Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 29 August 2022
Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights into the Molecular Studies of Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms for Sustainable Agricultural Production View all 6 articles

A photosynthetic bacterial inoculant exerts beneficial effects on the yield and quality of tomato and affects bacterial community structure in an organic field

Sook-Kuan LeeSook-Kuan Lee1Ming-Shu ChiangMing-Shu Chiang2Zeng-Yei HseuZeng-Yei Hseu3Chih-Horng Kuo
Chih-Horng Kuo4*Chi-Te Liu,,
Chi-Te Liu1,3,5*
  • 1Institute of Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 2Department of Agronomy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 3Department of Agricultural Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 4Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 5Agricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are microorganisms that promote plant health and play a critical role in sustainable agriculture. As a PGPR, Rhodopseudomonas palustris strain PS3, when applied as a microbial inoculant, exhibited beneficial effects on a variety of crops. In this study, we investigated the effects of PS3 on tomato growth, soil properties, and soil microbiota composition in an organic field. The results demonstrated that PS3 inoculation significantly improved the yield of marketable tomato fruit (37%) and the postharvest quality (e.g., sweetness, taste, vitamin C, total phenolic compounds, and lycopene). Additionally, soil nutrient availability (35–56%) and enzymatic activities (13–62%) also increased. We detected that approximately 107 CFU/g soil of R. palustris survived in the PS3-treated soil after harvest. Furthermore, several bacterial genera known to be associated with nutrient cycling (e.g., Dyella, Novosphingobium, Luteimonas, Haliangium, and Thermomonas) had higher relative abundances (log2 fold change >2.0). To validate the results of the field experiment, we further conducted pot experiments with field-collected soil using two different tomato cultivars and obtained consistent results. Notably, the relative abundance of putative PGPRs in the genus Haliangium increased with PS3 inoculation in both cultivars (1.5 and 34.2%, respectively), suggesting that this genus may have synergistic interactions with PS3. Taken together, we further demonstrated the value of PS3 in sustainable agriculture and provided novel knowledge regarding the effects of this PGPR on soil microbiota composition.

Introduction

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) are rhizosphere microorganisms that colonize plant roots and improve yield (Kloepper et al., 1980). PGPRs can enhance plant growth by multiple mechanisms, such as increasing the uptake of essential nutrients (i.e., phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and biological nitrogen fixation), mitigating abiotic stress (i.e., production of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase and ACC), enhancing resistance to plant diseases (i.e., PGPR-induced systemic resistance and ISR), modifying phytohormonal content, and altering the rhizosphere microbiota (Spaepen and Vanderleyden, 2011; Glick, 2014; Hakim et al., 2021; Mohanty et al., 2021). Common PGPR include those in the genera Pseudomonas, Azospirillum, Azotobacter, and Bacillus, which play an essential role in organic farming and agricultural sustainability as effective microbial inoculants (Oancea et al., 2017; Castiglione et al., 2021; Hamid et al., 2021).

Rhodopseudomonas palustris is a photosynthetic bacterium that can be applied as a PGPR inoculant to improve crop yield and quality, as well as alleviate biotic and abiotic stress for crops (Sakarika et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2021a). The deduced plant growth-promoting mechanisms of the plant-associated beneficial bacterium R. palustris can be summarized as facilitating nutrient acquisition in the soil or rhizosphere (i.e., biofertilization), producing phytohormones (i.e., biostimulation), and inducing the immune system in plants (i.e., biocontrol; Lee et al., 2021a).

Rhodopseudomonas palustris strain PS3 was isolated from rice paddy soil in Taiwan (Wong et al., 2014). This strain could utilize different carbohydrate sources, produce versatile extracellular hydrolytic enzymes, fix nitrogen, and produce indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in a free-living state (Wong et al., 2014). When PS3 was inoculated in soil treated with chemical fertilizer or in a hydroponic system, it enhanced fertilizer efficiency and exerted beneficial effects on leafy crops (Wong et al., 2014; Hsu et al., 2015, 2021). In this study, we aimed to further understand the effects of PS3 on fruit crops, soil health, and the microbial community in an organic field. To achieve this goal, we conducted a field trial on tomato production. Furthermore, to establish the potential environmental impact on the soil microbial community, we performed a microbiota survey based on high-throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA gene amplicons throughout the flowering and fruit set periods.

Materials and methods

Preparation of microbial inoculant

Rhodopseudomonas palustris strain PS3 (international culture collection catalog numbers: BCRC 910564; DSM 29314) was cultivated in modified van Niel medium supplemented with CH3COONa (2 g/L) and peptone (5 g/L; i.e., modified PNSB medium) as described previously (Lo et al., 2020). Fifty milliliters of the precultured broth was inoculated into a 2,000 ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 600 ml of fresh modified PNSB broth and cultivated in the dark at 37°C and 200 rpm for 22 h. After culturing, 600 ml of the inoculum was transferred into 12 L of fresh modified PNSB broth to produce large-scale cultures until the cell density reached approximately OD600 = 2.0 and adjusted to a concentration of OD600 = 1.0 [approximately 1 × 109 colony forming units, (CFU)/ml] for further experiments.

Experimental field

This study was carried out on a Town-South organic farm (24.29°N, 120.40°E) located in Tonghsiao Township, Miaoli County, Taiwan (Supplementary Figure S1A). The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse; the soil moisture, temperature, illumination, and electroconductivity (EC) were monitored and recorded with a VegTrug Soil Tester (Xiaomi Co., Ltd.). During the planting period, the average soil temperature and moisture were 23.7°C and 24.82%, respectively. Moreover, the sunlight intensity was approximately 5,000 lux inside the greenhouse, and the EC was 235.5 μS/cm for the experimental farmland soil (Supplementary Figure S1B).

Experimental design for the field trial

The commercial tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) hybrid cv. “Yu Nu” was used as the plant material, which was grafted onto an eggplant rootstock to make it more disease-resistant (Liu et al., 2009). We grew the tomato plants in 0.8 m × 8.0 m plots with a row spacing of 60 cm and a plant spacing of 25 cm, and we cultivated approximately 40 plants per furrow at the vegetative stage. In each row, 10 of the plants were labeled and used for investigating the agricultural traits and soil biochemical process (Supplementary Figure S2A). Due to limitations of the commercial farm site’s irrigation and planting systems, the PS3 inoculant was applied to one of two neighboring plots in a two-block design. The soil properties of the control group (i.e., OF+M, applying plant-based organic fertilizer on a regular basis depending on the routine of the farm, supplemented with modified PNSB medium) and the experimental group (i.e., OF+PS3, applying plant-based organic fertilizer, supplemented with PS3 inoculant) were similar, suggesting that the initial environments resembled each other (Supplementary Table S1). The timeline for sampling and inoculation is illustrated in Supplementary Figure S2B. Two hundred milliliters of modified PNSB broth or the PS3 inoculant (fermented broth; OD600 = 1.0, equivalent to 109 CFU/ml) was poured into the rhizosphere of individual tomato plants during their vegetative, flowering, and ripening stages. A drip irrigation system was used on this farm, and the plant-based organic fertilizer 426 (Fwusow industry Co., Ltd., Taiwan) was applied as base fertilizer, and a top dressing fertilizer was applied at the stage of fruit ripening. We observed differences in the inflorescence and fruiting branches of tomato plants during the growing season. We periodically harvested the 10 labeled red ripe tomatoes from the beginning until the end of the production period. For each treatment, we collected the soil samples from each plant associated with roots and packed them into zipper bags stored on ice-cold packs before analysis. The soil samples were air-dried to measure soil physicochemical properties (plant-available nutrients) or stored at −20°C for soil enzyme activities. Five soil samples were collected from the respective rhizospheres of each plant and treatment for DNA extraction (Supplementary Figure S2B).

Analysis of yield parameters of tomato fruit

The numbers of inflorescence and fruiting branches of the tomato plants were investigated during the whole cultivation period. We harvested tomato fruit from individual labeled plants (n = 10) at the ripening stage to determine the agronomic traits. The fresh weights of 50 fruits per plant were determined, and the fruits were dehydrated in an oven at 65°C (for at least 72 h) to constant weights to determine the dry weights. The marketable yield was determined by summing the weight of all the tomato fruits.

Analysis of fruit quality

The total soluble solid (TSS or Brix) content and total acidity were measured by a portable Brix-acidity meter (PAL-BX|ACID3 Master Kit, ATAGO Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The sugar/acid ratio (°Brix ÷ % Acid) was calculated by dividing the Brix degree with the citric acid percentage. The lycopene levels in the fresh fruit were determined using the method described by (Giovannetti et al., 2012) with some modifications. The vitamin C levels in fresh fruit were extracted according to the application note provided by Merck (Merck, Germany). The vitamin C test strip (Merck, Germany) was stained with the sample solution and measured by a reflectometer (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The calculation formula was as follows: obtained value (milligrams/liter) × 4. The total phenolic levels of the extracts were determined using Folin and Ciocalteu reagent following the method described by (Chandra et al., 2014) with some modifications. The phenolic content was calculated as gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g of dry plant material. All determinations were carried out in 20 replicates per plant.

Root analysis

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria can alter root system development and growth through the production of phytohormones, secondary metabolites, and enzymes (Grover et al., 2021). To investigate the effects of PS3 on roots, we analyzed the morphology and histology of the roots. After the harvesting season ended, individual roots of the labeled tomato plants were sampled and weighed. Five adventitious roots were collected from each plant. According to the distance between the adventitious roots and the taproots, each adventitious root was cut and divided into three parts: where T represents the portion in closest proximity to the taproots, M represents the portion midway between the taproots and soil, and B represents the portion far away from the taproots. Slice preparation and toluidine blue staining were performed as described by Li et al. (2017) with some modification. The slices were photographed using a light microscope (OLYMPUS BX51, Japan). ImageJ was used for area quantification and analysis.

Soil physicochemical analysis

The soil pH and soil electrical conductivity (EC) were determined by a 1:5 soil/deionized water suspension with a pH meter (TOA-DKK, HM-41X, Japan) and EC meter (Field scout, FSEC-20, United States). The organic carbon (SOC) and organic matter (SOM) concentrations (%) in the soil were measured by the Walkley black method (Nelson and Sommers, 1996). In addition, the potassium permanganate test was used to determine the soil active carbon (SAC) content (Weil et al., 2003). Moreover, total nitrogen was analyzed by Kjeldahl digestion (Bremner, 1996). The soil extract (20 ml) was distilled after the addition of MgO and Devarda’s alloy to quantify the levels of ammonia (NH4+-N) and nitrate (NO3-N), respectively (Keeney and Nelson, 1983).

We also determined the exchangeable potassium (Ex.K), exchangeable calcium (Ex.Ca), and exchangeable magnesium (Ex.Mg) as described by Mehlich (1984). Phosphorus (P) availability was determined with the Bray P method (Olsen and Sommers, 1983). The levels of K, Ca, Mg, and P were quantified by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS; PE Analyst 200, PerkinElmer, Inc., United States).

Soil extracellular enzyme activities and biological properties

To determine the function and nutrient cycling capacity of the soil microbiota, we assessed the activities of the extracellular enzymes isolated from the soil as described by Yang et al. (2019). Dehydrogenase activities in the soil samples were determined following the method described by Casida et al. (1964) and quantified by a spectrophotometer (Ultrospec 2,100 pro, Cambridge Scientific Co., Ltd., America) at 485 nm. The phosphatase activities were determined according to the method described by Tabatabai and Bremner (1969) and was quantified the absorbance at 410 nm. Urease activity was measured using a colorimetric method (Bremner and Douglas, 1971) and measured at a wavelength of 578 nm using a spectrophotometer.

DNA extraction and Illumina sequencing

Five soil samples were collected from the respective rhizospheres of each plant and treatment for DNA extraction. For each sample, 0.6 g of the soil was used for total DNA extraction with the soil FAST DNA spin kit (MP Biomedicals, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of DNA was determined using a fluorometer (Nanodrop ND-1000, J and H Technology Co., Ltd), and the purity of the DNA was monitored using 1% agarose gels. The bacterial V3-V4 regions of 16S rDNA were amplified by PCR using 341F (5′CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′ GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′). Sequencing libraries were generated using the TruSeq Nano DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, United States) following the manufacturer’s recommendations, and index barcodes were added. The library quality was assessed by a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific) and an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. The library was finally sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq platform to generate 300 bp paired-end reads by Genomics BioSci and Tech Co., Ltd. (New Taipei, Taiwan).

Classification and taxonomic assignment of OTUs

Sequences of primers were removed from the demultiplexed sequences using Cutadapt 1.8.1 (Martin, 2011). Data for 16S rDNA were analyzed with QIIME2 version 2020.6 (Bolyen et al., 2019). The paired-end reads were merged using the command “qiime vsearch join-pairs.” Then, joined sequences were filtered by quality (Phred score * 20) and dereplicated with VSEARCH. UCHIME was used to eliminate singletons or chimeras, resulting in 68% of reads remaining (68% was a count from chimera removing sequences divided by OTU clustering sequences × 100%; Supplementary Table S2). Before downstream analysis, we clustered representative sequences into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with a threshold of 99% sequence identity by using the q2-vsearch plugin. Subsequently, taxonomy was assigned by the “classify-sklearn” function of the “feature classifier” plugin with a Naïve Bayes classifier trained on SILVA 132, using 99% OTUs full-length sequence of 16S rRNA genes (Quast et al., 2013; Yilmaz et al., 2014). Across the 10 samples, qualified sequences were detected, and representative OTUs were aligned with MAFFT using the “alignment” plugin in QIIME2. Variable positions were masked using the “mask” function in QIIME2 (Katoh and Standley, 2013). The phylogenetic tree was built using the “Fasttree” function within the “phylogeny” plugin. (Price et al., 2010).

Quantitative PCR

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed in five biological repeats and three technical repeats with a LightCycler® 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche Applied Science). Each qPCR consisted of 5 μl of FastStart SYBR Green Master Mix (Roche Applied Science), 0.2 μl of each primer (10 μmol/μl), and 1 ng/μl DNA template in a 10 μl volume. The primers BchF and BchR were used for R. palustris species-specific quantification, and the 16S rDNA universal primers 340F and 514R were used for total bacterial quantification (Supplementary Table S3). The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min; 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s.

Verification with pot experiments

The pot experiments were conducted using two cherry tomato cultivars (i.e., “Yu Nu” and “Red Pearl”). Tomato seedlings were planted in soil-filled pots (containing approximately 1.0 kg of soil) and grown in a phytotron (Agricultural Experimental Station, National Taiwan University, Taiwan) with natural sunlight at 25/20°C day/night and 80 (±5) % relative humidity. The pot experiments were conducted with the following treatments: (a) organic fertilizer 426 without inoculant (OF+M); (b) organic fertilizer 426 with PS3 inoculant (OF+PS3). Each treatment had five replicates. The organic fertilizer had an N/P/K ratio of 4:2:6 (FWUSOW INDUSTRY CO., LTD., Taiwan). Then, 0.86 g was applied to each pot, and the plants were fertilized in every development stage of tomato (seedlings, flowering, and fruit formation). The dosage of the PS3 inoculant was adjusted to approximately 1.0 × 109 CFU ml−1, and 20 ml of bacterial suspension was applied to the topsoil (root surrounding) in each pot. After 95 days of planting, fruits and soils were sampled for analysis as described above.

Statistical analyses

For plant phenotype and soil environment data, bar plots were generated using GraphPad Prism 6. The statistical analysis was performed based on Welch’s t test. Microbial community analyses were conducted with QIIME2 (Hall and Beiko, 2018). To normalize the sequencing output among samples, we rarefied the OTU table to 16,000 reads per sample (Supplementary Figure S3). Alpha diversity indices, including the observed OTU counts and Shannon index, were calculated by the “qiime diversity alpha” function. The differences in microbial community composition among all treatments were analyzed by principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis distances. The statistically significant differences between treatments were assessed by permutational ANOVA (PERMANOVA). The log2-fold change coupled with permutation t test (value of p < 0.05) was used to identify significantly different biomarkers/OTUs at the genus level among the treatments. The dot plots were illustrated by the R x64 ver 3.5.3 package “DESeq2” (https://www.r-project.org/; Love et al., 2014). In addition, Pearson correlation coefficients were used to analyze the relationships among predominant OTUs, plant growth traits, and soil environments.

Results

PS3 inoculation showed beneficial effects on the yields and quality of tomato fruits

By comparing the PS3-inoculated plants (i.e., OF+PS3) to the control group (i.e., OF+M), we found significant differences in all of the traits measured except for the number of inflorescence branches (Figure 1). Notable effects of PS3 inoculation included increasing the number of fruiting branches by 25% (Figure 1B), the yield of marketable tomato fruit by 37% (Figure 1D), and the fresh weight of individual tomato fruit by 33% (Figure 1E). With regard to the flowering percentage, we found that the value for mature flowers of the OF+PS3 treatment was 10% higher than that of the OF+M treatment at 50 days after planting (50 DAP; Figure 1G). For verification, we performed a pot experiment with tomato seedlings (var. Yu Nu) grown in Akadama soil. As shown in Supplementary Figure S4, we observed that the total flower number of the PS3-treated plants was significantly higher than that of the OF+M treatment.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Effects of Rhodopseudomonas palustris PS3 on grafted tomato vegetative and reproductive growth traits. (A) Number of inflorescence branches. (B) Number of fruiting branches. (C) Marketable fruit numbers. (D) Marketable fruit yield. (E) Fresh weight of fruits. (F) Dry weight of fruits. (G) Flower development for a the first branch at various stages 50 days after planting (DAP). (H) Fruit color transformation for the first–sixth branches at 98 DAP. (I) Fruit color transformation for the first–sixth branches at 122 DAP. (J) Fruit drop percentage for all harvested branches of grafted tomato at 136 DAP. OF + M: applying the plant-based organic fertilizer and new PNSB medium in the soil; OF + PS3: applying plant-based organic fertilizer and PS3 inoculant in the soil. DAP represents days of planting in panels (G–J). All results are expressed as the mean ± SE. The statistical test was based on Welch’s t-test for panels (A–F) (ns, p ≥ 0.05; *, p < 0.05) and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for panels (G–J; letters above means indicate significant differences among treatments at a threshold of p < 0.05).

According to the classification by Qin et al. (2012), we determined the percentage of tomato fruit at the corresponding ripening stages in individual plants based on their surface color (Figures 1H,I). At 98 DAP, those classified as being in the light-red and red ripe stages were 1.3–2.0 times more abundant in the OF+PS3 treatment than in the OF + M treatment (Figure 1H). In contrast, those classified as being in the breaker stage were fewer in the OF + PS3 group. At 122 DAP, most of the fruit had ripened in both groups, and those classified as being in the red ripe stage were 20% more abundant in the OF + PS3 group (Figure 1I). At the end of the harvesting (136 DAP), we calculated the total number of dropped fruit from the first to sixth branches in an individual plant. As shown in Figure 1J, the fruit drop rate in the OF + PS3 group (1.85%) was lower than that in the OF + M treatment (9.6%).

The postharvest quality of the tomato fruit was markedly higher in the PS3-inoculated group. The Brix (TSS) and acidity values of the tomato fruit were determined and are shown in Figure 2. The TSS content mainly includes sugars (fructose), and the ratio of sugars to acid (Brix/acid ratio) can act as a simple index of fruit quality (taste; Aoun et al., 2013). As shown in Figure 2, the sweetness and taste of tomato fruit from the OF + PS3 group were significantly increased, by 12 and 38%, respectively (Figures 2AC). Furthermore, the levels of ascorbic acid (vitamin C), total phenolic compounds, and lycopene were assessed to quantify the antioxidant and nutritional quality of tomato fruit. As shown in Figure 2D, the total ascorbic acid content of tomato treated with PS3 was approximately three times that of the control-treated tomato. The lycopene and total phenolic levels increased by 19 and 16%, respectively (Figures 2E,F).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Effects of Rhodopseudomonas palustris strain PS3 on grafted tomato harvesting quality at the ripening stage. (A) Total soluble solids (°Brix). (B) Acidity. (C) Brix/acid ratio. (D) Total ascorbic acid (mg/L). (E) Lycopene contents (mg/kg FW). (F) Gallic acid concentration (equivalent to total phenolic content). All results are expressed as the mean ± SE. The statistical test was based on Welch’s t-test (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; and ***, p < 0.005).

PS3 inoculation promoted root growth

As shown in Figures 3A,B, the PS3-treated plants showed marked increases in root diameter and biomass (i.e., fresh weight). For microscopic observation, we sliced the lateral roots into three sections (T: root close to taproot, M: root midway between taproot and soil, and B: root far away from taproot; Figure 3C). As shown in Figures 3D,E, the corresponding areas for different sections of the OF + PS3-treated roots were significantly greater than those for sections of the OF + M group, as shown by staining analysis. We noticed that the xylem area increased markedly in the presence of PS3 inoculation (Figures 3D,E), whereas the phloem area of OF + PS3 was slightly larger than that of OF + M, but the difference was not statistically significant (Figures 3D,E).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Comparison of the morphological root growth patterns between the control and Rhodopseudomonas palustris PS3 inoculation groups. (A) Root phenotype. (B) Root fresh weight. (C) Sampling procedures for light microscopic observation. Sampling and sectioning methods are based on distance from taproot, where T is close to tap root, M distance is midway between taproot and soil, and B is far away from taproot. (D) Cross-sections of grafted tomato roots (T, M, and B) stained with Toluidine blue (TBO). (E) Average total root area, xylem area, and phloem area. The statistical test was based on Welch’s t-test.(ns, p ≥ 0.05; ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.001). Data are expressed as the mean ± SE.

PS3 inoculation enhanced soil nutrient availability and soil enzymatic activities

Soil physicochemical properties were affected by PS3 inoculation. As shown in Figure 4, the soil EC and the levels of most available nutrients, such as available P, Ex.K, Ex.Ca, Ex.Mg, and nitrate, were higher in the PS3-inoculated samples, although no significant difference was observed for the total organic matter. However, the active carbon content (POXC) in the OF + PS3 soil (780 mg/kg) was significantly higher than that in the OF+M treatment (600 mg/kg; Figure 4H). Notably, inoculation with PS3 significantly increased the amount of endogenous nitrate in plants (Figure 4I). Overall, inoculation with PS3 improved the available nutrients in the soil and endogenous N content in plants. Furthermore, as shown in Figures 4JK, the dehydrogenase, phosphatase, and urease activities in the OF+PS3 soil increased by 62, 13, and 36%, respectively.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Physicochemical properties and enzyme activities of soil samples under different treatments. (A) pH. (B) Electroconductivity (EC). (C) Available phosphorus (P). (D) Exchangeable potassium (Ex.K). (E) Exchangeable calcium (Ex.Ca). (F) Exchangeable magnesium (Ex.Mg). (G) Organic matter (%). (H) Available carbon (POXC). (I) Nitrate. (J) TPF concentration (represented as soil dehydrogenase activity). (K) p-NPP concentration (represented as phosphatase activity). (L) NH4+-N (represented as urease activity). TPF, triphenylformazan; p-NPP, para-nitrophenylphosphate. The statistical test was based on Welch’s t-test (ns, p ≥ 0.05; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, and **** p < 0.001). Data are five biological replicates and expressed as the mean ± SE.

Indigenous soil microbial community structure was affected by PS3 inoculation

We determined the rhizosphere microbiota composition in the organic tomato farmland by a culture-independent 16S rDNA amplicon survey. A total of 411,722 high-quality sequences were extracted from the samples, and the read counts per sample ranged from 20,274 to 52,813, with an average of 41,177 (Supplementary Table S2). Based on these reads, 51,822 16S rDNA gene operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified (Supplementary Table S2). The taxonomic assignment of OTUs indicated that those samples were dominated by 12 bacterial phyla (relative abundances >1.0%; Figure 5A). Among these phyla, Acidobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia showed significant differences in relative abundance between the OF + M and OF + PS3 samples (Figures 5BE). Proteobacteria were the most abundant phylum, for which OF + PS3 showed a higher relative abundance than OF + M by 22% (Figure 5D). For the other three phyla, the relative abundances were lower in the OF + PS3 groups (Figures 5B,C,E).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Microbiota composition. Five biological replicates (labeled as 1–5) were used for each set. (A) Relative abundance at the phylum level; only those accounting for at least 1.0% are labeled, and the remainder is grouped under “unclassified bacteria.” (B–E) Bacterial phyla exhibiting significant differences in relative abundance between different treatments (p < 0.05); alpha-diversity includes (F) observed OTUs and (G) mean species richness (Shannon index); beta-diversity indicated by (H) principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on weighted UniFrac distance; Blue dots represent full rate organic fertilizer with nutrient medium (OF + M). Red dots indicate full rate organic fertilizer with PS3 inoculum (OF + PS3). A data point denotes one sample or biological repeat. Each treatment consisted of five biological repetitions.

The bacterial diversities of the two groups were assessed using observed OTU counts and the Shannon index (Figures 5FH). The alpha diversity and total bacterial quantification (approximately 6.79 Log CFU g−1) between the two groups did not differ significantly (Figures 5FG; Supplementary Figures S5A,B; Supplementary Table S3). The overall compositional differences were analyzed based on PCoA (Figure 5H), which demonstrated clear distinction between the OF + M and OF + PS3 samples. Notably, the first and second principal axes explained 43.5 and 18.8% of the total variation, respectively. This finding indicated that although the microbiota composition appeared to be similar at the phylum level (Figure 5A), inoculation with PS3 resulted in considerable changes in the soil microbiota composition at the OTU level.

Based on the log2-fold change and permutation t test of the relative abundance of the OTUs, 46 OTUs were selected as representative OTUs from the OF + M to OF + PS3 groups (Supplementary Table S5). After eliminating 26 OTUs classified only at the domain level, 20 OTUs representing eight genera and five phyla were identified (Figures 6A,B). Among these selected OTUs, 11 OTUs were identified as significant OTUs in the OF + PS3 group, including those belonging to Proteobacteria (black square filled), Patescibacteria (triangle open), and Actinobacteria (square open; Figure 6A). We noticed that the genus Rhodopseudomonas had the highest log2-fold change (i.e., 16.71) in the OF + PS3 group (Figure 6A). This finding is consistent with the expectation and indicates long-term survival of the PS3 inoculant in the soil. Furthermore, we applied qPCR with a species-specific primer set to calculate the abundance of R. palustris. Approximately 107 CFU/g soil of R. palustris was detected in the soil sample of the OF + PS3 treatment, while it was not detected in the OF + M samples (Supplementary Figures S5C,D; Supplementary Table S3). On the other hand, nine selected OTUs were more abundant in the OF+M samples, including those belonging to Patescibacteria (triangle, open), Verrucomicrobia (red circle, filled), Actinobacteria (square, open), and Chlamydiae (cross; Figure 6A).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Pairwise comparison. (A) Differential abundant of selected OTUs Log2-fold change of differentially abundant selected OTUs between the OF + M and OF + PS3 treatments at the phylum and genus levels (p < 0.05 and relative abundances >0.05%). OTUs were assigned to genus (y-axis) and phylum levels (colors and shapes). Log2FC represented as Log2-fold change. Negative “Log2FC” values (x-axis) indicate higher abundance in OF + M samples, and positive values indicate higher abundances in OF + PS3 rhizosphere OF + M: (B) Relative abundances of selected individual OTUs in OF + M and OF + PS3 treatments (p < 0.05). OF +M: bar in gray, noninoculated control; OF + PS3: bar in black, the inoculation treatments with strain PS3. Significant difference in the relative abundances (≥0.05) of samples based on permutation T-test (ns, p > 0.05; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001). Each treatment consisted of five biological repetitions.

At the OTU level, we found that OTU4 (genus Thermomonas), OTU8 (Haliangium), OTU21 (Novosphingobium), OTU14 (Luteimonas), and OTU24 (Dyella) were more abundant in the OF + PS3 samples (Figure 6B). In contrast, OTU44 (unclassified), OTU45 (unclassified), OTU40 (unclassified), OTU39 (unclassified), OTU35 (unclassified), OTU34 (unclassified), OTU33 (ADurb.Bin063-1), and OTU32 (unclassified) were more abundant in the OF + M samples (Figure 6B).

Correlation between tomato harvesting parameters and soil microbial community composition

An analysis of Pearson correlation was conducted to evaluate the relationship between the postharvest parameters of tomato and the relative abundance of individual phyla (relative abundances >1.0%; Supplementary Figure S7). Patescibacteria and Proteobacteria exhibited positive correlations with postharvest or soil parameters (Supplementary Figure S7); also, the majority of selected OTUs were found to belong to these two phyla (Figures 7A,B). Therefore, we examined the relationship between various parameters and the relative abundance of these selected bacterial OTUs for further investigation (Figures 7A,B). Most of the selected OTUs enriched in the OF + PS3 samples were significantly associated with the gallic acid (total phenolic) content, fruit dry weight, and total ascorbic acid content (Figure 7A). Among these, OTU2, OTU8, and OTU23 were positively correlated with fruit dry weight, and OTU4, OTU15, OTU 20, and OTU24 showed positive correlations with the gallic acid content. OTU7, OTU15, and OTU21 were positively correlated with the total ascorbic acid content (Figure 7A). We noticed that OTU15 was positively associated with most postharvest quality parameters (i.e., Brix/acid ratio, flavonoids, and total ascorbic acid) and negatively correlated with acidity (Figure 7A). On the other hand, most of the selected OTUs enriched in the OF+M samples were negatively associated with the gallic acid content and total ascorbic acid content (Figure 7A). Among these, OTU32, OTU33, OTU35, OTU39, and OTU45 were negatively correlated with the gallic acid content. OTU35 and OTU39 were negatively associated with the total marketable yield. OTU33, OTU44, and OTU45 were positively correlated with acidity. These results indicated that some of the selected OTUs exhibited apparent effects on plant harvesting parameters, especially fruit quality.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Pearson correlation between the relative abundance of individual microbial groups and plant/soil characteristics. (A) Selected OTUs versus tomato harvesting characteristics. (B) Selected OTUs versus soil properties. The red and green nodes represent the positive and negative Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r), considering a p value <0.05, respectively. Each treatment consisted of five biological repetitions.

Moreover, as shown in Figure 7B, 80% of the OTUs were correlated with soil environmental factors, such as EC, dehydrogenase activity, and phosphatase activity. OTU2 exhibited a high positive correlation with EC. OTU4, OTU14, and OTU24 were positively correlated with dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities. OTU7 and OTU15 exhibited high abundances and positive correlations with most soil parameters. OTU8 and OTU23 were positively correlated with EC and Ex.Ca. OTU20 was positively associated with EC, Ex.Ca, Ex.Mg, phosphatase, and POXC. Most of the selected OTU abundances in the OF+M samples were negatively correlated with soil parameters, especially dehydrogenase, EC, Ex. Ca, Ex. Mg, nitrate, phosphate, and POXC (p < 0.05). Among the environmental factors, dehydrogenase showed a strong negative correlation with the selected OTUs in the OF + M samples (r = −0.89, p = 6 × 10−4).

The pot experiment reproduced the correlation between the selected parameters and selected genera

To verify the correlation between the harvest index, soil properties, and the associated selected genus, we performed a pot experiment with better-controlled growth conditions compared to the field trial. The pot experiment used two tomato cultivars (Red Pearl and Yu Nu) and soil collected from the aforementioned organic field. As shown in Figures 8AC; Supplementary Figure S6, the fruit dry weight, total phenolic content, root weight, and ascorbic value of the PS3-treated tomato fruit were increased by approximately 20, 33, 50, and 6%, respectively, in comparison with those in the OF + M group. Additionally, the EC, soil dehydrogenase activity, and phosphatase activity were all higher in the OF + PS3 soil (Figures 7, 8D–F). It is noteworthy that the increasing trends were similar for both cultivars, indicating the robustness of our findings. We performed 16S rDNA microbiota analysis after harvest and highlighted five dominant bacterial genera in the PS3-treated soil as mentioned above (Figure 6). We found that the relative abundance of the bacterial genus Haliangium increased significantly in the presence of PS3 in both cultivars (Figure 8K). The Thermomonas abundance was significantly higher in the presence of PS3 in the Yu-Nu cultivar (Figure 8I). On the other hand, the other three bacterial genera (Novosphingobium, Dyella, and Luteimonas) showed no significant difference in abundance in either cultivar following PS3 inoculation (Figures 8G,H,J).

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Verifying the selected parameters and potential genera by pot experiments with two tomato cultivars (Red pearl and Yu Nu) and soil collected from the aforementioned organic field. (A) total ascorbic acid (vitamin C content); (B) gallic acid concentration (total phenolic content); (C) dry weight of fruits; (D) soil electroconductivity (EC); (E) p-NPP concentration (soil phosphatase activity); (F) TPF concentration (soil dehydrogenase activity); Relative abundances of (G) Novosphingobium (%); (H) Luteimonas (%); (I) Thermomonas (%); (J) Dyella (%); and (K) Haliangium (%). Data are expressed as the mean ± SE. The statistical test was based on Welch’s t-test for panels (A–F) (ns, p > 0.05,* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, and **** p < 0.001) and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for panels (G–K) (letters above means indicate significant differences among treatments at a threshold of p < 0.05). Each treatment consisted of five biological repetitions.

Discussion

The PS3 inoculation exhibited notable effects in improving several key agricultural traits of tomato fruits in this study (Figures 2, 3), including marketable fruit yield, vitamin C content, phenolic content, and lycopene concentration, etc. According to our previous studies, the presumed mechanisms include (1) biofertilization for increasing plant-available nutrients in soil and (2) biostimulation for stimulating plant nutrition use efficiency (reviewed by Lee et al., 2021a). In this study, PS3 inoculation enhanced the soil physicochemical traits and enzymatic activities in the organic field (Figure 4). Since recent studies have revealed that PGPRs could affect soil physicochemical properties by interacting with microbial communities (Bhattacharyya et al., 2018; Mickan et al., 2021), we also investigated the soil microbiota composition in this study based on a high-throughput culture-independent approach. We found that several bacterial genera (Novosphingobium, Luteimonas, and Thermomonas) related to soil nutrient cycling and soil health had relatively higher abundances in the PS3-inoculated soil (Figures 5, 6). Diazotrophic Novosphingobium spp. exhibit distinctive endophytic colonization and have various PGP characteristics, such as phosphorus solubilization and nitrogen fixation (Smit et al., 2012; Rangjaroen et al., 2017). Luteimonas spp. have been reported to possess the ability to degrade complex organic compounds, resulting in an increase in nutrient uptake for nitrogen or phosphorus in plants to promote early plant development (O’brien, 2016; Kohout, 2019; Lin et al., 2020). Thermomonas spp. are denitrification and nitrogen fertilizer-associated bacteria that are responsible for saccharase activity (O’brien, 2016). We hypothesized that the beneficial effects on tomato exerted by PS3 inoculation could be attributed to the direct stimulatory effect of PS3 on plant physiology and the indirect stimulatory effect via interactions with microbial communities to elevate the available soil nutrients (Figure 9).

FIGURE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9. A schematic diagram proposed to explain the potential mechanism by which Rhodopseudomonas palustris PS3 could affect tomato development and quality under organic farming systems. (1) Rhodopseudomonas palustris PS3 improves the nutrient uptake of plants (Hsu et al., 2021). (2) Rhodopseudomonas palustris PS3 promotes fruit growth and quality by altering the soil microbiome, and enhancing soil health and soil enzyme activities. (3) Rhodopseudomonas palustris PS3 was applied alone or in combination with other beneficial microbes to enhance root growth and nutrient cycling. (4) Rhodopseudomonas palustris PS3 improves fruit color transformation by increasing the lycopene content, thereby enhancing the marketable yield (in prediction).

We noticed that the fruit drop percentage of preharvest OF+PS3-treated tomato (9%) was significantly lower than that of OF+M-treated tomato (2%; Figure 1J). Premature fruit drop is often associated with abiotic stresses, such as extreme temperature, water stress, or low light intensity (Lee et al., 2008, 2021b). Based on the data from historical weather observations and statistics provided by the Central Weather Bureau of Taiwan, the tomato plants experienced dramatically insufficient sunlight during their fruit set period (December 2020) compared with the past growing seasons (Supplementary Table S4). This may explain the high percentages of premature fruit drop, particularly in the control group. Premature fruit drop or fruit abscission is generally regulated by phytohormones, such as ethylene and abscisic acid (ABA) and signal transduction pathways (Botton et al., 2011). However, very few studies have discussed the molecular mechanisms by which PGPRs prevent fruit drop. Lee and colleagues reported that the expression levels of cell wall degradation and abscisic acid signaling genes were all upregulated during abscission (Lee et al., 2021b). Belimov and colleagues reported that treating rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings with an abscisic acid-metabolizing rhizobacterium, Novosphingobium sp. P6W, could decrease or alter the ABA concentrations in plants (Belimov et al., 2014). We noticed that the genus Novosphingobium dominated in the PS3-treated soil (Figure 6). Accordingly, we speculated that the beneficial effect of PS3 was not limited to the direct beneficial effects of PGP (i.e., improve N uptake), but also to the regulation of phytohormone responses via the soil microbiota.

Several studies have indicated that PGPR inoculation may regulate the composition of host rhizobacterial communities (Zhang et al., 2019a,b), which are involved in plant growth promotion (Gadhave et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2018a). This study found that inoculation with PS3 in organic tomato farmland led to a higher relative abundance of Proteobacteria (Figure 5D). Proteobacteria are related to a wide range of biological activities associated with the cycling of carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and other elements (Spain et al., 2009). Smit et al. (2001) proposed that the ratio between the abundances of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria (P/A) could indicate the general nutrient status of soils. Low P/A ratios (0.16–0.46) suggest that the soils are oligotrophic, while high ratios (0.87 or above) indicate that they are copiotrophic (Smit et al., 2012; Shen and Lin, 2021). As shown in Figures 5B,D, the average P/A ratios in the OF+M control and the OF+PS3 treatment were 2.46 and 3.64, respectively, suggesting an improvement in soil nutritional status after PS3 inoculation. Furthermore, since Proteobacteria were the most dominant OTUs in the PS3-treated soil (Figure 6), we deduced that the PS3 inoculant acted synergistically with the nutrient cycle-related phylum Proteobacteria to improve the biomass and quality of the tomato plant.

As shown in Figure 7, the selected OTUs in the PS3-treated soil samples of the organic field revealed positive relationships with fruit dry weight, total phenolic content, total ascorbic acid content, soil dehydrogenase activity, phosphatase activity, and EC. To verify the correlation, we conducted pot experiments with seedlings of two tomato cultivars (i.e., Red Pearl and Yu Nu) and the same soil collected from the organic field (Figure 8). We found that PS3 inoculation significantly improved the harvest qualities of tomato fruit and the soil characteristics, consistent with the observations from the field experiments. Since the soil EC value is positively correlated with the nutrient availability of the soil (Heiniger et al., 2003), PS3 inoculation could improve soil fertility. In addition to nutrients, we also found that the activities of some soil enzymes, such as dehydrogenase and phosphatase, were significantly increased (Figures 4J,K). Since soil enzyme activity is regarded as an indicator of microbial activity (Quilchano and Marañón, 2002; Gu et al., 2009; Salazar et al., 2011), we hypothesize that PS3 inoculation can stimulate microbial activity in the soil.

One notable difference between the field trial and pot experiments was that while five genera were found to have higher relative abundance in the field upon PS3 inoculation (Figure 6B), only Haliangium had significantly higher abundance in the pot experiment (Figure 8K). With regard to the other four genera (i.e., Novosphingobium, Dyella, Luteimonas, and Thermomonas), the differences between the field trial and pot experiment may be explained by multiple factors, particularly temperature. It has been reported that temperature or season is the key factor determining the relative abundance or composition of soil bacteria (Frindte et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2022; Zhelezova et al., 2022). We conducted the pot experiments in a phytotron under well-controlled temperature conditions (25/20°C day/night and 80 (±5) % relative humidity). In contrast, the temperature conditions in the organic field were dynamic, including fluctuations in the diurnal temperature range (min: 14°C; max: 29°C) and moisture. It is likely that Haliangium was not easily affected by the dramatic change in climate. In addition, we noticed that even though we inoculated PS3 with different tomato cultivars (Red Pearl and Yu Nu), the relative abundance of Haliangium remained high. Haliangium spp. have been proposed to inhibit fungal pathogens in plants by producing particular secondary metabolites (e.g., haliangicins; Sun et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018b). Additionally, Haliangium spp. have been regarded as indicators of soil quality and hubs of PGPRs (Zhou et al., 2018; Shang and Liu, 2021; Wolińska et al., 2022). Based on the findings and literature, we propose that Haliangium can be a potential indicator for determining the efficiency of PS3 inoculation in soil, and this needs to be further verified in various fields and studied on microbe-microbe interactions.

Conclusion

This study enhances our understanding of the effects of beneficial phototrophic bacteria on plant growth, soil physicochemical properties, and the composition of microbial communities in the soil of organic tomato farms. According to our results, inoculation with R. palustris strain PS3 significantly improved the yield and quality of tomato plants under organic farming practices. Several bacterial groups associated with nutrient cycling exhibited higher relative abundance after PS3 inoculation. These differences were positively correlated with the growth characteristics and harvest quality of tomato, suggesting that a favorable rhizosphere bacterial community may contribute to improvements in fruiting and yield. Therefore, inoculation with PGPRs, such as the strain PS3 characterized in this study, can provide a sustainable way of improving the health of plants and soil in modern agriculture.

Data availability statement

The data presented in the study are deposited in the online repository, accession number PRJNA865887, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/865887.

Author contributions

S-KL, C-HK, and C-TL: conceptualization. S-KL: experiment and data analysis. S-KL and C-TL: writing–original draft preparation. C-HK, M-SC, and Z-YH: review and editing and American Journal Experts English editing service. C-HK and C-TL: supervision. C-TL: funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (108-2313-B-002-058-MY3, MOST 109-2321-B-005-027) and Academia Sinica. Computational resources were provided by the Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica. This article was subsidized for English editing by National Taiwan University under the Excellence Improvement Program for Doctoral Students (108-2926-I-002-002-MY4), sponsored by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our great appreciation to Ming-Ke Chen and Town South Organic Farm for providing the experimental site and suggestions for the field trial.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.959080/full#supplementary-material

References

Aoun, A. B., Lechiheb, B., Benyahya, L., and Ferchichi, A. (2013). Evaluation of fruit quality traits of traditional varieties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) grown in Tunisia. Afr. J. Food Sci. 7, 350–354. doi: 10.5897/AJFS2013.1067

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Belimov, A. A., Dodd, I. C., Safronova, V. I., Dumova, V. A., Shaposhnikov, A. I., Ladatko, A. G., et al. (2014). Abscisic acid metabolizing rhizobacteria decrease ABA concentrations in planta and alter plant growth. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 74, 84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.10.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhattacharyya, D., Duta, S., Yu, S.-M., Jeong, S. C., and Lee, Y. H. (2018). Taxonomic and functional changes of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of kimchi cabbage after seed bacterization with Proteus vulgaris JBLS202. Plant Pathol. J. 34, 286–296. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.03.2018.0047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolyen, E., Rideout, J. R., Dillon, M. R., Bokulich, N. A., Abnet, C. C., Al-Ghalith, G. A., et al. (2019). Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Botton, A., Eccher, G., Forcato, C., Ferrarini, A., Begheldo, M., Zermiani, M., et al. (2011). Signaling pathways mediating the induction of apple fruitlet abscission. Plant Physiol. 155, 185–208. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.165779

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bremner, J. M. (1996). “Nitrogen-total,” in Methods of Soil Analysis. eds. D. L. Sparks, A. L. Page, P. A. Helmke, R. H. Loeppert, P. N. Soltanpour, and M. A. Tabatabai, et al. (Madison, Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America), 1085–1122.

Google Scholar

Bremner, J. M., and Douglas, L. A. (1971). Inhibition of urease activity in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 3, 297–307. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(71)90039-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Casida, L. E. J., Klein, D. A., and Santoro, T. (1964). Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 98, 371–376. doi: 10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Castiglione, A. M., Mannino, G., Contartese, V., Bertea, C. M., and Ertani, A. (2021). Microbial biostimulants as response to modern agriculture needs: composition, role and application of these innovative products. Plan. Theory 10:1533. doi: 10.3390/plants10081533

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chandra, S., Khan, S., Avula, B., Lata, H., Yang, M. H., Elsohly, M. A., et al. (2014). Assessment of total phenolic and flavonoid content, antioxidant properties, and yield of aeroponically and conventionally grown leafy vegetables and fruit crops: a comparative study. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2014:253875. doi: 10.1155/2014/253875

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frindte, K., Pape, R., Werner, K., Löffler, J., and Knief, C. (2019). Temperature and soil moisture control microbial community composition in an arctic-alpine ecosystem along elevational and micro-topographic gradients. ISME J. 13, 2031–2043. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0409-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gadhave, K. R., Devlin, P. F., Ebertz, A., Ross, A., and Gange, A. C. (2018). Soil inoculation with bacillus spp. modifies root endophytic bacterial diversity, evenness, and community composition in a context-specific manner. Microb. Ecol. 76, 741–750. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1160-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Giovannetti, M., Avio, L., Barale, R., Ceccarelli, N., Cristofani, R., Iezzi, A., et al. (2012). Nutraceutical value and safety of tomato fruits produced by mycorrhizal plants. Br. J. Nutr. 107, 242–251. doi: 10.1017/S000711451100290X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glick, B. R. (2014). Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol. Res. 169, 30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grover, M., Bodhankar, S., Sharma, A., Sharma, P., Singh, J., and Nain, L. (2021). PGPR mediated alterations in root traits: way toward sustainable crop production. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4:618230. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.618230

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gu, Y., Wang, P., and Kong, C. H. (2009). Urease, invertase, dehydrogenase and polyphenoloxidase activities in paddy soil influenced by allelopathic rice variety. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 45, 436–441. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.06.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hakim, S., Naqqash, T., Nawaz, M. S., Laraib, I., Siddique, M. J., Zia, R., et al. (2021). Rhizosphere engineering with plant growth-promoting microorganisms for agriculture and ecological sustainability. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5, 617157. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.617157

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hall, M., and Beiko, R. G. (2018). 16S rRNA gene analysis with QIIME2. Methods Mol. Biol. 1849, 113–129. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8728-3_8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamid, B., Zaman, M., Farooq, S., Fatima, S., Sayyed, R. Z., Baba, Z. A., et al. (2021). Bacterial plant biostimulants: a sustainable way towards improving growth, productivity, and health of crops. Sustain. For. 13, 2856. doi: 10.3390/su13052856

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heiniger, R., Mcbride, R., and Clay, D. (2003). Using soil electrical conductivity to improve nutrient management. Agron. J. 95, 508–519. doi: 10.2134/agronj2003.5080

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hsu, S., Lo, K., Fang, W., Lur, H., and Liu, C. (2015). Application of phototrophic bacterial inoculant to reduce nitrate content in hydroponic leafy vegetables. Crop, Environ. Bioinform. 12, 30–41. doi: 10.30061/CEB.201503_12(1).0003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hsu, S. H., Shen, M. W., Chen, J. C., Lur, H. S., and Liu, C. T. (2021). The photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris strain PS3 exerts plant growth-promoting effects by stimulating nitrogen uptake and elevating auxin levels in expanding leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 12:573634. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.573634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katoh, K., and Standley, D. M. (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keeney, D., and Nelson, D. (1983). “Nitrogen—inorganic forms,” in Methods of Soil Analysis. eds. A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney (Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy), 643–698.

Google Scholar

Kloepper, J. W., Leong, J., Teintze, M., and Schroth, M. N. (1980). Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Nature 286, 885–886. doi: 10.1038/286885a0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kohout, C. E. (2019). The plant growth-promoting potential of root-associated bacteria from plants growing in stressed environments. Master Thesis. University of Saskatchewan. Available at: https://harvest.usask.ca/handle/10388/11926 (Accessed July 05, 2022).

Google Scholar

Lee, Y., Do, V. G., Kim, S., Kweon, H., and Mcghie, T. K. (2021b). Cold stress triggers premature fruit abscission through ABA-dependent signal transduction in early developing apple. PLoS One 16:e0249975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249975

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, S. G., Ko, K. D., and Lee, C. W. (2008). Influence of post-fruit set plant exposure to low light intensity on growth and yield of oriental melon. Acta Hortic. 771, 249–255. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.771.37

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, S. K., Lur, H. S., and Liu, C. T. (2021a). From lab to farm: elucidating the beneficial roles of photosynthetic bacteria in sustainable agriculture. Microorganisms 9, 2453. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122453

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Zhao, W., Zhou, X., Feng, J., Gao, Y., Yao, X., et al. (2017). The use of toluidine blue staining combined with paraffin sectioning and the optimization of freeze-thaw counting methods for analysing root-knot nematodes in tomato. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 58, 620–626. doi: 10.1007/s13580-017-0042-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, P., Yan, Z. F., and Li, C. T. (2020). Luteimonas cellulosilyticus sp. nov., cellulose-degrading bacterium isolated from soil in Changguangxi national wetland park, China. Curr. Microbiol. 77, 1341–1347. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-01934-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, N., Zhou, B.-L., Zhao, X., Lu, B., Li, Y., and Hao, J. (2009). Grafting eggplant onto tomato rootstock to suppress Verticillium dahliae infection: the effect of root exudates. HortScience 44, 2058–2062. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.7.2058

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lo, K. J., Lee, S. K., and Liu, C. T. (2020). Development of a low-cost culture medium for the rapid production of plant growth-promoting Rhodopseudomonas palustris strain PS3. PLoS One 15, e0236739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236739

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Love, M. I., Huber, W., and Anders, S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martin, M. (2011). CUTADAPT removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17:200. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mehlich, A. (1984). Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15, 1409–1416. doi: 10.1080/00103628409367568

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mickan, B. S., Alsharmani, A. R., Solaiman, Z. M., Leopold, M., and Abbott, L. K. (2021). Plant-dependent soil bacterial responses following amendment with a multispecies microbial biostimulant compared to rock mineral and chemical fertilizers. Frontiers. Plant Sci. 11:550169. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.550169

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mohanty, P., Singh, P. K., Chakraborty, D., Mishra, S., and Pattnaik, R. (2021). Insight into the role of pgpr in sustainable agriculture and environment. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5:667150. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.667150

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nelson, D. W., and Sommers, L. E. (1996). “Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter,” in Methods of Soil Analysis. eds. D. L. Sparks, A. L. Page, P. A. Helmke, R. H. Loeppert, P. N. Soltanpour, and M. A. Tabatabai, et al. (Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy), 961–1010.

Google Scholar

O’brien, F. J. M. (2016). The role of the rhizosphere microbial community in plant chemistry and aphid herbivory in Brassica oleracea. Ph. D. Thesis. University of Southampton. Available at: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/411973/ (Accessed July 05, 2022).

Google Scholar

Oancea, F., Raut, I., and Zamfiropol Cristea, V. (2017). Influence of soil treatment with microbial plant biostimulant on tomato yield and quality. Agri. Food J. Int. Sci. Publ. 1314-8591, 156–165.

Google Scholar

Olsen, S. R., and Sommers, L. E. (1983). “Phosphorus Page AL,” in Methods of Soil Analysis. eds. R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeney (Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy), 403–427.

Google Scholar

Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., and Arkin, A. P. (2010). FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, J., Chao, K., and Kim, M. S. (2012). Nondestructive evaluation of internal maturity of tomatoes using spatially offset Raman spectroscopy. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 71, 21–31. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.04.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., et al. (2013). The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quilchano, C., and Marañón, T. (2002). Dehydrogenase activity in Mediterranean forest soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 35, 102–107. doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0446-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rangjaroen, C., Sungthong, R., Rerkasem, B., Teaumroong, N., Noisangiam, R., and Lumyong, S. (2017). Untapped endophytic colonization and plant growth-promoting potential of the genus Novosphingobium to optimize rice cultivation. Microbes Environ. 32, 84–87. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME16112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakarika, M., Spanoghe, J., Sui, Y., Wambacq, E., Grunert, O., Haesaert, G., et al. (2020). Purple non-Sulphur bacteria and plant production: benefits for fertilization, stress resistance and the environment. Microb. Biotechnol. 13, 1336–1365. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13474

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salazar, S., Sánchez, L. E., Alvarez, J., Valverde, A., Galindo, P., Igual, J. M., et al. (2011). Correlation among soil enzyme activities under different forest system management practices. Ecol. Eng. 37, 1123–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.02.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shang, J., and Liu, B. (2021). Application of a microbial consortium improves the growth of Camellia sinensis and influences the indigenous rhizosphere bacterial communities. J. Appl. Microbiol. 130, 2029–2040. doi: 10.1111/jam.14927

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, F. T., and Lin, S. H. (2021). Shifts in bacterial community associated with green manure soybean intercropping and edaphic properties in a tea plantation. Sustain. For. 13, 11478. doi: 10.3390/su132011478

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smit, E., Leeflang, P., Gommans, S., Broek, J. V. D., Mil, S. V., and Wernars, K. (2001). Diversity and seasonal fluctuations of the dominant members of the bacterial soil community in a wheat field as determined by cultivation and molecular methods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 2284–2291. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.5.2284-2291.2001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smit, A. M., Strabala, T. J., Peng, L., Rawson, P., Lloyd-Jones, G., and Jordan, T. W. (2012). Proteomic phenotyping of Novosphingobium nitrogenifigens reveals a robust capacity for simultaneous nitrogen fixation, polyhydroxyalkanoate production, and resistance to reactive oxygen species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 4802–4815. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00274-12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spaepen, S., and Vanderleyden, J. (2011). Auxin and plant-microbe interactions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3:a001438. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001438

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spain, A. M., Krumholz, L. R., and Elshahed, M. S. (2009). Abundance, composition, diversity and novelty of soil Proteobacteria. ISME J. 3, 992–1000. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.43

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Y., Feng, Z., Tomura, T., Suzuki, A., Miyano, S., Tsuge, T., et al. (2016). Heterologous production of the marine myxobacterial antibiotic haliangicin and its unnatural analogues generated by engineering of the biochemical pathway. Sci. Rep. 6, 22091. doi: 10.1038/srep22091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tabatabai, M. A., and Bremner, J. M. (1969). Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1, 301–307. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, J., Li, Q., Xu, S., Zhao, W., Lei, Y., Song, C., et al. (2018a). Traits-based integration of multi-species inoculants facilitates shifts of indigenous soil bacterial community. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1692. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01692

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Wu, F., and Zhou, X. (2018b). Changes in rhizosphere microbial communities in potted cucumber seedlings treated with syringic acid. PLoS One 13:e0200007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, D. D., Zhao, W., Reyila, M., Huang, K. C., Liu, S., and Cui, B. K. (2022). Diversity of microbial communities of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica at spatial scale. Microorganisms 10:371. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weil, R., Stine, M., Gruver, J., and Samson-Liebig, S. (2003). Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: a simplified method for laboratory and field use. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 18, 3–17.

Google Scholar

Wolińska, A., Kruczyńska, A., Podlewski, J., Słomczewski, A., Grządziel, J., Gałązka, A., et al. (2022). Does use of an intercropping mixture really improve the biology of monocultural soils-a search for bacterial indicators of sensitivity and resistance to long-term maize monoculture. Agronomy 12, 613. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12030613

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wong, W.-T., Tseng, C.-H., Hsu, S.-H., Lur, H.-S., Mo, C.-W., Huang, C.-N., et al. (2014). Promoting effects of a single Rhodopseudomonas palustris inoculant on plant growth by Brassica rapa chinensis under low fertilizer input. Microbes Environ. 29, 303–313. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, S. X., Liao, B., Xiao, R.-B., and Li, J. T. (2019). Effects of amendments on soil microbial diversity, enzyme activity and nutrient accumulation after assisted phytostabilization of an extremely acidic metalliferous mine soil. Appl. Sci. 9, 1552. doi: 10.3390/app9081552

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yilmaz, P., Parfrey, L. W., Yarza, P., Gerken, J., Pruesse, E., Quast, C., et al. (2014). The SILVA and "all-species living tree project (LTP)" taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D643–D648. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Liu, Y. X., Zhang, N., Hu, B., Jin, T., Xu, H., et al. (2019a). NRT1. 1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 676–684. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0104-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L. N., Wang, D. C., Hu, Q., Dai, X. Q., Xie, Y. S., Li, Q., et al. (2019b). Consortium of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria strains suppresses sweet pepper disease by altering the rhizosphere microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 10:1668. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01668

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhelezova, A., Chernov, T., Nikitin, D., Tkhakakhova, A., Ksenofontova, N., Zverev, A., et al. (2022). Seasonal dynamics of soil bacterial community under long-term abandoned cropland in boreal climate. Agronomy 12, 519. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12020519

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, X., Zhang, J., Pan, D., Ge, X., Xue, J., Chen, S., et al. (2018). P-Coumaric can alter the composition of cucumber rhizosphere microbial communities and induce negative plant-microbial interactions. Biol. Fertil. Soils 54, 363–372. doi: 10.1007/s00374-018-1265-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: PGPR, biostimulant, microbiota, soil health, sustainability

Citation: Lee S-K, Chiang M-S, Hseu Z-Y, Kuo C-H and Liu C-T (2022) A photosynthetic bacterial inoculant exerts beneficial effects on the yield and quality of tomato and affects bacterial community structure in an organic field. Front. Microbiol. 13:959080. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.959080

Received: 01 June 2022; Accepted: 26 July 2022;
Published: 29 August 2022.

Edited by:

Ajar Nath Yadav, Eternal University, India

Reviewed by:

Ayomide Emmanuel Fadiji, North-West University, South Africa
Asma Imran, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Pakistan
Ashutosh Kumar Rai, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia

Copyright © 2022 Lee, Chiang, Hseu, Kuo and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Chih-Horng Kuo, chk@gate.sinica.edu.tw; Chi-Te Liu, chiteliu@ntu.edu.tw

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.