Encapsulation and Controlled Release of Resveratrol Within Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Prostate Cancer Therapy
Zanib Chaudhary1,2† 
Sugarniya Subramaniam3,4,5† 
Gul Majid Khan2 
Muhammad Mustafa Abeer1 
Zhi Qu1 
Taskeen Janjua1 
Tushar Kumeria1,5,6* 
Jyotsna Batra3,4,5* 
Amirali Popat1,5,6*- 1School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- 2Department of Pharmacy, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
- 3School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- 4Faculty of Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Queensland, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- 5Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
- 6Mater Research Institute, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
Resveratrol (RES) is a naturally existing polyphenol which exhibits anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer properties. In recent years, RES has attracted attention for its synergistic effect with other anti-cancer drugs for the treatment of drug resistant cancers. However, RES faces the issues of poor pharmacokinetics, stability and low solubility which limits its clinical application. In present study, RES has been loaded onto uniformly sized (~60 nm) mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) to improve its in vitro anti-proliferative activity and sensitization of Docatexal in hypoxia induced drug resistance in prostate cancer. RES was efficiently encapsulated within phosphonate (negatively charged) and amine (positively charged) modified MSNs. The effect of surface functionalization was studied on the loading, in vitro release, anti-proliferative and cytotoxic potential of RES using prostate cancer cell line. At pH 7.4 both free and NH2-MSNs loaded RES showed burst release which was plateaued with almost 90% of drug released in first 12 h. On the other hand, PO3-MSNs showed significantly slower release kinetics with only 50% drug release in first 12 h at pH 7.4. At pH 5.5, however, both the PO3-MSNs and NH2-MSNs showed significant control over release (around 40% less release compared with free RES in 24 h). Phosphonate modified MSNs significantly enhanced the anti-proliferative potential of RES with an IC50 of 7.15 μM as compared to 14.86 μM of free RES whereas amine modified MSNs didn't affect proliferation with an IC50 value higher than free RES (20.45 μM). Furthermore, RES loaded onto PO3-MSNs showed robust and dose dependent sensitization of Docatexal in hypoxic cell environment which was comparable to pure RES solution. This study provides an example of applicability of MSNs loaded with polyphenols such as RES as next generation anticancer formulations for treating drug resistant cancers such as prostate cancer.
Introduction
Prostate cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men over the age of 50 (Siegel et al., 2011). Moreover, due to the prolonged latency of prostate cancer, it has become an attractive target for chemotherapeutic strategies (Van Poppel and Tombal, 2011). Hypoxia is a common event in solid tumor environment which leads to distant metastasis, resistance to chemotherapeutics and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (Semenza, 2012; Liu et al., 2014; Rankin and Giaccia, 2016). The underlying mechanism involves the role of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) which regulates the expression of proteins that contribute to the oncogenesis and enable the cancer cells to survive under hypoxic conditions (Vaupel, 2004). Docetaxel (Doc) has been considered as a standard first line therapy in prostate cancers (Francini and Sweeney, 2016; Mansour et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2018). However, the survival rate remains only modest owing to rapid resistance to Doc acquired by patients (Qian et al., 2018). There is a dire need to revamp the mainstay treatment of prostate cancer i.e., Doc to target hypoxia-induced chemoresistance (Seruga et al., 2010; Fernandez et al., 2015).
Recently, many researchers have explored the antimetastatic efficacy of dietary polyphenols in vivo and their use as a supplementary therapy is gaining momentum (Hussain et al., 2016; Amawi et al., 2017). Resveratrol (RES), a naturally occurring polyphenol, exhibits a wide range of properties such as anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, pro-apoptotic, and anti-angiogenic effects (Kundu and Surh, 2008; Lancon et al., 2016; Eräsalo et al., 2018). Studies suggest that the dietary intake of RES could prevent cancers and, enhance the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents (Khan et al., 2008). In experimental models, RES has shown anti-cancer effects and has shown to significantly suppress the initiation and progression of tumor growth (Khan et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2012). RES has been previously reported to have anti-cancer effects on prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP, DU145, and PC3 (Athar et al., 2009; Cimino et al., 2012). Although, RES offers many benefits its effectiveness is decreased by its low bioavailability and serum stability (De Vries et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2019; Tabibiazar et al., 2019). Many drug delivery systems including nanoparticles have been used in order to improve its stability, bioavailability and targetability (Summerlin et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2019).
In theory, the nanoparticles should load high contents, protect the cargo until it reaches the site of action, allow efficient uptake of the loaded/encapsulated drug by the cells and escape reticuloendothelial system (Watermann and Brieger, 2017). These features are required to overcome challenges such as multidrug resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs worsening morbidity of the cancers. The current development of mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) strongly advocates that MSNs can overcome these barriers owing to their unique features (He and Shi, 2014). These features include flexibility in surface functionality due to silanol functional groups available for facile modification, superior textural properties such as pore size, surface area and pore volume of mesopores and controllable morphology (Zhou et al., 2018). Therefore, silica nanoparticles have been recently used in a human trial for patients with melanoma and have shown strong implications in cancer diagnosis (Phillips et al., 2014). An interesting feature of MSNs is that it can encapsulate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules with similar loading efficiency owing to extensively available pores (Slowing et al., 2008; Desai et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2018). Majority of chemotherapeutics and nutraceuticals with anticancer potential are hydrophobic in nature and as is the case of MSNs have been frequently used to demonstrate delivery of such substances. RES is hydrophobic in nature and has been successfully loaded onto MSNs by our group previously (Ton et al., 2012; Summerlin et al., 2016). We demonstrated anticancer potential of RES in MCM-48 MSNs in colon cancer cell lines by improving their anti-inflammatory activity in vitro by reducing NF-κB (Summerlin et al., 2016). In addition, the effects of varying particle sizes i.e., 90, 150, and 300 nm with pore sizes of 3.5 and 7 nm on modulating aqueous solubility and anti-inflammatory activity of RES was studied (Juère et al., 2017).
Surface functionality is another property of MSNs which has significant effect on the biological performance of the encapsulated drug (Jambhrunkar et al., 2014). However, to date there has been no investigation of how RES interacts with MSNs with different surface chemistries and the effect of surface functionalities on release and biological activity of RES such as its anti-cancer potential. Herein, we hypothesize that MSNs functionalized with positively charged surface amine groups and negatively charged phosphonate groups loaded with RES may lead to effectively enhanced anti-cancer activity of RES in prostate cancer cells and reversed hypoxia induced Doc resistance in PC3 cells. In the present work, we have explored the effect of RES-loaded MSN to reverse the hypoxia-induced resistance to Doc in PC3 cell lines. The findings may help to establish use of preferential functional group and propose a platform nanoparticle-based drug delivery system for synergistic anti-cancer activity of RES with Doc for prostate cancer therapy.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 99%), cetyltrimethyl ammonium chloride (CTAC, 25 wt% in H2O), triethanolamine (TEA, ≥ 99%), 3-aminopropyl-triethoxy silane (ATPES, 99%), 3-trihydroxysilyl-propyl methyl-phosphonate, mono-sodium salt (THMP, 50 wt% in H2O) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Australia), Resveratrol (99% pure trans-Resveratrol) obtained from Candlewood Stars Inc. CT USA. All other reagents and solvents were of HPLC grade and did not require any further purification.
Methods
Fabrication of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles
MSNs were synthesized following a previously established protocol with slight modifications (Pan et al., 2012). Briefly, 2 g CTAC and 0.04 g TEA were dissolved in 20 mL DI water and kept for vigorous stirring at 95°C in a silicone oil bath. After 1 h, 1.5 mL of TEOS was added dropwise at a rate of 1 mL per minute into the dispersion. This mixture was stirred for another hour under similar conditions. The mixture was allowed to cool, and the MSNs were collected as pellets after centrifugation (20,000 × g, 15 min). The particles were washed with ethanol several times and dried overnight at 60°C in an oven. The dried pellets were crushed and subjected to calcination in muffle furnace (Thermo scientific, Australia) at 550°C for 7 h to completely remove the surfactant.
Surface Modification of MSNs Particles
The MSNs were surface modified with two types of functional groups namely; (a) phosphonate (PO3) i.e., negative charge moiety and (b) amine (NH2) i.e., positive charged moiety. For phosphonate modification, 0.20 mL THMP was dissolved in 20 mL milli-Q water. The pH of solution was adjusted from 11 to ~5–6. The acidic pH prevents hydroxylation and condensation of silanol groups during the functionalization. To this pH adjusted solution, 200 mg of MSNs were added, and bath sonicated for 5 min. The mixture was refluxed overnight at 100°C and 1,000 RPM. Next day, the phosphonated MSNs (PO3-MSN) were collected as pellets by centrifugation (Multifuge X1R, Thermofisher, Australia) and washed two times with water followed by washing with ethanol (20,000 × g, 10 min each cycle). The pellets were oven dried overnight (60°C). For amine surface modification 250 mg MSNs were vacuum dried overnight to remove any moisture from the pores. The particles were then added into 50 mL toluene and stirred for 30 min (50°C). The temperature of silicone oil bath was increased to 115°C. APTES (262 μL) was added and the mixture was refluxed overnight. Next day, the amine modified MSNs (NH2-MSN) were collected by centrifugation and washed two times with acetone and once with ethanol. The pellets were oven dried overnight (60°C).
Resveratrol Loading Onto Surface Modified MSNs
Resveratrol was loaded onto surface modified MSNs using rotary evaporation method. For 10 wt% loading, 10 mg of RES were accurately weighed and dissolved in 8 mL methanol. The mixture was bath sonicated for 5 min. To this, 90 mg of MSNs were added and stirred overnight at room temperature. Next day, the organic solvent was evaporated using rotary evaporator at 40°C. The RES loaded particles were scratched off from round bottom flask (RBF) and stored in a dry cool place away from light.
Physicochemical Characterizations
The prepared particles before and after surface modifications were characterized for their particles size, surface charge, surface area, and pore size. The dynamic light scattering was performed using Nano series ZS instrument (Malvern, UK). The particles were suspended in PBS 7.4 and bath sonicated for 10 min prior to measurements. A Mettler-Toledo Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)/differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) instrument was used to determine the functional groups incorporation in terms of percentage mass grafting. The particles were accurately weighed around 5 mg in the TGA alumina crucible (70 μL) and the method comprised of a temperature range of 50°C to 900°C with a temperature ramp rate of 10 degrees per minute under air ambient. The percentage loading capacity was also determined using thermogravimetry analysis. The particles were suspended in ethanol and sonicated for 10 min for TEM grid preparation and the images were obtained using a HITACHI HT7700B Transmission electron microscope operated at 100 kV. N2-Sorption analysis was done using a Tri-Star II 3020 Nitrogen adsorption system to measure the surface area and pore size of particles before and after RES loading onto functionalized MSNs. The particles were weighed around 60–70 mg and degassed prior to surface area analysis. Fourier Transformed Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy was performed using the Perkin Elmer FTIR spectrometer to confirm the incorporation of functional groups and Resveratrol onto the MSNs. The RES loading efficiencies (LE%) of the functionalized MSNs were calculated using equation described in Section S1 (Supplementary Material).
In vitro Release Study
A calibration curve was prepared for RES ranging from a concentration of 100 ng mL−1 to 25 μg mL−1 (R2 = 0.999). Separate calibration curves were prepared for two different pH values i.e., pH 7.4 and pH 5.5 (Figure S5). The in vitro release experiments were performed by suspending 300 μg RES or equivalent of RES loaded particles in 5 mL of release medium (PBS 7.4 or PBS 5.5). At predetermined time intervals 1 mL was taken out, and centrifuged (20,000 × g, 5 min). The separated supernatant was diluted as per respective calibration curve and analyzed in HPLC at 306 nm. The volumes taken out at every time point were replaced with fresh buffer. The buffers used in this study were phosphonate buffers.
Proliferation Assay
PC3 cells were originally sourced from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). PC3 cells were cultured in RPMI1640 (1X) (Life Technologies) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma). Culture media was replaced at 3/4-day intervals and at 70–80% confluency. Cells were passaged by washing twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and detached with Trypsin/EDTA Solution (TE, Life Technologies). All cells were regularly tested for Mycoplasma by Mycoplasma detection KIT (Universal Mycoplasma Detection KIT, ATCC). Stock solution of the RES (10 mM) was prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and stored at −20°C.
IncuCyte assay
Proliferation assays were performed using the IncuCyte live cell imaging system (Essen Biosciences, Australia). This system enables real-time cell counting by analyzing the occupied area (% confluence) of cell images over time. Briefly, 5 × 103 cells were trypsinized and seeded in a Corning® 96 Well TC-Treated Microplates in 150 μL media and grown for 24 h. Next day, cells were treated transiently with RES and RES loaded MSNs (10, 15, and 20 μM) and placed in IncuCyte live cell imaging system as described previously (Matin et al., 2019). Two images per well were taken every 2 h for five consecutive days and confluency of the cells was measured. Each experiment consisted of three independent replicates. The cell viability was plotted and analyzed by the One-Way ANOVA test using GraphPad Prism software.
CyQuant assay
Cell viability assay was performed by measuring fluorescent quantification of DNA content by CyQuant NF assays (ThermoFisher Scientific, Catalog number—C35006). Briefly, 5 × 103 cells/well-seeded in a black plastic plates (Perkin Elmer Life Sciences) in 150 μL media and grown for 24 h. After 24 h, cells were treated with RES, RES loaded and blank MSNs as controls (PO3-MSN and NH2-MSN) and placed in incubator at 37°C (5% CO2) for 72-h. After a 72-h period, cell viability was measured using CyQuant NF assays (ThermoFisher Scientific, Catalog number—C35006) according to the manufacturer's instructions and fluorescence (520 nm) was measured after excitation at 480 nm using a microplate reader (FLUO Star Omega, BMG LAB TECH). Each experiment consisted of three independent replicates. The cell viability was plotted and analyzed by the One-Way ANOVA test using GraphPad Prism software.
Presto-Blue Assay Under Hypoxic Conditions
Briefly, 5 × 10 3 cells per well were seeded in a Corning® 96 Well TC-Treated Microplates in 150 μL media and grown for 24 h. After 24 h cells were treated with increasing concentrations of RES loaded MSNs, PO3-MSN-RES and Doc (Sigma Aldrich, Catalog number 01885) placed under normoxic (21% O2) and hypoxic conditions (2% O2) for 72-h. After a 72 h period, cell viability was measured using prestoBlue® Cell Viability Reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific, Catalog number–A13261) using a microplate reader (FLUO Star Omega, BMG LAB TECH) at excitation 560/10 nm and emission 590/10 nm. Each treatment was normalized to negative control analyzed by the One-Way test using GraphPad Prism software.
Results and Discussion
Physicochemical Characterizations
MSNs with controlled and uniform size of ~60 nm were prepared using CTAC as structure directing agent, TEOS as silica precursor and TEA having dual action as basic catalyst and complexing/capping agent. TEA has been reported in earlier studies to control the particle size by limiting further growth of the particles due to its capping action as well as accelerating nuclei formation and ultimately yielding higher number of particles with similar sizes (Kobler et al., 2008; Lv et al., 2016). In our study, the TEA amount in the mixture was fixed at 0.04 g, which provided uniform spherical shaped MSNs with a controlled particle size of ~60 nm and porous structure as seen in TEM image, which is in agreement from previous findings (Figure 1a) (Pan et al., 2012). The surface of the MSN was functionalized with negatively charged phosphonate-functional groups (PO3-MSN) and positively charged amine-groups (NH2-MSN) using silane chemistry. Analysis of the TEM images shows that surface modification did not have any impact on size, shape, and morphology of the MSNs (Figures 1b,c).
Figure 1. Transmission electron microscopy images of (a) Pristine MSN, (b) PO3-MSN, (c) NH2-MSN. The particles were suspended in ethanol and sonicated for 10 min for TEM grid preparation. The scale bar for inset images is 50 nm. Hydrodynamic diameter (d). Intensity mean values for blank and RES loaded MSNs (e). Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) plots for pristine and functionalized particles (f). Zeta potential measurements plotted before and after RES loading onto MSNs. For DLS and zeta potential measurement 0.1 mg mL−1 dispersions of each particle were bath sonicated in PBS pH = 7.4 for 10 min prior to analysis.
The pristine and functionalized MSNs were further characterized by dynamic light scattering. Surface charge was monitored by determining zeta potential of the unloaded and RES loaded MSNs in PBS (pH 7.4). Pristine MSNs show a hydrodynamic diameter of 61 nm, which increased slightly to an average diameter of 72 nm after phosphonate modification. The NH2-MSNs however showed tendency to aggregate in PBS and had a higher value of hydrodynamic diameter i.e., 267 nm (Guillet-Nicolas et al., 2013) which was consistant with previous literature. The unloaded pristine MSNs show zeta potential of −20.7 mV, which was further increased to −38.1 mV after grafting of negatively charged functional groups i.e., the PO3 groups onto the MSN surface. The surface mass grafting of NH2 was confirmed by shift in zeta potential from −20.7 to −2.59 mV, which directly relates to amine functionalization (Table 1, Figure 1). The RES loading increased the magnitude of negative surface charge of the MSNs to −42.8 and −11.2 mV, respectively (Table 1, Figure 1).
Table 1. Particle size analysis of RES loaded and unloaded functionalized MSNs.
The mass grafting of the functional groups and loading of RES onto MSNs was determined by TGA. Loading capacity, defined as the percentage loading of RES onto MSNs by weight, was also calculated using TGA, the values are presented in Table S1. The thermograms confirmed the functionalization of MSNs and loading of the functionalized MSNs with RES. As per Figure 1e, PO3 functional groups composed 4% of the total mass of the functionalized MSNs, while a higher grafting in case of NH2-MSNs with a value of 6.3% was found. The loading of RES was found close to theoretical loading i.e., 10% with 10.2, and 11.2% loading onto PO3-MSNs and NH2-MSNs, respectively (Table S1, Figure 2). Moreover, no endothermic melting peak of RES was observed for functionalized MSNs based RES formulation whereas, a clear endothermic melting peak (250 to 290°C range) is visible for free RES. This indicates that the drug is potentially inside the pores as it is maintained in its amorphous form, while free RES exists in crystalline form (Figure S1). Surface functionalization of the MSNs was also confirmed using FTIR spectroscopy, which displayed IR vibrational bands specific to each functionalization (Figures S2a,b). The pristine MSNs present peaks at 1,080 cm−1 and 810 cm−1 corresponding to Si-O and Si-O-Si vibrations of silanol groups. Salinization with NH2 and PO3 can be confirmed by the appearance of peaks between 2,800 cm−1 and 2,980 cm−1 corresponding to stretching vibrations of C-H bond of the propyl chain of the silane (Kumeria et al., 2013). Fourier Transformed Infrared (FTIR) spectrum of pure RES showed a typical trans-olefinic band at 961 cm−1 and band of O-H stretching at 3,202 cm−1. The three characteristic bands of RES can be seen in RES loaded MSNs ensuring the successful mass grafting of RES onto the functionalized MSNs. These three characteristic bands are shown in Figures S3a,b where, 1,380, 1,580, and 1,606 cm−1 bands correspond to C-O stretching, C-C olefinic stretching and C-C aromatic double bond stretching (Apoorva et al., 2014).
Figure 2. In-vitro release study. Three-hundred microgram RES and equivalent particles were weighed (10%wt. loading) and added into the release medium (A) PBS of pH 5.5 and (B) PBS of pH 7.4. At predetermined time points 1 mL was taken out from the release medium and centrifuged prior to analysis by HPLC. The volume taken out was replaced with fresh medium (n = 3 ± SD). The release is represented as percent cumulative drug released (%CDR) at any given time point.
The porosity and surface area of pristine and functionalized MSNs were assessed by nitrogen physisorption analysis. Figure S4 shows MSN had a pore size of 2.7 nm, which remained largely unaffected by functionalization and drug loading confirming that particles still retain majority of their porous architecture after functionalization and RES loading. It is important to note that even after 10% loading we didn't see any significant change in pore size however both surface area and pore volume decreased. This could be due to the hydrophobic nature of RES which will repel from hydrophilic functional groups on the surface of the pores and potentially exist as isolated amorphous aggregates (Abbaraju et al., 2014). The BET surface area of pristine MSNs was found to be 397 m2/g, which decreased after PO3- and NH2- surface modifications (Table 2). The available surface area was further reduced to 295, 119, and 74 m2/g after loading of RES, indicative of occupation of higher number of pores with RES loaded onto MSNs.
Table 2. Surface area and porosity of MSNs after functionalization and RES loading.
In vitro Release Profile of RES From Functionalized MSNs
The in vitro release profile of RES from functionalized particles is shown in Figure 2 as cumulative % release. At pH 7.4 free RES was released up to 85% in first 8 h followed by 100% release in 24 h. No significant control over the release was observed for NH2-MSNs at pH 7.4 as the significant content from the particle was released within first 8 h similar to free drug. PO3-MSNs, however, showed control over release with only 40% RES was released in first 8 h followed by up to 65% release over 24 h. At pH 5.5 (which loosely mimic the pH inside the cancer cell) only 60% of the free RES is released over 24 h whereas PO3-MSNs and NH2-MSNs show 40% of total release in 24 h. The overall release behavior could be attributed to kinetic solubility, which is affected by dissolution media and needs to be investigated in detail.
In vitro Assessment of Anti-cancer Potential of Resveratrol in PC3 Cell Line
RES reduced proliferation of PC3 cells in a dose dependent manner and 20 μM showed a significant retardation in proliferation of the cells (Figure 3A) compared to DMSO treated cells as shown in Figure 3C. The IC50 value was calculated to be 14.86 μM for free RES. Further, 10, 15, and 20 μM of RES significantly reduced cell viability of PC3 cells in a dose dependent manner compared to DMSO control as measured using the Presto-Blue assay (Figure 3B).
Figure 3. Resveratrol and PO3-MSN-RES inhibited proliferation and cell viability of PC3 cells. Cell proliferation and cell viability were measured using the InCucyte live system and CyQUANT, respectively. Data is presented as Mean ± SEM, n = 3, One-way ANOVA test, Tukey's post-hoc test, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001. (A) Representative phase contrast images of DMSO control, 20 μM of RES, 20 μM of PO3-MSN-RES and 20 μM of PO3-MSN-control treated PC3 cells are shown at 72 h. (B) RES and PO3-MSN-RES inhibited cell viability in a dose dependent manner (Each treatment normalized to vehicle i.e., DMSO and PO3-MSN-Control). (C) RES inhibited proliferation in PC3 cells (D) PO3-MSN-RES reduced proliferation.
Afterwards, PO3-MSNs and NH2-MSNs were tested to see the variation of anti-proliferative activity of RES encapsulated within these particles. A preliminary analysis showed that NH2-MSNs had an IC50 of 20.45 μM at 72 h i.e., higher than that of free RES while PO3-MSN-RES indicated better anti-proliferative activity than that of free RES (Figure S6). A detailed characterization by using PO3-MSN-RES showed an IC50 of 7.15 μM indicating enhanced anti-proliferative potential. The proliferation of PC3 cells was reduced in a dose dependent manner and 15 and 20 μM of PO3-MSN-RES significantly reduced proliferation of PC3 cells (Figures 3A,D) compared to DMSO dissolved RES. Further, 10, 15, and 20 μM of PO3-MSN-RES significantly reduced the cell viability of PC3 cells (Figure 3B), similar to RES as measured using the CyQuant assay. It is to be noted that the blank MSNs had no effect on cell proliferation (Figures 3A,D, Figure S6). The findings confirmed that using the PO3 modified colloidal MSNs improves the biological activity of RES as evident by significant decrease in IC50 of RES from 14.86 μM DMSO dissolved RES to 7.15 μM for the PO3 modified MSNs, a 2-folds reduction compared to RES.
In vitro Assessment of Synergistic Effects of Resveratrol and Docetaxel
RES is known for its anti-cancer potential through synergistic effects with chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin (Kim et al., 2014). An interesting feature of RES reported recently, is that it enhances the chemo-sensitivity of doxorubicin (DOX) in breast cancer cells. It increases the cellular influx of DOX due to down-regulation of ATP binding transporter genes MDR-1 and MRP-1 (Kim et al., 2014). In the present study, an attempt was made to understand if there is possibility to reduce the Doc-resistance using RES encapsulated within MSNs. Because of resistance, higher amounts of Doc are required for desired therapeutic action and Doc is typically cytotoxic to normal cells. The tumor micro-environment plays a substantial role to cause resistance against taxanes. Particularly, hypoxia renders the prostate cancer cells resistant to drugs acting on cell cycle by retarding cell proliferation and also leads to promotion of malignant cell phenotype (Lohiya et al., 2016). In our study, a combination of the lowest RES concentration i.e., 10 μM with a range of concentration of Doc was tested to see if there is a synergistic effect of RES in hypoxia induced chemoresistance of prostate cancer cell lines. The experiments were conducted using normoxia and hypoxia conditions to observe cell viability.
A higher cell viability was observed in the hypoxic conditions for the same dose of treatment as compared to normoxic conditions for a dose range of 0.1–100 nM of Doc, validating the effects of hypoxia induced Doc resistance. However, the hypoxic cell viability was significantly reduced by Doc + RES and Doc + PO3-MSN-RES as compared to free Doc used alone (Figure 4). The effect was pronounced up to a concentration of 100 nM and indicated that RES could reduce the concentration of Doc required to achieve the significant reduction in cell viability. It could be seen that the lower concentrations of Doc (0.1–10 nM) in combination with RES (10 μM) were enough to reduce the cancer cell burden to half (Figure 4). The effects of RES to reduce Doc concentration was in agreement from previous study with nano-encapsulated RES to reduce resistance against Doc (Singh et al., 2018). The synergistic effect can be due to substantial cytotoxicity due to its anti-oxidant potential which helps in scavenging the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated due to hypoxia (Shimojo et al., 2013). However, the magnitude of effects of PO3-MSN-RES paralleled and sometimes exceeded the effects induced by equimolar concentrations of free RES dissolved in DMSO. These findings indicate no loss of biological activity when RES in encapsulated within PO3-MSNs. It is important to mention that the empty nanoparticles alone induced no effect on cell viability or proliferation indicating that particles alone are relatively inert.
Figure 4. Inhibitory effect of RES and PO3-MSN-RES on hypoxia-induced resistance to Doc in PC3 cells. PC3 cells were cultured with increasing concentrations of Doc (0.1–100 nM), RES, PO3-MSN-RES in (A) normoxia and (B) hypoxia for 72 h and cell viability was determined. Hypoxia induced docetaxel resistance in PC3 cells and docetaxel sensitivity was enhanced after combination with RES and PO3-MSN-RES under hypoxic conditions in PC3 cells. Cell viability was normalized to DMSO and PO3-MSN-Control. Data was presented as Mean ± SEM, n = 3, One-way ANOVA test, Tukey's post-hoc test, ****P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P = 0.0177.
Conclusion
In this study, we have successfully loaded functionalized MSNs with RES and investigated the effect of surface functionality on physicochemical characteristics, drug loading, in vitro release and in vitro anti-proliferation and cytotoxic potential using prostate cancer cell line. Both positive and negatively charged MSNs showed efficient encapsulation (~100% loading) and no sign of crystalline resveratrol after encapsulation which was confirmed using DSC. In-vitro release assay revealed that compared to free RES and NH2-MSNs negatively charged PO3-MSNs showed superior control over release at both pH 7.4 and pH 5.5. Consequently, PO3-MSNs demonstrated significantly higher anti-proliferative activity compared to free RES (pre dissolved in DMSO) and NH2-MSNs in PC3 cells. The free RES (pre-dissolved in DMSO) and RES encapsulated in PO3-MSNs reversed the hypoxia induced resistance to Doc in PC3 cells, indicated by lower concentrations of Doc required to achieve >50% cytotoxicity as compared to Doc alone. In summary, our results indicate that functionalized silica based nanoparticles can be used to combine polyphenols (such as RES) and chemotherapeutic agents which are prone to drug resistance (Doc) in order to improve the efficacy of both polyphenol and chemotherapeutic drug in resistant cancers such as prostate cancer. However, further testing in other prostate cancer cell lines and in vivo efficacy tests are warranted in order to translate these formulations before they can be tested clinically.
Data Availability
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.
Author Contributions
ZC, SS, GK, TK, JB, and AP contributed conception, design, and significant writing. ZC and SS performed majority of experiments. ZQ performed TEM analysis. TJ and MA helped in statistical analysis, and critically analyzed the manuscript figures and provided suggestions. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The study was funded by Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan, National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT 1146627, GNT1143296), The University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology funding.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
ZC acknowledges the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan for financial support and The University of Queensland for research facilities. SS was supported by the QUT Postgraduate Research Award (QUTPRA) and QUT HDR Tuition Fee Sponsorship. AP and TK are thankful to National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia for Career Development (GNT 1146627) and Early Career Fellowship (GNT1143296), respectively. AP and TK are thankful to The University of Queensland and the UQ Faculty of Health and Behavioral Sciences (HaBS) for the UQ ECR grant and collaborative seeding grants. JB was supported by NHMRC Career Development Fellowship. The prostate cancer in vitro studies were conducted at TRI, which was supported by a grant from the Australian Government.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00225/full#supplementary-material
References
Abbaraju, P. L., Meka, A. K., Jambhrunkar, S., Zhang, J., Xu, C., Popat, A., et al. (2014). Floating tablets from mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 2, 8298–8302. doi: 10.1039/C4TB01337A
Amawi, H., Ashby, C. R., Samuel, T., Peraman, R., and Tiwari, A. K. (2017). Polyphenolic nutrients in cancer chemoprevention and metastasis: role of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) pathway. Nutrients 9:e911. doi: 10.3390/nu9080911
Apoorva, A., Kharb, V., and Saharan, V. A. (2014). Process optimisation, characterisation and evaluation of resveratrol- phospholipid complexes using Box-Behnken statistical design. Int. Curr. Pharmaceut. J. 3, 301–308. doi: 10.3329/icpj.v3i7.19079
Athar, M., Back, J. H., Kopelovich, L., Bickers, D. R., and Kim, A. L. (2009). Multiple molecular targets of resveratrol: anti-carcinogenic mechanisms. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 486, 95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2009.01.018
Cimino, S., Sortino, G., Favilla, V., Castelli, T., Madonia, M., Sansalone, S., et al. (2012). Polyphenols: key issues involved in chemoprevention of prostate cancer. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2012:632959. doi: 10.1155/2012/632959
De Vries, K., Strydom, M., and Steenkamp, V. (2018). Bioavailability of resveratrol: possibilities for enhancement. J. Herbal Med. 11, 71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.hermed.2017.09.002
Desai, D., Åkerfelt, M., Prabhakar, N., Toriseva, M., Näreoja, T., Zhang, J., et al. (2018). Factors affecting intracellular delivery and release of hydrophilic versus hydrophobic cargo from mesoporous silica nanoparticles on 2d and 3d cell cultures. Pharmaceutics 10:237. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10040237
Eräsalo, H., Hämäläinen, M., Leppänen, T., Mäki-Opas, I., Laavola, M., Haavikko, R., et al. (2018). Natural stilbenoids have anti-inflammatory properties in vivo and down-regulate the production of inflammatory mediators no, il6, and mcp1 possibly in a PI3K/Akt-dependent manner. J. Nat. Prod. 81, 1131–1142. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00384
Fernandez, E. V., Reece, K. M., Ley, A. M., Troutman, S. M., Sissung, T. M., Price, D. K., et al. (2015). Dual targeting of the androgen receptor and hypoxia-inducible factor α pathways synergistically inhibits castration-resistant prostate cancer cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 87, 1006–1012. doi: 10.1124/mol.114.097477
Francini, E., and Sweeney, C. J. (2016). Docetaxel activity in the era of life-prolonging hormonal therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 70, 410–412. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.002
Guillet-Nicolas, R., Popat, A., Bridot, J. L., Monteith, G., Qiao, S. Z., and Kleitz, F. (2013). pH-responsive nutraceutical–mesoporous silica nanoconjugates with enhanced colloidal stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn. 52, 2318–2322. doi: 10.1002/anie.201208840
He, Q., and Shi, J. (2014). MSN anti-cancer nanomedicines: chemotherapy enhancement, overcoming of drug resistance, and metastasis inhibition. Adv. Mater. 26, 391–411. doi: 10.1002/adma.201303123
Huang, X., Liu, Y., Zou, Y., Liang, X., Peng, Y., Mcclements, D. J., et al. (2019). Encapsulation of resveratrol in zein/pectin core-shell nanoparticles: stability, bioaccessibility, and antioxidant capacity after simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Food Hydrocoll. 93, 261–269. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.02.039
Hussain, S. A., Sulaiman, A. A., Balch, C., Chauhan, H., Alhadidi, Q. M., and Tiwari, A. K. (2016). Natural polyphenols in cancer chemoresistance. Nutr. Cancer 68, 879–891. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1192201
Jambhrunkar, S., Qu, Z., Popat, A., Yang, J., Noonan, O., Acauan, L., et al. (2014). Effect of surface functionality of silica nanoparticles on cellular uptake and cytotoxicity. Mol. Pharm. 11, 3642–3655. doi: 10.1021/mp500385n
Juère, E., Florek, J., Bouchoucha, M., Jambhrunkar, S., Wong, K. Y., Popat, A., et al. (2017). In vitro dissolution, cellular membrane permeability, and anti-inflammatory response of resveratrol-encapsulated mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Mol. Pharm. 14, 4431–4441. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00529
Khan, N., Afaq, F., and Mukhtar, H. (2008). Cancer chemoprevention through dietary antioxidants: progress and promise. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 10, 475–510. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1740
Kim, T. H., Shin, Y. J., Won, A. J., Lee, B. M., Choi, W. S., Jung, J. H., et al. (2014). Resveratrol enhances chemosensitivity of doxorubicin in multidrug-resistant human breast cancer cells via increased cellular influx of doxorubicin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1840, 615–625. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.10.023
Kobler, J., Möller, K., and Bein, T. (2008). Colloidal Suspensions of Functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2, 791–799. doi: 10.1021/nn700008s
Kumeria, T., Bariana, M., Altalhi, T., Kurkuri, M., Gibson, C. T., Yang, W., et al. (2013). Graphene oxide decorated diatom silica particles as new nano-hybrids: towards smart natural drug microcarriers. J. Mater. Chem. B 1, 6302–6311. doi: 10.1039/c3tb21051k
Kundu, J. K., and Surh, Y. J. (2008). Cancer chemopreventive and therapeutic potential of resveratrol: mechanistic perspectives. Cancer Lett. 269, 243–261. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.057
Lancon, A., Frazzi, R., and Latruffe, N. (2016). Anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic properties of resveratrol in ocular diseases. Molecules 21:304. doi: 10.3390/molecules21030304
Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Yan, X., Xu, Y., Luo, F., Ye, J., et al. (2014). HIFs enhance the migratory and neoplastic capacities of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by promoting EMT. Tumour Biol. 35, 8103–8114. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2056-0
Lohiya, V., Aragon-Ching, J. B., and Sonpavde, G. (2016). Role of chemotherapy and mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin. Med. Insights 10, 57–66. doi: 10.4137/CMO.S34535
Lv, X., Zhang, L., Xing, F., and Lin, H. (2016). Controlled synthesis of monodispersed mesoporous silica nanoparticles: particle size tuning and formation mechanism investigation. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 225, 238–244. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.12.024
Mansour, M., Van Ginkel, S., Dennis, J. C., Mason, B., Elhussin, I., Abbott, K., et al. (2018). The combination of omega-3 stearidonic acid and docetaxel enhances cell death over docetaxel alone in human prostate cancer cells. J. Cancer 9, 4536–4546. doi: 10.7150/jca.26681
Matin, F., Jeet, V., Srinivasan, S., Cristino, A. S., Panchadsaram, J., Clements, J. A., et al. (2019). MicroRNA-3162-5p-Mediated Crosstalk between Kallikrein Family Members including prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer. Clin. Chem. 65, 771–780. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.295824
Pan, L., He, Q., Liu, J., Chen, Y., Ma, M., Zhang, L., et al. (2012). Nuclear-Targeted drug delivery of TAT peptide-conjugated monodisperse mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 5722–5725. doi: 10.1021/ja211035w
Phillips, E., Penate-Medina, O., Zanzonico, P. B., Carvajal, R. D., Mohan, P., Ye, Y., et al. (2014). Clinical translation of an ultrasmall inorganic optical-PET imaging nanoparticle probe. Sci. Transl. Med. 6:260ra149. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009524
Qian, J., Shen, S., Chen, W., and Chen, N. (2018). Propofol reversed hypoxia-induced docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer cells by preventing epithelialand#x2013; mesenchymal transition by inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor 1and#x3b1. Biomed Res. Int. 9:4174232. doi: 10.1155/2018/4174232
Rankin, E. B., and Giaccia, A. J. (2016). Hypoxic control of metastasis. Science 352, 175–180. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4405
Semenza, G. L. (2012). Hypoxia-inducible factors: mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 33, 207–214. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2012.01.005
Seruga, B., Ocana, A., and Tannock, I. F. (2010). Drug resistance in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 12–23. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.136
Shimojo, Y., Akimoto, M., Hisanaga, T., Tanaka, T., Tajima, Y., Honma, Y., et al. (2013). Attenuation of reactive oxygen species by antioxidants suppresses hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells. Clin. Exp. Metast. 30, 143–154. doi: 10.1007/s10585-012-9519-8
Siegel, R., Ward, E., Brawley, O., and Jemal, A. (2011). Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J. Clin. 61, 212–236. doi: 10.3322/caac.20121
Singh, S. K., Lillard, J. W., and Singh, R. (2018). Reversal of drug resistance by planetary ball milled (PBM) nanoparticle loaded with resveratrol and docetaxel in prostate cancer. Cancer Lett. 427, 49–62. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.04.017
Slowing, I. I., Vivero-Escoto, J. L., Wu, C.-W., and Lin, V. S. Y. (2008). Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as controlled release drug delivery and gene transfection carriers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60, 1278–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.012
Summerlin, N., Qu, Z., Pujara, N., Sheng, Y., Jambhrunkar, S., Mcguckin, M., et al. (2016). Colloidal mesoporous silica nanoparticles enhance the biological activity of resveratrol. Colloids Surf. Biointerfaces 144, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.076
Tabibiazar, M., Mohammadifar, M. A., Roufegarinejad, L., Ghorbani, M., Hashemi, M., and Hamishehkar, H. (2019). Improvement in dispersibility, stability and antioxidant activity of resveratrol using a colloidal nanodispersion of BSA-resveratrol. Food Biosci. 27, 46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2018.10.015
Ton, Q. N., Tran, T., Yang, A. E., Gottlieb, H. B., and Bellanger, R. A. (2012). Resveratrol: potential as anticancer agent AU - aluyen, julia khristine. J. Diet. Suppl. 9, 45–56. doi: 10.3109/19390211.2011.650842
Van Poppel, H., and Tombal, B. (2011). Chemoprevention of prostate cancer with nutrients and supplements. Cancer Manag. Res. 3, 91–100. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S18503
Vaupel, P. (2004). The role of hypoxia-induced factors in tumor progression. Oncologist 9 Suppl 5, 10–17. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-90005-10
Watermann, A., and Brieger, J. (2017). Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as drug delivery vehicles in cancer. Nanomaterials 7:189. doi: 10.3390/nano7070189
Xu, C., Yu, S., Liu, L., Wu, X., and Dai, H. (2018). Magnetically targeted co-delivery of hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs with hollow mesoporous ferrite nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 8, 15326–15335. doi: 10.1039/C8RA02343C
Yu, W., Fu, Y. C., and Wang, W. (2012). Cellular and molecular effects of resveratrol in health and disease. J. Cell. Biochem. 113, 752–759. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23431
Keywords: resveratrol, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, chemotherapy, anti-cancer activity, prostate cancer
Citation: Chaudhary Z, Subramaniam S, Khan GM, Abeer MM, Qu Z, Janjua T, Kumeria T, Batra J and Popat A (2019) Encapsulation and Controlled Release of Resveratrol Within Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Prostate Cancer Therapy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7:225. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00225
Received: 01 July 2019; Accepted: 03 September 2019;
Published: 18 September 2019.
Edited by:
Orazio Vittorio, University of New South Wales, AustraliaReviewed by:
Hien Duong, University of Sydney, AustraliaDaria Chudakova, Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Australia
Copyright © 2019 Chaudhary, Subramaniam, Khan, Abeer, Qu, Janjua, Kumeria, Batra and Popat. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tushar Kumeria, t.kumeria@uq.edu.au; Jyotsna Batra, jyotsna.batra@qut.edu.au; Amirali Popat, a.popat@uq.edu.au
†These authors have contributed equally to this work