Implementation of Creative-Innovative Aspects in the Indonesian Language BSE Evaluation Instrument

Imam Safi'i(1*), Wini Tarmini(2), Prima Gusti Yanti(3),

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA Jakarta
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA Jakarta
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v15i1.17546

Abstract


This article aims to describe the implementation of the creative-innovative aspects in the evaluation instrument in the Indonesian BSE SMA 2019/2020. The method used is content analysis. The results showed that the four indicators of creative-innovative aspects had been implemented properly. Indicators of developing new ideas were 85 questions or 52.80%, open and responsive as many as 15 questions or 9.32%, expressed creative ideas as many as 40 questions or 24.84%, using concepts in new situations as many as 13 questions or 8, 07%, and creates novelty as much as 8 questions or 4.97%. The results of this study can be used as an assessment of the eligibility of BSE in Indonesian.


Keywords


creative-innovative, BSE, Indonesian

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amponsah, S., Kwesi, A. B., & Ernest, A. (2019). Lin’s creative pedagogy framework as a strategy for fostering creative learning in Ghanaian schools. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 11–18.

Cupák, A., Fessler, P., & Schneebaum, A. (2020). Gender differences in risky asset behavior: The importance of self-confidence and financial literacy. Finance Research Letters, October, 101880.

do Adro, F. J. N., & Leitão, J. C. C. (2020). Leadership and organizational innovation in the third sector: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4(2), 51–67.

Ferreira, J. J. M., Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, F. A. F. (2020). Wearing failure as a path to innovation. Journal of Business Research, 120(June), 195–202.

Gachanja, I. M., Nga’nga’, S. I., & Kiganane, L. M. (2020). Influence of organization learning on innovation output in manufacturing firms in Kenya. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4(1), 16–26.

Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269.

Gralewski, J. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs about creative students’ characteristics: A qualitative study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 138–155.

Gucyeter, S., & Erdogan, S. C. (2020). Creative children in a robust learning environment: Perceptions of special education teacher candidates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(100675).

Horasan-Doğan, S., & Cephe, P. T. (2020). The effects of creative drama on student teachers’ creative pedagogy and identity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38.

Horkoff, J., Maiden, N. A., & Asboth, D. (2019). Creative goal modeling for innovative requirements. Information and Software Technology, 106, 85–100.

Janssen, E. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Heijltjes, A. E. G., Mainhard, T., van Peppen, L. M., & van Gog, T. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Actively Open-minded Thinking scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36(November 2019), 100659.

Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., Patston, T., Cropley, D. H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). The creative student in the eyes of a teacher: A cross-cultural study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35(February), 100636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100636

Lee, S. M., & Trimi, S. (2021). Convergence innovation in the digital age and in the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Journal of Business Research, 123, 14–22.

Liao, Y. H., Chen, Y. L., Chen, H. C., & Chang, Y. L. (2018). Infusing creative pedagogy into an English as a foreign language classroom: Learning performance, creativity, and motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 213–223.

Liu, X., Xu, Y., Montes, R., & Herrera, F. (2019). Social network group decision making: Managing self-confidence-based consensus model with the dynamic importance degree of experts and trust-based feedback mechanism. Information Sciences, 505, 215–232.

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution.

Nisja, I. (2018). Kesesuaian Buku Teks Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Kelas X dengan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Gramatika: Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1, 162–172.

Novianto, A., & Mustadi, A. (2015). Analisis buku teks muatan tematik integratif, scientific approach, dan authentic assessment sekolah dasar. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 45(1), 1–15.

Pandey, A., Gupta, V., & Gupta, R. K. (2019). Spirituality and innovative behaviour in teams: Examining the mediating role of team learning. IIMB Management Review, 31(12), 116–126.

Pandey, S., & Gupta, S. (2019). ACC deaminase producing bacteria with multifarious plant growth promoting traits alleviates salinity stress in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants. Frontiers in Microbiology. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10(1506).

Pogorilic, S., Vitezica, P., & Bolanca, S. (2011). PHP48 Croatian Pharmaceutical Expenditure Before and After Healthcare Reform – Comparison to EU Countries. Value in Health, 14(7), A341–A342.

Rizzi, V., Pigeon, C., Rony, F., & Fort-Talabard, A. (2020). Designing a creative storytelling workshop to build self-confidence and trust among adolescents. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100704

Rouquette, O. Y., Knight, C. J., Lovett, V. E., & Heuzé, J. P. (2021). Effect of parent responsiveness on young athletes’ self-perceptions and thriving: An exploratory study in a Belgian French-Community. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 52(March 2020).

Safi’i, I., Listeini, F. Y., & Tarmini, W. (2020). Kevaliditasan Instrumen Evaluasi dalam BSE Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020. Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahsa, Sastra, Dan Seni, 21(1), 31–43.

Scotney, V. S., Schwartz, J., Carbert, N., Saab, A., & Gabora, L. (2020). The form of a ‘half-baked’ creative idea: Empirical explorations into the structure of ill-defined mental representations. Acta Psychologica, 203(November 2019), 102981.

Shaari, R., Mahmud, N., Wahab, S. R. A., Rahim, K. A., Rajab, A., & Panatik, S. A. (2012). Deep as a Learning Approach in Inspiring Creative and Innovative Minds among Postgraduate Students in Research University. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 152–156.

Shen, H., Wang, H., Wang, Z., & Yin, D. (2020). Do mandatory pension contributions hinder innovation? Empirical evidence. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4(2), 27–39.

Shen, Y., Xie, W., Wang, X., Qu, J., Zhou, T., Li, Y., Mao, X., Hou, P., & Liu, Y. (2020). Impact of innovative education on the professionalism of undergraduate nursing students in China. Nurse Education Today, 104647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104647

Sutanto, P. (2017). Panduan Implementasi Kecakapan Abad 21 Kurikulum 2013 di SMA. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 94.

Th, P. K. A. (2012). Perbedaan Tingkat Kesantunan Berbahasa Aspek Berbicara dan Menulis Hasil Belajar Menggunakan Buku Ajar Santun Berbahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Indonesia (BSE) pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP dengan Model Pertemuan Kelas. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(1).

V. L., González, M. T. D., & Phillips-Silver, J. (2020). Marcos, R. I. S., Fernández, Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 100663.

Vocke, C., Constantinescu, C., & Popescu, D. (2020). Status quo and quo vadis: Creativity techniques and innovation methods for generating extended innovation processes. Procedia CIRP, 91, 39–42.

Yang, Z., Zhou, Y., Chung, J. W., Tang, Q., Jiang, L., & Wong, T. K. (2018). Challenge Based Learning nurtures creative thinking: An evaluative study. Nurse Education Today, 71, 40–47.

Yulianti, U. H. (2011). Analisis Perbandingan Kualitas Buku Teks BSE Bahasa Indonesia Untuk SMP Kelas VII Karya Ratna Susanti, Atikah Anindyarini-Sri Ningsih, dan Maryati-Sutopo: Kajian Isi, Penyajian, dan Bahasa. (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Negeri Semarang).


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 266 times | PDF view : 59 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Imam Safi'i, Wini Tarmini

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Department of Indonesian Language, Faculty of Languages and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar in cooperate with Asosiasi Dosen Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (ADOBSI) and Ikatan Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (IKAPROBSI).

Address: Department of Indonesian Language Office, DG Building Second Floor, UNM Parangtambung, Daeng Tata Raya Street, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Email: retorika@unm.ac.id

e-ISSN 2614-2716

p-ISSN 2301-4768

Indexed by:

Creative Commons License
RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra,dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.