Political discourse as practical reasoning: A case study of a British Prime Minister candidate speech

Lucyna Harmon

University of Rzeszów , Poland


Abstract

The paper outlines the method of political discourse analysis proposed by I. Fairclough & N. Fairclough (2012), who point to argumentative and deliberative nature of political discourse as practical reasoning that aims to decide a problem-solving action in a given situation. The novelty of this approach is explained through references to its established alternatives as focused on representation and power relations. The above mentioned method is applied to the British PM campaign candidacy speech by Andrea Leadsom to test how it works in the case of this type of political discourse which is different from the one originally examined. On this occasion, the meaning of the term ‘discourse’ is illustrated through the practical necessity of involving in the analyses the extra-linguistic and intertextual context.

Keywords:

discourse, politics, deliberation, argumentation, Fairclough

Bitzer, L.F. (1968). The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 1, 1-14.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, I., & Fairlclough, N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction 2 (pp. 258-284). London: Sage.

Lemke, J. (1995). Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Taylor and Francis.

Purvis, T., & Hunt, A. (1993). Discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology… The British Journal of Sociology 4, 473-499.

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetoric of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.

Van Dijk, T.A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? Retrieved from

http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Politics,%20Ideology%20and%20Discourse.pdf. 6.09.2016.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H.E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 352-37). Blackwell.

Van Dijk, T.A. (2006). Politics, Ideology, and Discourse. Retrieved from

http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Politics,%20Ideology%20and%20Discourse.pdf. 2.09.2016.

Van Dijk, T.A. (2009). Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach. In R.Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 62-86). London: Sage.

Wodak, R. (2005). Language and Politics. Retrieved from

http://host.uniroma3.it/linguisti/lcs ingles/Roma3/Newsblog/Entries/2014/4/6_New_class_time_files/Wodak-Language%20and%20Politics.pdf. 2.09.2016.

Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (2001) Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology. Retrieved from https://www.corwin.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/24615_01_Wodak_Ch_01.pdf. 15.09.2016.

Download

Published
30-12-2017


Harmon, L. (2017). Political discourse as practical reasoning: A case study of a British Prime Minister candidate speech. LingBaW. Linguistics Beyond and Within, 3(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.31743/lingbaw.5651

Lucyna Harmon 
University of Rzeszów