Zongfa(宗法) is an system aimed to unite many kindred groups in a way that the eldest centered. It examine an order of the kindred. Since the age of Chunqiu-Zhanguo(春秋戰國), Zongfa had ceased as a result of the replacement of Fengjian(封建).
Wan Si-tai found the distinction between primary line(Daizong:大宗) and minor lines(Xiaozong:小宗) in the difference of each status. He also argued that the distinction between Daizong and Xiaozong would come out since five generations passed. Wan Si-tai recognized the difficulty of the revival of Zongfa, but he presented Fengjian as a solution. And he emphasized the recovery of the mind of Guli(古禮) in Jingdian(經典).
Mao Chi-ling said that the reason of the shape of Zongfa was the discontinuation of Zhuhou(諸侯) and his brothers in kinsfolk. Because of the value of identification, the main line of descent was very important. Meanwhile, he explained Xing(姓), Shi(氏), and Zu(族). According to his theory, Xing separated into Shi, and Shi separated into Zu again. Eventually, Shi and Zu mean Daijong and Xiaozong.
To explain Zongfa, Wan Si-tai took notice of the union. He was unbound to the union of kindred in that time. And he took a serious view of Jingxue, so he emphasized the recovery of Guli and Jingdian and the importance of Fengjian at once.
Mao Chi-ling criticized Wan Si-tai's theories, for example, the interpretation of Biezi(別子), the level explanation of Daizong and Xiaozong, and the understanding of Zong(宗) with generation. His interpretation about words and phrases is clearer than Wan Si-tai's. And he concentrated on many examples in Jingdian. So Mao Chi-ling's theory of Zongfa has stronger color of Kaojuxue(考證學) than Wan Si-tai's.
KCI 등재
萬斯大와 毛奇齡의 宗法論 ― 經學史적 접근을 중심으로 ―
The Theory of the Zongfa(宗法) of Wan Si-tai(萬斯大) and Mao Chi-ling(毛寄齡) ― Focus on View of the History of Jingxue(經學) ―
명청사연구
약어 : -
2010 no.34, pp.113 - 142
DOI : 10.31329/jmhs.2010..34.005
발행기관 : 명청사학회
연구분야 : 역사학
Copyright © 명청사학회
약어 : -
2010 no.34, pp.113 - 142
DOI : 10.31329/jmhs.2010..34.005
발행기관 : 명청사학회
연구분야 : 역사학
Copyright © 명청사학회
종법, 대종, 소종, 경학, 만사대, 모기령
Zongfa, Primary line(Daizong), Minor lines(Xiaozong), Jingxue, Wan Si-tai, Mao Chi-ling
Zongfa, Primary line(Daizong), Minor lines(Xiaozong), Jingxue, Wan Si-tai, Mao Chi-ling
- 1. [단행본] 井上徹 / 2000 / 中國の宗族と國家の禮制 / 硏文出版
- 2. [학술지] 佐々木愛 / 2000 / 張載․程頤の宗法論について / 史林 / 83 (5)
- 3. [단행본] 井上徹 / 2005 / 宋-明宗族の硏究 / 汲古書院
- 4. [학술지] 鄭台燮 / 1994 / 明末의 禮學 / 東國史學 / 28
- 5. [학술지] 鄭台燮 / 1995 / 顔元과 戴震 / 東國史學 / 29
- 6. [학술지] 鄭台燮 / 1995 / 淸初의 禮學(Ⅰ) / 東洋史學硏究 / 52
- 7. [학술지] 鄭台燮 / 1997 / 明末淸初 經世學과 淸代 漢學의 內在的理路 / 明淸史硏究 / 6
- 8. [단행본] 王圻 / 1986 / 續文獻通考 in : 宗廟考 / 現代出版社 : 1768
타입을 선택하세요
萬斯大와 毛奇齡의 宗法論 ― 經學史적 접근을 중심으로 ―
@article{ART001492409},
author={
서용석
},
title={
萬斯大와 毛奇齡의 宗法論 ― 經學史적 접근을 중심으로 ―
},
journal={
명청사연구
},
issn={1598-2017},
year={2010},
pages={113 - 142},
doi={10.31329/jmhs.2010..34.005},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.31329/jmhs.2010..34.005}
TY - JOUR
AU - 서용석
TI - 萬斯大와 毛奇齡의 宗法論 ― 經學史적 접근을 중심으로 ―
T2 - 명청사연구
PY - 2010
IS - 34
PB - 명청사학회
SP - 113 - 142
SN - 1598-2017
AB - Zongfa(宗法) is an system aimed to unite many kindred groups in a way that the eldest centered. It examine an order of the kindred. Since the age of Chunqiu-Zhanguo(春秋戰國), Zongfa had ceased as a result of the replacement of Fengjian(封建).
Wan Si-tai found the distinction between primary line(Daizong:大宗) and minor lines(Xiaozong:小宗) in the difference of each status. He also argued that the distinction between Daizong and Xiaozong would come out since five generations passed. Wan Si-tai recognized the difficulty of the revival of Zongfa, but he presented Fengjian as a solution. And he emphasized the recovery of the mind of Guli(古禮) in Jingdian(經典).
Mao Chi-ling said that the reason of the shape of Zongfa was the discontinuation of Zhuhou(諸侯) and his brothers in kinsfolk. Because of the value of identification, the main line of descent was very important. Meanwhile, he explained Xing(姓), Shi(氏), and Zu(族). According to his theory, Xing separated into Shi, and Shi separated into Zu again. Eventually, Shi and Zu mean Daijong and Xiaozong.
To explain Zongfa, Wan Si-tai took notice of the union. He was unbound to the union of kindred in that time. And he took a serious view of Jingxue, so he emphasized the recovery of Guli and Jingdian and the importance of Fengjian at once.
Mao Chi-ling criticized Wan Si-tai's theories, for example, the interpretation of Biezi(別子), the level explanation of Daizong and Xiaozong, and the understanding of Zong(宗) with generation. His interpretation about words and phrases is clearer than Wan Si-tai's. And he concentrated on many examples in Jingdian. So Mao Chi-ling's theory of Zongfa has stronger color of Kaojuxue(考證學) than Wan Si-tai's.
KW - 종법, 대종, 소종, 경학, 만사대, 모기령
DO - 10.31329/jmhs.2010..34.005
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.31329/jmhs.2010..34.005
ER -
서용석 (2010). 萬斯大와 毛奇齡의 宗法論 ― 經學史적 접근을 중심으로 ―. 명청사연구, 34, 113 - 142.
서용석 . 2010, “萬斯大와 毛奇齡의 宗法論 ― 經學史적 접근을 중심으로 ―”, no.34, pp. 113 - 142. Available from: doi:10.31329/jmhs.2010..34.005
서용석. “萬斯大와 毛奇齡의 宗法論 ― 經學史적 접근을 중심으로 ―“ 명청사연구 34 pp. 113 - 142. (2010): 113.
서용석 . 萬斯大와 毛奇齡의 宗法論 ― 經學史적 접근을 중심으로 ― 명청사연구 [Internet]. 2010; 34, : 113 - 142. Available from: doi:10.31329/jmhs.2010..34.005
서용석 . “萬斯大와 毛奇齡의 宗法論 ― 經學史적 접근을 중심으로 ―“ 명청사연구 no.34 (2010): 113 - 142. doi: :10.31329/jmhs.2010..34.005