The BCMA-Targeted Fourth-Generation CAR-T Cells Secreting IL-7 and CCL19 for Therapy of Refractory/Recurrent Multiple Myeloma

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) technology has revolutionized cancer treatment, particularly in malignant hematological tumors. Currently, the BCMA-targeted second-generation CAR-T cells have showed impressive efficacy in the treatment of refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (R/R MM), but up to 50% relapse remains to be addressed urgently. Here we constructed the BCMA-targeted fourth-generation CAR-T cells expressing IL-7 and CCL19 (i.e., BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells), and demonstrated that BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells exhibited superior expansion, differentiation, migration and cytotoxicity. Furthermore, we have been carrying out the first-in-human clinical trial for therapy of R/R MM by use of BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03778346), which preliminarily showed promising safety and efficacy in first two enrolled patients. The two patients achieved a CR and VGPR with Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome only 1 month after one dose of CAR-T cell infusion, and the responses lasted more than 12-month. Taken together, BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells were safe and effective against refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma and thus warranted further clinical study.

Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by the abnormal expansion of bone marrow plasma cells (1). Despite the advent of new therapies such as monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory drugs, and autologous stem cell transplant, MM remains incurable (2, 3). Treating patients with refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (R/R MM) is challenging, and new treatments are critically needed.

In recent years, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell immunotherapy has made outstanding advances in the treatment of B-cell malignant hematological tumors (4–9). CARs are synthetic fusion molecules, mostly single-chain fragment variables (scFvs) derived from a monoclonal antibody (mAb) (10). CAR-T cells can specifically recognize surface molecules on target cells independent of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-peptide presentation and subsequently induce target cell lysis through the release of perforin and granzyme B (11). Fourth-generation CAR-T cells, known as armored CAR-T cells, co-express key cytokines, such as interleukins and chemokines, or suicide genes that can significantly enhance the efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy (1, 12, 13).

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) (14–16) is a cell surface protein expressed in tumor cells and involved in the maturation and differentiation of B cells into plasma cells. BCMA is highly expressed in malignant MM plasma cells but rarely found in normal tissue, except normal plasma cells (17, 18), which makes it a promising target for BCMA-directed immunotherapy. Previous clinical studies have shown efficacy against MM (19); however, a lack of durable effector functions by conventional CAR-T cells lead to up to 50% relapse (15, 20). Further studies have to be conducted urgently to determine the optimal CARs for treating MM.

To decrease MM relapse, we developed a fourth-generation BCMA-targeted CAR-T secreting IL-7 and CCL19 for R/R MM with superior long-term effector functions. Studies have indicated that IL-7 and CCL19 play important roles in the maintenance and formation of the T-zone in lymphoid organs (21, 22). IL-7, a non-hematopoietic cell-derived cytokine critical for the development of the immune system, is a major regulator of proliferation and homeostasis of CD8 and CD4 T cells (23–25). CCL19, which is constitutively expressed by stromal cells in the lymphoid T-zone (26, 27), is a chemotactic agent for dendritic cells and T cells migrating to secondary lymphoid tissue and plays an important role in the initiation of the adaptive immune response (28).

Here we demonstrated that BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells are capable of eradicating MM cells both in vitro and in vivo and showed preliminarily their promising safety and efficacy in the first two enrolled patients of our ongoing first-in-human clinical trial.

Materials and Methods

Culture Conditions

MM1S, U266, and K562 cells, purchased from ATCC, were maintained in RMPI-1640 medium (Sigma) and HEK-293T cells were maintained in DMEM(Sigma) supplemented with 10% FBS (PAN), 1% sodium pyruvate (Gibco), 1% L-glutamine (Gibco) and 1% Pen Strep (Gibco). All cells were cultured under 5% CO₂ at 37°C and were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination.

Isolation and Transduction of T Cells

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were harvested from healthy donors or patients and isolated by density gradient centrifugation. T cells were enriched and activated by anti-CD3/CD28 coated beads (Invitrogen) and cultured in X-VIVO serum-free medium (Lonza, 04-744Q) supplemented with 5% AB serum (Sigma), 10% nonessential amino acids (Corning), 0.01% recombinant human IL-2, and 0.05% IL-7 and IL-15 (PeproTech). Transduction was performed with CAR-encoding lentiviral vector after 24 h of stimulation, and lentiviral transduction efficiency was assessed 7 days after transduction by flow cytometry.

Flow Cytometry

FITC-labeled BCMA protein (ACRO) and PE-conjugated anti-BCMA antibody were used to detect lentiviral transduction efficiency and verify expression of the target antigen on tumor cells. For intracellular staining, we used the Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (BD Biosciences) to fix and permeabilize cells, then labeled the cells with APC-conjugated anti-IFN-γ antibody and APC-conjugated anti-IL-2 antibody. Anti-CD62L antibody (PE), anti-CCR7 antibody (PerCP-Cy5.5), anti-CD45RO antibody (FITC), anti-CD45RA antibody (APC), anti-CD8α antibody (PE-Cy7), and anti-CD4 antibody (APC-Cy7) were used to stain surface markers on T cells. All antibodies of brands not mentioned above were from BioLegend. Data were acquired with a BD FACS AriaII (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo X (FlowJo).

Cytokine Assays

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to detect and quantify concentrations of soluble cytokine and chemokine proteins. The culture supernatant of CAR-T cells was retained 3 and 5 days after transduction, and levels of IL-7 and CCL19 were analyzed with an IL-7 ELISA kit (R&D Systems) and CCL19 ELISA kit (NeoBioscience), respectively. Effector cells were co-cultured with MM1S (1 × 10⁵ cells/well) at a 1:1 ratio. After 24 h, a GM-CSF ELISA kit (BD Biosciences) was used to measure the concentration of GM-CSF in the culture supernatant.

Transwell Migration Assay

Chemotaxis on T cells was measured with a transwell (Corning) with a 5 μm pore permeable membrane insert. The transwell chamber was placed in a 24-well plate (BIOFIL). CFSE-labeled T cells were seeded in the upper chamber, and the 5-day supernatant of the CAR-T cell culture was added to the lower chamber. The cells were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO₂, and the number of cells that migrated from the upper to the lower chamber was evaluated under a fluorescence microscope.

Cellular Cytotoxicity Assays

Bioluminescence assays of luciferase were performed to determine cytotoxic activity of CAR-T cells against BCMA-expressing target cells. 1 × 10⁴ target cells were co-incubated in a flat-bottomed 96-well tissue culture plate (BIOFIL) for 4 h with CAR-T cells at various E:T ratios. Untransduced cells served as a negative control. One group in which only target cells and RPMI1640 medium were added was set as the maximum value (Max), and another group that contained target cells and ddH₂O was set as the minimum background value (Min). Each group consisted of three auxiliary holes. Specific lysis was calculated as follows: lysis (%) = (Max – V)/(Max – Min) × 100%.

In vivo Analysis of CAR-T Activity

NSG mice were purchased from GemPharmatech and injected intravenously with 4 × 10⁶ BCMA-K562-Luc-GFP cells on day 0. Mice were randomly divided into two cohorts (n = 3 per cohort). Then 6 × 10⁶ BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells (experimental group) and mock-T cells (control group) were injected intravenously on day 7. Tumor burden was measured by intraperitoneal injection of 150 mg/kg D-luciferin and imaging 2 min later with an exposure time of 30 s by the IVIS^® Spectrum BL. Living Image was used to assess bioluminescence for each mouse as photons/s/cm²/sr. Imaging was performed on days 7, 10, 17, and 24 to monitor tumor progression. All reagents and instruments not annotated above were from PerkinElmer.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism v6.0. The data are shown as the mean ± SD (N = 3). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by multiple comparisons test and the two-tailed unpaired t-test were used for comparison of 3 or 2 groups, respectively. Differences at P-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Study Design and Participants

This study reports early clinical experience from the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The protocol is included in Figure 4B. Enrolled patients were 18–80 years old with a confirmed diagnosis of R/R MM as defined by International Myeloma Working Group criteria (29). All patients provided written informed consent before treatment. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University.

Assessments

AEs were identified and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. CRS was assessed with the modified criteria proposed by Lee et al. (30). We assessed CR and VGPR according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) updated diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma in this clinical trial (31, 32)

Results

Generation and Characterization of BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T Cells

We constructed the plasmids carrying the second-generation CAR (BCMA-hBBz), which contained the anti-BCMA scFv, the CD8 transmembrane region, and the intracellular signaling domains of human 4-1BB and the CD3ζ motif in tandem. A 2A linker sequence was inserted directly downstream of CARs followed by IL-7 and CCL19 molecules for equal molar expression, designated BCMA-7 × 19 CAR (Figure 1A). Flow cytometric data showed high transduction efficiency in both BCMA-hBBz CAR-T and BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T on day 5 after transduction (Figures 1B,C).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Efficient expression of CAR on lentiviral-transduced T cells and functional verification of IL-7 and CCL19. (A) Schematic representation of BCMA-hBBz CAR and BCMA-7x19 CAR. (B) CAR expressions of CAR-T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. The numbers in scatter plots represent the percentages of positively stained cells. (C) The expression rates of BCMA CAR and BCMA-7x19 CAR. Data are means± SD obtained from seven donors. MOI = 80. P-value was calculated by two-tailed student t-test. ns, not statistically significant (P > 0.05). (D) Quantitative detection of IL-7 (left) and CCL19 (right) secretion by ELISA. (E) Number fold change of BCMA-hBBz and 7 × 19 CAR-T cells at the indicated time-points. ****P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA. (F) The count of migrating T cells (N = 3). ****P < 0.0001 was calculated by two-tailed student t-test. ***P < 0.001.

We next validated the functional secretion of IL-7 and CCL19 separately. As shown in Figure 1D, significantly increased concentrations of IL-7 and CCL19 were observed in BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells compared to mock-T and BCMA-hBBz CAR-T cells on days 3 and 5. In line with the facts that IL-7 enhances the proliferation of T cells and CCL19 is a chemoattractant for CCR7⁺ T cells (23, 24, 28, 33), we examined the absolute number of cells and performed transwell migration assay. The results demonstrated that IL-7 secreted by BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells enhanced the proliferation and survival of CAR-T cells, and CCL19 promoted lymphocyte migration and recruitment of peripheral T lymphocytes (Figures 1E,F).

An Extraordinarily High Proportion of Stem Cell-Like Memory T cells (Tscm)

Naïve T cells differentiate into Tscm, central memory T cells (Tcm), effector memory T cells (Tem), and effector T cells (Teff). Preclinical models revealed that Tscm—defined by the expression of CD45RA, CD45RO, and CD62L—had greater potential for self-renewal and pluripotent differentiation, longer persistence and greater anti-tumor activity compared to Tcm (34–36). BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells showed a higher Tscm ratio by flow cytometry due to delayed terminal differentiation (Figures 2A,B). The CD4/CD8 ratio showed no significant difference (Figure 2C). We also monitored changes in the Tscm ratio at 5, 7, and 9 days after transduction. Results showed that the durable and effectiveness of BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-Tscm vs. Tcm was time-independent, indicating that it probably had a higher and longer anti-tumor potential (Figure 2D).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Phenotype of CAR-T cell. (A) Expression of CD45RA and CD45RO on CAR-T cells subsets in CD62L⁺ cells by flow cytometry. Tcm (CD62L⁺CD45RO⁺CD45RA⁻), Tscm (CD62L⁺CD45RO⁻CD45RA⁺). (B) Statistical chart of subset distribution. (C) CD4/CD8 ratios of CAR-T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. (D) Change of Tscm ratio at the indicated time-points. P-value was calculated by two-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001.

Cytotoxicity of BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T Cells in vitro and in vivo

To determine the anti-tumor activity of BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells in vitro, we generated U266-Luc-GFP, MM1S-Luc-GFP, and BCMA-K562-Luc-GFP cells, which could simultaneously express the target antigen and luciferase (Figure 3A). We next determined cytotoxicity by co-culturing T cells with the three target cells. BCMA-hBBz CAR-T and BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells specially and effectively lysed the BCMA-expressing cell lines, whereas mock-T cells showed a background killing at various effector-to-target cell (E:T) ratios. It needs to be emphasized that BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells showed significantly stronger cytotoxicity compared to BCMA-hBBz CAR-T cells at low E:T ratios (Figure 3B). Moreover, we verified similar levels of IL-2, IFN-γ, and GM-CSF released by CAR-T cells after specific killing, which were strongly associated with neurotoxicity and cytokine release syndrome (CRS; Figure 3C).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Cytotoxicity analysis of BCMA-hBBz and 7 × 19 CAR-T cells in vitro and in vivo. (A) MM1S-Luc-GFP, U266-Luc-GFP and BCMA-K562 cell lines stably expressing BCMA and luciferase. (B) CAR-T cells and target tumor cells were co-incubated for 4 h at the indicated E:T ratios. Cytotoxicity assay with BCMA-K562 (left), MM1S-Luc-GFP (middle) and U266-Luc-GFP cells as targets (right). Differences between groups were determined using two-way ANOVA. Mean ± SD, ****p < 0.0001. (C) Cytokine release by CAR-T cells in response to multiple myeloma cell lines. CAR-T or mock-T cells were incubated with MM1S-Luc-GFP cells at 1:1 for 24 h, IL2 (left), IFN-γ (middle) and GM-CSF (right) were analyzed by intracellular staining or ELISA. P-value was calculated by two-tailed student t-test. ***P < 0.001. ns, not statistically significant (P > 0.05). (D) Flow chart of animal experimentation. (E). On day 0, NSG mice were injected intravenously with 4 × 10⁶ BCMA-K562 cells. On day 7, mice received 6 × 10⁶ BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells (n = 3), BCMA-hBBz CAR-T cells (n = 3) or mock-T cells (n = 3). Luciferase bioluminescent imaging analysis on days 7, 10, 17, and 24. (F) Average bioluminescent signal for each group in different days [mean radiance (p/s/cm²/sr)] ±SD.

Subsequently, we assessed the anti-tumor effects of BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells in vivo (Figure 3D). NSG mice were inoculated with 4 × 10⁶ BCMA-K562-Luc-GFP cells intravenously on day 0 as a xenogeneic model of MM. On day 7, the xenogeneic mice were treated with an intravenous injection of 6 × 10⁶ BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells, BCMA-hBBz CAR-T cells or untransduced mock-T cells. As shown in Figures 3E,F, the mice treated with BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells displayed a significant decrease in systemic tumor burden as evidenced by signal intensity 17 days after cell infusion. By contrast, luciferase activity rapidly and steadily increased in mice injected with the mock-T cells. Taken together, our data showed that BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells efficiently and markedly lysed tumor cells expressing BCMA on the surface in vivo and ex vivo.

Demographics and Baseline Characteristics

We obtained the following results from two R/R MM patients showing the safety and efficacy of BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cell therapy. The patients had received three to five prior lines of treatment but eventually developed R/R MM. The clinical baseline characteristics of the two subjects were summarized in Table 1. Patient 1, a 69-year-old man, presented with a soft tissue mass in the left fourth rib about 72 × 110 mm and progressive extramedullary recurrence of IgD-λ-R/R MM. Patient 2 had been diagnosed with IgA-κ MM for 9 years; classic proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulators combined with traditional chemotherapy regimens had been used for many courses, but efficacy was poor and adverse drug reactions were unbearable. Patient 1 received a single injection of 4 × 10⁶/kg BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells, and Patient 2 received a single injection of 3 × 10⁶/kg BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells. The treatment scheme for the two patients was detailed in Figure 4B. The manufacturing of clinical grade CAR-T cells was successful in the two patients; the characterization of CAR-T cells, including phenotype and specific cytotoxicity, were shown in Table 2, Supplementary Figures 1, 2. The subjects received no other chemotherapy since enrolling in the study.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Baseline characteristics.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Clinical efficacy after BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T infusion. (A) Duration of response and survival after BCMA-7X19 CAR-T cell infusion. (B) Scheme for CAR-T preparation and treatment. (C) Patient 1, serum immunoglobulin IgG, IgA, IgM are in the normal range, both before and after infusion. (D) Patient 1, representative CT scans at different baselines (baseline1: First extramedullary recurrence of multiple myeloma; 1 year after Len and DXM induction therapy shown in baseline 2: progression of extramedullary recurrence; baseline 3: 1 month before BCMA-7X19 CAR-T infusion); and CT scans post-CAR-T cell infusion 1, 4, and 10 months. Scale bars, 1 cm. (E) Patient 2, monitoring of urine light chain protein and (F) Serum immunoglobulin IgG, Ig A, Ig M levels before and after treatment. (G) Serum kinetics of a panel of cytokines in patients who received infusions with high doses of CAR-T cells, as determined by Luminex multiplex assay (R&D Systems) Horizontal lines denote mean values.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Characteristics of CAR-T products.

Safety and Adverse Events (AEs)

AEs attributable to any cause occurring within 46 days of BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cell infusion were graded and evaluated according to CTCAE v5.0 (Table 3). Both patients received scheduled doses, and there was no dose-limiting toxicity. No serious adverse effects (>grade 3 AEs) were noted in either patient. AEs included maximum grade 2 and grade 1 events in patient 1 and patient 2, respectively, and neither patient experienced neurological symptoms (Table 3, Supplementary Table 1). Grade 1 CRS occurred in the two patients, according to Lee's (30) CRS grading criteria. The most common AEs related to BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cell infusion were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and fever. In addition to adverse hematological symptoms, both patients experienced grade 1 gastrointestinal bleeding and grade 1–2 hypoproteinemia. All AEs ranged from grade 1 to grade 3 in severity and resolved without special treatment. It is important to point out that AEs were self-limiting and reversible. Immunotherapy-induced changes in vital signs and kidney indicators, such as blood pressure, pulse, heart rate, respiration, CRP, uric acid and creatinine, were within the normal range and controllable (Supplementary Figure 3). Based on the safety profile of the two assessable DLT patients in phase 0, this regimen was deemed safe for study in phase 1.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Adverse event grading based on CTCAE v5.0.

Clinical Response and Persistence

The two patients had an objective response within 1 month after BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cell infusion, with patient 1 achieving a VGPR of extramedullary recurrence and patient 2 attaining a CR (Figure 4A). As of April 12, 2020, the length of follow-up was 14 and 12 months of patient 1 and patient 2, respectively. Patient 1 was treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for 11 months after diagnosis of extramedullary recurrence. A soft tissue mass on the fourth left rib progressed from 34 × 45 mm to 51 × 81 mm. Even after five courses of multi-drug chemotherapy, the soft tissue expanded to 72 × 110 mm (Figure 4D). A representative computed tomography (CT) scan showed a significant reduction in the size of the plasma cell tumor mass that maintained for more than 14 months (Figure 4D). Serum IgA, IgD, and IgM concentrations were within the normal range (Figure 4C). Patient 2 had undergone multiple courses of chemotherapy with poor efficacy, intolerable adverse reactions, and aggravation of thigh pain dependent on painkillers. After 2 months of CAR-T treatment, blood and urine concentrations of IgA and light chain protein decreased to regular base levels (Figures 4E,F).

We monitored plasma levels of seven cytokines before BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cell infusions and at multiple time-points after infusions. The peak fold increases over the baseline level were calculated for each cytokine for each patient (Figure 4G). The cytokines with the largest median fold increases were interferon-γ, IL-6 and IL-10. The cytokines with high peak blood levels are associated with CRS (35), and peripheral CAR⁺ cell levels are associated with anti-tumor responses in patients treated with CAR-T cells (37, 38). Ultimately, these data have demonstrated that BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cell therapy has potential clinical efficacy and durability with good safety.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first preclinical and clinical study of anti-BCMA CAR-T cell secreting of IL-7 and CCL19 to treat R/R MM patients. The results are promising. First, 7 × 19 CAR-T cells targeting BCMA exhibited superior expansion, survival, accumulation of Tscm cells, migration and cytotoxicity compared to their traditional second-generation CAR-T counterpart. Second, the conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine (day −4) followed by BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells (day 0) at a dose of 4 × 10⁶ cells/kg was safe for further study and the toxicity was manageable. Finally, patients with R/R MM who received an infusion of BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells responded effectively within 1 month and experienced no relapse in more than 12 months. The encouraging results facilitated the pivotal ongoing BCMA-7 × 19 phase 1 trial.

CAR-T cell immunotherapy is a significant milestone in modern cancer treatment. In the past 5 years, 125 clinical trials of CAR-T for R/R MM have been listed at https://clinicaltrials.gov, including 72 ones targeting BCMA. BB2121, a CAR-T cell therapy targeting BCMA, has received FDA breakthrough therapy approval and European Medicines Agency (EMA) priority approval. Neither VGPR nor CR was achieved in a low-dose group (50 × 10⁶ cells, n = 3); When the number of CAR-T cells increased to ≥150 × 10⁶ cells, the efficacy reached up to 94%, but this was accompanied by toxic hematological effects mostly of grade 3 or higher (39–41). It was recently reported that 6 of 15 patients who achieved complete remission experienced a relapse in just 6 months of follow-up (42). Overall, further improvements of CAR-T cell therapy in MM will be needed: optimizing the persistence and survival of CAR-T cells, decreasing the toxicity associated with CAR-T cell therapy, specifically targeting tumor cells and minimizing off-target toxicities.

Improving CAR persistence will rely heavily on understanding the biology of CAR-T cells and on the functionality and subsequent optimization of designs (43). Preclinical and clinical reports have indicated that 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain-containing CARs tend to persist better than those containing a CD28 co-stimulatory domain (44–48). Our BCMA-7 × 19 CAR vector contained a binding domain that recognizes BCMA, a CD8 transmembrane region, an intracellular 4-1BB co-stimulatory molecule, and a CD3ζ T cell signaling domain. IL-7 regulates the proliferation of T cells and maintains the stability of the intracellular environment (25), and CCL19 is a chemotactic agent for recruiting CCR7⁺ T cells and dendritic cells (22, 28, 49, 50). We showed the superiority of our BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells in terms of proliferation and chemotaxis by calculating absolute cell counts and performing transwell migration assay, which provided a good start-up for solving the problems such as CAR-T cell proliferation, infiltration and accumulation in the tumor microenvironment.

Tscm are distinguishable from Tcm and Tem in phenotype, functional capacity to expand extensively, self-renewal, and differentiation potential (51–53). Several clinical studies have shown that the modifications to induce differentiation toward a Tcm/Tscm profile improve CAR-T cell response in subjects (54, 55). We confirmed a significant increase in the frequency of Tscm in BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells by multiple cell surface marker analyses, which may be related to IL-7 in retaining the subpopulation of Tscm, compared to BCMA-hBBz CAR-T cells (56). In contrast, there was no difference in the frequencies of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ CAR cells. Moreover, we successfully manufactured BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells (Tscm + Tcm > 75%) for the first enrolled R/R MM patients, with one patient's Tscm up to 58%.

We have initiated a clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells in R/R MM patients. The first two enrolled and heavily treated R/R MM patients received autologous CAR-T cells (3–4 × 10⁶/kg) following lymphodepletion chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m² for 4 days) and fludarabine (30 mg/m² for 4 days). Clinically significant toxicity was not observed, and most AEs were grade 1 or 2. Only two AEs (neutropenia and nausea) were grade 3 and were most likely related to cyclophosphamide/fludarabine. No high-grade AEs were recorded. None of the subjects experienced a DLT, and thus a maximum tolerated dose of CAR-T cells has not been determined yet.

In conclusion, this work preliminarily suggests that BCMA-7 × 19 CAR-T cells have substantial anti-MM activity and safety, although the small number of patients enrolled is a weakness of this study. Our study may help pave the way toward clinical application of BCMA-targeted fourth-generation CAR-T cells and thus highlight a potential strategy for dealing with malignancies of BCMA overexpression such as Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia and glioblastoma/astrocytoma (57, 58).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the institutional independent ethics committee of Lishui people's Hospital and Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The animal study was reviewed and approved by Wenzhou Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

JG, ST, AZ, and DD: designed the study. DD, KW, AZ, and JG: performed the experiments, interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript. DF, CWe, JL, LL, SZ, XX, CWa, QH, and DL: performed experiments. YL, AZ, JJ, and BF: performed clinical trials. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was partially funded by the Scientific Research Fund of National Health Commission of PR China (WKJ-ZJ-1928), Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2019A1515110831), Zhejiang Provincial Major Research Project, Wenzhou Municipal Science and Technology Research Program (ZS2017014, 2018ZY001), Lishui Municipal Science and Technology Research Program (2019ZDYF19).

Conflict of Interest

AZ and JG were employed by Zhejiang Qixin Biotech.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.609421/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Chmielewski M, Abken H. TRUCKs: the fourth-generation of CARs. Exp Opin Biol Ther. (2015) 15:1145–54. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2015.1046430

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. (2011) 364:1046–60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1011442

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, Catalano JV, Belch A, Cavo M, et al. Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood. (2018) 131:301–10. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-795047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Duong CP, Yong CS, Kershaw MH, Slaney CY, Darcy PK. Cancer immunotherapy utilizing gene-modified T cells: from the bench to the clinic. Mol Immunol. (2015) 67:46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.12.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Srivastava S, Riddell SR. Engineering CAR-T cells: design concepts. Trends Immunol. (2015) 36:494–502. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.06.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Park JH, Rivière I, Gonen M, Wang X, Sénéchal B, Curran KJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of CD19 CAR therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378:449–59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709919

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Turtle CJ, Hanafi LA, Berger C, Hudecek M, Pender B, Robinson E, et al. Immunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a defined ratio of CD8+ and CD4+ CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. Sci Transl Med. (2016) 8:355ra116. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Dai H, Wu Z, Jia H, Tong C, Guo Y, Ti D, et al. Bispecific CAR-T cells targeting both CD19 and CD22 for therapy of adults with relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. (2020) 13:30. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00856-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Jia H, Wang Z, Wang Y, Liu Y, Dai H, Tong C, et al. Haploidentical CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR-T cells induced MRD-negative remission in a patient with relapsed and refractory adult B-ALL after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Hematol Oncol. (2019) 12:57. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0741-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Sadelain M, Brentjens R, Rivière I. The basic principles of chimeric antigen receptor design. Cancer Discov. (2013) 3:388–98. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Ewen C, Kane KP, Shostak I, Griebel PJ, Bertram EM, Watts TH, et al. A novel cytotoxicity assay to evaluate antigen-specific CTL responses using a colorimetric substrate for Granzyme B. J Immunol Methods. (2003) 276:89–101. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(03)00073-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Chmielewski M, Hombach AA, Abken H. Of CARs and TRUCKs: chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells engineered with an inducible cytokine to modulate the tumor stroma. Immunol Rev. (2014) 257:83–90. doi: 10.1111/imr.12125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Tian Y, Li Y, Shao Y, Zhang Y. Gene modification strategies for next-generation CAR T cells against solid cancers. J Hematol Oncol. (2020) 13:54. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00890-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Mikkilineni L, Kochenderfer JN. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies for multiple myeloma. Blood. (2017) 130:2594–602. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-793869

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Brudno JN, Maric I, Hartman SD, Rose JJ, Wang M, Lam N, et al. T cells genetically modified to express an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor cause remissions of poor-prognosis relapsed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. (2018) 36:2267–80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8084

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Bu DX, Singh R, Choi EE, Ruella M, Nunez-Cruz S, Mansfield KG, et al. Pre-clinical validation of B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) as a target for T cell immunotherapy of multiple myeloma. Oncotarget. (2018) 9:25764–80. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Berahovich R, Zhou H, Xu S, Wei Y, Guan J, Guan J, et al. CAR-T cells based on novel BCMA monoclonal antibody block multiple myeloma cell growth. Cancers. (2018) 10:323. doi: 10.3390/cancers10090323

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Hipp S, Tai YT, Blanset D, Deegen P, Wahl J, Thomas O, et al. A novel BCMA/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager for the treatment of multiple myeloma induces selective lysis in vitro and in vivo. Leukemia. (2017) 31:2278. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Xu J, Wang Q, Xu H, Gu C, Jiang L, Wang J, et al. Anti-BCMA CAR-T cells for treatment of plasma cell dyscrasia: case report on POEMS syndrome and multiple myeloma. J Hematol Oncol. (2018) 11:128. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0672-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ali SA, Shi V, Maric I, Wang M, Stroncek DF, Rose JJ, et al. T cells expressing an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor cause remissions of multiple myeloma. Blood. (2016) 128:1688–700. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-04-711903

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Brown FD, Turley SJ. Fibroblastic reticular cells: organization and regulation of the T lymphocyte life cycle. J Immunol. (2015) 194:1389–94. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402520

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Adachi K, Kano Y, Nagai T, Okuyama N, Sakoda Y, Tamada K. IL-7 and CCL19 expression in CAR-T cells improves immune cell infiltration and CAR-T cell survival in the tumor. Nat Biotechnol. (2018) 36:346–51. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Jiang Q, Li WQ, Aiello FB, Mazzucchelli R, Asefa B, Khaled AR, et al. Cell biology of IL-7, a key lymphotrophin. Cytok Growth Factor Rev. (2005) 16:513–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Fry TJ, Mackall CL. Interleukin-7: master regulator of peripheral T-cell homeostasis? Trends Immunol. (2001) 22:564–71. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4906(01)02028-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Geiselhart LA, Humphries CA, Gregorio TA, Mou S, Subleski J, Komschlies KL. IL-7 administration alters the CD4:CD8 ratio, increases T cell numbers, and increases T cell function in the absence of activation. J Immunol. (2001) 166:3019–27. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.5.3019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Gunn MD, Tangemann K, Tam C, Cyster JG, Rosen SD, Williams LT. A chemokine expressed in lymphoid high endothelial venules promotes the adhesion and chemotaxis of naive T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1998) 95:258–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.1.258

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Dieu MC, Vanbervliet B, Vicari A, Bridon JM, Oldham E, Aït-Yahia S, et al. Selective recruitment of immature and mature dendritic cells by distinct chemokines expressed in different anatomic sites. J Exp Med. (1998) 188:373–86. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.2.373

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Yoshida R, Nagira M, Imai T, Baba M, Takagi S, Tabira Y, et al. EBI1-ligand chemokine (ELC) attracts a broad spectrum of lymphocytes: activated T cells strongly up-regulate CCR7 and efficiently migrate toward ELC. Int Immunol. (1998) 10:901–10. doi: 10.1093/intimm/10.7.901

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Dimopoulos MA, Sonneveld P, Leung N, Merlini G, Ludwig H, Kastritis E, et al. International myeloma working group recommendations for the diagnosis and management of myeloma-related renal impairment. J Clin Oncol. (2016) 34:1544–57. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Lee DW, Gardner R, Porter DL, Louis CU, Ahmed N, Jensen M, et al. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood. (2014) 124:188–95. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-552729

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, Bladé J, Barlogie B, Anderson K, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. (2006) 20:1467–73. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404284

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Rajkumar SV, Harousseau JL, Durie B, Anderson KC, Dimopoulos M, Kyle R, et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood. (2011) 117:4691–5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-299487

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Bradley LM, Haynes L, Swain SL. IL-7: maintaining T-cell memory and achieving homeostasis. Trends Immunol. (2005) 26:172–6. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2005.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Gattinoni L, Klebanoff CA, Restifo NP. Paths to stemness: building the ultimate antitumour T cell. Nat Rev Cancer. (2012) 12:671–84. doi: 10.1038/nrc3322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Topp MS, Duell J, Zugmaier G, Attal M, Moreau P, Langer C, et al. Anti-B-cell maturation antigen BiTE molecule AMG 420 induces responses in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. (2020) 38:775–83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02657

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Blaeschke F, Stenger D, Kaeuferle T, Willier S, Lotfi R, Kaiser AD, et al. Induction of a central memory and stem cell memory phenotype in functionally active CD4 and CD8 CAR T cells produced in an automated good manufacturing practice system for the treatment of CD19 acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2018) 67:1053–66. doi: 10.1007/s00262-018-2155-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Kochenderfer JN, Somerville RPT, Lu T, Shi V, Bot A, Rossi J, et al. Lymphoma remissions caused by anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells are associated with high serum interleukin-15 levels. J Clin Oncol. (2017) 35:1803–13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.3024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Brudno JN, Somerville RP, Shi V, Rose JJ, Halverson DC, Fowler DH, et al. Allogeneic T cells that express an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor induce remissions of B-cell malignancies that progress after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation without causing graft-versus-host disease. J Clin Oncol. (2016) 34:1112–21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.5929

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Friedman KM, Garrett TE, Evans JW, Horton HM, Latimer HJ, Seidel SL, et al. Effective targeting of multiple B-cell maturation antigen-expressing hematological malignances by anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Human Gene Ther. (2018) 29:585–601. doi: 10.1089/hum.2018.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Brudno JN, Kochenderfer JN. Recent advances in CAR T-cell toxicity: mechanisms, manifestations and management. Blood Rev. (2019) 34:45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2018.11.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Raje NS, Berdeja JG, Lin Y, Munshi NC, Siegel DS, Liedtke M, et al. bb2121 anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Updated results from a multicenter phase I study. J Clin Oncol. (2018) 36:8007–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.8007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Raje N, Berdeja J, Lin Y, Siegel D, Jagannath S, Madduri D, et al. Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb2121 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. (2019) 380:1726–37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Huang R, Li X, He Y, Zhu W, Gao L, Liu Y, et al. Recent advances in CAR-T cell engineering. J Hematol Oncol. (2020) 13:86. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00910-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. van der Stegen SJ, Hamieh M, Sadelain M. The pharmacology of second-generation chimeric antigen receptors. Nat Rev. (2015) 14:499–509. doi: 10.1038/nrd4597

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Zhao Z, Condomines M, van der Stegen SJC, Perna F, Kloss CC, Gunset G, et al. Structural design of engineered costimulation determines tumor rejection kinetics and persistence of CAR T cells. Cancer Cell. (2015) 28:415–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Kochenderfer JN, Dudley ME, Kassim SH, Somerville RP, Carpenter RO, Stetler-Stevenson M, et al. Chemotherapy-refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and indolent B-cell malignancies can be effectively treated with autologous T cells expressing an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor. J Clin Oncol. (2015) 33:540–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.2025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Maude SL, Frey N, Shaw PA, Aplenc R, Barrett DM, Bunin NJ, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N Engl J Med. (2014) 371:1507–17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407222

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Lee DW, Kochenderfer JN, Stetler-Stevenson M, Cui YK, Delbrook C, Feldman SA, et al. T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet. (2015) 385:517–28. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61403-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Pellegrini M, Calzascia T, Toe JG, Preston SP, Lin AE, Elford AR, et al. IL-7 engages multiple mechanisms to overcome chronic viral infection and limit organ pathology. Cell. (2011) 144:601–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Pellegrini M, Calzascia T, Elford AR, Shahinian A, Lin AE, Dissanayake D, et al. Adjuvant IL-7 antagonizes multiple cellular and molecular inhibitory networks to enhance immunotherapies. Nat Med. (2009) 15:528–36. doi: 10.1038/nm.1953

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Gattinoni L, Klebanoff CA, Palmer DC, Wrzesinski C, Kerstann K, Yu Z, et al. Acquisition of full effector function in vitro paradoxically impairs the in vivo antitumor efficacy of adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells. J Clin Investig. (2005) 115:1616–26. doi: 10.1172/JCI24480

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. June CH. Adoptive T cell therapy for cancer in the clinic. J Clin Investig. (2007) 117:1466–76. doi: 10.1172/JCI32446

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Paulos CM, Suhoski MM, Plesa G, Jiang T, Basu S, Golovina TN, et al. Adoptive immunotherapy: good habits instilled at youth have long-term benefits. Immunol Res. (2008) 42:182–96. doi: 10.1007/s12026-008-8070-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Kawalekar OU, O'Connor RS, Fraietta JA, Guo L, McGettigan SE, Posey Jr AD, et al. Distinct signaling of coreceptors regulates specific metabolism pathways and impacts memory development in CAR T cells. Immunity. (2016) 44:380–90. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Fraietta JA, Lacey SF, Orlando EJ, Pruteanu-Malinici I, Gohil M, Lundh S, et al. Determinants of response and resistance to CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Med. (2018) 24:563–71. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0010-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Cieri N, Camisa B, Cocchiarella F, Forcato M, Oliveira G, Provasi E, et al. IL-7 and IL-15 instruct the generation of human memory stem T cells from naive precursors. Blood. (2013) 121:573–84. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-431718

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Elsawa SF, Novak AJ, Grote DM, Ziesmer SC, Witzig TE, Kyle RA, et al. B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) stimulates immunoglobulin production and malignant B-cell growth in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Blood. (2006) 107:2882–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-09-3552

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Deshayes F, Laprée G, Portier A, Richard Y, Pencalet P, Mahieu-Caputo D, et al. Abnormal production of the TNF-homologue APRIL increases the proliferation of human malignant glioblastoma cell lines via a specific receptor. Oncogene. (2004) 23:3005–12. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207350

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar