At, Arabidopsis thaliana; OS, Oryza sativa L; Sb, Sorghum bicolor; Zm, Zea mays. (B) Heatmap analysis revealing the gene expression of CfALKBH1-5 in G1, G2, Y1 and Y2 sectors based on RNA-seq. Data are presented as the mean of three independent biological replicates. (C) The relative mRNA expression of CfALKBH5 in yellow leaves and green leaves as determined by qRT-PCR analysis. Asterisks indicate significant differences (*P < 0.05). (D) Subcellular localization of CfALKBH5 in tobacco leaf epidermal cells. The 35S::GFP and construct for 35S::CfALKBH5-GFP plasmid was introduced into tobacco epidermal cells by particle bombardment. The nuclei of the tobacco leaf epidermal cells were detected via DAPI staining. Bar=20 μm.

CfALKBH5 is a nuclear protein

To further investigate the nucleus localization of CfALKBH5, the plasmid encoding the 35S::CfALKBH5-GFP and 35S::GFP control were transiently expressed in tobacco epidermal cells. The fluorescence signals of CfALKBH5-GFP were localized in the nucleus of epidermal cells, whereas 35S-GFP was detected to be uniformly distributed throughout the tobacco epidermal cells (Figure 6D). These data indicated that CfALKBH5 was a nuclear-localized protein.

The suppression CfALKBH5 results in a chlorotic phenotype in C. fargesii

The pTRV2-CfALKBH5 (suppression) and pTRV2 vector (empty vector) were infected using an efficient virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) system following to previous protocol (Chen et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2020), which has been generally used in functional characterization of genes in plenty of plant species (Chen et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2020). To ensure the accuracy of this experiment, a minimum of three biological replicates were performed, which contain at least 15 transformed C. fargesii plants in each replicate. A chlorotic phenotype was observed in pTRV2-CfALKBH5-infected plants (Figure 7A, Supplementary Figure S5). The relative mRNA expression level of CfALKBH5 was significantly lower in pTRV2-CfALKBH5 infected plants than that in control plants, indicating the suppression was effective in our experiment (Figure 7B). Furthermore, the methylation level was detected by the m6A methylation kit, the result showed that CfALKBH5 silencing significantly increased the m6A level in the total RNA (Figure 7C). The contents of chlorophyll and carotenoid were analyzed in the leaves of CfALKBH5-silenced and control seedlings. Compared with the control plants, the total chlorophyll content of leaves markedly decreased in CfALKBH5 silencing plants, but the content of carotenoid did not significantly change (Figures 7D, E). The results showed that CfALKBH5 might play a role in chlorophyll synthesis/metabolism by regulating the methylation levels.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7 The function analysis of a putative methyltransferase CfALKBH5 by silencing CfALKBH5 gene in C.fargesii. (A) VIGS-mediated CfALKBH5-silenced plants (Figure 7A) compared to pTRV2 vector-infected plants (control, Figure 7B). 15 plants were selected for photography in each treatment, and the most representative photos were selected. The red circle represents the infected area. Bar=2 cm. (B) The expression levels of CfALKBH5 in pTRV2-CfALKBH5 and control plants. The relative expression levels are shown as fold change values. Asterisk indicates a significant difference (*, P< 0.05). (C) The levels of m6A in total RNA of pTRV2- and pTRV2- CfALKBH5-treated plants, respectively. (D, E) The total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were measured in the leaves of pTRV2-CfALKBH5 and control plants.

The suppression of CfALKBH5 could change the expression level of pigment biosynthesis and photosynthesis genes

Based on m6A-seq and RNA-seq data, the m6A levels of some key genes involved in chlorophyll metabolism, carotenoid biosynthesis, and photosynthesis were altered in yellow leaves (Supplementary Table S9). Therefore, qRT-PCR was performed to explore whether these genes also changed in pTRV2-CfALKBH5-infected and control plants. Compared with the control leaves, the expression levels of chlorophyll biosynthesis-related genes CfHEMA, CfCAO and CfGLK and photosynthesis-related genes CfLHCA3 and CfPsbP were down-regulated in pTRV2-CfALKBH5-infected plants (Figure 8). In contrast, the gene expression of CfPSY and CfVDE involved in carotenoid synthesis were up-regulated in the CfALKBH5-silenced leaves (Figure 8). Taken together, CfALKBH5 suppression indeed induced the change of gene expression profiles in pigment biosynthesis and photosynthesis.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8 The expression comparison of important genes involved in chlorophyll metabolism, carotenoid biosynthesis and photosynthesis between pTRV2-CfALKBH5-and pTRV2-infected plants. (A–C) The expression levels of CfHEMA, CfCAO, CfGLK genes involved in chlorophyll metabolism in pTRV2-CfALKBH5-and pTRV2-infected plants. (D–F) The expression levels of CfPSY, CfVDE, CfZDS genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis in pTRV2-CfALKBH5-and pTRV2-infected plants. (G–I) The expression levels of CfLHCA3, CfPsbP, CfPsbH genes involved in photosynthesis chlorophyll metabolism in pTRV2-CfALKBH5-and pTRV2-infected plants. Asterisks represent the significant difference, P < 0.05.

Discussion

m6A methylation is an important mechanism of epigenetic regulation at the post-transcriptional level and has been studied in eukaryotic, including mice, human, Arabidopsis, rice, barley, tomato, sea buckthorn and apple (Meyer and Jaffrey, 2014; Zhao et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021; Hou et al., 2022; Su et al., 2022). However, as a valuable horticultural tree, the abundance, distribution, and function of m6A modification of C. fargesii remain unclear. In this research, we confirmed the presence of m6A modification of yellow-green leaves in C. fargesii. Firstly, we used an m6A RNA methylation quantification kit to detect the presence differences of m6A methylation levels in different color leaves of Maiyuanjinqiu and C. fargesii. Secondly, we identified the m6A methylation sites in C. fargesii genome based on Illumina Novaseq sequencing. In addition, m6A methylation levels presented differences in the total RNA between Maiyuanjinqiu and C. fargesii, indicating functional diversity of m6A modification and providing new insights into early post-transcriptional regulation during leaf chlorosis.

The transcriptome-wide distribution of m6A methylation is divergent in eukaryotes, including transposable element gene exons and transposons (Hu et al., 2021; Song et al., 2021). In this research, m6A-seq revealed m6A distribution pattern mostly in the 3’-UTR of mRNAs both in Maiyuanjinqiu and C. fargesii (Figure 2C), which is consistent with previous reports that have demonstrated m6A peaks near the 3’-UTR in plants (Shen et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2019; Luo et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2021), Notably, we discovered highly conserved RRACH motif and URUAY (R = A/G, Y = U/A) sequence as a previously identified plant-specific motif (Wei et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2019; Luo et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2021). In addition, RRACH-like motifs, which were found in humans, mice, Arabidopsis, and maize (Dominissini et al., 2013; Meyer et al., 2012; Linder et al., 2015; Duan et al., 2017; Miao et al., 2020) (Figure 2E). In addition, our findings revealed an overall negative association between mRNA m6A modification and transcripts abundance (Figure 3), which was consistent with the findings of the ripening of tomato fruits (Zhou et al., 2019). Moreover, we found several genes with m6A modification are related to photosynthesis, which is similar to those in Arabidopsis (Li et al., 2014). The above results indicated that m6A modifications were conservative in plants. Unexpectedly, there are more increased m6A-methylated genes in Y1 but more decreased m6A-methylated genes in Y2. We speculated that the formation mechanisms of the natural yellow leaves are complicated, and there might be other underlying compensation mechanism might play a role in the light green leaf (Y2) of Maiyuanjinqiu. For example, in addition to demethyltransferase ALKBH5, whether there were other unknown m6A methyltransferases might be also involved in regulating the process deserve further investigation.

Several studies have demonstrated that RNA demethylases and methyltransferases may bind to and remove m6A marks, and play a vital role in regulating mRNA fate (Hu et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2020; Shao et al., 2021). In particular, several YT521-B homology (YTH) domain-containing proteins have been identified as m6A readers that regulate either negative or positive mRNA stability in animals and plants (Du et al., 2016; Shi et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2018; Wei et al., 2018; Baquero-Perez et al., 2019; Song et al., 2021). Moreover, several studies have demonstrated that the physiological functions of RNA methyltransferases were illustrated in different species. For example, the activity of mRNA methyltransferase METTL3 was influenced by SUMOylation in mammals (Du et al., 2018). In Arabidopsis, five potential RNA demethylases were identified, among which, ALKBH10B was involved in the floral transition and abiotic stress, while ALKBH9B participated in alfalfa mosaic virus infection (Duan et al., 2017; Martínez-Pérez, 2017; Han et al., 2023). In this study, an extensive search of the Catalpa bungei genome was performed and identified five putative RNA demethylases. Based on the transcriptome and qRT-PCR results, the expression levels of CfALKBH5 reduced dramatically in yellow-green leaves of Maiyuanjinqiu compared with those of C. fargesii. In this study, CfALKBH5 nuclear localization suggested that CfALKBH5 is mainly responsible for nuclear RNA methylation rather than chloroplast or mitochondrial RNA methylation. In tomato, SlALKBH2 localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and regulated fruit ripening (Zhou et al., 2019). In Arabidopsis, CPSF30 localized to the nucleus and regulated the splicing of mRNA implicated in the salicylic acid pathway in response to external stimuli (Bruggeman et al., 2014). The localization of methylase might be related to its potential function, the functional analysis of CfALKBH5 is very important for biological issues of concern.

In this study, the silencing of CfALKBH5 significantly increased the abundance of m6A modification in total RNA in C. fargesii, indicating that CfALKBH5 indeed influences m6A modification. Moreover, CfALKBH5 suppression resulted in a chlorotic leaf phenotype and decreased chlorophyll contents. Moreover, qRT-PCR results showed that the expression levels of several critical genes involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis, carotenoid biosynthesis and photosynthesis had changed in pTRV2-CfALKBH5-infected plants. It is worth considering that although we detected changes of the expression levels of CfPSY and CfVDE genes in pTRV2-CfALKBH5-infected plants, there was no significant difference in carotenoid content. This means that more complex regulatory mechanisms might be involved in this process except for m6A methylation, which needed to be further studied. For example, whether these genes involved in chlorophyll metabolism, carotenoid biosynthesis, and photosynthesis are m6A modified and whether the m6A levels of these genes are altered in CfALKBH5 knockdown plants remain unclear. In addition to m6A methylation, are there other types of modification regulating leaf color of Maiyuanjinqiu also need to be studied.

Conclusion

In summary, we first investigated the differences of global m6A methylation levels in different leaf color sectors in woody plants. We found that the m6A methylated sites were mainly identified around the 3’-untranslated regions (3’-UTR), which was slightly negatively correlated with the mRNA abundance. Furthermore, the m6A methylation levels were significantly enhanced in the yellow sectors compared with the green sectors based on m6A RNA methylation quantification detection and m6A-seq data. Crosstalk analyses between peak and differential genes were conducted, KEGG and GO analyses showed that m6A modification genes were associated with photosynthesis, pigments biosynthesis and metabolism, oxidation-reduction and response to stress, etc. In addition, the overall increase in m6A methylation is associated with the decreased expression of RNA demethylase gene CfALKBH5. Interestingly, the silencing of demethylase CfALKBH5 caused a chlorotic phenotype and increased m6A methylation level, suggesting the role of CfALKBH5 in the formation of yellow-green leaves of Maiyuanjinqiu. Our results revealed that m6A modification could be considered as a vital epigenomic mark and contribute to the naturally variations in plants.

Data availability statement

The data presented in the study are deposited in the National Genomics Data Center repository (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA010119), the accession number is CRA010119. The datasets generated and /or analyzed during the current study are available in NCBI with the accession number OQ401832 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/all/?term=OQ401832). Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

YZ performed the experiments and wrote the original draft. NW conceived the experiment and revised the paper. PF, WM and NL contributed to data analysis. YY, LZ, JH and GQ provided help in the experiments. JW provided the project funds, supervised the entire experiment and writing process. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted.

Funding

This work was supported by funding of the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD2200301).

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr.Yuan Cao and Dr. Liuqiang Wang from the State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding for their excellent technical assistance on the fluorescence observation and professional suggestions. We also thank A. prof Chao Wang from Northeast Forestry University for giving us a lot of help in experiments.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167789/full#supplementary-material

References

Amara, U., Hu, J. Z., Cai, J., Kang, H. (2023). FLK is an mRNA m6 a reader that regulates floral transition by modulating the stability and splicing of FLC in arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 16 (5), 919–929. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2023.04.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amara, U., Shoaib, Y., Kang, H. (2022). ALKBH9C, a potential RNA m6A demethylase, regulates the response of arabidopsis to abiotic stresses and abscisic acid. Plant Cell Environ. 45 (12), 3566–3581. doi: 10.1111/pce.14447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arribas-Hernandez, L., Brodersen, P. (2020). Occurrence and functions of m6A and other covalent modifications in plant mRNA. Plant Physiol. 182 (1), 79–96. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.01156

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baquero-Perez, B., Antanaviciute, A., Yonchev, I. D., Carr, I. M., Wilson, S. A., Whitehouse, A. (2019). The Tudor SND1 protein is an m6A RNA reader essential for replication of kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. Elife 8, e47261. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boccaletto, P., Bagiński, B. (2021). Modomics: an operational guide to the use of the RNA modification pathways database. Methods Mol Biol. 2284, 481–505. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1307-8_26

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bruggeman, Q., Garmier, M., De Bont, L., Soubigou-Taconnat, L., Mazubert, C., Benhamed, M., et al. (2014). The polyadenylation factor subunit CLEAVAGE AND POLYADENYLATION SPECIFICITY FACTOR30: a key factor of programmed cell death and a regulator of immunity in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 165 (2), 732–746. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.236083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, G., Liu, H., Wei, Q., Zhao, H., Yu, Y. (2017). The acyl-activating enzyme phaae13 is an alternative enzymatic source of precursors for anthocyanin biosynthesis in petunia flowers. J. Exp. Bot. 68 (3), 457–467. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dominissini, D., Moshitch-Moshkovitz, S., Salmon-Divon, M., Amariglio, N., Rechavi, G. (2013). Transcriptome-wide mapping of N6 -methyladenosine by m6A-seq based on immunocapturing and massively parallel sequencing. Nat. Protocol. 8, 176. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.148

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, H., Zhao, Y., He, J., Zhang, Y., Xi, H., Liu, M., et al. (2016). YTHDF2 destabilizes m6A-containing RNA through direct recruitment of the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex. Nat. Commun. 7 (1), 12626. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12626

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duan, H. C., Wei, L. H., Zhang, C., Wang, Y., Chen, L., Lu, Z., et al. (2017). ALKBH10B is an RNA N6-methyladenosine demethylase affecting arabidopsis floral transition. Plant Cell. 29 (12), 2995–3011. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00912

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M., KOSTAS, S. A., DRIVER, S. E., MELLO, C. (1998). Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391 (6669), 806–811. doi: 10.1038/35888

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frye, M., Jaffrey, S. R., Pan, T., Rechavi, G., Suzuki, T. (2016). RNA Modifications: what have we learned and where are we headed? Nat. Rev. Genet. 17 (6), 365–372. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.47

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, R., Shoaib, Y., Cai, J., Kang, H. (2023). ALKBH10B-mediated m6A demethylation is crucial for drought tolerance by affecting mRNA stability in arabidopsis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 209, 105306. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105306

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, Y. J., Li, L. L., Yao, Y. X., Li, Y. L., Zhang, H. Q., Fan, M. (2021). Transcriptome-wide N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation in watermelon under CGMMV infection. BMC Plant Biol. 21 (1), 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03289-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hou, N., Li, C., He, J., Liu, Y., Yu, S., Malnoy, M., et al. (2022). MdMTA-mediated m6A modification enhances drought tolerance by promoting mRNA stability and translation efficiency of genes involved in lignin deposition and oxidative stress. New Phytol. 234 (4), 1294–1314. doi: 10.1111/NPH.18069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hou, Y., Sun, J., Wu, B., Gao, Y., Nie, H., Nie, Z., et al. (2021). CPSF30-l-mediated recognition of mRNA m6A modification controls alternative polyadenylation of nitrate signaling-related gene transcripts in arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 14 (4), 688–699. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.01.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, J. Z., Manduzio, S., Kang, H. (2019). Epitranscriptomic RNA methylation in plant development and abiotic stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00500

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, J., Cai, J., Park, S. J., Lee, K., Li, Y., Chen, Y., et al. (2021). N6-methyladenosine mRNA methylation is important for salt stress tolerance in arabidopsis. Plant J. 106 (6), 1759–1775. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15270

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, H., Weng, H., Sun, W., Qin, X., Shi, H., Wu, H., et al. (2018). Recognition of RNA n 6-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat. Cell Biol. 20 (3), 285–295. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0045-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, H., Weng, H., Chen, J. (2020). The biogenesis and precise control of RNA mA methylation. Trends Genet. 36 (1), 44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.10.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huong, T. T., Yang, Z., Ngoc, L. N. T., Kang, H. (2022). ALKBH8B, a putative RNA demethylase, plays a role in the response of arabidopsis to salt stress and abscisic acid. J. Plant Biol. 65 (4), 319–330. doi: 10.1007/s12374-022-09351-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kierzek, E., Kierzek, R. (2003). The thermodynamic stability of RNA duplexes and hairpins containing N6-alkyladenosines and 2-methylthio-N6-alkyladenosines. Nucleic Acids Res. 31 (15), 4472–4480. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, D., Langmead, B., Salzberg, S. L. (2015). HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12 (4), 357–360. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Wang, X., Li, C., Hu, S., Yu, J., Song, S. (2014). Transcriptome-wide N6-methyladenosine profiling of rice callus and leaf reveals the presence of tissue-specific competitors involved in selective mRNA modification. RNA Biol. 11 (9), 1180–1188. doi: 10.4161/rna.36281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, P., Wang, S. A., Ma, L., Li, L., et al. (2015). Comprehensive transcriptome analysis discovers novel candidate genes related to leaf color in a Lagerstroemia indica yellow leaf mutant. Genes Genom. 37, 851–863. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.132

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liang, Z., Riaz, A., Chachar, S., Ding, Y., Du, H., Gu, X. (2020). Epigenetic modifications of mRNA and DNA in plants. Mol. Plant 13 (1), 14–30. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lichtenthaler, H. K., Wellburn, A. R. (1983). Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Analysis 11 (5), 591–592. doi: 10.1042/bst0110591

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Linder, B., Grozhik, A. V., Olarerin-George, A. O., Meydan, C., Mason, C. E., Jaffrey, S. R. (2015). Single-nucleotide-resolution mapping of m6A and m6Am throughout the transcriptome. Nat. Methods 12 (8), 767–772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3453

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Livak, K. J., Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–ΔΔCT method. Methods 25 (4), 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luo, J. H., Wang, Y., Wang, M., Zhang, L. Y., Peng, H. R., Zhou, Y. Y., et al. (2020). Natural variation in RNA m6A methylation and its relationship with translational status. Plant Physiol. 182 (1), 332–344. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00987

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martin, M. (2011). Cut adapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads, embnet. 17, 10-12. EMBnet J. 17 (1), 10–12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martínez-Pérez, M., Apariciom, F., López-Gresa, M. P., Bellés, J. M., Sánchez-Navarro, J. A., Pallás, V. (2017). Arabidopsis m6A demethylase activity modulates viral infection of a plant virus and the m6A abundance in its genomic RNAs. PNAS 114 (40), 10755–10760. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703139114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, J., Lu, Z. L., Liu, H., Zhang, L., Zhang, S. W., Chen, Y. D., et al. (2014). A protocol for RNA methylation differential analysis with MeRIP-seq data and exomePeak R/Bioconductor package. Methods 69 (3), 274–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.06.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meyer, K. D., Saletore, Y., Zumbo, P., Elemento, O., Mason, C. E., Jaffrey, S. R. (2012). Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3' UTRs and near stop codons. Cell 149 (7), 1635–1646. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meyer, K. D., Jaffrey, S. R. (2014). The dynamic epitranscriptome: N6?methyladenosine and gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15 (5), 313–326. doi: 10.1038/nrm3785

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miao, Z., Zhang, T., Qi, Y., Song, J., Han, Z., Ma, C. (2020). Evolution of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methylome mediated by genomic duplication. Plant Physiol. 182 (1), 345–360. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00323

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., Smyth, G. K. (2010). edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roundtree, I. A., Luo, G. Z., Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Zhou, T., Cui, Y., et al. (2017). YTHDC1 mediates nuclear export of N6-methyladenosine methylated mRNAs. ELife 6, e31311. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31311.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scutenaire, J., Deragon, J. M., Jean, V., Benhamed, M., Raynaud, C., Favory, J. J., et al. (2018). The YTH domain protein ECT2 is an m6A reader required for normal trichome branching in arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 30 (5), 986–1005. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00854

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shao, Y., Wong, C. E., Shen, L., Yu, H. (2021). N6-methyladenosine modification underlies messenger RNA metabolism and plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 63, 102047. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, L., Liang, Z., Gu, X., Chen, Y., Teo, Z. W., Hou, X., et al. (2016). N6-methyladenosine RNA modification regulates shoot stem cell fate in arabidopsis. Dev. Cell. 38 (2), 186–200. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, H., Wang, X., Lu, Z., Zhao, B. S., Ma, H., Hsu, P. J., et al. (2017). YTHDF3 facilitates translation and decay of N6-methyladenosine-modified RNA. Cell Res. 27 (3), 315–328. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, H., Wei, J., He, C. (2019). Where, when, and how: context-dependent functions of RNA methylation writers, readers, and erasers. Mol. Cell 74 (4), 640–650. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, P., Yang, J., Wang, C., Lu, Q., Shi, L., Tayier, S., et al. (2021). Arabidopsis N6-methyladenosine reader CPSF30-l recognizes FUE signals to control polyadenylation site choice in liquid-like nuclear bodies. Mol. Plant 14 (4), 571–587. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.01.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, T., Fu, L., Kuang, L., Chen, D., Zhang, G., Shen, Q., et al. (2022). Transcriptome-wide m6A methylation profile reveals regulatory networks in roots of barley under cadmium stress. J. Hazard. Mater. 423, 127140. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127140

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, J., Chen, S., Jia, G. (2023). Detection, regulation, and functions of RNA N6 methyladenosine modification in plants. Plant Commun. 4, 100546. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5776-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trapnell, C., Roberts, A., Goff, L., Pertea, G., Kim, D., Kelley, D. R., et al. (2012). Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7 (3), 562–578. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Lu, Z., Gomez, A., Hon, G. C., Yue, Y., Han, D., et al. (2014). N6 -methyladenosine dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature 505 (7481), 117–120. doi: 10.1038/nature12730

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Wang, C., Wang, D., Wang, Y. (2014). Molecular characterization and transcript profiling of NAC genes in response to abiotic stress in Tamarix hispida. Tree Genet. Genomes 10 (1), 157–171. doi: 10.1007/s11295-013-0672-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Zhao, B. S., Boxuan, S., Roundtree, I. A., Lu, Z. K., Han, D. L., et al. (2015). N6-methyladenosine modulates messenger RNA translation efficiency. Cell 161 (6), 1388–1399. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, N., Zhu, T., Lu, N., Wang, Z., Yang, G., Wang, J., et al. (2019). Quantitative phosphoproteomic and physiological analyses provide insights into the formation of the variegated leaf in Catalpa fargesii. IJMS 20 (8), 1895. doi: 10.3390/ijms20081895

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Zhu, T., Ma, W., Wang, N., Qu, G., Zhang, S., et al. (2018). Genome-wide analysis of long non-coding RNAs in Catalpa bungei and their potential function in floral transition using high-throughput sequencing. BMC Genet. 19 (1), 1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12863-018-0671-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, L. H., Song, P., Wang, Y., Lu, Z., Tang, Q., Yu, Q., et al. (2018). The m6A reader ECT2 controls trichome morphology by affecting mRNA stability in arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 30 (5), 968–985. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00934

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, Z., Zhang, X., He, B., Diao, L., Sheng, S., Wang, J., et al. (2007). A chlorophyll-deficient rice mutant with impaired chlorophyllide esterification in chlorophyll biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 145 (1), 29–40. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.100321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, W., Adhikari, S., Dahal, U., Chen, Y. S., Hao, Y. J., Sun, B. F., et al. (2016). Nuclear m6A reader YTHDC1 regulates mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell. 61 (6), 507–519. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Hsu, P. J., Chen, Y. S., Yang, Y. G. (2018). Dynamic transcriptomic m6 a decoration: writers, erasers, readers and functions in RNA metabolism. Cell Res. 28 (6), 616–624. doi: 10.1038/s41422-018-0040-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, W., Meng, J., Liu, J., Ding, B., Tan, T., Wei, Q., et al. (2020). The N1-methyladenosine methylome of petunia mRNA. Plant Physiol. 183 (4), 1710–1724. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, G., Lv, Z., Diao, S., Liu, H., Duan, A., He, C., et al. (2021). Unique features of the m6A methylome and its response to drought stress in sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides linn.). RNA Biol. 18 (sup2), 794–803. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2021.1992996

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, C., Samanta, D., Lu, H., Bullen, J. W., Zhang, H., Chen, I., et al. (2016). Hypoxia induces the breast cancer stem cell phenotype by HIF-dependent and ALKBH5-mediated m6A-demethylation of NANOG mRNA. PNAS 113 (14), E2047–E2056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.160288311

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, F., Zhang, Y. C., Liao, J. Y., Yu, Y., Zhou, Y. F., Feng, Y. Z., et al. (2019). The subunit of RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase OsFIP regulates early degeneration of microspores in rice. PloS Genet. 15 (5), e1008120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, B. S., Roundtree, I. A., He, C. (2017). Post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18 (1), 31–42. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Yang, Y., Sun, B. F., Shi, Y., Yang, X., Xiao, W., et al. (2014). FTO-dependent demethylation of N6-methyladenosine regulates mRNA splicing and is required for adipogenesis. Cell Res. 24 (12), 1403–1419. doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, H., Camacho, L., Wee, E., Batoko, H., Legen, J., Leaver, C. J., et al. (2005). A rab-e GTPase mutant acts downstream of the rab-d subclass in biosynthetic membrane traffic to the plasma membrane in tobacco leaf epidermis. Plant Cell. 17 (7), 2020–2036. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.031112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, H., Li, S., Zhang, X., Sui, N. (2020). Functional implications of active N6-methyladenosine in plants. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00291

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, L., Tang, R., Li, X., Tian, S., Li, B., Qin, G. (2021). N6-methyladenosine RNA modification regulates strawberry fruit ripening in an ABA-dependent manner. Genome Biol. 22 (1), 1–32. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02385-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, L., Tian, S., Qin, G. (2019). RNA Methylomes reveal the m6A-mediated regulation of DNA demethylase gene SlDML2 in tomato fruit ripening. Genome Biol. 20 (1), 1–23. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1771-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Catalpa fargesii, CfALKBH5, Epitranscriptomics, RNA methylation, N6-methyladenosine, yellow-green leaf

Citation: Zhang Y, Wang J, Ma W, Lu N, Fu P, Yang Y, Zhao L, Hu J, Qu G and Wang N (2023) Transcriptome-wide m6A methylation in natural yellow leaf of Catalpa fargesii. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1167789. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1167789

Received: 16 February 2023; Accepted: 30 May 2023;
Published: 19 June 2023.

Edited by:

Yi Zheng, Beijing University of Agriculture, China

Reviewed by:

Xu Xiaozhao, China Agricultural University, China
Hunseung Kang, Chonnam National University, Republic of Korea

Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Wang, Ma, Lu, Fu, Yang, Zhao, Hu, Qu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Nan Wang, nanwang2019@caf.ac.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.