You are here

Influence of agricultural practices and sowing dates under different weather conditions on soybean yield

 

The article is devoted to determining the optimal sowing time for soybeans with stable warming of the soil, considers the processing with a stratifier PRSM-5 and chisel processing against the background of pre-sowing rolling. Using soil-cultivating units of three types, an analysis was made of the effectiveness of various methods of basic cultivation against the background of various agricultural practices. The optimal timing of soybean sowing was determined with stable heating of the soil to 8–10 o С when treated with a stratifier PRSM-5 and up to 10–12 o С during chisel cultivation against the background of pre-sowing rolling. The obtained results of the research showed that the soil density depends primarily on the method of basic cultivation. The analysis of soil density indicators as a whole showed that after treatment with the stratifier PRSM-5 it was somewhat less and averaged 1.04 g/cm3 , and after chisel treatment – 1.09 g/cm3 . The analysis of the structural composition of the soil showed that the best structural structure of the soil was noted when processing with a stratifier PRSM-5 due to the removal of the most agronomically valuable soil lumps from the lower layers to the surface, here the structural coefficient was high and reached 2.36, and with chisel processing – 2.08. An analysis of the reserves of productive moisture at the end of the growing season showed that during chisel processing they were used more rationally, and significantly decreased in the phase of full ripeness after processing with a stratifier PRSM-5 – they amounted to 57 mm, and after chisel processing – 69 mm. The experimental data obtained indicate that under dry weather conditions, the best yield was formed when treated with a stratifier PRSM-5 at the second sowing date, and when chisel loosening - during the first and pre-sowing rolling.

Key words: soybean, tillage, stratifier PRSM-5, density, structure, yield.

 

Reference: 
1. Kuts, O., Shevchenko, S., Semenenko, I., Dukhin, E., Yakovchenko, A., Yakovchenko, O. (2021). Study of the efficiency of sweet potato growing in the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine by different methods of soil mulching. EUREKA, Life Sciences. no. (6), pp. 17–24. DOI: 10.21303/2504-5695.2021.002156
2. Syromyatnikov, Y. (2019). Design parameters of the rotor of a tillage loosening and separating machine. Agriculture, Vol. 2, pp. 7–27. DOI: 10.7256/2453- 8809.2019.2.31975
3. Syromyatnikov, Y. (2019). Influence of local soil loosening on soy yield. Știința Agricolă. Vol. 1, pp. 117–124.
4. Pashchenko, V.F. (2019). The influence of local loosening of the soil on soybean productivity. Tractors and Agricultural Machinery. Vol. 5, pp. 79–86. DOI: 10.31992/0321-4443-2019-5-79-86
5. Kiryushin, V.I. (2019). The management of soil fertility and productivity of agrocenoses in adaptive-landscape farming systems. Eurasian Soil Science. Vol. 52 (9), pp. 1137–1145. DOI: 10.1134/S1064229319070068
6. Etemadi, F. (2019). Agronomy, nutritional value, and medicinal application of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Horticultural Plant Journal. Vol. 5 (4), pp. 170–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpj.2019.04.004
7. Luiz, M.C.P. (2020). Effects of sowing time and plant population on the productive potential and agronomic characters in soy. Bioscience Journal. Vol. 36 (1), pp. 161–172. DOI: 10.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-42336
8. Tamarakhan, O., Nurzhan, K. (2021). Influence of sowing time on the yield of soy bean of the variety "Nafis" in the conditions of the aral region. Euro-Asia Conferences. Vol. 1 (1), pp. 284–287.
9. Ferreira, C.J.B. (2021). Soil compaction influences soil physical quality and soybean yield under long-term no-tillage. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. Vol. 67 (3), pp. 383–396. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2020.1733535
10. de Moraes, M.T. (2020). Soil compaction impacts soybean root growth in an Oxisol from subtropical Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research. Vol. 200, 104611 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104611
11. Yue, L. (2021). Impacts of soil compaction and historical soybean variety growth on soil macropore structure. Soil and Tillage Research. Vol. 214, 105166 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2021.105166
12. Yang, X. (2018). Modelling the effects of conservation tillage on crop water productivity, soil water dynamics and evapotranspiration of a maize-winter wheat-soybean rotation system on the Loess Plateau of China using APSIM. Agricultural Systems. Vol. 166, pp. 111–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.08.005
13. Hanhur, V.V., Len, O.I., Hanhur, N.V. (2021). Effect of minimizing soil tillage on moisture supply and spring barley productivity in the zone of the LeftBank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy. Vol. 1, pp. 128–134. DOI: 10.31210/visnyk2021.01.15
14. Cherenkov, А.V. (2021). Increasing the efficiency of moisture resources in crop rotation by tillage optimization in Ukrainian Steppe zone. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. Vol. 35, 39 p. DOI: 10.15421/2021_73
15. Siroshtan, A. (2021). Yield and sowing qualities of winter bread wheat seeds depending on the preceding crops and sowing dates in the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. Vol. 9 (2), pp. 76–82. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.15
16. Gobin, A. (2018). Weather related risks in Belgian arable agriculture. Agricultural Systems. Vol. 159, pp. 225–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.06.009
17. Popolzukhina, N. (2019). Photosynthetic and symbiotic efficiency in shaping the yield of pea seed in the agro-ecological conditions of the southern forest-steppe of Western Siberia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 315 (6), 062028 p. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/315/6/062028
18. Akhtar, K. (2019). Wheat straw mulching offset soil moisture deficient for improving physiological and growth performance of summer sown soybean. Agricultural water management. Vol. 211, pp. 16–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.031
19. Ferrari, M. (2018). Path analysis and phenotypic correlation among yield components of soybean using environmental stratification methods. Australian Journal of Crop Science. Vol. 12 (2), pp. 193–202. DOI: 10.21475/ajcs.18.12.02.pne488
20. Acharya, B.S. (2019). Winter cover crops effect on soil moisture and soybean growth and yield under different tillage systems. Soiland Tillage Research. Vol. 195, 104430 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2019.104430
21. Syromyatnikov, Y.N., Mozgovskyi, O.F., Kutz, O.V., Paramonova, T.V., Mykhailyn, V.I., Huliak, N.V. (2021). Influence of constant traditional soil treatment in vegetable-fodder crop rotation on density of black soil. Vegetable and Melon Growing. no. (70), pp. 66– 79. DOI: 10.32717/0131-0062-2021-70-66-79
22. Syromyatnikov, Y.N. (2018). Results of field studies of a rotary tillage loosening-separating machine with experimental working bodies. Bull. Altai State Agrarian Univ. no. 5(163), pp. 184–193.
23. Kuts, O.V., Mykhailyn, V.I., Paramonova, T.V., Rozhkov, A.O., Onyshchenko, O.I., Semenenko, I.I., Zhernova, O.S. (2022). Influence of different fertilizer systems on seed productivity of tomato. Vegetable and Melon Growing. no. (72), pp. 61–70. DOI: 10.32717/0131-0062-2022-72-61-70
24. Nunes, M.R. (2019). Dynamic changes in compressive properties and crop response after chisel tillage in a highly weathered soil. Soil and Tillage Research. Vol. 186, pp. 183–190. DOI: 10.1016/j. still.2018.10.017
25. Maslov, G. (2020). Technological and Technical Improvement of Crop Cultivation Processes. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies. Vol. 11 (8), pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.14456/ITJEMAST.2020.148
26. Kuts, O.V., Pomaz, N.V. (2013). Efficacy of em-preparation used for optimization of eggplants nutrition. Agriciltural microbiology. no. 17, pp. 148–158. DOI: 10.35868/1997-3004.17.148-158
27. Nanka, A., Morozov, I., Morozov, V., Krekot, M., Poliakov, A., Kiralhazi, I., Stashkiv, M. (2021). Substantiation of the Presence and Parameters of Seed Guides in the Openers, Which Increase the Quality of Sowing and Yield. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. no. 4(1), 112 p. DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2021.239304
28. Sun, J., Wang, Y., Ma, Y., Tong, J., Zhang, Z. (2018). DEM simulation of bionic subsoilers (tillage depth> 40 cm) with drag reduction and lower soil disturbance characteristics. Advances in Engineering Software. no. 119, pp. 30–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.02.001
29. Hang, C., Gao, X., Yuan, M., Huang, Y., Zhu, R. (2018). Discrete element simulations and experiments of soil disturbance as affected by the tine spacing of subsoiler. Biosystems Engineering. no. 168, pp. 73–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.03.008
30. Romanyuk, N., Ednach, V., Nukeshev, S., Troyanovskaya, I., Voinash, S., Kalimullin, M., Sokolova, V. (2023). Improvement of the design of the plow-subsoiler-fertilizer to increase soil fertility. Journal of Terramechanics. no. 106, pp. 89–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2023.01.001

 

Download this article: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon syromuatnikov_1_2023.pdf319.2 KB