CONTEMPLATING HEALTH ECONOMICS, CODING AND REIMBURSEMENT IN ORTHOTICS, PROSTHETICS AND PEDORTHICS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.36125

Keywords:

Coding, Economics, Fee for Service, Orthotics, Prosthetics, Reimbursement

Abstract

Reimbursement to U.S. healthcare service providers is largely transitioning from fee for service to fee for value for those clinicians who code using current procedural terminology and through their coding, describe their professional services. The Orthotic, Prosthetic and Pedorthic profession (O&P), currently codes using a system that describes the devices they evaluate for, fabricate, fit and maintain and their professional services are incorporated into their codes. These O&P codes, in contrast to those for other healthcare disciplines, are predominantly product based rather than service based, focusing on product features and function more than clinical service. This editorial manuscript provides a brief overview of the system the US O&P profession uses currently, particularly in the context of other healthcare professions transitioning to value based coding and reimbursement and culminates in a call to action for the profession to academically consider the strengths and weaknesses of the current system relative to alternative systems.

Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/36125/28316

How To Cite: Highsmith MJ, Fantini CM, Smith DG. Contemplating health economics, coding and reimbursement in orthotics, prosthetics and pedorthics. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2021; Volume 4, Issue 2, No.5. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.36125

Corresponding Author: M. Jason Highsmith, PhD, DPT, CP, FAAOP
School of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida. Florida, USA.
E-Mail: mhighsmi@usf.edu
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8361-7345

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

M. Jason Highsmith, School of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida. Tampa, Florida, USA.

M. Jason Highsmith, PT, DPT, PhD, CP, FAAOP, attended Northwestern University’s prosthetics program in 2004 and was certified following residency in 2006. He is dual licensed in physical therapy and prosthetics. He currently serves as the VA’s National Director of Orthotic, Prosthetic & Pedorthic Clinical Services Program Office. He is joint appointed as a Professor at the University of South Florida (USF), is a Past-President of the American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists and is a Captain (Physical Therapist) in the US Army Reserves. Dr. Highsmith manages a considerable research portfolio and has published numerous peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts. The views expressed in this article are his alone, and do not represent the US Departments of Defense, Veterans Affairs, any university or any other organization.

Christopher M. Fantini, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation & Prosthetics Services, Washington, USA.

Christopher Fantini, MSPT, CP, BOCO, is a board-certified Prosthetist/Orthotist with over 25 years of physical rehabilitation experience.  Mr. Fantini received a Master of Science in Physical Therapy from Columbia University in New York City and earned post graduate Certification in Prosthetics from Northwestern University in Chicago. Mr. Fantini has participated in notable work on advanced prosthetic devices to help facilitate the progression of emerging concepts & technologies to their clinical application. He has authored numerous peer reviewed articles as well as several chapters in texts relating to prosthetic care. He participates in the education/mentoring of Residents in the disciplines of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Orthotics/Prosthetics. He has and continues to work on several projects relating to both direct patient care as well as strategic planning to advance the field of O&P. The views expressed in this article are his alone, and do not represent the US Department of Veterans Affairs or any other organization.  

Douglas G. Smith, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Uniformed University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Douglas G. Smith, MD is a board-certified Orthopaedic Surgeon with over 30 years of experience in amputation surgery, the rehabilitation of individuals with limb loss, prosthetic prescription and prosthetic evaluation.  He is Professor Emeritus in the Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine at the University of Washington in Seattle.  He is also a Professor in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at the Uniform Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Maryland.  He works for the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, and in his role as the Chief Orthopaedic Advisor for The Center for Rehabilitation Sciences Research in the department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at The Uniform Services University he provides clinical education, consultation to the multi-disciplinary amputee care team and he supervises clinical research in limb salvage, amputation surgery and rehabilitation.  He also serves on the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association (AOPA) medical advisory board.  The views expressed in this article are his alone, and do not represent the US Department of Defense, any university or any other  organization.  

References

Stevens PM, Highsmith MJ. An introduction to the proceedings of the AAOP’S state-of-the-science conference on the economic science of lower-limb prosthetic rehabilitation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2019;31(1S):1-2. DOI: 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000233

Dobson A, El-Gamil A, Shimer M, DaVanzo JE. Economic value of prosthetic services among medicare beneficiaries: a claims-based retrospective cohort study. J Prosthet Orthot. 2019; 31(1S):94-100. DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00545

Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Bongiorni DR, Sutton BS, Groer S, Kaufman KR. Safety, energy efficiency, and cost efficacy of the C-Leg for transfemoral amputees: A review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010; 34(4):362-377. DOI: 10.3109/03093646. 2010.520054

Chen C, Hanson M, Chaturvedi R, Mattke S, Hillestad R, Liu HH. Economic benefits of microprocessor controlled prosthetic knees: a modeling study. J Prosthet Orthot. 2019; 31(1S):84-93. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-018-0405-8

Hirsch JA, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Nicola GN, Barr RM, Bello JA, Donovan WD, et al. Current procedural terminology; a primer. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(4):309-312. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011156

Goldman AH, Kates S. Pay-for-performance in orthopedics: how we got here and where we are going. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(2):212-217. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-017-9404-9

Strazzabosco M, Allen JI, Teisberg EO. Value-based care in hepatology. Hepatology. 2017; 65(5):1749-1755. DOI: 10.1002/ hep.29042

Patel K, Presser E, George M, McClellan M. Shifting away from fee-for-service: alternative approaches to payment in gastroenterology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 14(4):497-506. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.025

Kaye DR, Miller DC, Ellimoottil C. Alternative payment models and urology. Curr Opin Urol. 2017; 27(4):360-365. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000403

Hirsch JA, Rosenkrantz AB, Ansari SA, Manchikanti L, Nicola GN. MACRA 2.0: are you ready for MIPS? J Neurointerv Surg. 2017; 9(7):714-716. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012845

Lichtenstein RL. The United States' health care system: problems and solutions. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993; 38(3):310-316; discussion 316-317. DOI: 10.1016/0039-6257(93)90080-q

Stevens PM, Highsmith MJ, Sutton BS. Measuring value in the provision of lower-limb prostheses. J Prosthet Orthot. 2019; 31(1S):23-31. DOI: 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000232

Fairley M. L-Codes: Are They Meeting the Needs of O&P? [Internet]. The O&P Edge. 2008, [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://opedge.com/Articles/ViewArticle/2008-08-01/2008-08_01

Daigh JD. Healthcare Inspection, Foot Care for Patients with Diabetes and Additional Risk Factors for Amputation [Internet]. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Inspector General. Report #11-00711-74. 2013, [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://www.va.gov/oig/pubs/VAOIG-11-00711-74.pdf

Daigh JD. Healthcare Inspection. Prosthetic Limb Care in VA Facilities [Internet]. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Inspector General. Report #11-02138-116. 2012, [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://www.va.gov/oig/pubs/VAOIG-11-02138-116.pdf

Jarmon GL. Medicare Improperly Paid Suppliers for Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies Provided to Beneficiaries During Inpatient Stays [Internet]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Inspector General. A-09-17-03035. 2018, [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region9/91703035.pdf

Levinson DR. CMS has not Promulgated Regulations to Establish Payment Requirements for Prosthetics and Custom-Fabricated Orthotics [Internet]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Inspector General. OEI-07-10-00410. 2012, [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-10-00410.pdf

Finn BJ. Audit of the Management and Acquisition of Prosthetic Limbs. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs [Internet]. Office of Inspector General. Report #11-02254-102. 2012, [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://www.va.gov/oig/pubs/VAOIG-11-02254-102.pdf

Brown JG. Medicare Losses Resulting from Early Payments for Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics and Supplies [Internet]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Inspector General. OEI-03-99-00620. 2000, [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-03-99-00620.pdf

Brown JG. Medicare Payments for Orthotics. Inappropriate Payments [Internet]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Inspector General. OEI-02-99-00120. 2000, [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-02-99-00120.pdf

Wright S. Use of Surety Bonds to Recover Overpayments made to DMEPOS Suppliers [Internet]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Inspector General. OEI-03-11-00351. 1997, [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-03-11-00351.pdf

Reinkemeyer LM. Use of Not Otherwise Classified Codes for Prosthetic Limb Components [Internet]. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Office of Inspector General. Report #16-01913-223. 2018, [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://www.va.gov/oig/pubs/VAOIG-16-01913-223.pdf

Levinson DR. Questionable Billing by Suppliers of Lower Limb Prostheses [Internet]. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Office of the Inspector General. OEI-02-10-00170. 2011, [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-02-10-00170.pdf

Stark G, Stiner B. L-code obstacles: Experience from the front lines [Internet]. The O&P Edge. 2008. [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://opedge.com/Articles/ViewArticle/2008-08-01/2008-08_03

Phillips Otto J. L-codes: What's wrong? What's right? [Internet]. The O&P Edge. 2008. [cited 2021, January 5], Available from: https://opedge.com/Articles/ViewArticle/2008-08-01/2008-08_02

Resnik L, Latlief G, Klinger SL, Sasson N, Walters LS. Do users want to receive a DEKA Arm and why? Overall findings from the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014; 38(6):456-466. DOI: 10.1177/0309364613506914

Resnik L, Klinger SL, Etter K. The DEKA arm: its features, functionality, and evolution during the veterans affairs study to optimize the DEKA arm. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014; 38(6):492-504. DOI: 10.1177/0309364613506913

Resnik L. Research update: VA study to optimize DEKA arm. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010; 47(3):ix-x. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010. 03.0034,

Hsiao WC, Braun P, Becker ER, Dunn DL, Kelly N, Causino N, et al. Results and impacts of the resource-based relative value scale. Med Care. 1992;30(11 Suppl):NS61-79. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199211001-00006

Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn DL, Becker ER, Yntema D, Verrilli DK, et al. An overview of the development and refinement of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale. The foundation for reform of U.S. physician payment. Med Care. 1992; 30(11 Suppl):NS1-12. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199211001-00001

Becker ER, Dunn D, Braun P, Hsiao WC. Refinement and expansion of the Harvard resource-based relative value scale: the second phase. Am J Public Health. 1990; 80(7):799-803. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.7.799

Hsiao WC, Becker ER. Paying physicians according to their resource-costs: the development of a resource-based relative value scale. Health Policy. 1989; 12(3):257-261. DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(89)90075-4

Hsiao WC, Braun P, Kelly NL, Becker ER. Results, potential effects, and implementation issues of the resource-based relative value scale. JAMA. 1988; 260(16):2429-2438. doi:10.1001/jama. 1988.03410160105013

Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn D, Becker ER. Resource-based relative values. An overview. JAMA. 1988; 260(16):2347-2353. doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03410160021004

Hsiao WC, Braun P, Yntema D, Becker ER. Estimating physicians' work for a resource-based relative-value scale. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319(13):835-841. DOI: 10.1056/ NEJM198809293191305

Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn D, Becker ER, DeNicola M, Ketcham TR. Results and policy implications of the resource-based relative-value study. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319(13):881-888. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198809293191330

Hsiao WC. The resource-based relative value scale: an option for physician payment. Inquiry. 1987;24(4):360-361.

Cutti AG, Lettieri E, Verni G. Health technology assessment as theoretical framework to assess lower-limb prosthetics—issues and opportunities from an international perspective. J Prosthet Orthot. 2019; 31(1S):55-73. DOI: 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000235

Published

2021-09-21