The Feminist Museum Hack as an aesthetic practice of possibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.RELA9142Keywords:
Aesthetic pedagogies, feminism, hacking, museumAbstract
This article outlines the central components, foundations and key activities of the Feminist Museum Hack, an investigative, pedagogical, analytical and interventionist tool we have designed to explore patriarchal assumptions behind the language, images and stragecrafting (positioning, lighting) of museums and art galleries. We also share findings from a study of student and community participants who employed the Hack in a museum in Canada and an art gallery in England. While differences existed due to institutional genres, findings showed participants’ ability to see and to reimagine absences, objectification, fragmentation, and double-standards and apply these to the world beyond the institution’s walls. As a form of pedagogy of possibility, the Hack encourages critique, just ire and the imagination. As it hones visual literacy skills it emboldens participants to challenge the authority of the museum narratives and to engage in creative practices of agency and activism.
Metrics
References
Ashton, J. (2017). Feminisms and museums. Edinburgh: MuseumsEtc.
Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. London: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Bates, L. (2018). Misogynation. London: Simon and Shuster.
Berger J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin.
Bergsdóttir, A. (2016). Museums and feminist matters: Considerations of a feminist museology. Nordic journal of feminist and gender research, 24(2), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2016.1182945
Bierema, L. (2003). The role of gender consciousness in challenging patriarchy. International journal for lifelong education, 22, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370304825
Borg, C., & Mayo, P. (2010). Museums: Adult education as cultural politics. In E. Taylor, & M. Parrish (Eds), Adult education in cultural institutions: Aquariums, libraries, museums, parks and zoos. New directions for adult and continuing education, 27, 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.379
Carson, F., & Pajaczkowska, C. (Eds.). (2001). Feminist visual culture. New York: Routledge.
Clover, D.E., Taber, N.; & Sanford, K. (2018). Dripping pink and blue: Seeing the unseen of patriarchy through the Feminist Museum Hack. Andragoška spoznanja, 24(3), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.24.3.11-28
Code, L. (2003). Ecological thinking: The politics of epistemic location. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cramer, L., & Witcomb, A. (2018). Hidden from view? an analysis of the integration of womens history and womens voices in Australias social history exhibitions. International journal of heritage studies, 25(2), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1475409
English, L., & Irving, C. (2015). Feminism in community: Adult education for transformation. Rotterdam: Sense Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-202-8
Fisher, T. (2009). Outside the republic: A visionary political poetics. Textual practice, 23, 975-986. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502360903361600
Forgan, S. (2005). Building the museum: Knowledge, conflict, and the power of place. Isis, 96, 572-585. https://doi.org/10.1086/498594
Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of indignation. Boulder: CO: Paradigm.
Frances M. (2009). Collage and cut-ups. Personal construct theory & practice, 6, 15-20.
Fyfe G., & Law J. (1988). Picturing power: visual depiction and social relations. London: Routledge.
Gordon-Walker, C. (2018). Exhibiting nation: Multi-cultural nationalism (and its limits) in Canadas museums. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Gosselin, V., & Livingstone, P. (2016). Museums and the past: Constructing historical consciousness. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Hall, S. (2013). Introduction. In S. Hall, J. Evans, & S. Nixon (Eds.), Representation (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Haiven, M., & Khasnabish, A. (2014). The radical imagination. London: Zed Books.
Hannay, C. (2018, September 15). Canadians visiting museums, galleries more than ever, survey shows. Globe and Mail. Retrieved Mars 20, 2019, from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/articlecanadians-visiting-museums-galleries-more-than-ever-survey-shows/
Haraway, D. (2013). The persistence of vision. In N. Mirzoeff (Ed.), The visual culture reader, (3rd ed., pp. 356-362). London: Routledge.
Hesse-Biber, S & Leavy, P. (2007). Feminist research practice. London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984270
Holloway, S. (2012). Visual literacies and multiliteracies: An ecology arts-based pedagogical model. Language and literacy, 14(3), 150-168. https://doi.org/10.20360/G2R59F
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1992). Museums and the shaping of knowledge. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203415825
Janes, R. (2009). Museums in a troubled world. Milton Park, Abingdon, USA: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877456
Knowles, J., & Cole, A. (2008). Arts-informed research. In J. Knowles, & A. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 55-70). Thousand Oaks: CA: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226545.n5
Latham, K.F. (2007). The poetry of the museum: A holistic model of numinous museum experiences. Museum management and curatorship, 22(3), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770701628594
Lazar, M. (Ed). (2005). Feminist critical discourse analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901
Leavy, P. (2015). Art meets method: Arts-based research practice (2nd ed.). London: Guilford press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.003
Levin, A. (2010). Gender, sexuality and museums. London: Routledge.
Lowenthal, D. (1998). The heritage crusade and the spoils of history. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511523809
Macedo, A.G. (2015). Visual literacy narratives of dissent: Unframing women and representation. Journal of romantic studies, 15, 83-98. https://doi.org/10.3828/jrs.2015.150307
Manicom, L,. & Walters, S. (Eds.). (2012). Feminist popular education in transnational debates: Building pedagogies of possibility. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137014597
Mirzoeff, N. (Ed.). (2013), The visual culture reader (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Mohanty, C. (2012). Forward. In L. Manicom, & S. Walters (Eds.), Feminist popular education in transnational debates: Building pedagogies of possibility (pp. i-iii). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pollock, G. (1988). Vision and difference: Feminism, femininity and the histories of art. London, Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
Porter, G. (1991). Partial truths. In G. Kavanagh (Ed.), Museum languages: Objects and texts (pp. 101-118). Leicester: Leicester university press.
Porter, G. (1988). Putting your house in order: Representations of women and domestic life. In R. Lumley (Ed.), The museum time machine: Putting cultures on display (pp. 101-125). London: Routledge.
Porter, G. (1996). Seeing through solidarity: A feminist perspective on museums. In S. Macdonald, & G. Fyfe (Eds.), Theorizing museums: Representing identity and diversity in a changing world (pp. 105-126). Oxford: Blackwell publishers/The sociological review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb03427.x
Proctor, A. (2018, April 18). Museums are hiding their imperial pasts - which is why my tours are needed. Retrieved Mars 20, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/23/museums-imperialist-pastsuncomfortable-art-tours-slavery-colonialism
Ranciere, J. (2009). The Emancipated Spectator. London: Verso.
Riley, S., Evans, A., & Mackiewicz, A. (2016). Its just between girls: Negotiating the postfeminist gaze in womens looking talk. Feminism and psychology, 26(1), 94-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353515626182
Rogers, R. (Ed.) (2011). An introduction to critical discourse in education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Rogoff, I. (2013). Studying visual culture. In N. Mirzoeff (Ed.), The visual culture reader (3rd Ed., pp. 14-26). London: Routledge.
Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies. London: Sage.
Sartre, J. (1963). Search for a method. New York: Knopf.
Steeds, L. (Ed.). (2014). Exhibition. London: Whitechapel Gallery.
Ulrich Obrist, H., & Raza, A. (2015). Ways of curating. New York: Penguin random house.
Vaughn, K. (2005). Pieced together: Collage as an artists method for interdisciplinary research. International journal of qualitative methods, 4(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690500400103
Whitehead, C. (2009). Museums and the construction of disciplines: Art and archaeology in nineteenthcentury Britain. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.
Wilson MacKay, S., & Monteverde, S. (2003). Dialogic looking: Beyond the mediated experience. Art education, 56, 40-45.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Darlene Clover, Sarah Williamson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
As RELA is an open access journal, this means that anyone who can access the Internet can freely download and read the journal. There are no commercial interests for Linköping University Electronic Press or the European Society for Research on the Education of Adults (ESREA) in publishing the journal. There are no charges for publishing authors.
The core idea of open access is that copyright remains with the author(s). However, we publish with the agreement of the author that if she or he decides later to publish the article elsewhere, that the publisher will be notified, prior to any acceptance, that the article has already been published by RELA.
When publishing with RELA, it is with the agreement of the author that if they make their article available elsewhere on the internet (for example, on their own website or an institutional website), that they will do so by making a link to the article as published in RELA using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number of the article and acknowledge in the text of the site that the article has been previously published in RELA.
