Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 06 January 2023
Sec. Plant Breeding
This article is part of the Research Topic Sorghum and Pearl Millet as Climate Resilient Crops for Food and Nutrition Security, Volume II View all 9 articles

Combining ability studies of grain Fe and Zn contents of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) in West Africa

  • 1Pearl Millet Breeding, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Niamey, Niger
  • 2West African Centre for Crop Improvement, College of Basic and Applied Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
  • 3Pigeon Pea Breeding, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India
  • 4Department of Rainfed Crop Production (DCP), Institute National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger, Maradi, Niger
  • 5HarvestPlus, Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia

Micronutrient malnutrition is a major challenge in Africa, where half a million children die each year because of lack of micronutrients in their food. Pearl millet is an important food and fodder crop for the people living in the Semi-Arid regions of West Africa. The present study was conducted to determine the stability, combining ability, and gene action conditions of the high level of Fe and Zn content in grain and selected agronomic traits. Hence, eight genotypes were selected based on the availability of grain Fe and Zn contents and crossed in a full diallel mating design. Progenies from an 8 × 8 diallel mating along with the parents were evaluated in an alpha lattice design with three replications in three locations for two years. The parental lines Jirani, LCIC 9702 and MORO, had positive significant general combining ability (GCA) effects for grain Fe concentration, while Jirani and MORO had positive significant GCA effects for grain Zn concentration. For the specific combining ability (SCA), among the 56 hybrids evaluated, only the hybrids LCIC 9702 × Jirani and MORO × ZANGO had positive significant SCA effects for grain Fe concentration across locations, and for grain Zn concentration, the hybrids Gamoji × MORO, LCIC 9702 × Jirani, and ICMV 167006 × Jirani had positive significant SCA effects. The reciprocal effects were significant for grain Zn concentration, grain yield, flowering time, plant height, test weight, and downy mildew incidence, suggesting that the choice of a female or male parent is critical in hybrid production. Grain Fe and Zn concentration, flowering time, plant height, panicle length, panicle girth, panicle compactness, and downy mildew incidence were found to be predominantly under additive gene action, while grain yield and test weight were predominantly under non-additive gene action. A highly positive correlation was found between grain Fe and Zn concentrations, which implies that improving grain Fe trait automatically improves the grain Zn content. The stability analysis revealed that the hybrid ICMV 167006 × Jirani was the most stable and high-yielding with a high level of grain Fe and Zn micronutrients.

Introduction

Micronutrient malnutrition affects around 2 billion people worldwide, and most countries in West Africa have serious levels of hunger (Global Hunger Index, 2019). The people living in West and Central Africa (WCA) do not have access to nutritionally balanced food products. As a result, they suffer from micronutrient malnutrition or “hidden hunger” (Badu‐Apraku and Fakorede, 2017). Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) is the sixth most important cereal globally, and it is the staple food for the people living in drought-prone areas of Africa. It is a drought-tolerant cereal predominantly grown in the semi-arid regions of West Africa, where other cereals fail to produce. The diet in West Africa is mostly based on pearl millet. This cereal occupies a large proportion of the cereals grown and consumed because of its hardiness and ability to withstand high arid temperatures. In addition, farmers grow pearl millet because it is the most reliable cereal crop cultivated under short growing seasons and low rainfall conditions (Taylor, 2004; Uzoma et al., 2010; Srivastava et al., 2022). The drought and heat-tolerant features of pearl millet make this crop a priority crop for fighting hunger in WCA.

In West Africa, the presence of highly variable environments, nutrient-poor soils, and abiotic and biotic constraints affect the performance of cultivars (Sattler et al., 2019; Sharma et al., 2021). There are several biotic and abiotic constraints affecting the grain yields in pearl millet. Downy mildew (Sclerospora graminicola), millet head miner (Heliocheilous albipunctella), striga (Striga hermonthica), drought, and high temperatures are the major biotic and abiotic constraints affecting the grain yields of pearl millet. In addition, the pearl millet varieties grown in Sub-Saharan Africa are mostly OPVs with limited yield potential. In 2020, pearl millet was grown on 13.75 m ha in West Africa, which was 42.83% of the total pearl millet area grown in the world and has recorded lower grain yields of 740 kg/ha, which is far less than the world average yield based on FAO statistics (FAOSTAT, 2020). In Niger during the 2021 rainy season, pearl millet yields were estimated at 349 kg/ha (National Institute of Statistics in Niger, 2022). However, in India, due to the rapid introduction of hybrids in all regions that replaced the cultivation of landraces and OPVs, pearl millet production shifted from 288 kg/ha in 1950–1951 to 1,255 kg/ha in 2014–2015 (Charyulu et al., 2016). In 2020, productivity of 1,243 kg/ha was reported (Sanjana Reddy et al., 2021). Therefore, it is important to identify the best-yielding genotypes that display high stability for grain yield, Fe, and Zn content across the region.

Many studies have shown the positive impact of the consumption of biofortified crops and the results of these studies were also similar to iron fortification and supplementation strategies to fight against hidden hunger (Kodkany et al., 2013; Saltzman et al., 2013; Haas, 2014; Finkelstein et al., 2015; Foley et al., 2021). Recently, Africa’s first biofortified pearl millet variety, CHAKTI, was released in Niger (Jayashree and Meyer, 2018). This variety is gaining importance in the farming communities in Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso, and Senegal because of its extra early maturity, high yield, and high grain Fe and Zn content (Mavindidze, 2020). Efforts are underway at the ICRISAT and National Agricultural Research systems (NARs) breeding programs in West Africa to acquire genetic information on these traits for pearl millet hybrid breeding programs to efficiently develop improved pearl millet varieties with high grain Fe and Zn content. However, there is only limited information on genetic variability and heterosis for grain Fe and Zn content in West African pearl millet varieties.

The use of stable hybrids rich in grain Fe and Zn concentration and with high grain yield, which correspond to the needs of farmers, is an appropriate and sustainable strategy for resource-poor farmers to alleviate hidden hunger in Niger. Hence, the present study was undertaken to assess the variability and heritability of grain Fe and Zn concentrations, grain yield, flowering time, panicle length, and plant height and selected agronomic traits in pearl millet, determine the combining abilities, estimate the heterosis, and determine the stability of pearl millet hybrids for high grain Fe and Zn concentration and high grain yield.

Materials and methods

Field evaluation

Field evaluations were performed at three locations at the ICRISAT Sadoré (13°14’40.66”N 2°16’38.92”E) research station, the Institute National de la Recherche Agricole du Niger (INRAN)-Tara (11°55’24.1”N 3°20’03.5”E) research station, and the INRAN-Maradi (13°27’43.2”N 7°06’32.9”E) research station in Niger during the 2017 and 2018 cropping seasons.

Genetic materials

The experimental material consists of diverse parents selected from previous information on the grain Fe and Zn contents, agronomic, and morphological traits. It consisted of the two landraces Gamoji and MORO and six open-pollinated varieties (OPVs) ICMV IS 89305, Jirani, LCIC 9702, ICMV 167006, and ZANGO (Table 1). The genotypes CHAKTI, GB 8735, ICMV IS 92222, SOSAT-C88, ICMV 167005, and ICMV IS 99001, were used as controls for this trial. To generate, under the field conditions, enough seeds for the multilocation and multiyear trials, each parental line was sown in a four-row plot (female) followed by the other parental lines in a two-row plot (pollen source), such as P1 (four rows)–P2 (two rows); P1 (four rows)–P3 (two rows); P1 (four rows)–P4 (two rows); P8 (four rows)–P6 (two rows); and P8 (four rows)–P7 (two rows). In addition, two nurseries used as pollen sources were planted at two different dates (10-day intervals), composed of all eight parental lines sown each in an eight-row plot (seven hills per row). An average of 19 crosses for each combination was performed, which allowed the generation of 28 direct crosses and 28 reciprocals.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Parental lines and checks used in the 8x8 full diallel.

The 56 crosses, along with the parents and selected checks, were sown in an alpha lattice design in three replications, across three locations. The test material was sown in two rows of 4.8 m in length each, with a distance of 0.75 m between the rows. In addition, there was spacing between the hills of 0.8 m i.e., seven hills per row. The test plots were thinned to two plants per hill 12 days after emergence (DAE). A basal application of mineral fertilizer at 100 kg/ha was carried out during the field preparation. Weeding of the test plots was carried out when necessary. The test plots were micro-dosed with urea (3 g per hill) at 30 DAE. The trial was grown under rain-fed conditions and no external irrigation was provided. Normal agronomic practices were followed during the growth of the trial.

Data collection

Data was collected for downy mildew incidence (DM), flowering time in days (FLO), plant height in cm (Pht), panicle length in cm (PL), panicle girth (PG), panicle compactness (Pcom), thousand seed weight in g (1000 sdw), grain yield in t/ha (GY) following the descriptor IBPGR/ICRISAT et al., 1993, the grain Fe content (GFe) and grain Zn content (GZn) in ppm were measured using the ED-XRF (energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence) spectrometer at the ICRISAT-Sadoré research station. The ED-XRF conditions used for the analysis were as suggested by Paltridge et al. (2012).

Data analysis

Diallel analysis was carried out based on method I and model 1 of Griffing (1956), and the GGE biplot analysis was performed using Plant Breeding Tools (PBTools) version 1.3 (IRRI, 2013–2020). To determine the significance of the general combining ability (GCA), specific combining ability (SCA), and reciprocal combining ability (RCA), the t-test was used according to Griffing (1956). To determine the relative importance of GCA and SCA, the predictability ratio was calculated according to Baker (1978). The performance per se of parental lines and hybrids and the interrelation among grain Fe and Zn contents and agronomic traits were analyzed using Fonseca software (VSN International, 2015). Mid-parent heterosis and better-parent heterosis were calculated following Fonseca and Patterson (1968). The significance of F1 hybrids from mid-parent and better-parent heterosis was determined using a t-test (Wynne et al., 1970; Iqbal et al., 2009). Narrow and broad sense heritabilities were calculated according to Teklewold and Becker (2005).

Results

Performance per se of parents and hybrids

The mean performance of grain Fe concentration over the locations and years among the parents ranged from 36.0 ppm (HKP) to 56.6 ppm (Jirani), while among the hybrids (direct crosses and reciprocal crosses) the mean ranged from 35 ppm (HKP × ZANGO) to 57.5 ppm (Jirani × LCIC 9702) (Table 2), whereas the mean of grain Zn concentration among the parents and hybrids was 37.4 ppm. The average grain Zn concentration among the parental lines varied from 33.5 ppm (HKP) to 49.0 ppm (Jirani) and among the hybrids from 30.9 ppm (HKP × ICMV 167006) to 49.0 ppm (Jirani × LCIC 9702). For grain yield, the hybrids (direct and reciprocal crosses) were more productive compared to the parents across the six environments. The grain yield among the parents ranged from 0.6 t/ha for LCIC 9702 to 1.1 t/ha for ICMV IS 89305, while among the hybrids the average grain yield varied from 1.2 t/ha for MORO × Jirani to 2.6 t/ha for ICMV IS 89305 × ICMV 167006. Among the top seven hybrids, the hybrid ICMV 167006 × HKP was the lowest yielding (with 2.3 t/ha) and the hybrid ICMV IS 89305 × ICMV 167006 was the highest yielding genotype (with 2 t/ha). All the top seven hybrids have the genotype ICMV 167006 as a parent. Among the 64 genotypes (eight parents and 58 hybrids), the earliest genotype was the hybrid Jirani × LCIC 9702 which flowered after 48.7 days, while the parental line ICMV 167006 was the latest genotype to flower after 62.2 days. For plant height, the mean performance across environments was 209.9 cm. In the pooled analysis, the mean plant height among the parents varied from 162.1 cm for Jirani to 216.1 cm for ICMV 167006, and among the hybrids, it varied from 173.4 cm for LCIC 9702 × Jirani to 238.5 cm for ICMV 167006 × HKP. Among the five tallest hybrids, four hybrids have the genotype ICMV 167006 in their parentage, while the five shortest hybrids have Jirani as a parent. The panicle length across sites ranged from 22.6 cm for Jirani to 51.3 cm for HKP among the parents, while for the hybrids it ranged from 24.8 cm for Jirani × LCIC 9702 to 55.8 cm for ZANGO × ICMV IS 89305. The variation of panicle girth across environments was similar among parents and hybrids. Among the parents, it ranged from 6.7 cm for MORO to 10.2 cm for Gamoji, while among the hybrids it ranged from 6.7 cm for ICMV 167006 × MORO to 10 cm for Gamoji × LCIC 9702. Gamoji and Jirani both had a panicle girth across environments that were above the overall mean of 8.1 cm. The compactness of the panicle was scored from loose (3) to very compact (1). Among the parental lines, the genotypes ICMV 167006 and MORO had the best compact panicle, and one or both genotypes were also in the parentage of the top ten hybrids with very compact panicles. Across sites, the parental line Gamoji had the loosest panicle. For test weight, the mean performance of the parents over the environments ranged from 9.2 g (ICMV 167006) to 11.1 g (LCIC 9702) in the parental lines, while among hybrids it ranged from 9.9 g (ICMV 167006 × MORO) to 12.3 g (HKP × Jirani). The downy mildew incidence was the lowest for the hybrid ICMV IS 89305 × ZANGO (2%) while it was the highest for the hybrid HKP × LCIC 9702 (27.7%).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Pooled performance per se of grain iron and zinc content and agronomic traits of pearl millet genotypes (8 parents and 56 hybrids).

Estimates of variance and genetic variance components

The pooled analysis of variance indicated a highly significant difference (P <0.01) among environments for all studied characters, except for grain Fe concentration, which was significant at P <0.05 (Table 3). Similarly, for crosses (parents, direct crosses, and reciprocal crosses), all studied characters showed highly significant (P <0.01) differences. There were significant differences among general combining abilities for all traits except for downy mildew incidence, which was non-significant. For grain Fe concentration, panicle length, panicle girth, and compactness of panicle reciprocal effects were non-significant, while for grain Zn concentration and downy mildew incidence maternal effects were significant (P <0.05), and consequently reciprocal effects were significant for these traits. The maternal and non-maternal effects were both significant for flowering time, plant height, and test weight, whereas for grain yield only the non-maternal effects were significant at P <0.05.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 Mean squares of crosses and combining ability effects of grain iron and zinc density and agronomic traits evaluated in 56 F1 families and 8 parents combined from six environments (three locations and two rainy seasons).

The cross–environment interactions were significant for all traits apart from panicle length, panicle girth, and test weight. The mean squares of the general combining ability × environment (GCA × E) interaction were highly significant (P <0.001) for all traits except for panicle girth (significant at P <0.05) and for panicle length and test weight (which were non significant). The specific combining ability × environment (SCA × E) interaction was non-significant for all traits except for flowering time, plant height, and grain yield. For the interaction of reciprocal effects and environment (REC × E) only flowering time was significant at P <0.05, and the interaction of non-maternal effects and environment (NONM × E) was significant at P <0.01.

The overall variance due to general combining ability (Ơ2GCA) was predominantly higher than the variance of specific combining ability (Ơ2SCA) for all traits studied, except for grain yield and test weight (Table 4 and Figure 1). For grain Fe concentration, the GCA variance was 15 times higher than the SCA variance, while for Zn grain concentration, the GCA variance was around seven times higher than the SCA variance. For grain yield and test weight, the SCA variance was greater than the GCA variance by 16 and 20 times. The predictability ratio, was close to 1 for grain Fe and Zn concentration, flowering time, panicle length, and panicle girth. The predictability ratio was very low for grain yield (0.13) and test weight (0.07). The narrow sense heritability and broad sense heritability were very high for grain Fe and Zn concentrations, flowering time, panicle length, panicle girth, and panicle compactness. However, the narrow-sense heritability was low for grain yield and test weight.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4 Estimates of variance and genetic variance components.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Relative proportions of GCA and SCA for gain iron content (GFe), grain zinc content (GZn), and selected agronomic traits in an 8 x 8 full diallel analysis, averaged over six environments (three locations and two rainy seasons) (GFe, Grain iron density; GZn, Grain zinc density; FLO, flowering time; Pht, plant height; PL, panicle length; PG, panicle girth; GY, grain yield; Pcom, panicle compactness; 1000sdw, thousand seed weight, and DM, downy mildew incidence).

General combining ability

The eight pearl millet parental lines showed different behaviors in this study, carried out in three locations and two rainy seasons (Table 5). For grain Fe concentration across sites, only Jirani, MORO, and LCIC 9702 had, in descending order, the positive and significant general combining ability for grain Fe content. On the other hand, for grain Zn concentration, only Jirani and MORO had positive significant GCA. Out of the eight parental lines, three showed negative and significant effects, whereas five exhibited positive and significant effects for flowering time. For plant height, positive significant general combining ability was observed for ZANGO, HKP, ICMV 167006, and ICMV IS 89305. However, significant negative GCA effects were observed for Jirani, MORO, and LCIC 9702. Similar trends were observed for panicle length except for ICMV 167006 and Gamoji, which had respectively negative and positive significant GCA effects. For panicle girth, only the parental lines Gamoji followed by LCIC 9702 had positive GCA. The rest of the parents had either a negative significant or non-significant GCA. Across sites, only ICMV 167006 had significant positive general combining ability effects for grain yield. Concerning panicle compactness, the parental lines ICMV 167006 and MORO had negative significant general combining ability effects. The mean squares of the parents’ LCIC 9702, Gamoji, and HKP were positive and significant for the test weight. For downy mildew incidence, only parent strains ICMV IS 89305 and ZANGO had negative significant GCA effects.

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5 General combining effects of 8 pearl millet parents over three locations evaluated in two rainy seasons using Griffing's method 1.

Specific combining ability

Significant positive and negative SCA effects were observed for all the traits of interest among the direct crosses and reciprocal crosses (Table 6). For grain Fe concentration, only the hybrids LCIC 9702 × Jirani and MORO × ZANGO exhibited positive significant specific combining ability. As for grain Zn concentration, positive significant SCA effects were observed for the hybrids Gamoji × MORO, LCIC 9702 × Jirani, and ICMV 167006 × Jirani. For grain yield, the specific combining ability (SCA) varied from −4.1 (Jirani × MORO) to 5.1 (LCIC 9702 × ICMV 167006). Positive significant SCA effects for grain yield were observed for seven crosses, and among these crosses, ICMV 167006 was the parent of five hybrids. For flowering time, panicle compactness, and downy mildew incidence, respectively, nine hybrids, six hybrids, and three hybrids had negative significant SCA effects, while the best SCA effects were respectively recorded for the hybrids MORO × Jirani, LCIC 9702 × MORO, and HKP × LCIC 9702. In contrast, for test weight, plant height, panicle length, and panicle girth, positive significant SCA effects were observed for twelve hybrids, seven hybrids, three hybrids, and two hybrids.

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6 Specific combining effects of 28 pearl millet direct and reciprocal crosses over 3 locations evaluated in two rainy seasons (2017 & 2018) using Griffing's method 1.

Heterosis

For grain Fe and Zn concentration assessed across environments, no positive significant mid-parent heterosis or better-parent heterosis was observed for these traits among the 56 hybrids (Supplementary Table 1). By contrast, grain yield showed the most heterosis and heterobeltiosis. For grain yield, 22 hybrids had positive significant mid-parent heterosis that ranged from 103.9 to 284.4, whereas for better parent heterosis, nine hybrids had significant estimates that varied from 113.3 to 236.5. The hybrids resulting from the direct and reciprocal cross between the parental lines ICMV 167006 and LCIC 9702 had the highest positive and significant heterosis and heterobeltiosis.

Interrelation among grain iron and zinc concentration and agronomic traits

The interrelation between grain Fe concentration and grain Zn concentration across environments was the most positive and highly significant correlation (P <0.01) among parental lines and hybrids, with a coefficient of 0.63 and 0.81 (Table 7). For parents and hybrids, grain Fe concentration displayed a low to moderately significant and negative correlation with flowering time, plant height, and panicle length. Only hybrids showed a low significant and negative correlation between grain Fe content and grain yield. The grain Zn concentration was significantly negatively correlated with plant height (r = -0.14**, -0.42** for rainy season 2017 and 2018, respectively), panicle length (r = -0.10*, -0.37**), and panicle compactness (r = −0.32**).

TABLE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Table 7 Correlation among grain iron density (GFe), grain zinc density (GZn), and selected agronomic traits in hybrids of pearl millet from a full 8x8 diallel study pooled across 3 locations during 2 rainy seasons.

A low positive and highly significant correlation (r = 0.31**) was found for panicle length and flowering time during the rainy season 2017. Plant height was positively significantly correlated with panicle length (r = 0.10*, 0.51**) and grain yield (r = 0.23**, 0.59**). The panicle length had a low positive significant correlation with panicle girth (r = 0.12**, 0.25**), grain yield (r = 0.23**, 0.18**), and test weight (r =0.12**, 0.24**). For panicle girth, a positive correlation with grain yield (r = 0.21**, 0.10*), panicle compactness (r = 0.32**, during rainy season 2018), and test weight (r = 0.24**, 0.18**) was recorded. A significant positive correlation (r = 0.31**, 0.38**) was registered for grain yield and test weight.

Stability analysis for grain yield

Stability analysis for grain yield, with respect to grain yield, the GGE biplot analysis of 56 hybrids (direct and reciprocal crosses), eight parents, and six checks across six environments revealed that the principal component axis 1 (PC1) explained 68.4% of total variation and the principal component axis 2 (PC2) explained 16.2% of the total variation, with both PC1 and PC2 describing 84.6% of the total variation for grain yield (Figure 2 and Table 8). The most desirable genotypes for grain yield in descending order were G25 (ICMV IS 89305 × ICMV 167006), G34 (ICMV 167006 × LCIC 9702), G47 (LCIC 9702 × ICMV 167006), G18 (HKP × ICMV 167006), G11 (Gamoji × ICMV167006), G14 (Gamoji × MORO), G54 (MORO × ICMV 167006), G31 (ICMV 167006 × HKP), G42 (Jirani × MORO), G32 (ICMV 167006 × ICMV IS 89305), and G51 (MORO × Gamoji). Among these genotypes, G31 (ICMV 167006 × HKP) was the most stable.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Polygon views of “which-won-where” of the GGE biplot of grain yield of 56 hybrids, 8.

TABLE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Table 8 Information on pearl millet genotypes and the environments for the Figure 2, 3.

The hybrids G11, G18, and G14 were the vertex genotypes in the sector that included the environments E1, E3, E5, and E6 (respectively Gaya Rainy Season 2017, Maradi Rainy Season 2017, Sadore Rainy Season 2017, and Sadore Rainy Season 2018). The genotype G25 was the vertex of the sector containing E2 (Gaya Rainy Season 2018), and the genotypes (G34 and G47) were the vertex genotypes in the sector that contained the environment E4 or Maradi Rainy Season 2018 (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Polygon views of “which-won-where” of the GGE biplot of grain yield of 56 hybrids, 8.

Discussion 

Parents and hybrids performance per se

Based on the mean performance across all six environments, high variability of grain Fe and Zn concentration among the parents and hybrids was found in the present study. This suggests the possibility of improving these traits through plant breeding. Similar findings were reported by Rai et al. (2013); Rai et al. (2014); Rai et al. (2015), that there is a large variability in grain Fe and Zn content in pearl millet germplasm and breeding materials. The varieties with high grain Fe and Zn concentration (Jirani, LCIC 9702, CHAKTI, GB 8735) are all of the Iniari parentage. The Iniari germplasm from Togo, Benin, Ghana, and Burkina Faso has been extensively used in pearl millet programs due to its early maturity and large seed size, and it has been found to be the best source of Fe and Zn content in pearl millet (Andrews and Kumar, 1996; Rai et al., 2008; Velu et al., 2011; Rai et al., 2012; Govindaraj et al., 2019).

Estimates of variance and genetic variance components

For grain Fe and Zn concentration, the relatively high proportions of GCA over SCA, the high ratio of additive and dominance variance, and the predictability ratio close to unity (0.97 for iron and 0.93 for zinc) suggest that these traits are predominantly under the control of additive gene action. This is in line with previous studies that reported these traits being under additive gene action in pearl millet (Velu, 2006; Rai et al., 2007; Govindaraj et al., 2013; Kanatti et al., 2014; Kanatti et al., 2016; Pujar et al., 2022). With respect to the agronomic traits, flowering time, plant height, panicle length, panicle girth, panicle compactness, and downy mildew incidence had a high predictability ratio, implying that these traits are under additive genetic control. Several studies have reported these traits being under additive gene action (Izge et al., 2007; Kanfany et al., 2018; Subbulakshmi et al., 2019). However, grain yield and test weights had very low predictability ratios of 0.13 and 0.07, respectively, indicating non-additive gene action to be predominant in the inheritance of these traits.

A high narrow sense heritability was found for grain Fe concentration (82%) and grain zinc concentration (78%) across the environments, which indicate that both grain Fe and Zn concentration are highly heritable. Previous studies on pearl millet have reported a high narrow-sense heritability for grain Fe and Zn concentrations ranging from 65% to 86% for both micronutrients (Kanatti et al., 2016). To sum up, these findings might imply that genetic improvement for grain Fe and Zn concentrations can be effective in pearl millet.

The reciprocal effects were significant for grain zinc content, grain yield, flowering time, plant height, test weight, and downy mildew incidence, which suggests that the choice of female or male parent is critical to improving these traits in order to avoid missing potential good hybrids. For instance, the top cross hybrid Jirani × LCIC 9702 that had the highest grain Fe and Zn concentration was a reciprocal cross. The partitioning of the reciprocal effects into maternal and non-maternal effects for grain Fe and Zn content showed that there was a difference between maternal effects and non-maternal effects (significant only for grain zinc concentration) and the mean squares of maternal effects were higher than non-maternal effects for both grain Fe and Zn concentration, suggesting that maternal effects may influence to a certain extent the inheritance of these traits. In a study on maize, Chakraborti et al. (2011) reported significant reciprocal differences in the diallel crosses of quality protein maize for kernel Fe and Zn concentrations. For grain yield, only the non-maternal effects were significant in our experiment. These effects are mainly caused by the specific interactions between cytoplasm and nucleus genes (Zhang and Kang, 1997; Mahgoub, 2011).

General combining ability

The parental lines Jirani, MORO, and LCIC 9702 had, in descending order, superior positive GCA effects for grain Fe and Zn concentration, except LCIC 9702 had non-significant GCA effects for grain zinc concentration. Therefore, these parents contributed to higher grain Fe and Zn concentrations in their hybrids, making them the best general combiners to use in a biofortification program. For the agronomic traits, the best combiners were identified for plant height (ZANGO, HKP, ICMV 167006, and ICMV IS 89305), for panicle length (ZANGO, HKP, and ICMV IS 89305), for panicle girth (Gamoji and LCIC 9702), for grain yield (ICMV 167006), and for test weight (LCIC 9702, Gamoji, and HKP). For disease resistance, flowering time, and panicle compactness, the negative GCA effects are desired, thus the best combiners for a flowering time were Jirani, LCIC 9702, and MORO; for panicle compactness, they were ICMV 167006 and MORO; and for downy mildew incidence, ICMV IS 89305 and ZANGO. All these combiners are likely to contribute to favorable alleles in recurrent selection programs and can also be used as parents to develop synthetic populations.

Specific combining ability

For grain Fe and Zn concentration, respectively, only two crosses, LCIC 9702 × Jirani and MORO × ZANGO, and three crosses, Gamoji × MORO, LCIC 9702 × Jirani, and ICMV 167006 × Jirani displayed positive significant SCA effects. These crosses originated from high and high or low and high GCA effects parents and had good performance per se across sites. This is in line with Izge et al. (2007), who reported that hybrids that generally perform well exhibit significant SCA effects.

Heterosis

The absence of positive significant mid-parent heterosis and better parent heterosis among the 56 hybrids suggests that heterosis offers limited opportunities for the improvement of these micronutrients in pearl millet. Similar findings were reported in pearl millet (Govindaraj, 2011; Velu et al., 2011; Manwaring et al., 2016). Kanatti et al. (2014) showed that in order to efficiently breed pearl millet hybrids rich in iron and zinc, these micronutrients should first be incorporated into both parents. The high positive heterosis and heterobeltiosis recorded for many hybrids for grain yield and test weight suggest that heterosis can be exploited to breed for these traits in pearl millet hybrids.

Interrelation among grain iron and zinc concentration and agronomic traits

Among the parents and the hybrids, a strong positive correlation between grain Fe and Zn concentration was observed across environments, with respective values of 0.74 and 0.71 (P <0.001). These findings may suggest that grain Fe and Zn concentrations can be selected simultaneously in a single improved variety in biofortification breeding programs. These results are in line with previous studies that demonstrated a positive significant correlation between these traits (Velu et al., 2007; Gupta et al., 2009; Govindaraj, 2011; Kanatti et al., 2014). Both grain Fe and Zn concentrations were not correlated either with grain yield, panicle girth, and test weight or with downy mildew incidence in the parental lines. This means that parental lines having high grain Fe and Zn content could be developed without compromising on these traits. In contrast, in hybrids, grain iron had a highly significant and low negative correlation with grain yield. Many studies have reported that there was a negative relationship between grain yield and micronutrients (Banziger and Long, 2000; Reddy et al., 2005; Garvin et al., 2006; Jiang et al., 2007; Morgounov et al., 2007; Shi et al., 2008; Govindaraj et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Prasad, 2010; Anusha et al., 2021; Srungarapu et al., 2022). The decline in micronutrient concentration as grain yield increases is probably due to a dilution effect. Therefore, taking into account the weak negative correlation between grain yield and grain Fe content, it is possible to select high-yielding hybrids with high grain Fe content by selecting from larger segregating populations and progenies. Similarly, grain Fe and Zn content had a weak to moderate negative correlation with plant height and panicle length. These findings might also be partially explained by the effect of the sink. The more the plant and panicle size is increased, the more the dilution effect of minerals in the grain is important. However, these findings do not imply that by reducing plant height and panicle length, the grain will be richer in iron and zinc. The plant height, panicle length, panicle girth, and test weight had low positive correlations with grain yield across sites. This could be the effect of increased seed production that resulted in high grain yield. This is in line with previous reports on pearl millet (Govindaraj et al., 2009; Patil et al., 2018). Both seed set and long panicle were found to be correlated with the yield per unit area, which suggests that farmers will likely adopt an early variety with a long panicle and a good seed set for better yield (Gupta et al., 2015; Ausiku et al., 2020).

Stability analysis for grain yield

In this study, the best yielding stable hybrid across environments was the hybrid ICMV 167006 × HKP (average 2.3 t/ha). Among the parental lines, ICMV 167006 was the only one with positive significant GCA effects for grain yield. Moreover, in a study conducted by Bashir et al. (2014), they found that B9_Tabi (parent of ICMV 167006) had a high tillering capacity and was the most stable genotype under severe drought. Many authors reported that the high tillering capacity of pearl millet varieties increases their plasticity, under severe drought the secondary tillers are able to compensate for the losses of the main tillers (Vadez et al., 2012; Haussmann et al., 2012; Srivastava et al., 2022). The most stable high-yielding (1.9 t/ha) hybrid with high grain iron (48.9 ppm) and zinc (42.3 ppm) content was ICMV 167006 × Jirani (G33). This genotype should be extensively evaluated and promoted for commercialization to contribute to improved micronutrient nutrition and pearl millet production and productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa. The hybrids G11, G18, and G14 were the vertex genotypes in the sector that contained the environments E1, E3, E5, and E6, which means that they were the highest-yielding genotypes (winning genotypes) for this set of environments.

Conclusions

Based on the overall performance of the genotypes across environments, the most effective combiners (GCA) for grain Fe concentration (Jirani, MORO, and LCIC 9702) and for grain zinc concentration (Jirani and MORO) could be used to develop hybrids, synthetic varieties, and open-pollinated varieties by the National Agricultural Research Systems (NARS) and international research institutes. The absence of positive significant mid-parent and better parent heterosis for grain Fe and Zn in the hybrids generated from this study, indicates that heterosis offers limited opportunities for the improvement of these micronutrients in pearl millet. Therefore, to breed for these micronutrients, they should first be incorporated into both parents. However, for grain yield and test weight, the high positive heterosis and heterobeltiosis suggest that heterosis can be exploited to breed for these traits in pearl millet hybrids. This study revealed that grain Fe and Zn concentration, flowering time, plant height, panicle length, panicle girth, panicle compactness, and downy mildew incidence are predominantly under additive gene actions, while grain yield and test weight are predominantly under non-additive gene actions. As a result, the additive nature of the former traits provides scope for their improvement under recurrent selection, while the non-additive nature of grain yield and test weight justifies the initiation of a hybrid program in order to improve these traits by crossing progenitor combinations with superior SCA. The significance of reciprocal effects for grain zinc content, grain yield, flowering time, plant height, test weight, and downy mildew incidence indicated that the choice of which parent is female or male is critical in hybrid production when these traits are considered. In both parental lines and hybrids, a highly positive correlation was found between grain Fe concentration and grain Zn concentration. This suggests that these traits may be improved at the same time in a variety. The GGE biplot allowed the identification of the highest-yielding and most stable hybrid across environments, which was the hybrid ICMV 167006 × HKP (2.3 t/ha).

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

PG conceived the concept and provided the materials, helped in designing of the diallel, hybrid trial, data curation, and drafting the manuscript. BG conducted the research and statistical data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. IA conducted major part of Maradi location trials. RM helped in data analysis, edited the manuscript with critical suggestions. DD, MG and PT edited and made minor corrections and contributed for manuscript editions. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The present research was carried out with the financial support of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and the ECONET (Strive Masiyiwa) funding along with HarvestPlus Challenge Program and Gates Foundation.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank colleagues from the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid-Tropics (ICRISAT), ICRISAT Sahelian Center, Sadoré-Niger, and collaborators from INRAN (National agricultural research institutes in Niger) in Tara (Mr. Djibo and his team).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1027279/full#supplementary-material

References

Andrews, D. J., Kumar, K. A. (1996). Use of the West African pearl millet landrace iniadi in cultivar development. Plant Genet. Resour. Newsl. 105, 15–22.

Google Scholar

Anusha, G., Rao, D. S., Jaldhani, V., Beulah, P., Neeraja, C. N., Gireesh, C., et al. (2021). Grain fe and zn content, heterosis, combining ability and its association with grain yield in irrigated and aerobic rice. Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90038-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ausiku, A. P., Annandale, J. G., Steyn, J. M., Sanewe, A. J. (2020). Improving pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) productivity through adaptive management of water and nitrogen. Water. 12, 422. doi: 10.3390/w12020422

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Badu-Apraku, B., Fakorede, M. A. B. (2017). “Breeding of quality protein and provitamin a maize,” in Advances in genetic enhancement of early and extra-early maize for sub-Saharan Africa (Berlin, Germany: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64852-1_9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baker, R. J. (1978). Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Sci. 18, 533–536. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183X001800040001x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Banziger, M., Long, J. (2000). The potential for increasing the iron and zinc concentration of maize through plant breeding. Food Nutr. Bull. 20, 397–400. doi: 10.1177/156482650002100410

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bashir, E. M. A., Ali, A. M., Ismail, M. I., Parzies, H. K., Haussmann, B. I. G. (2014). Patterns of pearl millet genotype-by-environment interaction for yield performance and grain iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) concentrations in Sudan. Field Crops Res. 166, 82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chakraborti, M., Prasanna, B. M., Hossain, F., Singh, A. M. (2011). Evaluation of single cross quality protein maize (QPM) hybrids for kernel iron and zinc concentrations. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 71 (4), 312–319.

Google Scholar

Charyulu, D., Shyam, M., Bantilan, C., Borikar, S., Gupta, S.k., Rai, K. N. (2016). Pearl millet technology adoption and impact study in maharashtra (Telangana, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics). doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20271.74409

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

FAOSTAT (2020) Faostat: Food and agriculture data (Rome: FAOSTAT). Available at: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (Accessed Sep 13, 2022).

Google Scholar

Finkelstein, J. L., Mehta, S., Udipi, S. A., Ghugre, P. S., Luna, S. V., Wenger, M. J., et al. (2015). A randomized trial of iron-biofortified pearl millet in school children in India. J. Nutr. 145 (7), 1576–1581.10.3945/jn.114.208009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Foley, J. K., Michaux, K. D., Mudyahoto, B., Kyazike, L., Cherian, B., Kalejaiye, O., et al. (2021). Scaling up delivery of biofortified staple food crops globally: paths to nourishing millions. Food Nutr. Bull. 42 (1), 116–132.DOI: 10.1177/0379572120982501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fonseca, S., Patterson, F. L. (1968). Hybrid vigor in a seven parent diallel cross in common winter wheat (Triticum aestivum l.). Crop Sci. 8, 85–88. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183X000800010025x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garvin, D. F., Welch, R. M., Finley, J. W. (2006). Historical shifts in the seed mineral micronutrient concentration of US hard red winter wheat germplasm. J. Sci. Food Agric. 86 (13), 2213–2220. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2601

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Govindaraj, M. (2011). Genetics of grain iron and zinc concentration in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) r. br.) (India: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University). PHD thesis.

Google Scholar

Govindaraj, M., Rai, K. N., Cherian, B., Pfeiffer, W. H., Kanatti, A., Shivade, H. (2019). Breeding biofortified pearl millet varieties and hybrids to enhance millet markets for human nutrition. Agric. 9 (5), 106. doi: 10.3390/agriculture9050106

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Govindaraj, M., Rai, K. N., Shanmugasundaram, P., Dwivedi, S. L., Sahrawat, K. L., Muthaiah, A. R., et al. (2013). Combining ability and heterosis for grain iron and zinc densities in pearl millet. Crop Sci. 53, 507–517. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2012.08.0477

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Govindaraj, M., Selvi, B., Rajarathinam, S. (2009). Correlation studies for grain yield components and nutritional quality traits in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) r. br.) germplasm. World J. Agric. Res. 5 (6), 686–689.

Google Scholar

Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability relation to diallelcrossing systems. Division Plant Industry. C.S.I.R.O. Canberra A.C.T. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9, 463–493. doi: 10.1071/BI9560463

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, S. K., Rai, K. N., Singh, P., Ameta, V. L., Gupta, S. K., Jayalekha, A. K., et al. (2015). Seed set variability under high temperatures during flowering period in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum l. (R.) br.). Field Crops Res. 171, 41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.11.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, S. K., Velu, G., Rai, K. N., Sumalini, K. (2009). Association of grain iron and zinc content with grain yield and other traits in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) r. br.). J. Crop Improv. 36, 4–7.

Google Scholar

Haas, J. E. (2014). Efficacy and other nutrition evidence for iron crops. Biofortification Prog. briefs, 39–40.

Google Scholar

Haussmann, B. I. G., Rattunde, H. F. W., Weltzien-Rattunde, E., Traoré, P. S. C., vom Brocke, K., Parzies, H. K. (2012). Breeding strategies for adaptation of pearl millet and sorghum to climate variability and change in West Africa. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 198, 327–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2012.00526.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

IBPGR/ICRISAT, International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (1993). Descriptors for pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) r. br.). Rome, Italy: International bureau for plant genetic resources (IBPGR); and patancheru 502 324 (Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).

Google Scholar

Index, G. H (2019). “Global hunger index,” in Global hunger index-Peer-Reviewed annual publication designed to comprehensively measure and track hunger at the global, regional, and country levels Bonn: Welthungerhilfe; and Dublin: Concern Worldwide. Available at: https://www.globalhungerindex.org/india.html.

Google Scholar

International Rice Research Institute, IRRI (2013 - 2020). Available at: http://bbi.irri.org.

Google Scholar

Iqbal, M., Khan, K., Rahman, H., Khalil, I. H., Sher, H., Bakht, J. (2009). Heterosis formorphological traits in maize (Zea mays l). Maydica 55, 41–48.

Google Scholar

Izge, A. U., Kadams, A. M., Gungula, D. T. (2007). Heterosis and inheritance of quantitative characters in diallel crosses of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum l.). J. Agron. 6 (2), 278–285. doi: 10.3923/ja.2007.278.285

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jayashree, B., Meyer, C. (2018) Africa's first biofortified pearl millet variety aims to combat anaemia. Available at: https://www.icrisat.org/africas-first-biofortified-pearl-millet-variety-aims-to-combat-anaemia/.

Google Scholar

Jiang, S. L., Wu, J. G., Feng, Y., Yang, X. E., Shi, C. H. (2007). Correlation analysis of mineral element contents and quality traits in milled rice (Oryza stavia l.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 55 (23), 9608–9613. doi: 10.1021/jf071785w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kanatti, A., Rai, K. N., Radhika, K., Govindaraj, M. (2016). Genetic architecture of open-pollinated varieties of pearl millet for grain iron and zinc densities. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 76, 299–303. doi: 10.5958/0975-6906.2016.00045.6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kanatti, A., Rai, K. N., Radhika, K., Govindaraj, M., Sahrawat, K. L., Rao, A. S. (2014). Grain iron and zinc concentration in pearl millet: combining ability, heterosis and association with grain yield and grain size. Springerplus. 3, 763. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-763

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kanfany, G., Fofana, A., Tongoona, P., Danquah, A., Offei, S., Danquah, E., et al. (2018). Estimates of combining ability and heterosis for yield and its related traits in pearl millet inbred lines under downy mildew prevalent areas of Senegal. Int. J. Agron., 20181–12. doi: 10.1155/2018/3439090

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kodkany, B. S., Bellad, R. M., Mahantshetti, N. S., Westcott, J. E., Krebs, N. F., Kemp, J. F., et al. (2013). Biofortification of pearl millet with iron and zinc in a randomized controlled trial increases absorption of these minerals above physiologic requirements in young children. J. Nutr. 143, 1489–1493. doi: 10.3945/jn.113.176677

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahgoub, G. M. A. (2011). Partitioning of general and specific combining ability effects for estimating maternal and reciprocal effects. J. Agric. Sci. 3, 213–221. doi: 10.5539/jas.v3n2p213

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manwaring, H. R., Bligh, F., Yadav, R. (2016). The challenges and opportunities associated with biofortification of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) r. br.) with elevated levels of grain iron and zinc. Front. Plant Sci. 7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01944

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mavindidze, D. (2020) Iron pearl millet: Crop of the future for improving nutrition in sahel. Available at: https://www.harvestplus.org/knowledge-market/in-the-news/iron-pearl-millet-crop-future-improving-nutrition-sahel.

Google Scholar

Morgounov, A., Gómez-Becerra, H. F., Abugalieva, A., Dzhunusova, M., Yessimbekova, M., Muminjanov, H., et al. (2007). Iron and zinc grain density in common wheat grown in central Asia. Euphytica 155 (1-2), 193–203. doi: 10.1007/s10681-006-9321-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

National Institute of Statistics in Niger (2022). Rapport d'évaluation de la campagne agricole d'hivernage 2021 et perspectives alimentaires 2021/2022 (Niamey, NIGER: Ministère de l’Agriculture Secrétariat Général Direction des statistiques). Available at: https://reca-niger.org/IMG/pdf/rapport_definitif_des_resultats_de_l_eper_2021.pdf.

Google Scholar

Paltridge, N. G., Palmer, L. J., Milham, P. J., Guild, G. E., Stangoulis, J. C. R. (2012). Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis of zinc and iron concentration in rice and pearl millet grain. Plant Soil 361 (1-2), 251–260. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-1104-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patil, S. K., Gupta, S. K., Dangi, K. S., Shashibhushan, D., Balram, M., Ramesh, T. (2018). Panicle traits and plant height are important selection indices to enhance productivity in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.R.Br.) populations. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7 (12), 306–312.

Google Scholar

Prasad, R. (2010). Zinc biofortification of food grains in relation to food security and alleviation of zinc malnutrition. Curr. Sci. 98, 1300–1304.

Google Scholar

Pujar, M., Govindaraj, M., Gangaprasad, S., Kanatti, A., Gowda, T. H., Kumar, D., et al. (2022). Generation mean analysis reveals the predominant gene effects for grain iron and zinc contents in pearl millet. Front. Plant Sci. 12 (693680), 1–13.

Google Scholar

Rai, K. N., Govindaraj, M., Pfeiffer, W. H., Rao, A. S. (2015). Seed set and xenia effects on grain iron and zinc concentration in pearl millet. Crop Sci. 55, 821–827. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.04.0305

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rai, K. N., Govindaraj, M., Rao, A. S. (2012). Genetic enhancement of grain iron and zinc content in pearl millet. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crop Foods. 4, 119–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-837X.2012.00135.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rai, K. N., Gupta, S. K., Sharma, R., Govindaraj, M., Rao, A. S., Shivade, H., et al. (2014). Pearl millet breeding lines developed at ICRISAT: a reservoir of variability and useful source of non-target traits. SAT eJournal 1 (1), 1–13.

Google Scholar

Rai, K. N., Hash, C. T., Singh, A. K., Velu, G. (2008). Adaptation and quality traits of a germplasm-derived commercial seed parent of pearl millet. Plant Genet. Resour. Newsl. 154, 20–24.

Google Scholar

Rai, K. N., Velu, G., Bhattacharjee, R., Kulkarni, V. N., Muralidharan, V., Longvah, T., et al. (2007) Gene action for grain zinc content in pearl millet. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232244804.

Google Scholar

Rai, K. N., Yadav, O. P., Rajpurohit, B. S., Patil, H. T., Govindaraj, M., Khairwal, I. S., et al. (2013). Breeding pearl millet cultivars for high iron concentration with zinc concentration as an associated trait. J. SAT Agric. Res. 11, 1–7.

Google Scholar

Reddy, B. V. S., Ramesh, S., Longvah, T. (2005). Prospects of breeding for micronutrients and b-carotene-dense sorghums. ISMN. 46, 10–14. Available at: http://oar.icrisat.org/1210/.

Google Scholar

Saltzman, A., Birol, E., Bouis, H., Boy, E., De Moura, F. F., Islam, Y., et al. (2013). Biofortification: progress toward a more nourishing future. Glob. Food Sec. 2 (1), 9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2012.12.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanjana Reddy, P., Satyavathi, C. T., Khandelwal, V., Patil, H. T., Gupta, P. C., Sharma, L. D., et al. (2021). Performance and stability of pearl millet varieties for grain yield and micronutrients in arid and semi-arid regions of India. Front. Plant Sci. 985. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.670201

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sattler, F. T., Pucher, A., Ango, I. K., Sy, O., Ahmadou, I., Hash, C. T., et al. (2019). Identification of combining ability patterns for pearl millet hybrid breeding in West Africa. Crop Sci. 59 (4), 1590. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2018.12.0727

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, S., Sharma, R., Govindaraj, M., Mahala, R. S., Satyavathi, C. T., Srivastava, R. K., et al. (2021). Harnessing wild relatives of pearl millet for germplasm enhancement: Challenges and opportunities. Crop Sci. 61 (1), 177–200.

Google Scholar

Shi, R., Li, H., Tong, Y., Jing, R., Zhang, F., Zou, C. (2008). Identification of quantitative trait locus of zinc and phosphorus density in wheat (Triticum aestivum l.) grain. Plant Soil. 306, 95–104. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9483-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Srivastava, R. K., Yadav, O. P., Kaliamoorthy, S., Gupta, S. K., Serba, D. D., Choudhary, S., et al. (2022). Breeding drought-tolerant pearl millet using conventional and genomic approaches: Achievements and prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 13, Art–781524. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.781524

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Srungarapu, R., Mohammad, L. A., Mahendrakar, M. D., Chand, U., Venkata, R. J., Kondamudi, K. P., et al. (2022). Genetic variation for grain protein, fe and zn content traits in chickpea reference set. J. Food Compost. Anal. 114, 104774. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104774

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Subbulakshmi, K., Ravikesavan, R., Babu, C., Iyanar, K. (2019). Study of genetic variability in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) r. br.] hybrids for grain yield and quality parameters. Agric. Sci. Dig. 38, 289–292. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-4822

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Taylor, J. R. N. (2004). Pearl millet (Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria), 132p.

Google Scholar

Teklewold, A., Becker, H. C. (2005). Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel cross of Ethiopian mustard inbred lines. Crop Sci. 45, 2629–2635. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0085

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Uzoma, A. O., Eze, P. C., Alabi, M., Mgbonu, K., Aboje, J. E., Osunde, A. O. (2010). The effect of variety and planting date on the growth and yield of pearl millet in southern guinea savanna zone of Nigeria. Scholars J. Agric. Vet. 2, 122–129.

Google Scholar

Vadez, V., Hash, T., Bidinger, F. R., Kholova, J. (2012). II.1. 5 phenotyping pearl millet for adaptation to drought. Front. Physiol. 3. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00386

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Velu, G. (2006). Genetic variability, stability and inheritance of grain iron and zinc content in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.) (Coimbatore, India: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University). Ph.D Thesis.

Google Scholar

Velu, G., Rai, K. N., Muralidharan, V., Kulkarni, V. N., Longvah, T., Raveendran, T. S. (2007). Prospects of breeding biofortified pearl millet with high grain iron and zinc content. Plant Breed. 126, 182–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01322.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Velu, G., Rai, K. N., Muralidharan, V., Longvah, T., Crossa, J. (2011). Gene effects and heterosis for grain iron and zinc concentration in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) r. br). Euphytica. 180, 251–259.

Google Scholar

VSN International. (2015). Genstat for Windows. 18th Edition (Hemel Hempstead, UK:VSN International Ltd.,).

Google Scholar

Wynne, J. C., Emery, D. A., Rice, P. H. (1970). Combining ability estimation in Arachishypogaea l. II. field performance of F1 hybrids. Crop Sci. 10, 713–715. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183X001000060036x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Kang, M. S. (1997). DIALLEL-SAS: A SAS program for griffing's diallel analyses. Agron. J. 89, 176–182. doi: 10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020005x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, F. J., Su, Y. H., Dunham, S. J., Rakszegi, M., Bedo, Z., McGrath, S. P., et al. (2009). Variation in mineral micronutrient concentrations in grain of wheat lines of diverse origin. J. Cereal Sci. 49 (2), 290–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.11.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Pennisetum glaucum L., micronutrient malnutrition, combining ability, biofortification, grain Fe and Zn, diallel analysis

Citation: Gaoh BSB, Gangashetty PI, Mohammed R, Ango IK, Dzidzienyo DK, Tongoona P and Govindaraj M (2023) Combining ability studies of grain Fe and Zn contents of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) in West Africa. Front. Plant Sci. 13:1027279. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1027279

Received: 24 August 2022; Accepted: 14 October 2022;
Published: 06 January 2023.

Edited by:

Salvatore Ceccarelli, Bioversity International, Italy

Reviewed by:

Stefania Grando, Consultant, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
Untung Susanto, BRIN (National Research and Innovation Agency), Indonesia

Copyright © 2023 Gaoh, Gangashetty, Mohammed, Ango, Dzidzienyo, Tongoona and Govindaraj. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Prakash I. Gangashetty, P.Gangashetty@cgiar.org

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.