J Appl Biomed 4:179-185, 2006 | DOI: 10.32725/jab.2006.020

A method for the detection of post-operative lymphoedema after operation for breast cancer: multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis

Michael J. Halaška1,*, Viktor Komárek2, Ivana Malá3, Jiří Chod1, Pavel Strnad1, Jan Novotný4, Hana Stankusová5, Dušan Kolařík6, Dana Marešová7
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2nd Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague
2 Department of Biophysics and Informatics, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague
3 University of Economics in Prague
4 Department of Oncology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague
5 Department of Oncology, 2nd Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague
6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague
7 Department of Physiology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague

Lymphoedema, a pathological accumulation of extracellular water (ECW), is a severe post-operative complication. Multifrequency bioimpedance analysis (MFBIA) is a method for the detection of changes in ECW. Our aim is to establish the methodology of MFBIA and to apply it on to group of patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.
We measured a control group of 60 women, another group of 5 women with pronounced lymphoedema and a group of 36 patients undergoing breast cancer surgery during a 9-month period after surgery using MFBIA and circumferential measurements for recording volume changes in the upper limb. Different linear extrapolations from 1, 5, 50, 100, 200 kHz were determined to find resistance at 0 Hz for each patient; ratios of R0 were evaluated for non-dominant/dominant and non-operated/operated limbs. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to compare the correlation between the results and patient characteristics.
Extrapolation using 5, 50, 100 kHz had the lowest standard deviation. Within the patients with pronounced lymphoedema, bigger differences were found by MFBIA as compared with circumference measurements. A stronger correlation between limb volumes calculated from circumference measurements with weight and BMI as compared with MFBIA was found. Lymphoedema was found in 14 women in the tested group. The best association between patients' subjective symptoms was with the MFBIA measurement.

Keywords: lymphoedema; post-operative complication; multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis; breast cancer

Received: February 6, 2006; Revised: June 1, 2006; Published: July 31, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Halaška MJ, Komárek V, Malá I, Chod J, Strnad P, Novotný J, et al.. A method for the detection of post-operative lymphoedema after operation for breast cancer: multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. J Appl Biomed. 2006;4(4):179-185. doi: 10.32725/jab.2006.020.
Download citation

References

  1. Armer J.: The problem of post-breast cancer lymphedema: impact and measurement issues. Cancer Invest. 23:76-83, 2005. Go to original source...
  2. Box R. C., Reul-Hirche H. M., Bullock-Saxton J. E. et al.: Physiotherapy after breast cancer surgery: results of a randomized controlled study to minimize lymphoedema. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 75: 51-64, 2002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Cornish B. H., Thomas B. J., Ward L. C.: Improved prediction of extracellular and total body water using impedance loci generated by multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. Phys. Med. Biol. 38:337-346, 1993. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Cornish B. H., Bunce I. H., Ward L. C. et al.: Bioelectrical impedance for monitoring the efficacy of lymphoedema treatment programmes. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 38:169-176, 1996. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Cornish B. H., Ward L. C.: Data analysis in multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. Physiol. Meas. 19:275-283, 1998. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Cornish B. H., Chapman C., Hirst C. et al.: Early diagnosis of lymphoedema using multiple frequency bioimpedance. Lymphology 34:2-11, 2001. Go to PubMed...
  7. Cornish B. H., Thomas B. J., Ward L. C. et al.: A new technique for the quantification of peripheral edema with application in both unilateral and bilateral cases. Angiology 53:41-47, 2002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Dittmar M., Reber H.: New equations for estimating body cell mass from bioimpedance parallel models in healthy older Germans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 281:1005-1014, 2001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Gerber L. H.: A review of measures of lymphedema. Cancer 83:2803-2804, 1998. Go to original source...
  10. Hayes S., Cornish B., Newman B.: Comparison of methods to diagnose lymphoedema among breast cancer survivors: 6-month follow-up. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 89:221-226, 2005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Kissin M. W., Querci della Rovere G., Easton D. et al.: Risk of lymphedoema following the treatment of breast cancer. Br. J. Surg. 73:580-584, 1986. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Mikes D. M., Cha B. A., Dym C. L. et al.: Bioelectrical impedance analysis revisited. Lymphology 32:157-165, 1999. Go to PubMed...
  13. Ward L. C., Byrne K., Rutter K.: Reliability of multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis: An inter-machine comparison. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 9:63-72, 1997. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...