Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison Study on Combustion Characteristics between Semicoke and Coke Breeze

  • COKE
  • Published:
Coke and Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The iron and steel industry is a major emitter of pollutant gases into the atmosphere, thus greatly affecting the quality of the environment. It is therefore imperative to find alternative means of reducing the pollutant gases emitted into the atmosphere through sintering activities in the iron and steel industry. This study focuses on semicoke as an alternative sinter fuel to replace coal, coke breeze and other fuels used in iron ore sintering. Specifically, comparison between semicoke and coke breeze was made with respect to their combustion characteristics and combustion efficiency. Investigations were made based on drop tube furnace test results, thermogravimetric analyses and optical microscopy. The chemical kinetics governing the combustion mechanism of semicoke and coke breeze were also investigated. Semicoke was high in volatile, hydrogen, net calorific value and oxygen content. The relatively high volatile content, low ignition and heating temperatures, high combustion index and combustion efficiency of semicoke makes semicoke a better alternative fuel to power sinter plants. Consequently, among the semicoke sample types employed in the study, SC2 semicoke showed high combustion characteristics. This study is relevant in the iron and steel industry as it investigates the validity of combustion efficiency of semicoke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Ooi, T.C., Thompson, D., Anderson, D.R., Fisher, R., Fray, T., and Zandi, M., The effect of charcoal combustion on iron-ore sintering performance and emission of persistent organic pollutants, Combust. Flame, 2011, vol. 158, no. 5, pp. 979–987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Griffin, P.W. and Hammond, G.P., Industrial energy use and carbon emissions reduction in the iron and steel sector: a UK perspective, Appl. Energy, 2019, vol. 249, pp. 109–125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Qu, Y., An, J., He, Y., and Zheng, J., An overview of emissions of SO2 and NOx and the long-range transport of oxidized sulfur and nitrogen pollutants in East Asia, J. Environ. Sci., 2016, vol. 44, pp. 13–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang, Y., Li, R., and Wang, S., Research progress and prospects of coal petrology and coal quality in China, Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol., 2020, vol. 7, pp. 273–287.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu, D.Q., Luo, Y.H., Pan, J., and Zhou, X.L., Characterization of semicoke generated by coal-based direct reduction process of siderite, J. Centr. South Univ., 2015, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 2914–2921.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu, D., Zhou, X., Pan, J., and Luo, Y., Direct reduction and beneficiation of a refractory siderite lump, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall., 2014, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 246–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mousa, E., Wang, C., Riesbeck, J., and Larsson, M., Biomass applications in iron and steel industry: An overview of challenges and opportunities, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2016, vol. 65, pp. 1247–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmed, H., New trends in the application of carbon-bearing materials in blast furnace iron-making, Minerals, 2018, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 561–571.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gan, M., Ji, Z., Fan, X., Zhao, Y., Chen, X., and Fan, Y., Insight into the high proportion application of biomass fuel in iron ore sintering through CO-containing flue gas recirculation, J. Clean. Prod., 2019, vol. 232, pp. 1335–1347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Hussiny, N.A., Khalifa, A.A., El-Midany, A.A., Ahmed, A.A., and Shalabi, M.E., Effect of replacement coke breeze by charcoal on technical operation of iron ore sintering, Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 2015, vol. 6, pp. 681–686.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luo, Y.H., Zhu, D.Q., Pan, J., and Zhou, X.L., Utilization of semicoke as by-product derived from coal-based direct reduction process in iron ore sintering, Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2016, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 628–634.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jha, G. and Soren, S., Study on applicability of biomass in iron ore sintering process, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2017, vol. 80, pp. 399–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, X., Wang, D., Song, M., Xin, C., and Zeng, W., Tetraethylenepentamine-modified activated semicoke for CO2 capture from flue gas, Energy Fuels, 2017, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 3055–3061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao, J.P., Loo, C.E., and Dukino, R.D., Modeling fuel combustion in iron ore sintering, Combust. Flame, 2015, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 1019–1034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yörük, C.R., Meriste, T., Sener, S., Kuusik, R., and Trikkel, A., Thermogravimetric analysis and process simulation of oxy-fuel combustion of blended fuels including oil shale, semicoke, and biomass, Int. J. Energy Res., 2018, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2213–2224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang, W., Ning, X., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Niu, L., Jiang, C., Zhang, N., and Wang, G., Effect of Effect of ash on coal combustion performance and kinetics analysis, Combust. Sci. Technol., 2022, vol. 194, no. 4, pp. 785–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jelonek, Z., Drobniak, A., Mastalerz, M., and Jelonek, I., Assessing pellet fuels quality: A novel application for reflected light microscopy, Int. J. Coal Geol., 2020, vol. 222, p. 103433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, S.J., Wu, F., Zhang, G., Zhu, P., Wang, Z.Y., Huang, C.J., and Chen, S.T., Research on the combustion characteristics of anthracite and blended coal with composite catalysts, J. Energy Inst., 2014, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 96–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, J., Wang, B., and Cheng, F., Thermal and kinetic characteristics of combustion of coal sludge, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2017, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 1899–1909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, G., Yang, Z., Zhang, J., Yang, Z., and Shao, J., Combustion characteristics and kinetics study of pulverized coal and semicoke, High Temp. Mater. Proc., 2019, vol. 38, pp. 783–791.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, S.J., Huang, C.J., Wu, F., Zhu, P., and Zhang, G., Investigation on influence of steel industry wastes on pulverized coal combustion characteristics, J. Energy Inst., 2013, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 167–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is financially supported by the Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Coal Conversion and New Carbon Materials (grant no. WKDM202007) and Hubei Technological Innovation Special Fund (Grant no. 2020ZYYD019). The support of Nangang Industry Development Co. Ltd is also appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alex Kojo Acquah, Hongming Fang, Shijie Wang or Xiaoxiong Wu.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alex Kojo Acquah, Fang, H., Wang, S. et al. Comparison Study on Combustion Characteristics between Semicoke and Coke Breeze. Coke Chem. 64, 407–416 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X21090027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X21090027

Keywords:

Navigation