J Appl Biomed 18:136-142, 2020 | DOI: 10.32725/jab.2020.018

Alterations of glycaemia, insulin resistance and body mass index within the C-peptide optimal range in non-diabetic patients

Vladimír Kron1,6,*, Miroslav Verner2,5, Pavel Smetana1, Jana Janoutová3, Vladimír Janout4, Karel Martiník6
1 University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Food Biotechnologies and Agricultural Products Quality, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
2 Hospital of České Budějovice, a. s., Central Laboratories, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
3 Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Healthcare Management, Olomouc, Czech Republic
4 Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Center for Research and Science, Olomouc, Czech Republic
5 University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
6 Center for Metabolic Assessment of prof. MUDr. Karel Martiník, DrSc., s.r.o., Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

The study focused on changes or cut-offs of glycaemia, insulin resistance and body mass index within the C-peptide reference range (260-1730 pmol/l). The metabolic profile of individuals in the Czech Republic without diabetes (n = 3186) was classified by whiskers and quartiles of C-peptide into four groups with the following ranges: 290-510 (n = 694), 511-710 (n = 780), 711-950 (n = 720) and 951-1560 pmol/l (n = 673). Fasting levels of glucose, insulin, HOMA IR (Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance) and BMI (body mass index) were compared by a relevant C-peptide range. Participants taking medication to control glycaemia were excluded. The evaluation involved correlations between C-peptides and the above parameters, F-test and t-test. Changes in glucose levels (from 5.3 to 5.6 mmol/l) between the groups were lower in comparison to insulin, which reached relatively greater changes (from 4.0 to 14.2 mIU/l). HOMA IR increased considerably with growing C-peptide concentrations (0.9, 1.5, 2.2 and 3.5) and BMI values showed a similar trend (28.3, 31.0, 33.6 and 37.4). Considerable changes were observed for insulin (5.2 mIU/l, 57.8%) and HOMA IR (1.3, 61.3%) between groups with C-peptide ranges of 711-950 and 951-1560 pmol/l. Although correlations involving C-peptide, insulin, glucose and BMI seemed to be non-significant (up to rxy = 0.25), the mean values of insulin, HOMA IR and BMI showed statistically significant changes between all groups with various C-peptide concentrations (p ≤ 0.001). Generally, most important differences appeared in glucose metabolism and body mass index between C-peptide ranges of 711-950 and 951-1560 pmol/l. Absolute and relative changes of C-peptide concentrations are possible to use for the assessment of glucose regulatory mechanism. The spectrum of investigated parameters could be a useful tool to prevent the risks linked with the alterations of glycaemia.

Keywords: Body mass index; C-peptide; Glucose; Insulin resistance
Grants and funding:

Funding source: This work was supported by Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic NAZV QK1910174.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Received: July 17, 2020; Revised: November 22, 2020; Accepted: November 28, 2020; Prepublished online: December 8, 2020; Published: December 14, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kron V, Verner M, Smetana P, Janoutová J, Janout V, Martiník K. Alterations of glycaemia, insulin resistance and body mass index within the C-peptide optimal range in non-diabetic patients. J Appl Biomed. 2020;18(4):136-142. doi: 10.32725/jab.2020.018. PubMed PMID: 34907766.
Download citation

References

  1. Andrade RLM, Gigante DP, de Oliveira IO, Horta BL (2018). C-peptide and cardiovascular risk factors among young adults in a southern Brazilian Cohort. BMC Endocr Disord 18: 80. DOI: 10.1186/s12902-018-0308-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bilal A, Basanagouda SP, Thaseen A (2010). Significance of C-peptide in type 2 diabetics - a study in the North Karnataka population of India. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 3: 65-78.
  3. Buse JB, Polonsky KS, Burant CF (2008). Type 2 diabetes mellitus. In: Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Larsen PR. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 1329-1391.
  4. C-peptide serum analyze (2020). Manual of recommendations of IKEM. [online] [cit. 2020-07-15]. Available at: https://www2.ikem.cz/plm_lp/_LP_05206-L0000006.htm
  5. Cardellini M, Farcomeni A, Ballanti M, Morelli M, Davato F, Cardolini I, et al. (2017). C-peptide: a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in subjects with established atherosclerotic disease. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res 14: 395-399. DOI: 10.1177/1479164117710446. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Christensen MB, Gaede P, Hommelc E, Gotfredsen A, Nørgaard K (2019). Glycaemic variability and hypoglycaemia are associated with C-peptide levels in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 46: 61-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.02.002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Francis S, Padinjareveedu SC, Nesheera KK, Jacob J (2017). Fasting C-peptide correlated with fasting insulin and post glucose load C-peptides in young adults but the C-peptides could not be partitioned into groups with and without family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Contemp Med Res 4: 467-472.
  8. Gómez-Ambrosi J, Silva C, Galofré JC, Escalada J, Santos S, Gil MJ, et al. (2011). Body adiposity and type 2 diabetes: increased risk with a high body fat percentage even having a normal BMI. Obesity (Silver Spring) 19: 1439-44. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2011.36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Haban P, Simoncic R, Zidekova E, Ozdin L (2002). Role of fasting serum C-peptide as a predictor of cardiovascular risk associated with the metabolic X- syndrome. Med Sci Monit 8: 175-179.
  10. Horáková D, Štěpánek L, Janout V, Janoutová J, Pastucha D, Kollárová H, et al. (2019). Optimal homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) cut off in Czech population. Medicina 55: 158. DOI: 10.3390/medicina55050158. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Juszczak A, Pryse R, Schuman A, R Owen K (2016). When to consider a diagnosis of MODY at the presentation of diabetes. Br J Gen Pract 66: 457-459. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X685537. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Khan HA, Sobki SH, Ekhzaimy A, Khan I, Almusawi MA (2018). Biomarker potential of C-peptide for screening of insulin resistance in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. Saudi J Bio Sci 27: 1729-1732. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.05.027. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Li Y, Meng L, Zheng L (2015). Association between serum C-peptide as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in nondiabetic individuals. PLoSOne 10: e112281. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112281. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Methodology of glucose, total, HDL and LDL cholesterol (2020). Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Diagnostics, University Hospital Hradec Králové. [online] [cit. 2020-07-15]. Available at: http://ukbd.fnhk.cz/seznam-metod.html
  15. Pagana K, Pagana TJ (2013). Mosby's Manual of Diagnostic and Laboratory Tests. 5th ed. Elsevier Saunders, St. Louis.
  16. Palmer, JP (2009). C-peptide in the natural history of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 25: 325-328. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.943. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Pinckney A, Rigby MR, Keyes-Elstein L, Soppe CL, Nepom GT, Ehlers MR (2016). Correlation among hypoglycemia, glycemic variability, and C-peptide preservation after alefacept therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Analysis of data from the immune tolerance network T1 DAL trial. Clin Ther 38: 1327-1339. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.04.032. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Pujia A, Gazzaruso C, Montalcini T (2017). An update on the potential role of C-peptide in diabetes and osteoporosis. Endocrine 58: 408-12. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-017-1286-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. S-C-peptide analyze (2020). Manual of recommendations of DPC. Biolab company. [online] [cit. 2020-07-15]. Available at: https://www.biolab-kt.cz/laboratorni-prirucka/HVEZDAAAWX.htm
  20. Shetty V, Jain HR, Singh G, Parekh S, Shetty S (2017). C-peptide levels in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: a case-control study. Int J Sci Stud 4: 7-13. DOI: 10.17354/ijss/2017/38. Go to original source...
  21. Siy YP, Dampil OAC, Quimpo AJ (2017). The correlation of body mass index with fasting C-peptide levels of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus Filipino patients. Philipp J Intern Med 55: 1-5.
  22. Smith JD, Wijeratne N, McNeil A (2019). The need to feed? Is blood glucose above 8 mmol/L needed for the correct interpretation of C-peptide in patients with diabetes? Pathology 51: 114. DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2018.12.321. Go to original source...
  23. Svačina Š, Bretšnajdrová A (2003). Diabetes and obesity, 1st ed. Prague: Maxdorf.
  24. Test ID: CPR, C-Peptide serum (2020). Manual of Mayo Clinic Laboratories. [online] [cit. 2020-07-15]. Available at: https://www.mayocliniclabs.com/test-catalog/Clinical+and+Interpretive/8804
  25. Thunander M, Törn C, Petersson Ch, Ossiansson B, Fornande J, Landin-Olsson M (2012). Levels of C-peptide, body mass index and age, and their usefulness in classification of diabetes in relation to autoimmunity, in adults with newly diagnosed diabetesin Kronoberg, Sweden. Eur J Endocrinol 166: 1021-1029. DOI: 10.1530/EJE-11-0797. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Toffolo G, De Grandi F, Cobelli C (1995). Estimation of beta-cell sensitivity from intravenous glucose tolerance test C-peptide data. Knowledge of the kinetics avoids errors in modeling the secretion. Diabetes 44: 845-854. DOI: 10.2337/diab.44.7.845. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Wahren J (2004). C-peptide: new findings and therapeutic implications in diabetes Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 24: 180-189. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2004.00558.x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Wang Y, Wan H, Chen Y, Xia F, Zhang W, Wang C, et al. (2019). Association of C-peptide with diabetic vascular complications in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab 46: 33-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.04.004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Yosten GL, Maric-Bilkan C, Luppi P, Wahren J (2014). Physiological effects and therapeutic potential of proinsulin C-peptide. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 307: 955-968. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00130.2014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Zierath JR, Handberg A, Tally M, Wallberg-Henriksson H (1996). C-peptide stimulates glucose transport in isolated human skeletal muscle independent of insulin receptor and tyrosine kinase activation. Diabetologia 39: 306-313. DOI: 10.1007/BF00418346. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.