Quick Links
   

Journal of Neurosurgery
 
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
 
Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
 
Neurosurgical Focus

Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum

Amin B. Kassam, M.D.1,2,3,4, Paul A. Gardner, M.D.1,4, Carl H. Snyderman, M.D.1,2,3,4, Ricardo L. Carrau, M.D.1,2,3,4, Arlan H. Mintz, M.D.1,4, and Daniel M. Prevedello, M.D.1,4
1Minimally Invasive endoNeurosurgery Center, 4Department of Neurological Surgery; and 2Center for Cranial Base Surgery, 3Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Abbreviations used in this paper: ACoA = anterior communicating artery; CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; EEA = expanded endonasal approach; ICA = internal carotid artery; IIS = inferior intercavernous sinus; mOCR = medial opticocarotid recess; MR = magnetic resonance; PCA = posterior cerebral artery; PCoA = posterior communicating artery; SCA = superior cerebellar artery; SIS = superior intercavernous sinus; TSA = transsphenoidal approach.

Address correspondence to: Paul A. Gardner, M.D., Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Suite B-400, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213. email: .

DOI: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/4/0715

Object

Craniopharyngiomas are notoriously difficult to treat. Surgeons must weigh the risks of aggressive resection against the long-term challenges of recurrence. Because of their parasellar location, often extending well beyond the sella, these tumors challenge vision and pituitary and hypothalamic function. New techniques are needed to improve outcomes in patients with these tumors while decreasing treatment morbidity. An endoscopic expanded endonasal approach (EEA) is one such technique that warrants understanding and evaluation. The authors explain the techniques and approach used for the endoscopic endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas and introduce a tumor classification scheme.

Methods

The techniques and approach used for the endoscopic, endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas is explained, including the introduction of a tumor classification scheme. This scheme is helpful for understanding both the appropriate expanded approach as well as relevant involved anatomy.

Results

The classification scheme divides tumors according to their suprasellar extension: Type I is preinfundibular; Type II is transinfundibular (extending into the stalk); Type III is retroinfundibular, extending behind the gland and stalk, and has 2 subdivisions (IIIa, extending into the third ventricle; and IIIb, extending into the interpeduncular cistern); and Type IV is isolated to the third ventricle and/or optic recess and is not accessible via an endonasal approach.

Conclusions

The endoscopic EEA requires a thorough understanding of both sinus and skull base anatomy. Moreover, in its application for craniopharyngiomas, an understanding of tumor growth and extension with respect to the optic chiasm and infundibulum is critical to safely approach the lesion via an endonasal route.

Keywords: classification; craniopharyngioma; endoscopy; expanded endonasal approach.

Cited by

M.D., M.D., M.D., M.D., M.D., M.D., and M.D.. (2008) Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series. Journal of Neurosurgery 109:1, 6-16
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2008.
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (3298 KB) 
, . (2008) Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 1:2, 53
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2008.
CrossRef

PDF (17,640.671 KB) | Full Text