Yonsei Med J. 2009 Feb;50(1):39-44. English.
Published online Feb 24, 2009.
Copyright © 2009 The Yonsei University College of Medicine
Original Article

Umbilical Artery Doppler Study as a Predictive Marker of Perinatal Outcome in Preterm Small for Gestational Age Infants

Young Ji Byun, Haeng-Soo Kim, Jeong In Yang, Joon Hyung Kim, Ho Yeon Kim and Suk Joon Chang
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Received May 29, 2008; Accepted August 20, 2008.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the merit of umbilical artery Doppler study as a predictive marker of perinatal outcome in preterm small for gestational age (SGA) infants.

Materials and Methods

A total of 218 patients at 27 - 36 weeks of gestational age (GA) who received antenatal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry and delivered singleton infants with SGA. The ratio of peak-systolic to end-diastolic blood flow velocities (S/D) in the umbilical artery was measured in each patient. The patients were divided into 3 groups: the normal group with S/D ratios of less than 95th percentile (n = 134), elevated S/D ratio group of 95th or more percentile (n = 41), and those with absent/reversed end diastolic flow (n = 43). Maternal characteristics and neonatal outcomes of these groups were comparatively analyzed.

Results

The gestational age (GA) at the time of diagnosis of SGA, the mean GA at delivery, and the mean birth weight showed statistically significant difference among three groups (p < 0.001). Also, poor perinatal outcome was significantly increased in infants with abnormal S/D ratio (13.4% vs. 31.7% vs. 67.4%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed umbilical artery Doppler study as a significant independent factor for prediction of poor perinatal outcome (odds ratio: 3.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4 - 9.5, p = 0.007).

Conclusion

Antenatal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry is shown as a significantly efficient marker in predicting perinatal outcome in preterm SGA infants.

Keywords
Preterm small for gestational age infant; umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry; perinatal outcome

INTRODUCTION

Small for gestational age (SGA) occurs in approximately 5 - 10% of all pregnancies, and is one of critical obstetrical conditions that affect perinatal morbidity and mortality. The definition of SGA is not yet firmly established, nevertheless, it is commonly defined as birth weight or body weight, as estimated by ultrasonography, less than the 10th percentile for the gestational age, because fetal body weights less than this figure are often accompanied by increased perinatal morbidity and mortality rates.1 In addition, infants born with SGA have increased risk of coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes as adults.2 However, not all SGA infants demonstrate poor neonatal outcomes, as some are constitutionally small but healthy infants. Therefore, it is important for obstetricians to identify such infants and distinguish them from true growth restricted babies, which is not always easy.

The application of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in high risk pregnancy with hypertension or presumed impaired fetal growth has been associated with a trend of reduction in perinatal deaths and also associated with fewer inductions of labor and admissions to hospital.3 It is also available for evaluating the fetal-placental circulation in pregnancies which are suspected to have severe placental insufficiency.4 The primary cause in 60% of pregnancies with fetal growth restriction (FGR) has been reported to be placental insufficiency.4 When chorionic villi vessels are injured, which leads to reduction in umbilical artery blood flow, Doppler index increases and, in the end, there appears absent/reversed end diastolic blood flow.5, 6 In FGR fetuses, there exists strict correlation between the umbilical artery Doppler waveform and increased incidence of perinatal complications7 and, particularly, absent/reversed end diastolic umbilical artery blood flow has been shown to be associated with high perinatal mortality, long-term impairment of intellectual development, and neurodevelopmental delay.8-12

Compared to preterm appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants, preterm SGA infants have comparatively higher risk of morbidity and mortality.13, 14 Of particular note is that, although the adverse neonatal outcomes of preterm SGA infants increase after the third trimester of pregnancy,15 there is no difference in terms of neurodevelopmental outcome at 22 months after birth between preterm SGA and AGA infants.16 To date, there are only a few studies carried out on the association of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in such preterm SGA infants with perinatal outcomes.

In the present study, we determined whether umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry can predict perinatal outcomes in preterm SGA infants delivered between 27 and 36 gestational weeks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted from a chart review of pregnancies who delivered a SGA infant at 27 - 36 weeks of gestation at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University Hospital, between 1997 and 2006. SGA was defined as those infants with a birth weight of less than the 10th percentile in the distribution curve for the calculated gestational age.17 Those pregnancies excluded from this study were multiple pregnancies, those patients who did not receive umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, pregnancies with evidence of congenital malformations of the fetus, chromosomal abnormalities, hydramnios, and TORCH infections. Ultrasonography of pregnancies was conducted with ATL HDI-UM9 (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, Wash, USA), Aloka SSD-5500 (Aloka Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). Five identical umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry waveforms were obtained from midpoint between the fetal abdominal wall and the placental insertion site of the umbilical cord. The patients were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (or control group), in whom the S/D ratio, which was derived from measurement of the peak systolic velocity and minimum end-diastolic velocity, was less than the 95th percentile, Group 2 with equal to or greater than 95th percentile S/D ratio, and Group 3 in whom the end-diastolic blood flow was absent or reversed. All patients less than 34th weeks of gestation were treated with steroids. Maternal characteristics and neonatal outcomes were analyzed and compared between the above groups.

The parameters analyzed in this study were maternal age, obstetrical history, gestational age at the time of diagnosis of SGA, gestational age at the time of delivery, time interval between the times of SGA diagnosis and delivery, mode of delivery, incidence of cesarean section due to fetal distress, and incidence of severe preeclampsia and oligohydramnios. Also, neonatal gender, birth weight, incidence of Apgar scores of less than 7 at 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and duration of admission, duration of ventilator care, perinatal death, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) were analyzed. After delivery, all neonates underwent chest and abdominal X-ray exams, brain and abdominal ultrasound exams and, in cases where intracranial hemorrhage was suspected, diagnosis was confirmed by brain computerized tomography (CT). Poor perinatal outcome was defined as the presence of any 1 of the followings; perinatal death, RDS, BPD, grade 3 or above IVH, NEC, and PVL.

Results obtained were expressed as mean ± SD, and statistical analysis was done by Chi-square, independent T-test, ANOVA test and logistic regression utilizing the SPSS for Windows (version 12.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighteen infants met the inclusion criteria over the study period (Table 1). There were 134 infants in Group 1, 41 infants in Group 2, and 43 infants in Group 3.

Table 1
Characteristics of Study Population

The weeks of gestation at the time of diagnosis of SGA in the Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 34.1 ± 1.9, 33.5 ± 2.6, and 31.7 ± 2.2 weeks, respectively. Gestational age at the time of delivery was 35.0 ± 1.5, 34.0 ± 2.4, and 32.0 ± 2.2 weeks, respectively, for the same 3 groups, and it was the shortest in Group 3 (p < 0.001). The incidence of severe preeclampsia in the 3 groups were 31.3% (42/134), 26.8% (11/41), and 53.5% (23/43), being statistically higher in Group 3 (p = 0.015), however, there was no significant difference in oligohydramnios between the 3 groups. The time intervals from the diagnosis of SGA to delivery were 8.7, 5.9, and 3.7 days, being significantly shorter in Group 3 (p = 0.002), but no significant difference was observed between the 3 groups in terms of cesarean section rates due to fetal distress (Table 2).

Table 2
Maternal Outcome according to Umbilical Artery S/D Ratio

The mean birth weights of infants at the time of delivery in Group 1, 2, and 3 were 1904.0 ± 342.5, 1629.0 ± 375.1, and 1151.2 ± 364.9 g, respectively, Group 3 being the lowest (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of neonatal gender or NICU admission rates, however, we were able to observe significant increase in the rate of less than 7 Apgar score at 5 minutes, duration of NICU care and ventilator care, and perinatal death as Doppler index was becoming poorer (p < 0.001). Also, there was significant difference in poor perinatal outcome between Group 1, 2, and 3 (13.4%, 31.7%, and 67.4%, respectively, p < 0.001, Table 3).

Table 3
Neonatal Outcome according to Umbilical Artery S/D Ratio

The multivariate regression analysis revealed that gestational age (OR; 0.4, 95% CI 0.4 - 0.6, p < 0.001) and umbilical artery S/D ratio (OR; 3.7, 95% CI 1.4 - 9.5, p = 0.007) were statistically significant independent factors for prediction of poor perinatal outcome (Table 4).

Table 4
Factors Affecting the Poor Perinatal Outcome

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we observed that poor umbilical artery Doppler index in preterm SGA pregnancies is associated with increased incidence of adverse perinatal outcome, and that umbilical artery Doppler index is an independent factor of prediction for perinatal outcome, irrespective of gestational age. In particular, Group 3, which showed absent/reversed end diastolic blood flow, was associated with the worst perinatal outcome which was in agreement with previously reported results.7-11, 18

Previous studies showed that, in pregnancies accompanied by FGR, the umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry can discriminate those at high risk for adverse perinatal outcome and predict neonatal outcome.7, 18-21 It has also been emphasized that FGR with normal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry is a disease entity different from those with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler blood flow,22 which may be managed by outpatient care,23 and that SGA fetuses with normal umbilical artery S/D ratios do not show increased morbidity compared to AGA pregnancies.24 In addition, it has been reported that, if the umbilical artery S/D ratio and amniotic fluid volume are normal, adverse outcomes will occur only during delivery of the baby, and therefore, close antenatal surveillance may be unnecessary.25 Furthermore, in cases of SGA fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetries, the frequency of fetal surveillance could be reduced from twice weekly to fortnightly, because no differences in neonatal outcomes were detected between antenatal cares provided twice a week and every two weeks.26 In an extensive series, Seyam et al. demonstrated that pregnancies with normal umbilical artery Doppler blood flow are associated with decreased risk for oligohydramnios (31.3% vs. 60.2%, p = 0.037), neonatal birth weight of less than 10th percentile (37.5% vs. 73.8%, p = 0.004), and NICU admissions (0% vs. 26.5%, p = 0.02), compared to pregnancies with abnormal Doppler blood flows.18 In our study, we were able to demonstrate that those pregnancies with normal umbilical artery Doppler index showed decreased risk for poor perinatal outcomes such as low birth weight, less than 7 Apgar scores at 5 minutes, ventilator care frequency, and NICU admission duration. Thus, the umbilical artery Doppler study appears to assist clinicians in distinguishing constitutionally small infants from those with FGR.

However, McCowan et al. found that, among 109 babies with normal umbilical artery blood flow velocity waveforms out of 186 SGA babies, 49% showed low ponderal indices, 26% were hypoglycemic at the time of birth, and 35% received NICU care, thus concluding that not all SGA babies with normal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms result in favorable outcomes.27 In a similar study, 129 SGA fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry were compared with normal pregnancies, and there was a higher incidence of NICU admissions (15.5% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.001) and neonatal morbidity (2.3% vs. 0%; p = 0.04), and suboptimal neurodevelopmental outcome in the SGA group.28

Therefore, in light of the above conflicting data available, a better method is needed to assess the well-being of the FGR fetus, such as an integrated antenatal test which combines a biophysical profile and Doppler study employing other vessels.29

One of the key points in this study that is different from many previous studies is that we diagnosed the SGA status of the infant not by antenatal ultrasound assessment, but by birth weight measured after birth. This method would eliminate possible errors in birth weight measurement, especially for infants who are truly larger than SGA weights estimated, since neonatal birth weight less than the 10th percentile is associated with poor perinatal outcome compared to FGR diagnosed antenatally.1 Another different aspect of this study was that all subjects studied were preterm deliveries before 37 weeks of gestation. As deliveries are specifically differentiated from term pregnancies, the narrowing of the scope of study subjects would make the results more credible.

In a recent study, Spinillo et al. reported that, in pregnancies of less than 35 weeks accompanied by FGR, the umbilical artery Doppler study is unrelated to infant outcome if FGR is not present even after adjusting for gestational age and birth weight (OR: 3.2, 95% CI 1.18 - 8.66), although the absent/reversed umbilical artery end-diastolic flow is an independent predictor for increased risk of either neonatal death or cerebral palsy.30 Similarly, our present results showed that there was a significantly increased incidence of neonatal death and duration of admission for NICU care in preterm SGA infants with umbilical artery absent/reversed end diastolic flow. However, we also observed that the NICU admission rates were high in all the three study groups, irrespective of the Doppler index values. This is most likely due to the fact that all subjects in this study were preterm SGA infants, therefore, they were babies with smaller birth weights, regardless of other neonatal complications.

In this study, 1 of the drawbacks besides its retrospective nature is that, although umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry studies were conducted in pregnancies that showed evidence of FGR, other additional waveforms, such as the middle cerebral artery or the ductus venosus, were not evaluated when pregnancies showed normal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms, and therefore, they are not available for comparison.

From the results of this study, we could conclude that the absent/reversed end diastolic flow, as detected by antenatal umbilical artery Doppler in preterm SGA infants, is associated with increased risk for poor perinatal outcome. More specifically, we confirmed in the present study that gestational age and umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry were independent predictors for perinatal outcome. Although there exists presently no method to overcome SGA in utero, umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry is expected to assist clinicians in predicting perinatal outcome and managing preterm SGA fetuses, and also formulating antenatal surveillance guidelines for such conditions.

Notes

A part of this study was presented in the 17th World Congress on Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology in 2007 in Florence, Italy.

References

    1. Garite TJ, Clark R, Thorp JA. Intrauterine growth restriction increases morbidity and mortality among premature neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:481–487.
    1. Barker DJ, Gluckman PD, Godfrey KM, Harding JE, Owens JA, Robinson JS. Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet 1993;341:938–941.
    1. Neilson JP, Alfirevic Z. Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD000073.
    1. Gagnon R, Van den Hof M. Diagnostic Imaging Committee, Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. The use of fetal Doppler in obstetrics. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003;25:601–614.
      quiz 615-6.
    1. Giles WB, Trudinger BJ, Baird PJ. Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: pathological correlation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:31–38.
    1. Morrow RJ, Adamson SL, Bull SB, Ritchie JW. Effect of placental embolization on the umbilical arterial velocity waveform in fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1055–1060.
    1. Soregaroli M, Bonera R, Danti L, Dinolfo D, Taddei F, Valcamonico A, et al. Prognostic role of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in growth-restricted fetuses. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002;11:199–203.
    1. Brar HS, Platt LD. Reverse end-diastolic flow velocity on umbilical artery velocimetry in high-risk pregnancies: an ominous finding with adverse pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:559–561.
    1. Karsdorp VH, van Vugt JM, van Geijn HP, Kostense PJ, Arduini D, Montenegro N, et al. Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. Lancet 1994;344:1664–1668.
    1. Valcamonico A, Danti L, Frusca T, Soregaroli M, Zucca S, Abrami F, et al. Absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: risk of neonatal morbidity and brain damage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:796–801.
    1. Zelop CM, Richardson DK, Heffner LJ. Outcomes of severely abnormal umbilical artery doppler velocimetry in structurally normal singleton fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:434–438.
    1. Wienerroither H, Steiner H, Tomaselli J, Lobendanz M, Thun-Hohenstein L. Intrauterine blood flow and long-term intellectual, neurologic, and social development. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:449–453.
    1. Piper JM, Xenakis EM, McFarland M, Elliott BD, Berkus MD, Langer O. Do growth-retarded premature infants have different rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality than appropriately grown premature infants? Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:169–174.
    1. Kristensen S, Salihu HM, Keith LG, Kirby RS, Fowler KB, Pass MA. SGA subtypes and mortality risk among singleton births. Early Hum Dev 2007;83:99–105.
    1. Gilbert WM, Danielsen B. Pregnancy outcomes associated with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1596–1599.
      discussion 1599-601.
    1. Gortner L, van Husen M, Thyen U, Gembruch U, Friedrich HJ, Landmann E. Outcome in preterm small for gestational age infants compared to appropriate for gestational age preterms at the age of 2 years: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;110 Suppl 1:S93–S97.
    1. Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:163–168.
    1. Seyam YS, Al-Mahmeid MS, Al-Tamimi HK. Umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry in intrauterine growth restriction and its relation to perinatal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;77:131–137.
    1. Berkowitz GS, Mehalek KE, Chitkara U, Rosenberg J, Cogswell C, Berkowitz RL. Doppler umbilical velocimetry in the prediction of adverse outcome in pregnancies at risk for intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:742–746.
    1. Gaziano EP, Knox H, Ferrera B, Brandt DG, Calvin SE, Knox GE. Is it time to reassess the risk for the growth-retarded fetus with normal Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical artery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1734–1741.
      discussion 1741-3.
    1. Malhotra N, Chanana C, Kumar S, Roy K, Sharma JB. Comparison of perinatal outcome of growth-restricted fetuses with normal and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms. Indian J Med Sci 2006;60:311–317.
    1. Burke G, Stuart B, Crowley P, Scanaill SN, Drumm J. Is intrauterine growth retardation with normal umbilical artery blood flow a benign condition? BMJ 1990;300:1044–1045.
    1. Nienhuis SJ, Vles JS, Gerver WJ, Hoogland HJ. Doppler ultrasonography in suspected intrauterine growth retardation: a randomized clinical trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:6–13.
    1. Ott WJ. Intrauterine growth restriction and Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2000;19:661–665.
      quiz 667.
    1. Baschat AA, Weiner CP. Umbilical artery doppler screening for detection of the small fetus in need of antepartum surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182(1 Pt 1):154–158.
    1. McCowan LM, Harding JE, Roberts AB, Barker SE, Ford C, Stewart AW. A pilot randomized controlled trial of two regimens of fetal surveillance for small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal results of umbilical artery doppler velocimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182(1 Pt 1):81–86.
    1. McCowan LM, Harding JE, Stewart AW. Umbilical artery Doppler studies in small for gestational age babies reflect disease severity. BJOG 2000;107:916–925.
    1. Figueras F, Eixarch E, Meler E, Iraola A, Figueras J, Puerto B, et al. Small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler have suboptimal perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;136:34–38.
    1. Baschat AA, Galan HL, Bhide A, Berg C, Kush ML, Oepkes D, et al. Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:41–47.
    1. Spinillo A, Montanari L, Bergante C, Gaia G, Chiara A, Fazzi E. Prognostic value of umbilical artery Doppler studies in unselected preterm deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:613–620.

Metrics
Share
Tables

1 / 4

ORCID IDs
PERMALINK