Abstract
Dry cooling of coke is an effective method of cooling red-hot coke. The unit of a coke oven where red hot coke is cooled with inert circulating gas is known as the coke dry cooling plant (CDCP). The coke from CDCP has very low moisture in the range of 0.3–0.5%. Cold and hot strength properties of coke produced from CDCP are better than from wet quenching. But the limitations of CDCP are its poor performance i.e., low cooling rate, and burning losses. In the present work, the performance of the cooling chamber in different SAIL plants was studied and compared. An effort was made to find the critical parameters that affect the performance of chamber, i.e., cooling rate of coke. It was found that oxygen equivalent is one of the critical factors which affect the performance of chambers. In addition to this, the reasons for coke floating in the chamber were also studied. It was found that the rheological properties of coal blends have a strong relationship with coke strength and have an effect on coke mean size. Reduced coke size causes, coke to float in the chambers which leads to a low discharge rate from the chambers.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Errera, M. and Milanez, L., Thermodynamic analysis of a coke dry quenching unit, Energy Convers. Manage., 2000, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00090-4
Yang, W., Xu, T., Chen, G., Guo, Yu., Jia, L., and Li, W., Coke dry quenching and utilization of its waste heat for electricity in iron and steel industry, Int. Conf. on Power Electronics and Intelligent Transportation System, Shenzhen, China, 2009, pp. 227-230.
Liu, H., Zhang, X., Xu, L., and Wang, M., Mathematical model for fluid flow and heat transfer in the cooling shaft of coke dry quenching unit, J. Therm. Sci., 2002, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-002-0024-2
Fedak, S. and Kurylko, S., Start-Up and Commissioning of Coke Dry Cooling Plant (CDCP). Explanatory Note, 2014.
Surenskii, O.N., Coke dry quenching, Spravochnik koksokhimika (Coke-Chemist Reference Book), Rudyka, V.I. and Zingerman, Yu.E., Eds., Kharkov, Kharkov. Inzh.-Ekon. Inst., 2014.
Vorob’ev, D.D., Balanov, V.G., Davidzon, R.I., et al., Coke losses during dry quenching, 1972, no. 2, pp. 24–25.
Rod’kin, S.P., Korobeinikov, A.P., Ushakov, E.B., and Stepanov, P.V., Ecological evaluation of the coke dry quenching, Koks Khim., 1987, no. 3, pp. 52–55.
Rod’kin, S.P. and Korobeinikov, A.P., Selection of the analysis method of coke fume on coke dry quenching units, Koks Khim., 1988, no. 10, pp. 26–28.
Li, Q., CDQ Coke Float Process Analysis and Optimization Measures, Hongxing Coking Plant, Gansu Jiuquan Iron and Steel (Group) Co. Ltd, vol. 39, no. 5.
Stakheev, S.G., Sukhorukov, V.I., Korchakov, S.A., et al., Treatment of excess coolant from coke dry-quenching units, Coke Chem., 2005, vol. 10, p. 14.
Danilin, E.A., Innovations in the dry quenching of coke, Coke Chem., 2015, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 465–475. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X15120030
Díez, M.A., Alvarez, R., and Barriocanal, C., Coal for metallurgical coke production: Predictions of coke quality and future requirements for cokemaking, Int. J. Coal. Geol., 2002, vol. 50, pp. 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-5162(02)00123-4
Prashad, H.N., Karmakar, R.S., Tiwary, M., Singh, B.K., and Dhillon, A.S., Possibilities of eliminating coke cutting in case of stamp charged coke, Tata Search, 1996, pp. 52–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Jha, P.K., Kumar, A., Kushwaha, S.K. et al. Investigation of Thermal and Hydraulic Regime of CDCP for Higher Throughput in SAIL Plant. Coke Chem. 65, 492–499 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X22700193
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X22700193