Imran Ahmad
Raza Ali Naqvi
Araceli Valverde
Afsar R. Naqvi- Mucosal Immunology Lab, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
Macrophages (Mφ) are long-lived myeloid cells that can polarize towards the proinflammatory M1 or proresolving M2 phenotype to control diverse biological processes such as inflammation, tissue damage, and regeneration. Noncoding RNA are a class of nonprotein-coding transcriptome with numerous interdependent biological roles; however, their functional interaction in the regulation of Mφ polarization and immune responses remain unclear. Here, we show antagonistic relationship between lncRNA (MALAT1) and microRNA (miR-30b) in shaping macrophage polarization and immune functions. MALAT1 expression displays a time-dependent induction during Mφ differentiation and, upon challenge with TLR4 agonist (E. coli LPS). MALAT1 knockdown promoted the expression of M2Mφ markers without affecting M1Mφ markers, suggesting that MALAT1 favors the M1 phenotype by suppressing M2 differentiation. Compared to the control, MALAT1 knockdown resulted in reduced antigen uptake and processing, bacterial phagocytosis, and bactericidal activity, strongly supporting its critical role in regulating innate immune functions in Mφ. Consistent with this, MALAT1 knockdown showed impaired cytokine secretion upon challenge with LPS. Importantly, MALAT1 exhibit an antagonistic expression pattern with all five members of the miR-30 family during M2 Mφ differentiation. Dual-luciferase assays validated a novel sequence on MALAT1 that interacts with miR-30b, a microRNA that promotes the M2 phenotype. Phagocytosis and antigen processing assays unequivocally demonstrated that MALAT1 and miR-30b are functionally antagonistic. Concurrent MALAT1 knockdown and miR-30b overexpression exhibited the most significant attenuation in both assays. In human subjects with periodontal disease and murine model of ligature-induced periodontitis, we observed higher levels of MALAT1, M1Mφ markers and downregulation of miR-30b expression in gingival tissues suggesting a pro-inflammatory function of MALAT1 in vivo. Overall, we unraveled the role of MALAT1 in Mφ polarization and delineated the underlying mechanism of its regulation by involving MALAT-1-driven miR-30b sequestration.
Introduction
The ability of a healthy immune system to clear a plethora of antigens relies on the enormous plasticity displayed by the relevant cell types. Monocytes, macrophages (Mφ), and dendritic cells (DCs) are members of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) that constantly patrol peripheral tissues. These cells are the imperative players in innate immunity, which form the first lines of defense and are responsible for maintaining tissue integrity and homeostasis via active recruitment to sites of injury and infection (1). Mφ recognize pathogens by diverse Toll-like receptors (TLRs), phagocytize them, secrete cytokines that eventually activate the adaptive arm of the immune system, and perform critical roles in wound repair. The coordinated combination of local stimuli facilitates the activation of differential switches inside Mφ and induces them to acquire specialized functional phenotypes, viz. inflammatory (M1) and reparative (M2) subtypes, depending upon the phase of infection (1–3). Mφ polarization is a tightly controlled process, and numerous endogenous and exogenous molecules can skew their phenotype. Dysregulation of Mφ polarization has been implicated in autoimmune diseases, cancers, fibrosis, viral infections, etc. (3–8). However, the mechanistic details of this process and the molecular events regulating Mφ polarization are not fully understood. Therefore, deciphering the role of endogenous regulatory molecules that control the differentiation and function of these multifunctional immune cells can uncover novel regulatory mechanisms.
One intriguing finding of human genome annotation was the abundance of transcripts with little or no protein-coding potential, later termed long (>200 nts) noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) (9, 10). As of now, more than 50,000 different lncRNAs have been identified in humans, and the list continues to expand (11). However, a large repertoire of lncRNAs remains uncharacterized. Interestingly, lncRNAs are modular molecules that can physically interact with DNA, RNA (mRNA/miRNA) or protein to regulate transcriptional, posttranscriptional and translational output of the genome (12–14). Aberrations in lncRNA expression have been reported to be associated with disease manifestation in cancers, neurodegenerative disorders, autoimmunity, etc. (15).
Macrophage polarization is a dynamic process that is regulated by changes in gene expression, transcription factors, epigenetic modifications, signaling pathways, and posttranslational modifications (16–18). Recent studies have uncovered the differential expression of lncRNAs during macrophage differentiation and macrophage polarization in various diseases (19–22). Currently, few lncRNAs have been demonstrated to regulate macrophage polarization. For instance, lncRNAs AFAP-AS1 and PVT1 promote M1 polarization, while DLX6-AS1 and LINC00467 promote M2 polarization (23–25). However, lncRNA-mediated regulation of Mφ phenotype and innate immune functions and their interaction with other noncoding RNAs during these biological processes remain poorly studied.
A recent publication from our laboratory methodically showed the differential lncRNA expression profile in monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation. In that study, we observed higher expression of MALAT1 (26). In this article, we examined the role of MALAT1 in macrophage polarization and the underlying mechanisms, which have not been fully explored. Furthermore, we investigated MALAT1-mediated regulation of macrophage polarization through microRNA sponging. Our results show that lncRNA MALAT1 and miR-30b crosstalk was instrumental in skewing M1/M2 polarization and regulating key innate immune functions including phagocytosis and antigen processing. We examined MALAT1 and miR-30b profiles and their relationship with macrophage polarization markers in gingival (gum) biopsies collected from periodontally diseased human subjects and mice model of ligature-induced periodontitis.
Methods
Primary human monocyte isolation and differentiation
The freshly prepared buffy coats collected from healthy donors were used to purify Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (Sylvan N. Goldman Oklahoma Blood Institute, Oklahoma City, OK) using Ficoll Paque (Catalog# GE17-1440-02, GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ)-based density centrifugation method, as described earlier (27, 28). The purified PBMCs were used to isolate CD14+ monocytes, which were differentiated into M1 Mφ, M2 Mφ or DCs in the presence of recombinant human (rh) GM-CSF (1000 U/ml; Catalog# 300-03, PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ), M-CSF (50 ng/ml; Catalog# 300-25, PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) or GM-CSF+IL-4 (50 ng/ml; Catalog# 200-04, PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) (27–31). Cells were harvested at various time points for flow cytometric analysis or RNA isolation.
Transient GapmeR and miRNA transfection
MALAT1 (Catalog# LG00000003-DDA) and control (Catalog# LG00000002-DDA) GapmeRs were purchased from Qiagen (Germantown, MD). Transient transfection of GapmeRs was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Catalog# 11668027, Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were transfected with lncRNA MALAT1 or control GapmeR at a final concentration of 50 nM. siGLO Red oligos (Catalog# D-001630-02, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) were used to determine transfection efficiency.
Cell viability assay
Cell viability assays were performed using the CellTiter 96 AQueous Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (Catalog# G3580, Promega, Madison, WI), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, CD14+ monocytes were seeded and differentiated in 96-well plates and transfected with MALAT1 or control GapmeR, and assays were performed at 24 h and 48 h post transfection.
Total RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and qPCR
Total RNA was isolated from monocytes, M1/M2 Mφ and DCs using the miRNeasy mini-kit (Catalog# 217004, Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 500 ng of total RNA was used to synthesize first-strand cDNA using the Reverse Transcription Kit (Catalog# RT31-100, Qiagen). For lncRNA expression profiling, commercially available primers were purchased from Sigma, and transcript expression was quantified by real-time PCR using a StepOne plus thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). Expression levels were normalized with respect to β-actin, and the fold change was calculated using the delta-delta CT method. M1 or M2 Mφ were harvested at 36 h post-transfection with lncRNA or treatment with LPS. Total RNA was isolated, and the expression of MALAT1 lncRNA and gene markers of M1 (iNOS, STAT1, TNF-α, ARG2) and M2 (ARG1, STAT3, CCL2, IL-10) Mφ was analyzed by RT–qPCR. The data are presented as normalized fold change with SD.
Flow cytometry
Cells were harvested and washed in ice-cold PBS supplemented with 1% (v/v) FBS and 0.08% sodium azide. Samples were analyzed using a FACScan or BD Cyan flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose CA). Equal number of cells (10,000 or 20,000) were captured for all the experiments. Cellular debris was excluded based on size (forward scatter [FSC]) and granularity (side scatter [SSC]). Couplets were excluded based on SSC versus FSC and SSC versus pulse width measurements. Samples were stained for cell surface markers with antibodies conjugated with either FITC, PE or APC (Dectin-1, Catalog# 355404; HLA-DR, Catalog# 980402; CD163, Catalog# 326510; TLR-8, Catalog# 395504; STAT3, Catalog# 371804; IL-10, Catalog# 506807; BioLegend, San Diego, CA; FcϵRI, Catalog# FCABS400F; EMD, Millipore). For positive and negative controls, unstained and isotype control-treated cells were used, respectively. Further analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
Antigen uptake, processing and phagocytosis assays
M1 and M2 macrophages (300,000/well, 96-well plate) were transfected on Day 7 with MALAT1 or control GapmeRs (Qiagen). MALAT1 or control GapmeR-transfected M1 and M2 Mφ were incubated with both Texas Red-conjugated Ova (Catalog# O23021) and DQ-conjugated Ova (Catalog# D12053) (both 1 mg/ml, Molecular Probes, Grand Island, NY) in complete media to assess antigen uptake and antigen processing, respectively (29, 32–34). Phagocytosis assay was performed with pHrodo Red/Green-conjugated E. coli (Catalog# P35361/P35366; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at 24 h post-transfection, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (27).
Macrophage bactericidal activity assay
To measure the bactericidal activity of macrophages, differentiated macrophages were incubated with E. coli, and the number of surviving bacteria was quantitated by MTS (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium)-based colorimetric assay (35–37). CD14+ monocytes (50,000) were seeded per well of a 96-well plate and differentiated into M1 or M2 macrophages. LncRNA MALAT1 was silenced using ASO-MALAT1, and cells were incubated with E. coli (DH5α) particles. E. coli particles (from log phase cultures in LB media) were quantitated by measuring the O.D. at 600 nm (OD600 = 8.0X108 cells/ml). Bacteria were washed and resuspended in DMEM, and 5X105 particles were incubated per well of macrophages (MOI 10). Culture plates were centrifuged at 150×g for 5 min to bring the bacteria into contact with the macrophages. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 8 h. After incubation, macrophages were lysed by Milli-Q water (hypotonic lysis) for 30 minutes. E. coli viability was determined using the CellTiter 96 AQueous Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (Catalog# G3580; Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. At the same time, a bacterial titration standard containing a 2-fold dilution of bacteria in DMEM was prepared, and an MTS assay was performed. Absorbance from the bacteria titration plate was fitted to the standard curve from which viable bacteria numbers were calculated in ASO-MALAT1- or ASO-Control-transfected macrophages.
Multiplex cytokine array
Cell culture supernatants (spent media) were collected from M1 and M2 macrophages challenged with E. coli LPS for 4 h and 24 h. The levels of 8 different cytokines (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, CXCL10 and TNF-α) were analyzed by multiplex assays using custom multiplex cytokine plates (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Data were collected on a MAGPIX instrument (Luminex, Austin, TX).
LncRNA MALAT1 cloning
Bioinformatics prediction of miR-30b-5p and miR-26a binding sites in lncRNA MALAT1 was performed by using an online database, RNA hybrid (https://bibiserv.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/rnahybrid/). To perform a luciferase assay to test the predicted binding sites of miR-30b-5p and miR-26a within lncRNA MALAT1, a 1574 bp fragment of lncRNA MALAT1 (8-1582 bp) was PCR amplified (forward primer – TGCAGCCCGAGACTTCTGTAAAGG; reverse primer – GCTTCATCTCAACCTCCGTC) using genomic DNA from monocytes and ligated in dual luciferase reporter vector psiCHECK-2 downstream of Renilla luciferase (Promega Corporation) vector in Xho1 and Not1 sites in MCS. For overexpression of MALAT1 in completion luciferase assays with psiCHECK2-TLR8, the MALAT1 sequence was subcloned from psiCHECK-2 in pCDNA3.1 (pcDNA-MALAT1) within EcoRI and NotI sites.
Dual luciferase assays
Dual luciferase reporter assays were performed using Promega dual luciferase kit (Catalog# E1980, Promega, Madison, WI) as previously described (27). Briefly, HEK293 cells were seeded in 96-well plates, at a density of 3X104 cells/well in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. All transfections were performed using 0.5 μL of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), 120 ng of dual luciferase reporter plasmid psiCHECK2 containing a lncRNA MALAT1 fragment having hsa-miR-30b binding site, and co-transfected with a final concentration of 10 nM, 25 nM and 50 nM of synthetic hsa-miR-30b (Catalog# MSY0000130, Qiagen) or control mimics (50 nM) (Catalog# 1022076, Qiagen). At 36 h post-transfection, cells were lysed in passive lysis buffer (Promega Corporation), and dual luciferase assays were performed using the multilabel reader VictorTM x5 (Perkin Elmer 2030- Perkin Elmer Health Sciences Inc., Shelton, CT, USA).
Transcriptome profiling
For transcriptome wide expression profiling microarray analysis was used. Dendritic cells were transfected with miR-30b-5p or control mimic and harvested after 36 h, and total RNA was isolated using the miRNeasy kit (Qiagen). We used Affymetrix HTA-2_0 arrays (Santa Clara, CA, USA) for gene expression profiling, and the analysis was performed as described previously (38). Array data were in compliance with Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME) guidelines and deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus public database under Accession Number GSE151262.
Study population and sample collection
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee at the University Autónoma de Nuevo León Facultad de Odontología, Monterrey, Mexico, and Institutional Review Board at the University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Dentistry, Chicago, IL, USA (IRB # 2015-1093). Subjects presenting to the Postgraduate Periodontics Clinic at the Dental School of the Universidad Autonóma de Nuevo León were recruited for this study. Subjects (N=10) with chronic periodontal disease displayed probing depth ≥ 6mm with bleeding on probing and radiographic evidence of bone loss. Health periodontal patients displayed probing depths ≤ 3mm, with no bleeding on probing and no radiographic evidence of bone loss. Inclusion criteria included male and female patients ages 18 to 65 years and in good systemic health. Exclusion criteria included chronic disease (diabetes, hepatitis, renal failure, clotting disorders, HIV, etc), antibiotic therapy for any medical or dental condition within a month before screening, and subjects taking medications known to affect periodontal status (e.g. phenytoin, calcium channel blockers, cyclosporine). For periodontally healthy subjects (N=10), a single gingival biopsy sample (including gingival epithelium, col area, and underlying connective tissue) was collected at the time of crown-lengthening procedures. The biopsy sample was harvested using intrasulcular and inverse bevel incisions approximately 2 mm from the free gingival margin at the crest of the interproximal papillae extending horizontally capturing the interproximal col area and immediately placed in RNAlater (Catalog# AM7020, Invitrogen) and stored at -80°C until further use.
Murine model of ligature-induced periodontitis
Periodontitis was induced using a 6-0 silk ligature placed bilaterally between the maxillary first and second molar and local injection of P. gingivalis (2µl of 1X109 pfu) around buccal and palatal gingiva) in 8-12-week-old female mice (n=4) under anesthesia using intraperitoneal injection of ketamine and xylazine. Animals were euthanized at 8 day post-ligature (DPL) placement. The mice with displaced ligature during experimental period were excluded from the evaluation. Gingival tissue were harvested from around the maxillary first and second molars and homogenized. Total RNA was extracted from the excised gingival tissue using the miRNeasy kit (Qiagen). RT-qPCR was performed as described above and the gene expression levels were normalized to those of the reference endogenous controls RNU6A and β-actin for miRNA and mRNA, respectively.
Statistical analysis
All of the data were analyzed and plotted using GraphPad Prism (La Jolla, USA). The results are represented as mean ± SD or SEM from three independent replicates. P values were calculated using ANOVA combined with a post-hoc test. P < 0.05 was considered significant (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
Results
MALAT1 expression is responsive to macrophage differentiation and TLR4 stimulation
Our previous lncRNA PCR array profiling showed higher expression of MALAT1 in M2Mφ compared to monocytes, suggesting its role in macrophage differentiation (26). Therefore, in this study, we first examined the expression dynamics of MALAT1 in monocytes during M1 and M2 Mφ differentiation at the following time points: 18 h, day 3, day 5, and day 7. Our results showed a time-dependent upregulation of MALAT1 during both M1Mφ and M2Mφ differentiation (Figure 1A). The expression of MALAT1 increased significantly at day 3 and peaked at day 5. Comparing the peaks of its expression at day 5 in monocytes, we observed 7-fold and 3.7-fold increase in MALAT1 expression in M1 and M2 Mφ, respectively. These observations suggest that MALAT1 levels are induced during macrophage differentiation, however, its expression is particularly high in M1 subset.
Figure 1 Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 is responsive to macrophage differentiation and activation in vitro and in vivo. (A) Expression of MALAT1 during the differentiation of M1 and M2 macrophages compared with monocytes in vitro. Primary CD14+ monocytes were isolated and differentiated into M1 Mφ or M2 Mφ in the presence of recombinant human (rh) GM-CSF (1000 U/ml) or M-CSF (50 ng/ml). Total RNA was isolated at various time points, and MALAT1 expression was quantified by RT–qPCR. (B) Time kinetics of MALAT1 expression in response to LPS stimulation (100 ng/ml) in M1 and M2 macrophages. Data (n=3) are representative of three independent experiments and are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA combined with a post-hoc test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. (C) In vivo macrophages (from human subjects) express higher MALAT1 than monocytes and after TLR activation. MALAT1 RNA expression in a public dataset (GSE22373) in blood monocytes and intestinal macrophages or in macrophages treated with S. typhimurium flagellin (100 ng/ml) for 24 h.
Monocytes are also precursors to myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs). We then investigated whether the induction of MALAT1 occurs during monocyte differentiation to DCs. MALAT1 expression was examined during DC differentiation and we observed that its levels significantly increase as early as 18 h (5-fold) and peaked at day 3 (15-fold) of mDC differentiation (Figure S1A). Together, these observations clearly suggest that MALAT1 expression is induced during monocyte-to-Mφ and DC differentiation.
Macrophages are long-lived, TLR4+ myeloid cells, and dynamic transcriptional changes are integral to elicit adept immune responses. Therefore, we next evaluated whether MALAT1 is responsive to TLR4 ligation, viz. E. coli LPS challenge. M1 and M2 Mφ were treated with E. coli LPS (100 ng/ml) for 3, 12, and 24 h, and MALAT1 expression was quantified by RT–qPCR. In M2Mφ, MALAT1 was upregulated by LPS treatment as early as 3 h and was sustained until 24 h (2-fold increase) (Figure 1B). In contrast, MALAT1 levels in M1 Mφ showed a progressive decrease in levels, suggesting that MALAT1 is differentially expressed in M1 and M2 Mφ in response to TLR4 activation and may contribute to polarization pathways (Figure 1B).
Next, we asked whether MALAT1 expression is differentially regulated in vivo. For this, we examined MALAT1 expression in a published microarray dataset (GSE22373) of unstimulated monocytes and macrophages and flagellin-stimulated monocytes and macrophages. We noted higher expression of MALAT1 in macrophages than in monocytes and in response to flagellin treatment (TLR5 stimulation) [Figure 1C (39)]. Overall, these results show that MALAT1 expression is responsive to Mφ differentiation and activation and suggest that MALAT1 may regulate both aspects of Mφ biology.
Knockdown of MALAT1 favors M2 macrophage phenotype
To elucidate the role of MALAT1 in Mφ polarization, we performed MALAT1 knockdown using antisense oligos (ASO-MALAT1). CD14+ monocytes were differentiated into M1 and M2 Mφ and then transfected with ASO-MALAT1 or ASO-Control at day 3. We observed significant MALAT1 silencing in ASO-MALAT1 transfected Mφ (both subtypes) compared to ASO-Control Mφ (Figure S1B). We did not observe any adverse effect of MALAT1 knockdown on the viability of M1 or M2 Mφ (Figure S1C) in the MTT assay.
Next, we examined the impact of MALAT1 knockdown on Mφ polarization by quantifying the expression of various M1 and M2 Mφ phenotype markers by RT–qPCR. Compared to the control, knockdown of MALAT1 resulted in increased mRNA expression of M2 markers ARG1 (4.8 ± 0.87-fold), STAT3 (1.63 ± 0.24-fold), CCL2 (4.69 ± 1.19-fold), and IL-10 (1.45 ± 0.1-fold) (Figure 2A; Upper panel). To further validate our RT-qPCR results, we quantified the expression of STAT3 and IL-10 by flow cytometry and observed significant reduction in both STAT3 (2.73 ± 0.43-fold) and IL-10 (2.63 ± 0.35-fold) levels in MALAT1 RNAi compared to the control (Figure S1D). In contrast, the expression of M1Mφ markers iNOS (1.68 ± 0.87-fold), STAT1 (0.87 ± 0.52-fold), TNF-α (1.34 ± 0.49-fold), and ARG2 (1.81 ± 0.73-fold) showed a trend of upregulation in MALAT1 knockdown conditions, albeit the changes were not significant (Figure 2A; lower panel).
Figure 2 Knockdown of MALAT1 attenuates M1 and M2 macrophage differentiation from monocytes. (A) mRNA expression of macrophage polarization-specific genes in MALAT1 knockdown cultures. M1Mφ and M2Mφ were transfected with MALAT1 (ASO-MALAT1) or control (Control_ASO) GapmeR at a final concentration of 50 nM. After 48 h, total RNA was isolated to quantify M2 (ARG1, CCL2, STAT3, IL-10) and M1 (iNOS, STAT1, TNF-α, ARG2) markers by RT–qPCR using specific gene primers. GADPH was used as an internal control. The 2-ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the expression compared to control GapmeR-transfected cells. (B) Histograms showing cell surface expression of M2 (Dectin-1) and M1 (HLA-DR) markers in MALAT1 knockdown macrophages. The gray shaded area represents isotype control, while orange and blue lines represent ASO-MALAT1 and ASO-Control, respectively. Percent geometric MFI values for Dectin-1 and HLA-DR in MALAT1- or control GapmeR-transfected cells. Data (n=4) are representative of three independent experiments and are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by, ANOVA combined with a post-hoc test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 (two-tailed Student’s t-test); ns, non-significant.
To confirm the RT–qPCR results, cell surface markers for Mφ polarization, Dectin-1 (Clec7a) for M2Mφ (40–42), and HLA-DR for M1Mφ (43–45) were evaluated by flow cytometry. Supplemental Figure 1E shows the gating strategy for flow analysis. MALAT1 knockdown resulted in significantly higher (89.7 ± 3.1%) Dectin-1+ population than the control (49.8 ± 14.31%) (Figure 2B). The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Dectin-1 in M2Mφ was seven-fold higher (718%) in MALAT1 knockdown cells than in control transfected cells. Although HLA-DR+ cells slightly decreased in MALAT1 knockdown (73.7 ± 20%) compared with ASO-control (100.33 ± 11.96), this change was not statistically significant (Figure 2B). Together, these experiments clearly suggest that MALAT1 downregulation leads to increased expression of M2 gene markers thereby favoring the M2 phenotype.
MALAT1 regulates antigen uptake, processing, and phagocytosis in macrophages
Macrophages are classical antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that recognize diverse antigens, internalize them by endocytosis or phagocytosis, process them, and finally present on their cell surface for T cell activation (46). To study the effect of MALAT1 knockdown on the function of macrophages, we evaluated antigen uptake, processing and bacterial phagocytosis in MALAT1 knockdown M2Mφ. To examine the effect of MALAT1 knockdown on antigen uptake and processing, Mφ were treated with Texas red-labeled ovalbumin and DQ-ovalbumin, respectively. DQ-ovalbumin is labeled with BODIPY dye with a fluorogenic quencher, which is released upon hydrolysis by cellular proteases. Extracellular DQ-ovalbumin is non-fluorogenic and becomes fluorogenic upon uptake and processing by macrophages.
Knockdown of MALAT1 in M2Mφ resulted in decreased antigen uptake (Figure 3A). The percentage of Texas red-positive cells significantly decreased from 100.4 ± 7.8% in ASO-Control cells to 67.7 ± 5.4% in MALAT1 knockdown cells (Figure 3B; left panel). Geometric MFI values showed ~30% reduction in florescence intensity further showing attenuation of antigen uptake (Figure 3B; right panel). The processing of internalized ovalbumin in MALAT1 knockdown Mφ was also decreased, as observed by imaging (Figure 3C). Similar results were observed in flow cytometry analysis (Figure 3D). The percentage of BODIPY-positive cells and the MFI were significantly decreased (~40%) in MALAT1 knockdown compared to control cells.
Figure 3 MALAT1 knockdown regulates antigen uptake and processing by macrophages. Cells were transfected with ASO-MALAT1 or ASO_Control oligos and after 48 h incubated with Texas Red-conjugated Ova (for antigen uptake), and BODIPY-Ova (for antigen processing) for 2-4 hours. For phagocytosis assays, cells were incubated with pHrodo™ Red E coli BioParticles™ (Invitrogen) for 2-4 hours. Representative florescent microscopy images (A, C, E) showing the inhibitory impact of MALAT1 knockdown on (A) antigen uptake, (C) antigen processing and (E) phagocytosis. Because antigen uptake and antigen processing assays were performed simultaneously in the same well, ASO_control images are repeated for both (A, C) panels showing Texas Red-Ova and BODIPY-Ova florescence. In addition, for quantitative analysis, Mφ were harvested after incubation with different fluorescent probes and analyzed by flow cytometry. Overlay of representative flowcytometric histograms (B, D, F) of ASO_MALAT1 or ASO_Control transfected cells showing differences in (B) Texas red, (D) BODIPY and (F) rhodamine florescent signals for each of the biological assays examined. Bar graphs showing corresponding percent geo. MFI values next to each histogram. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of four independent experiments in each cell type. Student’s t-test was conducted to calculate p values. **P < 0.01. (G) Schematic showing the workflow of the macrophage bactericidal activity assay. (H) Bactericidal activity assay in MALAT1 knockdown M1 and M2 macrophages. In (B, D, H, F): Each bar shows the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (ANOVA combined with a post-hoc test); ns, non-significant..
To assess the effect of MALAT1 knockdown on phagocytosis, cells were treated with pHrodo-Red-labeled E. coli, and bacterial uptake was quantified by imaging and flow cytometry analysis. Knockdown of MALAT1 remarkably attenuated bacterial phagocytosis by M2Mφ, as shown in Figure 3E. Microscopy results were independently verified by flow cytometry (Figure 3F), as observed by a significantly lower percentage of pHrodo red-positive cells. Quantitation of geometric MFI also showed reduced uptake in MALAT1 knockdown (48.13%) cells compared to control (set at 100).
Bactericidal activity is a characteristic function of M1Mφ. We next asked whether MALAT1-mediated skewing of the Mφ phenotype toward M2 could attenuate bacterial killing potential. Cells were transfected with ASO-MALAT1 or ASO-Control and challenged with live E. coli at different concentrations. Figure 3G shows the workflow of the macrophage bactericidal activity assay. To quantitate the bacterial counts, we standardized the absorbance of E. coli culture in the MTS assay to plot a standard curve for calculating the unknown bacterial numbers and used this curve to assess bactericidal activity (Figure S2A). MALAT1 knockdown in M2Mφ showed significantly less bactericidal activity (51.76%) than that in ASO-Control transfected M2Mφ (set at 100%) (Figure 3H). Higher numbers of viable E. coli (4.4X106) were observed in MALAT1 knockdown M2Mφ compared to the control (2.31X106), suggesting that lower MALAT1 expression impairs bactericidal activity (Figure S2B). In contrast, MALAT1 knockdown in M1Mφ showed no statistical differences in bactericidal activity, as observed by similar levels of viable E. coli counts (2.14X106) compared to the control (3.09X106) (Figure 3H; S2B). These results suggest that the knockdown of MALAT1 attenuates phagocytosis, antigen processing and differentially impairs bactericidal activity of M2Mφ.
MALAT1 knockdown leads to altered inflammatory cytokine secretion
Cytokine secretion is tightly coupled with endocytosis or phagocytosis (47, 48). Having established that MALAT1 knockdown negatively regulates phagocytosis, we next asked whether it also affects the innate immune response by modulating the cytokine secretion. M1 or M2Mφ were transfected with ASO-MALAT1 or ASO-Control for 48 h and then challenged with E. coli LPS (100 ng/ml). Supernatants collected at 4 and 24 h were examined for secreted levels of six different pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, CXCL10, and TNF-α. Most of the cytokines examined (except IL-8) showed significant changes in expression either at an early or late time point in MALAT1 knockdown cells compared to control cells, suggesting that MALAT1 regulates innate immune responses in macrophages.
Compared to ASO-Control macrophages, MALAT1 knockdown M1 and M2 macrophages showed significant downregulation in the levels of IL-6, TNF-α, while IL-1α, IL-1β, and CXCL10 exhibited antagonistic expression in M1 and M2 macrophages (Figure 4A). Downregulation of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α was observed at both 4 and 24 h in M2 macrophages, but a significant reduction was observed at 4 h in M1 macrophages. These results indicate that MALAT1 knockdown has a similar impact on anti-inflammatory cytokines in both M1 and M2 macrophages but causes differential changes in proinflammatory cytokine levels. No significant changes were noticed for IL-8 expression in MALAT1 knockdown cells. Figures 4B, C summarizes the modulation of various cytokines in MALAT1 knockdown cells.
Figure 4 MALAT1 knockdown regulates inflammatory cytokine secretion by macrophages. Inflammatory cytokines were measured in the culture media of MALAT1-depleted M1 and M2 macrophages stimulated with E coli LPS for 4 and 24 hours. (A) Bar graph showing proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, CXCL10 levels in M1 and M2 macrophages (n=4). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 (ANOVA combined with a post-hoc test). (B) Heatmap of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in M1 and M2 macrophages. (C) Table summarizing the expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in M1 and M2 macrophages.
Interestingly, MALAT1 knockdown reduced the levels of IL-1α and IL-1β at the 24 h time point in M1 Mφ and caused upregulation of IL-1α (both at 4 and 24 h) in M2 Mφ, but no significant changes were observed for IL-1β in M2 macrophages (Figure 4A). Similarly, the proinflammatory chemokine CXCL10 was differentially impacted by MALAT1 knockdown in M1 and M2 Mφ. Reduced levels of CXCL10 were observed in M2Mφ at both time points; although it was significant at 4 h, no significant impact on CXCL10 levels was observed in M1Mφ (Figure 4A). These findings validate our previous observations that MALAT1 displays distinct functionality in M1 and M2 macrophages. Overall, cytokine profiling in E. coli LPS-challenged M1 and M2 macrophages strongly supports that MALAT1 controls the innate immune response by supporting the proinflammatory immune response and that MALAT1 knockdown has a differential impact on M1 and M2 macrophages.
MALAT1 acts as an endogenous sponge of miR-30b and promotes the expression of its targets
Recent studies have shown that lncRNAs can bind and sequester mature miRNAs (16, 24, 25). By regulating the bioavailability of functional miRNAs, lncRNAs can modulate the expression of their target protein-coding genes. Our laboratory has previously reported a key association between the expression dynamics of miRNAs and M-CSF-mediated monocyte-to-Mφ differentiation (28). miR-30 family members were among the significantly downregulated miRNAs, and we demonstrated their role in potentiating the differentiation and function of both macrophages and DCs (27, 28). The expression of all five members of the miR-30 family (miR-30a-e) was significantly downregulated during M2 macrophage differentiation (Figure S2C). Interestingly, compared to M1Mφ, miR-30b is expressed at higher levels in M2Mφ suggesting a differential role of miR-30b in macrophage polarization (Figure 5A). Also, the MALAT1 and miR-30b showed inverse expression pattern in M2Mφ (Figure 5B, Left Panel), which was also confirmed with correlation analysis showing a negative Pearson correlation coefficient (r) value -0.6722 (Figure 5B, Right Panel). Therefore, we hypothesized that overexpression of miR-30 family members would antagonize MALAT1 function by promoting the M2 phenotype.
Figure 5 MALAT1 acts as an endogenous sponge of miR-30b and promotes the expression of its targets. (A) Comparative miR-30b expression levels in differentiating M1 and M2 macrophages. Total RNA isolated from monocyte-derived M1 and M2 Mφ were examined for miR-30b expression by RT-qPCR. Histograms showing M1 normalized miR-30b expression in M2 Mφ. RNU6B was used a endogenous control. (B) MALAT1 and miR-30b-5p in M2 macrophage differentiation (Left panel) showing inverse expression pattern confirmed with correlation analysis (Right panel), where n represent the number of XY data pairs, r is Pearson correlation coefficient, P=0.006. Transcript expression was normalized to β-actin (for MALAT1) and small nuclear RNA, RNU6B (for miR-30b) (C) miR-30b overexpression promotes the M2 phenotype. Day 4 M2Mφ were transfected with miR-30b mimic, inhibitor, or control mimic (50 nM), and M2-specific markers, viz. Dectin-1 and CD163 expression, were assessed by flow cytometry. Representative dot plots show the percent cell population positive for the markers. Bar graphs (on the right side of dot plot) show overall Dectin-1+ and CD163+ cells in two independent experiments (n=3). (D) Sequence alignment of predicted complementary interactions of miR-30 family members and MALAT1. Conserved seed sequence is shown in yellow box. (E) Functional miR-30b interaction with MALAT1. The dual luciferase reporter plasmid psiCHECK2 (120 ng) cloned with the lncRNA MALAT1 fragment containing the predicted hsa-miR-30b binding site was cotransfected with various concentrations of hsa-miR-30b (10, 25 or 50 nM concentrations) or control mimic (50 nM) in HEK-293T cells. miR-26a, another miRNA with a binding site on MALAT1, was also screened by dual luciferase assay. At 36 h posttransfection, cells were lysed to quantify Renilla and firefly luciferase activity. Renilla activity was normalized to firefly activity, and the ratios subsequently normalized to vector transfected with control mimic set as 1. Data are expressed as the ± SEM of four independent transfections. (F) Competitive dual luciferase assay with psiCHECK2-TLR8 cotransfected with miR-30b mimic alone or in conjunction with pcDNA-MALAT1 with the miR-30b binding site or in conjunction with ASO_Control or ASO_MALAT1. Bar graphs show reduced normalized Renilla activity in miR-30b cells, which was restored in pcDNA-MALAT1-transfected cells. Data are expressed as the ± SEM of four independent transfections. (G) MALAT1 functionally titrates miR-30b levels. Cells were transfected with ASO_Control, ASO_MALAT1, miR-30b mimic, miR-30b with ASO_MALAT1, and miR-30b inhibitor with ASO_MALAT1, and intracellular expression of TLR8 was examined by flow cytometry. Representative overlay histograms show TLR8 expression in different combinations, supporting that MALAT1 acts as an endogenous competitor of miR-30b. Bar graphs with the mean percent TLR8+ population are plotted from the same experiments. Each bar shows mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments (n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001 (ANOVA combined with a post-hoc test).
To test this hypothesis, Day 4 differentiated M2Mφ were transfected with miR-30b mimic, inhibitor, or control mimic and in all transfections, the expression levels of miR-30b was verified by qPCR (Figure S4A), after that the M2 markers (Dectin-1 and CD163) were quantified on Day 7. Flow cytometric analysis showed that M2Mφ transfected with miR-30b mimic upregulated both Dectin-1 and CD163. We observed a significantly higher percentage of Dectin-1+ cells in miR-30b overexpressing M2Mφ (44.9 ± 4.75%; P<0.005) than in the control (23.7 ± 3.55%) (Figure 5C). Conversely, suppression of miR-30b by an inhibitor reduced Dectin-1 expression (21.1 ± 1.5%) compared to miR-30b mimic (Figure 5C). Similarly, the expression of CD163 was upregulated in miR-30b mimic-transfected cells (48.3 ± 6.64%; P<0.022) compared to control (32.0 ± 3.21%) or inhibitor-transfected cells (24.5 ± 4.55%). These data suggest that miR-30b expression in monocytes favors the M2 phenotype rather than the M1 phenotype and functionally antagonizes the role of MALAT1 in shaping macrophage polarization (Figure 5C).
In an independent transcriptome analysis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells overexpressing the miR-30b mimic, we identified various genes regulated by miR-30b involved in antigen processing and presentation, phagosome, and endosomal pathways (most enriched GO terms) (Figures S3A-D). We bioinformatically predicted the upstream regulators viz. transcription factors that regulate differentially expressed genes in miR-30b overexpressing dendritic cells. Network analysis based on the transcription factors revealed that monocyte differentiation, M1 polarization, and M2 polarization pathways (among other signaling pathways) were enriched in miR-30b transfected dendritic cells suggesting that miR-30b exhibit a propensity to target gene networks involved in macrophage polarization (Figures S3E, F). Although these analyses were performed in CD14+ monocyte-derived dendritic cells, they indicate a transcriptome-wide role of miR-30b in macrophage differentiation and polarization.
Antagonistic expression and function of miR-30b and MALAT1 prompted us to ask whether MALAT1 negatively regulates mature miR-30b levels. Detailed bioinformatics analysis was performed to scan potential miRNA binding sites within the MALAT1 sequence, and we identified a novel sequence complementary to the miR-30 family seed region (Figure 5D; Figure S2D). To substantiate our in silico analysis, we cloned a partial MALAT1 sequence harboring the hsa-miR-30b recognition site into the psiCHECK2 vector for a dual luciferase assay. HEK293T cells were transfected with psiCHECK2-MALAT1 and miRNA or control mimic (at final concentrations of 10, 25, and 50 nM), and dual luciferase assays were performed after 36 h. Compared to the control mimic, we observed a dose-dependent reduction in Renilla luciferase activity in MALAT1 and miR-30b mimic co-transfected cells, confirming the presence of a functional miR-30b binding site on MALAT1 (Figure 5E; left panel). Luciferase assays were also performed with psiCHECK2-MALAT1 and miR-26a, another miRNA similar to miR-30b that is downregulated during M2Mφ differentiation (data not shown) and predicted to bind MALAT1 in our bioinformatic screening (Figure S2D). However, we did not observe significant changes in luciferase activity compared to the control (Figure 5E; right panel). These results confirm that MALAT1 physically interacts with miR-30b via a novel interacting site and may affect its biological functions.
MALAT1 relieves miR-30b gene targets from posttranscriptional suppression
Next we asked whether MALAT1 promotes miR-30b target expression by titrating its levels. TLR8 and FcϵRIγ are important mediators of macrophage innate immune responses. Studies from our laboratory have identified TLR8 and FcϵRIγ as novel targets of miR-30b [38; Naqvi et al., unpublished results]. Our previous in-depth analysis of miR-30b related pathways identified various genes involved in immunity and TLR8 and FcϵRIγ 3’UTRs showed strong miR-30b binding site (27–29, 38, 49). To validate MALAT1 and miR-30b interaction, we examined if the known miR-30b target including TLR8 and FcϵRIγ are impacted by MALAT1 knockdown or miR-30b overexpression/inhibition. To test whether MALAT1 can functionally sequester miR-30b and relieve its cognate targets, we performed a luciferase assay with psiCHECK2-TLR8 co-transfected with miR-30b mimic and MALAT1 overexpressing plasmid pCDNA-MALAT1. Transfection of miR-30b with psiCHECK2-TLR8 reduced renilla luciferase activity (~20%; P<0.01), while the presence of MALAT1 inhibited the miR-30b mimic-mediated reduction in luciferase activity by sequestering miR-30b, as evident from comparable renilla luciferase activity (no significant change) to psiCHECK2-TLR8 co-transfected with control mimic (Figure 5F). Co-transfection of ASO-MALAT1 with psiCHECK2-TLR8 and miR-30b mimic showed further reduction in luciferase activity (~30%; P<0.01) compared to psiCHECK2-TLR8 co-transfected with control mimic. This reduction is even more pronounced (~14% more) than psiCHECK2-TLR8 co-transfected with miR-30b mimic alone. This is likely due to reduced copy numbers of MALAT1 transcripts that can sequester miR-30b, resulting in higher miR-30b levels available to bind to and inhibit TLR8 as observed by reduced renilla luciferase activity.
To confirm the luciferase assays, we examined the surface expression of TLR8 and FcϵRIγ in MALAT1 knockdown, miR-30b overexpression, miR-30b inhibition, or a combination of these treatments by flow cytometric analysis. Transfection of the miR-30b mimic simulated the overexpression scenario, which could not be sequestered by the physiological levels of MALAT1; thus, we observed significantly low TLR8 expression (23.3 ± 3.3%) compared with the control mimic (45.5 ± 4.0%; P<0.005) (Figure 5G). Conversely, we observed a decrease in TLR8 expression in MALAT1 knockdown, further supporting an inverse relationship between these noncoding RNAs. Flow cytometry data showed reduced TLR8 expression (36.2 ± 4.9%; P=0.079) in MALAT1 knockdown cells compared to control cells (45.5 ± 4.0%). This could be attributed to the reversal of MALAT1-mediated sequestering of miR-30b (Figure 5G). To validate this further, we transfected cells with ASO-MALAT1 and miR-30b mimic and observed a highly significant reduction in TLR8 (P<0.001). The observed TLR8-expressing cells (15.9 ± 3.11%) were significantly less abundant than miR-30b or MALAT1 alone (Figure 5G). Transfection of miR-30b inhibitor with or without ASO-MALAT1 resulted in 38.4 ± 3.5% and 43.9 ± 5.2% TLR8+ populations, respectively, suggesting that inhibition of miR-30b restored TLR8 expression. However, miR-30b inhibition showed more potent restoration without MALAT1 knockdown, further substantiating the functional sequestration of miR-30b by MALAT1.
Furthermore, we evaluated the expression dynamics of FcϵRIγ, a previously identified target of miR-30b from our laboratory (49). FcϵRIγ levels showed similar expression profiles as those observed for TLR8 under different transfection conditions. The percentages of FcϵRIγ-expressing cells were 39.26 ( ± 3.13), 19.3% ( ± 0.98), 15.0% ( ± 1.4), 11.4% ( ± 2.26), 26.7% ( ± 3.77), and 35.1% ( ± 1.60) in cells transfected with ASO-Control, ASO-MALAT1, miR-30b mimic, ASO-MALAT1 + miR-30b mimic, miR-30b inhibitor and ASO-MALAT1+miR-30b inhibitor, respectively (Figures S4B, C). Using two validated miR-30b targets, we show that MALAT1 acts as an endogenous sponge, and thus, its expression levels may play a critical role in M2Mφ phenotype by regulating miR-30 levels.
MALAT1/miR-30b axis regulates phagocytosis and antigen processing in macrophages
After establishing that miR-30b sequestration by MALAT1 relieves miRNA-mediated repression of its target messenger RNAs (mRNAs), we next asked whether perturbing the MALAT1/miR-30b axis can impair Mφ innate functions viz. phagocytosis and antigen processing, which eventually bridge the innate and adaptive arms of immunity (50). To test this hypothesis, M2Mφ were transfected with ASO-Control, ASO-MALAT1, miR-30b mimic, ASO-MALAT1 + miR-30b mimic, miR-30b inhibitor, and ASO-MALAT1 + miR-30b inhibitor, and the phagocytosis of rhodamine-labeled E. coli and processing of BODIPY-conjugated soluble antigen ovalbumin (Ova) were assayed. Compared to the control, a significant decrease in bacterial phagocytosis was noted in cells treated with the miR-30b mimic (Figure 6A). We observed a significant attenuation of bacterial uptake in M2Mφ treated with ASO-MALAT1, as shown before (Figure 3; Figure 6A). Flow cytometry analysis showed a significant decrease in bacterial phagocytosis in MALAT1 knockdown (37.0 ± 4.3%) and miR-30b overexpression (21.0 ± 4.0%) compared to the control (74.0 ± 4.35%) (Figure 6B). These results clearly demonstrate that lncRNA MALAT1 and miR-30b regulate phagocytosis in M2 Mφ in an antagonistic manner. Both fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry data showed significantly attenuated bacterial uptake in MALAT1 knockdown and miR-30b-overexpressing cells. Our flow cytometry data showed further decrease (15.3 ± 4.50%) in pHrodo positive cells in ASO-MALAT1 and miR-30b mimic cotransfection, a significant reduction compared to either MALAT1_ASO (37.0 ± 4.3%) or miR-30b overexpression (21.0 ± 4.0%) alone. To further validate that the above effect on phagocytosis is driven by the MALAT1 and miR-30b interaction, we transfected M2Mφ with miR-30b inhibitor alone or with ASO-MALAT1 and observed a significant reversal of the miR-30b effect. The observed values of bacterial phagocytosis were 61.3.0 ± 5.1% and 71.3 ± 8.62% for the miR-30b inhibitor and miR-30b inhibitor + ASO-MALAT1 groups, respectively (Figure 6B). These results substantiate the deterministic role of MALAT1 and miR-30b in phagocytosis.
Figure 6 MALAT1 and miR-30b exhibit antagonistic regulation of phagocytosis and antigen processing in macrophages. (A) Phagocytosis assays were performed with labeled E coli in Mφ transfected with ASO_Control, ASO_MALAT1, miR-30b mimic, miR-30b with ASO_MALAT1, and miR-30b inhibitor with ASO_MALAT1. Representative images were captured using a fluorescence microscope and quantified by flow cytometry, as shown by overlay histograms. (B) Bar graphs showing the rhodamine+ population analyzed by flow cytometry. (C) Same as (A) but cells were assessed for antigen processing after incubation with BODIPY-Ova. BODIPY release (green signal) indicating antigen processing was captured using a fluorescence microscope and quantified by flow cytometry, as shown by overlay histograms. (D) Bar graphs showing the BODIPY+ population analyzed by flow cytometry. The data presented are representative of three independent experiments (n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001 (ANOVA combined with a post-hoc test), n.s, non-significant.
Since our above data strongly determined the effect of the MALAT1/miR-30b axis on phagocytosis, we next addressed whether the MALAT1 and miR-30b axes regulate antigen processing in M2 Mφ. To do so, the role of MALAT1 along with miR-30b in antigen processing of Ova was evaluated. M2Mφ transfected with ASO-MALAT1 showed a remarkable decrease in BODIPY (green signal) fluorescence under the microscope (Figure 6C). These data were further validated by flow cytometry. Herein, we observed a significant (P<0.005) reduction in percent antigen processing in M2Mφ treated with ASO-MALAT1 (43.0.0 ± 5.56%) compared to ASO-Control (67.2 ± 4.7%). miR-30b mimic treatment exhibited more robust suppression of antigen processing, as observed by 25.3 ± 3.6% BODIPY-positive cells (Figure 6D). The reduction in antigen processing further in ASO-MALAT1- and miR-30 mimic-treated M2Mφ strongly suggests an antagonistic role in antigen processing. These data were further validated by reversal of antigen processing suppression upon treatment with a miR-30 inhibitor, either alone or in conjunction with ASO-MALAT1. The observed values of antigen processing in M2Mφ treated with miR-30b inhibitor alone or with MALAT1 were 51.2.3 ± 2.05% and 64.0 ± 4.68%, respectively, approaching the value of ASO-Control-treated cells (Figure 6D). Together, these results clearly demonstrate that the MALAT1/miR30b axis in macrophages is functionally important in regulating innate immune functions such as antigen processing and phagocytosis.
Higher MALAT1 expression correlates with reduced miR-30b levels and increased proinflammatory macrophage phenotype markers in inflamed gingival tissues
Our in vitro studies suggest that MALAT1 favors M1 phenotype by suppressing M2 promoting miR-30b. To confirm these findings, we examined MALAT1, and miR-30b expression in gingival biopsies collected from periodontally healthy and diseased human subjects as well as mice with ligature-induced periodontitis. Compared to healthy subjects, inflamed gingival biopsies showed markedly higher levels of MALAT1 (Fold change) and reduced expression of miR-30b (Figure 7A, B). These results corroborate with the murine model of periodontitis, where we observed significantly higher MALAT1 and downregulation of miR-30b at 8DPL, which marks disease establishment and simulates human periodontitis subjects (Figures 7D, E). The correlation analysis of MALAT1 and miR-30b expression in both human (Figure 7C) and murine (Figure 7F) gingival biopsies confirmed their inverse relation with negative Pearson correlation coefficient (r) values -0.9079 and -0.7568 for human and murine biopsies, respectively. These findings strongly suggest in vivo functional antagonism of MALAT1 and miR-30b.
Figure 7 MALAT1/miR-30b exhibit antagonistic expression in inflamed human and murine gingival biopsies. Total RNA was isolated from healthy and inflamed gingival biopsies from human (n=10/group) and mice (n=3-4/group) subjected to ligature-induced periodontitis and the expression of MALAT1 and miR-30b was examined by RT-qPCR. Histograms showing relative fold change expression of (A, D) MALAT1 and (B, E) miR-30b-5p in periodontally healthy and inflamed human and murine gingiva. Transcript expression was normalized to β-actin (for MALAT1) and small nuclear RNA, RNU6B (for miR-30b). Correlation analysis shows the inverse relation between the expression of MALAT1 and miR-30b in inflamed human; P=0.007 (C) and murine gingiva; P=0.2432 (F). Where n represent the number of XY data pairs, r is Pearson correlation coefficient. Expression of M1 macrophage phenotype markers is induced in inflamed murine gingiva. Histograms showing normalized expression of (G) iNos, (H) Cox2 (both M1 markers), (I) Mrc1, (J) Arginase1 (both M2 markers) in murine gingiva. β-actin was used as endogenous control. Data is presented as mean ± SEM. ANOVA combined with a post-hoc test was used to calculate P values. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001; ns, non-significant..
We next asked whether higher MALAT1 and lower miR-30b affect macrophage polarization in vivo. Studies from other labs and ours (Uttamani et al., unpublished results) have demonstrated abundance of M1 phenotype macrophages in inflamed human gingiva (51). We therefore examined M1 and M2 markers in healthy and inflamed murine gingival biopsies. Our results show significantly higher expression of inos2 and cox-2 compared to animals without ligature (Figures 7G, H). Expression of arginase 1, an M2 marker, was significantly downregulated in inflamed gingiva, while MRC1 levels did not show significant change (Figures 7I, J). Overall, these results strongly support that higher MALAT1 expression correlates with M1 markers and exhibit antagonism with miR-30b in vivo indicating a functional role of MALAT1 in shaping macrophage polarization.
Discussion
Macrophage polarization is a highly coordinated biological process that involves the integration of numerous factors acting at the transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and posttranslational levels. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been demonstrated to play deterministic roles in macrophage polarization. Despite a large number of known lncRNA transcripts, only a few are characterized for their functional role in macrophage polarization. This study evaluated lncRNA MALAT1 in macrophage polarization and studied its crosstalk with miR-30b, via a novel interaction site. We demonstrated the biological significance of this interaction in periodontally diseased human and murine gingival biopsies.
The relationship between MALAT1 expression and macrophage phenotype is poorly understood and needs further investigation. MALAT1 expression analysis in M1 and M2 Mφ exhibit differential response suggesting a unique functional requirement of this lncRNA by polarized Mφ. We therefore focused on delineating whether MALAT1 favors a specific macrophage phenotype. Knockdown of MALAT1 in M2Mφ significantly induced the expression of multiple M2 markers, including Arg1, STAT3, CCL2, IL-10, and Dectin-1, and concomitantly downregulated M1 markers (STAT1, CXCL10, HLA-DR), albeit not significantly. In line with our results, Cui et al. (52) reported that MALAT1 knockdown in IL-4-generated murine M2Mφ promoted the M2 phenotypic markers arginase 1 (Arg-1), YM-1, and mannose receptor C-type 1 (MRC1). Moreover, alveolar macrophages from MALAT1-deficient mice display the M2 phenotype, supporting a proinflammatory function of MALAT1. Consistent with our observations, knockdown of MALAT1 suppresses proinflammatory cytokine secretion, favoring the M1 phenotype (53), while delivery of MALAT1 through extracellular vesicles promotes the M1 phenotype via upregulation of HMGB1 (54). In contrast, Huang et al. (55) demonstrated that exosomes from oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL)-treated endothelial cells deliver MALAT1 to monocytes and promote the M2 phenotype (55). MALAT1 knockdown in hepatocellular carcinoma cells inhibits VEGF-A levels and skews macrophages toward the M1 subtype (56). Thus, Mφ polarization is differentially responsive to endogenous and exogenous factors and MALAT1 is one of the critical molecular determinants in the process. Overall, these observations support an unequivocal role of MALAT1 in macrophage polarization.
The functional effect of MALAT1 on macrophage innate immune functions, viz. phagocytosis and antigen presentation, which are critical in the clearance of pathogens, is scarce in the scientific literature. In this study, we showed a clear role of MALAT1 in macrophage antigen uptake, processing and phagocytosis. A remarkable decrease in the uptake and processing of ovalbumin and phagocytosis of E. coli in MALAT1 knockdown macrophages substantiate a close relationship between MALAT1 expression and the vital innate functions of macrophages. Consistent with the pro-M1 function of MALAT1, we observed reduced bacterial clearance in cells silenced for MALAT1. Taken together, our functional assays suggest that MALAT1 knockdown impairs bacterial phagocytosis and clearance, indicating its role in shaping innate immune functions in macrophages.
In addition to initial pathogen/antigen recognition, macrophage activity can be further augmented by secreted cytokines during the course of pathogen clearance. With this intent, we evaluated the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines during the phagocytosis of M1 and M2 macrophages in our study of MALAT1 knockdown. A significant reduction in pro- (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, CXCL10, and TNF-α) cytokines in MALAT1-ablated M1 and M2 macrophages corroborates attenuated phagocytosis. These results suggest that MALAT1 expression modulates the inflammatory microenvironment by regulating upstream cytokine signaling cascades required for the proper functioning of polarized macrophages. MALAT1 is induced by NFκB activation, and our results show that TLR4/5 ligation upregulates MALAT1 expression in macrophages, suggesting its contribution to positive feedback in the proinflammatory cascade. Indeed, higher MALAT1 expression is associated with inflammation in acute pancreatitis (57). Wang et al. (58) have also shown that MALAT1 expression induces proinflammatory cytokines by increasing H3 histone acetylation (H3) at the MyD88 promoter. This leads to the induction of IRAK1- and TRAF6-mediated signaling events eventually activating NFκB and downstream proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) in microglia causing cerebral injury (58). Another study demonstrated that upregulation of lncRNA MALAT1 epigenetically represses the expression of anti-inflammatory genes by recruiting PRC2 to their promoters and subsequently induces heightened transcription of inflammatory genes (59). Overall, MALAT1 expression potentiates a robust innate immune response by promoting cytokine expression through multiple mechanisms and favors the M1 phenotype.
Our findings and previous studies clearly support that MALAT1 controls macrophage polarization; however, the mechanism by which MALAT1 regulates this process remains largely unexplored. We speculate that crosstalk between MALAT1 and miRNA would add another dimension to miRNA-dependent M1/M2 polarization. Several studies have demonstrated the miRNA sponging effect of MALAT1 in biological pathways. Yu et al. (60) showed that MALAT1 could potentially regulate the proliferation and activation of primary hepatic stellate cells by sponging miR-101b and regulating the expression of Rac1 (60). Another study showed that MALAT1 acts as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) to ZEB2 mRNA and regulates its expression by sponging miR-200 family members (61). Additionally, MALAT1 was reported to induce the migration and invasion of breast cells by regulating the expression of cdc42 through miR-1 sequestration (62). In this study, we explored the targets of MALAT1 lncRNAs involved in regulating M1 and M2 polarization. Our lab has previously reported differential expression profiles of miRNAs during macrophage differentiation and function (27, 28). The miR-30 family includes five members (viz. miR-30a, b, c, d, and e), and all of them are downregulated during monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation (28) and TLR stimulation (49). The expression pattern of the miR-30 family is antagonistic to MALAT1, suggesting a functional relationship between these noncoding RNAs in macrophage biology. Interestingly, bioinformatics analysis revealed novel binding sites for miR-30b on MALAT1. To date, no report has suggested the role of miR-30b and MALAT1 crosstalk in regulating macrophage polarization. Using dual luciferase assays, we confirmed that miR-30b directly binds to MALAT1. This functional interaction allows MALAT1 to sequester miR-30b and relieve its cognate targets TLR8 and FcϵR1γ from posttranscriptional repression [38; Naqvi et al., unpublished results].
miR-30b and MALAT1 are ubiquitous, highly abundant noncoding RNAs. In this study, we show that miR-30b exhibits functional antagonism with MALAT1. Overexpression of miR-30b promotes the M2 phenotype, similar to that observed in MALAT1 knockdown. Our global transcriptome analyses of miR-30b-overexpressing DCs identified hundreds of differentially expressed genes. Several transcription factors, including STAT3, STAT1, PPARG, YY1 and SP1, with well-documented roles in myeloid cell development, monocyte differentiation and M1 and M2 macrophage polarization, were enriched. These results strongly highlight the role of miR-30b in regulating gene networks related to macrophage polarization. In addition to the roles of MALAT1 and miR-30b in orchestrating macrophage polarization events, we evaluated how this noncoding RNA interaction competitively regulates phagocytosis and antigen processing. Compared to MALAT1 knockdown or miR-30b overexpression alone, we observed a remarkably significant reduction in E. coli phagocytosis and ovalbumin processing in MALAT1 knockdown along with miR-30b overexpression. These data unequivocally suggest that MALAT1 is an endogenous inhibitor of miR-30b function in macrophages. Functional antagonism between MALAT1 and miR-30 family members is reported to regulate biological processes in other cells. For instance, Dong et al. also showed that MALAT1 has the potential to rescue the functional effect of miR-30a in vitro and in vivo by relieving the inhibitory effects of miR-30a on autophagy in cerebral cortex neurons and middle cerebral artery occlusion-reperfusion (MCAO)-induced ischemic brain infarction in mice, respectively (63). Another study in primary neurons showed that the MALAT1/miR-30 axis regulates neurite outgrowth in hippocampal neurons by regulating the expression of spastin, a microtubule-severing enzyme important for neurite outgrowth (64). Taken together, our results show a novel lncRNA:miRNA interaction in macrophages integral to cell plasticity and innate immune responses.
Previous studies have shown that the inflammation caused by periodontal pathogens skew macrophage polarization primarily towards proinflammatory (M1) phenotype, which play a significant role in aggravation of periodontal diseases (51). Dysregulation of lncRNA and miRNA expression is implicated in various immune-mediated diseases; however the functional relationship between different noncoding RNAs is less explored. Our results show a novel lncRNA and miRNAs interaction that may contribute to the severity of periodontal disease. Given that both MALAT1 and miR-30b are responsive to various inflammatory stimuli, bacterial perturbations in the levels of these highly abundant and ubiquitous noncoding RNAs could play critical role in disease progression. MALAT1 expression promotes the proliferation of human periodontal ligament stem cells (65), as well as regulate their osteogenic differentiation through miR-155-5p (66). Whereas the knockdown of MALAT1 is reported to inhibit the progression of chronic periodontitis via miR-769-5p (67). While other studies focused on non-immune cells, our study focused on myeloid macrophages that are central to the pathology of periodontal disease. Importantly, our results show that MALAT1/miR-30b axis regulates the polarization of primary human macrophages and also in inflamed murine gingiva. Higher expression of MALAT1 correlates with increased levels of M1 markers (iNos2 and Cox2) and downregulation of M2 marker arginase1. Taken together, our in vivo and in vitro results support pro-inflammatory role of MALAT1 by promoting M1 phenotype and suppressing M2 phenotype via functional sequestration miR-30b, an anti-inflammatory molecule. Although further studies are required to fully characterize the role of MALAT1/miR-30b axis in periodontal diseases, our findings offer concurrent targeting of different noncoding RNA classes as a novel treatment modality to control periodontal inflammation.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrates that MALAT1 is responsive to macrophage polarization and activation stimuli and that knockdown of MALAT1 favors the M2 phenotype. Mechanistically, MALAT1 exhibited antagonistic expression and function with another noncoding RNA, miR-30b. The expression of miR-30b is downregulated during macrophage differentiation, and our previous studies have shown that miR-30b is a negative regulator of innate immune responses. In this study, our results suggest that overexpression of miR-30b promotes M2 polarization. By titrating the levels of miR-30b, via a novel binding site, MALAT1 may favor the M1 phenotype. In human and murine healthy and inflamed gingival biopsies we validated antagonistic expression of MALAT1 and miR-30b, which correlates with higher M1 markers in periodontal disease signifying the functional relationship of these noncoding RNA in shaping macrophage phenotype. Concurrent therapeutic targeting of MALAT1 and miR-30b may provide a valuable means of subterfuge to curtail inflammation.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, GSE151262.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Institutional Review Board at the University of Illinois at Chicago and Ethics Committee at the University Autónoma de Nuevo León Facultad de Odontología, Monterrey, Mexico. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin. The animal studies were approved by UIC Office of Animal Care and Institutional Biosafety. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.
Author contributions
IA: Investigation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing- Original draft, Visualization. RN: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing- Original draft, Visualization. AV: Investigation, Formal analysis. AN: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing- Reviewing and Editing, Funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was supported by the NIH/NIDCR R01 DE027980 and R03DE027147 to AN.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1214810/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol (2008) 8:958–69. doi: 10.1038/nri2448
2. Wang N, Liang H, Zen K. Molecular mechanisms that influence the macrophage m1- m2 polarization balance. Front Immunol (2014) 5:614. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00614
3. Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol (2011) 11:723–37. doi: 10.1038/nri3073
4. Labonte AC, Tosello-Trampont AC, Hahn YS. The role of macrophage polarization in infectious and inflammatory diseases. Mol Cells (2015) 37:275–85. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2014.2374
5. Ruffell B, Coussens LM. Macrophages and therapeutic resistance in cancer. Cancer Cell (2015) 27:462–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.02.015
6. Braga TT, Agudelo JS, Camara NO. Macrophages during the fibrotic process: M2 as friend and foe. Front Immunol (2015) 6:602. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00602
7. Leitinger N, Schulman IG. Phenotypic polarization of macrophages in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2013) 33:1120–6. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300173
8. Liu C, Li Y, Yu J, Feng L, Hou S, Liu Y, et al. Targeting the shift from M1 to M2 macrophages in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mice treated with Fasudil. PloS One (2013) 8:e54841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054841
9. Jarroux J, Morillon A, Pinskaya M. History, discovery, and classification of lncRNAs. Adv Exp Med Biol (2017) 1008:1–46. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5203-3_1
10. Jathar S, Kumar V, Srivastava J, Tripathi V. Technological developments in lncRNA biology. Adv Exp Med Biol (2017) 1008:283–323. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5203-3_10
11. Derrien T, Johnson R, Bussotti G, Tanzer A, Djebali S, Tilgner H, et al. The GENCODE v7 catalog of human long noncoding RNAs: analysis of their gene structure, evolution, and expression. Genome Res (2012) 22:1775–89. doi: 10.1101/gr.132159.111
12. Engreitz JM, Ollikainen N, Guttman M. Long non-coding RNAs: spatial amplifiers that control nuclear structure and gene expression. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2016) 12:756–70. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.126
13. Yu W, Gius D, Onyango P, Muldoon-Jacobs K, Karp J, Feinberg AP, et al. Epigenetic silencing of tumour suppressor gene p15 by its antisense RNA. Nature (2008) 451:202–6. doi: 10.1038/nature06468
14. Johnsson P, Ackley A, Vidarsdottir L, Lui W, Corcoran M, Grandér D, et al. A pseudogene long-noncoding-RNA network regulates PTEN transcription and translation in human cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol (2013) 20:440–6. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2516
15. Wapinski O, Chang HY. Long noncoding RNAs and human disease. Trends Cell Biol (2011) 21:354–61. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.04.001
16. Chen MT, Lin HS, Shen C, Ma YN, Wang F, Zhao HL, et al. PU.1-Regulated Long noncoding RNA lnc-MC controls human monocyte/macrophage differentiation through interaction with MicroRNA 199a-5p. Mol Cell Biol (2015) 35:3212–24. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00429-15
17. Roy S, Schmeier S, Arner E, Alam T, Parihar SP, Ozturk M, et al. Redefining the transcriptional regulatory dynamics of classically and alternatively activated macrophages by deepCAGE transcriptomics. Nucl Acids Res (2015) 18:6969–82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv646
18. Walter W, Alonso-Herranz L, Trappetti V, Crespo I, Ibberson M, Cedenilla M, et al. Deciphering the dynamic transcriptional and post-transcriptional networks of macrophages in the healthy heart and after myocardial injury. Cell Rep (2018) 10:622–36. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.029
19. Wang Y, Yu G, Liu Y, Xie L, Ge J, Zhao G, et al. Hypoxia-induced PTTG3P contributes to colorectal cancer glycolysis and M2 phenotype of macrophage. Biosci Rep (2021) 41(7):BSR20210764. doi: 10.1042/BSR20210764
20. Li Q, Lu L, Li X, Lu S. Long non-coding RNA NKILA alleviates airway inflammation in asthmatic mice by promoting M2 macrophage polarization and inhibiting the NF-kappaB pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2021) 24:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.07.023
21. Huang Z, Luo Q, Yao F, Qing C, Ye J, Deng Y, et al. Identification of differentially expressed long non-coding RNAs in polarized macrophages. Sci Rep (2016) 22:19705. doi: 10.1038/srep19705
22. Roux BT, Heward JA, Donnelly LE, Jones SW, Lindsay MA. Catalog of differentially expressed long non-coding RNA following activation of human and mouse innate immune response. Front Immunol (2017) 8:1038. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01038
23. He W, Che H, Jin C, Li Y, Li F, Zhou R. LncRNA AFAP1-AS1 promotes M1 polarization of macrophages and osteogenic differentiation of valve interstitial cells. J Physiol Biochem (2021) 77:461–8. doi: 10.1007/s13105-021-00821-0
24. Luo Y, Yang Z, Lin X, Zhao F, Tu H, Wang L, et al. Knockdown of lncRNA PVT1 attenuated macrophage M1 polarization and relieved sepsis induced myocardial injury via miR-29a/HMGB1 axis. Cytokine (2021) 143:155509. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2021.155509
25. Jiang H, Deng W, Zhu K, Zeng Z, Hu B, Zhou Z, et al. LINC00467 Promotes Prostate Cancer Progression via M2 Macrophage Polarization and the miR-494-3p/STAT3 Axis. Front Oncol (2021) 19:661431. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.661431
26. Ahmad I, Valverde A, Naqvi RA, Naqvi AR. Long non-coding RNAs RN7SK and GAS5 regulate macrophage polarization and innate immune responses. Front Immunol (2020) 11:604981. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.604981
27. Naqvi AR, Fordham JB, Nares S. miR-24, miR-30b, and miR-142-3p regulate phagocytosis in myeloid inflammatory cells. J Immunol (2015) 194:1916–27. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401893
28. Fordham JB, Naqvi AR, Nares S. Regulation of miR-24, miR-30b, and miR-142-3p during macrophage and dendritic cell differentiation potentiates innate immunity. J Leukoc Biol (2015) 98:195–207. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1A1014-519RR
29. Naqvi AR, Fordham JB, Ganesh B, Nares S. miR-24, miR-30b and miR-142-3p interfere with antigen processing and presentation by primary macrophages and dendritic cells. Sci Rep (2016) 6:32925. doi: 10.1038/srep32925
30. Verreck FA, de Boer T, Langenberg DM, Hoeve MA, Kramer M, Vaisberg E, et al. Human IL-23-producing type 1 macrophages promote but IL-10-producing type 2 macrophages subvert immunity to (myco)bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2004) 101(13):4560–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400983101
31. Lukic A, Larssen P, Fauland A, Samuelsson B, Wheelock CE, Gabrielsson S, et al. GM-CSF- and M-CSF-primed macrophages present similar resolving but distinct inflammatory lipid mediator signatures. FASEB J (2017) 31(10):4370–81. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700319R
32. Peachman KK, Rao M, Palmer DR, Zidanic M, Sun W, Alving CR, et al. Functional microtubules are required for antigen processing by macrophages and dendritic cells. Immunol Lett (2004) 95(1):13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2004.05.013
33. Odobasic D, Kitching AR, Yang Y, O’Sullivan KM, Muljadi RC, Edgtton KL, et al. Neutrophil myeloperoxidase regulates T-cell-driven tissue inflammation in mice by inhibiting dendritic cell function. Blood (2013) 121(20):4195–204. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-456483
34. Strisciuglio C, Miele E, Giugliano FP, Vitale S, Andreozzi M, Vitale A, et al. Bifidobacteria enhance antigen sampling and processing by dendritic cells in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammation Bowel Dis (2015) 21(7):1491–8. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000389
35. Stevens MG, Olsen SC. Comparative analysis of using MTT and XTT in colorimetric assays for quantitating bovine neutrophil bactericidal activity. J Immunol Method (1993) 4:225–31. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(93)90091-K
36. Drevets DA, Canono BP, Campbell PA. Measurement of bacterial ingestion and killing by macrophages. Curr Protoc Immunol (2015) Chapter 14:Unit 14.6. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1406s12
37. Grela E, Kozłowska J, Grabowiecka A. Current methodology of MTT assay in bacteria - A review. Acta Histochem (2018) 120:303–11. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2018.03.007
38. Valverde A, Nares S, Naqvi AR. Impaired cell migration and structural defects in myeloid cells overexpressing miR-30b and miR-142-3p. Biochem Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech (2020) 1863:194628. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2020
39. Smythies LE, Shen R, Bimczok D, Novak L, Clements RH, Eckhoff DE, et al. Inflammation anergy in human intestinal macrophages is due to Smad-induced IkappaBalpha expression and NF-kappaB inactivation. J Biol Chem (2010) 18:285:19593–604. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.069955
40. Hu Y, Wen J, Zhang B, Xiao H. Precision control of mTORC1 is crucial for the maintenance and IL-13 responsiveness of alveolar macrophages. Int Immunopharmacol (2021) 95:107552. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107552
41. Jiao H, Natoli R, Valter K, Provis JM, Rutar M. Spatiotemporal cadence of macrophage polarisation in a model of light-induced retinal degeneration. PloS One (2015) 10(12):e0143952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143952
42. Lü WD, Liu YZ, Yang YQ, Liu ZG, Zhao K, Lu JR, et al. Effect of naturally derived surgical hemostatic materials on the proliferation of A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cells. Mater Today Bio (2022) 14:100233. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100233
43. Mily A, Kalsum S, Loreti MG, Rekha RS, Muvva JR, Lourda M, et al. Polarization of M1 and M2 Human Monocyte-Derived Cells and Analysis with Flow Cytometry upon Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. J Vis Exp (2020) 18(163). doi: 10.3791/61807
44. Nielsen MC, Andersen MN, Møller HJ. Monocyte isolation techniques significantly impact the phenotype of both isolated monocytes and derived macrophages in vitro. Immunology (2020) 159(1):63–74. doi: 10.1111/imm.13125
45. Zong Z, Zou J, Mao R, Ma C, Li N, Wang J, et al. M1 macrophages induce PD-L1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through IL-1β Signaling. Front Immunol (2019) 16:1643(10). doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01643
46. Muntjewerff EM, Meesters LD, van den Bogaart G. Antigen cross-presentation by macrophages. Front Immunol (2020) 8:1276. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01276
47. Chung EY, Kim SJ, Ma XJ. Regulation of cytokine production during phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. Cell Res (2006) 16:154–61. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310021
48. Lacy P, Stow JL. Cytokine release from innate immune cells: association with diverse membrane trafficking pathways. Blood (2010) 7:9–18. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-265892
49. Naqvi AR, Fordham JB, Nares S. MicroRNA target Fc receptors to regulate Ab-dependent Ag uptake in primary macrophages and dendritic cells. Innate Immun (2016) 22:510–21. doi: 10.1177/1753425916661042
50. Desjardins M, Houde M, Gagnon E. Phagocytosis: the convoluted way from nutrition to adaptive immunity. Immunol Rev (2005) 207:158–65. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00319.x
51. Lam RS, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Lenzo JC, Holden JA, Brammar GC, Walsh KA, et al. Macrophage depletion abates Porphyromonas gingivalis-induced alveolar bone resorption in mice. J Immunol (2014) 1:2349–23462. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400853
52. Cui H, Banerjee S, Guo S, Xie N, Ge J, Jiang D, et al. Long noncoding RNA Malat1 regulates differential activation of macrophages and response to lung injury. JCI Insight (2019) 21:e124522. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.124522
53. Dai L, Zhang G, Cheng Z, Wang X, Jia L, Jing X, et al. Knockdown of LncRNA MALAT1 contributes to the suppression of inflammatory responses by up-regulating miR-146a in LPS-induced acute lung injury. Connect Tissue Res (2018) 59:581–92. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2018.1439480
54. Liu J, Niu Z, Zhang R, Peng Z, Wang L, Liu Z, et al. MALAT1 shuttled by extracellular vesicles promotes M1 polarization of macrophages to induce acute pancreatitis via miR-181a-5p/HMGB1 axis. J Cell Mol Med (2021) 25:9241–54. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16844
55. Huang C, Han J, Wu Y, Li S, Wang Q, Lin W, et al. Exosomal MALAT1 derived from oxidized low-density lipoprotein-treated endothelial cells promotes M2 macrophage polarization. Mol Med Rep (2018) 18:509–15. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8982
56. Hou ZH, Xu XW, Fu XY, Zhou LD, Liu SP, Tan DM. Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 promotes angiogenesis and immunosuppressive properties of HCC cells by sponging miR-140. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (2020) 1:C649–63. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00510.2018
57. Gu L, Liu J, Xu D, Lu Y. Reciprocal feedback loop of the MALAT1-microRNA-194-YAP1 pathway regulates progression of acute pancreatitis. Med Sci Monit (2019) 13:6894–904. doi: 10.12659/MSM.915598
58. Wang L, Zhou H. LncRNA MALAT1 promotes high glucose-induced inflammatory response of microglial cells via provoking MyD88/IRAK1/TRAF6 signaling. Sci Rep (2018) 29:8346. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26421-5
59. Biswas S, Thomas AA, Chen S, Aref-Eshghi E, Feng B, Gonder J, et al. MALAT1: an epigenetic regulator of inflammation in diabetic retinopathy. Sci Rep (2018) 25:6526. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24907-w
60. Yu F, Lu Z, Cai J, Huang K, Chen B, Li G, et al. MALAT1 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to mediate Rac1 expression by sequestering miR-101b in liver fibrosis. Cell Cycle (2015) 14:3885–96. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1120917
61. Xiao H, Tang K, Liu P, Chen K, Hu J, Zeng J, et al. LncRNA MALAT1 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate ZEB2 expression by sponging miR-200s in clear cell kidney carcinoma. Oncotarget (2015) 10:38005–15. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5357
62. Chou J, Wang B, Zheng T, Li X, Zheng L, Hu J, et al. MALAT1 induced migration and invasion of human breast cancer cells by competitively binding miR-1 with cdc42. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2016) 25:262–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.02.102
63. Dong G, Ma J, Yan L, Li T, Li Z, Han X, et al. Down-regulation of lncrna MALAT1 attenuates neuronal cell death through suppressing beclin1-dependent autophagy by regulating mir-30a in cerebral ischemic stroke. Cell Physiol Biochem (2017) 43:182–94. doi: 10.1159/000480337
64. Jiang T, Cai Z, Ji Z, Zou J, Liang Z, Zhang G, et al. The lncRNA MALAT1/miR-30/spastin axis regulates hippocampal neurite outgrowth. Front Cell Neurosci (2020) 20:555747. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.555747
65. Chen P, Huang Y, Wang Y, Li S, Chu H, Rong M. MALAT1 overexpression promotes the proliferation of human periodontal ligament stem cells by upregulating fibroblast growth factor 2. Exp Ther Med (2019) 18(3):1627–32. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7748
66. Hua L, Zhang X. MALAT1 regulates osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells through mediating miR-155-5p/ETS1 axis. Tissue Cell (2021) 73:101619. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2021.101619
Keywords: long noncoding RNA, microRNA, MALAT1, macrophage polarization, lncRNA-miRNA interaction, miRNA sponge, miR-30b, phagocytosis
Citation: Ahmad I, Naqvi RA, Valverde A and Naqvi AR (2023) LncRNA MALAT1/microRNA-30b axis regulates macrophage polarization and function. Front. Immunol. 14:1214810. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1214810
Received: 30 April 2023; Accepted: 21 September 2023;
Published: 04 October 2023.
Edited by:
Michal Adam Olszewski, University of Michigan, United StatesReviewed by:
Manish Muhuri, Voyager Therapeutics, Inc, United StatesQing Lin, Johns Hopkins University, United States
Analisa DiFeo, University of Michigan, United States
Copyright © 2023 Ahmad, Naqvi, Valverde and Naqvi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Afsar R. Naqvi, afsarraz@uic.edu
†These authors have contributed equally to this work