透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.69.152
  • 期刊

台灣的新生殖科技與性別政治,1950-2000

The New Reproductive Technologies and Gender Politics in Taiwan, 1950-2000

摘要


本文分析人工協助生殖科技過去50年在台灣的歷史發展,探討不孕診療在什麼樣的異性戀父權社會下發展,新生殖科技又如何可能改變生殖理念與實作,挑戰生殖分工,撼動性別系統。我們發現,50年代男性遠生殖的生殖理念,使得不孕檢查重女輕男;重視父系傳承的社會價值,也使當時對於AID的討論著重在男權的保障。然而,在70年代開始,強調男女同步的不孕檢查,將男性拉近生殖,而AID增高實施比例,降低「男性的種」的重要性,造就非父系血親的生殖突破。90年代,不孕檢查逐漸破除「生殖=女人」的生殖意識,但是以IVF與ICSI為主的助孕科技反而由於「男性不孕,治療女性」的不孕醫療模式,強化了女體與生殖的關連性。雖然異性戀夫妻的不孕「治療」愈發以血親為重,非異性戀婚姻體制的邊緣他者卻在90年代開始利用新生殖科技其分離性與生殖的特色,成為使用科技的新主體。現今醫學凝視的對象也從不孕的器官擴散到社會生活的各個層面,醫療助孕的社會儼然來臨。本文強調,著重新生殖科技多重使用的歷史脈絡與意義轉換,以及掌握性別與生殖關係的多樣性,才能明辨新生殖科技與性別系統的變動關係。

關鍵字

新生殖科技 性別 不孕

並列摘要


By means of investigating the historical development of the new reproductive technologies (NRT) in Taiwan since 1950s, I demonstrate how the heterosexual patriarchy shapes the medical treatment of infertility, and how the NRT could transform the sex/gender system. In the 1950s, the reproductive ideologies that equated women with procreation exempted men from infertility examination and treatment. In the 70s, the emphasis on the couple as a unit for infertility exam, as well as the use of artificial insemination using donors' semen, challenged the orthodoxy of husbands' lineage. However in the 90s, while the voice of ”men first” in the infertility exam further linked men with reproduction, as the NRT advanced, women had to experience more and more intrusive medical intervention. Particularly, with the availability of in-vitro fertilization and ICSI, fertile women with their infertile male partners often had to undergo more medical intrusion. While the heterosexual couples tended to apply the NRT to the attainment of biological parenthood, the characteristics of the NRT that separate heterosexual sex from procreation led single women and lesbians to use the NRT to have their own children. Also in the 90s, the medical gaze extended from the infertile bodies to various dimensions of social lives, thus implying the birth of a society of medicalized conception. This paper stresses that only by seeing the multiple meanings and diverse uses of the NRT, as well as the complexity of the sex/gender system, could we reveal the dynamic interactions between the NRT and the society.

參考文獻


Annandale, E., Clarke, J.(1996).What is Gender? Feminist Theory and the Sociology of Human Reproduction.Sociology of Health and Illness.18(1)
Armstrong, D.(1983).Political Anatomy of the Body: Medical Knowledge in Britain in the Twentieth Century.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Becker, G.(2000).The Elusive Embryo: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies.Berkeley:University of California Press.
Bijker, W. E.(1995).Handbook of Science and Technology Studies.London:Sage.
Chandley, A. C.(1998).Chromosome Anomalies and Y Chromosome Microdeletions as Causal Factors in Male Infertility.Human Reproduction.13(1)

被引用紀錄


林宛樞(2013)。同志家庭權之論述、保障與界限:以《台灣伴侶權益推動聯盟版民法修正草案》為中心〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2013.00621
林鈞琪(2011)。胚胎植入前基因檢測使用之規範方式 -以倫理諮商為輔助模式-〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2011.00198
陳家萱(2007)。不再「傻傻的」孕婦:戰後以來台灣產前檢查醫療化的發展與影響〔碩士論文,高雄醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6832/KMU.2007.00069
鄧思文(2012)。性交易法制的社會控制意涵:性自主的考察〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.01378
楊潔(2011)。生育政治的期待與現實:馬來西亞華裔生育圖像的族群與性別政治分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.02225

延伸閱讀