skip to main content
10.5555/1599081.1599184dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescolingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Topic identification for fine-grained opinion analysis

Published:18 August 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Within the area of general-purpose fine-grained subjectivity analysis, opinion topic identification has, to date, received little attention due to both the difficulty of the task and the lack of appropriately annotated resources. In this paper, we provide an operational definition of opinion topic and present an algorithm for opinion topic identification that, following our new definition, treats the task as a problem in topic coreference resolution. We develop a methodology for the manual annotation of opinion topics and use it to annotate topic information for a portion of an existing general-purpose opinion corpus. In experiments using the corpus, our topic identification approach statistically significantly outperforms several non-trivial baselines according to three evaluation measures.

References

  1. ACE. 2005. The NIST ACE evaluation website. http://www.nist.gov/speech/tests/ace/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagga, A. and B. Baldwin. 1998. Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. In In Proceedings of MUC7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bethard, S., H. Yu, A. Thornton, V. Hativassiloglou, and D. Jurafsky. 2004. Automatic extraction of opinion propositions and their holders. In 2004 AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Breck, E., Y. Choi, and C. Cardie. 2007. Identifying expressions of opinion in context. In Proceedings of IJCAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Choi, Y., C. Cardie, E. Riloff, and S. Patwardhan. 2005. Identifying sources of opinions with conditional random fields and extraction patterns. In Proceedings of EMNLP. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Choi, Y., E. Breck, and C. Cardie. 2006. Joint extraction of entities and relations for opinion recognition. In Proceedings of EMNLP. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Choi, F. 2000. Advances in domain independent linear text segmentation. Proceedings of NAACL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cohen, W. 1995. Fast effective rule induction. In Proceedings of ICML.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Freund, Y. and R. Schapire. 1998. Large margin classification using the perceptron algorithm. In Proceedings of Computational Learing Theory. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hasegawa, T., S. Sekine, and R. Grishman. 2004. Discovering relations among named entities from large corpora. In Proceedings of ACL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hu, M. and B. Liu. 2004. Mining opinion features in customer reviews. In AAAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Joachims, T. 1998. Making large-scale support vector machine learning practical. In B. Schölkopf, C. Burges, A. Smola, editor, Advances in Kernel Methods: Support Vector Machines. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kim, S. and E. Hovy. 2006. Extracting opinions, opinion holders, and topics expressed in online news media text. In Proceedings of ACL/COLING Workshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kobayashi, N., K. Inui, Y. Matsumoto, K. Tateishi, and T. Fukushima. 2004. Collecting evaluative expressions for opinion extraction. In Proceedings of IJCNLP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Krippendorff, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Luo, X. 2005. On coreference resolution performance metrics. In Proceedings of EMNLP. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Malioutov, I. and R. Barzilay. 2006. Minimum cut model for spoken lecture segmentation. In Proceedings of ACL/COLING. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ng, V. and C. Cardie. 2002. Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In In Proceedings of ACL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pang, B., L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of EMNLP. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Passonneau, R. 2004. Computing reliability for coreference annotation. In Proceedings of LREC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Popescu, A. and O. Etzioni. 2005. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. In Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rosenfeld, B. and R. Feldman. 2007. Clustering for unsupervised relation identification. In Proceedings of CIKM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Soon, W., H. Ng, and D. Lim. 2001. A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics, 27(4). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stoyanov, V. and C. Cardie. 2008. Annotating topics of opinions. In Proceedings of LREC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Turney, P. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of ACL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Vilain, M., J. Burger, J. Aberdeen, D. Connolly, and L. Hirschman. 1995. A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. In Proceedings of the MUC6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Voorhees, E. and L. Buckland. 2003. Overview of the TREC 2003 Question Answering Track. In Proceedings of TREC 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Wiebe, J., T. Wilson, and C. Cardie. 2005. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation, 1(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Wiebe, J. 2005. Personal communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilson, T., J. Wiebe, and P. Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wilson, T. 2005. Personal communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Yi, J., T. Nasukawa, R. Bunescu, and W. Niblack. 2003. Sentiment analyzer: Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. In Proceedings of ICDM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Topic identification for fine-grained opinion analysis

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image DL Hosted proceedings
              COLING '08: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 1
              August 2008
              1178 pages
              ISBN:9781905593446

              Publisher

              Association for Computational Linguistics

              United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 18 August 2008

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate1,537of1,537submissions,100%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader